v. 10. And the children of Israel i. e. some of the chief amongst them in the name of the whole as say our Annotators shall put their hands upon the Levites by which sign saith Ainsworth they put the charge and service of the Church upon them and consecrated them to God in their name wherein they figured the Church of Christ called the General Assembly of the First-born from whence in the very next verse they are called the Offering or Wave-Offering of the children of Israel which Aaron is said to offer or wave for them v. 11. and are said v. 14. to be thus separated from amongst the children of Israel i. e. according to the Rites before-mentioned in allusion to which some think the same word is used Acts 13. 2. and Paul Rom. 1. 1. saith of himself that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 separated to the Gospel of God If it be objected that it is said ver 14. Thus shalt thou separate as if it were Moses his act alone the whole context confutes that vanity in which there is an apparent distinction betwixt the act of Moses Aaron and the People But here he is said to separate them because the whole of this affair was managed according to the directions given by him from the Lord to them And vers 16. to be wholly given to the Lord viz. by the People Given of the sons of Israel unto God i. e. for his Service faith Chazkum After all which they enter upon the work of the Lord to which they were thus solemnly deputed and set apart v. 11 15. This Animadverter saith indeed that the reason of the laying on of the hands of the children of Israel upon the Levites was to signifie their obedient yeelding them in their stead to God c. If he mean that it was one reason whereof it 's granted no act of worship which we perform but we thereby signifie our subjection and obedience to God If the formal and only reason his Assertion is void of truth it being as was shewed to set them apart to the office of Ministry or Service of God that they laid their hands on them nor is there the least print in v. 19 the only proof of this Assertion of any such thing 'T is true the choice i. e. the first-choice or appointment of them to this Ministry was God's the presentment of them to the Congregation Moses his act the yeelding of them or rather the solemn deputation of them to the work of the Lord not the act of the first-born meerly but of the Congregation who were called together for this purpose The Assembly in their Annotations speak clearly hereunto Numb 8. 10. The Children meaning some of the chief among them in the name of the whole Their hands the imposition of hands was used in Benedictions and Ordinations not only in the Old-Testament as Gen. 48. 17 20. Numb 27. 23. but in the New See Acts 6. 6. 13. 3. 1 Tim. 4. 14. 2 Tim. 1. 6. The Peoples putting their hands upon the Levites was partly to testifie that they gave up all carnal and worldly respects and interests in them and bequeathed them wholly to God and that they did approve of their office in the behalf of themselves in whose stead they stood in the performance of many of their ministrations But Mr. T. hath found out a grievous mistake which he again takes notice of Sect. 8. which if true enervates all that we have asserted and that is that these were not Priests they were distinct from the Levites viz. Aaron and his sons who were called of God Heb. 5. 4. without the Peoples laying on of hands But 1. Aaron and his sons were Levites Exod. 4. 14 16 18 20. 2dly Calling of God and Consent and Ordination of the People are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that though Aaron wâ—s called of God he might also be set apart by the People unto that work who were not altogether therein unconcerned as is evident Exo. 29. 4. Lev. 8. 2 3 4. This Animadverter is not ignorant of the saying of Cyprian upon that action of Moses Num. 20. 26. Sicâ—t in Numeris c. As in the book of Numbers God commanded Moses saying Take Aaron thy brother and Eleazer his son and set them before all the Synagogue God commands him to be constituted Priest before all the Synagogue whereby he instructeth and sheweth that Sacerdotal Ordinations ought not to be managed without the knowledge of the People who are to assist therein c. And Piscator upon Heb. 5. 4. saith Ministerio Ecclesiae c. i. e. None ought to exercise the Ministerial Function except he who is thereunto called of God Now this vocation is either immediate or mediate The Prophets Apostles and Christ the Prince of them were immediately called Mediately were the PRIESTS of old and Evangelists called as are at this day Pastors Teachers Governors and Deacons each of whose vocation is by the Church And Josephus tells us plainly Lib. 3. cap. 9. that all the People approved the election of Aaron to the Priesthood which God had made And l. 4. c. 2. introduceth Moses speaking to the People upon the occasion of Korah's Rebellion thus Although by the loss of that honour viz. of the Priesthood which he Aaron hath received from your own election And 't is most certain that a long time after Zadok was anointed to the office of High-Priest by the People 1 Chron. 29. 22. But the Levites were not Priests Answ 1. That they were not such Priests as Aaron and his sons is granted Priests to offer Sacrifice or burn Incense they were not nor do I any where assert them so to be Priests and Levites are sometimes in Scripture distinguished I also grant but then Priests are taken for the Sacrificing-Priests viz. Aaron and his sons to whose assistance in their ministry and service they were appointed by the Lord. Yet 2dly That the word Priests is of various acceptions in the Scripture Mr. T. cannot deny 1. The People of Israel all of them are called a Kingdom of Priests Exod. 19. 6. 2dly Persons of note eminency power and authority Gen. 41. 45. Exod. 2. 16. pass under the same denomination 3dly The first-born of the male-children Exod. 19. 22. with 13. 2. are say some so called As â—s 4thly Christ Heb. 7. 17. 5thly The Saints 1 Pet. 2. 5. The word is 6thly usually taken for Church-officers that were solemnly set apart as Ministers of the Sanctuary for the solemn management of the publick Worship and Service of God And of these with the leave of Mr. T. I would take the confidence to assert that amongst others there were of these three sorts 1. The Chief or High-Priest who alone might once in the year enter into the most Holy but not withouâ— Blood Heb. 9. 7. 2dly The inferiour and ordinary Priests who approached to the Altar of Burnt-Incense offered Sacrifices c. 3. The Levites who were a
make the Tabernacle For see saith he that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the Mount i. e. To the type and example set before him to imitate to which he was not to add the least pin of his own 1 Chr. 28. 11. The pattern of the Porch i. e. of the Temple saith Vatablus which David received either by revelation or by the hand of the Prophet 1 Chr. 28. 12 19. Exod. 8. 27. 39. 1 5 7 21 26 31 43. other places instanced in the S. T. preach forth the same thing These were types of the heavenly Ordinances in the Church of Christ Heb. 8. 5. And type out that nothing of man is to be superadded thereto but all things to be done according to Divine Commandment To the same thing doth the Spirit of the Lord bear witness Exod. 40. 23 25 29. Num. 8. 3. Exod. 35. 10 29. 36. 1 5. Isa 29. 13. To which may be further added Deut. 4. 1 2 40. Now therefore hearken O Israel unto the Statutes and Judgments which I teach you for to do them Ye shall not add to the Word which I command you neither shall you diminish ought from it that you may keep the Commandments of the Lord your God Thou shalt keep therefore his Statutes and Commandments which I command thee this day All which prove not only the obligation that lay upon them to conform to what was of the Institution of the Lord but the utter unlawfulness to add thereto or introduce any thing of their own in his service The ground of the acceptance of any Worship or Service offered to him being his Command and Institution and that with such evidence and brightness that it seems Mr. T. durst not look them in the face lest they shouâ—d have so reproved him as to have hindred his further advance in that good work and cause he was resolved having undertaken its defence to prosecute He only takes notice of two of these many places instanced in viz. Lev. 8. throughout which he grants speak of the investure of the Priests into their Office according to the Rites set down but whether any other might to these have been added to the sons of men he tells us not which yet he should have proved if he would have demolished and thrown down what it was his good pleasure to set himself against And he doth wisely not to approach too near this Scripture which stands with a two-edged Sword in its hand to defend the Truth opposed by this Animadverter No less than ten times viz. v. 4 5 9 13 17 21 29 34 35 36. The Commandment of the Lord is laid as the foundation of the whole of that procedure clearly importing that matters of this nature viz. things relating to his Worship are solely to be bottom'd on Divine Precepts and condemning and interdicting whatever of the like nature is offered to him on any other bottom Which Aaron's sons afterwards attempting to do Lev. 10. 1. perish in the flames of God's jealousie and wrath R. Menachem on Lev. 8. 36. hath these words In every other place it is said as the Lord commanded Moses but here because they added unto the Commandment he saith not so for they did not as the Lord had commanded and added moreover unto them strange Fire which he had not commanded them Lev. 10. 1. And Josephus b. 3. c. 9. saith thâ—s Nadab and Abihu bringing Sacrifices unto the Altar not such as were appointed by Moses but of that sort they were accustomed to offer aforetimes were burned by the violent flame that issued from the Altar that at length they died The other place he takes notice of is Isa 29. 13. which he refers to be discussed to the first chapter All the other places as was said are passed over in silence which manner of dealing is a great abuse both to the Truth and Reader To the Truth by waving the consideration of what is offered as the substratum upon which it is built To the Reader by pretending to answer to what is asserted by his Antagonist for the confirmation of Truth without advancing one step forward towards its confutation But perhaps he means not that where God hath given direction about any part of Worship it 's lawful to add any thing thereunto but onely wherein God hath not spoken and determined as touching the management of his Worship there the will of some of the children of men takes place and they may determine But if so 1. This is a most pitiful Petitio principii or begging the thing in question viz. That God hath not determined the whole of his Worship and Service but hath left somewhat to the wills of men relating to Worship as such to be determined by them which is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the thing in question and will never be granted him upon those terms 2dly Contrary to that fundamental principle placed in the nature of man and implyed and fairly intimated in each Scripture before instanced in that nothing in his Worship and Service is acceptable to him but what is of his own prescription 3dly Diametrically opposite to Deut. 4. 1 2. these additions let them be of what nature or in what case they will are additions to the Word of Jehovah Isa 29. 13. with Mark 7. 7. being evidently doctrines and institutions of men which the Spirit there tells us must have no place in the Worship of God That the Jews had their Service more fully particularized in all things pertaining to it than we have if he mean things relating to Service or Worship as such is spoken after the rate that a great many other things in this Treatise are viz. with confidence enough but without proof There being nothing relating to Gospel-Worship as such but is determined by Christ and appointed in the Scripture When he sends forth his Apostles Mat. 28. they were to teach what he had commanded them nothing more or less And he being Lord and Master of his House whose House are we Heb. 3. 6. who dares be so bold as to intermeddle with the affairs thereof without his appointment or can do so without an incroachment upon his Soveraignty He was faithful as Moses who received and revealed the Ordinances of the then House of God that he left nothing relating to the Worship thereof as such to the wills of men But of this more hereafter Sect. 8. Of the apostasie of the Jews from Divine Institutions The aim of the Author in remarking it It s application to the Church of England Whose Investions are expresly forbidden Of things in themselves out of the casâ— of Worship indifferent 'T is not in the power of the Church to make that which is left indifferent by the Lord a necessary Worship The judgement of the Protestant Writers Of the decency and order is in the Ceremonies of the Church of England Of their being imposed by Publick Authority How they draw from God
JERUBBAAL OR A Vindication of the Sober Testimony against Sinful Complyance from the Exceptions of Mr. Tombs in Answer to his THEODULIA Wherein the unlawfulness of hearing the present Ministers is more largely discussed and proved The Arguments produced in the Sober Testimony reinforced The Vanity of Mr. Tombs his Reply thereunto evinced His forty Arguments for Hearing fully answered The Inconsistency of Mr. T. his present Principles and Practices with passages in his former Writings remarked and manifested in an Appendix hereunto annexed Will ye plead for Baal will ye save him he that will plead for him let him be put to death whilst it is yet morning If he be a God let him plead for himself because one hath cast down his Altar Judg. 6. 31. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 2. 18. Nulla potest lingua satis exprimere quantum malum quantum periâ—ulum quantum confusionem sacrae Scripturae contempâ—us quae pâ—ocul dubio sufficiens est pro Ecclesiae gubernatione alias Christus imperfectus Legislator esset Et humanorum inventorum affectatio in Ecclesiam invexit Ad hujus rei evidentiam consideretur clari status cui sapientia coelestis desponsari debuit sua cum me etrice ilia sapientia humana adulteriam commiserunt illi si ut status Ecclesiae mere bestialis monstrosus evaseâ—it infra coelum supra vero terra subest Spiritus dominatur caro c. non erubescunt tamen quidam dicere humanis inventionibus melius Ecclesiam gubernari quam Lege Divina Lege Evangelii Christi quae assertio blasphema est c Johannes Gerson Seâ— in die Circumcis p. 3. consider 1. London Printed in the Year 1668. An ANSWER to the Epistolary Preface of Mr. Tombs his Theodulia To the Christian Readers especially those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil Dearly Beloved T Is now some five years since 〈◊〉 little Treatise call'd A Sober Testimony against Sinful Complyance was for my own and some few Christians of my intimate acquaintance use and further information in the grand Controversie of the Time viz. the Hearing of the present Ministers of England compiled and about two years after upon the earnest request of some Friends whom I could not deny published for the satisfaction and further establishment of others also What the success by the blessing of the Lord of that undertaking was with the acceptance it had with many truly fearing God I list not now to declare Not long after its publication without any enquiry of mine I had frequent intimations of an Answer by some one or other thereunto which by several it seems was deemed necessary I confess being in my own spirit assured I had pleaded for nothing but what in the substance of it would be found to be the Truth of Christ I was not over-solicitous into whose hands that undertaking would be committed When I heard not long after that the party whose Exceptions thereunto we have in the ensuing Treatise considered had undertaken the refutation thereof I was not a little well-pleased since an opposition thereunto was deemed necessary that it fell into such a hand For although I had frequent intimations of that sad frame of spirit he hath of late been under and from some Tractulates lately published by him had some ground to believe it yet was I unwilling to entertain any evil surmise concerning him which I knew to be a fruit of the flesh or to give way without most evident proof to the belief of the suggestion intimated Two things I did assure my self of 1. That he would deal like a Scholar in the management of the present Controversie candidly and fairly for the bolting-out of Truth as he phraseologiseth p. 1. Nor could it enter into my mind that a person of such Learning as Mr. Tombs would be accounted to be in stead of a fair and sober Answer should have turn'd aside by Cobweb-like and unnecessary distinctions like the obs and sols of the Schoolmen of which it may be said as one †Prudent Apothe. of some of the Ancient Philosophers of old-spake of others Statum lacessunt omnipotentis Dei Calumniosis litibus Fidem minutis dissecant ambagibus Ut quisque est lingua nequior Solvant ligantque quaestionum vincula Per Syllogismos plectiles to the clouding and obscuring of what was plain and obvious to the understanding of the meanest capacity and the perverting the intendment of his Antagonist nakedly represented to a meaning never intended by him as not once that he might seem to say somewhat he hath done setting up a man of straw of his own foâ—ming to spend the heat of his misgâ—ided zeal upon 2dly I supposed also that a man of that repute in days past for Sobriety to which he is still no mean pretender and Holiness as Mr. T. would never have defiled himself with the vomit and shameful spewing of passionate and most unchristian expressions worse than which had he been disputing with the Devil if he would have taken a measure of modesty from the Archangel he could not have made use of he is frequently venting and disgorging against his Adversaâ—y The review whereof I am assured will not be over-pleasing to him if his heart be but in the least fixt upon that frame of spirit in which our services for God of which he deems his present undertaking to be a part should be managed He hath sure read and I wish he would lay it to his very heart Jam. 1. 20. that the wrath of man worketh not the Righteousness of God and 2 Tim. 2. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Lud. de Dieu and others interpret de verborum as well as verberum pugna of tongue-strifes and contentions and is by some rendred to scold as also Tit. 1. 7. from the guilt whereof I know not how he will acquit himself He talks indeed of Billings-gate Rhetorick used by others p. 16. and expects he saith in his Epistle to the then Lord Chancellor no other event than Obloquy from persons of the mind of this Author For my part I am not conscious to my self of giving the least occasion of such expressions from this Animadverter not remembring what one sentence throughout the whole Treatise doth justly deserve such a castigation and am resolved not to return him the same measure he is pleased to mete out not liking the Copy so well as to write after it So that what-ever he meets with from others I assure him how grateful soever it may be unto him upon some accounts which may make him expect it as he speaks he shall miss of the returnal of Obloquy for Obloquy those wrathful passionate expressions he is frequently venting in the Papers under consideration Through Grace we have otherwise learned Christ and can say touching this Animadverter as Calvin touching Luther Though Luther call me Dog c. yet I will say of him he is I hope
Christ tells us is the Law and the Prophets Mat. 7. 12. i. e. what is required in the doctrine of the Law and the Prophets and is the sum of what they teach concerning the duties of man to man viz. That whatsoever we would that men should do to us we should do to them But 4thly This Ordinance is expresly established by the Lord Numb 31. 26 27. Take the sum of the Prey that was taken and dividâ— the Prey into two parts between them that took the War upon them who went out to Battel and between all the Congregation And Jos 22. 8. And he spake unto them saying Return with much Riches unto your Tents and with very much Cattel divide the spoyl of your enemies with your Brethren So that this Ordinance of David is no addition to the Civil-Laws of Israel What Mr. T. hath further to add touching this matter chap. 1. shall there be considered Sect. 6. The Election or Ordination of Levites not asserted by the Author of the Sober Testimony to be a Rule for the Ordination and Election of Ministers now Mr. Tombs his mistake and injurious dealing therein manifested Mr. T. grants as much as we assert in this matter The ground of giving the first-born to God The Levites given to him by the Congregation in the room of the first-born The People set apart the Levites to the Ministry Exod. 22. 29. Numb 8. 16 17 18. explained The reason of the Peoples laying on of hands Aaron and his sons Levites In what sense the Levites are called Priests their office and work THe seventh Section is by this Animadverter fronted with this The Election and Ordination of the Levites is no Rule for Election and Ordination of Ministers now which if with an intendment to insinuate into the mind of the Reader as the Assertion of the Author of the S. T. he egregiously abuseth both the one and the other There being not the least word syllable or tittle throughout the whole Treatise that gives him the least ground to surmise any such thing but rather the contrary The Election and Ordination of Ministers is a positive Institution of Christ to be managed according to Rules given forth by him in the New-Testament This I prove as well as I can chap. 4. pag. 33. So that what Mr. T. closeth this Section with that if it were true that in this act of imposing their hands there were Election and Ordination this was not a successive Election and Ordination as is when one dies and another is chosen and ordained in his room as oft as there is such a vacancy when one Minister dies and another comes in his stead For this Election and Ordination if it may be so called was but once and of the whole company together and so is no pattern for Election or Ordination of Elders successively by a particular Congregation successively or the major part of them is not at all to the purpose I no where intimate that it is a pattern of such an Election Though I know as wise men as this Animadverter that do as Cyprian Epist lib. 1. ep 4. and others Yet I see no reason but that we may review what was by the appointment of the Lord practised amongst his people that bears some analogy and resemblance to what is commanded under the Gospel for our further enlightning therein Mr. T. himself in his Apology or Plea for the two Treatises grants p. 141. that we may use an Analogie to enforce a Duty before proved And this is the whole of what I profess to be my aim in this Review of Ancient Institutions in the Prologue thereunto in these words Yet inasmuch as some beams of light may be communicated unto the present enquiry by a retrospection into the state of things in the time of the old Law it shall not be grievous to us briefly to remark the state and management of affairs under that Oeconomy which was so plainly asserted to be my sole aim therein that I cannot but wonder Mr. T. should have the confidence to impose upon me as if from thence I would deduce a pattern for New-Testament-Institutions which he knows I do not But I say that persons were appointed by the Lord to be chosen by the Congregation for the publick administration of Ordinances and Worship Thus were the Levites Exod. 13. 2 12 13. 22. 29. Num. 3. 12. Answ I do so indeed what hath this Animadverter to say against it 'T is true he grants they were given to God from among the Children of Israel to do the service of the Congregation but it is not true that they-were appointed by the Lord to be chosen by the Congregation Answ This must be a little further considered Upon the account of his sparing the first-born of the children of Israel when he slew the firstborn of the Egyptians doth the Lord challenge them to be his Exod. 13. 14 15. These were the Congregation of Israel to set apart unto the Lord v. 12. Thou the People or Congregation of Israel v. 3. shalt set apart unto the Lord all that openeth the matrix or as the Serventy renders it thou shalt put them apart unto the Lord. This is call'd chap. 22. 29. the giving of the first born of their sons to God viz. to his work and service In the stead of these he afterwards appointeth the Levites Numb 8. 16 18. For they the Levits are wholly given unto me from among the children of Israel in stead of such as open every womb even instead of all the first-born of the children of Israel Concerning whom these few things are considerable 1. That the Levites are said to be given wholly given unto God and that in the stead or room of the first-born v. 16 17 18. who they were that set apart the first-born to God was before shewed 2dly That by theâ—r being given unto God is intended their donation for his work and service is evident v. 11. for an offering of the children of Israel that they the Levites may execute the service of the Lord. Whether the people had any hand in setting them apart to this work and service is the question to which the Spirit speaks fully ver 9 10. 1. The Levites were to be brought before the Tabernacle of the Congregation 2. The whole Assembly of the children of Israel is to be gathered together v. 9. which had been needless had they not been concerned in their approbation which is all I intended by the word chosen which the Animadverter afterward carps at or can be supposed to do having before asserted that they were appointed by the Lord a word frequently used in that sense as he knows Precious Ainsworth saith as much upon the place The whole or all the Congregation saith he because the thing concerned them all to know and approve the Levites being now taken instead of the first-born 3dly Whether this were testified by the peoples imposition of hands let the Scripture determine
more inferiour order of Ministers given for the help of the Priests to them in the work of the Sanctuary and solemn service of God Who are called Priests Psal 132. 9. and are said to have a Priesthood Josh 18. 7. upon the account of their destination unto the service of the Tabernacle and work of the Ministry to distinguish them from the Congregation or Body of the People of Israel they are so called They were indeed as was said an inferiour order to Aaron and his sons but draw nigh to God they did in the Service of God they were imployed on the behalf of the Congregation and are called Priests and said to have a Priesthood and hereupon one would think one might assume the boldness to call them so Mr. T. tells us indeed it was the Priests office to do that work in which was the Worship of God viz. to offer the Sacrifices sprinkle the Blood and such other duties the Levites were imployed to do other services as the bearing of the utensils and such like Wherein how truly and candidly he speaks is to be considered 1. 'T is true it was the Priests office Aaron and his sons to do that work in which was the Worship of God i. e. the work they did when they drew nigh to God or worshipped him was the Worship of God which by office they were bound to do But that it was their office exclusively to the Levites to do that work in which was the Worship of God as he must be interpreted if we suppose him to speak pertinently is false They ministred and by office whereunto they were set apart in the Service and Worship of God as was before proved Their bearing the utensils was as much the Worship of God being commanded by him as sacrificing or sprinkling the Blood of the Sacrifices upon the unclean And this Animadverter if I may assume the boldness to say so writes indiscreetly and fallaciously to oppose these 2dly 'T is true that to Aaron and his sons it did by office and exclusively to the Levites appertain to offer Sacrifice and sprinkle the Blood but that the Levites were only imployed in bearing the utenâ—â—ls and the like is not so They were as well as the Priests the sonâ— of Aaron 1. To teach the people and instruct them in the Law Deut. 33. 10. 2 Chron. 17. 7 8 9. 80 30. 22. 31. 4. 35. 3. Ezra 7. 10 11. Nehem. 8. 7 8. 9. 4 5. 2dly They were solemnly to praise God 1 Chron. 16. 4. 23. 30. 2 Chron. 8. 14. 20. 19. 30. 21. 31. 2. Ezr. 3. 10. Neh. 9. 9. 12. 24. 3dly To bless in his Name Deut. 10. 8. 4thly The Judgment of things sacred appertained to them as touching Leprosie Deut. 24. 8. 2 Chron. 19. 8 10 11. works in which the Worship of God was as eminently as Sacrifice c. upon the account of their designation whereunto they may be called Priests and are so in the Scripture Yet 3dly I no where use the name Priests to denote the Levites only in distinction from Aaron and his sons but make use of that term to denote the Officers or Ministers amongst the Jews designed and separated for the Worship of God and the management of holy things for and to them whether Priests or Levites who being so called by the Spirit of the Lord I thought I might warrantably use that appellation without distasting any one and as yet see no just ground for the change of my thoughts in that matter Sect. 7. Persons invested into the office of Priesthood not left to the liberty of their own wills or the wills of any the whole of their Worship with respect to the matter and manner thereof of divine Institution Of the Candlestick made by Moses The matter of it His obligation to the pattern in making it What it typed out The ground of the acceptance of Worship Several places of Scripture revised and considered THat persons invested into the office of Priesthood were not left to the liberty of their own wills or the wills of any of the sons of men that the whole of their Worship with respect to the matter and manner thereof was purely of divine Institution is a third Assertion of mine touching the state of things under the old Law which Mr. T. takes notice of Sect. 8. which he grants to be thus far true that what was of the Institution of the Lord both as to matter and manner they were not in their office left to their own wills or the wills of any others and so much he saith the Scriptures produced prove Sed dabitur ignis tamen etsi ab inimicis petam We will not thank him for his grant and doubt not but to manifest somewhat more viz. That nothing was to be intermixed with what the Lord had instituted nothing of man to be super-added thereunto whether you respect the matter or manner of the Worship And this the Scriptures instanced do prove Exod. 25. 9 40. According to all that I shew thee after the pattern of the Tabernacle and the pattern of all the Instruments thereof even so shall ye make it And look that ye make them after their pattern which was shewed thee in the Mount And this Dr. Willet upon the place plainly asserts It is hence gathered saith he the form of the Tabernacle is not left to the will of man no not to the judgment of Moses to teach us that God will not be served with will-worship according to the devices and inventions of men but as he himself hath prescribed Prelarg Piscat So our blessed Saviour alledgeth in the Gospel out of the Prophet Mark 7. 7. Num. 8. 4. According to the pattern which the Lord had shewed Moses so he made the Candlestick The Candlestick was a figure of the Church said to be but one here because the Church at this day was National as also Zech. 4. 1. But Rev. 1. 20. we reade of seven Candlesticks which are expresly said to be the seven Churches of Asia i. e. they signified the seven Churches of Asia they were represented by the seven Candlesticks said here and there to be made of Gold beaten Gold to point forth the matter constituting them to be visible Saints and to be made according to the pattern of which Exod. 25. 31. to type forth that no other ground or form of Doctrine or of the Church is to be brought in than that which is shewed of God 2 Tim. 1. 13. 1 Tim. 1. 3 4. 3. 15. Mat. 28. 20. To this Pattern Moses was so strictly bound that it was utterly unlawful for him to have added the least of his own invention which to have done had been not only great unfaithfulness in him but an impeachment of the Wisdom of God and his Love to his People Heb. 8. 5. Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to
Israelitish Apostasie God left not himself without a Witness reserved to himself a Remnant Of the self-invented Worship of that day Whether there be no such Worship to be found in England The duty of Saints with relation thereunto Of Mr. T. his rash judging THat God left not himself without a Witness in the height of the Israelitish Apostasie but raised up one or other to testifie for him against their self-invented Worship that he reserv'd unto himself a Remnant that clave to him and his pure Appointments is a seventh Assertion in the S. T. which Mr. T. also grants to be true Sect. 12. but yet hath somewhat to say hereunto 1. That self-invented Worship was bowing the knee to Baal 1 King 19. 18. Rom. 11. 3 4. Serving Idols 2 King 17. 12. Burning Incense to Vanity Jer. 18. 15. Going after other Godds to serve them and worship them Jer. 25. 6. 35. 15. Answ Very good Doth the Author of the S. T. deny that when the Apostacy of the Jews arose to its height it came indeed to this the beginning hereof being laid in the departure from that Principle That God is to be served according to the revelation he makes of himself not according to mans inventions his citation of the places now again mentioned by Mr. T. evinceth the contrary 2. O but there is no such self-invented Worship found in England Answ That there is not in every particular the same is granted I know not that they set up the image of Baal to worship it what they do in the chambers of their imagery God only sees openly they serve not the same Idols nor burn Incense to Vanity c. but that there is no such self-invented Worship to be found in England is gratis dictum and without proof All self-invented Worship being indeed such like it in its principle a departure from the fore-mentioned fundamental-principle of Religion being the source and spring from whence it issues forth A bowing the knee to Baal or yielding obedience to other Lords viz. the Instituter and Commander of that Worship which is invented a serving Idols in the setting up Man in the room of the Spirit of God and the image or form created and made by him in the place of Divine Appointments But 2dly 'T is to me a fond conceit to imagine that upon a supposition that the Ministers and Church of England are not guilty of such gross Abominations as the places mentioned intimate the Jews to be guilty of against whom the Prophets bear their Testimony Therefore none must bear testimony against present Abominations nor can they be justified in their so doing from these Texts Whereas had they been guilty of less wickedness than they were it had been the duty of the Servants of the Lord to have testified against them The doing of what was not commanded by the Lord as well as what was expresly forbidden is part of their Testimony 2 King 16. 11. 17. 11 13. We pretend not to be extraordinarily raised up and spirited to witness against present Abominations conceiving it not at all needful in the present undertaking Every Christian that hath tenderness to the honour and glory of God according to the capacity they are in being obliged to testifie for him against the Innovations and Will-worship of the day Whether that speech of Christ to James and John be most aptly applyed to this Animadverter and that generation he is become the Advocate of and who they are that call for fire to come down from Heaven upon those that will not imbrace their doctrines others will judge We have through grace otherwise learned Christ Whether it be bitter or holy Zeal for God that moves us by whom whether our language will be judged just reproof or unjust reviling will one day be declared I am sure Mr. T. hath adventured upon what doth not at all appertain to him in judging before the time And in this can we rejoyce that under all his Censures we have the Testimony of the Spirit of the Highest That in godly simplicity and from a principle of holy Zeal â—o God we are carried forth in this matter Though we dare not acquir our selves of fleshly mixtures which we too much discern to our abasement and grief in all our undertakings But what hath this Animadv to accuse us of 'T were as easie to have manifested if it had been so and we conceive he would not have spared us could he have done it wherein the bitterness of our Zeal did appear as to have said it was bitter to have shewed wherein our reproof was unjust as to intimate it to be so These are but words and I hope not spoken from a spirit of gall and bitterness towards us though perhaps some other will be apt to think they are so Sect. 12. The People of God of old not to hearken to the teachings of such as were not sent by the Lord. The Command of God touching their cutting-off Saints forbidden to hear them The false Prophets preached much truth though not the whole truth So doth Antichrist They were not called false Prophets meerly for their preaching falshood but because they ran before they were sent The present Ministers preach falshoods c. In what sense to be cut off Separation from the enjoyned false worship of old commanded 'T is a breach upon the Sovereign Authority of God called by the names of Adultery Whoredom Idolatry c. Upon what account so called Jer. 9. 2. Hos 3. 3. 1. 2. Rev. 14. 8. explained worshipping God at Jerusalem Non-separation from his Worship there no argument of the unlawfulness of Separation from the Church of England IN his 13th Section Mr. T. takes notice of what I offer in the eighth place touching the duty of the Saints of old viz. That they were 1. Not to hearken to the teachings of such as were not sent of the Lord though they pretended never so much to be sent by him This we prove 1. from the Command of God touching these false Prophets viz. to cut them off Deut. 18. 20. 2dly They are expresly forbidden to hear them Deut. 13. 3. Jer. 27. 6 16. To which the Animadverter replies 1. None are said in the Texts mentioned nor in any other he meets with not to be sent by the Lord who delivered the Truth of God but such as delivered falshoods inciting to Idolatry or contradictory to the message to the true Prophets Answ 1. If by the Truth of God he means the whole Truth of God 't is granted That never any false Prophet delivered the whole Truth of God nor do the Ministers of England as we prove S. T. p. 91. If he mean that all they delivered was false and erroneous there is nothing more false can be invented or spoken They knew and so did Satan that set them on work that so to have done had been immediatly to have miscarried in the design they were advancing Antichrist in his Ecclesiastical
injury or offence committed against his Brother that is not a sin against God but in this sense we deny the offence here to be private and had Mr. T. by one Argument endeavoured to have evinced it he had done something a failure wherein renders the ensuing fabrick liable to sink with its own weight 1. Sins against our Brother are sins against God Psal 51. 4. Against thee only have I sinned saith David touching the wickedness he had wrought in the matter of Uriah 2. The word rendred trespass against thee Mat. 18. 15. is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies properly to erre from the prefixed mark metaphorically to sin a sin or to do that which is contrary to the Law of God Alsted in Lex Theol. which though by it we are injured as a sin is properly against God As all Indictments in criminal pleas are stiled against the King his Crown and Dignity Nor can the Animadverter give one instance throughout the whole New-Testament of the use of the word for such a private offence or scandal committed against a Brother as is not a sin and transgression against God What he adds 2dly That the Brother against whom the trespass is committed might remit or forgive it is 1. more than the Scripture will justifie him in asserting Must be received cum grano Salis with caution or 't is plainly atheological 1. If he mean he might remit or forgive it so far as it was an injury to him 't is granted in â—ome cases he might but it is also a sin against God which he must not suffer to rest upon his Brother Levit. 19. 17. 2. If he mean that upon an acknowledgment of the offence and manifestation of sorrow and repentance so far as he is able to discern unfeigned he be bound to own and receive him as formerly without acquainting any others or the Church with it 't is undoubtedly true He hath attained the utmost end aimed at in the whole process viz. the conviction and bringing the offender to repentance and therefore need not advance one step further to do so were frivilous ridiculous irregular sinful an open breach upon all the rules of charity enjoyned by Christ But yet it follows not that by Church is not meant a particular Congregation but select Arbitrators When Mr. T. proves the consequence of this proposition The offended Brother may forgive the Offender upon his confession of and sorrow for his trespass committed so as to own him for a Brother without publishing his fault that was only known to them two to any other therefore by Church to whom without such acknowledgment and repentance he was to have communicated it we are to understand select Arbitrators I will be his convert In what he adds that there is no act ascribed to the Church save an Admonition to the injurious Brother to do right to him whom he hath wronged this Animadverter is evidently mistaken For 1st Here is a Juridicial Sentence ascribed to the Church vers 18. Verily I say unto you the Church whatsoever ye shall bind on Earth c. 2dly The issue or consequence of this Juridicial Sentence is That hâ— is to the Church for what one is lawfully to a part of the Body he is to the whole as a Heathen or Publican i. e. shut out of their Communion or Fellowship But Mr. T. is sure he tells us the Publicans were not excluded a sacris Answ 1. If by sacra he means those Ordinances that peculiarly related to them as members of the Judaical Church and by Publicans unproselyted uncircumcised Publicans 't is most false that such were not excluded a sacris They might not partake of the Passover with them to instance in no more particulars Exod. 12. 48. And Maimonides in Korban Pesach Cap. 5. Sect. 5. tells us That as the Circumcision of himself omitted debarreth him from keeping the Passover so doth the circumcision of his Sons and his Servants c. if omitted And if he kill it before he do circumcise them it is unlawful Of which R. Menacheâ— renders a reason on Exod. 12. Whilest the power of uncleanness and the superfluous foreskin is upon him c. he is unfit to be united with the divine Majesty c. 2. If by sacra he mean coming to their Synagogueâ— to hear them Preach or Expound the Law he speaks nothing to the purpose an Excommunicated person may come to the Church-Assemblies and hear and see what is done there as may an Heathen The Scripture instanc't in affords not the least sanctuary to his Assertion First 'T is a Parable and so it may be a supposition of what never was Secondly 'T is spoken it seems of a broken converted Publican He looked down smote upon his Breast cried out The Lord be merciful to me a sinner Thirdly 'T is not said that he joyned with the Jewish Church in any act of Worship That he went up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Holy the whole building of the Temple consisting of an inward and outward Court is so called to pray is Parabolically said of him as of the Pharisee but both the one and the other prayed by themselves severally and apart vers 11. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 word for word standing to himself or apart from the Publican he prayed these things O God I thank thee c. vers 13. And the Publican 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 standing a far off viz. in the first Court of the Temple where all sorts of People Publicans and Sinners might come 1 Kings 8. 41. Fourthly 'T is most certain and the Animadverter cannot be ignorant hereof That the Publicans were excluded not only a sacris which they were but also from Civil Communion so far as possibly they could insomuch as it was a great crime charged upon Christ by them That heate and drank with Publicans and Sinners and that more than once Matth. 9. 11. and 11. 19. Mark 2. 16. Luke 5. 30. and 7. 34. Accordingly upon this sentence of the Church upon the Offender the Members of the Society are to carry it towards him not only as towards a Heathen with whom they might have civil Commerce but as towards a Publican with whom they at that day had none 1 Cor. 5. 11. 2 Thes 3. 14. And he that should have seen the Publican Luke 18. if there was ever such a thing done praying in one Court and the Pharisee in another or if in the same Court one at one Corner and the other at the other apart by themselves would scarce have concluded that they held Communion together or inferred therefore the Publicans were not excluded a sacris Which Consequence Mr. T. will take time to make good usque ad Graecas Calendas It remains That forasmuch as by Church Mat. 18. 17. is not meant the Jâ—â—ish Synedrium nor the Lord Bishop and his Consistory nor the Civil Magistrate nor the Presbyterie nor Mr. T. his Select
Arbitrators the vanity of each of which hath been evinced that therefore it is a particular instituted Church of Christ in the New Testament as Mr. T. knows the learned of old and of late have interpreted it So Ignatius who applies it to the particular Church of Philadelphia Chrysostome c. The judicious Casaubon Exercit. Lib. 15. p. 433. c. These things premised we attend his Answers to the Questions proposed in S. T. of which in the next Section we shall treat Sect. 14. Whether there be any National Church under the Oeconomie of the Gospel Mr. T. his answers hereunto considered Isa 49. 23 66. 8. explained That they are Prophesies that wait their accomplishment demonstrated Of the miraculous conversion of the Jews Zach. 12. 10. explained The Sign of the Son of Man Mat. 24. 30. What. THe first Quest in S. T. proposed by us is Whether since the Apotomie or unchurching the Nation of the Jews the Lord hath so espoused a Nation or People to himself as that upon the account thereof the whole Body of the People thereof may be accounted his Church Whether there be any National Church under the Oeconomie of the Gospel This Mr. T. is pleased to make two Questions though in it self but one the latter being only exegetical to the former 1st He grants That God hath not since the unchurching the Nation of the Jews espoused a Nation to himself as that the whole Body of the People thereof may be accounted his i. e. There is no National Church of divine Institution under the Gospel for if there be the Lord hath most assuredly visibly espoused that Nation to himself and they are to be accounted his What hâ— adds viz. We own no Church visible now but of Believers by their own personal profession we are not concerned to take notice of His mentioning the 9th Article of the Church of England by way of approbation and as if it were of the same mind with him touching the subjects of the visible Church is an abuse of it and the Reader 'T is known that the addition in the Confession of Faith of the Assembly Chap. 25. Art 2. Of Childrens Church-membership is the Doctrine of the said Church Of this matter we are not now treating Secondly In answer to the Question Whether there be any National Church under the Oeconomy of the Gospel I say saith Mr. T. that though there be no National Church so as that the whole Nation and every member of the Nation be to be accounted of the visible Church of Christ by virtue of their generation and Proselytism and such Covenant as was made to Abraham concerning his natural Seed or to Israel at Mount Sinai or elsewhere yet the whole number of Believers of a Nation may by reason of their common profession be called a National Church as well as the whole body of men throughout the world upon the account of their professing the Faith of the Gospel c. are and may be called the visible Catholick-Church of Christ Answ 1. But if Mr. T. thinks this to be an answer to the Question he will scarce find in this matter any Corrival Quaestio est de ollis Responsio de sepis We are not enquiring whether a company of Believers living in a Nation may be called upon the account of their Faith and Profession a National Church which by the figure Caâ—achresis it may be they may I am sure most abusively and improperly it is that they are so called Nor 2dly Is the enquiry de facto of what by the Providence of God is come to pass in which sense we grant there is a Natioâ—al Church under the Gospel the Church of England is so But 3dly Whether upon the account of a compulsed or education-Faith and Profession contradicted by the most assumed and professed by persons living in a Nation divided in several Parishes Diocesses under the conduct of their Parochial Ministers and Diocesan Metropolitan Bishops united together under one or more Ecclesiastical visible Head This company of People thus molded are or may truly be accounted a Church of Christ instituted by him under the Oeconomie of the Gospel Which whoever will undertake to demonstrate must I conceive attempt the proof of these few things First That a profession of Faith forced and compelled or at least in which men have been trained up from their Infancy as the Turkes are in the Doctrine of their Alcoran and that for the most part contradicted in their conversation is sufficient to give a man or woman a right and title to Church-membership Secondly That persons co-habiting or living together in a Parish are de jure upon the account of that their co-habitation at least if they make so much profession as to be able to say the Creed Lords-Prayer and ten Commandments though as was said contradicted by a course of debauchery c. are a Church of Christ or that Parish-Churches quâ tales are of the Institution of Christ Thirdly That the Subordination of these Churches and Ministers to Diocesan Bishops Archdeacons Consistories and Commissaries and these again to an Arch-Bishop or Metropolitan is of the same Original Fourthly That these Bishops Arch-deacons Commissaries Courts Ecclesiastical Metropolitical Head are of the Institution of Christ Which when Mr. T. or any one for him shall do I will be a Member of the Church of England But he knows an easier way 'T is but saying That there is no Institution of a Church by Preception or Command and he avoids he thinks the necessity of putting himself to all this toyl But seriously Sir very few considerate and judicious Christians will care to be Members of such a Church as is destitute of divine Institution and whether his Clients of the Church of England will thank him for this part of his Plea I am not certain In the greatness of his love he seems to be killing his Mother with kind embraces The Church of England is not he grants of the Institution of Christ for there is no Church that is so that there is no need to alleadge Isa 49. 23. and 66. 8. for the Institution of a National Church Nevertheless that the Prophesie Isa 49. 23. waits the time of its accomplishment is said by the author of the S. T. with more confidence than evidence Answ Well Mr. T. will not be guilty of the same crime what evidence brings he of this confident assertion Why many learned Interpreters among whom Mr. Gataker think otherwise But Sir we have not learned Jurare in verba Magistri to take any mans dictates for evident proof of any thing of this nature which we are sure they are not As learned Interpreters are of the mind of the Author of S. T. The truth of the Assertion is evident 1st The Prophesie hath respect to some time after the coming of Christ in the flesh of which he speaketh vers 1 3 4 5 7 8. which one consideration manifests the nothingness of
by him For it will hence follow that whoever brings the truth of Doctrine is a true Minister Then the Devil was so Mark 1. 24. Luke 4. 34. Every private Brother a Woman may be so For where the Form denominating is there the Subject is rightly denominated from it But this is too absurd for Mr. T. to cleave to His sixth Argument is False Prophets false Apostles false Brethren are onely denominated from their false Doctrine therefore they are not false Ministers but true who teach the truth of the Gospel The Antecedent he proves from 2 Pet. 2. 1. 2 Cor. 11. 13. Gal. 2. 4 5. 1 Joh. 2. 18 21 22 26. 2 Joh. 7. Answ 1. We deny the consequence it doth not follow â—pon supposition that false Prophets are so denominated from their false Doctrine that whoever preach true Doctrine are true Ministers the proof whereof we expect by the next 2ly the Antecedent is manifestly false False Prophets are so called because they ran and prophesied in the Name of the Lord when he never sent them speak in them or to them Jer. 14. 14 15. 23. 21 22. 27. 15. 28. 15. 29. 9 31. 43. 2. Ezâ—k 13. 6. Of false Apostles there is the same reason The true Apostles are so call'd upon the account of their Mission from Christ nor is any one so except lawfully called by Christ saith Pareus on 1 Cor. 1. The false upon the account of their pretending thereto when indeed they were never sent by him Nor doth 2 Cor 11. 13. make void this Assertion it rather establisheth it T is true the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or false Apostles preached false Doctrine but they are not upon that foot of account so denominated but because they were metaschematizing or transforming themselves into the Apostles of Christ as Satan is also sometimes transforming himself into an Angel of light i e they come as the Apostles of Christ pretend to be his Ambassadors men sent by him as M. T. knows the word signifies when really and indeed they were not so 1 Joh. 2. 18 21 22 26. tells us of Antichrists that were already come such as Simon Magus Ebion Cerinthus and that tâ—ey opposed the Person and Doctrine of the Son of God who with their endless genealogies and unintelligible conceptions attempted the total overthrow of the Gospel wondrously perplexing the Saints of that day but that therefore they were called false Apostles there is not the least mention Gal. 2. 4 5. speaks of false Brethren but that they are so called singly upon the account of their spreading false opinions is a conceit that Mr. T. will not in haste make good They were unsound hypocritical Professors that pretending to be Brethren sought an occasion to injure and mischieve the Children of the Lord which Paul had too great an experiment of 2 Cor. 11. 26. 2 Pet. 2. 1. hath already been considered So that with more Scripture-evidence it may be argued If false Prophets false Apostles be so denominated upon the account of their running before they were sent pretending to come in his Name when he never missionated them Then they are false Ministers who come in the Name of Christ and have received no authentick Commission from him But the Antecedent is true as we have evinced Therefore Sect. 19. Of God's determining the whole of our Worship His so doing of old in the Statutes and Judgments he gave to Israel an eminent act of Love it is so now to his New-Testament-Churches Mr. T. his ten Arguments to the contrary answered Acts 15. 10. Heb. 7. 18 19. 9. 9 10. Joh. 1. 18. explained THe third Query in the S. T. is Whether God doth not beaâ— as much love to and exercise as much faithfulness over his New-Testament-Churches as over the National Church of the Jews To this Mr. T. answers No doubt of it He grants he doth To the fourth Query Whether he hath not as of old he did with reference to the then Church determined the whole of the Worship appertaining to them to whose Institutions without any humane additions it is the duty of fouls solely to conform He answers in the Negative God hath not determined Circumstantials in Worship he must mean Circumstances of Worship relating to it as such or he speaks nothing to the purpose and these are such necessary parts of Worship that without them it is not accepted and his not doing so is an argument of greater love to his New-Testament-Churches than his determining the whole of his Worship to the Church of the Jews was to them Answ 1. In pag. 32. he tells us that if God do design more diligently the longitude and latitude of the Jewish Church at their calling hereafter which are things Mr. T. accounts Accidentals of Worship undetermined and leave the dimension of our Church to humane choice this may be done out of more special love to them So that the same act of God is it seems a manifestation and no manifestation of greater love from God i. e. when it will serve Mr. T. his design to assert it to be so it is so when otherwise he will perswade to the belief of the contrary Quo teneam vultus mutantem Protea nodo 2dly When the Lord speaks of the Judgments and Statutes he had given to Israel whereby the whole of their Worship was determined he speaks of them as the wondrous manifestation of his love to theâ— whereby they were eminently exalted above all the people in the world Psal 147. 19 20. Ezek. 20. 11. Neh. 9. 13. Deut. 6. 24. That the determination of their Worship should be an issue of dearest love and the non-determination of ours a manifestation of greater love is an Assertion that had need be back't with strong proofs and evidence else it is not likely to find the least entertainment amongst the Saints But this he manifests by no less than a decad of Reasons Reas 1. Because the determination of the whole of the Worship of God to the Jews was the imposing of a yoke on them which neither the elder nor later Jews were able to bear Acts 15. 10. Answ But this is a mistake of the Animadverters The Apostle Peter saith not the determination of the whole of the Worship of God to them was such a yoke but the pressing Circumcision and Mosaical Observances by some Sect-masters amongst them as the way to Justifâ—cation and Salvation was so As is evident from ver 1 5 11. The Doctrine of Justification and Salvation by the works of the Law was a yoke that they were not able to bear Ergo the determination of the whole of the Worship of God was so is a most ridiculous and puerile Conclusion 2. Grant the yoke to be Mosaical Observances their number and multitude c. made them such an insupportable yoke not their deteâ—mination by the Lord. Whatever he institutes and commands as such is the joy and delight of the Saints to conform to not
their yoke and burden Reas 2. Because the determination of the whole of God's Worship to the Jews did bring in many things which were unprofitable weak and made nothing perfect Heb. 7. 18 19. And if God had so determined to us he had commanded things unprofitable weak c. Therefore Answ 1. The will of God was the ground and measure of those things the Apostle calls unprofitable c. which had they been more so upon the account thereof they ought to have been submitted unto the unprofitableness and weakness of any thing being no ground for its rejection when commanded by the Lord. 2dly This Animadverter is not so much of Gods counsel as to be able to say what had been if the whole of Gospel-Worship had been as it is determined by the Lord. That there is some part of Gospel-Worship instituted he will not deny Is this unprofitable weak If not what necessity is there that what he supposeth not to be instituted had it been so should be liable to such a crimination 3dly What is most weak contemptible and unprofitable in the eye of man is usually made the power of God to them that are saved 1 Cor. 1. 18 23 24 25. 4thly These supposed accidentals of Worship non-determined of God are left by him according to Mr. T. his dictate to be determined by Governours If the determination of the Lord would have rendred them weak and unprofitable doth their determination make them efficacious and profitable Are they wiser stronger than God or being determined by them may we reject them as unprofitable weak and good for nothing To what purpose disputes he then for them 5thly If God hath left them to be set down by Governours to whom obedience is due as saith the Animadverter 't is out of love and faithfulness to us that he hath done so that it should be greater love and faithfulness in him to us to leave them to the determination of men with a necessity of our subjection to them when determined than to do it himself is absurd to assert But 6thly The observances instanced in by Paul Heb. 7. 18 19. were not accidentals of Worship they were necessary and essential parts thereof such things wherein the greatest part of the Instituted Worship of God amongst the Jews did consist which are called weak and unprofitable c. not with respect to the determination of God as if his determining them made them so which were impious to imagine nor in respect of the end for which they were instituted by the Lord which it was impossible they should be he never failing of his end nor mistaking in the choice of means proper and suitable thereunto but with respect to the great works of Justification Sanctification c. accomplished and wrought by the Melchizedechian Priesthood of the Lord Jesus as the Apostle speaketh and in this sense all the Worship of Christ that is determined by him is weak unprofitable makes nothing perfect viz. in it self or with respect to Justification and by this Animadverters Argument it had therefore been a greater demonstration of love and faithfulness in the Lord to us to have determined no part of Instituted Worship Reas 3. The things God determined to the Jews about the Circumstantials of his Worship were but shadows of good things to come which were not fit to be continued or to be supplied with any other Christ being come who was the Body or Substance Colos 2. 16 17. Heb. 10. 1. Therefore Answ 1. What was fit or not fit for God to do Mr. T. is too bold to assume the confidence to determine He never made him or any of the Sons of men his Counsellor 2. Not the circumstantials of Worship only but the greatest part of the instituted Worship of the Lord amongst them was a shadow of good things to come The Sacrifices Passover Ordinances of the Priesthood c. were eminent Types of Christ who was the Substance and Body of them yet no accidentals of Worship but that wherein the Worship it self did consist But 3dly Mr. T. will never prove That if God determine the whole of his Worship under the Gospel he must introduce such things as are such shadows of good things to come as the Jews Observances were The determination of the whole of the Worship of Chriâ—t asserted by us secures us we find by experience from such things which the asserting a liberty in men to determine what they please under the notion of accidentals of Worship exposeth us to witness the Cross in Baptism Surplice Hood Tippet and a hundred such ridicuâ—ous trinkets invented by them and yet except he prove this his reason is irrational and ludicrous Let us see if there be any more weigâ—t in what follows Reas 4. Such Ordinances were carnal to endure only to the time of Reformation which is this time of the Gospel Heb. 9. 9. Therefore it 's part of Gods love c. that neither the same in particular nor other are precisely determined to us by God Answ 1. The Jewish Ordinances are called Carnal or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Justifications or Righteousnesses of the flesh because in their own nature they reached only to the outward man saith Piscator because they did sanctifie only to the purifying of the flesh vers 13. say our Annotators These were to continue but untill the time of Reformation as the Apostle saith even to the times of the Gospel but that no other Ordinances that in their own nature I speak not of what is done by the blessing of the Lord upon his own appointments reach only to the outward man and the purifying of the flesh are of the appointment of Christ whatever others say Mr. T. upon second thoughts will not assert it But 2dly These Ordinances were carnal and vertually â—bolished at the death of Christ actually taken away and removed when the Temple was destroyed by Titus Vespatian the same Ordinances in particular are not determined by the Lord but that no other Ordinances are is a slip of Mr. T. his Pen or it may be a Typographical error which he will not justifie 3dly When this Animadverter proves that it was not an act of rich love and faithfulness in the Lord upon the cessation of the carnal Ordinances of the Jews to institute de novo and precisely determine a more simple or spiritual Worship or that because these then ceased therefore it could not be an act of love in the Lord so to do i. e. When he shall make good his Inference he may be supposed to say something but till then an ordinary capacity will be able to discern that he doth but trifle His 5 6 7 Reasons are not worth the mentioning concluding only That New-Testament-Believers are released from Jewish Observances which we assert and own as well as he And when he shall be able to manifest that any thing else can Logically or Rationally be deduced from them I will be his bondman Reas 5. For
what though the Jews were in their minority and therefore to be kept under those beggarly elements c. until the time appointed by the Father Gal. 4. 1 2 3 9. Doth it therefore follow that God hath not determined the whole of his Worship now Is the Son because grown up to offer to God what Worship he pleaseth This indeed follows That we are not under those beggarly Elements and to return to them or any like them not of the appointment of Christ is an act of great ingratitude to the Lord for his love and faithfulness manifested to us in the establishment of a more sublime and spiritual Worship under the Gospel As also that it is great wickedness to introduce impose or subject to such beggarly Elements now these stood for the most part in bodily rites in differences of meats and drinks of times places garments c. of which he may do well humbly to inform his good Mother the Church of England that she is too too guilty The like may be said of his 6th Reason The time before Christ was an estate under Moses a Servant the estate of Christians is under Christ the Son Gal. 4. 4 5 6 7. Heb. 3. 5. Therefore we are no longer to be subject to Mosaical appointments had been somewhat tolerable arguing but therefore 't is greater love in the Lord not to determine the whole of his Worship to us now which being the Position he attempts the proof of should have been his Inference is such a pittifull illation that one would never expect from such a learned person as Mr. T. It rather follows Therefore Christ hath determined the whole of his Worship under the New Testament being faithful as a Son when Moses the Servant according to the appointment of the Lord gave forth Laws for the ordering the whole of the affairs of the then House of God especially considering that he was the Prophet like unto Moses whom the Father promised to raise up into whose mouth he said he would put his words and that he should speak unto the Sont of Men whatever he commanded him Deut. 18. 18. Accordingly when he comes into the world 't is said of him He revealed the Father Joh. 1. 18. Gr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he plainly and delucidly expounded to them the mind and will of the Father that the Father spake to us in or by him Heb. 1. 1. and gives us a charge to hear him Mat. 3. 17. Reas 7. His seventh Reason is like the rest 'T is true had not the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or hand-writing of Mosaical Ceromonies been abolished Col. 2. 14. we had not reaped the fruit of Christs death by which they were abolished Ephes 2. 14 15. and so consequently tasted the less of the love of the Lord. But that therefore 't is a greater argument of love in God not to determine the whole of his Worship or that if he haâ— done so we had not reaped the fruit of Christs death is such a sort of nakedness in Mr. T. his arguing that one would not willingly discover did not the vindication of Truth necessitate one hereunto Reas 8. His eighth Reason is if possible more weak and absurd The Apostles judged it a great benefit to the Christian Churches that they were exempt from the Rites and Ceremonies of the Mosaical Law Acts 15. 28. therefore they accounted it an effect of Gods love that he had not determined the whole of his Worship to us With what affection others will peruse these passages I cannot tell for my part I heartily pitty him that he should ever undertake the defence of a cause so deplorable as to be driven to such pittiful shifts in the managerie thereof which I cannot impute to his want of Abilities which he will one day find he might better have imployed than in his present undertaking but the desperateness of the Cause he endeavours to defend It follows indeed that therefore they accounted it an effect of Gods love that they were delivered from the burden of those external Rites and Ceremonies especially as they appertained to the Covenant of Works and so do we 'T is strange if this Animadverter reckon it to be so that he should plead for the same the like yea worse Ceremonies imposed not by the Lord but by men whose servants we never were nor in these matters ought to be But that they accounted it an effect of love that God had not determined the whole of his New-Testament-Worship is such a câ—imination as their souls abhorred But he proceeds Reas 9. 'T is an effect of greater love to the Gentile Churches that God hath not determined the whole of his Worship because they being of divers Nations and Languages under divers Governments used to divers Customs they could not conveniently if at all practise such an Uniformity of Circumstances as they must have done if God had so determined Answ 1. That their being of divers Nations c. should discapacitate them with respect to their conforming to the will of God even in Circumstantials of Worship as such any more than they are discapacitated in their conforming to that part of Instituted Worship Mr. T. grants to be determined by the Lord is beyond the ken of my shallow understanding 2dly That the Saints must have practised any external Uniformity I suppose he means it with respect to Liturgies falsly called Divine Service in use amongst the Papists and Church of England Vestments called Holy c. if God had determined the whole of his Worship we crave leave to deny he hath so done yet such an Uniformity ought not to be practised 't is wretched and abominable And yet had the Lord seen it meet to have enjoyned any such thing it ought to have been practised nor would it by the Saints have been accounted a less argument of his love to them because thereby they should have been exposed to outward inconveniencies This reason at the best is but carnal and selfish from our conveniencies external or inconveniencies a measure of the Lords love in Divine Appointments is not to be taken But there is yet one Reason behind Reas 10. The Assertion That God hath determined the whole of his Worship in Circumstantials relating to it as such is to infringe our Christian Liberty and to bring us into such bondage as they were in under the Law therefore not agreeable to that love God bears to the New-Testament-Churches Answ 1. That the Lords determining the whole of his Worship should in the least infringe our Christian Liberty is a monstrous assertion it rather establisheth it in the freedom it gives not only from the Jewish Ceremonies but the Inventions and Devices of men with force and violence attempted to be imposed upon us For if God had determined the whole of his New-Testament-Worship it cannot be supposed that we owe the least homage or subjection to these We may not be the servants of men 2dly I never yet thought
that a conformity to any thing that God had revealed and determined as our duty had upon that account been our bondage 'T is the liberty joy and delight of the Saints to do his will Psal 119. 45. 1 Joh. 5. 3. Psal 19. 8. 119. 111. Such kind of weak impertinent arguings asserted with state and confidence as is the manner of the man must he be content to deal with who undertakes the consideration of what is proposed by this Animadverter But to recite these Arguments had been Answer sufficient to the judicious and intelligent Reader We attend his further motion Sect. 20. God had designed his own Officers for the management of the affairs of his House Who they are may be collected from Ephes 4. 11. The Animadverter proves not that Arch-Bishops c. do the work of the Ministers of the Gospel are commissionated by Christ His apprehension when he took the solemn League and Covenant not the same as now The extensiveness of the Priviledges of the Saints under the Gospel-Oeconomie What things were wanting to the Jews under the second Temple which they had under the first The Election of Ministers the peculiar Priviledge of the Church That it was practised by the Saints in the first Ages granted by the Animadverter Many things charged upon the Saints then living that are false Neither former disorders nor present distempers amongst the Saints any sufficient Warrant for the changing an Institution of Christ. The Priviledge of Women asserted from Scripture and learned Writers Of the Decree of the Council of Carthage 1 Cor. 14. 34 35. 1 Tim. 2. 12. explained What is to be done in case of difference in the Congregation touching the election of Officers MR. T. in his 21. Sect. proposes the 5th Query in S. T. to consideration viz. Whether God hath not now as then under the time of the Law designed the several Officers and Offices his wisdom thought sufficient for the management of the affairs of his House so that the Invention of new ones by the Sons of Men is not only needless but a daring advance against the soveraignty care and wisdom of God over his Churches To which after a large harangue touching Moses the 70 Elders Joshua the Judges David and other Kings the Prophets Aaron and his Sons with the Levites whom the Lord appointed for the management of the affairs of his House having also learnedly told us that God hath not in the Christian Church designed such Officers and Offices as these the twelve Disciples and amongst the rest Peter to whom he seems to assert a Primacy by way of promise to appertain He resolves the Question in the affirmative Tells us that who the Officers of Christ's designing are may best be gathered from Eph. 4. 11. of which we have formerly spoke in Chap. 3. of S. T. As for what follows when Mr. T. shall prove 1st That the Arch-Bishops Bishops c. of the Church of England do the works enjoyned by Christ and his Apostles to the Ministers of the Gospel 2dly That every one that doth those works though not Commissionated by Christ thereunto nor performing them after the order appointed by him is a Minister of Christ 3dly That its lawful for the Sons of men to make more degrees of Ministry one above the other under new Names Titles with maintenance forreign to the maintenance of Christ employed in works he no where charges upon them to do than Christ ever instituted appointed shall look upon our selves as concerned in what he offers in this Section But till then we shall neither trouble our selves or Reader with his Lordly dictates which being tendred without proof may righteously be rejected by us Only thus much I would tell him in his ear That if he had when he took the solemn League and Covenant the same apprehension of this generation of men he now seems to have he did very wickedly to swear to endeavour the extirpation of Prelacy i. e. as in the Covenant is explained Church-Government by Arch-Bishops Bishops their Chancellours and Commissaries Deans Deans and Chapters Archdeacons and all other Ecclesiastical Officers depending on that Hierarchie What Durst he sware to extirpate the Ministers and Ministry of Christ as he now supposeth them to be But Tempora mutantur nos mutamur in illis In Sect. 22. Mr. T. takes notice of the 6th enquiry in S. T. touching the extensiveness of the Priviledges of the Saints under the Gospel whether not commensurate with theirs under the Law which if understood of Saints in appearance or the visible Church he tells us The visible Church of the Jews had in some things greater Priviledges as those mentioned Rom. 9. 4 5. 3. 1 2. and are they not as much committed to the Church and People of God now so that these Texts are little to his advantage together with Gods revealing his mind to them by Urim and Thumim extraordinary Prophets and many more which he not being pleased to particularize to us we shall not turn aside to make enquiry after But to those instanced in we Answer First That the Church and People of God are destitute of some of the Priviledges mentioned is granted and so was the Church of the Jews after their return from the Babylonish Captivity The Rabbies tell us That in the second Temple there were five things wanting which had been in the first 1. The Ark with the Mercy-Seat and Cherubims 2. The fire from Heaven 3. The Urim and Thummim Ezra 2. 63. Neh. 7. 65. whereby the Lord never answered them more 4. The Majesty or divine presence whereby they seem to mean the Oracle in the most holy place where God hath dwelt between the Cherubims Psal 80. 2. Numb 7. 89. 5. The Holy Ghost or the Spirit of Prophesie which was not in the Prophets after the second year of Darius after Haggai Zechariah and Malachie had finished their Prophesies Secondly The Inference of the Animadverter is weak Believers or visible Saints under the Gospel have not some things with which the Church of the Jews was priviledged therefore their Priviledges are not as extensive which notwithstanding they might be yea abundantly more extensive The first Temple upon many accounts was more glorious than the second which wanted as was but now remarked many things wherein its glory lay Yet Hag. 2. 9. the Prophet tells them that the glory of the latter house should be greater than of the former which it was though it had not the same things for its ornament and glory upon other accounts viz. it s being honoured with the bodily presence of Christ there c. Of the Priviledges of the Gospel-Churches and their super-eminency with respect to the Old-Testament-Church we shall not now treat They are delivered from the Yoke of Ceremonial Observances have the Gospel unvailed preached amongst them 2 Cor. 3. 18 c. Nor need we the intendment of our present enquiry being only this Whether the solemn deputation of
afterwards and here and in his Roman discussed asserts that 't is not tyrannical Dominion but the Dominion of one Apostle over another that is interdicted So that the same thing is doubtful and not doubtful with Mr. T. in the writing a few lines And this he proves by no fewer than ten reasons in his Rom. discussed 2dly Here he tels us that 't is an affectation of the Rule which a person may have and lawfully exercise that is forbidden there that the Dominion or Rule it self is interdicted which he would do well to reconcile and answer his Arguments he there produceth for its confirmation The sum whereof is Christ would have none amongst them superiour but all equal he forbids not only tyrannical Dominion but also any Dominion at all over one another which is saith he apparent 1. From the occasion of the words Christ forbids what they sought for but they sought for chief Dignity Seniority and priority of Order as do the Bishops of England 2dly From the Subjects whose Dominion is forbidden viz. Kings that had lawfull Authority and therefore such Rule is forbidden as the best Rulers used amongst the Nations 3dly The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although sometimes meant of meer lordly forcible Rule against the will and good of the person ruled yet here it cannot be so meant sith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to use Dominion at all and to have power at all over one another is forbidden Luke 22. 25. 4thly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the simple 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is used still of Rule without abuse is forbidden 5thly It is forbidden to be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. to affect that title which implies one to be under another and to be beholden one to another as persons that could gratifie one another which doth imply superiority in some sort 6thly The additional speech of Christ commanding in the stead of Dominion Mat. 20. 26 27. rather Ministry and Service shews he would have none among them superiour but all equal 7ly Christ's propounding himself as their example only in service 8â—y He requires such a mutual debasement as takes away the taking to themselves priority of order or place or rule over one anotheâ— Mat. 20. 26 27. Mark 10. 43 44. Luke 22. 26. 9ly This is confirmed by other places upon a like occasion Mat. 18. 1 2 3 4. Mark 9. 33. Luke 9. 46. In which Christ resolves them that they should be as a little child that assumes not Empire but is humble and accounts others as equal to him 10ly From Luke 22. 28. that Christ having forbidden superiority in any of them among themselves promises them a Kingdom afterward in recompence of their abiding with him in his temptations All which manifest 1. a Superiority interdicted 2. That the Superiority interdicted is not interdicted to all Christians as he would in his Theodulia bear us in hand for then Christians should be forbidden to exercise Civil Dominion and Power as Mr. T. his ten Arguments manifest But 3. a Superiority of order over one another as the Bishops of England exercise over their fellow-Ministers That the Apostles exercised any such Superiority over the Church of God or Ministers of a lower order as the Bishops of England exeâ—cise over them this Animadverter will never prove And if he were able so to do this would not justifie the Bishops in their exercise of such Superiority who are invested with no Apostolical Power that I know of 'T is true a rule over the Faith of Saints is disclaimed by the Apostle 2 Cor. 1. 24. but that this is not the whole of what is interdicted in the places before-cited he hath himself proved by ten Arguments but now repeated by us As for 1 Pet. 5. 3. he tells us what the Assembly in their Annotations say on the place viz. that is not imperiously commanding your own inventions in the stead of the Doctrine of the Gospel not carrying hemselves insolently and magisteriously towards Gods People 3 Joh. 9. Answ 1. All this is known to be practised by the present Bishops They command imperiously their own inventions to which the preaching of the Gospel must give place when there is not time for both as in the case of Liturgy-worship is known to be true How insolently and magisterially they carry it towards the people of the Lord the whole Nation is witness 2. The Elders being interdicted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to exercise Lordly Rule over the Heritage of God is certainly an interdiction of the introduction of any such Officer into the Churcâ— of God as against the will of the Lord's People should by vertue of an Office-power exercise a Lordly jurisdiction over them and their Ministers as a superiour order of Priesthood and certainly more forbidden than the office of an Elder Jurisdiction is not an abuse of our Prelates Office as is known though they too often abuse it by exercising it exorbitantly even contrary to their own Canons but a great a chief part of it wherein they do 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 exercise dominion over the People of God and that against their will by fore and violence to their utter undoing and that in execution of that office they have received and exercise according to their Canon Laws in their Courts Ecclesiastical We further prove in S. T. That the office of Lord-Bishops is Antichristian because derived from and only to be found in the Papacy none of the Reformed Churches have retained it the Woman in her flight into the Wilderness carried it not along with her it 's rejected by the true Spouse and Witnesses of Christ in all ages We instance in several as Hierom the Churches of Helvetia c. To this Mr. T. replies 1. Though the latter Popes viz. from the time of Boniface the third about the year 606. be the head of Antichrist yet it doth not follow that the office that is derived from and is only to be found in the Papacy is surely Antichristian there having been bad Officers perhaps derived from good Popes and continued only in the Church of Rome Answ 1. That the Popes of Rome were not the head of Antichrist till the time of Boniface the third this Animadverter will never prove 2dly Should it be granted him what good Popes he will find from the time of Sylvester about the year 320 I know not nor what Officers were derived from them Lord-Bishops there were none till afterwards When Constantine coming to the Throne the Man of Sin began by little and little according to the prophesie of Paul touching him 2 Thess 2. 7. to shew himself in the following Popes The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Letter viz. the Roman Pagan Emperours being removed out of the way about which time many report a Voice was heard Hodie Venenum c. This day Poyson is poured forth into the Church of Christ And from this time the noble and renowned
be called of sent by him So was Aaron Acts 14. 23. 6. 3 5. manifest that the Way of the Lord's mission is not by Lord-Bishops but by his Churches and People What he tells us he hath said in answer to any of these Scriptures we have replyed to Chap. 2. We add in S. T. 3ly That Prelates their Chancellors and Officers have power from Christ to cast out of the Church of God is owned by them contrary to Mat. 18. 16 17. 1 Cor. 5. 4. To which our Animadverter subjoyns He finds no such Law Answ It may be he is willingly ignorant hereof This he cannot but know that in the Name of Christ the Officers mentioneâ— do excommunicate out of the Church so call'd of Christ Do they do this without Law Is it not one of their Church-constitutions that they may do so Do not the present Ministers own them herein Whilst they cite present persecute their Neighbours for not coming to Divine Service as they call it it may be for refusing to pay them a four-penny-due in the Ecclesiastical Courts even to an Excommunication whose Act therein they afterwards publickly denounce and declare once and again in obedience to them What more evident The weakness of his answer to Mat. 18. 1 Cor. 5. we have already manifested We say further in S. T. That they own 4ly that the Office of the Suffragans Deans Canons are lawful and necessary to be had in the Church contrary to 1 Cor. 12. 18 28. Rom. 12. 7. Ephes 4. 11. The Officers instituted by Christ are sufficient for the edification and perfecting of the Saints till they all come unto a perfect man v. 12 13. In what sense the forementioned being not one of them of the Institution of Christ may be owned as lawful and necessary without an high contempt of the Wisdom and Sovereignty of Christ I am not able to conceive this is the sum Mr. T. replies 1. He knows not where this imagined Ordinance is Answ That there are such Officers and Offices in the Church of England established by the Laws thereof he cannot be ignorant To say They are Antichristian or repugnant to the Word of God is censured by the Canons thereof Can. 7. That the Ministers own submit to some of them is known The vanity and impertinency of Mr. T. his pleading for them not to mention his perjury therein is discovered in our present Vindication of Chap. 3. from his exceptions against what is by us therein argued We say they own 5thly That the Office of Deacons in the Church is to be imployed in publick Praying administration of Baptism and Preaching if licensed by the Bishop thereunto contrary to Act. 6. 2. Ephes 4. 11. Mr. T. replies 'T is not contrary to Christ's Revelation that they should be imployed in those works Ans 1. But when Christ hath instituted the office of Deacons for this end to attend Tables or look after the provision and necessities of the Saints That any persons may own an Office of Deacons in the Church to be imploy'd by virtue of Office-power in any other work than that for which they are intrusted by Christ and called unto Office without an advance against that Institution of Christ is absurd to imagine 2. That the present Ministers own such an Office he doth not deny 3. What he speaks of Stephen and Philip he had said before and to it we have replied already and need noâ— add more A sixth Law or Ordinance that we say they own is this That the Ordinance of Breaking Bread or the Sacrament of the Lords Supper may be administred to one alone as to a sick man ready to die Which is diametrically opposite to the Nature and Institution of that Ordinance 1 Cor. 10. 16. and 11. 33. Mat. 26. 26. Acts 2. 42. and 20. 7. To which Mr. T. This is not easily proved from the Scripâ—ures instanced in Answ Whether it be or not is left to the judgment of the judicious Reader to determine I am weary in pursuâ—â—g him in his impertinencies He grants a Communion is proved in that Sacrament 1 Cor. 10. 16. but vers 17. and 1 Cor. 12. 13. prove the Communion to be rather with all Christians Of which yet there is not one word in either of the places In vers 17. He speaks of the Church of Corinth that was one bread one body The other Scripture speaks nothing of Saints Communion one with another in this Ordinance 1 Cor. 11. 33. Acts 20. 7. he confesseth prove That it should be administred when all the Communicants Church or Brethren he should say are come together Whether its administration to one alone be not diametrically opposite hereunto as also to the very first Institution of this Ordinance Mat. 26. 26. let the Judicious judge Though it be said Act. 2. 46. that they brake bread from house to house it doth not follow there was none beside the Minister and the sick man the words import the contrary We manifest further in S. T. That they own 7thly a prescript form of Words in Prayer that a ceremonious pompous Worship devised â—y man and abused to Idolatry is according to the will of God and may lawfully be used under the New Testament Dispensation contrary to Mat. 15. 9. and 28. 20. John 4. 23. Deut. 12. 32. Jer. 51. 26. Rom. 8. 26. 1 Cor. 14. 15. By this prescript form of Words this ceremonious pompous Worship the Common-Prayer-Book Collegiat-Worship and Service is intended This I say is devised by man the owning whereof is contrary to Mat. 15. 9. and 28. 20. Deut. 12. 22. abused to Idolatry The owning hereof is opposite to Jer. 51. 26. It is Ceremonious and Pompous the abetting whereof is adverse to Joh. 4. 23. as is the owning of a prescript Form of Words to Rom. 8. 26. 1 Cor. 14. 15. To which our Animadverter replies 1. He should have told us what part of the Common-Prayer-Book was abused to Idolatry Answ The whole of it is so being Worship not appointed by the Lord and used in that Church that is the most Idolatrous Church in the world What he hath said in this Chap. Sect. 3. or in Chap. 3. Sect. 4. We have already answered His great out-cry of our abuse of Jer. 51. 26. produced to prove it unlawful to use any thing in the Worship of God abused to Idolatry will soon be evinced to be an empty sound Vox praeterea nihil 1. We have for our Companions in this Exposition persoâ—s not contemptible for wisdom and holiness who make conscience of applying Scriptures and abusing the Reader 2. Of all men Mr. T. iâ— the most incompetent for the management of this charge who most egregiously perverts Scriptures in this Treatise contrary to former Interpretations given by himself to them and to the plain intendment of the Spirit therein As we have in part manifested and may do further in our Appendix 3. He egregiously abuseth the Reader in this very passage whilst
Saints Liberty That 't is a sin against the 5th Commandment is ridiculous till he hath proved them our spiritual Parents Sect. 3. Non-hearing the present Ministers tends not to Schism The nature of Schism The Schism condemned in the Church of Corinth what 'T is not to have the Faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or accepting persons condemned Jam. 2. 1. what it is 'T is not to cause offences and divisions contrary to Rom. 12. 4 5. 14. 1. 15. 1. 16. 17. Nor making inclosures coâ—â—â—â— to 1 Cor. 14. 36. Phil. 3. 15 16. explained The vanity of Mr. T. his arguings from thence manifested The Holy Ghosts recording the Prophesiâ— of Balaam Of Caiphas of Infidel Idolatrous Poets no grounds for the Saints to hear the present Ministers The impertinency of 1 Thes 5. 20 21. to his purpose Nothing can be argued to prove the lawfulness of hearing them from the Authors concession Chap. 2. Our Reasons against hearing them cannot righteously be retorted against our selves The grounds of our denying the lawfulness thereof neither false nor doubtful The Ministers of England have not sufficiently proved the truth of their Ministry Of the duty of Christians with respect to hearing The power of the Church over Ministers Non-hearing the present Ministers takes not away the the Christians Liberty Is no negative Superstition Our denial of the lawfulness of hearing them no denial of the Kingship of Christ or usurpation thereof No hindrance of the knowledge of Gods Word No evil consequences or absurdities follow hereupon FOR the lawfulness of hearing the present Ministers Mr. T. further argues thus Arg. 22. That which tends to Schism amongst Christians or to a breach of that peace unity and love should be among them who have the same God Lord Spirit Faith that is the same or very like Schism among the Corinthians or tends to it and hath begotten or is like to beget the same if not worse effects among the Christians in England is to be avoided as a great evil and that which tends to peace among them is a great good to be imbraced 1 Thes 5. 13. 1 Cor. 12. 25 26 27. But the non-hearing the present Ministers of England tends to Schism amongst Christians Therefore Answ We deny his Minor Non-hearing the present Ministers is not Schism tends not to it is nothing like the Schism amongst the Corinthians For 1st We were never by our free consent Members of the Church of England 2dly It 's no particular instituted Church of Christ 3dly We meet not with them and there dispute side quarrel contend when met together for the celebration of the samâ— numerical Ordinances as was the case of the Church of Corinth The matter of Schism is so clearly stated our non-concern therein with respect to our departure from the Church of England by Dr. Owen in his Treatise of Schism that as Mr. Cawdrey hath not Mr. T. will never be able solidly to reply thereunto 4thly We do nothing in our separating from them than what God calls us to as we have proved If the disturbance of peace envyings ensue hereupon we cannot help it these things were the frequent attendments of the Gospel in the first promulgation thereof as is known whilst we make it our care to keep the guilt of these things from off us we are innocent and not concern'd with the bitter and passionate declamations of persons hereabout We may with more evidence of truth argue That which tends to Schism amongst the Churches of Christ or to a breach of the peace unity and love which should be among them which is the same or much like the Schism that was amongst the Members of the Church of Corinth is to be avoided as a great evil But the hearing the present Ministers tends to Schism Therefore He further Argues Arg. 23. That which is to have the Faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons for other reasons than their faith is sinful and unlawful Jam. 2. 1. But to hear one that preacheth the Faith of Christ because he is of our particular Society or by reason of particular interest or agreement in opinion or any other than the unity of Faith in the Lord Jesus and to declaim hearing another that hath the same Faith preacheth it and holds communion with them that imbrace it or to separate from such He should have added because he is not of our particular Society or by reason of particular interest or non-agreement in opinion is to have the Faith of our Lord Jesus with respect of persons Therefore Answ We may grant the whole without the least disadvantage to the cause we have undertaken the defence of we refuse not the hearing the present Ministers because not of our particular Society but for other Reasons of which before 2. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or accepting persons that is condemned Jam. 2. 1. is a respecting persons for their outward condition in the world as their riches honour with the neglect or contempt of others though equal or better deserving for their poverty or the like which cannot be charged upon us with respect to the present Ministers so that this instance of the Apostle is not at all to his purpose He adds Arg. 24. To cause offences and divisions contrary to the Doctrine taught us in the Scriptures is sinful and unlawful Rom. 16. 17. But those who teach men not to hear their Ministers which preach to them the truth of Gods VVord because they are not in a Congregational Church or not Elected and Ordained according to the Rules of such Churches or because they conform to some things conceived unwarrantable which are made the reasonâ— of unlawfulness to hear the present Ministers do cause offences and divisioâ—s contrary to the Doctrine Rom. 12. 4. 5. 14. 1. 15. 1. Therefore Answ This Argument is bottom'd upon many miserable mistakes the discovery whereof will expose it to the contempt of all that pass by for its insufficiency and weakness in respect of the end aimed at by it 1st We teach not men not to hear their own Ministers but such as â—ccording to the appointment of Christ were never such 2dly VVe teach them not to avoid such as preach the pure Word of God but suct as corrupt it intermixing therewith the leaven of Antichristianism and Superstition which Mr. T. tells us in his Fermentum Pharisaeâ—â—um is a good ground to avoid hearing them 3dly We say not that they are not to be heard meerly because not in a Congregational Church but because we are destitute of any Scripture-Warrant for our so doing because they walk disorderly act from an Antichristian Call That this is to cause offences contrary to the Doctrine Rom. 12. 4. 14. 1. 15. 1. which forbids the giving offence to weak Believers by the intempestive using of our Liberty in things indifferent is such a frivolous conceit as persons
odious with Ministers and People whereby they were necessitated to joyn in Communion by themselves Praecurs Sect. 12. p. 48. Because it is manifest from Acts 2. 41. 46. 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3. 12. 13. Persons were Baptized before they brake bread together therefore the taking any without Baptism to the Lords Supper will but strengthen men in their opinion that their Infant Sprinkling is sufficient Therefore he sees a nececessity of desisting from that enterprâ—se of admitting persons of different perswasions touching Baptism into their communion ibid. p. 49. The Christian-Church-constitution of Volunteers is better ibid. Sect. 11. pag. 431. In the Worship of God it was wont to be accounted a certain Rule that Gods Worship should be observed according to his appointment and no otherwise ib. Sect. 16. p. 66. My opposing the Bishops began with the soonest And for my non conformity Reasons were given with some of the first I justifie not the Ceremonies ibid. Sect. 21. p. 89. It is true our English Prelatical Divines do account Baptism sufficiently administred that is so done yea though it were by a Popish Priest or a Midwife ibid. p. 91. However for the Tenet of the Peoples governing by Vote I know no reason why they he speaks of those called Independants should be called a Sect rather than their opposites The Excommunication which â—he Scripture speaks of is no where made a part of Government or of the Elders Office any more than the Peoples In Antiquity its apparent out of Cyprian That the People had a great hand in Elections Excommunications Absolutions ibid. p. 93. No one Country City or Tribe together were gathered by the Apostles or other Preachers into the Christian visible Church but so many of all as the Lord vouchsafed to call by his Word and Spirit 1 Cor. 1. 26. Not many wise men Ergo Not the whole Nation And afterward to Mr. B. Question Hath he not commanded to disciple Nations He answers Yes to make Disciples of all Nations by preaching the Gospel to every creature but no where by Civil Authority to gather a whole City Country or Tribe and to draw them into a National and City-Covenant together â—bid Sect. 22. p. 97. Jeroboams Sacrificing and keeping a Feast at another time thâ—n God appointed Ahaz his forming an Altar after the pattern of that of Damascus Nadab and Abihu their offering strange fire keeping Holy Dayes to Saints he condemns as Will-worship Full Review of the Dispute conceâ— Infant-Baptism p. 3. 1 Pet. 2. 9. Which are meant only of the Elect and true Believers of every Nation are applied to a National Church consisting of a great part of either ignorant persons that know little or nothing of Christianity or persecutors of Godliness profanely despising the Word and hating the Godly ibid. pag. 27. God forbad Infants under eight dayes old to be circumcised in that he appointed the eighth day to be Circumcised Now if this be a forbidding to Circumcise before as I acknowledge it is and so do many Protestant Divines as Paraeus Com. in Gen. 17. 11. then that is forbidden which is otherwise than God appointed ibid. p. 81. And p. 180. He reckons the Cross in Baptism amongst Popish usuages such as Bell Baptism Baptizing of Dead persons I said it is a carnal imagination that the Church of God is like to civil Corporations if persons were admitted to it by birth nor is it to the purpose to prove the contrary that Mr. M. tells me the Jewish Church was in the like civil Corporations for I grant it was the whole Nation whereas the Christian Church hath another constitution ibid p. 265 266. If Christ did say to Judas that his Body was broken for him and his Blood shed it will be hard to avoid thence the proof of Universal Redemption I think it the safe stand most likely tenent that Judas went out afore the Lords Supper p. 291. ibid. Christ is the Head of the visible Church in giving them Officers outward order direction ibid. p. 294. But all these are alterd now the Church is not National no one High-Priest Temple Sanhedrim ibid p. 334. I know that our Army hath done so much for the setling the Church as that the Anti-Prelatists Congregations had been either none or much oppressed if they had not broken the force of the opposite party Nor dare I be so unthankful to God or them as not to acknowledge the great Mercy and benefit we at this day enjoy thereby however Mr. B. fret at our Liberty and jibe at the Instruments ibid. p. 383. A not commanding is a plain forbidding Mr. Collings provoc pro. ch 5. Nothing is lawful in the Worship of God but what we have precept or president for which whoso denies opens a door to all Idolatry and Superstition and Wil-worship in the world which Mr. T. approves of ibid p. 408. Of divine Institution there is no reason can be right but what is from Gods own appointment though it may seem right to us it should be so In things positive our reason is deceivable and Gods appointment is only to be attended ibid p. 461. And now Sir though I might to these Collections which are diametrically opposite to the main principles of your Theodulia the very basis upon which that Fabrick stands have added many more as you well know yet am I willing to spare you not knowing but the Lord may give you to see and bemoan your evill in gladding the hearts of the Wicked sadning the Righteous or confirming them in crooked paths who have turn'd aside thereunto which notwithstanding your natural temper and heâ—ght of spirit with which we are sufficiently acquainted that will pâ—oâ—pt you to say something in a way of self-justification is not impossible for God to do If you write in Answer to our Reply and to the purpose you shall receive a Return 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a spirit of meekness and christianity If we meet therein wiâ—h meer dictates without tender of proof impertinent citations of Scriptures without the least attempt to minifest their congruity with the assertion they are introduced to prove and a parcel of passionate railing expressions in the stead of the words which the Wisdom that is from above and the Spirit of our dear Lord teacheth which we too often meet with in your Theodulia you have your Answer Farewell FINIS