nuper defuncti ut animos omnium in sui promotionem accenderet amorem ut illum in Regem susciperent patronum to which it was generally answered That if he with a willing mind would grant and by his Charter confirm to them illas libertates consuetudines antiquas which their Ancestors enjoyed in the time of Edward the Confessor in ipsum consentirent in Regem unanimiter consecrarent Henry willingly granted this and taking an Oath that he would perform it consecratus est in Regem at Westm. upon Lady day favente Clero populo and so forthwith he was Crowned by Maurice Bishop of London and Thomas Archbishop of York After such his Coronation he granted and confirmed to the Nation for the advancement of Holy Church and preservation of the peace of his people a Charter of their antient Liberties The Charter the Reader may find in that industrious Revivor and Restorer of decayed and forgotten Antiquities Mr. Lambard as also in Matth. Paris Where it appears that the Archbishops Bishops Barons Earls Vicounts or Sheriffs Optimates totius Regni Angliae were Witnesses to the Charter And that at the Coronation of the King those Laws were made de Communi Consilio assensu Baronum Regni Angliae by the common advice and assent of the Barons of England It being usual in succeeding ages at the Coronations of our English Kings to confirm make and ordain Laws De assensu Baronum Regni per Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament I shall from hence observe two things 1. That these Laws were granted and confirmed assensu Baronum Regni or Baronagii Angliae there being a clear difference between Barones Regis and Barones Regni as appears in the very bowels of those Laws and elsewhere for the K. Saith Si quis Baronum nostrorum c. but who were comprehended under those first phrases Mr. Camden will tell us Nomine Baronagii Angliae omnes quodammodo Regni ordines continentur and so the Commons as we now call them were there and assented to those Laws 2. Clero Populo universo Angliae congregatis We read King Stephen assensu Cleri Populi in Regem Angliae electus per Dominum Papam confirmatus 10 H. 2. Congregato Clero Populo Regni or as Fitz-Stephens Generali Concilio the King made the Assise or Statute of Clarendon which Council the learned Selden calls a full Parliament King John was Crowned mediante tam Cleri quam Populi unanimi consensu favore Anno 50 H. 3. Per providentiam Cardinalis meaning the Popes Legate apud Kenilworth Clerus Populus convocantur which the Patent Roll of that year thus confirms The King a le request de honourable pier Sire Ottobon Legat d'Engleterre son Parlement eust sommons à Kenilworth where the Statute or Dictum de Kenilworth was made between the King and his Communante or Parlement Rex primo postmodum Clerus Populus juraverunt quod Dictum inviolabiliter observarent Thus have I at length I hope fully ascertained and explained the Historians phrase Clerus Populus and proved it to be a Parliament from the Pat. Roll of H. 3. Yet I do not think that the Lords Temporal only were the Populus nor the Lords Spiritual the Clerus for I agree with Dr. Heylyn that there is no Record either of History or Law which I have observed in which the word Clerus serves to signifie the Archbishops and Bishops exclusive of the other Clergy or any writing whatsoever wherein it doth not either signifie the whole Clergy generally or the inferior Clergy only exclusive of the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates and 't is my opinion as far as I can find that the word Populus following Clerus was Thema universale in significando and comprehended as well the Commons as the Lords and indeed the subject matter of the Historians speaks it William the Second Henry the First King Stephen and King John were to be elected and created Kings of England having no hereditary right 't was but reasonable then and according to the Laws and precedents of other Countries in like Cases Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet and so was the solemn Resolution of both Lords and Commons in the Parliament 40 E. 3. That neither King John nor any other could put the Realm or people of England into subjection sanz assent de eux without their assent or as the Parliament 29 H. 3. declared sine assensu Regni or as Malmesbury says in vita Willielmi primi absque generali Senatus Populi conventu Edicto But now to close the Reign of Henry the first I will out of that excellent Historian Matthew Paris transcribe the Oration or Speech of that King to the Common Council or Parliament in the seventh year of his Reign his elder Brother Robert Duke of Normandy then claiming the Crown of England and ready to invade this Nation with a great Force the Speech of the King the learned Monk thus delivers to us MAgnatibus igitur Regni ob hoc Londoniam Edicto Regio convocatis Rex talibus alloquiis mel favum oleumque mellitis mollitis blandiens dixit Amici fideles mei indigenae ac naturales nostis veraci sama referente qualiter frater meus Robertus electus per Deum vocatus ad regnum Hierosolymitanum foeliciter gubernandum quam frontosè illud infoeliciter refutaverit merito propterea à Deo reprobandus Nostis etiam in multis aliis superbiam ferocitatem illius quia vir bellicosus pacis impatiens est vosque scienter quasi contemptibiles quos desides vocat glutones conculcare desiderat Ego vero Rex humilis pacificus vos in pace in antiquis vestris libertatibus prout crebrius jurejur ando promisi gestio confovere vestris inclinando consiliis consultius ac mitius more mansueti principis sapienter gubernare super his si provideritis scripta subarata roborate iteratis juramentis praedicta certissime confirmare omnia videlicer quae sanctus Rex Edwardus Deo inspirante providè sancivit inviolabiliter jubeo observari ut mecum fideliter stantes fratris mei immò mei totius Regni Angliae hostis cruentissimi injurias potenter animose ac voluntarie propulsetis Si enim fortitudine Anglorum roborer inanes Normannorum minas nequaquam censeo formidandas Talibus igitur promissis quae tamen in fine impudenter violavit omnium corda sibi inclinavit ut pro ipso contra quemlibet usque ad capitis expositionem dimicarent This Speech to me is another strong Confirmation and Argument against the Norman Conquest for 't is luce clarius 1. That King Henry the First did not pretend to hold the Crown Jure Victoris 2. That the English were not totally subdued and destroyed by his
the Third had the assent of the Commons in Parliament to make them Laws Now the word Progenitors in the Statute must I conceive go higher than Ric. 1. for Bracton a Learned Judge who flourished in the time of Henry the Third and so by a reasonable computation of time may be supposed to have lived in the latter end of the Reign of Ric. 1. or beginning of King John's after he had declared to posterity that he had bent his mind ad vetera judicia perscrutanda diligenter non sine vigiliis labore and whatsoever he found Notatu dignum he reduced in unam summam perpetuae memoriae commendanda concludes this point thus Cum legis vigorem habeat quicquid de consilio de consensu Magnatum Reipublicae communi sponsione authoritate Regis sive Principis praecedente justè fuerit definitum approbatum And so just and excellent was the ballance of the Constitution of our legal Government in preventing any order or rank of the Subjects to impose upon or bind the rest without their common consent and in conserving as it were an universal liberty and property to every individual degree of men from being taken from them without their assent as the County Palatine of Chester ab antiquo were not subject to such Laws to which they did not consent for as well before the Conquest of England as after they had their Commune Concilium or Court of Parliament by authority of which the Barones Milites quamplures alii Rot. 44 H. 3. m. 1. dorso Barones liberi homines omnes alii fideles Rot. Pat. 3. E. 1. m. 6. or as the Supplication to H. 6. saith The Abbots Priors Clergy Barons Knights Esquires and Commonalty did with the consent of the Earl make or admit Laws within the same such as should be thought expedient and behoveful for the Weal of the Inheritors and inheritance of the said County and no Inheritors or Possessors within the said County were chargeable or liable or were bounden charged or hurt of their Bodies Liberties Franchises Lands Goods or Possessions unless the said County or Parliament had agreed unto it And I dare under submission affirm that neither this County Palatine nor Durham were ever subjugated to have their Estates given away at the good will and pleasure of the Earl or Bishop under any notion or fancy in those days of being their representatives in the Commune Concilium Regni or that being dependant Tenants their consents were included in their Lords assent and if the Commune Concilium Cestrense or Parliament was deduced from Records it would be of greater use to shew us as in a Mirror the Government of England in antient days than what I have yet seen published by any Author 3. That the Answer of the King to the Petition penned and made by all the Judges of the Land his Council in Parliament cannot be supposed to be grounded upon a modern usage of 59. years from the time of 49 H. 3. till then if the Tenants in Capite jure repraesentationis made the Parliament as some hold but was a Declaration of the ancient Custom and right of the Nation 4. That it was not in the power of all the Tenants in Capite of England or the greatest part who were the Petitioners though with the Kings consent to bind and oblige others or to make or alter a Law sine assensu Communitatis Regni who had votum consultivum and decisivum an Act of Authority and Jurisdiction as well in assenting to spiritual Laws as Temporal as may appear for an inâ—tance in their Declaration or Protestation to E. 3. in Parliament Que nul estatut ne Ordenance soit fait ne grante au Petition du Clergie si ne soit per assent de voz Communes ne que vous dites Communes ne soient obligez per nulles constitutions q'ils font pur lour avantage sanz assent de voz dites Communes Car eux ne veullent estre obligez nul de voz Estatuz ne Ordinances faitz sanz lour assent Fortescue cap. 8. pag. 40. tells us Sed non sic Angliae Statuta oriri possunt dum nedum Principis voluntate sed totius Regni assensu ipsa conduntur Et si Statuta licet tanta solennitate prudentia edita efficaciae tantae quantae conditorum cupiebat intentio non esse contingant Concito reformari ipsa possunt non sine Communitatis Procerum Regni illius assensu quali ipsa primitus emanarunt And that this was the antient Law and Right of the Kingdom appears by the answer of E. 1. an o 22. of his Reign to the Petition of the whole Clergy of England for the Clergy having given the King medietatem omnium bonorum tam temporalium quam spiritualium complaining that the Immunity of the Church laesa fuit violata petiit à Rege quosdam Articulos Rege jubente jussit enim Rex postquam votis ipsius paruerant in giving the Subsidy ut ipsi ab eo peterent remedia quae vellent Et petierunt imprimis ut Statutum de manu mortua quod in praejudicium Sanctae Matris Ecclesiae fuit editum deleretur Cui quidem Articulo respondit Rex quod idem Statutum de Consilio Magnatum suorum so phrased by the Historian fuerat editum ordinatum absque eorum Consilio non erat revocandum but a more certain authority tells us that the Statute was made per Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament as appears by Rot. Claus. 7 E. 1. m. 5. dorso Rot. Pat. 10 E. 1. m. 13. and then the Commons were unquestionably an essential part and joined in the making the Statute The SIXTH ARGUMENT From the form of penning of 〈◊〉 of Parliament and expressions in Records in 49 51 54 H. 3. where it is pretended the Commâ—ns first began to be a part of the Legislative Power which agree with the phrases of Records of Acts of Parliament before that time THE King writes to the Bishop of London and to the rest of the Bishops of the Province of Canterbury that his heart was wounded 〈…〉 to dolore that the Earl of Gloucester and other Rebels had by crafty perswasions circumvented pro 〈…〉 r Prince Edward ad partem suam proditoriâ— aâ—â—axeâ—unt proprii contemptu Sacramenâ— contra formam de nostro ejusdem silii nostri Praelatorum Magnatum Communitatis Regni nostri unanimi assensu voluntate nuper London provisam The King per le conseil l'assentement le Rei de Alemain de Countes de Baruns del Commun de la terre pardoned and released the Earl of Gloucester and all his Company c. And the King per le Conseil Passentement le Rei de Alemain les Cuntes de Barons le Commun de la terre pardoned and released the Londoners totes maneres de
learned Bodin of the Clergy the Nobility and the Commissioners of the Provinces and antient Cities 3. The Portugal Cortes or Parliament consists of the Bishops and Prelats the Nobiles majores minores and two Procurators or Burgesses from every City who have a deliberative voice which they call definitive 4. In Denmark Pontanus saith the Bishops the Nobility Civitatum Delegati the Deputies or Commissioners of Towns and Cities made up their General Council 5. For Sweden it does not much differ from the Government and form of Denmark their Common Council consisting of the same Estates and degrees of people that is to say Proceres Nobiles the greater and the less Nobility Episcopi Ecclesiastici Civitates Universitates the Cities Boroughs and Villages I might here if it were needful shew how great a share and interest the Hanze or free Towns in Germany have by their Deputies in all Ages had in the Diet or General Council of the Empire 6. But now at last we are come to Scotland Sir John Skene in his Epistle Dedicatory to King James before his Scottish Laws writes thus Intelligo tuas tuorumque Majorum Leges quae cum Legibus Regni tui Angliae magna ex parte consentiunt and then in his Book shews that Willielmus cognominatus Leo who as is said begun to Reign in 1105. and reigned 49. Years so as he was King of Scotland 5 10 of our Henry the first held his Assise or Parliament at Perth where several Laws were ordained to the observance whereof Episcopi Abbates Comites Barones Thani tota Communitas Regni tenere firmiter juraverunt King Alexander began to Reign Anno 1214. which was the sixteenth Year of our King John and Reigned 35. Years so as he died an 38 H. 3. he made his Laws de Consilio assensu venerabilium Patrum Episcoporum Abbatum Baronum ac proborum hominum suorum Scotiae And what the Communitas Regni in King William's Statutes and the probâ— homines in King Alexanders were the League made between the French King and the Crown of Scotland Anno 28 E. 1. clearly shews being ratified and confirmed in their Parliament per Johannem de Balliolo then King ac Praelatos Nobiles Universitates Communitates Civitatum Villarum dicti Regni Scotiae and the constant practice ever since hath been that the Cities and Boroughs have sent their Proxies or Representatives to the Parliaments of that Kingdom It may therefore seem very strange that when the Cities and Boroughs in all the Kingdoms of Europe de jure and de facto were ab antiquis temporibus even in times coeval with the Government an essential part of their Common Councils or Parliaments that England should not be under the same constitution being but descendants from Gaul or the more Northern Countries if so 1. Was it because in the Britton Saxon and Norman times there were no Cities or Boroughs or if there were were they so poor and inconsiderable as they deserved no observation in the eye of the State or 2. Was it because by a strange and unheard of fate peculiar and proper only to them they were not fit or capable to give or hear reason as well as the Delegates or Representatives of the Cities and Boroughs of France Spain Portugal Denmark Sweden and Scotland or 3. Had they no property or right in their Estates Certainly in my opinion none of these Objections can be admitted allowed or proved for In the Brittons time venerable Bede tells us Erat Britannia viginti octo Civitatibus quondam Nobilissimis insignita praeter Castella innumera quae ipsa muris turribus portis ac seris erant instructa firmissimis Nor were they of less reputation in the Saxon or Norman times when they were thought so necessary and proper for the safety of the Govern ment preservation and defence of the Laws that it was ordained by William the First and the Common Council of the Kingdom That no Market or Fair should be permitted to be held nisi in Civitatibus Regni nostri in Burgis ubi consuetudines Regni Jus Commune dignitates Coronae nostrae deperiri non possunt nec defraudari nec violari sed omnia recte in aperto per Judicium Justitiam fieri debent c. ad tuitionem gentium populorum regni ad defensionem Regni And if in the Brittons times the Nation was so strong in Cities and Castles surely it cannot be imagined but that in the Saxon and Norman times when the Nation became to be more civilized and considerable in the World the Estates or Degrees of the Inhabitants would easily part with these Liberties and Priviledges which their Ancestors though less knowing and powerful did claim and enjoy Having thus concluded my Arguments against the Position of 49 H. 3. I have thought it not altogether impertinent to add some brief Observations for the better understanding of antient Records and Historians in their various Lections and different expressions I shall therefore consider 1. The different application of the words Commune Communitas or Plebs 2. The several Denominations by which our antient General or Common Council or Parliaments were expressed 3. The various acceptation of the word Baro and that under the Phrase of Baronagium Angliae both Lords and Commons were comprehended Observation I. The different application of the words Commune Communitas or Plebs THere lies a main Objection against me for some Authors say that the words Commons Communitas or Plebs is not to be met withal in any antient Authors or Records ab ingressu Willielmi Primi usque ad excessum H. 3. and therefore conclude they were never a part of the Commune Concilium or Parliament before 49 H. 3. because not mentioned eo nomine Admitting the Objection true which I conceive otherwise yet it is no Conclusive Argument for before the Statute An. 3 R. 2. cap. 3. I cannot find the appellation of Lords Temporal nor before the 13 th of that King cap. 2. the phrase Lords Spiritual and Temporal in our Printed Statute Books Ergo from thence it follows by a necessary consequence according to their Argument that they were not any part of the Generale Concilium or Parliament before those times because not expressed by that name I suppose this Conclusion will not be admitted true But as I am well satisfied that the Archbishops Bishops Abbots and Priors who were often expressed by and comprehended in the word Praelati and who in after times constituted the Lords Spiritual and the Earls and Barons as now differenced the Lords Temporal were ab antiquo undoubtedly a part of the Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament so it may be proved if insisted upon That the Milites and libere tenentes de Regno or Angliae the Knights and Gentlemen or
7. Barones 8. Parliamentum 9. Barones Angliae 10. Baronagium Angliae 11. Enprimes est accorde assentu q' le franchise de seinte Esglise la grand Chartre la Chartre de la Forest les autres Statutes faitz per nostre dit Seignour le Roy ses Progenitors Piers la Commune de sa terre Anno 37 o H. 3. 1. Tota Nobilitas Angliae 2. Parliamentum 3. Archiepiscopi Episcopi Abbates Priores Comites Barones Milites alii Magnates Regni Angliae 4. Magnates Communitas Populi 5. Anno 1253. 37 H. 3. Hoc anno H. Rex Angliae ad instantiam Praelatorum Comitum Baronum Cartas duas eis concessit unam de libertatibus quae Magna Charta dicitur alia quae dicitur de Foresta pro qua concessione Communitas Angliae concessit Regi quintam decimam partem omnium bonorum suorum mobilium per totam Angliam Baronagium In the Parliament at Oxford 42 H. 3. Parliamento autem incipiente solidabatur Magnum Propositum Consilium immutabile exigendo constantissime ut Dominus Rex Cartam Libertatum Angliae quam Johannes Rex pater suis Anglis confecit confectam concessit quamque idem Johannes tenere juravit fideliter teneat conservet quamque idem Rex Henricus multoties concesserat tenere juraverat ejusque infractores ab omnibus Angliae Episcopis in praesentia sua totius Baronagii horribiliter fecit excommunicari ipse unus fuerat excommunicantium So as the Excommunication here meant being that of 37 H. 3. then made in the presence of the King Great men and Communitatis Populi is here said to be done in praesentia totius Baronagii Angliae And for the Honour of Magna Charta I will conclude this head with an Act of Parliament That Valiant and great Prince E. 4. after the overthrow of his Enemies and peaceful possession of the Crown assisted with the Judges of England Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors his Dukes Earls Viscounts and Barons with the great men or Knights of the Counties and Commons in full Parliament hath left this recorded to Posterity They call this great Charter the Laudable Statute of Magna Charta which Statute was made for the great wealth of this Land upon which Magna Charta the great Sentence and Apostolique Curse by a great number of Bishops was pronounced against the breakers of the same and the same Sentence is four times in the year openly declared according to the Law of Holy Church and in affirmance of the said Statute of the said great Charter divers Statutes have been made and ordained And great reason certainly they had to put so high a value on that so famous Charter since the substantial part of the Laws thereof were no less than the great results decrees and judgments ordained by the prudence and justice of the Brittish Saxon and Danish Dynasties founded upon two grand and principal Bases or Pillars Liberty and Property which like those two brasen ones called Boaz and Jachin supporting the Temple of Solomon upheld the tottering Frame and Fabrick of our antient Government though often by evil men designed to be overthrown A Charter empta redempta purchased and redeemed with vast treasure of the Nation and the effusion of a Sea of Christian blood A Law published and established with fearful execrations and terrible Curses against the infringers and breakers thereof and all done with that religious solemnity and profound Ceremony as it may seem inferior only to that of the Commandments of Almighty God given to the Jewish Nation All great Ministers of State and Justice were at their entrance into their Offices solemnly to swear the observation thereof and great reason there was for the making of this Law both for the preservation of the King and also the Kingdom for that Parliament well knew the woful confusions in the Reign of Edward the Second who being seduced by his two Minions the Spencers for want of observing the good old Laws and Customs of England cut off the head of Thomas Earl of Lancaster his Uncle that being the first act of shedding the sacred Royal blood by colour of Law I ever met withal in History they usurped Royal Power they sent the Queen and Prince afterwards great Edward the Third beyond Sea and prevailed with E. 2. to declare the Queen and Prince Traytors They Monopolized the Kings Eyes Ears and his whole Understanding so that the King nothing did or would do but what they did counsel him were it never so great wrong and if any had the courage to complain against them or so much as fetch a loyal sigh or lament the hard fate of the King then imposed upon by those Favourites they were branded with arraigning the Government striking at the foundation of State and being guilty of Treason and what not The consequences of whose unhappy Counsels and Policies are too well known in History to have been the ruine both of the King and themselves The Priests and Confessors were strictly commanded to frame and direct the Consciences of the people to the observation and obedience of the Great Charter and they did so not like the Sibthorps and Manwarings of later times who by their Flatteries of Prerogative for their own promotion seek to ruine the Subjects property Observation III. The various acceptation of the word Baro and that under the phrase of Baronagium Angliae both Lords and Commons were comprehended AS to the word Baro it was not much more in use before William I. obtained the English Diadem that I can find than the word Communes Baro Britanni pro suo non agnoscunt in Anglo-Saxonic is legibus nusquam comparet nec in Alfrici Glossario Saxonico inter dignitatum vocabula habetur For the English Saxons called those in their own Language â—alâ—epmen which in Latine were named Comites and the Danes Earls but of so extensive an import in its signification as we read of Aldermani Regis Aldermani Comitatus Civitatis Burgi Castelli Hundredi sive Wapentachii novem decimorum so according to the strict word they had whole Regiments of Earls The greatest title of which seldom if at all descended hereditarily till the Confessors time and after Will I. became King the word â—alâ—epman began to change and vary its signification and in room of Aldermani Regis we find Barones Regis for Aldermani Comitatus Barones Comitatus for Aldermani Civitatis Barones Civitatis for Aldermani Burgorum Barones Burgorum for Aldermani Castellorum Barones Castellorum for Aldermani Hundredorum Barones Hundredorum sive Wapentachiorum Sir Henry Spelman saith that simplices villarum Maneriorum Domini de quocunque tenentes qui sacham socham habent were antiently called Barones And all Freeholders hoc est tam in Soccagio quam per servitium militare had the Title of Barones
as Bracton before cited Consensâ— communi totius Regni 3. Those Aides were given tam de tenentibus aliorum quam de tenentibus de Domino Rege in Capite levanda quo praetexta dictus Compotus de Auxiliis praedictis were as well for the Fees of the Tenants of the then Prior as for the Fees of the Prior himself which the Prior said would clearly appear to the Court by the Certificate of the Prior his Prodecâ—ssor in the time of H. 3. made to the Barons of the Exchequer so that the Tenants of the Prior did grant an Aid as well as the Prior himself and that in Parliament for as I have observed before Rot. Claus. 32 H. 3. m. 13. dorâ—o there was a Parliament then held 4. That in the Reign of H. 3. and preceding times when the Knights and Freeholders who held not of the King but other Lords did in the Commune Concilium or Parliament graâ—◠〈◊〉 Auâ—â—lium or Aid to the Crown the great Lord or Baron of the Fee of who 〈…〉 the Freeholders held was 〈◊〉 in the Exchequer to answer for 〈…〉 thereof under the title of his 〈◊〉 as the Bishop of every 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till Queen Elizabeth's time was by Law chargeable for the coll 〈…〉 of 〈◊〉 granted by the Clergy within his Dâ—ocess yet certainly as the Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 any power to give for or tax his 〈◊〉 no more could or did any great Lord of the Fâ—â—â—ither jure t 〈…〉 or 〈◊〉 tâ—tionis charge or give away the 〈◊〉 of his free T 〈…〉 who were independent in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 solummodo 〈◊〉 this P 〈…〉 not well observed and understood 〈◊〉 late Authors has caused the 〈◊〉 about the T 〈…〉 〈◊〉 representing the 〈◊〉 in Parliament 5. 〈…〉 held of the King in Capite yet very considerable in number and all the Citizens and Burgesses should till 49 H. 3. either be totally excluded from being any part of the Generale Concilium Regni or Parliament or else by a Law of which there is not the least footsteps in History or Law were for so many Ages to be represented by the Tenants in Capite only in Parliament the transcendent Power of which Council in Conjunction with the King as Head thereof Sir Thomas Smith that great and learned man who was Secretary and Privy-Councellor to our famous Queen an old Parliament-man when he comes to write of the Parliament and its largeness of Power says thus In Comitiis Parliamentariis posita est omnis Augustae absolutae que potestatis vis quippe quemadmodum Robur virtus Angliae dieuntur in Acie residere Parliamentaria Comitia veteres leges jubent esse irritas novas indueunt praesentibus juxta ac futuris modum constituunt jura posseâ—siones hominum privatorum commutant spurios Natalibus restituunt Cultum divinum sanctioribus corroborant pondera mensuras variant incerti juris contreverâ—â—as dirimunt ubi nihil lege cautum fuit censum agunt Capitationes vectigalia indicunt delictorum gratiam faciunt afflictas Majorum sceleribus perditas familias erigunt vitae nâ—â—isque potestatem in cos obtinent quos ad hujusmodi disquisitiones Princeps advocaverat atque ut concludam breviter quiâ—quid in Centuriatis Comitiis aut in Tribunitiis Populus Romanus efficere potuisset 〈◊〉 omne in Comitiis Anglicanis tanquam in Coetu Principem populumque represent ante commode transigitur Interesse enim in illo conventu omnes intelligimur â—ujuâ—cunque amplitudinis status aut dignitatis Princepsve aut Plebs fuerit sive per se ipsum hoc fiat five per procuratorem nam omnibus peraeque gratum esse oportet quâ—â—quid ex Senatusconsulto Parliamentario profectum est 6. It is observable that the Prescription of Progenitores Regis in the Record of the Prior of Coventry tempore E. 3. did expresly extend to the Reign of H. 3. his great Grandfather and higher too so that I had good authority and warrant to say before that when the Burgesses of St. Albans in the Parliament 8 E. 2. affirmed That they and their Predecessors sicuâ— caeteri Burgenses de Regno as the rest of the Burgesses of the Kingdom had totis retroactis temporibus in all times past in the time of F. 1. Pregenitorum suorum and of His Progenitors sent Two Burgesses to every Parliament they had as well as other Boroughs of England sent Burgesses to the Generale Corailium or Parliament before mentioned in the 17th year of King John Grandfather to E. 1. at least and so by clear evidence before 49 H. 3. From the aforesaid Authorities and Reasons we may with good consequence conclude 1. That the People or Commons of England from the time of the Norman Conquest till 49 H. 3. were not represented in the Commune Concilium Regni or Parliamâ—nt by such only as held of the King in Capâ—â—e 2. And that the Commons or People 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—â—â—in to be represented by Knights Citizens Burgesses and Barons of the Cinque Ports in the said 40 H. 3. And now I shall subjoin some material Records relating to my former Discourâ—â— Inter Communia de Term. Trin. Anno 7 E. 2. Adhuc Recorda PJn nomine Poliarcâ—t Jesu Christi salvatoâ—is mundi totiusque Creature Creatoris cujus Divino Dominatui quique donatores debito servitio subnixe deserviunt cujus etiam omnipotentatui universi potentatus obsecundari examussim preproperant quia bonitas ejus bon 〈…〉 atis est incomprehensibilis miseratio inter minabilis dapsilitas bomtatis ineffabilis longanimitas quoque super pravorum nequitias quantitatis prosixitate cujusâ—ibet longior qui coâ—idiaâ—â—s admonitionibus religiosam conversationem duccntes monet ut pie Seâ—tando justitiae culturam non eam deseren dolinquant quin potius perseverabilt instantia in ejus cultura ut permaneant patâ—rno affectu hortatux qui nihilomâ—nus eadem affectione mandat peccatoâ—ibus ut resipiscant a suis iniquitatibus convertentes quia eorum execratut mortem ejus amoris stimulo fide suffultus cujus largifâ—ua miseratione Ego Cnut Rex totius Albionis Insule aliarum nationum plurimarum in Cathedra Regali promotus cum Consilio decreto Archiepiscoporum Episcoporum Abbatum Comitum aliorumque omnium fidelium eligi sanciend Atque perpeti stabilimento ab omnibus confirmandum ut Monasterium quod Biadricesworth Nuncupatur sit per omne evum Monachorum gregibus deputatum ad inhabitandum ab omni Dominatione omnium Episcoporum Comitatus illius funditus liberum ut in eo Domino servientes Monachi sine ulla inquietudine pro statu Regni Domini prevaleant precari Placuit etiam mihi hanc optionis electionem roborare privilegio isto in quo indere prccepi libertatis donum quod jam olim Edmundus Rex occidentalium SaxonnÌ„ largitus est suo equivoco pro nanciscenda ejus gratia mercede aeterna scilicet Edmundo Regi Martiri quod bone
ire de rancour de male volente c. The King and Prince having undertaken the Crusado for the Holy Land quia tamen Praelatis Magnatibus Communitati Regni non videtur expediens neque tutum that they should be both out of the Kingdom istis temporibus it was agreed the Prince should go and a Subsidy was granted to the Prince by the Parliament If one should shew the Authors of the novel opinion only these Records and thereupon ask them who the Communitas mentioned in these Records after the words Praelati Barones Magnates were I doubt not but they would say Knights Citizens and Burgesses because they are after the pretended inception of 49 H. 3. but then I desire to know what authority they can shew why the Communitas in 29 32 37 48 H. 3. should not be a part of the Parliament as much as of 49 51 54. of that King since the words or phrases of both are alike in the Records For I do not think it a true way of reasoning That because the notion of 49 H. 3. is generally published by our now Historians and so believed Ergo it unquestionably was so and has always and in all ages been distinctly known and believed The SEVENTH ARGUMENT From the defect and loss of Parliament Rolls of H. 3. and E. 1. and from the universal silence of all Records and our antient Historians contemporary and succeeding 49 H. 3. till our days IT is true indeed for any thing yet appears the Parliament Rolls of H. 3. are all lost or destroyed though references are made to them by several Clause and Patent Rolls of H. 1. and H. 2. yet no direct Writ of Summons ad Parliamentum is extant of that time either of the Lords or Commons so M r Pryn till the Dorse of the Clause Roll 49 H. 3. in a Schedule affixed thereto where there are Writs for Electing and sending to a Parliament at London two Knights Citizens and Burgesses and Barons for the Cinque-Ports and likewise Summons to the great Lords But if that Roll of 49 H. 3. and Rot. Claus. 22 E. 1. had been destroyed as many others of that time were then had there been no footsteps or testimony left us on Record yet discovered of any formal Summons to Parliament of them or the Prelats and temporal great Lords till 23 E. 1. though several Parliaments were in the interim no less than twelve as the Printed Statute Books tell us And the Commons expresly said to be present at some and implyed in all if the Phrase of Commune Concilium Regni implies so much which 〈◊〉 think is unquestionable when compared with the Statute of Westm. 1. made 3 E. 1. which was not eleven years after 49 H. 3. wherein the constituent parts of the Commune Concilium Regni are enumerated and expressed the Statute being made Per l'assentements des Archievesques Evesques Abbes Priors Countes Barons tout le Comminalty de la terre illonques summones Now because from that one Record of 49 H. 3. being the only Roll as yet found out it should be wonderfully observed and from thence infallibly concluded and nicked and by an ominous and influential Asterism of Rebellion and Treason marked that the very first Writs whereby the great Lords are said to be also first Summoned to send two Knights Citizens and Burgesses for each County City and Borough 〈◊〉 Parliamentum in Octabis Sanâ—ti Hillarii were made in this very year at that very Crisis of time nay tested on such very days when the rebellious Barons after the Battel of Lewes had the King and Prince in their power and exercised Regal Authority in his name under good favour seems not at all satisfactory and convincing to me until they give more certain and greater testimonials and evidence and answer these few Records If the Epocha of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses or Commons as now called and distinguished from the great Lords being first admitted a part of the Parliament and Legislative Power had such a Creation and Origine it is more than a wonder though the Parliament Rolls be destroyed that the Lieger Books Charters or Historians of that time either National or Foreign of which there are not a few or our antient Lawyers Bracton Britton Fleta and Hengham had not amongst many Narratives of far less moment and weight given posterity a remark or some short hint or memorial of so suddain so great and so universal a change or Catastrophe of the whole constitution and ancient frame of the English Government as that must unquestionably be admitted to be or some subsequent Chronologer had not so much as dreamed of it till of late or that branch in the ancient Coronation Oath of our Kings demanded by the Archbishop had not been omitted or ne ver administred which runs thus Concedis justas leges consuetudines esse tenendas promittis per te esse protegendas ad honorem Dei corroborandas quas Vulgus elegerit secundum vires tuas Respondebit Rex Concedo promitto The word Elegerit being admitted to be of the praeterperfect tense it certainly shews that the peoples Election had been the foundation and ground of antient Laws and Customs and the term of justas leges seems to allow a liberty of debate reason and argument so much as might be of efficacy and force to demonstrate and convince that the Laws so required by the Commons of the King were just and reasonable the debate and consideration of which certainly was never nor ever could be intended to be done in the diffusive capacity of all the Commons of England separatim but in an intire or in an aggregat body that is in their Communia Concilia or Parliaments And with this agrees the Statute of Provisors An. 25 E. 3. which saith Whereupon the said Commons have prayed our Soveraign Lord the King that upon the mischiefs and damages which happen to his Realm he ought and is bound by his Oath with the accord of his people in his Parliament thereof to make remedy and law and removing the mischiefs and damage which thereof ensue And this they say sith the right of the Crown of England and the Law of the Realm was such Nor indeed can I apprehend any colourable pretence much less a probable reason that if the Barons had 49 H. 3. usurped the Soveraign power into their hands they should 1. So easily and speedily divide and share it with the Commons constitute a new Court of Parliament and make them essential and coordinate with themselves in the Legislative Power sure we know it is natural for all Courts ampliare non diminuere Jurisdictionem 2. That at that Parliament the numerous Barons as they stile them should but summon 23. of their own Order when the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors and Deans made 120 if we must be concluded by the Records If there were then
two Houses of Parliament and that the Knights Citizens and Burgesses did not sit with the Lords the Prelates having so great advantage of the Temporal Lords in their Votes were very unkind to the Crown they made not use of their over-ballance for the delivery of the King and Prince then said to be in Custody 3. Nor have I yet met with any reasons given why when the Government of the whole Kingdom was at this Parliament of 49 H. 3. to be setled after so long and bloody a War the Barons being then so victorious and numerous as our modern Authors say they would by their absence hazard and endanger the loss of all by entrusting the Prelates and Commons with the over-ballance Many remarkable observations might be raised upon this Record both as to the Lords and Commons but I will now pass to my eight Argument concluding this with M r Pryâ—â—s opinion how the Parliament Rolls before E. 3. came to be lost or destroyed I will use his own words That there are no Records at all in the Tower except some few antient Charters or Exemplifications of them antienter than the first year of King John all the rest from William the first his Reign till then except some few in the Exchequer not relating to Parliaments being utterly lost the first Parliament Rolls yet remaining are these 5 8 9 and 19 th of King E. 2. the Statute Roll of H. 3. E. 1. E. 2. containing some Statutes made in their Reigns a Parchment Book of some Pleas in Parliament during the Reigns of King E. 1. and 2. and a few Bundles of Petitions in the Parliaments of 6 E. 1. and 1 2 3 and 4 E. 3. none of which are here abridged viz. in the Abridgment by him published only I find in the Clause Patent Charter and Fine Rolls of King John H. 3. E. 1 and 2. some Writs of Summons and some memorials of Acts Ordinances made and Aids Subsidies Dismes Quindisms Customs granted in Parliaments held during their Reigns the Rolls whereof are perished and quite lost either through the negligence of the Record Keepers or the Injury Iniquity of the times during the Civil Wars between the King and Barons in the Reigns of King John and H. 3. and betwixt the two Houses of Lancaster and York for the Title of the Crown wherein it is very probable the prevailing King's parties by their Instruments imbezled suppressed such Parliamentary Records and Proceedings as made most against their Interests Power Prerogatives Titles or through the default of our Kings great Officers and Attornies who sending for the Parliament Rolls out of the Tower upon special occasions never returned them again for reasons best known to themselves by means whereof those Parliament Rolls being no where to be found their defects must be supplied only out of such fragments and memorials of them as are extant in our other Records and antient Historians especially in Matthew Paris Matthew Westm. William of Malmesbury Henry Arch-Deacon of Huntingdon Roger de Hoveden Simeon Dunelmensis The Chronicle of Brompton Radulphus de Diceto Ranulphus Cestrensis and Thomas of Walsingham who give us some accompts of their proceedings and transactions which else had been utterly buried in oblivion as well as their Rolls wherein they were at large Recorded as is evident by the Parliament Rolls yet extant The EIGHTH ARGUMENT From the various opinions of the learned men in and since H. 8. who never dreamed of any such origine nor was it ever heard of till of late IT would be tedious to set down the various and wandring opinions and reasons of our modern Authors in English touching the beginning of our Parliaments and constituent parts thereof especially of the Commons as now called and comprehended in the Knights Citizens and Burgesses in Parliament I will but instance in a few eminent Authors and leave the Croud behind The great Antiquary Mr. Lamberd holds that they were before the time of William the First and there are other learned men who give their assent to that as a great truth Mr. Prynn saith By all the ancient Presidents before the Conquest it is most apparent That all our Pristine Synods and Councils were nought else but Parliaments that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voting in them as Members and Judges Polydore Virgil Hollinshead Speed and Martin are of opinion that the Commons were first summoned at a Parliament at Salisbury An. 16 H. 1. Sir Walter Raleigh in his Treatise of the Prerogative of Parliaments thinks it was Anno 18 H. 1. My Lord Bacon in a Letter to the Duke of Buckingham asks Where were the Commons before H. 1. gave them authority to meet in Parliament Dr. Heylin finds another beginning and saith that H. 2. who was Duke of Anjou was the first Institutor of our High Court of Parliament which being an Anjovian he learned in France But I cannot find that any of those ever supposed the Commons were first introduced in Parliament 49 H. 3. by Rebellion Nor was this opinion entertained by any Author I can meet with Anno 1529. 21 H. 8. for in an answer of that great and excellent person Sir Thomas More Lord Chancellor of England in his supplication of Souls against the supplication of Beggers discoursing about King Johns making in the 14 th year of his Reign and three years before his granting Magna Charta the Realm Tributary to the Pope declares his Judgment without any doubt or hesitation and therein as I take it the universal tradition and belief of all learned men of that and precedent times That the Clergy and all the Lords and Commons of the Realm made the Parliament in the age of King John and that never could any King of England give away the Realm to the Pope or make the Land Tributary without their grant whose Book and so his opinion we find approved of and published by a grave and learned Judge of the Kingdom Mr. Justice Rastall and dedicated to Queen Mary her self An. 1557. not much above a Century ago The NINTH ARGUMENT From the comparison of the antient Generale Concilium or Parliament of Ireland instanced An. 38 H. 3. with ours in England wherein the Citizens and Burgesses were which was eleven years before the pretended beginning of the Commons here AS great a right and priviledge surely was and ought to be allowed to the English Subjects as was to the Irish before 49 H. 3. and if that be admitted and that their Commune Concilium or Parliament had its Platform from ours as I think will not be denied by any that have considered the Histories and Records touching that Land we shall find the two ensuing Records An. 38 H. 3. clearly evince that the Citizens and Burgesses were then a part of their great Council or Parliament That King being in partibus transmarinis and the Queen being left Regent