Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	bishop_n	king_n	sir_n	11,216	5	5.9979	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A67481	Some remarks upon a speech made to the grand jury for the county of Middlesex concerning the execution of penalties upon the churches of Christ, which worship God in meeting-houses, for their so doing : and may serve for an answer to part of the order of the justices, Jan. 13 to the same purpose : in a letter to Sir W.S. their speaker.	J. W.; Smith, William, Sir, 1616 or 17-1696.	1682 (1682)	Wing W69; ESTC R3500	12,116	16

and some Grand Juries and a great many Burroughs that were easily taken with it You seem Sir to be a little out in your Divinity whilst you introduce God Almighty in Creation Giving Man a Law and printing it on his heart and by our Lord Christ restoring that Law by instruction and the sending of Bishops to govern the Church by Ceremonies and Liturgies which have the Sanction of a Parliament whereas Gods giving his Laws into Mens minds and writing them in their hearts is made both by the Prophet Jeremy and the Divine Author to the Hebrews the special Promise and Priviledge of the New Covenant whereof Christ is Mediator And if Christ has not written his Laws in mens hearts by the Gospel Sir Wm's Argument doth equally justifie all the Papists of Spain Italy France c. as the Protestants of the Church of England and equally condemn the Protestants in those Countrys as the Dissenters here in England for they have their Bishops by a continued Succession as well as we and they have their Ceremonies and Liturgy called the Mass as well as we and these have the Sanction of their Parliaments the agreement both of Kings and People as well as ours Thus Sir you have made Popery as much the Religion of Christ as Protestantism and justifie all Persecutions of Christians that are made by Bishops and Laws The French King is beholding to you for vindicating him in his present Persecution of the poor Protestants to whom yet thanks be to God and the King we give entertainment But when you seriously think of this Establishment by Bishops and the agreement in Parliament It raiseth your admiration how any man can think himself hardly dealt with when he is required to comply with that which he hath before agreed Pray Sir were you never on the Negative side in any Law that was pass'd in those Parliaments wherein you sate if you were then you did not agree to that Law now suppose that that Law had been the Law of conformity to the Mass as it was in Queen Maries days would you have thought your self obliged to have yielded obedience to it because you were over Voted Sir Sanctions of King and Parliament cannot make a thing good which in its nature is not so neither can it make an indifferent thing lawful to me if I in my Conscience think it otherwise for whatsoever is not of Faith is sin Christ has not given Bishops to be Lords over his Heritage which they will be if you give them power to make Laws and enforce them against the Conscience of Believers in things not necessary to be determin'd and much less in things already otherwise determin'd in the Doctrine of Christ. You admire again That any should think it reasonable that Publick Conventicles should be permitted in opposition to the said Established Government I have said something before that is applicable to this to allay this admiration I add that many Conventiclers do think their Pastors to be Bishops 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Overseers as your self note which they are as much obliged to obey as if there were an Humane Law for it Again Some are greatly offended at the rancour and bitterness they perceive in many high-flown Men of the Church against those that dissent from them who would have those severe Laws executed against them whilst in the mean time they are not more certain of any thing than that they heartily desire their own Salvation and endeavour honestly to find out and to walk in the right way to it and hence they are most certain it is contrary to the mind of Christ any of his Followers should punish them for their Meeting together in his Name in pursuance of those ends and consequently that Church that does so offends against a Fundamental Point of Christian Practice for they have the like perswasion concerning the Integrity of others that differ from them as they have of themselves and are therefore sure that if they be so they can no more execute Penalties upon them than they upon others They ought to have the same love and respect for them as they have for Conformists and to do unto them as they would have them do unto themselves if they be otherwise minded they offend both against the Law of nature and the Law of Christ. If either they or the Dissenters offend against the necessary Principles and Laws of Government though it be never so much their consciences so to do they deny not the Magistrates right to punish them but they are certain this is none of those cases It is an excellent passage of the late Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale p. 1308. bserved in his Life relating to the Quakers He considered Marriage and Succession as a right of nature there is the same reason of other rights of nature from which none ought to be barred what mistake soever they might be under in the Points of Revealed Religion Surely the publick meeting together to worship God is a natural right which therefore men ought not to be deprived of though they mistake in the circumstances of their so meeting and worshiping But I will leave the defence of publick meetings to publick prints specially I refer you to the Conformists Plea for the Nonconformists the first and second parts for that in reason should be read by you with less prejudice than those things they say in their own behalf You cannot understand but that the Conventiclers allow their teachers both Infallibility and Supremacy what Sir more then you allow to your Bishops you would not have said this but that you had a mind to make an odious Parallel between Papists and Dissenters But who knows not that Dissenters do all maintain this as the great principle of Protestantism viz. That every man ought to be satisfied in his own Judgment concerning his Religion and not to pin his faith upon any man or number of men further than they are perswaded from the infallible word of God And this is the chief reason why they frequent gathered Churches and not Parish Churches and sometimes go from one Congregation to another as they find it more conducing to the great end of their eternal Salvation You say The Romish Church is an united body and not to be withstood but by another united body and if the people were united and reconciled to this true Protestant Church of England it was not possible that Popery should prevail here First Sir The people are so far united to this Church that they have the same Faith and the same Doctrine for Substance and they worship God in no other manner than is allowed by the practice of the Church of England so that I would fain be informed what better capacity the Church of England would be in if all come to the Parish-Church than She is now If there was not one Protestant Dissenter in England how would that hinder a Popish Successor from bringing in Popery We see that