the Proclamation was published whereby all Jesuites and Priests ordained by forrein authority were commanded to depart out of this kingdome by a certain time prefixed After which time he began to lurk and to change his name howbeit at last he was apprehended in Dublin and committed to prison in the Castle there Upon his first Examination taken by the Lord Deputie himself he acknowledged that he was a Priest and ordained by a Popish Titulary Bishop that he had accepted the title and Office of the Pope's Vicar-generall in the three Dioceses before named and had exercised spirituall jurisdiction in foro conscientiae and in sundry other points he maintained and justified the Pope's authority onely he said he was of opinion that the Pope had no power to excommunicate or depose his Majestie because the King is not of the Pope's Religion The next Term after he was indicted upon the Statute of 2 Eliz. enacted in this Realm against such as should wilfully and advisedly maintain and uphold the jurisdiction of any forrein Prince or Prelate in any causes Ecclesiasticall or Civil within this Realm By which Statute the first offence of that kind is punished with losse of goods and one year's imprisonment the second offence incurreth the penaltie of the Praemunire and the third offence is made high Treason Upon this Indictment he was arraigned convicted and condemned and so rested in prison during the next two Terms without any farther question He then made petition unto the Lord Deputie to be set at liberty whereupon his Lordship caused him to be examined by Sir Oliver Saint John Sir James Fullerton Sir Jefferie Fenton the Atturney and Solicitor generall At first he made some evasive and indirect answers but at last voluntarily and freely he made this ensuing acknowledgement or confession which being set down in writing word for word as he made it was advisedly read by him and subscribed with his own hand and with the hands of those who took his examination and afterwards he confirmed it by his oath before the Lord Deputie and Counsell The Confession or Acknowledgement of Robert Lalor Priest made the 22. of December 1606. FIrst he doth acknowledge that he is not a lawfull Vicar-generall in the Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes and thinketh in his conscience that he cannot lawfully take upon him the said Office Item he doth acknowledge our Sovereign Lord King James that now is to be his lawfull chief and Supreme Governour in all causes as well Ecclesiasticall as Civil and that he is bound in conscience to obey him in all the said causes and that neither the Pope nor any other forrein Prelate Prince or Potentate hath any power to controll the King in any cause Ecclesiasticall or Civil within this Kingdome or any of his Majestie 's Dominions Item he doth in his conscience believe that all Bishops ordained and made by the King's authority within any of his Dominions are lawfull Bishops and that no Bishop made by the Pope or by any authority derived from the Pope within the King's Dominions hath any power or authoritie to impugn disannull or controll any Act done by any Bishop made by his Majestie 's authoritie as aforesaid Item he professeth himself willing and ready to obey the King as a good and obedient Subject ought to doe in all his lawfull commandments either concerning his function of Priesthood or any other dutie belonging to a good Subject After this Confession made the State here had no purpose to proceed against him severely either for his contempt of the Proclamation or offence against the Law So as he had more liberty then before and many of his friends had access unto him who telling him what they heard of his Confession he protested unto them that he had only acknowledged the King's Civill and Temporall power without any confession or admittance of his authoritie in Spirituall causes This being reported unto the Lord Deputie by sundry Gentlemen who gave faith unto what he said his Lordship thought sit that since he had incurred the pain of Praemunire by exercising Episcopall jurisdiction as Vicar-generall to the Pope that he should be attainted of that offence as well to make him an example to others of his profession for almost in every Diocese of this Kingdome there is a Titulary Bishop ordained by the Pope as also that at the time of his Trial a just occasion might be taken to publish the Confession and acknowledgement which he had voluntarily made signed and confirmed by oath before the Lord Deputie and Councell who have likewise subscribed their names as witnesses thereof Hereupon in Hillarie Term 4 Jacobi an Inditement was framed against him in the King's Bench upon the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. cap. 5. containing these severall points 1. That he had received a Bull or Brief purchased or procured in the Court of Rome which Bull or Brief did touch or concern the King's Crown and dignity Royall containing a Commission of Authoritie from the Pope of Rome unto Richard Brady and David Magragh to constitute a Vicar-generall for the See of Rome by the name of the See Apostolick in the severall Dioceses of Dublin Kildare and Fernes within this Kingdome of Ireland 2. That by pretext or colour of that Bull or Brief he was constituted Vicar-generall of the See of Rome and took upon him the style and title of Vicar-generall in the said severall Dioceses 3. That he did exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction as Vicar-generall of the See of Rome by instituting divers persons to Benefices with cure of souls by granting dispensations in causes Matrimonial by pronouncing sentences of divorce between divers married persons and by doing all other acts and things pertaining to Episcopal Jurisdiction within the said several Dioceses against our Sovereign Lord the King his Crown and dignity Royal and in contempt of his Majesty and disherison of his Crown and contrary to the form and effect of the Statute c. To this Inditement Lalor pleaded Not guilty and when the issue was to be tried the name and reputation of the man and the nature of the cause drew all the principal Gentlemen both of the Pale and Provinces that were in town to the hearing of the matter At what time a substantial Jury of the City of Dublin being sworn for the trial and the points of the Inditement being opened and set forth by the King's Serjeant the Attorney general thought it not impertinent but very necessary before he descended to the particular evidence against the prisoner to inform and satisfie the hearers in two Points 1. What reason moved us to ground this Inditement upon the old Statute of 16 Rich. 2. rather then upon some other later Law made since the time of King Henr. 8. 2. What were the true causes of the making of this Law of 16 Rich. and other former Laws against Provisors and such as did appeal to the Court of Rome in those
times when both the Prince and people of England did for the most part acknowledge the Pope to be the thirteenth Apostle and onely oracle in matters of Religion and did follow his doctrine in most of those points wherein we now dissent from him 1. For the first Point we did purposely forbear to proceed against him upon any later Law to the end that such as were ignorant might be informed that long before King Henr. 8. was born divers Laws were made against the Usurpation of the Bishop of Rome upon the rights of the Crown of England well-nigh as sharp and as severe as any Statutes which have been made in later times and that therefore we made choice to proceed upon a Law made more then 200 years past when the King the Lords and Commons which made the Laws and the Judges which did interpret the Laws did for the most part follow the same opinions in Religion which were taught and held in the Court of Rome 2. For the second Point the causes that moved and almost enforced the English Nation to make this and other Statutes of the same nature were of the greatest importance that could possibly arise in any State For these Laws were made to uphold and maintain the Sovereignty of the King the Liberty of the people the Common Law and the Commonweal which otherwise had been undermined and utterly ruined by the Usurpation of the Bishop of Rome For albeit the Kings of England were absolute Emperours within their Dominions and had under them as learned a Prelacy and Clergy as valiant and prudent a Nobility as free and wealthy a Commonalty as any was then in Christendom yet if we look into the stories and records of these two Imperial Kingdoms we shall find that if these Laws of Provision and Praemunire had not been made they had lost the name of Imperial and of Kingdoms too and had been long since made Tributary Provinces to the Bishop of Rome or rather part of S. Peter's Patrimony in demesne Our Kings had had their Scepters wrested out of their hands their Crowns spurned off from their heads their necks trod upon they had been made Lacquays or Footmen to the Bishop of Rome as some of the Emperours and French Kings were our Prelates had been made his Chaplains and Clerks our Nobility his Vassals and Servants our Commons his Slaves and Villains if these Acts of manumission had not freed them In a word before the making of these Laws the flourishing Crown and Commonwealth of England was in extream danger to have been brought into most miserable servitude and slavery under colour of Religion and devotion to the See of Rome And this was not onely seen and felt by the King and much repined at and protested against by the Nobility but the Commons the general multitude of the Subjects did exclaim and cry out upon it For the Commons of England mâ—y be an example unto all other Subjects in the world in this that they have ever been tender and sensible of the wrongs and dishonours offered unto their Kings and have ever contended to uphold and maintain their honour and Sovereignty And their faith and loyaltie hath been generally such though every Age hath brought forth some particular monsters of disloyaltie as no pretence of zeal or religion could ever withdraw the greater part of the Subjects to submit themselves to a forrein yoke no not when Popery was in her height and exaltation whereof this Act and divers others of the same kind are clear and manifest testimonies For this Act of 16 Rich. 2. was made at the prayer of the Commons which prayer they make not for themselves neither shew they their own self love therein as in other Bills which contain their Grievances but their love and zeal to the King and his Crown When after the Norman Conquest they importuned their Kings for the Great Charter they sought their own Liberties and in other Bills preferred commonly by the Commons against Shriefs Escheators Purveyors or the like they seek their own profit and ease but here their Petition is to the King to make a Law for the defence and maintenance of his own honour They complain That by Bulls and Processes from Rome the King is deprived of that Jurisdiction which belongs of right to his Imperial Crown That the King doth lose the service and counsel of his Prelates and learned men by translations made by the Bishop of Rome That the King's Laws are defeated at his will the Treasure of the Realm is exhausted and exported to enrich his Court And that by those means the Crown of England which hath ever been free and subject unto none but immediately unto God should be submitted unto the Bishop of Rome to the utter destruction of the King and the whole Realm which God defend say they and thereupon out of their exceeding zeal and fervency they offer to live and die with the King in defence of the liberties of the Crown And lastly they pray and require the King by way of justice to examine all the Lords in Parliament what they thought of these manifest wrongs and usurpations and whether they would stand with the King in defence of his Royall liberties or no. Which the King did according to their Petition and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal did all answer that these Usurpations of the Bishop of Rome were against the liberties of the Crown and that they were all bound by their allegeance to stand with the King and to maintain his honour and Prerogative And thereupon it was enacted with a full consent of the three Estates That such as should purchase in the Court of Rome or elsewhere any Bulls or Processes or other things which might touch the King in his Crown and dignitie Royall and such as should bring them into the Realm and such as should receive them publish them or execute them they their Notaries Proctors Maintainors and Counsellors should be all out of the King's protection their lands and goods forfeited to the King their bodies attached if they might be found or else processe of Pramunire facias to be awarded against them Upon these motives and with this affection and zeal of the people was the Statute of 16 Rich. 2. made whereupon we have framed our Inditement Now let us look higher and see whether the former Laws made by King Edw. 1. and King Edw. 3. against the Usurpation of the Bishop of Rome were not grounded upon the like cause and reason The Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. expressing the mischiefs that did arise by Breves of Citation which drew the bodies of the people and by Bulls of Provision and Reservation of Ecclesiasticall Benefices which drew the wealth of the Realm to the Court of Rome doth declare that by these means the ancient Laws Customes and Franchises of the Realm were confounded the Crown of our Sovereign Lord the King diminished and his person falsely defamed
recommendation unto the young King his Son then lately crowned who hearing of his coming commanded him to forbear to come to his presence untill he had absolved the Archbishop of York and others whom he had excommunicated for performing their duties at his Coronation The Archbishop returned answer that they had done him wrong in usurping his office yet if they would take a solemn oath to become obedient to the Pope's commandment in all things concerning the Church he would absolve them The Bishops understanding this protested they would never take that oath unless the King willed them so to doe King Henry the Father being hereof advertised into France did rise into great passion and choler and in the hearing of some of his servants uttered words to this effect Will no man revenge me of mine enemies Whereupon the 4 Gentlemen named in the Stories of that time passed into England and first moving the Archbishop to absolve the Bishops whom he had excommunicated for performing their Duties at the young King's Coronation and receiving a peremptory answer of deniall from the Archbishop they laid violent hands upon him and slew him for which the King was fain not onely to suffer corporal penance but in token of his humiliation to kisse the knee of the Pope's Legate And this is the abridgement of Becket's Troubles or rather Treasons for which he was celebrated for so famous a Martyr And thus you see by what degrees the Court of Rome did within the space of one hundred and odde years usurp upon the Crown of England four points of Jurisdiction Viz. First sending out of Legates into England Secondly drawing of Appeals to the Court of Rome Thirdly donation of Bishopricks and other Ecclesiasticall Benefices And fourthly exemption of Clerks from the Secular power And you see withall how our Kings and Parliaments have from time to time opposed and withstood this unjust Usurpation Now then the Bishop of Rome having claimed and welnigh recovered full and sole jurisdiction in all causes Ecclesiasticall and over all persons Ecclesiasticall with power to dispose of all Ecclesiasticall Benefices in England whereby he had upon the matter made an absolute conquest of more then half the Kingdome for every one that could read the Psalm of Miserere was a Clerk and the Clergie possessed the moietie of all temporall possessions there remained now nothing to make him owner and proprietor of all but to get a surrender of the Crown and to make the King his Farmer and the people his Villains which he fully accomplished and brought to passe in the times of King John and of Hen. 3. The quarrell between the Pope and King John which wrested the Scepter out of his hand and in the end brake his heart began about the Election of the Archbishop of Canterbury I call it Election and not Donation or Investiture for the manner of investing of Bishops by the Staffe and Ring after the time of King Hen. 1. was not any more used but by the King's licence they were Canonically elected and being elected the King gave his Royall assent to their election and by restitution of their Temporalties did fully invest them And though this course of election began to be in use in the time of Rich. 1. and Hen. 2. yet I find it not confirmed by any Constitution or Charter before the time of King John who by his Charter dated the fifteenth of January in the sixteenth year of his Reign granted this privilege to the Church of England in these words viz. Quod qualiscunque consuetudo temporibus praedecessorum nostrorum hactenus in Ecclesia Anglicana fuerit observata quidquid juris nobis hactenus vindicaverimus de caetero in universis singulis Ecclesiis Mâ—nasteriis Cathedralibus Conventualibus totius regni Angliae liberae sint in perpetuum electiones quorumcumque Praelatorum majorum minorum Salvâ nobis haeredibus nostris custodiâ Ecclesiarum Monasteriorum vacantium quae ad nos pertinent Promittimus etiam quod nec impediemus nec impediri permittemus per ministros nostros nec procurabimus quin in universis singulis Monasteriis Ecclesiis postquam vacuerint praelaturae quemcunque voluerint libere sibi praeficiant electores Pastorum petitâ tamen à nobis priùs haeredibus nostris licentiâ eligendis quam non denegabimus nec differemus Et similiter post celebratam electionem noster requiratur assensus quem non denegabimus nisi adversus eandem rationale proposuerimus legitimè probaverimus propter quod non debemus consentire c. But to return to the cause of his great quarrell with the Pope The See of Canterbury being void the Monks of Canterbury suddenly and secretly without the King's licence elected one Reignold their Subprior to be Archbishop who immediately posted away to be confirmed by the Pope But when he came there the Pope rejected him because he came not recommended from the King Hereupon the Monks made suit to the King to nominate some fit person to whose election they might proceed The King commends John Gray Bishop of Norwich his principall Counsellour who was afterward Lord Justice of this Kingdome who with a full consent was elected by them and afterwards admitted and fully invested by the King These two elections bred such a controversie as none might determine but the Pope who gave a short rule in the case for he pronounced both elections void and caused some of the Monks of Canterbury who were then present in the Court of Rome to proceed to the election of Stephen Langton lately made Cardinal at the motion and suit of the French King who being so elected was forthwith confirmed and consecrated by the Pope and recommended to the King of England with a flattering Letter and a present of four Rings set with precious stones which were of great value and estimation in those days Howbeit the King more esteeming this Jewell of the Crown namely the Patronage of Bishopricks returned a round and Kingly answer to the Pope That inconsiderately and rashly he had cassed and made void the election of the Bishop of Norwich and had caused one Langton a man to him unknown and bred up and nourished amongst his mortal enemies to be consecrated Archbishop without any due form of election and without his Royal assent which was most of all requisite by the ancient laws and customes of his Realm That he marvelled much that the Pope himself and the whole Court of Rome did not consider what a precious account they ought to make of the King of England's friendship in regard that his one Kingdome did yield them more profit and revenue then all the other countries on this side the Alpes To conclude he would maintain the liberties of his Crown to the death he would restrain all his subjects from going to Rome And since the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates within his dominions were as learned and religious
any Excommunication out of he Realm And therefore by the rule of the Court the Plaintif was not thereby disabled Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt Spiritualis Jurisdictionis capaces Where a Prior is the King's debtor and ought to have Tithes of another Spiritual person he may chuse either to sue for subtraction of his Tithes in the Ecclesiastical Court or in the Exchequer and yet the persons and matter also were Ecclesiastical For seeing the matter by a mean concerneth the King he may sue for them in the Exchequer as well as in the Ecclesiastical Court and there shall the right of Tithes be determined And Fitzherbert in his Nabre fol. 30. holdeth that before the Statute of 18 E. 3. cap. 7. right of Tithes were determinable at the Temporal Courts at the election of the party and by that Statute assigned to be determined in the Ecclesiastical Court and the Temporal Court excluded thereof And the Courts of divers Mannors of the King 's and of other Lords in ancient times had the Probates of last Wills and Testaments And it appeareth by 11 H. 7. fol. 12. that Probate of Testaments did not appertain to the Ecclesiasticall Court but that of late time they were determinable there So as of such Causes and in such manner as the Kings of the Realm by general consent and allowance have assigned to their Ecclesiasticall Courts they have Jurisdiction by force of such allowance The King did by his Charter translate Canons Secular into Regular and Religious persons which he did by his Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and could not doe it unlesse he had Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall The Abbot of Waltham died in the 45. year of E. 3. and one Nicholas Morris was elected Abbot who for that the Abbey was exempt from ordinary Jurisdiction sent to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope And because the Pope by his Constitutions had reserved all such Collations to himself he did recite by his Bull that he having no regard to the Election of the said Nicholas gave to him the said Abbey and the Spiritualties and Temporalties belonging to the same of his spirituall grace and at the request as he feigned of the King of England This Bull was read and considered of in Councill that is before all the Judges of England and it was resolved by them all that this Bull was against the Laws of England and that the Abbot for obtaining the same was fallen into the King's mercy whereupon all his possessions were seised into the King's hands as more at large by the said Case appeareth Where the Abbot of Westminster had a Prior and Convent who were Regular and mort in law yet the King by his Charter did divide that Corporation and made the Prior and Convent a distinct and capable Body to sue and be sued by themselves At a Parliament holden in the 25. year of King Edward the Third it was enacted by consent of the whole Parliament That as well they that obtained Provisions from Rome as they that put them in execution should be out of the King's protection and that a man might doe with them as with the enemies of the King And he that offendeth against such Provisors in body goods or other possessions should be excused against all people and should never be impeached or grieved for the same By which Law every man might lawfully kill such an Offendor as a common enemy against the King and his Countrey so hainous were such offences then holden Afterwards in the same 25. year of King Edward the Third it was in open Parliament by the grievous complaints of all the Commons of this Realm shewed that the Grievances and Mischiefs aforesaid did daily abound to the great dammage and destruction of all this Realm more then ever before viz. That of late the Bishop of Rome by procurement of Clerks and otherwise had reserved and did daily reserve to his Collation generally and specially as well Archbishopricks Abbies and Priories as all other Dignities and other Benefices of England which were of the Advowrie of people of Holy Church and gave the same as well to Aliens as to Natives and did take of all such Benefices the First-fruits and many other Profits and a great part of the Treasure of the Realm was carried away and dispended out of the Realm by the purchasors of such graces and also by such privy Reservations many Clerks advanced in the Realm by their true Patrons which peaceably had holden their Advancements by long time were suddenly put out Whereupon the said Commons did pray their said Sovereign Lord the King that fithence the right of the Crown of England and the Law of the said Realm was such that upon the mischiefs and dammages which happened to his Realm he ought and was bound of the accord of his said people thereof to provide remedie and law for the avoiding the mischiefs and dammage which thereof came That it might please him thereupon to ordain remedy The said King Ed. the 3. seeing the mischiefs and dammage before named and having regard to the Statute made in the time of his Grandfather King Ed. 1. and to the causes contained in the same which Statute holdeth always his force and was never defeated nor adnulled in any point and forasmuch as he was bound by his Oath to see the same to be kept as a Law of this Realm though that by sufferance and negligence it had been fithence attempted to the contrary also having regard to the grievous complaints made to him by his people in divers his Parliaments holden heretofore willing to ordain remedy for the great dammage and mischiefs which had happened and daily did happen to the Church of England by the said cause by the assent of all the Great men and the Commonalty of the said Realm to the honour of God and profit of the said Church of England and of all his Realm did order and establish That the free Election of Archbishops Bishops and all other Dignities and Benefices electory in England should hold from thenceforth in the manner as they were granted by the King's Progenitors and founded by the Ancestors of other Lords And that all Prelates and other people of Holy Church which had Advowsons of any Benefices of the King's gift or of any of his Progenitors or of other Lords and Donors to doe Divine Service and other charges thereto pertaining should have their Collations and Presentments freely in the manner as they were infeoffed by their Donors And in case that Reservation Collation or Provision be made by the Court of Rome of any Archbishoprick Bishoprick Dignity or other Benefice in disturbance of the Elections Collations or Presentations afore named That at the time of the Avoidance that such Reservations Collations and Provisions ought to take effect the said King Edward the Third and his Heirs should have and enjoy the same Collations to the Archbishopricks and other Dignities
that is to say the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates being in the Parliament severally examined making protestations that it was not their mind to deny or affirm that the Bishop of Rome might not excommunicate Bishops nor that he might make Translation of Prelates after the Law of Holy Church answered and said That if any Executions or Processes in the King's Court as before were made by any and censures of Excommunications be made against any Bishop of England or any other of the King's liege people for that they had made execution of such commandments and that if any executions of such Translations be made of any Prelats of the same Realm which Prelats were very profitable and necessary to the King and to his said Realm or that his sage men of his Council without his assent and against his will be withdrawn and eloigned out of the Realm so that the substance and Treasury of the Realm might be destroyed that the same was against the King and his Crown as it was contained in the Petition before named And likewise the same Procurators every one by himself examined upon the said matters did answer and say in the name and for their Lords as the said Bishops had said and answered And that the said Lords Spiritual would and ought to stand with the King in these cases lawfully in maintaining of his Crown and in all other cases touching his Crown and his Regalty as they were bound by their Allegeance Whereupon the King by the assent aforesaid and at the prayer of his said Commons did ordain and establish That if any purchase or pursue or cause to be purchased or pursued in the Court of Rome or elsewhere any such Translations Processes and Sentences of Excommunication Bulls Instruments or any other things which touched the King their Lord against him his Crown and his Regalty or his Realm as is aforesaid and they which bring them within the Realm or them receive or make thereof notification or any other execution within the same Realm or without that they their notorious procurators maintainers fautors and counsellors should be put out of the King's protection and their lands and tenements goods and chattels forfeit to the King and they be attached by their bodies if they may be found and brought before the King and his Council there to answer to the cases aforesaid or that processe be made against them by Premunire facias as it is ordained in other Statutes of Provisors and others which do sue in any other Court in derogation of the Regalty of the King as by the said Act also appeareth In the Reign of King Henry the Fourth IT is resolved that the Pope's Collector though he have the Pope's Bulls for that purpose hath no Jurisdiction within this Realm and there the Archbishops and Bishops c. of this Realm are called the King's Spirituall Judges By the ancient Laws Ecclesiasticall of this Realm no man could be convicted of Heresie being high Treason against the Almighty but by the Archbishop and all the Clergy of that Province and after abjured thereupon and after that newly convicted and condemned by the Clergy of that Province in their general Council of Convocation But the Statute 2 H. 4. cap. 15. doth give the Bishop in his Diocese power to condemn an Heretick And before that Statute he could not be committed to the Secular power to be burnt untill he had once abjured and was again relapsed to that or some other Heresie Whereby it appeareth that the King by consent of Parliament directed the proceedings in the Ecclesiasticall Court in case of Heresie and other matters more spirituall The Pope cannot alter the Laws of England The Judges say that the Statutes which restrain the Pope's Provisions to the Benefices of the advowsons of Spiritual men were made for that the Spiritualty durst not in their just cause say against the Pope's Provisions So as those Statutes were made but in affirmance of the Common Laws Excommunication made by the Pope is of no fore in England and the same being certified by the Pope into any Court in England ought not to be allowed neither is any Certificate of any Excommunication available in law but what is made by some Bishop of England for the Bishops are by the Common Laws the immediate Officers and Ministers of justice to the King's Courts in Causes Ecclesiasticall If any Bishop do excommunicate any person for a Cause that belongeth not unto him the King may write unto the Bishop and command him to assoil and absolve the party If any person of Religion obtain of the Bishop of Rome to be exempt from obedience Regular or ordinary he is in case of Premunire which is an offence as hath been said contra Regem Coronam Dignitatem suas The Commons did grievously complain to the King at the Parliament holden in the 6. year of H. 4. of the horrible mischiefs and damnable customes which then were introduct of new in the Court of Rome that no person Abbot or other should have provision of any Archbishoprick or Bishoprick which should be void till he had compounded with the Pope's Chamber to pay great and excessive sums of money as well for the First-fruits of the same Archbishoprick or Bishoprick as for the other lesse Services in the same Court and that the same sums or the greater part thereof be paid before hand which sums passed the treble or the double at the least of that that was accustomed of old time to be paid in the said Chamber and otherwise by the occasions of such Provisions whereby a great part of the Treasury of this Realm had been brought and carried to the said Court and also should be in time to come to the great impoverishing of the Archbishops and Bishops within the same Realm and elsewhere within the King's dominions if convenient remedy were not for the same provided The King to the honour of God as well to eschew the dammage of this Realm as the perils of their souls which owen to be advanced to any Archbishopricks and Bishopricks within the Realm of England and elsewhere within the King's dominions out of the same Realm by the advice and assent of the Great men of his Realm in the Parliament did ordain and establish That they and every of them that should pay to the said Chamber or otherwise for such Fruits and Services greater sums of mony then had been accustomed to be paid in old time past they and every of them should incur the forfeiture of as much as they may forfeit towards the King as by the said Act appeareth No person Religious or Secular of what estate or condition that he were by colour of any Bulls containing priviledges to be discharged of Tithes pertaining to Parish-churches Prebends Hospitals Vicarages purchased before the first year of King Richard the 2. or after and not executed should put in execution any
and other Ordinaries having Episcopal Jurisdiction to punish and chastise Priests Clerks and Religious men being within the bounds of their Jurisdiction as shall be convicted afore them by examination and lawfull proof requisite by the law of the Church of Advoutrie Fornication Incest or any other fleshly Incontinency by committing them to ward and prison there to abide for such time as shall be thought to their discretions convenient for the quality and quantity of their trespass And that none of the said Archbishops Bishops or Ordinaries aforesaid be thereof chargeable of to or upon any action of false or wrongfull imprisonment but that they be utterly thereof discharged in any of the cases aforesaid by virtue of this Act. Rex est persona mixta because he hath both Ecclesiastical and Temporal Jurisdiction By the Ecclesiastical Laws allowed within this Realm a Priest cannot have two Benefices nor can a Bastard be a Priest but the King may by his Ecclesiasticall power and Jurisdiction dispense with both of these because they be mala prohibita and not mala per se In the Reign of King Henry the Eighth BY an Act of Parliament made in the 24. year of King Henry the 8. that is to say by the King 24 Bishops 29 Abbots and Priors for so many were then Lords of Parliament by all the Lords Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled it is declared That where by divers sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it was manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal estate of the Imperial Crown of the same unto whom a Body politick compact of all sorts and degrees of people divided in terms and by names of Spiritualty and Temporalty been bound and ought to bear next to God a natural and humble obedience he being also institute and furnished by the goodness and furtherance of Almighty God with plenary whole and entire Power Preheminence Authority Prerogative and Jurisdiction to render and yield Justice and final determination to all manner of folk resiants or subjects within this his Realm in all causes matters debates and contentions happening to occur insurge or begin within the limits thereof without restraint or provocation to any forrein Princes or Potentates of the world The Body Spiritual whereof having power when any cause of the Law Divine happened to come in question or of Spiritual learning that it was declared interpreted and shewed by that part of the said Body politick called the Spiritualty then being usually called the English Church which alwaies had been reputed and also found of that sort that both for knowledge integrity and sufficiency of number it had been always thought and was also at that hour sufficient and meet of it self without the intermeddling of any exteriour person or persons to declare and determine all such doubts and to administer all such offices and duties as to the rank spiritual did appertain For the due administration whereof and to keep them from corruption and sinister affection the King 's most noble Progenitors and the antecessors of the Nobles of this Realm did sufficiently indow the said Church both with honour and possessions And the Laws Temporal for trial of property of lands and goods and for the conservation of the people of this Realm in unity and peace without ravine or spoil was administred adjudged and executed by sundry Judges and Ministers of the other part of the said Body politick called the Temporaltie And both their Authorities and Jurisdictions did conjoyn together in the due administration of Justice the one to help the other And whereas the King his most noble Progenitors and the Nobility and Commons of the said Realm at divers and sundry Parliaments as well in the time King Edward the 1. Edward the 3. Richard the 2. Henry the 4. and other noble Kings of this Realm made sundry Ordinances Laws Statutes and Provisions for the entire and sure conservation of the Prerogatives Liberties and Preheminences of the said Imperial Crown of this Realm and of the Jurisdiction Spiritual and Temporal of the same to keep it from the annoiance as well of the See of Rome as from the authority of other forrein Potentates attempting the diminution or violation thereof as often and from time to time as any such annoiance or attempt might be known or espied And notwithstanding the said good Statutes and Ordinances made in the time of the King 's most noble Progenitors in preservation of the Authority and Prerogative of the said Imperiall Crown as is aforesaid yet nevertheless fithence the making of the said good Statutes and Ordinances divers and sundry inconveniences and dangers not provided for plainly by the said former Acts Statutes and Ordinances have risen and sprung by reason of Appeals sued out of this Realm to the See of Rome in causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces right of Tithes Oblations and Obventions not onely to the great inquietation vexation trouble costs and charges of the King's Highness and many of his subjects and resiants in this his Realm but also to the great delay and lett to the true and speedy determination of the said causes forasmuch as the parties appealing to the said Court of Rome most commonly did the same for delay of Justice and forasmuch as the great distance of way was so far out of this Realm that neither the necessary proofs nor the true knowledge of the cause could be so well known or the witnesses there so well examined as within this Realm so that the parties grieved by means of the said Appeals were most times without remedy In consideration thereof the King his Nobles and Commons considering the great enormities dammages long delaies and hurts that as well to his Highness as to his said Noble subjects Commons and resiants of this his Realm in the said causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces Tithes Oblations and Obventions did daily ensue did therefore by his Royall assent and by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in that Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same enact establish and ordain That all causes Testamentary causes of Matrimony and Divorces rights of Tithes Oblations and Obventions the knowledge whereof by the goodness of Princes of this Realm and by the Laws and Customes of the same appertained to the Spiritual Jurisdiction of this Realm then already commenced moved depending being happening or hereafter coming in contention debate or question within this Realm or within any of the King's dominions or Marches of the same or elsewhere whether they concern the King his Heirs or Successors or any other subjects or resiants within this Realm of what degree soever they be should be from thenceforth heard examined discussed clearly finally and definitively adjudged and determined within the King's Jurisdiction and
Subjects to live that perswaded his Subjects that he was no lawfull King and practised with them within the heart of this Realm to withdraw them from their Allegeance and Loyalty to their Sovereign the same being crimen laesae Majestatis by the ancient Laws of this Realm BY this and by all the Records of the Indictments it appeareth that these Jesuites and Priests are not condemned and executed for their Priesthood and Profession but for their treasonable and damnable Perswasions and Practices against the Crowns and Dignities of Monarchs and absolute Princes who hold their Kingdoms and Dominions by lawful Succession and by inherent Birth-right and descent of inheritance according to the fundamental Laws of this Realm immediately of Almighty God and are not Tenants of their Kingdomes as they would have it at the will and pleasure of any forrein Potentate whatsoever Now albeit the proceedings and process in the Ecclesiastical Courts be in the name of the Bishops c. it followeth not therefore that either the Court is not the King 's or the Law whereby they proceed is not the King's Law For taking one example for many every Leet or View of Frank-pledge holden by a Subject is kept in the Lord's name and yet it is the King's Court and all the proceedings therein are directed by the King's Laws and many subjects in England have and hold Courts of Record and other Courts and yet all their proceedings be according to the King's Laws and the Customes of the Realm Observe good Reader seeing that the determination of Heresies Schisms and Errours in Religion Ordering Examination Admission Institution and Deprivation of men of the Church which do concern God's true Religion and Service of right of Matrimony Divorces and general Bastardy whereupon depend the strength of mens Discents and Inheritances of probate of Testaments and letters of Administration without which no debt or dutie due to any dead man can be recovered by the Common Law Mortuaries Pensions Procurations Reparations of Churches Simony Incest Adultery Fornication and Incontinency and some others doth not belong to the Common Law how necessary it was for administration of Justice that his Majestie 's Progenitors Kings of this Realm did by publick authority authorize Ecclesiasticall Courts under them to determine those great and important Causes Ecclesiastical exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Common Law by the King's Laws Ecclesiastical Which was done originally for two causes 1. That Justice should be administred under the Kings of this Realm within their own Kingdome to all their Subjects and in all Causes 2. That the Kings of England should be furnished upon all occasions either forrein or domestical with learned Professors as well of the Ecclesiasticall as Temporall Laws THus hath it appeared as well by the ancient Common Laws of this Realm by the Resolutions and Judgements of the Judges and Sages of the Laws of England in all succession of ages as by Authority of many Acts of Parliament ancient and of latter times That the Kingdome of England is an absolute Monarchy and that the King is the onely Supreme Governour as well over Ecclesiasticall persons and in Ecclesiastical causes as Temporal within this Realm to the due observation of which Laws both the King and the Subject are sworn I have herein cited the very words and texts of the Laws Resolutions Judgements and Acts of Parliament all publick and in print without any inference argument or amplification and have particularly quoted the books years leaves chapters and such like certain references as every man may at his pleasure see and reade the Authorities herein cited This Case is reported in the English and Latine tongues as some other Writers of the Law have done to the end that my dear Countrymen may be acquainted with the Laws of this Realm their own Birth-right and inheritance and with such evidences as of right belong to the same assuring my self that no wise or true-hearted English-man that hath been perswaded before he was instructed will refuse to be instructed in the truth which he may see with his own eyes lest he should be disswaded from errour wherewith blindfold he hath been deceived For miserable is his case and worthy of pity that hath been perswaded before he was instructed and now will refuse to be instructed because he will not be perswaded FINIS Of what quality and credit Robert Lalor was His apprehension and first examination His first inditement and conviction His second examination His confession or acknowledgement The Inditement of Lalor upon the stat of 16 Ric. 2. The true cause of making the Statute of 16 R. 2. and other Statutes against Provisors The Statute of Praemunire made at the prayer of the Commons The effect of the Statute of 16 R. 2. c. 5. The effect of the Statute of 38 Edw. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 27 Ed. 3. cap. 1. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. reciting the Statute of 25 Ed. 1. These Laws made by such as did professe the Romish Religion Laws against Provisors made in Ireland When the Pope began first to usurp upon the liberties of the Crâ—wn of England A comparison of the spiritual Monarchy of the Church with the temporal Monarchies of the world The Pope had no jurisdiction in England in the time of the Britans The first usurpation of the Pope upon the Crown began in the time of King William the Conquerour By sending Legates into England In the time of William Rufus the Pope attempted to draw Appeals to Rome but prevailed not In the time of K. Henry the first the Pope usurpeth the donation of Bishoprikks c. Histor Jornalensis M S. in Archiv Rob. Cotton Eq. Aur. In the time of King Stephen the Pope gained Appeals to the Court of Rome In the time of K. Henry 2. the Pope claimed exemption of Clerks from the Secular power A brief of Th. Becket's troubles or rather treasons The Constitutions of Claringdon Four points of jurisdiction usurped upon the crown of England by the Pope before the reign of K. John The cause of the quarrell between K. John and the Pope When Canonical election began first in England King John's round and Kingly Letter to the Pope The Pope curseth the King and interdicteth the Realm King Edw. 1. oppâ—seth the Pope's Vsurpation E. 2. suffereth the Pope to usurp again E. 3. resisteth the Vsurpation of the Pope King Rich. 2. The Evidence against Lalor Lalor's Confession publickly read When the distinction of Ecclesiasticall Spirituall causes from Civil and Temporal causes began in the world Caudrey's Case The objections of the Counsell of the Plaintif 1. 2. 3. 4. The resolutions of the Court to the 1. and 2. To the 3. To the 4. What causes belong to the Ecclesiasticall Court. see Circumspectè agatis 13 E. 1. W. 2. 13 E. 1. cap. 5. versus finem Artic. cleri 9 E. 2. 15 E. 3. c. 6.31 E. 3. cap. 11.2 H. 5. c. 7.1 H. 7. cap. 4.23 H. 8. cap.
ENGLAND'S INDEPENDENCY Upon the Papal Power Historically and Judicially Stated By Sr. JOHN DAVIS Attorney Generall in Ireland And by Sr. EDWARD COKE Lord Chief Justice in England In Two REPORTS Selected from their greater Volumes For the Convincing of our English Romanists and Confirming of those who are yet unperverted to the Court or Church of ROME With a Preface written by Sir JOHN PETTUS Knight LONDON Printed by E. Flesher I. Streater and H. Twyford Assigns of Richard Atkins and Edward Atkins Esquires And are to be sold by severall Book-sellers in Fleetstreet and Holborn MDCLXXIV To the Right Honourable JAMES Earle of SUFFOLK Lord Lieutenant of that County c. MY LORD I Have the honour of being one of your Deputies in the County of Suffolk which I hope will admit me to the freedome of placing your Lordship in the Front of Two Reports cull'd out from the many other Reports of two as Learned persons in our Laws as that Age did afford I have perswaded the Stationer to reprint them as fit at this time to be generally perus'd For Sr. John Davis in his Report of Lalor's Case gives an Historicall Account of the Pope's Invasions upon us from Edward the Confessor's time in matters Civil and the Lord Chief Justice Coke gives also a full and clear Account of the Pope's Intrusions upon us in matters Ecclesiasticall Neither of them do meddle with the Cavills of Religion between us and the Papal Power but what concerns their State and ours and that deduced from Antiquity how we ought to pay our single Obedience both to Church and State as our Predecessors have done or endeavour'd to doe for many Ages to their respective Kings And though there have been many Invasions or Intrusions upon us by the Power and Policy of the Pope and his Agents yet we were alwaies struggling to get out Sometimes we mastered them and sometimes we were mastered by them according to the Resolution or Weakness of those our former Kings who were to maintain their inherent Interests And however some Papal Pretences seem to be yet we may clearly see when they got the upper hand what Subjection they intended to impose upon us as they did on King John and they nick'd the time when he was imbroyl'd and even totally immerged in the Distempers of his untruly Subjects and inraged Forreiners and then by the opportunity of those Factions and Forreiners they did subjugate this Kingdome to his Principality in Italy and made it its Vassall more then ever any Emperour of Rome did pretend to or could accomplish And though after King John there were various Contests by our successive Kings yet none did so effectually rout the Papal Interest here as Henry the VIII for which the Romanists do rip up all his Vices to make him as odious to the world as possible and among other things they affirm that He was the man that rebell'd from their Church Whenas their Historie and ours tell us and them that he lived and died a Roman Catholick And they farther say that it was He that brought in our Religion which they now call Heresie and is but a Reformation of theirs and even that Reformation was begun and prosecuted though but in parcells by former Ages but not establisht till Henry the VIII had first broke their Civil Interest here and then it went on with ease by King Henry's Successours But by their Railings on Henry the VIII Luther Calvin and I know not whom whose Doctrines we do not altogether follow the Papal Agents do most wonderfully deceive the unfixt and wavering minds of men who do not know the true Foundation of our Church and State here in England clearly and through all Antiquity independent upon any Church or State but its own or on any person but the Monarch thereof as is most fully set forth in these excellent Reports wherein your Lordship and others by an hour 's reading may see what is our Right and how it hath been maintain'd and lost and regain'd by that most resolute Prince then owning the whole Body of the Papal Doctrine but not the Pope's Superiority or power to establish any thing in these Kingdomes It is true this Prince had Discontents and was crost in his Designs which it may be did either provoke him or upon this it is likely he did take occasion to pick a quarrel that he might the more speciously accomplish what his Predecessours could not effect However God doth often produce good Events by such as we call evill Mediums as the Beams of the Sun make their way through Darknesse and Vapours which now again begin to spread over our heads like thick Clouds contracted by long Exhalations ready to break and send forth Lightning Thunder and Storms upon this Nation And thus I apprehend their contraction When Henry the VIII had thus restor'd us to our Liberties and ancient Rights and disbanded the Papall Power and Interest here it was time for the Pope to contrive some other Stratagems and therefore what he could not doe by the power of Bulls c. he tries to effect by a long and continued Art And first he infuseth into his Catholick King of Spain how fit a person he was to be Universal Monarch of Christendome which the King of Spain's Ambition readilie embraced the whole Design whereof may be read in Campanella the Jesuite in his Discourse of the Spanish Monarchy About the same time the Pope also inveigles his most Christian King Henry the IV. of France telling him also how fit a person he was to be Universal Moderator of Christendome which Bait this King's Ambition did also readily embrace the whole Modell and Platform whereâ—f is also set down by the Bishop of Rhodes in his History of the said Henry the IV. And in all this time while both these Kings were driving on these Designs it is observable by the Confession of those Historians that neither of them were privy to each other's Intentions the business was so cunningly managed by the Pope whose great Art it was to keep their Designs secret and put both their Wheels in motion at once yet to keep his Spoak in that Wheel which turned most to his advantage In both these cited Books of Rhodes and Campanella your Lordship will find that their chief aims and directions were to weaken the English and therein they say in these words That there was no better way then by causing Divisions and Dissensions among the English and by continuall keeping up the same and that as for their Religion it could not be easily rooted out unless there were some certain Schools erected in Flanders c. by the Scholars whereof there should be scattered abroad the seeds for Divisions in the Natural and Theologicall Sciences which would distract and discompose their opinions and judgments and that the English being of a nature still desirous of Novelties and Changes are easily wrought over to any thing Now that this hath been put in practice
Britanniae Anglorum Regem Monarcham By which it appeareth that the King by his Charter made in Parliament for it appeareth to be made by the counsell and consent of his Bishops and Senators of his Kingdome which were assembled in Parliament did discharge and exempt the said Abbot from the Jurisdiction of the Bishop c. and by the same Charter did grant to the said Abbot Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction within his said Abbey which Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction being derived from the Crown continued untill the Dissolution of the said Abbey in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth In the Reign of King Edward the Confessor THe King who is the Vicar of the Highest King is ordained to this end that he should govern and rule the Kingdome and people of the Land and above all things the Holy Church and that he defend the same from wrong-doers and destroy and root out workers of mischief And this shall suffice for many before the Conquest In the Reign of King William the First IT is agreed that no man can make any Appropriation of any Church having Cure of Souls being a thing Ecclesiastical and to be made to some person Ecclesiastical but he that hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction But William the First of himself without any other as King of England made Appropriation of Churches with Cure to Ecclesiastical persons Wherefore it followeth that he had Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction In the Reign of King Henry the First HEnry by the Grace of God King of England Duke of Normans To all Archbishops Bishops Abbots Earls Barons and to all Christians as well present as to come c. We do ordain as well in regard of Ecclesiasticall as Royall power that whensoever the Abbot of Reading shall die that all the possession of the Monastery wheresoever it is do remain entire and free with all the rights and customs thereof in the hands and disposition of the Prior and Monks of the Chapter of Reading We do therefore ordain and establish this Ordinance to be observed for ever because the Abbot of Reading hath no Revenues proper and peculiar to himself but common with his brethren whosoever by God's will shall be appointed Abbot in this place by Canonicall election may not dispend the Alms of the Abbey by ill usage with his secular kinsmen or any other but in entertaining the poor Pilgrims and Strangers and that he have a care not to give out the Rent-lands in fee neither that he make any Servitors or Souldiers but in the Sacred garment of Christ wherein let him be advisedly provident he entertain not young ones but that he entertain men of ripe age or discreet as well Clerks as Lay-men In the Reign of King Henry the Third IN all the time of H. 3. and his Progenitors Kings of England and ever fithence if any man did sue afore any Judge Ecclesiasticall within the Realm for any thing whereof that Court by allowance and custome had not lawful conusance the King did ever by his Writ under his great Seal prohibit them to proceed And if the suggestion made to the King whereupon the Prohibition was grounded were after found untrue then the King by his Writ of Consultation under his great Seal did allow and permit them to proceed Also in all the Reign of H. 3. and his Progenitors King of England and ever fithence if any issue were joyned â—pon the loyalty of Marriage general Bastardy or such like the King did ever write to the Bishop of that Diocese as mediate Officer and Minister to his Court to certifie the loyalty of Marriage Bastardy or such like all which do apparently prove that those Ecclesiastical Courts were under the King's Jurisdiction and commandment and that one of the Courts wure so necessarily incident to the other as the one without the other could not deliver Justice to the parties as well in these particular cases as in a number of cases before specified whereof the King 's Ecclesiasticall Court hath Jurisdiction Now to command and to be obeyed belong to Sovereign and Supreme Government By the ancient Canons and Decrees of the Church of Rome the issue born before solemnization of marriage is as lawfully inheritable marriage following as the issue born after marriage But this was never allowed or appointed in England and therefore was never of any force here And this appeareth by the Statute of Merton made in the 20. year of King Henry the 3. To the King 's Writ of Bastardy whether one being born afore matrimony may inherit in like manner as he that is born after matrimony all the Bishops answered that they would not nor could not answer to it because it was directly against the common order of the Church And all the Bishops instanted the Lords that they would consent that all such as were born afore matrimony should be legitimate as well as they that be born within matrimony as to the succession of inheritance forsomuch as the Church accepteth such to be legitimate And all the Earls and Barons with one voice answered We will not change the Laws of England which hitherto have been used and approved In the Reign of King Edward the First IN the Reign of King Edward the First a Subject brought in a Bull of Excommunication against another Subject of this Realm and published it to the Lord Treasurer of England and this was by the ancient Common Law of England adjudged Treason against the King his Crown and Dignity for the which the offendor should have been drawn and hanged but at the great instance of the Chancellour and Treasurer he was onely abjured the Realm for ever The said King Edward the 1. presented his Clerk to a Benefice within the Province of York who was refused by the Archbishop for that the Pope by way of Provision had conferred it on another The King thereupon brought a Quare non admisit The Archbishop pleaded that the Bishop of Rome had long time before provided to the said Church as one having supreme Authority in that case and that he durst not nor had power to put him out which was by the Pope's Bull in possession For which his high Contempt against the King his Crown and Dignity in refusing to execute his Sovereign's Commandment fearing to doe it against the Pope's Provision by judgement of the Common Law the Lands of his whole Bishoprick were seized into the King's hands and lost during his life Which Judgement was before any Statute or Act of Parliament was made in that case And there it is said that for the like offence the Archbishop of Canterbury had been in worse case by the judgement of the Sages of the Law then to be punished for a Contempt if the King had not extended grace and favour to him Concerning men twice married called Bigamy whom the Bishop of Rome by a Constitution made at the Council of Lions hath excluded from all priviledge of Clergy whereupon certain Prelates