more over their fellow-Presbyters or shepherds of the flock but commanded to give good example to their flock expecting not a triple Crown here on earth that perisheth but a Crown of Glory that fadeth not away which Christ the only chief Shepherd will give at the great day of Judgment to all his holy humble diligent and faithful Pastors And thus was the Church governed in the Primitive times communi conciâ—io Presbyterorum by the common Jerom. in Tit. 〈◊〉 1. Jerom. ad Evagrium council of the Presbyters as St. Jerome told the Pope himself and this Council was not such a pickt Council of Princely Cardinals of his own creatures and sworn vassals as the Popes is which hath only a shew of the ancient Government of the Church but is indeed a wicked combination against it a meer device to uphold his Usurpation tyranny power pride and Lordly dominion over the Princes of the world and the Churches and Church-officers of Jesus Christ But it was a common Council of fellow-Presbyters of the same Church chosen by the Church in which Council for necessary order sake was by common consent toâ— chosen for that time one Presbyter that was the most worthy grave aâ—â— able man to be president or if you will Speaker of that Council for tâ—â—â— time who had only a precedency of order but no more a superiority of jurisdiction over the Colledg of Presbyters than the Speaker of the House of Commons hath over the rest of his fellow-commoners in Parliament assembled here in England 2. That the Pope of Rome is not St. Peter ' s Successor either in his Apostleship for that was extraordinary and died with him or Bishoprick For Peter the Apostle was not properly a Bishop neither could he be as the word Bishop is now commonly taken with us For he was an Apostle of the whole Church and so could not be tyed to the Church of Antioch or Rome as Papists would make the world believe he was He that makes Peter the Apostle a Bishop brings him oâ—â— of the Parlor into the kitchin as Dr. Raynolds speaks of St. James the Apostle in his Conference with Hart. He that makes the King of England a Justice of Peace or the Lord Chief Justice of England a Justice of Peace but of one County Diocess City or Parish or Town unkings the King and Unlord-chief-justiceth the other Peter had no superiority of authority over the rest of his fellow-Apostles Peter was not the Rock upon which Christ promised to build his Church but that Confession that Peter made in the name of Christs Disciples Thou art Christ the Son of the living God And Peter had the same Commission from Christ and no other that the other Apostles had and they had the same that he had Peter was no more Bishop of Rome than S. Paul was Nay it can never be proved by Sacred Scripture that Peter the Apostle was at Rome at any time but that he was elsewhere above twenty years may be proved by Sacred Scripture and very probably that he was not at Rome when we cannot certainly prove him elsewhere in this or that particular place Obj. Papists out of Eusebius say thus That when Peter had laid the foundation Hart in Conference with Dr. Raynolds c. 6. D. 3. P. 257. of the Church at Antioch where be saâ—e Bishop seven years he went to Rome and preaching the Gospel there twenty-five years continued Bishop of that City Ans To this I answer thus 1. That though Eusebius was a â—â—arned man yet he was a meer man and not infallibly guided in his History and works as the Prophets and Apostles were 2. Eusebius is reproved by Pope Gelasius in a Council of seventy Bishops as false in his History which reproof is proved to be just by Canus viz. For his reporting of Christs Epistle to Agbarus and his avouching many things by Clemens Alexandrinus whereas the fable of the one and the works of the other are reproved by the Council And moreover he writeth in the same Chronicle That Sennacherib who besieged Jerusalem and Salmanassar who took Samaria were one and the same man which Saint * Com. in Isa 36. Jerom hath shewed to be contrary to holy Scripture as Dr. †Confer c. 6. d. 3. p. 258. Reynolds answers Hart. And he saith further That such another oversight is this of Peter ' s being seven years Bishop of the Church of Antioch and 25 years after that Bishop of the Church of Rome and he gives those probable reasons that others do give to prove That Peter was never at Rome He proves the first part of the story to be false and contrary to Sacred Scripture thus Peter by this account should have gone to Antioch about the 4th year after Christs death and there abode seven years even till the second * So Cornel. a Lapide Chron. Actuum Apostolorum pag. 3. year of Claudius the Emperor in †Cornel. a Lapide saith he went to Rome the third of Claudius in his Preface to the first Epistle of Peter which he went to Rome But the holy Scripture sheweth that Paul who was not presently converted after Christs death after three years found Peter at Jerusalem Gal. 1. 18. He went up to Jerusalem to see Peter and abode with him fifteen days And Peter after that abode within the coasts of Jury first at Lydda Act. 9. 38. then at Joppa where he tarried many days Act. 9. 43. then at Caesaria Act. 10. 48. then at Jerusalem Act. 11. 2 where Herod Agrippa cast him into prison in the second or * Cornelius a Lapide saith 't was in the third year of Claudius Chron. Act. Apostolor p. 3. the very time that he removed as he saith from his seven years sitting Bishop at Antioch to Rome and wrote his first Epistle Preface to the 1. Epistle of Peter Vid. Lightf Harmony p. 92. third year of Claudius as it is likely for he died in the fourth when the Church of Antioch was both †plainted and wâ—tered by others and not by Peter viz. by Barnabas and Paul and were called Christians before ever Peter câ—â— there And therefore the first branch of Eusebius his report that Peter having founded the Church of Antioch and that he sate there Bishop seven years in the second year of Claudius is flatly contrary to Scripture And Onuphrius in his Annotations upoâ— Platina in Vitam B. Petri Apostoli saith It is most clear and surely known by the Acts of the Apostles and Paul ' s Epistle to the Galatianâ— that for nine years after Christs death Peter never went out of Jury till the second year of the reign of Claudius and therefore he could not sit seven years Bishop at Antioch before he went to Rome Thus the former part of Eusebius his story being proved false why may not the latter part viz. that Peter after this sate twenty-five years Bishop of Rome be also false To which I
Law as the old Pharisees were of the Traditions of the Elders the latter swearing to him blind obedience all making a shew of Religion but under the pretence thereof devour widows houses they garnish and visit the Sepulchres of the Martyrs but shed the blood of Christs most faithful Ministers and members who observe the traditions and commands of the Pope but make void the commandments of God Mat. 15. Mat. 23. I know not any men under heaven more like the old Pharisees than these creatures of Antichrist in the Church of Rome are their Doctrines and doings declare them his Formalists who have it may be a form of godliness but denying the power thereof who make these latter times to be very perilous 2 Tim. 3. 3. That he challengeth Princely dominion over the Church of Christ and people and Nations needs no proof Three Popes of Rome successively forged and pleaded a forged Decree for the Pope of Rome's Supremacy his trampling upon Emperours and Kings making them to kiss his Toe hold his Stirrup deposing of them and making others making what Laws he pleaseth dispensing with and making void Gods Laws as he pleaseth releasing subjects of their allegiance to their lawful and godly Princes and commanding them to rebel against dethrone and destroy them and their most Christian and loyal Subjects In a word he exalteth himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped 2 Thes 2. 4. which is one great mark of Antichrist 4. That his usurped authority hath no good ground in holy Scripture but is expresly forbidden by our blessed Lord and Saviour Mat. 20 25 26. But Jesus called them i. e. his Disciples unto him and said ye know that the Princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them and they that are great exercise authority upon them but it shall not be so among you but whosoever will be chief among you let him be your servant Even as the son of man came not to be ministred unto but to minister and to give his life a ransome for many Luk. 22. 25. 1 Pet. 5. 3. Nether as being Lords over Gods heritage but being ensamples to the flock Neither in those places of Scripture where Christs Ecclesiastical Orders of Church-Officers are set down is there any mention of an Universal Bishop as 1 Cor. 12. 28. Ephes 4. 11. Peter the Apostle disclaims this Princely Monarchy and Supremacy when he called himself the Elders of the Churches Fellow Presbyter and forbid them to Lord it over Gods heritage 1 Pet. 5. 1 2 3. Cyprian in his Epistles to several Popes of Rome calls them brothers Jerom also writing to the Pope of Rome tells him and proves it too that by divine right a Bishop and a Presbyter is the same Act. 20. 17 28. Phil. 1. 1. Tit. 1. 5. 1 Pet. 5. 1 2. Ephes 4. 11. in his Epistle ad Oceanum that with the ancient Fathers Bishops and Presbyters were all one And adversus Lucifera nos he saith that a Bishops preferment was not by necessity of Gods Law but granted to him by the Church to honour him withall In his Epistle ad Evagrium handling this question at large he saith Who can endure his foolishness that preferred Deacons before Priests that is Bishops seeing the Apostle plainly teacheth that a Bishop and a Presbyter are all one And for proof he alledgeth Tit. 1. 5. Act. 20. 17. 28. Phil. 1. 1. 1 Pet. 5. 1 2. Ephes 4. 11. And of this judgment also was St. Augustine Chrysostome Beda Oecumenius Sedulius Primasius Theophilact Theodoret Anselm Ambrose John Wickliff Thom. Walden Luther Zuinglius Calvin Oecolampadius Melancthon John Lambert Martyr Bishop Hooper Bishop Bale Mr. Tindal Martyr Musculus Zanchius Bullinger Gualter Chemnitius Danaeus Chamier Junius John Bradford Mâ—rtyr Dr. Hâ—mphry Dr. Reynolds Dr. Hollard Professors of Divinity at Oxford Bishop This is Bishop Jewel's argument against the Pope in his Def. of his Apology Jewel Bishop Morton Dr. Whitaker Mr. Cartwright Dr. Willet Amandus Polauus Michael Medina among the Papists and many more that write upon the Sentences many of which may be seen in Mr. Masons defence of Ordination by Presbyters in the Reformed Churches where there are no Diocesan Bishops 5. That he produceth Antichristian * Antichristianism was covered for a long time under the Cloak of Orthodoxy and Ceremonial indifferency saith Mr. Tomson a Bishops Chaplain in his Antichrist arraigned p. 85. fruits practises and doctrines appears by his abominable pride superstition Idolatrous worships pretended miracles and lying wonders by his Council of Trent wherein he Decrees That mens persons are justified before God by their own good works and all the errors before confuted denying justification of mens persons before God by faith alone which Errors he labours to maintain by his Creatures as Bellarmine Stapleton Harding Cornelius a Lapide and others especially by the Jesuits and also introduâ—ing his Traditions and Apocryphal Scriptures in which are many things directly contrary to Gods word and Christs interest and upon these and some other accounts did our Church of England in King Edward the sixth his reign pray in her Litany thus From the tyranny of the Bishop of Rome and his detestable enormities good Lord deliver us 6. That he is the Babylonical Beast that hath two horns like a lamb and speaks as a dragon That is he professeth the innocency of Christ the Lamb of God but speaks and acts like a Dragon he uttereth blasphemous speeches thunders out cruel and unjust Excommunications against Christs servants and venteth and maintaineth Doctrines of Devils speaking lies in hypocrisie having his conscience seared with an hot iron forbidding to marry and commanding to abstain from meats which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving 1 Tim. 4. 〈◊〉 2 3. of them which believe and know the truth The tâ—â— horned beast by his Ecclesiastical and Temporal power pretending Orthodoxy and Ceremonial indifferency decency and order and Apostolical traditions better adorning and promoting Christianity restored the Image of the old Pagan Beast that is under these and some other pretences restored idolatry and tyranny again into the Roman Empire and persecution against the true Church of Christ The two Horned Beast in the 13th of the Revelations is say some the same with the great Whore arrayed in purple and scarlet that 〈◊〉 a golden cup in her hand full of all abominations and filthiness of her fornication upon whose forehead was a name written Mystery Babyloâ— the great the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth in the 17th of the Revelations But I humbly conceive with submission to better judgments that if this do not intend some other Beast like the great Whore of Rome as I fear it doth then the Whore or Church of Rome is in the 13th Chapter described by her Head and principal â—â—mbers chiefly because Horns signifie Powers And in the 17th Chapter she is described as taking in not oaly the Head and Cardinals but
so much holiness for as the Gospel teacheth us the spirit of Jesus is a good spirit an holy spirit a sweet spirit a lowly spirit a merciful spirit full of charity and love full of forgiveness and pity not rendering evil for evil extremity for extremity but over coming evil with good and remitting all offence even from the heart According to which rule if any man live uprightly of him it may be safely pronounced that he hath the Holy Ghost within him if not then 't is a plain token that he doth usurp the name of the Holy Ghost in vain Ye shall judg them by their fruits which if they be wicked and naught then 't is impossible that the tree of whom they proceed should be good Such were all the Popes and Prelates of Rome for the most part as doth well appear by the story of their * See Dr. Prideaux his Introduction to History from p. 77. to p. 155. there you 'l read of Usurping Nimrods Luxurious Sodomites Aegyptian Magicians devouring Abaddons incurable Babylonians Bishops of Rome Lives and therefore they are worthily accounted among the number of false Prophets and false Christs which deceived the world a long while The Lord of heaven and earth defend us from their tyranny and pride that they never enter into his Vineyard again to the disturbance of his silly poor flock but that they may be utterly confounded and put to flight in all parts of the world And be of his great mercy so work◠in all mens hearts by the mighty power of the Holy Ghost that the comfortable Gospel of his Son Christ may be truly preached truly received and truly followed in all places to the beating down of sin death †By K. Edward the sixth and Q. Elizabeth's Injunctions all Deans Archdeacons Parsons Vicars and Ecclesiastical persons were to the best of their skill to declare against the Bishop of Rome's pretended and usurped power and jurisdiction two times at least every year openly Art 1. but have not some of them really neglected it been ready to declare four times in the year for the Bishop of Rome's traditions inventions and dumb Ceremonies and that the Pope of Rome is not Antichrist the Pope the Devil and all the Kingdom of Antichrist that like scattered and dispersed sheep being at length gathered into one fold we may in the end rest togetogether in the bosom of Abraham Isaac and Jacob there to be partakers of eternal life through the merit and death of Jesus Christ our Saviour Amen Obj. But it may be objected by some that all this that is here in this Homily said against the Bishop of Rome and his Adherents may be said of some other Churches or at least against some other Bishops and their Adherents as have rejected the Bishop of Rome's authority as Mr. Mede observes that the Greek Churches have who imbrace the beasts impieties but refuse to be subject to him Ans To this I answer thus 1. with Mr. Mede and Dr. More that there may be little Babylons but Rome is Babylon the great they may be sister or daughter-harlots but Rome is the mother of harlots They may be little Misses but she is the great Whore other Churches may be corrupt in Doctrines of Faith and the Sacraments and the exercise of the Keys but none so corrupt as Rome is 2. If any Churches have retained too much of the Popes Doctrine Discipline Ceremonies Practises let them come out of Babylon that they partake not of her sins and receive not of her plagues Apoc. 18. 4. have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but rather reprove them 2. 'T is contrary to the Doctrine of the Church of Ireland which Church in her 80th Article of Religion saith thus The Bishop of Rome is so far from being the supream head of the universal Church of Christ that his works and doctrine do plainly discover him to be that man of sin foretold in the holy Scriptures whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth and abolish with the brightness of his coming 3. 'T is contrary to the Confession of Faith by the Church and Kingdom of Scotland and sworn to by King James and the Subjects of Scotland which saith thus But especially we detest and refuse the usurped authority of that Roman Antichrist upon the Scriptures of God upon the Church the civil Magistrate and consciences of men The whole Confession is very considerable and imitable to be seen in the latter end of the Harmony of Confessions 4. Not to mention what other Churches hold of the Pope of Rome's being the Antichrist yet because Dr. Heylin finds so much fault with the 80th Article of Cypr. Angl. lib 4. p. 269. 273. Ireland and pleads so much for Romish erroneous Doctrines as taught by our first Reformers and Martyrs but most falsely as I have shewed in some points before I shall give their sense of this point as I find their sayings set forth by Mr. Fox in his Book of Martyrs in one Volume Walter Mantell in his Apology prayeth thus I beseech the living God which hath received me to his mercy and brought to pass that I die stedfast and undefiled in his truth at utter defiance and detestation of all Papistical and Antichristian Doctrine I beseech him to keep and defend all his chosen for his names sake from the tyranny of the Bishop of Rome that Antichrist p. 1398. Q. Mary March 2. 1554. Bishop Hooper of whom Dr. Heylin boasts much to little purpose in his Letter of Consolation sent to certain godly brethren taken in Bow-Church-yard in Prayer and laid in the Counter in Breadstreet saith thus I have been sorry to perceive the malice and wickedness of men to be so cruel devilish and tyrannical to persecute the people of God for serving of God saying and hearing of the holy Psalms and the word of eternal life These cruel doings do declare that the Papists Church is more bloody and tyrannical than ever was the sword of the Ethnicks and Gentiles When I heard of your taking and what ye were doing wherefore and by whom ye were taken I remembred how the Christians in the Primitive Church were used by the cruelty of Be-like there are some Christned Heathens unchristned heathens in the time of Trajan the Emperour about 77 Christians of old looked upon and accused as Traytors and movers of sedition for serving the true God truly so now by Papists and such like years after Christs ascension into heaven and how the Christians were persecuted very sore as though they had been Traytors and movers of sedition whereupon the gentle Emperour Trajan required to know the true cause of Christians trouble A great learned man called Plinius wrote unto him and said it was because the Christians said certain Psalms before day unto one called Christ whom they worshipped for God When Trajan the Emperour understood it was nothing but Conscience and
which ought to be the rule of all mens religious actions declaim against and thereby condemn his Majesties piety and prudence and suppress in many places the Whosoever forbids us to do what God commandeth or commandeth us to do what God forbiddeth is accursed unto all them that love the Lord. Basilius Moral c. 14. quoted by Bishop Jewel in his Reply to Harding a. 14. d5 p 373. most pure worship and service of God the preaching up the real interests of the Lord Jesus Christ and the preaching down the Errors Heresies Idolatries and Suâ—â—â—stitions and Antichristian inventions of the Apostatized Church of Rome with whom the Laudensian party long laboured a reconciliation Let any unprejudiced man that is judicious seriously read Dr. Heylin's Cyprianus Anglicus and his Introduction thereunto and he will see much more than I do but hint and also what a mongrel Religion he would make ours and have established here and what principles of Tyranny and Popery he therein lays down and commends But though these things might be true in some heretofore yet now they see the error their selfish and passion hath led themselves and it may be others inconsiderately into that they may fear they shall be put besides the saddle it may be beaten with those rods which they made for other men that earnestly desired the Churches peacé and the Kingdoms welfare by any powerful ill-minded and ill-principled Prince as Heylin most falsely saith King Edward the sixth was of that will but make use of those weapons which they have made to subvert their dissenting brethren they are well content at least some of them to tolerate Protestant dissenters as may be seen in and about the Cities of London and Westminster and they preach against Popery very much Very good 't is well their eyes begin to be opened if they be not shut again before they 'l see and forsake the true causes and sin no more Old Bishop Bonner told them long since That liking of the Popes Broth would incline men to like in time their Beef too I wish their moderation might be known to all men But is a toleration of the pure Worship of God and preaching his truth all the fruit the sight of their error hath brought them to no question they I mean the Episcopal party would grant as much to home-born Papists 'T is granted to foreign Protestants though 't is true their great Father in God A. B. Laud overthrew that liberty of the Protestant Religion which King Edward the sixth Queen Elizabeth and King James granted them under hand and seal as Dr. Heylin largely shews in his Cyprianus Anglicus and thereby he made such an evil president as 't is believed did his present Majesty much mischief in his late Wars and rendred his gracious offers to the Netherlanders of protection and liberty of their Religion if they would come under his Government ineffectual lest such Bishops as A. B. Laud was should in time have though not his yet some succeeding Princes ears and thereby as he make void all grants and promises unto them What is no more to be granted to home-born Protestants who adhere to our doctrine of Faith and the Sacramants than to Foreigners Is granting a bare and uncertain toleration of the pure Worship of God to those godly Protestants that adhere most firmly to the pure Protestant Religion in Doctrine Discipline and Worship and a full comprehension with rewards and great promotions allowed and given to those that hold Popish Doctrines not only contrary to the Word of God but also to the sound Doctrine of the Church of England well becoming those Bishops that are in profession Protestant Is this a sufficient and the right way to keep out Popery is it proper for the chast Spouse of Christ to take upon her the badges of the great Whore of Rome Is it proper for the Israel of God to sâ—mbolize with her who is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt Is it proper for those that profess themselves the Saints and servants of the most high God and the followers of Jesus Christ to impose and contend for the proper marks of the Beast spoken of in Revelations the 1â— and 17 Chapters Doth not learned and religious Peter * Et nos si verè Christiani sumus non decet ritus caeremonias vel a Judoeis vel à nationibus aliis accipere sed tantum debem is usurpare quae nobis mandata sunt in literis divinis P. Martyr loc com clas 2 ae c. 5. S. 16. P. 220. Martyr say That if we be Christians indeed it becomes us not to receive Rites and Ceremonies from the Jews or other Nations but that we ought to use those things only which are commanded in the Divine Writings a Should we believe that those men †Aquin. 12 ae q. 103. a 2. Pet. Mart. loc Com. cl 2 ae p. 197. Pareus Beza in 1 Cor. 10. 18. those Jews who after pretence of sight of their errors are sound Christians and intend really to keep out and root out Judaism yet command and rigorously enjoin the use of the Rites and Ceremonies of the Jewish Religion which are the proper badges and real professions thereof as Papists themselves say and our men prove Can any rational sound Protestant be so silly as to think and say that if the Ceremonies be left in their use as the Bishops themselves say they are in their own nature indifferent that then farewell the Church of England For what is the Church of England like the Church of Rome built upon such sandy weak or unnecessary foundations or must the Kingdom be said to be so much in love with the Ceremonies of the Church of Rome as to give 400000 l. per Annum to the Bishops and their agents and dependants to uphold them Doth not the Church of England say * Homily against peril of Idolatry Part 3. p. 69. That the Church of Rome Knowing her self to be a foul filthy old withered Harlot understanding her lack of natural and true beauty and great lothsomeness which of her self she hath doth after the custom of such Harlots paint her self and deck and attire her self with gold pearl stone and all kind of precious jewels that she shining with the outward beauty and glory of them may please the foolish phantacy of some lovers and so entice them to spiritual fornication with her who if they saw her but in simple apparrel would abhor her as the foulest and filthiest Harlot that ever was seen Are not Ministers bound and do they not subscribe and give assent to this very Doctrine how can we then without great shame and suspicion wear her apparel and call her a true Church carry her name as it were in our foreheads comply with her in suâ—h unnecessary things except we have a months-mind to return to her ugly bosom and base drâ—â—gery Are not the Lords people forbidden Mark the word Unnecessary to do any
Habeant debitam reverentiam ad mensam Domini Heylin's Cypr. Anglic. l. 4. p. 403. Altare Christianum cap. 24. p. 175. A. B. Laud's Star-Chamber Speech pag. 48. l. 18. Laud and Dr. Pocklington argue for bodily reverence to the holy Altar or Gods board as they call it The Altar is the greatest place of Christs residence upon earth yea greater than the Pulpit for there 't is hoc est corpus meum this is my body but in the Pulpit 't is at most but hoc est verbum meum this is my word And a greater reverence no doubt is due to the body than to the word of our Lord and so in relation answerably to the throne where his body is usually present than to the seat where his word useth to be proclaimed Yea the Archbishop expresly calls this corporal bowing to or towards the Altar true Divine worship and he pleads for it upon a moral account in his Star-Chamber Speech p. 44 45. O come let us worship and fall down and kneel before the Lord Psal 95. 6. And in the 49 page of that Speech he saith That the Knights of the Garter are bound by their Order and Oath to give due honour and reverence Domino Deo Altari ejus in modum virorum Ecclesiasticorum to the Lord God and to his Altar and this in the manner as Ecclesiastical persons both worship and do reverence That is in plain English as 't was done in the time of King Henry the fifth by Idolatrous Priests in time of Popery which without doubt was worship not meer civil but as he calls it divine worship And Dr Pocklington in his Altare Christianum c. 24. p. 175. saith thus For as much as God hath put it into the hearts of the Governours of our Church to restore the Lords-Table to the ancient and true place it had in the Primitive Church and also to the honour and reverence â—hich of right belongs to it in regard of the presence of our Saviour whose chair of state it is upon earth Which honour and reverence he necessarily implies was adoration for chap. 21. p. 144. of the same Book he saith they honour reverence and adore towards it for his sake whose Sacrament is consecrated thereon And chap. 16. p 107. he saith the Archbishop of Constantinople whose example he brings and pleads for it did beseech his people to be quiet ut adoremus sanctum altare that is that we may worship or adore the holy Altar Religious reverence it is and must be that he saith is due to the holy Altar Where 't is observable that he makes to adore and to do reverence the same thing If bodily revâ—rence purposâ—ly performed to a religious thing called the most * Pocklington's Altâ—re Christ p. 157. holy place under the cope of heaven set purposely in a religious place or most holy place according to him and upon religious accounts of Gods most special presence or Christs true and real presence thereon Hoc est corpus meum be not religious or divine reverence which is worship I do acknowledg I do not know what it is But A. B. Laud saith That there is a reverence due to the Altar but such as comes far short of divine worship Star-Chamber Speech p. 49. But he doth not plainly say what it is meer civil worship he cannot mean for the reasons before given a meer negative reverence which is readily yielded is due he cannot mean neither for he pleads for a positive reverence expressed by bowing * Incurvation is by consent of Nations an appropriate sign of religious worship in a Temple saith Dr. H. More in his Mystery of Iniquity c. 11. p. 36. see more in him hereafter quoted Art 14. of this Book the body to the Altar it must therefore be a religious reverence which how it doth come far short of divine worship I do not yet see his Grace doth not tell us how to distinguish his reverence from divine worship I think that A. B. Laud's and his parties distinction between divine positive bodily worship and outward bodily positive reverence expressed by incurvation or bowing of the body to the holy Altar for it 's divine excellency is not much unlike that which the Papists make between their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they give outward divine worship to their Images but they call it only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reverence And do not A. B. Laud Dr. Heylin and others of his party give the same divine bodily reverence bowing the body to the holy Altar as such that they give God but they will not have it called divine worship but only reverence Which distinction saith Bishop Jewel is much like that of the Physicians wife who said Pepper is cold in working but hot in operation for their distinction is not in difference of matter but only words Cicero saith to one Bonum esse negas praepositum esse dicis Thou wilt not have worldly wealth called bonum but only praepositum dost thou thereby any thing abate avarice even so we say Mr. Harding ye will not have adoration of Images called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but Sir do ye by this any thing abate Idolatry So Bishop Jewel in his Reply to Harding Art 14. D. 12. p. 381 382. there ye may find Harding using almost the same words for reverence to his Images that our men use for reverence to their Altars It 's clear it is not a meer civil nor meer negative reverence that is by Papists and some of our men given to the holy and high Altar and it is as positive and as much external reverence as is given to God himself or would be given to Christ himself if he were corporally present on the Table and it is the same for substance that Idolaters give to their Altars Images and Idols and it is divine adoration when we bow the body upon some divine cause as Mr. Perkins saith in his Idolatry of the last times p. 824. Now yielding obeisance or outward reverence to or towards the Altar is done upon a divine cause viz. Gods special presence and therefore 't is called by them Gods Throne Gods chair of State and Gods mercy-seat And the same Mr. Perkins in the same Treatise p. 828. saith That Images themselves Reliques of Christ and Saints holy things as Temples Altars and such like are made Idols when they are adored and worshipped with religious worship for when we bow to them it is more than civil worship And p. 830. of the same Treatise he saith That if we will keep our selves from Idols we must take heed of keeping of Idols thas is Images that have been abused to Idolatry and are in likelihood still to be abused especially if they stand in publick places The commandment of God is to destroy the Idols of the heathen their altars and their high places Exod. 34. 13. Now 't is acknowledged by A.
creatures of God and therefore are not corporally to be adored or religiously worshipped or reverenced For not only Dr. * Omâ—â—s cultus religiosus Deo debetur Bell. Enter T. 2. l. 6. c. 5. p. 263. Ames but also A. B. †A. B. Usher Sum of Ch. Relig. upon 2d Com. p. 229. Vsher informs us That all religious worship and reverence is to be given to God alone and not imparted to those things which are not God at all And Bishop * Ser. upon 1 Cor. 11. 23. p. 50. Jewel saith that adoration belongs only to God but is given to the Sacrament without any warrant from Gods word Christ that best knew what ought to be done therein when he ordained and delivered the Sacrament appointed not that any man should fall down to it or worship it St. Paul that took the Sacrament at Christs hands and as he had taken it delivered it to the Corinthians yet never willed adoration * Nor kneeling at receiving it or godly honour to be given to it The old Doctors St. Cyprian Chrysostom Ambrose Jerome Augustine and others that received the Sacrament at the Apostles hands and as it may be thought continued the same in such sort as they had received it never made mention in any of their Books of adoring or worshipping of the Sacrament It is a very new device and as is well known came but lately into the Cburch about 400 years past Honorius being then Bishop of Rome commanded the Sacrament to be lifted up and the people reverently to bow down to it If the Sacrament for which you say the Altar or Table is to be reverenced be not adorable or religiously to be reverenced then certainly the Altar or Table is not religiously to be bowed to as you do but the Sacrament I have proved above is not religiously to be adored worshipped or reverenced Ergo the Table or Altar is not so religiously to be adored worshipped or reverenced 2. If the holy Table set Altarwise be therefore religiously to be reverenced because Christs body and blood is thereon Sacramentally corporally I have proved above he is not thereon then I say 1. That the Font should be so reverenced adored and bowed to because therein his body and blood is Sacramentally present too as Bishop * Bishop Jewel's Reply to Harding art 5. d. 10. p. 21. Jewel shews out of St. Augustine and others No man may doubt saith Augustine but that every faithful creature is then made partaker of Christs body and blood when in Baptism he is made the member of Christ And if A B. Laud's reason be good the * Star-Chamber Speech p 47. and so in relation to the Throne where his body is usually present Font is more to be reverenced than the holy Table because Christ is more usually present there than on the Table for the Sacrament oâ— Baptism is there more often administred than the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is on the Table and is for any thing I see as holy as the Table yea more holy by his reason 2. If the Archbishops reason in the Margen be good then should we much more bodily bow to or do reverence to the Pulpit for there Christs body and blood is mostly Quando * St. Jerome in Psal â—47 audimus Sermonem Domini caro Christi sanguis ejâ—â— in auribus nostris funditur that is when we heaâ—â— the word of God the flesh and the blood of Christ iâ— poured into our ears saith St. Jerome upon Psalm 147. quoted by Bishop Jewel in his Reply to Harding Art 12. D. 5. p. 337. and St. * Quest 1. Interrogo p. 7. Augustine saith Interrogo vos c. I demand of you this question my brethren answeâ— me Whether think you is †He means in dignity greater the body of Chrisâ— meaning thereby the Sacrament saith Bishop Jewel or the word of Christ if ye will answer truly this must we say that the word of God is no leâ—â— than the body of Christ Which is directly contrary to A. B. Laud's assertion and reason of it And St. Jerome upon Psal 147. saith Ego corpâ—â— Basilius saith Christ called his flesh and blood the whole mystical Doctrine of his Gospel which he published in his dispensation in the flesh Epist ad Caesarienses quoted by Bishop Jewel Reply to Harding a. 14. d. 8. p. 375. Credere in eum est manducare panem vivum August Tract 26. in Johan Jesu Evangelium puto quamvis quol Christus dicit qui non manducat mean carnem c. possit intelligi de mysterioâ— tamen verius corpus Christi sanguis ejâ—â— sermo scripturarum est Joh. 6. 53. Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of God and drink his blood ye have no life in you That is except ye spiritually feed on Christ by faith which may be done as well in hearing and receiving the worâ— preached as in receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper administred ye have no spiritual life in you That is I take the body of Jesâ—â— to be the Gospel Although these words of Christ he that eateth not my flesh c may be taken of the Sacrament yet in truer sense thâ— word of the Scripture is the body of Christ And * In Exod. Hom. 13. Origen saith Quod si corpus Christi utâ— inimitantâ cautela quomodo putatis minoris esse periculi verbum Dei neglexisse quam corpus ejus If ye take such heed in keeping the Sacrament which is called his body how can ye think there is less danger in neglecting the word of God than there is in neglecting the Sacrament which is called his body If saith Bishop Jewel the Sacrament were in deed and really the body of Christ and so our very Lord and God thus to compare it with the creature and to make it inferiour unto the same as St. Augustine St. Jerome Origen and other godly Fathers do it were great blasphemy This also is directly contrary to A. B. Laud's Doctrine these things and many more Quotations ye may see in Bishop Jewel's Reply to Harding Art 21. D. 10. p. 451 452. Besides the bread and wine are consecrated by the word of God and prayer and therefore cannot be more eminent than the word of God The less is blessed of the better Heb. 7. 7. 3. If the Altar or holy Table be to be bowed to more than the Pulpit because 't is Christs Throne his Mercy-seat and Chair of State then it will follow that the Pulpit is as adorable or to be bowed to as much as if not more than the holy Table For 1. the Pulpit is called the Tribunal of the Church 2. Though I find not in any ancient orthodox Author that the Communion-table is called a Throne either of God or man Cyprian l. 4. Epist 5. quoted by Dr. Pocklington Altare Christianum c. 8. p. 44. yet I find in * Athanas in Epist
is cultus religiosus of which incurvation in such circumstances is assuredly one kind I mean exhibited to either an invisible power or to its visible representation in an Image And consent of Nations Dr. More Mystery of Iniquity c. 11. p. 36. hath made it an appropriate sign of religious worshipâ— especially in a Temple Yea c. 5. p. 14. of the same learned Book he saith thus To do religious worship to the picture or image of any creature of any Person of the holy Trâ—nity or of all three or particularly to the image of Christ though this religious worship is intended to pass through the representation to God himself Father Son or Holy Ghost is notwithstanding Idolatry according to the second instance where worshipping the true God by an image is proved to be Idolatry and every thing that is not God that hath religious worship given to it thereby becomes an Idol And c. 14. p. 46. of the same Book he saith That an Idol and Images in religious worship are all one one is a Latin and the other is a Greek word they both signifie the likeness of some thing and the worshipping of the true God by an Idol is Idolatry And p. 50. of the same Book he saith That whatsoever is interposed betwixt God and us by way of God in our worshipping is not an help but an hinderance to the perfection of that worship You may read much more to this purpose in that useful and learned Book but I forbear Now apply this to your Altars and corporal bowing to them upon your religious accounts of divine excellency and then I believe you will be forced either to acquit the Papists yea the Jews of Idolatry in worshipping the true God by Images or representations or else you must condemn your selves of Idolatry and will I hope renounce it But lest this should not suffice consider what other of our learned Divines say To worship God in at or before an image purposely is Idolatry and superstition and God so worshipped is made an Idol which is forbidden Deut. 4. 15 16 17 18 19. So Perkins in his Cases of Conscience l. 2. c. 11. S. 2. p. 206. A. B. Vsher upon the second Commandment saith 1. That such are Sum of Christ Religion p. 229. 230. guilty of Idolatry as worship those things that are not God 2. Such as countenance them or do any thing to the furtherance of Idolatry and that outward religious adoration of those things that are not God is forbidden in the second Commandment and that this worship be denied to every thing that is not God as the Sun and Moon Angels Saints Reliques Images and such trash as Rome alloweth Deut. 4. 17 19. Col. 2. 18. Revel 19. 10. 22. 8 9. Act. 10. 25 26. That Idem ibidem p. 232. we must not give the least token of reverence either in body or soul unto any religious Images Psal 97. 7. Hab. 2. 18. Isa 44. 15. Exod. 32. 4. for that is a further degree of Idotry as to shrine clothe or cover them with precious things to light candles before them to kneel and creep to them or to use any gestures of religious adoration unto them 1 King 19. 18. wherein although the gross Idolatry of Popery be taken away from amongst us yet the corruption cleaveth still to the hearts of many as may be seen in them that make courtesie to the Chancel where the high Altar stood and give the right hand unto standing Crosses and Crucifixes c. Now upon this account do our learned Divines condemn the Papists as guilty of Idolaty for their worshipping as they say Bishop Andrews upon 2 d. Comm. p. 279. the true God before or in or by Images or Crucifixes as some amongst us do before in or by or through their Altars And indeed I think they are as much Idolaters as the Heathens were who as the Ancients say and prove out of the Heathen Authors that they intended not the worship of their Images of Jupiter * Bishop Andrews ubi supra A. B. Usher upon 2 d. Comm. in Sum of Christ Religion p. 232. Mars but those Deities as they called them whom they represented as the Papists pretend they worship not the Image but the thing represented by it 8. That is an abuse of Gods Ordinance to use any thing that God hath commanded for his Worship otherwise than he himself hath appointed forbidden in the second Commandment as to hang pieces of St. John ' s Gospel about mens necks c. 1 Chron. 15. 13. 2 King 18. 4. 2 Sam. 6. 3 7 8. So saith reverend A. B. Usher Now though it be Sum of Christ Relig. p. 226. granted that God hath appointed the Communion-table as an help or mean for the decent comely and orderly celebration of the Sacrament of the Lords-Supper viz. To be consecrated and set thereon to shew forth the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 11 24 25. yet he hath not appointed it to be used in his worship as a mean motive or memorative object to mind men of and move them to adoring him or worshipping God before towards in or by it Good King Hezekiah's breaking the Brazen Serpent set up by Moses at Gods command when 't was abused to Idolatry is a good president for good Magistrates to destroy Altars and restore Communion-tables when set up altarwise against the East-wall of the Chancel and abused to Idolatry to their ancient place the body of the Church and forbid their subjects purposely and upon any religious accounts whatsoever to bow or adore or do bodily reverence to or towards them 9. If to bow corporally versus altare or worship God towards the Communion-table purposely and upon religious accounts it being will-worship be not flat Idolatry yet 't is a manifest appearance of Popish Idolatry which should be carefully avoided 1 Thes 5. 22. Abstain from all appearance of evil Upon which place Bishop * Exposition in locum Jewel saith thus Be not Idolaters leave off to do any thing that may bring you into suspition of Idolatry give not that honour unto any creature which is proper unto God Have no fellowship with their works bear no appearance of liking their evil Abstain from appearance of evil in word and deed it 's an appearance of evil needlesly to use Idolaters words as Priest Altar Sacrifice as they do it 's a greater appearance of evil and the more to be avoided to set our Communion-tables altarwise it 's a preparation to make them Altars and to bowing to them and it 's the greatest appearance of evil and the more to be abstained from when any Crucifix or Image is set upon the altar or on the wall or glass window over or near it as was in times of professed Popery and in some places in A. B. Laud's time directly contrary to the drift of the Homily against the peril of Idolatry and Queen Elizabeths Injunctions so much
pleaded Who commanded that all Monuments and occasions of Idolatry should be pulled down and that the ten Commandments should be set upon the east-wall over the Table vid. Collection of Orders p. 124. I pray read and consider what Dr. * Rise growth of Socinianism c. 5. p. 36. Cheynell saith of this matter Crucifixes must be had and set up at the east-end that was too plain next the Communion table to colour this design or at least to add varnish to it must be advanced into an altar and men must by a tacite consent as we were informed at the Visitation of Merton Colledg express some outward reverence by bowing towards the East the Altar the Crucifix chuse which you please all if you will but in no case must we be commanded to bow and yet we must be censured as disobedient if we refuse to bow this saith he was interpreted by rational men an asking of our consent to bring in Popery it was now high time to make protestations that we would bow neither to East nor Hoast nor Altar Mr. Hildersham saith That if any part of Upon Joh. 4. Lect. 33. p. 143. heaven be more unfit for us to turn our faces towards in prayer than other the East is the unfittest because we find Idolaters blamed for doing so Ezek. 8. 16. which we cannot find noted in any other part And he brought me into the inward Court of the Lords house and behold at the door of the Temple of the Lord between the Porch and the Altar were about twenty-five men with their backs towards the Temple and they worshipped the Sun towards the East The Temple of God was so built that the Sanctum Sanctorum was in the western part of it the entrance into it was in the Eastern part of it and when any service was done by the people or Priests in prayer or sacrifice they performed it with their faces westward towards the ark and boliest of holies and their backs were eastward which the Lord in wisdom purposely ordered to be so that he might prevent Eastern and Sun-worship and the * Dr. Heylin saith That worshipping towards the East was so common that it drew the Primitive Christians into suspition of being worshippers of the Sun Cyp. Angl. Introduct S. 18. p. 17. and hath been so common among us appearance thereof which was the practise of the Gentiles then Now if God in wisdom purposely ordered his house so and placed his Ark and Mercy-seat the Types of his special presence that the Priest and people might look Westward and not Eastward to avoid Eastern Sun-worship and the appearance thereof which was the worship of the Gentiles that lived about them sure there is as much reason for us Protestants to avoid purposely worshipping God towards the East or Altar which our learned Divines have judged to be Will-worship or Idolatry in the Papists who live not only about us but amongst us And this learned King James of famous memory thought a good reason to be seen in the Conference at Hampton-Court p. 74. who there speaking to the objection against the Surplice That 't was a kind of garment which the Priests of Isis used to wear surely said his Majesty till of late I diâ— not think that it had been borrowed from the Heathen because it 's commonly termed a rag of Popery in scorn but were it so yet neither did we now border upon the heathenish Nations neither art any of them commorant amongst us whâ— thereby might take * This is a good argument against our using the Surplice because we live amongst Papists who do thereby take occasion to be confirmed in Papism and in their superstitious using of it occasion to be strengthned or confirmed in Paganism For theâ— THERE WERE JUST CAUSE TO SUPPRESS THE WEARING of it But now we have bowing to Altars from the Papists who are our neighbours and live amongst us who may and no doubt but they will take occasion to strengthen themselves in their Superstition and Idolâ—try hearing us call our Ministers Priests and our Communion-tables Altars and seeing us turning and setting them altarwise and setting Dr. Pocklington pleads for aâ— Altar with a â—râ—ss upon it in his â—unâ—ay â—o 〈◊〉 p. 48 50. and in his 〈◊〉 Chrâ—st c. 21. â— â—â—3 of Candlesticks and Tapers on them and Crucifixes and Images on or oveâ— them and bowing to them it may make them believe that they have been and are in the right That Christs body is corporally present in the Sacrament and on the Table and that Divine honour is due to a thing ratione contactus as they say there is divine honour due to the Cross because Christs body touched it and that the Sacrament is an unbloody and propitiatory Sacrifice which they offer up to God upon the holy Altar and therefore they need not make one step towards us seeing we are coming so fast towards of them as knot the Jesuit and others of them observed Men use * Dr. Heylin's Cyprianus Anglicus l 4. p. 252 253. Dr. Cheynells rise and growth of Socinianism c. 6. p 70. 64. willingly the once fearful names of Priests and Altars c. Object But 't is objected That David Daniel and the Jews worshipped towards Gods Ark Mercy-seat Temple and Jerusalem therefore men may do so now towards the holy Altar Answ To this I answer 1. That these places were holy by the special institution and presence of God and hence is Jerusalem called the holy city Mat. 4. 5. Mat. 27. 53. and so the Temple of God in Jerusalem is called the holy Temple Psal 5. 7. And the Temple was called holy because God had chosen and sanctified it to put his name there for ever and in which he promised that his eyes and his heart should be perpetually 2 Chron 7 16. And hence 't is said that Hannah who prayed in the Temple at Shiloh prayed before the Lord and that Elkanah and his wives worshipped before the Lord 1 Sam. 1. 12 19. because the Lord was specially present there and hence it was that when the Jews could not go up to the Temple that they looked towards it and Daniel opened his windows towards Jerusalem where the Temple was when he prayed Dan. 6. 10. 1 King 8. 48. And in the Temple one place was more holy than another for there was the Holy of Holies Heb. 9. 2 3. 2. That they were commanded so to do Deut. 12. 5 6 7 11 12 13 14 15. 3. Jerusalem as comprehending the Temple was a * Hom. for repairing of Churches T. 2. p 78. Type of Christ and therefore were they to look towards it when they prayed And Solomon prayed that God would be present there and that he would hear the prayers of his people when they pray towards the city which he had chosen 1 King 8. 44. 45. and in 1 King 9. 3. you may read That God heard Solomons prayers which he made before
imputed to believers for Justification but that Mediatory righteousness of Christ whereby he suffered for our breach of Gods most righteous Law which deserves Gods curse Gal. 3. 13. and actively fulfilled the whole Moral Law of God for us which we were bound to do Levit. 18. 5. Gal. 3. 13. Gal. 4. 4 5. Mat. 3. 15. If a Creditor cast his debtor into prison for non-payment of such a sum of money as he owed him till he be payed the money or otherwise satisfied for his debt upon his sureties or friends coming to him and paying him all the money and he taking accepting and allowing of it as full and perfect satisfaction to him for the debt doth impute it or reckon it or put it upon his account and consequently to him as though it were paid and made by his debtor in person himself and doth therefore in manifestation thereof deliver up his bond or cross his Book and release him out of prison So 't is here Gods accepting taking and allowing of our Saviour Jesus Christs our sureties active and passive obedience for us as though actually and personally performed by us as full and perfect satisfaction to his Justice and thereupon we applying it by Faith pardoning our sins delivering of us from the curse of the Law formally punishments and eternal death doth thereby impute his obedience or righteousness to us that by Faith in Christ do make application of it to our selves Now the Minor is the express Doctrine of the Church of England and Ireland Homily for Salvation p. 13 14 15 16 17. And this Justification or righteousness which we so receive of Gods mercy and Christs merits imbraced by faith is taken * Mr. Fowler himself makes Justification and acceptance with God all one Free Disc p. 134. accepted and allowed by God for our full and perfect justification And again Homily for Good-Friday T. 2. p. 175. Neither was it possible for us to be loosed of this debt of our own ability it pleased him that is Christ our Surety to be the payer thereof and to discharge us quit his paying our debt meritoriously discharging us quit necessarily implys that God did accept of the merits of his death and doings for us And Ibi. p. 177. Christ was obedient to his Father even to the death and this he did for us all that believe in him And such favour did he purchase for us of his heavenly Father by his death that for the merit thereof if we be true Christians indeed and not in word only we be now fully in Gods grace again and clearly discharged from our sins those expressions that Christ did purchase for us Gods favour and clearly discharged us from our sins manifest it to all the world that God did accept and take and allow as full satisfaction of what Christ did for us Again Ibi. p. 187 188. Christ by his own oblation and once offering himself upon the Cross hath taken away our sins and restored us again into Gods favour so fully and perfectly that no other sacrifice for sin shall hereafter be requisite or needful in all the world And in the 34th Article of Religion of the Church of Ireland they say thus We are accounted righteous before God only for the merit of our Lord and Saviour Jâ—sus Christ applied by Faith and not for our own works or merits And this righteousness which we so receive of Gods mercy and Christs merits imbraced by Faith is taken accepted and allowed of God for our perfect and full Justification And in 35th Article they say thus And whereas all the world was not able of themselves to pay any part towards their ransome it pleased our heavenly Father of his infinite mercy without any desert of ours to provide for us the most precious merits of his own Son whereby our ransome might be fully paid the Law fulfilled and his Justice fully satisfied So that Christ is now the righteousness of all them that truly believe in him He for them paid their ransome by his death he for them fulfilled the Law in his life that now in him and by him every true Christian may be called a fulfiller of the Law for as much as that which our infirmity was not able to effect Christs justice hath performed And this Doctrine viz. that Christ hath for us made a full and perfect satisfaction to Gods Justice is the express Doctrine of the Church of England in her Order of the Communion which saith there That Jesus Christ did suffer death upon the Cross for our Redemption and that he made there by his own oblation of himself once offered 〈◊〉 full perfect and sufficient sacrifice oblation and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world And Homâ—ly of Christs Nativity T. 2. p. 169. Christ made perfect satisfaction by his death for the sins of all people And that God doth take accept and allow it as full and perfect satisfaction for the sins of all his elect people is most evident by the holy Apostles Creed which the Church of England also believeth as well as by the holy Doctrine of the Canonical Scriptures which hold that Jesus Christ did not only die and was buried and was for a time held under the power of death and the grave which was as his imprisonment but that he was raised again for our Justification which declared that God was fully satisfied with what he had done and suffered else he would not have let him out of Prison Rom. 4. 25. And that he ascended up into heaven and there sitteth at the right hand of God and that from thence he shall come to iudg both quick and dead Rom. 8. 34. Heb. 1. 3. And God hath declared that in him he is well pleased Mat. 3. 17. Mat. 17. 5. And that we are compleat in him Col. 2. 18. And that we are justified in and by him Rom. 3. 24. And that we have peace with God through him Rom. 5. 1 2. And that there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus Rom. 8. 1. And that he saves his people from their sins to the uttermost Mat. 1. 21. Heb. 5. 25. Of which you may see much more hereafter in the 13th particular concerning Purgatory To pass by many more arguments 4 Sacred Scripture doth evidently hold it forth unto all that will not wilfully shut their eyes or that are not judicially blinded 1. Jer. 23. 6. This is the name whereby Christ shall be called that is by all Gods people the Lord our righteousness * See Bishop Andrews his Sermon in locum All Gods people shall profess that they have their righteousness from Christ which is in effect the same with Isa 45. 25. In the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified and shall glory All the spiritual seed of Israel that is all Gods Elect shall be justified that is shall obtain remission of their sins and right to everlasting life by virtue of the Son
〈◊〉 may be sufficiently yea abundantly proved by that which hath been said Cur gratia Dei sit efficax in quibusdam id dependit a voluntate hominum Bel. lib. 1. de graet lib. arbitr c. 12 13. before but that this efficacious grace of God in converting an elected sinner is not finally resistible by the will of man as Papists and * See the 3d and 4th Chapters of the Synod of Dort and therein the Remonstrants 8th error rejected about Conversion Arminians would make the world believe may further be proved by the Homily for Rogation-week T. 2. part 1. p. 21â— God doth what liketh him none can resist him for he worketh all things in his secret judgment yea even the wicked to damnation as Solomon saith and the Scripture saith Who hath resisted his will Rom. 9. 19. that is his effectual will in regenerating an elected sinner and God in his effectual calling or converting a sinner taketh away the resistibility against it out of his heart Ezek. 36. 26 27. A new heart will I give you and a new spirit will I put within you and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh and I will give you an heart of flâ—sh and I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statutes and ye shall keep my judgments and do them Isa 43. 13. I will work saith God and who shall let it Job 9. 12. Behold he taketh away who can hinder him Isa 14. 24. The Lord of Host hath sworn Surely as I have thought so shall it come to pass as I have purposed so shall it stand V. 27. The â—ord of Hosts hath purposed and who shall disannull it Now Gods election of man is frequently called his purpose as Rom. 8. 28. Rom. 9. 11. Ephes 1. 11. To Papists I might urge â—sâ—her 13. 8 9. Lord Almighty King for the whole World is in thy power and if thou hast appointed to save Israel there is none that can gain-say it v. 11. no man can resist thee Ephes 3. 11. 2 Tim. 1. 9. Moreover if man can always resist the efficacious grace of God in converting an elected sinner then it might come to pass nay it would come to pass most certainly that Jesus Christ should have no peculiar people for the corrupt will of man cannot incline to imbrace the grace of God that is offered in the Word and Ordinances of God till the Spirit of Christ by saving * Deus qui voluntatem praeparat ipse eam donat quam si per suam gratiam homini non dederit nunquam potest homo in Deum velle credere Fulgentius de veritate praedestinat l. 1. grace do overcome and change the perversness of it and make it willing for though to will is of nature yet to will well is of grace It is God that worketh in 〈◊〉 both to will and to do of his good pleasure that is to will and to do well Phit 2. 13. as the Articles and Homilies and Liturgy of the Church of England ubi supra do abundantly declare Or 〈◊〉 Jesus Christ should have a peculiar people then he must by these meâ—â— Doctrine viz. That mans will can ponere obicem and always resiâ—â— Gods will and determine to refuse Gods grace offered yea reject it beiâ—â— wrought in him which indeed implies a contradiction be beholding to man for it who determined himself to accept of his gracious offers all which would otherwise have beeâ— in vain and ineffectual Lastly Bellarmine * Bellar. l. 3. de gratia c. 3. Ames Bellar. Enervat T. 4. l. 3. c. 3. de efficaci gracia p. 56. himself setting down the vanous opinions of men about effectual grace saith this is the first The first opinion is of them that do plaâ—â— efficacious grace in mans assent and co-operation so that it 〈◊〉 called efficacious grace from the event because it doth dispâ—â—â— the effect and therefore it doth dispose the effect because maâ—â— will doth co-operate or help with it This opinion saith hâ—â— is altogether alien from the judgment of St. Augustin and aâ—â— of the Sacred Scriptures it overthrows the foundation of Goâ—â— Predestination and abuseth the woâ—â— effectual grace * Wendelin Christ Theol. l. 1. c. 3. p. 132. Wendelin saith which is the meer and special frâ—â— gift of God to the free will of man corrupt and dead in sins as that 't is in mans power to believe or not believe do plainâ—â— broach a Pâ—lagâ—an-heresie contrary to the whole Scripture Effectual grace is not a physical action whereby God doth compel the will of Vid. August l. de correct gratia c. â—4 Cui volenti saâ—vum facere nulâ—um bomiâ—um resistit arbitrium c. Hier. in Ephes c. 1. Illt â—â—nullus resistere potest quia omnia quae voluerit faciat Aquin. 〈◊〉 q. 103. a. 8. 9. 19. 2. 6 c. ad 3. mâ—n or physically determine it without its own proper deliberation for a supernatural effect cannot be produced by a natural operation and so man nilling should be converted and believe which implies a contradiction neither is this effectual gracâ— only a moral perswasion in it self in different to which it is in mans power to yield or oppose for so God should not work more effectually in converting man than the Devil and seducers do in keeping him from conversion and the efficacy of grace should not consist in the motion of God but in the strength of arguments and so there should be placed in the will of man unconverted an aptitude of obeying that moral perswasion and converting himself but effectual grace is a supernatural action or work of God whereby he doth outwardly by his word and other appointed means and inwardly by the efficacy of his Spirit not physical action but divine secret and ineffable motion illuminate the blind mind of man change make new and convert the perverse will of man that the will being renewed doth begin by its own free election to will and chuse the good that is shewed it from the enlightned understanding And by this effectual grace God doth so work upon the will of man that his will doth no longer resist the grace of God but comply with Gods Will and wills what he wills Of this see further Nihil in libero arbitrio constitutum superat voluntatem Dei Aug. Enchir. c. 100. Nothing is in mans will can over-power Gods will the Synod of Dort Chapter 3 and 4. of Conversion Articles 10 11 12 13 14. and Errors 6 7 8. rejected by them See also the Confession of Faith made by the Assembly of Divines c. 10. of effectual calling Article 1 2. and the 33d Article of Religion of the Church of Ireland and the 9th Article of Lambeth It is not in the free choice and power of every man to be saved ART VIII That truly regenerated persons cannot Bellar. l. 2. de justificatione c. 14. Synod of Dort 3d
for in King Hen. 8. and in the second of King Edward the sixths days the people were appointed to pray for their deliverance from the Tyranny of the Bishop of Rome and his detestable Enormities Now from this sound Doctrine of the Church of England I hope I may have leave without offence to our Heylinists to prove the Pope of Rome successively to be the Antichrist the holy Scripture writes of As thus He that under the pretence of Religion being the Servant the Vicar of Christ and the Successor of Peter is the Inventor and setter up of Superstitious and Pharisaical Sects which are against the Word of God and the glory of his name that challengeth and exerciseth Princely dominion over Nations and people and dominion over the Church of Christ which is his Kingdom whose usurped authority hath no good ground in holy Scripture that produceth Antichristian fruits practises and doctrines affirming that a man can by his own works take away and purge his own sin and justifie himself and denying this Doctrine that a man is justified alone by faith That is the Babylonical beast that is the successor of the Scribes and Pharisees the spoiler and destroyer of Christs Church the instrument and minister of Satan the head of that Antichristian Babylonical Sect which say of Jerusalem that is the true Church of God Down with it even to the ground whose Religion is rebellion whose Faith is faction and whose practise is murdering of souls and bodies is not to be accounted a Christian man the Vicar of Christ the Successor of Peter but an adversary to Christ and his Gospel That is Antichrist the Antichrist the holy Scripture writes of But the Pope of Rome successively is so and 〈◊〉 therefore he is the Antichrist the holy Scripture writes of The major is the Doctrine of the Church of England The Minor is also very largely proved in every particular by Dr. Henry More in his Learned and Elaborate and Ingenious Book called The Mystery of Iniquity which deserves seriously to be read and compared with the Doctrine and practises of the Church of Rome The full proof of the Minor would take in the whole Body of Popery which is learnedly confuted by Dr. Ames in his Bellarminus Enervatus Festus Hommius in his seven Theological Disputations against the Papists and others Yet I shall take the pains to set down some of the heads and leave you to apply them 1. The Pope of Rome is not as he pretends to be Christs Vicar General here on earth 1. Papists do not prove that the Pope of Rome is Christs Vicar General either in Temporals or Spirituals by Sacred Scripture 2. Christ is such an Head of his Church that he needs not such a Vicar on Earth as the Pope pretends to be for Christ is God as well as Man and is ever with his Church and will be even to the end of the world Mat. 18. 20. Mat. 28. 20. Lo I am with you even to the end of the world 3. To set up the Pope of Rome to be Christs Vicar is to deny Christs presence with his Church For a Vicar is one that doth supply the place of one that is absent and it is to deny Christ to be the Monarch of his Church and saith in effect that he is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and makes the Church of Christ monstrous Biceps having two heads 4. The Officers that Christ hath appointed in his Church are not his Vicars but his Ministers Stewards c. their Office is not Magisterial but only Ministerial 5. When Christ ascended up into Heaven he did not commit the Government of his Church Universal to one man but to the whole Colledg or company or society of his Apostles Joh. 20. 21. Christ said to all his Apostles except Thomas that were alive this As my Father sent me even so send I you c. Here Christ performed that which he promised to Peter Mat. 16. 19. And I will give thee c. That was but a promise of this gift here Christ performed it to him and to all his Disciples to whom in Peter the promise was made Read also for this Mat. 28. 18 19 20. And when the Apostles died they did not institute one particular man over the whole Universal Church of Christ on Earth but ordained fit men in every particular Church or Congregation of believers to rule it and gave them authority and a charge to govern it by common counsel as ye may see was the practise of two Apostles when they solemnly took their leave of the Churches which they had planted Act. 20. 28. Take heed therefore unto your Hooker saith That the Apostles themselves ordained only in each Christian City a Colledg of Presbyters and Deacons to administer holy things Evaristus a Bishop of Rome about 112 years after the Birth of our Saviour begun the distinction of the Church into Parishes Ecclesiast Pol. l. 5. p. 433. And in the end of the same he saith That Presbyters and Deacons having been ordained before to exercise Ecclesiastical Functions in the Church of Rome promiscuously he was the first that tyed each one to his own station selves and to all the flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Bishops as he there calls all the Elders of the Church of Ephesus to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood Here you may see that the Government of the Church of Ephesus was committed not to one singular man alone over the flock and the Pastors too as Papists would have but to the whole Presbytery or company of Presbyters whom Paul sent for at Miletus Act. 20. 17. to whom he gave this authority and charge Read also I pray what St. Peter saith whose Successor the Pope pretends to be to the Elders that is the Presbyters of the Churches of Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bythinia 1 Pet. 5. 1 2 3 4. The Elders which are among you I exhort who am also an Elder he doth not say Bishop much less Bishop of Bishops but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow-Presbyter and a witness of the sufferings of Christ also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed Feed the flock of God which is among you not far distant from you taking the oversight thereof not by constraint but willingly not for filthy lucre but of a ready mind neither as being Lords mark this over Gods heritage but being ensamples to the flock of humility holiness meekness righteousness patience constancy charity mercy c. not of pride prophaneness tyranny injustice cruelty beastiality covetousness c. And when the chief sâ—epherd Christ shall appear that is come to Judgment ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away Lo here again the Government of the Church is not committed to one man or Bishop but to the Presbyters of the Churches and they forbidden to Lord it over the flock much
add further that 't is evident by Gal. 1. 18 that after three years after Paul return from Arabia he returned to Damascus which might be 〈◊〉 or seven years after Christs death For Papists write that Pâ—â— was converted the 20th year of Tiberius the Emperour which was the second year after Christs death as they themselves reckoâ— And he went after he received his sight to Damascus and then preached Jesus Christ Act. 9. 19 20 22. and thence went into Arabia and thence returned to Damascus again and there preaâ—â—ched and then after three years he went up to Jerusalem to sâ—â— Peter and abode with him fifteen days which could not be 〈◊〉 above six years after Christs death Then fourteen years after that Paul with Barnabas went up from Antioch to Jerusalem thâ—â— is fourteen years after Paul's Conversion as Cornelius a Lapide wiâ—â— have it but others think 't was fourteen yeaâ—â— after his * Dr. Lightfoot's Harmony p. 96. first going up to Jerusalem to sâ—â— Peter which must needs be nineteen or twenâ—â— years aâ— least after Christs death Others will have it to be to the Council of Jerusalem which was as Jerom saith eighteen years after Christs death where Peter was the first but not the conclusive speaker Act. 15. and then and there it was agreed among them that Paul and Barnabas should be the Apostles of the Gentiles and Peter and James of the Jews Gal. 2. 9. And that after this Peter came down to Antioch as Onuphrius affirms ubi supra and that then Paul reproved him to his face for dissembling Which clearly confutes Eusebius his story of St. Peter's being Bishop seven years at Antioch before the second or third year of Claudius Papists say that the Council was held the ninth year of Claudius and that that very year he banished the Jews out of Rome and that then Peter by the counsel of God came from thence * If Peter had then came from Rome and upon such an account 't is very probable that some mention would have been made of it in Sacred Writ as well as of Aquilla ' s and Priscilla ' s Act. 18. 2. to Jerusalem but this they do not prove by good evidence Affirmantis est probare they that affirm that Peter was at Rome must prove it I have proved that Peter was at Jerusalem and the coasts thereabout above 20 years after Christs death then he could not be at Rome the second or third year of Claudius as they say but prove not Cornelius a Lapide saith that from Christs death to Peter's death which was the last year of Nero there Chron. Actuum Apostolorum p. 7. were but 36 years above 20 of which years I have proved Peter to be elsewhere Then it s undeniably true That he sate not seven years Bishop at Antioch and 25 years Bishop at Rome for there remain but 16 years at the most in which time it will be difficult if not impossible to prove that Peter was at Rome That Peter was not at Rome I offer these arguments 1. Paul in his Epistle to the Romans written in the third of Nero's reign say some others say 't was written in the 13th of Claudius in which Peter say Papists sate Bishop Cent. 1. l. 2. c. 10. p. 432 of Rome saluteth many Saints but maketh no mention of St. Peter whom 't is very probable he would not have neglected if he had been there Bishop 2. When Paul was at Rome he wrote to those that were abroad and makes mention of several particular fellow-labourers and yet he makes not mention of Peter Yea though he make mention of the Salutation of Aristarchus and Mâ—rcus one whom they say was at Rome with Peter Jesus called Justus one of the Circumcision and Epaphras and St. Luke the beloved Physician who wrote the Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles and Demas who afterward forsook him though I say he remembers these mens Salutations to the Colossians yet not one word of or from Peter Col 4. 10 11 12 14. and when he wrote to Timothy from Rome a little before his death he saith to him Eubulus greeteth thee and Pudens and Linus who is said to be the first Bishop of Rome that is Pastor of the Church there and Claudia and all the brethren yet no remembrance from Peter to him though he had been at Rome and could not but be acquainted with Peter if he had been there 2 Tim. 4. 21. So in his Epistle from Rome to Philemon vers 23 24. he saith thus There salute thee Epaphras my fellow-labourer in Christ Jesus Marcus Aristarchus Demas and Lucas my fellow-labourers yet not a word of Peter 3. Paul mentioning his fellow-workers unto the Kingdom of Goâ— nameth Aristarchus Marcus and Jesus who is called Justus saith thus These are my fellow-workers unto the Kingdom of God which have been a comfort to me but not a word of Peter yea if he had been there Bishop of Rome formerly 't is charitable to conceive that he would have written to the Church at Rome in Paul ' s behalf but not a word of any such matter They say that they heard not any thing concerning him Act. 28. 21. 4. Paul at Rome writing to Timothy tells him thus At my first answer no man stood with me but all men forsook me 2 Tim. 4. 16. Now if Peter had been there and Bishop of Rome as they say he was 't is not probable that he would have forsaken him especially having had such a check for his first denying of his Lord and Master 5. When Paul was brought Prisoner to Rome Luke in the Acts of the Apostles Act. 28. telleth us that he was received of the brethren yet makes no mention at all of Peter though Cornelius a Lapide tell us That Claudius Actuum Apostolorum Chron. p. 5. his Decree for banishing the Jews was revoked the first year of Nero this being they say the third but Diodate saith 't was the tenth or eleventh year of Nero ' s reign iâ— which time Peter might have returned to Rome at least once in tâ—â— years he might have visited his Church there and St. Paul too to whom he had given the right hand of fellowship in a more emiâ—â—â—â— and more dangerous place than Rome even at Jerusalem 6. After Paul had been at Rome three days he sent for the chief of the Jews and when they came to his lodging he gave them an account of his being brought prisoner there Which if Saint Peter had been there 't is very likely he would have known and told them yea if he had been formerly Bishop of Rome though he had been at Jerusalem or Antioch or thereabout he would have sent them notice of it either by letter or by word by some one of the Brethren but that they deny Act. 28. 21. 7. They desire to hear what he thought for as concerning this Sect we know that it is every where spoken against And they
St. Peter who spake of the Church at Literal Babylon which he knowing and hearing St. John whose Scholar they say he was by Babylon in his Revelations to mean Rome thought Peter to mean so too which was the ground of his Error that Peter was at Rome and of those that inconsiderately followed him Old Writers have misreported things and yet have said they had them from the Elders and they from the Apostles Irenaeus who wrote in the next Age after the Iren. l. 2. c. 39. Apostles reports That the Lord Jesus taught forty or fifty years and that this he had of all the Elders of Asia and that they had it from St. John and that St. John lived with them till Trajan's time and that Mr. Calamy was mistaken and abused by a Writer and Printer of his Casual Sermon preached at Aldermanbury after the Act a-against Nonconformists Preaching viz. That we should be delivered Anno 1666 but he affirmed no such words but reproved that vain conceit some of those Elders did not only see John but other Apostles and they heard these things from them And yet notwithstanding all these great Authorities or Traditions this was an erroneous opinion of Irenaeus and that of Epiphanius is held the sounder That Christ lived but about thirty-three years and theâ— suffered death and this is believed because it is most agreeable to Scripture Therefore I say that the testimony of Papias yea of Jerome is not to be credited where there is not good ground in Sacred Scripture for their opinions especially where many probable reasons are produced from Scripture against their uncertain opinions And so I may say of the Fathers that said that Peter was at Rome and died there Some of our Divines produce Jerome to prove that he was Crucified at Jerusalem Papists say that he was Crucified which was a Jewish death and that Paul who without doubt suffered death at Rome was beheaded which was a Roman death Dr. * Confer c. 6. d. 3. p. 265. â—yranus a Papist upon Mat. 23. 34. saith Some of them ye shall kill as James the Brother of John c. Some shall ye crucifie as Peter and Andrew his Brother Vid. also Chrysostom in Mat. 23. 34. Reynolds tells Hart that a learned man viz. Velenus in opusculo inscripto Petrum non fuisse Romam 〈◊〉 illic passum of our side having weighed and seeing the dissention of Writers touching the time that he came to Rome and knowing by the Scripture that their speech of his abode in Rome is false and marking the shameful practise of the Romanists in forging calos for their own advantage as Constantines Donation and espying some such forgery among their Monuments of Peter 〈◊〉 Linus fable of his death and finding his Martyrdom mentioned by Jerom and Lyra in such sort as though he had been crucified by the Scribes and Pharisees he was brought by these and the like perswasions into this opinion that Peter never came to Rome And of this opinion was Balaeâ—â— in Act. Rom. Pont. l. 1. praefat and so have been many others since And besides there were Christians at Rome in the time of Tiberius and Caligula before ever Peter is reported to be at Rome as Eusebius witnesseth Hist l. 2. c. 2. and Tertullian in his Apology c. 5. And if we may believe * Libro 1. recognitionum Clementio Object Papists object that if Peter long ago preached to the Gentiles Act. 15. 17. Ergo he preached at Rome Answ I answer thus 1. That it follows not 2. Paul preached to the Gentiles before Peter did Act. 〈◊〉 3. Before Peter saw the Vision of the sheet and heard the command of the Lord be thought it unlawful for him to go to the Gentiles Act. 10. 28. 4. Peter first preached Christ to Cornelius and his friends at his house in Caesaria Act. 10. 5. 'T is most probable that Antioch received the Gospel from Barnabas and Paul and others before Rome and they were first called Christians Act. 11. 19 26. 6. Some of those strangers of Rome that were at Jerusalem Act. 2. 10. might preach the Gospel at Rome Clement Barnabas was there before Peter And that which is objected out of Act. 28. 21. that the Jews told Paul That they had received no Letters out of Judea concerning him and that neither any of the brethren shewed or spake any harm of him is not to be conceived that they had not received or heard of his Epistle which he sent to the Romans some few years before but concerning his particular business and occasion of his being sent Prisoner then to Rome And it makes much as I observed before against St. Peter's being so long Bishop at Rome as Papists would have that these Jews should hear nothing of Paul and be so ignorant of the Doctrine of the Gospel of Jesus Christ of which Peter was by special agreement an Apostle to them Thus I suppose I have sufficiently overthrown the main foundation of the Popes Primacy and Supremacy For if Peter was never at Rome then he was not Bishop of Rome and if he was not Bishop of Rome then the Pope of Rome is not his Successor in the Episcopacy thereof and then by Papists own consequence he is not supreme Bishop of all the Church 3. The Pope of Rome successively was and hath been the inventor and setter forth of Superstitious and Pharisaical Sects which are against the Word of God and the glory of his name To shew in particular how every Pope brought some Superstition into the Church would be very Voluminous for that therefore I must refer you to the Centurists to Dr. Reynolds Conference with Hart to Dr Henry More 's Mystery of Iniquity and the little Treatise of ancient Ceremonies called Vitis degeneris Bishop Jewel's Works and the Mass in English and Latin by James Mountain Printed 1641. I might refer you to the Popes Decretals and indeed they are a good evidence against themselves but they are late forgeries devised to justifie their latter Superstitions and Usurpations therefore I forbear though some Romanizing Protestants have them in too high estimation Though â—ome real Hereticks were the first Inventors of some Superstitions yet the Popes and their Agents were the first setters up imposers of theâ—â— in the Church bringing of Spittle Salt Cream Oyl and the sign of the Cross into the service of God at Baptism is well known to be theirs Kneeling or adoring as * Bishop Sparrow in his Rationale p. 273. some men call it at the receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper Vsing the sign of the Cross above thirty times praying to and for the Dead at their Mass worshipping of †Vide ubi supra p. 〈◊〉 what the Church of England saith in her Homily against peril of Idolatry part 3. p. 70. Images of Saints departed this life of Crucifixes the Cross Altars bowing to the East their Superstitious Fasts and Feasts putting holiness in times
places things which God hath not placed in them as in Water Garments Surplices Cowles Crosses Bells Books Candles their Sacerdotal garments which ought they say to be hallowed and consecrated by the Bishop as the Amice the Albe or Surplice the Girdle the Stole the â—annell or Maniple and the Chasible for ordinary Priests And the Bishops Gloves of leather Sandals or Apostolical Shooes Breeches the Tunick the Dalmatick the Miter they are all brought into the Church as I said by the Popes of Rome and their Agents The Amice is the first Priestly habit in which the Priest muzles his head in form of an Hood of which habit their Doctors say * See and wonder at their most ridiculous application of Scripture Durands Rationale l. 3. c. 2. Tollet instructio Sacerdotis l. 2. c. 2. the Apostle speaks Epâ— 6. 17. Take the helmet of salvation And 't is worn upon the Priests head because his head signifies the Divinity which kept it self hidden at the Lords passion as Gabriel Biel saith in his Eleventh Lesson upon the Canon of the Mass And so saith Pope Innocent the third l. 1. Mysteriorum cap. 35. where also he saith that this Amice signifies the Angel clothed with a cloud Revel 10. 1. 2. Upon this Amice the Priest puts the Albe or Surplice which is as Mountain calls it a white * I have known some wear an half-shirt instead of a Surplice shirt because it is written †Innocent 3. l. 1. c. 51. Let thy garments be always white Eccles 9. 8. And it is of fine linnen because it is written That the fine linnen is the righteousness of Saints Revel 19. 8. This shirt hath about the borders of it some light work with green or red silk because it is written The Queen is at thy right hand with embroidered garments Psal 45. So Innocent 3d B. 1. of the Mysteries of the Mass Gabr. Biel in his 11th Lesson upon the Canon of the Mass saith that this Albe or white Surplice signifies the fools garment wherewith Herod clothed Christ for to mock him 3. Upon this Albe they put the girdle which signifies chastity for as Pope Innocent 3d saith Luxury is in the reins of this girdle say they speaks Isaiah the Prophet Innoc. l. 1. c. 37 52. Isa 11. 5. Righteousness shall be the girdle of his loyns It serves also to put us in mind that Christ hath a golden girdle girt about his paps Revel 1. 15. and of what is said by St. Luke 12. 35. Let your loyns be girded about 4. The Stole comes next after which signifies the yoke of the Lord Mat. 11. 30. and hangs on the right hand and on the left because we must be armed with the armour of righteousness on the right and on the left hand 2 Cor. 6. 7. Tollet * Instruc Sacerd. l. 2. c. 2. Innoc. l. 1. c. 9. 54. saith That it goes down to the ground for to signifie perseverance which goes unto the end 5. Then comes the Maniple or Fannel in fashion of a Napkin upon the left arm because it is written Psal 126. Venientes venient cum exultatione portantes manipulos suos they shall come bringing their sheaves with them with rejoicing as Durand and Tollet say and Pope Innocent also B. 1. ch 43. where he saith also that the Maniple is put upon the left arm because it is written in the Song of Songs his left arm is under my head 6. The last piece and which doth cover all the rest Innoc. 3d l. 1. c. 50. is the Chasuble from casula a little cottage which I take to be a Cope which signifies charity For as St. Peter saith Charity covers a multitude * So doth a Chasuble of sins 1 Pet. 4. 8. Pope Innocent saith it signifies the Universal Church When the Bishop sings Mass 1. He changeth or shifts his shooes and stockings because God said to Moses put off thy shooes for the place whereon thou standest 〈◊〉 holy ground Exod. 3. 5. Pope Innocent the third in the first Book of the Mysteries of the Mass saith That Isaiah by the spirit of prophesie admireâ— the beauty of the Bishops stockings and sandals when he said How beautiful are Isa 52. 7. But when and where do Bishops do so Preaching is none of their work they say the feet of those that bring glad tidings that publish peace And in his 2d Book Chap. 22. he saith That the priest ought to pray towards the East because the day-spring fom on high hath visited us Luk. 1. 78. 2. When the Bishop sings Mass he hath gloves on his hands to the end as Durand the Master of the Ceremonies saith that his left hand may not know what his right hand doth according to the Lords coâ—â—ment Mat. 6. 3. And these gloves are of leâ—tâ—â—â— because Jacob's hands were covered with kids-skins Innoc. 3. l. 1. c. 41. 57. Innoc. 3. l. 1. c. 34. when Isaac blessed him as the Pontifical teacheth And Pope Innocent also saith and he groundeth the Sandals or Episcopal shooes upon that which is said Psal 60. Over Edom will I cast out my shoo 3. The Rings he hath on his hands signifie that he is the Spouse of the Church as it is written For I have espoused thee to one husband 2 Cor. 11. 2. Again because the father of the * What a prodigal Bishop Innoc. 3. l. 1. c. 46. 61. prodigal son caused a ring to be put upon his finger which finger whereon the ring is signifleth the Holy Ghost as it is written †Is not that a piece of blasphemy digitus Dei est thiâ— is the finger of God Exod. 8. 19. as the same Authors say 4. The Cross or Pastoral staff signifies the correction as it is written 1 Cor. 4. 21. Shall I come unto you with a rod. And in Psal 45. 6. The Scepter of thy Kingdom is a right Scepter though the Cross it may be be a crooked staff 5. The Horns of the Miter signifie the two Testaments saith Pope Innocent the third B. 1. of the Mysteries of the Mass c. 60. these things you may read in Peter du Moulins Book of the Mass in French and Translated into English by James Mountain Ann. 1641. Chapters 12 and 13 and Chap. 8. Moreover thus at Mass they ligâ—â— Wax-candles at Noon-day because Christ said I am the light of the world And the Altar must be of stone because St. Paul saith that the rock was Christ 1 Cor. 10. 4. Of the two Horns of the Altar the one signifies the Jews and the other the Gentiles Whence also the Priest transporteth the Mass-book from one Horn to the other because that from the Jews the Gospel is passed to the Gentiles And this Mass-book is laid upon a Cushion because it is written My yoke is easie and my burden light Mat. 11. 30 The Priest turns his back to the people because God
said to Moses Thou shalt see my back-parts Exod. 33. 23. Sometimes he turns again shewing his face to the people passing by because St. Paul saith Videmus in aenigmate we see through a glass darkly 1 Cor. 13. 12. When the Priest passeth from one corner of the Altar to the other the Clerk which serves him removes also with him because the Lord said Where I am there shall also my servant be Joh. 12. 26. The Massifying Bishop stands at the right horn of the Altar because it is written Deus ab austro veniet God shall come from the South These things are to be seen in Bishop Durand's Rationale in the Books of Pope Innocent the third of the Mysteries of the Mass in Gabriel Biel upon the Canon of the Mass in Tollet of the Instruction of Priests in Hugo de Sancto Victore in his Mirrour of the Church Who but the Popes instituted in the Church the making of the sign of the Cross to fright away the Devil who but Pope Honorius not above 500 years since instituted kneeling which some call adoring at receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper Which saith Bishop Jewel William Bishop Jewel Serm. upon 1 Cor. 11. 23. p. 51 52. Bishop Jewel's Reply to Harding art 8. d. 1. pag. 283. where he pleads against adoration of the Sacrament that there is neither commandment of Christ nor any word or example of the Apostles or ancient Fathers for it but that 't was lately devised by Pope Honorius about Anno 1226. but after Transubstantiation as Vitiâ— Degeneâ—â— saith pag. 109. Durand and John Dunce Scotus perceiving could not be justified without great peril of Idolatry they removed the bread and wine out of the Sacrament and turned them into the body and blood of Christ and so brought in Transubstantiation which destroys not only the nature of the Sacrament but the body and blood of Christ too All Papists that I have read as * Aquinas 3. q. 75. a. 2. O. Contrariatur venerationi hujus Sacramenti si aliqua substantia creata esset ibi quae non possit adoratione latriae adorari Aquinas Vasquez †Bellar. de Sacramento Eucharistiae l. 2. c. 8. a. 2. cap. 13. a. 5. cap. 24. a. 6. Hardâ—ng's answer to Jewel's Challenge fol. 111. a. Bellarmine and some others say as Durand and Scotâ—â— do that to kneel at receiving the bread and wine at the Lords-Supper as Papists did if Christs body and blood be not corporally present under them is Idolatry Upon this account I find the learned Frenchman * Dall Apol. c. 20. and Dr. Heylin saith thus The Lutherans held with the Catholicks that Christs body was really in the Sacrament else they knew that there was no reverence due to the Sacrament History of Presbytery p. 2. Yea he saith This prayer the body of the Lord Jesus Christ preserve thy body and soul unto eternal life was left out of King Edward's second Liturgy because 't was thought to savour of Transubstantiation Cypr. Angl. 25. A B. Laud in his Star Chamber-Speech pag. 55. saith very well of Communion Tables standing Altarwise thus That if it advance or usher in Superstition and Popery it ought to stand so in none Dallaus saying to this purpose That this viz. their kneeling at receiving the Elements in that Sacrament were ground enough if there were nothing else to separate from the Church of Rome All our learned and sound Divines maintain against the Church of Rome That it is Idolatry to kneel purposely before a creature in a Religious state or state of worship put before a man that we may not do the needless works of Idolators that 't is scandalous to do needlesly as Idolators do that a publick declaration of a mans good intention in doing a needless action that appears evil or is otherwise scandalous frees not that action from being actively scandalous That it 's impossible to adore God in or through an image and set give no religious positive reverence that is worship to the image To give the appropriate signs significative of our agnition of the Divine excellency to any thing that is not God is Idolatry Nay though these appropriate signs were used without devotion by the party towards the supposed object and were intended only by other men to be directed thither or only were interpretable to be so directed it were Idolatry notwithstanding saith Dr. Henry More in his Mystery of Iniquity c. 10. p. 32. Idolatry is committed saith he when we perform some rite or ceremony that is to say some external religious action appropriated to the signifying our acknowledgment of divine eminency before or rather unto that which is not God Where by before or unto I understand saith he an intended direction by our selves or others or at least by interpretation of custom of the religious action as to an object we would * If this and what Bishop Prideaux Fasc cont loc 4. S. 3. q. 6. p. 241 be true I see not how Catholicks or Lutherans or Dr. Heylin himself can free themselves from Idolatry â—â— injungitur ut indifferens recipitur a nostris ut gost is summae reverentiae tanto mysterio debitus For is not kneeling received and done by them as to an object they would honour thereby and is not kneeling a purposed and an accustomed sign of our acknowledgment of Divine excellency in Gods house and in Gods worship there honour thereby for that is the only thing whereby the action becomes Idolatry for there will always be a necessity of performing our religious rites before or towards something or other by way of circumstance of place which might be without the least guilt or suspition of that crime Wherefore it is the intended and accustomary application of the appropriate signs of the acknowledgment of the Divine excellency unto an object where the Divine excellencies are not that is to any thing that is not truly God which is this hainous sin of Idolatry saith Dr. Henry More in his Mystery of Iniquity c. 10. p. 33. For saith he as a woman that renders or gives up to one that is not her husband what is appropriate to her husband to wit the use of her body let her fancy what mental restrictions or directions of her intention she will in the act is questionless a downright adulteress so whosoever applies the appropriate acknowledgments of the Divine excellencies which is religious worship to that which is not God let him mince it as well as he can with mental limitations and restrictions if he once pass this religious worship upon this undue object he is thereby without all controversie a gross Idolater Ibid. Again he saith Whatsoever is interposed betwixt God and us by way of object in our worshipping is not an help but an hinderance to the perfection of that worship Ibid. c. 14. p. 50. To worship before an image and to worship an image are in sacred Scripture all
who gave direction for it to his General Joab and he is guilty of it too for following of David's unjust command 2 Sam. 12. 9. Thou hast killed Vriah the Hittiâ—e with the sword and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon So here what the ten-horned beast is said to do may be well charged upon the Church of Rome the Pope and his Hierarchy because he causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast whose deadly wound was healed and he deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of these miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast Rev. 13. 12 14. Rev. 19. 20. And therefore is the blood of the Prophets and of all the Saints and of them that were slain upon the earth for Religion said to be found in her Rome Revel 18. 24. 2. Their activity v. 14. These shall make war with the Lamb. In Rev. 13. 7. 't is said That this ten-horned beast shall make war with the Saints and overcome them But here in Revel 17. 14. he makes war with Christ and is overcome by him for he is Lord of Lords and King of Kings and they that are with him are called and faithful and chosen 'T is true that they that make war against Christs Saints do make war against Christ Act 9 4 Saul Saul why persecutest thou me Those Kings that make war against and persecute Christs Saints as such do make war against and persecute Christ himself and so he takes it and will reward it That this ten-horned beast is said to overcome the Saints and yet to be overcome by Christ may be both true of the same beast for he did overcome the Saints at first but he is or shall be overcome by Christ and his called chosen and faithful Soldiers at last and therefore 't is said That he that leadeâ—h into captivity shall go into captivity he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword here is the patience and faith of the Saints to suffer in the mean time and to believe and wait for the performance of this promise Rev. 13. 10. 2. The Whore is described more plainly by her large Dominion by the people upon whom she sitteth called in the first verse many waters which is interpreted by the Angel v. 15. And he saith uâ—â—o the waters which thou sawest where the whore sitteth are people and multitudes and nations and tongues which is a manifest description of the Roman Empire which consisted of many People and Nations and Tongues and upon these as well as upon the ten-horned beast or chief secular rulers did the great Whore of Rome sit that is reign and rule prick on and stir up to Superstition Idolatry and Persecution against Christs Church And therefore 't is said That the Kings of the earth that is of the Empire or earthly Church and the inhabitants of the earth have committed fornication and been made drunk with the wine of her fornication Revel 17. 2. she claims universal power over all this Terrestial world 3. This great Whore is described by her destruction And that 1. By the * A learned man by ten Kings understands their Kingdoms or people who against the minds of their Kings will thus destroy the great whore Antic p. 23. Revel 18. 9. instruments of her ruin and they are the ten horns or the ten Kings unto whom the Roman Empire was divided v. 16. And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast these shall hate the whore c. 2. By the degrees of her destruction these ten Kings shall hate the whore and shall make her desolate and naked and shall eat her flesh and burn her with fire 1. They shall hate the whore of Rome the Pope his Cardinals Hierarchy and Clergy with whom they have committed spiritual fornication whereas before they loved her while the virtue of her intoxicating cup lasted but now seeing their own folly and her cunning craftiness selfishness pride covetousness luxury filthiness hypocrisie and cruelty that her whole Government Religion Worship pompous Ceremonies Purgatory Indulgences Excommunions Jubilees Processions Doctrines of the Popes Infallibility and Supremacy Justification of mens persons before God by their own good works traditions merits holiness of times places Churches Altars Vestments Copes Hats Palls Surplices Crosses Spittle Cream Salt Holy-water Auricular confession of sins worshipping of Saints departed Angels Images Reliques of Saints kissing of the Popes Toe of the Tayl of the Asse on which Christ rode adoring of the pretended Cross on which Christ was Crucified bowing to the East setting up of Altars and Crucifixes and Tapers on them and bowing to them as they do baptizing of Bells forbidding to Marry but allowing of Stews dispensing with Oaths incestuous Marriages holding of Plurality of Dignities Benefices with cure of souls and causeless Non-residency and many more such Doctrines and practises politick devices to uphold enrich and advance themselves their relations and servants and suppress the pure Doctrine and Worship of Christ and undo and destroy his most faithful servants and sincere Worshippers I say these Kings seeing these things and many more clearly their inordinate love is turned into well-guided hatred of her They hate her that is they separate from her they avoid communion with her they cease to commit any spiritual fornication with her 2. They make her desolate they do not only forsake her themselves but also they cause their subjects to do so too and that they do by setting up in their respective Kingdoms Gods pure worship and service without her proper ceremonies which she calls * Bellar. de effectibus Sacrament l. 2. c. 3. a. 20. badges and †Aquinas 12â— q. 103. a. 4. O. professions of her Religion and Gods pure word without her Legends Apocriphals and Traditions 3. They make her naked which they do both by words and deeds 1. By words by publick Preaching Confessions and Writings declaring and demonstrating her abominable filthiness that she may be detested by others 2. By deeds by with-drawing her gold silver precious stones first-fruits Peter-pence Abbies Friories Commendams Benefices Dignities and Revenues from her which were wont to be given her which the Whore by her pious frauds cunning craftiness got from the Ancestors of Kings and deluded people 4. They shall eat her flesh which is to be understood not carnally but mystically these Kings shall not prove Canibals and corporally with their teeth eat the flesh that is upon the bones of the great Whore of the Pope and his Cardinals but they will retain either to their own proper use or rather for the maintenance of Gods pure Worship and Interests those revenues which were paid to the Whore out of their Dominions as such to the upholding of her Pride and Idolatries Superstitions Luxuries and Bawds and they shall persecute her which in Scripture-language is eating of ones flesh Job 19. 22. Why do ye persecute
me as God and are not satisfied with my flesh Psal 27. 2. When the wicked even mine enemies and my foes came upon me to eat up my flesh they stumbled and fell Upon which words St. Augustine saith thus Carnes nostras manducant qui nos persequuntur they that persecute us do eat our flesh 5. They shall burn her with fire that is they shall consume and destroy her as she is a Whore that is as she is an Idolatrous false and Antichristian Church but whether they shall go to Rome her seat and burn that with material fire in order to the destruction of this Mystical Babylon is not certain yet I dare not positively determine against it because all I have read except one are for it But this is certain that they shall be zealous against her and against her false Doctrine and false Worship and her cunning undermining of the Doctrine of the Gospel and the pure Worship of Christ and the true interests and ends of Christianity and to that end countenance maintain and protect and promote true and pure Gospel-worship and Doctrine and the assertors thereof and discountenance and suppress such persons as labour by power or policy to advance Antichristian Doctrines practises and interests for they know that they have crafty treacherous cruel powerful and malicious enemies to deal with Rev. 16. 13 14. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the Dragon and out of the Cardinals Bishops Jesuits mouth of the Beast and out of the mouth of the false Prophet For they are the spirits of Devils working miracles which go forth unto the Kings of the earth and of the whole world to gather them to the battel of the great day of God Almighty 3. By the principal Author of her destruction v. 17. And God shall put it into their hearts to fulfill his will and to agree and give their Kingdom unto the beast until the words of God shall be fulfilled Hence some learned men have conceived that those Kings at least some of them that have hated the great Whore and made her desolate and naked and have eaten her flesh but have not burnt her with fire that is have not utterly consumed her Idolatries false Doctrines Hierarchy Vide King James his Paraphrase upon Revel 17. p. 56. Revel 18. 9. Ceremonies Images Altars Laws c. but have retained them upon such grounds as may easily bring them in love again with the great Whore shall again give up their power and strength and Kingdoms to the beast the great Whore rides and consequently to her and her abominations that have been rejected and the industrious actings of some men to reconcile the Greek and Protestant Churches to the Church of Rome have increased the fear of that opinion Now what God will do I know not but I know that mens not receiving the love of the truth and their having pleasure in unrighteousness is a just and provoking cause thereof 2 Thes 2. 10 11 12. But I humbly conceive that though these words are placed immediately after the degrees of the great Whores destruction yet they do not necessarily imply that they shall agree again to give up their Kingdoms to the beast and so to the great Whore again but they are an assurance that God will make the ten horns or Kings Viis modis some one and some another way instrumental to destroy the great Whore as he hath promised And that because as what they did before in unanimously agreeing to give up their power and strength to the beast proceeded from God in his wise and wonderful Providence for the fulfilling of his words by his Prophets Dan. 7. 8 21 22 25 28. As he put it into their hearts to fulfill his will and to agree to give their Kingdoms to the beast to uphold Idolatry superstition heresie and the Whores tyrannies and this in just judgment against them so now he who hath the hearts of Kings in his hands will alienate their hearts from the great Whore and incline their wills to agree to hate her and to make her desolate and naked and to eat her flesh and to burn her with fire God is able to do it and he will do it in his appointed time Dan. 7. 25. Rev. 18. 3 4 5 6 7 8. For strong is the Lord who judgeth her 4. Lastly the great Whore is described most plainly by her seat or chief place of residence and therein Society and Government v. 18. and that is Rome And the woman which thou sawest is that great city which reigneth over the Kings of the earth The Angel saw that there might be some that would in time suggest that other Cities were built upon seven Hills as Bishop Mountague in favour some think of the great Whore saith Constantinople is therefore prevents this Evasion and saith that the City where the great Whore of Babylon sits is that great City which did in St. John ' s time reign over the Kings of the earth he speaks of her in the present tense which reigneth over the Kings of the earth Now Constantinople was not then in being as it is now and hath been since Constantine of Byzantium made it the Head of the Oriental Empire and enlarged it and called it Constantinople and it did not reign then in St. John's time over the Kings of the earth as Rome did and therefore it cannot be this great City Rome did in St. John's time and long after reign over the Kings of the earth as Poets Fathers * Ribera Bellarmine Cornel. a Lapide and Papists themselves acknowledg it 's a shame for Protestants to question much more to deny it But this Woman succeeds in that City and Polity to govern it and the whole Empire as it is a beast This Woman is not a singular person but a City or Polity and society of men governing in that great city Rome which in St. John's time did reign over the Kings of the earth the whole Empire So now this great Whore there sits and rides the beast the Empire at least it did so as Idolatrous as in St. John's time the Woman the great city of Rome not the walls houses and streets but the citizens and not every one of them but the Rulers the Emperours Senators and Officers ruled that great city reigned over it and over the Kings of the earth so now the Woman the great Whore the Pope the two-horned beast and his Cardinals and Clergy and Officers reign or at least did so over the Kings of the earth which is ascribed to the whole Ciey because the Head and Officers and Rulers thereof did and do it And this Seat of this Babylonical beast or great Whore or Antichrist may be found in his number 666 as Dr. More in his Synopsis Apocalyptica relates of which he Synops Apocalyp l. 1. c. 15. Sec. 10. p. 314 saith he hath treated largely in his Mystery of Godliness
acteth against and contrary to them By which saith he they do declare themselves to be none of the Church of Christ but rather of the Synagogue of Satan Yea he there tells his Wife That he called them with good conscience as Christ called their forefathers the children of the Devil and that as their father the Devil is a lyar and murtherer so their Kingdom and Church as they call it standeth by lying and murdering therefore my dear Wife have no fellowship with them Ibid. Bishop Ridley in his Letter in Captivity calls the Church of Rome the Strumpet of Babylon and the Pope of Rome Antichrist Fox his Book of Martyrs p. 1626. col 1. And in his Answer at his Examination to Bishop White he saith He cannot but confess with St. Gregory a Bishop of Rome also that the Bishop of that place is the very true Antichrist whereof St. John speaketh by the name of the Whore of Babylon And I say saith he with the said St. Gregory that he that maketh himself a Bishop of all the world is worse than Antichrist Ibid. p. 1650. col 2. And in his Communication with Dr. Brooks Bishop of Gloucester when he degraded him exhorting him to recant and submit to the Church of Rome he saith thus You know my mind concerning the usurped authority of the Romish Antichrist Ibid. p. 1659. col 2. And a little after when he would Bishop Ridley though when he was in his Pontificalibus he contended too much for the Surplice c. yet when he came to die he refused it and abominated it put on him the Surplice c. he inveighed against the Romish Bishop and all that foolish apparel calling him Antichrist and the apparel foolish and abominable Ibid. In his Farewell Letter to all his Friends he calls the Bishop of Rome the Babylonical Beast and the then Bishops of England thieves of Samaria Sabei Caldei These robbers have rushed out of their dens and have robbed the Church of England of all the aforesaid holy treasure of God they have carried it away they have overthrown it and instead of Gods holy word the true and right administration of Christs holy Sacraments as of Baptism and the other they mix their Ministry with mens fantasies and many wicked and â—â—godly traditions Ibid. p. 1674. And these Bishops he calls the Soldiers of Antichrist Ibid. p. 1675. col 1. And in his Letter to the Lords Temporal he saith thus I wonder my Lords what hath bewitched you that ye are so suddenly fallen from Christ unto Antichrist from Christs Gospel unto mens traditions from the Lord that bought you to the Bishop now of Rome I warn you of your peril be not deceived except ye will be found willingly consenters unto your own death For if ye think thus we are Lay-men this is a matter of Religion we follow as we are taught and led if our teachers and governours teach us and lead us amiss the fault is in them they shall bear the blame My Lords 't is true I grant you that both the false teacher and the corrupt governour shall be punished for the death of their subjects whom they have falsely taught and corruptly lead yea and their blood shall be required at their hands But yet neverthelss shall that subject die the death himself also that is he shall also be damned for his own sin For if the blind lead the blind Christ saith not the leader only but both shall fall into the ditch Shall the Synagogue and the Senate of the Jews trow ye which forsook Christ and consented to his death therefore be excused because Annas and Caiphas with the Scribes and Pharisees and their Clergy did teach them amiss yea and also Pilate their Consenters and doers are both guilty saith Bishop Ridley Ibid. p. 1675. governour and the Emperours Lieutenant by his tyranny did without cause put to death Forsooth no my Lords no. For notwithstanding that corrupt Doctrine or Pilates washing of his hands neither of both shall excuse either that Synagogue and Seigniory or Pilate but at the Lords hand for the effusion of that innocent blood on the latter day shall drink of the deadly whip * Bishop Gardners six Articles called the Whip with six strings I â—elieve he alluded to Ye are witty and understand what I mean Therefore I will pass from this to tell you that ye are fallen from Christ to his adversary the Bishop of Rome pag. 1667. And immediately after he tells them That he doth not in calling the Bishop of Rome Christs adversary or Antichrist rage or raile but speak the words of truth and sobriety And shews That that Church while it continued in the Apostles Doctrine was Apostolick and those that sate in that See might be called Apostolici but since that See hath degenerated from the trace of Truth and true Religion which it received of the Apostles at the beginning and hath preached another Gospel hath set up another Religion hath exercised another power and hath taken upon it to order and rule the Church of Christ by other strange Laws and Canons and rulers than ever it received of the Apostles the Apostles of Christ which thing it doth at this day and hath continued so doing alas alas of too too long a time since the time I say that the state and condition of that See hath thus been changed in truth it ought of duty and of right to have the names changed both of the See and of the Sitter therein As that See then for that true trade of Religion and Doctrine of Christs Apostles justly and truly was called Apostolick so as truly and justly for the contrariety of Religion and * Is this not directly contrary to A B. Laud's Doctrine in his Relation wherein pag. â—â—6 he saith That the Church of Rome and Protestants set not up a different Religion diversity of Doctrine from Christs and his Apostles that See and the Bishop thereof at this day both ought to be called and are indeed Antichristian The See is the seat of Satan and the Bishop of the same that maintaineth the abominations thereof is Antichrist himself indeed And for this cause this See at this day is the same which St. John calleth in his Revelation Babylon or the Whore of Babylon and spiritual Sodoma and Egyptus the mother of fornications and of the abomination upon the earth and with this Whore do spiritually meddle and lye with her and commit most stinking and abominable adultery before God all those Kings and Princes yea all Nations of the earth which do CONSENT TO HER ABOMINATIONS and use or practise the same Ibid. p. 1668. And in his Lamentation for the change of Religion in England he saith thus The head under Satan of all mischief is Antichrist and his brood and the same is he which is the Babylonical Beast Ibid. p. 1671. col 2. And in p. 1673 he calls King Edward the sixth that innocent that
godly hearted and peerless young Christian Prince Whom Dr. Heylin saith He was a man of ill principles and that 't was no infelicity to the Church he means Rome sure that he died so soon And in p. 1673 col 2. he saith thus Now then seeing the Doctrine of Antichrist is returned again into this Realm and the old Laws of Antichrist are allowed to return with the power of their father again c. Mr. John Philpot Martyr in his seventh Examination and Answer saith That the Church of Rome is a false Church and the Synagogue of Satan Ibid. p. 1704. col 2. And in his ninth Examination he tells Harpsfield That the Religion of Rome is a false Religion Ib. p. 1709. col 1. So he told Chadsey Ibid. p. 1715. col 1. And at his last Examination he told the Lord Mayor of London That he was sorry to see that that authority which representeth the Kings and Queens persons should now be changed and be at the commandment of Antichrist And ye speaking to the Bishops pretend to be the follows of the Apostles of Christ and yet ye be very Antichrists and deceivers of the people and that Church which ye pretend to be the Catholick Church is the Church of Rome the Babylonical and not the Catholick Church of that Church I am not Ibid. p. 1721. col 1. Thomas Whittel Priest and Martyr saith That he was well content to give over his body for the testimony of Gods truth and pure Religion against Antichrist and all his false Religion and Doctrine Ibid. p. 1738. Barthlet Green a Scholar and Martyr affirmeth That the Church of Rome is the Church of Antichrist Ibid. p. 1744. A. B. Cranmer M. calleth and proveth the Pope of Rome to be Antichrist Fox his Book of Martyrs p. 1768. col 2. That the Traditions and Religion of that usurping Prelate of Rome are most erroneous false and against the Doctrine of the whole Scripture and the author of the same to be very Antichrist so often preached by the Apostles and Prophets in whom do most evidently concur all signs and tokens whereby he is painted to the world to be known Ibid. p. 1774. col 2. Many of which marks he sets down there And at St. Maries in Oxford when he recanted his Recantation he said thus And for the Pope I refuse him as Christs enemy and Antichrist with all his false Doctrine and this he declared he spake without dissimulation Ibid. p. 1781. col 1. And in his Letter to Queen Mary he saith thus of the Pope If this be not to play Antichrists part I cannot tell what is Antichrist which is no more to say but Christs enemy and adversary who shall sit in the Temple of God advancing himself above all others yet by hypocrisie and fained religion shall subvert the true Religion of Christ and under pretence and colour of Christian Religion shall work against Christ and therefore hath the name of Antichrist whom he there proves to be Antichrist Ibid. p. 1784. col 2. John Mandrell Robert Spicer and William Coverley denying the Pope to be head of the Church or Christs Vicar affirmed him to be Antichrist and Gods enemy Ibid. p. 1788. William Times Curate and Martyr answered Bonner That the See of Rome is the See of Antichrist and therefore to that Church I will not conform my self nor once consent to it Ibid. p. 1791. And p. 1793. he saith The Church of Rome is the Antichristian Church Sixteen Martyrs at once make this Confession The See of Rome is the See of Antichrist the congregation of the wicked whereof the Pope is head under the Devil Article the third for proof of which they offer to be burnt Ibid. p. 1810. col 1. ART XV. That it is lawful to set up and suffer Bishop Mountague in his Gag pag. 300. saith That Images and Pictures of Christ may stand in Churches pro institutione rudiorum commone factione Historiae excitatione devotionis And pag. 318. that the Images and Pictures of Christ the blessed Virgin and Saints may not only for Civil uses but also for Religious imployment and helps of piety be set up in Churches and that the Church of Rome and we differ not therein so practise exceed not Doctrine And p. 317. that Dulia may be given to them Images of the Sacred Trinity of God the Father of God the Son Crucifixes of God the Holy Ghost or of Saints departed this life in Temples or Churches where Gods people do usually meet to worship God THis I renounce 1. Because 't is contrary to the Doctrine of the Church of England in her excellent Homily against the peril of Idolatry wherein she saith as followeth p. 12. These costly deckiâ—â— of Churches and Images have nothing profited those that are wise and of understanding but have thereby greatly hurt the simple and unwise occasiâ—â—ing them thereby to commit most horrible Idolatry p. 13. Our Images 〈◊〉 been be and if they be publickly suffered in Churches and Temples 〈◊〉 will be worshipped and so Idolatry committed to them Wherefore our Iâ—â—ges in Temples and Churches be indeed none other but Idols as unto 〈◊〉 which Idolatry hath been is and ever will be committed p. 15. That 〈◊〉 honouring of abominable Images is the cause the beginning and end of 〈◊〉 evil and that the worshippers of them be either mad-men or most wicked men p. 17. Although it be said now commonly that Images be Lay 〈◊〉 Books yet we see they teach no good lesson neither of God nor of goâ—â—ness but all error and wickedness and therefore God as he forbiddeth 〈◊〉 Idols or Images to be made or set up so doth command such as we find 〈◊〉 and set up to be pulled down broken and destroyed Deut. 7th and 〈◊〉 Chapters where 't is observable that all the occasions of Idolatry 〈◊〉 to be avoided and therefore did God forbid marriages with the children of Idolaters for they will turn away thy son from following me that they may serve other gods so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you and destroy thee suddenly p. 18. To set up Images or Altars is a wickedness and great offence and abomination in the sight of the Lord. p. 19. It is impossible that we should be worshippers of Images and the true servants of God also as Paul teacheth 2 Cor. 6. p. 21. Upon 1 Joh. 5. ult Tertullian saith Keep your selves from Images and Idols he saith not now keep your selves from Idolatry as it were from the service of them but from the Images or Idols themselves that is from the very shape or likeness of them do ye think those persons which place Images and Idols in Churches and Temples yea shrine them even over the Lords-Table as 't were of purpose to the worshipping and honouring of them take good heed either to St. John ' s counsel or Tertullian ' s for so to place Images and Idols is it to keep themselves from them
peace said she to her husband And that frivolous story of his Dog following after them with which some have made vain sport and others may again in Tob. 11. 4. appointed to be read at Morning-prayer October the third I come to Tob. 12 12. appointed to be read at Evening-prayer October the third where this is appointed to be read of the Angel Raphael Now therefore when thou didst pray and Sarah thy daughter-in-law I did bring the remembrance of your prayers before the holy one and when thou didst bury the dead I was with thee likewise And vers 15. 't is appointed to be read thus I am Raphael one of the seven holy Angels which present the prayers of the Saints and which go in and out before the glory of the holy one Which words imply two gross errors 1. That there are but seven holy Angels that wait upon God and go in and out before him which is contrary to the Canonical Scriptures which say that thousands ministred unto him and ten thousand times 〈◊〉 Cornel à Lapidâ— Junius Diodate Willet in locum thousand stood before him Dan. 7. 10. which is generally by Papists as well as Protestants understood of holy Angels See also Heb. 12. 22. Apoc. 5 1â— See also A. B. Vsher his Sum of Christian Religion p. 118. where 〈◊〉 saith that all the Angels do wait upon the Lord their God in heaven to exâ—cute his will 2. That those seven Angels are Gods remembrancers 〈◊〉 mind him of the prayers of his Saints and presenters of their prayers beâ—â— him A kind of Heavenly Courtiers or Officers that do present to as remember God of the good works prayers and alms c. of 〈◊〉 holy ones as if God did not regard or remember their prayers 〈◊〉 services without these seven Angels mediations intercession Which office saith learned Jâ—â— Jun. in Tob. 12. 12. the Scripture doth no where give to created Aâ—gâ—â— but maintain to belong only to Christ and which â—lâ—â— if there were nothing else is enough to prove the 〈◊〉 Upon the 15 ver bulousness and impurity of the Book and to rejeâ—â— as evil and unfit to be read in publick yea to be bound up with the Sacred Word of God And learned A. B. Vsher where before reckons up all the offices of the Sum of Christian Religion pag. 118. good Angels to the souls and bodies of good men but mentioneth not their presenting of the Saints prayers before God nor remembering God of them And 't is a Doctrine and place of Scripture as you call it that makes much for the Which is a good argument there is no such thing Bishop Prideaux Fascic cont c. 4. S. 2. q. 1. p. 169. Article 7th Papists Idolatrous invocating of Angels And 't is contrary to the Doctrine of the Church of England and of other Reformed Churches and of the Canonical Scriptures which say That Jesus Christ the second Person in the Sacred Trinity the Angel of the Covenant as he is called Mal. 3. 1. is the only person that doth present the prayers of the Saints to God and that he is our only Mediator of Redemption and Intercession as may be fully proved by Rom. 8. 34. 1. Tim. 2. 5. Heb. 7. 25. 1 Joh. 2. 12. Revel 8. 3 4. And the last Collect in the Lâ—tany and the Collect for St. Stephens day which prayers say That Christ is our only Mediator and Advocate And by the Homily of Prayer Tom. 2. Part 2. p. 115. and Part 3. p. 118. where 't is said thus In the word of God the Holy Ghost doth plainly teach us that Christ is our only Mediator and Intercessor with God and that we must not run or seek to another See also A. B. Vsher's Sum of Christian Religion p. 166 and p. 176. where he sheweth That one part of Christs Intercession for us doth consist in his presenting our prayers unto God and making them acceptable in his sight And 't is contrary to Psal 8. 4. Psal 111. 5. Psal 112. 6. Levit. 26. 42. Luk. 12. 6 7. and many other places of Sacred Scripture where 't is said That God is mindful of his people and of his Covenant made with them Yea that he doth hear what his people say and take special notice of what they do yea and record what they say and do Read Mal. 3. 16. Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another and the Lord hearkned and heard it and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord and that thought upon his name If God take notice of and record what his people say one to another then without doubt he takes notice of and remembreth the prayers which they make unto himself and therefore he needs no such remembrancing Angels as this feigned Raphael speaks of to put him in mind of his Saints prayers And he hath appointed Jesus Christ to present the prayers of and make Intercession for his people Joh. 6. 27. Him hath the Father sealed and appointed Heb. 3. 12. to the office of a Redeemer and of making satisfaction for the sins of his people and Intercession for them as Bishop Reynolds very learnedly sheweth upon Psal 110. pag. 383 384. 387 388 c. And Christ hath undertaken the work of our Redemption and making Intercession for his people He was not only made a surety to us of a bâ—tter Covenant Heb. 7. 22. but he also is said to come to do the office of a surety Lo I come to do thy will O God Heb. 10. 5 7 9. God fitted him and prepared him for the work of our Redemption v. 5. and Christ voluntarily undertook it Then said I Lo I come in the volume of thy Book it is written of me to do thy will O God v. 7 9. Hence doth he call himself the good shepherd that doth lay down his life for his sheep Joh. 10. 11 15. which Doctrine is saith the Reverend Bishop the rock and foundation of all the Churches comfort and therefore the Doctrine held forth in the foresaid feigned story of Tobit is the more pernicious and abominable being so destructive of our Lord and Saviours right and of all good Christians sure and solid comfort and those men that refuse to give their unfeigned assent and consent thereunto and to its use and publick reading are the more excusable not to say commendable for denying themselves so far as they have done rather than do that or consent to the doing of that which is as you see so much conducing to Popish Doctrine and practise and contrary to Gods sacred and precious truth the honour and interest of Jesus Christ and the comfort and welfare of all good Christians In the Months of September and October all the Book of Judith is appointed to be read in publick in Churches and Chappels Where to pass by many of the falsities that Orthodox learned Divines both ancient and modern do find in
the History if it may be so called for the Text saith that 't was acted and therefore pen'd after the captivity yea after the return of the Jews to Jerusalem as is clear in chap. 4. 3. and chap. 5. 19. and then there was no true Nabucodonosor King of the Assyrians as may be gathered from the Books of Daniel Ezra and Nehemiah And 't is therefore thought to be but a * Bishop Prideaux Fascic controvers c. 1. q. 2. p. 16. fiction or meer Romance and was intended to procure favour from the Roman Emperour or his Deputy in the Jews Country for the distressed Jews which was the drift of Achiors good speech and counsel or else to work their ruin by some such crafty and deceitful and bloody woman as Judith was and by such wicked practises as she is said to use as may be gathered from Chap. 8. 35. in chap. 9th 2. Judith prayeth unto God and therein commends the deceitful and cruel fact of Simeon Gen. 34. which God the Holy Ghost by righteous Jacob condemns Gen. 49. 5. And also prayeth God to prosper her feigned tales and lies Give into my hand the power that I have conceived smite by the deceit of my lips the servant with the Prince and the Prince with the servant break down their stateliness by the hand of a woman and make my speech and deceit to be their wound and stripe who purposed evil things against thy Covenant Chap. 12. 3 4 9 10 13. And chap. 10. 12 13. she tells two or three lyes to compass her design And she said I am a woman of the Hebrews and am fled from them for they shall be consumed There is one lye at least And I am come to Holophernes the chief captain of your army to declare words of truth There 's another lye And I will shew him a way whereby he shall win all the Hill-country without losing the body or life of any man There 's another lye And in chap. 11. there are many more lyes yea a most abominable series of treachery swearing flattering aequivocating and dissembling and all covered with the fair pretence of Religion to the great dishonour of God and the scandal of Religion the opening of the mouths of the wicked to blaspheme and speak evil of God Religion and good men I pray read the words and seriously consider them and then judg whether they do not tend more to the destruction than the edification of the ignorant hearers and readers and teach more evil than good manners vers 5. Then Judith said unto Olophernes receive the words of thy servant and suffer thine handmaid to speak in thy presence and I will declare no lye unto thee this night v. 6. And if thou wilt follow the words of thine handmaid God will bring the thing perfectly to pass by thee and my Lord shall not fail of his purposes v. 7. As Nebucodonosor King of all the earth liveth and as his power liveth who hath sent thee for the upholding of every living thing for not only men shall serve him by thee but also the beasts of the field and the cattel and the fowls of the air shall live by thy power under Nebucodonosor and all his house v. 8. For we have heard of thy wisdom and thy policies and it is reported in all the earth that thou only art excellent in all the Kingdom and mighty in knowledg and wonderful in feats of war v. 9. Now as concerning the matter which * Chap. 5. 18 1â—â— Achior did speak in thy counsel we have heard his words for the men of Bethulia saved him and he declared unto them all the words that he had spoken v. 10. Therefore O Lord and Governour reject not his word but lay it up in thine heart for it is true for our Nation shall not be punished neither can the sword prevail against them except they sin against their God v. 11. And now that my Lord be not defeated and frustrate of his purpose even death is now fallen upon them and their sin hath * It meets not overtakes them if this be true overtaken them wherewith they will provoke their God to anger whensoever they shall do that which is not fit to be done 12. For their victuals fail them and all their water is scant they have determined to lay hands upon their cattel and purposed to consume all those things that God hath forbidden them to eat by his Laws v. 13. And are resolved to spend the first fruits of the corn and the tenths of the wine and oyl which they had sanctified and reserved for the Priests that serve in Jerusalem before the face of our God the which things it is not lawful for any of the people so much as to †Did not David and his men eat the shew-bread and did he sin in so doing did not our Saviour justifie them in eating of it in that extremity Mat. 12. 3 4. and were not these besieged Bethulians in as great extremity as David and his men were Which place plainly shews that a rigorous observation of Ceremonies must give place to necessity saith Diodate upon the place touch with their hands v. 14. For they have sent some to Jerusalem because also they that dwell there have done the like to bring them a license from the Senate 15. Now when they shall bring them word they will forthwith do it and they shall be given thee to be destroyed the same day But now comes the double iniquity 16. Wherefore I thine handmaid knowing all this aâ—â— fled from their presence and God hath sent me to work * Had King James who discovered the Papists Powder-treason heard her he would have examined her a little and found out her dissimulation Had any Nonconformists uttered such words in any of their works Mr. Debater would no doubt have cried out Treason treason c. and yet to the reading of this he gives assent and consent for instruction of people in manners Art 6. B. Prideaux Fasc cont c. 1. q. 2. p. 16. things with thee whereat all the earth shall be astonished and whosoever shall hear it 17. For thy servant is religious and serveth the God of heaven day and night Now therefore my Lord I will remain with thee and thy servant will go out by night into the valley and I will pray unto God and he will tell me when they have committed their sins v. 18. And I will come and shew it unto thee then thou shalt go forth with all thine army and there shall be none of them that shall resist thee v. 19. And I will lead thee through the midst of Judea until thou come before Jerusalem and I will set thy throne in the midst thereof and thou shalt drive them as sheep that have no shepherd and a dog shall not so much as open his mouth at thee for these things were told me according to my foreknowledg and they were declared unto me
and I am sent to tell thee Now I pray seriously consider all-her words and search whether you can find so many lies told at one time by one person except in the Popish Legends and all hid under the cloak of Religion prayer revelation and affection when nothing was intended but murther and mischief as the two next Chapters plainly shew was her design I know there may be good use made of this story or fiction to teach Kings and great men Generals and others to take heed of entertaining of fair-faced and smooth-tongued Women lest they be deceived shamed yea ruined by them and 't is to be feared some persons may the Lord restrain them take example by Judith to lye swear dissemble equivocate and do any thing to compass their bloody designs against the Princes and Potentates of the world and may think it lawful to use unlawful means to obtain as they judg a good end as the Monk of Swinstead-Abby did against King John who poysoned him in the Chalice and those wicked wretches that poysoned the Emperour Henry the seventh in the Host and those wicked bloody Papists that stab'd King Henry the * If I mistake not saith Dr. Jer. Taylor 's Sermon at St. Maries in Oxford upon November 5th p. 19. it was Pope Sixtus Quintus who sometimes pronounced a speech in full Consistory in which he compares the assassinate of Jâ—ques Clement and Judith where after having aggravated the faults of the murdered King he concludes him to have died impenitent denied him the solemnities of Mass Dirge requiem for his soul at last he ends with a prayer that God would finish what in this bloody manner he had begun third of France with a knife in the belly and King Henry the fourth his successor in the mouth and at the heart All which Mr. Prin speaks of in his Rome's Master-piece p. 34. and an Indian nut that the confederate Papists had prepared for King Charles the first From which and the like bloody designs and practises the Lord in mercy preserve King Charles the second and all his Royal Relations and loyal subjects especially when they shall hear and read that her treacherous and bloody fact is so much and by such men commended and held forth for peoples example of life and instruction in good * Art 6. manners and as part of the Old Testament at least †See Preface to the Common-prayer-book Parag. 4. agreeable to the will of God I beseech you to read over all this and examine and consider it well and then I make no question but you 'l see cause enough to tear these two fabulous erroneous and dangerous Books out of our Bibles and cast them out of our Churches Methinks seeing the ancient Fathers so ordered the matter that the whole * See Preface concerning the Service of the Church Parag. 1. Bible or the greatest part thereof should be read once every year and seeing that Order is called a †Ibid. Parag. 2. godly and decent order and fault found that it hath been altered broken and neglected by planting in * Are not the stories of Tobit Judith Susanna Bell and the Dragon as uncertain Ex Historicis Apocryphis incertum est an Tobias Judith cum fragmentis de Susanna Bell Dracone habeantur pro Dramaticis potius quam vâ—ris narrationibus Bishop Prideaux Fascic cont c. 1. q. 2. p. 16. uncertain stories and Legends that commonly when any Book of the Bible was begun after three or four Chapters were read out all the rest were unread this corruption should not be continued still as the directions for proper Lessons plainly shews it is so doth the Kalender For there is not one Chapter of either of the Books of Chronicles in which Books are many things that are not so plainly and fully set down in the Books of the Kings And also the whole Book of the the Canticles which shews the excellency and mutual love of Christ and his Church is neglected and but twelve Chapters of the Prophecy of â—zekiel are appointed to be read in the whole year the other thirty-nine especially that exceeding profitable and remarkable Chapter Ezek. 16. wherein God takes special care and gives a special charge to have Jerusalem know her abominations v. 2. and to take notice of his extraordinary love towards her v. 6. are left out and several other Chapters in other Books of the Old Testament in which are things very profitable to be read for the understanding of other places of Scripture confirmation of Doctrine and instruction in good manners And there is appointed to be read as a Lesson but one piece of a Chapter of the Book of the Revelations that excellent Book which hath so much concerning the Church of God in this latter end of the world and discovers so much of the Antichrist and other enemies of Christ and his true and pure Church of which Book Christ saith Blessed is he that readeth and they that hear the words of this Prophecy and keep those things that are written therein for the time is at hand Revel 1. 3. And that if any man shall take away from the words of the Book of this Prophecy God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life and out of the holy city and from the things that are written in this Book Revel 22. 19. and that is the 19th Chapter and that but to the 17th verse and that as obscure and mysterious and as hard to be understood as most of the rest of that holy Book and the rest that is omitted more easie most of it to be understood than that and to be sure much more profitable for the Church of Christ than the 24th Chapter of Ecclesiasticus is which is appointed to be read by special order upon the 24th of August St. Bartholomews day and to be more sure than those that are appointed to be read out of Tobit and Judith and yet there are above 120 Chapters of Apocryphal Books appointed in the Kalendar to be read in one year And whether appointing them and punishing Ministers for reading those other of the Books of Scriptures be not a virtual taking away the words of that Book I humbly leave to your consideration And seeing your Convocation-men who Can. 139. call themselves the Church of England say they have ordained nothing to be read but the pure word of God or that which is agreeable to the same If a great part of the pure word of God must give place as less †Except certain Books and Chapters which be least edifying and might best be spared and therefore are left unread Vide Order how the rest of the holy Scripture is appointed to be read Parag. 1. conducing to the instruction of people in good manners than the Apocryphal Scriptures do methinks they might have done well to have left out all such parts and passages and expressions of them as are not agreeable to
wicked man and that Hezekiah was an eminently godly man and King as may be seen 2 King 16. 20. 2 King 18. 2 Chron. 〈◊〉 ult 2 Chron. 29. 2 Chron. 30. 2 Chron. 31. 20. And was Abijah the Son of wicked Jeroboam who made Israel to sin a wicked child and curseâ— off-spring Doth not the Lord say of him thus That all Israel 〈◊〉 mourn for him for he only shall come to the grave because in him there is found some good thing toward the Lord God of Israel in the house of Jeroboam 1 King 14. 13. Doth it not hence follow that none of the wives of wicked men are wise and none of their children shall be saved â—nd it will not shift it off by saying that the words are only indefinite and sound no more but this that some wicked mens wiveâ— are foolish that is light and wanton and that some of wicked mens children are wicked and cursed for so it may be said of truly godly mens wives and children as we may see in Davids and Solomons and then what punishment or discouragement is this more to the ungodly than to the godly and therefore that is not the sense and was not the meaning of the Author but the former which is false and not agreeable to Gods pure word of truth 5. Whether that in Wisd 3. 16 17 18 19 verses be agreeable to the pure word of God which is As for the children of adulterers they shall not come to their perfection and the seed of an unrighteous bed shall be rooted out for though they live long yet shall they be nothing regarded and their last age shall be without honour or if they die quickly they have no hope neither comfort in the day of trial For horrible is the end of the unrighteous generation Now I pray are these things universally true of Bastards or not that they are not so 〈◊〉 A. B. Vsher saith of this see his cruel sentence against Bastards Sum. of Ch. Relig. pag. 16. consider 1. That Jephthah was a bastard Judg. 11. 1 2. and yet he came to his perfection and though he was cast out so as he did not inherit his fathers land yet he lived long and he was regarded and his last age was with honour for he was a valiant vertuous and victorious man and was chosen first by the Gileadites to be General of all their forces and afterward he was chosen Judg of all Israel and he ruled Israel six years ond he had hope and comfort in the day of tryal for he is reckoned by the Apostle amongst those believing worthies of whom he saith that the world was not worthy of them Heb. 11. 32 38. he was endued with the spirit of prudence and fortitude yea and was a truly godly man as appears by his prudent and just dealing with the Ammonites and his conscientious keeping of his rash vow though 't was so much against his own interest and disadvantageous to his only child And his death was not more horrible than other mens the Scripture speaks no evil of his death as it doth of several wicked mens Sauls Ahabs Achitophels Jehorams Jezabels and Judas's and others but only that he died after he had judged Israel six years and that he was buried in one of the cities of Gilead his own country 2. 'T is against the express Text of Scripture and scope of the Spirit of God in Ezek. 18. 4 8 17 20. which saith That it shall be no more said that the parents have eaten sowre grapes and the childrens teeth are set on edg For the soul that sinneth it shall die The children shall not be punished for the fathers fault 3. Adulterers and Adulteresses that were infamous by their own fault have had hope and have been saved as we may see in K. David and Rahab and therefore sure Bastards that are not infamous through their own default but only as such through the sin of their Parents may have hope and may through Gods mercy upon their repentance for their own sins and faith in Christ be saved too eternally 4. If this of Philo were universally true then no man could ordinarily be fully perswaded and sure of his Salvation which is a Doctrine that may bring true born children into an uncomfortable condition and make them almost without hope and bring them to a terrible end 5. Pharez the son of Judah begotten adulterously upon â—is Daughter-in-law Tam. r was a bastard Ceâ— 38 and yet was no 〈◊〉 miserable person as the Author of the Book of Wisdom describes a bastard to be For he was a hopeful yea a blessed man God so blessed Pharez that among the Posterity of Judah it was said in craving a blessing on a family Let thy house be like the house of Pharez whom Tamar bare unto Judah Ruth 4. 12. Yea he was honoured with being one of our Lord and Saviour Christs Progenitors according to his humane nature as ye may see by comparing Ruth 4. 18 19 20 21 22. 1 Chron. 2. 4 5. Mat. 1. 3. Luk. 3 33. 6. Whether that in Wisd 8. 19 20. said to be spoken of Solomon as the The ninth Chapter is called Solomon's Prayer in the old Translation words preceding and succeeding shew be agreeable to Gods pure word viz. For I was a witty child and had a good spirit yea rather being good I came into a body undefiled and do not rather savour of much base pride and be not directly contrary to true Solomon's Doctrine Prov. 27. 2 Let another man praise thee and not thy own mouth a stranger and not thine own lips and do not smell very rankly of the * Upon this account Bishop Prideaux condemns this Book Fascic controv c. 1. q. 2. p. 14. Pythagoreans and the Pharisees error who held That the souls of good men when they die go not immediately to heaven and there remain but into the bodies of other good men as †De Bello Judaico l. 2. c. 7. Josephus relates of the Pharisees Yea and do not virtually deny original sin for he saith that he had a good spirit which I take to be meant of his soul for 't is in the Latin Bonam animam fortitus eram and that he was good i. e. of a good soul and that he came into a body undefiled i. e. with sin what else is or can be the meaning For I am of their opinion that hold that the first sin of Adam our common father was and is imputed to all us his posterity descending from him by ordinary generation and that we naturally want that original righteousness which was in Adam and that we are prone to sin which proneness to sin is propagated to us by or with the seed of our Parents Of which to discourse here would take up too much time and paper but this I do but hint I intend the Pharisees error which I conceive is not agreeable to the pure Word of God in Zach. 12. 1.