Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n baron_n earl_n knight_n 10,768 5 7.7193 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A28585 The continuation of An historicall discourse of the government of England, untill the end of the reigne of Queene Elizabeth with a preface, being a vindication of the ancient way of parliaments in England / by Nath. Bacon of Grais-Inne, Esquire. Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660.; Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660. Historicall and political discourse of the laws & government of England. 1651 (1651) Wing B348; ESTC R10585 244,447 342

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of Matthew Paris Matthew Westminster and Hoveden although he pleaseth to mention the severall rankes of Great Men and those in blacke Letters of a greater size and saith That not one Commoner appeares yet Master Seldens Hoveden in that very place so often by the Opponent cited tells him that both Clerus and Populus were there Thirdly The Opponent citeth an instance of Lawes made by Richard the First in his twenty fourth page and hee setteth downe the severall ranks of Great Men and amongst the rest ingeniously mentioneth Milites but it is with a Glosse of his owne that they were Barons that were made Knights when as formerly Barons were mentioned in the generall and therefore how proper this Glosse is let others judge especially seeing that not onely Milites and Milites Gregorij but even Ministri were present in such conventions even in the Saxon times And Master Selden in the former knowne place mentioneth an Observation that Vniversi personae qui de Rege tenent in Capite sicut ceteri Barones debent interesse judicijs curiae Domini Regis cum Baronibus Fourthly He citeth in his twenty fifth page another instance in King Johns time in which after the assent of Earles and Barons the words Et omnium fidelium nostrorum are also annexed but with this conceit of the Opponents that these Fideles were those that adhered to the King against his enemies be it so for then the Commons were present and did assent or they may be saith he some specially summoned as Assistants take that also and then all the true hearted in the Kingdome were specially summoned and were there so as the conclusion will be the same In the fifth place hee citeth a strange President as he calls it of a Writt of Summons in King Johns time in his twenty seventh page wherein Omnes miletes were summoned Cum armis suis and he concludes therefore the same was a Councell of Warr. First Because they were to come armed it s very true and so they did unto the Councills in the ancient Saxon times and so the Knights of the Counties ought to doe in these dayes if they obey the Writte Duos Milites gladijs cinctas c. Secondly He saith That the Knights were not to come to Councill that is his opinion yet the Writt speakes that the Discreti Milites were to come Ad loquendum cum Rege ad negotijs regni Its true saith hee but not Ad tractandum faciendum consentiendum Its true it s not so sayd nor is it excluded and were it so yet the Opponents conclusion will not thence arise That none but the King and those who are of the House of Lords were there present The sixth and last instance mentioned by the Opponent is in his thirtieth page and concerneth Escuage granted to King John who by his Charter granted that in such cases he would summon Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Earles and the greater Barons unto such Conventions by speciall Writts and that the Sheriffe shall summon promiscuously all others which hold in Capite and thence hee concludes That none but the Great Lords and the Tenants in Capite whom he calls the lesser Barons were present but no Knights Citizens or Burgesses all which being granted yet in full Parliament the Citizens and Burgesses might be there For Councills were called of such persons as suited to the matter to be debated upon If for matters purely Ecclesiasticall the King and his Councell of Lords and the Church-men made up the Councill If for advice in immergencies the King and such Lords as were next at hand determined the conclusions If for Escuage the King and such as were to pay Escuage made up a Councill to ascertaine the sum which was otherwise uncertaine If for matters that concerned the common liberty all sorts were present as may appeare out of the very Charter of King John noted in my former discourse page 258. and also from an Observation of Cambden concerning Henry the third Ad summum honorem pertinet saith he Ex quo Rex Henricus tertius ex tanta multitudine quae seditiosa ac turbulenta fuit optimos quosque ad Commitia Parliamentaria evocaverit Secondly The Opponent takes that for granted that never will be Viz. That all the Kings Tenants In Capite were of the House of Lords when as himselfe acknowledgeth a difference page 28. Viz. That the Barons are summoned by Writs Sigillatim as all the Members of the House of Lords are but these are by generall summons their number great and hard it will be to understand how or when they came to be excluded from that Society I shall insist no further upon the particulars of this Tractate but demurr upon the whole matter and leave it to judgement upon the premises which might have beene much better reduced to the maine conclusion if the Opponent in the first place had defined the word PARLIAMENT For if it was a Convention without the People and sometimes without the KING as in the Cases formerly mentioned of the Elections of William Rufus and of King Steven And if sometimes a Parliament of Lords onely may be against the King and so without King or People as in the Case betweene Steven and Maud the Empresse and the case likewise concerning King John both which also were formerly mentioned possibly it may be thought as rationall for the Commons in after Ages to hold a Parliament without King or House of Lords and then all the Opponents labour is to little purpose THE CONTINUATION OF AN Historicall Discourse of the Government of ENGLAND THE former times since the Norman entry like a rugged Sea by crosse windes of arbitrary vapours in and about the Crowne and by Forraine ingagements from the holy Chaire made the true face of affaires cloudy and troublesome both for the Writer and the Reader Hence forward for the space of three hundred yeares next ensuing Kings by experience and observation finding themselves unequall to the double chace of absolute Supremacy over the Sturdy Laity and incroaching Clergy you will observe to lay aside their pretentions against the peoples Liberties and more intentively to trench upon the Spiritualty now growne to defie all Government but that of Covetousnesse Nor would these times allow further advantage to Kings in this worke they being either fainted by the tickle Title of the Crowne hovering between the two Houses of Yorke and Lancaster or drawne off to Forraine imployments as matters of greater concernment for the present well being of the Kingdome or for the spreading of the fame of such as desired to be renouned for valiant Men. It will be superfluous to recount the particular atchievements formerly attained by these Ecclesiasticall men the former Treatise hath already sayd what was thought needfull concerning that For the future I shall even premise this That the insuing times being thus blessed with a truce or stricter League between Kings and Commons the errours in
THE CONTINUATION OF AN HISTORICALL DISCOURSE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ENGLAND Vntill the end of the Reigne of Queene ELIZABETH WITH A Preface being a Vindication of the ancient way of Parliaments in ENGLAND By Nath Bacon of Grais-Inne Esquire LONDON Printed by Tho Roycroft for Matthew Walbanck and Henry Twyford and are to be sold at Grais-Inne Gate and in Vine Court Middle Temple 1651. The Contents of the severall Chapters of this Book I. THe sum of the severall Reignes of Edward the third and Richard the second fol. 3. II. The state of the King and Parliament in relation of him to it and of it to him fol. 13. III. Of the Privy Council and the condition of the Lords f. 26. IV. Of the Chancery fol. 35. V. Of the Admirals Court. fol. 41. VI. Of the Church-mens Interest fol. 45. VII Concerning Trade fol. 64. VIII Of Treason and Legiance with some considerations concerning Calvins Case fol. 76. IX Of Courts for causes criminall with their Laws fo 92. X. Of the course of Civill Justice during these times fo 96. XI Of the Militia in these times fol. 98. XII Of the Peace fol. 108. XIII A view of the summary courses of Henry the fourth Henry the fifth and Henry the sixth in their severall Reignes fol. 115. XIV Of the Parliament during the Reignes of these severall Kings fol. 127. XV. Of the Custos or Protector Regni fol. 134. XVI Concerning the Privy Councell fol. 141. XVII Of the Clergie and Church-government during these times fol. 146. XVIII Of the Court of Chancery fol. 162. XIX Of the Courts of Crown Plas and Common Law fo 165 XX. Concerning Sheriffs fol. 168. XXI Of Justices and Lawes concerning the Peace fol. 170. XXII Of the Militia during these times fol. 175. XXIII A short survey of the Reignes of Edward the fourth Edward the fifth and Richard the third fol. 181. XXIV Of the Government in relation to the Parliament fol. 187. XXV Of the condition of the Clergie fol. 191. XXVI A short sum of the Reignes of Henry the seventh and Henry the eighth fol. 194. XXVII Of the condition of the Crowne fol. 202. XXVIII Of the condition of the Parliament in these times fol. 223. XXIX Of the power of the Clergy in the Convocation f. 229. XXX Of the power of the Clergy in their ordinary Jurisdiction fol. 232. XXXI Of Judicature fol. 241. XXXII Of the Militia fol. 245. XXXIII Of the Peace fol. 253. XXXIV Of the generall Government of Edward the sixth Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth fol. 259. XXXV Of the Supream power during these times fol. 268. XXXVI Of the power of the Parliament during these times fol. 277. XXXVII Of the Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall during these last times fol. 283. XXXVIII Of the Militia in these later times fol. 290. XXXIX Of the Peace fol. 297. XL. A summary Conclusion upon the whole matter fol. 300. A PREFACE CONTAINING A Vindication of the Ancient way of the Parliament OF ENGLAND THE more Words the more Faults is a divine Maxime that hath put a stop to the publishing of this second part for some time but observing the ordinary humor still drawing off and passing a harsher censure upon my intentions in my first part then I expected I doe proceede to fulfill my course that if censure will be it may be upon better grounds when the whole matter is before Herein I shall once more minde that I meddle not with the Theologicall right of Kings or other Powers but with the Civill right in fact now in hand And because some mens Pens of late have ranged into a denyall of the Commons ancient right in the Legislative power and others even to adnull the right both of Lords and Commons therein resolving all such power into that one principle of a King Quicquid libet licet so making the breach much wider then at the beginning I shall intend my course against both As touching the Commons right jointly with the Lords it will be the maine end of the whole but as touching the Commons right in competition with the Lords I will first endeavour to remove out of the way what I finde published in a late Tractate concerning that matter and so proceede upon the whole The subject of that Discourse consisteth of three parts one to prove that the ancient Parliaments before the thirteenth Century consisted onely of those whom we now call the House of Lords the other that both the Legislative and Judiciall power of the Parliament rested wholly in them lastly that Knights Citizens and Burgesses of Parliament or the House of Commons were not knowne nor heard of till punier times then these This last will be granted Viz. That these severall titles of Knights Citizens and Burgesses were not known in Parliament till of later times Neverthelesse it will be insisted upon that the Commons were then there The second will be granted but in part Viz. That the Lords had much power in Parliament in point of Jurisdiction but neither the sole nor the whole The first is absolutely denyed neither is the same proved by any one instance or pregnant ground in all that Book and therefore not cleerly demonstrated by Histories and Records beyond contradiction as the Title page of that Book doth hold forth to the World First because not one instance in all that Book is exclusive to the Commons and so the whole Argument of the Discourse will conclude Ab authoritate Negativa which is no argument in humane testimony at all Secondly the greatest number of instances in that Booke are by him supposed to concerne Parliaments or generall Councils of this Nation holden by the Representative thereof whereas indeed they were either but Synodicall Conventions for Church matters whereunto the poore Commons he well knoweth might not come unlesse in danger of the Canons dint or if they did yet had no other worke there then to heare learne and receive Lawes from the Ecclesiasticks And the Lords themselves though present yet under no other notion were they then as Councell to the King whom they could not cast out of their Councell till after Ages though they often endeavoured it Thirdly the Author of that Tractate also well knoweth that Kings usually made Grants and Infeodations by advice of the Lords without the ayde of the Parliament And it is no lesse true that Kings with the Lords did in their severall ages exercise ordinarily Jurisdiction in cases of distributive Justice especially after the Norman entrance For the step was easie from being Commanders in Warr to be Lords in peace but hard to lay downe that power at the foot of Justice which they had usurped in the rude times of the Sword when men labour for life rather then liberty and no lesse difficult to make a difference between their deportment in commanding of Souldiers and governing of Countrey-men till peace by continuance had reduced them to a little more sobriety Nor doth it seeme irrationall that private differences
disabled to understand as in Case of Infancy there the Royall Assent can bear litle weight with it but most of all in the Kings absence where either the Assent is put thereto by Commissioners that know not the Kings particular minde or the Act is done onely by the Houses in nature of Ordinances and yet these of force to binde all Parties but the King But nothing more debased the Royall Assent in these times then a trick that Edward the Third plaid in the middest of the fullest strength of his Government It was in time of War which never is time of good Husbandry and laying up nor of sober advise in laying out nor of equity in levying and collecting money for the nerves of War This forward Warrier in the heat of his Atchievements findes his strength benummed for want of money he leaves off comes home rages against his A. Bishop to whom he had committed the care of Provision for his War and the A. Bishop as hotly falls upon some of the Treasury in the Army on the one side and upon others in the Countrey whose oppressions saith he in stead of bringing in money made the people to give a stop thereto A contest hereupon thus had it was concluded by the Power of the Parliament that such men should be questioned and that the Parliament from time to time should call all Officers of State to account and thereupon ensues a calme After the Parliament ended the King repeats the matter it makes his heart sick he disgorgeth himself by a Proclamation made by advise of Nobles and Wise men as he saith and tells all the World he dissembled with his Parliament and what he did was done by duress of minde to please for the time and to gain his ends which being now had he by his Proclamation revokes what he had done in Parliament or indeavoured it And thus is England put to school to learn to dissolve three hard knots First Whether a King can dissemble with his Parliament Secondly Whether Edward 3. his dissembling assent makes a Law Lastly Whether by a Proclamation by advise of Nobles and Wise men he can Declare that he dissembled with his Parliament and therein not dissemble the Royall Assent so as to bring all the Lawes made in any Kings time into question at least during his life However the result may be its evident the Royall Assent gets no honor hereby and the Statute as little that hath suffered this Proclamation all this time to passe among the number of the Statutes in Print as a Law when as many Statutes that are Lawes of note are left out as uselesse Although in the generall the two Houses joyned in every Act Ad extra yet Ad intra and in relation one to another they had their severall operations the House of Commons intermedled more in the matter of fact the House of Lords in matter of right although in either of these there is a mutuall aspect from both In matters of judicature much rested with the Lords and therefore it is ordained that The House of Lords shall remedy all offences contrary to the Law of Magna Charta And in cases where no remedy is left nor judgment by the Law the matter shall be determined in Parliament and the King shall command execution to be done according to the judgment of the Peeres Which Lawes seeme to bee but declarative of the former Lawe and in the nature of reviving that power into Act which was formerly layd asleep and doth strongly implye that the ultimate act in judicature rested with the Lords in relation not onely to the House of Commons but also in relation to the King whose work in such cases is not to judge above or with the Peers but to execute their sentence and that carries with it a list whereby the power of a King may appeare not to be so supreame in making of the Law as some would have it for if his Judgement and Conscience be bound by the Votes of the Peers in giving a Law in Case of a particuler person where the Law was not formerly known Let others judge of the value of this Negative Vote in giving Law to the whole Kingdome It s true that this Parliament was quarrelled by the King and he kept it at a bay by a Proclamation that pretended Revocation as far as a Proclamation could revoke an Act of Parliament but it effected nothing nor did the contest last long Now though this Jurisdiction thus rested in the House of Lords in such Cases as well as in others yet is it not so Originally in them as to be wholly theirs and onely as they shall order it for the Commons of England have a right in the course and order of Jurisdiction which as the known Law is part of their liberty and in the speedy execution of Justice as well as they have right to have Justice done and therefore whereas in Cases of Error and delayes the Appeale was from the inferiour Court to the Parliament which immediately determined the matter and now the trouble grew too great by the increase of Pleas For remedy hereof a kind of Committee is made of 1 Bishop 2 Earls 2 Barrons who by the advice of the Chancellor Treasurer and the Judges shall make good judgement in all Cases of Complaint of delay in Judgement which Committee is not made by Order of the Lords alone which they might have done in case Jurisdiction had bin wholly and onely shut up in their custody but by Act of Parliament and joynt concurrence of the Commons with the Lords For as the Commons challenge speedy Execution of Justice as one of their liberties So also to be under the jurisdiction of such Judges and Courts as the Lawes in the making whereof themselves challenge a Vote do establish appoint I will conclude this Chapter with the Constitution of the Parliament in these times For the difficulties that befell between the Kings and their people or Houses of Parliament wrought two sad effects Viz. A propensity to decline calling of Parliaments so often as was used and exspected and when it assembled as great a propensity in the Members to decline their attendance by means whereof as the Historians tell us the Parliament was somtimes inforced to adjourn it self for want of number sufficient the first of these arose from want of good will in the Kings the other from want of courage and zeale in the people The first of these was fatall and destructive to good Government for though in distempered Parliaments its good to withdraw yet in distempered times its necessary to meete and gain a right understanding of all parties and therefore these times were so happy as to binde themselves by publique Acts of State to recontinue the Assembling of Parliaments For the face of the Times represented unto all that Agitations were like to be quick violent and to continue for some succession of Time It s
at a distance and after long delay But Edward the Third sums up all into one breif and brings a compleate modell thereof into the World for future Ages to accomplish as occasion should lead the way The cours was now established to have Justices settled in every County there to be resident and attending that Service First they were named Guardians or Wardens of the Peace but within a few yeares altered their Title to Justices First they were chosen out of the good and lawfull men of each County After that they were two or three chosen out of the worthiest men and these were to be joyned with Lawyers Then was one Lord and three or foure in each County of the most worthy men adjoyned with Lawyers Afterward in Richard the Seconds time the number of Justices in each County might attain to the number of six and no Steward of any Lord to be admitted into the Commission but within half a yeare all is at large so be it that the choise be out of the most sufficient Knights Esquires and Gentlemen of the County Again within two yeares the number in each County is set at eight yet in all these the Judges and Serjeants were not reckoned so as the work then seemeth not so much as now a dayes although it was much of the same kinde and yet it grew up into that greatnesse which it had by degrees Before they were settled by Edward the Third there were Custodes pacis which might be those whom we now a dayes call the High-Constable of the Hundred whose work was purely Ministeriall Afterward about the second yeare of Edward the Third the Guardians of the Peace had power of Oier and Terminer in matters of riding Armed upon the Statute 2. Ed. 3. After that they have power of inquiry by Indictment in certain Cases within foure yeares after they have power of Oier and Terminer in Cases of false Jurors and maintenance and about tenne years after that they obtained like power in matters of Fellony and Trespasse The way of Commissions in case of life and member thus opened another occasion of Commission offers it self for a determinative power in case of offences against the Statute of Labourers and the Cognisance hereof is soon settled upon Commissioners in the Counties specially chosen for that Service which questionlesse as the times then stood was as commendable work as it was necessary For Souldiers were so many that Labourers were very few and those that once are accustomed to Armes thinke ever after meanly of the handycraft nor will they ever stoop thereto after their Spirits are once elivated by Mastery of Adventures And secondly those few Labourers that remained of the Sword Plague and other disasters of these wasting times understood their advantage and set a value upon their labours far above their merit apprehending that men would rather part with too much of a little then to let their work lie still that must bring them in all they have but these Commissioners lasted not long though the worke did The Justices of Peace are looked upon as meet for that service and its a vain thing to multiply Commissions where the work may be done by one that before this time had obtained an additionall Cognisance of all Causes of Riots Batteries wandering dangerous Persons and offences in Weights and Measures and in Purveiance To them I say all this work concerning Labourers is also committed by the Parliament and herewith a way was laid open for Crimes of greatest regard under Fellony to be determined by triall in the Countrey according to the course of Common Law The issue of all which was not only ease to the People but a great escape from the rigor of the Councel-Table in the Star-Chamber and the Kings-Bench at Westminster on the one side and also from the gripe of the Clergy on the other who hitherto held the Cognisance of the Markets in Weights and Measures to themselves This modell so pleased all men that Richard the Second that was pleased with nothing but his owne pleasure gave unto the Justices of Peace yet further power to execute the Statute at Northampton against riotous ridings and to settle the wages of Labourers and Servants to punish unlawfull Huntings by the meaner sort of people and regrators of Wooll fals Weights in the Staple unlawfull wearing of Liveries and unlawfull fishings contrary to the Statute at Westminster 2. Thus was the power of Justices of the Peace grown to that heighth in these and other things that it undermined not onely the Councel-Table and Kings Bench but the Commissions of Gaole delivery and of Oier and Terminer so farre forth as their work was much lesse then formerly for Neighbous in cases of Crime are better trusted with the lives and estates of men then strangers so as in all this the people are still the gainers The manner of Judicature by these Justices of the Peace still remains nothing appears by any Statute in these times that one Justice of the Peace might doe alone but record a forcible detainer although questionlesse in point of present security of the Peace and good behavior by the intent of the Statutes he might doe many things but in Cases of Oier and Terminer all must be done in publique Sessions which the Justices of the Peace had power to hold by Commission onely untill the thirty sixth year of Edward the Third and ever after that they held their Sessions by vertue of the Statutes and had power to determine divers things in their Sessions according to discretion These were remedies after the Fact now see what preventing Physick these times afforded One thing that much irritated the spirits of men into discontents was false newes or slanderous reports raised and spread amongst the great men For in these times the Lords were of such considerable a power as the vexation of one Lord proved the vexation of a multitude of the meaner sort and though the Statute of Westminster the 1. formerly had provided against such tales yet it touched onely such as concerned discord between the King and People although by implication also it might be construed to extend further But Richard the Second willing to live in quiet that he might injoy his pleasure would have the people know their duties in plain words and agreed to a Law that all such as published such false newes tending to sow strife between the great men should be imprisoned untill the first mover was found and if he were not found then the Relator should be punished by advice of the Councell So much power was then given to the Councell what ever it was Thus the seed was choked or was so intended to be though every passion was not thus suppressed For some angers conquer all feare and will hold possession come what will In the next place therefore provision is made against the first actings in sorting of parties by
more of that now they devise a way to spoile and prey for themselves and yet neither to rob nor break house To this end they would scatter little Scrolls in writing requiring the party that they intended to prey upon to leave so much Money upon such a day at such a place and this was Sub paena of burning the parties house and goods which many times did insue upon default made this practise was at once made Treason to prevent the grouth of such an evill And the like was done with Robberies and Manslaughters contrary to the Kings Truce and Safeconduct As many or more new Fellonies were also now created One was the cutting out of mens tongues and plucking out of eyes a strange cruelty and that shewed the extreame savagenesse of those times so much the more intollerable by how much the poore tortured creature could hardly be either eye or eare witnesse of the truth of his own wrong A second Fellony was the customary carrying of Wooll or Wool-fells out of the Realme to other places except Callis Another Fellony concerneth Souldiers which I refer over to the next Chapter The last was Servants plundering their Masters Goods and absenting themselves if upon Proclamation made they appeare not this was also made Fellony In the next place as touching forcible entries and riots the remedies so often inculcated and new dressed shew plainly the nature of the times These kind of crimes commonly are as the light Skirmishes in the beginning of a War and follow in the conclusion also as the faintings of a battell fought till both sides be weary I shall not enter into each particular Statute diverse of them being little other then as asseverations annexed to a sentence to add credit and stirr up minding in men that otherwise would soone forget what is sayd or done The remedies formerly propounded are now refined and made more effectuall First in regard of speed which is as necessary in these forces as the stopping of the breaches of waters in the first Act and therefore one Justice of the Peace may proceed upon a holder by force or breaker of the Peace with a Continuando but Riots are looked upon as more dangerous and the first opposition had need be more stiffe least being uneffectuall aggravates the violence and therefore it s required that two Justices and the Sheriffe should joyne in the worke to carry one the worke with more Authority and Power And what they cannot do in the punitive part they must certifie to the King and his Councel or to the Kings Bench if traverse be made So as though the Power of the County be annexed to the Sheriffe Jure ordinario to maintaine the peace yet the Parliament did delegate the same upon Justices as it thought most expedient To maintaine and recover the Peace when it s broken shewes more Power but to prevent the breach shewes more Wisdome and therefore to all the rest the Wisdome of these times provided carefully First for Guards and Watches according to the Statute at Wint and committed the care thereof to the Justices of the Peace And secondly against the gendring of partyes for its commonly seene that such as are admired for excellecies of Person are so far adolized of some as that their gestures actions and opinions are observed tokens of favour though never so small are desired from such and the Idoll likes it well gives Points Ribbons it may be Hats and with these men are soon gained to be Servants in the fashion and not long after to be servants in Action be it War or Treason or any other way This manner of cheat the former times had been too well acquainted with Knights and Esquires are not feared in times where the word Lord carries the wonderment away their offences against the Statutes of Liveries are all great though in themselves never so small and therefore are sure of Fine and Ransome and it s well if they escape a yeares Imprisonment without baile or mainprize Lords may weare the Kings Livery but may give none Knights and Esquires may weare the Kings Livery in their attendance upon his Person but not in the Countrey The King and Prince may give Liveries to Lords and meniall Servants The summe is that Liveries may be given by the more publique Persons for State not to make parties and Men may weare Liveries in token of Service in Peace and not in Armes One thing must be added to all which may concern triall in all Viz. A Law was now made that Noble Ladies shall be tried by their Peeres a Law now of the first stamp and strange it is that it never came before now into the breast of the Law but that it came now it is not strange no meaner Person then the Dutches of Glocester is first charged with Treason when that could not appear then for Necromancy very fitly that she might be tried by the Ecclesiasticall way of witnesses She is found guilty and a Sentence of Penance and imprisonment or banishment passed thereupon after such a wilde way as both Nobles and Commons passed this Law for the Vindication of that Noble Sexe from such hudling trialls for the future CHAP. XXII Of the Militia during these times THe Title of Henry the Fourth to the Crown was maintained principally by his Tenures which the Courtiers call Knight-Service but the Common People force of Armes and that which destroyed many a man was the principall means of his subsistence Otherwise its clear that his Title was staring naught nor could he outface Mortimars Title without a naked Sword which he used warily for he had Enemies enough to keep his Sword in hand and Freinds enough to keep it from striking at randome for coming in by the Peoples favour he was obleiged to be rather remisse then rigorous yet his manner of comming was by the Sword and that occasioneth men much to debate about his absolute power in the Militia as supposing that what power he had other Kings may De jure challenge the same and let that be taken for granted though it will not necessarily follow in true reasoning And let it also be taken for good that Henry the Fourth entered the Throne by his Sword yet is there not any Monument in Story or Antiquity that favoureth any absolute right in him over the Militia but the current is I think somwhat clear against it First because Henry the Fourth De Jure could not compell men to serve beyond the Seas but raised them by contract and therefore by Act of Parliament he did confirme the Statute 1 Ed. 3. Stat. 2. cap. 5. which Statute was purposely made to that end And the same also is countenanced by another Statute made in these times whereof we now Treat by the words whereof appeareth that the Souldiers for the Forrain Service were levied by Contract between them and the Captain who undertooke to Levy them by
wage so as none were then compelled to enter into Service by imprest or absolute command nor is there any authority amongst all those cited in Calvins Case that doth mention any such thing but contrarily that Opinion of Thirning is expresse That the King cannot send men beyond Seas to Warres without wages and therefore no man is bound to any such Service by any absolute Legiance as the Reporter would understand the point but if he receiveth wages thereto he by that Contract binds himselfe Secondly it seemeth also to be granted that such as went voluntarily in the Kings Service ever had the Kings pay after they were out of their Counties if the King ruled by his Lawes for by the Statute formerly mentioned the King did likewise confirm the Statute of 18 Ed. 3. Stat. 2. cap. 7. which is expresse in that point and the matter in Fact also is evident upon the Records Thirdly touching the Arming of those that were thus Levied as their was a certain Law by which all men were Assessed to certain Armes either by the Service and Tenure of their Lands or by Parliament for such as were not bound to finde sufficient Armes by their Tenure according as is contained in the Statute 25 Ed. 3. Stat. 5 cap. 8. So did Henry the Fourth by the Statute formerly mentioned to be made in his time Confirm that Law of Edward the Third In the Argument of Calvins Case it is much insisted upon to prove the Legiance of an English man to the King to be absolute because he hath power to send men to Warre at his pleasure and he hath onely power to make Warre and if so then hath he absolute power in the Militia As touching the power of sending men to Warre hath been already spoken but as touching the power to make Warre there is no doubt but where a King hath made a League with another King he onely can break that League and so make Warre and that Opinion of Brian must be agreed for good in that sense But if a League be made by Act of Parliament or if the King will have Warre and the Parliament will make a League without him no authority doth in such case avouch that it is the right of the King or that he hath a Legall Power to break that League as he pleaseth Neither in the next place hath the King any right or Legall power to make War with his own Subjects as he pleaseth but is bound to maintain the Peace not onely by his Oath at his Coronation but also by the Lawes whereto he is bound if he will reign in right of an English King For every man knoweth that the grounds of the Statutes of wearing of Liveries was for the maintaining of the Publique Peace And Henry the Fourth amongst other provisions made against that trick hath this That the King shall give onely his Honourable Livery to his Lords Temporall whom shall please him and to his Knights and Esquires meniall and to his Knights and Esquires which be of his retinue and take of him their yearely Fee for Terme of Life and that no Yeoman shall take or weare any Livery of the King nor of none other Lord. And another Law was made within one yeare ensuing confirming the former and providing the Prince may give Liveries to such Lords as he pleases and to his meniall Gentlemen and that they may weare the same as in the Kings Case By both which the King and Prince are both in one Case as touching the power of giving Liveries if the one hath absolute power then hath the other the like If one be under the Directory of Law in that point then is also the other For it is clear that the King is intended by the Statute to be bound from giving Liveries and the people from wearing them otherwise then in especiall Cases and then the Conclusion will be that if the King may not give Liveries to prejudice of the Peace then may he much lesse break the Peace at his pleasure or Levy Men Armes and Warre when he shall think most meet Take then away from the King absolute Power to compell men to take up Armes otherwise then in case of Forrain Invasion power to compell men to goe out of their Counties to War power to charge men for maintenance of the wars power to make them find Armes at his pleasure and lastly power to break the Peace or doe ought that may tend thereto Certainly the power of the Militia that remaineth though never so surely setled in the Kings hand can never bite this Nation Nor can the noise of the Commission of Array Intitle the King unto any such vast power as is pretended For though it be granted that the Commission of Array was amended by the Parliament in these times and secondly that being so amended it was to serve for a President or Rule for the future yet will it not follow that Henry the Fourth had or any Successours of his hath any power of Array originally from themselves absolutely in themselves or determinatively to such ends as he or they shall thinke meete First as touching the amendment of the Commission it was done upon complaint made by the Commons as a greivance that such Commissions had issued forth as had been greivous hurtfull and dangerous And the King agrees to the amendments upon advice had with the Lords and Judges and if it be true that the amendments were in the materiall Clauses as it is granted then it seemeth that formerly a greater power was exercised then by Law ought to have been and then hath not the King an absolute power of Array for the just power of a King can be no greivance to the Subject Secondly if the Commission of Array thus mended was to serve as a rule of Array for the future then there is a rule beyond which Henry the Fourth and his Successors may not goe and then it will also follow that the power of Array is not Originally nor absolutely in the King but from and under the Rule and Law of the Parliament which rule was not made by the Kings own directions but as we are told beyond expectation alterations were made in materiall parts of the Commission and the powers in execution there whereof no complaint of greivance had been made The issue then is if the King had an Universall Power in the Array the Parliament likewise had a generall Liberty without any restriction to correct that power Lastly suppose that this power of the Parliament is executed and concluded by the Commission thus amended and that thereby the Kings Power is established yet can it not be concluded that this Power is Originally or absolutely in the King It s not absolutely in him because it is limited in these particulars First it s not continuall because its onely in case of eminent danger Secondly It s not generall upon all occasions but onely in case of a
the People However unequall it may seem yet both that and other advantages were gained by the House of Lords after the seperation was once made as many of the ancient Statutes by them only made do sufficiently hold forth which although in the generall do concern matters of Judicature wherin the Lords originally had the greatest share yet other things also escaped the Commons Vote which in after ages they recovered into their consideration again And the condition of the People in those times did principally conduce hereunto For untill the Norman times were somwhat settled the former ages had ever been uncertain in the changes between War and Peace which maintained the distance between the Lords and their Tenants and the Authority of the one over the other savouring of the more absolute command in War And after that the Sword was turned into the plough-share the distance is established by compact of Tenure by Service under perill of default although in a different degree for the Service of a Knight as more eminent in War so in Peace it raised the minde to regard of publique Peace but the Service of the plough supporting all is underneath all yet still under the common Condition of free men equally as the Knight Peace now had scarcely exceeded its minority before it brought forth the unhappy birth of Ambition Kings would be more absolute and Lords more Lordly the Commons left far behinde seldom come into mention amongst the publique Acts of State and as uselesse set aside this was the lowest ebb that ever the Commonage of England indured which continued till Ambition brought on contention amongst the great men and thence the Barons Warrs wherein the Commons parting asunder some holding for the King who promised them Liberty from their Lords others siding with the Lords who promisied them Liberty from the King they became so minded of their Liberties that in the conclusion they come off upon better advantage for their Liberties then either King or Lords who all were Loosers before their reckoning was fully made These Wars had by experience made the King sensible of the smart of the Lords great Interest with the People and pointed him to the pin upon which the same did hang to take which away a Designe is contrived to advance the value of the Commoners and to levell the Peerage that they both may draw in one equall yoke the Chariot of Prerogative The power of the Commons in publique Councells was of some efficacy but not much Honour for their meetings were tumultuary time brought forth a cure hereof the flowers of the People are by Election sent to the Representative and so the Lords are matched if not over-matched the People lesse admiring the Lords and more regarding themselves This was but a dazle an eclips ensues for Kings having duely eyed the Nature of Tenures between the Lords and Commons look upon it as an out-work or block-house in their way of approach Their next endeavour is therefore to gain the Knighthood of England within the compass of their own Fee and so by priority to have their Service as often as need should require by a trick in Law as well for their own safety in time of War as for their benefit in time of Peace This was a work of a continuing Nature and commended to Successors to accomplish by degrees that the whole Knighthood of England is become no more the Lords till Kings be first served and thus the power of the People is wholly devolved into the Kings Command and the Lords must now stand alone having no other foundation then the affections of the People gained by beneficense of Neighbourhood and ordinary society which commonly ingratiates the inferiour rank of men to those of higher degree especially such of them as affect to be popular Henry the seventh found out this sore and taught his Successors the way to avoid that occasion of jealousy by calling up such considerable men to attend the Court without other wage but fruitlesse hopes or under colour of Honour to be had by Kings from the presence of such great men in their great Traines or of other Service of speciall note to be done onely by men of so high accomplishment And by this meanes Lordship once bringing therewith both Authority and Power unto Kings before Kings grew jealous of their greatness in these later dayes is become a meer jelly and neither able to serve the Interest of Kings if the People should bestir themselves nor their own any longer henceforth the Commons of England are no mean Persons and their representative of such concernment as if Kings will have them to observe him he must serve them with their Liberties and Lawes and every one the publique good of the People No mans work is beneath no mans above it the best Honour of the Kings work is to be Nobilis servitus as Antigonus said to his Son or in plain English supreame Service above all and to the whole I now conclude as I found this Nation a Common-Wealth so I leave it and so may it be for ever and so will it be if we may attain the happinesse of our Fore-Fathers the ancient Saxons Quilibet contentus sorte propria A Table of the Principall Matters conteined in this Book A A Betting of Felony made Felony 299 Administration granted to the next of the Kindred 51 Admirals power from the Parliament 41. formerly under many brought into one 42. once gained jurisdiction to the high water-mark 44. and his Power regulated by Law ibid. over Sea-men Ports and Ships 44 Allegiance according to Law 18. vide Supremacy the nature thereof in general 79. its not natural 79 89. not absolute or indefinite 82. not to the King in his natural capacity 86. it obligeth not the People to serve in forrain War 10● it is due to the person of the King for the time being 246 279. what it is in time of War and relation thereunto 247. Henry the seventh and Henry the eighth indeavoured to advance it in relation to the Crown but effected it not 204. Appeals in cases Ecclesiastical restrained from Rome and given in the Kings case to the Convocation and in the cases of the People the Archbishop afterwards to the Delegates and were never setled in the Crown 227 233. vide Archbishop Archbishop hath the lawfull power of the Pope in Appeals and Dispensations Licenses and Faculties 233. the Archbishop of York looseth his jurisdiction over the Scottish Bishops 193 Arrays Commission of Array 178 vide War Assent of the King to Acts of Parliament serveth onely to the execution of the Law and not to the making thereof 21 Association of the People for the common safety before the Statute inabling the same 298 B. BAstardy not to be determined by the Ordinary before Summons to the Pretendors of Title to be heard 156 Bench the Kings Bench at Westminster abated in power by the Commissions of Oyer and Terminer and Gaol delivery