of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To Our right Trusty and well beloved Counsellor Sir Edward Hide Knight Chancellour of England Greeting Whereas We by our Council for certain great and urgent Causes concerning Vs the good Estate and Common-wealth of this our Realm and of the Church of England and for the good Order and Continuance of the same have appointed and ordain'd a Parliament to be holden at our City of Westminster the eighth day of May next ensuing In which Case divers and sundry Writs are to be directed forth under our Great Seal of England as well for the Nobility of this our Realm as also for the Election of Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities and Burrough Towns of the same to be present at the said Parliament at the Day and Place aforesaid Wherefore We Will and Command you forthwith upon receipt hereof and by Warrant of the same to cause such and so many Writs to be made and sealed under our great Seal for accomplishment of the same as in like Cases have been heretofore used and accustomed And this Bill signed with our Hand shall be as well to you as to every Clerk or Clerks as shall make or pass the same a sufficient Warrant in that behalf Given at Our Palace at White-hall this Eighteenth Day of February in the Twelfth Year of Our Reign and in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Six Hundred Sixty and One. Observations and Proceedings on this Warrant THe King of England by his undoubted Prerogative hath and his Predecessors ever had in himself the Power of Summoning as also to appoint the times of beginning continuing discontinuing or dissolving of Parliaments This Summoning for I shall speak of the rest in order or Uniting the chiefest Parts of his Kingdom into a Parliament or Representation of the Kingdom in a less Body than it self is performed by the King's Warrant in his Name and by his Authority only as Supreme not only of his Kingdom but of its Representation and from this Warrant all Writs of Summons for a Parliament are deriv'd The Warrant is in English Sign'd by the King 's own Hand and Seal'd with his Privy Seal or Signet but the Writs are always in Latin or anciently some few in French and are Seal'd with the King 's Great Seal in his Name with a Teste of his Approbation though not manually Sign'd or Seal'd by him The Warrant is General viz. for summoning the Nobility as also for Elections of Knights Citizens and Burgesses but the Writs deriv'd from those Warrants are to particular persons of particular degrees as will be shewn The Form of this Warrant is ancient and hath had little or no variation except in the leaving out of Abbots and Priors ever since the 36 of Henry the 8th and except in leaving out Prelates and Bishops in this very Warrant whereby the Bishops had no particular Writs before the sitting of this Parliament but within three Months after for which Omission Reasons will be given in the 7th Chapter Before this Warrant was issued the King and so former Kings did advise with their Privy Council which is manifested by the Words of the Warrant viz. Whereas We by our Council yet if these words had been omitted at any time and not inserted in the Warrant the Warrant was held good and sufficient for due Summons However for publick satisfaction the words of every Writ are always Quia de advizamento assensu Concilij nostri and this Council is call'd the King's Privy or Private Council of which I shall speak more and is the King 's constant or standing Council as well in time of Parliament as when there is none sitting so as before this Magnum Concilium or Parliament is summon'd this Privy Council consults and deliberates concerning the Motives and Reasons for calling it and after such deliberations and results doth advise the King to send out a Warrant And therefore I conceive it useful to set down the Names of such as were of the King 's Privy Council when the calling of this Parliament was advis'd and resolv'd upon At the Court of White-hall Feb. 1660 1. The KING Present His Royal Highness the Duke of York His Highness Prince Rupert William Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Juxon Edward Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellor of England Hide Thomas Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England Wriothesley John Lord Roberts Lord Privy-Seal Baron of Truro John Duke of Latherdale Maitland Earl of Guilford James Duke of Ormond Lord Steward of the King's House Butler George Duke of Albemarle Monk Henry Marquess of Dorchester Pierpoint Montague Earl of Lindsey Lord great Camberlain Bertie Edward Earl of Manchester the King's Chamberlain Montague Aldjernoone Earl of Northumberland Piercy Robert Earl of Leicester Sydny Charles Earl of Berkshire Howard Thomas Earl of Cleveland Wentworth George Earl of Norwich Goring Henry Earl of St. Albans Jermin Edward Earl of Sandwich Montague Arthur Earl of Anglesey Annesly Charles Earl of Carlile Howard William Viscount Say and Seal Fiennes Francis Lord Seymour Baron of Troubridge Frederick Lord Cornwallis Baron of Ai. Anthony Lord Ashley Cooper Charles Berkley Knight and Baronet Sir George Carteret Knight Vice-Chamberlain Sir Edw. Nicholas Knights Secretaries of State Sir Will. Morrice Knights Secretaries of State After the Warrant is sign'd and seal'd by the King it is sent from the Signet-Office to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper and Directions are given to the Heralds to make Proclamation at the Court-gate and Capital City of London of the King's Resolutions of which I shall speak more in the Chapter of Proclamations The Lord Chancellor c. upon the receipt of this Warrant doth issue out his Warrant also to the Master of the Rolls as the chief Clerk of the Pettibag-Office in this Form YOu are hereby requir'd forthwith to prepare for the great Seal of England the several Writs of Summons for the Lords Temporal As also for the Judges and others to appear at the Parliament to be holden the 8th of May next together with the several Writs of Election of the several Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the several Counties Cities Towns and Burroughs within the Kingdom of England Dominion of Wales and Town of Berwick upon Tweed as also of the several Barons of the Cinque-Ports to serve in the said Parliament in such Method and Form and directed to such persons as are and have been usual in such Cases all which said Writs are to bear date this present eighteenth of February 1661. and for the so doing this shall be your Warrant Dated c. Upon receipt of the Lord Chancellor's Warrant the Clerks of the Pettibag by the assistance of the former Precedents of Writs and anciently by help of the Masters of Chancery and by advice with the Heralds as to Titles and true Names of Persons do fix a Schedule or digest or Forms of Writs to be issued
Marshal and Duke Thomas dying at Padua about the end of this Parliament Henry the Brother succeeded in the Dukedom and sat as Duke of Norfolk and Henry the Eldest Son of the said Duke Henry being then intituled Earl of Arundel did sit as Earl of Arundel and Lord Mowbray so as that Title of Earl Marshal is in Duke Henry and the Title of Mowbray in the Earl of Arundel and that Title of Earl Marshal only inpossibility to come again into Mowbray And this may be added that during Duke Thomas his Life James Earl of Suffolk by Deputation did execute that Office for reasons which I leave to other Writers SECT XIII Of the Lord Admiral of England Obs I THE Kings of England do constantly make Admirals of Squadrons of Ships but the Admiral which I am here to speak of is the highest of all intituled the Lord Admiral of England and may be well call'd Admirals from their seeing and knowing the mirabilia or Wonders of the Deep The Greeks call'd this Officer Thalassiarcha from Thalassa the Sea and Archos the Chief at Sea and from thence the Romans according to the Latin Idiom call'd him Thalassiarchus and of later days Admirallus which is no Latin word and in English Admiral 2. To him is committed the Government of the King of England's Navy and Power to decide all causes Maritim as well Civil as Criminal and of all things done on or beyond the Seas in any part of the World and many other Jurisdictions on the Coasts and in Ports Havens and Rivers and of such Wrecks and Prizes as are call'd by the Lawyers Lagon Jetson and Flotson that is Goods lying in the Sea floting on the Sea or cast by the Sea on the shore admitting some few exceptions and Royalties granted to other Lords of Mannors And these and all other Cases dependant on this Jurisdiction are determin'd in his Courts of Admiralty by such Rules of the Civil Law as do not invade the Common Laws of England 3. And of these Civil Laws which concern Sea assairs there are two most eminent Guiders to Civilians viz. Those made at Rhodes in the Mediterranean by the Grecians and augmented by the Romans call'd Lex Rhodia or the Rhodian Law The other made at Oleron an Island anciently belonging to England but lying on the borders of France by out King Richard the First both of which are still in great veneration 4. So as well for the Laws by which he governs the Maritim concerns as for his great Jurisdiction being as vast as the Ocean he may be said to have alterum Imperium extra intra Imperium and therefore this Honour and Care is intrusted to the hands of some one of the Blood Royal or some one or more joyntly of the most eminent of the Nobility 5. And in respect of this Power there is a constant Converse and Commerce with all parts of the World especially where the Civil Laws are practis'd and therefore it hath been the prudence of our former Kings even to this day to allot him a place in the Lords House as to the Marshal of England for both of their concerns are chiefly manag'd as I have shewn by the Civil Laws so as the Lord Marshal and Lord Admiral may be look'd on as the two Supporters to the learned Professors of those Laws as the other Lords are to the Professors of the Common Laws and possibly the greatest number of the Masters of Chancery of whom I shall speak in order who sit in the Lords House were originally contrived to be Doctors of the Civil Laws upon this ground That if there were at any time just occasion in that House to make use of any points in that Profession they might give their advices or opinions therein 6. This Dignity as I said was ever conferr'd upon some of the chief Nobility by vertue whereof they had their Writs of Summons and their Place in the Lords House and this long before the Act of Precedency for we find the Earl of Arundel in 13 Edw. 3. and the Earl of Northumberland in 7 R. 2. the Earl of Devon and Marquess of Dorset in the same Kings time and so the Earls of Salisbury Shrewsbury Worcester and Wiltshire and others of the like Degrees recited in the Clause Rolls needless to renumerate being Admirals were summon'd and in our extant Pawns in 36 H. 8. Johanni Dudley Vicecomiti Lisle Magno Admirallo and in 1 E. 6. Tho. Dom. Seymer Magno Admirallo and in 7 Edw. 6. Edv. Fenys Domino Clinton Magno Admirallo and in 1 2 3 4 Mariae Phil. Mar. Gulielmo Howard de Effingham Magno Admirallo and in 4 5 Phil. Mar. Edw. Fenys again and Charles Earl of Nottingham in Queen Elizabeth's time and George Duke of Buckingham in King James's time and King Charles the First 's time were still summon'd to Parliament with the Title of Admiral added to their hereditary Titles in their Writs and to this Parliament Jacobo Duci Ebor. Magno Admirallo c. And all these had their places in the Lords House according to the Act of Precedency as those before the Act was made This Office was conferr'd on the Duke of York for this Parliament Vid. Cap. 2. SECT XIV Of the Lord Steward of the King's House AS for the Orthography and Etymology and Antiquity of this Title Steward Obs I. I shall refer them to my Annotations However as it is sometimes writ with a T and sometimes a D it is under four Considerations the first as it represents a Royal Name and Family and therefore for distinction this is writ Stewart with a T and hath the superintendence chief interest and influence in all Parliaments since that Name was of that use in England 2. The other three are Titles official and written Steward with a D and as a further distinction from the first in Latin they are call'd Seneschalli and this the chief of the three is call'd Seneschallus Angliae or Lord High Steward of England of whom I shall give a full account in the Chapter of the Trials per Pares and shew how this great Officer is imploy'd either in or out of Parliaments 3. The last and least Degree of the 3 is call'd also Senescallus such as are the Stewards of Corporate Towns or Mannors which are not concern'd in the Summons or of use in Parliaments otherwise than as considerable Assistants in Elections of Members to serve in Parliaments But the Lord Steward of whom I now speak was call'd in H. the 8th time Magnus Magister Hospitij Regis or the Great Master of the Kings Houshold and ever since Magnus Senescallus Hospitij Regis or the Lord high Steward of the Kings House and he hath not only an eminent Employment Trust and Authority in ordering the Kings Houshold but an Authority above all Officers of that House except the Chappel Chamber and Stables but in all Parliaments is obliged to attend the Kings
is remarkable that this William Lord Pawlet Marquess of Winchester was Exemplar in all the Parliament Pawns which are extant in the Pettibag from the first of Edw. the Sixth to the first of King James inclusive which is 55. years and was in that time Lord Treasurer 22. years which was longer than any of his Predecessors continued in that Office except Cicil who continued 27. years 1 Car. 1. Georgio Duci Buckingham for one Parliament Sir Thomas Coventry being then Lord Keeper and had a distinct Writ and Sir Richard Weston Treasurer who was then in Scotland 15 Car. 1. Johanni Marchioni Winchester for one Parliament Sir John Finch being then Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and had a distinct Writ also Will. Bishop of London was Lord Treasurer and had his Writ 13 Car. 2. Thomae Comiti Southampton for this Parliament Sir Edward Hyde being then Lord Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Earl was Grandchild to that Wriotheslly mentioned in the 36. of Hen. 8. and died without Issue Anno. 166 So from the 36. of H. 8. to this Parliament of the 13. of Car. 2. there were three Exemplars to Three Barons Two of them being Chancellors and one Lord Keeper and to Two Marquesses to one Duke and to one Earl and all these not of the Blood Now as to the three Barons having Exemplars which Degree had not any before the 36. H. 8. it may be presumed that the Exemplars were given them in relation to their Offices as Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper or President of the Kings Council And as to the two Marquesses having Exemplars who had not any till the 6. of Edw. 6. one was as he was Treasurer and the other in the 15. of Car. 1. only as Marquess because there was no Duke Summon'd to that Parliament and Sir John Finch was then Lord Keeper and William Bishop of London Lord Treasurer and both had distinct Writs so there was none of the three great Officers of State remaining to be Exemplars except Henry Earl of Manchester then Lord Privy-Seal who according to the fore-mentioned Act of Precedency is placed in the Lords House before all Dukes Marquesses c. not of the Blood but I suppose because there was no President wherein the Lord Privy-Seal had been Exemplar since its first Institution in the 11. of Hen. 4. and being not called Lord Privy-Seal nor that place in the Lords House allotted to him till the 31. H. 8. possibly for those reasons it was not given to the Lord Privy-Seal but to the Marquess singly or else it was an omission in not minding the Act of Precedency These latter Writs from the 36. of Hen. 8. did seem to break the method of the former for before that Pawn of that year no Dukes or Marquesses were made Consimilars where an Earl was made Exemplar but in the Exemplar of the 36. H. 8. Wriothesly Earl of Southampton was made Exemplar and the Duke of Norfolk then Lord Treasurer of England and Charles Duke of Suffolk the Great Master of the Kings Houshold and President of the Council were besides the Marquess of Dorchester and Thirteen Earls and Twenty eight Barons made his Consimilars so as the precedency of his Exemplarity must be ascribed to his Chancellorship which according to the Act of Precedency was to be before all Dukes c. not of the Blood and upon the same reason Pawlet Lord St. John in the first Edw. 6. being then Lord Keeper had the Exemplar Writ and the Duke of Somerset though the Kings Uncle Governor of the Kings Person and Protector of England as also the Marquess of Dorchester and Marquess of Northampton and Thirteen Earls and Thirty Barons were his Consimilars which is the only President which I know of where the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper had the Exemplar to a Duke of the Bloud and upon the like reason as I conceive in the 6 of Ed. the 6. William Marquess of Winchester being Lord Treasurer the next in Precedency to the Lord Chancellor by the Act of 31. H. 8. had the Exemplar to two Dukes one Marquess Fourteen Earls One Viscount and Thirty one Barons all which were his Consimilars and it is probable the reason why this Exemplar was given to the Treasurer and not to the Chancellor was because Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely was then Lord Chancellor and so it was not proper for that Bishop to be Exemplar for the reasons before alledged Now in the first Car. primi Thomas Coventry being Lord Keeper and having a distinct Writ the Duke of Buckingham had the Exemplar who had one Marquess Thirty seven Earls Eleven Viscounts and Fourty seven Barons to his Consimilars Also in the 15. Car. 1. John Marquess of Winchester Son to the former Marquess of Winchester was made Exemplar Sir John Finch being Lord Keeper who had a distinct Writ and William Bishop of London being in Scotland but he had no Duke or other Marquess but Fifty eight Earls Five Viscounts and Forty four Barons his Consimilars and so reduced the proper Consimilars to its former method But the 14. Car. 2. Thomas Wriothesly Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer Grandchild to the former Earl of Southampton altered it again there being now also a distinct Writ to Sir Edward Hyde Lord Chancellor for this Earl had three Dukes one being General Four Marquesses Fifty five Earls Eight Viscounts and Sixty eight Barons his Consimilars I conceive as Lord Treasurer for according to ancient Practice as I have shewn an Earl had not any Dukes entred as his Consimilars The number of all the Exemplar Writs extant from the 15. of Edw. the 2d in An. 1322. to the 13. of Car. 2di An. 1661. are but Twenty and but Fourteen Kings from whom they were granted The number of the Parliaments in which the Nobles did Sit to whom such Exemplars were issued were 107. and these 107. Parliaments were in the space of 341. Years As concerning the years when these Exemplars were first issued to the respective degrees of Nobles before mentioned they are in this order of time 15 Edw. 2. This first Exemplar Writ as I have shewn was to an Earl and 〈◊〉 was of the Bloud viz. to Edward 〈◊〉 of Chester Eldest Son to Edw. 2. and â—â—â—ter King Edw. the 3d. for there was then no Duke in England 3 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Prince of the Bloud was to the same Earl being then made Prince of Wales 37 Edw. 3. The first Exemplar Writ to a Duke of the Blood was not till this year though the first Duke in England distinct from that of Earl as Mr. Selden saith was the Eleventh of Edw. 3d. and then Edward the Kings Eldest Son was in Parliament created Duke of Cornwall yet Speed in his Chronicle of Edw. 3d. makes this Creation in the 3d of Edw. 3d. when saith he he was created Prince of Wales Duke of Aquitain and Cornwall which agrees with the Records of the Tower and
therefore I conceive there is some mistake in Mr. Selden but however the mistake be the first Exemplar Writ to a Duke was not till this year for though Edward Prince of Wales was Duke in the Third or Eleventh year of his Father and Thomas Earl of Norfolk soon after was created Duke of Norfolk and Henry Earl of Lancaster soon after created Duke of Lancaster yet they had not any Exemplar Writs as Dukes but before as Earls so as John Duke of Lancaster in this Parliament of the 37. Edw. the 3d. was the first Duke which had an Exemplar Writ 47 Edw. 3. As I have shewn the first Exemplar to an Earl of the Bloud so this shews the first Exemplar to an Earl not of the Bloud which was this year to Richard Earl of Arundel for though there were many Earls before not of the Bloud yet they had only Consimilar Writs but no Exemplars extant to any of them till this Year 28 H. 6. And though there were many Dukes not of the Blood since the first Creation of that Title yet the first Duke not of the Blood who was thought fit to be an Exemplar was not till this Parliament and the Predecessor of this Duke was an Earl in Edw. 3ds time and even this Duke was Earl in the time of his Predecessors before any Duke was created 6 Edw. 6. Though the first Marquess created in England was in the 9th of Rich. 2d yet none were thought fit to be Exemplars till this 6. of Edw. the 6th that William Marquess of Winchester was made the first Exemplar in Parliament of that Dignity but his Exemplar had the additional Title of Lord Treasurer who is the second Officer of State 36 H. 8. Although a Baron is a more ancient Title with us in England than any of the other Degrees of the Nobles yet we find no Record now extant wherein a Baron singly as Baron had the Exemplar Writ for as I said Thomas Wriothesly Baron of Tichfield being Chancellor William Pawlet Baron of Bazing being Lord Keeper were Exemplars in those Parliaments and had Consimilars appointed them but Edward Hyde Baron of Hindon having a distinct Assisting Writ had no Consimilar allotted him either in respect of his Barony or Assistancy Thus we find that Earls Dukes Marquesses and Barons have been Exemplars but we do not find any Viscounts to be so in any Parliament since the creation of that Dignity which was as I said in Hen. 6ths time to John de Beaumont And the reason is because the word Vicecomes doth imply a Consimilar to Comes so it were improper for Comites to be Consimilars to a Vicecomiti Concerning the additionals of the Titles to those Nobles mentioned in their Exemplars it may be observed That in all those Writs to Hen. the 8ths time the words Consanguineo Charissimo Praedilecto Dilecto Fideli were not so positively sixt to the several Degrees in their Writs but since that time they have past in a more constant method viz. to Dukes and Marquesses Praecharissimo Consanguineo to Earls and Viscounts Charissimo Consanguineo to Barons Praedilecto Fideli and to the Lord Chancellor as chief Assistant Praedilecto perquam Fideli but to all the other Assistants of which I shall speak more only Dilecto Fideli SECT III. Observations on the Consimilars to the former Exemplars WHen Princes of the Blood were made Exemplars there was ever some Prince of the Blood in the Consimilars and then followed in the same Register in every Clause-Roll or Pawn the other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons without interposition of the Lords Spiritual and Ecclesiastical to the Princes of the Blood and the Temporal Lords not of the Bloud so it continued in that method till the 21. of King James but then the Exemplar being to the Prince of Wales and no Consimilar to him there follows the Exemplar and Consimilars to the Lords Spiritual of which I have spoken and after them follows the particular Writ to John Bishop of Lincoln as Lord Keeper and after that the Exemplar to Lodowick Duke of Richmond who had one Duke one Marquess Thirty eight Earls nine Viscounts and Fourty seven Chevaliers his Consimilars and ever since the 21. Jac. there hath been an interposition either of the Lords Spiritual or Lord Chancellor between the Dukes of the Blood and the Nobles that were not of the Blood and so in the 13 Car. 2. though the Bishops were deprived from that Roll as I have shewn yet the Lord Chancellors Writ did interpose and it may further be observed That when Princes or Dukes of the Blood or not of the Blood were Exemplars other Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons were Consimilars but when Earls were Exemplars there were no other Consimilars admitted of Degrees above them but still under them viz. of Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet when the three Dukes beforementioned were made Exemplars 't is true the Duke of Suffolk and Oxford had Dukes to their Consimilars as formerly being pari gradu but the Duke of Norfolk had no Duke to his Consimilar for he had only four Earls one Viscount and Thirty one Barons of which there is no other precedent that I can find 2. As to the different Titles of these six Degrees viz. Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons of whom I have spoke more in the Fifth Chapter it is fit to be hinted here that Prince in English and Principi in the Latin Writ Duke and Duci Marquess and Marchioni Viscount and Vicecomiti have little difference in their Orthography but Comiti in all their Latin Writs and Earl which is their general appellation in English have very great difference concerning which and the other Degrees I have writ more at large before and in my Annotations to which I refer the Reader and so Baron and Baro have but little variation yet this may be observed here of this Title Baro that in all the Consimilar Writs in Clause Rolls or Pawns wherein those of that Degree are enumerated from the 15th of Edw. 2d to the 13. of Car. 2. neither the Titles or words Baro nor of Banerettus are mentioned in the Writs but either the Articles De or Le or La or the words Dominus Miles Equies Auratus or Chevalier are added to the Barons name viz. Hugo de Spencer Johanni de Bello Campo Johanni de St. John de Bazing Roberto de Monte albo Johanni de Sancto amando Willielmo de la Souch de mortuo mare Nicolao de Cantilupo le Quint Johanni de Insula de rubro monte Nicolao de Sancto Mauro Michaeli de la Pool who was then Banneret Admirallo Maris Johanni de Moubray Mariscallo Petro de malo lacu le Quint Hugo de le Spencer Willielmo la Zouch de mortuo mare Johanni le Strange Johanni le Shelton and many more and some only in their Christian names and Sirnames viz. Richardo Gray Richardo Talbot Gulielmo Aincourt
Which Schedule or digest they keep fairly ingrost in Parchment as a Record in this Office and this Record is then entituled the Parliament Pawn and hath no other Name which is as they say the awarding of several Writs for a Parliament And this methodical Record is very ancient as may be collected by comparing this with those which remain in the Pettibag And with the like Endorsments are the Clause Rolls in the Tower but there are no more Pawns at present in this Office than from the 21 of Hen. 8. to this of the 31 of Car. 2. making twenty in all Formerly these Pawns or Records some time after the dissolution of every Parliament as will be shewn were carried to the Inrolment Office and then among many other Parliamentary Matters of weighty concern transcrib'd into Parchment Rolls and from thence for more safety carried to the Tower of London where they lost the name of Pawns and were and are still call'd Parliament Clause or Close Rolls which I mention because I shall have often occasion in this Treatise to recite such Clause-Rolls wherein the Pawns were for the most part inserted or endors'd And in respect I do not find that any who have writ before me of Parliaments have taken notice of those Parliament Pawns although they are Recorded and kept in the Pettibag an ancient Office of Record I have cull'd out one of the twenty and made it the foundation of the whole Scheme of this Treatise That there are no more Parliament Pawns in the Pettibag than as I said from the 21. of Hen. the 8th to the 13. Car. 2d this reason may be given that when they were again Enroll'd and transmitted to the Tower or Rolls Chappel it might be thought needless to preserve them in respect that from Ed. the 2. d. to Ed. the 4. th Inclusive they are safely kept inroll'd among the Records in the Tower and from Ed. the 4th to the 21 of Hen. the 8. Exclusive they are kept safe amongst the Records in the Rolls Chappel and from the 21 of Hen. the 8th to the 13 Car. 2d they are preserved amongst the Records in the Pettibag Office and of these which remain in the Pettibag that of the 31 of Hen. the 8th is much defaced and interlin'd but that of the 21 and all the rest from the 36 Hen. 8. are farely ingrost and Legible and Tyed up in one great Bundle the last of which made up for this Parliament of 13 Car. 2d is here Verbatim Transcribed In which for want of Application to the Heraulds the Clerks have Committed many mistakes I suppose by long discontinuance of Methodical Parliaments not being well instructed viz. In the Titles of the Lord Stourton Lord Vaux Lord Wharton Lord Pagit Lord Shandois Lord Stanhop Lord Charles Howard Ld. Roberts Ld. John Pawlet Ld. Coventry Ld. Frances Seymour Ld. Bruce Ld. Newport Ld. Colpeper Ld. Gerrard Ld. Langdale Ld. Hollis Ld. Cornwallis Ld. Delamare Ld. Townsend Ld. Ashly Ld. Crew and some others which shall be rectified in the 4th part of this Treatise However I thought fit to follow the Record Verbatim except in the Marginal Figures and Notes which I have added with Recommendation of Care for the future viz. the 13. Car. 2d is here verbatim transcrib'd CHAP. II. The Copy of the Parliament Pawn of the 13. Car. 2d Anno tertiodecimo Caroli secundi Regis CAROLUS secundus Dei gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor c. Praecharissimo dilecto Fratri suo Jacobo Duci Ebor'um Albaniae magno Admirallo suo Angliae Salutem Quia de Advisamento Assensu Concilii nostri pro quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos statum defensionem Regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae Anglicanae concernent ' quoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem nostram Westm ' octavo die Maii prox ' futur ' teneri ordinavimus ibidem vobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni nostri Colloquium habere tractatum Vobis sub fide Ligeantia quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungen'd mandamus quod consideratis dictorum Negociorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante excusatione quacunque dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus praedictis super dictis Negociis tractatur ' vestrumq ' Consilium impensur ' hoc sicut nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem defensionem Regni Ecclesiae praedict ' expeditionemque dictorum negotiorum diligitis nullatenus omittatis T.R. Teste Rege apud Westm'd decimo octavo die Februarii Anno Regni sui tertio decimo CONSIMILE Breve dirigitur Praecharissimo Consanguineo suo Ruperto Duci Cumbriae T. ut supra Consimile REX c. Archiepiscopo Cant ' c. Consimilia Archi ' Ebor Episcop ' REX praedilecto perquam fideli Consiliario suo Edro ' Dno ' Hyde Cancellar suo Angliae salutem Quia c. Ut supra usq ' tractatum tunc sic vobis mandamus firmiter injungen'd quod omnibus al'pretermissis praedict die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum caeteris de Concilio nostro super dictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumq ' consilium impensur ' hoc nullatenus omittatis T. ut supra REX Praecharissimo consanguineo suo Thomae Comiti South'ton Thesaurario Angliae Salt'm Quia c. ut supra usque tractatum tunc sic Vobis sub fide Ligeancia quibus nobis tenemini c. ut supra T. ut supra CONSIMILIA Brevia diriguntur Personis subscript ' sub eodem dat' Videlt ' Praecharissimo Consanguineo suo Consimilia GEorgio Duci Bucks Carolo Duci Richmond Georgio Duci Albermarl Exercituum suorum Generali Dukes Three JOhanni Marchioni Winton ' Marquesses Four Edro ' Marchioni Wigorn ' Will'o Marchioni Novi Castri Henr ' Marchioni Dorcestr ' CHarissimo Consanguineo suo Montague Comiti Lindsey magno Camerario suo Angliae Earls Fifty five Jacobo Comiti Brecon ' Senescallo Hospitii Edro ' Comiti Manchester Camerario Hospitii Alberico Comiti Oxon ' Algernon ' Comiti Northumbr ' Francisco Comiti Salop. Carolo Comiti Derb ' Johanni Comiti Rotel ' Will'o Comiti Bedford ' Philippo Comiti Pembr ' Montgomeri Theophilo Comiti Lincoln ' Carolo Comiti Nott ' Jacobo Comiti Suff ' Ric'o Comiti Dors ' Will'o Comiti Sarum Joh'i Comiti Exon ' Joh'i Comiti Bridgewater Rob'to Comiti Leic ' Jacobo Comiti North'ton Carolo Comiti Warr ' Will'o Comiti Devon ' Basil'Comiti Denbigh ' Georgio Comiti Bristol ' Lionell'Comiti Midd ' Henrico Comiti Holland Joh'i Comiti Clare Olivero Comiti Bullingbrooke Mildmay Comiti Westmerland Thomae Comiti Berks. Thomae Comiti Cleveland Edr'o Comiti Mulgrave Henr ' Comiti Monmouth Jacobo Comiti Marlborough Thomae Comiti Rivers Henrico Comiti Dover Henrico Comiti Stamford Henr ' Comiti
Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. one who is in Doctrinam mores sacros gregis Inspector and when Bishops grew numerous it was thought fit to place one to look after them and he had the addition of Archos i. e. principalis and so call'd Archi-Episcopus or Arch-Bishop having a certain number of Bishops and their Diocesses reduced to his Province or Care so that the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury with his own Diocess hath twenty two Diocesses or Bishopricks of the twenty six within his Province and the Arch-Bishop of York hath with his own four which makes in all twenty six besides the Bishop of Man who hath no Writ of Summons Anciently these Arch-Bishops and Bishops with Abbots Priors Deans Arch-Deacons and Proctors making the two Convocation-houses were summoned to appear two days before the Temporal Lords but since Henry the Eighth's time when Abbots and Priors were excluded the Bishops are summon'd to meet the same day that the Parliament begins but as Convocation-houses they are not summon'd to meet at Parliament till two or three days after the Lords Spiritual and Temporal are met and sitting in Parliament and those two Convocation-houses are seldom Adjourn'd Prorogu'd or Dissolv'd in three or four days and sometimes longer after the two Houses of Lords and Commons are Adjourn'd Prorogu'd or Dissolv'd These Arch-Bishops and Bishops considering them upon a Baronial account distinct from the Convocations are entred in all Clause Rolls and Pawns next the Blood Royal except when there was a casual interposition as this last of Vice-gerent and their places distinctly set down as in this Act viz. the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury then the Arch-Bishop of York and the other according to Seniority or Antientry as the word of the Act is till the Bishops of London Durham and Winchester were as by this Act fix'd in their Precedencies to the other twenty one and yet there is another method of Precedencies us'd in the Lords House and in all Solemnities by way of counterchanging of Precedencies between the Lords Spiritual and Temporal as will be shewn These twenty six injoy their Offices of Bishops upon a Spiritual and Ecclesiastical account and therefore are call'd Lords Spiritual their Ecclesiastical serving in ordine ad piritualia These for many Ages did manage the Offices of Chancellor and Keeper of the Great Seal also of Treasurer President Privy-Seal and Secretary of which I shall speak more but since Henry the Eighth's time these five Offices have been distinctly manag'd by Laicks of the chiefest quality and merit and the Bishops in a manner circumscrib'd to the Jurisdiction of their respective Diocesses which are of a kind of mixt nature consisting of Spiritualities and Temporalities In the Lords House they have almost equal Prividledges with the Lords Temporal except in matters of Blood when in respect of their Canons they commonly withdraw themselves appointing Proxies and entring Protestation but these Priviledges are not Hereditary like the Temporal Lords but meerly Successive and their Writs are somewhat of a different Nature from those to the Lords Temporal in point of extent concerning the Convocation-houses which do make a kind of a Parliament annext to a Parliament of which I shall speak more at large But how the Bishops were Summon'd may be read in the seventh Chapter SECT VI. Of the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper Obs THis great Officer being not only recited in this Act but having a peculiar Writ of Assistance in this and other Pawns which the next Ten Officers following have not in respect of their Offices I shall discourse more fully of him so soon as I have given a short view of the Ten remaining to be spoken of Edward Hyde Baron Hyde and Lord Chancellor was Summon'd by Writ Feb. 18. 1661. See Chap. II. SECT VII Of the Lord Treasurer of England Obs THis Officer being joyn'd also in this Pawn to the Earl of Southampton then Lord Treasurer and in former Pawns to other Degrees and being intended to be discours'd of in the fourth Exemplar and in the fifth Section of the Barons of the Exchequer I shall defer its inlargement to those Chapters Thomas Earl of Southampton Lord Treasurer of England was Summon'd by Writ Feb. 18. 1661. See Chap. II. SECT VIII Of the Lord President of the King's Council Obs I THis Officer from the time of King John was call'd Principalis and Capitalis Consiliarius and so continu'd till Queen Elizabeth's time and after not us'd till once in King Charles the firsts time and ever since to the end of this Parliament the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper hath supply'd the duty of that Place though not the Title the difference of granting them was that one was always by Patent and the other only by delivery of the Great Seal 2. There are also other Lord Presidents which sit in the Lords House viz. the President of Wales and President of the North but being not mention'd in this Act and the latter not sitting in this Parliament I refer them to my Annotations as also other Presidents of lower Degrees as of Colleges c. SECT IX Of the Lord Privy-Seal Obs IN Edward the Third's time and long after this Office was call'd Keeper of the Privy or Private Seal distinguishing him from the other call'd the Keeper of the Great Seal afterward he was call'd Clerk of the Privy-Seal Clerk being then a Title of Eminency and Gardien del Privy-Seal and in 34 H. 8. Lord Privy-Seal 2. He hath his Office by Patent but the Keeper of the Great Seal as I said only by delivery of that Seal and 't is very probable that this Office was in imitation of that which was us'd by the Romans the Officer whereof was call'd Comes privatorum and as Cassiodore calls him the Governour of the King 's private Affairs 3. Whilst the Court of Requests was in use he was also call'd the Master of it being Master or Superiour to the Four Masters of Requests who were to receive peruse and present all Petitions to the King or to the Parliament in time of Parliament and direct the Petitioners in the right way of proceeding in their business and for want of this direction many men are ruin'd by crafty and unskilful directors and the Parliament troubled with needless applications for I conceive this Court was plac'd as will be shewn between the House of Lords and House of Commons for the Masters to sit there in time of Parliament as Tryers of Petitions to either House and were to judge whether the matter was proper for either House or any other Court which doubtless did take off a great expence of time from both Houses and from intangling them in matters which were properly relievable in other places 4. There are three forts of Seals which are chiefly us'd for publick Affairs two of them pass under the names of Privy or Private the other the Great or Broad-Seal yet for a clearer distinction one of the two is call'd the Privy
Signet and hath four Clerks to attend its Office the other the Privy-Seal and hath also four Clerks to attend its Office and the third is call'd as I said the Great Seal and hath properly six Clerks to attend it but increas'd to many more The Privy Signet is under the Custody of the Chief Secretary of State the Privy Seal under the Custody of the Lord Privy Seal and the Broad Seal under the Custody of the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper so as most matters which concern a declaration of the King's pleasure in writing do take their rise from the Privy Signet and from thence transmitted to the Privy Seal and from thence to the Great Seal to receive its determination 5. But to pass by all private or publick Matters about which these three Officers are concern'd this is certain that the Clerks of these three Offices excluding none in some form or other are concern'd in the Warrants and Writs c. for the Summoning every Parliament 6. When the chief Officer of this Office did pass under the Title of Keeper or Clerk of the Privy Seal most of them were Ecclesiasticks yet having this Office he had his Writ of Summons and Place in the Lords House as may be collected from the Rolls of 15 Edw. 3. when Sir William Keldsly was Keeper of the Privy Seal and 20 Edw. 3. when Mr. Jo. Thoresby was call'd Clerk of the Privy Seal and from 28 Edw. 3. when Sir Michael of Northumberland was Keeper of the Privy Seal Sir being an Epithite given in those days to the Clergy and still in use in the Universities for Batchelors of Arts and from 11 R. 2. and 1 2 H. 4. when Sir Richard Clifford was Keeper of the Privy Seal and these had Writs and from 3 4 H. 6. a Writ was expresly sent Magistro Willielmo Alrevill Custodi privati sigilli and from that time the Rolls and Pawns which speak of them are dormant or wanting to the Pawn of 30 H. 8. when the Writ to John Earl of Bedford is there entred Castos privati sigilli and he being so in 31 H. 8. when the Act was made his Precedency was setled as is therein shewn and there first intituled Lord Privy Seal and so this Officer hath continued in that additional Title of Lord to this time However in the Latin Writs he is styled only Custos privati sigilli without the addition of Dominus and so in the very Pawn of that year and in 36 H. 8. and is no more mention'd in any of the Pawns till 6 and 7 Edw. 6. when John Earl of Bedford was still Custos privati sigilli and from that time those Pawns which are extant do not mention that Officer till 1 Car. 1. when Edward Earl of Worcester was entred Custos privati sigilli and 15 Car. 1. when Henry Earl of Manchester was Custos privati sigilli and had their Writs but in this Pawn of 13 Car. 2. none is mention'd and yet the Lord Roberts was then Lord Privy Seal so as it was an omission of the Clerks as I conceive 7. Most of the Keepers of the Privy Seal as I have observ'd were Ecclesiasticks before 30 H. 8. but since that time this Office hath been conferr'd only upon such as were Temporal Lords above the degree of Barons and not under 8. This great Officer hath also an appartment near the Lords House for his accomodations and sometimes us'd for the Lords Committees as will be shewn 9. These four last mention'd are plac'd in this order in the Lords House whether or not they be of any of the Noble Degrees John Lord Roberts of Truro Lord Privy Seal was Summon'd by Writ of Feb. 1661. See Chap. 2. SECT X. Of the Lord Great Chamberlain of England THE five foregoing Officers of State viz. Vice-Gerent Chancellor Treasurer President and Privy Seal were anciently chosen out of Ecclesiastick Degrees but those which I am now to speak of except the Secretaries being for the most part also Clergy-men were chosen out of Laicks persons of the greatest Merit Fortunes or Families and had their Places as they were annext to the Degrees of the Nobility 2. The learned Institutor saith that if the King gave Lands to a man to hold of him to be Chancellor of England Chamberlain of England Constable of England Marshal of England or High Steward of England c. these Tenures were call'd Grand Sergeanties and these and such like Grand Sergeanties were of great and high Jurisdictions some of them concerned matters Military in time of Wars and some services of Honour in time of Peace 3. This Officer ever was and still is in great Veneration and Use and I conceive though now most of his Imployments are about the King's Court yet the word Camerarius which we call Chamberlain was like to that among the Romans call'd Comes Aerarij and had such relation to the Treasury of the Kingdom as the Chamberlains of London and the Chamberlains of the Palatines of Lancaster and Chester have to their distinct Treasuries of which I shall speak more fully in order as also in my Annotations and I apprehend that these great Officers need not Writs because it is requisite these should be always attending on the Kings Person but when they are otherwise commanded to his Imployments in their Offices and there is scarce any of them especially this but are so glutinated to some Noble Person that it cannot be said whether the Writ be more in respect of the Office or Person that Manageth that Office 4. This Office was injoy'd for many Successions by the Earls of Oxford till Richard the Second by violence took it away the House of Commons 1 H. 4. pray'd the King that it might be restored to Richard then Earl of Oxford being as it was then alledged his due Inheritance yet in 1 H. 6. that King granted it to the Duke of Glocester the 36th of Hen. 8. the Writ was to Edward Earl of Hertford Magno Camerario Angliae and 1 Edw. 6. to John Earl of Warwick Magno Camerario Angliae Afterwards by a Match it was hereditated to the Family of the Berties who after some disputes about the Title did sit in Parliament in the time of Charles the First and this Parliament as Earl of Lindsey and Lord great Chamberlain of England whereby one part which his Lordship is to act as his Predecessors had done is to take care that all things be provided in the House of Lords that may suit with the Grandeur and Conveniencies of the Persons who are there to be imploy'd and for that and other purposes he hath also an Appartment near the Lords House as will be shewn 5. Montague Bertie Earl of Lindsey Lord Great Chamberlain of England was summon'd by Writ Feb. 18. 1661. See Cap. 2. SECT XI Of the High Constable of England IT may be well suppos'd that Constabularius Angliae was instead of Comes stabuli amongst the old Romans which
Episcopo Carlilin P. Johanni Episcopo Roffensi P. Roulando Episcopo Coventry Lichffeldiae Henrico Episcopo Assanensis D. Georgio Episcopo Landavensis D. Thomae Episcopo Bangorensis P. Gulielmo Episcopo Norwicae P. Johanni Episcopo Herefordiae D. Roberto Episcopo Wintoniensis D. Gulielmo Episcopo Bathon Wellen. Roberto Episcopo Cecestriae D. Custodi Spiritualitatis Episcopatûs Wigorn ipso Episcopo in Remotis agente Custodi Spiritualitatis Episcopatûs Dunelmensis ipsa fede vacante XX. in all SECT XVI Observations on this Writ to Cardinal Wolsey THis Writ except the Title of it is like that of Ed. 2d yet I have thought fit to enter it for some reasons particularly 1st For the Eminent nature of the Titles which this Cardinal ascrib'd to himself who had also tryed several experiments to have been made Pope and probably the Passions of Hen. 8. and the Cardinals disappointments therein might hasten the dissolution of the Abbots and other proceedings in order to the lessening the Popes interest here and this refusal of the Cardinal may justly give an occasion to say that the English have always had hard measure in their Attempts therein for though the Conclave have admitted above 50. English men to be Cardinals yet it seems their Policy hath been not to admit of any English man to be Pope except one in our Henry 2. time called Nicolas Brakespear who being Pope Intituled himself Adrian the 4th so that from Higynus's time there hath been but one English man made Pope unless Johannes natione Anglicus Gussarus officio Papa Sexu Faemina quae sedet in Papatu An. 20. Mens 6. who in English we call Pope Joane be allow'd for one of the 246. Popes to this time yet the Pope hath exercised the highest Jurisdiction here that England could afford which is a very Partial and unequal way of dealing 2. The 2d reason of Entring this Writ is to shew that the Archbishop of York was herein the Exemplar to the Archbishop of Canterbury of which there is no Precedent before for the three Cardinals which were Archbishops viz. in the time of King John Edward the 3d and Hen. the 6th were all three Archbishops of Canterbury so as this precedency must be attributed to the Cardinals Dignity above all Archbishops and not to any irregularity in placing the Exemplar And here it may be observed that as the Title of Archbishop did long since leap over the Title of Bishop and the Titles of Patriarch and Pope over Archbishops afterwards viz. Anno Christi 1099. when the Title of Cardinal first began by Pope Pascal the 2d his institution the Title being rais'd by him of certain Parochial Priests in Rome of whom he had more confidence did in effect leap over all the Four other Degrees and by it had the sole power of Electing Popes being under their management so as the Pope hath only the Title left and the 70 Cardinals the power of Electing him in which they are unwilling to admit of any English man although if they did he would be so over-ballanc'd that there were no great hazard of his Election In the mean time the Conclave is so kind to its own Interest as to appoint one of those Cardinals to be Protector of England he being at this day Stiled Eminentissimus Dominus Franciscus Cardinalis Barbarinus Angliae Protector 3. It may be observed that amongst many other Titles he Intitled himself Presbyter to gratifie all interests 4. Though H. 8. might intitle himself Fidei Defensor 8 years before this Writ yet this is the first Writ on Record wherein this Title is given and this also is the last Writ that I find was sent to any Cardinal to sit in Parliament for though Cardinal Pool was Cardinal and Archbishop of Canterbury in Queen Mary's time yet he had no Writ either as Cardinal or Archbishop or both but the Exemplar was in that Parliament to the Bishop of Winchester and no Writs to the Bishops of Canterbury York London or Durham 5. When this Writ was made he was Lord Chancellor yet it is not inserted in the Writ possibly because Sir Thomas More was in Prospect to be Lord Chancellor and was actually so before the Parliament met And now having shewn the first Writ among the Pawns I shall proceed to the Writs in the subsequent Pawns and then shew the alteration of them The second Pawn or bundle of Writs extant in the Pettibag is of the 31 of Hen. 8th wherein the first Writ is to Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury and this Writ also agrees with the former except in the Titles and with all the Writs to Archbishops from Edward the 2ds time to this as they are in the Clause Rolls The third Pawn or Record of Writs in the Pettibag is of the 36 of Hen. 8th which is the remarkable Writ because it differs from all the former Writs since Ed. 2ds time both in the Titles and the Praemonition for in this Writ he is intituled King of Ireland and Supream Head but before this only Lord of Ireland Now as to the Title of King of Ireland Hen. the 2d did give the same to his Son King John but the Pope would not let him enjoy it nor did any of his Successors assume it till Hen. the 8th resolved to reassume it in defiance of the Pope and writ himself King of Ireland instead of Lord of Ireland because as I said in the former Section he would not place the Title of Defender before Ireland as the Pope had directed him in his Bull or it may be in respect the Pope pretended a Title under King John to Ireland and as for the other Title of Supream Head though it was given him by the Parliament 12 years before yet I find it not in any Parliament Writ till this year of the 36. H. 8. So that the Preamble or Titular part of the Writ is thus Henricus Dei gratiâ Angliae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei Defensor Ecclesiae Anglicanae Hiberniae Supremum Caput Then for the Premonition whereas the words Priorem Capellanum or Capitulum were plac'd next unto Praemonentes in this Writ the words were Praemonentes Decanum Capitulum because Abbies and Priories were newly dissolv'd and Deanaries Constituted and so the Writs thus alter'd have continued till this Writ for the year 1661. But before I set down the Writ for 1661 I must a little repeat some short progresses and methods ushering in that Writ for though the Bishops were in the year 1641. by an Act of King Charles the First with the Consent of the Lords Temporal and Commons disabled from Exercising any Temporal Jurisdiction or Authority and thereupon soon after put out of the Lords House as I have shewn yet there was no occasion of new Writs to them till the year 1661. and then there could be no new Writs made for their Restauration till they were restor'd by the same power of King Lords Temporal and Commons by
on a special account of Absence and then it was performed by one of the Chief Justices 5. But to pass these being more fully shewn in my Annotations I do not find in any of the Clause-Rolls or in the Pettibag-Pawns that a Chancellor or Keeper had any distinct Writs of Summons to a Parliament till the 28. of Eliz. when Sir Tho. Bromley Knt. being the Queens Sollicitor was made Lord Chancellor and Summoned by a distinct Writ in the same Form as is hereafter set down which very Form hath continued ever since And in the 35. of Eliz. Sir John Puckering being but Serjeant at Law was made Custos Sigilli and had a particular Writ of Summons to that Parliament and in the 39. of Eliz. Sir Tho. Egerton Knt. being then Master of the Rolls was made Custos Sigilli and had this assisting Writ of Summons for that Parliament and the like in the 43. of her Reign and so in the 21. of King James and in the First of Caroli Primi particular assisting Writs were sent to the Bishop of Lincoln in these words Reverendo in Christo Patri praedilecto fideli Consiliario nostro Joanni Episcopo Lincolniae magni sigilli Angliae Custodi So as he had this Writ as an assisting Writ and another Writ virtute Baroniae 6. It may here be observed that this was the only Bishop that was either Keeper or Chancellor from the First of Eliz. to this time whereas before Queen Eliz. for the most part Bishops or Ecclesiasticks did execute those Offices but whenever it was conferred upon the Laicks choice was made out of the most eminent Families as in the 26. of Hen. the Second as I said Gessrey Natural Son to Henry the Second was made Chancellor and in the 15th of King John Ralph de Nevile was made Keeper of the Great Seal and in 22. of Henry the Third Geffrey a Templer and John de Lexington were made Keepers of the Great Seal and in the 37. of his Reign his Queen upon the Kings going into Gascoine which is remarkable as I said had the Custody of the Great Seal and in the 45. of that Ring Walter de Merton was made Chancellor and in the 49. of that King Thomas de Cantilupe was made Chancellor and in the 53. Richard de Middleton made Custos Sigilli and in the 56. John de Kirkley and Peter de Winton made Keepers of the Seal and in the 2. of Edward the Third Henry de Bughersh made Chancellor In the 14. of Edw. the Third John de St. Paul made Keeper of the Seal in the same year Sir Robert Burgtheire Knt. made Chancellor and Keeper of the Seals and the like in the 15th to Robert Parning and in the 17th to Robert de Sadington and in the 19th to John de Offord and in the 20. to John de Thoresby In the Records of the same year it is said that Sir Lionel Duke of Clarence the Kings Son then Lord Keeper of England gave Command by Proclamation That no Arms should be worn sitting that Parliament whose name is omitted in the Catalogue of the Lord Keepers by Mr. Selden in his Discourse of the Office of Chancellor and Keeper and in the 45. to Sir Robert Thorpe and in the 46. to John Knivet and in the 2. of Rich. the Second to Sir Le Scroop and in the 6. of Rich. 2. to Sir Michael de la Pool and in the 11. of Hen. 4. to Sir Thomas Beaufort and in the 32. H. 6. Richard Earl of Salisbury was made Chancellor singly and in the 21. of Hen. the Eighth Sir Thomas Moor Knt. made Chancellor and Keeper and in the 24. of Hen. the Eightht Thomas Audley made Chancellor and Keeper and in the 36. Hen. 8. Thomas Lord Wriothesly made Chancellor and Keeper and in the First of Edw. the Sixth Sir William Pawlet Knt. Lord St. John of Basing made Keeper and in the same year Sir Richard Rich made Chancellor and in the First of Eliz. Sir Nicholas Bacon Keeper and the 21. Thomas Bromley Chancellor who continued so to the 28. of her Reign and was the first that I find as is before mentioned that had a particular Writ of Assistance and though in the Fourteenth of King James Sir Francis Bacon was Keeper in the Eighteenth of Jac. Henry Viscount Mandevile Lord President of the Council and Lodowick Duke of Richmond William Earl of Pembroke Sir Julius Caesar had jointly the Custody of the Great Seal and in the first Car. 1. Sir Thomas Coventry and in the 16. Car. 1. Sir Edw. Littleton and 21. Car. 1. Sir Rich. Lane were Keepers of the Great Seal yet we find no particular Writs in the Pettibag directed to any but such as I have before mentioned and to these which follow viz. in 15. Car. 1. Sir John Finch Knt. Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas was made Custos Sigilli and had a particular Writ of Summons to attend that Parliament 7. As to this Writ of 13. Car. 2. of which I am to treat it is to be observed that the Warrant before mentioned sent to Sir Edward Hyde Knt. and Chancellor to impower him to send out Writs was directed in these words To our Right Trusty and Well-beloved Counsellor Sir Edward Hyde Knt. Chancellor of England but in his Latine Writ of Assistance the words are Praedilecto perquam fideli Consiliario suo Edwardo Domino Hyde Cancellario suo Angliae leaving out Militi or Equiti aurato and putting in Domino and the reason of this variation as I conceive was That the Warrant was agreed on by the King and Council before the Third of November at which time he was Baron of Hindon and therefore in the Warrant he is named only Sir Edward Hyde Knt. but in the Writ Domino Hyde which is the Adjunct Title of a Baron as he then was and I find before the Parliament met he was created Viscount Cornbury and Earl of Clarendon and thereupon had another Writ in relation to those Dignities which was entered in the Pawn and the entry dated the 12th of April before the Parliament met and in the latter Writ he had also his additional Titles so that I observe that if the Chancellor or Keeper be above the Degree of a Baron he hath his Writ according to his Degree and therein only intimating his Chancellorship or Keepership as is before shewn in the 36. of Hen. the Eighth 1 Mariae c. But if he be not a Baron then he hath this Assisting Writ Quatenus Chancellor or Keeper as may be seen in the former Precedents from the 28. of Eliz. to this Writ of 13. Car. 2. If he be a Baron as I said he hath or may require a Baronial Writ besides this Assisting Writ The form of his Assisting Exemplar Writ is as follows the other will be seen among the Barons SECT VIII The Form of the Assisting Writ to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae
and Recesses so he gives the second Fiat to its Dissolution he hath also an appartment near the Lords House as will be shewn for himself to retire to and for his Serjeant at Arms and others of his Attendants Thus having considered the Lord Bishops and Lord Chancellors Writs I must observe how exquisitely and harmoniously these two Degrees are interpos'd both in their sitting in the Lords House and in the method of their Writs in Pawns and in the Act of Precedency being placed in all of them between the first and second Rank of the Lords Temporal as it were to shew that the Lords Temporal are always to embrace and maintain Religion and Equity as the two chief Supporters of a Parliament I have spoken of the first Supporters to Religion and Equity viz. Princes of the Bloud and now I shall speak of the other Supporters viz. the Nobles not of the Bloud distinctly five Titles viz. Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons but more especially of their Writs which Summon them to sit in Parliament which will guide me into several observations CHAP. IX Of the Fourth Exemplar Writ to the Nobles not of the Bloud-Royal To the Lord-Treasurer c. IN the Eighth Chapter I shewed the Exemplar Writs to Princes Dukes and Earls of the Bloud-Royal I am now according to the method of this Pawn to shew the Exemplar Writs to Dukes Marquesses Earls and Barons not of the Bloud I shall begin with that in Anno 1661. being agreeable to that Exemplar before recited to the Dukes of the Bloud from the word Salutem to the end of the Writ but the Preambles to that word do afford variety almost in all Writs and therefore before I make the Observation upon it I shall give a view of the Writ at large being only abbreviated in the Pawn CArolus Secundus Dei Gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei defensor c. Praecharissimo Consanguineo suo Thomae Comiti Southampton Thesaurario Angliae Salutem Quia de Advisamento assensu Concilii nostri pro quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis nos statum defensionem regni nostri Angliae Ecclesiae ' Anglicanae concernen ' Quoddam Parliamentum nostrum apud Civitatem nostram Westm ' 8. die Maii prox futur ' teneri ordinavimus ac ibidem vobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus dicti Regni nostri Colloquium habere tractatum vobis sub fide ligeantia quibus nobis tenemini firmiter injungendo mandamus Quod consideratis dictorum negotiorum arduitate periculis imminentibus cessante excusatione quacunque dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum ac cum Magnatibus Proceribus praedictis supra dictis negotiis tractatur ' vestrumque Concilium impensur ' Et hoc sicut Nos honorem nostrum ac Salvationem defensionem Regni Ecclesiae praedictae expeditionem dictorum negotiorum diligitis nullatenus omittatis Teste Rege apud Westm ' 18. die Febr. Anno Regni nostri 13. SECT II. Observations 1. ALl Parliamentary Exemplar Writs of this nature which are extant from the 15. of Edward the Second to the 21. of Henry the Eighth if they were not directed to some one of the Heirs of the Crown or to Princes Dukes or Earls of the Bloud were still directed to an Earl not of the Bloud except Three to Three Dukes in Henry the Sixths and Edward the Fourths time it being evident from what hath been said That Earls called in Latin Comites was a more ancient Title in this Kingdom than Dukes Richard the Eldest Son to Edw. the Third being the first that was so created but Earls long before and though Edward the Third did create many Dukes more than his Son which were of the Bloud yet still to keep the old Title of Earl and in veneration thereof as may be supposed he in the Fourty Seventh of his Reign did think sit as the King usually appoints the Sword to such a Person as he directs to carry it before him to grant the Exemplar Writ to an Earl not of the Bloud for the Parliament to be holden that year and so did his Successor as may be seen in this following Table viz. 47. Edw. 3. Richardo Comiti Arundel who sat one Parliament 18. Rich. 2. Henrico Comiti Darby who sat one Parliament 3. Hen. 5. Radulpho Nevile Comiti Westmerland and the like Writ in the same year so he sat two Prrliaments 7. Hen. 5. Henrico Percey Comiti Northumbr and the like in the same year and in the Eighth and Ninth of this King and Twelfth of Hen. 6. so he sat five Parliaments note that the Christian names and Sirnames of Nevile and Percey are in this Writ which is not usual to Earls only the Christian names The three Exemplars to Dukes not of the Bloud are in time subsequent to Earls for the first Exemplar to a Duke was not till 28 H. 6. Gulielmo Duci Suffolciae who sat one Parliament 38 H. 6. Henrico Duci Oxoniae who sat one Parliament 1 Edw. 4. The third Johanni Norfolciae and the like in the same year so he sat two Parliaments And then after these Three Dukes again to an Earl viz. 3 Edw. 4. Richardo Comiti Warwick who sat one Parliament so from the 47. of Edw. 3. to Rich. the 3. there was Eight not of the Bloud viz. Five Earls and Three Dukes who had Exemplars From Richard the Third to the 21. of Hen. 8. there is as I have shewn a want of Records in the Tower so as the first Exemplar that appears to us in the Pettibag of such as had Exemplar Writs being not of the Bloud do begin at the 36. of H. 8. viz. 36 Hen. 8. Thomae Wriothsley Militi Domino Wriothsley Cancellario he sat one Parliament and was the year before made Baron of Titchfield and in the first of Edw. 6. Earl of Southampton 1 Edw. 6. Gulielmo Pawlet Militi Domino Senescallo magni hospitii nostri ac Praesidenti Concilii nec non Custodi magni Sigilli He was then Lord St. John of Bazing and afterwards created Marquess of Wincester 6 Edw. 6. Gulielmo Marchioni Winchester Thesaurario Angliae Thomas Goodrick Bishop of Ely being Chancellor and had his distinct Writ this Marquess had his several Writs viz. in the 6 of Edw. 6. and 7 of Edw. 6. and 1 Mariae and 1 M. 1. and 2 Phil. and M. and 2 and 3 P. and M. and 4 and 5 P. and M. in which time the Bishops of Ely Winchester and Archbishop of York were Lord Chancellors and had distinct Writs it being not proper for them being Lords Spiritual to be Exemplars to the Lords Temporal besides he was Exemplar in the 28. 30. 35. 39. and 43. of Eliz. and Primo Jacobi in which time Sir Thomas Bromley and Sir Christopher Hatton were Lord Chancellors and Sir John Puckering and Sir Thomas Egerton LordKeepers and each of them had distinct Writs so as it
Abbots c. in their time were Pares inter seipsos and both of those Degrees were also Pares upon a Baronial account so the Dukes and Marquesses being Earls or Barons before they were created Dukes or Marquesses in respect of their Earldoms or Baronies were Peers to the Earls and Barons and the Viscounts also most of them being Barons before they were created Viscounts in respect of their Baronies were Peers also to the Barons so also upon a Baronial account they were Pares pari gradu Baroniali Till Patents of Creation did more exactly distinguish them without relation to Baronies so as now to speak properly each Degree are Pares or Prees to their distinct Degrees 9. I must here again make use of my former observation viz. That in the Writs to Dukes they were Summon'd to be present in Parliament Cum Magnatibus Proceribus and so are the Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet the Pattents to the Dukes do place them inter Proceres Magnates putting Proceres or Peers before Magnates or Lords and in the Pattents to Marquesses they are placed inter alios Marchiones and the Earls inter alios Comites and the Viscounts inter alios Vicecomites and the Barons inter alios Barones But none of the Lords Patentees except the Dukes in relation to their places do take any notice of the position of the words inter Proceres Magnates for the Earls and Barons Patents have reference only to their own Degrees and not to the three other Degrees so as Proceres or Peers is applied only to the Dukes in their Patents of Creation 10. This is all that I can satisfie my self in concerning the use of the words Lords and Peers Praelati Magnates Proceres and that this may be the more satisfactory to others I shall recite the words of the learned Selden in his Titles of Honour whose lasting Credit is beyond exception saith he Though there be a distinction of Degrees in our Nobility yet in all publick actions they are Peers or Equals as in the Tryals of Noblemen c. in which the Spiritual Lords never did or do concern themselves Personally because it is against their Canons to act in any matters which relate to Blood yet whatever Acts pass these words are inserted viz. We the Lords Spiritual and Temporal c. with the Kings Assent c. for though the Lords Spiritual consist of Archbishops and Bishops and the Lords Temporal of Princes of the Blood Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons yet they are all included as Peers in the words Lords Spiritual and Temporal and so in many cases the word Peers is also generally applied so that as the words Lords and Peers have been of latter times intermixedly used we cannot well make a difference between them otherwise than is before exprest 11. That the words Lords and Peers have been used promiscuously in relation to the five Degrees of the Lords Temporal is evident from the Commissions issued for the Trials of the Earl of Strafford 1640. the Lord Morley Anno 1665. the Lord Cornwallis Anno 1676. the Earl of Pembroke Anno 1678. wherein the words are Damus autem Vniversis singulis Ducibus Marchionibus Comitibus Vicecomitibus Baronibus c. without mentioning Praelatis for reasons before mentioned and though the Earl of Strafford and Earl of Pembroke were Earls yet by the Commission they were triable per Barones Viceomites Comites Marchiones Duces and not by Earls only and so though the Lord Morley and Lord Cornwallis were only Barons yet they were triable by Dukes Marquesses Earls and Viscounts and not by Barons only whereby the word Peers seems to be a word of eminency giving no real distinction to those five Degrees of Nobility so as all the Degrees of the Temporal Lords are Peers and the Peers Lords to confirm this I shall cite one passage more from Mr. Selden who saith That though we borrowed the word Peers from the twelve Peers in France yet here we apply it to all the Lords in Parliament and not to any set number of them because saith he the number of our Nobles may be more or less as the King pleaseth and as Marquesses and Viscounts were as I said interpos'd to Dukes Earls and Barons so he may abstract less or add more as he thinks most fit for the support of Nobility for he is Dominus Nobilitatis Honoris or the Fountain of Honour and that this Prerogative may be more fully seen herein in the 21. of Jacobi it being needless to quote former precedents five several Writs were issued after the Pawn was setled yet entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year to five several persons viz. to the Lord Grandison Sir Robert Chichester Sir John Sucklin Knight Comptroler of the Kings House to Sir Thomas Edmunds Knight Treasurer of the Kings Houshold and to Sir Richard Weston Knight Chancellor of the Exchequer to summon and impower them to sit in the Lords House who otherwise had no right of Tenure Prescription or Creation So in the first of Caroli primi six several Writs were issued and also entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year viz. to Oliver Lord St. John and again to Sir Thomas Edmunds Sir John Sucklin Sir Richard Weston and to Sir Robert Nanton Knight one of the Kings Privy-Council and to Sir Humphry May Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster and so in 15 Car. primi two Writs were issued and also entred in the Margent of the Pawn for that year viz. to Charles Viscount Wilmot of the Kings Privy-Council and to Edward Newburgh Knight then Chancellor of the Dutchy of Lancaster and also of the Kings Privy-Council 12. To sum up all I apprehend That those Lords Spiritual which are summon'd by Writ to sit in Parliament are Vital Peers and the Lords Temporal so summon'd are hereditary Peers for there are other English Lords which may be but are not summon'd and thereby are no Parliament Peers yet are Lords and upon an hereditary account also for the King as I said can summon or not summon any of them when he thinks fit unless any Lord claims a right by Patent of Creation or otherwise and then upon that right he demands his Writ and it is seldom denied if the grounds of their demands be right if dubious the Case is debated in the Lords House as in the Case of the Lord Abergaveny c. Some are of opinion That the Lords Temporal are only to be accounted Peers and not the Lords Spiritual first Because they sit there rather by their Writs of Summons than Tenures as anciently they did secondly Their Titles of Lord is but vital at most thirdly In case of Treason or Felony committed by a Spiritual Lord or Lord Temporal the manner of trying them upon Indictment and Judgment upon Conviction are clearly different as will be shewn in the Chapter of Trial by Peers 13. Notwithstanding these
stand fair but if divulged they are sure not only to lose the credit of the Event but double the disrepute if both be bad Herein some men are naturally of a more reserved temper than others however those are only fit to be Counsellors and Secretaries of State who have no Windows in their Breast that is no such transparent Eyes as men may easily see their disposures of Affairs but can wisely keep the Secrets of State from other mens Inspections and in Parliaments I conceive such Tempers are very useful for if the People Trust them they do well in performing their Trust but appealing again to the People shews a diffidence in their own Judgments Thus having shewn the Kings Warrant in the Front and the Secretaries Writ in the Rear and fix't the Noble Lords betwixt those who manage the Laws Divine and those who are Assistants in Human Laws and run through the most constant Writs which are us'd for Summoning such as are to fit in a Parliament either as Essential or Assisting Members thereof I should now proceed to the House of Commons but I shall crave leave First To speak of some accidentall Writs for Assistants Secondly Of the manner of return of all the aforesaid Writs Thirdly Of such as sit there without Writ or Patent Fourthly Of such as sit there only by Patent and Fifthly Of some other Officers who are imployed there by vertue of Patents CHAP. XIV Of Consimilar Writs and Patents upon Emergent occasions 1. I Find in Mr. Prins Breviary That he cites many Records long before Henry the Eighth which I shall not examine because some of them have been so long disus'd Of Knights Justices of North Wales Treasurer of Carnarvan Treasurer of the Kings House Chancellor of the Exchequer Deans Archdeacons Escheators and one Magister Thomas Yong which he takes to be a Master of Chancery that have been Summon'd by Writ to sit in Parliaments in the Lords House but since Henry the Eighth in the Pettibag several Writs of Assistants were issued as I have shewn in the 11th Chap. Sect. 9. to shew the Kings Power some of which were Professors of the Law and some not 2. There was another Writ viz. to the Warden of the Cinqueports which was not constant but occasional for sometimes it was directed to an Earl and sometimes to some one Person under the Degree of a Baron yet by vertue of the Writ he was impowr'd to sit in the Lords House but since Henry the Fourths time when that Office was supplied by the Prince of Wales after called Henry the Fifth who had a Writ with the addition of Guardian ' Quinque Portuum that Trust hath been committed to some one of the Blood Royal and from that Writ other Writs are derived to all the Cinqueports But in respect this Writ as to a Parliament is mostly concern'd about Election of 16. Members to serve in the House of Commons I shall refer the Discourse of it to the second part in that Chapter which particularly treats of the Cinqueports 3. If at any time the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper be absent upon just occasion as when the Lord Keeper Bridgman in this Parliament was Sick a Patent was made for Sir John Vaughan then Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas to supply his place and the like to Sir Francis North Chief Justice of the Common Pleas also c. and though for the most part this happens in time of Parliament yet because it may happen between the time of Summons and the Sitting of a Parliament which is the chief design of this part of this Treatise I have thought fit to enter the form of that Patent in this place rather than defer it viz. CHARLES c. To Our Right Trusty and Welbeloved Sir Francis North Knt. Chief Justice of Our Court of Common Pleas Greeting Whereas Our Right Trusty and Welboved Councellor Heneage Lord Finch Our Lord High Chancellor of England is often so infirm that he is not able constantly to attend in the upper House of this Our present Parliament now holden at Westminster nor there to supply the room and place in the said upper House amongst the Lords Spiritual and Temporal there Assembled as to the Office of the Lord Chancellor of England hath been accustomed We minding the same place and room to be supplied in all things as appertaineth for and during every time of his absence have named and appointed you And by these Presents do Name Constitute and Appoint and Authorize you from day to day and from time to time when and so often as the said Lord Chancellor shall happen at any time or times during this present Parliament to be absent from his accustomed place in the said upper House to Occupy Vse and Supply the said room and place of the said Lord Chancellor in the said upper House amongst the Lords Spiritual and Temporal there Assembled at every such day and time of his absence and then and there at every such time to do and execute all such things as the said Lord Chancellor of England should or might do if if he were there personally present Vsing and Supplying the same room Wherefore We Will and Command you the said Sir Francis North to attend to the doing and execution of the premisses with Effect and these Our Letters Patents shall be your sufficient Warrant and Discharge for the same in every respect In Witness whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patents Witness our Self at Westminster the Nineteenth day of March in the Nine and twentieth Year of our Reign Per ipsum Regem propria manu Signat And having now dispatch't all the Writs and Patents which concern the Summoning of such as sit in the Lords House it is proper to shew the manner of returning of those Writs which is usual in all Courts and ought to be strictly observed here CHAP. XV. Of Returns of Writs relating to the Summoning of such as are to Sit in the Lords House IN all Judicial Courts from whence Writs do issue there is care taken for their due Returns as may be seen in Fitz Herbert and such Authors who have treated of the nature of Writs and their Returns but none of them giving a full account of Parliament Writs and Returns gives me occasion to insert this Chapter As to the Return of the Writs to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Assistants they ought by every individual Person who had a Writ to be deliver'd to the Clerk of the Parliament before the House Sit or immediately upon their Entrance into the House at the Table and by the said Clerk they are to be kept with the Records of that House By the omission of this method many inconveniencies have and may happen to their Successors or Posterity and therefore it is wisht there were more care taken in their due Returns to which they may be incourag'd being of so little trouble in the performance But as to the
was commonly taken for the Master of the Horse to the Emperour and is a Place still of great Honour in most parts of Europe but I conceive he was rather call'd Comes stabuli as an Officer or Office of refuge for so stabulum also signifies However for many Ages this Office was held in Grand Sergeanty by those persons hereafter nam'd but in 12 H. 8. it became forfeited to the Crown and since that never granted to any Subject but pro hac vice at some Solemnities as at the Coronation of King Charles the Second in April 1661 a little before this Parliament Algernoone Piercy Earl of Nortbumberland was made High Constable of England pro hac vice for with the Ceremony of that day his Office ended and Henry the Eighth I conceive did enter it in the Act of 31 of his Reign that in case there should be any use of this Officer when any such Solemnity happen'd in time of Parliament his place might be known without dispute 3. Before the 13th of Henry the 8th in some respects it had a greater power than the Earl Marshal and in others equal to it and so the extravagant parts being taken away the rest fixt in the Earl Marshal of whom I shall speak next however it hath left a name of great honor and use those of Honor are the Constable of Dover c. those of Use are the high Constables and Constables disperst in all parts of England 4. Whilst this great Officer was of constant use he was constantly summon'd to Parliaments viz. 50. E. 3. Thomas de Woodstock Comes de Buck Constabularius Angliae and so that 1.3 and 4. Ric. 2. Thomas Dux Glostriae Constabularius Angliae 17. R. 2. and the 1st of Hen. the 4th Henry Percy Earl of Northumberland Constab Angliae and the 2d of Hen. the 5th and 1. H 6. Summons to Humphrey Duke of Gloster Const Angliae and to John Duke of Bedford Const Angliae 2. H. 6. and from thence again to the Duke of Buckingham Const Angliae but from thence to the 20. of Hen. the 8. there are no Pawns as I said to guide us to the knowledge of such as were summon'd to the intervening Parliaments but it appears by other Records that in the 13th of Hen. the 8. this Office of Constable of England was turn'd into an hac vice and so only granted upon the Solemnity of Coronation and thereupon is not mention'd in any following Pawns to this time or was of any use in this Parliament SECT XII Of the Earle Marshal of England THis great Officer hath not so great a Latitude of power as the Constable of England had yet he hath under his Jurisdiction the Care of the Common Peace of the Land in deeds of Ams and matters of War when it happens in Forraign or Domestick parts in most of which he is guided by the Civil Laws and yet not to do any thing repugnant to the Common Laws In times of War he is more absolute in times of Peace less this mane of Marshal 't is very probable had its Original from Mars the Romans God of War and was the same which they call'd Comes Militum 2. However with us this Great Officer had and hath several Courts under his Jurisdiction viz. the Court of Chevalry now almost forgotten and the Court of Honor now quiet layd aside but the Sedes Mariscalli or Court of Marshalsee is still in being where he may sit in Judgment against Criminals offending within the verge of the Kings Court and the chief Officer under him is call'd the Knight Marshal 3. As also the Herauld Office or Colledge where when doubts arise concerning Descents Pedegrees Escuchteons c. he determins them this was Incorporated by Ric. the 3d. and many priveledges added by Philip and Mary 4. and 5. 4. Heraulds amongst the old Romans were a certain Order of Priests call'd Faeciales and so term'd because Bello paceque faciendo apud eos jus erat pronuntiare c. they were also call'd Caduceatores from a little wand which they carried whereon was fixt two wings to represent Mercury the nimble Messenger of War quod Contentionem Bella Cadere facerent 5. This Office or Colledge consists of 3 Regulators of Arms Ceremonies Pedegrees and Descents of Nobility and Gentry the first is call'd Garter Rex Armorum Principalis chief King at Arms and is also an Officer to the Soveraign and Knights Companions of the most noble order of the Garter the 2d call'd Clarentius also King of Arms but his Jurisdiction is only on the Southside of Trent The 3d. call'd Norray also King of Arms for the Northside of Trent these two being confin'd but Garter not consin'd 6. Besides these there are 6 more properly call'd Heraulds quasi Honorem tenentes Haeredes Aulae dicentes such as are able to give an account to the Court of Heyres to Families and these have distinct Titles distinguishing their Imployments viz. 1. York 2. Lancaster 3. Somerset 4. Richmond 5. Chester 6. Windlesour 7. And there are also 4 Under Graduats call'd Pursevants or such who with readiness do pursue the Commands of their Superior Officers properly in Marshal Causes and therefore call'd Pursevants at Arms to distinguish them from other Pursevants or Messengers from other Courts and these 4 have also 4 distinct Titles viz. Blewmantle 2. Rougecross 3. Rouge-Dragon 4. Portcullis but of the Earl Marshal and Heraulds I shall speak more as they are imployed in Parliamentary Ceremonies 8. There is no doubt but these Earls Marshals have for many ages sat in Parliaments viz. the Duke of Norfolk Marshal of England was summon'd 15 Ed. 2. But 11 R. 2. the Title of Earl Marshal of England being by Patent granted to Thomas de Mowbray Earl of Nottingham and entail'd on the Heirs Males of his Body which failing yet the Title of Mowbray descending on Thomas Earl of Arundel King James did by Pattent make him Earl Marshal for life and he was Summon'd to Parliament by both Titles but he dying Thomas Earl of Arundel and Mowbray Grandson and Heir to the said Thomas had no Writ provided for him in Feb. 1660 when this Pawn was made being then suppos'd to be a Lunatick and upon that account kept close at Padua in Italy but soon after by the Solicitation of Henry Howard next Brother and Heir to the said suppos'd Lunatick the Dukedom of Norfolk was restor'd after a long Attainder and by Act of Parliament settled on the said Thomas the Grandson and the said Henry being soon after created Earl of Norwick did manage the Office of Earl Marshal and had a Patent for the same from this present King Charles therein setling this Office upon him and the Heirs Males of his Body with a large Intaile for want of such Issue to the next Heir Male of that Noble Family So Henry was Summond about the middle of this Parliament as Earl of Norwich with the Title also of Earl