Selected quad for the lemma: life_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
life_n	die_v	fee_n	tenant_n	5,326	5	10.2578	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28801	Examen legum Angliæ, or, The laws of England examined, by Scripture, antiquity and reason cujus author anagrammat[os] est, A gomoz boa oz̄ bary.	Booth, A., 17th cent.; Boon, A.	1656 (1656)	Wing B3738; ESTC R38641	162,879	175

Grantor and to the Issue in Tail the Land in Law had been the parties to whom it was conveyed and Cesty que use he for whom the use was had nothing but Equity to recover the Profits But now since Littleton wrote all possession is transferred to the use and the Law changed Plow Com. 349. 6. 27. By a Statute made 2 H. 5. all such Jurors as were to be returned for Tryal of Issues joyned in any the Courts at Westminster or before Justices of Assize 2 H. 5. c. 3. second Parliam 11 H. 7. c. 21. were to have 40 s. by the year in Lands and Tenements c. By the Statute of the 27 Eliz. it is enacted 27 El. c. 6. That such Jurors shall have 4 l. by the year at least and so it is to be expressed in the Venire facias which is an alteration since Littleton wrote 28. All those special pleadings discussed by occasion of Littletons Text 23 H 8. c. 5. 7 Jac. c. 5. 12 Act 23 Octob. 1650. 21 Jac. c. 14. l. 3. sect 485. are taken away by several Acts of Parliament And by the last Act of the 23 Octob. 1650. liberty is given in all cases to plead the general Issue which is a great ease in most cases although in a Replevin the Law is rather worse then it was as is shewed in its proper place 29. By several Statutes since Littleton wrote the times for commencing of real and possessory and personal Actions are limited 32 H. 8. c. 2. 21 Jac. c. 16. First by the Statute of the 32 H. 8. and afterwards by the Statute of 21 Jac. By which Statute it 's said the Kings Right is concluded as well as all other persons and barred after twenty years in all real Actions These are abridgements of the Law since Littletons time 27 H. 8. c. 4. 1 Ed. 6. c. 14. 30. All those Laws mentioned by Littleton concerning Free Chappels and Chantries and the cases thereupon depending are at an end by those Statutes since Littleton wrote 31. By several Statutes made since Littletons time the petty Errors in Pleadings 32 H. 8. c. 30. 18 El. c. 14. Mispleadings and Jeofailes are helped and amended in real mixt and personal Actions insomuch as where at Common Law every mistake of a Letter Word want of Warrant of Attorney or Misreturn of any Writ or any other petty inconsiderable Error or Mistake 21 Jac. c. 13. was sufficient to destroy any Action or to arrest or reverse Judgement Act 1652. Now no Error before Appearance nor any Error but what is matter of Substance and of the Essence of the Action can prejudice the Suit This is an amendment of the Common Law 32. The Law concerning ordinary Jurisdiction and Spiritual Law as they called it which is discussed by Littleton Littleton l. 3. sect 648. Lib. 3. Sect. 648. hath been since altered by the Statute of the 25 H. 8. which restraineth the Ecclesiastical Laws 25 H. 8. c. 19. that they be not repugnant to the Common Law nor the Statutes and Customes of the Realm and since the same Law concerning ordinary Jurisdiction and Ecclesiastical Laws are abolished with the Hierarchy of Bishops c. and their Courts 33. Since Littleton wrote there were two Statutes made to preserve Remainders and Reversions in Lands and Tenement expectant upon Estates for Life 32 H. 8. c. 31. which it seems by the Common Law might be barred by a Common Recovery or thereby the Entry of him in Reversion or Remainder taken away But by those Laws such Recoveries by Tenant for life are void and the Entry saved by the last Statute of the 14 Eliz. 14 El. c. 8. which is contrary to the Law in force when Littleton lived although the first Statute be Repealed by that last mentioned 34. The like Law was concerning Tenant in Dower Coke Com. Lit. l. 3. sect 697. 11 H. 7. c. 20. If she had aliened in Fee with Warranty and dyed that Warranty had bound the Heir But now if Tenant for Life or in Dower alien it is a forfeiture and the heir may enter This is a good amendment of the Common Law 35. If Tenant in Tail be in possession 26 H. 8. c. 13. 33 H. 8. c. 20. or that hath Right of Entry be attainted of High-Treason the Estate Tail is barred and the Land forfeited But this Attainder was no Barre at the Common Law nor when Littleton wrote 36. If Tenant in Tail levy a Fine with Proclamations 4 H. 7. c. 24. Coke Com. Lit. l. 3. sect 708. according to the Statute this a Barre to the Estate Tail but not to him in Reversion or Remainder if he maketh his Claim or pursueth his Action within five years after the Estate Tail spent But the Law was otherwise when Littleton wrote 37. When Littleton wrote if the Kings Donee in Tail the Remainder in the King had suffered a Common Recovery the Estate Tail had been barred but not the Reversion or Remainder in the King and if such Donee had levied a Fine with Proclamations 4 H. 7. c. 24. 34 H. 8. c. 20. Coke Com. Lit. l. 3. sect 708. after the Statute of the 4 H. 7. this had barred the Estate Tail although the Reversion were in the King But since by the Statute of the 34 H. 8. a Common Recovery had against the Tenant in Tail of the Kings Gift or such a Fine levied by him the Reversion continuing in the King is no Barre to the Estate Tail wherein the Law hath been changed since Littleton wrote 38. By several Statutes made since Littleton wrote the wife of a man attainted of Misprision of Treason 1 Ed. 6. c. 13. 5 Ed. 6. c. 11. 5 El. c. 1. 11. 18 El. c. 1. Murther or Felony is Dowable which was not so favoured at the Common Law 39. By the Statute of Westm 1. No Sheriff or Minister of the Kings was to take any thing for execution of his Office 23 H. 6. c. 10. 19 H 7. c. 8. 29 El. c. but what the King allowed to him and is was so by the Common Law But by Statutes afterwards of which two are since Littleton wrote Fees are allowed to be taken by such Officers 32 H. 8. c 32. 40. By the Common Law no Executor or Administrator of Tenants in Fee-simple or Fee-tail had any means to recover Arrerages of Rents and Services due in the life-time of such Tenant Now the Law is altered and such Executors and Administrators are by Statute enabled to sue for and recover the same 27 H. 8. c. 10. Coke Com. Lit. l. 3. c. 5. sect 384. 41. By the Statute of 27 H. 8. If a man seised in Fee-Covenant upon good Consideration to stand seised to himself for life and to the use of his eldest Son in Tail with the Remainder to his second Son in Tail with Remainders over c. and to

Scope of the story which was to shew that Naaman by the Miracle of healing with the word applied by the Prophet was converted from Paganisme to vvorship the true God and the same well suits with the Prophets answer to Naamans Petition go in peace (h) Calvin Institut l. 3. cap. 2. f. 32. Calvin considers Naaman as a new Convert and one that had some knowledge of Christ The common reading makes Naaman a grosse Hypocrite praying to be dispenced with in his beloved sin and it seems to charge the Prophet with unfaithfulnesse in not reproving Naaman for this reservation which could not have stood with true repentance but rather incouraging him Saying go in peace which inconveniences are all taken away by rendring the words in the sence of the Preterperfect tence That in Judges 11. concerning Jephthah his vow Judges 11.30.39.40 and concerning his daughter The last Translation seems to countenance such horrible Murder as was committed by the Heathen Gentiles and sometimes by the Idolatrous Israelites in sacrificing their Children to Devils The word in the last verse Translated lament the daughter of Jephthah being rendred according to the Marginal reading To confer or talk with the daughter of Jephthah sufficiently clears the matter Piscator on the Place And lets us know that she was not murdered or offered for a burnt-offering But that she was redeemed as God had appointed in the (i) Lev. 27.2 3. Num. 18.15 Exod. 34.20 Law but was dedicated to be a servant in the house of God as Samuel was This reading agrees with that vers 38. she bewayled her Virginity not her death This Act of Jephthah is judged to be an Act of his faith for which he is commended Heb. 11.32 If he had murdered his daughter he would have been reproved for it which he is not Therefore we must conceive that Jephthah's vow was Conditonal Vers 31. that if that which had met him coming out of the doors of his house had been a thing which might have been offered for a Dog or a Swine might have met him which might not be offered in Sacrifice he would have offered it to the Lord If otherwise it were a thing not to be offered and might be redeemed he would redeem it and offer something in lieu thereof As Abraham did the Lambe instead of his Son There are divers things in the New Testament which ought to be cleared in point of Translation That Acts 14.23 Acts 14.23 Translated when they had ordained them Elders in every Church The Text being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is (k) Pasor Lex pag. 609. A. Quun que ipsis per suffragia creassent Presbyteros 2 Corint 8.19 truely read they Created them Elders by suffrages which in the Geneva Translation is rendred they ordained them Elders by Election But this word Election signified by extending or lifting up the hands of the people the late Translators Holyoke Belcanqual and their fellows being Episcopal men made shift to thrust out of the Text That they might preserve the Bishops power of ordination as our Presbyters do now who tell us that the Church Math. 18.17 is but the Presbytery or representative Church which exposition is justified by no Scripture for the word Church is either taken for the (l) Acts 15.3 4 22 23. and 13.1 Members without the Officers called brethren or else for the Officers and Members together That in Phil. 1.21 Phil. 1.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The new Translation reads Grammatically out of the Vulgar Latine For to me to live is Christ to dye is gain which is perfect non-sence The two infinitive Moods without wronging the Text may be either translated substantively or as participles and then the sence is for Christ is to me in life and death or living and dying gain or advantage which is according to the Geneva Translation and suits with the sence of the fore-going verse Christ shall be magnified in my body whether it be by life or by death For these and many other causes which might be shewed it were fit a more perfect Translation of the holy Scriptures were had and published 3 In the next place I set it down as a sinfull defect that there is no Law against swearing by Creatures as the Sun Light Jerem. 5.7 Perk. on the Decal Com. 3. vol. 1. pag. 42. col 2. the Bread the Drink the Money and such like which Oathes are very common amongst the prophane and ignorant multitude and are as bad if not worse than prophane swearing by the holy name of God Math. 5.34 35. Exod. 23.13 Isa 65.16 Amos 8.14 4. The like may be said of swearing by Idols as the Crosse the Masse the Rood or by Saints as Saint Mary by our Lady That place Matth. 23.22 Condemneth such swearing Perk. on the Decal Com. 3. vol. 1. pag. 42. col 2. by Imaginary Saints as Saint George by Faith and Troth c. the like may be said of wicked cursing against our selves or others as Pox Plague the Devil rot thee and the like c. these are all unlawfull yet we have no Law against them their unlawfulnes appears by these Scriptures Ier. 4.2 and 5.7 Psal 109.17 and Psal 115 8. Deut. 6.13 Willet Hex in Exod. chap. 20. pag. 347. 5. The use of Lots in sport is a sinfull thing and no Law against it as (m) The use of Cardes dice and the very Sale of them are prohibited by the Lawes of Geneva Lawes Geneva pag. 30. 36. Carding Dicing Playing at such Games as wherein is no use or exercise of skill or memory but meer chance as it 's called these are a sporting with the Divine providence of God which is not to be meddled with but with great reverence and Lots are to be used onely in weighty matters for that therein Almighty God is immediately appealed unto as Judge and determiner of the controversie So they may be used in chusing of Officers or Governours where God hath not declared his will or in division of inheritances and such like The use of these Lots in other cases is unwarrantable Prov. 16.16.33 Levit. 16.9 Perkins on the third commandment vol. 1. pag. 43. Acts 13.19 6. The like may be said of Gaming and playing for great sums of money the same is a horrible sin and the cause of many other sins there is unlawfull getting and unlawfull spending with unnecessary expence of precious time every Lawfull means of getting is sanctified by the word of God and prayer Gaming for money is not sanctified by the word of God and prayer Ergo Gaming for money is no Lawfull means of getting The Major of this Proposition is the Scripture it self all things i. e. all Lawfull things are sanctified by the word of God and prayer the Minor is undeniable there being no word of God to vvarrant such a course of getting and what man upon any ground of Scripture or word of faith can or dare