Selected quad for the lemma: life_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
life_n	issue_n	tail_n	tenant_n	5,928	5	10.8453	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A31458	The laws of Q. Elizabeth, K. James, and K. Charles the First concerning Jesuites, seminary priests, recusants, &c., and concerning the oaths of supremacy and allegiance, explained by divers judgments and resolutions of the reverend judges : together with other observations upon the same laws : to which is added the Statute XXV Car. II. cap. 2 for preventing dangers which may happen from popish recusants : and an alphabetical table to the whole / by William Cawley of the Inner Temple, Esq.	Cawley, William, of the Inner Temple.	1680 (1680)	Wing C1651; ESTC R5101	281,468	316

be a Popish Recusant convict at any time after his or her conviction shall exercise any publick Office or Charge in the Commonwealth but shall be utterly disabled to exercise the same by himself or by his Deputy except such Husband himself and his Children which shall be above the age of nine years abiding with him and his Servants in houshold shall once every month at the least not having any reasonable excuse to the contrary repair to some Church or Chappel usual for Divine Service and there hear Divine Service And the said Husband and such his Children and Servants as are of méet age receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper at such times as are limited by the Laws of this Realm and do bring up his said Children in true Religion This Clause extends not to all sorts of Recusants who are convicted or have Wives who are Recusants convicted as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 46. To whom this clause extends But at this day only to the Popish Recusant convicted or having a Wife who is a Popish Recusant convicted To whom not A Popish Recusant not convicted hath a Wife who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant The Husband is not disabled by this Statute to exercise any publick Office or Charge for that neither the Husband is a convicted Recusant nor the Wife a Popish Recusant A person who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant hath a Wife who is a Popish Recusant but not convicted The Husband is out of this Branch of the Statute for that neither the Husband is a Popish Recusant nor the Wife convicted Stat. Sect. 11. A Married Woman being a Popish Recusant And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Married Woman being or that shall be a Popish Recusant convict her Husband not standing convicted of Popish Recusancy which shall not conform her self and remain conformed but shall forbear to repair to some Church or usual place of Common Prayer and there to hear Divine Service and Sermon if any then be and within the said year receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm by the space of one whole year next before the death of her said Husband shall forfeit and loose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower in thrée parts to be divided during her life of or out of any the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which are or were her said Husbands and also be disabled to be Executrix or Administratrix of her said Husband and to have or demand any part or portion of her said late Husbands Goods or Chattels by any Law custom or usage whatsoever The issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower A Woman may have Joynture and Dower both And not of two parts of her Joynture or Dower as Wingate tit Crown numb 134. For there are divers Cases where notwithstanding the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. the Wife shall have her Dower and Joynture both And forfeit two parts of both And if she offend against this branch she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both And that not only where the Joynture made to her is not warranted by that Statute but in some Cases where the Joynture is pursuant and according to the Statute she shall have her Dower and Joynture both Of the first sort are these Where the Joynture is not warranted by Stat. 27 H. 8. 10. If an Estate be made of Lands to the Wife for the life of another Co. 4. 3. Vernons Case Or for a thousand years or for a thousand years if she live so long Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a Rent be granted to the Wife for the life of another or for years or any other way not pursuant to that Statute Vide Anderson 1. 288. c. 296. Bickley's Case Anderson 2. 30 31. c. 20. Wentworths Case Or if an Estate be made to others in fee or for the Wives life upon Trust for her benefit Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a man Covenant to stand seized to the use of himself in Tail the Remainder to the use of his Wife for life Pasch 16. Jac. B. R. Woods Case Or if the Husband make a Feoffment in see to the use of himself for life the remainder to another for life or years the remainder to the Wife for her life Co. 4. 2. 3. Hutton 51. Sherwells Case In all these Cases although the Lands or Rent were conveyed to the Wife for her Joynture yet the Estate not being within the Statute of 27 H. 8. her acceptance thereof shall not bar her Dower but she shall have such Joynture and her Dower also And the reason why in the two last Cases the Wife shall not be barred of her Dower although there be an Estate limited to her for her life is because the Estate is not in its first Creation appointed to take immediately after the death of the Husband And no matter which arises ex post facto can salve this or make it a Joynture within that Statute to bar her Dower And therefore if in the first of those two Cases the Husband Tenant in Tail dies without issue or if in the last Case he in the remainder die before the Husband or the term for years determines in the Husbands life time so that the Wife may enter presently after his death yet because the Estate to the Wife for her life was not originally limited to take immediately after his death it shall not bar her Dower For quod ab initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalescet Co. 4. 2 3. Hutton 51. And as in all the Cases before mentioned if the Estate were made for her Joynture the Wife shall have such Joynture and her Dower both so if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act and conform not within the year next before her Husbands death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both Of what Lands she shall not forfeit the profits But otherwise it is where an Estate is given or limited by the Husband to the Wife and it s neither expressed nor can be averred and proved to be given or limited for her Joynture or in recompence of her Dower And therefore if any of the Estates before mentioned which are not within the Statute of 27 H. 8. be granted or limited to the Wife by the Husband or any other Estate for her life or otherwise which would be a good Joynture within the said Statute if it were intended for a Joynture as if a man before or after Marriage Covenants to stand seized of Lands to the use of himself for life the Remainder to his Wife for her life and it is neither expressed in the Deed nor can be averred and

the arrearages of twenty pounds monthly before such seizure due or payable shall ensue or be continued against such Offender so long as the same person shall continue in coming to Divine Service according to the intent of the said Estatute It was resolved by all the Judges Mich. 37 38 Eliz. That if a man had been convicted according to this Statute by Proclamation upon default and afterwards conformed himself Where Conformity discharges the penalty he should be discharged of the penalty due upon his Conviction notwithstanding these words and full satisfaction of all the Arrearages And the reason of this given by Coke Chief Justice B. R. in Dr. Fosters Case is for that this Statute saith That such Conviction should be as sufficient as if there were a Verdict recorded but 't is only a Judgment which converts the penalty into a Debt and not a Verdict And here all penalties are discharged upon Conformity unless such as are converted into a Debt But otherwise it would have been if there had been a Judgment against the Recusant upon Trial or Confession on the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. For then his Conformity would have come too late to have saved the penalty incurred by his Conviction For by the Judgment the penalty was converted into a Debt Rolles 1. 94. C. 41. Quaere tamen Whether these words here due and payable are to be understood due and payable upon a Judgment only However now by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. 1 Jac. 4. if the Recusant conform either before or after Judgment he shall be discharged of all penalties But the profits of the Recusants Lands taken before his Conformity shall never be restored Savile 130. C. 201. The profits not to be restored It hath been questioned upon this Statute Where the penalty is discharged upon the death of the Recusant where not if a Recusant convicted by Proclamation upon default had died before seizure of two parts of his Lands whether his Lands might have been seized after his death for the Arrearages of the 20 l. per month or if they were seized in his life time whether they should have been discharged after his death without payment of such Arrears And the Opinion of those who held that the seizure should neither ensue nor continue after his death but that the Arrears were discharged was principally grounded upon the aforesaid construction of this Statute viz. that due and payable extended only to Arrearages due and payable upon a Judgment and converted into a Debt But when the Recusant was convicted by Proclamation the penalty was never converted into a Debt and therefore when he died there were no Arrearages due in the sense of this Statute for the heir to pay And yet that by such Offender here is generally intended all Recusants convicted as well by Proclamation upon default as upon Judgment and the heirs of either should have had the benefit of this Proviso viz. That upon the death of the Ancestor no seizure should ensue or be continued only in the Case of a Judgment the Arrears were to have been paid But there seems now to be no further need of this Question for the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4. meets with both these Cases For if there be no seizure of the Recusants Lands in his life time the discharge of the heir will depend upon his Conformity and if there were a seizure the two parts shall continue in his Majesties possession till the Arrears are paid and satisfied Intailed Lands when discharged and when not But this is not intended of intailed Lands For without any aid of this Proviso if a Recusant Tenant in Tail be convicted by Proclamation upon default and dies neither any seizure for the Arrears of the 20 l. per month shall ensue after his death nor if they were seized in his life time shall the seizure be continued after his death nor is the Heir in Tail bound to pay any such Arrears But if a Judgment be had against the Recusant Tenant in Tail in his life time the Heir is bound in that Case of which see farther in Stat. 1 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 4. If a Judgment was had against the Recusant before the said Statute of 1 Jac. and he had died before seizure of the two parts of his Lands The question was whether after his death they might have been seized by force of this Statute of 29. for the Arrears of the penalty incurred in his life time For that the seizure here given is meerly in nature of a nomine poenae or penalty inflicted for his contempt in not paying the 20 l per month and should not have gone in satisfaction of the Debt But the Queen should have held the Land till the 20 l. per month were otherwise paid and satisfied And when this penalty of seizure was not executed in the Recusants life time by his death the contempt was gone and consequently the penalty inflicted for that contempt could not then be put in Execution Vide Lane 92 93. Beckets Case Ibid. 107. Halseys Case Stat. 1 Jac. 4. But now by the Statute of 1 Jac. 4. the seizure is not as a meer penalty for the contempt of non-payment but for the satisfying of the King of the Arrears of the 20 l. per month and the profits of the Land shall go towards the payment and satisfaction thereof so that now there is no question but the two parts of the Recusants Lands may be seized after his death Seizure after the Recusants death unless the Heir discharge himself by his Conformity Note Discharge upon Affidavit in all these Cases of seizure where the Land is to be discharged upon the death of the Recusant although an Affidavit be made of his death and a discharge obtained thereupon yet 't is a Rule in the Court of Exchequer Commission to enquire That a Commission shall be awarded first to enquire Savile 130. Case 201. And where by the said former Estatute Stat. Sect. 8. The third part of the forfeiture how to be disposed of the third part of the forfeitures for not coming to Divine Service is limited to the Poor Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be lawful to and for the Lord Treasurer of England Chancellor and Chief Baron of the Exchequer for the time being or two of them to assign and dispose of the full third part of the twenty pounds for every month paid or to be paid into the Receipt of the Exchequer as is aforesaid for the relief and maintenance as well of the Poor and of the Houses of Correction as of impotent and maimed Soldiers as the same Lord Treasurer Chancellor and Chief Baron or any two of them shall order or appoint Any thing in the said Estatute made in the said thrée and twentieth year of her Majesties Reign mentioned to