Selected quad for the lemma: lord_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
lord_n aaron_n abolish_v priesthood_n 24 3 9.4952 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A56195 A rational account why some of His Majesties Protestant subjects do not conform to some exuberances in, and ceremonial appurtenances to the Common prayer published for the instruction of the ignorant, satisfaction of all contenders, and the churches union in Gods publick worship. Prynne, William, 1600-1669.; Stucki, Johann Wilhelm, d. 1607. Antiquitatum convivialum. Liber 2, cap. 26, De vestitu conviviali. 1673 (1673) Wing P4048; ESTC R7507 105,873 159

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

shall be hallowed and their Garments with them Which Garments being accordingly made by B●zaliel by Gods prescription were put upon Aaron and his Sons who were consecrated by Moses together with their holy Garments wherein they the succeeding High-Priests and Jewish Priests usually ministred to the Lord whence they were stiled Priests Garments and holy Garments which they were to put on when they ministred to the Lord and to put off when their ministration was ended as these Texts at large attest From whence Al●uinu● de Divinis officiis c. 38 39. Honorius Augustodunensis in his Gemma Animae l. 1 2. Thomas Waldensis Doctrinalis Tom. 3. Tit. 4. c. 29. De sacris vestibus quibus Sacerdos intrat ad Missam Gulielmus Durantus Rationale Divinorum l. 3. the Roman Missal Pontifical Ceremonial and all who write of Bishops and Priests Vestments under the Gospel and their Consecrations derive both their pattern and legitimation To which I answer That these Texts are so far from justifying that they are the strongest Arguments that can be against the Vestments of Priests and Prelates now contended for upon these several accounts 1. All and every of these Aaronical Vestments under the Law were particularly invented prescribed together with their matter form colour use by God himself in precise terms not by Moses or Aaron and his Sons alone according to their own fancies But the Vestments Garments Rochets Surplisses of Popes Archbishops Bishops Priests Deacons now contended for were neither particularly invented prescribed by God himself or Christ either in respect of their matter form colour use directly or indirectly nor by any one Text in the Old or New Testament but merely invented prescribed by Popes Archbishops Bishops Priests Monks according to their own vain doting fancies Therefore no wayes justified but condemned by these Texts 2ly All these Garments were made and the constant use of them in Divine services and administrations punctually enjoyned by Gods special Command warrant law not by Popes Bishops Councils Decretals Injunctions Constitutions Canons Visitation Articles alone as all Pontifical Sacerdotal Garments Rochets Surplisses Hoods and other such Trinkets are 3ly They were all put on Aaron and his Sons and both of them consecrated together by Moses alone the chief civil Magistrate not by any Pope Bishop Priest or other Ecclesiastical person who now only ingrosse and claim the right of ordaining consecrating all Archbishops Bishops Priests Ministers Deacons Ecclesiastical persons together with the hallowing of their Garments Rochets Surplisses and deem it no lesse than Sacrilege and U●urpation for Kings or Civil Magistrates to ordain or consecrate any of them or order ought concerning them but at their requests and as their Substitutes 4ly These Garments of theirs were different both in matter kind form fashion from Rochets Surplisses Al●ees Hoods Planets Dulmaticks Chymeres Palls Stoles Pectoral Cr●sses Cass●ckes Gownes Black Silken Girdles Copes Miters square Gaps and other Vestments now used contended for by Ceremonial Prelates and Clergy-men Therfore not warranted but condemned by these Texts 5ly These Garments were prescribed to Aaron and his Sons to put on only when they went in to the Tabernacle Altar Temple to offer up Levitical Sacrafices and Services unto God not when they prayed preached instructed the people in their several Cities Synagogues or in their Kings Pallaces as these Texts resolve Therefore no presidents for Bishops Priests or Deacons to imitate when they preach read Prayers officiate or administer Sacraments in Cathedrals or Parish Churches and Chapels 6ly Aaron the High Priest and his Successors with his Sons and Jewish Priests Sacrafices Priesthood Altars Vestments were all temporary typical utterly abolished by the incarnation passion sacrifice resurrection ascention of our Lord Jesus Christ who they typiFIed shadowed as inconsistent with and not fit to be continued under the Gospel as the Epistle to the Hebrews Galatians Romans Collossians Acts 15. and whole New Testament all Commentators on them Old and New resolve especially Hebr. 7 8 9 10. Therefore these Vestments may not ought not to be revived continued under the Gospel unlesse we will revive the Aaronical Priesthood High Priest Priest Levites with their Sacrifice● Altars Tabernacle Temple and all other Levitical Ceremonies Vestments in specie and renounce both Christ himself with his Priesthood Ministry and the Gospel 7ly None were to put on or wear these holy Garments but Aaron and his Sonnes who were all Priests by birth and succession not election and ordination as all Apostles Bishops 〈◊〉 Ministers Deacons were and yet are who being none of the Tribe of Levy or Sonnes of Aaron by natu●al generation can claim no Title by the Law to their Priestly Garments much less by the Gospel which thus expresly resolve● Hebr. 7. 12 13. For the Priesthood being changed there is made of necessity a change also of the Law For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another Tribe of which no man gave attendance at the Altar and of which Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning Priesthood An unanswerable Text against all Evangelical Bishops Ministers Deacons claimes and pretences especially being Gentiles not Jewes by birth and Christians by regeneration to Aaronical Levitical Priestly Vestments or Ornaments which Text I desire them all to answer at their leisures 8ly If any allege they onely use these Garments by way of allusion or imitation not prescription I answer 1. That they have no Precept nor warrant in the Gospel for this their allusion or imitation but direct Precepts warrants cautions against it as inconsistent with the Gospel and Salvation too Hebrews 6 7 8 9 10. c. 12. 27 28 29. c. 13. 10 11. Col. 2. 14 to the end Phil. 3. 2 3. Tit. 1. 10 11. Gal. 4. 30 31. c. 5. 1 2 3 4 11 12. Acts 15. 2ly They have no President from the Apostles or primitive Christians Churches for above 300. years after Christ 3ly If our Bishops Priests Deacons will imitate them in their Garments it must be in fashion species form end use as well as matter and colour the best reallest imitation Our Bishops or the Pope who pre●end themselves the High Priests Successors though they can never prove it must then wear a Brestplate ephod robe broidered coat miter girdle of the same materials form as Aarons were And our Pri●sts Deacons must wear fine linnen Ephods Breeches Bonnets and none but linnen not woolen Garments on them whiles they minister nor any thing that may cause sweat and lay aside all their Surplisses Hoods Gownes Copes Caps Cassocks of wool silk satin 〈◊〉 velvet which now they use else they do not imitate but prevaricate from this president 4ly Then none but Bishops Ministers Deacons nor any Scholars in Colleges Halls nor Singing-men Choristers and others not in sacred Orders must wear Surplisses as now they are enjoyned by the forecited Canons since none but Aaron and his Sonnes alone were
A RATIONAL ACCOUNT Why some of His Majesties Protestant Subjects Do not Conform To some Exuberances in and Ceremonial Appurtenances TO THE Common Prayer PUBLISHED For the Instruction of the Ignorant satisfaction of all Contenders and the Churches Union in Gods publick Worship Rom. 4. 13 19. Let us therefore follow after the things which make for Peace and things werewith one may edifie another Let us not judge one another any more but judge this rather that no man put a stumbling-block or an occasion to fall in his Brothers way Phil. 2. 1 2 3 4. If there be therefore any consolation in Christ if any comfort of love if any fellowship of the Spirit if any bowels and mercies fulfill ye my joy that ye be like minded having the same love being of one accord of one mind Let nothing be done through strife or vain-glory but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better then himself Look not every one on his own things but every man also on the things of others LONDON Printed and are to be Sold by Booksellers in London and Westminster-Hall 1673. To the Kings most Excellent Majesty CHARLES the IId By the Grace and admirable Providence of GOD of Great Britain France and Ireland KING Defender of the Faith and all syncere Professors of it within His Dominions HAving had the Honour on last Easter-Eve to present Your Majesty with a Brief Account of my Service that Week in the almost-accomplished Great good-work of Paying and Disbanding Your Majesties Army and Navy which for 7. Months space ingrossed all my time from Morning till Night and oft till Midnight to Your Majesties great content and your Peoples ease from future incessant heavy Monthly Taxes I humbly crave leave to prostrate at Your Royal feet my Easter-holy-dayes studies to exonerate the Backs of hundreds and truly tender Consciences of thousands of Your loyal pious sober-minded Protestant Subjects of all Degrees from some Exuberances in the Common-Prayer Book and superfluous Ceremonies Vestments attending it which give them offence and may well be laid aside if your Majesty and your approaching Parliament shall judge convenient for our Churches future peace union in Gods publick worship in pursuance of Your Majesties late most Gracious Pious Prudent elegant Declaration to all Your Loving Subjects of Your Kingdom of England and Dominion of Wales concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs which gave Life and Birth to this Publication It is very observable that albeit the Popes of Rome and their Flatterers hold themselves infallible in their Chair and their Church Councils inerrable yet they all accord that their Publike Missals Liturgies though made confirmed by their joynt advice with greatest care and diligence are amendable alterable upon just occasions Witnesse their late Council of Trents Decree for the correction amendment of their formerly established Catechism Missal Breviary and the subsequent amendations of them and institution of A NEW MASSE BOOK by Pope Pius the 5. with the advice of Learned men expressed in his Bull dated at Rome July 1557. praefixed to Missale Romanum ex Decreto Sacro-sanctii Concilii Tridentini RESTITUTUM Pii 5. Pontificis Maximi jussu editum printed at Rome that year enjoyned by that Bull to be universally observed without any subsequent addition alteration or mutation under pain of his Papal indignation Yet notwithstanding by another Bull of his own dated at Rome 17 December 1570. beginning with this memorable Clause For this purpose God hath anointed us with the oyl of gladnesse and made us partakers of his Inheritance that being called to his Priesthood like Aaron we should not only wholsomly order those things which pertain to divine worship but should also more wholsomely moderate those things which have been formerly enacted by us and moreover alter and dispose of them as upon serious consideration of things and persons we discern to be wholsomly expedient in the Lord He did upon this account by reason of some difficulties concerning the use of this New Missal arising in the Kingdom of Spain tendred by some Grave men sent to him from Philip their Catholike King to which he gave undoubted credit Of his own meer motion without the instance of any Petition tendred to him thereupon out of his certain knowledge and plenitude of Apostolical power think fit to reform several things in this New Missal as to the Kingdoms of Spain and alter dispense with it in no lesse than 21. particulars expressed in this Bull notwithstanding all his former Bulls and Prohibitions to the contrary After which Pope Gregory the 10. his immediate Successor by another Bull dated at Rome 30 December 1573. to take away some other new scruples and differences about this Missal in the said Kingdoms of Spain upon the motion of other Delegates sent thence from that same King Philip granted several other dispensations and amendments of this Missal in sundry Particulars comprised in his Bull Notwithstanding his Predecessors Letters and all and singular clauses prohibitions and Decrees to the contrary Which two Bulls of theirs are printed before Missale Romanum c. Cum licentia privilegio Salmanticae 1589. Some thirty years after Pope Clement the 8. observing divers Errors to be crept into this Missal of Pope Pius the 5. by the Trent Councils Decree through the Printers Errors and some alterations in the Epistles Gospels Psalms according to the vulgar Edition different from the Original Text commanded his learned Cardinals to revise and correct this Missal according to the original copy of Pius Quintus which task they undertaking put some things into better form in the Missal it self and expressed some things more clearly and fully in the Rules and Rubricks which being notwithstanding deduced from their principles and foundations may seem rather to imitate and supply their sense than to induce any innovation Which being thus revised amended enlarged with new Masses for new canonized Saints and proper Masses of Saints expressed at large for the easier benefit of those who celebrated them he caused to be most exactly printed in the Vatican and published for the common good in the year of our Lord 1604. as he declares in his Bull praefixed to this Missal dated at Rome the 7. of July the same year with this additional Title Missale Romanum ex Decreto Sacro-sancti Concilii Tridentini Restitutum Pii 5. Pont. Max. jussu editum Clementis 8. auctoritate RECOGNITUM ET CUM MISSIS NOVIS DE SANCTIS à Paulo 5. Gregorio 15. S. D. N. Urbano 8. ordinatis Missae propriae de Sanctis OMNES AD LONGUM POSITAE SUNT PRO FACILIORI CELEBRANTIUM COMMODITATE If therefore the Council of Trent it self thought meet to reform the antient Roman Catechism and Missal formerly established into which it confesseth either by the vice of times or unwariness or dishonesty of men many things had crept which were far from the dignity of so great a Sacrifice and had need to be reformed that