Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n abhor_v verse_n zion_n 39 3 9.3928 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A15525 A commentarie vpon the most diuine Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes Containing for matter, the degeneration of our nature by Adams Fall; and the restauration thereof, by the grace of Christ. Together with the perfection of faith, and the imbecillity of workes, in the cause of iustification of elect sinners before God. For forme and maner of handling, it hath the coherence and method, the summe and scope, the interpretations & doctrines the reasons and vses, of most texts. All which, are set downe very familiarly and compendiously, in forme of a dialogue, betweene Tlmotheus [sic] and Silas, by Thomas Wilson, one of the six preachers in the cathedrall church of Canterbury. Wilson, Thomas, 1563-1622. 1614 (1614) STC 25791; ESTC S120148 882,533 1,268

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

heere applieth it to the Apostles which published the Gospell also the Prophets in their preaching with gladsome thinges did mingle very heauy thinges and terrible threatnings but the preaching of the Apostles was most gladsome and wholesome We beseech you be reconciled c. 2. Cor. 5 Tim. What is here meant by feet Silas One member is put for the wholeman so as by feet is meant the Apostles themselues and their comming with the Gospell The reason why hee onely mentioned the feete is because they trauelled vppon their feete to spread the Gospel both naked and weary being poore and needy see Math. 10. Secondly to shewe thereby that the Gospel should not be spread abroad by force and strength but by a humble lowly kinde of teaching Tim. Why are the Apostles feete called beautifull Sil. To signifie that their comming was beautifull and desirable preaching most sweet and comfortable matters Their comming was thus beautifull first in respect of the manner of their teaching which was with great alluring and delighting their words being sweet as hony and very gracious Secondly in respect of their sweet exhortations and holy life Thirdly because of their powerfull miracles wherewith they confirmed their doctrine Lastly in respect of the message which they brought which was glad tidings of peace and good things Tim. What signifies peace Silas Atonement with God by Christ who of enemies are made friendes to God by iustifying them Rom. 5 1. Whereof followes a double peace first of the conscience in that sinne being now forgiuen it can no more vexe or torment the conscience which cannot now accuse and furiously raile against vs as it was wont to doe neither can our wicked affections so disquiete vs being renewed and led by the spirit Secondly a most louing peace with the brethren hauing all one heart in the Lord and one soule Tim. What are the good things heere spoken of Silas Not earthly and perishing but celestiall and eternall good things as remission of sinnes righteousnesse the holy Ghost regeneration and eternall life the least of them greater then a world Tim. What doctrine doth arise from the words thus opened Silas First that the substance of the Gospell is to declare the enmity of God with man in regard of sinne and that reconciliation is to be attained only in Christ through faith Secondly that the Gospell ought to be much loued respected of vs aboue all other things because it brings vs tydings sure and sweete of the chiefest good thinges as that our sinnes are forgiuen vs c. Thirdly that all outward blessings and deliuerances are tokens of God reconciled to true beleeuers Fourthly that all afflictions whatsoeuer haue not now the nature of punishments but are for chastisment vnto amendment and remembrances c. O how ioyfull tydings are these especially to contrite and troubled soules which are feared with their sinnes and Gods iudgements How should we esteeme of that Gospell which declareth such desireable and gladsome matters how dull and heauie be those soules which be not affected which leape not for ioy Tim. What vse of this point Silas To reproue such as neglect the Gospell or prefer ought before it or contemne it or do not duly consider the excellency of it Secondly to exhort all men to bee much more aboundantly thankefull for the Gospell which offers and opens a treasure of most worthy and rare good things liuing well and godlily that God may long graunt vs the possession of it least for vnbeliefe and vnthankfulnes we deserue to loose it as the seauen Churches of Asia did Reue. 2 3. Tim. What other doctrine gather you hence Silas That the true and diligent Minister of the Gospel ought greatly to bee had in reuerence The reason is because they are the messengers that bring vnto vs these excellent and needfull things and God hath here commanded vs to admire their very feete which are their basest members For if such as bring vs good newes though but of temporall things are welcome to vs and wee gladly respect them then how much more are the messengers of eternall saluation to be had in honour againe if we thinke them worthy to be esteemed that offer vnto vs but a world ly treasure how much more are they to bee accounted off which brings vs a spirituall and heauenly treasure Lastly if in euery profession the Ministers thereof vse to bee honoured as the idolatrous Pagans honour their sacrificing Priests the Papistes their massing priestes the Turkes their praying Priests therefore a shame were it to Christians if they should not honor their preachers which preach peace to thē being messēgers of reconcilement to the K. of heauē Tim. What vse of this poynt Sil. It exhorts all godly Christians to haue their Ministers in singular loue and to acknowledge them thankefully to prouide for them not grudgingly to exchaunge their temporall for spirituall good things their earthly for celestiall 1 Cor. 9. Galat. 6. 1 Thes. 5 12. 13. Secondly a sharp reprehension of such as vse their well deseruing Ministers vnkindly or vnreuerently falsly accusing them wilfully resisting them cowardly forsaking them these shew themselues vnwoorthy of the Gospell which so badly entreat the Ministers of it Tim. What other doctrine Silas That it is the duty of Gods Ministers to preach good things to the people which reproues the vnsufficient or vnwilling which will not or cannot there is an heauy and eternall waight of vengeance due to such Also it bewraies the Pope to be no true Minister of Christ because he doth nothing lesse then bring peace and the message of saluation nay hee is a maine enemy to the doctrine of the Gospell disturbes the peace of kingdomes and common-wealths by his ambition and tyranny and yet he dareth to appropriate this text to himselfe offering his feete couered with Buskins of gold to be kissed of Kings and Princes because it is written How beautifull are the feete that bringeth glad tidings applying that vnto his proud pompous shooes which the Holy-Ghost vnderstood of sounde and painefull preaching which the Pope flyes from as the Owle abhorres the light DIAL XII Verse 16 17. But they haue not all obeyed the Gospell for Esay saith Lord who hath beleeued our report Then faith is by hearing and hearing by the word of God Tim. VVHat doth this Text containe Silas A cause why we should not maruaile that the Iewes did not beleeue the Gospell though the Apostles were sent of God to preach such a worthy and welcome message for Esay had foretold that it should come to passe Secondly a conclusion of the former gradation in verse 14. shewing whence faith in Christ doth proceede as touching the neerest and externall cause namely by the Organ of hearing verse 17. Tim. What is meant by the Gospell Silas Generally any gladsome newes but especially the glad tydings of remission of sinnes by Christ as Luke 2 10 11. I
was the child of God and he fell most grieuously and did long lye in his sinne but hee recouered his fall and was saued For first hee is of the Holy Ghost intituled the beloued of God 2 Sam. 12. 24. 25. which was neuer affirmed of any reprobate Secondly hee was one of the penmen of the Scripture euen an holy Prophet and of al the holy Prophets Christ saith they sitte downe in the kingdome of God Luke 13. 28. Thirdly he was a tipe of Christ and so was neuer any reprobate Fourthly Gods promise was made especially touching the person of Solomon that howsoeuer his sinnes should be corrected with the rod of men yet his mercies hee would neuer take from him nor remoue his louing kindnesse 2 Sam. 7. 14. 15. Fiftly he was by repentance restored to God and to his Church as appeareth both by the title of his booke called Ecclesiastes which is as much to say as a person vnited againe to the Church vpon his repentance done and published in the Church And the argument of that Booke which is a large condemning of those vanities and follies wherewith he had beene ouertaken do fully witnesse his repentance but none that repenteth can perish Luke 13 2. Therefore whatsoeuer else he lost by his fall yet the grace of reconciliation with God hee lost not Sil. But the Apostle saith of such as taste the good word of God and the power of the world to come that they may fall away Heb. 6 5. Silas True such as taste only that is lightly slenderly bee touched may but the true beleeuer which eateth and digesteth and receiueth the worde cannot fall away Tim. Yet the Apostle Heb. 10 26. saith of such as haue receyued the knowledge of the truth that they may vtterly forsake God and renounce him Sil. The Apostle speaketh of such as receiue the knowledge of the truth by their iudgement and not by their affection into the braine and not into the heart Tim. But Christ in the 13. of Mathew saith of such as doe receiue the word with ioy which is an affection of the heart that in time of temptation they fall away Silas The ioy there spoken of is not the fruite of the spirit in a truely sanctified heart reioycing in the sence of Gods peculiar loue vnder the hope of his glory but a tickling of the minde delighted with knowledge of new and strange things which may be in an Hypocrite and be lost but the other cannot be lost for of it sayth Christ in Iohn 16 22. it cannot be taken from vs. Tim. Yet the Apostle Heb. 10 29. writeth of such as bee sanctified by the blood of Christ that they may goe from God and perish Silas He speaketh of such a sanctification as standeth in profession and not in power and practise Secondly he speaketh of a generall sanctification which maketh a light and slender change not of a speciall sanctification which effectually and more throughly changeth transformeth a man into the Image of God Tim. But the true Beleeuers which are truly sanctified may sinne grieuously against Conscience and thereby wholly loose Grace Silas All grieuous sinnes against Conscience do not vtterly destroy and put out grace but much weaken slake the grace of God These grieuous sins of Conscience be of two sorts Some proceede of humaine infirmity such as of Dauid Peter Salomon Others arise of diabolicall malice such as of Iudas Cain Esau these doe destroy grace But Gods children after their calling cannot fall into such for all their sins come either of ignorance or weakenesse but not of malice and prophane contempt of God and these alone do lay wast the conscience Tim. What think ye of that Doctrine which teacheth that one effectually called may wholy through some grosse sin loose grace and fall from Christ yet afterwards againe bee ioyned to him Silas This is vtterly vntrue for as Christ being aliue from the dead dieth no more but liueth eternally vnto God so likewise the life of grace in his members is perpetuall and can no more returne to the death of sinne then Iesus can returne to the graue Rom. 6 8 9. for the life of grace must be the life of glory therefore eternal and vnchangeable Moreouer if a Christian may so fall from Christ as he shall neede to be engrafted and ioyned to him the second time then also this new ingrafting must be sealed by a new baptisine which is absurd and impious For as men are but once borne into this worlde so they are but once borne anew and are but once to haue the Sacrament of newe birth and if there be any such extinction of Grace how is the seed of new birth immortall and his loue vnchaungeable and his 〈◊〉 abides for euer Tim. How 〈◊〉 it the prodigall child who is the picture of one that after grace of reconcilement falleth from his obedience to God is said Luke 15. to bee lost and dead being before a child Sil. To this I answere that it is a parable and sure arguments cannot bee raysed from parables Secondly it is said of that child that hee was lost and dead and it is true he was so in his fathers opinion and in his owne seeming so Gods children in their owne sence and in the opinion of the Church their mother they are lost but truely and indeed they are not so Tim. You holde then confidently that a man regenerate which once truely beleeueth in Christ can neuer be quite pluckt from grace Sil. I doe confidently affirme and that for very good and vndeceiueable reasons and grounds which I will rehearse in order The first is from the authority of Scripture Psal. 1. 6. The wicked and his wayes shall perish but the Godly and his wayes shall be knowne and crowned Psal. 37. 24. The righteous falleth and riseth againe because the Lorde held vnder his hand Psal. 125. 1. He that trusts in the Lord shall be like Mount Sion that cannot be remoued Math. 24. 24. It is not possible that the elect should be deceiued The second reason dependeth vpon Gods election vppon which the stablenes and firme stedfastnes of the faithfull is grounded as vpon a most sure rock mountain of brasse as it may appeare by 2 Tim. 2. 19. where the Apostle hauing spoken of some Apostatates who were falne from God he doeth comfort the weake minds of beleeuers with this resolution that their standing is firme because of Gods election which for the assurance and certainty of it is there likened to a soundation or seale two thinges of greatest strength and validity The third reason or ground dependeth vpon the free and vnchangeable couenant which God hath striken with his elect the tenour whereof is in Ieremy 31 38 40. From whence I doe obserue that the couenant of grace and saluation is euery way sure and constant both on Gods part who altereth not his good wil towards his and also on our part who shal haue no wil
not vnder the Law but vnder grace God forbid Know ye not that to whomsoeuer ye giue your selues as seruants to obey his seruants ye are whom ye obey whether it be of sinne vnto death or of obedience vnto righteousnesse Tim. VVHat doth this Text contayne Silas An answere of the Apostle Paul vnto a cauilling obiection made against his former doctrine Tim. First of all tell vs what he meaneth by Sinne when he saith What then shall we sinne v. 15. Sil. By Sinne is meant heere not one act of sin but a continuall course of sinning and it is as much as if it had beene said Shall wee liue or leade our liues in sinne as before verse 2. or shall we serue sinne verse 6. or shall we obey sinne This then is the meaning of the obiection Shall wee giue ouer our selues licenciously to sinne because wee are not vnder the Law but vnder Grace Which obiection did arise from the ill vnderstanding of the Apostles words For his words were so taken of some as if hee had meant by not beeing vnder the Law our freedome from the gouernment and doctrine of the law and so the bridle being cast loose in our necks we might haue liued as we list which was very farre from the Apostles meaning Tim. What may we learne from this Obiection Silas Our first instruction from this Obiection is to learne how ready and prone sinnefull men bee to snatch vp all manner of occasions which may nourish liberty in sinne peruerting holy doctrine to this end therefore al men must watch ouer their owne hearts being naturally bent to these crooked shifts auoyding the company of sinnefull men which affect such naturall licenciousnesse Secondly that the il vnderstanding of things wel taught breeds errors and cauillings and therefore we must take heed of mistaking good doctrine Thirdly that there is no doctrine so sound but one or other will carpe at it wrest it therefore Teachers must arme themselues with patience Fourthly that Ministers of the word must haue skill not onely to teach the truth but how to meet with and conuince such gaine-sayers Tim. Now tell vs what answere the Apostle makes vnto the former cauillations and how the Obiection is wiped away Sylas It is first to be noted that the Apostle doeth not directly answere their cauilling argument which is Sophisticall being a fallacy from the ambiguity of the speech of not beeing vnder the law which the obiectours tooke as beeing meant of a freedome from the obedience of the law wheras the Apostle vnderstood it of the rigorous exaction of the law forbidding euill thinges and giuing no strength to forbeare them but rather prouoking our lusts more after such euils as it forbids Our Apostle therefore contents himselfe to answere the consequent of the argument namely that which was vntruly concluded and gathered from his owne doctrine to witte that we might freely sin this consequent he answereth two wayes His first answere is by words of detestation God forbid in 15 verse hereby teaching vs that all wicked and false things inferred from the worde must bee abhorred of vs. In the second part of his answere he proues the quite contrary to the obiection namely that such as bee not vnder lawe but vnder grace ought not to serue sin but Christ their Lord. Tim. How doth he proue this by what argument Sylas By these two reasons the first is taken from the condition of Seruants in the beginning of the 16. verse This reason standeth thus It is meete that euery one obey him whose seruant he is but all true beleeuers are the seruants of God and not of sin therefore are they bound not to obey sin but God in doing his will Which the Apostle doeth confirme and backe by the testimony of euery mans conscience know ye not that a seruant must obey him that is his Lord and that Christ is your Lord and not sin ye all know this by the light of nature the one and the other ye know by the light of the word Tim. What thinges are wee to learne out of this first reason Sylas First that it is wisedome in the Ministers of the word to build their doctrine vppon knowne and receiued principles of which euery one is conuicted that they are true Secondly wee must iudge of our seruice either to sinne or to God not by our profession but by our practise and obedience if we do fulfill and obey the lusts of sinne then are we the seruants of sin whatsoeuer wee professe or say to the contrary Thirdly that it standes with great reason that a Christians life should be a continuall obedience to Christ because he is our Lord and hath admitted vs to be his seruants who by nature through Adams fall were wholly captiues to Sathan and sin but Christ by his death hath freed vs from this captiuity and addicted vs to himselfe to this end that we should not now serue sin our former Lord but Christ our new maister who hath deliuered vs from sin and Sathan as seruants which paste from one maister to another doe euer please and serue the latter maister Tim. What is the second reason whereby he proues that wee ought to obey Christ and not sin Sylas The second reason of this text is taken from the effects which follow the seruice of Christ and of sin which be death and life whether it bee of sin to death or of obedience vnto righteousnesse This second reason hath two branches and may be thus framed such as obey and serue sin must haue death for their reward therefore wee ought not to serue sin least we dye for it Againe such as obey Christ by doing righteous things shall haue eternall life for their reward therefore wee ought to obey Christ and renounce the seruice of sinfull lusts that wee may liue for euer Tim. What instructions do ye gather from hence Sylas First of all that sin and righteousnes be two contrary Lords as fire and water as God and Mammon loue the one and hate the other Secondly that all men must doe seruice to one of these two Lordes no man can serue both at once because they commaund contrary thinges Thirdly wee learne here the nature of sin that it is repugnant to the obedience of the lawe or vnto righteousnes therefore a filthy vnrighteous and bitter thing Fourthly that the seruice of sin is to bee auoyded as a damnable or deadly thing bringing to destruction in hell and deseruing it Lastly that a righteous life that yeelds obedience vnto God shall end in eternall life though it cannot merite it Tim. But our Apostle hauing said whether of sin to death why did he not likewise say or of righteousnesse to life but saith thus of obedience to righteousnesse What are we to learne by this kinde of phrase and stile Sil. These three things First that this is the righteousnesse of workes to liue obediently vnto the will of God reuealed in his word