Homagio Ligeancia quibus nobis tenemini is peculiar to the Temporal Lords But that in fide dilectione is not so peculiar to the Ecclesiastical Lords but is inserted into the Lay Lords Writs sometimes The reason why Archbishops Bishops Deans Parsons Prebends and other Ecclesiastic Bodies Politic when they do Homage saith (h) Littleton Cap. de Homagio â—ect 86. Littleton do not say Jeo deveign vostre Home I become your Man from whence Homagium or Hominium comes is (i) Par estre tant solement le home de Dieu because he is solely the Homager of God and so Glanvil Lib. 9. c. 1 2. Bracton fol. 78. F. Britton c. 68. lesta L. 3. c. 16. resolve that no Man (k) Post consecrationem hom â—gium non faciunt quiequid fecerunt ante sed tantum â—idelitatâ—m elected Bishop after Consecration doth Homage whatever he hath done before but only Fealty and no Convent or Abbat or Priâ—r ought to do Homage because they hold in anothers name viz. the name of the Churches But that these Ecclesiastics swore Fealty appears by many examples produced by Mr. Prynn (l) Brief Register part 1. fol. 196. to 206. p. 427 657 663. and what Oaths they took in his abridgment of the Records of the Tower But this is now of little use and so I leave it and shall observe some Particulars which Mr. Prynn and others have noted from the several Writs of Summons to Temporal Lords First it may be observed 1. Observations upon the Writs to Temporal Lords That it alone did not ennoble that a Summons by Writ though for two or three Generations from Father to Son did not ennoble the Blood to make them Barons So Ralph de Camois 49 H. 3. was summoned by Writ and ranked in the Roll above all Barons and Ralph his Son Anno 7 E. 2. But (m) Claus 7 R. 2. m. 32. dorso Thomas the Grandchild being chosen one of the Knights for Surry was discharged by the King 's Writ because he and many of his Ancestors were Bannerets and King Richard the Second summoned him to that very Parliament and he was summoned ever after during Life yet his Posterity as others were omitted which if they had been Barons properly as those by Creation and Tenure of Lands had not been omitted but might have challenged Summons ex debito Justiciae But I cannot enter into this long Controversy First and secondâ— Brief Register the curious may peruse Mr. Prynn and Elsyng's ancient method of holding Parliaments Page 33. who is of opinion that every degree of Baron passed with actual Ceremony and those Patents some had whereof the first upon Record he saith was 11 R. 2. to the Lord John Beauchamp of Rolt was an entailing of the Honour rather than the Creation because the words are ipsum Johannem in unum Parium Baronum Regni praeficimus whereas if he had been then created the words should have been per praesentes praefecimus Besides we find Henry Bromflet Knight was created by special Writ and his Heirs Males Barons de Vescy 27 H. 6. (n) Claus 27 H. 6. m. 26. dorso â—ntred after the names of the Temporal Lords in the very Summons in common Form to which is added Volumus enim vos haeredes vestros masculos de Corpore vestro legitime exeuntes Barones de Vescy Now this special Writ and Clause of Creation had been meerly void and nugatory had the general Writ alone ennobled him and his Posterity Yet in all the (o) Prynne part 1. Brief Register p. 228. subsequent Summons 28 29 31 33 38 H. 6. He is only called Dominus not Baro de Vescy as also may be noted of Beauchamp Secondly 2. The use of Barâ— in Writs how rare It may be observed that the word Baro and Barones are frequently met withal in Histories the Clause-Rolls of King John and H. 3. and in the Preface of Magna Charta and several Statutes applied to all the (p) Ibid. p. 218. Temporal Lords of Parliament yet in all the Clause-Rolls and Writs of Summons Mr. Prynn hat not observed any particular Persons amongst them summoned by the Title of Barons but only the Barons of Graystock and Stafford from Ed. 1. to H. 6. as Johanni Willielmo Radâ—â—pho Baroni de Graystock and so in Ed. 1. and 3. Edmundo Radulpho Baroni de Stafford Thirdly 3. Title of Dominus in Writs of Summons as to the Title of Dominus Mr. Prynn saith It is not to be found given to any but two before the time of H. 6. The first is John de (q) Cl. 16 E. 3. par 2. m. 13. dorso Moubray stiled Dominus Insulae de Axholm none else having this title till after the Reign of Richard the Second The next so stiled is 11 H. 4. (r) Cl. 11 H. 4. m. 32. dorso where a Writ issued Johanni Talbot Domino de Furnival which though omitted in some Summons after was again used in the Summons to him (s) Cl. 4 H. 5. m. 16. dorso 4 H. 5. and H. 5. after which none is found stiled Dominus till (t) Cl. 22 H. 6. m. 21. dorso 22 H. 6. that Robert Hungerford Chevalier is stiled Dom. de Mollins as he is in 25 H. 6. which gave the Title of Dom. de Poynings to Henry Percy and in Cl. 27 H. 6. m. 21. dorso this Title Dominus is given to Hungerford Percy and four more after which it grew more common to them and others summoned as may be seen in Sir William Dugdale's Summons lately Printed who (u) Cl. 49 H. 3. m. 5. 49 H. 3. reckons Dom. Hugo Dom. Humet and Dom. Stanford Fourthly 4. Title of Chevalier Another Title given to Barons of the upper House is that of Chevalier which was not given to any Temporal Lords or Barons in any Writs or Lists of Summons to Parliament before 49 Ed. 3. (w) Cl. 49 E. 3. n. 4.6 dorso 50 E. 3. part 2. m. 6. dorso wherein Summons issued Willielmo de Morle Chevalier Willielmo de Aldburgh Chevalier Joh. de Welle Chevalier Hugoni de Dacre Chevalier After which it grew more common under King Richard the Second Henry the Fourth and Fifth After the beginning of H. 6. and during the Reign of H. 6. and Ed. 4. there was scarce any Temporal Lord in the lists of Summons but was stiled Chevalier or Miles and so it continues to this day though not as Mr. Prynn saith because they were all generally Knighted for their greater Honour for it is apparent in the Lists exhibited by Sir William Dugdale that most of the Barons by descent though never Knighted had the Title Fifthly 5. Of Councils that were not Parliaments There is great difference betwixt Writs of Summons to general Parliaments and particular Councils upon emergent occasions which are not properly Parliaments All Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Lords Barons
together with Judges and King's Council Citizens Burgesses of Parliament and Barons of the Cinque-Ports being usually summoned to the one but to the other some few Spiritual and Temporal Lords only without (x) Brief Register part 1. pag. 187. to 192. any Judges Assistants Knights Citizens Burgesses or Barons of the Cinque-Ports or some few of them only and divers who were no usual Lords or Barons of Parliament as Mr. Prynn hath made evident and the Rolls themselves in the Margin notes them by de Concilio summonito or deveniendo ad Concilium which some Antiquaries having not noted have confounded them SECT 4. Of the Judicature of the House of Lords IT is evident that the Lords in Parliament have ever been the usual Judges not only in all criminal and civil causes 6. The Lords Judicature proper for Parliaments to judg or punish and Writs of Errors but likewise in all cases of Precedencies and Controversies concerning Peers and Peerage which Power was in them as the King 's Supreme Court before there were any Knights Citizens or Burgesses summoned to our Parliaments So Hoveden (y) Annal. pars poster p. 561. ad 566. is express in the case of Sanctius King of Navar and Alphonsus King of Castile Comites Barones Regalis Curiae Angliae adjudicaverunt Anno 1177. 23 H. 2. So Fleta in Ed. the First 's time writes (z) Habet enim Rex Curiam suam in Concilio suo in Parliamentis suis praesentibus Pralatis Comitibus Baronibus Proceribus aliis viris peritis ubi terminatae sunt dubitationes judiciorum Lib. 2. c. 2. p. 66. thus The King hath his Court in his Council in his Parliaments there being present the Prelates Earls Barons Nobles and other skillful Men viz. the Judges Assistants where are ended the doubts of Judgments This Particular of the Jurisdiction of the House of Lords is so fully in every Branch of it proved by Mr. Prynn in his Plea for the Lords House that it were an Injury to the inquisitive Reader not to referr him to that Treatise for full Satisfaction therefore I shall only pick out a very few out of a Manuscript I have of the Priviledges belonging to the Baronage of England and Mr. Prynn In the fourth of King (a) Roâ— Parl. 4 E. 3. m. 7. num 3. Judgment of Lords on John Mautravers Edward the Third the Peers Earls and Barons assembled at Westminster saith the Record have strictly examined and thereupon assented and agreed that John Mautravers is guilty of the death of Esmon Earl of Kent Uncle of our Lord the King that now is wherefore the said Peers of the Land and Judges of Parliament judged and awarded that he the said John should be drawn hanged and beheaded In the first of R. 2. John Lord of (b) Rot. Par. 1 R. 2. m. 6. num 38 39. Gomenys and William de Weston were brought before the Lords sitting in the white Chamber On John Lord of Gâ—menys and William Weston for delivering up Forts to the Enemy and were severally charged at the Commandment of the Lords by Sir Richard Scroop Knight Steward of the Kings House William Weston being accused for rendring the Castle of Outhrewike and John Lord of Gomenys for rendring the Castle of Ards. They both made plausible defences and Sir Rich. Scroop Steward tells William that the Lords sitting in full Parliament do adjudge him to death But because our Lord the King is not yet informed of the manner of this Judgment the execution thereof shall be respited till the King be informed thereof and the like Sentence he passed upon John Lord of Gomenies only adding that he being a Gentleman and Banneret should be beheaded There are many more Examples of Judgments given in Capital matters upon Bergo de Bayons 4 E. 3. m. 7. num 4. Thomas de Gurny eadem membrana num 5. and others and for Offences not Capital of Richard Lions 59 E. 3. m. 7. William le Latymer 42 E. 3. m. 2. William Ellis ibid num 31 John Chichester and Botesha 1 R. 2. num 32. Alice Piers Ibid. num 41. Mr. Antiquity of Judgment by Peeâ—s Prynn (c) Plea for Lords p. 203. Hist lib. 4. shews this Jurisdiction out of Historians even from Cassibellan out of Geoffrey of Monmouth Also Anno 924. of Elfred a Nobleman who opposed King Aethelstan's Title and had his Lands adjudged by the Peers forfeit to him the Words of the King are Et eas accepi (d) Malmsb. de Gest is Reg. lib. 2. c. 6. p. 62. Spelman Conc. Tom. 1. p. 407 408. Anno 1043. quemadmodum judicaverunt omnes â—ptimates Regni Anglorum So Earl Godwin having murdred Prince Alfred Brother to King Edward the Confessor being fled into Denmark and hearing of King Edward's Piety and Mercy returned and came to London to the King who then held a Great Council and denied the Fact and put himself upon the (e) vnde super hoc pono me in consideratione Curiae vestrae Chron. Brompton col 937 938. consideration of the Kings Court and the King speaks to the Earls and Barons thus Volo quod inter nos in illa appellatione rectum judicium decernatis debitam justiciam faciatis and after it is said Quicquid judicaverint per omnia ratificavit So in the Constitutions of (f) An. 1164. M. Paris 94. Sicut Barones caeteri debent interesse judiciis Curiae Regis cum Baronibus quousque perveniatur in judicio ad diminutionem membrorum vel ad mortem The House of Lords the King's Court of Barons Clarendon it is appointed That the Archbishop Bishops and those Clergy that held in Capite as by Barony should be Parties in the Judgments of the Kings Court as other Barons ought with the other Barons till it come in Judgment to the loss of Member or to Death So in the Case of Tho. Becket Archbishop of Canterbury Anno 1165. 11 H. 2. we find in Hoveden parte post p. 494 495. that Barones Curiae Regis judicaverunt eum esse in misericordia Regis and afterwards when he would not yield to the Kings Will he (g) Dixit Baronibus suâ—s Cito facite mihi judicium de illo qui homo meus Ligeus est stare Juri in Curia mea recusat saith to his Barons Quickly make to me Judgment of him who is my Liege Man and refuseth to stand to the Law in my Court The Barons going out judg'd him fit to be seiz'd on and sent to Prison and the Historian saith tunc misit Rex Reginaldum Comitem Cornubiae Robertum Comitem Leicestriae ad indicandum ei judicium de illo factum Anno 1208. King (h) Anno 10 Johan Mat. Paris p. 218. John exacted Pledges of his Subjects and amongst others of William de Breause who said If he had offended the King he would be ready to answer his Lord and that without Hostages secundum judicium
Council being in the Charter to my judgment reckoned as one of their Franchises or rather something exceeding their municipal Liberties and Free Customs being coupled to them with an and to have a Priviledge to have some of them Members of the great Council of the Kingdom What the Tenents in Capite were summoned for for so I think the words ad habendum commune Concilium Regni de Auxiliis must be understood But then when it is restricted there with de Auxiliis only it may very well give a ground to their opinion that think the principal use was to proportion the Aid or Tax and assent to what the King the Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and Peers did ordain However this was That such great Numbers sate not with the Lords it seems clear to me that this numerous body of so different an Order from the Barons majores must have a distinct Place for consulting apart and must select Committees to transact with the King and Lords and must for order sake appoint some to speak for them what they petitioned for or assented to and could not constantly sit with the Prelates and Lords and do rather believe that the Prelates had one place where they sate and the Barons another and these Tenents in Capite a third at least for their usual Consultations among their own Order and met in the public place when there was occasion or might have access by Committees which certainly was the practice in after-times as appears in that Parliament of 6 E. 3. (k) Rot. Parl. 6 E. 3. num 2. Cest assavoir les Prelâ—â—z par eux meâ—mes les ditz Countes Barouns autres Grantz par eux mesmes auxint les Chivalers des Countes par eux mesmes No mention of Citizens or Burgesses the morrow after the Nativity of our Lady the King requiring the advice of his Parliament touching his French Affairs and Voyage thither It is said they thereupon treated and deliberated that is to say the Prelates by themselves and the said Earls Barons and other great men by themselves and also the Knights of the Counties by themselves and then gave their advice From whence by the way we may observe the true ground of calling our Parliament Houses without the King the three Estates Having dispatched this I come now to consider the Speakers of the House of Commons Hackwel (l) Modâ—â— tenendi p. 200. Method of Parl. 124. The first Speaker upon Record and Elsyng name the first that is found upon Record to be Sir William Trussel 13 E. 3. Num. 9. where it is said Les Chivalers des Countes les Commons responderent per Monsieur William Trussel but the Record names him not Speaker however he performed that Office then Hackwel names Scroope before him 6 E. 3. and Sir Peter de la Mare after him but the first that Mr. Elsyng or Mr. Prynne (m) Prynne's Abridgment p. 151. finds upon Record and by the name of Speaker is Sir Thomas Hungerford 51 E. 3. for it is said that the last day of the Parliament he declared that during the Parliament he had generally moved the King to pardon all such as were in the last Parliament unjustly convicted which imports that this was a Petition of the Commons presented by him their Speaker Anno 1 R. 2. Sir Peter de la Mare being Speaker made his Protestation that what he had to say was from the whole House therefore required if he should speak any thing haply without their consents that the same ought to be amended before his departure from the said place The first Petition we meet with that a Speaker (n) Abridgment of Records p. 174. Petition for Freedom of Speech made to the King from the Commons was 2 R. 2. by Sir James Pickering their Speaker that if he should speak any thing that haply might be ill taken it might be as nothing so as the Commons might at any time amend the same and the like he petitioned for himself which is the first Petition as to Liberty of Speech we meet with The first Speaker presented to the King in full (o) Id. p. 360. Parliament by the Commons 20 Ric. 2. was Sir John Bushey the King 's great Favourite In this Parliament the Houses sate together in a long (p) Hackwel Moâ—us p. 202. House built of Timber in the Palace-Yard at the Impeachment of the Duke of Gloucester the Earls of Arundel and Warwick Sir Arnold Savage was Speaker 2 H. 4. who is the first upon Record that the Commons were required by the King to chuse as Speaker and he was again in 5 H. 4. who desired the King in the name of the Commons that they might freely make complaint of any thing amiss in Government which was yielded to by the King Anno 7 H. 4. Sir John Tiptost was chosen Speaker who desired to be discharged because of his Youth but he was allowed he forgot to make the usual Protestation but came up the next day and made it with this Addition (q) Rot. Parl. 7 H. 4. num 6. That if any Writing were delivered by the Commons in this Parliament and they should desire to have it again to amend any thing therein it might be restored to them which was granted While he was Speaker he Signed and Sealed the Deeds of the entailing of the Crown on H. 4. (r) 7 H. 4. with these words Nomine totius Communitatis He was a Person of extraordinary Parts Son of John Lord Tiptost and for all the Apology for his young Age he was within three Years after made Lord Treasurer of Enggland and by H. 6. made Marquess of Worcester Anno 1 H. 5. William Sturton Esquire was chosen Speaker who without the assent of his Companions did agree before the King to deliver in Parliament certain Articles but three days after the Commons sent Sir John Doreword (r) 7 H. 4. with several of their Members to the House of Lords to declare to the King that their Speaker had no Authority from them to yield thereto and the King was pleased to accept of it There are three Petitions the approved Speaker makes to the King First That the Commons may have freedom of Speech as of (s) 25 H. 1. num 10. The Speakers of latter Times express the particular Privilege of Freedom from Arrest right and custom they have had and all their ancient and just Privileges and Liberties allowed them In Sir Thomas Moor's Speech 14 H. 8. it was thus worded That if in communication and reasoning any man in the Commons House should speak more largely than of duty they ought to do that all such offences should be pardoned and to be entred upon Record which was granted only I find that H. 4. (t) Rot. Parl. H. 4. num 10. said that the hoped or doubted not that the Members of Parliament would not speak any unfitting thing or abuse
all manner of People as well Poor as Rich that for Highness nor for Riches nor for Hatred nor Estate of no manner of person or persons nor for any Deed Gift nor Promise of any person the which is made to him nor by Craft nor by Ingen he shall let the Kings Right nor none other Persons right he shall disturb let or respite contrary to the Laws of the Land nor the Kings Debts he shall put in respite where that they may goodly be levied that the Kings need he shall speed above all others that neither for gift wages nor good deed he shall layne disturb nor let the profit or reasonable advantage of the King in the advantage of any other person or of himself that he shall take of no person for to do wrong or right to delay or to deliver or to delay the People that have to do before him c. where he may know any wrong or prejudice to be done to the King he shall put and do all his power and diligence that to redress and if he may not do it that he tell it to the King or to them of the Council that may make relation to the King if he may not come to him Sir Edward Coke (z) 4. Instit p. 103. 110 111. hath commented on the Mirror to explain all the Power and particular business of the Court and further observeth that the Patent of the King to the Chief Baron the rest of the Barons Atturney General and Sollicitor are not so long as the King pleaseth but quam diu se bene gesserint which is interpreted a place for life and there is good reason being too many changes would give too many an insight into the Kings Revenue There is a Manuscript (a) Codex niger c. 1. Nulli licet statutum Scaccarii infringere vele is quavis temeritate resistere Habet enim hoc commune cum ipsa Dom. Regis Curia in qua ipse in propria persona Jura decernit quod nec Recordationi nec Sententia in eo latae liceat alicui contradicere of Gervasius Tilburiensis writ in the time of Henry the second which gives an account how it came to be called the Exchequer from a checked Covering of the Table at which the Officers of the Court sate and saith That it is lawful for none to infringe the Statutes of the Exchequer or by any rashness to resist them it having that common with the Court of the Lord the King in which he in his proper person gives Judgment that it is not lawful for any to contradict either the Record or Sentence By which it appears that this Court was distinct from the Kings Bench where the King sate in person and that by the Institution of William the Conqueror not only the great Barons of this Realm as well Ecclesiastical as Secular but also the Justice of England as President thereof by his Office were Members of this Court and so continued to do long after as the Judicious (b) Origines Jurisâ—ic fol. 50. Sir William Dugdale hath by Precedent shown Mr. Prynne hath given us two Records out of the Exchequer (c) Commun Term. Mich. 35 H. 3. Rot. 2. 34 H. 3. and Rishanger 40 H. 3. that that King in his proper person sate and gave judgments in the Court of Exchequer and gave not only Rules to be observed about the Revenue Sheriffs and Bailiffs but also concerning punishing Blasphemy defending Pupils Orphans and Widows and how the Magnates deported themselves to their Tenents and if (d) Inquirant qualiter Magnates se gerunt erga homines suoâ— si forte non possunt plenarie corrigere tunc ostendant easdem transgressiones Dom. Regi they found them transgressing that they correct them as they can and if they cannot fully correct them they show the same transgressions to the King He hath also given an account how 54 H. 3. (e) Pat. 54 H. 3. m. 22. dorso Incep 55. Rot. 3. dorso the accounts of the Sheriffs into the Exchequer were to be digested and in Michaelmass-Term the same Year how the Barons of the Exchequer were to administer the new Oath to the Mayor Elect of the City of London likewise in the same (f) Animadv fol. 55 56. Author there is a large refutation of Sir Edward Coke's Opinion that the Statute of Rutland as he calls it was a Statute made by the King Lords and Commons where it is proved against Sir Edward that it was made for the ordering of the Exchequer at Rothelan in Wales by the King and his Council and not at Rutland but I shall not enter into such Particulars There are several other Courts which have peculiar Jurisdictions by the King's Grants and Prescription as the Court of Requests abolished 17 Car. 1. The Court of Chivalry Court of Marshalsea of the Admiralty and that for redress of delays of Justice which Sir Edward Coke and others have treated of at large and fall not so necessarily for me to discourse of So I shall proceed to the Itinerant Justices and of Assizes and Gaol-delivery SECT 7. Of Itinerant Justices and Justices of Assize and Nisi Prius SOme Shadow of this we find in the time of the Conqueror when Geofrey Itinerant Justices Earl of Constance and some other Barones Regis did sit at (g) Regist Ecclesiae Eliensis fol. 24 b. Kenteford to hear and determine the Claim touching the Rights and Liberties of the Church of Ely at that time disputed before them But the settlement of the Constitution of them was not till 22 H. 2. Anno 1176. as Roger Hoveden (h) Annal. pars post p. 148 149 150. hath related when the King held his Great Council at Nottingham communi omnium Consilio divisit Regnum suum in 6 partes per quarum singulas Justiciarios Itinerantes constituit and the Twenty fifth of his Reign at his great Council at Windsor (i) Idem p. 590 591. Et unicuique partium praefecit viros sapientes ad faciendam Justitiam ad audiendum clamorem populi he divided England into four Parts and over every Part he appointed Wisemen to do Justice and hear the Complaints of the People The Form of the special Writ from the King to impower them to act and of the Writ directed to the Sheriffs to summon all such Persons as were concerned in this Service to appear before the Justices may be seen in Sir William Dugdale's Origines Juridiciales fol. 52. a.b. In which latter Writ (k) Cl. 3 H. 3. m. 13. dorso the Persons summoned to appear were Archbishops Bishops Abbats Earls Barons Knights libere tenentes and in every Village four Legales Homines Praepositum de quolibet Burgo 12 Legales Burgenses Sir Ed. Coke (l) 4. Instit p. 184. calls these Justices in Eyre and saith they had Jurisdiction in all Pleas of the Crown and of all Actions real personal and
injuries which were brought upon the King beyond Sea by which not only the King but many of the Earls and Barons were disinherited therefore the King required Counsel and Aid of them of a Fifteenth Upon this the Archbishop and the whole number of Bishops Magna Charta granted Earls Barons Abbats and Priors having had deliberation answered the King That they would willingly yield to the Kings desire if he would grant them the long desired Liberties The King saith my Author being led by Covetousness or as he means being desirous of a supply yielded to what the Magnates desired so he granted that which is called Magna Charta so deservedly priz'd by all Englishmen ever since and the (f) Idem num 30. Charta de Foresta and presently Charters were got drawn and the King sealed them and they were sent into all Counties two one of the Liberties and the other of the Forests Matth. Paris saith expresly That they (g) Ita quod chartae utrorumque Requm in nullo invâ—niuntur dissimiles were the same that King John had granted and so refers the Reader to peruse them in what he had writ on his Reign It is to me very strange that since so many Original Grants of the Kings of England and other ancienter Deeds being every where to be found among the ancient Evidences of many Noble and Gentlemens Families yet no where that I can learn any of these Original Charters are to be found except one at Lambeth as Mr. Pryn hath observed That upon Record being only an Exemplification in King Edward the First 's time Anno 1232. on the Nones of March the King called a Great Council to (h) Idem fol. 314. num 20.17 H. 3. Westminster where there met Magnates Angliae tam Laici quam Praelati The King required an Aid for the payment of his Debts contracted by his Expeditions beyond Sea To which Ralph Earl of Chester on behalf of the Nobility answered That the Earls Barons and Knights that held of the King in Capite being with the King personally in that Expedition and having fruitlesly spent their Money were poor so that of (i) Vnde Regi de Jure auxilium non debebant Idem num 30. The Tenents in Capite having personally served according to the Tenure of their Service deny the King Aid right they ow'd not Aid to the King And so my Author saith the Laics having asked leave all departed and the Prelates answered That many Bishops and Abbats being absent they desired respite till some other meeting which was appointed fifteen days after Easter By this we may observe who they were that had the power of giving consent or granting aid for if there had been any other Members of the Lay Order besides Earls Barons and Knights that held in Capite the Earls of Chester's Argument had been of no validity In the Statute of Merton (k) Pulâ—on Stat. p. 1. In one part it is said Our Lord the King granted by the Consent of his Magnates 20 H. 3. it is thus expressed Before William Archbishop of Canterbury and other his Bishops and Suffragans and before the greater part of the Earls and Barons of England there being assembled for the Coronation of the said King and Helioner the Queen about which they were called thus it was provided and granted as well of the foresaid Archbishop Bishops Earls and Barons as of the King himself and others I shall only cull out some few of the Great Councils in this Kings Reign wherein most fully are expressed the true Members of them or such wherein something remarkable was transacted Anno 1237. 21 H. 3. The King keeping his Christmas at Winchester sent his (l) Matt. Paris fol. 367. num 30. Misu c. scripta Râ—galia pracipiens omnibus ad Regnum Angliae spectantibus c. ut omnes sine omissiâ—ne conveairent Regni negotia tractaturt totum Regnum contingentia Royal Writs through all England commanding all that appertained to the Kingdom of England that is all who were to be Members of the great Council which my Author explains particularly thus viz. Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors installed Earls and Barons that without failure they should meet at London on the Octaves of the Epiphany to treat of the Affairs of the Kingdom concerning the whole Kingdom then he adds That on the day of St. Hilary there met at London an (m) Insinita Nobilium multitudo viz. Regni totalis universitas infinite Multitude of the Nobles viz. The whole University of the Kingdom which were the Persons of those Orders before particularized Anno 1246. 30 H. 3. By the Kings (n) Edicto Regio convocata convenit ad Parliamentum generali â—â—mum â—otius Regni Anglicani totalis Nobilitas Idem p. 609. num 10. Edict was called to the most general Parliament saith Matthew Paris all the Nobility of the whole Kingdom of England viz. of the Prelates as well Abbats and Priors as Bishops also Earls and Barons and a few Pages after concerning the same Parliament he saith All the Magnates of the Kingdom met and the King himself first spake to the Bishops apart then to the Earls and Barons and last to the Abbats and Priors In this The word Parliament now used that which frequently in Matthew Paris is called Colloquium now he gives the Title of Parliament to from the French word parler to confer or speak together and we find what is meant also by totalis Nobilitas Anno 1253. 37 H. 3. By the (o) Tota edicto Regio convocata Angliae Nobilitas convenit de arduis Regni Negotiis simul cum Râ—ge tractatura Idem fol. 745. num 40. Kings Edict the Nobility of England being summoned met at London to treat together with the King of the arduous Affairs of the Kingdom and there were present with most of the Earls and Barons the Archbishop Boniface and almost all the Bishops of England In this great Council were the Tenents in Capite according to King John's Charter The King in this Parliament or Colloquium requires Money for an Expedition into the Holy Land but for fifteen days there were great Contests about it till the King de novo confirmed King John's Charters and a solemn Excommunication was agreed upon to be pronounced against the Infringers of it and my Author saith Rex Magnates Communitas Populi protestantur in the Presence of the Venerable Fathers c. That they never consented or do consent that any thing be added or altered in the Charters but plainly contradict it so 3 May (p) Pat. 37 H. 3. m. 13. Anno 1253. in Westminster-Hall the Exemplification passed the Seal of the King and other great Men. But it is principally to be considered what is expressed in the Patent * Praefatus Dominus Rex in prolatione praefatae sententiae omnes libertates consuetudines Regni sui Angliae usitatas dignitates Jura Coronae
Proclamation and shall return the names of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses Return of Indentures in certain Indentures betwixt the Sheriff and those that were present at the Election whether the persons elected were present or not c. The Returns to the Writs 1 H. 5. Who were Chusers of Burgesses shew the Election to be by common assent and consent of those present as that for Lestwythiel where 32 Electors are named and that for Surry hath only four but adds omnium aliorum fidelium ibidem existentium The Indenture for Sussex is in French and saith Les Gentilles homes Communes the Gentlemen and Commons had chosen Richard Sayvile c. The Sheriff of Bristol saith Coadunatis discretioribus magis sufficientibus Burgensibus ex assensu Johannis Clive Majoris Villae praedictae aliorum plurimorum existentium eligimus c. The elected were two Burgesses of Bristol Thomas Norton and John Leycester both for Knights for the County of Bristol and Burgesses for the Villa of Bristol and in another these are called Burgenses and Mercatores The next alteration that I find is after the Statute of the (b) Cl. 23 H. 6. m. 21. dorso The Knights to be resident in the County and the Electors to have at least 40 s. a year Lands 8 H. 6. c. 7. which agrees with that of 23 H. 6. that every Knight to be chosen within the Kingdom of England to come to the Parliament shall be chosen by such as live in the County whereof every one have a free Tenement to the value of Forty Shillings per annum beyond all Reprizes and that those who are elected be abiding and resident in the said County and the Sheriff have power upon Oath to examine the Electors what yearly Estate they have and that the Sheriff incur the penalty of 100 Marks for his false return and the Knights so returned lose their Wages There are several Precepts that command that at such Elections (c) Proclamari inhiberi facias ne aliqua persona tunc ibidem armata seu modo guerrino arraiata ad electionem illam accedat Rot. Parl. 8 H. 6. m. 13. num 18. None to come in an Hostile manner to elect no person come there Armed or arrayed in Warlike manner or do nor attempt any thing that may be in disturbance of the Kings Peace or the Election as particularly is expressed in the Writs 2 E. 3. m. 31. dorso and several others to be perused in the first part of Prynne's Brief Register a p. 27. ad 28 177 214. Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 22. dorso 18 H. 6. and several other places which were prohibited that Elections thereby might be made free That it may appear that the Elections in ancient times were not made by such as we now call Freeholders of forty Shillings a Year which now is established by Statute Law I think it not amiss to insert what I find of a particular usage in Yorkshire (d) Prynne's Brevia Parliamentaria Rediviva p. 152 153 154. Atturneys of Noblemen and Ladies in Yorkshire Electors whereâ—â— it appears by the first Indentures of the Elections and Returns of Knights for the County of York that the Atturnies of the Archbishop of York and of sundry Earls Lords Nobles and some Ladies who were annual Suitors to the County Court of Yorkshire were sole Electors of the Knights as appears by the Return 13 H. 4. upon the Writ of 12 H. 4. betwixt Edm. Sandford Sheriff on the one part and Will. Holgate Attorney of Ralph Earl of Westmorland Willâ— de Kyllington Atturney of Lucy Countess of Kent Will. Hesham Atturney of Pet. Lord de Mâ—lolacu William de Burton Atturney of William Lord de Roos Rob. Evedal Atturney of Ralph Baron of Graystock William do Heston Atturney of Alex. de Metham Knight Henry de Preston Atturney of Henry de Percy Knight chuse John de Ever Knight and Robert de Plompton Knight Also 2 H. 5. The Indenture is betwixt William de Harrington Knight Sheriff of Yorkshire and Robert Maulevereâ— Atturney of Henry Archbishop of York William Fencotes Atturney of Ralph Earl of Westmorland William Archer Atturney of John Earl Marshal and so the Atturnies of Hen. le Scrop Knight Lord of Masham of Peter de Mulolacu Alexander de Metham Robert Roos of Margaret which was Wife of Henry Vavasor Knight and of Henry Percy The like are found in the Eighth and Ninth of H. 5. and the 1 2 3 5 7 H 6. in all which the Atturnies only of Nobles Barons Lords Ladies and Knights who were Suitors made the Elections of the Knights of Yorkshire in the County Court and sealed the Indenture I have a French Letter of Atturney from the Lady Ross to that purpose concerning which if God give me Life I shall give an account in my Antiquities of Yorkshire This Method ceased before 25 H. 6. at which time the Return made by Robert Vghtred Sheriff of Yorkshire hath the Names of Forty two Gentlemen most of which are of very ancient Families and such as had great Estates then and so continue to have though I doubt not but as it is the Custom now the much lesser part of those present were only inserted as Parties to the Indentures However by the Community we may understand who elected were not like the Freeholders now The next thing we are to consider in the Writs of Summons to Parliament What the Knights Citizens and Burgesses were summoned for is what the Knights Citizens and Burgesses so elected were by the Writ authorized to do The first Writ (e) Ad consulendum consentiendum pro se communitate illa hiis quae Comites Barones Proceres praedicti concorditer ordinaverint in praemissis Cl. 22. E. 1. m. 6. dorso that we find for Election of Knights of Shires expresseth their convening to be To consult and consent for themselves and the Community to those things which the Earls Barons and foresaid Nobles unanimously should ordain in the premisses and the Writ to the Sheriff of Northumberland is ad aâ—diendum faciendum quod tunc ibidem plenius injungemus to hear and do what we shall then and there fullier enjoin In the Writ 25 (f) Cl. 25 e. 1. m. 6. dorso E. 1. the King intending to confirm the great Charter and Charter of the Forrest that he might levy the eighth part of all the Goods of his Lieges for his most urgent necessity against the French convenes the Parliament before Prince Edward his Son and the Knights are to meet to receive the said Charters facturi ulterius quod per dictum Filium nostrum ibidem fuerit ordinatum to do further what should be ordained by the Prince The Writ 25 E. 1. (g) Bundel num 1. Ad faciâ—ndum quod tunc de Communi Conciliâ— ordinabitur in praemissis expresseth that the Knights Citizens and Burgesses are to do what then shall be
with the Ensigns of their Offices some of the Nobles being appointed to carry the Sword and the Cap of Maintenance Three great Gilt Maces are carried See for this more fully Elsyng's Method of holding Parliaments p. 86. and all the Heralds attend in their Cloth of Gold Coats The two Archbishops and Bishops in their Robes sit upon Benches next the Wall on the Right-hand and the rest of the Great Officers that stand not by the State and all the Nobility in order upon the Bench on the Left-hand or on the Forms that stand in the middle where also sit the Judges Master of the Rolls Secretaries of State twelve Masters of Chancery Atturney General Solicitor General and Clerk of the Crown and the other Clerks Assistants which it is not my business exactly to describe The King being Seated when it 's his pleasure Leave given to the Commons to chuse their Speaker the House of Commons are sent for who standing bare at the Lords Bar attend the King's Speech and the Chancellor's and then have leave to chuse their Speaker whom commonly some of the Members of the House that are of the King's Privy-Council propose and if any one oppose it (u) Hackwel p. 127. he is to name another But I shall refer the curious to Mr. Elsyng and others that treat of this at large Sir Edward Coke (w) 4. Instit p. 8. saith That though the Commons are to chuse their Speaker yet seeing that after their choice the King may refuse him for avoiding expence of time and contestating about it the use is as in the Conge de eslier of a Bishop that the King by some of his Privy-Council as in this present Parliament was done by the Earl of Middleton on of his Majesty's Principal Secretaries doth name a discreet and learned Man whom the Commons elect for without their Election no Speaker can be appointed for them because he is their Mouth and trusted by them and so necessary as the House of Commons cannot sit without him So that if he be totally disabled by grievous Sickness another must be chosen in his place as he instanceth in Sir John Cheney 1 H. 4. and Sir John Tirrel Whether the two Houses sate together 15 H. 6. But whereas (x) 4. Instit c. 1. sect 2. he affirms that in antient time the two Houses sate together and the surest mark of the time of the division of them was when the House of Commons had a continual Speaker Mr. Prynne (y) P. 8 9. in his Animadversions hath made the contrary very clear by several Records wherein it 's expresly said they consulted apart as particularly in 6 E. 3. (z) Et les Chivalers des Countez Gents du Communs par eux mesmes Rot. Parl. 6 E. 3. num 6. at York the Prelates Earls Barons and great Men by themselves and the Knights of the Counties and the People of the Commons by themselves treated of the Business propounded to them Another (a) Freeholders Grand Inquest p. 19. saith That if Sir Edward means the Lords and Commons did sit and vote together in one Body few will believe it because the Commons never were wont to lose or forgo any of their Liberties or Priviledges and for them to stand now bare where they were used to sit and vote upon this Supposal is an alteration not imaginable to be indured by them and when we consider the sole Power of Judicature in the Lords and who the Burgesses were in old times it still makes it more improbable and it is to me a very remarkable thing that neither in History or Record any thing is to be found that will clear this doubt However it is certain that (b) Rot. Parl. 50 E. 3. num 8. 50 and 51 E. 3. the Commons had a Speaker and Sir Edward Coke (c) Coke Instit 4. p. 255. saith that the accustomed (d) Ancient Place saith Elsyng p. 84. place of that thrice worthy Assembly of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses of Parliament when held in Westminster was in the Chapter-house of the Abbat of Westminster and it continued so till the Statute of 1 Ed. 6. c. 14. which gave the King Colleges free Chappels c. whereby the King enjoyed the beautiful free Chappel of St. Stephen founded by King Stephen which had Lands and Revenues of the old yearly value of 1089 Pound ten Shillings five Pence since which time the Chappel thereof hath served for the House of Commons when Parliaments have been held at Westminster As Sir Edward Coke because he believed the two Houses sate together will not allow them to have had a Speaker before 50 E. 3. so on the other hand Mr. (e) Id. p. 123. Elsyng saith That the Commons ever had a Speaker none will doubt for their Consultation apart from the Lords though he thinks they often met and did sit together in one Room and then a Speaker was necessary to avoid Confusion of Speech and Argument But he brings no better Argument for it (f) Lib. Sti. Albani Bibl. Cotton fol. 207. than that Petrus de Mountfort (g) It should be 42 H. 3. That Peter Mountfort was not Speaker of the Commons House 44 H. 3. signed the Letter to Pope Alexander touching the recalling of Adomar elect Bishop of Winchester from Banishment Wherein they say if the King and the Regni Majores hoc volent Communitas tamâ—n ipsius in Angliam jam nullatenus sustineret and this was sealed by all the Lords and by Peter de Mountford vice totius Communitatis which he saith sheweth plainly they had a Speaker In answer to which I suppose it a great mistake to say that Petrus de Mountfort signed the Letter vice Communitatis which either ignorantly or willfully is Printed in Mr. Elsyng Comitatus for (h) Additament Math. Paris 1132 1133. Anno Dom. 1258. 42 H. 3. ult Edit Matthew Paris who relates the whole Story saith it was signed by ten Persons who were all great Barons vice totius Communitatis and the Preface of the Letter shews it was Communitas Comitum Procerum Magnatum aliorumque Regni Angliae and this aliorum can mean only the Milites which held by Military Service of the great Barons and the lesser Tenents in Capite which were no Representatives of the Commons as our Knights Citizens and Burgesses at this day are and the Inscription of the Popes Letter shews who he understood this Communitas to be when he superscribes it dilectis Filiis Nobilibus viris Consiliariis clarissimi in Christo Filii nostri illustris Regis Angliae ac caeteris Proceribus Magnatibus Regni Angliae Now the Persons that subscribed this are thus ranked by Matthew Paris R. de Clare Gloverniae Herefordiae S. de Monteforti Legriae E. Bigod Marescallus Angliae H. de Bohun Hertfordiae Essex W. Albemarle J. de Placeto Warewici Comitis H. Bigod Justiciarius Angliae P.
intended to invade the Subjects Liberties but if they allowed the Writ the delicious Power of Imprisoning such as they had a Pique to was utterly lost and all Persons referred to the ordinary Courts of Justice or upon their failure to the House of Lords Sir William Jones against any ones Release by Habeas Corpus if they were imprisoned by the House of Commons the Supreme Tribunal of England Sir William Jones insisted much upon the Power of the House and that they did not intend by that Act to bind themselves which yet must bind the King though it might as well be alledged That he did not intend to bind himself by it However Sir William persisted urging See Debates of the House p. 217. That whatever Reasons may be given for discharging such as are not committed for Breach of Privilege if grounded on the Act for the Habeas Corpus will hold as strong for discharging of Persons for Breach of Privilege and so consequently deprive the House of all its Power and Dignity and so make it insignificant and said That was so plain and obvious that all the Judges ought to take notice of it and so judged it below the House to make any Resolution therein but rather to leave the Judges to do otherwise at their peril and let the Debate fall without any Question But Baron Weston had the Courage to grant the Habeas Corpus Baron Weston grants the Habeas Corpus as rather willing to expose himself to the Displeasure of the House than deny or delay Justice contrary to his Oath I could not omit this remarkable Passage as a Specimen of the Arbitrariness of the Leading Party in that House Brief Register part 4. p. 846. and now shall proceed to Mr. Prynne's Remarks upon the Proceedings of the long House of Commons He observes Privilegia omnino amittere meretur qui sibi abutitur concessa penestate Ejus est interpretari cujus concedere Summa Rosella Privilegium 3. That Privileges may be lost by the abuse of the Power and that whatever Privilege the House hath is from the King's Grant or Toleration Therefore according to the Canonists Rule If the Privilege granted be expressed in general dubious or obscure Words then it is in the power of him to interpret who hath the power to grant Now the Petition of the Speaker is That the Commons in this Parliament may and shall have all their Ancient and Just Privileges allowed them Therefore the King Nemini liceat Chartas Regias nisi ipsis Regibus judicare Placita Parl. 18 E. 1. num 19. p. 20. being the sole Granter of these Privileges must be the only proper Interpreter and Judge of them as he is of all his other Charters of Privileges Liberties Franchises and Acts of Parliament themselves after his Regal Assent thereto not the Commons or Persons to whom they are granted and that both in and out of Parliament by Advice of his Nobles or Judges of the Common-Law Therefore he saith first How the Breach of Privilege to be punished according to Mr. Prynne See the Authority Brief Regist part 2. p. 847. That if the Commons by Petition to the King and Lords in Parliament complain of the Breach of their ancient Privileges and Liberties as they ever did in the Cases of Lark Thorp Hyde Clerk Atwyll and others the King by Advice of his Lords in Parliament assisted with his Judges hath been and as he humbly conceives is the sole proper Judge of them and their violations not the Commons who being Parties Prosecutors and Complainants are no legal indifferent Judges in their own or Menial Servants cases if they will avoid partiality which is the reason the Law allows Challenges to Jurors in Civil and Criminal causes Therefore he observes Ibid. p. 1206. that the House of Commons taking Informations without Oath may be easilier abused by misinformation and sometimes thereby are put upon over hasty Votes which upon finding out evil Combinations they are forced to retract Secondly The Chancellor or Lord Keeper to grant the Writ If the complaint of the breach of Privilege be made in the Commons House and thereupon an Habeas Corpus Writ of Privilege or Supersedeas prayed under the great Seal for the Members or menial Servants release whose Privilege is infringed the Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the great Seal representing the Kings person in Chancery the Court for relief in cases of Privilege is the properest Judge and Examiner of the claimed Privilege and its violations upon Oath and other sufficient Evidence assisted by all the Kings Judges in cases of difficulty who thereupon will grant or deny the Writs Thirdly The Judges of the Courts to which the Writ is directed to judge of the validity of the Privilege When these Writs of Privilege Supersedeas or Habeas Corpus are granted to any Member or menial Servants and directed to any of the Kings Courts to enlarge their restrained Persons or stay any Arrests Process or Judgments against them the Kings own Judges in his respective Courts to which they are directed are then the proper Judges of the Privileges of Parliament and of their breaches suggested in these Writs who may examine not only all matters of Law or Fact comprised in them which are Traversable but likewise adjudge allow or disallow the very Privilege it self if no real ancient Parliamentary Privilege allowed by the Laws and Customs of the Realm How far he is in the right I will not undertake to judge but I remember somewhere he wisheth an Act of Parliament to pass to adjust these matters which possibly would prevent many of those chargeable attendances about false Returns and save much expence of time in the discussing of them and enable the Subjects to pay a right and due obedience to them SECT 12. Concerning the Royal Assent to Bills I Have treated so much of this elsewhere as to the sole Power in the King the ancient Custom of Sealing the Acts with the Kings Seal and of some of the Prelates and Nobles as Witnesses of their Assents that I shall only now speak as to the usual formality of passing the Bills into Acts by the Kings last Act. See also his Memorials For Mr. Hackwell hath given a full account of the manner how Statutes are enacted in Parliament by passing of Bills to which Book I refer the curious Reader that would understand the order that is used in the debating and passing of them When Bills are passed by both Houses upon three several Readings in either House Hackwell of Passing of Bills p. 179. ad 182. they ought for their last approbation to have the Royal Assent whereby every Statute is as Mr. Hackwell observes like Silver seven times tryed The Royal Assent is usually deferred to the last day of the Session and because some have been of opinion that the passing of Bills The Royal Assent determines not the Session
Goods thereof to be done as shall please him There is in this Oath as great Security taken Observations on this Oath as morally can be that the Judges perform their Office uprightly and judge according to the Law and if this will not make them wary how they give Judgment contrary to Law there are other Constraints upon them As first That the King may displace them when he pleases they holding their Places only durante beneplacito Secondly The House of Commons may question them for any false Judgment and Miscarriage in their Office which must be a great Check and deterring of them from giving any unjust Judgment either for Lucre-sake by Bribes or Partiality of Affection There are besides others two illustrious Examples of punishment of Corrupt Judges the one of Sir William Thorp (t) Rot. Parl. 25 E. 3. Rot. 10. condemned for breach of his Oath in taking Bribes Judges punished for breaking their Oath He was Indicted before the Earls of Arundel Warwick and Huntingdon the Lord Gray and Lord Burghers 24 E. 3. and the Record saith Ideo consideratum per dictos Justiciarios assignatos ad judicandum secundum voluntatem Regis secundum Regale posse suum because he broke the Oath which he took to the King and so was adjudged to be hanged The (u) Exact Abridgment p. 74. Record of this Judgment was brought into the Parliament 25 E. 3. the King having by a Writ under the Privy-Seal stayed his Execution and it was read opeâ— before the Lords and all the Lords affirmed the Judgment to be good provided this Judgment should not be drawn into example against any other Officers who should break their Oaths but (z) Qui praedictum Sacramentum fecerunt fregerunt habent Leges Regales Augliae ad custodiendas only those that took the said Oath of Justices and broke it such to whom the Royal Laws of England are committed The other is the Famous Sir Francis Bacon Lord St. Albans who being Lord Chancellor was found guilty of taking Bribes by his Servants whom though many for his great Learning would acquit as leaving too much to his Servants yet he fell an illustrious example of Justice against the highest Judges and in the forecited Record against Sir William Thorp it is apparent that the Lords who in those days were the sole Judges in Parliament thought no persons breach of Oath was capitally to be punished but only the Justices Before I come to speak to some of the long Parliaments writing Champions misapplication of the Kings Power in his Courts I think it expedient to give some Characters I have met withall of the qualifications of Judges In a Speech made to Justice (a) MS. Speech penes Rad. Thoresby de Leedes Gen. Manwood when he was chosen Lord Chief Baron the Chancellor tells him There are four things requisite in a Judge First His knowledge of the Law which is presumed every one hath that the King appoints to be his Justiciary Secondly Discretion that though in his Judgment he may vary from the letter of the Law yet he may never judge contrary to the intention of it which is Animus Legis Thirdly Integrity for it were better to have a Judge of convenient learning and discretion that would command and rule his Affection and Judgment than one of excellent knowledge and discretion that will submit the same to his corrupt Affections Fourthly Care and diligence For if a judge be furnished with all the preceeding qualifications yet if he be slothful and do not expedite his Judgment all the former serve to little purpose for qui diâ— distulit diâ— noluit My Lord St. Albans (b) Essays though he fell as before I have noted under great censure yet in his Essays tells us that a Judge's Office is Jus dicere non Jus dare that they ought to be more wise than witty more reverend than plausible more advised than confident and above all things that Integrity was their Portion and proper Vertue The unjust Judge being a Capital remover of Land-marks Injustice making Judgment bitter and delay sowre Another famous (c) E. of Clarendon's Survey p. 125. Chancellor whose unexpected exile after he was raised to the happiest Estate of a Subject may teach all to judge no State of Felicity assured upon Earth tells us that Judges are presumed by Education to be fitted for the understanding of the Laws and by their Oaths bound to judge according to Right and so must be the most competent to explain the difficulties of the Law which no Soveraign as Soveraign can be presumed to understand and comprehend and that the judgments and decisions those Judges make are the Judgment of the Soveraign who hath not qualified them but Authoritatively appointed them to judge in his stead and are to pronounce their Sentence according to the reason of the Law not the reason or will rather he means of the Soveraign But now I proceed to other matters The Long Parliament impeached all the Judges that had voted the legality of Ship-mony The Long Parliaments Impeachment of Judges as also brought to their Bar the Lord Chancellor that thereby they might strike a greater terror on the Kings Loyal Subjects especially in the House to make them comply with them and though they would have had the Power of nominating and removing the Judges and have rent that branch of his Royal Prerogative from him yet they not trusting if they effected this that it would do them any service when they had put in such Judges as they liked if the King might still Commissionate them according to old form pro beneplacito Therefore they pressed hard They would alter pro beneplacito that every Judge should continue quamdiu se bene gesserit which I only note to show they were desirous to new model the whole Government As the long Parliament of 1641. by their dissolving of Church-Government gave birth to varieties of Opinions The Long Parliament endeavours to weaken the King's Prerogative Schisms and Heresies in Religion so by their design of unloosening mens Obligation to the Monarchy they were forced to make use of many false Inferences and Judgments of the known Laws Amongst which one was when they were beaten off from the several pretences of having some Paramount Power over the King whereby he stood obliged to resign his reason to their Votes they alledged that since the King could not reverse a Judgment given in an inferior Court a fortiori he could not frustrate their Votes being the Supreme Court as well as Council In Answer to which it is to be considered How Judges in their Judgments sustain the Person of the King that in other Courts the Judges sustain the Person of the King the Law is deposited in the hands of the King and all Justice is administred by him and in his name so that his consent is by Law involved in what by Law they
its Mitigation So Matt. Paris saith Episcopatus Abbatias omnes quae Baronias tenebant eatenus ab omni servitute sâ—â—ulari libertatem habuerant sub servitute statuit militarâ— and according to the Rules of the Feudal Law which as it was the Law for the most part in Normandy as to Possession and Tenure so was it in England until by the Indulgence of Usurpers as well as of lawful Sovereigns to the great Men and of them to their Tenents and Followers their Tenures became more easie and were changed into Inheritances both Free and Bond. So by Compact or Agreement betwixt kind and favourable as well as indigent Lords and serviceable Tenents as also by the Introduction of the use of the Canon or Imperial Law the Rigor of the Feudal Law was abated and received several Alterations and Amendments by flux of Time and especially by Acts of great Councils or Parliaments and the Necessities or Indulgence of Princes So that instead of more rigid Tenures the soft ones of Fee-simple in all its kinds by Deed or Feofment or inheritable and qualified Copyholds were introduced As to the second Particular concerning William the Conqueror's setling Laws for the equal Government Of the Conqueror's Laws both of the Normans and English I shall first give an account out of (f) Parte posteriori fol. 346. Hoveden what these were and how they were procured He saith That the Danish Laws being understood by the Conqueror to be used in Norfolk Suffolk and Cambridg-shire others (g) Chron. Liâ—â—f See for the Conqueror's Charter and Laws Dr. Brady fol. 17 252 254 258 298 249. add the Deirans and the Isles concerning Forfeitures he preferred them before the other Laws of the Kingdom and commanded they should be observed and gives the reason for it that his and the Ancestors of most of the Barons of Normandy were come from Norway therefore the Laws of the Danes ought to be preferred before those of the Britains viz. of the English and Picts Which saith my (h) Quo audito mox universi compatriota qui legâ—s edixerant tristâ—s essecâ—i unanimiter deprecati sunt quatenus permitâ—eret lâ—ges sibi prâ—prias consueâ—udines â—â—iqua halere Id. num 10. Hoveden fol. 347 num 1. Author being heard by the great Men of the Country who had as hereafter I shall show been appointed to revize the Laws they all were very sorrowful and unanimously intreated him that he would permit them to have the Laws proper to themselves and their ancient Customs under which their Fathers lived and they were born and bred under for that it would be very hard for them to receive unknown Laws and to judge of those things they understood not See Brady's Answer to Argum. Aâ—tiâ—oâ—â— p. 298 299. But finding the King unwilling to be drawn to consent they follow on their suit praying for the Soul of King Edward who bequeathed him his Crown and Kingdom whose Laws they were that they might not have the Laws of strange Nations imposed on them but he would grant them the Continuance of their Countries Laws To which intreaty of his Barons after Counsel taken my Author saith I cannot conceive but here were many of the Saxon Nobility and Men of best Account otherwise they could not call them the Laws their Fathers had lived under and the Normans could not then know much of our Laws or Speech but this was before he had subdued all fully he acquiesced and from that day the Laws of King Edward were of great Authority and Esteem throughout England and were confirmed and observed before other Laws of the Country Our Author further notes That these were not the proper Laws of King Edward but of Edgar his Grandfather which had been little observed for 68 years as in one place and 48 years in another he saith by reason of the Danish Invasions c. and being revived repaired and confirmed by King Edward were called his Laws The Account the Chronicle (i) Anglos Nobiles Sapientes suaâ—â—ge eruditos Id. fol. 348. Spelm. Concil tom 1. fol. 619. of Lichfield gives is this That King William in the fourth year of his Reign at London by the Counsel of his Barons made to be summoned through all the Counties of England all the Noble Wisemen and such as were skilled in their Law that he might hear their Laws and Customs and then gives an account how he approved of the Danish Laws used in Norfolk c. Concerning the Kindness the Conqueror pretended in his first four Years and his Rigour after see at large Dr. Brady in his Answer to the Argumentum Antinormanicum especially p. 260. and 299. But afterwards at the Intreaty of the Community of the English he yielded to grant them King Edward's Laws Before I proceed any further I cannot but note that what Hoveden calls Compatriotae here is called Communitas Anglorum and in both of them afterwards it is called Concilio Baronum by which we may know who these Compatriotae and this Communitas were viz. the Barons or great Men. Our Author proceeds That by the King's Precept out of every County of England Twelve Wisemen were chosen who were enjoyned an Oath before the King that according to their utmost they should discover the establishments of their Laws and Customs (k) Vt quoad possent recto tramite incedentes nec ad dextram nec ad sinistram divertentes nihil addentes nihil praevarieando mutantes Omnia quae praedicti â—urati dixerunt going in a strait Path neither declining to the right or left Hand omitting adding or prevaricating nothing and Aldred Archbishop of York who crowned King William and Hugh Bishop of London by the King's command writ the Laws which the said sworn Persons did produce But it is to be noted that this Chronicle of Lichfield is of a later Date than other Writers and the Laws in it differ from those in Ingulphus The next Testimony is that of (l) Circa sinem Hist fol. 519. num 36. Leges aquiâ—â—mi Regis Edwardi quas Dom. meus inclitus Rex W. authenticas esse perpetuas c. proclamarat Ingulphus who tells us That he brought from London to his Monastery i.e. Croyland the Laws of the most just King Edward which his Lord the famous King VVilliam willed to be Authentic and Perpetual and had proclaimed under the severest Penalties to be inviolably kept through the whole Kingdom of England and commended them to his Justiciaries in the same Language they were set forth in c. of which I shall say something below The Author of Jus Anglorum ab Antiquo and the Argumentum Anti-Normanicum and Mr. Petyt in his Rights of the Commons asserted have writ largely to prove That the Conqueror made little Innovation in our Laws and on the contrary the profoundly learned (m) Answer to Petyt p. 14. Great Officers Normans Doctor Brady hath from undeniable Records
proved that he brought in the Feudal Law of Tenures and much of the Norman Laws and that in his time and for an Hundred years after the Justiciaries or Chief Justices the Chancellors Lawyers Ministerial Officers and under-Judges Earls Sheriffs Bailiffs Hundredaries c. were all Normans likewise the Military Men and Lords of Mannors mostly were such and in his Preface to the Norman History and his Answers to the forementioned Authors every where clears it and proves That though the Conqueror See for proof of the whole Eadmer Hist Novel fol. 6. num 10 20 30. Ingulph fol. 512. a. num 50. That these Great Barons as Tenents in Capite had power to make Laws and Constitutions to bind their Sub-Feudataries is apparent by what Malmsbury de 〈◊〉 Reg. lib. 3. saith That the Laws of W. Fitz-Ozborn Earl of Hereford remained still in force That no Soldier for any Offence should pay above 7 s. The Conqueror's Liberality to the Normans in the first beginning of his Reign promised fair Matters yet he observed no more of those Laws than served for his own interest Yet he also saith That where any Relaxation of the Rigor of the Feudal Laws was the benefit principally accrued to the Norman English who indeed were as active as could be expected to obtain ease to themselves and claim the Advantage of all the favourable Laws had been used in the Saxon times but they themselves were great Oppressors of those under them These Matters therefore being so copiously discoursed of by the learned Doctor I shall pass that whole matter by and come to the third Particular Sir Roger Twysden notes in the Conquerors Policy and so directly speak to the Constitutions of his Great Councils and his Sovereignty in making or confirming Laws As to the third Particular First it is clear that the Conqueror divided the Land among his great Men the Officers and Soldiers for proof of which we need no more but the Testimony of Gervase of (n) Black Book of the Exchequer Post regni conquisitionem post justam Rebellium subversionem facta est inquisitio diligens qui fuerint qui contra Regem in bello dimicantes per fugam se salvaverint hiis omnibus haeredibus eorum qui in bello occubuerunt spes omnis c. praeclusa Tilbury who saith That after the Conquest of the Kingdom and just subversion of the Rebels when the King himself and his great Men had viewed and surveyed their new Acquists there was a strict enquiry made who there were that fighting against the King had saved themselves by flight From these and the Heirs of such as were slain in Fight all hopes of possessing either Lands or Rents were cut off But such as were called and urged to fight against King William and did not if in Process of time they could obtain the favour of their Lords and Masters by an humble Obedience and Obsequiousness they might possess something in their own Persons without hopes of Succession their Children only enjoying it afterwards at the will of their Lords to whom when they became odious they were every where forced from their Possessions Because some are prejudiced against the judicious Doctor Brady for asserting the Conquerours changes that he made I hope they will give ear to what the learned Selden affirms thus * Ex quo cis Normannorum adventum praeter ipsum Regem non fuit in Anglia is qui Allodii ut lequantur Jure sundum possederit cum scilicet aliis ad unum omnes siduciarios proâ—e dixeris Dominos superiorem investiâ—urae Anctâ—rem interpesita side perpetuo agnâ—scâ—ntes Lib. 2. Jan. Ang. That some while since the coming in of the Normans there was not in England except the King himself any one who held Land in right of Freehold as they term it since in truth one may call all others to a Man only Lords in trust of what they had as those who by swearing Fealty and doing Homage did perpetually own and acknowledge a Superior Lord of whom they held and by whom they were invested in their Estates So he Now this Fealty and Homage is now held no kind of Slavery but then it was as I have elsewhere noted Let us hear what the same Mr. Selden a little below saith That the Conqueror did not totally change the Constitution of the Laws Probe tametsi dixeris eversum secundum quod disputant Jurisconsulti Anglicum Imperium Id. Gervas Tilâ— c. 23. Oblatis vomeribus in signum desicientis Agriculturae although we may truly say according to what Lawyers dispute That the English Empire and Government was overthrown by him Thus far that learned Man Let us now return to the Exchequer-book where we find That when a common miserable Complaint of the Natives came to the King that they thus exposed and spoiled of all things should be compelled to pass into other Countries At length after Consultation upon these things it was decreed That what they could by their deserts and lawful Bargain obtain from their Lords The English compound with their Lords they should hold by unviolable Right but should not claim any thing from the time the Nation was conquered under the Title of Succession or Descent Therefore he saith they were obliged by studied Compliance and Obedience to purchase their Lords Favour It is true that in the 55th Law of (o) LL. Gulielm primi Edit Twysden p. 170. William the Conqueror it is said That he wills and firmly commands and grants that all Freemen liberi Homines of the whole Monarchy of his Kingdom may have and hold their Lands and Possessions well and in (p) In pace libere ab omni exactione injusâ—a ab omni tallagio Peace free from all unjust Exactions and Tallage that is extraordinary Impositions and Taxes so as nothing be exacted or taken unless their free services which of Right they ought and are bound to perform to us and as it was appointed to them and given and granted to them by us as a perpetual Right of Inheritance by the Common Council of the whole Kingdom In which we may observe The English have little Benefit by his Relaxation of the Feudal Law that this was no Magna Charta made to English Men these liberi Homines were such as held in Military Service as appears by the 58th Law following and those then were Normans and the Relaxations to them were that these Fees were made Hereditary which was not frequent among Feudataries in those days and the Complaints that were made after and the amendments that Hen. 1. promised were mostly about the hard Taxes and Exactions Therefore I may conclude That the ordinary English tho' many of them might live upon the Lands they and their Ancestors had enjoyed yet their Tenure was changed and they were but Vassals to other Lords 'till by little and little by the ways I have mentioned under the first Heads they
called 50 Regni By the Statute of Marleburgh 52 H. 3. it is evident All the Barons not summoned but the more discreet and so of the lesser Barons That even all the great Barons were not summoned but only the more Discreet and such as the King thought fit to call and the like is observed of the lesser Barons or Tenents in Capite For if it had been by General Summons that Restriction of the more Discreet had been useless so that it appears that what (z) Britannia fol. 122. Quibus ipâ—â— Rex dignaâ—us est brevia summonitionis dirigere venirent c. non alii Mr. Camden's ancient Author observes is true That after the horrid Confusions and Troubles of the Barons Wars those Earls and Barons whom the King thought worthy to summon by his Writ to meet came to his Parliaments and no other The Preamble to this Statute of (a) Stat. Edit 1576. p. 15. Marlebridge runs thus in Tottel Providente ipso Domino Rege ad Regni sui Angliae meliorationem exhibitionem Justitiae prout Regalis Officii poscit Vtilitas pleniorem convocatis discretioribus ejusdem Regni tam majoribus quam minoribus provisum est statutum ac concordatum ordinatum According to Pulton the (b) Fol. 14. Preamble is thus That whereas the Realm of England of late had been disquieted with manifold Troubles and Dissentions for Reformation whereof Statutes and Laws be right necessary The Use and Benefit of Laws whereby the Peace and Tranquillity of the People must be observed wherein the King intending to devise convenient Remedy hath made these Acts Ordinances and Statutes underwritten which he willeth to be observed for ever firmly and inviolably of all his Subjects as well high as low Thus we see in the whole Reign of H. 3. excepting in that Parliament of Montfort's Faction the Bishops and dignified Clergy Earls Barons and Tenents in Capite were only summoned as Members of the great Councils and there were no Representatives of the Commons and the Kings Authority in summoning dissolving and making Laws is most manifest Of Parliaments in King Edward the First 's Reign I Shall now glean out of Tottel and Pulton's Editions of the Statutes the most material Preambles which give light to the constituent Parts of Parliaments to the Legislative Power in the King with the Concurrence of the two Houses and how that in the Series of the Kings Reign hath been expressed and such other matters relating to the Parliament as may shew the gradual Progress of their Constitution to the usage of this present Age leaving the Reader to make his own remarques from the matters of Fact and the expressions used by my Authors and explaining some The Preface to the Statute of (a) Ceux sont les establishments le Roy Ed. fitz Roy Hen. fait a Westminst c. par son Councel par Passentments des Archevesques Evesques Abbes Priores Countes Barons tout le Commonalty de la terre illonques summons Tottel Stat. fol. 24. Pulton p. 19. Westminster begins thus These are the Establishments of King Edward Son to King Henry made at Westminster at his first General Parliament after his Coronation c. by his Council and by the Assent of the Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors Earls Barons and the whole Commonalty of the Land thither summoned This Parliament was prorogued before it met and the Writ of Prorogation mentions only Quia generale Parliamentum nostrum quod cum Praelatis Magnatibus Regni nostri proposuimus habere c. Therefore having prorogued it mandamus c. Intersitis ad tractandum ordinandum una cum Praelatis Magnatibus Regni nostri (b) Brady against Petyâ— fol. 147. c. So that all the Members are included in the two general Terms of Praelati Magnates which great Men very frequently comprehended as well the Barones Majores as Minores the Earls Barons and greater Tenents in Capite and the less which then were called the Community of the Kingdom The rest of the Preamble of the Statutes made at (c) Pulton's Stat. An. 1275.3 E. 1. f. 19. Westminster runs thus Because our Lord the King hath great Zeal and desire to redress the State of the Realm c. the King hath ordained and established these Acts under written The Preface to the Statute de Bigamis 4 Oct. 4 Ed. 1. is thus (d) In prasentia venerabilium purum quâ—ruâ—dam Episcoporum Angliae aliorum de Concilio Râ—gis â—â—citatae sâ—â—erunt constitutiones â—ub â—riptae postmodâ—â—m coram Domino Rege Concilio sâ—o auditae publicatae Quia omnes de consiliâ—â—am â—usâ—â—â—â—arii quam alii concordaverunt c. Tottel p. 39. b. expressed In the Presence of certain Reverend Fathers Bishops of England and others of the Kings Council the constitutions under written were recited and after heard and published before the King and his Council for as much as all the King's Council as well Justices as others did agree that they should be put in writing for a perpetual memory and that they should be stedfastly observed In the First Chapter it is said Concordatum est per Justiciarios alios sapientes de Concilio Regni Domini Regis It was agreed by the Justices and other wise or sage Men of the Council of the Kingdom of the Lord the King Perhaps saith the judicious Doctor Brady the best understanding of the preamble and first Chapter may be that the Laws and Constitutions were prepared by the King and his (e) Answer to Pâ—tyt fol. 148. Council with the Assistance of the Justices and Lawyers that were of it or called to assist in it and declared afterwards in Parliament (f) Praeâ—iâ—â—ae autem constitutiones eâ—iâ—â— suerunt c. exâ—une lâ—â—um habeanâ— Tottel fol. 40. for it is said in the close of the Statute The aforesaid Constitutions were published at Westminster in the Parliament after the Feast of St. Michael the 4th of the Kings Reign and thence forward to take place The Preamble to the Statute of Gloucester Anno 1278. 6 E. 1. is thus (g) Pour amendment de son Roialm pur plus pleinir exhibition de droit si comâ—â—â—â— prâ—sit dâ— Office demanâ— appâ—lles le plues discretes de son Roialme auâ—â— bien des Granders comâ— des Meindres establie est concordantment ordine Tottel fol. 50. The King for the amendment of the Realm and for the more full Exhibition of Justice according as the benefit of his Office requires having called the most discreet of his Realm as well the greater as the smaller It is established and unanimously ordained as Pulton adds after by the King and his Justices certain Expositions were made The Statute of Mortmain is thus prefaced Nos pro (h) Tottel p. 48. Vtilitate Regni volentes providere Remedium de Concilio Praelatorum Comitum Baronum aliorum fidelium
Regni nostri de Concilio nostro existentium providimus statuimus ordinavimus which (i) Pulton fol. 35. Anno 1279. 14. Nov. 7 E. 1. Pulton renders by the Advice of our Prelates Earls Barons and Subjects of our Kingdom being of our Council the King hath provided made and ordained whereas by Fideles is to be understood the Tenents in Capite The Statute of Acton Burnel or Statute Merchant 11 E. 1. according to Tottel was made by the (k) Ce Roy per luy per tout son Counsel ad ordain establâ—e Tottel fol. 49. 82. King himself and his whole Council That this was done in Parliament appears by the Statute of Merchants made in the 13th of the same King wherein it is said Our Lord the King by himself and by his Council at his (l) A son Parliament quâ—il â—â—â—â—t a Acton-Burnel c. Parliament which he held at Acton Burnel 11 Regni made and ordained these Establishments or as (m) Pulton fol. 36. Pulton hath it The King caused the Statute made by the King and his Council at Acton Burnel to be rehearsed and hath ordained and established Since the 49 of H. 3. to the 18 of Ed. 1. we find (n) Râ—t Pat. 20 E. 1. m. 15. no Writs for summoning of Knights Citizens and Burgesses but the 14 of June 18 Ed. 1. The King issued out the following Summons Rex c. The Form of Summons of Knights Citizens and Burgesses renewed at the Petition of the Nobles Two or three Knights to be chosen cum per Comites Barones quosdam alios de Proceribus Regni nostri nuper fuissemus super quibusdam specialiter requisiti tam cum ipsis quam cum aliis de communitatibus Regni illius colloquium habere volumus tractatum c. Tibi praecipimus quod duos vel tres de discretioribus ad laborandum potentioribus Militibus de Comitatu praedicto sine dilatione eligi eos ad nos c. venire facias c. cum plena potestate pro se communitate Comitatus praedicti ad consulendum consentiendum pro se communitate illa hiis quae Comites Barones Proceres praedicti tum duxerint concordanda vel concorditer ordinaverint in praemissis The English of which is Whereas we have been especially petitioned and requested by the Earls Barons and others of the great Men of our Kingdom concerning certain matters upon which we will have Conference and treat as well with themselves as with others of the Counties of that Kingdom We command thee that without delay thou makest to be chosen two or three of the most discreet and ablest Knights for dispatch of business of the Counties aforesaid and cause them to come to us c. with full Power for themselves and the whole Community of the County aforesaid to consult and consent for themselves and that Community to such things which the Earls Barons and great Men aforesaid shall think fit to agree upon From this we may observe That by Vertue of this Writ No Citizens and Burgesses but only Knights for Counties no Citizens or Burgesses could be chosen or sent to Parliament But only Knights for Counties Secondly The Scutage was granted in this Parliament as Doctor Brady hath noted fourteen days before the Writ for Election of Knights issued out and it is (o) Tottel's Stat. p. 85. apparent That the Statute of Westminster the Third was made the Eighth of July which was a week before they were to appear and consequently was made without them for the Preamble runs Dominus Rex in Parliamento suo apud Westmonasterium post Pascham Anno Regni sui 18. viz. in quindena S. Johannis Baptistae i.e. 8 July ad instantium Magnatum Regni sui concessit providit statuit From this Writ and the Variation of the following Writs and other Records the judicious Doctor Brady (p) Answer to Petyt fol. 151. notes That it was from the Kings Authority and at this time that the House of Commons came to be fixed and established in the present constant form it now is and hath been for many Kings Reigns and it doth appear that King Edward the First was not altogether confined to any certain number of Knights Citizens or Burgesses nor were several strict forms and usages now practised ever then thought of or some legal Niceties or Punctilioes now in use then judged of absolute Necessity The Statute of Quo (q) Pulton An. 1290. fol. 58. Warranto in the Eighteenth Year of Edward the First saith that the King of his special Grace and for the affection he beareth to his Prelates Earls and Barons and others of his Realm hath granted c. The Statute de (r) Idem Anno 1293. fol. 61. Malefactoribus in Parcis in the Twenty first Year of Edward the First saith Our Lord the King at his Parliament c. at the instance of the Nobles of the Realm hath granted c. Anno 1294. the King issues out his (s) Cl. 22 E. 1. m. 6. dorso Four Knights for a County Writs to cause two Knights out of every County to be chosen c. Dated the Eighteenth of October and the next day issues out Writs for other two to be chosen to meet at the same time and place Out of Mr. Ryley's (t) Fol. 241. Placita Parliamentorum it is clear that the Parliament which met on the Octaves of St. * Claus 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso Hilary or the Twentieth of January in the Twenty eighth Year of Edward the First sate but eight days the Writ for the Commons Expences bearing date January the Thirtieth of the same Year and the Letter to the Pope signed by the Temporal Lords for themselves and the whole Community of the Kingdom of England is dated February the twelfth next following after the Commons had been dismissed fourteen days so that the Barons still continued to stile themselves the Community of England The Barons stay after the Commons dismissed and both Spiritual and Temporal Barons and others of the King's Council did stay and dispatch much Business after all others were dismissed as further appears in a (u) See Brady's Answer to Petyt fol. 152. Proclamation 21 March 33 Ed. 1. Wherein the King gives the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates Earls and Barons Knights of Counties Citizens and Burgesses and other Persons of the Commons which by our Lord the King's Command came to this Parliament many Thanks for their coming and willeth that at present they return into their Counties so as they readily and without delay do come again at the time when they shall be remanded except the Bishops (w) Sauve les Evesques Countes Barons Justices autres qui sont du Conseil nostre Seigneur le Roy que ceux ne sen allient saunz especial conge du Roy. The King's Council prepare Laws Earls and
Barons Justices and others which are of the King's Council who may not depart without special leave of the King I shall not here enter into the enquiry how far the extent of the Power of the King's Council was in those days but it is very apparent that the King with advice of his Council proposed Laws and that others proposed by the Houses were considered by the King and Council as no doubt they are now considered before the King gives his Assent to Bills So in the Statute of the Definition of (x) Pulton An. 1304. fol. 72. Conspirators in the three and Thirtieth Year of King Edward the First it is said This Ordinance was accorded by the King and his Council in his Parliament Also in the Ordinance of (y) Idem Anno 1305. Enquests the Eighteenth of Sept. in the thirty third Year of Ed. the First It is said it is agreed and ordained by the King and all his Council that is his Parliament As to the special Prerogative of the King in giving the ultimate Character and fiat to the Laws every Act expresseth it so the Statute of (z) 18 Sept. 33 E. 1. Champerty the Statutes are called by the King Our Statutes and Our Lord the King hath commanded and in the Statute de Conjunctim feoffat it is said It is no new thing that among divers Establishments of Laws which we have ordained in our time so in the Ordinatio Forestae 34 Ed. 1. The King Ordains (a) Id. Anno 1306. fol. 73. We have ordained for our selves and our Heirs So in the Statute De asportatu Religiosorum 35 Ed. 1. it is said by the Council of his Earls Barons great Men and other Nobles of his Kingdom at his Parliament Our Lord the King hath Ordained and Enacted I shall only note first That in the Twenty eighth of this King those the (b) Cl. 28 E. 1. m. 3. dorso King had appointed being ready to give an account of the Perambulation of the Forests the King put a present stop to their report and his determination because the Prelates Earls Barons The Reason the King will determine nothing without advice in Parliament and the rest of the Magnates of the Kingdom in whose Presence his own and others Reasons should be propounded and heard and by whose Councils he intended to work especially seeing they were bound by Oath as well as himself to observe and maintain the Rights of the Kingdom and Crown were not then present and those were not summoned who should propound their Reasons so far as the matters concerned them and the King was not willing without their advice to put an end to the matters therefore he orders the Sheriffs to cause the two Knights that came to the last Parliament by his Precept now to come and the like for the Cities and Burroughs and if any were dead or infirm so that he could not come then to cause another to be chosen By which it appears that it was only from the King's Indulgence and that he might more deliberately resolve for the best advantage of his Subjects and for their satisfaction that he would have the advice of a fuller Assembly We may also further note from hence that it was in the King's Power to summon the same Knights Citizens and Burgesses without a new Choice except the Persons were dead or infirm Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Second's time IN this King's Reign these following Particulars are most observable In the Statute for (a) Pulton An. 1307. fol. 79. Knights 1 Regni it is said Our Lord the King hath granted In the Summons 5 Ed. 2. the Precept to the Sheriff The same Knights c. to come that were before is to cause to come to the Parliament to be held at Westminster those Knights Citizens and Burgesses in his Bailiwick which he caused to come lately to the present Parliament at London and which for certain causes went from the said Parliament (b) Cl. 5 E. 2. m. 26. dorso Vel alios ad hâ—â— idoneos loco ipsorum si ad hoc vacare non possunt or others fit for the Imployment if they cannot be at leisure Dated Octob. 11. In the sixth of Ed. 2. we have an example of the King 's (c) Cl. 6 E. 2. m. 27. dorso A Form of Prorogation proroguing the House of Commons in these Words Dominus Rex praecepit quod Milites Cives Burgenses qui ad Parliamentum Regis ibidem summonitum convenerunt pro Comitatibus Civitatibus Burgis Angliae ad propria remearent ita quod reverterentur ibidem in crastino S. Mich. prox futuro sub poena qua decet So that as they were commanded to return home so they were appointed a time to return under the Intimation of a Punishment The Preamble to the (d) Pulton An. 1315. fol. 80. The King with his Council revise Articles after the Parliament ended Articuli Cleri runs thus That by the Kings Progrenitors and himself at the Instance of the Prelates certain Articles were made and in the Parliament at Lincoln 9 Regni he caused them to be rehearsed before his Council and made certain answers to be corrected and to the residue of the Articles answers were made by him and his Council and so by way of Charter they are published at York 24 Nov. 10 Regni The Statute of (e) Id. 1316. fol. 83. Gavelet at London saith It is provided by our Lord the King and his Justices In the Statute de Terris (f) Id. Anno 1323. 17 E. 2. fol. 91. Templariorum it is said Great conference was had before the King himself in the presence of the Prelates Earls Barons Nobles and great Men of the Realm and others present whereupon the Greater part of the King's Council The King's Council and Justices affirm as well the Justices as other Lay-men being assembled the Justices affirmed precisely c. After the recital of Particulars the words are It is ordained and agreed in the same Parliament Anno 1326. the last of Ed. 2. There is a Prorogation of the (g) Claus 20 E. 2. m. 4. dorso A Prorogation before Meeting Parliament before meeting which runs thus That though the King had intended Colloquium Tractatum Conference and Treaty in the Quindene of St. Andrew by Isabel the Queen and Edward his eldest Son Custos of the Kingdom the King then being beyond Sea and the Prelats Proceres Magnates Regni and so had commanded two Knights of the Community of the County two Burgesses of every Burrough (h) Quia tamen quibusdam de causis necessariis utilibus praedict Parliamentum Tractatum usque in crast inum Epiphaniae prox jam futur c. duximus prorogandum yet for certain causes necessary and profitable he hath prorogued the said Parliament and Treaty unto the day after Epiphany c. Of the Parliaments in King Edward the Third's
time THE Preface to the Statutes at (a) Pulton An. 1327. fol. 93. Westminster 1 Ed. 3. is thus To the Honour of God c. King Ed. 3 at his Parliament held at Westminster c. Petition made by the Commonalty to the King and his Council at the request of the Commonalty of his Realm by the Petition made before him and his Council in the Parliament by assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and other great Men assembled at the said Parliament hath granted for him and his Heirs for ever these Articles The title of the Statute made at (b) Idem Anno 1329. fol. 97. Westminster 27 Nov. 4 Ed. 3. is thus At the request of the Commons these things be Established and Enacted by our Lord the King his Prelates Established and enacted by the King Prelates c. Earls and Barons and other of the same Parliament So that at Westminster (c) Idem Anno 1331. fol. 100. 5 Ed. 3. Our Lord the King by the Assent of the Prelates c. and other Great Men and at the request of his People hath granted and established The Preamble to the Statutes at York (d) Idem Anno 1335. fol. 103. Shewed by the Knightsâ— c. for the Commons assented to by the Lords with the Advice of the King's Council 9 E. 3. runs thus It was shewed to our Lord the King by the Knights of the Shires Citizens of the Cities and Burgesses of Burroughs which come for the Commons of the said Shires Cities and Burroughs Our Lord the King c. by the Assent of his Prelates c. and other Nobles of this Realm summoned at this Parliament and by the Advice of his Council being there Upon the said things disclosed to him Ordains c. So the Statute at (e) Idem Anno 1336. p. 105. Westminster 10 E. 3. is Our Lord the King by the Assent of the Prelates c. and at the Request of the Knights of Shires and his Commons by their Petition hath Ordained Established c. The Preamble to the Statute for the Clergy 16 Apr. 14 E. 3. runs thus At the Petition of John Archbishop of Canterbury and other Prelates upon deliberation had with the Peers of our Realm and other of our Council and of the Realm summoned to our said Parliament Thus far we find the King Establishing and Ordaining upon the Petition of the Commons as also of the Prelates with the Assent of the Prelates and Nobility and his Council Before I proceed to those Statutes which mention the assent or advice of the whole Parliament I think fit to insert at large the Repeal of an imperfect Statute made 15 E. 3. There having been (f) Idem Anno 1541. 15 E. 3. fol. 115. a Statute made That Ministers of the Church should not answer before the Kings Justices for things done touching the Jurisdiction of the Church For what reasons and in what manner this was repealed Repeal of Law unduely prâ—cured will best appear by the Kings Precept to the Sheriff of Lincoln which runs thus Whereas at our Parliament summoned at Westminster in the Quindene of Easter last past certain Articles expresly contrary to the Laws and Customs of our Realm of England and to our Prerogatives and Rights Royal were pretended to be granted by us in the manner of a Statute And considering how by the Bond of our Oath we be tied to the observance and defence of such Laws Customs Rights and Prerogatives and providently willing to revoke such things to their own State which be so improvidently done Upon Conference and Treatise thereupon with the Earls Barons and other Wise Men of our said Realm and because we never consented to the making of the said Statute but as it then behoved us we dissimuled in the Premisses by Protestations of Revocation of the said Statute if indeed it should proceed to eschew the danger which by denying the same we feared to come for as much as the said Parliament otherwise had been without dispatching any thing in discord dissolved and so our earnest business had likely been ruinated which God prohibit and the said pretended Statute we promised then to have sealed It seemed to the said Earls Barons and other Wise Men that sithence the Statute did not of our Free Will proceed the same be void and ought not to have the name or strength of a Statute and therefore by their counsel and assent we have decreed the said Statute to be void and the same as much as it proceeded of Dread we have agreed to be adnulled Nevertheless that the Articles contained in the said pretended Statute which by other of our Statutes or of our Progenitors Kings of England have been approved shall according to the form of the said Statute in every point as convenient is be observed and the same we do only for the Conservation and Redintegration of the Rights of our Crown as we be bound and not that we should in any wise grieve or oppress our Subjects whom we desire to rule in lenity and gentleness So the King commands all these things to be openly Proclaimed 1 Oct. 15. Regni From this Statute we may 1st Observations upon iâ—â—â— observe That without the Kings free and express consent there can be no Law pass'd 2ly The Bishops are not mentioned in this it being contrary to some Liberties Churchmen claimed by the Canons 3ly The Kings assent was not compleat but only a temporary one like a Salvo Jure lest his earnest business for which he called them should miscarry for want of a seeming compliance therefore he is said to promise the Sealing of it which was in that Age the Characteristick of Confirmation but never did it but rather made some kind of Protestation in the presence of some that what he did was unwillingly 4ly That seeing it did not proceed of his Free Will therefore by the advice and consent of the Earls Barons and other Wise Men it is declared void Lastly The principal reason why he gave not his free consent to it was because it was against his Coronation Oath whereby he was tied to the observance and defence of the Laws Customs Kings not bound to consent to what Bills the Houses propose Rights and Prerogatives So that upon the whole they that would advise their Princes to consent to whatever Bills the Houses should tender as in the Chapter of Factious Members of Parliament I shall have occasion to discourse may learn from hence That the King found himself obliged to consent to no Bills contrary to the Law Customs Rights and Prerogatives such were those the unhappy Parliament of 41 in the point of the Militia and their other dethroning Bills and of late another Parliament in the Bill of Seclusion endeavoured to impose upon their Soveraigns contrary to the fundamental Laws and Prerogatives of the Crown To proceed The Preface of the Statute at (g) Id. 1346. fol. 118. Westminster
7th May 20 E. 3. runs thus Because that by divers complaints made to us we have perceived that the Law of the Land which we by our Oath are bound to maintain is the less well kept c. we greatly moved of Conscience in this matter c. by the assent of the great Men and other Wise Men of our Council We have ordained c. The Preamble to the Statute of Labourers (h) Idem Anno 1349. fol. 120. repealed 23 E. 3. was thus Upon deliberation and treaty with the Prelates and the Nobles and learned Men assisting us of their mutual assent ordained and that Statute for Labourers which remains in force 25 E. 3. saith Whereas it was ordained by our Lord the King and by assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and others of his Council c. It is apparent by several Records So one Knight for a County when two Burgesses 27 E. 3. So the King names one Knight one Citizen and one Burgess to be sent 43 E. 3. m. 2. That the Kings of England have not been tied to the certain number of Knights Citizens and Burgesses though for a long while two only have been chosen of each but heretofore sometimes but one other times two or three as that 18 E. 1. and 4 Knights 22 E. 1. Besides which liberty there is a (i) Cl. 24 E. 3. p. 2. m. 3. memorable Record in this Kings Reign wherein the King appointed the qualifications of such as were to be chosen Members of the House of Commons The Writ is directed to all the Sheriffs of England Quod de Comitatu tuo duos Milites c. de discretioribus probioribus Militibus Civibus Burgensibus ad laborandum potentioribus qui non sint Placitatores querelarum manutentores aut ex hujusmodi quaestu viventes c. sed homines valentes bonae sidei publicum commodum diligentes eligi Qualification of Members to be elected Pleading Lawyers Maintainers of Plaints and such as lived of such like gain were forbid to be chosen upon some particular Reason of State then inducing it of which I shall write something in the Chapter of Parliaments The other Preambles most (k) Pulton An. 1350. fol. 121.25 E. 3. Idem Anno 1350. fol. 125. Assent of the Commonalty remarkable in this Kings Reign are mostly By the assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and other great men and all the Commons or of all the Commonalty of the Kings Realm The King hath Granted Ordained Established c. The Statute for the Clergy (l) Idem Anno 1350. fol. 122. 25 Regni saith Our Lord the King seeing and examining by good deliberation the Petitions and Articles delivered to him in his Parliament c. by Simon Archbishop of Canterbury and other Bishops of his Province upon certain Grievances c. By the Assent of his Parliament by the assent of his Parliament for him and his Heirs willeth and granteth the Points underwritten The Statute of Provisors 25 E. 3. is (m) Id. 1350. fol. 129.25 E. 3. The King bound by his Oath to remedy Mischiefs and Damageâ— to his Realm by accord of his People in Parliament singular in its Preamble That whereas in the Parliament 15 E. 1. at Carlisle the Petition heard put before the said King and his Council in his said Parliament by the Commonalty of the said Realm containing c. whereupon the said Commons have prayed our Lord the King that sith the right of the Crown of England and the Law of the said Realm is such That upon the Mischiefs and Damages which happen to his Realm he ought and is bound by his Oath with the accord of his People in his Parliament thereof to make Remedy and Law and remove the Mischiefs and Damages which thereof ensue so pray the King thereupon to ordain Remedy The Statute of Provisors (n) Id. 135â— fol. 131. 27 E. 3. runs Our Lord the King by the Assent and Prayers of the Great Men and Commons of this Realm c. hath ordained The Statute of (o) Idem Anno 1353. fol. 133. Staple 27 E. 3. hath a singular Preface whereas good deliberation had with the Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and Great Men of the Counties that is to say of every County one One Knight for a County and so for Cities and Burroughs for all the Counties and so of Cities and Burroughs c. by the Council and common consent of the said Prelates c. Knights and Commons the King hath ordained c. In the 28. Princes are named after Prelates The Preamble of the Statute at (p) Idem Anno 1362. fol. 152. The Request of the Commons Westminster 36 E. 3. runs thus The King at the request of the Commons by their Petition delivered to him in the said Parliament by the Assent of the Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and other Great Men in the Parliament assembled have granted for him and his Heirs for ever the Articles underwritten In the Second Chapter of which it is said The King of his own Will without motion of the Great Men or Commons hath granted in ease of his People The Statutes made (q) Idem Anno 1368. fol. 159. 42 E. 3. have only At the Parliament of our Lord the King it is assented and accorded So in (r) Idem Anno 1369. fol. 190. 43 E. 3. The Prelates Great Men and Commons seeing the Mischiefs pray the King in this present Parliament thereupon to ordain Remedy The Preamble to the Statutes (s) Idem Anno 1376. fol. 191. 50 E. 3. runs thus The Prelates Dukes Earls Barons and others assembled at the Parliament c. Our Lord the King desiring much that the Peace of his Land be well kept and his faithful Subjects in quietness and tranquillity maintained hath therefore made and ordained certain Ordinances and also granted certain Graces and Pardons to his Commons of England In all which it is evident the Two Houses had no more but an Advising or Petitioning and Assenting Power It is every where expressed that the King solely Ordaineth Establisheth Granteth However he owns an obligation by his Coronation Oath to make good Laws for his Subjects CHAP. XXVII Of the Parliaments of England during the Reigns of King Richard the Second to the First Year of King James the Second THE Preface to the Statutes at (a) Pulton An. 1377. fol. 163. Westminster 10 R. 2. is thus Richard by the Grace of God c. to the Sheriff of Nottingham Greeting Know you That to the Honour of God c. by the whole Assent of the Prelates Dukes Earls and Barons of this our Realm Special Instance and Request of the Commons at the instance and special Request of the Commons of our Realm assembled at our Parliament We have ordained and established certain Statutes in amendment and relief of this our said Realm That at (b) Idem Anno 1378.
Preamble to the Writ of Summons 4 E. 3. is very (r) Cl. 4 E. 3. m. 13. dorso General Causes of Summons remarkable Rex c. Qualiter negotia nos statum Regni nostri contingentia postquam suscepimus gubernacula Regni nostri hucusque in nostri dampnum dedecus ac depauperationem populi nostri deducta erant vestram credimus prudentiam non latere propter quod non volentes hoc urgente conscientia ulterius sustinere ac desiderantes toto corde statum Regimen Regni nostri secundum juris ac rationis exigentiam ad honorem Dei tranquillitatem pacem Sanctae Ecclesiae ac totius populi ejusdem Regni reformari Ordinavimus c. Parliamentum c. The 22 of E. 3. hath a peculiar (s) Cl. 22 E. 3. part 2. m. 9. dorso Clause Quod dictum Parliamentum non ad Auxilia seu Tallagia a populo dicti Regni nostri petenda vel alia onera eidem populo imponenda sed duntaxat pro justitia ipsi populo nostro super dampnis gravaminibus sibi illatis facienda Another considerable (t) Cl. 31 E. 3. m. 21. dorso Clause is to be found 31 E. 3. Et quum praedicta negotia perquam ardua sine maxima deliberatione tam Praelatorum Cleri quam Magnatum Communitatis ejusdem Regni nullo modo expediri poterunt ad quorum expeditionem Auxilium Consilium tam a vobis c. habere necessario oportet The (u) Cl. 3 H. 6. m. 9. dorso Preamble 3 H. 6. is to enquire how Justice hath been done c. Quia nos jam dum in Annis degimus teneris an pax justitia ubilibet inter Ligeos nostros Regni nostri Angliae sine quarum observatione Regnum aliquod prospicere non potest debite conserventur exhibeantur necne c. Therefore he summons a Parliament The cause (w) Cl. 22 23 E. 4. m. 11. dorso of the Summons 22 E. 4. is thus expressed Quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos securitatem defensâ—onem Ecclesiae Anglicanae ac pacem tranquillitatem bonum publicum defensionem Regni nostri Subditorum nostrorum ejusdem concernentibus Therefore he summons them The special causes are mostwhat to have supply against the Kings Enemies Special Causes of Summons the French or Scotch Kings and it is to be noted that in the Summons of King E. 2. mostly the (x) Sâ—otis Inimiâ—is Rebellibus nosâ—ris Claus 2. E. 2. m. 20. dorso Scots are not only called the Kings Enemies but his Rebels which implies them Subjects by vertue of the Homage done to his Father and so 8 E. 2. M. 24. dorso it is called Terra nostra Scotiae though he was the most unfortunate of all our Kings in his Expeditions against that Kingdom The first (y) Cl. 14 E. 3. part 2. m. 28. dorso With the Advice of the King's Council Writ I have found wherein it is said the King called his Parliament with the Advice of his Council was 14 E. 3. quia de avisamento Concilii nostri ordinavimus and so in 46 E. 3. and afterwards sometimes used and often omitted but in later times generally used The last considerable thing in their Writs is what the Prelates c. summoned were to do at these Parliaments which most-what is comprehended in these Words That it is (z) Vestrum expedit habere consilium Cl. 6 Jo. m. 3. dorso What the Summoned were to do expedient to have their Counsel or nobiscum super dictis negotiis tractaturi vestrumque consilium impensuri 23 E. 1. m. 9. dorso or ad tractandum ordinandum faciendum nobiscum Cl. 24 E. 1. m. 4. dorso Ad ordinandum de quantitate modo subsidii Ibid. m. 7. dorso habere colloquium tractatum Claus 2 E. 2. m. 20. dorso ad tractandum consentiendum Cl. 6 E. 2. m. 2. dorso So in (a) Cl. 14 E. 3 par 1. m. 33. dorso another Ordinabimus quod juxta consilium vestrum aliorum Praelatorum Magnatum caeterorumque ibidem convocatorum viderimus opportunum In the (b) Cl. 20 E. 3. par 2. m. 22. dorso 20 of E. 3. it is thus expressed Ad consentiendum hiis quae tunc praedictos Praelatos Comites alios Proceres ordinari contigerit super negotiis antedictis and the like 46 E. 3. m. 11. dorso In the Writ 38 H. 6. m. 29. dorso it is Ad tractandum consentiendum praecludendum super praemissis aliis and 23 E. 4. Et concludendum and so in the 15th of K. Ch. the First Ad tractandum consentiendum concludendum SECT 3. Of the Summons of the Temporal Lords I Have been the longer upon these Writs of Summons to the Clergy Summons to the Lords Temporal like those to the Prelates excepting in some few Particulars because those to the Nobles differ'd not much and the material differences will be all I need note in their Writs and in these we may find the gradual alteration from giving Counsel and Advice only it came to Treaty Ordaining Consenting Doing and Concluding I shall refer the curious Reader for the remarks that may be made from all these Writs to Mr. Prynn's (c) Part 1. Briâ—f Register p. 1â—2 c. Collection of them and only note some few most to my purpose of the Earls Barons and the greater Tenents in Capite's Writs and then proceed to the Writs of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses The first Writ of Summons to a Parliament now left upon Record as (d) Ibid. p. 160. Mr. Prynn notes is that of 49. H. 3. those of the (e) Cl. 45 H. 3. m. 3. dorso 45th being only Summons to assist the King cum Equis Armis cum Posse vestro as that to W. de Bello Campo de Aumel and others shew being only to afford him aid against his Enemies and Rebels In most of the Writs to the Princes Dukes Earls Barons and Peers In Fide Homagio vel Ligeanâ—ia proper to Temporal Lords we find the Mandamus is Vobis in fide homagio quibus nobis tenemini But sometimes as to Edmund Earl of (f) Cl. 25 E. 1. m. 25. dorso Cornwal it is Mandamus in homagio fide dilectione and that to Thomas de (g) Cl. 36 E. 3. m. 42. dorso Furnival 36 E. 3. is fide ligeancia quibus nobis tenemini That to Edward Prince of Wales 49 E. 3. 6 m. dorso is directed Carissimo primogenito suo Ed. Principi Walliae and the Mandamus neither hath adjoined to it fide homagio or any other Word See Prynne's Brief Register part 1. p. 207. but only commands him to be present in propria persona though others have fide homagio or ligeancea It is to be noted that the clause in
Curiae suae Baronum Parium suorum So Anno 1240. 24 H. 3. (i) Graviter accusatus coram Rege Curia tota Lond. Mat. Westm 153. Matthew Paris saith That Hubert de Burgo Earl of Kent was grievously accused before the King and his whole Court and it was adjudged he should resign to the King four of his Castles I cannot omit one memorable passage that (k) Mat. Westm Anno 1260. p. 295 296. Anno 1260. 44 H. 3. there falling out a difference betwixt King Hen. 3. Prince Edward his Son Simon Montfort and other Nobles the King called his Baronage to St. Pauls and there it being urged that Prince Edward had done some injuries to the King he offered to prove himself innocent before the King and his Uncle who was King of the Romans saying Who are Peers of Prince Edward That none of (l) Omnes alios Barones Comites sibi de â—ure non esse Pares nec sâ—â—s in eum excercerâ— disâ—ussiones the rest of the Barons and Earls were by right his Peers nor ought to exercise upon him their Discussions of the matter By which it appears that he judged himself to be something more than a Peer of the Realm being the Heir apparent of the Crown I might fill a large Volum with the Histories and Records to prove this but since Levellers and the House of Commons that voted the House of Lords dangerous and useless have received such deadly wounds by Mr. Prynne in his Plea for the Lords who was once one of their own Champions I think it needless to whet those Weapons again since they always will be in readiness for any one to make use of if need require and shall only obviate one objection that may be urged That whatever the usage was before the Representatives of the Commons An Objection That after the House of Commons were admitted the Jurisdiction of the Lords House was lessened Answered yet the Commons after were often admitted to a share of Judicature in some cases But I shall give a few Instances how after this change of the Constitution of Parliament still this power of Judicature remained in the King and House of Lords Roger de (m) 4 E. 3. num 11.28 E. 3. num 9 10. Mortimer being accused of High Treason 4 E. 3. for the Murther of King Edward 2. after his resignation and unlawful deposition Knighton (n) De Event Angliae lib. 3. c. 16. col 1556 1557. giving an account of the proceedings agreeable to the Parliament Roll saith Rex praecepit Comitibus Baronibus caeteris Magnatibus Regni justum judicium ferre super praedicto Rogero de Mortimer So at the Parliament held at Salisbury 7 R. 2. W. de Zouch is said to be called to the Parliament to stand to the Judgment (o) Ad standum judicio Regis Domincrum Walâ—ingham p. 334. Hist Ang. Hypodig Neust p. 141. of the King and the Lords So Michael de la Pole Earl of Suffolk and Chancellor of England 10 R. 2. (p) Rot. Parl. 10 R. 2. num 6. ad 18. was accused by the Commons in full Parliament before the King Bishops and Lords and at last it is said The Lords in full Parliament gave judgment against him In the Parliament 11 R. 2. Thomas Duke of Gloucester offered to put himself upon his Tryal as the Lords of the Parliament would award c. After which the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal claimed their Liberties and Franchises namely That all weighty matters in the same Parliament which should be after moved touching the Peers of the Land should be judged and determined by them by the course of Parliament and not by the Civil Law nor yet by the Common Law of the Land used in other Courts of the Realm Yet this seems a very high Demand for they have not Juris dandi but dati Jurisdictionem as they are a Court of Ministerial Jurisdiction being the Court of the King's Barons in Parliament And though when upon Writ of Error (q) Egerton sect 4.22 23. any Judgment in the King's Bench is examined in the House of Lords and there affirmed or reversed the Judgment is said to be affirmed or reversed in Parliament yet we cannot conclude they have the Power of the High Court of Parliament that their Decrees if against the Law should be as binding as Acts of Parliament How the Lords judge ministerially And though the same House in the same Session may not have Power to review again their own Judgment nor to restore again any Judgment they have reversed because they judge ministerially and not sovereignly and so bind their own Hands as well as their Inferiors whereas an Absolute Supreme Court is never at the last Period of Jurisdiction yet we see Attainders in one Parliament reversed in another and so may their Judgments be But this obiter I shall but add one proof more being full and express to the purpose to prove the House of Lords sole Jurisdiction with the King who must always be understood to give Judgment by them The Record is 1 H. 4. (r) Rot. Par. 1 H. 4. num 79. Exact Abridgment p. 392. where it is said That 3 Nov. the Commons in this Parliament shewed to the King Come les joggements du Parlement apperteignent soulement au Roy Seignieurs nient aus Communes c. That the Judgments of Parliament appertained only to the King and to the Lords and not unto the Commons Thereupon they prayed the King out of his special Grace to shew unto them the said Judgments and the cause of them that so no Record might be made in Parliament against the said Commons which are or shall be parties to any Judgment given or hereafter to be given in Parliament without their Privity Whereunto the Archbishop of Canterbury gave them this Answer by the Kings Commandment That the Commons themselves are Petitioners and Demanders and that the King (s) Et que le Roy les Seigniours de tout temps ont eues averont de droit les Juggement in Parliament en manere come mesmes les Communes soâ—t monstres and Lords from all times have had and shall have of right the Judgments in Parliaments in manner as the Commons have shewed How far the King and House of Lords have been Judges of the Priviledges of the House of Commons I shall declare in that part of this Chapter wherein I treat of that House SECT 5. Of the Assistants to the House of Lords HAving thus far treated of the Constituent Parts of the House of Lords I come now to the Assistants to this most Honourable House which were mostly the (t) Prynne's Brief Register part 1. sect 3. p. 240. The Judges and other Assistants of the House of Lords King 's Great Officers as well Clergy-men as Secular Persons who were no Lords or Barons of the Realm as namely his Treasurer
in the Record Item mandatum est singâ—lis Vicecomitibus per Angliam quod venire faciant duos Milites delegalioribus probioribus discretioribus Militibus singulorum Comitatuum ad Regem London in forma praedicta Item in forma praedicta scribitur Civibus Ebor. Lincoln caeteris Burgis Angliae quod mittant in forma praedicta duos de discretioribus legalioribus probioribus tam Civibus quam Burgensibus suis and so to the Barons of the Cinque-Ports which runs thus Rex Baronibus Ballivis Portus sui de Sandwico Cum Praelati Nobiles Regni nostri tam pro negotio Liberationis Edwardi Primogeniti nostri quam pro aliis Communitatem Regni nostri tangentibus ad instans Parliamentum c. Vobis mandamus in fide dilectione quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes omnibus aliis praetermissis mittatis ad nos ibidem 4 de legalioribus discertioribus Portus vestri c. Nobiscum cum praefatis Magnatibus Regni nostri tractatum super praemissis consilium impensuri From all which it is observable first Observations on the first Writ to the Barons of the Cinque-Ports that in all probability the Writs then issued to the Knights Citizens and Burgesses were the same in form and substance with those to the Spiritual and Temporal Lords and in those to the Sheriffs c. Secondly the Qualifications of those to be elected are limited Thirdly It doth not appear whether the Counties themselves or the Sheriffs alone were to elect Fourthly The Writs for electing Citizens and Burgesses were directed immediately to the Citizens and Burgesses themselves not to the Sheriffs of the Counties Lastly that no Writ issued to the Citizens of London their Liberties then being seized into the King's Hand and that York and Lincoln are the only Cities mentioned particularly in the Roll. The first Writs entred at large in the Rolls are those (e) Cl. 22 E. 1. m. 6. dorso 22 E. 1. wherein is expressed that the King intending a Colloquium Tractatum with his Barons and great Men he commands that the Sheriffs cause to be elected two Knights De diâ—â—retioribus ad laborandum potentioribus cum plena potestate pro se tota communitate Com. praedicti ad consulendum consâ—ntiendum pro se communitate illa Hiis quae Comites Barones Proceres praeâ—icti concorditer ordinaverint in praemissis c. of the more discreet and more able to take Pains c. to come to Westminster c. with full Power for themselves and the whole Community of the said County to consult and consent each for himself and the said Community to those things which the Earls Barons and Nobles aforesaid unanimously ordain in the Premisses so that for want of such like Power the Business remain not undone I shall now insert what Variations I find in the Writs of Summons promiscuosly whether to Knights Citizens or Burgesses unless there be some remarkable difference to be observed First The Qualifications in the Writs As to their Qualifications generally both Knights Citizens and Burgesses are to be de legalioribus discretioribus ad laborandum potentioribus In the Writ 25 E. 1. (f) Cl. 25 E. 1. m. 6. dorso it is probioribus legalioribus and some two or all of these Epithetes are generally used till (g) Cl. 22 E. 3. m. 7. dorso 22 E. 3. m. 7. dorso where it is expressed that the Knights be gladio cinctos ordinem militarem habentes non alios de qualibet Civitate de quolibet Burgo duos Burgos de aptioribus discretioribus probioribus fide dignis Militibus Civibus Burgensibus Cl. 24 E. 3. par 2. m. 3. dorso and in the Twenty fourth of E. 3. there is an addition and limitation No Maintainers of Sâ—its c. to be choâ—â—n Qui non sunt Placitorum aut querelarum manutentores aut ex hujusmodi quaestu viventes sed homines valentes bonae fidei publicum commodum diligentes eligi and the self-same Limitations are in the 25 28 and 29 E. 3. So that it was used so long as the King thought fit In (h) Cl. 26 E. 3. m. 14. dorso 26 Ed. 3. it is unum Militem de provectioribus discretioribus magis expertis Militibus and so for Citizens and Burgesses by which it appears the King desired not any under Age as now is allowed to be chosen In 31 Ed. 3. besides (i) Cl. 31 E. 3. m. 2. dorso the usual words de discretioribus probioribus there is added de elegantioribus personis eligi Which in no Writ else before or after is to be found In the 36 E. 3. (k) Cl. 36 E. 3. m. 16. dorso it is de melioribus validioribus Militibus c. That of the Forty fourth of (l) Cl. 44 E. 3. m. 12. dorso E. 3. runs Duos Milites gladiis cinctos in Armis Actibus Armorum magis probatos circumspectos discretos It appears by the Parliament Roll 46 (m) Nul home de Ley pursuont busoignes en la Courte de Roy ne Viscount pur le Temps que il est Viscount soient retournez ne acceptez Chevalers des Countees neque ves qui sont Gentz de Ley Visâ—ounts ore retournez au Parlement eient Gages Rot. Parl. 46 E. 3. cum 13. E. 3. That it was accorded and assented to in that Parliament and an Ordinance made That no Lawyer pursuing Business in the Court of the King nor any Sheriff while he was Sheriff should be returned or accepted Knights of the Counties and if any were so returned they should have no wages Therefore in the fourteenth Number of the said Roll it is thus expressed Mes voyet le Roy que Chevalers Serjaunts i. e. Esquires not Serjeants at Law des meulieur valeurs du paiis soiz retornez desore Chevalers en Parlement quils sount esluz en plein Counts That Knights and Esquires of greatest value in their Country should be chosen in the full County The very next Writ 47 E. 3. (n) Cl. 47 E. 3 m. 13 dorso To be Knights giâ—t with Swords and skilful in Arms. runs thus Duos Milites gladiis cinctos seâ— Armigeros which explains the word Serjaunts before as in that Age being reputed Servants to Knights as holding Lands in such a Tenure of them de dicto Com. digniores probiores in Actibus Armorum magis expertos discretos non alterius conditionis duos Cives Burgenses qui in navigo exercitio mercandisarum notitiam habeant meliorem eligi and then in the Close follows Nolumus autem quod tu seu aliquis alius Vicecomes Regni praedicti aut aliquis alteriâ—s conditionis quam superius specificatur aliqualiter sit electus and the last Clause
agreeth with the Act of Parliament 37 E. 3. c. 18. where it is said before the Chancellor Treasurer and Great Council Thirdly The Kings Privy Council which appears to be different from the last Great Council by many Records and particularly by that of (c) Rot. Claus 16 E. 2. m. 5. dorso 16 E. 2. where it is said Hen. de Bellomont Baron of the Kings Great and Private Council was sworn This Council is called Concilium Privatum secretum continuum Regis The Privy Council properly so called Lord President The First Member of this Council is the Lord President who was anciently called Principalis Consiliarius and sometimes Capitalis Consiliarius The first Lord President Sir Edward Coke (d) 4. Instit c. 2. fol. 55. 1. par Pat. num 22. John Bishop of Norwich is mentioned 7 Jo. by Matt. Paris fol. 205. mentions was the Earl of Lancaster 50 E. 3. 1 R. 2. then he reckons these in order the Duke of Bedford 1 H. 6. the Duke of Gloucester 10 H. 6. the Duke of York 11 and 22 H. 6. John Russel Bishop of Rochester and after of Lincoln is called President 13 E. 4. John Fisher Bishop of Rochester 12 H. 7. Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk from the 25th to the 37th of H. 8. the Lord Pawlet 1 E. 6. the Duke of Northumberland 5 and 7 of E. 6. the Earl of Arundel 1 and 2 Ph. and M. in Q. Elizabeth's time we find none but in this Catalogue Mr. Prynne (e) Animadv p. 45. Pat. 13 E. 4. part 1. m. 3. hath truly noted That the Bishop of Rochester was not made President of the Kings Council but of the Prince's and was his Tutor as appears by the Patent it self there cited dated the 10th of Nov. This Office of Lord President was never granted but by Letters Patents under the Great Seal durante beneplacito In the Statute of 21 H. 8. c. 2. he is said to be attendant on the Kings most Royal Person the reason of which saith Sir Ed. Coke is That of latter times he hath used to report to the King the Passages and the State of the business at the Council Table The Lord Privy Seal is the next Principal Person that hath Precedence in the Kings Council Lord Privy-Seal concerning whose Office my Lord (f) 4. Instit c. 2. fol. 56. Coke hath discoursed at large to whom I must refer the Curious Reader as also to him for the Acts of Parliament Orders of the same and Acts of Council together with Mr. Prynne's (g) P. 45. Animadversions whereby the Privy-Council was to be regulated and concerning the Jurisdiction and Proceedings of the Kings Council Mr. Lambard's (h) P. 108. to 116. fol. 29. Archaion and Mr. Crompton's Jurisdiction of Courts may be consulted the several Bundels of Petitions to the King and his Council in the Tower of London and the Answers to them the Placita Parliamentaria coram Rege Concilio in the Tally Office of the Exchequer and in the Parchment Book of them in the Tower under King Edward the First printed by Mr. (i) In Placit Parl. Append. Those summoned to Parliaments as Assistants called the King's Council and in Parliament-time joyned with the King's Council in several Cases Ryley Of this Privy Council there seems to me to be two sorts one constantly attending the King and his Affairs the other in Parliament time only which had their particular Summons as I have before at full discoursed of and these two I find so obscurely distinguished that it is difficult in some places to understand which are meant but I think in time of Parliament these were joyned to the Kings Council for besides that they had a distinct Summons and in them as a specifical distinction the word caeteris was omitted in that part of the Summons which runs dictis die loco personalitor intersitis nobiscum ac cum caeteris Praelatis Magnatibus c. because they were not Parliamentary Barons there was also added in proceedings and judgments upon them these words coram ipso Domino Rege ejus concilio ad Parliamenta sua or ad Parliamentum suum or coram Concilio nostro in praesenti Parliamento For the particular Instances of which being they are very numerous Mr. Prynn's (k) A pag. 363. ad pag. 393. brief Register may be consulted wherein it seems to me upon the perusal of the several Records that these Assistants to the House of Lords were likewise joyned to the rest of the Kings standing Council in Parliament time so it is expressed in the Case of (l) Idem pag. 378. John Salâ—eyn and Margaret his Wife and Isabel her Sister Daughters and Heirs of Robert de Ross de Work thus Habito super praemissis diligenti tractatu per ipsum Dom. Regem totum Concilium and in the same it is thus also worded videtur Dom. Regi Concilio suo concordatum est consideratum per ipsum Dom. Regem Concilium suum So in others per Concilium Archiepiscoporum Episcoporum Comitum Baronum caeterorumque (m) Idem pag. 380. de Concilio suo existentium singulis de Concilio suo totius Concilii Domini Regis So in 21 E. 1. the Archbishop of York's Case videtur Domino Regi in pleno Parliamento praedicto Comitibus Baronibus Justiciariis similiter toti Concilio ipsius Dom. Regis and so it is said Magnates alios de Concilio ipsius Domini Regis rogavit This is further cleared by sundry (n) Idem pag. 383. The Court of Star-chamber was said to be coram Rege Concilio suo See Coke Inst 4. c. 5. Prefaces to and passages in our Printed Statutes as formerly I have noted So the Statute of Bigamy 4 Oct. 4 E. 1. saith In the presence of certain Reverend Fathers Bishops of England and others of the Kings Council the constitutions under written were recited after heard and published before the King and his Council for as much as all the Kings Council Justices and others did agree So the Statute of Quo Warranto 30 E. 1. Cum apud Westminster per nos Concilium nostrum provisum So 33 E. 1. it is agreed and ordained by the King and all his Council So 42 E. 3. c. 3. the Statute made on Petition of the Commons in Parliament begins (o) Plese a nostre Seigneur le Roy son bon Counsel pur droyt Government de son Peuple ordeigner Pleaseth it our Lord the King and his good Council for the better Government of his People to ordain By great store of Records it is apparent that in old times the Kings and their Councils gave Judgment in divers Cases of difficulty and other Common Cases concerning the Law of the Realm (p) See 11 H. 4. num 28. 63. Respectuatur per Dom. Principem Concilium Pryn. Animadv p. 39. 264 265 267 296.
(p) 14 E. 3. c. 5. Stat. 1. Rot. Parl. 2 â— 2. num 63. confirmed by Parliament a Court for redress of Delays of Judgment in the Kings Great Courts raised by Statute 14 E. 3. whereby one Prelate two Earls and two Barons the Chancellor Lord Treasurer the Justices of both the Benches and other of the Kings Council have Power to call before them the Tenor of Records and Processes of such Judgments so delayed and to proceed to take a good accord and Judgment and so remand all to the Justices before whom the Plea did depend He likewise (q) 4. Instit c. 6. fol. 67. tells us That by the Common-Law it is required that both plena celeris Justitia fiat and all Writs of Praecipe quod reddat are quod juste sine dilatione reddat c and that there did and yet doth lye a Writ de pracedendo ad Judicium when the Justices or Judges of any Court of Record or not of Record delayed the Party Plaintiff or Defendant Justice and in Case the Prelate the two Earls two Barons the Chancellor Treasurer c. may not for the Difficulty determine it then to bring it to the next Parliament there to have a final accord From this whole Discourse I hope it is apparent that as our Kings authorize the Justices to do right to every one according to the Laws and Customs of England so the Judges cannot well fail of performing it Before I end this Chapter I cannot omit the inserting of some of the Expressions that I find in the Saxon Laws whereby the desire those Kings had that equal Justice should be administred is very manifest The eighth Law of King Ina inflicts a mulct of thirty Shillings upon every (r) Hwilcum scirmen oththe othrum dâ—man Shireman or other Judge that grants not Justice to him that requires it and besides that within a Week he afford him right in Saxon thus binnan seoffon nihte gedo hine rihtes wrythe The first of the secular Laws of King Edgar runs thus That every one enjoy the Benefit of right Judgment whether he be Poor or Rich but in exacting of Punishments let there be that Moderation that they may be attempered to Divine Clemency and may be tolerable to Men. The Saxon runs thus That ole mà n sy folc rihtes wyrth ge earm geeadig and him mon righte Domas deme sy on thaerebote swylec forgyffenysse swylec hit fore God ge beorglice sy and for weoruld aberendlic The third Law of the same King is that the Judg who shall pass false Judgment on any shall pay the King a Hundred and twenty Shillings unless he confirm it by Oath that he did it by Error and Ignorance not for Malice However he shall be removed (s) Et tholige a his Thegnscipes butan he aeft al thaem Cyng gebiege swa he hin gethasian wills out of his place unless he obtain the same again of the King By which it further appears that in those days the King removed and placed Judges at his Pleasure The first of the secular Laws of King Canutus runs thus First I will that Man (t) That man ribte laga upp araere aegh wylec unlaga georne assylle set up right Laws and unjust Laws be suppressed and that every one according to his Power pluck up utterly by the Roots all unrighteousness and set up Gods Right i. e. Divine Justice and for the time to come the Poor as well as the Rich enjoy right Judgment and to both of (u) Fole rihtes wyrthe him man ribte domes deme them right Dooms be deemed Then the next Law is for exhibiting Mercy in judgment that even in Capital Matters such moderation be used in imposing the mulct that it be (w) Swa it for Gode sy gebeolice for woruld aberendlice As in the Law of King Edgar attempered to divine Clemency and be to be born by Men and that he that judgeth think in his Mind what he asks when he saith in the Lords Prayer and forgive us our Debts or Trespasses as we forgive them that trespass against us and he forbids that any Christian be put to Death for any small or contemptible cause that for a (x) Et ne forspille man for litlum Godes handgeweorce his agenne ceap the he deorgevobt small matter they suffer not to perish the work of Gods Hands which he hath redeemed with a great price In the Eleventh Law we find that the King saith That by all help and work it is to be endeavoured by what reason principally he may gain Counsel that may (y) His man fyrmest mâ—g raed aredian Theode to Thearfe ribâ—ne Cristendom swy thort araeran agh wilec unlaga georne assyllan confirm such things as are for the profit of the Republick and may confirm Christian Piety and may totally overthrow Injustice from hence that Profit at last coming to the Kingdom that Iniquity may be suppressed and Justice may be set up in the Presence of God and Men. I could add more but I shall have occasion in the next Chapter to mention something of this Subject and shall only close with that Admonition of King James (z) Dalton's Justice of Peace c. 2. the First to the Judges in the Star-Chamber 1616. wherein he gave them in Charge to do Justice uprightly and indifferently without delay without Partiality Fear or Bribes with stout and upright Hearts with clean and uncorrupt Hands and not to utter theirown Conceits but the true meaning of the Law not making Laws but interpreting the Law and that according to the true Sence thereof and after deliberate Consultation remembring their Office is Jus dicere not Jus dare CHAP. XXXIV Of Justices of Peace and their Sessions SIR Edward Coke (a) 4. Instit c. 31. fol. 170. observes that the Constitution of Justices of Peace is such a form of subordinate Government for the Tranquillity and quiet of the Realm as no part of the Christian World hath the like which may be true in the particular Limitation of the Power Officers like our Justices of Peace anciently in other Countries But that in other Countries such like Officers have been appointed particularly for the preservation of Peace is evident in the ancient Laws of the Wisigothes (b) Lib. 2. c. 16. compiled by Theodoricus their King about the Year of our Lord 437. which constituted Pacis Assertores and appointed them Judges to hear and determine those causes quas illis Regia deputaverit ordinandi Potestas So in the Sicilian (c) Anno 1221. Ibid. p. 704. to 722. lob 1. tit 8. Laws compiled by the Emperor Frederick the Second we find one Title de cultu pacis generali pace in Regno servanda and another de (d) Ibid. tit 41. officio Justiciaratus where the Title Office and Commission of the Justiciarii Regionum is at large recited almost in Parallel terms with ours at this Day The
preserved in Peace Arms are necessary and they cannot be provided for without Taxes The Subjects receive the benefit of protection and by the care of the Government peaceable possession of their Houses Fields and Cattle Liberty of Trade dispensation of Justice and other great Emoluments by its guard and vigilance which require a numerous retinue of Officers of State Justice and War and Multitude of subordinate Ministers Something also must be allowed for the grandeur and port is necessary for the regulating it at home and abroad the maintaining Correspondence by Ambassadors the providing for defence against foreign Invasions and preserving Tranquillity at home in all which the Publick is concerned therefore the reason is very just and equitable that besides a standing Revenue for defraying these constant charges there should be subsidiary supplys upon emergencies adequate to the occasions As Cicero justly admonisheth Da operam ut omnes intelligant si salvi esse volunt necessitati esse parendum That the Subjects be made to understand that if they will be safe As the Subject is protected so he ought to support the Government they must yield to necessity this absolute necessity of parting with a portion of their Estates for securing the rest For though it be prudence in a private man justly and moderately to enrich himself yet craftily to withhold from the Publick and to defraud it of such parts of the Wealth as is by Law required is no sign of prudence saith Mr. Hobs as judiciously as any position he lyes down but want of knowledge of what is necessary Civil War for their own defence and covetousness to part with nothing they can hold makes this restive humour in many That the Kings of England have quitted that Soveraign badge of raising money upon the Subject by their own Impositions without consent of Parliament is manifest since Edward the First 's time (b) 27 E. 1. c. 5. Anno 1299. The Act for which runs thus For so much as divers People of our Realm are in fear that the Aids and Tasks which they have given us before time towards our Wars and other business of their own grant and good will howsoever they were made might turn to a Bondage to them and their Heirs because they might be at another time found in the Rolls and likewise for the prices taken throughout the Realm by our Ministers We have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not draw such Aids Task nor Prices into a Custom for any thing that hath been done heretofore be it by Roll or any other Precedent that may be found (c) Cap. 6. The next is thus Moreover we have granted for us and our Heirs as well to Archbishops Bishops Abbats Priors and other folk of Holy Church as also to Earls Barons and to all the Commonalty of the Land that for no business from henceforth we shall take such manner of Aids Tasks nor Prices but by the common assent of the Realm and for the common profit thereof See for this the Charter of King John saving the ancient Aids and Prices due and accustomed These being not fully enough expressed the Statute of 34. E. 1. though as short in words as any to be found yet is of the largest extent and as liberal a Boon of Royal bounty as any People can boast of from their Prince It is thus No Tallage or Aid shall be taken or levied by Us or our Heirs in our Realm without the good will and assent of Archbishops Bishops Earls Barons Knights Burgesses and other Free-men of the Land Therefore all those who would enjoy the benefit of this Law must take care they preserve the Succession and the two Houses of Parliament (d) MS. Speech second Parl. Elâ—z an 1562. Inducements to supply the Sovereign The Lord Chancellor in Queen Elizabeth's time thus by the Queens command discourseth to the Houses If when any part of the natural Body hap to be in danger the Head and every part hasteth to the relief so how inconvenient and unnatural is it when danger is offered to the whole that the Head should take the whole care and bear the whole burthen and the Members remain uncareful and uncharged It is certain (e) Coke Instit 1.90 the Prince can make no War of any great concernment without the assistance of his Subjects Purses as well as Bodies unless all would voluntarily serve upon their own charges for that neither sudden dangers can be evaded nor Forces raised and all things necessary for them provided nor peace be long preserved when the Prince hath an empty Exchequer for Treasure is Firmamentum Belli Ornamentum Pacis A late (f) States of France Objection French Author concerning his own Country makes this objection That Princes having assigned for their usual charges of the Government Tribute and other Incomes they ought to be therewith contented and not without occasion raise new Taxes to the detriment of the Liege people and contrary to the intention of the Trust Yet he owns this ought to be soberly understood for a wise Physician applies those Remedies necessary without the Patient's leave and will force him though by cutting off a Limb to save his life So when there may happen a necessity urgent and unforeseen that either will suffer no delay or which ought not for some time to be divulged in such cases saith he the King without the States and whether they will or no may lay new Impositions and make all other necessary provisions by the absolute Power he hath to rule and preserve his State and Subjects he not being able to defend them without necessary Forces Therefore in such occasions it is to be supposed that with the Power of Government there is transferred to the Prince the Power to do that without which good Government cannot be executed but when there is not that kind of necessity the States are called Thus far my Author Since therefore (g) Coke 1. Insiit p. 161. qui diruit medium destruit finem he that takes away the necessary means for a King to preserve his people in uncommon events hazards the ruine of the People some have inferred that when dangers should be so sudden that there could not be time to convene a Parliament or that such a Parliament met should for some design deny the Prince Money then the Kings Prerogative might extend to the raising of Money and they instance in the Loans by Privy Seals exacted upon the Subjects even in Queen Elizabeth's time This indeed was the Plea for Ship-money and as the case was stated by King Charles the First Concerning Ship-Money all the Judges once subscribed their affirmative opinions though Mr. Justice Hutton and Crooke retracted after and with great learning the case was argued and Judgment given in favour of the King Yet he hoping by the yielding to the abolishing of it to have stopped the misery of a War consented to an