I substitute the one of them to the other that is if the one die the other shall haue all and the mother nothing at all t Gazalup verb. substitutio brem loqua Anglonomoph I haue noted in your wordes Codign two thinges which haue no small coherence and agreement with matters of our Law First in that by will according to your Law an entrie may be limitted to a straunger 2. In that ye hold that he which defeateth the estate of him that breaketh the condition shall defeat his whole estate and shal entirely claime the possession Which two assertions I shall seuerally prooue by cases of Law beginning with the first A man seised in fee of landes deuisable 3. By Will according to the common Law an entrie may be limitted to a stranger did deuise them to one for terme of his life and that he should be a Chapplein and that he should chaunt for his soule all his life time and that after his decease the tenements should remaine to the Cominaltie of a certaine village to finde a chappleine perpetuall for the same tenements and he died and the deuisee entred and held the landes sixe yeares and was no chappleine and the heire of the deuisour outed him and he brought an Assise And it seemed to the Court that the limitation that he should be a chappleine was no condition and that the heire could not enter for then the remainder should be defeated which may not be because by the intent a perpetuall chappleine ought to found u 29. Ass pla 17. Whereby it appeareth that they in the remainder were to take aduantage in this case of the breach of the thing that was to be done and not the heire So in Fitz Iames his case the clause of entrie was limitted to him in the remainder for breach of the condition by the particular tenant for it was helde that the limitation might determine the estate and that being determined he in the remainder might enter uu 13. et 14. Elizab. Com̄ 403. Newyses case Also 34. E. 3. the case was that a man had issue a sonne and a daughter and deuised land deuisable to one for life vpon condition that if the sonne should disturbe the tenant for life that the land should remaine to the daughter and the heires of her bodie the father dieth the sonne disturbeth the tenant for life who dieth the daughter brought a Formedon and it was allowed a 34. E. 3. Formedon pla vlt. But yet the aduantage of 4. The aduantage of entrie limitted to a stranger is in the late reports doubted of entrie by vertue of the limitation is not in other late reportes so cleare but hath been greatlie doubted of Stubes being Cestuy que vse deuised to his wife certaine land during her life ita quòd non faceret vastum the remainder to his yonger sonne in taile and died after the Statute of 27. of ioyning the possession to the vse is made the woman dieth the question was who should enter for the condition broken the heire the feoffees or he in the remainder b 3. Mar. 117. Dy. And an other case was equally doubtfull Wilford was bound in an Obligation without daie of payment limitted and deuised his land to his executors vppon condition that if they did not paie the said summe according to the obligation that the deuise should be voide and that then A. should haue the land to him and to his heires vppon condition that hee paied the money Wilford died A. died the executors are requested to pay the money and they would not pay it the question of the booke left vndecided is whether the heire of A. may enter into the land and paie the money c 3. Mar. 128. Dy. In like maner land in Gauelkind was deuised to the eldest sonne vpon condition that he should paie 100. li. to the wife of the deuisour he fayled of the payment it was questioned by Manwood whether the yonger sonne might enter into the moitie as by an implied limitation d 15. Eliz. 317. Dy. But touching such entries by force of some speciall limitation or condition Mast. Frowike giueth a good rule 21. H. 7. that an estate of inheritance can not cease by vertue of a condition broken onelie but there ought to be also an entrie But otherwise it is of a particular estate and the reason is because such an estate may be determined by word as by surrender and by the same reason it may cease by the wordes of the condition e 21. H. 7. 12. per Frowike Now that the 5. That the entrie for the condition broken defeateth the whole estate whole estate of the feoffee or donee is defeated by the breach of the condition and the entrie of the partie may be prooued by diuerse authorities in our Law and that there can be no fraction of the condition 14. Elizab. all the Iustices agreed And so was iudgement giuen in Winters case that by the graunt of the reuersion of part of the landes with which a condition runneth the condition is wholie confounded because it is a thing penall and entire and may not be apportioned nor diuided f 14. Elizab. 308. Dy. And 33. of Henrie the eight according to Mast. Brookes report it was helde for Law that if a man giue land in taile or lease it for life rendring rent with a condition for default of payment to reenter now if he lease part of the land to the donour or lessour or if the donour or lessour enter into part of the land he cannot enter for rent behind after but the condition is wholie suspended because a condition cannot be apportioned or diuided Therefore some scruple may with good reason be made of the case 16. Elizab. in my Lord Dyers reportes A man leased land for yeares vppon condition that the lessee should not alien the land to anie person without the assent of the lessour nor any part of the land the lessour giueth licence to alien part and the lessee alieneth the residue without licence it was adiudged that the lessour may enter notwithstanding the dispensation of the condition ex parte g 16. Elizab. 334. Dy. Howsoeuer 5. Edw. 6. be to the same purpose that a man enfeoffed two vppon condition to make backe a lease for life to the feoffour the remainder in fee to a straunger the one of them onelie maketh estate accordingly And by the opinion of manie this is good for a moitie by the dispensation of the partie who might take aduantage of the condition by his acceptance of estate h 5. Ed. 6. 69. Dy. For 23. Elizab. the case was such A man was bound in an hundred pound to giue to the obligee the moitie of all the fishes taken by his water-mille he tooke twentie one fishes and gaue tenne to the obligee and an action of Dette was brought vpon the obligation and the plaintife recouered
because he did not giue vnto him the moitie of the other fishe This was adiudged in the Kinges Bench. But now suppose that the condition doth extende onelie to some particular estates whether shall the other estates depending bee totallie defeated by the breach of the condition And surelie our Law is that the breach of the condition shall defeat no estate but onelie that whereunto it is annexed For the case was 3. Mar. that a man deuised land to his wife vppon condition that shee should bring vp his eldest sonne the remainder to the second sonne The elder sonne entreth for the condition broken hee shall onelie defeate the estate of the wife And if the tenant for life and hee in the remainder ioine in a feoffement vppon condition that if such an acte be not done that the tenant for life shall reenter this doth not defeate the entire estate of the feoffee i 3. Mar. 125. Dy. And if a gift of land be made in taile the remainder to the right heires of the donee vppon condition that if hee alien in fee then the donour may enter if the donour enter for the condition broken the estate taile is onelie defeated k 11. H. 7. 6. 13. H. 7. 23. 10. H. 7. 11. So if a man lease land for life by deede indented the remainder ouer in fee rendring a rent with clause of reentrie for non payment by the tenant for life and to reteigne the land during his life If hee enter for the condition broken he shall haue the land onlie during the life of the tenant for life l 29. Ass pla 17. Nomomath I giue yee great thankes for the vnwearied continuance of your paines and though I bee in questioning at a non-plus yet I see your inuention and memorie are not grauelled nor dryed vp parched as it were with summers drought I praie you therefore let vs still conuerse together vnder one roofe within my walles there is no Sinon no Dauus no Momus but chast learning cabboned with frugall contentment that if God doe still vouchsafe the Moone-diall of this darksome life with the reflexe of his intellectuall illumined influence this triple-wheeled clocke may still be kept in motion by the diuine agilitie of his Lawfauouring spirit A TABLE OF THE Sections or Diuisions of the principall pointes matters and questions which are handled in euerie Dialogue The Diuisions and principall contents of the first Dialogue of Prohibitions and Consultations The 1. Diuision 1. THe originall of tithes is inquired of 2. The councell of Constance is said to haue condemned Wicklife for holding tithes to bee pure almes The 2. Diuision 1 The originall of tithes is demonstrated to be by the law of God 2. God his deputies for the receipt of tithes are set downe 3. The heathens which knew not God had great regard of of paying tithes 4. Lucullus is specially commended for the paying of tithes 5. Camillus is likewise commended for his diligence in procuring tenth to be payed 6. The Romanes carefull in paying first fruits 3. Diuision 1 Whether Parsons ought to haue no more liuing then tithes 2. It is denyed by the Canonist that they ought to haue no more liuing 4. Diuision 1 A lay man by the Canon-law may prescribe in paying a speciall portion in lieu of tithes 2. The ciuill lawe agreeth thereunto 3. By the common lawe a man may prescribe in paying a temporall recompence in lieu of tithe 5. Diuision 1 Two sortes of tithes are set downe by the Canonist some feudall some ecclesiasticall 2. The Church onely holdeth conusaunce of the right of tithes by the Cannon lawe 3. The king of Fraunce his edict touching tithes is sette downe 4 That by the Canon law where the question of tithes is facti and not iuris the examination thereof may belong to a laye iudge 5. Where the suite of tithes is betwixt clergie men though it bee meerely possessorie yet it be longeth to an ecclesiasticall iudge by the Canon law 6. Diuision 1 The nature of feudall tithes is opened by the Canonist 2 Charles Martle is accused of Church-pillage 3. The Canonist telleth a strange tale of Charles Martle 4. It is thought of Nomomathes to bee but a fable 5. One of the ancient statutes of England is compared with the aforesaid edict of the king of Fraunce 6. The common law agreeth with the Canon in the attributing of the decision of the right of tithes to the spirituall iudge 7. Where one parson may sue a spoliation against the other in the spirituall court 8. The executors may bee sued in the spirituall court 9. Of what trees tithes may bee demaunded by the statute of 45. E. 3. 10. That the rent payed for tithes vpon a lease for yeares is a laye chattell 7. Diuision 1 A precept issueth with a monition vnder payne of excommunication for the due satisfaction of tithes 8. Diuision 8 The degrees which the Canon law obserueth in punishing offences in the clergie 2. Two sorts of excommunication sette downe by the Canonist 3 The compulsorie statutes of England for payment of tithes are mentioned by the barrister 4. Impropriate tithes at the common law are compared with feudall tithes 9. Diuision 1 The Ordinarie ex officio may cite men to pay tythes 10. Diuision 1 Two sortes of heretickes formatus and suspectus 2. In what cause the wife and children of heretickes shall enioy their landes 3. Heretickes by the ciuill law not punishable by fire 4. The Canonist poasteth the punishment of heretickes to the common law 5. The professor of common law bandeth backe againe the punishment of heretikes to the Canon law 11. Diuision 1 What thinges may bee tearmed Church-land by the ciuill law 2. Of Churchyards the spirituall Court shall hold iurisdiction by the common lawe 3. The right of gleabe lande is triable by the common law 4. Lands deuised not subiect to the iurisdiction of the ecclesiasticall Court 5. Suites for chattels real must be in the spirituall court 12. Diuision 1 That ius patronatus by the Canon law is determinable in the ecclesiasticall court and that it passeth by the word ecclesia 2. The diuers significations of the word ecclesia at the common lawe 3. The interest of the Parson patron and Ordinarie in the Church is shewed 4. What thinges doe make a patron by the Canon law 5. Ius patronatus is one of the proper obiects of the common law 6. That an aduowson lieth in tenure 13. Diuision 1 Punishment pro laesione fidei concerning a temporall acte is not to be adiudged in the ecclesiastical Court 2. Periurie in an ecclesiasticall court punishable in an eclesiasticall court 3. Lindwoods authoritie touching punishment pro laesione fidei in temporall matters at the ecclesiasticall law is not admitted 4 The barrister disproueth the generall citations of Bishoppes ad Sacramenta praestanda by the common lawe 5. Nomomath encountreth him in this point 6. The ciuill law agreeth with the Canon in matter
sort day but absolutely fully it is not because it is destitute bereft of the clere light of the sunne knowledge which relyeth vpon the sound foundation of things knowne is answerable to the day which is full of cleare and perfite light Now as opinion is more like to ignorance then to knowledge so euen-tide is more like to night whereupon ensueth that twilight must needs bee more like vnto night but now suppose that a paiment of money is assumed to be made within the compasse of such a day whether is it to be intended of the Romaine day or some other ciuill day or the natural day which is wholly in vse amongst the Venetians for in Venice the clocke is told foure and twenty times for the day and it is meete that this question should be decyded by the custome of each countrie Now come we to speake of howers which to the Romaines were not in vse during the space of three hundred yeares therefore in their lawes of the twelue tables times are otherwise set downe namely Sunne-rise Noone and Sunsett the first second third and fourth watch plenum forum ful market boum solutio the time of the loosing of the oxen from the plough accensa lumina candle light and such like names But to know the proper vse of these howers that are fitte to bee obserued which Paulus the Ciuilian noteth Cuiusque diei maior pars est horarum septem primarum diei non supremarum he meaneth not that there should be fourteene howers of the day because it is manifest that there are but twelue but his meaning is that the greatest parte of the day is spent in the first seuen howers if you accompt from the first hower to the seuenth inclusiuè as namelye from sixe a clocke in the morning to twelue a clocke for then there will remayne to the other parte of the day but fiue howers And the former parte of the day is not onely the better for the number of howers but because men in these howers are more apt for the dispatch of their busines Wherefore Nonius h Noni lib 9. de compendiosa doctrin vpon these wordes of Virgill Nunc adeo melior quoniam pars acta diei est commenteth thus Our youth is the best part of our age and so Maro wisely calleth the first part of the day the better part as being the youth of the day for if a man should number seauen howers from a eleuen of the cloke to fiue in the afternoone yet these howers will not be so conuenient for perfitting of busines as the seauen abouesaid and therfore he that demaundeth six pence for trauayling to a place on foote from eleuen to fiue to which an other hath gon for a groat from six to twelue is not altogether vniust because in the afternoone men be more vnapt and more vnable to trauaile The last and least part of time if it be any part of time is a moment which may better be imagined then described for it is as swift as a man can imagin and what is more swift then imagination It hath receyued a definition somewhat obscure of Plato Momentum est quod nullo prorsus in tempore est i Pla. in Parmen It is taken by some to be punctum temporis for as a mathematicall point is that cuius nulla est pars so a moment is a point of time cuius nulla est pars yet Pliny seemeth to distinguish more rhetorically then truely punctum temporis from a moment when he saith Quod momentum aut immo quod temporis punctum aut beneficio sterile aut vacuum laude k Plini in Panegyr the existence of a moment cannot possibly be discerned and therfore is not so much as the twinckling of an eye The vse of a moment is more fit for the operation of Law then for the act of a man for the Law doth operate without compasse of time in an instant but man neuer for euery act of man must haue space longer or shorter according to the qualitie of the work But the nature of such instants or moments which the Law doth imagin is such so sodaine vt omnem respuant moram as in the Ciuill Law is well noted l l. 23. §. vlt. D. de adult And the reason is because in the operation of Law that which it doth imagin to be done is dicto citius presently and without delay done m l. in suis D. de lib. et post and therefore it is commonly said it is done ipso iure or it is said ipso iure or ipso facto But this course can not be obserued in the actions of men who can not doe any thing without space of time because their act is alwayes continuate and therefore must needes be done continuo tempore And whereas the act of man is mixt with the act of Law though in regard of the same thing the act of the Law be momentary yet the act of man must needes beare some delay Those thinges by the ciuill Law which are taken from enemies doe incontinent become his who doth seise and take them n l. 5. §. vlt. de acquir re â—o The Law doth giue them vnto him presently but yet there must be a time to take them that the Law may giue them And so if when a Lease is made to A. of land for the terme of the life of B and A. dieth C. entreth into the land and inioyeth it as an occupant the Law because it wil not haue the freehold in suspence doth imagin that it was presently and immediatly in C. after the death of A and that he entred presently but if we respect this entrie as the act of man we must needes imagin that he had some time to enter into the land and by his entrie which is an act consisting of motion to gaine the freehold It remaineth now according to our purpose that after this discourse of the partes of time some thing should be spoken of the differences of time which I will handle verie briefely for the matters precedent haue giuen some light thereunto and they are not of themselues verie obscure And first to speak of the time which we cal a continuall time that in the ciuill Law is sometime taken for as much as during a mans life o l. 1. §. pe de off pre vrb l. 2. C. de his qui latr and therfore he that hath purchased land for his life is tearmed Perpetuarius p Alci lib. 1. parer g. c. 37. and in the common Law these wordes a touts iours make but an estate for life q Littlet lib. 1. cap. 1. fo 1. yet in proper sense it extendeth vnto the last mark of time A long or short time is distinguished either by the measure of the parts of time abouesaid or by the measure of the Law which is the discretion of the Iudge The differeÌ„ce which is made of auncient
any wayne ouer such a bridge being fraught with carriage shall paie iiij d' and the partie causeth all the thinges in the wayne when he commeth to the bridge to be caried ouer the bridge on mens backes here is no defraudation of the Law But if he should giue iiij pence for the cariage ouer the bridge but not currant money now the Law should be defrauded e Io. in §. penult Insti de â—dop And when a man is preiudiced by the fraudulent dealing of an other man he may by our Law haue an action against him which is called actio doli an action of Deceit Canonolog Indeede the difference of Dolus is vsed likewise in our Law And we haue a rule of that which you haue tearmed dolum bonum 3. The same difference the common Law obserueth Frangenti fidem fides frangatur eidem f 23. q. 1. noli existimare C. de pac l. cum proponas in glo Accur And likewise an example of it vsed in our law namelie of Salomon who did vse such cunning betwixt the two harlots in searching out who was the true and naturall mother of the child But the deceit which of you hath ben tearmed dolus malus is in our Law nomen reatus which it doth punish as being done against the Law for qui peccat non peccat de legis authoritate g 23. q. 4. qui peccat Anglonomoph That deceit which of ye both 4. Dolus malus punishable at the common Law by an action vpon the case or a writ of Deceit hath been tearmed dolus malus doth not in our Law escape punishment but for the more strong inhibiting and repressing of it it doth afforde a double remedie against such as endammage others by deceit namelie either a writ of Deceit or an Action vpon the case For if a man plaie with an other at dice and he hath false dice with which he plaieth and winneth the other mans money he that loseth his money in such sort may haue an Action vpon the case for this deceit And in other like cases an Action vpon the case or a writ of Deceit will lie at the pleasure and election of the plaintife And if I present one to a Church whereof I am Patron to the Ordinarie and one T. disturbeth me wherefore an other man purchaseth a Quare impedit in my name retournable in the Common place I not knowing thereof against the said T. and after causeth the writ to be abated or me to be nonsuit in the action I may haue a writ of Deceit against him h 5. 5. E. 3. Quare impedit 37. 20. H. 6. 20. Fitzh nat bro. 96. A. And in euery case an action vpon the case is maintenable against him which sueth an originall in the name of the plaintife against his will i 7. H. 6. 45. So if a man forge a statute merchant in my name sue a Capias therupon whereby I am arrested and had in execution I may haue a writ of Deceit against him that forged it k 19. H. 6. 44. 58. 34. H. 6. 19. Fitzh Nat. be 96. B. So if the Warden of an Infant vouch one by couin who is not sufficient or pleadeth some bad plea wheras he might haue pleaded a better plea the Infant shall haue a writ of Deceit against him and shall recouer the full value in dammages l 9. E. 4. 34. And 11. H. 6. a writ of Deceit was brought against an Attourney for acknowledging a satisfaction whereas his master was not in truth satisfied m 11. H. 6. 34. And in a Praecipe quod reddat if the Shirife retorne the tenant of the land to be summoned whereas in truth he was neuer summoned whereupon the tenant loseth by default vpon the Graund cape retourned Now the tenant may haue a writ of Deceit against him that recouered and against the Shirife for his false retourne n Fitzh Nat. bre 97. C. But the writ of Deceit in this case doth not determine the right of the land but doth only defeat the iudgement o 35. H. 6. 44. 18. E. 4. 11. 33. H. 6. 43. 41. E. 3. 2. 43. E. 3. 31. 50 E. 3. 18. And 5. E. 4. is that no dammages in this case shall be recouered against the Shirife but he shall be onelie fined p 5. E. 4. 49. And if a man recouer in a writ of Wast by default whereas the defendant was neuer summoned the defendant in this case may haue a writ of Deceit q 20. E. 3. Disceit 5. 29. E. 3. 54. 48. E. 3. 59. 19. E. 2. Disceit 56. 19. E. 3. Disceit 3. And if a man bargaine with an other and assume vpon consideration to enfeoffe him of certaine land and he enfeoffeth an other he to whom the assumpsit was made may haue a writ of Deceit r 20. H. 6. 36. 16. E. 4. 9. Fitzh Nat. br 98. F. or an Action vpon the case at his pleasure Å¿ 3. H. 7. 14. 2. H 7. 11. And if one sell to an other a Horse which he knoweth to haue a secreat disease in his bodie or selleth certaine quarters of Graine which is full of grauell a writ of Deceit lieth t 20. H. 6. 36. So 13. H. 4. a writ of Deceit was brought for selling a certaine quantitie of wooll and warranting it to be 50. sackes whereas it wanted of that measure the defendant pleaded in barre that it was weyed before the sale and that the seruants of the plaintife being his factors did accepr it and caried it beyond the sea whereupon the plaintife demurred u 13. H. 4. 1. And if a man lose his land by default in a Praecipe quod reddat whereas he was neuer summoned and die his heire may haue an action of Deceit and shall haue restitution of the land uu 8. H. 6. 5. per Rolfe 15. E. 3. Disceit 43. 18. R. 2. Disceit 50. Fitzh Nat. bre 98. Q. And 1. E. 3. in the booke of Assises it is said that if a recouerie in such case be had against the father by default whereas in truth the father was dead at the time of the recouerie the heire may auoide this by writ of Disceit or Error a 1. Ass p. 16. And whereas there be two tenants for life the remainder to the heires of one of them and they both lose by default being not summoned and the tenant for life dieth the suruiuor shall haue a writ of Disceit for the whole Otherwise it had been if the recouerie had been against the tenant for life onelie by default b 8. E. 3. Disceit 7. Nomomath You haue sufficientlie discussed 7. Diuision the point of deceit Now I would craue your opinions of an other matter Suppose that a man by slaunderous and opprobrious speeches is impeached and his good name impaired this being but a verball iniurie whether doe your Lawes inflict punishment vpon such
is not enlarged because the condition was against law the estate should haue beene enlarged by the performance of the condition but notwithstanding such condition yet the lease is good because that did not beginne by the condition But if an obligation be endorsed with a condition directly contrarie to law both the obligation the condition be void a 8. E. 4. 13. 2. E. 4. 3. And if a man be bound that he shall keepe the obligee without damages and doe not shew wherein such condition is voide because hee may suffer damages for committing treason murder or other felonie which thinges are against law and it is also against law to saue him without damages for such thinges so that the cōdition is void but the obligation is not void because such things are not expressely rehearsed within the condition so that the condition is not directly contrarie to law b 9. H. 4. Conditions 6. And conditions which are repugnant in themselues are voide in law as if a feoffement or gift in tayle be made that the feoffee or donee may not take the profits or vpon condition that they shall make no waste or vpon condition that the wife of the feoffee c. shal not be endowed or if a lease for life be made vpon condition that the lessee shall doe no fealtie these estates be good and the conditions voide or if an annuitie be granted prouiso that it shal not charge the person of the grauntor the graunt is good the condition is voide c 21. H. 30. 20. E. 4. 8. But if a man seised of land in fee lease the said land for yeares by indenture rendring rent prouiso that the lessor shall not distrein for the rent this is a good prouiso because the lessor may haue an action of dette d 5. H. 7. 7. but land or rent may be giuen to a man in taile so that he may alien to the profits of his issue and this is a good condition for it is agreeable to law and the donor may as wel giue conditionally as simpliciter in the taile e 46. E. 3. 4. G. garrantie 18. And 7. H. 6. it was held by all the Iustices in the eschequer chamber beside Iune that if a man make a feoffement with warrantie prouiso that the feoffee shall not vouch him and his heires and that if he doe the warrantie shall be voide this is a good prouiso But if the prouiso had beene that he should neyther vouche nor rebutte the prouiso had beene void for that had cut off all the force of the warrantie f 7. H. 6. 44. And if two grant custodiam parci de A. to I. capiendo feoda quae B. nuper parcarius cepit prouiso quòd scriptum non extendat ad onerandum vn des grauntors this prouiso was taken to be void because it restreyneth all the effect of the graunt in regarde of him and if land bee giuen in taile the remainder in fee vpon condition that if the donee or his heires do alien in fee that the donor or his heires may enter the opinion of the court was that this was a good condition for a man may make a condition in the negatiue of any thing which is prohibited by the law as if he make a feoffement prouiso that the feoffee shall not not committe felonie or that hee shall alien within age or in mortmayne and a man may enfeoffe A. and his wife vpon condition that they shall enfeoffe none other for that were a discontinuance otherwise it is that they shall not leuie a fine for that is contrarie to their estate g 10. H. 7. 8. So if a man make two executors prouiso that the one of them shall not administer this is a void prouiso because it restrayneth all the authoritie giuen in the premises as to him and the intent which agreeth not with lawe is to no purpose h 19. H. 8. 4. Dy. p Brud Englef And it hath beene agreede that if a man doe limitte an vse in taile with a prouiso that if cesty que vse doe such an acte his estate shall cease during his naturall life that this prouiso is repugnant and against lawe for the estate can not be determined in part And Iustice Walmsley sayd that when an estate is giuen to one it may bee defeated wholly by condition or limitation but it cannot bee determined in parte to one and giuen in parte to another for that is repugnant to the rules of law as if a man make a lease for life vpon condition that if the lessee pay not twentie pound that a nother shal haue part of the land this future limitation 6 What conditions impossible in fact are at the common law is voide i 41. Eliza. Corbets case 86. b. Com̄ And as to conditions impossible in facte such conditions if they go to the defeasans of an estate the estate notwithstanding remaineth good but estates cannot bee enlarged by such a condition impossible and if an obligation bee endorsed with a condition impossible the obligation is good and the condition is voide Therefore if a man seised of land doe enfeoffe a straunger vpon condition that if the feoffor go on foote from London to Stamford in a day that then it shall bee lawfull for him and his heires to reenter the condition is voide quia impossibile the estate good e 14. H. 8. 32. but if A. bee bound to B. that C. shall appeare in the common place Octab. Trin. in an action of debt brought by the said B. against C. retournable at the same day and C. appeareth the same day and his appearance is not recorded now the obligation is forfeited But if in this case C. had dyed before the day of the returne the obligation had beene saued because the condition became impossible by the acte of God f 9. E. 4. 25. 15. H. 7. 2. 38. H. 6. 19. Nomomath Now I pray you shew vnto me 6. Diuision whether conditions are to bee expounded strictly and according to the rigorous sence of the wordes are according to equitie and the exigence of the case so that the circumstances of a mans speech or actions shal haue the regiment of conditions Codicgn Conditions are in our lawe taken 1. Conditions in the ciuill law are taken according to equitie according to equitie For if I graunt to one an annuitie of ten pound yearely quamdiu res meas gesserit the law maketh this sence of these wordes that he shall haue ten pound yearely si res meas gesserit together with a limitation g l. pater §. fi ff de condi demon So if I buy of one the fishes which are taken by him though he haue not alreadie taken any fishes yet the wordes doe imply a condition that that the buyer shall haue them if any bee taken So if I say Acceptis centum solidis a Titio instituo eum haeredem it is
betwixt the laps and the kinges presentment q Ibid. fol. 21. It is answered by some that the ordinarie may present one who shall be remouable at the kings will and some thinke that he shal sequester the profites of the benefice to serue the cure but in some case the King may not surcease his time as if the tenant for terme of life do forfeit his estate to the king if he be not seised during his life hee may not afterward seise it qq 8. H. 5. Trauers 47. but in this case the reason is because hee can haue no other estate then he which forfeiteth and he which commeth in of the estate of an other can haue no greater right then he had for if a man haue land in the right of his wife or in the right of a Church hee can not haue it otherwise then the Church or the wife hath it r 18. E. 3. 20. so if there be Lord and tenant and the tenant alieneth in mortmaine and the Lorde entreth yet hee shall haue onely such right in the land as he hath in the seigniorie notwithstanding that the statute do say Quod proximus dominus intrabit retinebit in feodo ſ 39. E. 3. 38. 50. E. 3. 21. l. 5. E. 4. 61. For this is grounded vpon naturall reason and naturalia sunt immutabilia and the princely prescription must bee maintained bona fide Wherefore the Duke of Sauoy which had the Cittie of Nice in pledge of the French King did vniustly withhold that Cittie frō the king being the lawful owner then because hee had inueterate possession in the same for by the ciuil law a man may not prescribe in a pledge t l. 9. C. de pl. act Deci. 3. consi 108. and Iouius is likewise angrie against the king of Fraunce himselfe for keeping Perpinianum in the like sort Parum sincera fide saith he veteris pacti conditionem multis cauillationibus inuoluebat u Iou. lib. 1. for it is true that Cephalus saith in quaestione valde dubitabili non est praescriptio x Ceph cons 102. But surely bonafides is requisite in such matters of prescription except it be apparāt that the will of God is for the prescription Wherefore Bellarmin confesseth that the Turke doth lawfully possesse such thinges as hee hath taken from vs because God his will is that for our sins we should be cast out of the land wherein we and our ancestors inhabited a Bellar. 5. contr But he doth not possesse them bonafide because hee can not by any speciall meane conuey them particularly to himselfe for as Doctor Gentilis hath well obserued An Turcae opinio latrocinantis cogitat de iusta voluntate Dei b Alb. Gentil lib. de iu. bel 1. 22. Aratus the Sicyonian was so strong and peremptorie for the title of prescription that hee did not thinke it conuenient to remoue or take away from the vsurpers any thing that they haue violently taken from the owner if they haue had possession during the space of fiftie yeares onely c Cicer. 2. de offic Prescription hath alwayes beene of force to hinder these that had right to pursue their clayme Wherefore Demosthenes sayth well Hee that hath helde an other mans landes or goodes a long time should not please himself therewith but impute it to fortune which hath hindred the lawfull owners d Demosth ad maca Is any thing more to bee laughed at then that which is said of some interpreters of the law who are not to bee laughed at that the kingdome of Spaine may now be claimed by the Romane Emperour by reason of his ancient imperiall right whereas it is manifest that sithence the time of the ancient Romane Emperours it hath beene a long time possest of the Saracens a long time of the Spaniards The fifth Chapter That by the consent of all nations consent principally maketh a lawfull mariage IF a man should examine the seueral rites circumstances and ceremonies of the diuers people of the worlde in the knitting and celebrating of mariage he might as well number and obserue the diuerse-couloured spottes of the Chamaeleon for euery nation hath had in this by some fatall lotte both their custome and chaunge of custome I will onely endeuor to proue that which is conteined in my assertion that by the consent of all nations c. The definition of thinges is alway the best proofe therefore it is good to beginne this discourse with the definition of mariage Mariage is the lawfull coniunction of man and woman conteining an indiuiduall societie of life and the participation of diuine and humane right a 30. q. c. nullam where it is said a lawfull coniunction nothing els is meant but a free consent executed by the contract which as it is the beginning of the definition so it is the ground of the mariage and these wordes conteining an indiuiduall societie of life do signifie that they shall continue foreuer together as long as they liue Howbeit the rule of the common Law do in this sauour of the irregular Religion Post contractum matrimonij ante carnalem copulam possit alter altero inuito religionem intrare b Gazalup in verb. nuptiae And for the further proofe that the ground of mariage is consent there be three thinges by the Canon Law required to mariage c Codi ap C. vlti c. 27. q. 2. Fides Proles and Sacramentum Fidelitie which is put in the first place is the hart of mariage and it springeth of consent and therefore if a man do contract with a woman in this sort Contraho tecum si te pro quaestu adulter andum exposueris this is no contract of mariage because it is contra bonum fidei which consisteth in this that neither of the maried couple shall break the bond of mariage but shall faithfully and vnitedly obserue it Likewise Progenie is an other thing that mariage requireth and therefore it can not be a good contract of mariage if it be made in this forme Contraho tecum si generationem prolis euites or si venenum sterilitatis accipias because mariage was instituted of God for the solace of man and the multiplication of mankind by children Thirdly a solemne promise is requisite in mariage and therefore if a man do contract with a woman donec ditiorem vel pulchriorem habeat faeminam this is no good league of mariage because it is contrarie to the oath of an indiuiduall societie And so if any man in a foreine land sucking as yet the smoak of the Popes Tobaccho be a votarie to Religion and a bondslaue to his cloyster for England the Lord be praised is at this day as free from Monkes as it is from wolues Three things are required at his handes namely chastitie obedience and the abdication of propertie as well in landes as in goodes d Gazalup in verb. matrimon But that