Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n archbishop_n bishop_n john_n 13,096 5 6.2353 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A49781 The right of primogeniture, in succession to the kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland as declared by the statutes of 24 E.3 cap 2. De Proditionibus, King of England, and of Kenneth the third, and Malcolm Mackenneth the second, Kings of Scotland : as likewise of 10 H.7 made by a Parliament of Ireland : with all objections answered, and clear probation made : that to compass or imagine the death, exile, or disinheriting of the King's eldest son, is high treason : to which is added, an answer to all objections against declaring him a Protestant successor, with reasons shewing the fatal dangers of neglecting the same. Lawrence, William, 1613 or 14-1681 or 2. 1681 (1681) Wing L691; ESTC R1575 180,199 230

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

done with greater gravity And presenting unto him the point of the Sword said Repent thee of thy former wicked Life but especially of the shedding of blood of that notable Instrument of God Mr. George Wischard which albeit the fire Consumed before Men cryes for Vengeance before God on thee And we from God are sent to revenge him for here before God I Protest That neither hatred of thy Person nor love of thy Riches nor the fear of any Trouble thou couldst have done me in particular moved or moveth me to strike thee but only because thou hast been an obstinate Enemy of Jesus Christ his Holy Gospel and so he struck him twice or thrice through with a Stog-Sword and so he fell and never a word heard out of his mouth but I am a Priest fie fie all is gone While they were busied with the Cardinal the Fray rose in the Town the Provost Assembles the Commonalty and comes to the House side crying What have you done with my Lord Cardinal Where is my Lord Gardinal Have you slain my Lord Cardinal They were first answered gently Best it were for you to return to your own Houses for the man you call the Cardinal hath received his Reward and will trouble the World no more But then more inragedly they cry We shall never depart till we see him on which Shewed dead from the place whence he had proudly viewed the burning of Mr. Wischard his Body is shewn dead over the Wall from the place whence he had so proudly fed his Eyes with the burning of Mr. Wischard So hear appears to the full the sad Story of a Pious Protestant Minister betrayed by breach of the Faith of a perfidious Papist to be miserably Burnt and the Judgment of God on him who betrayed and Burnt him And can any Protestant Minister who is so truly in Heart as well as in Name whoever reads the Persecutions under Emperors and the Perfidious Murders by Popes and Papist Princes give Faith again to a Papist Successor Of the Cruelties of Popish Prelates against Protestants It would amaze the most barbarous Nations in the World should they but hear of the Cruelties of Papist Priests towards Protestants yea those Indian and American Nations themselves who are immediatly governed by Apparitions or Oracles of the Devil or Pontifical Magicians inspired by him for we do not hear in History that they burn alive any for difference in Religion or difference in Conscience from themselves nor put them to such Racks or Tortures or to double Deaths of Strangling and Burning or Strangling and Disemboweling for the very Mexican Priests They think one Death not sufficient unless it be double so abhorred for their Butcheries of Sacrificing their Enemies to the Sun do only speedily cut open their Breasts and neither Strangle nor Dismember them The Persians in the height of their Empire though in High Treason did only Strangle and neither Burn Disembowel nor Dismember as appears in the Example mentioned Hist Cap. 2.21 In those days when Mordecai sat in the King's Gate Two of the King's Chamberlains Bigthan and Teresh of those who kept the Door were wroth and sought to lay Hands on the King Ahasuerus and the thing was known to Mordecai who told it to Esther the Queen and Esther certified the King thereof in Mordecai's Name and when Inquisition was made of the matter it was found out therefore they were both Hanged on a Tree Et Cap. 7.10 Haman was Hanged on his own Gallows So the Turk Strangles Offendors so did the Jew but neither Jew Mahometan or Pagan Strangle and Burn or Strangle and Disembowel or Strangle and Dismember or lay two kinds of Deaths on the same Person at the same time but those were Inventions of Papist Priests though to the Dishonour of the Protestant Religion in some of them their Example is too much followed so that Papist Priests against Religion are worse than the Jew Mahometan Pagan yea than the very Indians and Americans the Devil himself for though it may be doubted whether he exceed them in good Nature Truth and Honesty yet 't is clear he doth in Wit not to draw the Infamy of so much Cruelty and Perjury on his Kingdom as they do on theirs Sir John Oldcastle Lord Cobham was Cruelly Burnt by the Papist Prelats In the Time of Henry the Fifth Sir John Oldcastle Lord Cobham was censured by the Bishops at a Synod in London for maintaining of Wickliff's Doctrine which was the Protestant Religion and after in a Synod at Rochester was by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury pronounced to be an Heretick and the same Arch-Bishop then Enacted by Decree That the Scripture should not be Translated into English But some mark it as a Judgment of God upon him That his Tongue both the Root and Blade swelled so big that he could not long speak the English Tongue with it for the swelling hindred him from swallowing his meat whereby he was at last starved and miserably died In the mean time Sir John Oldcastle Lord Cobham presents his Belief to the King himself in Writing who being then a Papist and ruled by the Bishops they supplying him with great Sums of Money refused it and suffered him to be Condemned for an Heretick and Committed to the Tower of London whence making an Escape The King promised a Thousand Marks to any that should bring him But the Protestant Doctrine of Wickliff was then so much favour'd by the People that he continued 4 years after undiscovered till at length being taken on the Borders of Wales he was brought to London where he was Drawn from the Tower to St. Giles's Fields The Prelates thought Phalaris Brazen Bull not sufficient Torment for a poor Protestant Mrs. Anne Askew first rackt tortur'd and her bones distorted and then Burnt and there Hanged in a Chain by the Middle and afterwards Consumed by Fire the Gallows and all Bak. Hist 177. Another of the Followers of Wickliff was Burnt by the Bishop's Sentence in Smithfield in an Iron Pipe or Butt They thought Phalaris Brazen Bull not Torment enough for a poor Protestant Mrs. Anne Askew a Protestant in the time of H. 8. was Condemned by the Bishops see herein the Romish Episcopal Mercy they caused her one of that weak Sex twice to be so miserably Rackt and Tortured that her Bones thereby was so disjoynted that she was not able to go to the place of Execution in Smithfield whither they had Condemned her but they carried her thither in a Chair and set her to the Stake and cruelly Burnt her Neither doth the Cruelty of these Monsters spare the Innocent Babes any more than the Mothers A Babe Burnt with the Mother The Acts and Monuments relate of a poor Protestant Woman great with Child whom the Bishop had Condemned to be Burnt for an Heretick and whilst she was Burning in the violent Flames the Child miraculously sprang from her beyond the Fire and might
truth in what the Flatterers of Kenneth boast that by this means the Govetousness and Slaughters of Kindred are avoided Neither are the Treacheries of Guardians less to be feared to the Children of Kings left in Minority than of their Kindred wherefore now the Tyrant being fallen who Ravished our Liberty let us valiantly resume the same and his Law Enacted by force and assented to by fear if it be a Law and not rather a selling us for Slaves let us abrogate and repeal the same and Restore again our Ancient Fundamental Laws which brought forth this Kingdom of nothing and from so small beginnings not only advanced to such an height as is inferiour to none of our Neighbours but when cast down hath again raised the same to its former Strength and let us imbrace the present opportunity while it offers it self which if once Elapsed we may in vain seek again The People are by this perswaded and the Twelfth day after the Funeral of Kenneth he is chosen King Anno Domini 994. And was after Slain in Battel in the Town of Vaumond in Louthian in the Second Year of his Reign And though Milcolumbus or Malcolm the second Son of Kenneth the Third who was so tormented in Conscience for Poysoning the first Son of his Brother Duffus to get an Act to Intayl the Grown to his own Posterity made no Conscience to kill Grinius another Son of the same Duffus in Battel Malcolm Son of Kenneth revives and confirms the Law making the Kingdom hereditary and having by the Success gotten the Power of the Sword into his hand in the Same manner as his Father Kenneth had by force Enacted again by force confirmed at the Same Scone by Parliament the Act of Intayl of the Crown to the Issue of Kenneth Buchanan 196. Yet doth Buchanan the same Historian p. 200 201 censure this Act of changing the Ancient Law of Election by Parliament of the Brother or any other person more fit than the Son to be Injust Imprudent and Infortunate Objections against the Reviver 1. Injust 1. Injustice Because he saith Italex enervat vires consilij publici sine quo nullus Legitimus dominatus potest consistere Such a Law enervates the Strength of Parliaments without which no Lawful Government can be for all Government is either by Conquest or Contract As to Conquest there is none demanded or acknowledged on Such a Title As to Contract there can be none without a Parliament who are the Representative of the People to contract for them 2. Imprudent ● Imprudence Because Propinquorum in eos qui Regno potiuntur insidias et Regnantium adversus eos quos et natura et lex voluit ●●ique esse Charissimos suspitiones nesarias quas narrationis or do Exphrabit tot priorum Seci●●orum clades cum illis collatae calamitatibus quae Alexandri tertij interitum sunt consecutae Leves prae ijs tolerabiles videri possunt The Treacheries of Kindred against those who enjoy the Kingdom and the wicked Suspitions of those who Reign against them who by the Bonds of Nature and Law they ought to esteem most dear as this discourse in order shall declare And the Slaughters of so many former Ages compared with the Calamities which hereby followed the death of Alexander the Third were light and tolerable Note Alexander the Third began his Reign Anno Domini 1649. he Married first Margaret Daughter to Henry the Third King of England by whom he had Alexander the Prince David and Margaret who married Hangonamus or as some call him Ericus Son to Magnus 4th King of Norway who bare him a Daughter commonly called the Maiden of Norway The Maiden of Norway had United England and Scotland if she had lived Skene And concerning this Lady of Norway saith Buchanan Lib. 8. p. 241. Edvardus Anglorum Rex gnarus suae sororis neptem Regis Norvegiae filiam unam Ex Alexandri posteris esse superstitem Eandemque Regni Scotorum Legitimam Heredem Legatos ad eam deposcendam filio suo in Scotiam misit c. Edward the First King of England knowing his Neice the Daughter of the King of Norway to be the only Remaining Issue of Alexander the Third and Lawful Heir to the Crown of Scotland he sent his Ambassadours into Scotland to ask her in Marriage for his Son They when they Argued much in the Publique Gonvention of the Publique Benefit which would ensue such Marriage they found the Minds of the Scots not Dis-inclined from that affinity for Edward was a man of great Courage and of great Power and Ambition of greater And the glory of his Valour in the Holy Warr while his Father was alive and in Subduing Wales after his death shone bright Neither could they ever Remember the Scotish and English name to have been nearer Conjoyned than under the Last Kings Neither could old Hostility be more Commodiously abolished then if there were an Union made of both Nations upon Honest and Equal Conditions The Marriage was therefore Readily Assented unto and Conditions added by Mutual assent of both That the Scots should so long use their own Laws and Magistrates till such Children should be born of the same as were able to Reign And if none should happen to be procreated or being born should dye before their Lawful age Then the Kingdom of Scotland should go to the next of the Blood-Royal Things being thus Agreed Michael or as others mention Daevid Wemes and Michael Scot two Knights of Fife of great Repute for their Prudence with their Country in those Times were sent Embassadors to Norway but they because Margaret for that was the Young Ladies Name dyed before their Arrival returned home sad and nothing done by whose immature death there arose such Controversie as vehemently shook England and almost destroyed the Name of the Scots For to go on with the History as he and other Writers Relate it not withstanding this new Act of Intayling the Crown Ten Competitors arose to the Crown of Scotland notwithstanding the Act of Reviver making the same hereditary there arose Ten Competitors for the Succession Erick King of Norway Florence Earl of Holland Robert Bruce Earl of Anandale John de Baliol Lord of Galloway John de Hastings Lord of Abergaveny John Cumyn Lord of Badenair Patrick de Dunbar Earl of March John de Vesey Nicholas de Hues William de Ross All or the most part of them alledging themselves descended from David Earl of Huntingdon Younger Brother to William King of Scots and Great Uncle to the late King Alexander But the Principal and most Potent Factions which contended were that of Balyol and Bruce On which saith Sir Richard Baker Hist 96. broke out the Mortal Dissention between the Two Nations which consumed more Christian Blood and continued longer And the Wars between the Factions of Baliol and Bruce then any Quarrel we read of ever did between any Two People in the
of him as he did his Dutchy of Normandy and do him Homage for it which would add a great Honour to that Crown Then was he be-before-hand with Pope Alexander to make Religion give Reputation to his Pretended Right he promised likewise to hold it of the Apostolick See if he prevailed in his Enterprize whereupon the Pope sent him a Banner of the Church with an Agnus of Gold and one of the hairs of Saint Peter And he likewise by great Promises got his own Brother Odo Bishop of Baieux to furnish him with Forty Ships for his Expedition After William had with great difficulty got the Battel at Hastings wherein King Herold happen'd to be kill'd with an Arrow in his Eye some of his Nobility with all their Power strove to establish Edgar Atheling the next of the Royal Issue in his Right to the Crown but the false Bishops rather bent to let in a Foreign Enemy being fool'd by him with fair Promises than to assist the Native Prince and by their Example drew in the Nobility to trust to his Personal Oath made at his Coronation before the Altar of St. Peter to defend the Holy Church that was the Papist Church and the Rectors and to Govern the Universal People according to the Laws but this Oath and his Promises were as weak to bind him as the single hair of St. Peter he had got from the Pope for as soon as he had Establish'd himself he was not such a Fool to do Homage for England to the French King nor to hold the same of the Apostolick See nor to defend the Bishops and Abbots in their fat Bishopricks and Abbies but as Cambden saith He made such clear work with them that he did not leave one English Ecclesiastick whom he thrust not out of his place and fill'd their Rooms with Erench Sr. Johns And for the English Nobility he drove some to fly to Scotland some to Norway some to Hungary and any other Places where they could be received till in the end he had totally destroyed them and filled their Places with French Contes and to shew himself no partial Dealer with those who would trust his word he spared not his own Brother Odo the Bishop of Baieux but notwithstanding the Forty Ships with which he had Supplied him on promise of better dealing he seized and Confiscated all his Treasure which he had which was very great and hoarded up with an Intention to have bought the Papacy And it is no wonder if mali Corvi malum ovum And he practised the same deceit against themselves and their false Religion had taught him towards others for let a Papist Prince swear never so many Oaths to Papists of his own Religion and break them all the same Religion fits him with Popes enough at his Elbow to Confess and Absolve him instantly or if he doubts his Trencher-Popes cannot do it he can have for Money his Unholiness himself to Absolve him from any Oath Covenant or League with any other Papist Prince whether of Peace or War and how many Examples are there of the same And more easily can he do it with his own Subjects as Dan. Hist fol. 143. King John a Papist King forswore himself to Papist Subjects being Absolved from his Oath by the Pope King John for the Glory of God and Emendation of the Kingdom in Parliament makes Articles of Agreement between him and the Barons wherein are Confirmed all the Laws and Liberties of the Kingdom and Mutual Oaths taken on both sides by the King and Barons in Solemn manner for the Observation of the same Articles The King likewise sends his Letters Patents to all Sheriffs of the Kingdom to cause all Men of what degree soever within their several Shires to Swear to observe the Laws and Liberties thus granted by his Charter There we see a Papist King agrees with Papist Subjects on Oath in the highest manner and both the King and Barons and the whole Body of the People of what degree soever are solemnly Sworn before God And the Laws and Liberties are likewise Confirmed by Act of Parliament But the next News in the History we hear of is He hath some Papist evil Councellors who tell him he was now a King without a Kingdom a Lord without a Dominion and a Subject to his Subjects whereon this Papist King sends to the Pope and by Bribery he Absolves the King from his Oath Nullifies the Act of Parliament and Excommunicates the Lords Now therefore let it be shewn how these Papist Lords being laid in the Pickle of Excommunication and not having Personam standi in Judicio could have done to have bound the Conscience of their Papist King to have performed to them his Contract Covenant League and Oath or let it be no wonder if Protestants are very fearful to have a Successor of such a Religion or if they think that these Lords had not been more happy if they had had a Protestant King or of any Religion which would have bound his Conscience to have kept his Word and much more his Oath to his Subjects The Papist Lords grown Desperate of Right from their English Papist King run into the other Extreme and will Trust themselves to the Oath of a Foreign Papist King seeing their own would not keep his they send therefore over-Sea and go in great haft to Louys the French Kings Son to Sollicit him to take upon him the Crown of England who is their tres humble Serviteur and as ready to Swear to them as they to him A French Oath pretended surer than an English and to make wise to them that a French Oath was surer than an English over therefore he comes to England in Person with as great a Fleet and Army as the Power of France could make on so likely hopes of a Conquest incouraged by so great a Power of the English Barons who call'd them in and joyned with them and being Landed in Kent in May the Lords bring him to London where he takes his Solemn Oath to Restore their Laws and Liberties and recover their right for them King John who had first forsworn himself was notwithstanding in the Field with another Army against King Louys but fell into a Feaver and Died or as some say was poisoned On his Death many of the English Lords hoping to find more Truth in the Son than in the Father returned from Louys to their Native King and suddenly Crowned Henry the Third the eldest Son of King John being then but Nine years old in a great Parliament Assembled at Gloucester 28 Octob. by which Parliament his Tutelage by Reason of his Minority was Committed to the Great Marshal William Earl of Pembrook a Man Eminent both in Courage and Council And it is likewise to be noted That this Henry was begotten by King John of Isabel the Daughter and Heir of Aymer Earl of Angloulesm who was before the Marriage pre-contracted to Hugh le Brun Earl of March