Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	believe_v	faith_n	word_n	11,191	5	4.5836	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A76783	St. Paul and St. James reconcil'd. A sermon preach'd before the Vniversity of Cambridge, at St. Mary's Church, on Commencement-Sunday in the afternoon, June 30. 1700. ... / By Offspring Blackall, D.D. Chaplain in ordinary to Her Majesty..	Blackall, Offspring, 1654-1716.	1700 (1700)	Wing B3050A; ESTC N36965	18,049	16

will be easy to understand all those Places wherein he attributes this to Faith only in a Sense very agreeable to the Doctrine which St. James here teaches it will be easy then to understand what St. Paul means Rom. iv 5. where he says That God justifies the Ungodly then I say that Passage which hath been thought the strongest will appear to be no Objection at all against St. James's Doctrine the meaning thereof being only this That the Grace of God in Christ Jesus is so large as that he do's not refuse even the vilest and greatest Sinners but readily accepts them to Favour upon their Belief of the Gospel and closing with the Terms of it And there will be then no difficulty at all in understanding how Abraham was justify'd by Faith only according to St Paul and how he was justify'd by Works that is not by Faith only as St. James expresly affirms he was at the 21st Verse of this Chapter For the Case was thus Upon his giving a full and hearty Assent to the Truth of the Divine Promises he was immediately receiv'd into God's Favour and Acceptance even before the Sincerity of his Faith has been actually try'd by his Obedience Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for Righteousness Rom. iv 3. so that he was then in a justify'd state And yet if after this he had declin'd to leave his Country and his Father's House or even to sacrifice his Son at God's Command he wou'd by this Disobedience have fall'n from that state of Divine Favour and not have been finally justify'd by God but then all his former as well as his later sins which had been once remitted to him with a temporary and conditional Remission upon his first entring into the Covenant of Grace by Faith by virtue of which Remission he was while he continu'd in the Covenant a justify'd Person wou'd nevertheless have been imputed to him and he condemn'd for them if he had afterwards swerv'd from his Obedience In short therefore the Justification which St. Paul generally speaks of is that whereby we are made Heirs of Salvation as he himself explains it in the afore-cited Text Tit. iii. 7. That being justify'd by Grace we shou'd be made Heirs according to the Hope of eternal Life but the Justification which St. James speaks of is that by which we are actually admitted into the Possession of this Inheritance And therefore tho' in order to the first Justification nothing more be necessary but only that we close with and accept of those Terms of Reconciliation which God offers to us Yet in order to the Second Justification it is moreover necessary that we shou'd make good that Covenant which we before entred into or else tho' we are already justify'd in St. Paul's Sense that is are now already by our embracing and believing and professing the Gospel in such a Capacity and Likelihood of obtaining eternal Life as an Heir is of enjoying his Father's Estate we shal never be justify'd in St. James's Sense that is we shall never actually possess and enjoy the Estate but notwithstanding our present Heirship shall at last be cast off and disinherited for our Disobedience And this Observation concerning the different Senses wherein these two Apostles do sometimes use the Word justify may I suppose be alone sufficient to reconcile them in most if not in all those assages wherein they seem to differ But II. The Word Faith or Belief which they do both use in treating of this Subject is likewise a Word capable of and frequently in Scripture us'd in different Senses and I believe it may easily be made appear that in those Places wherein St. Paul attributes so much to Faith wherein he is thought to declare that that is the only Condition of our final Justification and admittance into the Promis'd Inheritance he means quite another thing by Faith than St. James does when he says that that alone is not sufficient even all that St. James means by Faith and Works too I will not trouble you now with all 〈◊〉 ●●gnifications in which the Word Faith or Belief is us'd in Holy Scripture but shall take no ice only of two which I suppose most applicable to the case in hand 1. The First Sense of it which I shall take notice of is that which indeed is the most obvious and proper meaning of the Word that is when by Faith is meant An assent of the Mind to the Truth of some Reveal'd Proposition And in this Sense St. James uses the Word By that Faith which being without Works he says is not sufficient to justifie or save us he plainly means nothing more than only a Belief of those Truths which are reveal'd in the Gospel And the Case that he puts is this That a Man believes there is a God and that those things which he has reveal'd are true and that all his Promises and Threatnings shall be made good but nevertheless takes no care to live well and in this case he says that such a Faith as this is an empty dead Faith and that it will be of no real advantage to us any more than it is to the Devil's who believe all these Truths as firmly as we can do but without any Benefit to themselves because the Promises being not made to them they are not thereby incited to the doing of good But the Promises are made to us and therefore it can hardly be conceived it is scarcely to be supposed that any Man that firmly believes all the Truths of the Gospel and considers his own Interest therein should nevertheless allow himself in a wicked Life Faith is naturally such an active lively and working Principle that it can hardly fail to shew it self by its Effects 2. And for this Reason Secondly the word Faith which most properly signifies nothing but the Cause or Principle is oftentimes in Scripture put to signifie both the Cause and the Effect too that is both a Belief of the Gospel-Truths and also a Life led answerably to such a Belief And in this large and comprehensive sense 'tis clearly evident St. Paul does use the word in divers places and especially in those Epistles where he treats of Justification by Faith as may appear from his oftentimes using othe Words and Phrases instead of the single word Faith For whhat he sometimes calls Faith he at other times in those same Epistles calls the Law of Faith and the Obedience of Faith Rom. iii. 27. i. 5. xvi 26. And in Rom. x. 16. he most clearly explains his own meaning to be to include and comprehend Obedience in the word Faith whenever he attributes so much to Faith But they have not all obeyed the Gospel for Esaias saith Lord who hath believ'd our Report In which words the same thing is plainly meant by obeying the Gospel and believing the Report of the Preachers of it from whence it clearly appears That the Faith or Belief which he so much magnifies

in that Epistle is not an idle ineffectual Belief but such a Faith as makes Men to be obedient Forasmuch therefore as the Faith which St. Paul speaks of when he says we are justify'd by Faith includes in it all that St. James means by Faith and Works too it is plain That tho' we suppose that they do both use the word justifie always in the same sense there is not however any Contrariety in their Doctrines altho' one says that we are justify d by Faith and the other that we are justify'd by Works and not by saith only But 3. There is also an ambiguity in the word Works and it is not improbable nay I suppose I shall make it very plain that these two Apostles S. Paul and S. Jam. in their several Discourses upon the Subject of Justification do likewise use this Word in very different Senses and that St. Paul when he excludes Works do's not mean the same by Works that St. James do's when he affirms that we are justify'd by Works and not by Faith only And if St. James by Works when he affirms them to be necessary together with Faith means those Works of Piety Justice and Charity and other Moral Duties which are required in the Gospel as to any one that reads the former part of the Chapter it will be evident that he do's and on the other side if St. Paul when he excludes Works means by Works only either those materially good Works which Men might do without the Grace of the Gospel or the Merit of good VVorks or else those Ritual Observances which were requir'd by the Ceremonial Law of Moses then tho' their VVords and Expressions be different yet their Sense may be the very same Now concerning this place in St. James I think there can be no Dispute he plainly takes both Faith and VVorks in the most proper and usual acceptation of the words By Faith when he affirms that Faith alone is not sufficient he plainly means a meer Belief of the Truths of the Gospel and by VVorks when he affirms that they are necessary together with Faith he plainly means such a sort of Life and Conversation as the Belief of the Gospel Truths is naturally apt to produce a Conversation becoming the Gospel of Christ And both these he affirms to be necessary in order to our final Justification at the last day And on the other side St Paul if at any time he speaks of the same Justification that St. James do's means by Faith when he says we are justify'd by that only all that St. James means by Faith and VVorks too as hath been shewn already and by Works when he says we are justify'd by Works he means only either the Merit of good VVorks or such VVorks as might be done by unregenerate Men without the Grace of the Gospel or else the Ritual Observances of the Mosaical Law And that he uses the VVords in these Senses and do's not mean to exclude from being a condition of our final Justification that hearry Obedience to the Precepts of the Gospel which a firm Belief of the Truths of it is naturally apt to produce will further appear if these two things be considered 1 The occasion and design of those Discourses of St. Paul wherein Faith is so much magnified and VVorks are set so light by And And 2 The several Cautions that are here and there intermix'd in those Discourses as it were on purpose to prevent our mistaking his meaning and thinking that we may be sav'd by Faith alone without a good Life 1. We may consider the Occasion and Design of those Discourses of S. Paul wherein Faith is so much magnify'd and Works are set so light by and which consequently do seem most to contradict the Doctrine here taught by St. James And I premise this first of all That none of St. Paul's Epistles seem to have been written as if they were intended to comprehend the whole Christian Religion they rather suppose Christianity already planted in those Places to which his Epistles are directed It was not consequently his Intention in every Epistle that he wrote to teach all the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ and to lay again the foundation of Repentance from dead Works and of Faith towards God Heb. vi 1. for all this had been done before those same Apostles by whose Ministry they had been converted and baptiz'd having also then according to the Commission given them by Christ taught them to observe all things whatsoever our Lord had commanded As such therefore the Apostle consider'd the Persons to whom he wrote viz. as true Disciples of Christ as Persons that had before been taught to obey as believe the Gospel and so had no fear upon him that by his using the Word Faith or Works in an uncommon Sense and yet in such a Sense as the Controversy he was handling led him to use them in they to whom he wrote wou'd ever be in danger of embracing an Opinion so contrary to the first Principles of the Christian Religion as it plainly was to think that they might be saved only by believing without obeying the Gospel The main design then I say of most of St Paul's Epistles I mean of the Controversial Parts of them seems to be to furnish the Christians to whom he wrote with Answers to those Objections which the Enemies to Christianity among whom they liv'd did make against it And most of the Churches to which these Epistles were directed were made up chiefly of Gentile Converts with whom nevertheless there were some Jewish Converts also intermix'd but the far greatest part of the Inhabitants of those places were profess'd Jews or Gentiles who tho' both zealous each for their own way and against each other yet readily joyn'd their Forces together as against a common Enemy to hinder the growth and spreading of Christianity So that St. Paul had three sorts of Adversaries to deal with viz. the Gentiles the Jews and the Judaizing Christians The Gentiles who had been long bred up under the Institution of their Philosophers and by their good and wholsom Precepts of Morality were in a good readiness and disposition to embrace the Gospel which in general commanded little more than they were taught before their own Philosophers only requiring a stricter and more perfect observance of those Rules and adding new Motives and Encouragements to it from the plain Revelation of a future state of Rewards and Punishments of which before the coming of Christ Men had but an obscure Notion and very slender Assurance The main Objection therefore which these had to make against St. Paul was that he took as they thought a great deal of pains to little purpose in going about to establish a new Belief and a new Profession of Religion among them seeing that al to Practice they had been taught all the same things in substance by their own Philosophers so that consequently they thought he might have spared his labour

the forbearance of God In which Text being justify'd and having our Sins remitted seem'd to be us'd as Terms of he same Signification And the Psalmist meaning to describe the Blessedness of a justify'd Person thus expresses it Blessed are they whose Iniquities are forgiven and whose Sins are cover'd Psal xxxii 1 2. Blessed is the Man to whom the Lord will not impute Sin Rom iv 5 6 7 8. And indeed this is all the Justification that Sinful Men and such all Men are are capable of For being in truth Sinners they can't by a Just God be acquitted as Innocent They can therefore be justify'd no other way but by having their Sins forgiven them and by being receiv'd to Mercy for if God should enter into strict Judgment with us no Man living cou'd be justify'd in his Sight as the Psalmist says Psal cxliii 2. To justify therefore in the common Scriptural Notion of it is to absolve from Guilt to discharge from Punishment and accordingly it is frequently in Scripture oppos'd to Condemnation It is God that justifyeth says the Apostle who is he that Condemneth Rom. viii 33 34. And in another place Being justify'd by his Blood we shall be sav'd from Wrath through him Rom. v. 9. Now taking the Word in this Sense there is a two fold Justification First When we take upon us the Profession of the Christian Religion in Baptism for then our past Sins are forgiven us then we are receiv'd into a Covenant of Grace and Pardon But this is not a full Justification for our Sins are not then clearly pardon'd and forgiven because they may after this be still imputed to us and so they will be in case we afterwards do either in Profession or in Works deny that Faith which we then take upon us Our Second therefore and our compleat and final Justification is not till the great Day of Judgment when God will for ever acquit from the Guilt and free from the Punishment of all their past Sins all those who continu'd faithful to that Covenant which they entred into with God at their Baptism Supposing therefore at present that St Paul and St. James do by Faith and Works both mean the same things Yet if they do not both speak of the same Justification if St. Paul when he speaks of Justification by Faith means the First Justification which is dispensed to us in Baptism and St. James when he affirms that we are justify'd by Works and not by Faith only means the Second and Final Justification at the last day there is plainly no manner of Contrariety between them For it may be true that in order to our being admitted into the Covenant of Justification and Pardon nothing more may be required but only that we firmly believe and embrace the Christian Religion and accordingly we may observe that as a previous Disposition to Baptism nothing else seems to be requir'd but only that we should believe the Gospel and in Profession renounce our former Sins according to that of St. Philip to the Eunuch Acts viii 37. If thou believest with all thine Heart thou mayst be baptiz'd and yet it may be true too that our being put into a justify'd state by Baptism will in the event be no advantage to us but rather only increase our Condemnation unless afterwards we continue true and faithful to that Profession which we then take upon us and are careful to perform our part of that Covenant which we then enter into with God Now I say this last seems to be what St James affirms and the first all that St. Paul teaches at least in many of those Places where he says we are justify'd by Faith For that by the Justification which St. James speaks of when he says We are Justify'd by Works and not by Faith only he means our Final Justification at the great Day upon which that Salvation will immediately be bestow'd upon us which at our Baptism was only promis'd and assur'd to us upon certain Conditions is evident by his using Justification and Salvation in this Dispute as Terms equivalent For thus he expresses the Doctrine of the Text in the 14th Verse where he first begins to handle the Subject What doth it profit my Brethren if a Man say he hath Faith and have not Works can Faith save him It is plain that he means the same thing there by being sav'd that does in the Text and other Verses of this Chapter by being justify'd and consequently that by Justification in this Discourse of his concerning Faith and Works he means that Final Justification upon which Salvation is immediately consequent And on the other side that St. Paul in very many at least if not in all those Places wherein he attributes Justification to Faith only without Works means therefore only our first Justification that is our being admitted into the Covenant of Grace and being put into a justify'd state by Baptism will I suppose be no less evident if these two things be consider'd 1. That in many places he speaks of Justification as a thing past which he cou'd not do if he had meant the same thing by Justification that St. James does For thus writing to the Corinthians he says 1 Cor. vi 11 Ye are or ye have been justify'd in the Name of the Lord Jesus And Rom. vi 1. speaking of himself and other Christians that were then living and consequently not finally justify'd in St. James's Use of the Word he says that being justify'd by Faith they had Peace with God And upon this he grounds their Hope that they should also if they continu'd in Faith be finally justify'd by God at the last Day ver 9. For if while we were Sinners Christ dy'd for us much more then being now justify'd by his Blood we shall be sav'd from Wrath thro' him 2. It may be also further observ'd That in many places he expresly joyns Justification with Baptism as an Effect or Concomitant of it as in Tit. iii. 5 7. Not by Works of Righteousness which we have done but according to his Mercy he sav'd us by the washing of Regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost that being justify'd by his Grace we shou'd be made Heirs according to the Hope of Eternal Life and in 1 Cor. vi 11. Such were some of you but ye are wash'd but ye are sanctify'd but ye are justify'd they were justify'd it seems at the same time that they were wash'd that is at their Baptism when they openly and solemnly renounc'd those wicked Works which they had formerly liv'd in and took upon them the Profession of the Christian Faith Now therefore if this be granted which seems to be very probable That St. Paul generally means this by Justification viz. only our being admitted into a State of Grace and Favour with God at our Baptism in which State if we continue by persevering in Faith and Obedience we shall at last be justify'd and acquitted finally in the great Judgment it