Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n abraham_n woman_n zion_n 26 3 8.8406 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A64135 Treatises of 1. The liberty of prophesying, 2. Prayer ex tempore, 3. Episcopacie : together with a sermon preached at Oxon. on the anniversary of the 5 of November / by Ier. Taylor. Taylor, Jeremy, 1613-1667. 1648 (1648) Wing T403; ESTC R24600 539,220 854

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the Kings of the Gentiles but as the sonne of man so must your regiment be for sicut misit me Pater c. As my father hath sent me even so send I you It must be a government not for your Impery but for the service of the Church So that it is not for your advancement but the publick ministery that you are put to rule over the Houshold * And thus the Fathers expresse the authority and regiment of Bishops * Qui vocatur ad Episcopatum non ad Principatum vocatur sed ad servitutem totius siae saith Origen And S. Hierom Episcopi Sacer dotes se esse noverint non Dominos And yet S. Hierom homil 6. in Isai. himselfe writing to S. Austin calls him Domine verè sancte suscipiende Papa * Forma Apostolica haec est Dominatio interdicitur indicitur Ministratio S. Bernard lib. 10. de considerat It is no Principality that the Apostles have but it is a Ministery a Ministery in chiefe the officers of which Ministration must governe and wee must obey They must governe not in a temporall regiment by vertue of their Episcopacy but in a spirituall not for honour to the Rulers so much as for benefit and service to the subject So S. Austin Nomen est operis non honoris ut intelligat se non esse lib. 19. de civit Dei cap. 19. Episcopum qui praeesse dilexerit non prodesse And in the fourteenth chapter of the same book Qui imperant serviunt ijs rebus quibus videntur Imperare Non enim dominandi cupidine imperant sed officio confulendi nec principandi superbiâ sed providendi misericordiâ And all this is intimated in the Propheticall visions where the regiment of Christ is design'd by the face of a man and the Empire of the world by Beasts The first is the regiment of a Father the second of a King The first spirituall the other secular And of the Fatherly authority it is that the Prophet saies Instead of Fathers thou shalt have Children whom thou maist make Princes in all lands This say the Fathers is spoken of the Apostles and their Successors the Bishops who may be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Princes or Rulers of Churches not Princes of Kingdomes by vertue or challenge of their Apostolate But if this Ecclesiasticall rule or cheifty be interdicted I wonder how the Presidents of the Presbyters the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Reformed Churches will acquit themselves How will their Superiority be reconciled to the place though it be but temporary For is it a sinne if it continues and no sinne if it lasts but for a weeke or is it lawfull to sinne and domineere and Lord it over their Brethren for a weeke together * But suppose it were what will they say that are perpetuall Dictators Calvin was perpetuall president and Beza till Danaeus came to Geneva even for many years together * But beyond all this how can the Presbytery which is a fixt lasting body rule and governe in causes Spirituall and Consistoriall and that over all Princes and Ministers and people and that for ever For is it a sinne in Episcopacy to doe so and not in the Presbytery If it be lawfull here then Christ did not interdict it to the Apostles for who will think that a Presbytery shall have leave to domineere and as they call it now a dayes to Lord it over their Brethren when a Colledge of Apostles shall not be suffered to governe but if the Apostles may governe then we are brought to a right understanding of our Saviours saying to the sonnes of Zebedee and then also their successors the Bishops may doe the same If I had any further need of answer or escape it were easy to pretend that this being a particular directory to the Apostles was to expire with their persons So S. Cyprian intimates Apostoli pari fuêre De Vnitat Eccles consortio praediti honoris dignitatis and indeed this may be concluding against the Supremacy of S. Peter's Successors but will be no waies pertinent to impugne Episcopall authority For inter se they might be equall and yet Superiour to the Presbyters and the people Lastly It shall not be so with you so Christ said non designando officium but Sortem not their duty but their lot intimating that their future condition should not be honorary but full of trouble not advanc'd but persecuted But I had rather insist on the first answer in which I desire it be remembred that I said seeking temporall Principality to be forbidden the Apostles as an Appendix to the office of an Apostle For in other capacities Bishops are as receptive of honour and temporall principalities as other men Bishops vt sic are not secular Princes must not seeke for it But some secular Princes may be Bishops as in Germany and in other places to this day they are For it is as unlawfull for a Bishop to have any Land as to have a Country and a single acre is no more due to the Order then a Province but both these may be conjunct in the same person though still by vertue of Christs precept the functions and capacities must be distinguished according to the saying of Synesius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To confound and intermixe the Kingdome and the Priesthood is to joyne things incompossible and inconsistent Inconsistent I say not in person but absolutely discrepant in function 3. Consider we that S. Peter when he speakes of the duteous subordination of Sarah to her Husband Abraham he propunds her as an example to all married women in these words shee obeyed Abraham and called him Lord why was this spoken to Christian women but that they should doe so too And is it imaginable that such an Honourable compellation as Christ allowes every woman to give to her husband a Mechanick a hard-handed artisan he would forbid to those eminent pillars of his Church those lights of Christendome whom he really indued with a plenitude of power for the regiment of the Catholike Church Credat Apella 4. PASTOR and FATHER are as honourable titles as any They are honourable in Scripture Honour thy Father c Thy Father in all senses They are also made sacred by being the appellatives of Kings and Bishops and that not onely in secular addresses but even in holy Scripture as is knowne * Adde to this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are Acts. 15. Rom. 12. Hebr. 13. used in Scripture for the Prelates of the Church and I am certaine that Duke and Captaine Rulers and Commanders are but just the same in English that the other are in Greeke and the least of these is as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Lord. And then if we consider that since Christ erected a spirituall regiment and us'd words of secular honour to expresse it as in the instances above although Christ did interdict a secular principality yet
innocents of murdering them who were confessed righteous for such was their proposall being rather willing that Catholiks should perish with those whom they thought hereticks then that their should be no blood spilt But to the question it was fire they called for The most mercilesse of all the Elements No possibility of relenting when once kindled and had its object It was the fittest instrument for mercilesse men men of no bowels whose malice like their instrument did agere ad extremum suarnm virium worke to the highest of its possibility Secondly It was fire indeed they called for but not like that in my text not fire from heaven They might have called as long and as loud as those Priests did who contested with Elisha no fire would have come from heaven to have consum'd what they had intended for a sacrifice Gods Anathema's post not so fast as ours doe Deus non est sicut homo Man curseth often when God blesseth men condemne whom God acquits and therefore they were loath to trust God with their cause they therefore take it into their own hands And certainly if to their Anathemas they adde some fagots of their own and gunpowder 't is oddes but then we may be consum'd indeed and so did they their fire was not from heaven Lastly it was a fire so strange that it had no example The Apostles indeed pleaded a mistaken precedent for the reasonablenesse of their demand they desir'd leave to doe but even as Elias did The Greekes only retaine this clause it is not in the Bibles of the Church of Rome and really these Romano-barbari could never pretend to any precedent for an act so barbarous as theirs Adrimelech indeed kil'd a King but he spar'd the people Haman would have killed the people but spared the King but that both King and people Princes and Iudges branch and rush and root should dye at once as if Caligula's were actuated and all England upon one head was never known till now that all the malice in the world met in this as in a center The Sicilian evensong the mattins of S. Bartholomew known for the pittilesse and damn'd massacres were but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the dream of the shadow of smoake if compar'd with this great fire In tam occupato saeculo fabulas Vulgaris nequitia non invenit This was a busy age Herostratus must have invented a more sublim'd malice then the burning of one Temple or not have been so much as spoke of since the discovery of the Powder-Treason But I must make more hast I shall not else clime the sublimity of this impiety Nero was sometimes the populare ●dium was popularly hated and deserv'd it too for he slew his Master and his wife and all his family once or twice over opened his mothers wombe fired the Citty laught at it slandred the Christians for it but yet all these were but principia malorum the very first rudiments of evill Adde then to these Herods Master-piece at Ramah as it was deciphred by the teares and sad threnes of the Matrons in an Vniversall mourning for the losse of their pretty infants yet this of Herod will prove but an infant wickednesse and that of Nero the evill but of one citty I would willingly have found out an example but I see I cannot should I put into the scale the extract of all the old Tyrants famous in Antique stories Bristoni stabulum Regis Busiridis ar as Antiphatae mensas Tauricaregna Thoantis Should I take for true story the highest cruelty as it was fancied by the most hieroglyphicall Egyptian this alone would weigh them down as if the Alpes were put in scale against the dust of a ballance For had this accursed Treason prosper'd we should have had the whole Kingdome mourne for the inestimable losse of its chiefest glory its life its present joy and all its very hopes for the future For such was their destind malice that they would not only have inflicted so cruell a blow but have made it incurable by cutting off our supplies of joy the whole succession of the line Royall Not only the Vine it selfe but all the Gemmulae and the tender O live branches should either have been bent to their intentions and made to grow crooked or else been broken And now after such a sublimity of malice I will not instance in the sacrilegious ruine of the neighbouring Temples which needs must have perished in the flame nor in the disturbing the ashes of our intomb'd Kings devouring their dead ruines like Sepulchrall dogs these are but minutes in respect of the ruine prepared for the living Temples Stragem sed istam non tulit Christus cadentum Principum Prudent hymn Impune ne for sansui Patris periret fabrica Ergo quae poterit lingua retexere Laudes Christe tuas qui domitum struis Infidum populum cum Duce perfido Let us then returne to God the cup of thanks giving he having powred forth so largely to us of the cup of salvation We cannot want where withall to fill it here is matter enough for an eternall thankfulnesse for the expressiou of which a short life is too little but let us here begin our Hallelujahs hoping to finish them hereafter where the many quires of Angels will fill the consort Praise the Lord ye house of Levi ye that fear the Lord Praise the Lord. Praise the Lord out of Sion Psal. 135. v. 20. 21. which dwelleth at Hierusalem FINIS