firste chapter Also Britton an other old wryter which wrote hys booke in king Edwarde the first name sayeth des heirs nequedent si ils y eyent ascuns qui auncestre morust seisie de ascun terre tenu de nous en chief des aunciens demeanes de nostre corone volons auer les gardes de touts les terres dōt appent que deiuent descend a ceux heirs come lour heritage ouesque touts les blees en teles terres troues maintefoits de qui fees que les terres sont Britton here not only agreeth with the other but also geueth the king the corne growing vpon the groundes which the kinges tenant holdeth at the tyme of his death A. 21. H. 3. in Fitz. ti Prerogat ' P. 26. P. 25. Also in the great Abridgement of Fitzherbert you shal find in the time of king Henry the thirde written in this manner Nota quod lex angliae et consuetudo eiusdē est quod a quibuscunque aliquis feoffatus fuerit dum tamen a domino Rege aliquo tempore fcoffatus fuerit per tenementum qd ' tenetur per seruic̄ militare quod dn̄s rex habebit custod ' omniū terrar ' et tenemētorū tā de feoffamēto aliorū quā de feoffamento proprio Which text if a man will any thing wrest he may make the kinges prerogatiue more lyberall then is made or declared by this statute or any other the writters before remembred for it extendes to any landes holden of the king by knightes seruice whether they be holden of the king in capite or not but forasmuche as the saide other writers haue written so plainlye in this matter we will stand to them and extende the prerogatiue no further howbeit as I saide all those writters being so longe before the making of this statute doe plainly argue proue that this statute dothe but confirme and declare that that was the commen law before M 15. E 4.12 vnles we woulde doubt of the time of the making thereof as Littleton doth in 15. E. 4. but without doubt it was made in king Edward the secondes time and that plainlye appeareth by the woordes contayned in the third chapter of this prerogatiue which be these Et illa voluntas tempore Regis H. patris Regis E. estimari consueuit c. Which woordes were not written in kinge Edward the first daies for then the woords had bene patris nostri so that as I thinke it is not to bee doubted but that it was written in the time aboue limitted and expressed Then go wee to thexposicion of this first chapiter of prerogatiue The woords be dominus rex habebit custodiam omnium terrarum eorum qui de ipso tenent in capite per seruicium militare These woordes go generally to all the kings tenauntes that is to saye aswell to his tenantes for terme of lyfe as to his tenauntes of estate of enheritaunce if it so be that he that is in the reuercion haue the saide reuercion by discent and be heir vnto the said tenant for terme of life not forcing whether he haue the reuercion by discent from the said tenaunt for terme of life or else from any other ancestour as take the case to be this a man holdeth no landes of the kinge but onely as tenaunt by the curtesie and those landes are holden in chiefe by knightes seruice the saide tenaunt by the curtesie is seased in his demesne as of fee of landes holden of other lordes and dieth the landes holden of other discend vnto him in the reuertion whiche is indede nexte heire vnto the said tenant by the curtesie in this case the king shall not onely haue the wardship of the landes that were holden by the curtesie if the saide heire be wythin age but also the landes holden of other by vertue of thys prerogatiue And if the saide heire were of full age at the tyme of the deathe of the saide tenaunt by the curtesie the king shall haue primer season both of the one lande and of the other as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuiū fo 298. Like lawe is it if a woman be indowed of lands holden in capite and is seased in fee simple of landes holden of other and dieth seased and they discende vnto the heire whiche is in the reuercion in this case the kinge shal haue bothe these landes by vertue of this prerogatiue like as hee shall haue in the other case before 26. li. ass p. 57 and that maye you see in 26. li. ass for in bothe these cases they bee the kinges tenauntes and hold of him by knightes seruice in capite for tenaunt en dower in the kinges cas holdeth not of the heire but onelye of the kinge as it shal appeare more fully hereafter But if he in the reuercion bee not heire of the landes holden of other in the cases aboue remēbred otherwise it is But what if he in the reuercion haue the same reuercion by purchace and not by discent whether shall the king then haue his prerogatiue or not and as to that it shoulde seeme by the newe Natura breuium fo 259. that the kinge shall haue his prerogatiue in that case also for there the remainder was to the heire and to his wife and to the heires of theire two bodyes lawfully begotten and the husbande in the remainder dyd sue liuere howbeit against the law as me semeth ideo quere but if the case in the saide newe Natura breuium had been that landes holden by knightes seruice in capite had beene geuen to one for terme of his lyfe the remainder ouer in fee which parson in the remainder hath issue and dyeth and tenaunt for terme of lyfe holdeth landes of other Lordes and dyeth whiche discende to the issue that is in the remainder there it might be saide that the king shoulde haue prerogatiue in the whole like as he had in the cases before remembred of tenaunt by the curtesie and tenant in dower for like reason will serue in the one case that serueth in the other The woordes of the Statut be further de quibus ips◠tenētes fuerunt seisiti in dominico suo vt de feodo die quo obierunt de quocunque tenuerint These woordes rather apperteigne vntoo the landes holden of other then too the Landes holden of the Kinge in Capite as it shoulde appeare by the cases beefore remembred and then by these woordes the kinges tenaunt in his life tyme must himselfe bee seased either in possession or reuercion of those landes that hee holdeth of a common person that shall dyscende vnto his heire For if hee were neuer seased thereof but they discende vnto his heire from some other auncestor the king shall not haue his prerogatiue in them as appeareth in 15. 15. E. 4. f. 10. E. 4. but whether the kinges tenaunt were seased of them in his owne right or in another bodyes right it maketh no difference
for when the lyuerie is missued it is as it had beene neuer sued Howebeit thys reseisure shall not bee wytheoute a Scire facias as I shall thereof speake more at large hereafter But yf the heyre or he that should sue lyuerie doe make a rightfull suite for the same according to thorder of the lawe and asmuche as in hym lyethe to do to haue liuerye howebeeit the kynge will not but willbee aduised ere hee make hym lyuerie and so protracte the time in this case his highenesse of ryghte maye not haue the profites from the tyme the partye was thus delayed but ought to restore theÌ„ vnto the partye vppon his lyuerye as maye appeare in the firste yeare of Henrye the seuenthe H. 1. H. 7. in Fits ti Liuery P. 18. And thereuppon it is to be noted that there be two kynde of lyueries the one generall the other speciall The generall is the liuerye that this statut speketh of the especial may be more properly treated of when wee come to the 12. chapiter of this prerogatiue And this generall lyuerie is sometime made cum exitibus and sometimes sine exitibus but for the most parte sine exitibus for wheare it is made cum exitibus from the time of the seisure there it is properlye noe liuerye for it appearethe the kynge neuer seised rightfully or by anye title As for example if the kynge will seise the lande that is founde in thoffice to be holden of Tharchebyshoppe of Canterburye or Byshoppe of Durham or anye suche persones as are exempted in the first chapiter of this prerogatiue in this case they shal haue an Ouster le main vna cum exitibus H. 16. E. 3. in Fits ti Liuere P. 29 as it appearethe in 16. E. 3. The same lawe is it yf of landes holden in capite there be a lease made for terme of lyfe the remainder ouer to estraunger 14. H. 4. f. 34 18. E. 3. f. 21. 24. E. 3. f. 27. tenaunt for terme of lyfe dyâ—th and this matter founde by office nowe if the kynge seise hee in the remainder shall haue an Ouster le main vna cum exitibus as it appearethe in 14. H. 4. 18 E. 3. 24. Edwarde the thirde Like law it is where .ij. hold iointly of the king the one dyethe and this matter founde by office and yet that notwithstandynge the kynge seises hee that suruiues shall haue an Ouster le mayn vna cum exitibus as it appearethe in the boke of Assises 44. 44. li. ass in Fits ti Liuere P. 11. T. 45. E. 3. f. 18. E. 3. and in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—â— f. 257. For in all these cases where the Ouster le maine is vna cum exitibus the king ought not to haue seiseised and so sayethe Thorp 45. E. 3. The words of the statute be further Post mortem eorum qui de eo tenent VpoÌ„ this it is to bee sene at what time after the kynges tenants deathe this lyuerie shall be sued If the possession of the free holde immediatlye after the deathe of the kynges tenaunte discende vnto his heire it is to bee sued fourthwithe and yf but onelye a reuercion discende then it is not to be sued tyl after the death of the particular tenaunt as it may appeare in the newe Natura breuium f. 291. where the heire sued not lyuerie tyll after the deathe of the tenaunt by the curtesye tenaunt in dower and tenaunt for terme of lyfe But learne what the lawe shoulde haue beene if the kynges tenant hadde dyed seised of a reuersion whereupon rent had beene reserued hys heire of full age whether hee should haue theÌ„ sued liuerie fourthwith or els to haue taried tyll the deathe of the particuler tenaunt for in the seuenthe yeare of kyng Henrye the sixte Iune thinks he should tary or els it might followe the kynge should haue double lyuerie that is to say one for the rent an other for the lande M. 7. H. 6. f. 3 but Paston is in contrarye opinion and resembles it to a reuersion dependyng vpon an estate tayle with a rent reserued howebeit at this daye there is election geuen vnto the heire that is to say eyther to sue his liuerie immediatly after the deathe of his auÌ„cester in the lyfe of these particuler tenaunts or els to tarye vntill they die and if he sue his lyuerie in theire lyfe he paiethe for primer seisin but the moytie of one yeares profyte yf after theire deathe then he payethe the hole yeares profit howebeit if there be a rent reserued he pursueth his liuery in the lyfe of the particular tenaunt it seemes besides the halfe yeres profit of the value of the land he shal also paye the hole yeares profit of the rent reserued therfore learn what common experience teacheth vs in that case The woordes of the statut be Qui de eo tenent in capite By these words he must holde of the kinge in chiefe for yf he holde not of hym in chiefe the kynge can haue noe primer seisin And yet you shal see in the newe Natura breuium folio 296. that of lands in the citie of LoÌ„don holden of the king in burgage the king had primer seisin the heire thereof sued his liuery but that president semes to bee against the lawe for Markham saiethe in 7. E. 4. that in Neuels case it was founde that ones father died seised of certain lande that hee helde of the kyng in Burgage T. 7. E. 4. f. 9 and thereupon thexchetor did seise whiche seiser by thaduise of all the Iustices was discharged by a Supersedeas awarded to thexchetor for the wordes of bothe the foresayde statutes be verye plaine therein that is to saye that hee must holde of the kynge in capite but whether he holde of the kyng by knights seruice or by Socage in capite it makethe noe matter so that he holde in capite for the kinge in bothe cases shall haue primer seisin althoughe not wyth so large a prerogatiue in th one case as in the other For in the firste case where the tenure is knyghtes seruyce in capite the kynge shall haue the same prerogatiue when the heire is of full age at the deathe of his auÌ„cester as he should haue hadde yf hee hadde beene wythin age that is to saye primer seisin aswell in the landes holden of others as of hym selfe bee it that the landes holden of other bee holden by knyghtes seruice or in Socage But otherwyse yt ys where the tenure is but a tenure by Socage in capite for there the kynge shall haue noe primer seisin in landes holden of other namelye if theye be holden of other by knyghtes seruice as it appearethe plainlye by the statute of Magna charta capit 27. and in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—â— nor yet anye primier seisin of landes holden of hymselfe in Socage in capite â–ª If the heyre at
quod consentire poterit Et tunc elegat ipsa vtrum maluerit habere virum illum cui premaritat ' fuerit vel alium quem Rex ei obtulerit nullus qui de Rege tenet in Capite per seruicium militare potest alienare maiorem partem terrarum suarum ita quod residuum non sufficiat ad facienduÌ„ seruicium suum fine licencia Regis sed hoc non consueuit intelligi de membris et particulis earundem terrarum This Chapter containeth twoe matters beinge dyuers in nature and therfore I entend to seuer and deuyde the one from the other and the Chapter followinge to adioyne to the latter braunche hereof because they entrete both of one thinge The seuenth chapiter DE Serieantiis alienatis sine licentia regis consueuit rex arentare huiusmodi Seriâ—antias per rationabileÌ„ extentam inde faciendam 13. H. 3. in Fitz. ti Gard p. 147. This statute is but a confirmacion of the common law For it is writen in the .13 yere of king H. 3. in this wise Thomas summonitus est ad respondendum regi quare abduxit Helenam filiam et heredem E. c. T. dicit quod ipse ê‘ assensum E. in vita ipsius E. desponsauit predictam Helenam in facie ecclesie c. et quia predicta Helena est infra etatem et cuÌ„ ad etatem peruenerit potest coÌ„sentire matrimonio vel dissentire ideo remanet predicta Helena in custodia dnÌ„i Regis vsque ad etatem vt consentiat vel dissentiat c. Here it is not set furth nor expressed what is thage in a woman to coÌ„sent to matrimonie and that is all that is to be sought vpoÌ„ this statute for Bracton in his first booke in the latter ende of a chapter which hath this paragrafe s De minoribus qui debent esse sub tutela et Cura dnÌ„orum vel parentum saith quod femina septimo anno etatis sue potest consentire matrimonio et virum sustinere anno duodecimo for he saieth quod femina maius est capax doli quá masculus et quod maturiora sunt vota mulieris quam viri So that by him it appeareth that a Woman maye consent to matrimonie after she is .vii. yeres of age And so I iudge the lawe was at that tyme taken For it appeares in the tyme of kinge E. 1. that a man that helde by knightes seruice maried his heire apparant being vnder age died 13. E. 3. in Fitz. ti Gard p. 138 the lorde claimed the wardship of the bodye an issue was tended against him that at the time of the saide mariage the infant was of thage of seauen yeres and this issue was receiued by the Courte for a good issue to barre the lord of the wardship of the body qd ' nota Howbeit it apperes not by the said booke whether the heire were male or female Wangford saies An. 35. H. 6. fol. 37. that when a woman is .vii. yeares of age her auncestour may then gather aid to marie her which saieng argueth as mee seemeth that shee is then mariageable And also this seemes to make with Bracton Howbeit the lawe is not so taken in these daies For she cannot now consent to matrimonie before thage of .12 yeres This statut spekes onely of the heire female and yet Cheiny saieth in .7 H. 6. M. 7. H. 6. â—â— 30. E. 3. in Fitz. ti Gard p. 156. 128 that the heir male shal be taken wtin the compas of this statute by an equitie because the statute is beneficiall And so it should appere .30 E. 1. where the sonne was maried in the life of his ancestour then being no more then of chage of .v. yeres wheÌ„ the childe came to â—hage of xii yeares thancestour died the court adiudged in this case that the lord should haue the wardship of the body to th entent that if the enfant hereafter ere he passe thage of .14 yeres disagree to the firste mariage the lord may haue the mariage of him And so it may appere by this booke that this statut is but a confirmacion of the common law for euery lorde shal haue like aduauntage in this case as the king shal haue therewith agrees Paston 7. H. M. 7. H. 6. 11 6. adding farther to this that by the order of the comon law before this statut of Prerogatiue if the heire would haue staÌ„d to the first mariage when he or she came to the yeres of conset they should haue paied the double value by this statut they pay nothing therefore the case was there The kings tenant in chief hauing a sonne heir of â—hage of .14 yeres doth mary hym dyeth the king offers the child mariage at the age of .14 yeres whiche he refuseth holdes him selfe to the first mariage adiudged that then fant might so doe that for the same he should neuer pay the double value ne single of his mariage there Babthorp saieth that if the woman had died the heire beinge within the age of consent the kinge shoulde haue hadde the mariage of the childe notwithstandinge that hee was once maried in the life of his auncestour for yt was no mariage but at pleasure and therewith agrees Britton fo 169. Yea although the wife had died after the yeares of consent and before the childe had come to thage of xxi yeres quere of this matter for I am enformed that the lawe is not taken at this daie as the saide booke is in .7 H. 6. ¶ Now to thother branch of the Statute and the chapter next folowing the same It appeareth by Glanuill in the beginning of his seuenth booke that euery freeman hauing land whether he had an heire apparant then lyuing or not or whether the said heire apparant would coÌ„sent to it or not yet might he geue some reasonable porcion of his landes with his daughter or any other woman in mariage or to any man that had don him seruyce or in almes to any religious house or to any other whome he would so the said gifte were made in his health for in extremitie of sicknes hee might not bee suffered so to doe lest it should be thought to be done rather of a rage and furie of the mynde whiche through sicknes for the moste parte commeth to men then of any good discrecion and so might he in his gift excede measure Howbeit suche a gyfte in sicknes was euer good with the consent of the heire or with his confirmacion Againe if he had manye sonnes he could not without the consent of his heire apparant geue any porcion of his enheritance to any of the yonger sonnes for so might he disherit theldest thorough affeccioÌ„ that the fathers lightly beare towardes theire yonger sonne more then towardes thelder But of his purchased lande he might giue the yonger a porcion whether theldest woulde or not And if he had none issue he might geeue
in this case if ther bee an other record found that proueth the landes to be holden of the kinge in capite vppō these .ii. records together proces shal be made against the partie by Scire facias to come and shewe why he should not make a fine for the alienacion Like lawe it is where there is a record to proue that he that aliened is but tenant in taile of the kinges gift and he pretendinge to be tenant in fee simple doth purchace a licence of alienaciō and a lienethe and after dyethe without issue which deathe is founde by office but nothinge of his state taile or lycence appeareth in the sayde office yet vpon all these recordes laied together the king shal haue a Scire facias against the alienee to show why the land should not be seised in to his handes and his highnesse aunswered of the profites since the death of tenaunt in taile for when hee was but tenaunt in tayle it appearethe that the lycence was pourchased vpon false suggestyon and so voyde 40. li. assise in Fit ti Garde P. 1. and thenne the landes ought to reuerte to the kynge beecause hys reuercion coulde not bee discontinued And this maye yowe see 40. li. ass Then laste of all it is to bee seene whether the possession may bee taken from the kynge bye entrye or not And as to that yf the kynges possession bee by matter of recorde noe persone can dysseise hym or take the possession from hym for lyke as the kynge maye not take by gyfte from anye persone but by matter of recorde noe more maye the possession departe from hym but by matter of recorde and therefore his hyghnes cā not haue assise or Electione firme siue custodie lyke as a common persone maye yea and thoughe the entrie bee not immedyatlye vppon hym but vppon his committee or fermer yet it is noe disseisin to his hyghnesse as it appearethe 4. H 7. folio 2. M. 2. H. 4. M. 14. E. 4. folio 35. H. 6. in Fits titulo Suggestion P. 9. 2 M. 35. H. 6. folio 1 Bye the whiche sayde booke of 35. it also appearethe that if the kynge or hys commyttee bee cast oute of the wardeshyppe of the landes that the remedy is in thys manner that is to saye vppon suggestion thereof made in the Chauncerye there shal bee awarded a wrytte called Amoueas manum and that vppon a certaine payne whyche wrytte maye bee awarded onelye vppon this suggestion wythoute anye presentmente or enquirie and thys writte maye bee graunted to the committee as well beefore possession hadde of the warde as after for where the kynge was once possessed by office and grauntes it ouer yet this possession styll remaines for the kynge abydeth stil gardeyne notwythstandynge anye such graunt And therefore this writte of Amoueas sub pena lyethe for the grauntee or committee although the graunt be absque aliquo inde reddendo And if vppon this writte of Amoueas the defendant do not restore the thing then shall goe out againste him an attachement vpon which writ the defendant maye appeare and shewe his title which if it be founde agaynste him he shall then make restitucion by iugement and paye a fyne and aunswere the meane issues profites Thus dothe it appeare that the king cannot be disseised or eiected if his highnesse bee once seised by mater of recorde Otherwyse it is before his seisin bee by mater of recorde for if beefore office a straunger entre by title or without title this is no intrusion vpon the kinges possession but in this case the heire may haue Assise of mort dauncester againste the straunger if hee will whiche proues that by his entrie hee hath gottē bothe a freeholde and a fee simple But as sone as the office is founde and the eschetoure entreth this possession of the straunger whiche entred witheoute title is clerely vndone and the freeholde and the fee simple reuested in the heyre But if the entrie of the straunger weare by title and afterwarde office is founde and the kynge seisethe whether then it bee so or noe learne And it shoulde seeme to bee all one or els the kynges seisure is not good for howe can the kynge seise in an other bodyes ryghte if the ryghte weare taken awaye beefore by an entrie therefore it shoulde seeme eyther hys highnesse hathe noe title in that case to seise or els by his seisure the freeholde and the fee simple muste reuest in the heire But note that if the kynge wyll bye coloure of a recorde seyse an other mannes lande whiche recorde geeues him noe title in deede notwythestandynge anye suche seysure yet hee that hathe righte maye entre vppon the kynge and bye his entrie reuestes agayn in himselfe bothe the freeholde and fee simple as where it is foūd the kynges tenaunte dyed seysed but of an estate for terme of lyfe the reuersion to an other and thys notwythestandynge the kynge seisethe in this case if hee in the reuersion entre vppon the kynge this is a good entrie and therefore the case was hee made a feffement after his entrie and it was thoughte to be a good feffemēt Like law is it where the kynge is entitled but onelye to the profites as vppon an vtlagarie in a parsonall action or vpon the conuiction of a clerke in these cases if the partie entre and make a feffemēt or if a straunger that hathe title to entre do entre hee dyschargeth the kynge of hys interest and of these maters Trauers 12. Assise 156. you shal find bokes 8. H. 4. f. 16. 21. E. 3. f 1. 3 H. 7. 10. E. 3. 27. ass P 15. 9. H. 6. f. 20. 21. H. 7. f. 7. Enterpleder SOmetyme it happenethe that by two seuerall offices founde in one countie seuerall parsones be seuerallye founde heires to one man wherebye forasmuche as the kinge is brought in doubt to whiche of them his hyghnesse maye make liuerie they therefore muste firste enterplede and when by enterpleder the priuitie of the bloode is tried beetweene them then his highnesse oughte to make the liuerye to him that is tryed to bee the nexte heire of him that dyed As for an example by one Diem clausit or specyall commission in one countie one is founde heire to hym that dyed the kyngs tenant and of full age and by an other Diem clausit or speciall commissiō in the same countie one other is founde heire also to hym that dyed and within age in this case the heire that was firste founde shal haue a Scire facias in the chauncerie against hym or her that was last foūd heire to come shew why liuerie should not be made vnto hym that last dyed seised thereof vppon whiche writte yf a Scire feci be returned and the partye defendaunt cometh not or yf he come and confesse that he hymselfe is not heire then the plaintife in the Scire facias shal haue hys lyuerie but if hee come
that hath but a chatell shall not be receiued in anye case to falsifie the record that geueth any man interest in the freehold although he be a straunger to that record Contrarie lawe is it of him that hathe a freeholde or inheritaunce in the lande for they shall trauerse the recorde in suche case Lyke lawe is it where the kynge is entitled but to the wardeshyppe of the heire of his tenaūt hee that is fermer of the dimise of a straūger shal not trauerse hys office althoughe the king be not entitled thereby to anye freeholde for it was not the minde of the makers of these statutes to helpe them that clayme but chatels which are accompted in law as nothing because they perishe and abide not Et de minimis non curat lex Howbeit learne what the law wil in these cases for I haue seene noe bookes of them The lorde in title of wardshyppe shal trauerse the office and yet hee claymethe but a terme of yeares in the lande as where it is founde by office that such a one helde lands of the king in chief and dyed his heire within age where in deede he holdeth no suche lande of the kynge but onelye of mee by knightes seruice in this case I that am lorde shall trauerse this office that is to saye shewe howe they bee holden of mee by knightes seruyce without that they be holden of the king as appereth in 1. H 7. Trauers 20. For ther it toucheth the lords inheritance in the righte of his seignory because he by the false office is to lose the profit that is presently fallen by reason of his seignorie it is reason he be receaued to trauerse the office But if hee were but lorde in socage he shoulde not be receiued to his trauerse because he therby can make no title to the wardshippe of the body 37. lib. ass P 35. and landes of the childe for it is a good generall grounde if the kynge be once seised his highnes shall reteine against all other that haue noe title notwithstandinge it be found allso that the kynge had no title but that the other had possession before him as appeareth in .37 lib ass where it was found that neither the kinge nor the partie had title and yet adiudged that the kynge shoulde reteine for thoffice that fyndes the kyng to haue a right or title to entre makes euer the king a good title allthough it bee false and his highnes therby maye take possession against any other that is seised of the landes and reteyne vntill such time as thoffice be trauersed by him that hath title and tried to bee a false offyce And therfore no man shal trauerse thoffice vnlesse he make him selfe a title And if hee can not proue his title to be true allthoughe he be able to proue his trauerse to bee true yet this trauerse wil not serue him As for an exāple it is foūd the kyngs tenaunt died seised of certayn lands that he held of the kynge in chiefe his heire beeinge within age where in dede he had made a feffement in his life time to an other of those landes it is no trauerse for the feffee to say he dyed not seised but he must first make him selfe a title by the feffement and for asmuch as it is founde that the landes are holden in chiefe if he wyl make his title good againste the kyng he must shewe fourth a lycence of alienation or a dispensation therof or els hee muste trauerse the tenure in chiefe as well as he shall doe the rest of thoffice otherwise his tytle is not good Trauers P. 44. et 46. Liuerie p. 18 as it appearethe in .36 E. 3. 3. H. 4. 6. H. 5. .3 H 7. f. 14. Howbeit Hussey holdeth opiniō that not mā may trauerse the tenure but the lord or the heire vnlesse his title be found by office but whether the lawe be so or not learn for as I take it the lorde and euery straunger that hath a tytle againste the kynge makinge his title shall trauerse the office before his title be found by office for when the trauerse is found for the partie his title nowe appeareth of recorde and by the trauerse found the office which was the kings title is vtterly destroyed gone so that now the king is not to make any liuerie of the lands to any person but onely to a moue his hands from the same with the meane issues and profites as one that had no cause to seise them And therefore euery man may enter now that will if he haue right or title of entrie to the lands for the king deliuereth them to no person certaine but onely ryddes his own hands of them as he that had neuer seised thē but otherwise it is where the king is to make liuerie for there his highnes must bee enformed certainly by mater of recorde who shal be his tenāt whoe it is that ought to receiue the liuerie at his handes least his highnes be deceiued in thadmitting of his tenant which ys ought to be a great mater towarde the lord therfore the cases be not lyke wherfore I think a man may trauerse by force of these statutes without hauing their title first found by office so be our bokes .36 E 3. 2. E. 4. f. 10. 16. E. 4. f. 4. Trauers 44. 43. li. ass P. 20. Howbeit 5. E. 4. fo 5. semes to weye to the cōtrarie hereof 12. H. 6. also where it is sayde that if it bee found that the kings tenāt died seised wher in dede he was iointly enfeffed with me now can I not trauerse this office except an other office were founde for me But contrarie lawe should it be if it had ben foūd by the office iointenant with hym for term of life wher in dede I was iointenaunt with him in fee simple in this case I may traūse thoffice because mētiō is made of me in the sayd office this boke case admitted to be law yet it varieth frō the case before remēbred of the strāger that trauersed thoffice for here thoffice is true and when it is found by office that he died seised this maye be allthough the sayde dying seised were iointlye with an other for any thynge that is expresselye founde to the certaintie and then the king here is to admit an other tenant as in the case of the liuerie before of whome as yet he hath no credible informacion that is to saye by mater of recorde and then it is lyke to the cases of tenant by the curtesie tenant in dower and the deuisee which in no wise can be admitted to their estats vnlesse mention be made of them in the office or some other office or mater of recorde found for them 9. H. 7. fo 24 Brief 618. as appearethe in 46. E. 3. M. 11. H. 8. and for none other reasō as I gather it but onely for that thoffice is
trauerser loffice ou auterment mre son droit et illeoques maunde deuaunt le roye a faire final discussion sauns attender auter maundement This statute speakes bothe of trauerse and Monstrance de droit disiunctiuely whereby a man may gather that if Monstraunce de droit were not by thorder of the common law as it is saide 13. E. 4. f. 8. that it is yet were it geeuen by this estatute And no booke that beares date before this statut can I find that treates any thing of Monstraunce de droit Wherfore without preiudice to anye mans oppinion mine oppinion is that it is geuen onely by this statute but whether it bee so or not so I doe not greatly force Let vs see what it is in what cases it lieth If the kinge bee entitled by office or other matter of recorde that is trauersable Howbeit there is no cause of trauerse for that the office or recorde is true in this case anye manne that hath right to the possession of the freeholde of this lande whiche in shewinge of his right is able to confesse this office and auoid it shal bee receyued if hee bee putte out of hys possession or greeued thereby to come into the Chauncerie and shewe his saide right which beinge there proued to be true iudgement shal bee geeuen that the kinges handes be amoued from the possession of the saide landes with the meane issues and proftes to be restored vnto the party that sueth the said Monstraunce de droit As for an example it is founde by office that the kinges tenaunt by knightes seruice in chiefe dyed seised of certeine landes whiche are descended to his heir being within age where in dede in his life time I recouered this land against him and suing no execution suffred him to dye seised therof now vpon this office returned into the Chauncerie shall I come shewe my right that is to saye this recouere and auerre that this lande founde by office is the lande that I recouered or parcell thereof which being so proued and tried I shall haue an Ouster le maine Like law it is if the kings tenaunt disseised me of those landes and I made my continuall claime or that I had title to enter for condicion broken into the saide landes in the life of the kinges tenaunt and I entred and after was disseised by him But quere if I did not enter in his life whether now I may bee holpen by a Monstraunce de droit vppon the kinges possession And me thinkes not because I haue noe righte in that case till I enter for vntill that time the right continueth still in hym so that the kinge then hath a right ere I haue a right which ought too bee preferred and take place since it is but for a tyme before myne And for these cases see the booke in .3 H 7. fo 2. But if the king bee entitled by matter of worde not trauersable as if he be entytled by double matter of record in this case I can not haue my Monstraunce de droit no more than I can haue in the like case of Trauerse vnlesse my title be founde by one of the saide recordes As take the case to bee It is founde by office that one suche that holdeth of the kinge disseised mee and then committed a felonye vppon whome I entred after whiche entrie the saide tenaunt was attainted of the felonye in this case I shal haue the lande out of the kings hands by a Monstrance de droit causa qua supra And yet the kinges tytle is here by a record and not trauersable that is to saye thatteinder But what than My tytle is also founde by office and appeareth by matter of recorde M. 3. E. 4. 26 A. 4. H. 7. 6 whych beynge proued true doth clearelye auoide the kyngs possession and that is the reason I shall be receiued in thys case to a Monstraunce de droit as appeareth in .3 Edward 4. And therewith agreeth the booke 4. Henry 7. where kyng Richard the thirde was attainted of Treason by act of Parliament and found by office that he was seised of certeine land cometh one B. and saith that in the saide Parliament it was enacted that an atteinder of treason had against the father of the saide B. shoulde bee auoided and adnulled and hee restored to his landes and that these lands cōprised in the office were in the hands of the said king R. by attainder of his father aiudged that vpon this Monstraunce de droit the party should haue restituciō because his right appered by mater of record Like law is it wher it is found by office that such a one is attainted of felony is seised of such landes which are holden of the king nowe he that hath cause to sue his Monstraunce de droit can not be admitted therunto by reason of these two records Howbeeit if it bee so that there is noe suche attainder in deede then may the party that would sue a Monstraunce de droit saye that there is no suche recorde of attainder which beeinge founde true hee shal be receiued to his Monstraunce de droit as appeareth in the saide booke .4 H. 7. For nowe is there no recorde against him but onelye the office and notwithstandinge that by thoffice thattaindour is founde yet this fyndinge makes nothinge for the kinge if it bee vntrue For the iurie can neuer finde a matter of recorde and if they doe it is to little purpose for the recorde is euer triable by it selfe and if there bee suche a recorde it will appeare thoughe they fynde it not and if there bee none the finding of it is voide This may you see that a Monstrance de droit lyeth sometimes althoughe the kynge bee entytled by double matter of recorde if it so bee that the parties tytle appeare by matter of recorde or else it lyethe not M 14. E. 4. f. 1. 7 And yet Choke Littleton and Nedham helde oppinion in .14 E. 4. that if it bee founde before theschetour that one was tenant in taile of certeine landes holden of the kinge the remaynder to another in fee and that hee in the remainder is outlawed of felonye and that tenaunt in taile is dead without issue where in dede he beinge tenant in taile before the statute De donis condicionalibus after that hee hadde issue enfeffed one B. in this case the saide B. shall shewe this matter and that the vtlagarie was after the feffement made and so haue the landes out of the kinges handes by a Monstraunce de droit But it shoulde seeme their oppinion is againste the lawe and the bookes beefore rehersed vnlesse this feffement were founde by office Peticion .12 Trauers .7 because it appearethe that the kinge in this case is entytled by double matter of recorde And note that where the kinge is entitled but by office alone there the partye maye haue his Monstraunce de droit althoughe his title bee