but Dominus nosier our Lord the Lord of all that doe confess his holy Name and agree in the truth of his holy Word A title which accreweth to him in many respects as first in regard of our Creation For if all things were made by him and without him was nothing made that was made as St. Iohn affirmeth If by him all things were created both in Heaven and Earth visible and invisible as St. Paul informs us good reason that he should have the Dominion over the work of his own hands and that we should acknowledge him for the Lord our Maker In the next place he is our Lord in jure Redemptionis in the right of Redemption Concerning which we must take notice as before was said that man was made by God in his first Creation just righteous and devoide of malice 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the words of Damascen Created to this purpose after Gods own Image Vt imitator sui autoris esset that so he might more perfectly imitate his Creators goodness But falling from this happiness in which he might have served the Lord with perfect innocency he made a new contract with the Devil and became his servant and put himself directly under his dominion Do ye not know saith the Apostle that unto whom you yeild your selves servants to obey his servants ye are whom ye obey If then they were the Devils servants the Devil of necessity was their Lord and Master for Dominus servus sunt relata as our Logick teacheth us A miserable and most wretched thraldome from which there was no other way to set mankinde free but by the death and passion of our Saviour CHRIST which he being willing for our sakes to undergo did by the offering of himself once for all become the propitiation for our sins and obtain eternal redemption for us cancelling the bond or obligation which was against us and nayling it to his Cross for ever Nor were poor mankinde only servants to this dreadful Tyrant but for the most part they had listed themselves under him and became his souldiers fighting with an high hand of presumptuous wickedness against the Lord God and the Hosts of Heaven And they continued in that service taking part with the Devil upon all occasions till he received his final overthrow at the hands of our Saviour who by his death overcame him who had the power of death which is the Devil and having spoiled principalities and powers made a shew of them openly and triumphed over them By means whereof another title did accrew unto him of being the sole Lord over all mankinde and that is jure belli by the laws of war that rule of Aristotle being most unquestionably true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say those which are taken in the wars are in the power and at the disposal of the Conquerour And by the same right also of successful war men became servants unto him whose service as our Church hath taught us is perfect freedome For Servi are so called a servando from being saved and preserved in the day of battail Vocabuli origo inde ducta creditur quod ii qui jure belli possint occidi a victoribus conservabantur as St. Augustine from the Lawyers hath it because although they might be slain by the Law of Armes yet by the clemency of the Victor they were saved from slaughter and so made servants to the Conquerour And last of all he is our Lord jure Promotionis by the right of promotion because we hold of him all those temporal and eternal blessings which we enjoy in this life and expect in that which is to come He is the Lord of Life as St. Peter telleth us Act. 3.15 the Lord of glory saith S. Paul 1 Cor. 2.8 the Lord of joy Enter into the joy of the Lord as St. Matthew hath it 25.21 And he conferreth on us his servants life joy and glory out of the abundant riches of his mercy towards us and whatsoever else is his within the title and power of Lord. For having thereto a double right first by inheritance as the Son whom God appointed heir of all things Heb. 1.2 and then by purchase as a Redeemer for therefore he dyed and rose again that he might be Lord of all Rom. 14.9 contenting himself with the first alone he is well pleased to set over the latter unto us and to advance us to an estate of joynt-purchase in Heaven of life joy and glory and whatsoever else he is owner of For to that end it pleased him to come down from Heaven and be made man and be incarnate by the holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary which is the first of those great works which were performed by him in order to our Redemption and next in order of the Creed ARTICLE IV. Of the Fourth ARTICLE OF THE CREED Ascribed to St. ANDREW 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Qui conceptus est de Spiritu sancto natus ex Virgine Maria. i. e. Which was conceived by the holy Ghost born of the Virgin Mary CHAP. III. Of Gods free mercy in the Redemption of Man The Word why fittest to effect it The Incarnation of the Word why attributed to the holy Ghost The miracle thereof made credible both to Iews and Gentiles IT is a very ingenious conceit of Cameracensis that when God first created Adam he gave him all precious and excellent endowments as truth to instruct him justice to direct him mercy to preserve him and peace to delight him but that when he was fallen from God and forgot all the good which the Lord had done for him they returned back to him that gave them making report of that which had happened on the earth and earnestly moving the Almighty but with different purposes concerning this forlorn and unhappy creature For Iustice pleaded for his condemnation and called earnestly for the punishment which he had deserved Truth pressing for the execution of that which God had threatned on his disobedience But on the other side Mercy intreated for poor miserable man made out of the dust of the earth seduced by Satan and beguiled under faire pretences and Peace endevoured to take off the edge of Gods displeasure and reconcile the creature unto his Creatour When God had heard the contrary desires and pleas of those excellent Orators there was a councell called of the blessed Trinity in which it was finally resolved that the Word should be made flesh and take unto himself the nature of Man that he might partake of his infirmities be subject to the punishments which man had deserved and so become the propitiation for the sins of the world By this means the desires of all parties were fully satisfyed For man was punished according as Iustice urged the punishment threatned on mans disobedience inflicted as Truth required the offender pitied and relieved as Mercy intreated and God was
Parents were infected from the very birth Nor doth it any way advantage us in this present case that our Parents were regenerate for so we may suppose when they did beget us and being washed themselves from Original sin by the laver of regeneration should therefore in congruity be inabled also to beget children like themselves free from that pollution For the Regenerate are never so absolutely cleared from this corruption but that there is a law in their members which doth still war against the Spirit and that which as the Scripture telleth us hath in it self such an unpleasingness to God as maketh it to have somewhat in it of the nature of sin It is true that by the Sacrament of regeneration the guilt thereof is washed away and man thereby acquitted from the punishment of it yet there remaineth in us still that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that wisdom or sensuality of the flesh as St. Paul entituleth it whereby we are inclined to resist at all times and sometimes actually do rebel against the Spirit Or were it so that in the state of grace and regeneration we were all cleansed throughout yet might our children be partakers of those corruptions which naturally and originally were inherent in us For let the Husbandman Wâ—ndow and Rie and Pick his Wheat with all care and industry till there be neâ—ther Chaff nor Tare nor ill Seed amongst it yet when that Wheat is sown and the stalk grown up into an Ear those Ears will be as full of Chaff as was the Seed it self out of which they came before such care and pains had been took about it And so St. Augustine hath resolved it saying Oleae semina non oleas generare sed oledstros That the wilde Olive springs from the true Olive Tree What then may any man complain as it seems too many did in the time of Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What reason is it that we should be punished and afflicted it is for him we suffer for Adams fault and not our own that we are thus scourged Assuredly there is no such matter and we may say to such complainers as that Father did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not so saith he it is no such thing we suffer not for his but our own transgressions The best man hath too many sins which he is to answer for besides that of Adam and therefore none to lay the blame of his guilt and punishment upon Adam onely as if he onely had offended and not we our selves There is not one who hath not wretchedly increased that stock of wickedness which his Father left him adding transgressions of his own many actual sins to that original corruption which he had from Adam And howsoever we are unthrifts on that stock of grace which God is pleased to give unto us and eiâ—her hide our Talents in a Napkin as we know who did or else mispend them like the Prodigal on our riotous lusts yet we are too good husbands on that stock of sin which is bequeathed us by our Parents There is not a man amongst us but improves that patrimony adding one sin unto another as Lust to Drunkenness Murder to Adultery Rebellion to Secret Treasons Lascivious speech to loose Affections and unchaste actions unto both Which though they are the necessary consequents of original sin unless exceedingly held in by the bridle of grace so are they daily multiplied and increased continually by giving way to our corrupt affections and following the example of that first Transgressor Sic instituere majores posteri imitantur as he in Tacitus The Fathers manner of life is the Sons example So that the followers of Pelagius when they imputed sin unto imitation had they intended it of actual not original sin they had not been much wanting of the mark they aimed at We are made guilty of original sin immediately from our own Parents as they from theirs ascending till they came to Adam in the way of Propagation and make their actual sins our own in the way of imitation Nor need we press this further than with that of Origen Parentes non solum generant filium sed imbuunt qui nascuntur non solum filis Parentibus sunt sed Discipuli in reference unto sin and wickedness we are the Scholars of our Parents not their Children onely But whether it be by Propagation or by Imitation or by transcending all examples which have been before us most sure it is that we are all corrupt and become abominable that there is none that doeth good no not one being filled with all unrighteousness fornication wickedness covetousness Maliciousness full of envy murther debate malignity insomuch as from the Crown of the head to the sole of the foot there is nothing but swellings and soars and putrifaction More sure it is that even our righteousness is but like to a menstruous cloth and that our justest actions are not able to endure the trial if they should come to be weighed in the sight of God by the severity of the Law and the exact ballance of the Sanctuary Vae enim laudabili hominum vitae si remotâ misericordiâ discutias eam Woe saith Augustine to the most commendable part of all our lives should not God look upon us with the eyes of mercy and through the Spectacles of the merits of our Lord CHRIST IESVS Not to insist longer on those curiosities which are and may be made by unquiet men about the Introduction Propagation and universal over-spreading of the body of sin we must resolve as he that fell into a pit did resolve the Passenger who was inquisitive to know how he came into it At ille obsecro inquit tecum cogita quomodo hinc me liberes c. My friend said the poor fellow take no care to learn how I fell into it but do the best you can to help me out of it That we are fallen into the pit not only of Original but of Actual filthiness we all know too well and we know too that we first fell into it by the fault of our Father Adam but have since plunged our selves more deeply in the mire of sin then Adam by his personal error could have brought upon us If we are yet unsatisfied with the manner how notwithstanding all that hath been formerly here delivered and may be elsewhere found in the Antient writers we may do well to take as much care as we can for our getting out and not molest our selves and others with those needless questions which have been made about the manner of our falling in And this is that which we are next to go in hand with For if there were no way to get out of this pit the knowledge which we have of our falling in and of the condition we lie under till we be delivered would so perplex us and afflict us that Christians of all men would be most miserable But so
first Article I believe in God the Father Almighty that is to say I believe that there is one Immoratal and Eternal Spirit of great both Majesty and Power which we call God and that this God is the Father Almighty the Father both of Iesus Christ and of all mankinde who as a Father hath not only brought us into the world but hath provided us of all things necessary both for body and soul protecting us by his mighty power and governing us and our affairs by his infinite wisdom This is the sum of that which is to be conceived of this present Article of our belief in God the Father Almighty I know the Schoolmen do distinguish very frequently between Credere Deum Credere Deo Credere in Deum the first whereof they make to be a general belief of the beeing of God that is to say that God is that there is a God the second an affiance or relying on the veracity or truth of that which he hath pleased to impart to us in the holy Scriptures the last which is the phrase here used a confidence which we have in his grace and goodness a casting of our selves entirely into his mercy and protection For thus the Master of the Sentences lib. 3. distinct 23. cap. illud est Thomas Aquinas 2.2 qu. 2. Ant. 2. ad 1. 4. the Author of the Ordinary Gloss. Rom. 4.5 Durandus in Rationale divin cap. de Symbol and indeed who not And I know also that this nicety is generally fathered on Augustine who indeed makes a signal difference between credere Deo credere in Deum Credere in Deumutique plus est quam credere Deo to believe in God is more saith he then to believe that which the Lord hath spoken Of which he gives this instance in another place Nam daemones credebant ei at non credebant in eum for the Devils do believe what God saith unto them who cannot for all that be said to believe in God And finally he concludeth or the Schoolmen from him that when we say I believe in God we do not only say I believe God is or I give credit to his words but me ipsum amare credendo in eum ire membris ejus incorporari by believing to love him by believing as it were to grow into him and be incorporate with his members The Protestant Doctors many of them go the same way also making the Credo of this place to be the same with Fiduciam in Deo colloco the placing of our whole trust and confidence in God Almighty which are Zuinglius words with whom agree as to the meaning of the phrase P. Ramus de Relig. l. 1. c. 2. Zanch. de tribus Elohim part 1. lib. 4. cap. 7. lib. 5. c. 2. Amesius in Medull Theol. lib. 1. cap. 3. num 15. besides diverse others whose names it were impertinent to remember here By these in Deum credere to believe in God is made the highest and most excellent act or degree of faith the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or full assurance of the understanding which St. Paul speaks of Coloss. 2.2 higher then which a Christian cannot go in this present life Tertia fidei pars vel gradus as we read in Musculus non modo de Deo Deo sed in Deum credere And this he doth define to be Spem omnen in Deum dirigere firmaque fiducia ab illius bonitate pendere making it so peculiar unto God alone ut nec Moysi nec Prophetis nec Apostolis imo ne Angelis quidem debeat accommodari that it is neither to be used when we speak of Moses or of the Prophets or Apostles no nor of any of the Angels Finally for the phrase it self 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Apostles have made use of in this place of the Creed and in other parts of Divine Writ they make it an expression or form of speech so proper to the holy Ghost that neither the Septuagint in their Translation nor any learned Author amongst the Graecians ever used the same Which notwithstanding I am yet unsatisfied in the solidity and truth of the said distinction and also of the explication of the phrase here used And therefore with the leave of the learned Reader and with all due respect to those Reverend men who have transmitted them unto us I shall endevour to evince these two conclusions first that the phrase in Deum or in Christum â—redere the explication of the phrase in Deum credere and the distinction thereon founded is not so generally and universally true as it is pretended And 2. that howsoever it may be admitted in some texts of Scripture in which that phrase is used by the holy Ghost it can by no means be admitted in this place of the Creed First for the phrase in Deum or in Christum credere they make it signifie as before I said that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or full assurance which a Christian hath of the love of God the confidence which we have in his love and goodness the casting of our selves entirely into his goodness and protection which I conceive is more then the phrase importeth or was intended by it in the holy Ghost The only place in which we finde this form of speech in St. Matthews Gospel is in the 18. chap. vers 6. where it is said Whosoever offendeth any of these little ones 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 qui credunt in me which believe in me it were better that a mil-stone were hung about his neck c. In which place by those little ones or pusilli which our Saviour speaks of he neither meaneth little children nor men small in stature they must needs wrest the words too far who do so expound them but men weak in faith such as he elsewhere calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 men of little faith And certainly a weak faith or a little faith cannot consist with that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that full assurance and perswasion which is by them intended in the phrase in question Or if they mean it literally of little children because they finde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 parvulum a little childe to be a great part of the argument of that discourse either they must mean somewhat else by in Christum credere then their explication of the phrase admits of or else confess that little children are endued with that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that confidence in the love and goodness of Almighty God in Iesus Christ which is the highest pitch and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the strongest faith which I think no wife man will affirm Thus is it said of the Disciples in the second chapter of St. Iohn that when they had seen the miracle which Iesus did in Cana of Galilee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 crediderunt in eum they believed on him ver 11. Assuredly the faith of the Disciples at this time
derived from the natural seed of the body Quo quid perversius dici potest then which there could not any thing be said which is more perverse He that would see the judgment of the Protestant writers and how they do accord with the holy Scriptures expounded and applyed by consent of Fathers let him consult Calvin in his Comment on the Hebrewes cap. 12. Bullinger Decad. 4. Serm. 10. Beza in lib. quaestion et Respons Zanchius de operib dei part 3. l. 2. cap. 4. and Vrsin Tract Theolog. de peccato And for the opinion in this point of the old Philosophers that received maxime of theirs Creando infunditur infundendo creatur sufficiently declares it without further search But see how I am carried into this dispute ere I was aware besides my first meaning I am sure though not impertinently to the business of mans creation which is the work I have in hand For the accomplishing of which work being indeed the Master-peece of the whole Creation God did not only form the body and infuse the soul but he imprinted in him the impresse or character of his Heavenly image For it is said of man that God created him in his own image and that again repeated for our more assurance in the image of God created he him Gen. 1.27 About this Image of God thus imprinted in him there hath been much debate amongst learned men some placing it in Man himself others in somewhat adventitious and extrinsecal to him Of this last sort are they who place this Image of God in that dominion which God gave him over all the Creatures For so it followes in the Text Let us make Man in our image after our likenesse and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the fowles of the aire and over the Cattel and over all the earth And unto this the Poet doth allude in his Metamorphosis saying Sanctius his et quod dominari in caetera posset natus homo est that man who was to have dominion over all the rest of the Creatures was not made till the last But this if I conceive it rightly is rather a communication of some part of his Power then an impression of his Image unlesse perhaps their meaning be that God imprinted so much of his Heavenly Image in the face of man as to make all other Creatures stand in awe to him And if their meaning be no more then they come up to those of the other opinion who place this image of God in Man himself in something which is natural and essential to him which must either be in his body or his soul or both In one of those it must be there 's no doubt of that and little doubt in which of the two to finde it For certainly they look for it in a very wrong place who expect to finde it in mans body though of a gallant composition and erected structure The Heathen Oratour was able to inform some erroneous Christians one of whose many divine dictates this is said to be Ad divinam imaginem propius accedit humana virtus quam figura that man approched more near to the image of God in the virtues of his minde then the figure of his body I know a great dispute hath been also raised about this image of God in the soul of man that is to say in what it specially did conâ—ist and whether it were lost or not in the fall of Adam For stating of this controversie we will take some hints from the decisions of Aquinas who first declares that the image of God consisteth in that eminent perfection which is found in men expressing the nature of God in an higher degree then the chief excellencies found in all other creatures and secondly that this perfection is principally to be had in the soul of man Then he distinguisheth this perfection into these three conditions Creationis Recreationis et Similitudinis that is to say of nature grace and endlesse glory of which the first is to be found in all men and can never be lost the second is the portion of the man regenerated and the third is the reward of a soul in blisse The first consisteth in the largeness of the natural faculties of understanding and will not limited to the apprehension or desire of some certain things only but extended to all the conditions of being and goodness whose principall object is God so that they never rest satisfyed with any other thing but the seeing and enjoying of his blessed vision And this is that which is more briefly couched in those words of Augustines Fecisti nos ad te et irrequietum est cor nostrum donec requiescat in te O Lord saith he thou madest us only for thy self and our hearts are restlesse and unquiet till they rest in thee The second kind of this perfection in which the image of God is said to consist is supernatural when the soul actually or at lest habitually knoweth and loveth God aright though not so perfectly as he may and shall be known and loved hereafter And such was that perfection of the great Apostle who reckoned all but as dung so he might gain CHRIST who was so far inflamed with a strong desire of being united unto God that he desired to be dissolved without longer stay and such was the perfection of the holy Father who thought himself dead when he was alive out of a zeal of seeing the most blessed face of Almighty God Moriar ne moriar ut faciem tuam videam he dyed because he could not die to behold that vision The third and last degree of the said perfection is when the soul both knowes and loves the Lord her God in the fulnesse of happinesse And this is that whereof St. Paul hath told us saying that now we see darkly as thorow a glasse but then we shall see face to face Now know I but in part saith he but then shall I know even as I also am known These are the several perfections or degrees thereof in which Gods image printed in the soul of man doth consist especially according to the doctrine of the Roman Schooles and most pure antiquity and of these three the second is that only which was lost in Adam but partly though imperfectly renewed in the state of grace there being no man since the fall who either doth so perfectly know or so sincerely cherish the love of God in his soul as Adam did before it in his first integrity For when the Lord made Man in his first Creation he gave him such a clearness of understanding as was not darkened either with the cloudes of errour or the mists of ignorance and such a rectitude in his will as was not biassed unto evill by corrupt affections Perfectly good God made him but not good unchangeably for he was left in the counsel of his own hands as the wiseman
of the Article but shall take it in the literal and Grammatical sense With which expression I conclude this long dissertation ARTICVLI 6. Pars 2da 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Tertia die resurrexit a mortuis i. e. The third day he rose again from the dead CHAP. X. Of the Resurrection of our Lord and Saviour with a consideration of the circumstances and other points incident to that Article IT was the observation of the Antient Father that the incredulity of St. Thomas did much conduce unto the confirmation of the Christian faith in this great Article of the Resurrection Quam felix incredulitas quae omnium seculorum fidei militavit as St. Augustine hath it The rest of the Apostles who had seen the Lord had made this their Colleague acquainted with so great a miracle too great indeed for one of so weak faith to assent unto And therefore he requires a more â—ull and perfect demonstration of it then any of his fellows had before exacted Vnless saith he I put my finger into the print of his wounds and thrust my hands into his side I will not believe See here the stubbornness of incredulity The same man who had seen Christ raise up Lazarus after three days resting in the grave will not believe he had ability to work the like miracle upon himself Our gracious Saviour thereupon permits his body to be handled by this unbeliever And Thomas sensibly convicted of his infidelity breaks out into this divine ejaculation MY GOD AND MY LORD Prae caeteris dubitavit prae caeteris confessus est said the Father rightly Here was a miraculous generation of belief indeed Faith came not here by hearing but by believing only And by this way of generation of belief in him the Christian Church became the more confirmed and setled in this present Article this trial and experiment of St. Thomas having clearly manifested that Christ assumed not a body in appearance only neither one of a spiritual essence or a new created one but that he rose again in the same numerical body in which he suffered on the Cross and paid the price of our Redemption So that of all that glorious company there was none more fit to testifie the truth of this point then he and to deliver it to the world for his part of this Common Symbol as it was antiently conceived he did And unto this St. Gregory may possibly relate where he tels us saying Dum in Magistro suo palpat vulnera carnis in nobis sanat vulnera incredulitatis whilest Thomas feels the wounds in his masters body he healed the wounds of incredulity in his followers souls And certainly some such experiment as this was exceeding necessary to satisfie the wavering and doubtful soul in so high an Article which by reason of the seeming impossibility and unexampled strangenesse of the matter hath been more called in question and opposed both by Iew and Gentile then any other of the Creed It was indeed a work both of weight and wonder not to be wrought by any which was simply man To man meer natural man it was no lesse impossible to give a resurrection to the dead then to grant a dispensation or indulgence not to die at all How could it be expected that one meerly moral should be of strength sufficient to destroy death and to bury the grave to raise himself first from the jawes of death and receptacles of the grave and by the power thereof to restore poor man to his lost hopes of immortality Most justly may it be presumed that had so great a work been possible to mortal man man being proud enough to attempt great matters would first have took the benefit of his own abilities and so more easily have possessed the incredulous world with the truth and reall being of a resurrection by the powerfull Rhetorick of example In cases where the issue may be doubtfull and the triall dangerous we commonly make tryall and experiment as ignorant Empericks do their potions upon other men But where the issue or event is known and certain likely to yeeld honour to our selves in the undertaking we use not willingly to let others rob us of the glory of it or be beholding unto others for that which we conceive we can do our selves He then which was to be the first-fruits of the resurrection must have something in him more then ordinary something to raise a doubt in his greatest adversaries as in Iosephus a Iew but a very modest one whether it were lawfull or not to call him man to reckon him amongst the natural sons of Adam Tantae ejus res gestae quantas audere vix hominis perficere nullius nisi Dei was spoken in the way of flattery by the Court Historian but may be truly verifyed of the acts of Christ. Those Miracles of his upon true record as they could hardly be attempted by a mortal man so could they be performed by none but a powerfull God For who but he who both in name and power was the God of nature had power not only to suspend some acts of nature but absolutely to over-rule the whole course thereof Of which great works above the ordinary reach of man and nature if we accompt the resurrection as the principall we shall rightly state it It is within the power of Art and the rules of Physick to repaire the ruines of decayed nature and perhaps prolong the number of a few miserable days He only could restore life to the dead who first gave it to the living He only can restore our bodies to our souls in the last day who did at first infuse our souls into our bodies Which miracle before it could be wrought on us he must first work it on himself and thereby raise an hope and be belief in us to expect our own The head being raised gives good assurance to the body that though it do not rise at the same time with it it shall in due time be raised by it What other uses may be made of Christs resurrection we shall see anon This is enough to shew the reasons or necessity thereof by way of preamble to let us see that all the hopes we have of our own resurrection depends upon the certainty and truth of this Which though it be a principle of the Christian faith by consequence of common course to be confessed and not disputed Oportet enim discentem credere as the old rule is yet sithence that the truth thereof hath been much suspected by the Iews and the possibility debated by the Gentiles it will be necessary for the setling of a right beliefe to satisfie the one and refell the other Which done it will be easily seen that there is reason and authority enough to confirm this truth were it not left us for a principle And first beginning with the Iews who first and most maliciously opposed this part of holy Gospel we purpose
it a greater condemnation to our selves than men were aware of So could I wish the like Caution in all others also lest unawares they utterly exclude themselves out of Christianity For as Pope Gregory the first said unto some of the Bishops of his time concerning the Patriarch of Constantinople who had then took unto himself the title of Oecumenical or Vniversal Bishop viz. Si ille universalis or which is the same Catholicus est restat ut vos non sitis Episcopi so may we also say in the present case if we once grant them to be Catholickâ— we thereby do conclude our selves to be no Christians or at best but Hereticks Christian perhaps they have no fancy to be called the name of Christian in most parts of Italy being grown so despicable that Fool and Christian in a manner are become Synonyma Italico Idiomate per Christianum hominem stupidum stolidum solent intelligere as Hospinian tells us from the mouth of one Christian Franken who had lived amongst them Since then they have no minde to be called Christians nor reason to be called Catholicks let us call them as they are by the name of Papists considering their dependance on the Popes decision for all points of Faith And possibly we may gratifie them as much in this as if we did permit them the name of Catholicks For Bellarmine seems very much delighted with the Appellation flattering himself that he can bring in Christ our most blessed Saviour within the Catalogue of Popes and that he hath found a Prophecy in St. Chrysostom to this effect Quandoque nos Papistas vocandos esse That Papist in the times then following should be the stile and title of a true Professor Great pity it is but he and his should have the honor of their own discovery and Papists let them be since the same so pleaseth Now as the Papists make ill use of the name of Catholick so do their opposite faction in the Church of Christ conclude as falsly and erroneously from the title of Holy The Church is called Holy and is called so justly because it trains men up in the ways of godliness because it is so in its most eminent and more noble parts whom God hath sanctified by the Graces of his holy Spirit and finally because redeemed by the blood of Christ to the intent that all the faithful Members of it being by him delivered from the hands of their enemies might serve him without fear in righteousness and holiness all the days of their lives Not holy in the sense of Corah and his factious complices who made all the Congregation holy and all holy alike nor holy in the sense of some Antient and Modern Sectary who fancy to themselves a Church without spot or wrinkle a Church wherein there are no vessels of wrath but election onely and where they finde not such a Church they desert it instantly for fear they should partake of the sins and wickednesses which they observe to be in some Members of it Our Saviour Christ who better knew the temper of his Church than so compares the same in holy Scripture to a threshing floor in which there is both Wheat and chaff and to a fold wherein there are both Sheep and Goats and to a casting net which being thrown into the Sea drew up all kinde of Fishes both good and bad and to an house in which there are not onely vessels of honor as Gold and Silver but also of dishonor and for unclean uses and to a field in which besides the good Seed which the Lord had sown Infelix lolium steriles dominantur avenae the enemy had sowed his Tares In all and every one of which heavenly Parables our Saviour represented unto his Disciples and in them to us the true condition of his Church to the end of the world in which the wicked person and the righteous man are so intermingled that there is no perfection to be looked for here In which erroneous doctrines are so mixt with truth that it can never be so perfectly reserved and purified but errors and corruptions will break out upon it Perplexae sunt istae duae civitates in hoc seculo invicemque permistae saith the great St. Augustine The City of the Lord and the City of Satan are so intermingled in this world that there is little hope to see them separated till the day of judgement Though the foundation of the Church be of precious stones yet there is wood and hay and stubble in her superstructures and those so interwoven and built up together that nothing but a fatal fire is of power to part them I mean the fire of conflagration not of Popish Purgatory Were it not thus we need not pray to God for the good estate of the Church Militant here on Earth but glory as in the Triumphant as they do in Heaven And yet the Church is counted Holy and called Catholick still this intermixture notwithstanding Catholick in regard of time place and persons in and by which the Gospel of our Saviour Christ is professed and propagated Holy secundùm nobiliores ejus partes in reference to the Saints departed and those who are most eminent for grace and piety And it is called Ecclesia una one holy Catholick and Apostolick Church though part thereof be Militant here upon the Earth and part Triumphant in the Heavens The same one Church in this World and in that â—o come The difference is that here it is imperfect mixt of good and bad there perfect and consisting of the righteous onely Accordingly it is determined by St. Augustine Eandem ipsam unam Sanctam Ecclesiam nunc habere malos mixtos tunc non habituram For then and not till then as Ierom Augustine and others do expound the place shall Christ present her to himself a most glorious Church without spot or wrinkle and marry her to himself for ever Till that day come it is not to be hoped or looked for but that many Hypocrites False Teachers and Licentious livers will shroud themselves under the shelter of the Church and pass for Members of it in the eye of men though not accounted such in the sight of God The eye of man can possibly discern no further than the outward shew and mark who joyn themselves to the Congregation to hear the Word of God and receive his Sacraments Dominus novit qui sunt sui The Lord knows onely who are his and who are those occulti intus whose hearts stand fast in his Commandments and carefully possess their Souls in Truth and Godliness And yet some men there are as there have been formerly who fancy to themselves a Church in this present world without spot or wrinkle and dream of such a Field as contains no Tares of such an House as hath no Vessels but of honor sanctified and prepared for the Masters use The Cathari in
if they die in their Baptism in which respect they may be said to communicate with the rest of the faithful Concerning which the same St. Augustine hath most excellently resolved it thus No man in any wise may doubt but that every faithful man is then made partaker of Christs Body and Blood when in Baptism he is made a member of Christ And that he is not deprived of the Communion of that Bread and that Cup although before he either eat of that Bread or drink of that Cup he depart this world being in the unity of Christs Body For he is not deprived from partaking of the benefit of that Sacrament so long as he findeth in himself the things or the res Sacramenti as St. Cyprian calls it which the Sacrament signifieth As for the Union or Communion which the faithful have with one another though that arise upon their first incorporation in Iesus Christ by holy Baptism yet is more compleatly signified and more fully effected by that communion which they have in his Body and Blood And so St. Cyprian and St. Augustine and the rest of the Fathers do declare most plainly St. Cyprian as more antient shall begin the evidence and be the foreman of the Inquest That Christian men are joyned together with the inseparable bonds of charity the Lords Supper doth saith he declare St. Augustine generally first of all outward Sacraments In nullum nomen Religionis seu verum seu falsum coagulari possunt homines nisi aliquo signaculorum vel sacramentorum visibilium consortio colligantur Men saith he cannot be united into any Religion be it true or false unless they be joyned together in the bond of some visible Sacraments What he affirmeth of this particularly we shall see anon first taking with us that of Dionysius an Antient Writer doubtless whosoever he was Sancta illa unius ejusdem panis poculi communis pacifica distributio unitatem illis divinam tanquam unà enutritis praescribit that is to say That holy and peaceable distribution of the same one Bread and that common Cup prescribeth to them which are so fed and nourished together a most heavenly union More elegantly in the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which Pachymeres the Greek Paraphrast doth thus reason for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Because that common feeding together with such joynt consent bringeth to our remembrance the Lords Supper Nor doth the participation of this blessed Sacrament produce an union or communion between them alone who do receive the same together at one time and place but it doth joyn and knit together all the Saints of God how far soever they are distant and scattered far and near upon the face of the Earth For therein we profess that we are all servants in one House and resort all to one Table and feed all of one Spiritual Meat which is the Flesh and Blood of the Lamb of God The Prayers which are used in that holy action being so fitted and contrived in all Antient Liturgies that they extend not unto those onely which do then communicate but that they and the whole Church with them may by the death and merits of Iesus Christ and through Faith in his Blood obtain remission of their sins and all other the benefits of his passion as it is piously expressed in the Liturgy of the Church of England To this St. Ierom gives a clear and most ample testimony who being pressed by Iohn the then Bishop of Ierusalem with whom he had some personal quarrels to go to Rome and witness his integrity by communicating in the face of that Church A qua videmur communione separari from whose communion he had seemed to separate returns this Answer Non necesse esse ire tam longè that it was not needful for him to go so far How so Et hic in Palestina eodem modo ei jungimur In viculo enim Bethlehem Presbyteris ejus quantum in nobis est communion◠sociamur For here saith he in Palestine do we hold communion with that Church and I residing in this Village of Bethlehem am joyned in the communion with the Priests of Rome By which we see that whosoever doth worthily eat the Body of Christ and drink his Blood according to the Institution of our Lord and Saviour communicates thereby with all Christian men of all Countreys and Nations whatsoever and that by vertue and effect of the said Communion they be all knit and joyned together as members of the same one Body in the bonds of love And this is that which is affirmed by St. Augustine Non mirum si absentes adsumus nobis ignoti no smet novimus cum unius corporis membra simus unum habeamus caput una perfundamur gratia uno pane vivamus una incedamus via eadem habitemus is domo It is no wonder saith the Father that being absent we be present together and being not acquainted do know each other considering that we be the Members of one Body have the same one Head an endowment of the self-same Spirit and that we live by one bread go the same way and dwell together in one House To testifie this Communion which they had with each other by vertue of the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper it was a custom of the Primitive and Purest times to send some part of the consecrated Elements unto them which were absent and joyned not with them in that action And sometimes for one Bishop to send to another a Loaf of Bread as a token of consent in the point of Faith and in all brotherly love and concord which he that did receive it if he thought it fitting might consecrate and use at the Ministration Touching the first of these it was well observed by Irenaeus that when any of the Eastern Bishops came to Rome the Popes thereof which preceded Victor did use to send them some of the blessed Sacrament although they differed in the observation of the Feast of Easter whereby a mutual concord and communion was preserved between them Of which he writeth thus to the said Pope Victor Qui fuerunt ante te Presbyteri etiam cum non ita observarent Presbyteris Ecclesiarum of the East he meaneth cum Romam acciderent Eucharistiam mittebant And of the other it is said in those Epistles which Paulinus wrote unto St. Augustine Panem unum quem unanimitatis indicio misimus charitati tuae rogamus ut accipiendo benedicas i. e. The Loaf of Bread which I have sent unto you as a token of unity I beseech you to receive and consecrate See also to what purpose he sent those five Loaves which were designed for the said St. Augustine and Licinius of which he speaketh in the Six and thirtieth Epistle of that Fathers works and that other single Loaf in the Five and thirtieth where it appeareth That the Loaves so sent and consecrated
Monuments of the Catholick Church to signifie the death and not the birth-day of the Saints departed And more particularly we are thus informed by St. Augustine Solius Domini Beati Iohannis dies nativitatis in universo mundo celebratur i. e. That onely the day of the nativity of our Lord and Saviour and of St. Iohn Baptist were celebrated in his time in the Church of Christ Of Christ because there is no doubt but that he was conceived and born without sin original and of the Baptist because sanctified in his Mothers womb as St. Luke saith of him And for particular men it is said by Origen Nemo ex sanctis invenitur hunc diem festum celebrasse c. That never any of the Saints did celebrate the day of their own nativity or of any of their sons and daughters with a Solemn Feast The reason was the same for both because they knew that even the best of them were conceived in sin and brought forth in wickedness and therefore with no comfort could observe that day which the sense of their original corruptions had made so unpleasing But on the other side those men who either knew not or regarded not their own natural sinfulness esteemed that day above all others in their lives as that which gave them their first-being to enjoy their pleasures and they as Pharaoh in the Old Testament and Herod in the New failed not to keep the same as a Publick Festival Soli peccatores super hujusmodi diem laetantur as it is in Origen And hereupon we may infer without doubt or scruple that having the authority of the Scripture and the Churches practise and that practise countenanced by Authors of unquestioned credit not to say any thing further in so clear a case from the concurrent Testimonies of the Antient Fathers That there is such a sin as Birth-sin or Original sin a Natural corruption radicated in the Seed of Adam which makes us subject to the wrath and indignation of God Thus have we seen the Introduction of sin the first act of the Tragedy let us next look upon the second on the Propagation the manner how it is derived from Adam unto our Fore-fathers and from them to us And this we finde to be a matter of greater difficulty St. Augustine in whose time these controversies were first raised by the Pelagians did very abundantly satisfie them in the quod sit of it but when they pressed him with the quo modo how it was propagated from Adam and from one man to another he was then fain to have recourse to Gods secret justice and his unsearchable dispensation Et hoc quidem libentius disco quam doceo ne audeam docere quod nescio as with great modesty and caution he declined the business For whereas sin is the contagion of the soul and the soul oweth its being unto God alone and is not begotten by our parents the Pelagians either would not or could not be answered in their Quere How Children should receive corruption from their Parents not could the good Father give them satisfaction unto their demand But as a Dwarf standing on the shoulders of a Giant may see many things far off not visible to the Giant himself so those of the ensuing times building on the foundations which were laid by Augustine have added to him the solution of such doubts and difficulties as in his time were not discovered Of these some have delivered That the soul contracts contagion from the flesh even in the very act of its first infusion the union of the soul and body nor is it any thing improbable that it should so be We see that the most excellent Wines retain their natural sweetness both of taste and colour as long as they are kept in some curious Vessel but if you put them into foul and musty bottles they lose forthwith their former sweetness participating of the uncleanness of the Vessel in which they are Besides it is a Maxim amongst Philosophers Quod mores animae sequuntur temperamentum corporis That the soul is much byassed and inclined in the actions of it unto the temper of the body and if the equal or unequal temper of the body of man can as it seems incline the minde unto the actual embracing of good or evil then may it also be believed that the corruptions of the flesh may dispose the soul even in the first infusion of it to some habitual inclinations unto sin and wickedness Than which though there may be a more solid there cannot be a more conceiveable Answer But others walking in a more Philosophical way conceive that the accomplishment of the great work of Generation consists not in the introduction of the form onely or in preparing of the matter but in the constituting the whole compositum the whole man as he doth consist both of soul and body And that a man is and may properly be said to beget a man notwithstanding the Creation of his soul by God because that the materials of the Birth do proceed from man and those materials so disposed and actuated by the emplastick vertue of the Seed that they are fitted for the soul and as it were produced unto Animation Which resolution though it be more obscure unto vulgar wits is more insisted on by the learned than the former is and possibly may have more countenance from holy Scripture When God made man it is said of him That he was created after Gods own Image that is to say Invested with an habit of Original Righteousness his understanding clear and his will naturally disposed to the love of God But Adam having by his fall lost all those excellent endowments both of grace and nature begot a Son like to himself And therefore it is said in the fifth of Genesis That he begot a son in his own likeness after his own image and he called his name Seth Though Adam was created after the Image of God and might have still preserved that Image in his whole posterity had he continued in that state wherein God created him yet being faln he could imprint no other Image in the fruit of his Body than that which now remained in him his own Image onely the understanding darkned and the will corrupted and the affections of the soul depraved and vitiated Qualis post lapsum Adam fuit tales etiam filios genuit such as himself was after his Apostasie such and no other were the Children which descended of him â—s Paraeus very well observeth And if it fall out commonly as we see it doth that a crooked Father doth beget a crook-backed Son that if the Father look a squint the Children seldom are right-sighted and that the childe doth not onely inherit the natural deformities but even the bodily diseases of his Parents too It is the less to be admired that they should be the heirs also of those sinful lusts with which their
resurget qui inter impiorum manus occubuit that is to say with a sure Faith I do beleeve it was it seems a part of his Creed and with as great freedom I profess he both beleeved in his heart and confessed with his mouth that I shal rise again at the last day for as much as my Redeemer shall assuredly rise who is to be done to death by ungodly men And this is further to be noted in this Text of Scripture that we no sooner hear of a Creator in Moses than of a Redeemer in Iob no sooner of the death of mankind in Adam but of their restoring to life in Christ. And more than so that though Moses who wrot this was a Iew yet Iob who spake it was a Gentile not of the seed of Iacob though perhaps of Abrahams to shew that both the Iews and Gentiles as well the Gentiles as the Iews were to have their share in the resurrection of Christ Iesus and therefore in due time to expect their own I know that the Socinians Anabaptists and some other Sectaries who are no very good friends to the resurrection do otherwise interpret these words of Iob and will not have them meant of his resurrection but of his restitution to his former glories But for my part I must profess that if the Greek Catena and the authority of the Latine Fathers and the consent of all the Orthodox and learned Writers of these times were to be laid aside as incompetent Iudges I am not able to discern any thing from the Text or Context that the Holy Ghost intended them any other waies than to set forth Iobs constant faith in the resurrection the knowledge that he had of his Redemption from the jaws of death From Moses pass we to the Prophets to the Psalmist first Thou turnest man unto destruction and sayest Return ye children of men or come again ye children of men as the old Translation Thou turnest men unto destruction there we have their death he calls them to return again there is there resurrection And this appears yet further by the following words Thou carriest them away as with a flood they are as a sleep and if they be but as a sleep they shall be wakened in due time at the sounding of the last Trump without all peradventure I know indeed this Psalm doth bear the Title of the Prayer of Moses but whether made by him or by David or some other in his name is not yet resolved It is sufficient to this purpose that it passeth amongst Davids Psalms as a distinct and separate body from the works of Moses On forwards to Isaiah the Evangelical Prophet who seems to look on Christ as if gone before him Thy dead men saith he shall live together with my dead body shall they arise Awake and sing yee that dwel in dust for thy dew is as the dew of herbs and the earth shall cast out the dead And parallel to this in another place When yee be old your heart shall rejoyce and your bones shall flourish like herbs and then the hand of the Lord shall be known towards his Servants and his indignation towards his Enemies In both these Texts we find a Resurrection of the dead effected by the raising of the body of Christ and in some part with it a resurrection like to that of men which do wake from sleep like that of herbs which though they creep into the earth in the time of Winter shall again re-flourish in the Spring And in the last we have not onely a pure evidence for a resurrection but for the Day of Iudgement which shall follow on it wherein the righteous Judge shall distribute his rewards and punishments his hand of mercy towards his Servants but wrath and indignation upon all his Enemies St. Hierom so interpreteth the Prophets meaning and parallels this last place with another of the Prophet Daniel in which it is affirmed expresly that they which sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake some to everlasting life and some to shame and everlasting contempt Thereupon he doth thus infer Omnes igitur Martyres sancti viri qui pro Christo fuderunt sanguinem quorum tota vita fuit Martyrium resurgent evigilabunt atque laudabunt Deum Creatorem suum qui nunc habitant in pulvere de quibus in Daniele scriptum est c. Add to this rank of Proofs those several passages in which God calls himself the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Iacob and the illation made from thence by our Lord and Saviour to prove the very point which we have in hand Concerning the resurrection of the dead have you not read saith he that which was spoken to you of God saying I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob God is not the God of the dead but of the living Here is authority enough we need seek no further Authority enough to perswade us this that the Patriarchs before the coming of our Saviour were certain of their resurrection to eternal life that they were well assured of this that God would recompence their faith and reward their piety by making death the way onely to a greater happiness And this we finde to be a truth so generally received amongst the Iews even in the most declining time of their Church and State that none but the Sadduces who also did deny the being of Angels and of Spirits also did make question of it who for this cause are branded every where in the Gospel with this mark upon them that they said there is no resurrection as Mat. 22.23 Mark 12.19 Luk. 20 27. Act. 23.8 just as it followeth on the mention of Ieroboham the son of Nebat that he made Israel to sin Now to these Positive Texts of Scripture and such as have their being and foundation onely in the Old Testament we will adde such as are presented in the New and those not barely positive and peremptory as the rest before but such as seem to have a great measure of rationality in them and to be logically inferred upon very sound premises And of this kind we meet with divers in St. Pauls Epistle to the Corinthians amongst whom many doubtful souls had called in question the resurrection of the body To satisfie their doubts and remove their scruples the Apostle grounds himself on this that CHRIST was risen If CHRIST be risen from the dead how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead for if there be no resurrection of the dead then is CHRIST not risen Considering therefore we have proved that CHRIST is risen and that by the testimony of no fewer than five hundred brethren at one time besides the other arguments which have been and may be further alleged to confirm that truth it followeth by the reason of the Apostle that there is a
of those imperfections it may be said that then they are not raised in the self-same bodies To this we have the resolution of St. Augustine also affirming That in that glorious day the substance of their bodies shall continue as before it was but the deformities and imperfections shall be taken away Corporibus ergo istis naturae servabitur vitia autem detrahentur as the Father hath it A resolution which St. Paul doth seem to favor saying That the body shall be raised in glory though it be sown in dishonor as do his following words the former viz. Though it be sown in weakness in the weakness of old age or infancy shall be raised in power For neither is it likely that infancy being imperfection and old age corruption can stand with the estate of a glorified body or that our Lord which made the blinde to see and the lame to go which came to seek his grace on Earth will not much rather heal them of their imperfections whom he vouchsafeth to admit to the glories of Heaven A glorious place is fit for none but glorified bodies And so far glorified shall the bodies of Gods servants be as to be raised in power whereby they shall be freed from all wants and weaknesses in incorruption which shall make them free both from death and sickness in glory which shall make them shine with a greater splendor than any of the Stars of Heaven as did the face of Moses in the Book of Exodus and that of Stephen the Proto-martyr in the Book of the Acts and lastly in agility by which they shall be like the Angels mounting as on the wings of an Eagle to meet the Lord JESUS at his coming In reference unto these spiritual qualities St. Paul affirms That it was sown a natural body but shall be raised a spiritual body Natural for the substance still spiritual for the qualities and endowments of it Spiritualia post Resurrectionem erunt corpora non quia corpora esse desistunt sed quia spiritu vivificante subsistunt as St. Augustine hath it Another Quere yet remaineth which had been moved it seems in St. Augustines time by some whose curiosity did exceed their judgments The Question was Whether the woman should be raised to eternal glory in her own sex or the more noble sex of man Alas poor Souls what monstrous crime had they committed that they should be excluded from the Kingdom of Heaven Of what strange errors and mistakes must guilty-nature be accused when she framed that sex or rather God when he created it at first out of Adams side by which it is supposed uncapable of immortality Yes certainly say they for it seemeth to us that Christ hath so adjudged it saying That in the Resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage And if no marriage then no woman the woman being therefore made that she might be married Vain men why do they talk so idly in the things of God! Nuptias negavit dominus in resurrectione futuras non foeminas as St. Augustine noteth The Lord hath not excluded women from the Resurrection onely in answer to a captious Question which the Saduces made he returned them this That in that day there should be neither care nor notice taken of those worldly matters This is the sum and substance of our Saviours Answer and this is nothing to the prejudice of the Sex or Persons Nor need we doubt but as that Sex have done most acceptable service to the Lord their God either in keeping constantly the faith of wedlock or in preserving carefully an unspotted chastity or suffering resolutely for the testimony of the Faith and Gospel so shall they also in those bodies receive the crown reserved for so great obedience But what need more be said of this needless Quere which Christ our Saviour hath prevented and resolved already Who therefore first appeared to those of the Female Sex that making them the publishers of his Resurrection he might assure them of their own Qui ergo utrumque sexum instituit utrumque restituet God saith St. Augustine as he made both Sexes will restore both Sexes and raise up both in their own proper and original being unto Life eternal Other particulars of the manner of this Resurrection as the dreadful terror of the day the sounding of the Trump the conflagration of the world and the like to these have either been already handled or else will fall within the compass of the following Article That which remains to be considered at the present will be matters practical first in relation to our friends and then in reference to our selves and our own affairs First in relation to our Friends That we bemoan not their departure with too great extremity or sorrow for them without hope as if lost for ever Were it indeed so irrecoverable a losâ— that either their bodies were for ever banished from their souls or that their souls did die and perish with their bodies it were a misery to which no sorrow could be equal But being so assured of a Resurrection it is not to be supposed of them which die in the Lord that they are either lost to themselves or us They onely have withdrawn themselves for a certain season from the vanity and troubles of this present world and shall return at last unto life again both to our comfort and their glory In this respect it was the antient custom of the Church of Greece and is not yet worn out of use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To set boyled Corn before the Singers of the holy Hymns which are accustomed to be sung at the commemoration of the dead who sleep in Christ. And this they do to manifest their hopes in the Resurrection of which the Corn is so significant an embleme as before was shewn And to say truth Death if considered rightly is the gate of life and of a life not to be shaken with adversities or subject unto change of fortune Hanc Deus fidei praestat gratiam ut mors quam vitae constat esse contrariam instrumentum foret per quod in vitam transiretur it is St. Augustines note But what need Augustine be alleged when we may hear the same of the antient Druides of whom the Poet tells us that they held this Paradox Longae canitis si cognita vitae Mors media est That death was but the middle way to a longer life If then our Ancestors in those dark times of ignorance when they knew not Christ conceived no otherwise of death and the terrors of it than as the way unto a life of more excellent nature then certainly a nobler and moâ—e chearful constancy must â—eeds be looked for at our hands who are not onely more assured of the immortality of the soul which they blindly guessed at but of the Resurrection of the Body also which they never heard of The next consideration doth concern
to attone the difference The generall resolution is for this is neither time nor place to discusse it fully that the whole day amongst the Iews from sun to sun which the Astronomers call the artificial day was commonly divided into four quaternions of houres of which the first three had the name of the third houre the second three of the sixt hour the third three of the ninth hour and the last three of the evening or sun set Then that the sixt hour beginning where the third did end the same thing may be said to be done in the end of the third houre which was done in the beginning of the sixt inchoative in the sixt hour but completive in the third And so our Saviour may be said to be crucifyed in the third hour as St. Marke relateth that is to say in the end of the third houre complete and about the sixt hour as St. Iohn delivereth it that is to say about the sixt hour coming on Others conceive that Marke relates unto the time when Pilate did passe sentence on him and deliver him over to be crucifyed which was in the third hour of the day and that Iohn speaks as to the execution of the sentence which was done in the sixt And if this could agree with the other cicumstances it were undoubtedly the best and of most probability especially considering what good ground it hath from Ignatius who lived in the times of the Apostles By whom the whole story of the Passion is thus distributed In the third hour Christ was condemned by Pontius Pilate crucifyed in the sixt died in the ninâ—h and was buried before sunset And unto either of these two I should sooner yeild then hearken to the new devise of Daniel Heinsius who will have the third hour mentioned in St. Marks Gospell to be the third hour of our Saviours crucifying with which the circumstances of the text can no way agree and yet far sooner unto him then to an eminent Divine of great place and name affirming openly in a Sermon before the King on the credit of some old Greek copies that the text in Iohn had been corrupted Lesse difficulty far there is about the place of the Passion in which all Euangelists do agree in meaning though they use divers words St. Matthew Marke and Iohn do call it Golgatha according to the Hebrew name but St. Luke cals it Calvarie 23.33 according to that Hebrew name translated and made intelligible to the ears of the Romans In every one it signifieth the place of a skul and is so translated in our Bibles Matth. 27.33 Mark 15.22 Ioh 19.17 A name bestowed upon it as the Fathers say in regard that Adam was there buryed and his skul found there by the people many Ages after And though I dare not swear this for a Canonical truth yet certainly it hath as good grounds to stand upon as an old Tradition can confer For sure I am that such a Tradition there was in the time of Origen one of the most antient Christian writers whose works are extant Venit ad me talis traditio quod corpus Adae primi hominis sepultum est ibi ubi crucifixus est Christus There is a Tradition saith he that the body of the first man Adam was there buried where Christ was crucified Tertullian doth affirm the same amongst his verses So doth St. Basil also on Levit. 5. Epiphanius contra haereses n. 46. Chrysostom in his 84. Homilie on Iohn St. Augustine in the 71. Sermon inscribed de Tempore St. Ambrose Epistola 3. lib. 5. Hierom on Matth. 27. Theophylact in his Comments on the four Evangelists Nor do they only thus unanimously report the said Tradition but they give their reason for it too viz. that because all men dyed in Adam so by Christ all might be also made alive that so where sin took its beginning it should finde destruction and finally that ut super Adae tumulum sanguis Christi stillaret which was Hieroms conceit that so the bloud of Christ might fall upon Adams tomb And I remember I have seen a picture in an old peece of hanging in the stals at Westminster for we have our Testes fenestras too especially in such a case as this as well as Campian in a greater in which we finde the souldier piercing Christs side with his lance water and bloud issuing from the side â—o pierced and Adam starting out of his grave with a cup in his hand to receive the bloud Which fancy as it was conform to the old Tradition so did it hand somely express a good peece of Divinity the meaning of it being this that as Adam being the root of all mankinde had forfeited for himself and his posterity all those most excellent endowments of grace and nature which God had given him at the first so now he did lay hold upon Salvation for himself and his that all who were and were to be descended of him should have their part in the redemption of the World by the bloud of Christ. And this I call a piece of good Divinity howsoever expressed by reason that the universality of Redemption by our Saviours death was not alone the Doctrine of the Primitive times but is the genuine and confirmed doctrine of this Church of England which teacheth us to pray unto God the Son as the Redeemer of the world and every one of us to believe in the same God the Son who hath redeemed me and all mankinde and finally to pray to God to have mercy upon all men even upon all Iews Turks Infidels and Hereticks that they may all be saved amongst the remnant of true Israelites and be made one fold under the same one Shepheard IESVS CHRIST our Lord. No truth more rightly stated more piously applyed nor more fully explicated It is now time we lay our Saviour in his Grave being the last degree of his humiliation taking along with us such preparatives as lead unto the same in the holy Gospel in which the first passage which we meet with is how some devout people repaired to Pilate and begged the body of their Lord that they might entomb it others in reference to the great festival ensuing had desired of him that their legs might be broken and that they might be taken away to the end that their bodies might not remain upon the Cross on the Sabbath-day Which suit being granted and that the souldiers coming to Christ found him dead already they omitted the breaking of his legs for so had God disposed who before had signified that a bone of him should not be broken but yet to make sure work it seemed good to one of them to pierce his side with a spear and forthwith saith the Text came out bloud and water Ioh. 19.34 On this St. Augustine makes this gloss that by the bloud and water issuing from the side of CHRIST we are to understand the two
Sacraments of Baptism and the Lords Supper commanded and ordained by him De latere pendentis in Cruce Lancen percusso Sacramenta Ecclesiae profluxerunt as his words are briefly and hereunto the Fathers and most writers since have inclined generally This was the last remakable thing remembred in our Saviours passion the draining of his bloud to the last drop as it were which though it could not yet add to his former sufferings being dead before yet served it as a confirmation of his death in the eyes of those who otherwise might have called the realty thereof in question and was a certain note to discern him by after he was risen again from death to life as in the story of St. Thomas No further difficulty that I know of doth occur in this the pleading of this Text by the Canonists of the Church of Rome in maintenance of their mingling water with the wine in the blessed Sacrament being so silly a device that it deserves not to be honoured with a confutation But in the other passage which the Gospel mentioneth touching the not breaking of his bones perhaps a question may be made by some captious men how it can possibly agree with another text of holy Scripture where it is said This is my body which is broken for you and to what use the breaking of the bread doth serve in the holy Eucharist it not to signifie the breaking of our Saviours body But the answer unto this is easie For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the word used by St. Paul in the Original doth not only signifie to break in peeces though Rob. Stephanus in his Thesaurus expound the verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by no other word then the Latine Frango Sometimes it signifieth to strain as in that of Aristotle going up an hill 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the knees are bent or strained backwards and in that also of Hippocrates where he observeth that sometimes in holding the hand forth out-right 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the bowing of the joynt or elbow is strained Sometimes it signifieth to cut Hesychius an old Grammarian expounding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is cut and Theophrastus calling the cuttings of vines 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with whom Suidas Phavorinus and the Scholiast on Aristophanes do agree also And in this sense the bread is broken in the Sacrament although cut with knives there being mention of a sacred knife in St. Chrysostoms Liturgie which was employed unto no other use then that of the holy Sacrament And last of all it signifieth sometimes the tearing or bruising of the fleshy parts when the bones are neither broken nor so much as touched which is most clearly witnessed by Hippocrates the Father of all learned Physick giving this for a Rule of Art that the breaking of any of the bones is less dangerous then where the bones are not broken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but the veins and sinews adjoining are on every side bruised So that although the bones of our Saviour were not broken that he might in all things be agreeable to the Paschal lamb yet were his joints strained to the utmost when he was stretched upon the Cross his flesh most cruelly cut and torn with scourges his veins and sinews miserably bruised and broken with those outward torments All which as they are signified by this one word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render broken so doth it very well agree with that meaning of the word broken in our Engish Idiom As when we say a man hath got a broken skin or broken head when the flesh is only bruised and the skin but rased And hereto Beza doth agree in his Annotations on that Text By the word broken in St. Paul is designed saith he the very manner of Christs death his body being torn bruised and even broken with most cruel torments though his legs were not broken as the theeves were so that the word hath a marvellous express signification making the figure to agree so fully with the thing it self the breaking of the bread representing to us the very death and passion of our Saviour Christ. Now go we on Pilates leave being thus obtained and the certainty of Christs death assured by this second murder they hasten all they could unto his funeral to which was used small preparation but less pomp by far It was the day of preparation to the following festival as two of the Evangelists do affirm expressely the Friday or good Friday as we call it now in which it was not lawful for the Iews to do any work A garden there was hard at hand and in the garden a new sepulchre in which never man was laid before a Virgin-sepulchre for the son of a Virgin-mother a Garden to receive that great pledge of death which first found entrance by a Garden So that the labour was not much to take down his body and carry it to the next spot of ground and there intomb it No further cost bestowed upon his funerals who spared not his most pretious bloud to procure our happiness but a mixture made of Myrrhe and Aloes and had not Nicodemus been more valiant now then when he used to come unto his Saviour as it were by stealth he had wanted that And this was done after the custom of the Iews whose manner it was to bestow that charge upon their dead in sign of their belief of the Resurrection unto life eternal not out of any thought they had of his so speedy a Resurrection at the three days end though he had often told them that he would so do So far were they from looking to behold him again on the first day of the week then following that they did all they could to lay him up fast enough till the day of judgement and to that end not only wrapped him up in sear-cloaths for such the linnen clothes were which they wrapped him in Ioh. 19.40 but rolled a great stone to the dore of the sepulchre to make sure work with him God certainly had so disposed it in his infinite wisdome to make the miracle of his Resurrection the more considerable and convincing both with Iews and Gentiles This is the sum of those particulars that concern Christs burial Which though it seem of no more moment then as a confirmation of an unfaigned death and a preparative to his Resurrection and consequently may be thought unnecessary to be here added in the Creed yet upon further search into it we shall finde it otherwise Our Saviour had not overcome death if he had not dyed nor got the victory of the grave had he not been buryed His being restored unto life within three days of his death was a very great and signal miracle but not so great as that which had been acted before on Lazarus who had lain four days in the earth and began to putrefie His lying in the grave was the way