a sence very different from the Modern vulgar Notion Nor does the Judgment even of E. the 4th's own Parliament in the least favour the late King however if it did later Parliaments in the time of H. 7. have taken away all colour from such pretences That the Eldest Son even of the most Rightful Regnant King was not King upon the Death of his Father without a Parliamentary Settlement of the Crown upon him before his Fathers Death nor with it till the States of the Kingdom had actually received and recognized such Son will appear beyond contradiction And that the Eldest Son 's Right was only a Right to be declared King unless he was unfit to Reign or the exigencies of the Publick required the advancing some other Person of the Royal Family If a deserving Person was kept back or one so judged by his own Party or the Nation when he prevailed the least Complement they could make him was that of Right he ought to have been King before he was King but farther they never extended their Transports of Loyalty nor ever Authoritatively declared That he had such a Right as made him King while another possessed the Throne And till he got Possession it was never declared that he had Right Nor does the setting one aside before his coming to Possession or after make any difference in the Nature of the Right in question And I shall put it beyond Controversie that whenever a worthy Person of the Saxon Royal Family especially of that branch which for some Successions had been settled as the Regnant Family was solemnly recognized by the States of the Kingdom upon the Death or disability of a Person who stood forwarder in the Royal Line the Person so recognized became King de Jure and no other Person had any manner of Right unless such as was in Abeiance or in the Clouds and indeed no where till Possession brought it to Light and Being 3. Fully to shew this Gentleman his mistakes upon the Statute 11 H. 7. it will be requisite to transcribe the whole which is as follows The King our Sovereign Lord calling to remembrance the Duty of Allegiance of his Subjects of this his Realm and that by reason of the same they are bound to serve their Prince and Sovereign Lord for the time being in his Wars for the Defence of him and the Land against every Rebellion Power and Might reared against him and with him to enter and abide in Service in Battle if case so require That for the same Service what Fortune ever fall by chance in the same Battle against the Mind and Will of the Prince as in this Land some time passed hath been seen that it is not reasonable but against all Laws Reason and good Conscience that the said Subjects going with their Sovereign Lord in Wars attending upon him in his Person or being in other places by his Commandment within this Land or without any thing should leese or forfeit for doing their true Duty and Service of Allegiance It be therefore Ordained Enacted and Established by the King our Sovereign Lord by the Advice and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled and by the Authority of the same That from henceforth no manner of Person or Persons whatsoever he or they be that attend upon the King and Sovereign Lord of this Land for the time being in his Person and do him true and faithful Service of Allegiance in the same or be in other places by his Commandment in the Wars within this Land or without that for the said deed and true Duty of Allegiance he or they be in no wise Convict or Attaint of High-Treason or of other Offences for that Cause by Act of Parliament or otherwise by any Proces of Law whereby he or any of them shall now forfeit Life Lands Tenements Rents Possessions Hereditaments Goods Chatals or any other things but to be for that Deed and Service utterly discharged of any Vexation Trouble or Loss And if any Act or Acts or other Proces of the Law hereafter thereupon for the same happen to be made contrary to this Ordinance that then that Act or Acts or other Proces of Law whatsoever they shall be stand and be utterly void Provided always that no Person or Persons shall take any Benefit or Advantage by this Act which shall hereafter decline from his or their said Allegiance Here 't is observable 1st That whereas this Gentleman absurdly supposes that it is Treason to engage to fight against one whom one may lawfully kill and that one may enter into a contrary Allegiance but may not do any voluntary act of Allegiance it is evident by the Words that if Swearing Allegiance is safe so are all voluntary Acts of Allegiance for the Swearing is not expresly provided for by that Act or any otherwise than as it is a part of the Duty and Service of Allegiance to the Sovereign Lordâ— but if Associating for the Defence of the King's Person and Right be part of the Allegiance due then that is as much provided for as the Oath is and consequently this Gentleman must grant that the Statute 11 H. 7. indemnifies the present Associators That this is part of the Allegiance due appears by the Common-Law Oath of Allegiance affirmed in the Laws of W. 1. and continued down to this day in Substance and Obligation according to which all the Freemen of the whole Kingdom are to affirm with a League or Association and Oath that within and without the whole Kingdom of England they will be faithful to their Lord the King preserve his Lands and Honors with all fidelity together with his Person and defend them against Enemies and Strangers And in an other Chapter of that Law after Provision that all Freemen shall enjoy their Estates as had been before enacted and granted in a Common-Council of the whole Kingdom it adds We also enact and firmly enjoyn that all Freemen of the whole Kingdom be sworn Brethren or Associators to defend our Monarchy and our Kingdom according to their Strength and Faculties and manfully keep the Peace and preserve the Dignity of our Crown entire and constantly to maintain Right and just Judgment by all means according to their power without fraud and without delay What is this but an Association to defend the King and Kingdom against any Person whatever and by consequence to declare that the King for the time being is the only Rightful King Since his Person Crown and Dignity is to be preserved by all means in their Power This part of the Common-Law is affirmed by the Statute 11 H. 7. declaring it the Duty of Allegiance to defend the King and Land against every Power and Might and therefore as well against Pretenders to Title as others 2. This Act expresly indemnifies for voluntary Acts of Allegiance against the mind and will of the Prince 3. It can by no means have
his death his Son Edward having less to answer for and success to recommend him to the People upon more specious pretences succeeded H. 6. by a manifest election Tho' he and his Father had upon the agreement established in Parliament sworn to be true to H. 6. during his life or till he should freely quit his Crown the dread of their Arms got a liberty for 'em to enter their protestations that this was upon the express condition that the King performed his part but if he should compass or imagine the death or destruction of the Duke or his Blood should forfeit the Crown And indeed it seems that the first acts of Hostility after this agreement were committed by the Queen and others of the King's Party who in attempting to rescue him out of the custody of the Duke of York put an end to his pretensions with his life But his Son Edward having routed the Earl of Pembroke and other the King 's Loyal Subjects in a Battle near Ludlow march'd up to London where he was received with joy on the 28 th of February Then he calls a Great Council of Peers to whom he opens his claim upon the King's breach of the Articles After the Lords had considered of the matter they determined by Authority of the said Council that forasmuch as King Henry contrary to his Oath Honor and Agreement had violated and infringed the order taken and enacted in the last Parliament and also because he was insufficient to rule the Realms and unprofitable to the Common-wealth he was therefore by the aforesaid Authority deprived and dejected of all Kingly Honor and Regal Sovereignty and incontinent Edward Earl of March was by the Lords in the said Counseil assembled named elected and admitted for King and Governour of the Realm After this the same day the consent of the common People was ask'd in St. John's Fields where a great number were assembled The Lords being informed of the consent of the Commons acquainted the said Earl with their election and admission and the loving assent of the Commons The next day he went to Westminster where his Title and Claim to the Crown was declared 1. As Son and Heir to Richard his Father right Inheriter to the same 2. By Authority of Parliament 3. And forfeiture committed by H. 6. The Commons being again demanded if they would admit and take the said Earl as their Sovereign Lord all with one voice cried yea yea which agreement concluded he was then proclaimed Here it is observable 1. That Edward did not claim upon any Title Prior to the Settlement in Parliament 39 H. 6. and therefore in effect claimed as adopted Heir to H. 6. as H. 2. had been to King Stephen 2. He alledges against H. 6. forfeiture by breach of the Contrac̄t establish'd in Parliament and a Moral incapacity in him to Reign 3. Notwithstanding this he does not set up as King before a solemn judgment pronounced against H. 6. and in favour of him and the formallity of a publick election 4. It appears that tho' he came to London and was possessed of the head and strength of the Kingdom and Hen. 6. had in effect abdicated he who according to the modern notion of the Successionaries should have been King upon the death of his Father was not King nor so reputed by his own Party till all those accustomed ceremonies were over the last of which was on the 4 th of March Now if it shall prove that in the judgment of King Edward's own Parliament his right ot turn H. 6. out of Possession was founded in H. 6 ths breach of the Contract establish'd in Parliament that E. 4. was not King till the 4 th of March and that no Act committed against him before that day was Treason nor was there or could there be Treason against his Father who never had been King then it will appear that some consent or election of the States or People was essentially necessary to make a King even of one who had or at least was suppos'd to have all the right that descent could give him and that the other King must have forfeited or ceased to be King before such right could be duely claimed But 1. The Act of Parliament declaring E. 4 ths Title is held to be a restitution to the same so that the very Title or Right was as if it had been extinguished 2. It is in that Act particularly insisted on that H. 6. had declared before witness that he would not keep the contract established in Parliament and is expresly charged with the breach of it 3. E. 4. is adjudged to have been in lawful Possession of the Realm upon the 4 th of March and on that day lawfully seized and possessed But not before and then the exercice of the Royal Estate by E. 4. and amotion of H. 6. are declared rightwise lawful and according to the Laws and Customs of the Realm 4. That Act says the Crown ought to have descended to Edward's Ancestor and after his decease to the next Heir of Blood if the same Usurpation had not been committed Wherefore according to that Act the Crown did not descend to any one of Mortimer's Family while the Person who they supposed to have usurped the Crown or any descendant from him kept Possession 5. Edward's Parliament held his Father to have been no more than Duke of York and tho' in the Act attainting H. 6. he is charged with the Murder of Richard Duke of York the first Treasonable Fact in H. 6. and others is laid in levying War on the 29 th of March and imagining to depose their Sovereign Lord Edward who had been declared King on the 4 th of that March and H. 6 ths forfeiture is laid in acting against his Faith and Allegiance to his Sovereign Lord whereby they plainly shew that as there could be no Treason against the Duke of York because he was never received for Sovereign Lord neither could there have been any against E. 4. unless he had been so received 6. If any now will own his present Majesty to have right by Law and yet refuse to declare him rightful King They go no farther then E. 4. and his Party did even after his Possession in relation to such as they held to be Usurpers And should such Men add that neither has the late King any right as it is probable that they mean that he has no right making him King they therein would still keep to that President But then if they would exactly follow that they must believe that the late King cannot be duely restored to the Regal Dignity till he should be received by the election or consent of the States or Body of the People nor could that be rightfully done unless his present Majesty in a legal sense ceased to be King before such election or consent Thus far I am sure they cannot
come without a manifest departure from their avowed Principles and therefore to keep to them they must give up the only colourable Authority for their notion of King de jure and de facto And they must yield that there is not the least shadow of pretence from what was held in those times that there was a King of right at the very time that an other was in fact it going no farther than that the Person who was King ought not to have been King but while he was King the other was none 7. The judgment of E. 4 ths first Parliament whatever hard names they gave that Family on which they trampled was so far from being an Authority as has been pretended against the receiving his present Majesty upon the late King's breach of the Original or Common-Law Contract confirmed by several declaratory Statutes of the Kingdom and the solemn Oaths of our Kings that it is express for the eviction and amotion of one King upon his breach of a contract establish'd in Parliament and the setting up an other by an election And it is observable that the Act 1º E. 4. which confirms several judicial and other Acts of such as it calls Kings only in fact says other than by Authority of any Parliament holden in their times plainly admitting that Authority to be sufficient in it self H. 6. coming again into Power because of a Possession with such a consent of the People as made E. 4. King was formally again elected at the Tower and in H. 7 ths time was adjudged to have had his attainder purged by his re-adeption of Power which seems not to have been till he had been re-elected Then H. 6. calls a Parliament where he in his turn attaints the Adherents of E. 4. and as we are to believe himself but the Record of that having been cancelled and the Rolls loss'd it appears not whether it was for any Act committed before H. 6 ths re-adeption of Power The Tide again turning for E. 4. all the Acts of that Parliament are reversed and declared or made void from the time that he had been declared he was held to have continued the Possession of the Regal Dignity tho' with-held from the exercice of the Power and therefore H. 6. from the first admission of E. 4. to the Crown was accounted no King and his Parliament to be but a pretenced Parliament E. 4 ths usage of H. 6. was repaid to his Sons by their Uncle R. 3. some will have it that he made them away as indeed is intimated in the Act attainting R. 3. but 't is certain that they were bastardized in a Convention whose Acts were by Parliament after Richard was admitted King declared for truth and not to be doubted and there are Authorities to induce the Belief that Edward's Sons were really Bastards by reason of the Father's pre-contract however the Convention declared that they were not fit to Reign because they were Infants and their Mother ignoble and married clandestinely without the knowing and assent of the Lords George Duke of Clarence the next Brother to E. 4. having been attainted in a Parliament of E. 4. they having singular confidence in Richard's particular merit have chosen in all that in them is and by that their certain writing choose him their King and Sovereign Lord to whom they know of certain it appertaineth of Inheritance to be chosen And observing that tho' the Learned in the Laws and Customs know his Title to be good the most part of the People is not sufficiently learned in the Laws and Customs they declare that the Court of Parliament is of such Authority and the People of this Land of such a disposition as experience teacheth that Manifestation and Declaration of any Truth or Right made by the three States of the Realm assembled in Parliament and by Authority of the same maketh before all other things most faith and certain quieting of mens minds and removing the occasion of doubts and seditious language Therefore by the Authority of that Parliament it is pronounced and declared that their Sovereign Lord the King was and is the very undoubted King as well by right of Consanguinity and Inheritance as by lawful Election Consecration and Coronation And they Enact Establish Pronounce Decree and Declare Edward the King 's eldest Son Heir Apparent to him and his Heirs of his Body Any Man who compares that Act at large with the former Presidents must see that it was penn'd with great Wisdom and regard to the Constitution of the Monarchy And tho' out of an usual complement to the prevailing side R. 3. has generally been represented as a Monster in Person and Nature the learned Buck has made it doubtful which was the most deserving in all things R. 3. or H. 7. Certain it is that tho' the Crown had by Authority of Parliament been settled in remainder after H. 6. upon Duke Richard and his Heirs and that Duke's Grand-daughter was alive and marriageable in the Reign of R. 3. her suppos'd Right gave him no disturbance and his Possession was very quiet till he disobliged the Duke of Bucks who was the great Instrument in setting him up by rejecting his Claim to be High-Constable of England which was an Authority dangerous to be trusted in the hands of so popular a Man nor could the Duke and his Faction expect to succeed in their conspiracy without the support of French Forces and accordingly applied themselves to Henry Earl of Richmond afterwards H. 7. with whom the Duke of Brittany had for some years kept even E. 4. in awe Henry was glad of the opportunity and to strengthen his Interest agrees with some of his Party to marry the Daughter of E. 4. but was far from making any claim in her right It is very probable that one of E. 4 ths Sons was then alive be that as it will as appears by the Statutes 1 H. 7. cited above his Parliament held that he landed with Title and R. 3. being deserted and slain in the Field of Battle that opposition to Henry was by Authority of Parliament adjudged Treason against the Sovereign Lord of this Land and H. 7 th was held to have recovered his right After this when H. 7. meets his first Parliament he with his own Mouth tells the Commons in full Parliament that his accession to the Right and Crown of England was as well by just Title of Inheritance as by God's true judgment in giving him the victory over his enemy in the Field In which bating the Settlement in the time of the Confessor H. 7. claim'd as W. 1. did by the Inheritance of consanguinity and that Success which gave him the preference before others of the same Blood especially since that enemy whom he subdued was held to be an Usurper This 't is evident that he was accounted before H. 7. Landed But if
been intended or implied by that Statute that there was or could be any other King besides the King for the time being For 1. To take it in that sense would be to make the Statute fight against it self and not only to admit that he were but a King not the King but to require the Subjects to fight for and against one and the same Person 4. H. 7. And his Parliament could not be thought to admit that he was an Usurper or a King contrary to Law or Right But H. 7. certainly intended to provide for the indempnity of those that should pay Allegiance to him as well as of those that should pay Allegiance to future Kings for the time being And indeed upon some of the Words it may seem doubtful whether the enacting part was intended to reach beyond his time and whether any other Sovereign Lord for the time being was intended but he who was at that time But if in relation to the King whose Parliament passed this Act the King for the time being was supposed to be the only Lawful and Rightful King it must be so taken in relation to all other Kings for the time being if either the enacting Part or the Preamble extend to ' em 5. If this Act should carry a plain implication that some other besides the King for the time being was the King of Right this would be so far from being for the Security of the King for the time being as must have been then intended as well as the indemnity of his Subjects that it must needs have the like effect with their Discourses who will have it that the present Government is not Rightful but yet that a sort of Allegiance is due to it because of God's Authority tho' contrary to Right Whenever these Men speak out it appears that they allow no Authority to the King for the time being but what is derived from the Tacit or implied Consent of their King of Right But this Jesuitism was not thought of at the making of that Statute 6. I desire to know what Person besides H. 7. was so much as imagined to be Rightful King or Queen of England when that Act was made However whether it can be thought that in the Judgment of that Parliament any Person besides H. 7. had Right to the Crown after a former Parliament had Ordained Established and Enacted that the Inheritance of the Crown of England and France should be stand and remain in King H. 7. and the Heirs of his Body and in no other Person That they held this Settlement to have been duely and righfully made and that without any relation to his marrying the supposed Heiress to the Crown appears by three other Acts of the same Parliament One of which attaints R. 3. for traiterously conspiring against their Sovereign Leige Lord H. 7. Another indempnifies Men for Trespass or taking Goods in maintenance of the Title of H. 7. for the time that his Banner was displaied against Richard late Duke of Gloucester Usurper of the Realm Another goes farther and indemnifies them who came from beyond-Sea with H. 7. or were in Sanctuary or Hidel for his Quarrel and Title and speaks of the Battle against his Enemies in recovering and obtaining his Just Title and Right to his Realm of England Wherein H. 7 ths Right and R. 3 ds Usurpation consisted shall afterwards be considered 7. When the Parliament 11 H. 7. speaks only of the King or Prince or Sovereign Lord for the time being without giving any discription whereby it should be known who is the Prince unless what relates particularly to H. 7. It must be presumed that no King is intended but he that was the Sovereign or Leige Lord in the Eye and Reputation of Law which as appears by the Case of R. 3. an Usurper continuing so was not then taken to be But who ever was in the Possession of the Throne without Usurpation was always lawful and rightful King 8. It cannot be thought the Parliament 11 H. 7. would have made an Act directly contrary to three others of the same Reign but they would have expresly repealed the former Acts or have offered some reason to palliate or colour their Proceedings to the contrary But take the Statute of 11 H. 7. in this Lawyers Sense only with an Exception that as to the Matter in Question it was a Declaratory Law as the words plainly shew and it will farther appear and it is evident that the Statutes against R. 3. and indemnifying them that acted for H. 7. before the displaying his Banner as well as after while R. 3. was in Possession of the Throne were contrary to this Lawyer 's Sense of the Statute 11 H. 7. according to which they who assisted H. 7. must have acted contrary to their Duty of Allegiance to the King for the time being Wherefore it plainly follows that R. 3. was not King for the time being according to the true meaning of the Statute 11 H. 7. and yet H. 6. who was of the younger House was in his time the only King for the time being in the Judgment of that very Parliament which supposes R. 3. not to have been so as appears by their reversing the Attainder of H. 6. and declaring the Act of Attainder to have been contrary to the Allegiance of the Subject against all right wiseness honour nature and duty inordinate seditious and slanderous and reversing the Attainders of others for their true and faithful Allegiance and Service to Hen. 6. and yet those Attainders were in a Parliament of a King by many supposed to be the only Person that had Right to be King and that after his being formally recognized by the States and then in Possession of the Power of the Kingdom Obj. But it may be objected if the Act 11 H. 7. was made only to indemnifie them that paid Allegiance to Rightful Kings there was no manner of need of it Answ 1. Many needless Statutes have been made in affirmance of the Common-Law out of abundant caution 2. It could not be needless to obviate mens fears upon pretences which might be set up against the King for the time being by removing the supposal that Allegiance could be due to any body else 3. The enacting part extends to indemnifie Men for what they out of Loyalty should do in time of War against the mind and will of the Prince for which the caution was but reasonable Effectually to prove that the Judgment of Hen. 7 ths Parliament That there could be but one Rightful King at a time except where they were Partners in Power is according to the fix'd and known Constitution of this Monarchy and that this manifests His present Majesty to be our only lawful and rightful Sovereign Lord and that the late King neither is nor of Right ought to be King I shall as briefly as well as I can give an Abstract of what will appear to any
Heir to the Crown R. 2. following the example of E. 2. had the same fate of which the States of the Kingdom had some years before given him fair warning telling him they had an ancient Statute according to which they might with the common assent and consent of the People of the Realm abrogats him and advance somebody near of kin of the Royal Stock He not profiting by this admonition the States were some years after put to the exercice of their authority and having adjudged that he justly ought to be deposed the whole States appointed Commissioners for giving the Sentence of Deposition And a Record speaking of it says he was deposed for his demerits The Act of State for this says 't was as in like cases had been observed by the ancient custom of the Kingdom This being done Henry Duke of Lancuster as soon as the Kingdom was vacant rose out of his Seat and claim'd the Kingdom begin void His claim was al 's descandit be ryght lyne of the blode comeynge fro the gude Lord Henry therde The reason seems very plain why he claim'd from H. 3. his being the last inheritable blood which he could claim from not from R. 2. because deposed nor from E. 3. because of the forseiture of R. 2. declared or constituted his next Heir not from E. 2. because of his forfeiture nor from E. 1. becuase E. 2. had been his next Heir Hen. 4ths Descent from H. 3. was the qualification for an election This was not as has been supposed a strict right of Succession as he was the next Heir then appearing but he entituled himself to a preference before all other Descendants from that Blood as being a Deliverer of the Nation from Richard's tyranny he having with the help of his Kinsmen and Friends recovered the Kingdom which was upon the point of destruction through the defect of Government and violation of the Laws This induced the States and all the People unanimously to consent that Henry should fill the vacant Throne and they appointed all the Ceremonies of his Coronation But as far as proximity to the last King could infer a right he being Grandson to E. 3. had it before Mortimer descended from Lionel Duke of Clarence under whom the Family of York claim'd besides that H. 4. was undoubtedly the first on the Male line Tho' no Lay-man of knowledge and integrity can be thought at that time to have questioned those grounds upon which H. 4. was declared King yet since 't is hardly possible that there should be any Government which some will not be desirous to shake off as the Jews did the Theocrasy it can be no wonder that some would colour their ambition or malice under pretence of love to justice and that they should object want of right to disturb the most just and equal Government What was at the bottom of objections against H. 4ths Title will appear by the case of a true Head of the Church Militant Merk or Mark Bishop of Carlile who not being able as a Divine to make good his Argument against the receiving H. 4th for King was resolved to justifie it by dint of Sword after he was made King For in second of H. 4. he was indicted and tryed by a common Jury upon a special Commission for that he and other his Accomplices among which there were two bigotted Knights Blunt and Sely were leagued and confederated together with the Adversary and Enemy of England the French and thier Adherents traiterously to bring the said Adversary into the Land of England with intention to destroy the King and all his Leige People of the Kingdom and to new plant the Kingdom of England with our enemies of France that they in an hostile manner went up and down making great destruction and slaughter and without any Authority assuming to themselves Royal Power proclaim'd Richard to be King and that they would not suffer Henry to be their Lord or King To this Indictment the Bishop pleaded Church-Priviledge as an anointed Bishop which the Court over-ruled the the reason for which is very remarkable because the matters contained in the said Indictment concern the death of our Lord the King and the destruction of the whole Kingdom of England and consequently the manifest depression of the Church of England by which he claims to be priviledged all which is high and the greatest Treason and the Crime of laesa Majestas nor ought any man of right to pray in aid of the Law or to have it who commits such a Crime or intends to commit it c. His plea being thus over-ruled the Bishop pleaded not guilty but being convicted of the horrid matter contained in the Indictment it seems he did not think this a fit cause to die for and whether he merited a Pardon or no by sincere Repentance at least obtained one in which it is observable that he is called the late Bishop for this restitution to the Peace did not restore his Ecclesiastical Dignity He who is still called the late Bishop having a pardon sent him petitioned to be delivered out of Prison which was granted upon his finding Sureties for his good behaviour and four undertook that he should for the future behave himself well towards the King and his People Thus the fear of death reformed this stiff Prelate and made him engage to sit quietly under a Government which none but the Enemies to England and their Adherents endeavoured to subvert Still some were found calling themselves Englishmen who for the like ends with Merk would do their utmost to blemish H. 4ths Title this occasioned Oaths of Recognition thrice repeated 5o. of his Reign first at a Council of Worcester then at a Great Council at Westminster and after that in a full Parliament where the two former recognitions which were voluntary Associations were affirmed tho' as is there said there was no need of it By those Oaths they acknowledged the then King to be their Sovereign Leige Lord to obey him as their King and acknowledge the Prince his eldest Son as Heir apparent and inheritable to the Crown of England to him and the Heirs of his Body And for default of such Issue to his Brothers and their Issue successively and hereditably according to the Law of England to live and die against all People in the World The perjury of some and the doubts rais'd by others upon some of the expressions in the Act 5 H. 4. occasioned an other 7o. which by the Counsel and Assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal to wit the Prelates Great Men Peers and Clergy and also at the earnest Petition of the Commons and by Authority of the said Parliament declares that the King 's eldest Son shall be and is and ought hereafter and now to be
true lawful and undoubted Heir and Universal Successor to the Crown and Kingdoms of England and France and all the King's Dominions whatsoever and wheresoever beyond the Sea and also has right of universally succeeding the King in the said Crown Kingdoms and Dominions To have to him and the Heirs Male of his Body and in default of such Issue so in remainder to his Brothers In an other Charter pass'd in that Parliament the Inheritance or Hereditation of the Crown is entail'd upon the King and the Heirs Male of his Body then to his four Sons and the Heirs Male of their Bodies successively It seems the next year some doubts arose upon these different Settlements that 5o. then remaining upon Record therefore they cancel and make void the Letters Patent of the Entail 5o. and change and amend that Settlement which they seem to have thought defective 1. In only declaring the Prince Heir Apparent and Inheritable to the Crown which was no more than to declare him before others qualified to succeed if the States should Elect him 2. In declaring him Inheritable only to the Crown of England without mentioning its appurtenances seeming to think that in Grants of this Nature nothing would pass by implication But to prevent all ambiguities they being as is said in that Record met in a Parliament according to the Custom of the Kingdom for divers Matters and Things concerning the King and his Kingdom The King with common Consent of the Kingdom Enacts That a new Patent be Sealed constituting Prince Henry Heir Apparent to succeed the King in his Crown Realms and Dominions to have them with all their appurtenances after the King's Decease to him and the Heirs of his Body and so in remainder to his three Brothers successively whereby they had a larger Estate than by the Entail 7º which was to Heirs Male Thus by Virtue of one or more Settlements by Authority of Parliament H. 5. succeeded and yet it was thought a great instance of the confidence the States had in him that in a Convention or Assembly holden according to Ancient Custom in which they treated about creating a new King some of the Nobility immediately Swore Allegiance to him before he had been declared King But it is to be observed that whereas his Father died the 20th of March he is said to be created King on the 5th of April Death cutting off the course of his Glories his Infant Son H. 6. came in under the Parliamentary Entail but the Administration was held to have fallen upon the States who accordingly after having declared H. 6. King in full Parliament pass'd a Patent constituting Humfry Duke of Gloster Protecter of the Realm John Duke of Bedford Regent of France and Henry Beaufort Bishop of Winchester and Thomas Beaufort Duke of Exeter Governors of the young Prince The Death of the brave Duke of Bedford occasioned not only the loss of France but the raising the Family of York to a pretence which in all probability had been buried to this day had not H. 6ths treacherous Ministers put him upon making Richard Duke of York Regent of France after being High Constable of England and Lieutenant of Ireland With these advantages Duke Richard set up under a Mask of Popularity as if he only sought redress of grievances while himself was the only National Calamity As nothing but success could give him any colour of Title he was forced to conceal his Ambition even from his own Party till 26 H. 6 yet after that acknowledged and swore to H. 6ths Right and confirm'd it with the Sacrament which Solemnities were to be subservient to his imaginary Divine Right Tho' by his Frauds and Perjuries he often came within the prospect of a Crown 38 H. 6. he was deservedly Attainted of High-Treason and an Association with an Oath was voluntarily enter'd into by the Lords wherein every one severally acknowledges H. 6. to be his most redoubted Lord and rightwish or Rightful by Succession born to Reign over him and all the Kings Liege People that he will do his utmost for the We le and surety of the King's Person of his most Royal Estats and the very conservation and continuance of his most high Authority Preheminence and Prerogative and for the preservation of the Queen and of Prince Edward his Right redoubted Lord the Prince that after the King's Death he will take and accept the Prince for his Sovereign Lord and after him the Issue of his Body lawfully begotten for want of such Issue any other Issue of the Body of the King that he will never give Aid Assistance or Favour to any thing contrary to the premises and that he will put himself in his due undelayed devoir with his Body Goods Might Power Counsel and Advertisement to resist withstand and subdue all that should presume to do contrary to the premises or any of them This Association not being General throughout the Kingdom had no great effect not so much from any belief the Nation had of Richard's being injured as from the burdens a Treacherous Ministry induced a weak Prince to lay upon the Subjects This made the Commons of Kent invite over from abroad the Duke and his Party who had fled from Justice then the Tide turn'd and the King became wholly in the power of the Duke of York under whose awe and influence a Parliament was call'd where he laid claim to the Crown with circumstances which one would think were enough to give any Man a face of Title and yet his pretended Divine Right countenanc'd by Providence was mightily qualify'd by the courage of the Parliament and their regard to the Constitution of this Monarchy His claim was as Son to Ann Daughter to Roger Mortimer Son and Heir to Philippa Daughter and Heir to Lionel Duke of Clarence third Son to E. 3. whereas H. 6. descended from John of Gaunt the 4th and eldest surviving Son After Debate among the Lords upon this matter these Objections were agreed upon against Richard's pretence of Title 1. The Oaths they had taken to the King their Sovereign Lord. 2. Acts of Parliament made in divers Parliaments of the King's Progenitors of Authority sufficient to defeat any manner of Title to be made to any Person 3. Several Entails made to Heirs Male 4. That Richard did not bear Lionel's Arms. 5. That H. 4. took upon him the Crown not as Conqueror but right Inheritor to H 3. All that is urged materially against this for Richard is 1. That Oaths do not bind against God's Law and that requires Truth and Justice to be maintain'd but this being a Spiritual matter he refers to any Judge Spiritual 2. That there was but one Entail of the Crown 7 H. 4. but that this was void against the right Inheritor of the Crown according to God's law and all Natural laws 3. It could
rule and govern this Realm for lack of such Heirs then this Realm after your transitory life shall be destitute of a lawful Governor or else per case encumbred with such a Person that would covet to aspire to the same whom the Subjects of this Realm shall not find in their hearts to love dread and obediently serve as their Sovereign Lord. And all offenders against that Act their Abetters Maintainers Fautors Counsellors and Aiders were to be deemed and adjudged High Traytors to the Realm According to which it is very evident 1. That no Person would have had Right to succeed who was not within the express limitations then made or the future Provision by Virtue of the Authority of that Parliament 2. If any Person should aspire to succeed from a pretended Right of Proximity or the Settlement 1 H. 7. he would have been an Incumberer or Usurper of the Realm unless the Subjects should find in their Hearts or freely Consent to serve him as their Sovereign Lord that is till he should be elected King 3. That till the election of another King there would be a vacancy and whoever would pretend to be King till Elected was punishable as a Traytor to the Realm By Authority of the same Parliament the Illegitimations of Mary and Elizabeth are continued yet if the King and Prince Edward should die without Heirs of their Bodies the Crown was to go to the two Ladies successively but their respective interests to determine if they did not perform such Conditions as the King should appoint And in case of failure of Issue or in performance of the Conditions least the Realm should be destitute of a lawful Governor the Crown was to go as the King should appoint in such manner as is there directed The Settlement by Authority of Parliament 28 H. 8. was by the same Authority confirmed in substance 35º with a repetition of the inducement to place in the King a Power to appoint a Successor But whoever should have been so appointed or for want of such appointment elected by the Estates upon a vacancy according to a Statute 25 H. 8. and that above cited 1 H. 7. would have become a natural Lord. That what I have observed in Acts of Parliament in the time of H. 8. proceeded not from the prevalence of any Party or compliance with the King's humour but was the settled Judgment of the Learned of those times how much soever divided in other matters may appear by some passages between the Learned Sir Thomas Moore who had been Chancellor and Ryche then Solicitor General Sir Thomas being a Prisoner in the Tower for not owning the King's Supremacy Ryche to perswade him to comply used this argument If says he it should be enacted by Authority of Parliament that I should be King and that if any one should deny it it should be Treason would you say that I were not King For certain adds he in my conscience this would be no offence but you would be obliged to say so and to take me for King because your own consent was bound by the Act of Parliament Sir Thomas Answers it would be an offence if he should say he were not King because he should be bound by the Act for that he might give his consent to that matter This he said was a light case But what if a Parliament should enact That God should not be God Ryche replies It was impossible God should not be God But says he because your case from God is sublime I will propose to you this of an inferior Nature You know our King is constituted Supream Head on Earth of the Church of England and why ought not you Master Moore so to affirm and take him as well as in the case above of my being made King In which case you grant that you would be obliged to affirm and take me to be King Moore says these were not like cases because a King may be made by Parliament and may be deprived by Parliament to which Act every Subject being present in Parliament may give his consent But to the case of the Primacy he cannot be obliged because to that he cannot give his consent in Parliament c. And it is observable that tho' this is set forth in the Indictment against Sir Thomas Moore it is only used as proof of his denying the Supremacy without any aggravation from what he says of the Power of a Parliament in the present Question E. 6. succeded H. 8. according to Parliamentary Settlements without any formal recognition Nor was Mary his half Sister who succeeded him recognized but her Parliament thought it for her Honour to take off her illegitimation tho' that was not necessary to give her a Right to the Crown nor did that Parliament use any expressions whereby they might seem to think so When she came to marry Philip King of Spain they fully asserted their rightful Power all the marriage Articles being settled by Authority of Parliament By that Philip is made an English King Another Parliament makes it forfeiture of Goods and Chattels and perpetual Imprisonment the first time and High-Treason the second after a former Conviction maliciously to maintain that either of them ought not to enjoy the Stile Honour and Kingly Name Her Right was founded upon the express limitation to her by Authority of Parliament and her Husband 's not in marrying her but the consent of Parliament Upon the same Right her half Sister Elizabeth succeeded her By that good Providence which so often appear'd for her Mary dying while a Parliament was sitting The States with general consent decreed Elizabeth to be proclaimed true and lawful Heir to the Crown according to the Act of Succession 35 H. 8. And in the Act of Recognition she is declared their rightful and lawful Sovereign Leige Lady and Queen Soon after this in a Letter written with her own hand to Ferdinand the Emperor she tells him that she by God's goodness succeeded her Sister by right of Inheritance and consent of her Subjects Tho' she had sufficient opportunity to have procured an Act of Parliament to take off her illegitimacy she seemed with wisdom to decline it 1. Because the Authority of Parliament under which she claimed was more generally acknowledged in those days in relation to the Succession of the Crown than in voiding or confirming Marriages which has been held a Spiritual Matter 2. To admit that she owed her Crown wholly to the Authority of Parliament could not but be more popular than to pretend to it by right of Blood In the 8 th and 9 th of her Reign the Lords addressed to her that a Successor might be appointed in Parliament least God should call the Queen without certainty of Succession and affirm that the not granting their request would leave the Realm without Government In the 13 th of her Reign it is made
declaring that he would not then wear his Crown and dispensing with the Services of the Citizens of London and others * Mat. Par. Ipsi de communi conc totius regni ipsum cum iniquis corsiliariis suis a regno depellerent de novo Rege creando tractarent a Bracton lib. 2. c. 16. Rex autem habet superiorem Deum item Legem per quam factus est Rex item Curiam suam c. Vid. etiam ib. c. 24. l. 3. c. 9. b Lib. de Antiq. Leg. in Arch. Civ c Lib. de Antiq Leg. in Archiv Civ Lon. An. 1260. 44 H. 3. L. 55. H. 3. post ejus decessum rectis haeredibus coronae Angliae d Mat. West Gilbertus Johes Comites nec non Clerus populus ad magnum altare ecc Westm celeriter properaunt Ed. prim Regis fidel jurantes e Annales Wav f. 227. Facta convocatione omnium Prel c. a Rot. claus 1. E. 1. m. 11. b Walsing f. 1. c Mat. West f. 430. 25 E. 1. d Suscipiatis me quod si non rediero in Regem vestrum filium meum coronetis e Mirror p. 8. f Wals. f. 68. Non tam jure haereditario c. g Wals. f. 107. Rex dignitate regali abdicatur filius substituitur h Knighton col 2550. Post multos ejulatus c. i Rot. Claus 1 E. 3. m. 28. a Bib. Cot. Cleop. D. 9. Annales de Gestis Britcnum De. An. 1326. Convocatum est concilium generals c. b In Regem Angliae est sublimatus c Stat. 1. E. 3. Rastal a Rot. Parl. 50. E. 3. b Began his reign An. 1377. c Knighton f. 2683. Propinquiorem aliquem de stir pe regid d 23 R. 2. e Rot. Parl. 1. H. 4. n. 16. f N. 52. g Rot. serv die Coron H. 4. h Rot. Parl. 1. H. 4. i Rot. Parl. 1 H. 4. n. 54. so Welsing k Rot. Parl. sup Tpod. Neust f. 156. Regnum Angliae sic vacans l Vid. The Debate at large p. 127. m Walsing sup Rot. Parl. n Rot. Parl. n. 54. Iiden Status cum tote populo absque quacunque difficultate vel mâ—râ ut Dux praefatus super eos regnaret unanimiter consenserunt a Rot. Servic sup b Vid. inf the case of Bishop Merk c Rot. Pat. 2 H. 4. rot 4. d Interliga confederati adversario inimiâ—o nri Regis rni sui de Erancia adherentibus ad eundem adversar c. e Nota Richard's name was used only to colour the inviting the French to over-run this hand f Quod ipse Epus unctus 〈◊〉 a Nota Et consequenter eccles Anglicanae per quam c. b Pardonae vimus eidem nuper Episcope sectam pacis c. c Quod ipse amodo se bene geret erga Dominum Regem populum d This recited in the Petitions of the Commons Rot. Pat. 8 H. 4. p. 1. m. 4. e D'un volunt d'un assentcoment quil nen busoignoit my affermerent f Enheretablement a Pur viver morer encontre touts les gents de monde b Rot. Pat. 7. H. 4. pars 2. in 23. Ad ammovendam penitus materiam disceptationis c. c Fore esse 〈◊〉 fore esse debere Vid. alt ib. reciting the breach of former Oaths d Rot. Pat. sup Hereditas sive hereditaria e Rot. Pat. 8 H. 4. p. 1. m. 4. a Rot. Pat. 8. H. 4. Ponrvous succeder en voz saisditz corone roialms Seigniories pur les avoir ove routz leur appurtenances apres vre decesse a luy c. b Communi consensu regni juxta morem ejusdem regni c. c Heir apparent pour vous succeder d Pol. Virg. in Vit. H. 5. Drs. Gale Praef. Script Saxon. Dan. e Walsingham f Polydore Virgil. In quo de Rege creando more majorum agitabatur Vid. etiam Stow in the Reign of H. 5. mentioning this and calling that Assembly a Parliament g Rot. Parl. 1 H. 6. h 13 H. 6. a Vid. the Oath 29 H. 6. Stow f. 395. I am and ought to be humble subject and Lieage-man c. b Rot. Parl. 38 H. 6. n. 7. a Rot. Parl. 39 H. 6. n. 11. b N. 12. c Vid. unreasonableness of the new separation Fortescue's MS. of this belongs to the Cotton Library but not now to be found there unless restored very lately b N. 15. To be unto him and to the Heirs of his Body coming and to his 4 Sons c. c Elianor Wife of Lewis King of France Mat. Par. de An. 1150. d Mat. West f. 1200. a Vid. Sup. p. 27. b Vid. Grot. de jure belli pacis l. 2. sect 24. For the Neice from the elder Son to exclude the younger Son cannot hold in Hereditary Kingdoms For that gives only a capacity to succeed But of those that are capable regard is to be had to the priviledge of the Sex c Fortescue de Laud. Legum Angl. Rex a populo potestatem effluxam habet Vid. Rot. de B. R. d Grot. de jure belli pacis Lib. 2. e Ib. Sect. 14. Sect. 22. a Rot Parl. 39 H. 6. n. 18. The Oaths that the said Lords had made unto the King's highness c. saved and their consciences therein cleared c. it was agreed that the said mean the should be opened and declared to the King's highness b N. 18. c N. 27. The King by advice of the Lords condescended to the Accord and to be authoriz'd by Authority of this present Parliament d Baggot's Case 9 E. 4. Car-le corone fuit taille a lay per Parlement saving and ordaining by the same auctority the King to have the said Corones Reaumes Roial Estate Dignity and Preemirence of the same and the said Lordship of Ireland during his lyf natural e An. 1460. And furthermore by the same avis and auctoritie wolle consenteth and agreeth that after his decesse or when it shall pleas his highness to ley from him the said Corones c. or thereof ceasseth c. a Stow. f. 413. b Vid. Notes upon the Earl of Stamford's Speech An. 1692. Citting Grafton's Chron. f. 652 653. 658. Speed f. 851. Stow f. 414 415. c Ib. d 3d. Not mentioned in those Notes but in Hollinshead f. 663. e Notes upon the Earl of S's Speech Sup. a Hollinshead 663. After the Earl of March had taken upon him the Government b Rot. Parl. 1. E. 4. m. 8. Declaratio tituli regii restitutio ad eandem c Ib. d Rot. Parl. 1 E. 4. m. 8. n. 20 21 22 23 24. a Rot. Parl. 1 E 4. m. 17. Convictio quorundam Dom. al. authoritate Parl. The Earl of March upon the death of R. 2. and consequently E. 4. from him was undoubted a Vid. The Debate at large c. p. 128. b Rot. Parl. 1. E. 4. m. 7. 8. and that God had given Ed. the