have it further enacted That all manner of fees heretofore lawfull or hereafter by the King and Parliament to be made lawfull for or concerning the probat of Wills administration of the goods of the intestat letters of tuition receiving or making of accompts inductions to Archbishoprickes Bishoprickes Deanries Parochiall-Churches or other spirituall promotions and all other fees whatsoever heretofore lawfull or hereafter to be made lawfull for any travaile or paine to bee taken in or about the expedition or execution of any of these causes shall for ever hereafter be fees and allowances appropriated to the Judges and principall Registers of the said Courts equally to bee devided betweene them as heretofore hath beene accustomed and that the said Judges and Ministers within their severall charges shall be Collectors of the Kings tenths and subsidies granted and due by the Clergie taking for their travaile and paine in and about the same collection such fees as heretofore have beene accustomed Provided alwayes that none of the said civill and temporall Officers and Ministers nor any of them for any offence contempt or abuse to be committed by any person or persons in any wise incident to any of the said Courts and Consistories suspend excommunicate or interdict any person or persons but shall and lawfully may by authority of this present Act proceed against every offender and offenders by such ordinarie processe out of the said Register or Notaries office as is used upon a sub-paena out of the high Court of Chancerie and there upon default or contempt to proceed to attachment proclamation of rebellion and imprisonment of the partie offending as in the said high Court of Chancery is used Provided also that all appeales hereafter to bee made from all and every Court and Courts in the Shires and Diocesses of the Countrey shall bee made to the higher Courts as heretofore hath beene accustomed only with an alteration and addition of the names stiles and dignities of Archbishops Bishops and other Ordinaries unto the name stile and dignitie of our Soveraigne Lord the King his heires and successors And that upon the appeales so to be made it shall and may be lawfull for the Judges and Ministers of Justice of and in the said higher Courts to make out all manner of processe and processes and to do and execute all and every act and acts thing and things for the furtherance of Justice in the causes aforesaid as to them shalby the law seem equal right meet and convenient any law statute priviledg dispensation prescription use or custom heretofore to the contrarie in any wise notwithstanding Provided also that all and everie such Judge and Minister that shall execute any thing by vertue of this act shall from time to time obey the Kings writ and writs of prohibition of attachment upon prohibition and indicavit and not to proceed contrary to the tenour of such writ or writs in such and the same manner and form and condition as they have or ought to have done be ore the making of this act any thing in this act to the contrary notwithstanding Provided also that this act or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be interpreted to give any authoritie to the said Judges and Officers or any of them to put in execution any civill or Ecclesiasticall law repugnant or contrariant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realme or hurtfull to the Kings Prerogative Royall And thus it may seeme to be but a small labour a little cost and an easie matter for the King his Nobles and Wisemen of the Realme to devise formes of judgement and manner of processe and proceedings without any offices or functions of the Canon law whereby the use and studie of the Civill Law and the reward and maintenance for Civilians might be furthered and increased and not utterly overthrown and taken away as the Admonitor uncivily beareth us in hand As for the alteration of the censure of excommunication for contumacy mentioned in this project we have the consent of the reverend Bishops in this admonition that the same may be altered For the Admonitor their Prolocutor speaketh on this wise viz. As for the excommunication Pag. 138. Excommunication for contumacie by the Admonitors judgement may be taken away without offence and with the good liking of the Bishops practised in our Ecclesiasticall Courts for contumacie in not appearing or not satisfying the judgement of the Court if it had pleased the Prince c. to have altered the same at the beginning and set some other order of processe in place thereof I am perswaded saith he that the Bishops and Clergie of the Realme would have beene very well contented therewith And speaking of a certain manner of civill discomoning used in the Church of Tigure he further addeth viz. Which or the like good order devised by some godly persons if it might be by authoritie placed in this Church c. I think it would be gladly received to shun the offence that is taken at the other ADMONITION And matters of Tythes Testaments and Matrimonie matters also of adulterie slander c. are in these mens judgements meere temporall c. therfore to be dealt in by the temporall Magistrate only which as yet have either none at all or very few laws touching those things therefore the common law of the Realme must by that occasion receive also a very great alteration For it will be no small matter to apply these things to the temporall law and to appoint Courts Officers and manner of processe and proceedings in judgement for the same ASSERTION Indeed we hold that all these matters wherof mention is here made Matters of tythes and other causes of like nature pertain to civill justice and all others of the like nature are merely civill and temporall and by the temporall Magistrate alone to be dealt in and to bee discussed if we consider the administration of externall and civil justice And this we thinke will be granted of all and not to be denyed of any unlesse they be too too popishly addicted In regard whereof we have drawn as before is mentioned a project how Courts and manner of processe and proceedings in judgement by Doctors of the Civill Law may be appointed by the King and his high Court of Parliament without that that the common Law of the Realme by the occasion of any such courts offices or manner of processe and proceedings must receive any alteration at all much lesse a very great alteration Howbeit if it should not please the King and that the Civilians could not finde favour in his sight by courts offices and manner of processe and proceedings in judgement before specified or by the like to have the studie of the civill Law advanced yet we thinke it convenient once again How matters of tyths c. may be dealt in by â—he Kings Iudges to be examined how these matters may be dealt in according to the rules and grounds
against us that we which urge the same holy law for the bringing in of the discipline by pastors and elders should notwithstanding contrary to the same law intend the leaving out or altering any one of the three estates But which of the three estates was it that he meant should bee left out I trow there is none of the state of prelacie so ill advised as to take upon him the proof of this position viz. That the Lords spiritual The state of the prelacie is not one of the three estates in parliament by themselves alone doe make one of the three estates or that the statutes of England to this day have stood by their authorities as by the authoritie of those who alone by themselvs are to be accompted one of the three estates For if that were so how much more then might the great Peeres Nobles and temporall Lords challenge to make by themselvs an other estate And without contradiction to this day the commons summoned by the kings writ have ever been reckoned a third estate Now then if statutes have hitherto stood by authoritie of the Lords spirituall as of the first estate by the authoritie of the Lords temporall as of the second estate and by authoritie of the commons as of the third estate I would gladly be resolved what accompt the Admonitor made of the Kings estate It had not beene liegnes nor loyaltie I am sure howsoever hee spake much of the Lords spiritualls dutie and fidelitie in the execution of our late Queenes lawes to have set her Royall person authoritie and state behind the lobbie at the Parliament doore Either the kings Royall person then as not comprised within the compasse and circumcription of the three estates by his meaning which had beene but a very bad meaning must be thought to have beene hitherto secluded from authorizing the statute lawes made in Parliament Or els it is a most cleare case that the Lords spirituall themselves alone do not make any one of the three estates And what matter then of more weight may it happily seeme to be to alter the authoritie of the Lords spirituall and to leave them out of the Parliament when as notwithstanding they being left out the statutes of England may remaine and continue by authoritie of the three estates And it were not amisse for the Lords spirituall to consider that the bodie and state of the weale publike both now is and ever hath beene a perfect entire and complete bodie and State without the bodie and state of Prelacie and that the King and Nobles and Commons of the Realme without Prelates Bishops or Clerkes doe make up all the members and parts of the bodie and of the state and may therefore ordaine promulg and execute all manner of lawes without any consent Anno 36. h. 8. fo 51. h Anno m. j. fo 93. â— approbation or authoritie yeelded unto the same by the Bishops spirituall or any of the Clergie And thus much our Divines Histories and Lawes do justifie Sir Iames Dier Lord chiefe Justice of the Common pleas in his reports telleth us that the state and bodie of a Parliament in England consisteth first of the King as of the head and chiefe part of the bodie secondly of the Lords as principall members and lastly of the Commons as inferiour members of that bodie By a statute of provisoes it appeareth That the holy Church of 25. Ed. 3. holy church founded in the state of prelacie by the King England was founded into the state of prelacie within the Realm of England by the grand father of King Edward the third and his progenitors and the Earles Barons and other Nobles of the Realme and their Ancestors for them to informe the people of the law of God and to make hospitalities and almes and other workes of charitie in These uses are changed to the keeping of great horses great troopes of idlers wiâ—h long haire and great chaines of gold 6 Eliz. c. 1. The King bound to do lawes made without assent of prelates to bee kept as lawes of the realmes the places where the Churches were founded From whence it followeth First that the Archbishops and Bishops only and alone doe not make of themselves any state of prelacie but that the whole holy Church of England was founded into a state of Prelacie Secondly it is plaine that the Kings of England before they and the Earles Barons and other Nobles and great men had founded the holy Church of England into a state of Prelacie ought and were bounden by the accord of their people in their Parliaments to reforme and correct whatsoever was offencive to the lawes and rights of the crowne and to make remedie and law in avoiding the mischiefes dammages oppressions and grievances of their people yea and that the Kings were bound by their oathes to doe the same lawes so made to bee kept as lawes of the Realm though that thorough sufferance and negligence any thing should at any time be attempted to the contrary For whereas before the statute of Caerlile the Bishop of Rome had usurped the Seignories of such possessions and benefices as whereof the Kings of the Realme Earles Barons and other Nobles as Lords and Avowes ought to have the custodie presentments and collations King Edward the first by assent of the Earles Barons and other Nobles and of all the communaltie at their instances and requests und without mention of any assent of the state of prelacie in the said Parliament holden at Caerlile ordained that the oppressions grievances and dammage sustained by the Bishop of Romes usurpation should not from thenceforth be suffered in any manner And forasmuch as the grievances and mischiefes mentioned in the said Act of Caerlile did afterward in the time of King Edward the third daily abound to greater dammage and destruction of the Realm more than ever before and that by procurement of Clerks and purchasers of grace from Rome 31 Ed. 5 sta of â—â—ering the said King Edward the third by assent and accord of all the great men and commons of this Realme and without mention of any assent of Prelates or Lords spirituall having regard of the said Act of Caerlile and to the causes conteyned in the same to the honour of God and profit of the Church of England and of all this Realme ordained and established that the free elections of Archbishops Bishops and all other dignities and benefices elective in England should hould from thenceforth in the manner as they were granted by the Kings progenitors and founded by the ancestors of other Lords And in divers other statutes made by King Edward the third it is said that our soveraigne Lord the King by the assent of the great men and all the Commons hath ordained remedie c. That it was accorded by our Soveraigne Lord the King the great men and all the commons 36 Ed. 3. c. 6 8 Ed. 3. 3. statute of provisours
of Yorke and Silby were there present In a booke intituled the burning of Pauls Church in London 1561. and in the fift question moved by a papist it is said that this manner of ministration of Sacraments set forth in the booke of Common prayers was never allowed nor agreed upon c. no not by the Clergie of England at the last Parliament but only it was agreed upon by the Laitie which had nothing a doe with spirituall matters or causes of religion Whereunto the reverend Father Master Pilkington Bishop of M. Pilkington Bishop of Durisme Duresme answering was there not saith he a disputation for Religion appointed by the Queenes Majestie wherein your Clergie was affraid to utter their foolishnesse in defending their superstition lest they had taken more shame in answering than they did in holding their peace I thinke the Vniversities with so many places of this Realme receiving religion and these other disputing for it may bee counted to be some part of the clergie of the Realme And so it was not received without consent of the Clergie But these were not of the Parliament What then But as Ioash Josaphat Ezechias and Iosias did not make a new Religion but restored that which was defaced and had long lyen buried so our Parliament did not set forth a new religion but restore that which was godly begun before the good K. Edward confirmed by the Parliament and Clergie then c. But nothing can bee concluded as a law by Parliament say they without consent of the Clergie there present But this having not their consent cannot be counted a law as they think I had rather saith M. Pilkington leave this to be answered by the Lawyers than otherwise Yet that the world may see that something may be said in it we grant him not this to be true that no law at all can be made without consent of Bishops Look your old statutes of Parliament when Bishops were highest afore Edward the third and ye shall read that they passed by consent of the Lords temporall and commons without any mention of the Lords spirituall which statutes many of them stand in strength at this day Then it may well be gathered that the consent of the Clergie was not alwayes so necessarie as they thinke it The Lawyers Judges and Justicers put in practice and execute these lawes therefore their doings may be a sufficient reason to lead the unlearned what opinion they have of this statutes For Religion except Justice Rastall first executing that and afterward running away may condemne the rest which I trust he may not I thinke they would not execute them except they had the strength and nature of lawes If they doe contrary to their knowledge and opinion they cannot be able to answer their doings but I think no wise men are of this opinion Only these corner creepers that dare not shew their face and would deceive the people go about to deface all good and godly order that displeases them In the dayes of K. Edward they had the like fond opinion that the king could not make lawes in his minoritie untill he came unto full age and to make the people to disobey their Prince Hitherto M. Pilkington L. Bishop of Durisme with whom the most worthy and learned M. Jewell late Bishop of M. Iewel B. of Salisburie Salisburie agreeth in every point The wise and learned faith hee could have told you that in the Parliaments of England matters have evermore used to passe not of necessitie by the speciall consent of the Archbishops and Bishops as if without them no statute might lawfully be enacted but only by the more part of voyces yea although the Archbishops and Bishops were never so earnestly bent against it And statutes so passing in Parliaments onely by the voyces of the Lords temporall without the consent and agreement of the Lords spirituall have neverthelesse beene alwayes confirmed and ratified by the Royall assent of the Prince and have beene enacted and published under the names of the Lords spirituall and temporall Reade saith hee the statutes of King Edward the first there shall ye find that in a Parliament holden at S. Edmundsbury the Archb. and Bishops were quite shut forth and yet the Parliament held on and good and profitable lawes were there enacted the departing or absence or malice of the Bishops spirituall notwithstanding In the Records thereof it is written thus Habito Rex cum suis Baronibus Parliamento Clero excluso statutum est The King keeping a Parliament with his Barons the Clergie that is to say the Archbishops and Bishops being shut forth it was enacted c. In provisione de matrona in the time of K. Edward the third whereas matter was moved of bastardie touching the legitimation of bastards borne before mariage the statute passed wholly with the Lords temporall whether the Lords spirituall would or no. and that contrary to the expresse decrees and canons of the Church of Rome And thus much the most reverend and godly Father M. Iewell Bishop of Salisbury Wherefore to conlude this point against the Admonitors position I dispute thus All those persons who by any necessitie are none of the three estates aâ—d by whose authorities the statutes of England to this day have not stood to leave out the same persons may happily seem a matter of lesse weight than all men do judge it But the Archbishops and Bishops are such persons as by nâ—cessitie are none of the three estates and by whose consents the statutes of England to this day have not stood Therefore to leave out the Archbishops and Bishops may happily seem a matter of lesse weight than all men doe judge it If our Evangelicall Bishops be of that opinion of which the Popish Bishops were viz. that the house of Parliament is an unfit and an unmeet place to have the holy cause of the religion of God debated and concluded upon and that the Laitie without the clergie ought not to conclude any thing in Religion and that in respect hereof their presences their voices and their assents are necessary in the â—arliament If our Evangelicall Prelates I say make this objection then besides that hereby they unseemely unmannerly and unchristianly accuse the whole land of ignorance and blindnesse in religion supposing neither King nor Nobles nor Commons to be able to discern betweene night and day besides this I say so shamefull an abuse of a whole Christian nation I would pray them to remember what the most reverend Fathers Master Pilkington and Master Iewell have answered to such cavillous slanders For what else intended they by many examples and proofes brought for the Parliaments of England consisting of the King the Nobles and the Commons to be lawfull Parliaments and to have right to establish religion but to justifie against Popish scoffers that religion might be conceived and established in Parliament notwithstanding the absence or exclusion of the Clergie Besides since our
B upon a Sunday within a quarter of a yeare last past vvhen the Parishioners of B. vvere assembled together at the said Church to heare Divine Service caused diverse serving men and others to sit in the Pevv or place vvhich properly belonged to the Parson of the said Church so that vvhen the said M. G. came to take his place they thrust him and very disorderly in the time of Prayer kept him out of the said place Item VVe object unto you F. B. that about six yeares past you the said F. brought into the town of B. a bastard child as it is credibly thought of your ovvne and there placed it at nurse and have lately received it into your own house to the great offence of the inhabitants there and the bad example of others Et obijcimus cum duobus de quolibet Subscribed c. Whereunto in the foote of these Articles was added Master B. I pray you let this matter be followed ex officio and the parties presently to be sent for by warrant Subscribed c. Now these Gentlemen according to the Bishops direction being presently sent for by a Pursevant to answer the Articles objected they forthwith make their repaire to the Archbishop with a Copie of the Articles with whom they finde such grace as in their behâ—lfe immediately hee writeth to the Bishop as followeth SAlutem in Christo My very good Lord I have by meanes received these Articles enclosed signed by your Lordships hand and can not but greatly marveile that contrary to the orders of the Commission Court subscribed by your selfe and the rest of the Commissioners Note that the signe of Crosse in Baptisme by an Archbishops opinion is but of small moment and that suspition of bastardy may easily bee dismissed Note that the 17. of October was the Sabath day at what time Arch D. C and D. B. sitting as Commissioners the Arch. took pen inke and crossed the Articles all overthwart and so sent them backe with his Letter you would cause a Gentleman of such a qualitie as Master B. is to be sent for by a Pursevant before the ordinary processe of a Letter missive were served upon him especially for matters of so small moment Neither will it be thought to proceed of any just cause but rather of some other misconceite when it shall be understood that there is a controversie in Law elsewhere depending betweene him and a kinsman of yours And therefore for the avoyding of his further complaint and other offence that may grow thereby I heartily pray your Lordship to suppresse the same and proceed no further therein Desiring you withall to have due consideration of the cause lest I be enforced to deale likewise in the defence of my kinsman as you doe for yours And so praying your Lordship to returne unto me answer hereunto and what you meane to doe with my very hearty commendations I commit you to the tuition of Almighty God From c. the 17. of October c. Subscribed c. Vnto which Letter also was added as followeth Master B. I pray you according to the tener of this Letter to see that this cause of M. G. and F. B. be dismissed from thence and if any be bound to prosecute the cause against them let them understand that I meane to heare it at c. otherwise let it wholly be dismissed and the bands delivered The Bishops Answer to the Archbishops former Letters MAy it please your Grace to understand that I was the more willingly drawne to send for M. B. in that sort because he was oft and of long time accused not onely to be a disordered man himselfe but also a great and open maintainer and carier from place to place of that wrangling Puritan VV. And as it is to bee proved a refrainer from his Church and from the Communion as I am enformed And therefore if wee have omitted any circumstance or ceremonie it is in zeale of the redresse of such a disorderly person Which if it should bee found in your owne brother I thinke your grace would not spare him Neverthelesse if you your selfe take it in hand to his redresse I for my part shall bee intreated so that the man bee amended who hath caried himselfe cutragiously both in that and other things And so referring the whole matter to your graces discretion I take my leave praying God to blesse us in the peace of the Church From c. the 17. of October c. Your Graces most assured in Christ c. Whatsoever speciall cause might move these two great Prelates to stand either of them for the defence of his kinsman is not a thing materiall to this Treatise But this honestly enough may bee averred that it is no very good nor moderate kinde of ecclesiasticall discipline either for the Archbishop and his associates in regard of his kinsman presented to a benefice by the Gentleman to cancell the articles of his colleague and fellow commissioners or for the Bishops upon a splene taken against the Gentleman for standing upon the right of his patronage against his kinsman to violate the publike orders of the high commissioners whereunto he himselfe had subscribed Many other formes of ecclesiasticall discipline of late yeares have beene used by the high commissioners But whether they were all very good and moderate disciplines or no is greatly doubted by many wise learned and godly men And namely it is doubted whether such ecclesiasticall commissioners as by letters patents under the great Seale of England were authorised from the Queen to exercise use occupie and execute all manner of jurisdiction priviledges and preeminences concerning any spirituall or Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction be able to prove unto the Realme that they had lawfull power and authoritie by the statute of 1 Eliz. c. 1 or by the Queenes letters patents made according to the true intent of that statute or by any other law or statute of the Realme to depute and substitute any other person under them to use exercise and execute any part of that jurisdiction ecclesiasticall which by vertue of that statute and letters patents was committed only to their fidelities and discretions And whether it were a very good manner of ecclesiasticall discipline which was used exercised and executed either by the person so deputed or by the Commissioners themselves upon any processe or proceedings made by the said person substituted Againe it is doubted whether it were a good manner of Ecclesiasticall discipline for the high Commissioners to command the Magistrates Ecclesiasticall diâ—cipline against theâ—â— Magistrates of Banbury of the towne of Banburie at the suit of certaine popish companions to reset up a Crosse which by vertue of the Queenes injunctions they had peaceably and lawfully pulled down It is also doubted whether it were a very good manner of Ecclesiasticall discipline for the high Commissioners to detaine Master More one yeare or two in prison depriving him also from his living for
Bishop to demand of the Minister only this and no more viz. whether will you give all faiâ—hfull diligence to minister the Doctrine and Sacraments of Christ There is therefore some other kinde of Discipline of Christ intended by the Parliament to The Parliament intendeth some other disciplinâ—â—â—han of declaring by doctrine be attributed unto every Minister and wherewith also the law of the Realme doth enable every Minister than is this manner of discipline oâ— declaring by doctrine and teaching the people And this discipline also must needs be understood to be of the spirituall censures of the Church because Christ never instituted any other discipline And therefore because our opposites agree with us in a generalitie that the doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ are to be ministred as the Lord hath commanded only and none otherwise and yet neverthelesse doe dissent from us touching the persons Answer to the abstract 55 60 by whome this discipline is to be ministred because say they every particular ceremonie rite or circumstance of externall policie are not set downe in Scripture because of this their answer I say it is to be considered First unto what persons the function of the ministration of the discipline of Christ by the holy Scriptures is committed Secondly whether the same persons with their functions bee arbitrable ceremonious â—â—â—rituall or circumstantiall To what persons the discâ—pline of Christ by the Scriptures is committed and whether the persons be arbitrable or no Phil. 1. 1. Tit. 9 5 7 to bee altered and changed by authoritie of the Church as things indifferent yea or no. To the first seeing to one and the selfe same person the holy Scriptures attribute these two names Bishop and Pastor thereby signifying what are the two duties which belong to the same one person and seeing also no one person by Gods word is called a Bishop or Pastour in regard of his fellow brethren the other Bishops or Pastours but in regard of his owne flocke which hee overseeth and seeing also in well ordered Churches by the Ordinance of God certaine men of approved godlinesse 1 Tim 3 1 called according to the common name of the Hebrewes by the common name of Elders whom partly calleth Governors 1 Cor. 12 28. were joyned as Ecclesiasticall Magistrates to the Bishop Pastor or teaching Elder by whose common direction and authority Ecclesiasticall discipline was practised seeing I say these things are so we affirme that the persons to whom the ministration of the discipline of Christ rightly belongeth are the persons onely above specified and none other And further we say if any spirituall Discipline or The Discipline of Christ pâ—ophaned if the same be ministred by other persons than the holy Scriptures do appoint power which directly be longeth unto the Conscience be ministred in the Church by any other persons than by those persons onely that the same Discipline is not to bee called the Discipline but a meere prophanation of the Discipline of Christ For as it is unlawfull for any person to usurpe any part of the Bishops or Pastors office which consisteth in spirituall teaching the word and administring the Sacraments so is it also unlawfull for any person to usurpe any part of a Bishops Pastors or Elders office which consisteth in spirituall rule and government Whereupon it secondly followeth that the same persons with their functions are not arbitrable ceremoniall rituall and circumstantiall as things indifferent to bee altered by the authority of the Church but perpetuall substantiall essentiall and as it were the very maine and fundamentall pillers to uphold and stay the House of God from all spirituall sliding and falling downe And therefore from the execution of the Discipline of Christ we seclude the persons of all humane Archbishops humane Bishops Suffrafanes Arch-deacons Chancellors Commissaries Officials and all Rowland Allens because their persons together with their functions are arbitrable ceremonious rituall traditionall or circumstantiall yea and removeable at the pleasure of the King and State Neither doth this disagree from that which was erst said of a A Bishop Pastor and Elder and our Lord â— diffr Bishop or Pastor that they be all one in respect of their function For it is not said that an humane Bishop and Pastor but that a Bishop and Pastor are all one For a Bishop simply so called is not a Bishop and Pastor in respect of his fellow brethren but only in regard of his flocke which he over-seeth feedeth and ruleth But a What a Lord â— is humane Bishop is hee that is promoted unto this dignitie by man and who by mans authority taketh upon him superiority and preheminence over them which are equall unto him touching their function that intangleth himselfe with civill government and worldly affaires and whose Bishoply office consisteth not so much in the dispensation of Gods Word and Sacraments as in Lordly and Bishoply apparell Crossing with the signe of the Crosse confirmation of Children sole imposition of hands sole excommunication sole enjoyning of Articles upon the people and Clergie of his Diocesse consecration of Oratories delegation of his Episcopall authority to his Suffragane Vigar generall and principall officiall and other such humane and Bishoply functions All which are after the customes precepts and traditions of men And albeit D. O. by vertue of the Queenes congedelier were chosen by the Deane and Chapter of Lichfield in Episcopum Pastorem Ecclesiae Lichfieldensis The Lord Bishop of Lichfield is never honored with the title of being Lord Pastor Pastorall authority of a Lord Bishop and of other Pastours is equall yet is hee never intituled with the dignity of being the Lord Pastor but onely with the honour of being the Lord Bishop of Lichfield so that one and the selfe same person being a Bishop and a Pastor may bee a Lord Bishop over Pastors but not a Pastor over Pastors Whereupon it followeth that the Pastorâ—ll authority which he hath in common with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse is of superiority or proheminence above theirs and that touching the function both of his and their Pastorall cure and charge there is a paritie betweene him and them by reason whereof hee can have no power over them because par in parem non habet imperium But why is it that he can not be called Pastor Pastorum Ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Pastor of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield and yet may be called Dominus Episcopus Pastorum Ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Bishop of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield Why but only for that there is custome tradition and the Law of man for his Episcopall jurisdiction and for that his pastorall function if he have any belongeth unto hâ—m in common with his brethren the other Pastors jure divino The Whether a lord Bishop minister the doctrin Sacrament discipline of Christ by vertue of his lorldly episcopall or pastorall office
which is of humane institution if it be answered that the Bishop by reason Whether L. Bishopâ— by pastorall authority may excommunicate a Pastor of his pastorall power which he is said to have over all the Pastors and people of his Diocesse may lawfully not onely minister the Word and Sacraments but also the Discipline of Christ unto them all then it followeth that by a Pastorall power one Pastour may bee a Pastour of Pastors which is against the Scriptures and contrary to the brotherly and fellow-like authority which is common to all Pastors under the Sunne and betweene whom touching their Pastorall functions there is to this day by the Scriptures as little superiority and as great a paritie as ever there was betweene Apostles and Apostles betweene Prophets and Prophets or betweene Evangelists and Evangelists and as at this day there is betweene Bishops and Bishops betweene Archbiâ—hops and Archbishops or betweene Patriarkes and Patriarkes yea and as is between Earles and Earles Dukes and Dukes Kings and Kings Emperours and Emperours For no greater superiority or preheminence hath any one Pastor over the person or function oâ— an other Pastour touching the administration of any thing properly belonging to either of their pastorall functions than hath one Pastors over small flockes are as truly pastors as pastors over great flocks As great paritie betweene pastors pastor as between Apostles and Apostles Emperor over the person or function of an other Emperor or one King over the person or function of an other King or one Lord Biâ—hop over the person or function of an other Lord Biâ—hop or one Archbiâ—hop over the person or function of an other Archbishop or than had one Apostle over the person or function of an other Apostle Nay then hath one eye over an other eye one hand over an other hand one arme over an other arme or one foot over another foote And therefore if touching the functions which Pastors either among themselves have in common one with the other or which they have over their flockes there be no disparity but that the Pastors to whom small flockes are committed doe as really and as truly participate of the nature of true Pastors as those great Pastors doe upon whose great shoulders great burthens are imposed it behoveth great Pastors to prove unto us by the holy Scriptures that by the institution of their great pastorall function they have their power so enlarged as that thereby they may preach the Word minister the Sacraments and excommunicate and that on the other side the little Pastours have their power by the institution of their petie pastorall offices so streitned as whereby they may only preach the Word and administer the Sacraments but not excommunicate it behoveth I say great Pastors to bee able sufficiently to shew unto us these things out of the holy Scriptures or else it seemeth to stand with reason and equity deduced from the same Scriptures that a Pastor over a few should have like power to teach and to governe a few as a great Pastor over many hath to instruct and to rule many Marry if they thinke that onely great Pastors bee true Pastors and that great powers spirituall bee onely true powers spirituall then let them also conclude that onely great Knights be true Knights that onely great Dukes be true Dukes that onely great Kings be true Kings and that onely great principalities temporall bee true principalities temporall Which conclusion if they shall judge to be conclusionlesse because King Rehoboam had Not only Kings of great kingdomes but also Kings of small kingdomes bee true Kings as large a Patent to feede and to commmand two Tribes as King Salomon his Father had to command and to feede twelve or as the Archbishop of Yorke may suppose himselfe to have over nine or tenne Counties as the Archbishop of Canterbury can have over nine and thirtie or fortie then me thinketh it a matter very reasonably of them to be confessed that all true Pastors whether they be great Pastors or little Pastors may lawfully exercise all manner of such true power spirituall as unto true spirituall Pastors by the holy Scriptures doth appertaine For if Bishops being great Pastors may therefore preach and minister the Sacraments because they be as they say true Pastors then also may little Pastors therefore excommunicate because they bee as the Scripture saith true Bishops Wherefore if the Lord Bishop of London by vertue of his Pastorall office as he thinketh which with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse he hath in common deriveth unto him immediately from the Word of God may lawfully excommunicate then the Pastorall office which Master Doctor Andrews hath over the people of his Parish of Saint Giles without Creeplegate and the Pastorall function which Master Doctor White hath over the people of Saint Dunstones within Temple-barre being as absolutely and as immediately deduced unto them out of the same word what proofe can bee made out of the word that the Bishop being not Lord Pastour of the Pastours of his Diocesse may lawfully by the word excommunicate all manner of offenders both Pastors and people within his Diocesse and yet neverthelesse that neither Master Doctor Andrewes and Master Doctor White by the same word may excommunicate any one of their Parishioners at all Nay further what reason can there bee afforded from the Law of God that Master Doctor Abbot Deane of Winchester that Master Browne Master Barlow and diverse other Prebendaries in the Church of Winchester having certaine parochiall and Pastorall Churches annexed to his and their Deanry and Prebendes and Master D. Grey in his Parish by their pastorall functions should have absolute authority unlesse it bee during the time of the L. Bishops trienniall visitation to exercise the discipline of Christ within their severall and peculiar Churches and yet notwithstanding that neither Master Richman nor Master Burden being both of them grave godly and learned Pastors should have at any time any pastorall authority to exercise any censure at all And as it is in the Churth of Winchester so is it in the Church of Pauls in the Church of Salisbury and in well nigh all the Cathedrall and Collegiall Churches throughout the Realme The Deane Prebendaries and Canons having certaine parochiall Churches exempted from the Bishop within their exempt and peculiar jurisdictions by meere Pastorall authority for Episcopall authority by the Lawes of the Church have they none may exercise all manner of spirituall censures and that as well by their substitutes as by themselves Nay Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. use some part of Episcopall power Episcopall power to excommunicate granted by papall priviledges or prescribed use Power to excommunicate if it be of divine right may not be prescribed which is more in Cheshire Lancashire Yorkeshire Richmondshire and other Northern parts there be many whole Deanries exempted from the Bishops jurisdiction wherein the Deanes and their substitutes have
bishops and societie against the right and freedome of the law of God against the principles of humane fellowships against that which was in the begining and against that which the Apostles left in the Churches by colour of lawes brought into the Church by the cursings and fightings of the late Romane Bishops they would not henceforth barre and seclude the Kings Christian and faithfull people from giving their consents unto their pastours Yea and we further beseech their Lordships that are schollers unto the Apostles and as servants unto the old way of reason of nature of the law of God of the equitie of Christ and of humane societie they would hereafter imbrace that way which was from the beginning which is the old way and the best way and not any longer persist in a cursed and quarrelling way which is the new way and the worst way But if the Lords spirituall of their own accord shal not readily vouclsafe to yeeld unto us this our right at our intreatie then for my part I will briefly shew mine opinion what were expedient for the A supplieation to the king by the Lords and commons for the restitution of their right in the choice of their pastors Lords and commons in open parliament dutifully to pray and to supplicate at the Kings Majesties hand Namely At the humble petitions and supplications of all his Lords temporall and commons in Parliament assembled his majestie would bee well pleased to give his Royall assent to an act to be intituled An act for the restitution of the ancient right and freedome which the people of God in the old Churches had and which the people of England ought to have in to or about the election of their Pastours and abolishing all papal power repugnant to the same For if as it is plainly confessed the people of all Churches have right and freedome by the law of God by the equitie of Christ by the grounds of reason and nature by the principles of humane fellowships and by that which was from the beginning to elect their pastours and if also the same right and freedome being left to the old Churches and especially to the Church at Ierusalem by the Apostles have beene taken away by the cursings and fightings of the late Bishops of Rome then cannot the people without violation of those lawes rules and grounds by any Episcopall power be any more excluded from their said right and freedome than could or might the ancient jurisdiction of the Crowne of England have beene still usurped by the pope from the Kings of England ADMONITION But alas the common people of England thorough affection and want of right judgement are more easily wrought by ambitious persons to give their consâ—nt to unworthy men as may appeare in all those officâ—s of gaine or dignitie that at this day remaine in the choise of the multitude ASSERTION The Admonitor in one place of his admonition telleth us that he must not put all that he thinketh in writing and yet he writeth in this place that thing which might far better have been utterly unthought than once written for could he thinke to win the common people of England to a continuall good liking of high and stately prelacie by upbraiding and charging them to their faces in a book dedicated unto them with affection and wanting of right judgement Was this the way to procure grace favour and benevolence at their hands And albeit this slander deserved rather to have beene censured by the Commons in Parliament than by confutation to have beene answered yet for the better clearing of the right judgement of the common people giving their consents to most worthy men in all offices of gaine or dignitie remaining in their hands I thinke it necessarie to shew the indignitie of this contumelie There be I confesse in London Yorke Lincoln Bristow Exceter Norwich Coventry and other principall Cities and townes corporate Majors Sheriffes Stewards Recorders Bailiffes Chamberlains Bridge-masters Clerkes Swordbearers Knights Burgesses and such like offices some of dignitie some of gaine but that the officers of these or any other places whether of dignitie or gaine be chosen by the multitude of those places is utterly untrue for onely according to their ancient customes priviledges and Charters by the chief Citizens Townsmen and Borough-masters are those officers chosen The number also of which Electors in all places is not alike In London the Aldermen choose the Lord Major In other Cities and Townes sometimes eight and forty sometimes fourteene sometimes twelve sometimes only such as have borne office as Majors Sheriffes and Bailiffs in the same places nominate and elect their new Major Sheriffs and Bailiffes But that the Aldermen principall Towns-men Borough-masters and men having born chief offices in those cities towns and boroughs have easily been wrought by ambitious persons to give their consents unto unworthy men though it have pleased the Ll. Bb. with seene and allowed to have spred and published this saying yet that the same saying is wholly unworthy of any credit to bee given unto it or to bee regarded of any wise and indifferent man let the sober and peaceable elections made of the worthies of the land hereafter mentioned be witnesses The officers in Cities and townes corporate chosen with out contention and ambitious working of unworthy men And to leave to speake of the election of the Lord Major of the Citie of London Sheriffs Aldermen Wardens of companies Chamberlains bridge-masters and other annuall officers of honour and dignitie let us consider whether the Citizens of London have beene wrought by ambitious persons to choose M. Wilbraham M. Onslie M. Bromley to be their Recorders â—ll three afterward the Queenes solicitors and M. Bromly Lord Chancellor of England and let us consider whether the same Citizens as men of affection and want of right judgement did elect to be Recorders of the same Citie M. Serjeant Fleetwood Master Serjeant Flemming Master Serjeant Drue and how Master Crooke a man wise learned and religious and a Counseller and justicer within the principâ—litie of Wales The Recorder of the towne of Bedford is the right honourable the Lord S. Iohns of Bletsoe The Recorder of Bristoll was a long time Master Poppam now Lord chief Justice of England The Recorder of Northampton before he came to be Judge in the Kings bench was Master Serjeant Yelverton a favouter of the truth and an upright Justicer The Recorder of Warnick was Master Serjeant Puckering afterward Lord keeper of the great seale And of the same towne the Recorder now is a worthy Knight descended from a noble house Sir Foulke Grevile The Recorder of Coventrie is Sir Iohn Harrington Knight a man zealous for the true feare of God The Recorder of Chichester was M. Serjeant Lewkner now chiefe Justice in the principalitâ—e of Wales The Recorder of Norwich was Master Cooke the Kings Atturney generall And who soever shall enquire after the names and after the manner of election
matters of civill justice are heard examined and adjudged by one man alone If for the common benefit of the Tenants against incrochments over-laying of commons wast nuisances or such like any paine is to bee offered or presentment made the same is not set or made by the Steward Sheriffe or other Officer alone but by the common voyce and consent of all the homagers and sutors to the Court The Steward indeed is the director and moderator of the Court the giver of the charge and the mouth of the whole Assembly to pronounce and enact the whole worke of their meeting but hee is not the onely inquisitor the presenter the informer or the Judge to dispose all things according to his owne discretion Besides matters of the Kings peace are not committed in any Countie or other place within the Realme onely to one Justice of the peace alone For neither at the generall Sessions of the peace nor at any other lesse publike meetings any person for any offence Breaches of the Kings peace not punishable by one alone whereof hee standeth indighted or for which hee is punishable can bee fined amerced or bodily punished at the discretion of one Justice alone but by the greatest part of the Iustices assembled his penaltie is to bee imposed upon him Furthermore this manner of the examination of the fact and declaration of the Law for the tryall of the fact and judgement of the Law doth not reside in the brest of one Iuror or Iudge alone In the Court of the Kings Bench if a Prisoner hee brought to the Barre Iustice in any of the B. Courts is not executed by one Iudge alone and confesse not the Crime by the Iustice of that Court hee can receive no judgement unlesse hee bee first indicted by inquisition of twelve grand Iurors at the least and afterward againe bee tryed by other twelve brought judically into the Court face to face Yea and in this Court neither the interpretation of the common Law nor the exposition of any statute dependeth upon the opinion credit or authority of one Iudge or not of the Kings chiefe justice himselfe alone for his other three brethren and Co-juges varying from him in point of law may lawfully over-rule the Court. The same manner of Judgement for the Law is in use and is practized by the Judges in the Court of common Pleas and by the Barons of the Exchequer in the Latin Court of the Exchequer And not In the Courts of Equitie are many assistants Court of requests only in these Courts of law and Justice but also in all the Kings Courts of equitie and conscience it is not to be seene that any one person alone hath any absolute power without assistants finally to orâ—er judge and decree any cause appertaining to the jurisdiction of those Courts In the Court of Requests there are not fewer than two yea some times three or foure with Master of Requests in commission to heare and determine matters of equitie in Court of Wards that Court. In the Court of Wards and liveries there sitteth not only the Master of the Wardes but also the Kings Attourney the Receiver and other Officers of the same Court. In the Court of Court of the Chequer Chamber the Exchequer-chamâ—er with the Lord Treasurer who is chief and president of that Councell yet with him as assistants doe sit the â—hancellour of the Exchâ—quer the Lord Chiefe Baron High courts of Chancerie and the other Barons Whatsoever dâ—cree finall is made in the Kings high Court of Chancerâ—e the same is decreed not by the Lord Chancellour alone But by the Lord Chancellour and the high Court of Chancerie wherein the Master of the Roles and the twelve Masters of the Chancerie as coadjutors doe sit and give assistance In the most honourable Court of Starre-Chamber the Lord Chancellour the Lord Treasurer and the president of the Court of Star-chamber 3 H 7 c. 1 2 H 8 c 20 Kings most honourable Councel and Keeper of the Kings privie Seale or two of them calling unto them one Bishop and one temporall Lord of the Kings most honourable Councell the two chiefe Justices of the Kings bench and Common pleas for the time being or other two of the Kings Justices in their absence have full power and authoritie to punish after their demerits all misdoers being found culpable before them If we search our statutes besides the Courts and matters determinable in these spoken of before we shall finde that the complaints of errour whether it tâ—uch the King or any other person made in the Exchequer should bee 31 E 3 c 21 done to come before the Chancellour and Treasurer who taking to them two Justices and other sage persons are duely to examine the businesse and iâ— any errour be found to correct and amend the 14 E 3 c 5 Roles c. By reason of delayes of judgements used in the Chancerie in the Kings bench common bench and in the Exchequer it was assented established and accorded that a Prelate two Earles and two Barons chosen by the Parliament by good advice of the Chancellour c. shall proceed to take a good accord and to make 10 K. 2 c. 1 a good judgement When it was complained unto the King that the profits c. of his Realme by some great Officers c were much withdrawne and eloyned c. it pleased the King c. to commit the surveying aswell of the estate of his house c. unto the honourable Fathers in God William Archbishop of Canterburie 26 H. 6 b 11 H. 7 c. 25. c 19 H. 7 c. 7. and Alexander Archbishop of Yorke c. by a statute of commission for Sowers by a statute for punishment of perjurie by a statute against making or executing of acts or ordinances by any c Masters being not examined c. by the Lord Chancellour d 27 H 3 c. 27 c 32 H. c. 45. f 27 E c. 8 Treasurer or chiefe Justices c. By a statute for the erection of the Court of d Augmentation by a statute for erection of the Court of first e fruits and tenths and lastly by an f act for redresse of erroneous judgements in the Court commonly called the Kings bench By all these Statutes I say it is very apparant that the Administration of publike affaires in the common weale hath never beene usually committed to the advisement discretion or definitive sentence of any one man alone Which point is yet more fully and more perfectly Lord president and councell in Wales Lord president and councell in the North parts Lord Deputie councell in Ireland The King his honourable privie Councell The King and his grand councell in Parliament to be understood by the establishment and continuance of the Kings Lord President and Councell of Wales of the Kings Lord President and Councell established for the North of the Kings L. Deputie and Councel within