Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
lord_n	able_a	bear_v	zion_n	30	3	9.2439	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A09365	The whole treatise of the cases of conscience distinguished into three bookes: the first whereof is revised and corrected in sundrie places, and the other two annexed. Taught and deliuered by M. W. Perkins in his holy-day lectures, carefully examined by his owne briefes, and now published together for the common good, by T. Pickering Bachelour of Diuinitie. Whereunto is adioyned a twofold table: one of the heads and number of the questions propounded and resolued; another of the principall texts of Scripture vvhich are either explaned, or vindicated from corrupt interpretation.; Cases of conscience	Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Pickering, Thomas, d. 1625.	1606 (1606)	STC 19669; ESTC S114066	314,224	686

afflictions for this life and in glorie for the life to come Now if God hath decreed that those whome he foreknew should be conformable vnto his Sonne in these respects then hath he also decreed the afflictions themselues Secondly God doth not onely barely permit afflictions to be but also he effecteth them and brings them into execution as they are crosses corrections trialls and punishments I make peace saith the Lord and I create euill that is not the euill of sinne but of punishment which is euill in our sense and feeling For things are tearmed euill two waies some are euill indeed some are euill not indeed but in regard of our sense apprehension and estimation and of this latter sort are afflictions which God is said to create And to this purpose is the saying of the Prophet Amos Shall there be euill in the citie and the Lord hath not done it Thirdly as God causeth afflictions so he ordereth and disposeth them that is he limiteth and appointeth the beginning the end the measure or quantitie and the continuance thereof Yea he also ordereth them to their right endes namely his owne glorie the good of his seruants and the benefit of his Church Thus God is saide to correct his people in iudgement that is so as he will haue the whole ordering of the correction in his owne hand Ioseph tells his brethren that when they intended euill against him in selling him to the Ishmaelites for siluer God disposed it for good When Shemei cursed Dauid he forbade his seruants so much as to meddle with him and why because saith he the Lord bade him to curse and who then dare say onto him Why hast thou done so And to this purpose the Prophet Dauid saith I held my peace and said nothing why because thou Lord hast done it Psal. 39. 9. Here some wil say if Afflictions did come onely from God it were somewhat but of●ent●●es they come from men that beare vs no good will and therefore no maruell though we be impatient Answ. When crosses doe come from men God vseth them as instruments to execute his iudgements vpon vs and in this worke God is the chiefe doer and they are as tooles in the hand of the workman And the Lord inflicteth them vpon vs by men to trie our patience vnder the crosse Ioseph though he knew well the badde dealing of his brethren towards him yet he looked not to them alone but to an higher cause namely the Lord himselfe who executed his owne good will by them God faith he disposed it to good And againe God did send me before you into Egypt for your preseruation The Second ground is The commandement of God touching the crosse and obedience vnto him therein This commaundement is expressed Luk. 9. 23. where we are commanded to take vp our crosse euery day and follow Christ. Abraham was commanded with his owne hands to sacrifice his onely sonne Isaac and to this commandement though otherwise a great crosse vnto him he addresseth himselfe to yeeld obedience And in the prophecie of Micah the Church saith Shee will boare the wrath of the Lord that is shee will performe obedience to him in the crosse because shee had sinned against him And Saint Peter saith that God resisteth the proud and giueth grace to the humble therefore humble your selues vnder the mightie hand of God And this beeing the commaundement of God that we should yeeld obedience to him in euery affliction we ought to be no lesse carefull to obey it then any one commandement of the morall Law The Third ground is that God will be present with his seruants in their afflictions Vpon this ground Dauid comforts himselfe because God had promised to heare him to be with him in trouble and to deliuer him And in an other place Though I should walke in the shaddow of death I would feare none ill for thou art with me c. Now that we may the better vnderstand this doctrine we are to consider what be the Ends or Effects of Gods beeing with vs in affliction whereby he testifieth his presence and they are three The first is to worke our deliuerance from the crosse Call vpon me saith the Lord in the time of thy trouble and I will deliuer thee This promise must not be vnderstood simply but with an exception so farre forth as it shall be for our good For all promises of temporall deliuerance are conditionall and must be conceiued with this limitation of the crosse and chastisement if God please to impose it Some may say how if God will not deliuer vs but leaue vs in the affliction what cōfort shall we then haue Answ. In the second place therefore we must remember that God will temper and moderate our afflictions so as we may be able to beare them Habbakuk praieth vnto God in the behalfe of the Church that he would in wrath remember mercie And Paul saith that the Lord will not suffer vs to be tempted aboue that we are able to beare but will giue an issue with the temptation Thirdly put the case that God doth not moderate our afflictions but suffer them to remaine vpon vs not onely for some time of our life but to the very death yet then will he testifie his holy presence an other way namely by giuing the partie distressed power and strength to beare his affliction Vnto you it is giuen saith Paul for Christ that not onely ye should beleeue in him but also suffer for his sake The Fourth ground of comfort in affliction is that euery affliction vpon the seruants of God hath some speciall goodnesse in it Rom. 8. 28. We know that all things worke together for good vnto them that loue God And in regard hereof the crosses which are indured by Gods children are so farre from beeing preiudiciall to their saluation that they are rather helps and furtherances of the same Now this Goodnes is perceiued two waies First by the fruit and effect of it and then by the qualitie and condition thereof In both which respects afflictions are good Touching the fruits of Afflictions because they are manifold I will reduce them to seauen principall heads I. Afflictions doe make men to see and consider their sinnes Iosephs brethren for twentie yeares together were little or not at all troubled for their wickednes in selling their brother yet vpon their affliction in Egypt they began to consider what they had done We haue say they verily sinned against our brother in that we saw the anguish of his soule when he besought vs and we would not heare him therefore is this trouble come vpon vs. Manasses in the time of his peace gaue himselfe to witchcraft and the worshipping of straunge gods but when he was captiue in Babylon then was he brought to the sight of his sinnes mooued to humble himselfe before God for them II.

and erronious Grounds of Doctrine much preiudiciall to the direction or resolution of the Conscience in time of neede as namely I. That a man in the course of his life may build himselfe vpon the faith of his teachers and for his saluation rest contented with an implicite and vn-expressed faith Which doctrine as it is an onely meane to keepe men in perpetuall blindnes and ignorance so it serueth to no other purpose in the time of Temptatiō but to plunge the hart of man into the pit of despaire it being vncapable of cōfort for want of particular knowledg vnderstāding of the word promise of God I● That euery man ought to stand in feare and doubt of the pardon of his sinnes and that no man can be assured by the certentie of faith either of the present fauour of God or of his owne saluation True it is that in respect of our owne vnworthines and indisposition we haue iust cause not onely to doubt and feare but to dispaire and be confounded before the iudgement seat of God Yet that a man should not be certainely resolued by faith of the mercie of God in and for the merir of Christ is a comfortlesse doctrine to a distressed soule and contrarie vnto the sauing word of the Gospel which teacheth that certentie floweth from the nature of faith and not doubting III. That euery man is bound in conscience vpon paine of damnation to make speciall confession of his mortall sinnes with all the particular circumstāces therof once euery yere to his Priest This position practise besides that it hath no warrant of sacred writte nor yet any ground of Orthodoxe antiquitie for 800. yeares more or lesse after Christ it maketh notably to the disturbing of the peace of Conscience in time of extremitie considering that is impossible either to vnderstand or remember all many beeing hidden and vnknowne And the minde being in this case informed that forgiuenesse dependeth vpon such an enumeration may thus be brought into doubt and distrust and will not be able to rest by faith in the sole mercie of God the onely soueraigne medicine of the soule Againe the griefe of the mind doth not alwaies arise from all the sinnes that a man hath committed neither doth the Lord set before the sinners eies whatsoeuer euill hath bin done by him but some one or more particulars And these are they that doe lie heavie vpon the heart and to be eased of them will be worke inough though he doth not exhibite vnto the Confessour a Catalogue of all the rest IV. That some sinnes are veniall because they are onely besides the Lawe of God not against it and because they binde ouer the sinner onely to temporal and not to eternall punishments This conclusion first is false For though it be granted that some offences are greater some lesser some in a higher degree others in a lower Againe that sinnes in regard of the euent beeing repented of or in respect of the person sinning beeing in Christ and therefore accounted iust are pardonable because they are not imputed to condemnation yet there is no sinne of what degree soeuer which is not simply and of it selfe mortall whether we respect the nature of the sinne or the measure and proportion of diuine iustice For in nature it is an anomie that is to say an aberration from the perfect rule of righteousnesse therefore is subiect to the curse both of temporarie and eternall death It is an offence against the highest Maiestie and consequently man standeth by it ingaged to euerlasting torment Secondly it is a weake and insufficient ground of resolution to a troubled Conscience For whereas true and sauing ioy is the daughter of sorrow and the heart of man cannot be lifted vp in assurance of Gods fauour to the apprehensiō and conceipt of heauenly comforts vnlesse it be first abased and by true humiliation brought to nothing in it selfe The remembrance of this that the offence committed is veniall may in some cases too much inlarge the heart and giue occasion to presume when haply there will be reason to the contrary And if not that yet in case of falling by infirmitie after grace receiued the mind beeing forestalled with this erronious conceipt that the sinne is lesse then it is indeede because veniall may in the issue be lesse quieted and more perplexed V. That a man may satisfie the iustice of God for the temporall punishment of his sinnes committed To omit the vntruth of ●●is position Howe it maketh to the casing of the heart or the asswaging of the griefe of minde in temptation I appeale to common experience For when a man beeing assured of the pardon of his sinnes shall yet consider that there is something more behind to be done on his part how can he in probabilitie rely himselfe wholly vpon Christs satisfaction How can he reape vnto himselfe from thence any assurance of reconciliation to God whome he formerly offended If we may and must doe something in our owne persons whereby to appease the wrath of God why hath our Sauiour taught vs for our hearts releife wholly and onely to make the plea of pardon for our sinnes True it is indeede that Popish Confessours doe teach their Penitents when they feele the wrath of God vpon them for sinne to stoppe the mouth of Conscience by performance of a formall humiliation and repentance yea to offer vnto God some ceremoniall duties in way of satisfaction But when sorrow seazeth vpon the soule and the man falls into temptation then it will appeare that these directions were not currant for notwithstanding them he may want sound comfort in Gods mercie and runne into despaire without recouerie And for this cause vpon experience it hath bin prooued that euen Papists themselues in the houre of death haue bin content to renounce their owne workes yea the whole body of humane satisfactions and to cleaue onely to the mercie of God in Christ for their saluation By these instances and many more that might be alleadged to this purpose it is apparent vpon how weake and vnstable Grounds the Case-diuinitie of the Popish Church standeth and how indirect a course they take for the resolution and direction of the troubled Conscience Now by the benefit and abuse of this Doctrine we see how necessary it is that in Churches which professe Christiā religion it should be more taught and further inlarged then it is And to this purpose it were to be wished that men of knowledge in the Ministerie that haue by the grace of God attained vnto the Tongue of the learned would imploy their paines this way not onely in searching into the depth of such points as stand in bare speculation but in annexing thereunto the grounds and conclusions of practise wherby they might both informe the iudgement rectifie the conscience of the hearers By this means it would come to passe that the poore distressed soule might

named vnlesse the naming of them tend to the reproouing further condemning of them much lesse may they be represented for the causing of mirth and pastime For naming is farre lesse then representing which is the reall acting of the vice Indeed Magistrates Ministers may name them but their naming must be to punish and reforme them not otherwise Againe it is vnseemely that a man should put on the person behauiour and habite of a woman as it is also for a woman to put on the person behauiour and habite of a man though it be but for an houre The law of God forbiddes both Deut. 22. 3. And that law for equitie is not meerely iudiciall but morall Nay it is the law of nature and common honesty Here also the dauncing vsed in these daies is to be reprooued namely the mixed dauncing of men and weomen in number measure specially after solemne feasts with many lascivious gestures accompanying the same which cannot nor ought to be iustified but condemned For it is no better then the very bellowes of lust and vncleanes yea the cause of much euill It is condemned in the daughter of Herodias dauncing before Herod Mark 6. 22. And in the Israelites that sat downe to eat and drinke and rose vp to play that is to daunce We read indeed of a kind of dauncing commended in Scripture that Moses Aaron and Miriam vsed at the redde sea Exod. 15. 20. And David before the Arke 1. Sam. 18. And the daughters of Israel when Dauid gotte the victorie of Goliah 2. Sam. 6. 14. But this dauncing was of another kind For it was not mixt but single men together and women apart by themselues They vsed not in their dauncing wanton gestures and amorous songs but the Psalmes of praise and thanksgiuing The cause of their dauncing was spirituall ioy and the end of it was praise and thanksgiuing It may be alleadged that Ecclesiastes saith There is a time of mourning and a time of dauncing Eccl. 3. And Dauid saith Thou hast turned my ioy into dauncing Psal. 30. 1● And the Lord saith in Ieremie O daughter Sion thou shalt got forth with the daunce of them that reioyce Ier. 31. 4. I answer first these places speake of the sacred dauncing before named and not of the dauncing of our times Secondly I say that these places speake not of dauncing properly but of reioycing signified by dauncing that is to say a heartie reioycing or merrie-making Besides that the Prophet Ieremie speaks by way of comparison as if he should say Then shall the Virgin reioyce as men are woont to doe in the duin●● And it is sometimes the vse of the Scripture to expresse things lawfull by a comparison drawne from things vnlawfull as in the Parables of the vnrighteous Iudge the vniust Steward and the theefe in the night The third Conclusion We may not make recreations of Gods iudgements or of the punishments of sinne The Law of God forbiddes vs to lay a stumbling blocke before the blind to cause him to fall though it be not done in earnest but in sport Leuit. 19. 14. Vpon the same ground we are not to sport our selues with the follie of the naturall foole For that is the blindnes of his minde and the iudgement of God vpon him I know it hath beene the vse of great men to keepe fooles in their houses And I dare not condemne the fact For they may doe it to set before their cies a daily spectacle of Gods iudgement and to consider how God in like sort might haue dealt with them And this vse is Christian. Neuerthelesse to place a speciall recreation in the follie of such persons and to keepe them onely for this ende it is not laudable When Dauid fained himselfe to be madde before Achish the King of Gath marke what the Heathen King could say Haue I neede of madde men that ye haue brought this fellow to play the madde man in my presence Shall he come into my house 1. Sam. 21. 15. Againe the Bayting of the Beare and Cockefights are no meete recreations The baiting of the Bull hath his vse and therefore it is commanded by ciuill authoritie and so haue not these And the Antipathie and crueltie which one beast sheweth to another is the fruit of our rebellion against God and should rather mooue vs to mourne then to reioyce The Second answer to the former Question is this Games may be deuided into three sorts Games of wit or industry games of hazard and a mixture of both Games of wit or industrie are such as are ordered by the skil and industry of man Of this sort are Shooting in the long bow Shooting in the caleeuer Running Wrastling Fensing Musicke the games of Chests and draughts the Philosophers game and such like These and all of this kind wherein the industry of the mind body hath the chiefest stroke are very commendable and not to be disliked Games of hazard are those in which hazard onely beares the sway and orders the game and not witte wherein also there is as we say chance yea meere chance in regard of vs. Of this kind is Dicing and sundry games at the Tables Cardes Now games that are of meere-hazard by the consent of godly Divines are vnlawfull The reasons are these First games of meere hazard are indeede lo●s and the vse of a lot is an act of religiō in which we referre vnto God the determination of things of moment that can no other way be determined For in the vse of a lotte there be foure things The first is a casuall act done by vs as the casting of the Die The second is the applying of this acte to the determination of some particular controversie the ending whereof maintaines peace order and loue among men The third is confession that God is a soueraigne iudge to end and determine things that can no other way be determined The fourth is supplication that Go● would by the disposition of the lotte when it is cast determine the euent All these actions are infolded in the vse of a lotte and they are expressed Act. 1. ver 24. 25. 26. Now then seeing the vse of a lotte is a solemne act of religiō it may not be applied to sporting as I haue shewed in the first conclusion Secondly such games are not recreations but rather matter of stirring vp troblesome passions as feare sorrow c. and so they distemper the body and mind Thirdly covetousnes is commonly the ground of them all Wherevpon it is that men vsually play for mony And for these causes such plaies by the consent of learned Divines are vnlawfull The third kind of plaies are mixt which stand partly of hazard and partly of witte in which hazard beginnes the game and skil gets the victorie and that which is defectiue by reason of hazard is corrected by witte To this kind are referred some games at the cards and tables Now the common opinion of learned Divines is