Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	adore_v	due_a	great_a	56	3	2.1254	3	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A05172	Divine and politike observations nevvly translated out of the Dutch language, vvherein they vvere lately divulged. Upon some lines in the speech of the Arch. B. of Canterbury, pronounced in the Starre-Chamber upon 14. June, 1637. Very expedient for preventing all prejudice, which as well through ignorance, as through malice and flattery, may be incident to the judgement which men make thereby, either of his Graces power over the Church, and with the King, or of the equity, justice, and wisdome of his end in his said speech, and of the reasons used by him for attaining to his said end	Theophilus, fl. 1638.	1638 (1638)	STC 15309; ESTC S108356	57,625	70

so consistent as private prayer reading or religioâ— conference after Sermon with such observation of the Sabbath ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ God hath commanded And that the other in their conscience thinâ— that adoring ducking cringing kneeling to or at the Altarâ— is ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ seemeth to be an idolatrous act and derogatory to that revereâ—â—â— wherewith a mans hart ought to bee fiâ—led when he entreth into Church for religious exercise withall as a Tinker with his Biâ—â— driâ—king and dominering in an Alehouse upâ—n a Sunday after ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ hath duckt to the altar may not by any good Conformist be reproacâ—â—ed fâ—r breach of the morall Law for the Sabbath in respect of his prâ—â—viledge for so doing by warrant of the booke for recreations So ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ not ducking to the Altar at a mans entry into a Church canâ—ot bee ground for inferring that the omitter of it hath no more revereâ—â—â— toward God then a Tinker and his Bitch comming into an Alehouâ—â— in respect of the warrant that is in Scripture for worshâ—ppiâ—g Gâ—â— alone For albeit the command forbidâ—eth only to fall downe ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ bow before an image it followeth not that it is lawfull and necessâ—â—â— for Gods worship to bow and fall downe before an Altar or at the â—â—â—try of a Church where there is no image or that he that doth it ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ faileth â—hereby in his reverence due to God Arch. B. pag. 45. No man is constrained no man quÃ¨stioned only Religiously called ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ on Venite Adoremus Come let us worship Obserâ— If there be any Church Canon or command of those that ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ power in the times to bow to the Altar at a mans entry into ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Church theâ— are men conâ—traiâ—ed tâ— doe it for there is a necesâ—â—â—â— either of obedience or daâ—ger of being obnoxious to punishâ—â—â—â— for â—ot obedience in such a case and if there be neither Canon ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Law the practise of it is an innovation without any pretext of â—â—â—â—tant For there ' â—is Hoc est corpus meum This is my boâ—y Arch-B pag. 47. But in thâ— â—ulpit t is at most but Hoc est Verbum meum This in my Word And greater Râ—verence no doubt is due to the Body then to the Word of â—â—r Lord. And so in Relation answerable to the Throne where his Bâ—â—â— is usâ—ally presâ—nt then to the Seate Whence his Word useâ—h to bee â—â—oclaimed The argument founded by his Gr Obserâ—â— upon the words hoc est corpus â—eum cannot bind any man to a necessity of adoration and bowing to â—â—e Altar but only at the time of the celebration of the communion â—hen it is not given his Gr who as yet neither doth with the Roâ—ish Church professe a beleefe of transubstantiation nor hath orâ—â—ined pretended transubstantiated breade in the body of our Saviâ—â—r to be kept in a boxr upon the Altar canâ—ot by any warrant of orâ—â—odoxe religion pretend that because the body of our Saviour is upâ—â— the Altar in such manner as the word is in the Pulpitt that thereâ—â—re at the entry into the Church a man must adore or bow towards and where his Gr for shewing a necessity of this bowing and crinâ—â—ng to the Altar sayeth that a greater reverence is due to the body â—â—en to â—he word of our Lord as the words Verbum Corpus expreâ—se â—â—e essence of Chriâ—t That alike reverence is due to both I thinke noe â—â—n will deny and where Corpâ—â—â—hristi is taken for the Sacrament â—â—d Verbum Christi for the Gospâ—â—â— or preaching of it S. August lib. ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ hom 26. Affirmeth that alike reverence is due to both Saith he â—â—terrogo vos fratrâ—â— vel sorores diciâ—e mihi quid vobis plus esse videtuâ— verâ—â—m Dei an corpus Christi Si verum vultis respondere hoc vtique dicere â—â—etis quod non sit minus verbum Dei quam corpus Christi ideo quanâ—â— sollicitudine observamus quando nobis corpus Chrisâ—i administratur ut niâ—â— ex ipso de nostris manibus iâ— terram cadat tanta sollicitudine observâ—mus ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ verbum Dei quando nobis eâ—ogatur dum aliquid cogitamus aâ—â— loquiâ—â—â—r de corde â—â—stro pereat quia non minus reus crit qui verbum Dei neâ—â—genter audierit quâ—m ille qui â—orpus Christi in terram cadere negligentiâ— sua permisaeret If Aug saieth true that as great reverence is due to the word as to the body then is there as much reverence due to tâ—â— pulpit for the word as to the Altar for the Sacrament and either there is no necessity for Gods worship to cringe and duck to the Altar or it must bee also necessary to cringe and duck to the pulâ—â—â—t â—rch-B â—ag 48. And this Reverence yee doe when yee enter the Chappell and wheâ— you approach nearer to offer And this is no Innovation for you are bound to it by your Order and that 's not New Observ. Suppose the Knights of the Garter are bound as his Gr affirmeth by their order to bow towards the Altar when they enter into the Chappell and approach nearer to the Offer at the great anniversary solemnity of the saide order it will not thereupon follow that the Prelates injunction of that poâ—ture to all other persons is no innovaâ—tion in the manner of Gods worship either according to the Apostoâ—licall institution thereof or our Churches practise for the most parâ—â—ince the reformation Though some Ceremonies at the solemnitie ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ the Order of the Garter are done in the Church they doe not there by become such a piece of divine worship as his Majesties other Subjects must necessarily follow the paterne and practise off For as thâ— solemnity doth not give to all his subjects the ability to make so riâ—â— Offers to the Altar as are made thereto by those of the Order so doâ—â— it noâ— oblige them to a duety of ducking at the dore towards the Alâ—tar as the Knights doe when a mariage is solemnized in the Churcâ— in our English way the maÌ„ muâ—t putt a ring upon the womans foâ—â—â—â— finger and say with this ring I thee wed with my body I thee wâ—â—â—ship with all may wordly goods I thee endue this practise thougâ— done in the Church in solemnizing an action that hath better warraâ—â— in Gods institution then the most honourable Order of the Garâ—eâ— doth neither oblige men that are not married to a bodily worship ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ women nor maketh a mariage unlawfull in the solemnizing whereoâ— such ring and words are not used So his Majesties and the Knighâ—â— ducking offering and other gestures in the Church at the solemnâ—â—zing some Ceremonies of the aforesaid order doe neither oblige othâ—â— subjects to the same way of worship nor maketh all other worshiâ—â— profane unlawfull In a word if the Kings practise in his Chappeâ—â— in the celebration of the Ceremonies of the Order of the Garâ—â—â— were sufficient to oblige the people to doe the like in all the Churchâ— in Engl his Gr might by the like reason pretend

Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Text snippets containing the quad