Kings licence â—â—shops Court 〈◊〉 Rec. certif 13 A Bishop being an Ecclesiastical Iudge Co. ibib 134. b. 2. and sometimes a Lord of Parliament by reason of the Barony annexed to his Bishopricke the Law giveth much Honor and Reverence unto him And therefore none but the Kings Courts of Record as the Court of Common Pleas the Kings Bench Iustices of Goale-delivery and the like can write to the Bishop to certifie Bastardy Mulierty Loyaltie of Matrimony and the like Ecclesiastical matter For it is a Rule in Law that none but the King can write to the Bishop to certifie And therefore no Inferiour Court â—â—feriour â—ourt as London Norwich Yorke or and other Incorporation can write to the Bishop but in those Cases the Plea must be removed into the Court of Common Pleas and that Court must write to the Bishop â—â—are Impeâ—â— Wales and then remand the Record again and this is the reason why a Quare Impedit did lie of a Church in Wales in the County next adjoyning for that the Lordships Marchers could not write to the Bishop Neither shall Conusance be granted in a Quare Impedit because the Inferior Court cannot write to the Bishop And herewith agréeth Antiquity Bract. l. 3. 106. Fleta l. 5. c. 24. Britton 248. b. Nullus alius praeâ—er Regem potest Episcopo demandare Inquisitionem faciendam And another speaking of Loyalty of Mariage Nec alius quà m Rex super hoc demandaret Episcopo quod inde inquireâ—et Episcopus alterius mandatum quà m Regis non debet obtemperare And herewith also agréeth Britton Co. ibid. 137. b. 3. F. N. B. 79. a. If a Villain remaine in the Ancient Demean of the King a year and a day without clayme or seisure of the Lord Villein Ancient Demesne no 〈◊〉 the Lord cannot have a writ of Nativo habendo or seise him so long as he remains and continues there And the reason of this was in respect of the service he did to the King in Plowing and tillage of the Demeanes and other labours of Husbandry for the Kings benefit Glanv l. 5. c. 5. Fleta l. a. c. 44. Britton fol. 79. Mirr cap. 2. And herewith agrée old books which say that his Immunity was sometimes granted by common consent to the King for his profit and for the helpe and ease of his Villains So likewise Priest Chappel if a Villain be a Priest of the Kings Chappel the Lord cannot seise him in the presence of the King for the Kings presence is a priviledge and protection for him 27 Ass Pl. 49. Co. ibidem 15 If a Villain be professed a Monke or a Wife a Nun Villein the Lord cannot seise them c. Co. ibid. 156. a. 3. 16 If a Peere of the Realme or Lord of Parliament be demandant or Plaintiffe Tenant or Defendant Lord Knight Jury there must a Knight be returned of his Iury or else the Array may be quashed but if he be returned albeit he appeare not yet the Iury may be taken of the residue And if others be joyned with the Lord of Parliament yet if there be no Knight retured the Array shall be quashed against all So also in the like case in Attaint there ought to be a Knight returned of the Iury Note That this present Parliament which commenced Anno 16. Can. Bishops were by Act of Parliament excluded the house of Lords Bishops and therefore Quere whether at this day this Law holds in their Case or no Howbeit it seemes still to hold because they still retaine their Baronies in respect whereof they enjoyed Places and had votes in that house and doublesse shall still retaine divers other Priviledges which of right belong to Temporall Peeres that have Baronies Tamen quaere Co. ibid. 156. l. 6. b. 3. 17 At the Common Law Challenge peremptory any subject under the degrée of a Peere of the Realme upon an Indictment or Appeale of Treason or Felonie against him might in favorem vitae challenge peremptorily viz. 35. or any other number under thrée Iuries But a Lord of Parliament that being a Peere of the Realme is to be tryed by his Peeres shall challenge none of them because they are not sworne as other Iurors be Peere 〈◊〉 Challenge but find the partie guilty or not guilty upon their faith or allegiance to the King and they are Iudges of the fact and every of them doth separately give his Iudgement beginning at the lowest c. How the Common Law hath been altered concerning peremptorie Challenges see Co. ubi in margine Co. ibidem 18 A Péere of the Realme or a Lord of Parliament as a Baron Peere no â—â—ror Viscount Earle Marquesse and Duke propter honoris respectum in respect of honor and Nobility are not to be sworne on Iuries and if neither party will challenge him he may challenge himselfe For by magna Carta it is provided Quòd nec super eam ibimus Lords Commoâ— nec super eam mittemus nisi per legale judicium parium suorum aut per legem terrae Now the Common Law hath divided all the subjects into Lords of Parliament and into the Commons of the Realme Trial per pares The Péeres of the Realme are divided into Barons Viscounts Earles Marquesses and Dukes The Commons are divided into Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens Yeomen and Burgesses and in judgement of Law any of the said degrées of Nobility are Péeres to another as if an Earle Marquesse or Duke be to be tryed for treason or felonie a Baron or any other degrée of Nobility is his Péere In like manner a Knight Esquire c. shall be tryed per pares and that is by any of the Commons as Gentlemen Citizens Yeomen or Burgesses So as when any of the Commons is to have a triall either at the Kings suit or betwéen partie and partie a Péere of the Realme shall not be impanesseâ— in any Case Words of conâ—â—son bind in â—he Kings case â—nd of a wil. 19 If a man maketh a Feoffment in Fée ad faciendum or faciendum Co. ibid. 204. b. 4. or ea intentione or ad effectum or ad propositum that the Feoffée shall do or not do such an Act none of these words make the State in the Land conditional For in judgement of Law they are no words of Condition and so was it resolved Hill 18 E. in Co. Banco But this is to be understood in the Case of a common person for in the Kings case these or the like words do create a Condition and so it is also in the Case of the will of a Common person c. Condition not â—estroyed in â—â—e Kings case 20 A Common person being grantée of part of a reversion of Land Co. ibid. 21â— a. 3. shall not take advantage of a Condition by force of the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 34. As if
Sessions quod non legit Dier 205. b. 3 4 â—l and the prisoner is for some cause reprieved yet he may read at the next Sessions and shall have his Clergy in favorem vitae Vide 36 H. 6. that a Prisoner shall have his Clergy under the Gallows Life goods 44 If two men tilt before the King Hob. 134. Weaver and Ward or two Masters of Defence be playing their Prizes and one of them happen to kill the other this is not Felony because not done animo felonico and besides if it should be questioned as an Offence the life of the Offender which the Law much tenders would be brought into jeopardy there is the same Law also of a Lunatique that kills a man Howbeit in Trespasse which intends onely to give dammages according to hurt and losse it is not so And therefore if a Lunatique hurt a man he shall be answerable in Trespasse So likewise if in training for exercise in re militari one Souldier happen to hurt another he shall be answerable in Trespasse because it extends no farther then to his goods to satiâ—â—e dammages yet if the accident were inevitable he shall be excused c. 93 Things in the Realty more then those in the Personalty In waste the place wasted â— more respect then the dammages 1 It hath béen a question Co. Inst p. 1. 355. a. 4 c. Note that it is holden per Curiam 9 H. 5. 15. that the personalty is the principal Ideo quare Vide Co. l. 2. 68. b. 1. in Tookers case whether upon a Recovery had by default in an Action of Waste against tenant in Dower or by the Courtesie a Quod ei deforceat lieth upon the Statute of West 2. cap. 4. And some hold that it doth not in regard the dammages as they say are the principal and not the place wasted because the dammages were recoverable upon that action against such Tenants at the Common Law and the place wasted was afterwards given by the Statute of Glocester as a penalty so as the nature of the Action say they remaineth still to be personal for that the dammages are the principal c. But in that Case others are of opinion and say that albeit in that Action the dammages may be the more ancient recompence yet the place wasted being in the realty must néeds be the more principal And therefore upon a Recovery by default in such an action a Quod ei deforceat lieth as well as in any other c. And this last séems to be my Lord Cooks opinion because put last according to his own Rule in his Comment upon Littleton â— Lien real â—nd personal 2 There is a diversity betwéen a Lien real and a Lien personal Co. ib. 386. b. 3 11. E. 3. det 7. for a Lien real as a warranty doth ever descend to the heir at the Common Law but the Lien personal doth binde the special heirs as all the heirs in Gavelkind the heir on the part of the mother c. when such an heir being charged by the Obligation or other act of the Ancestor is in by descent c. So if two men make a Feoffment in Fée with warranty and the one die the Feoffée cannot vouch the survivor onely but the heir of him that is dead also Howbeit it is otherwise where two do joyntly bind themselves in an Obligation for if one die the survivor onely shall be charged c. Release of one Joynt-tenant no Bar. 3 In personal actions the one Ioynt-tenant may release all Co. l. 2. 68. 24 in Tookers ca. per Popham but if the personalty be mixed with the realty it is otherwise as in an Assise by two the release of all actions personal by the one is no bar against the other for albeit an Assise is an action mixt in the realty and personalty yet omne majus trahit ad se minus as it is adjudged 30 H. 6. Bar 59. Also a Ioynt-tenant shall not prejudice his Companion as to any matter of Inheritance of Frank-tenant but as to the profit of the Frank-tenant the one may prejudice the other for there is a privity and trust betwixt them and therefore if one of them take all the profits of the Land or all the Rent the other hath no remedie c. Things in the Realty may be intailed not those in the Personalty 4 By force of the Statute of West 2. cap. 1. Co. Inst p. 1. 19. b. 4. which createth estates tail under this word tenementa not onely all corporate Inheritances which are or may be holden may be intailed but also all Inheritances issuing out of any of those inheritances or concerning or annexed to or exercisable within the same though they lie not in Tenure as Rents Estovers Commons or other profits whatsoever granted out of land or Vses Offices Dignities c. which concern lands or certain places All these I say may be intailed within that Statute because they savour of the Realty But if the Grant be of an Inheritance meer personal or to be exercised about Chattels and is not issuing out of land nor concerning any land or some certain place such Inheritances cannot be entailed because they savour nothing of the Realty For example in 7 Ass Pl. 12. and 7 E. 6. 1. the Office of the fourth part of the Serjeant of the Common Pleas is liberum tenementum and therefore may be entailed In 18 E. 3. 27. the Office of the kéeping of the Church of our Lady of Lincoln was intailed and a Formedon brought thereupon by the issue intail In 5 E. 4 3. and 10 E. 4. 14. The Office of Marshal of England was intailed In 11 E. 4. 1. the Office of one of the Chamberlains of the Exchequer intailed In 1 H. 7. 28. the Office of a Fostership intailed In 4 H. 7. 10. and 9 E. 4. 56 b. Charters intailed In 19 H. 8. 3 An Vse intailed In 1 H. 5. 1. The nomination to a Benefice intailed c. Co. l. 7. 33. 34 Nevilâ— Caâ—â— 28 H. c. the Lord Vesceâ—â— Case Also the name of Dignity may be intailed within that Statute as Dukes Marquesses Earls Vicounts and Barons because they are named of some County Mannor Town or place In 14 Ass Pl. 2. if the issue in tail in a Formedon in a Descender be barred by false Verdict his release is no bar to his issue albeit the action is at the Common Law The like Law is of a writ of Error 3 Eliz. Dier 188. If a gift in tail be made with warrantie the Donée releases the warranty this shall not binde the issue in tail for to all these Cases and the like the said Statute doth extend But if I grant to a man and to the heirs of his body to be Kéeper of my Hounds or Master of my Horse or to be my Faulconer or the like with a fée therefore yet these cannot be
for the advancement and continuance of Commerce and trade which is pro bono publico for the Rule is that Jus accrescendi inter mercatores pro beneficio commercii locum non habet Trade 5 One of the chiefest reasons why a Condition not to alien Co. ibid. 223. a. 2. annexed to a feoffment devise or gift of lands or goods is void is for that it is flatly against trade and traffique bargaining and contracting betwéen man and man Vide infra 9. Monopolies 6 Trin. 44 Eliz. The grant of the sole making of Playing Cards was adjudged void because it restrained trade and traffique Co. l. 8. 125. a. 3. the case of London which are the very life of every Commonwealth and principally of an Island There is the same reason of all other Monopolies Vide Co. l. 11. 87. Guilda 7 In favour of trade and traffique Co. ibid. the Law giveth the King power by his prerogative to erect Guildam Mercatoriam viz. a Fraternity Society or Incorporation of Merchants to the end that good order and government may be by them observed for the increase and advancement of Merchandising and trade and not for the hindrance and diminution thereof Trade Idleness 8 At the Common Law none could be prohibited to work in any lawfull trade Co. l. 11. 53. b. 4. The Taylors of Ipswich for the Law abhorrs Idleness the Mother of all mischief Otium omnium vitiorum mater and principally in young people who ought in their youth which is their séed-time to learn lawfull sciences and trades which are for the advancement of traffique and profitable to the Commonwealth and thereof they ought to reap the fruit in their old age For Jeunesse Oisense Vieillesse disettense And therefore the Law detests Monopolies which prohibit the exercise of lawful trades And this appears in 2 H. 5. b. where a Dyer was bound that he should not use the Dyers trade by the space of two years and there Hall held that the obligation was against the Common Law and added farther Per dien si le plaintife fuit icy il iroit al prison tanque il feroit fine al Roy. Tail 9 Before the Statute of 32 H. 8. 36. it seems to be the better opinion that tenant in tail by a fine might have barred his heir Dyer 32. 28. 29 H. 8. albeit the reversion were in the King because the Law always disfavours restraint of alienation in prejudice of trade and traffique Vide supra 5. 199 Honor and Order Tenant by Curtesie 1 A man shall be tenant by the Curtesie of an house Co. Inst pars 1. 30. b. 2. that is Caput Baroniae or Comitatus because so it may be still preserved intire but it appeareth by 4 H. 3. that a woman shall not be endowed thereof because in such case it should be severed which the Law will not permit for that the Law respecteth Honor and Order Vide Title Dower 180. Villein 2 Amongst the cases where the Villein shall be privileged from the seisure of the Lord albeit he be not absolutely enfranchised Co. ibid. 137. b. 3. this is one viz. Ratione dignitatis as if the Villein be made a Knight the Lord cannot seise him Vide Britton 79. Challenge 3 A Péer of the Realm Co. ibid. 156. b. 3. or Lord of Parliament as a Baron Viscount Earl Marquess or Duke in respect of Honor and Nobility are not to be sworn on Iuries and if neither party will challenge him he may challenge himself for by Magna Carta it is provided Quod nec super eum ibimus nec super eum mittemus nisi per legale judicium parium suorum aut per legem terrae Now in reference to Honor and Order the Common Law hath divided all the Subjects into Lords of Parliament and into the Commons of the Realm The Peers of the Realm are divided into Barons Viscounts Earls Marquesses and Dukes And the Commons are divided into Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens Yeomen and Burgesses and in judgement of Law any of the said degrees of Nobility are Peers to another As if an Earl Marquess or Duke be to be tried for Treason or Felony a Baron or any other degree of Nobility is his Peer In like manner a Knight Esquire c. shall be tried per pares and that is by any of the Commons as Gentlemen Citizens Yeomen or Burgesses so as when any of the Commons is to have a trial either at the Kings sute or between party and party in such case a Peer of the Realm shall not be impannelled Co. ibid. 165. a. 3. 4 Concerning Inheritances of Honor and Dignity there is an antient Book-case in 23 H. 3. Tit. Partition 18. in these words Note Noble women Coparceners if the Earldom of Chester descend to Coparceners it shall be divided between them as well as other lands and the eldest shall not have this Seigniory and Earldom intire to her self Quod Nota adjudged per totam Curiam By this it appeareth that the Earldom viz. the possessions of the Earldom shall be divided and that where there be more daughters than one the eldest shall not have the dignity and power of the Earl that is to be a Countess but in such case the King who is the Soveraign of Honor and Dignity may for the uncertainty conferr the Dignity upon which of the daughters he please And this hath been the usage since the Conquest as is said Vide 3 H. 3. tit Prescription Howbeit if an Earl that hath his dignity to him and his heirs dieth having issue one daughter the dignity shall descend to the daughter and her posterity for there is no incertainty And this appeareth by many presidents and by a late Iudgement given in Sampson Leonards case who maried with Margaret the only sister and heir of Gregory Fines Lord Dacre of the South and in the case of William Lord Ros. Howbeit there is a difference between a dignity or name of Nobility and an office of Honor for if a man hold a Manor of the King to be Constable of England and die having issue two daughters and the eldest daughter taketh husband he shall execute the office solely and before Mariage it shall be exercised by some sufficient Deputy and all this was resolved by all the Iudges of England in the Duke of Buckinghams case 11 Eliz. Dyer 285. But the Dignity of the Crown of England was without all question descendible to the Eldest daughter alone and to her posterity and so it hath béen 25 H. 8. cap. 22. declared by Act of Parliament for Regnum non est divisibile and so likewise was the descent of Troy as appears by Virg. Aeneid 1. Praeterea Sceptrum Ilione quod gesserat olim Maxima natarum Priami Co. l. 1. 24. b. 4. in Porters case 5 Iudges in their resolutions ought to have a special care Goâ—d
tenant shall recover against the heire of the seisin of his mother viz. out of the residue of his mothers lands so much as the assets afterwards descended shall amount unto Here albeit at the making of the said Act being in 6 E. 1. there were no entailed lands for all Inheritance was then viz. before Westm 2. being 13 E. 1. fée simple absolute or conditional yet entailed lands are since taken to be within the equitie of the said Act of Glocester but not to retaine or recover as in case of fée simple lands the lands entailed but onely the lands which should so descend because otherwise there would be occasion of new suits and contention which would be inconvenient for if the tenant after assets descended might retaine or recover the lands entailed then if the assets were aliened the issues inheritable to the estate taile might by writ of Formedon in Descender recover the entailed lands againe which would beget a new suit and no way answer the intention of the said Act being indeed a good provision for fée simple lands but not for lands entailed without such a Construction by equity as aforesaid And therefore in case of entailed lands so aliened with warrantie the tenant shall have a Scire facias out of the rolles of the Iustices before whom the suit depends to recover the lands descended according to the provision of the said Act of Glocester which prevents the aforesaid inconvenience and in just and proportionable equity agrées with the case of Fée simple lands and the Intention of the same Act. Vide infrà 178. 22. and 38. 5. Interpretation of statutes 10 For the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in general be they penal or beneficial Co. l. 3. 7. b. 3. in Heydons case restrictive or inlarging of the Common Law four things are to be considered 1 What the Common Law was before the making of the Statute 2 What was the mischief and defect for which the Common Law did not provide 3 What remedie the Parliament hath resolved and appointed to cure that disease of the Common-wealth 4 The true reason of the remedie And then it is alwayes the office of the Iudges to make such construction as may represse the mischief and advance the remedie and also to suppresse such subtile inventions and evasions as may continue the mischief pro privato commodo and to adde force and life to the cure and remedie according to the true intention of the makers of the Act pro bono publico And upon this ground in Heydons case in the 3 Report the statute of 31 H. 8. Co. l. 3. 8. a. 3. cap. 13. of Monasteries was by all the Barons of the Exchequer adjudged by the general words thereof to extend to Copihold or Customarie estates and by them this Rule was then also agréed That when an Act of Parliament alters the service tenure interest of the land or other thing in prejudice of the Lord or of the Custome of the Mannor or in prejudice of the tenant there the general words of such an Act shall not extend to Copiholds but when the Act is generally made for the common good and no prejudice may accrue by reason of the alteration of any interest service tenure or custome of the Mannor In such case many times Copihold and Customarie estates are within the general purview of such Acts. 16 Quoties in verbis nulla est ambiguitas ibi nulla expositio contra verba expressa fienda est Co. Inst 1. 147 a. Co. l. 7. 24. a. Buts case 1 If a rent be granted out of the Mannor of Dale Rent and the grantor grant over that if the rent be behind the grantée shall distraine for the same in the Mannor of Sale this is no grant of rent only but a penaltie in the Mannor of Sale one reason thereof is because the Law néeds not to make construction that this shall amount to a grant of a rent for here the rent is expresly granted to be issuing out of the Mannor of Dale and the parties have expresly limited out of what land the rent shall issue and upon what land the distresse shall be taken and the Law will not make an exposition against the expresse words and intention of the parties when this way stands with the Rule of Law Co. l. 2 55. a. Bucklers c. se 2 A grants land to B. Habendum tenementa praedicta from Christmas next for life Here this grant is void Grant in futuro for an estate of franktenement cannot commence in futuro and the Law will make construction upon the whole grant And therefore albeit the habendum be void and so in effect is no habendum and thereupon the estate should passe by the premisses as in case of repugnancie or the like yet here no estate shall passe by implication of Law against the expresse limitation of the partie although his limitation be void Co. l. 5. 118. Edriches case 3 A seised of Land in fée Rent grants a rent out of it with clause of distresse to B. for the life of C. and dies the heire lets the land thus charged to D. for life the remainder to E. in fée the rent is behind for divers yeares in the life of D. who dies and also C. B. distrains him in the remainder for all the arrearages incurred in the life of D. In this case he in the remainder shall be charged with them by the last branch of the Statute of 32 H. 8. 37. by which an action of debt is given to the tenant pur auter vie after the death of Cesluy que vie against the tenant in demesne who ought to have paid the rent when it was first due and against his executors and administrators and also that he shall distraine for the same arrearages upon such lands c. out of which the said rents c. are issuing in such manner and forme as he ought or might have done if Cesty que vie had been alive Here I say the latter part of this branch doth expresly charge him in the remainder with the payment of the arrearages And the Iudges in that case said that they ought not to make any interpretation against the expresse letter of the Statute for nothing can so well expresse the intent of the makers of an Act as the direct words themselves for index animi sermo and it will be dangerous to give libertie to make construction in any case again the the expresse words when the intent of the makers appeares not to the contrarie and when no inconvenience may happen upon it And therefore in such cases A verbis legis non est recedendum Devise 4 Land was devised to A. for life Co. l. 6. 6. b. Wildes case the remainder to B. and the heires of his bodie the remainder to C. and his wife and after their discease to their children C. and his wife having
paramount but never to recover pro rata against her by force of the warranty in Law upon the partition for by her alienation the unitas juris that was betwixt them is severed and she hath dismissed her selfe to have any part of the land as parcener and as parcener she must recover pro rata upon the warranty in law or not at all Co. Inst pars 1 2. b. 2. 68 If an alien purchase lands Alien Merchant c. upon an office found the King shall have them yet being a Merchant he may take an house and kéep it so long as he useth commerce and for that purpose but when he leaves so to do dies or departs the Realm the King shall have them Dyer 13. 61. 28 H. 8. 69 If a man make his executors and enter into religion A Monk dereigned and after is dereigned In this case he shall have againe all his goods which his executors have not spent for cessante causa c. Dyer 57. b. 1. 25 H. 8. 70 Cestuy que use for terme of life since the Stat. of R. 3. makes a lease for the term of the life of the lessor and dies In this case the estate of the Lessée is determined Cestuy que use and he is after the death of Cestuy que use onely tenant at sufferance The Lo. Zouches case 20 Remoto impedimento emergit actio contra Co. Inst pars 1 128. b. 2. 1 If the defendant plead an outlawry in the Plaintiffe Out lawry in disability of his person and the Plaintiff after that plea pleaded purchase a charter of Pardon because the charter hath restored him to the law the defendant shall answer So note the disability abateth not the writ but dis-inableth the Plaintiff until he obtaineth a charter of Pardon Co. ibid. 133. b. 3. 2 Excommunication may be pleaded in disability of the person Excommunication yet if the demandant or Plaintiff purchase letters of absolution and shew them to the Court he may have a re-summons or re-attachment upon his original according to the nature of his writ 9 H. 7. 27. Co. ibid. 238. b. 2. 3 If a disseisor make a gift in taile Entry revived and the donée hath issue and dieth seised now is the entry of the disseisée taken away but if the issue die without issue so as the estate tail which descended is spent the entry of the disseisee is revived and he may enter upon him in the reversion or remainder 13 H. 4. 8 9. 33 H. 6. 5. b. per Moyle 34 H. 6. 11. a. per Curiam Co. ibid. 3 If there be grandfather father and sonne disseiseth one and enfeoffeth the grandfather who dieth seised The like and the land discendeth to the father now is the entry of the disseisée taken away but if the father dieth seised and the land discendeth to the sonne here is the entry of the disseisée revived and he may enter upon the sonne who shall take no advantage of the discent because he did the wrong unto the disseisée Co. ibid. 4 If a disseisor make a Lease to an Infant for life and he is disseised and a descent cast the Infant enters The like the entry of the disseisée is lawfull upon him Co. ibid 245 b. 1. 5 If the mulier entreth upon the Bastard Bastard Mulier and the Bastard recovereth the land in an assize against the mulier now is the interruption avoided and if the Bastard die seised this shall barre the mulier Littl. § 407. 408. Co. ibid. 248. 6 If I am disseised by an infant within age Entry revived who aliens to another in fée and the alienée dies seised and the tenements descend to his heire the Infant being still within age here my entry is taken away way but if the Infant within age enter upon the heire that is in by descent as he well may because the descent was cast during his nonage then may I well enter upon the desseisor because the infants entry hath defeated that descent The like 7 If I be disseised and the disseisor makes a feofment in fée upon condition and the feoffée dies seised of that estate Here Littl. § 409. Co. ibid. 248. I cannot enter upon the heire of the feoffée But if the condition be broken so that the feoffor doth therefore enter upon the heire Now may I well enter because by the entry of the feoffor the descent was utterly defeated The like 8 If a feme inheritrix take baron and they have a sonne Littl § 636. Co. ibid. 338. and the baron die and she takes another baron and the second baron lets the land that he hath in right of his wife to another for terme of his life and after the feme dies and then the tenant for life surrenders his estate to the second baron Littleton makes a Quaere whether the issue of the feme may enter during the life of the tenant for life but after his death he holds it cléer he may and my Lord Cook proves it plainly that he may also enter upon the baron immediately after the surrender Collateral and lineal warranty 9 A collateral warranty doth not give a right Co. ibid. 372. a. 1. Littl. § 708. but onely bindeth a right so long as the same continueth and therefore if the collateral warranty be determined removed or defeated the right is again revived as in this example If tenant in tail hath issue thrée sonnes and discontinue the taile in fée and the second sonne releaseth by his déed to the discontinuée binding himself and his heires with warranty c. and after the tenant in taile dies and the second sonne dies without issue here the eldest sonne is barred to have any recovery by writ of Formedon because the warranty of the second brother is collaterall unto him in as much as he can by no meanes convey unto himself by force of the entaile any descent by that brother and therefore as to the eldest brother it is collaterall warranty But in this case if the eldest brother die without issue then may the youngest brother well have his writ de Formedon in descender and shall recover the land because the warranty of the second brother is lineall to the youngest sonne in as much as he might have conveyed unto himselfe by possibility the estate by his second brother in case he had survived the eldest c The like 10 If tenant in taile lets lands to a man for term of his life Littl. § 738. Co. ibid. 387. the remainder to another in fée and a collaterall ancestor confirmes the estate of the tenant for terme of life and binds himselfe and his heirs to warranty for the terme of the life of the tenant for life and dies and the tenant in taile hath issue and dies in this case the issue is barred of his
2. 4. Sir Ed. dw Althams case and releaseth to the Reversioner omnes actiones c. sectas querelas Demand quaecunque nec non totam dotem suam ac titulum ac actionem dotis sibi contingent c. de aliquibus terris in Wethersfield c. this is onely a Release of her Dower in Wethersfield and not in Gosfield â—â—peachment Wast 6 If a man demise Land for life absque impetitione vasti Co. l. 11. 82. b. 3. Lewis Bowles case the Lessée may cut down the Timber-trees and convert them to his own use but if it be absque impetitione vasti per aliquod breve de vasto In that case the Action onely shall be discharged and not the property in the Trees so that the Lessor after they are felled may seise them c. Co. l. 3. 83. a. 4 Twines case 7 No purchaser shall avoid a precedent conveyance made by fraud and covin What is a good consideration within the Statute of 13 Eliz. 5. but he that is a purchaser for money or other valuable consideration For albeit in the preamble of the Statute of 13 El. 5. it is said For money or other good consideration and likewise in the bodie of the Act For money or other good consideration Yet these words good consideration are to be understood onely of valuable consideration and this appears well by the clause which concerns them that have power of revocation for there it is said For money or other good consideration paid or given and this word paid is to be referred to money and given is to be referred to good consideration so the sense is For money paid or other good consideration given which words exclude all considerations of nature bloud or the like and are to be understood of valuable consideration which may be given and therefore he that makes the purchase of the land for valuable consideration is the onely purchaser within that Statute And this last clause doth well expound these words other good consideration mentioned before in the preamble and bodie of that Act. 54 No man can do an act to himself Co. Inst pars 1. 38. b. 4. 39 a. 4. 1 A Feme Guardian in Soccage shall not endow her selfe De la plus beale without judgement Feme Doweâ— but after judgement she may as Littleton saith § 49. for then it is the act of the Law and not simply hers Co. ib. 48. b. 1. 2 If A. by Déed give lands to B. to have and to hold after the death of A. to B. and his heirs this is a void déed Grant in fâ—turo void because he cannot reserve to himselfe a particular estate and construction must be made upon the whole déed Littl. §. 168. Co. ib. 112. a. 3 A man cannot make any grant of lands Baron canâ—â— grant to feâ—â—â— c. to his wife during the Coverture because they are but one person in Law and a man cannot do an act to himselfe c. Littl. §. 212. Co. ib. 141. a. 4 A man cannot be judge in his owne cause No distresse iâ—repleviable and therefore if a man will prescribe that if any Cattle he Damage fesant upon the Demesnes of his Mannor he may detaine them untill he be satisfied for the damage at his own will and pleasure this custome is repugnant to reason and ought not to be allowed by the Iudges For Malus usus abolendus est quia in consuetudinibus non diuturnitas temporis sed soliditas rationis est confideranda Co. ib. 141. a. 2. Finch 19. 5 A fine levied before the Bailiffs of Salop was reversed A Fine void because one of the Bailiffs was party to the fine Quia nemo debet esse judex in propria causa Nemo potest esse judex c. Hillar 4. H. 4. Coram Rege Salop. Littl. §. 479 480. Co. ib. 280. a. 1. and 307. a. 4. Littl. §. 543 544. 6 If there be Lord and Tenant Extinguishment of rent c. and the Lord releaseth to the Tenant his Seigniory this must of necessity enure by way of extinguishment For the Tenant cannot have service to be taken of himselfe neither yet can one and the same man be both Lord and Tenant So also if a Rent-charge be granted out of land and the Grantée releaseth or granteth the rent to the Terre-tenant in this case the rent is extinct for a man cannot have land and also rent issuing out of the same land neither yet can he pay the rent to himselfe There is the same reason of Common of Pasture released to the Tenant of the land for that also works an extinguishment because a man cannot have Land and a Common of Pasture issuing out of the same land c. Co. ib. 280. a. 3. 7 If there be Lord and Tenant by Fealty and Rent Increasing extinguishment the Lord granteth the Seigniory for yeares and the Tenant attorneth the Lord releaseth his Seigniory to the Tenant for years and to the Tenant of the land generally the whole Seigniory is extinct and the estate of the Lessée also but if the release had béen to them and their heirs then the Lessée had had the inheritance of the one moity and the other moity had béen extinct And the reason of this diversity is because when the release is made generally it cannot enure to the Lessée longer than for life because it enureth by way of enlargement and being made to the Tenant of the land it enureth by way of Extinguishment because he cannot do service to himselfe and then there cannot remaine in the Seigniory a particular estate for life But when the release is made to them and their heirs each one takes a moity the one by way of encreasing of the estate and the other by extinguishment â—cceptance â—ttornment 8 If there be Lord and Tenant Littl. §. 558. Co. ib. 312. b. and the Tenant lets the Tenements to a Feme for term of her life the remainder over in fée the Feme takes Baron and after the Lord grants the services c. to the Baron and his heirs In this case there can be no attornment by parol c. because the Baron that ought to attorn cannot attorn to himselfe but his acceptance of the grant of the Seigniory amounts to an Attornment in Law The like 9 If the Lord grant his Seigniory to the Tenant of the land and to a stranger the Tenant cannot properly and formally attorn to himself Co. ib. 313. a. 1. but his acceptance of the grant is a good attornment in Law to extinguish the one moity and to vest the other moity in the stranger 10 If there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant take Feme Littl. §. 559. Co. Inst pars 1. 313. a. and after the Lord grant the services to the Feme and her heirs Acceptance Attornment Here can be no
vocation in Anno 11 Eliz. conveyed his lands to the use of himself for life and after to the use of Philip Earl of Arundel his eldest son in tail with divers remainders over and with proviso that if he should be minded to alter and revoke the said uses and should signifie his mind in writing under his own hand and seal subscribed by three credible witnesses that then c. and afterwards the said Duke was attainted of high treason In this case that proviso or condition was not given to the Quéen by the act of the 33 H. 8. cap. 20. because the performance thereof was personal and inseparably annexed to the person viz. to signifie his mind by writing under his own hand which none could do but the Duke himself upon which point all the possessions of the Dukedome so conveyed as aforesaid were saved and not forfeited by the attainder Vide 44. 8. â—o ib. 13. a. 3. 106 The Templers held divers of their possessions in Frankalmoign which tenure as Littleton saith Privity stâ—â—er then the â—â—neral word 〈◊〉 an Act of â—â—â—liament is annexed in privity to the bloud of the Donor and after they were dissolved and by Parliament Anno 17 E. 2. their possessions were given to the Hospitalers to hold them in the same manner as the Templers held yet by those general words they held not in Frankalmoign because the privity of the tenure on the Tenants part continued not and that privity being personal and inseparable by the general words of the act was not transferred to the Hospitalers There is the same law of the impropriation of a Church Founderâ—â— inseparabâ—â— which is also on incident inseparable to the house of Religion whereunto the Church is impropriate And therefore it is adjudged P. 3. E. 3. that the Hospitalers by the said Act of the 17 E. 2. should not have an Impropriation which was formerly inseparably annexed to the Corporation of the Templers because such a thing as that consisting in inseparable privity by the general words of an Act of Parliament shall not be transferred to others Co. l. 7. 13. a. 4. Englefeilds case 107 In tempore H. 8. Brook tit Corodie 3. it is holden Foundersâ—â— inseparable that a foundership which is inseparably annexed in privity to the bloud of the Founder shall not be forfeited by attainder â—ivity in â—oud estate â—â—d law diâ—â—rsities 108 There are three manner of privities viz. privity in bloud Co. l. 8. 42. b. 4 c. in Whittinghams case privity in estate and privity in Law Privies in bloud are meant of privies in bloud Inheritable and that is in 3 manners viz. inheritable as heir general heir special or heir general and special Privies in estate are as Ioyntenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donee Lessor and Lessee c. Privies in Law are as when the Law without bloud or privity of estate casts the land upon one or makes his entry congeable as the Lord by escheat the Lord that enters for Mortmaine Lord of a Villaine c. And first privies inheritable as heir general shall take benefit of Infancy and therefore if an Infant Tenant in Fée simple make feofment and die his heir shall enter there is the same Law also of him that is heir general and special as if a man give lands to another and the heirs male of his body and the Donée within age make feofment in Fée his Sonne that is heir general and special shall enter It is so also of him that is heir special and not general as if in the same case the Donée hath issue two Sonnes and the eldest hath issue a daughter and the Donee dies and the eldest Sonne within age makes feofment and dies without issue male the youngest Sonne is special heir per formam doni and shall avoid the feofment of his brother although he is not heir general because he is privie in bloud and hath the land by descent So if lands be given to one and the heirs female of his body and the Donee having issue a sonne and a daughter makes feofment within age and dies Here the daughter being heir special unto whom the right of entry descends shall enter and not the sonne unto whom nothing descends So it is likewise of the heir in Borough English for in all cases when any claimes by descent as heir special he shall take benefit of a right of entry which descends unto him for the infancy of his Ancestor There is likewise the same Law if his Ancestor were non compos mentis at the time of making the feofment because in those and such like cases the heir general cannot enter for that no right or title descends unto him but the right descends to the heir special Howbeit privies in estate unlesse it be in some special cases shall not take advantage of the infancy of the other and therefore if Donee in tail within age make feofment in fee and die without issue the Donor shall not enter because there was onely privity in estate betwéen them and no right accrued to the Donor by the death of the Donée So if there be two Ioyntenants in fée within age and the one maketh feofment in fee of his moitie and dies the survivour cannot enter by reason of the infancy of his companion because by his feofment the joynture was severed so long as the feofment remaines in force And therefore in such case the heir of the Feoffor shall have a Dum fuit infra etatem or shall enter into the moity But if there be two Ioyntenants within age and they joyn in a feofment in that case a joynt right shall remaine in them and therefore if one of them die the right shall survive and the survivor shall have the right of the land as from the first Feoffor which makes Littleton seem to hold cap. Discontinuance fol. 44. that the Survivour may enter in respect of the right accrued unto him For otherwise indeed this mischiefe would ensue that the heir of that Feoffor which died cannot enter for that the right survived nor yet the survivor because he shall not take advantage of the infancy of his companion but shall be forced to his writ of Right which without question he may have for that after the feofment the Ioyntenants might have joyned in it c. Lastly privies in Law as Lord by escheat Co. ib. 44. a. 4. c. shall never take advantage of the privity of infancy because he is a stranger to it and when the Infant dies without heire the feofment is unavoydable The same Law of Coverture and non same memory 109 A. grants lands to B. in tail Accruer of estate and farther that if B. or his heirs pay unto A. upon such a day at such a place xx s. that then B. shall have an estate of Fee-simple in the lands to him and his heirs In this case the privity of the estate
any Lord during the fathers life because the Law of Nature requires that the father during his life shall have the marriage of his heir apparent rather then the Lord or any other person whatsoever The Law is the same if D. had béen a daughter It is otherwise where the father dies living the mother when the Land holden by Knight-service descends to the son on the part of the father because the Law in that Case confides more in the father then in the mother c. Again this priviledge extends not to any collateral heir but onely to the son or daughter being heir apparent for albeit a man shall have an Action of Trespasse Quare consanguinem haeredem coepit and albeit the words be cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet because the wel bestowing of his heir apparent in marriage is a great establishment of his house yet that is to be understood as against a wrong-doer but not against a Guardian in Chivalry and the mother shall have the like writ for taking away of her son and heir apparent and yet the mother shall not bar the Lord by Knight-service of his wardship of his body as Littleton saith § 114. Qui ex filia tua nascitur in potestate tua non est sed patris sui Fleta l. 5. cap. 6. The like 3 Put the case there be Lord and Feme-tenant by Knights-service of a Carve of Land Co. ib. 84. b. 2. the Feme maketh a feoffment in fée upon condition and taketh the Lord to husband and have issue a son the wife dieth the issue entreth for the condition broken the Lord entreth into the Land as Guardian by Knights-service and maketh his executors and dieth In this Case the executors shall have the wardship of the Land during the minority of the heir but not the wardship of the body For albeit the Lord séemeth to have a double interest in the wardship of the body one as Lord and another as father yet as father and not as Lord in judgment of Law he shall have the wardship of the body of his son and heir apparent in respect of nature which was before any wardship in respect of Seigniories by Knights-service began And that wardship by reason of nature cannot be waved and claim made in respect of the Seigniorie And the executors of the father shall not have such a wardship which the testator had as father neither can such a wardship be forfeited by Outlawrie 33 H. 6. 55. 6. because it is due to the father in respect of privity of nature 9. 4 If the Sheriff or other Officer be of kindred or affinity to the Plaintiffe or Defendant Challenge to â—he Array and â—â—rour and that such affinity continue Co. ibid. 156. a 2. and 4. this is a cause of challenge to the Array as if the Sheriffe marry the daughter of either party or è converso this is a principal challenge so if there be affinity betwéen the son of the Sheriffe and the daughter of either party or è converso or the like albeit this is no principal Challenge yet is it a Challenge to the favour c. 5 If a Iuror be of blood or kindred to either party Consanguineus Co. ib. 157. a. 3 which is compounded of con and sanguìne â—o the Polles quasi eodem sanguine natus this is a principal Challenge to the Polles because the Law presumeth that one kinsman doth favour another before a stranger and how remote so ever he is of kindred yet the Challenge is good And if the Plaintiffe challenge a Iuror for kindred to the Defendant it is no Counter-plea to say that he is of kindred also to the Plaintiffe though he be so in a néerer degrée for the words of the venire facias forbiddeth the Iuror to be of kindred to either party 6 If a Body politique or incorporate sole or aggregate of many bring an Action that concerns their Body politique or incorporate Co. ibid. The like if the Iuror be of kindred to any that is of that body albeit the Body politique or incorporate can have no kindred yet for that those Bodies consist of natural persons it is a principal Challenge c. Co. ibid. 4. 7 Affinity or affiance by marriage is a principal Challenge The like and to the favoâ—â— and equivalent to Consanguinity when it is betwéen either of the parties as if the Plaintiffe or Defendant marry the daughter or Couzen of the Iuror or the Iuror marry the daughter or Couzen of the Plaintiff or Defendant and the same continues or issue be had And if the son of the Iuror hath married the daughter of the Plaintiff c. albeit this be no principal Challenge because it is not betwéen the parties yet is it a Challenge to the favour c. Co. l. 3. 38. b. 4. in Ratcliffes Case 8 Martha Wilcocks A maid conveyed away and married one of the daughters and co-heirs apparent of Eliz. the relict of William VVilcocks and then the wife of Ralph Ratcliffe dwelling in her mothers house at Hitchin being then under the age of sixtéen years and about fourtéen went from thence at two of the clock in the morning with the consent of the said Ralph to Bramfield being eight miles distant from Hitchin and there married Edw. Ratcliffe And in an Ejectione firmae brought by Luke Norton upon the demise of the said Edw. the issue was whether Eliz. the mother had the custody of Martha at the time of the said marriage for if she had then the Land of the said Martha being in soccage was to be lost for her life by force of the Statute of 4 5. P. M. cap. 8. which prohibiteth the conveying of a maid c. out of the custody and contracting Matrimony with her without the consent of her father if he be living or of her mother in case her father be dead c. in pain for the man to suffer imprisonment c. and for the maid to lose her land as aforesaid c. And in that Case it was resolved that Eliz. the mother had the custody of the said Martha at the time of the Marriage within the provision of the said Act for that Statute hath ordained two manner of new custodies viz. by reason of nature and by assignation And here the father of Martha being dead she is by nature left in the custody of her mother neither yet was the assent of Ralph Ratcliff the husband any thing at all material for the Statute hath annexed the custody to the person of the mother jure naturae which is inseparable and cannot by the marriage be transferred to the Baron but after the marriage remains onely in the mother c. Co. l. 3. 39. a. 4. in Ratcliffes Case 9 It is said No wardship during the â—â—thers life that if there be Lord and Feme tenant by Knights-service and the tenant make
a lease for life and after the Lord and the tenant inter-marry and have issue betwéen them a son and the Feme dies and after the father dies the son within age here the executors shall not have the wardship by reason of the Seigniory for the father hath the wardship of his eldest son jure naturae which is inseparable and cannot be waved and he cannot have the wardship of his son by the death of his wife in respect of his Seigniory for that was inseparably vested in him as father immediatly upon the birth of the son jure naturae And Littleton saith that the father during his life shall have the marriage of his son and heir apparent and not the Lord c. 3. Co. l. 6. 22. Ambrosia Gorges Case 10 Viscount Bindon being seised of land in capite had issue The like Douglas his daughter and heir who being married to Sir Arthur Gorge had issue by him Ambrosia a daughter Douglas dies and likewise Viscount Bindon Ambrosia being under age afterwards Sir Arthur Gorge takes another wife and hath Issue a son Ambrosia remaining still under age In this case Ambrosia was not in ward during the time she remained heir apparent to her father but after her father had a son so that she remained no longer heire apparent then had Queen Eliz. the Wardship both of her body and Lands c. Allegiance â—â—ue by nature 11 Faith Co. l. 7. Calv. Case fol. 13. b. obedience and ligeance are one to the Soveraigne by the Law of Nature which cannot be changed or taken away for albeit Iudiciall and Municipall Lawes have inflicted and imposed in several places and at several times divers and several punishments and penalties for breach or not observance of the Law of Nature for that Law onely consisting in commanding or prohibiting without any certaine punishment or penaltie yet the very Law of Nature it self could never be altered or changed And therefore it is certainly true that Jura naturalia sunt immutabilia And here with agréeth Bracton lib. 1. cap. 5. and Doct. and Student cap. 5. 6. For example 33. H. b. 55. 6. If a man hath a Ward by reason of a Seigniory and is out-lawed he forfeiteth the wardship to the King but if a man hath the wardship of his owne Sonne or Daughter which is his heire apparent and then is out-lawed he cannot forfeit that wardship because nature hath annexed it to the person of the Father as it appeareth in 33 H. 6. 55. b. So likewise the Faith Obedience and Ligeance which we owe to our Soveraigne cannot be taken away For bonus Rex nihil a bono patre differt patria dicitur à patre quia habet communem patrem qui est pater patriae In the same manner Maris foeminae conjunctio est de jure naturae 35 H. 6. 57. as Bracton and Doct. Stud. in the places before quoted do hold And therefore if he that is attainted of treason or felonie be slaine by one that hath no authoritie or executed by one that hath authoritie but pursueth not his Warrant In this Case 21 E. 3. 17. b. the eldest sonne can have no appeale for he must bring his appeale as heire which priviledge being ex provisione hominis he loseth by the attainder of his Father Howbeit his Wife if he have any shall have an appeale because she is to have her appeale as Wife which she continueth to be notwithstanding the attainder for that maris foeminae conjunctio is de jure naturae And therefore it being intended to be of true and law-full matrimonie is indissoluble and this is proved by the booke in 35 H. 6. fol. 57. So if there be Mother and Daughter and the Daughter is attainted of felonie now can not she be heire to her Mother for the cause afore said yet after her attainder if she kill her Mother this is parricide and petite treason For still she remaineth her Daughter because that is of nature If a man be attainted of felonie or treason 4 E. 4. 35 H. 6. 57. 2. Ass Pl. 3. he hath lost the Kings Legal protection for he is thereby utterly disabled to sue any Action reall or personal which is a greater disability then an alien in league hath and yet such a Parson so attainted hath not lost that protection which by the Law of Nature is given to the King for that is indelebilis immutabilis and therefore the King may protect and pardon him and if any man kill him without warrant albeit attainted as afore-said he shall be punished by Law as a Man-slayer By the Statute of the 25 E. 3. cap. 22. a man attainted in a Praemunire is by expresse words out of the Kings protection generally and yet this extendeth onely to legal protection as it appeareth by Litt. fol. 43. for the Parliament could not take away that protection which the Law of Nature giveth unto him and therefore notwithstanding that Statute the King may protect and pardon him And although by that Statute it was farther enacted that it should be done with him as with an enemie by which words any man might have slaine such a person as it is holden in 24 H. 8. Coron Br. 197. until the Statute made in 5 E. cap. 1. Yet the King might protect and pardon him A man out-lawed is out of the benefit of the Municipal Law for so saith Fitz. N. B. 161. Ut legatus est quasi extra legem positus And Bracton l. 3. tract 2. cap. 11. saith that caput gerit lupinum c. yet is he not out either of his natural ligeance or of the Kings natural protection for neither of them is tied to municipal lawes but is due by the law of Nature which was long before any judicial or municipal lawes And therefore if a man were out-lawed for felonie yet was he within the Kings natural protection for no man but the Sheriffe could execute him as it is adjudged in 2. Ass Pl. 3. Every subject is by his natural ligeance bound to obey and serve his Soveraigne c. It is enacted by the Parliament in 23 H. 6. cap. 8. that no man should serve the King as Sheriffe of any County above one yeare and that notwithstanding any clause of non obstante to the contrary that is to say notwithstanding that the King should expressy dispence with the said Statute howbeit it is agréed in 2 H. 7. that against the expresse purview of that Act the King may by a special non obstante dispence with that Act for that the Act could not barre the King of the service of his subject which the law of nature did give unto him One of the Chiefest grounds according to which the Case of the post-nati was resolved in 6 Jac. was because obedience and ligeance of the subject to the Soveraigne is due by the law of Nature for if they be due by that law
and the same law be parcel of the lawes of England as well as of all other Nations and is immutable and that post-nati we of England are united by birth-right in obedience and ligeance which is the true cause of natural subjection by the law of Nature It cleerly followed that Calvin the Plaintiffe in that cause being borne under one ligeance to one and the same King could not be an alien borne And there is great reason as it was then alledged that the law of Nature should direct that Case wherein five natural operations were remarkable 1 The King had the Crowne of England by birth-right being naturally procreated of the bloud Royal of this Realme Secondly Calvin the Plaintiffe was naturalized by procreation and birth-right since the descent of the Crowne of England Thirdly Ligeance and obedience of the subject to the Soveraigne due by the Law of Nature Fourthly Protection and government also due by the Law of Nature Fiftly It was presently said that this Case of Calvin in the opinion of divers was more doubtfull in the beginning but the farther it procéeded the cleerer and stronger it grew and therefore that the doubt did arise from some violent passion and not from any reason grounded upon the Law of Nature quia quantò violentus motus qui sit contra naturam appropinquat ad suum finem tantò debiliores tardiores sunt ejus motus sed naturalis motus quantò magis appropinquat ad suum finem tanto fortiores velociores sunt ejus motus And for as much as in case of an alien Borne you must of necessitie have two federal ligeances to two several persons but in this Case one person alone is head of both and the post-nati and we now joyned in ligeance so that one head which was copula tanquam oculus of that Case And ligeance of the subjects of both Kingdomes being due to their Soveraigne by one and the same Law viz. by the Law of Nature the post-nati cannot be aliens of either Kingdome but ad invicem naturalized subjects of both for Non adversatur diversitas regnorum sed regnantium non patriarum sed patrum patriarum non coronarum sed coronatorum non legum municipalium sed Regum Majestatum c. Mother guardian 1◠If the Grand-father hath issue a Sonne F. N. B. 1◠and the Sonne take Wife and hath issue and die the Mother of the issue shall have the Wardship of the issue which is her owne Sonne and not the Grand-father Albeit the issue may have the Land which ought to descend unto him from the Grand-father that the Mother shall not have it c. No champerty in the Sonne 13 The Statute of Articuli sup cartas cap. 11. provides Pl. Co. 88. b. 3. Partriges case that no Minister or other whatsoever to have part of the things which are in Plea shall undertake businesses which are so in plea yet if the Tenant hanging a percipe quod reddat against him enfeoffe his Sonne and heire apparent this shall be out of the danger of that Statute as it is taken in 6 E. 3. 274. in a writ of Champertie see it also in Fitz. Champertie 10. and the reason of this is for that the Sonne cannot be said a Maintainer of the Father because he is bound to aide and assist his Father when and as often as he may being enjoyned so to do by the Law of nature c. The Son may a bet his mother 14 By the Statute of West 2. cap. 12. it is ordained Pl. Co. ibid. that in an appeale it shall be inquired who were the Abettors and that they shall render damages to the partie acquit Neverthelesse if the heire abet his Mother to bring the appeale although it is within the words of that Statute yet shall he be out of the danger of it And so Herle tooke it in 6 E. 3. 274. For Common Law and reason say that he ought to be aiding to his Mother and may also abet her Considerations to raise uses 15 Affection for the provision of heires male that one shall engender Finch 25. Co. Inst p. 1. 21. b. 1. Brotherly love c. are good consideration to raise an use But long Acquaintance and familiarity are not Howbeit consideration of Mariage is more favoured in Law then any other Maintenance 16 The Sonne may maintaine his Father and one Brother another c. Finch ibid. 17 Brothers or Cofins shall not wage Battel in a writ of right Finch ibid. c. The Wife may relieve her Husband 18 A Statute Finch ibid. that maketh it Felonie to receive or give meat and drink to one that committeth such or such an offence the partie so receiving or giving having knowledge thereof stretched not to a Woman that receiveth or giveth meat and drink to her Husband in such a Case c. Privitie in Bloud strongest 19 You shall finde three manner of Privities spoken of in the Law Co. l. 8. 42. b. 4. 44. a. 4. in Whittinghams Case viz. Privitie in Bloud Privitie in Estate and Privitie in Law Privite in Bloud is that between the Ancestor the Heire Privitie in Estate as between Iointenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donée Lessor and Lessée c. Privies in Law are as when the Law without Bloud or Privitie of Estate casts the Land upon one and makes his entry Congeable as the Lord by escheate the Lord that enters for Mortmaine Lord of a Villein c. Now of these three sorts of privities onely the first which is by bloud and therefore most natural shall take advantage of Infancie Coverture non sanae memoriae c. and not the other two And therefore if an Infant Tenant in Fée-simple make a Feoffement and die his Heire shall enter There is the same Law also of heires special and of heires general and special unto whom the right of entry descends per formam doni or by the Custome as all Lands in Gavelkind Borough-English c. It is otherwise of privies in Estate and in Law And therefore if the Donée in tale within age make feoffment in Fée and die without issue the Donor shall not enter Because there was onely privitie in Estate betwée them and no right accrued to the Donor by the death of the Donée So if there be two Iointenants in Fée within age and the one makes Feoffment in Fée of his moitie and dies the sur-vivor cannot enter by reason the Infancie of his Companion Because by his Feoffment the joyntenure was severed so long as the Feoffment remaines in force and therefore in such Case the Heire of the Feoffor shall have a dum fuit infra aetatem or shall enter into the moitie In like manner Privies in Law as the Lord by escheate c. shall never take advantage of the Privitie of Infancie because they are strangers to it And in that
shall be void and after the Lessor grants the Reversion over the condition is broken the Grantée shall take advantage of that Condition by the Common Law for the lease is thereby absolutely void But if a lease for life had béen made upon such Condition the grantée shall not take benefit of the breach of the Condition because a frank-tenant whereof a praecipe lies cannot so easily cease but it is voidable by entry after the Condition broken which cannot by the Common Law be transferred to a stranger c. and with this agrées 11 H. 7. 17. Br. Condit 245. 2. Mar. per Bromley Rule 27. Co. l. 9. 135. a 1 in Ascoughs Case 20 If the Lord grant his Seigniory for yeares Seigniory Attornment Lessee for 〈◊〉 for yeares the remainder to the Tenant peravaile for life in this Case the Seigniory is suspended because the Tenant for life hath the frank-tenement of the Seigniory and he is Tenant to every praecipe of the Seigniory as in the Case of Littleton l. 2. cap. Attornment fol. 128. If land be let to a man for term of yeares the remainder to another for term of life and after the Lessor grants over the reversion and he in the remainder for life attornes this is a good attornment and shall binde the Lessée for yeares without any attornment made by him For he was Tenant of the frank-tenement and at the Common Law the termor for yeares was subject and under the power of the Tenant of the frank-tenement for he shall not falsifie a recovery at the Common Law against the Tenant of of the frank-tenement because he hath but a Chattel c. Co. lib. 10. 48. b. 3. in Lampets Case 21 If Lessée for 1000 yeares be ousted by the Lessor Frank-teâ—â—â— cannot drâ—â—â— in a Chattel and he maketh a lease for 2 yeares to another In this Case the Lessée for 1000 yeares may release to the Lessée for 2 yeares but if the Lessor disseise his Lessée for life and make a lease for 1000 yeares yet the Lessée for life cannot release to that Lessée for yeares because a frank-tenement is too high to be drowned in a Chattel Co. lib. 10. 87. a. 4. in Leonard Loveis Case 22 If a term be devised to one and to the heires males of his body A term shall go to the Eâ—ecutors his heire shall not have it but his Executors for the term which is but a Chattel cannot be entailed and such a devisée may alien the term to whom he pleaseth and so it was adjudged Tr. 28 Eliz. in B. R. in Peacocks Case and 21 Eliz. resolved by Anderson and Walmesly being referred unto them out of the Chancery betwéen Higgins and Milles. Sée also Dier 7. 28 H. 8. Pl. 8. F. N. B. 34. f. 23 If a Man make a devise of lands or Tenements Court Christiaâ— the devisée shall not sue for them in the Ecclesiastical Court and if he do the other party shall have a prohibition Otherwise it is of personal goods and also of Chattels real as a term of yeares a ward c. for for such the devisée may sue in that Court c. Co. l. 3. 26. a. 3. c. in Butler Bakers Case 24 An Estate of Inheritance or frée-hold cannot be put out of a man by any verbal wayver disclaimer or dis-agréement in pais Disclaim in pais of interâ— in goods 〈◊〉 so of frechâ— or otherwise then in Court of Record but a man may disclaime or disagrée to Interest in Chattels in pais and no such dis-agréement in a Court of Record is in that Case necessary For example If Lands be given to Baron and Feme in taile or in sée the Baron dies the Feme in this Case cannot divest the frank-tenement out of her by saying she dis-agrées to the grant or that she will have nothing to do with the land So if the Baron aliens his land and takes again an Estate to him and his wife in taile the Baron dies the Lord of whom the land is holden by Knight-service supposing that the Baron died solely seised by parol assignes dower to the Feme which she accepts yet this refusall of the Inheritance and acceptance of the Dower in pais shall not divest the frank-tenement out of her Likewise if a Charter of feofment be made to four and seisin delivered to three in the name of all and after the seisin delivered the fourth comming and séeing the déed dis-agrées to it and saith he will have nothing to do with the land yet it was adjudged in 13 R. 2. Title Jointenance that this dis-agréement by parol in pais could not divest the frank-tenement out of him And Thorpe in 53 E. 3. Tit. Disclaimer saith that in such Case the tenancy remaines in all until dis-agréement in Court of Record But if A. make an Obligation to B. and deliver it to C. to the use of B. this is the déed of A. presently Howbeit if C. offer it to B. there B. may refuse it in pais and by such refusal the Obligation shall be his force There is the same Law of a gift of goods and Chattels if the déed be delivered to the use of the Donée the goods and Chattels are immediately in the Donée before notice or agréement but the Donée may make refusal of such gift in pais and thereby the property and Interest shall be divested and such dis-agréement is not necessary to be made in a Court of Record as in Case of a frée-hold c. Condition to be void 25 There is a diversity betwéen a Condition annexed to a frée-hold and a Condition annexed to a lease for yeares Co. Inst p. 1. 214. b. 3. for if a man make a gift in taile or a lease for life upon Condition that if the Donée or lessée goeth not to Rome before such a day the gift or lease shall cease or be void the grantée of the Reversion shall never take advantage of this Condition because the Estate cannot cease before an entry but if the lease had béen but for yeares there the grantée should have taken advantage of the like Condition because the lease for yeares ipso facto by the breach of the Condition without entry was void for a lease for yeares may begin without Ceremony and also may end without Ceremony And of a void thing a stranger may take benefit but not of a voidable Estate without entry Rent issuing 〈◊〉 of fee and lease hold 26 A man seised of Black-acre in fée Co. 7. 23. a. Buts Case and possest of White-acre for yeares grants a Rent charge for life with clause of distresse in both In this Case the Rent issues onely out of Black-acre for out of White-acre in regard of the meanesse of the Interest thereof a frank-tenement cannot issue neither shall it be put in view and acceptance of the Lease of White-acre by grantée of the
memoriae and yet doth the Law of Nature and Law of the Realme prohibits generally the beating of any but this special Case for the prevention of a greater mischief hath an exemption and a special priviledge Pl. ibid. b. 4. 35 In a praecipe quod reddat the Tenant shall excuse his default by the increase of Waters and yet every default is abhorced in Law Necessity â—â—cused a default because it is a contempt of the Court but for that he could not without peril of death appeare the necessity of the accident in such Case shall excuse him 1 Kings 21. Math. 12. Pl. ib. 19 a. 1. 36 The Law of God prohibited the eating of Proposition Bread Proposition Bread anâ— Eates of 〈◊〉 may be 〈◊〉 yet it was adjudged by CHRIST himself to be lawful for David to eat it in a time of necessity to prevent famine So also upon the like occasion was it lawful for Christs Apostles to pull the Eares of other mens Corne and to eat them And in our Law an Obligation per dâ—â—â—s or minas shall be avoided because it is done by compulsion Pl. 37. b. 4. Plats Case 37 If the Sheriffe of Middlesex suffer an in-voluntary escape of a prisoner and making fresh suit after him takes him in Surrey Pursuit upâ—â— an escape â— of a diâ—â—â— where he is not Sheriffe yet he may justifie the taking of him there So â—â—so if one come to distrâ—ine for Rent-service and the Tenant séeing him comming drives away his Cattle from off the land yet there the Lord may pursue them within view and retake them in whatsoever land they are albeit they are out of his Authority For the pursuit and the possession after shall be adjudged as a possession with continuance when it is for Rent-service But it is otherwise for damage fesant and so the diversity is held 16 E. 4. fol. 10. yet H. 6. R. 2. abr per Fitz. Rescous 11. it is held also justifiable for damage fesant and all this is allowed for the necessity of the occasion and in favour of right and justice â—â—it patent â—ed in the 〈◊〉 Court 38 If a man hold as of a Seigniory in grosse F. N. B. 3. c which hath not a Mannor where the Lord may kéepe any Court in such Case the Tenant may sue Briefe de droit patent in the Kings Court and the Lord shall not have any Action against him for it nor by any meanes annul his Action because he hath not any Court to hold plea thereof And therefore he is compelled by necessity to sue immediately in the Kings Court. 〈◊〉 of right 〈◊〉 Dower suâ—â— in the â—B 39 If the Baron give part of his Mannor in taile to hold of him and die F.N.B. 8. a. b the Feme shall sue her writ of right of Dower in the Court of the Heire of the Baron against the Donée in taile and the writ shall be directed to the Heire But if the Baron make a Gift in taile of all the Land he hath and die here the Heire of the Baron cannot kéep any Court because he hath but a Seigniory in grosse and therefore in such Case it séemes reasonable that she shall have her writ of right of Dower against the Donée in taile directed to the Sheriffe and returnable in the Common Place and there shall be this Clause in the Writ Quia B. Capitalis Dominus feodi illius nobis inde remisit Curiam suam So it is also if the Baron lease all his Land for life there also the Feme shall sue such a Writ against the Tenant for life returnable in the Common Place because the Heire of the Baron in that Case also can kéeps no Court having but a Seigniory in grosse And in these Cases and the like the Lord shall not sue a prohibition to the Iustices of that Court that they should not procéed in such pleas for that the Feme in such Cases is forced by necessity to do it 40 If an Infant or Feme covert present not within 6 moneths Fitz. ib. 34. c the Bishop shall present by laps for there is a necessity the Church should be served 41 Where wast is made by the Kings enemies or by tempest Fitz. ib. 59. l. the Tenant shall not be punished for it 42 Ubi aliud suader necessitas cessat humanae constitutionis cessat voluntas Nomothetae Erasm in Coll. Conv. Proph. 43 A Dedimus Potestatem was granted to receive an Attorney for the Defendant in a Quid Juris clamat Dier 135. pl 15 3 4. P. M. albeit no former President could be found for it and this was allowed per Curiam by reason of the weakenesse of the Defendant who could not appeare in person without manifest danger of life â—â—â—ing a 〈◊〉 it Sea 44 Hob. 13. Bridgmans Case Hob. 13. per Hobart concerning the Masters impawning of another mans Ship at Sea for necessity of fact or other provision â—â—â—er by a â—â—tick 45 An Action of Trover and Conversion may be brought in a Lunatiques owne name Ho. 215. Cocks and Darson for graine sowne upon his Copi-hold land and caried away by a stranger and that for necessity because it can be brought in no mans name else 111. 2 Conveniencie Co. l. 9. 49. a. b. The Earl of Shrewsburies Case Vide Max. 184 cap. 5. 1 If a Parkship be granted to an Earl Dignity respected for conveniencie without words to make a Deputy yet he may kéep it by his servants for the Law doth allow divers acts for convenience in respect of the Dignity of the person as if Licence be given to a Duke to hunt in a Parke the Law for conveniencie given him such attendante as are requisite to the Digntiy of his Estate Vide 12 H. 7. 25. 13 H. 7. 10. So when a Bishop is riding forth or upon the way it is not convenient for his Estate and Degrée to be then inforced to examine the Ability of a Clerk but he ought to attend his convenient leasure 14 H. 7. 21. 15 H. 7. 7. 8. Co. ibid. and Mirror of Justices cap. 1. §. 2. 2 At the first institution of this Monarchy an Earl was Praefectus The liâ—e or Propositus Comitatus for so the Saxon word Shire-reeve imports The Romans called him Satropas from the Persians viz. Praefectus Provinciae And the Sheriff at this day called Vice-comes quasi vicem generis seu vicariis Comitis hath the whole authority for the Administration and Execution of Iustice that the Earl had and if the King do now by his Letters Patents commit unto the Sheriff custodium Comitatus without expresse words to make a Deputy yet he who comes in the place of the Earl may make a Sub-vice-comes viz. a Deputy who was in times past Seneschallus Vice-comitis and by West 2. cap. 39. Sub-vice-comes and by 11 H. 7. cap. 15. Shire-Clerk
hominis and it is as true Fortior aequior est dispositio Legis quà m hominis â—nt-tenants â—enants in Common Coperceners â—resentation â—dvowson 19 A joint-tenant or Tenant in common shall not have a Quare Impedit for the advowson which they have in jointure or in common F.N. B. 34. v. in Case one of them present alone against his companion that so presents but if two Coperceners cannot agrée in presenting the eldest sister shall have the first presentation and so shall also he have that hath her Estate and if either of them be disturbed by the other Copercener either of them shall have a Quare Impedit against the other sister And Coperceners and those who have their Estates shall present as Coperceners ought to do viz. the eldest first and then the second after her the third and so the rest in order according to their ages and the diversity betwéen joint-tenants or tenants in common and Coperceners ariseth from this ground because they are in by grant which is the act of the party but these are originally in by act in law 20 If an Abbot make waste in the Lands which he hath in ward F.N.B. 60. m. and dies the Successor shall not be charged therewith because his death is the Act of God it is otherwise if he be deposed for then the Successor shall be chargable with it because that is the Act of the party â—â—d Mesne 〈◊〉 Tenant â—rnment 21 If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant Co. Inst p. 1. 221. b. 4. Litt. §. 583. and the Lord grant by fine the services of his Tenant to another in fée here if the services of the Mesne be arreare the grantée shall not distraine the Tenant before attornment Howbeit if the grantée die without heire whereby the mesnalty escheats to the Lord Paramount in that Case if the services of the Mesnalty be arreare the Lord Paramount may distraine the Tenant without attornment because the grantée came to the mesnalty by the act of the party but the Lord Paramount comes to it by Act in Law 〈◊〉 entry in 〈◊〉 more adâ—tageous 〈◊〉 an entry 〈◊〉 Deed. 22 An actual entry into land is meerely the Act of the party Co. ib. 253. b. 4 and therefore is called an entry in déed and albeit a claime be also an Act of the party yet it is also mixt with force of Law and therefore it is called an Entry in Law and is not onely as forcible as an Entry in Déed but because it is as well an Act of Law as of the party it giveth the party a greater priviledge then an Entry in Déed doth for a continual claime of the Disseisée being an Entry in Law shall vest the possession and seisin in him for his advantage but never for his disadvantage and therefore if the Disseisée bring an Assise and hanging the Assise he make continual claime this shall not abate the Assise but he shall recover damages from the beginning but it is otherwise of an Entry in Déed â—â—nce in 〈◊〉 23 Vpon a Lease for yeares by indenture Dier 6. 28 H. 8. 1. c. the Lessée covenants and grants that if he his Executors or Assignes alien it shall be lawfull for the Lessor to re-enter and after he makes his Wife Executrix and dies the Feme takes a new husband who aliens In this Case some hold there is no breach of the Condition because the Baron is in by the Law and not Assignée of the Lessee as it is of Tenant by the Courtesie or Lord of a Villein but others hold the contrary ideo quaere Dier 45. 3. 31 H. 8. 24 A lease is made for term of yeares Devise of a Lease upon Condition that if the Lessée during his life assigne the term to any other without the Assent of the Lessor that then the Lessor may re-enter and the Lessée devised his term by his will to another without Assent c. And by Brooke and Hales this is a forfeiture because the Devisée shall be said to be in by the assignement that the Divisor made during his life but if the Executors had enjoyed the term that had béen no forfeiture because in that Case the Law makes the assignement Tamen quaere Co. Inst p. 1. 310. b. 3. 25 If a reversion of land be granted to an Alien by déed Attornment and before attornment the Alien is made denizen and then the attornment is made In this Case the King upon office found shall have the land for as to the Estate betwéen the parties it passeth by déed ab initio it is otherwise where land is granted to a mâ—n and a woman and they intermarie and then attornment is had for which Vide suprà Pl. 1. Dier 60. 22 23 36 H. 8. 26 There is a diversity Seisure of a villein where the body of a man in execution is set at liberty by authority of Law and when without authority as by the voluntary escape in a Sheriffe or the like For the Law saves all rights as in Case of a Villein to whom the Kings presence is a Sanctuary where the Lord cannot seise him howbeit afterwards out of his presence he may because the Law gives the Villain that priviledge pro tempore but if the Lord himselfe enfranchise him by manumission in déed or in Law for one hower he is frée for ever in favorem libertatis because that is the Act of the Lord himselfe So if a man be taken in execution and be suffered to escape by the Sheriffe this is an absolute discharge of the debt and the Plaintiffe is to have his remedy against the Sheriffe by action of debt Arrest of a Member of Parliament But if a Member of Parliament be arrested by a Sheriffe upon an execution and be afterwards fréed by the priviledge which the law gives him that is no discharge of the debt but that when he ceaseth to be a Member he may be arrested again upon the same judgement c. Dier 68. 24. in Kidwelleys Case 4 5 E. 6. 27 Where demand of Rent is to be made by the law as when no place is assigned for the payment thereof Demand of Rent the law it selfe is the place there it is not sufficient for the party to come to the land ad petendum redditum but he ought to bring witnesses with him and in their presence ought to make an expresse demand of the Rent upon the land as to say here I am and do demand such a Rent or the like albeit none be there present to pay the Rent But when the Rent is by the agréement of the parties payable out of the land the Lessor is not bound to demand it but the lessée is to tender it at his peril Dier 140. Pl. 39. 3 4 P. M. 28 A thing or action personal being once suspended though it be but for an hower is
surrendred and so by consequent if afterwards the Lessée commit waste he is subject to an Action for it â—â—gation 42 If a man be bound to make another before such a time such a release as the Iudge of the Prerogative Court shall devise and appoint Co. l. 52. b. 3. Lambs Case In this Case if the Obligor do not onely the first Act but likewise procure the Iudge to devise and direct the release before the time limited the bond is forfeit for in as much as the Iudge is a stranger to the Condition and the Condition is for the benefit of the Obligor and the performance thereof shall have his obligation he hath undertaken to performe it at his peril â—â—tion 43 If a man be bound to make to another a sufficient and lawful Estate in certain Land by the advise of I. D. Co. ibidem If he make an Estate to him according to the advise of I. D. be it sufficient or not or lawful or not lawful yet he saves the Obligation for if it be in sufficient or unlawful the Obligée may thanke himselfe to make choice of such a man as could give no better direction Fuit dit Co. l. 5. 33. b. 4. in Reades ca. 44 If after the death of a man Execution 〈◊〉 his owne wrong none takes upon him to be his Executor or if he died intestate none takes out letters of administration In such Case if a stranger use the goods of the dead or takes them into his possession which is the office of an Executor or Administrator such stranger may be charged as Executor of his own wrong For the Creditors of the dead person have not in such Case any other Co. ibid. 34. a. against whom they may bring their actions for the recovery of their debts or albeit there be an Executor that Administers yet if the stranger take the goods and claiming to be Executor payes debts and receives debts or pays Legacies and inter-medle as Executor in such Case also by such expresse Administration as Executor he may be charged as Executor of his own wrong Vide Dier 166. 10. 1. El. Co. l. 5. ii5 a. 3 in Wades Ca. 45 If the Lessor demands Rent of his Lessee according to the Condition of re-entry and the Lessée pay the Rent to the Lessor Acceptance counterfeit money and he receives it and put in his purse or pocket and after upon reviewing thereof at the same time he finds amongst the money that he had received some counterfeit pieces and thereupon refuseth to carie away the money but re-enters for the Condition broken In such Case it is said it was adjudged betwixt one Vane and Studley that the entry was not lawful for when the Lessor had once received the money it was at his peril and after such allowance he shall not take exception to it Co. lib. 5. 116. â— 3. Olands Case 46 A Feme Copi-holder of certain land durante viduitate sua Graine sowâ— Durante viduitate according to the Custome of the Mannor sowes the Land and before the severance of the graine takes Baron In this Case the Lord shall have the graine For albeit at the time of sowing the graine the Estate of his wife was uncertain and although her Estate determined by limitation and not by condition either in déed as in Case of re-entry or in Law as by forfeiture yet because it determined by the Act of the Lessée her selfe the Lord shall have the graine and not the Baron So if a Feme seised of land durante viduitate sua make a lease for years and the Lessée sow the land and after the Feme that made the lease takes Baron here the Lessée shall not have the graine for albeit his Estate is determined by the Act of a stranger yet he shall not be as to the Lessor in a better Case then his lessor was and the law imputes it to his folly to depend upon so fickle a thing as the will of a woman especially in point of marriage Co. ib. a. 4. 47 If Tenant at will sow the land Tenant at will sowes graine and after the will is determinned the Lessée shall have the graine but if the lessée himselfe determine the will before the severance of the graine he shall not have them because he hath determined his Interest by his own Act So if Lessor at will be out-lawed whereby the will is determined In this Case the King shall have the profits and the Lessée shall enjoy the graine but if Lessée at will be out-lawed whereby the will is determined in such Case the King shall have the graine Vide 9 H. 6. 20 21. Dier 173. 15. Co. ib. b. 1. 48 If a lease be made to Baron and Feme during the coverture Graine sowâ— divorce and the Baron sow the land and after they are divorced causa praecontractus the Baron shall have the graine and not the Lessor for albeit the suite is the Act of the party yet the sentence which dissolves the marriage is the judgement of law Et judicium redditur in invitum but if a lease be made to one until he make waste and he sow the grain Waste and after make waste he shall not have the graine Vide Max. 30. 34. â—â—faction of â—â—bt by deed 49 In Debt upon an Obligation of 10 l. the Plaintiffe pleades Co. l. 5 117. b. 2 Pinnels Case that one F. was bound by the same Déed with him and each of them in the whole and that the Plaintiffe made an acquittance to F. bearing date before the obligation but delivered after by which acquittance he acknowledged himselfe to be paid 20 s. in full satisfaction of the 10 l. and this was adjudged a good barre for if a man will acknowledge himselfe to be satisfied by Déed this is a good barre without receiving any thing Vide 36 H. 6. Barre 17. 12 R. 2. Barre 243. 10 H. 7. Yet payment of a lesse sum in satisfaction of a greater is not good satisfaction because a lesser sum can by no possibility be satisfaction for a greater â—â—re service â—â—tiplied â—â—â—ct 50 If one hold his land of his Lord by an intire annual service Co. l. 6. 1. b. 3. in Bruertons Case as a Spurre Horse or the like and after sels parcel thereof to another in this Case the alienée shall hold by the same intire service because such intire service cannot be apportioned and the land is severed by his owne Act So also if in such Case the Lord purchase parcel of the tenancy such intire services are gone in like manner as if the Lord had released his Seigniory in part of the tenancy because he hath discharged part of the land by his own Act. â—â—rneys acâ—â—nts 51 When a writ abates by default of the Clerke Co. l. 6. 10. a. 2 in Spencers Case as for false
Quare Impedit against the Lady Maltravers Co ib. 10 E. 3. 53. and she pleaded that she was Covert of Baron whereunto it was replied for the King that her husband the Lord Maltravers was put in exile for a certain cause she was ruled to answer Vide more examples hereof in Coke ubi supra where this difference is put that if the Husband be condemned to perpetuall banishment his wife in his absence and in her own name shall sue and be sued but if it be but Relegation for a time it seems to be otherwise And all this least the parties that have cause of Action should remain without remedy for when he is condemned to perpetuall banishment he is as a Monk profest dead in Law There is the same Law also of perpetuall abjuration 〈◊〉 person â—ll be chargâ—â— with an anâ—ity though â—harged by â—â—â—oes 11. If a man grant a Rent-charge out of his Land Co ib. 146. b. 1. Co. L. 7 39 b. 2. in Lillingstons case with Proviso that the Grantee shall not charge his person in such case regularly the Land shall be onely charged and his person free And yet in some case where there is such a Proviso in the Grant that the person of the Grantor shall not be charged neverthelesse the person of the Grantor shall be charged As if a man grant a rent charge out of certaine Lands to another for life with such a Proviso the rent is behind the grantee dyeth in this case the Executors of the Grantee shall have an action of debt against the Grantor and charge his person for the arrearages due in the life of the Grantee because the Executors have no other remedy against the Grantor for the arrearages Vide infr 32. Litt. 252. Co. 169. b. 4. 12. Where in Dower or upon Partition betwixt parcenors Egalty of partition a rent is granted to supply the thirds or for egalty of partition in such case the Law doth give a Distresse lest the Grantee should be without remedy having in liew thereof departed with a valuable recompence in Land Co. ibid. 197. a. 4. 13. For twenty shillings rent Tenants in common shall joyne in Assize or a pound of Pepper payable yearly two tenants in common ought to have severall Assises because they have them by severable titles as one tenant in common may have an Assise of the moity of twenty shillings or of the moity of a pound of Pepper de medietate unius librae piperis but not of ten shillings or de dimidio librae piperis And for that these things are in themselves severable Howbeit for an Hawk Horse or the like which are intire albeit they be tenants in common yet shall they joyne in an Assise because otherwise they should be without remedy for one of them cannot make his plaint in Assise of the moity of a Hawk Horse c. that were against the order of nature which the Law will not suffer and if they should not joyne they should have Damnum injuriam and yet should have no remedy by Law which would be inconvenient for the Law will that in every case where a man is wronged and endamaged that he shall have remedy Aliquid conceditur ne injuria remaneret impunita quod alias non concederetur so also shall they joyne in a Quare impedit in a Writ of right ward or ravishment of ward for the body for the same reason Co. ibid. 198. a. 3. Co. l. 10. 134. b. 3. in Read and Redmans case 14. If there be two Tenants in common of an Advowson The survivor shall recover and a stranger usurps so as the right is turned to an action and they bring a Writ of Quare impedit which concernes the realty the six moneths passe and the one dyeth In this case the Writ shall not abate but the survivor shall recover for otherwise there would be no remedy to redresse this wrong and so it is also of Coparceners Litt. S. 365. Co. ibid. 226. a. 3. 15. It is regularly true A Condition need not be shewed forth that a man shall not plead or take advantage of a Condition without shewing forth the proofe thereof in writing And yet if land be mortgaged upon condition and the Mortgagee letteth the Lands for years reserving a rent the condition is performed the mortgagor re-enters In an action of debt brought for the rent the Lessee shall plead the condition and the re-entry without shewing forth any Deed so in an Assise the tenant pleads a Feoffment of the Ancestor unto him c. the Plaintiff saith The Feoffment was upon condition and that the condition was broken and pleads a re-entry and that the tenant entred and tooke away the Chest in which the Deed was and yet detaineth the same the Plaintiff shall not in this case be inforced to shew the Deed Also if a woman give Lands to a man and his heires by Deed or without generally shee may in pleading aver the same to be Causa matrimonij prelocati albeit shee hath nothing in writing to prove the same And the reason of these cases and the like is lest the parties that should prove the conditions should upon failer thereof be utterly left without remedy Litt. S. 391. Co. ibid. 240. a. 3. 16. If the Feoffee of Land in fee upon condition dye seised Right and title a diversity this discent if the condition be broken shall not take away the entry of the Feoffor or his heires but if the Feoffee upon condition be disseised and the disseisor dye whereby a descent is cast this shall take away the entry of the Feoffee because he hath a right to the land and therefore his entry may be taken away for that he may recover his right by action But the Feoffor that hath but a Condition his title of entry cannot be taken away by any descent because he hath no remedy by action to recover the land and therefore if a descent should take away his entry it should barr him for ever And the Law in this case is all one whether the descent were before the condition broken or after Also he that hath a title to enter upon a Mortmaine shall not be barred by a descent because then he should be without all remedy So it is also where a Woman hath a title to enter Causa matrimonii prelocuti no descent shall take away her entry because shee hath but a title and no remedy by action If a man be seised of lands in Fee and in writing deviseth the same to another in Fee and dyeth and the Heire before any entry made by the Divisee entreth and dyeth seised this descent shall not take away the entry of the Devisee for if the descent which is an act in Law should take away his entry the Law should barre him of his right and leave him utterly without remedy So it is also of him that entreth for
the Guardian cannot lose the Wardship An Infant payes releif 3. Littleton saith Litt. S. 112. Co. ibid. 83. b. 4. That the heire of a Tenant by Knight-service ought not to pay releife untill his age of twenty one years yet in some case the Heire shall pay releif when he was within that age at the time of the death of his Ancestor As if a man holdeth Lands of the King by Knight-service in Capite and of a common person other Lands by Knight-service and dyeth his heire being within age here the King hath the Wardship both of body and Lands by his Prerogative untill the full age of the heire and therefore in this case the Heire though he be within age shall immediately pay releif to the other Lord for as the Law giveth away the Wardship to the King by reason of his Prerogative so doth it in respect thereof reserve to the other Lord all that conveniently may be reserved viz. his releif The Lord shall not have the body 4. A man seised of Land holden by Knight-service hath issue a Daughter who takes Baron and hath issue a Son Litt. S. 114. Co. ibid. 84. a. 3. the Tenant dyes and also the Mother in this case the Son shall not be in ward for his body living his Father but yet the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land untill the full age of the Son for albeit in this case the Law doth give the custody of the body to the Father and barreth the Lord thereof yet the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land by force of the tenure of the first creation thereof So it is also if the Father marry his heire within age and dyeth in this case also the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land Co. ibid. 88. b. 3. 5. Where the Father is Guardian of his Son for Land holden in Knight-service this is in respect of his paternall naturall custody Father Guardian in socage accountable and therefore in such case he shall not be answerable for his marryage or custody of his Lands but where the Father is Guardian by reason of a tenure in Socage he must by Law be accountable to the Son both for his marriage and also for the profits of his Lands which he should not be if he had the custody of his eldest son in this case as his Father in respect of nature And because the Law doth appoint him to be Guardian in Socage it compels him also to be accountable for the act of Law doth never any man wrong Co. ibid. 134. b. 2. Anic super carta cap. 15. 28. E. 1. 6. Before the Statute of Articuli super cartas In reall actions fifteen dayes returne in all Summons and Attachments in Plea of Land were contained the terme of fifteen dayes and it appeareth not onely by that Statute but likewise by the ancient Authors of the Law who wrote before that Statute that this was the ancient common Law And the reason of giving so many dayes in reall Actions was the Recovery being so dangerous that the Tenant might the better provide himself both of answers and proofes Co. ibid. 132. b. 2. 7. If I be disseised and my Brother release with Warranty Descent upon Profession and is afterwards profest in Religion and thereby the Warranty descend upon me In this case albeit the Law binds me by the Warranty yet I being his heire the Law gives me by descent such Inheritance as my Brother had at the time of his Profession Co. ibid. 137. a. 3. Litt. S. 203. 8. Albeit by an act in Law a man may have damnum Profession dischargeth wardship yet in such case it is alwayes absque injuria as if a Ward enter into Religion and be profest hereby the Lord loseth the Wardship of the Land which may be said damnum for by such Profession the Ward is civiliter mortuus a dead man in the Law and cannot hold any Inheritance neither can the Guardian continue the Wardship of the land because by the civill death of the Ward the Inheritance is descended to another but this damnum is absque injuria for by such Profession the land descends to another who is either to be in Ward or to pay releif And therefore in such case the law giveth the Guardian no remedy neither by any formed Writ nor by Action upon the case Co. Inst pars 1. 138. a. 3. 9. If Tenant for another mans life by his Deed grant a Rent charge to one for twenty one years Cesty que vie dyeth A annuity good the land evicted hereby the Rent-charge is determined and yet the Grantee may have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cesty que vie because the Rent charge did determine by the act of God and the course of law Actus Legis nemini facit injuriam So it is also if land out of which a Rent-charge is granted be recovered by an eyent title and thereby the Rent-charge is avoyed yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the Rent-charge is avoyded by the course of law and so it was holden in Wards case cited in Co. l. 2. fo 36. in Heywards case against an opinion obiter in 6 H. 6. 42. a. Vide Max. 114. Ex. 13. Co. ibid. 149. a. 1. 10. A. hath common of Pasture sans number in twenty Acres of land Common sans number not apportioned and ten of these Acres descend to A. the common sans number is intire and uncertaine and cannot be apportioned but shall remaine but if it had been a Common certaine as for ten Beasts in that case the Common â—â—â—dition shall be apportioned And so it is also of common of Estovers Turbary Piscary c. And it is to be observed that in none of these cases or the like the descent which is an act in Law shall worke any wrong to the Ter-tenant for neverthelesse he shall have thereby that which belongeth to him for the Act in Law shall never worke any wrong The like 11. Of Common or Corody certaine as for ten beasts Co. ibid. 164. b. 4. so many Dishes in certaine c. partition amongst Coparceners or Apportionment may be made for this can worke no wrong to the Ter-tenant But if a man have reasonable Estovers as House-boot Hay-boot c Appendant to his Free-hold they are so intire that they shall not be divided amongst Coparceners So likewise if a Corody uncertaine be granted to a man and his heirs and he hath issue diverse Daughters this Corody shall not be divided between them there is the same Law also of Common sans number for in these cases and the like if Estovers Common Piscary or Corody uncertaine should be partable amongst Sisters such partition would worke a wrong to the Ter-tenant Co. ibid. 165. a. 1. who should be opprest and over-charged thereby which the Law
own Tender but if he that gaged them tendred the money before the stealing and the other refused to deliver them then for this negligence and default in him he shall be charged with them Default in reâ—â—â—ictions 5 In real actions where Voucher lyeth Co. ibid. 101. b. 4. if the Sheriff return that the Vouchée is summoned and he make default then a Magnum Cape ad valentiam is awarded when if he make default again then Iudgement is to be given against the tenant Also if the vouchee do appear and after make default then a Parvum Cape ad valentiam is awarded and if he thereupon make default again then judgment is to be given as before Villein 〈◊〉 Lords 〈◊〉 6 If a Villein purchase land Co. ibid. 118. a. 4. b. 1 2. Littl. §. 177. and alien the land to another before the Lord enter In that case the Lord cannot enter for it shall be adjudged his folly that he entred not when the land was in the Villeins hand So it is likewise if a freeman hath issue and afterwards by confession becometh bond and purchase lands in fee and before the Lord enter he dieth seised and the land descends to his issue which is free in this case also the Lord shall not enter The like Law it is if the land so purchased by the Villein escheat to the Lord of the fee before any entry made by the Lord of the Villein as if the Villein dye without heir or be convict or outlawed for felony or if a recovery be had against the Villein in a Cessavit or the like in all such cases it will be imputed to the folly of the Lord of the Villein that he entred not in time when he might Also if a Villein be disseised before the Lord doth enter the Lord may enter into the land in the name of the Villein and thereby goin the Inheritance of the land but if there be a descent cast so as the entry of the Villein is taken away then the Villein must recontinue the estate of the land by judgement and execution before the Lord of the Villein can enter So if the Villein purchase lands in tayl and alien before the Lord enter the Lords entry is taken away causa qua supra but if the Villein dye and his issue recover the land entayled in a Formedon then the Lord may enter The like law is also of Seigniories Co. ibid. 2. Advowsons Reversions Remainders Rents Commons certain and such like certain Inheritances And all the reason of these â—â—â—es is besides the Lords folly and negligence because the Lord before his entry hath no interest but only a bare possibility Howbeit it is otherwise in the Kings case after office found because nullum tempus occurrit Regi Co. ibid. 118. a. 4. b. 3. Littl. §. 177. 7 If a Villein purchase goods or chattels Villein The Lords seisure of Goods and sell or give them away before the Lord seise them his title to the goods is gone for the Law imputeth it to his folly and negligence as before of lands c. for a bare claim of the goods of the Villein is not sufficient in Law but he must seise some part in the name of all the residue or that the goods be within the view of the Lord for the claim and view amount to a seisure as the claim of a Ward being present by word is a sufficient seisure albeit the Guardian layeth no hands of him And here under the name of goods and chattels are comprehended not only personal goods as an Horse a Cow Housholdstuff and the like but also chattels real as Wardships Leases for years Interests by Statute staple Statute merchant Elegit or the like and the gifts aforesaid do not only extend to gifts in deed but likewise to gifts in Law And therefore if a Wife hath goods and taketh Baron upon this gift in Law by force of the marriage the land is barred So likewise if a Villein having goods make his executors and dye by this gift in Law the Lord is barred for his folly and neglect Co. ibid. 131. a. 4. 8 In an action where a Protection lyeth â—â—â—tectiâ—n if after it is allowed the party tarrieth in the Country without going to the service for which he was relieved above a convenient time after the Protection had or otherwise withdraw himself from the service upon Information thereof to the Lord Chancellor he shall repeal the Protection in that case by an Innotescimus See the Statute of 13 R. 2. 16. Littl. §. 261. Co. ibid. 173. a. 4. 9 If lands be given to a man in tayl Partition who hath as much Feesimple lands and hath issue two daughters and dye and the daughters make partition and the feesimple lands are assigned to the youngest daughter for her purparty and the entailed lands to the elder and the youngest daughter aliens the feesimple lands and having issue dies In this case the issue of the youngest daughter may enter into the moiety of the entailed lands notwithstanding such partition for it will be imputed to the folly of the eldest daughter that she agreed to such a Partition whereas she might have had upon the Partition the moyety of the one and also of the other because in a writ of Partition she was not compellable to take the whole estate in tayl but might have challenged moities in each as aforesaid and that ex provisione legis But when she will not submit her self to the policy and provision of Law but betake her self to her own policy and provision there the Law will not ayd her So likewise if a man be seised of three Manors in fee of equal value Dower and taketh wife and chargeth one of the Manors with a rent-charge and dieth the wife may by the provision of the Law take a third part of all the Manors and hold them discharged but if she will in folly accept the entire Manor charged she shall hold it charged with the rent Mortgage 10 If the Mortgageor tender the money at the day to the Mortgagée and the Mortgagée refuse it and the Mortgageor thereupon enter Littl. §. 335. Co. ibid. 207. the Mortgagée is without remedy at the Common Law for it will be imputed to his folly that he refused it when lawfull tender thereof was made unto him Vide Max. 80. case 24. Bastard Mulâ—er 11 If there be a Bastard eygne and Mulier puisne Littl. §. 399. 401. Co. ibid. 244. and after the fathers death the Bastard enter and peaceably enjoys the land without entry of the Mulier all his life and having issue dieth seised In this case the Mulier is barred for ever for it is imputed to the folly and negligence of the Mulier that he entred not during the life of the Bastard and albeit the Mulier were under age or covert baron at the time of
Treason viz. Petty treason and in 19 H. 6. 47. tit Corone 7. Br. Treason 8. upon an Indictment one was arraigned for killing the wife of his Master which he confessed and thereupon it came into question whether or no he should be drawn and hanged or hanged only and it was adjudged by the advice of all the Iustices of both the Benches that he should be drawn and hanged for that it was treason And there it is not taken within the equity of that Statute which speaks only of killing the Master but rather within the words thereof because Master and Mistress import the same being one person in Law Amerciâ—meâ—t 8 If a feme coveâ—t be outragiously amercied F N. B. 75. d. and thereupon the husband be distrained for it he shall have the writ de Moderata misericordia to relieve himself from such outragious amerciament Villein and Nief 9 If a freeman marry a Nief she shall be free for ever F. N. B. 78. g. albeit the Baron die and she survive and this the Law giveth her as Britton saith in favorem libertatis and it séems reasonable that the Law should be so because she and her husband are but one person in Law and she ought to be of the same nature and condition in Law to all intents with her husband Now therefore her husband being free to all intents without any condition in Law or otherwise and she being of the same nature and condition with her husband if she be once clearly discharged of Villeinage to all intents she cannot be Nief after without some special act done by her self as divorce or Conusance in a Court of Record and this is in favour of Liberty Vide Exod. cap. 21. supra 4. A Lady of Honor. 10 A writ of partition was brought against the Duke of Suffolk and his wife and others per Radulphum Haward Armig. Dyer 59. b. 51 6 7 E. 6. Dominam Annam Powes uxor ejus for so she was named in the writ and exception was taken upon the Misnomer because she ought to have béen named only by the name of her husband and not otherwise And by the opinion of Montague Ch. Iustice and Hales Iustice the exception was good because by the Law of God she is sub potestate viri and therefore her name of dignity ought to he changed according to the degree of her husband notwithstanding the curtesie of the Ladies of Honor and the Court whereupon the plaintifs brought a new writ ad reâ—pondendum Radulpho H. Anna uxori suae nuper uxori Domini Powes defuncti 210 They cannot sue one another nor make any grant one to the other or the like Baron cannot gâ—aâ— to the â—â—mâ— 1 A man may at this day by his deed covenant with others to stand seised to the use of his wife Co. Inst para 1. 112. a. 4. Littl. §. 168. or make a feoffment or other conveyance to the use of his wife for now such an estate may be executed to such uses by the Statute of 27 H. 8. 10. because an use is but a trust and confidence which by such a mean may be limited by the husband to the wife so likewise in places where lands were devisable the husbands before that Statute might by his testament devise his tenements to his wife in fée for life or years because such devise took not effect until after the death of the devisor Howbeit at the Common Law a man could not by any conveyance either in possession reversion or remainder limit an estate to his wife neither yet since the said Statute covenant with his wife to stand seised to her use because he and his wife being one person in Law he can grant nothing to her nor covenant with her Co. ibid. 206. b. 3. 2 If a man be bound with a Condition to enfeoff his wife Bond. the condition is void and against Law because it is against a Maxim of Law viz. that a man cannot make any grant to his wife and yet the bond is good but if he be bound to pay his wife money that is good Et sic de similibus Co. l. 4. 29. b. 3. in Buntings case 3 Albeit he that is admitted to a Copyhold estate is in by him Copyhold that made the surrender yet a man may surrender to the use of his wife because the Baron doth it not immediately to the wife but by two means viz. by surrender of the Baron to the Lord to the use of the wife and by the admittance of the Lord according to the surrender but if the estate did immediately pass from the husband to the wife it could not be good Co. l. 8. 136. a. 2. in Sir Iohn Nedhams case 4 It was adjudged M. 30 31 Eliz. that Feme Executrix where in debt against a feme executrix she pleaded fully administred and it was found that the defendant had taken the Obligor to husband and that the husband was dead this was no release in Law neither yet the debt thereby extinct but only suspended during the Coverture for she could not against a Maxim of Law by taking him to husband make a release to him of the debt 5 Hob. 10. Fryer against Gildridge 211 Upon a joynt Purchase during the Coverture either of them taketh the whole Co. Inst pâ—rs 1. 55. b. 2. 1 If a man be seised of land in right of his wife Emblements and soweth the ground and dieth his executors shall have the Corn and if his wife die before him he himself shall have it But if husband and wife be joyntenants of the land and the husband sow the ground and then the land surviveth to the wife in this case it is said that she shall have the Corn. Vide 8 Ass 21. 8 E. 3. 54. Dyer 316. Co. ibid. 187. a. 4 2 If a joynt estate of land be made to a man and a woman and their heirs before mariage and after they intermarry in this case Baron feme hold by intierties the husband and wife have moities betwéen them but if it be during the Coverture they hold by intireties For example William Ocle and Joan his wife purchased lands to them two and their heirs afterwards William Ocle was attainted of high treason for the murder of E. 2. and was executed Joan his wife surviving him E. 3. granted the lands to Stephen de Bitterly and his heirs John Hawkins the heir of Ioan in a petition to the King discloseth this whole matter and upon a Scire facias against the Patentee hath judgement to recover the lands for that William and Joan were one person in Law Co. ibid. 187. b. 2. Vide Pl. Co. 58. b. 4. Wimbish and Talbois 3 If a feoffment were made before the Statute of Vses 27 H. 8. 10. to the use of a man and a woman and their heirs The like and