Laws of the Kingdom A DIGRESSION touching the Antiquity Vse and Power of PARLIAMENTS and the Qualification of such Gentlemen as are fit to be chosen the Peoples Representatives THe Recital of these several Laws for frequent calling of Parliaments declaring the same to be of such Importance or Necessity to the safety and wel-being of the Nation Invites us to give the vulgar Reader some further Information touching those most Honourable Assemblies which though a digression will I hope be no Transgression for I am willing at any time to go a little out of my way provided I may thereby meet with the Readers profit and Advantage Of the Names and Antiquity of Parliaments THe word PARLIAMENT is French derived from the three words Parler la ment to speak ones mind because every Member of that Court should sincerely and discreetly speak his mind for the general good of the Common-Wealth and this name saith Cook 1 Instit fo 110. was used before William the Conquerer even in the time of Edward the Confessor But most commonly in the Saxons time it was called Michegemote or Witenage Mote that is the Great Mote Meeting or Assembly whence our Ward-Mootes in London receive their name to this day or the Wise-Moote that is the Assembly of the wise men and Sages of the Land But this word Parliament is used in a double sense 1. Strictly as it includes the Legislative Power of England as when we say An Act of Parliament and in this Acceptation it necessarily includes the King the Lords and the Commons each of which have a Negative Voice in making Laws and without their joint Consent no new Laws can pass that be obligatory to the Subject 2. Vulgarly the word is used for the Two Houses the Lords and Commons as when we say the King will call a Parliament his Majesty has Dissolved his Parliament c. The Lords of Parliament are divided into two sorts viz. Spiritual that is to say the Bishops who sit there in respect of their Baronies parcel of their Bishopricks which they hold in their Politick Capacity and Temporal The Commons are likewise divided into three Classes or parts viz Knights or Representatives of the Shires or Counties where note that though the Writ require two Knights to be chosen and that they are called Knights yet there is no necessity that they should actually have the degree of Knighthood provided they be but Gentlemen for the Statute 23 Hen. 6. cap 15 hath these words That the Knights of the Shires for the Parliament hereafter to be Chosen shall be not able Knights of the same Counties for which they shall be chosen OR OTHERWISE such Notable Esquires or Gentlemen born of the same Counties as shall be able to be Knights and no man to be such Knight which standeth in the degree of a Yeoman and under Secondly Citizens chosen to Represent Cities Thirdly Burgesses that is to say those that are chosen out of Boroughs Note that the difference between a City and a Borough is this a City is a Borough Incorporate which is or has within time of Memory been an Episcopal See or had a Bishop and this althô the Bishoprick be Dissolved as West minster having heretofore a Bishop though none now still remains a City Cook 1. Instit Sect 164. Boroughs are Towns Incorporated but such as never had any Bishops Of the Three Estates in Parliament THere has been a great debate about the Three Estates some zealously pleading That the Bishops are one of the three Estates of the Realm and the Lords Temporal a Second and the Commons-house the Third and the King over all as a Transcendent by himself Others as stifly deny this and assign the King as he his the Head of the Common Wealth to be the first Estate the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal jointly to be the Second and the Commons-House the Third Non opis est nostrae tant as Componere Lites We shall not presume to undertake a decision of this arduous Controversy but in our poor opinion the matter seems to appear more difficult than really it is by means that the contending Parties do not first plainly set down what it is they severally mean by the word Estate Which may be taken 1. For a rank degree or Condition of Persons considered by themselves different in some notable Respects from others wherewith they may be compared And in this respect my Lords the Bishops may very properly be said to be an Estate or one of the Estates of the Realm for then there will be several Estates above the number of three for so in the House of Commons there may be said to be three Estates viz. Knights Citizens and Burgesses And heretofore in the days of Popery when there were 26 Abbots and Priors that held per Baroniam too as well as the Bishops called to the Parliament and sat in the Lords House see Fullers Church History Lib. 6. 292. Whether they being Religious and Monastical Persons whereas the Bishops were Seculars no small difference in their account might not as well claim to be a distinct Estate by themselves as now the Bishops do may be a question But secondly When we spake of three Estates in the Constitution of our English Government 't is most natural to mean and intend such a poize in the Ballance or such an Order or State as hath a Negative Voice in the Legislative Power For as the King and Commons excluding the Lords so neither the King and Lords excluding the Commons much less the Lords and Commons excluding the King can make any Law but this glorious Triplicity must be in mutual Conjunction and then from their united Influences spring our happy Laws But in this sence the Lords Spiritual by themselves have no pretence to be a distinct Estate That is they have by themselves no Negative Voice which I conceive the proper Characteristick or essential Mark of each of the three Estates For suppose a Bill pass the Commons and being brought into the Lords House all the 26 Bishops should be against it and some of the Temporal Lords yet if the other Temporal Lords be more in number than the Bishops and those that side with them the Bill shall pass as the Act of the whole house and if his Majesty please to give it his Royal Assent is undoubted Law Which demonstrates the Bishops have of themselves no Negative Voice and consequently are none of the three Estates of the Realm But if any will have them called an Estate and mean something else be it if he please to explain his Notion 't is like I shall not contend with him about a fiddle faddle word Touching the Power of the Parliament THe Jurisdiction of this Court saith Cook 1 Instit Sect. 164. is so Transcendent that it maketh Inlargeth Diminisheth Abrogateth Repealeth and reviveth Laws Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiastical Civil Martial Marine Capital Criminal and common And 4 Instit Fol. 36.
Liberties and of other contained in our Charter of liberties of our Forest the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Knights Freeholders and other our Subjects have given unto us the fifteenth part of all their movables 5. And we have granted unto them on the other part that neither we nor our Heirs shall procure or do any thing whereby the Liberties in this Charter contained shall be Infringed or Broken 6. And if any thing be procured by any Person contrary to the premisses it shall be had of no force nor effect These being Witnesses Lord B. Arch-bishop of Canterbury E. Bishop of London c. We Ratifying and approving these Gifts and Grants aforesaid confirm and make strong all the same for Us and our Heirs perpetually And by the Tenour of these presents do renew the same Willing and granting for Us and our Heirs that this Charter and all and singular his Articles for ever shall be stedfastly Firmly and Inviolably observed And if any Article in the same Charter contained yet hitherto peradventure hath not been kept We will and by Authority Royal Command from henceforth firmly they be observed In Witness whereof we have caused these our Letters Patents to be made T. Edward our Son at Westminster the twenty eighth day of March in the twenty eighth year of our Reign Notes on Magna Charta THis Excellent Law holds the first place in our Statute Books for though there were no doubt many Acts of Parliament long before this yet they are not now Extant 't is called Magna Charta or the Great Charter not in Respect of its Bulk but in Regard of the great Importance and weight of the matters therein contained it is also styled Charta Libertatum Regni the Charter of the Liberties of the Kingdom and upon great reason saith Cook in his Proem is it so called from the effect Quia liberos facit because it makes and preserves the people free Though it run in the stile of the King as a Charter yet as my Lord Cook well observes on the 38 Chapter it appears to have passed in Parliament for there was then a Fifteenth granted to the King by the Bishops Earls Barons Free-tenants and people which could not be but in Parliament nor was it unusual in those times to have Acts of Parliament in a Form of a Charter as you may read in the Princes case Co. Rep. L. 8. Likewise though it be said here that the King hath given and granted these Liberties yet they must not be understood as meer Emanations of Royal Favour or new Bounties granted which the people could not justly challenge or had not a Right unto before For the Lord Cook at divers places asserts and all Lawyers know that this Charter is for the most part only Declaratory of the principal grounds of the Fundamental Laws and Liberties of England no new freedom is hereby granted but a Restitution of such as lawfully they had before and to free them of what had been usurped and encroached upon them by any power whatsoever and therefore you may see this Charter often mentions Sua Jura their Rights and Liberatâ—s suas their Liberties which shews they had them before and that the same now were Confirmed As to the occasion of this Charter it must be noted that our Ancestors the Saxons had with a most equal poize and temperament very wisely contriv'd their Government and made excellent provisions for their Liberties and to preserve the People from oppression and when William the Norman made himself Master of the Land though he be commonly called the Conquerour yet in truth he was not so and I have known several Judges that would Reprehend any Gentleman at the Bar that casually gave him that Title For though he killed Harold the Usurper and Routed his Army yet he pretended a right to the Kingdom and was admitted by Compact and did take an Oath to observe the Laws and Customs But the truth is he did not perform that Oath so as he ought to have done and his Successors William Rufus King Stephen Henry the First and Richard likewise made frequent Encroachments upon the Liberties of their People but especially King John made use of so many Illegal Devices to drain them of Money that wearied with intollerable oppressions they resolved to oblige the King to grant them their Liberties and to promise the same should be observed which King John did in Running-mead between Stains and Windsor by two Charters one called Charta Libertatum The Charter of Liberties the Form of which you may read in Math. Paris Fol. 246. and is in effect the same with this here recited the other the Charter of the Forrest Copies of which he sent into every County and commanded the Sheriffs c. to see them fulfilled But by ill Council he quickly after began to violate them as much as ever whereupon Disturbances and great miseries arose both to himself and the Realm The Son and Successor of this King John was Henry the Third who in the 19th Year of his Reign Renewed and Confirmed the said Charters but within two Years after Cancelled them by the pernicious advice of his Favourites and particularly Hubert de Burgh whom he had made Lord Chief Justice one that in former times had been a great Lover of his Countrey and a well deserving Patriot as well as learned in the Laws but now to make this a step to his Ambition which ever Rideth without Reins perswaded and humored the King that he might avoid the Charters of his Father King John by Duresse and his own Great Charter and Charta de Foresta also for that he was within Age when he granted the same whereupon the King in the eleventh Year of his Reign being then of full Age got one of the great Charters and of the Forrest into his Hands and by the Council principally of this Hubert his Chief Justice at a Council holden at Oxford unjustly Cancelled both the said Charters notwithstanding the said Hubert de Burgh was the primier Witness of all the Temporal Lords to both the said Charters whereupon he became in high Favour with the King insomuch that he was soon after viz. the 10th of December in the 13th Year of that King Created to the highest Dignity that in those times a Subject had to be an Earl viz. of Kent But soon after for Flatterers and Humorists have no sure Foundation he fell into the Kings heavy Indignation and after many fearful and miserable Troubles he was justly and according to Law Sentenced by his Peers in an open Parliament and justly Degraded of that Dignity which he unjustly had obtained by his Council for Cancelling of Magna Charta and Charta de Foresta In the 9th Chap. of this great Charter all the Ancient Liberties and Customs of London are Confirmed and preserved which is likewise done by divers other Statutes as 14 Edw. 3. Cap. 2. c. The 29 Chapt. NO FREE-MAN SHALL BE TAKEN
Assent and Consent to the use of all things contained and prescribed in the Book of Common-Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites Ceremonies of the Church according to the use of the Church of England or have not subscribed the Declaration or Acknowledgment contained in a certain Act of Parliament made in the 14 Year of His Majesties Reign and Intituled An Act for the Vniformity of publick Prayers and Administration of Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies and for the establishing the Form of making ordaining and consecrating of Bishops Priests and Deacons in the Church of England according to the said Act or any other subsequent Act And whereas they or some of them and diverse other person and persons not ordained according to the Form of the Church of England and as have since the Act of Oblivion taked upon them to preach in unlawful Assemblies Conventicles or Meetings under colour or pretence of Exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom have setled themselves in divers Corporations in England sometimes three or more of them in a place thereby taking an opportunity to distil the poisonous Principles of Schism and Rebellion into the hearts of His Majesties Subjects to the great danger of the Church and Kingdom II. Be it therefore enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That the said Parsons Vicars Curates Lecturers and other persons in Holy Orders or pretended Holy Orders or pretending to Holy Orders and all Stipendiaries or other persons who have been possessed of any Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Promotion and every of them who have not declared their unfeigned Assent and Consent as aforesaid and subscribed the Declaration aforesaid and shall not take and subcribe the Oath following I A. B. do swear That it is not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take Arms against the King and that I do abhor that Traiterous position of taking Arms by his Authority against his Person or against those that are commissioned by him in pursuance of such Commissions and that I will not at any time endeavour any Alteration of Government either in Church or State III. And all such person and persons as shall take upon them to preach in any unlawful Assembly Conventicle or Meeting under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom 2. shall not at any time from and after the 24th day of March which shall be in this present year of our Lord God One thousand six hundred sixty and five unless only in passing upon the Road come or be within five Miles of any City or Town Corporate or Burrough that sends Burgesses to the Parliament within His Majesties Kingdom of England Principality of Wales or of the Town of Berwick upon Tweed 3 or within five Miles of any parish Town or place wherein he or they have since the Act of Oblivion been Parson Vicar Curate Stipendiary or Lecturer or taken upon them to preach in any unlawful Assembly Conventicle or Meeting under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom 4 Before he or they have taken and subscribed the Oath aforesaid before the Justices of the Peace at their Quarter-Sessions to be holden for County Riding or Division next unto the said Corporation City or Burrough Parish place or Town in open Court which said Oath the said Justices are hereby impowered there to administer 5 Upon forfeiture for every such Offence the sum of Forty pounds of lawful English Money the one third part thereof to His Majesty and His Successors the other third part to the use of the poor of the Parish where the Offence shall be committed and the other third part thereof to such person or persons as shall or will sue for the same by Action of Debt Plaint Bill or Information in any Court of Record at Westminster or before any Justices of Assize Oyer and Terminer or Gaol-delivery or before any Justices of the Counties Palatine of Chester Lancaster or Durham or the Justices of the great Sessions in Wales or before any Justices of Peace in their Quarter Sessions wherein no Essoin Protection or wager of Law shall be allowed IV. Provided always and be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful for any person or persons restrained from coming to any City Town Corporate Burrough Parish Town or place as aforesaid or for any other Person or Persons as shall not first take and subscribe the aforesaid Oath and as shall not frequent Divine Service established by the Laws of this Kingdom and carry him or her self reverently decently and orderly there to teach any publick or private School or take any Boarders or Tablers that are taught or instructed by him or her self or any other upon pain for every such Offence to forfeit the sum of Forty pounds to be recovered and distributed as aforesaid V. Provided also and be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid that it shall be lawful for any two Justices of the Peace of the respective County upon Oath to them of any Offence against this Act which Oath they are hereby impowered to administer to commit the Offender for six Months without Bail or Mainprise unless upon or before such Commitment he shall before the said Justices of the Peace swear and subscribe the aforesaid Oath and Declaration VI. Provided always that if any person intended to be restrained by vertue of this Act shall without fraud or Covin be served with any Writ Sub-poena Warranr or other Process whereby his personal appearance is required his Obedience to such Writ Sub-poena or Process shall not be construed an Offence against this Act. Note That as to the Penalty of Forty Pound the party must be tried at the Assises or Sessions before it is forfeited But any two Justices of Peace may commit for six Months unless before them he 'l swear and subscribe the Oath in this Declaration specified the Assent and Consent and the Declaration therein referr'd unto which if he do he puts himself out of their power Now the Assent and Consent he has spoke of is appointed by the Stat. 13 and 14. of Car. 2di chap. 4. as follows I A. B. do here declare my unfeigned Assent Consent to all every thing contained prescribed in by the Book intituled the Book of common Prayer Administration of the Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church according to the use of the Church of England together with the Psalter or Psalms of David pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches and the form and manner of making ordaining and consecrating of Bishops Priests and Deacons The Declaration is by the Act last mentioned as
mans Guilt is enough to Condemn him I see not why their personal knowledge of a Prisoners Innocency or of the Witnesses Swearing falsely should not be sufficient to Acquit him 2. The other ground upon which the Grand Juries are to Proceed is Testimony of Witnesses and this is call'd EVIDENCE because it ought to be such as may make the matter clear manifest plain and evident to the Jury and of this Evidence the Jury are the proper and only Judges therefore they ought according to their Oath diligently Inquire into the Quality Repute and Circumstances of the Witnesses the likelyhood of what they Depose and whether they do not Swear out of Malice Subornation Self-Interest Combination or some ill design which to Discover they will do well to Examine them apart to note their Variations and Contradictions to ask them sudden questions and what questions are pertinent not the Judges but the Jury only can determine for they may know how to make use of them towards Discovery of the Truth thô the Judge does not and 't is They are upon their Oaths not he 't is they must satisfy their own Consciences the Judge has nothing to do to Intermeddle he is bound by their Verdict Let Witnesses be never so rampantly positive yet if the Jurors have good and reasonable grounds not to believe them they will they must remain as Ignorant to the parties Crime as before we find this expresly asserted for Law in our Books as Stiles's Reports L. 11. thô there be Witnesses who prove the Bill yet the Grand Inquest is not bound to find it if they see cause to the contrary so Coke L. 6. The Judges use to determine who shall be Sworn and what shall be produced as Evidence to the Jury but the Jury are to consider what Credit or Authority the same is worthy of If a Grand Jury are not Judges of Evidence they signifie nothing If as some would perswade us because People Swear desperately thô they do not believe them they shall be bound to find the Bill then they signifie nothing and are no security to preserve Innocency A lewd Woman once resolv'd to Indict the then Arch-bishop of Canterbury for a Rape she Swore it no doubt very heartily according to this new Doctrine of going according to Evidence the Jury must presently have found the Bill the Arch-bishop must have been Committed to Prison Suspended from Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction his Goods and Chattels throughout England Inventoried by the Sheriffs would it think you in that Case have been a good Excuse for the Grand Jury to have said that thô they believ'd in their Conscience the Baggage swore false yet she Swearing it positively they as so many Parish Clerks were but to say Amen to her Oath of the Fact and to find Billa Vera against that eminent Prelate And if the Jury be Judges of the Credibility of Evidence in this Case and may go contrary to it why I pray may they not have the same Liberty where they find good Cause in others If an Indictment be laid against a man for Criminal words said to be utter'd in a Colloquium or Discourse thô the Witnesses roundly Swear all the express words in the Indictment yet unless they will Relate and set forth the Substance of the whole talk 't is impossible the Jury should Judge of the matter for the foregoing and subsequent words may render Expressions that are Innocent and Loyal which taken to halfs may be rank Treason as if one should say To affirm the King has no more Right to the Crown of England than I have which is the Opinion of the Jesuits of his Majesty if once Excommunicated by the Pope is detestable Treason And two men at some distance not well Hearing or Remembring or Maliciously designing against his Life should Swear That he said The King had no more Right to the Crown than he had Now that the Man did utter these very words is true but if you ask the Evidence the rest of the Colloquium they shall tell you there was much more Discourse but they cannot remember it what satisfaction is this to a Jury or would it not be hard for a Man to be put to hold up his Hand at the Bar under the frightful Charge of Treason in this Case Or if a Minister in his Sermon should Recite that of the Psalms The Fool hath said in his Heart there is no God Jesuited Evidence now may come and Charge him with Blasphemy and Swear that he said There was no God and ask them what Expressions besides he used may excuse themselves and say 'T is a great while agoe we cannot remember a whole Sermon but this we all positively Swear He said there was no God The Inquiry of a Grand Jury should be suitable to their Title a Grand Inquiry else instead of serving their Countrey and presenting real Crimes they may Oppress the Innocent as in the Case of Samuel Wright and John Good at a Sessions in the Old Baily about December 1681. Good Indicts Wright for Treasonable words and Swore the words positively but after a Grand Enquiry the Grand Jury found that Wright only spoke the words as of others thus They say so and so and concluded with this They are Regnes for saying it and also Good at last Confessed that Wright was his Master and Corrected him for Misdemeanours and then to be Reveng'd he comes and Swears against him which he Confessed he was Instigated to by one Powel so the Grand Jury finding it to be but Malice Return'd the Bill Ignoramus whereas if they had not Examin'd him strictly they had never discover'd the Intreigue and the Master had Causelesly been brought to great Charge Ignominy and Hazard The Judicious Dalton p. 539 says well No less care or Concern at all lies on the Grand Jury than does on the Petty Jury People may tell you That you ought to find a Bill upon any probable Evidence for 't is but matter of Course a Ceremony a Business of Form only an Accusation the party is to come before another Jury and there may make his Defence But if this were all to what purpose have we Grand Juries at all why are the wisest best men in a County for such they are or should be troubled why are they so strictly Sworn Do not Flatter your selves you of the Grand Jury are as much upon your Oaths as the Petty Jury and the Life of the man against whom the Bill is brought is in your Hands The Lord Cook 3. Iustit 33. plainly calls the Grand Jury-men all wilfully forsworn and Perjured if they wrongfully find an Indictment and if in such a Case the other Jury thro Ignorance c. should find the person Guilty too you are Guilty of his Blood as well as they but suppose he get off there do you think it nothing to Accuse a man upon your Oaths of horrid Crimes your very doing of which puts him thô never so Innocent to