die after the sale of the Lands and distribution what remedy hath the Bankrupt for the rest against the Executors of the Commissioners or against the Survivor of them After the Sale and before distribution all the Commissioners die but two what shall be done A new Commission shall be awarded to other Commissioners not to them and they shall be called before the new Commissioners as they who have the Estate of the Bankrupt in their hands 15. What shall be said a concealment of the Estate of a Bankrupt or of his Person or a fraudulent claim or demand or detaining of his Estate and what remedy for the Forfeiture or Fine 16. What damage is it to be out of the Kings Protection by this Statute 17. Who shall be said a Creditor within this Statute A sole Creditor if he can sue the Commission A Mortgage of Lands or Goods if they can sell them Conusee of a Statute-Merchant or Recognizance The Plaintiff who hath the Body of the Defendant in Execution upon a Judgment at the Common Law He who hath the Bankrupt in Execution upon a Statute-Merchant A Merchant is taken in Execution and after becomes indebted to A. and remains six Months in Execution and so is a Bankrupt if A. shall be a Creditor that is if he be a Bankrupt from the beginning of his Imprisonment by relation or only after the six Months A Merchant is imprisoned for Debt the Gaoler Credits him for Victuals for a Year if he shall be a Creditor for part for all or for none A Bankrupt is Convicted for keeping of Inmates or erecting Cottages the Statute gives an Action of Debt to the Lord of the Leet he is no Creditor 18. What Conveyance the Commissioners may make after the Death of the Bankrupt A Feme Covert sole Merchant within Age the Baron and Feme levy a Fine of the Land of the Feme a Commission is awarded the Fine is reversed for Non-age of the Feme with a Cessation of Execution during the Life of the Baron they have Issue the Feme dies the Commissioners sell the Issue enters The First Division Who shall be said to be a Merchant or other Person using or exercising the Trade of Merchandizes by way of Bargaining Exchange Bartry Chevisance or otherwise in gross or by Retail or seek his or their Trade of Living by Buying and Selling. 1. A Makes a Lease for Years to B. and grants the reversion to C. in Tail B. attorn and enters A. grants the reversion of C. to D. being a Denizen of Ireland C. commits Treason and attorns D. becomes an Adventurer to the East Indies C. is attainted D. is Non solvent and having no House keeps himself on Ship-board C. Dies without Issue a Commission is awarded and after supers the Commissioners sells the Land by Deed Inrolled in the Mayor's Court in London D. is a Bankrupt within the Statute and the Sale by the Commissioners is good 2. Tenant for Years of an Inn makes a Feoffment in Fee to Baron and Feme an Alien makes livery within the view to the Feme who enters the Baron is made King the Lessor being an Adventurer of Virginia Releases to the King by Deed Inrolled an Office is found the Queen waives the Lessor enters and keeps the Inn and being Non-solvent is made Keeper of a Castle in the Isle of Man where he was Born and there remains The Lessor is a Bankrupt within this Division of the Statute and the Commissioners may sell the Land 3. A Disseisor makes a Lease for Life to a Feme sole the remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. she makes a Feoffment in Fee upon condition and enters for the condition broken and grants a Rend charge to A. a Goldsmith of London Naturalized by Parliament the Disseisee Releases to the Feme she Marries A. the Disseisor enters and makes a Feoffment to a Stranger I. S. dies the Feme hath Issue and dies A. enters and being Non-solvent surrenders to the Issue and departeth the Realm to Merchandize the Commissioners sell the Rent the right Heir of I. S. enters A. is a Bankrupt within this Division of the Statute and the Vendee may presently Distrain for the Rent 4. R. Tenant in tail makes a Gift in tail to M. hath Issue and dies M. makes a Feoffment to C. and dies without Issue his Wife the Issue of R. enters a Son is Born who enters the Feoffee enters and being a Grasier buyes lean Cattel and feeds them upon the Land and Sells them when they are fat and sells his own House and after being Non-solvent keeps his Neighbours House C. is no Bankrupt within this Statute and the Issue of R. recovers the Land by Formedon and the Son Born hath no right 5. A Man hath Issue A. and B. two Daughters they Disseise I. S. and infeoff their Father A. Marries C. and by his leave becomes a Sempster in the Exchange London the Father dies I. S. releases to the Husband B. brings a Neuper Obiit against A. and C. C. makes default after default A. is received and being indebted to divers Creditors disclaims in the Blood the Husband keeps the House The Husband is a Bankrupt within this Statute and the Moiety of the Land is liable to the sale of the Commissioners during the Coverture 6. One makes a Lease for Years to A. the remainder to B. for the Life of A. the remainder to the right Heirs of A. B. dies A. having Issue a Daughter his Wife with Child with a Son devises the Land to I. S. for the Life of M. for payment of his Debts and makes I. S. his Executor and dies I. S. enters the Daughter being a Feme Covert sole Merchant in London enters M. dies the Daughter is Non solvent and elopes the Son born enters The Daughter is a Bankrupt within this Statute and the Commissioners may sell the Land 7. One devises his Land to A. B. and C. baeredibus A. paying 10 li. they enter and A. being an Exchanger enters into Religion B. releases to C. the Bills of A. are protested C. dies the Creditors of A. brings Action against his Executors and before Judgment A. is deraigned the Commissioners sell all the Land A. is a Bankrupt within this Statute but the sale is good only for a third part 8. M. and F. joyn Tenants of a Horse Mortgage him to E. a Feme sole who intermarries with M. F. being a Horsecourser performs the condition and takes the Horse E. by commandment 〈◊〉 her Husband Steals the Horse M. and E. are Divorced causa praecontractus M. dies E. is indicted for Felony the Horsecourser becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell the Horse F. is a Bankrupt within the Statute and the sale is good 9. The King makes a Lease for Years rendring Rent of the Pre-emption of Tynn in Cornwall to I. S. one of the Grooms of the Privy Chamber who becomes indebted to divers Persons for Tynn bought of
of Wight is parcel of Hamp-shire and Wales and Ireland are parcel of the Realm for Writs of Errour lie c. And I think it is very true Hollinshead description of Britain fol. 16. b. that the Isle of Man was then no parcel of the Realm for the first mention thereof in any Chronicles is the same year that England was Conquered by the Normans for when Harold had at Stainford-Bridge Conquered another Harold that was King of Norway one Gordard the King's Son of Ireland fled to the Isle of Man in time Conquered it and made himself Lord and Landlord of all the Isle So as to this day there is not a Free-holder in that Island but all are Tenants to the King of that Country It is about thirty miles long and fifteen miles broad it is not governed by any written Laws or Courts of Record but all their Controversies are ended by Arbitrators whom they call Deemsters When King John Conquered Ireland he sent Forces into Man and wasted it all but seated no Government there 1240. One Harold of the Norway Line was received and was invested in the Kingdom of Man by the King of Norway and yet afterwards he was made Knight by the King of England 1250. Or thereabouts in King Ed. 1. time Alexander King of Scots having Conquered all the Islands either by Strength or for Money amongst the rest brought the Isle of Man under his Dominion the old King's Daughter sued to Edw. 1. as to the Supream Head of Scotland the Answer Sequatur coram Justiciariis de Banco Regis ut Justicia Edw. 2. granted it to Piers Gaveston but in Anno 1393. William of Mountacute by strength won it from the Scots as Thomas of Walsingham saith and sold it to William Scroop he was attainted and so it came to Hen. 4. The King of England he granted it to Henry Peircy to hold it by carrying before the King Lancaster's Sword but presently he was attainted and the King granted it to Sir John Stanley and so it came to the Earl of Derby Seman's Case 5. Reports A Man's House is his Castle and his Castle is his House Points upon the first Case 1. IF Tenant for years may attorn before Entry 21 H. 7. One makes a Lease for years and before the Lessee enter the Lessor releases to him the release is void One bargains and sells his Land to another and before the Deed is inrolled he attorns to the grant of the reversion and after the Deed is inrolled and the Bargainee enters 21 H. 7.28 H. 8. Dyer Debt for Rent lies before entry of the Lessee Litt. Lord and Tenant the Tenant makes a Lease for life the Lord grants the Seigniory to the Tenant for life in Fee the Tenant ought to attorn yet he shall not hold of the Tenant for life during his life 28 H. 8. Brook Tenant for twenty years makes a Lease for ten years Tenant for ten years attorns it is good 20 H. 6 7. A Seigniory is granted by Deed to one for life the remainder in Fee Tenant for life dies before attornment c. contrary if it were by Fine 11 H. 4.18 One who hath nothing in the Land must attorn as Tenant in Dower who hath assigned her Estate 2. The reversion of Tenant in tail is granted he commits Treason and attorns and is attainted 12 E. 4.3 Tenant in tail shall not be compelled to attorn but 15 E. 4.13 if he attorn voluntarily it is good Nor Tenant in tail after possibility c. 46. E. 3.13 39 E. 3.20 3 H. 6.12 5 H. 5. Attornment 17. One makes a gift in tail rendring Rent the Donor by Fine grants the Rent the Tenant in tail must attorn 8 H. 5.10 Tenant for life grants his Estate upon condition the Lessor grants the reversion Tenant for life attorns and after performs the condition yet the Attornment is void But all the question is upon the relation of the Office and this shall not vacate the Attornment for it shall not relate for the mean profits of the Land Sir VVilliam Fleetwood's Case Cook lib. 8. by the same reason if Rent were reserved it were well paid and well received and sufficient to invest the reversion in the Grantee 3. Adventurer to the East-Indies is within the Statute 4. Gardian of a Ship is within the Statute The Chancellor hath authority to award a Commission but not to grant Supers And therefore death of the King or a new Commission leaving out the old Commission may be but no Supers If the King present to a Benefice above 20 l. the Chancellor cannot make a revocation but as well in our Case as in that Case by Warrant under the Signet Privy Seal or Seal Manual the Chancellor may award Supers 6. Denizen of Ireland Points upon the Third Case 1. TEnant for life the remainder to the right Heir of I. S. makes a Feoffment in Fee upon condition and enters for the condition broken who shall enter for the forfeiture The Feoffer shall not enter for all is out of him by the Feoffment and he hath nothing but a possibility The right Heir of I. S. shall not enter for his remainder is destroyed The first Question is upon the Statute of W. 2. cap. 25. Whether if Lessee for years make a Feoffment by Livery within the view the Feoffer or Feoffee or both of them or neither be Disseisors 2. Upon Baron and Feme whether a Feoffment without Deed to the Baron and Feme and Livery only to the Feme invests any thing in the Husband 3. Upon the matter admit they are both Disseisors whether the release made to the Husband shall exclude the Wife it shall but in this Case where Tenant for years enfeoffes two and the Lessor releases to one he shall not hold out his Companion 4. Baron and Feme are Joynt-Tenants of a term and the Baron is made King what is become of the term and so of Freehold Whether the King shall have all or the Queen all or they remain Joynt-Tenants or Tenants in Common they are Tenants in Common 5. A Feme commits a Disseisin to the use of her and her Husband and the Husband is made King and the Disseisee releases to the King what is wrought if he can agree to the Disseisin being King 6. A Feme Covert Alien purchaseth the Husband is made King and Office is found 7. A Feme Covert purchaseth the Husband is made King if he can waive Points upon the Statute 1. IF one born in the Isle of Man is within the Statute 2. If Adventuring to Virginia is Merchandizing 3. If an Inn-keeper be within the Statute 4. If going to the Isle of Man be a Departing 5. If keeping of a Castle be a keeping of his House The Second Division Who shall be said a Subject born of this Realm or of any of the late Queens Dominions or Denizen 1. A. and B. Disseise C. who in consideration that A. at his request hath
the Lord and a stranger the Lord disagrees the stranger shall have all 20 E. 4. Fitz. Nuper obiit 14. If the Defendant in a Nuper obiit disclaim in the Blood the other Coparcener shall have all by descent and a Mordancester of all 22 H. 6.44 A Precipe against two if one disclaim all vests in the other So here in as much as the use passed by the contract if one of them will waive that contract and take himself to another bargain then the first contract will stand good for all to the other and the Inrollment for all shall relate to the use of the other and shall be paramount to the fine and destroy the Conveyance by the fine as it is in Pophams Case 5 Eliz. 2. But then comes in the next question this fine was but of part of the thing bargained and sold and therefore it will not destroy the contract for all but only for part that is for a Moiety of the services I take it that this contract being entire being destroyed in part is void for all Qui partem individui facit nihil facit I will example it with other Cases 34 H. 6.21 It is a good plea in an action of debt for rent that the Lessor entered before the day of payment for the contract was entire and therefore the rent not apportionable 22 Ass 53. Lease for life rendring rent for Land part in Franchises and part in Guildable in an Assise brought at Common Law for the rent Conizance shall not be granted for the rent is entire and the Kings Court shall be preferred contrary to Thorp as it is in 46 E. 3.8 But if the Land is in question conizance shall be granted for so much as lies in Franchises 9 E. 4.1 One is to lease a Chamber and find the Lessee his board for 6 s. a Week in an Action of Debt for the Money non demisit cameram is a good Plea for destroy the contract in part it is destroyed in all for it is entire 30 H. 8 Litle Broke I sell my Horse and another man 's for 20 l. to be paid at a day to come and before the day the other man recovers his Horse against the Vendee yet the Vendor shall have an action for all the money So here the Consideration of the money raises the use that 's an entire Sum and if you will have that the Demeasnes shall pass by the contract for the use and the services or part of the services shall pass by the grant what a confusion would that be and how much of the Consideration went for the one and what for the other I might that way maintain my conclusion that the whole Mannor passes to D. 9 E. 4. Choke A Mannor consists of Demeasnes and Services sever them and the Mannor is destroyed and in Sr. Rol. Heiwards Case none shall take by fraction of Estates 3. The third question being that the Husband purchases Lands by Bargain and Sale to him and his Wife and before the Deed is inrolled the Husband takes a Fine or a Feoffment of the Land to him and his heirs and then the Deed is inrolled what shall the Wife have and I say as I said she shall have nothing 3 H. 7.9 It is plain that if Lands be conveyed to a Feme Covert if her Husband disagree the Feofment made to her is made void and it shall return to the Feoffer But if a Feofment be made to I. S. and a Feme Covert and her Husband disagrees all vests in I. S. Rutland's Case li. 5. Cook is that the Husband by Indenture limits Lands to the use of his Wife but before the fine levyed by other Indentures he limited the same to other uses so in that case before the assurance is perfected the Husband by whose means and bargain making this use was to rise to the Wife before this Assurance finished makes a new bargain for himself and the Wife if he disagree can take nothing Kenn's C. Cook lib. 7. It is the Husband hath the power to contract for the use although it be of the Wives Lands 4. The next matter that I intend a question upon the Statute of Inrollments is supposing this Land is held in Capite Lands held in Capite are bargained and sold to a man and before the deed is inrolled the Bargainee dies his heir within age whether here be such a dying seised and a descent as his Son shall be in ward and I think it is There be divers Cases where the heir shall be in ward and yet the Ancestour dyed not seised 48 E. 3.8 If there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant is disseised and dies his heirs within age the Lord may seise c. 20 H. 6. Tenant in tail aliens and dies his heir within age his heir shall be in Ward to the Donor 33 H. 6.5 Tenant for life the remainder in fee he in remainder dies his heir shall not be in ward for the remainder but if the Tenant for life die then by matter ex post facto he shall be 11 H. 4.61 By Hank and Norton If the heir recover in a writ of ayel on Cocinage he shall be in Ward If the Father lose by error or false verdict If the Son reverse the Judgment by error or attaint he shall be in ward If the Father recover and dies before entry or execution and the Son sue execution he shall be in guard Points upon the Statute Swinburn Fol. 175. I will that my villain be manumitted when my Son comes to age my Son dies before the age the villain shall be at Liberty when the Son would have been of age D. Enters and manumits a villain The Question is a man hath a Mannor to which be villains regardant he becomes a Bankrupt manumits the the villain Commission is agarded if the Commissioners may sell the villain and I have concluded they cannot For the villain being once at liberty in this case is infranchised for ever I grant that in divers cases a villain may be infranchised pro tempore and yet be a villain again 13 E. 4.2 As if Tenant in tail will enfeof his villain of the Mannor the issue shall have a Formedon and reduce both the Mannor and the villain 33 H. 6.13 Enfranchment by Tenant for years or for life is good but for their time And it is much controverted whether if a nieff marry a Freeman she be not for ever enfranchised Old Nat. Brevi fol. 6. If her Husband die she shall be a nieff again 33 E. 3. Statham Vil. She shall be neiff again even to her own Son when her Lord and Husband dies But as the Law saith there is nothing more respected than life and liberty So I am of opinion and I have authority for it that if she be once married either to her Lord or another Freeman she is at liberty for ever 31 E. 1. Fitz. vill 46. It is first questioned and some there are of
have but the use and profits of them under the King so it is said all Gaoles are the Kings Prisons and none others of the Land for life and member belongs to him only and the Lords have only the regard and that is the reason that in all Corporations in their Charters they always have a Grant and liberty to have a Prison Auditors by the Statute of W. 2. cap. 11. may send the Baily found in Arrearages to Prison by the Book it must be to the next Gaol though it be in another County otherwise an Action of false Imprisonment lies So our Commissioners must be careful to pursue their Commission but because the Statute saith they may dispose of his body at their discretions therefore to stay him in his own House or in one of theirs till he be further examined I think it not amiss although I have heard that some Commissioners have been blamed for not sending him to the Gaol 1. A. makes a Feoffment in Fee to B. by livery within the view B. Covenants with C. to stand seised to the use of D. his Son A. enters and makes a Feoffment to B. D. enters and makes a Lease for years to E. a Merchant upon condition to have in Fee E. is a Bankrupt C. disagrees to the Contract E. becomes a Recusant Convict and hath not Lands sufficient to pay 20 l. a Month the Commissioners sell the Land the King seizes the Term the condition is performed The Vendee shall have the fee-simple Points 1. IF livery within the view may be countermanded by livery in fact 2. If the Feoffee to whom livery is made within view before entry Covenants to stand seized to another use and after enters if the Covenant good that is if by his entry he by relation is in from the time of the Livery 3. If a covenants with B. to stand seised to the use of C. and C. enters and B. disagrees to the Covenant if the Land shall revert to A. 4. If a Bankrupt hath a Lease for years upon condition to have fee if the Commissioners may sell the Land with the possibility 5. A Bankrupt hath a Term and is a Recusant convict if the King or the Creditors shall have the Term 2. The King Lord Mesn and Tenant of Borough English Land the Tenant by License of the King to create Tenures devises the Land to A. in fee to hold of his Heirs by Knights service A. is attainted of Felony and devises the Land to his eldest Son a Merchant Bankrupt the Mesn enters the younger Son reverses the Attainder the eldest waives the Devise The Commissioners may sell all the Land Points 1. IF the King may grant to the Tenant of another to create new Tenures in prejudice of the Mesn as to Escheats 2. If Tenure in Borough English which is always Soccage may be altered into Tenure in Knights service 3. If it may be altered as to the Custom to descend to the youngest 4. If it may be altered as to the Tenure but not as to the Custom if the youngest Son shall be in Ward 5. Upon the Statute of Wills 32 H. 8. Lord and Tenant the Tenant is attainted and Devises his Land and dies the Heir reverses the Attainder before entry of the Lord if the Devise is good 6. One Devises Land to a Merchant and he becomes a Bankrupt and waives the Devise if the Commissioners may sell the Land 3. A Merchant makes a Lease for Life to an Infant the remainder to the King for Life of A. B. enters and dies seised the Deed is Inrolled A. dies the Infant enters the Lessor in consideration of marriage covenants to stand seised to the use of himself and his Wife and their Heirs the Infant at full age makes a Feoffment the Heir of the Disseisor enters the Lessor is a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell Lessor dies the Feme waives This is a good Sale of all the Land in Possession and Reversion Points 1. WHether the Inrollment doth not relate to avoid the descent 2. Whether the Entry of the Infant reduce the reversion 3. Whether the Sale not being good against the Wife is made good by her waiver Vide ante the Principal Case 5. One grants a Rent Charge to a Physician and his Heirs pro Consilio impenso impendendo the Physician is his own Apothecary and becomes non solvent for Drugs and Simples which he used in his Art a Commission is awarded the Physician keeps his House for fear of Arrests the Physician brings a Writ of Annuity and recovers by erroneous Judgement the Commissioners sell the Rent the Recoveree reverseth the Judgment the Physician dies This Sale of the Commissioners was good for this Rent but not to take effect during the Life of the Physician Points 1. IF an Annuity in Fee be granted pro Consilio may be sold 2. Whether he have any Election after he is Bankrupt 3. Whether the bringing of this Annuity which is reversed be an Election 6. One makes a Gift in Tail rendring Rent and dies the Rent is arrear a Disseisor enters and levies a Fine five years past the Heir of the Donor is a Bankrupt The Commissioners shall sell the Rent and the Arrearages Three Points upon the Statute 1. UPon the Statute of Fines the Second and Third upon the Statutes of Limitations and Bankrupts 1. Upon the Statute of Fines that is if Fines of the Land shall be a Bar for the Rent 2. And 3. Upon the Statute of Limitations If Commissioners may sell when the Party was concluded by the Statute of Limitations 6 Jacobi Banco Regis Executors notwithstanding no Seisin in their Testator by fifty years shall destrain by the the Statute of 32 H. 8. 7. A. and B. Tenants in Common of the Mannor of D. and Jointenants of the Mannor of S. They by Deed Poll bargain and sell Common of Pasture within the Mannors for a Cow to C. and his Wife and to the Heirs of their two bodies begotten C. the Husband grants the Common to E. in Fee the Wife dies without issue E. is a Bankrupt E. had Common for a Cow but it is neither Land Tenement nor Hereditament which may be sold by the Commissioners 8. The King grants to I. S. that he only for his life shall have the Importation of Steel he assigns his Patent to I. N. a Merchant I. N. becomes non solvent and after acknowledges himself to be a Villain regardent to the Honour of Hampton-Court a Commission is awarded I. N. Is a Bankrupt and the Commissioners may sell all his Lands and Goods but not the Monopoly 9. A. and B. Jointenants Covenant for natural affection to stand seised to the use of C. for life C. enters and B. dies C. dies the Heir of B. makes a Gift in Mortmain the Lord before entry bargains and sells the Seigniory to I. S. who enters and makes a Gift in Tail the remainder to I. N. a Merchant Tenant in Tail is
Commissioners may sell then there is their Authority the Vendee shall compound that is a second action which must be done if it may be done Hillary 38 Eliz. A Grant was made to the Mayor and Commonalty of London that the Mayor should have the search c. of all Handicrafts and should punish them but granted no Court where the same should be punished this was good for to search and to discover but void for him to punish but it must be punished as it may be otherwise The Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 13. of Highways saith Who comes not at the common days shall forfeit and orders that the offence shall be presented at the next Sessions c. Upon pain of Forty Shillings no Certificate is made yet the offence shall be punished 3. But now we are upon the point of Fines a question rises in this Case whether two Fines or but one or no Fine be due to the Lord and I think a Fine is due Plainly two Fines should have been paid one to the Lord of the Mannor upon the surrender of A. to C. and another upon the sale by the Commissioners as it is in the 4th Report fo 22. the heir surrenders before admittance the Lord shall have two Fines But in Hubbard and Hammond's Case it is said no Fine is due to the Lord before admittance for the admittance is the cause of the Fine and if after admittance it be denied it is a forfeiture But I take it in this case the Lord shall have no Fines for the Statute must have a reasonable construction and indeed for all parties according to equity and in all Statutes where the ordering of things is referred to mens discretions equity and good Conscience ought to respected and therefore it is said 3 E. 3. An accompt ought to be amended by the Auditors according to equity and good faith But what remedy hath the Lord for it 4. But here a Fine is tendered and refused now the question is double 1. What remedy generally 2. Whether it be lost for ever or not For the first if it had been in a case that the Lord could have admitted him he should have had the ordinary remedy as all Lords have for their Fines that is upon presentment of a Surrender or of the death of a Tenant or of sale by Commissioners the order is to call the Party that should be admitted and if he come not in time to seize his Land But here can be no Calling for here 's no Court Surely I think as the Vendee may enter without admittance so the Lord may enter again upon him and seize the Land till his Fines be paid but these Fines have been tendred and refused We see that tender and refusal in many cases is peremptory as Littleton in case of Mortgage 27 E. 3.88 Un distr pur dam. fesant si avoyde the Tenant pleaded that before the taking at the taking and after the taking he tendered sufficient amends and the Avowant refused he hath lost his damages and shall pay damages c. 22 Hen. 6.44 A Man is bound in an Obligation to stand to the award of J. S. he awards that the one shall release the other who tenders a release the other refuses in Action of Debt sur le ob tender and refusal is a good plea sans dira uncor Prist But yet in the same case it is put That if Money had been awarded and tendered and refused the Bond had been saved but the duty had remained 45 E. 3.9 The Lord destrains the Tenant tenders the Lord refuses yet the Rent is not lost but at another time the Lord may distrain Brian If the Tenant tender his homage and the Lord refuse he cannot destrain but upon a request if the Tenant refuse he may destrain So here the Tenant tenders his Fine the Lord refuses I take it the Fine is not lost but after a new request the Lord may seize 5. The last point upon my Statute is a Bankrupt purchases a Copyhold and the Tenant surrenders into two Tenants hands to the use of the Bankrupt and now he will not be admitted whether the Commissioners shall sell the Copyhold And I think they shall by the very words of the Statute which are That the Commissioners shall sell all Lands which the Bankrupt shall purchase with any other Persons of trust or to his secret use If then they may sell Lands wherein he hath secret use much more Lands wherein he hath an express use And in this Case if his negligence to pray to be admitted or his absence beyond Sea shall hinder the present Sale and he die his heir may be admitted after his decease And then a greater Question will rise Whether the Land may be sold or not 2. A Copyholder of Inheritance where the Custom is that the Wife shall be indowed surrenders into the hands of two Tenants to the use of the Mayor and Commonalty of D. in Fee and dies the Wife marries with I. S. a Merchant the Mayor and Commonalty are admitted the Heir of the Copyholder enters I. S. and his Wife affirm a Plaint in the Lords Court in nature of a Writ of Dower and recover against the Heir the Mayor and Commonalty enter I. S. and his Wife sue a Precept in nature of a Scire facias against the Mayor and Commonalty for to have a a Writ De Dote assignanda and damages I. S. becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell the Copyhold and assign the damages which shall be recovered the Vendee compounds with the Lord. This is a good sale for a third part of the Copy-hold during the Coverture and a good Composition but the Assignment of the Damages is void 3. A. Is Tenant in Tail of a Mannor where the Custom is that the Wife of a Copyholder shall have a Widow's Estate A. grants white Acre to B. by Copy for life and after he makes a Lease of white Acre for life to F. the Wife of B. dies A. makes a Feoffment of the Mannor to G. and all the Tenants attorn A. dies B. takes a second Wife and dies the Issue in Tail enters into the Mannor the second Wife takes M. to Husband who becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell white Acre the Vendee compounds with the Issue in Tail and enters F. dies The Sale is good during Coverture and the Composition is good 4. Baron and Feme have issue A. a Daughter the Baron dies the Mannor of Sale is given to the Feme for life the remainder to the Heirs of the Baron and Feme A Copyholder surrenders to the use of himself in Tail the remainder to A. in Fee the Feme takes a second Husband and hath issue B. another Daughter and dies A. enters the Copyholder suffers a customary recovery and dies without issue his Heir being a Merchant and Bankrupt B. enters the Commissioners sell the Copyhold the Vendee compounds with B. The Sale is good but the Composition
is good but for a fourth part 1. A. Shall have a Moiety as Heir of the Husband and the Moiety of the other Moiety as Heir of the Feme and B. the residue 2. If Tenant by Copy by Recovery may bar the Remainder 3. If when the Lord is in Remainder it be not so annexed to the Fee that it cannot be pulled out by a Recovery 5. The Mannor of D. is holden of the Mannor of S. by Copy and I. S. holds a House and Land Common for ten Cows of the Mannor of D. by Copy in Fee The Lord of D. surrenders his Mannor to the use of I. S. for life who is admitted accordingly I. S. grants the Common by Copy to A. a Merchant A. is admitted and is a Bankrupt I. S. dies the Lord of D. enters the Commissioners sell the Common the Vendee compounds with the Executors of I. S. The Common cannot be sold and if it might the Composition shall be with the Lord of D. 6. Tenant by Copy is disseised and the Disseisor is admitted Tenant by the Lord the Lord bargains and sells the Mannor to I. S. in Fee by Deed inroll'd the Disseisee becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell the Copyhold the Vendee compounds with the Bargainer This is a good Sale and a good Composition 1. If Tenant by Copy may be disseised or ousted and this shall be no disseisin to the Lord 2. If the Lord by the admittance of the Disseisor hath dispensed with the disseisin in part and so he may apportion his own wrong 7. A. disseises B. of the Mannor of S. and dies seized C. the Son of A. enters a Copyhold escheats D. enters and disseises C. and Leases the Mannor for years to E. who grants the Copy to F. in Fee F. dies his Heir is sworn of the Homage and becomes a Bankrupt D. dies B. enters the Commissioners sell the Copyhold the Vendee compounds with B. and is admitted the Heir of D. recovers in a Mortdauncester C. recovers in Entry sur disseisin and B. recovers against him in a Writ of Right The Sale is good and the Composition good 8. A. and B. joynt-Tenants in Fee of a Mannor they grant white Acre to I. S. for life by Copy A. enters into Religion at Roan B. makes a Lease for years of the Acre to C. to whom I. S. surrenders B. dies A. is deraigned C. surrenders to A. I. S. becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell the Copyhold the Vendee compounds with A. the Heir of B. enters This is a good Sale and a good Composition for a Moiety 9. Six Copyholds escheat the Lord grants them to A. a Merchant indebted and after the Lord makes a Feoffment of the Freehold of the Copy-hold to B. C. and D. the Merchant gives over Trading B. disseises C. and D. the Merchant continues his debt by Interest seven years pass C. and D. recover against B. and have judgment to hold in severalty C. and D. make partition the Merchant renues his Bonds with the Creditors and keeps his House the Commissioners sell the Copy-holds the Vendee compounds with B. C. and D. severally admitted The Sale is not good because the Merchant is no Bankrupt but if it were good the Composition was good and B. C. and D. have three Customary Mannors The Sixth Division What Fees Annuities Officers Goods Chattels Wares Merchandizes and Debts of a Bankrupt may be sold by the Commissioners 1. BEfore Quia Emptores one makes a Feoffment in Fee rendring Rent to be holden by Foreign service and a Tenant dies and his Heir dies before entry and a Stranger abates the Lord becomes a Bankrupt the Heir recovers in Mortdauncester the Commissioners sell all the Debts of the Lord. The Vendee shall have two actions of Debt for two several Reliefs 1. If the Heir shall pay Relief when his Ancestor had but a Possession in Law he shall Kelloway 173 6 H. 8. 2. If Debt lies against the Heir for relief due after the death of his Grandfather 13 E. 3. Relief 6. A distress lies 3. If Fee-farm made before Quia Emptores shall pay Relief 45 E. 3. fol. 15. now it shall not 4. If Tenant in Knights Service shall pay Relief Kelloway 5. If the Heir shall pay relief for Land which he had by recovery 6. Debt lies for relief by the Lord himself 23 H. 8. Brook It lies for his Executors 7. If relief is such a debt or duty which the Commissioners may sell 2. A. Tenant of two Acres herriotable covenants to stand seized to the use of himself for life the remainder to his Son in Fee with clause of revocation and for money paid he bargains one Acre to B. B. dies the Lord seizes a Herriot the Heir of B. re-enfeoffs A. A. revokes the first Deed the Lord is a Bankrupt A. dies the Commissioners sell all the Lords Goods to C. C. takes relief of the Heir of A. C. Shall have detinue for two Herriots against the Executors of A. 1. If two Herriots or but one are due notwithstanding the repurchase 34 E. 3. Herriot 1.2 They are due 2. If the power of revocation be not gone notwithstanding the repurchase 3. If acceptance of relief of the heir may be pleaded by the Executors in an action against them for the Herriot 26 E. 1. H. 6. Quaere 4. If detinue lies for a Herriot-Custom 6 E. 3.29 R. 2. Herriot 4. and 5. the Lord may seize it in all the goods 5. If the property of the Herriot is so vested in the Lord before seizure that the Commissioners may sell it 3. The King grants the Office of Aulnage of London to a Merchant stranger for years with a Fee of 20. l. per annum who assigns it to a Merchant Denizen indebted who discontinues his Trade of Merchandize and lives by his Office and enters into Recognizances for his debts and makes I. S. dis deputy and is made Steward of the Tower of London the Recognizances are forfeited and he keeps himself in the Tower Office is found The Commissioners shall neither sell the Office nor the Fee 1. If the Lease be good because no Office of trust or confidence 2. If discontinuance of Merchandize is an exemption from the Statute when the Creditors have taken new assurances 3. If the Steward of the Tower is not sole Judge there by Prescription 4. A Feme sole Alien grants to A. a Scottish Merchant the Office to be the master of her horse with a Fee of 20. l. per annum for his life she takes a Husband who is made King of England who by his Letters Patents grants the Mastership of the Queens Horse to I. S. with a Pension out of the Exchequer the Scot becomes a Bankrupt The Commissioners shall not sell his Office but they may sell his Fee and the Vendee shall have an Annuity for it against the Queen 5. A Resiant is injoyned in the Leet to reform a publique nusans by him made before such
or Coroner be granted to one it cannot be granted over for such an Officer ought immediately to attend on the King without any mean for the office of a Sheriff as Sir John Davies saith well c. for life and I am of opinion that if this grant had been made before primo of E. 3. it had been a Tenure by grand Serjanty for then the Tenant could not alien without license upon pain of forfeiture But now it is otherwise so as I am of opinion that this grant being now made and in fee it was a tenure by grand Serjeancy for life in the first Patentee and his Patent was his Commission But when he doth alien or die it will be a soccage in Capite And yet if it should turn to be a Tenure by Knights service in Capite yet I shall maintain the case at latter end that the Commissioners may sell the land notwithstanding that the heir of the Bankrupt is within age and in Ward 2. A Bargain and Sale to Baron and Feme and a stranger and before inrollment they are divorced the Question is how they shall take as three several Jointenants or each shall have a third part or whether the husband and wife shall be jointenants for either of them a quarter part and the stranger a jointenant with them for a half part 35 Ass 15. It is plain that if one make a feofment to the husband and wife and a third person the Husband and Wife as one person take the one Moiety and th' other person the other Moiety vide Librum 7 H. 4. fol. 17. That they that be divorced the divorce will change and alter their estates as if Lands be given in tayl speciall to an Husband and Wife and then they are divorced the estate tayl is turned to a freehold and they are made jointenants by dividable Moieties whereas before they held by intireties and yet if they marry afterwards again they are Tenants in tayl again 3. 39 H. 6.43 The difference is taken between a feoffment before coverture and after for if it be before and then they intermarry if the Husband alien all and die the Feme shall have a Cui in vita but for a Moiety contrary if it be after marriage Copledikes Case 3. rep Baron and Feme jointenants the Baron suffers a recovery of all and dies it shall be good for nothing against the Wife But there have been many Questions raised how they shall take when a Conveyance is commenced before coverture and finished after or as our Case is when the Conveyance is commenced during coverture and finished after Divorce as if a reversion be granted to a man and Feme sole and they intermarry and the tenant attorns they shall take by entireties because by the Book of 48 E. 3. The Attornment shall not relate and yet if a Feoffment of a Mannor be made to a man Feme sole and they intermarry and then the Tenants attorn they shall be in of the whole Mannor by Moieties because in that case the Attornment will relate as it is proved by Longes Case which was Pa. 31 Eliz. Rot. 20 24. One made a Feoffment of a Mannor to which an Advowson was appendent the Church became void and the Tenants attorned it was adjudged that in this case the Attornment should relate and that the Feoffee not the Feoffer should present But in our Case here be two relations together the Relation of the Divorce and Relation of the Inrollment I have shewed that the Relation of the Divorce shall change their Estates and the Relation of the Inrollment will give it them as they were to take at the time of the ensealing of the Indent 6 E. 6. Bro. 6 E. 6. two Jointenants and one Bargains and sells all the Land and before Inrollment the other dies yet no more shall pass than the Party had at the time of the ensealing of the Deed. Surely the Deed relates to make them in by Intireties and the Divorce to make them Jointenants but shall this Relation of the Divorce change or alter the Estate of the third person And I take it this nothing at all concerns the Stranger nor shall it alter his Estate but it shall be as a matter of estopel binding the Baron and Feme but not to be respected of estrangers and this is proved by the writ of Cui ante divorcium for there the Feoffment of the Husband stood as a discontinuance till it was defeated Lex non oberit tertio extraneo prodesse alteri nemo tenetur sed obesse vetatur 48 E. 3.38 Tenant for Life the remainder for Life the remainder in Fee the first Tenant for life makes waste he in remainder in fee releases to him in remainder for life this shall not make him who was the first Tenant for life to be punishable in waste 43 E. 3.17 An appeal is brought against two as Principals and an exigent is awarded now the King is interested in their Goods they appear the Plantiff declares against one of them as principal and against the other as accessary the second desires to have restitution of his Goods he shall not for alteration of the plaint by and between the Plantiff and Defendant shall not by relation of any matter ex post facto prejudice the King or a third parties interest But before this Divorce A. grants the services to I. S. a Tenant to B. the Husband here ariseth three Questions at once 1. If one bargain to two and afterwards levies a Fine or Feoffment to one of them whether it be not such a disagreement to the former Contract as by that bargain the other shall have all and the Feoffee nothing and I think the other shall have all and the Feoffee or Conizee nothing 2. Whether if one bargain for a Mannor and before Inrollment the Bargainor grants by Fine or Feoffment parcel of the Mannor to the Vendee whether this destroys not the bargain for all It doth 3. There is Husband and wife and the Husband purchases by bargain and sale to him and his Wife and their Heirs and before Inrollment the Husband takes a Fine or a Feoffment of all and then the Deed is inrolled what shall the Wife have I think she shall have nothing For the first and for all these questions we must agree upon this ground which is set down in Hinds Ca. Coke li. 4. That if a man buy Lands by bargain and sale and before Inrollment he accepts of a Fine or a Feoffment he is in by the fine and the Inrollment is of no force The next rule is That if Lands be conveyed to two and the one will disagree in Court of Record or disclaim in the tenancy all vests in the other 17 E. 3. fo 6. a Placito 18. A gift in tail was made to the Husband and Wife and they had issue and the Baron died the Wife disagreed all descended to the issue 10 E. 4. fol. 13. The Tenant infeoffs
but a Term passed then in whom was it till I. S. was made King in right of the Woman and that it shall remain no otherwise than a Man that hath a Term in the right of his Wife and is made King she shall have all her Inheritance and all her Terms no otherwise than if he were Dead 3 H. 7.14 The Queen and her Sisters were vouched as Heirs to E. the 4. A Baron and Feme Alien a Feoffment is made to the Feme the Baron is made King if upon Office found the King shall have the Land He shall not have it For the Baron being made King she is made a Denizen by relation to the Marriage which was to prevent the relation of the Office no otherwise than H. 7. being made K. it had such relation that it drowned all former Offences Forfeitures and Attainders whatsoever 7 E. 4.31 The King grants a Farm to the Baily and Commonalty of S. they are made Farmers and a Corporation 2 H. 7. A Lord infeoffes his Villain he hath the Land and his Freedom Grondon's Case Commentaries the King grants Land to a Corporation this is a Grant and a Licence in Mortmain Coke lib. 5.15 Tenant for Life grants a Rent charge to him in the reversion and his Heirs who grants it to one and his Heirs this is a grant and a confirmation A Disseisor makes a Lease for Life the remainder to the Disseisee the Disseisee grants this remainder over this is a grant and a confirmation A Parson makes a Lease to the Patron who grants it over this is an Assignment and a Confirmation A Feoffment is made to Baron and Feme the Baron is made King if the Feme can waive 1. Whether she can waive or not as a Feme may after death of her Husband 2. In whom it shall vest 3. How the release should work then 4. Whether a Feme Convert Disseisor can waive She may no otherwise than if the Baron were Dead for she shall have all her own Land and all her own Leases but not her Goods And it is not of necessity that she expect his Death for if a Feoffment be made to Baron and Feme and they are Divorced the Feme may waive In whom it shall vest Whether in the King or not because in a sort here was a partition But the question will be upon the release whether that shall relate to extinguish all the right of the Disseisee in all the Land as if the Case were Disseisor makes a Feoffment to Baron and Feme and I. S. the Baron and I. S. make partition the Disseisee releases to I. S. this inures only upon his possession for the half the Baron dies and the Feme waives I. S. hath all by Survivour yet shall not the release go to all Also by the waiver it cannot go to the King for that were to make him a Disseisor by the waiver it cannot return to the Lessee contrary to his Livery nor to the Lessor then will not this amount to an occupancy But in this Case the Queen cannot waive but still in regard of the Lessor she remains a Disseisor for if a Feme Covert be a Disseisor and her Husband die she shall not waive the possession for so for years and days she might take the profits and yet in the end pay nothing which were unjust 41 E. 3. An Infant may be a Disseisor and cannot waive a descent It may be probably alledged that she might waive for being a Feme Covert she may alledge ignorance of the matter of fact that is whether her Feoffer had but an Estate for years or was seised in Fee-simple and we find in our Books that great wrongs have been excused by the ignorance of a Man in what wrong he did and waiving the thing wrongfully taken As 22. Ass 85. vid. lib. faux imprison Heire son frere prise per Scots 7 H. 6.27 One brought an Action of Trespass for taking his Swans the Defendant pleaded that he was Lord of such a Mannor and that in a River within his Mannor he found the Swans and took them for strays but after he had notice whose they were he waived the possession of them and let them go this was a good excuse both of the Trespass and Damage 21 H. 6.14 One brings Trespass Quare filium suum rapuit c. He answered you married my Sister and had by her this Son and you being out of the Country it was reported you were Dead whereupon I as next kin to your Son seized him but when I heard you were alive I sent him home again to his Nurse Thus rightly did he waive and avoid his wrong for want of true intelligence which in Law we call Notice But in all those Cases these wrongs were with intents to do right and the parties were of opinion they were in the right but our case is of a Disseisor which is always intended a wrong-doer But you will say this Woman is no Disseisor at Common Law her entry was not malum per se but malum prohibitum a Statute Disseisor and she being a Feme Covert is not bound by Statute But I say she is bound by the Statute for in all Statutes where a Feme Covert is not expresly excepted she is bound as the Statute of 13 H. 6. Disseisin 1. per Martin Baron and Feme may both be Disseisors 35. Ass 5. Baron and Feme Disseisors Assise against the Baron sole abated 15 E. 4.15 Disseisin is made to anothers use the Disseisor is Tenant untill agreement 21 E. 4.53 Tenant is issuing out of Land of the Wife the Husband and Wife make a Rescous they are both Disseisors That as I have argued the Lessor enters his entry is congeable for a Moiety that is the Queen's part Tenant in tail makes a Feoffment to a Feme Covert without Licence the Husband dies the Feme waives Points upon the Statute AN Adventurer into Virginia is not within the Statute for although from time to time we send Trifles thither to exchange with the Savages yet the main drift and cause of our Traffick thither is for Plantation and Discovery and not for Merchandizing I hold the same of Greenland but not of Muscovia 2. He that is an Inn-keeper is within the Statute for he buys and sells again retail Ireland's Case in Smithfield 3. He was born in the Isle of Man the Statute is born within her Majesties Dominions or Denizen and I should have made small question but that one born within the Isle of Man is born in her Majesties Dominions if it were not for the Book of 11. H. 8. Kell fol. 202. It was found by an Office that the Earl of Derby dyed seised of the Isle of Man the Countess came and prayed to be endowed to whom Brudnell ex assensu Brook Fitz. Herbert and all the Kings Counsel said That the Office was void because the Isle of Man is not parcel of the Realm but the Isle
married B. being a poor Maid releases to A. and his Heirs to the use of B. and his Heirs Females of his Body they have Issue a Son and a Daughter B. dies the Daughter makes a Lease to C. for one and twenty years rendring the ancient Rent and dies having Issue E. a sole Merchant born upon the Coast of Flanders and is married to F. a Citizen of London born in the Port of Deep A. makes a Feoffment to F. who is outlawed for Debt The Feme is a Bankrupt within this Division and the Land shall be sold but subject to the Lease made to C. 2. One hath a House of Gavelkind and purchases Estovers to this House out of Land in Borough English and dies having two Elder Brothers they make partition of the House the Younger is Executed for Felony the Lord enters into a Moiety the Elder Brother born in Virginia and using to give Gold for Silver contrary to the Statute and for that is condemned in 100 l. in an Action upon the Statute at the sute of the Informer and the King and remains in Execution at the King's sute for six Months the Informer and I. S. a Creditor sue forth a Commission The Elder Brother is a Bankrupt within this Division but no part of the Land shall be sold by this Commission 3. The Lessor when the King was absent in Scotland enters upon the Lessee for life and die seised his Heir for Money paid by a Merchant Naturalized makes a Feoffment to him and to a Feme sole an Alien the Merchant and the Feme inter marry the Lessee and the Stranger make Livery by Letter of Attorney the Baron is made Church-warden and being non-solvent keeps the Church Office is found The Baron is a Bankrupt within this Division and all the Land shall be sold 4. White-Acre is given to A. and B. Baron and Feme and to the Heirs of the Baron for the Joynture of the Feme a Disseisor enters and levies a Fine to C. who marries D. an Alien A. dies five years pass D. is sole Merchant and made Denizen upon condition that she shall not depart the Realm without her Husband's leave B. brings Dower of Black-Acre the Heir of A. enters into White-Acre D. being non-solvent Elopes into Scotland C. enters The Feme is a Bankrupt within the Statute and White-Acre shall be sold 5. A Tenant for life and B. an Infant in reversion born in Greenland they levie a fine to C. B. uses his stock in the Muscovia Company and reverses the fine A. surrenders to the King by Deed B. being of full age and indebted to the Company procures himself to be arrested and after he grants the reversion to the King by Deed inrolled and after the first Deed is inrolled the Company sues a Commission B. is a Bankrupt within the Statute and the Commission is well awarded and the Land shall be sold 6. A. and B. a Merchant-Stranger enter upon C. the Heir of a Disseisor B. is made Denizen for seven years the Disseisee releases to A. who makes a Lease for years rendring Rent upon condition to re-enter for non-payment the Heir releases to B. the Land is extended for the Debt of A. B. is non solvent the extender enters for non-payment B. keeps his House seven years pass Office is found A. dies B. is a Bankrupt within this Division and the Land shall be sold subject to the Lease but not to the Extent 7. A Lord hath the Goods of Outlaws within his Mannor and M. his Tenant who was born in Gernsey is a Meal-man and outlawed and for redemption of his Goods enters into an Obligation to the Lord to pay 100 li. B. recovers 10 li. against him for Battery the Lord leases to him a Wind-mill M. reverses the Outlawry and being in Debt to a Scotch-man an Irish man and a Dutch man for Corn before his day of payment ceases to be a Meal-man and becomes a Miller and being non-solvent keeps himself in the Mill. He is a Bankrupt within the Statute but the Debts are not remedied by this Statute 8. An Accountant to the King hath a Seigniory and dies his Son being a Merchant and born upon the River of Canada releases to the Tenant all the services for the life of the Tenant who dies without Heir a Stranger abates the Son being non solvent goes to Barmudas a Commission is awarded for the King upon the Statute of 39 Eliz. cap. 7. and another Commission is upon the Statute of Bankrupts the Commissioners for the King sell the Tenancy to A. the Commissioners of Bankrupts sell the Seigniory to B. The Son is a Bankrupt within this Statute and B. shall recover the Land against the abator by Writ of Escheat 9. A. makes a Lease of years to B. a Merchant-Stranger Denizen of Ireland upon condition to have for life if he pay 10 li. at M. and to have in fee if he repair a High-way before Christmas rendring Rent upon condition to re-enter for non-payment the first condition is performed B. being non-solvent returns to Ireland and there stays in his House the Rent is due at the Feast of All Saints and is demanded and Arrear B. performs the second condition B. is a Denizen within the intent of this Statute but the King shall have the Land during his life Vpon the Second Division The Points of the First Case 1. IF one may release to one to the use of another 2. Two Disseisors are and they intermarry and the Disseisee releases to the Husband to the use of the Wife in tail where the Fee-simple is 3. If Marriage of a poor Maid be a good consideration to raise an use to the Maid or to A. 4. Lands are given to a Feme Covert and to her Heirs Females in tail she takes Husband hath Issue a Son and a Daughter if the Husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie 5. If the Issue in tail in the life of Tenant by the Courtesie makes a present Lease if this shall be good against the Issue of the Issue after the death of Tenant by the Courtesie Points upon the Statute 1. IF a Feme Covert sole Merchant be within the Statute 2. If the Husband of such a Feme by her Bankrupting shall be also a Bankrupt 3. If the Outlawry of the Husband for the Wives debt shall make the one or the other or both Bankrupts 4. If the Lands or Goods of the Husband shall be sold for the Debts of the Wife 5. If the inheritance of the Wife shall be sold 6. If one born upon the Coast of Flanders is born out or within the King's Dominions 7. If one born in the Port of Diep is born within the King's Dominions 8. If the Wife of an Alien sole Merchant be within the Statute 9. If a Wife Alien and the Husband English be within the Statute 10. If the Estate of Tenant in tail a Bankrupt shall be sold 11. If by Entry of the
Commissioners and Sale the Vendee shall avoid a Lease which Tenant in tail a Bankrupt might have avoided 1. If one may release to the use of another or if an use can be raised upon a release and it may for three reasons A Release may be upon condition for there the case was put in Libro and consequently to an use But by 43 Ass 12. the condition and the release ought to be both in one Deed. 17 Ass 2. 31 Ass 32. 2. Secondly it is a good proof that a release to a Disseisor may be to an use when a Disselsm may be to an use as 34 Ass 12. 37 Ass 8. 1 H. 5.4 15 E. 4.15 All is in the Disseisor until agreement And 2 H. 7.16 If one disseise another to the use of a third the first is Tenant until agreement but after all is in him to whose use although not to be punished for the force 3. My third Argument is taken out of the Book of 17 E. 3.5 where it is said That if the Disseisee take homage of the Disseisor he shall never have an Assise for now they be Lord and Tenant when at first the Disseisor was in the post and destroyed the Disseisees Estate and held of the Lord Paramount So I hold that if before the Statute of Quia Emptores Terrarum the Disseisee had released to the Disseisor the Disseisor must have held of him although it is true that since that Statute a release of all his right in the Land releases his Seigniory as 34 Ass But Temp. E. 1. Ass 423. In a Writ of Entry in the Post of Disseisin made by A. to the Demandants Grandfather which A. infeoffed the Grandfather of the Tenant the Tenant answered after A. infeoffed my Grandfather your Grandfather confirmed and released to my Grandfather reserving homage and my Grandfather did homage to yours and my Father to your Father c. But he relied upon the Deed a Tenure was reserved upon the confirmation in which Case a release makes a degree See my Moot Book fol. 121. Then if an use may be raised out of the possession of a Disseisor if a condition out of a release and a tenure out of a confirmation by the same reasons an use may be raised or declared by release 2. Two Disseisors and they intermarry it may seem they are mutually and respectively in by title for if the Husband make a Feoffment of his moiety yet he hath title to be Tenant by the Courtesie of her part and she hath title of Dower to his part after the Feoffment which is in severance of the Joynture Kelloway's Case Incerti Temp. fol. 129. This Case is well debated which was A. Feme sole and A. Joynt-Tenants she marries B. A. releases to B. whether this shall inure to the Husband only or to the Wife Keble saith That it shall inure to the Baron sole for before marriage he might have infeoffed the Baron and it is no reason that he should be hindred to convey the Land to none but the Feme by release and by the release he shall be Tenant in Common with himself in right of his Wife But by others the Law is contrary for he might have infeoffed others as well as have released to the Baron also a release to one shall be in many cases to the benefit of another as a Release to Tenant for Life c. 9 Eliz. Dyer 263. This Case seems to make against me Baron and Feme and I. S. were Joynt-Purchasers I. S. released to the Baron nothing went to the Wife but I say that cannot be for the Baron and Feme being seised by intireties the release could not make them hold the Land by several moieties 16 H. 9. Fitz. Herb. Release 45. Nor do I agree that Case for there the Case was that a Woman was Tenant for life and she takes Husband the Lessor releaseth to the Husband and his heirs by Paston he had the reversion for the Free-hold of the Husband was in right of his Wife and the release to him conjoyns that right but I agree well that the Fee-simple shall be in the Husband c. 19 H. 6.35 One makes a Feoffment upon condition that he shall make a Feoffment over if he doth it not the Feoffer may enter but if one makes a Feoffment in Fee upon condition that the Feoffee shall make a gift in tail and he doth it the Feoffee and not the Feoffor shall have the reversion So here 3. If marriage of a poor Maid be a good consideration to raise an use it is good to carry the Fee-simple to the Husband and the intail to the Wife Before the Statute of Quia Emptores Terrarum one might have created a Tenure in performance of a charitable use as to make or repair a Bridge or to keep a Castle 34 H. 8. Brook p. 51. 6 E. 3.13 One holds by three pence to aid the Sheriff and good and another by four pence of the Wapentake Fine and good because for to discharge the publick contribution 12 H. 7.18 Keeping of a Beacon whereby the Country may be warned when the Enemies come 11 H. 7.12 The same for finding a Chaplain chanting in such a place And by the same reason that a Tenure may be created an use may and the same consideration For before Qui Emptores Terrarum If one had made a Feoffment in Fee without declaring an use it was to the use of the Feoffee for the Law created a Tenure which was a sufficient consideration but after no use to the Feoffee but to the Feoffor if neither Tenure created nor use declared and for that a lease for life or for years or in tail is to the use of the Lessee or Donee for the Law will create a Tenure of him in reversion So here is a good consideration to raise the use of the Fee to the Husband and the Estate tail to the Wife is good without other consideration than that Tenant in tail must hold of him in reversion 24 H. 8. Brook 4. Lands are given to a Feme and her Heirs Females and she hath Issue a Son and a Daughter and dies if the Husband shall be a Tenant by the Courtesie He shall Cook lib. 8. Pains Case is reported as if before that Case the Law had been doubtful whether the Husband should be Tenant by the Courtesie when the Wife Tenant in tail had Issue which dyed and so she dyed without Issue For the Estate was determined and this was the reason that Leases for life or years are not good against the Lessor for Cessante Statu primitivo c. yet one may be Tenant in Dower without Issue and therefore the Estate tail will continue to some purposes 21 Edw. 3. Dower after a Dying seised without Issue 21 H. 3. Dower 198. Tenant by the Courtesie may be although the Issue dye before the Wife 16 E. 3. Aid 129. One may be Tenant by the Courtesie of the moiety of
Gavelkind without Issue by the Custome there Reppes Case the Child was ripped out of his Mothers Belly and so after the death of the Feme the Baron could not be Tenant by the Courtesie But this Question rises upon the Case put in Pains Case Lands are given to a Feme and her Heirs Males and she hath Issue a Daughter and dies the Husband shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie for although a Man shall be Tenant by the Courtesie notwithstanding the Estate tail be spent yet his Estate must begin by an Heir heritable to the Estate Here in our Case the Son was the Heir and by him the Father would have been Tenant by the Courtesie to all other his Wifes Lands but not to this But although a Female cannot be Heir that hath a Brother yet since the Statute of Donis and by the Equity of that a Daughter may be Heir by Cook in Shelley's Case notwithstanding that he had also a Son fol. 103. and so here he may be Tenant by the Courtesie for this Land by the Daughter and of other Land by the Son if the Wife had been Tenant in tail of other Lands to her and her Heirs Males 5. Tenant by the Courtesie is and Tenant in tail in reversion makes a lease to commence presently hath Issue and dies Tenant by the Courtesie dies if his Issue shall avoid the Lease This Question is grounded upon the words of the Statute of 32 H. 8. which gives power to Tenant iâ— tail to make Leases Provided always that this Act c. shall not extend to any Leases to be made of any Mannors c. being in the hands of any Farmer or Farmers by vertue of any old Lease unless the same old Lease be expired surrendred or ended within one year after the making of the new Lease and upon this Clause hath risen many Questions as Tenant in tail makes a Lease for Forty years not warranted and Ten years after makes a Lease for Twenty One years to another warranted Within a year Tenant for Forty years surrenders Tenant in Dower surrenders to the Issue in tail upon condition Tenant in tail makes a Lease c. Tenant in Dower enters for the condition and dies and Tenant in tail dies if the Issue may enter Tenant in tail makes a good Lease for One and Twenty years Tenant for years surrenders upon condition Tenant in tail makes another Lease for One and Twenty years or three lives the first Tenant in tail enters for the condition broken By Philips the second Lease is good Cook contra in Elmers Case lib. 5. And my Question is whether Tenant by the Courtesie be within those words Farmers c. and he is not Foster in his Reading upon this Statute vouched one Richards Case That Tenant by the Courtesie was no such Farmer Points upon the Statute 1. IF a Feme Covert sole Merchant by the Custom of London shall be within the first Branch or Division of this Statute which is using the Trade of Merchandizing or getting their living by c. she is That there is such a Custom in London and mentioned and allowed in our Books Custom Br. 43. Ley Br. 74. 1 E 4. fol. 6. An Action being brought in C. B. for ones Board in London he would wage his Law not And the difference put between Customs which go with the Lands as Gavelkind Borough English c. and Customs of Courts good within the Town but not here but a recovery by such Custom may well be pleaded here in this Case Littleton Billing saith A Feme Covert sole Merchant by the Custom of London shall be impleaded sole here 35 H. 6. fol. 28. The Question was Whether the property of the Kings Jewells could be altered or forfeited because they were pawned and forfeited in London By Needham in the Exchequer Chamber upon an Information Custom Brook 5. and Pledges 28. 21 H. 7.17 Departure Brook 10. in case of a Departure because he had intituled himself by a new matter that is by a Custom which he might have pleaded 9 E. 4.35 A Feme removed by Habeas Corpus objected by Pigot that she and her Husband were both arrested for the Femes debt because a sole Merchant and prayed that she might be remanded for they have no remedy here this had been allowed and granted to him had not the Woman come in charged with a Reddidit So upon an Exigent The Customs of London have been confirmed by Parliament 1 E. 37. R. 2. and admit that she could not be sole sued here as in the Courts of London yet if a Contract made by her shall bind the Husband by the Custom the Husband shall be sued here and it shall be said the Contract of the Husband as 21 H. 7. 2. The Husband shall be bound by the Contract of his Wife if he command before or agree after and it shall be accounted his folly to suffer his Wife and so they be both Bankrupts To put cases how the Husband shall be prejudiced by the Act of his Wife 49 E. 3.25 The Husband shall not be charged with the debt of the Wife which she owed before marriage after her death but if an Action during the Coverture were brought against the Baron and Feme and Judgment were had against them and she dies the Husband shall be charged 20 H. 6.22 If the Wife buy any thing by the Husbands commandment or that by his allowance comes to his use he shall be charged 9 E. 4.24 Debt against Baron and Feme the Baron appeareth the Feme makes default the default of the Wife is the default of the Husband Nat. Brevium 120. G. A man shall be charged by the Contract of his Servant or his Wife if he gives them Authority otherwise not 12 H. 7.24 The Baron shall pay Mony in the Spiritual-Court which was charged for corporal punishment of the Wife for a slander And so it is at our Law for all Slanders and Batteries as we see every day 20 H. 7. Kello 61. A Feme Disseisor takes Husband who occupies the Land without notice or cognizance of the Husband yet he shall pay damages I conclude her Merchandizes are his by the Common Law and by the Custom 3. For all the Reasons aforesaid the Outlawry of the Husband shall make him a Bankrupt by the Statute and shall make the Wife a Bankrupt by the Custom and the Statute Which is plain against all using Trade of Merchandizing and getting their living by Buying and Selling and that if he be non solvent as he must needs be by his Outlawry then she must be non solvent but whether the Creditors by the Commission shall have the Goods or the King by his Outlawry That is a Question that comes not within the compass of this Case but I shall move that some other time 4. But I put the Husband to be dead before the Commission and whether his Goods or Lands shall be sold afterwards is a Question but
some say it is not for Bona Ecclesiae sunt partimonia pauperum the Apostles distributed communes distributiones quotidianas distributiones at Lincoln to this day Linwood Sacriledge But I hold it is for as in our Case if he pay it before hand it goes out of his own Purse if afterwards though it go out of his Benefice yet it is to be intended this is benefit to the Patron for since the Statute of 39 Eliz. cap. 3. made for the relief of the Poor the more the Parson gives the less the Patron needs give and Charity ought to be voluntary and not for hope of a Benefice or a Reward But I will agree that if it had been in consideration that he shall maintain the Patron if he be at any time in want during his life this is no Simony Patronum faciunt dos edificatio fundus Patrono debentur honos onus emolumentum Linwood fol. 157. De beneficiis est onus alendi Patron Ecclesiae ubi ad summam pervenit paupertatem Ergo c. But this is likewise given to the poor to the end that he may be made Minister Whether this be Simony I think this is Simony in the highest degree and the very same which Simon Magus would have committed for he offered the Apostles money to be admitted into the Ministery he knew and saw that they received nothing to their own private use all things were common with them and as I said they distributed to every man as he had need yet you all know how he was answered and what became on him even eo quod voluit and yet non potuit quod voluit facere malum But the Statute for gift reward or benefit to the Ordinary or any Friend of his and so thought to be Simony in Spiritual Law yet it is not within the Statute yes indeed it is for even as they say Si quis aliquid dederit alio quam praesentandi aut ordinatori si alias beneficium non esset habiturus est Simonia But then saith the Statute if such a Minister be to be presented instituted and inducted into any Benefice for seven years after that immediately after the induction the Benefice shall be void and it shall be lawful to the Patron to present another But here is the Question upon this Statute by the first branch the King is intituled by the second the Patron but the Kings interest makes it no induction at all A. dies and B. is instituted and inducted 4. But admit here is no Simony in the Case then riseth another Question Whether here be any good presentation or not Where the Case is no more but this one presents and his Clerk is instituted one other presents the first Clerk after institution and before induction dies whether this presentation when another was instituted be good at all Or whether his death before induction have made it good whereby the second may be instituted and inducted It is plain if one present in the life time of the incumbent the presentment is void 22 H. 6.27 By admission and institution one is Parson before induction and Linwood saith he hath jus ad rem in re But 5 Eliz. Dyer he hath jus ad rem but not in re and Hare and Buckley's Case he is like a Tenant in Dower that hath Judgment but no Execution Or like a Copy-holder after a Surrender and before admittance but neither to charge nor bring action But as in my Lord Digbies Case in Coke l. 4. A Parson having one Benefice is instituted into another and then gets a dispensation and then is inducted the induction shall so relate that the dispensation is of no force So his death shall make that he had by the institution no interest at all but that the second presentation is good and consequently the induction But if in the life time of A. B. had been both presented and instituted the institution had been meerly void and then the induction could never be good 13 Ja. B. R. if it be not in the Kings Case 5. Afterwards B. being inducted into the Benefice of 5 l. value is inducted into another and then recovers Lands of 20 l. value to the first whether this first be void by the Statute 21 H. 8. and I take it it is not The Statute is That having a Benefice of 8 l. accepts of another and is inducted into the same then the former Benefice shall immediately be adjudged to be void And altho' I am of opinion that this Law shall be taken strict and even extended by equity because it is to repress a great inconvenience in the Church and Common-wealth That yet nevertheless this word having shall be construed as it is in the Statute of 32. of Wills in Buttler and Bakers Case pro ut the Case so here And here is also this word immediately which is much inforced there because the Land could not descend immediately till disagreement A man infeofts a Feme Covert and then grants rent charge the Husband dies she waves if she had agreed it would have avoided the charge and yet the disagreement shall not make it good But I cannot compare it to a better Case than the Case of a Ward the Rule is If Tenant in Knights service die seised his Heir within Age shall be in Ward with this addition to the Rule that if he were disseised and might enter or if he had made a Feoffment upon Condition and the Condition were broken if the Lord or the Heir enter he shall be in Ward or if the Tenant for Term of Life of a Ward make a Feoffment and the Heir enter the Land shall be in Ward So be the Books of 17 ass 18 ass 18. 19 E. 3. Gard 114 and 48 E. 3. fo 8. But 12 H. 7.20 Frowick if the Heir recover by action Auncestrell he shall not be in Ward 15 E. 4.13 Urfwick chief Baron the same or if he pay money to redeem Land and enter for the Condition performed he shall not be in Ward so here I hold the same Rule if B. had been disseised of parcel of his Glebe or that it had been forfeited for a Condition broken the first Benefice would have been void but not in this Case I hold that if his Rectory were a Signiory and but of 5 l. value and then he accept a second Benefice and afterwards by the Escheat of a Tenancy it had come to be of 8 l. or 10 l. value it shall not in this Case be void 6. But this Clerk was a Marchant and turns Priest and now leaves his old debts unpaid whether he can be a Bankrupt because of the words using the Trade c. He is ruled in John Quarles Case my Lord Chief Justice being Recorder was a Commissioner for he left his Marchandizing and was turned Gentleman 7. Whether yielding of himself to Prison in the Admirals Court in an action whereof their Court hath no Jurisdiction be a yielding himself
to Prison within the Statute The Admirals Jurisdiction is limitted by the Statute of 13 R. 2. cap. 5. that they shall not meddle with things done within the Realm scil this Realm 15 R. 2. cap. 3. de South les points 2 H. 4. cap. 11. gives an aection and double damages There was a Case in the Common Pleas. I take it the Admiral hath no Jurisdiction to hold Plea of a thing done upon the Land in Ireland for he is Admiral both of England and Ireland so the King hath his Justices there for to give justice for trespasses and offences there done first for that these Statutes are in force in Ireland as all other are which were made before 1 H. 7. And a Prohibition will lie here in the Kings Bench if they hold Plea of a thing whereof they have no jurisdiction although they cannot hold Plea thereof themselves as we see in the Orphans Case in Coke li. 5. and these Courts ought to respect them of Ireland as subordinate to them for 34 Assises Errors here upon a Judgment there 31 H. 8. Bro. Prohibition 17. A Prohibition lies against the Admiral when he supposeth a thing to be done upon the Sea which was done upon the Land 8. The Parishioners detain their Tythes The Question is A man is presented by Simony the Statute is the Presentation the Institution and Induction are all void But it is to give title to the King to present But to the Parishioner he is dominus pro tempore as if he had been meer laicus yet Sacraments ministred by him are of force The Church and the Minister are compared to the Husband and Wife A woman is married to one Husband and in facie Ecclesice she is afterwards married to another as the Priest is actually in facie of the Country inducted 17 Ass 32 H. 6. The Feme with her second Husband levy a Fine none can avoid this Fine but the right Husband no more can any displace the Simonist but the King And a Prohibition hath been awarded against a Parson supposing he was a Simonist and upon advice and consultation the Parson Closes B. ver Simony in the Exchequer another presented by the King and yet all one for the mean profits 9. The Grantee presents to the first Benefice question whether I grant one Primam advocationem proximam he presents and his Clerk is instituted and dies before induction whether his turn be served It is 38 E. 3.36.6 vide lib. 10. That Commissioners here may sell a Bankrupts Goods in Ireland and Irishmen may sue the Commission 11. The first is within the express words of the Law scil being also a Subject born The second is proved by the Case of the Merchants of Waterford 2 R. 3.11 An Act of Parliament in England shall not bind men of Ireland for their Lands but for things transitory it shall as the Case was there for shipping of Wools from Waterford to carry to other places than Callis Also a man attainted here of Felony or Treason shall lose his Lands in Ireland My Lord of Essex and Ororkes Case 12. An action of debt upon the Statute by the Statute of primo Jac. which gives not only all things in Action but also gives an Action to the Assignee in his own name but he must declare specially 1. A. makes a Lease of a Rectory to the King for another mans life and grants the reversion to B. a Merchant to the use of B. and C. the King grants his Estate to D. E. enters and marries with the Merchant C. dies D. releases to B. who being non solvent keeps his House the Tythes are sequestred for not repairing of the Quire the Creditors grant a Letter of License to B. for six months E. dies D. enters he for whose life dies B. renders himself to Prison for a Fine assessed before the High Commissioners six months past B. Is a Bankrupt within this division and the Moiety of the Rectory shall be sold and all the goods sequestred 1. The King tenant pur auter vie the lessor grants the reversion if good without Atturnment It is good 2. A grants to B. to the use of him and C. if they are Jointenants or Tenants in Common they are Tenants in Common 3. Tenant for life is disseised by a Feme sole she marries him in the reversion the disseisee releases to the Husband it is good to extinguish his right 4. What is wrought by the occupancy nothing 1. If a Bankrupt procures a Letter of License for six months and within the time is a Bankrupt again if he shall be a Bankrupt ab initio He shall be 2. If Imprisonment by the High Commissioners is within the Statute It is 3. If the Goods of a Bankrupt sequestred shall be sold They shall 2. A. Devises 20 l. to B. and C. and 200 Acres of Land to D. and E. his Executors D. proves the Will E. wastes the assets and dies D. a Merchant makes a Feoffment of 99 Acres to F. D. is non solvent and outlawed in Ireland B. and C. joyn with the Creditors in suing a Commission D. Is a Bankrupt within this Division and 101. Acres shall be sold and B. and C. shall be relieved 3. Tenant of the King makes a gift in tail and dies having issue two Daughters within age the Donee makes a Feoffment to Coparceners office is found and the Land being seised for the King he grants it to H. a Merchant as long as it shall be in our hands H. marries the younger and is non solvent and suffers himself to be arrested at the sute of a Son born the other Daughter dies H. confesseth the action and is imprisoned in execution for the damages the Commissioners sell the Interest of H. All this is found by another office H. Is a Bankrupt within this Division and the Vendee shall have an Ouster le main 1. Discontinuee makes a Feoffment to issues in tail within age if they are remitted for they are not Tenants in Common but Jointenants 2. Tenant of the King makes a gift in tail and dies his Heir within age the Discontinuee infeoffs the Infant if he shall be in Ward because a Purchasor notwithstanding the Remitter 3. Tenant in tail discontinues hath issue a Daughter within age and his Wife with Child with a Son and dies the Discontinuee infeoffs the Daughter the Son is born if he shall have the benefit of Remitter 4. If the Interest of the King by an office shall be devested by another office without Petition or monstrance de droit 5. If a Merchant being a Discontinuee confess an action of trespass at the sute of the issue in tail and is taken in execution if it make him a Bankrupt 4. Grantee of a next avoidance presents A. by parol to a Benefice of 5 l. value per Annum he is Instituted B. a Merchant and Farmer in Ireland and Indebted there by agreement with the Grantor pays 10 l. to the
in Chancery Feme Tenant for life of a Copy-hold the Lord grants the Reversion to three the Baron Surrenders to one of them who first dies there the Lord would have kept the Land as occupant during the Husbands life 9 Eliz. Dyer 267. But it was decreed that if the Husband and Wife would surrender to the Surviving Lessees in reversion the Lord must admit them or else avoid the possession So if the Lord will not admit the party to whose use the party shall have the Lands if a man surrender to the use of his last Will and Testament the Lord shall not have the Land but the Tenant during his life 3. But before I go any further let us consider of this Lease it is by a Surrender upon Condition and he in reversion surrenders to anothers use and the Condition is broken My Question is whether he in reversion shall enter for the Condition by the Common Law he cannot then may he enter by the Statute of 32 H. 8. Cap. 34. of Conditions there be divers Statutes which reach Copy-holds though they be not named Heydons Case lib. 3. Copy-holders are Lessees within the Statute 32 H. 8. of Monasteries The Statute of Cui in vita Receipt quod ei defortiat Coke li. 4. Kite per Wray Copy-hold estate is within the Statute of Champertie and Maintenance 32 H. 8. Cap. 9. Dean and Chapter of Worcesters Case Coke li. 6. Copy hold is within the Statute of 13. Eli of Leases by spiritual persons Lands usually let c. Lillingstones Case adjudged 27. Eliz. That if the Lord infeoff the Copy-holder to anothers use that the Copy-hold is saved by the Proviso in the Statute of 27. H. 8. Margaret Podgers Case A Copy-holder is bound by Fine and 5. years The general rule is layed down in Heydons Case That all Statutes that may be for the good of the Copy-holder shall extend to them therefore I am of opinion that such a Grantee shall enter for non-payment of rent or for doing of waste as the words of the Statute are For it is for the good of the Copy-holders that their Farmers be bound to pay their Rents keep their Tenements in repair I should make small question of this if the Lease were made by license for then it is a plain lease at Common Law and an Ejectione firme will lie But here the Lessee comes in by the Lords admittance but that is answered by my Lord Cook when he is once admitted he is in immediately from the Surrender and in the Per. 4. But this Condition is for waste and it is broken whether is there a forfeiture to him in reversion or a forfeiture to the Lord of the estate in fee simple It is to the Lessor not to the Lord wherein I fall again upon the difference when it is by License and when by Surrender for I take him to be as if he had a particular estate with a remainder over In Podgers Case fo 107. Si cop pour vie sit semble al case del Duke of Norff. Points upon the Statute A Merchant being a sufficient man departs the Realm and beyond the Seas becomes non solvent and so refuses to return although he be served with a privy Seal to return Here be two Questions First whether he be a Bankrupt for not returning For he is not within the Compass of the Statute of departing the Realm The next Question is admitting him to be a Bankrupt Whether the King shall have his Goods as the goods of a Fugitive or else whether they shall go to satisfy the Creditors For the first I think he is a Bankrupt and although he be not within the compass of these words depart the Realm yet it is plain he is within these words absents himself for although his departure was no offence either to the King or his Creditors For Merchants both by the Common Law and notwithstanding the Statutes of 5 R. 2. Cap. 2. or the Statutes of 13 Eliz. might depart the Realm without license except the King as it is in Natura Brevium fol. 85. had made proclamation to the Contrary Yet the King not only by the Statute but by the Common Law as he may forbid a man to depart so he may send for him at his pleasure to return And that is proved by the express Book of 2 3 Phil. and Mary Dyer fol. 128. Where it is said That if he be commanded to return either by the privy Seal or the great Seal and refuse his Lands and his Chattels shall be siesed into the Kings hands and for that a President was found in the Exchequer where in Anno 19 E. 2. It was William de Brittains case although it is true as I said the first departure is no offence according to the Book of 13 Eliz. D. fol. 296. But then admitting he is a Bankrupt and admitting that by his refusal to return he hath forfeited all his Goods and Lands to the King The Question is whether the King or the Creditors shall be preferred And I take it the Creditors shall be preferred Yet He agree the rule is that when a title falls to the King and a Common person both at once the King shall be preferred Dame Hales Villain and Ideot Priority and Posteriority 5 E. 3. But I rely upon a Case which was ruled upon a Trial by my Lord Cok. 12. Jac. in t Newman and Martin ou Martin fuit adjudge Bankrupt because he was beyond the Seas c. 2. Points upon the Statute One hath the freehold and another hath the Copy-hold of one onely acre severed from the Mannor this is plain as it is in my Lord Cokes 4. reports in Case This Copy-hold by no means can be transferred from one to another But now our question is Whether this Copy may be sold by Commissioners I say Parliamentum potest omnia By Act of Parliament it may be sold And here the very words of the Parliament are That the Commissioners may sell his Copy-hold estate The Law was taken before Corbets case was first argued That it was impossible to cut off perpetuities yet there were divers before that were cut off by Act of Parliament and they all that argued for the perpetuites agreed that by Act of Parliament it might be done By the Common Law a thing in action cannot be transferred as a debt upon an Obligation Yet by the Statute of Bankrupt Jacobi primo we see it is done every day But it will be objected that the Statute goes on and saith That the Vendee shall compound with the Lord for the Fine and be admitted Now if there can be no admittance then no sale and it shall be intended such Copy-hold whereof admittance may be And in Dr. Bonhams case divers cases are put where divers Acts of Parliament are void and divers others construed directly contrary to the words But out of that Case I will prove this to be good for first this Act saith The
a day upon pain of 10. l. at the next Court he is presented because no reformation is made and there then the Tenant Traverses the Presentment that he is not guilty the Traverse is disallowed the Lord becomes a Bankrupt the Affeerors resuse to affeere the amerciament the Commissioners sell all the debts of the Bankrupt to A. A. Shall have an action of debt for this amerciament 6. A. sues execution of a Statute Merchant and the Conizors Land is extended at too high a value and refused by the Extendor and delivered to the Jurors B. defeats the execution by extending an elder Statute A. is a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell all his debts the elder Statute is satisfied the Jurors will not enter This is a good Sale of the possibility to extend and the Vendee shall have a Scire facias against the Tenant by the elder Statute and the terretenants and the Jurors to revive the former Execution 7. A. and B. Tenants is Common grant a rent of 10. l. per annum to C. who brings an Annuity against A. and recovers and after he distrains and Avows upon B. and becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell the Annuity and the rent a fourth part of the Land descends to the Vendee The sale of the Annuity and also of the rent were good but he shall Avow upon B. but for 5. l. per annum 1. If he can bring an Annuity against one and distrain the other 2. How a Rent shall be apportioned when part of the Land descends to the Grantee 3. If a Rent charge be within this Statute because it is not within the words 8. A Mannor in Surry is giving to Baron and Feme and to the heirs of the Baron the Baron dies his heir being a Merchant claims the heirlooms the Executors of the Father claim them as Chatells the heir sells the Reversion and becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners sell the heir-looms This a good sale but the Wife shall have the use of them during her life 9. One makes a Feoffment upon condition that the heir of the Feoffee shall infeoff I. S. the Feoffee grants a Rent charge the Feoffer enters for the Conditions and dies the Feoffee re enters and two Co-partners being the heirs of the Feoffor bring a Mortdauncester against the Feoffee and recover the Land and damages they have other Land in execution by Elegit for the damages the one dies the other is a Bankrupt The Commissioners shall sell all the Extent 10. A Disseisor makes a Lease for life to A. who makes a Lease for years to B. a Merchant stranger who is made Denizen upon Condition that he shall not depart the Realm the Disseisee confirms his estate Tenant for life dies the Disseisor enters B. being non solvent by License of the King with a Non obstante departs the Realm the Commissioners sell the term the Vendee enters upon the Disseisor The sale of this term is good 11. A. By Deed Poll demises the Land of B. to C. a Merchant who enters B. re-enters C. in an action of Covenant grounded upon the Deed recovers 10. l. damages against A. C. being indebted is committed to Prison by the High Commissioners for non payment of a Fine by them assessed and there he remains by six moneths the Commissioners assign the damages to D. who sues a Scire facias in his own name against A. and hath Judgement to have Execution A. brings a Writ of Error against C. of the first Judgement C. confesses the Error The Judgement is erroneous and yet the assignment of the damages is good and D. shall have Execution 12. A. Makes a Joynture to his Wife an Alien of part of his Land and dies she is made a Denizen and takes a Bankrupt to Husband the Commissioners sell the Joynture part of it is evicted by elder title she sues a Scire facias and recovers other Land in recompence an Office is found the Commissioners sell as well the Land recovered in value as the residue which was not evicted The sale of the Land recovered in value is good but not for the residue For New-Inn The Case THe Land of A. is extended for the debt of B. and A. grants the reversion to C. in Tail B. attornes and hath a Liberate A. grants the reversion of C. to D. a Feme sole Merchant Denizen of Ireland C. commits Treason and attorns and suffers a common recovery to the use of himself D. takes E. an Alien and Londoner to Husband C. is attainted D. continues sole Merchant E. is naturalized D. is indebted and elopes C. dies without issue E. enters and is non solvent a Commission is awarded and proclaimed D. hath issue and dies an Office is found the Term expires Conclusion The Land shall be sold by the Commissioners 1. When Land is extended and before a Liberate it is to be considered in whom the Land is 3 E. 6.68 It is said that goods extended are in the custody of the Law but yet not so out of the Conizors possession but that they may be extended for the Kings debt due by the Conizor 41 E. 3. Fitz Recognizance 38. Land was extended by the Sheriff and before Liberate the Lands were extended for the Kings debt and so process stayed 33 H. 8. Broke Recognizance 41. Liberate may be taken out seven years after the extent 41 E. 3. fol. 1. It is questioned whether the party or the King shall have the mean profits of Lands taken by cape grand till a petty cape Also it will be objected that a reversion will pass by words of possession but possession will not pass by words of reversion Frokmerton and Tracy 43 E. 3. and Smith and Stapleton But except we prove this reversion to be well granted we are at an end of our case for all the rest depends upon this point We say then that when Lands are extended it is plain they are out of the Conizor presently And although it seems that for the time they are in the Kings hands yet when the Liberate comes they are in the Conizee ab initio and by strong relation So as if a Mannor be extended to which an Advowson is appendent and the Church becomes void and Liberate sued the Conizee and neither the King nor the Conizer shall present So if Arrearages of Rents fall due between the extent and the Liberate the Conizee shall distrain and avow for them Wherein I will compare it to Longs Case that was in the Common Pleas Pasch 31 Eliz. Rot. 2024. one granted a Mannor to which an Advowson was appendent and made Livery the Church became void and afterwards the Tenants attorned the Grantee shall present and the Attornment shall relate to make the Grantee in from the time of the Feoffment And although it is said 8 H. 5. fo 10. that no man can attorn to a grant of a reversion that hath as yet nothing in possession but hopes or possibilities As if Tenant for life
grant his Estate upon condition and the reversion is granted and he attorns and then enters for the Condition yet the attornment is void But yet the Law will respect such a possibility as 5 E. 3. fol. 36. Lands were given to the Baron and Feme the Baron dies the Feme makes a Lease for her own life the Lessee is impleaded in a Cui in vita and he vouches the Feme and she prays in aid of the heir of the Husband and well and yet the Feme had nothing If I bargain and sell Lands to one for life and then I grant the reversion and the Barganee attorns and then the Deed is Inrolled this Reversion is well granted and this is a good Attornment But it may be objected that the Land is not in the Conizee upon the extent for if it be extended at too high a rate he may return it upon the extendors for so are the Books of 44 E. 3. 2 H. 4.17 21 E. 3.21 15 H. 7.16 and divers others Books But I make this an Argument for my self for that shews it is out of the Conizor and if the Land were in the extendors hands no doubt but the reversion might be granted and by the Book of 1 E. 3.8 in a quid juris clamat they shall be forced to attorne 2 But admit that such a grant of reversion may be made yet no grant of a reversion can be good without Attornment of the particular Tenant and here your Conizee the Tenant attorns before his time that is before he hath possession by the Liberate and so the case of 8 H. 5. fol. 10. comes full against you To that I answer That the Tenant by Statute is esteemed in point of Attornment as Tenant for term of years for so the Case of 1 E. 3. fol. 8. esteems him And I make small Question but that if a man make a Lease for years and before the Lessee enter the Lessor grants the reversion and the Lessee attorns This is a good Attornment for it matters not whether ever the Lessee entered or not for the Land was in him to give grant or forfeit and 21 H. 7. fol. 27. after such a Lease If the Lessee will not enter yet if the Lessor waive the possession and a rent day accrews the Lessor may have an action of debt against the Lessee without ever making any averment that the Lessee entred So in our Case although the Conizee cannot enter of himself but by the Livery of the Sheriff yet he is not in by the Sheriff but by the Law in the Post And it is not very absurd to say he is in by and under and from the Conizor for if the Conizor had Covenanted that any to whom he after the Recognizance had conveyed the Land should have enjoyed it against all claiming from by and under him and the Conizee had sued execution the Covenant had been broken 3. Then allowing that this first grant of the reversion is good to C. in Tail Then the next question is that C. commits Treason and A. grants the reversion of C. in Fee to D. and C. Attornes Whether this be a good Attorment Whether if C. comes afterwards to be attainted for the Treason and an Office being found hath relation to intitle the King to the Land from the time of the Treason committed that is Whether this Office shall not relate to make C. no Tenant of the Land from the Time of the Treason committed I will agree it will relate to avoid all charges and incumbrances made by C. but yet the Attornment is good for that I will put but one Case that comes full home to the point which is Sir Miles Fleetwood's Case in my Lord Cooks 8. Report which is that the Attainder and Office relate to intitle the King to the Land from the time of the Treason committed but not to Chattels sold or to the mean profits of Lands received so as for the mean time C. was Tenant and might take the Profits and the Rents paid to him by the Tenants were well paid then a fortiore might he do and execute all instrumental Acts as if he had been Lord of a Mannor and a Copyholder after the Treason and before Attainder had surrendred to the use of another who had been admitted the surrender and admittance had been good and so consequently the Attornment for by the Attornment he parts with nothing of his own only he is a means to profit another mans grant of that which was never his 4. The next Question is That the Tenant in Tail commits Treason suffers a Recovery to the use of himself and then it attainted whether the King shall have the Fee-simple or else whether the Office shall not relate to make the Recovery void and whether he in Reversion who by intention of Law had recovered other Land in value shall have any benefit against the King by the Kings priviledge which he hath to avoid this Recovery It is plain that if this Recovery had been to the use of a Stranger the King by Office should avoid it and consequently he in Remainder would have been remitted The difference of the relation of an Office to intitle the King to Goods but from the Attainder and to Lands from the time of the offence committed are these 42 E. 3.26 33 E. 3. Fitz. Forfeiture 30 31 H. 6.5 temp H. 8. Bro. fo 42. I take it that if the King in this Case had taken the benefit of the Statute of 33 H. 8. c. 20. which gives the King all the Lands which a person attainted hath at the time of his Attainder though there be no Office sound then the King might have seized the Land and the party had had no remedy But now an Office being found the King is in by the Office which discovers the whole matter of Record and the party hath the benefit thereby And thereby it appears that C. was by the offence and the relation of the Attainder disabled to make any Conveyance or disposition of his Land That a Common Recovery is a Conveyance vide Coke li. primo Pelhams Case So this Grant of the reversion to D. is good and not pulled out by the Recovery But it is granted to one that is an Alien born but made a Denizen of Ireland whether now the King be not intitled to the reversion in Fee as the Lands of an Alien I take it that he that is free of Ireland is free of England it is true that one which was born in Scotland ante c. and these that were born in times past in Aquitain or in Normandy were Aliens born because these Countries were brought with the Kings of England as their former inheritance but Ireland was conquered by H. 2. and inhabited and planted with Englishmen and upon the matter made part of the demeasnes of the Crown of England as other Islands are as the Wight and Jernesey Virginia and Greenland and therefore the Kings of
wherewith he makes his Ware and sells his Ware again as a Shoomaker 16. A Vinter is a Bankrupt for he buys Wine and sells Wine but I doubt of a Brewer The second Division Who shall be said to be a Subject born within the Realm or Denizen 1. NO Ambassadors Children born in England can be for although they were born within the Realm yet they are not Subjects born 2. One born upon the Coasts of Denmark or the Low Countries is no Bankrupt but one born upon any part of the French Coasts or Brittany between Calice and the Isle of Oleron is a Bankrupt 3. One born in Ireland or the Isle of Man or in Garnesey c. or in Barwick is a Bankrupt but neither the ante nati nor post nati of Scotland are within this Statute but they are both within the Statute of primo the King 4. A Merchant Stranger is made Denizen upon condition that within seven years he shall marry an English Woman he becomes indebted and at five years end he marries an Alien and departs the Realm and before seven years end she dies and he marries an English Woman he shall be Denizen and Bankrupt within this Statute 5. A Merchant Stranger is made Denizen upon condition that he shall not depart the Realm and he departs yet he is a Bankrupt but if it were for anothers life contrary for that is not his own act 6. One is made Denizen of Ireland by Charter under the Great Seal of Ireland he is no Bankrupt but if it were under the Great Seal of England contrary 7. One naturalized by Act of Parliament is Bankrupt 8. A Merchant Stranger is sworn to Allegiance in the Leet or at Sessions and dwells here for twelve years by the Law of Nations this makes him subject to the King but not within the Statute for he must be a Subject born wherein he is different from an Ambassadors Son for he is born but no Subject and this contrary 9. Baron and Feme travel beyond the Seas by License a Son born there is not a Bankrupt yet he is a Subject but not a Subject born within the Realm 10. One born in England becomes a sworn Subject to the King of Spain and dwells and trades there for two years he is within the Statute and his Goods there shall be sold Doctor Story 11. A Merchant Stranger is naturalized without being sworn to the Supremacy or Allegiance he is a Bankrupt notwithstanding the Statute of 7 Jacobi cap. 2. The Third Division In what Cases and what matters make one Bankrupt as departing the Realm c. as in the second Division 1. A Feme Covert sole Merchant of London Elopes with her Goods into Scotland she is a Bankrupt 2. The Baron of such a Feme is outlawed for the Debt of the Feme the Baron and Feme are both Bankrupts 3. A Merchant departs the Realm to Merchandize and becomes indebted and to avoid arrests defers his return this doth tantamount as a departing of the Realm 4. One departs the Realm by License and becomes a Merchant and a Privy-Seal awarded against him he refuseth to return he is a Bankrupt 5. A Capias de excommunicato capiendo is awarded against one who for fear of Arrests departs the Realm he is no Bankrupt 6. The same for departing the Realm or keeping his House for fear of an Attachment in Chancery 7. A Merchant indebted keeps a Shipboard this is keeping his House 8. A Maltman becomes a Miller and he keeps in the Mill. 9. The King grants to a Merchant indebted the keeping of a Castle who keeps the same by colour of his Office but for fear of Arrests refuseth to come abroad to Church c. 10. A Merchant indebted departs the Realm to Merchandize and having loss by Tempest returns no more this is not a departing c. but an absenting himself 11. One recovers debt in the Admirals Court upon a Contract made upon the high Sea and the Defendant being a Merchant lies in execution in the Admirals Prison for six months he is a Bankrupt 12. An Apothecary is made Church-warden and being indebted keeps in the Church this is a keeping of his House 13. One hath no House of his own but keeps in another mans House and is a Bankrupt it is his House 14. There be now in England no Sanctuaries therefore all priviledged places where the Kings Officers cannot come and yet there is no Law nor Justice to be had judicially in the place is within these words of taking of Sanctuary 15. To keep in the Tower of London is no taking of Sanctuary but if the Steward or the Lieutenant be a Merchant and indebted and keep the Tower he is a Bankrupt 16. One takes Gray's-Inn is a Bankrupt yet they have no exemption from Officers but usus condo c. 17. One hath no House but an upper Chamber 7 E. 3. 18. One is outlawed he is a Bankrupt but if the Outlary be reversed for want of Proclamations all done in the mean time by the Commissioners is void but if it were reversed for Error contrary 19. One outlawed in the County Palatine of Durham is a Bankrupt but contrary in Ireland for the Record is not pleadable here 20. A Merchant hath a Rectory appropriate the Quire is not repaired the Tithes are sequestred no sequestration within the Statute 21. A Merchant ackowledges himself to be the villain of I. S. to defraud his Creditors he is a Bankrupt and yet his goods and body are not subject to Commission The fourth Division What Freehold Lands of a Bankrupt may be sold by Commissioners 1. A Merchant makes a Feoffment in Fee upon Condition upon payment of money to re-enter he becomes a Bankrupt the Commissioners may tender the money at the day and sell the Land 2. A Bankrupt is Tenant in Tail the Commissioners may sell the Land and the sale shall be as good as if it were by Fine for Tenant in Tail by Fine c. may lawfully depart with the Land 3. One hath a Lease for years upon condition to have in Fee the Commissioners may sell the Term and possession 4. Land is devised to a Bankrupt the Commissioners may sell and the Bankrupt shall not wave the devise 5. A Bankrupt hath a villain and manumits him the Commissioners shall not sell in favorem Libertatis 6. A Baron useth merchandize and is nonsolvent the Commissioners shall not sell his Barony 7. A Rent seck whereof is no seisin shall be sold and good without Attornment 8. All Offices of inheritance shall be sold as the Wardenship of the Fleet or a Jaylor by inheritance contrary of all Offices of trust that are but for life 9. A Monopoly granted to one and his Assignes as the sole making of Cards c. shall not be sold because it is a void Patent and nothing passes by it 10. The Office of sole Printing of Law Books is void therefore not saleable 11. A