of this sinne Heb. 6. 4. and 10. 26. 27. the Apostle calling it an apostasy or backslyding from God It is so also described 2. Pet. 2. 20. And 1. Io 5. 16. It is called a sinne vnto death As for the other kinds of this sin before specified some of them are consequently of this sin which we call a blasphemie and appertaine vnto it for desperation and final impenitency are the punishments of this sinne Obstinacie is in the very nature of this sinne for it caries with it an obstinate maliciousnesse And as for the other kinds I cannot see how they may be called sins against the holy Ghost for as for presumption what is it els but hypocrisie To Presumption repine at the graces of God in our brethren is a sinne against our neighbour and against the second table of the law Therefore let this rest that there is but one sin against the holy Ghost so called to wit the blasphemy against the holy Ghost or an apostasy from the grace of the spirit once receiued for these are one and the same to blaspheme against the holy Ghost and to fall from grace receiued Notwithstanding I deny not but that this sin which is but one in substance may haue his increase or growth for then it is come to a height when as it fighteth against all the known truth which is according to godlinesse Next we say that this one sinne is impardonable not for that it is seldome and hardly pardoned but for that it is neuer pardoned because such a one can neuer repent him of his sinne that he hath committed For this mans heart groweth to such a hardnesse and that by Gods iust iudgment as can neuer after be mollified And that this sin is simply impardonable is manifest by y e very words of the lord in y e gospel before cited for where it is sayd in Matth. it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come and in Mark This sinne is neuer forgiuen but is culpable of eternall damnation Do not these words cut off all hope of pardon So as I cannot but wonder at the Rhemists so impudently to extenuate Rhemists impudency 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the force of the words of the lord To the Heb. 6. he saith it is impossible that he which so sinneth should be renued by repentance then he addeth a waighty cause and most necessarie for sayth he This man crucifieth againe to himselfe the Sonne of God that is as much as in him lyeth Which point the better to conceiue it we must know there is a difference betweene all other sinnes and this sin against the holy Ghost as touching the remission and expiation of them For to expiat all other sinnes the sacrifice of Christ once offered is sufficient for them all and the vertue thereof extendeth it selfe to purge all sinnes for euer But when a man hath once sinned against the holy Ghost and profaned that pretious bloud the vertue thereof will neuer after be effectual for the expiation of his sin Wherefore he stands in neede of some new sacrifice to purge his sinne which thing shal neuer be granted him For if this were graunted then must Christ be crucified againe or some other sacrifice must be offered but neither can Christ be crucifyed againe neither can any other sacrifice bee offered for him as it is written Heb. 10. 26. For there remaineth no more sacrifice for sinnes Therefore this sin can neuer be expiat because a new sacrifice can neuer be giuen for it And this is the cause of the impossibility of the pardon of this sinne The aduersaries namely the Rhemists in their obseruations on this place do thus interpret this impossibilitie they say there is a double repentance or renuing or purging of sinne They say the first is easie and light in and by Baptisme where say they all the sinnes before Baptisme are purged by that light washing of baptisme The second they call penance or the purging of sinnes Popish sacrament of penanc as they say by the sacrament of Penance and in this Sacrament as they speake such sinnes are purged which are committed after baptisme and this is hard and painfull as consisting of fastings prayers satisfactions and other corporall afflictions If you graunt them this distinction then they say this impossibilitie of being renewed is in respect of that repentance renewing and purging of sinne which is in baptisme For they say it is impossible that a sinne committed after Baptisme some baptisme being iterated should be purged for we may not be rebaptized As for the latter penance and renewing they say there is a possibility in it For the greatest sinne after baptisme may be expiat by it Therefore they affirme the Apostle speakes couertly to such as sinne after baptisme sending them to the Sacrament of Penance that by vertue of that Sacrament their sinne may be expiat and that they may be renewed But by this their interpretation 2. Pet. 3. 16 they peruert the holy Scripture to their owne destruction For this is certaine that the Apostle here takes away all possibilitie of being renewed as the reason annexed manifestly proueth Finally it is euident by that place of Iohn before cited that this sinne is impardonable and that this is proper to that sin that it can by no meanes be pardoned For Iohn saith we may not pray for that sinne If we may not pray for it there is no hope of repentance or pardon for it I know what the Rhemists heere would say to wit that by this sinne vnto death we must vnderstand finall impenitencie finall impenitencie is not remitted because here wants repentance and therfore we may not pray for such a one after his death for he died in impenitency contemning the Sacrament of Penance But they affirme it to be lawfull to pray for other sinnes after death This againe is to peruert Scripture for the Apostle speaketh not of prayer to be or not to be after his death which hath so sinned but that prayer must not bee conceiued for him whilest he liueth after that it hath manifestly appeared vnto the church by infallible arguments that such a one hath sinned vnto death As for Iulian the Apostata for whom the Church prayed not while he liued yea it prayed against him in his life time after it was clearely discerned that hee had sinned vnto death that is had blasphemed against the holy Ghost I passe ouer that place of Peter before cited where the Apostle speakes of no difficultie but of a meere impossibilitie of being renewed of repentance and of remission of sinnes where it is said Their latter state is worse then the first and as it followeth but it hath happened vnto him as it is in the true prouerbe the dog hath returned to his owne vomit and the sow to her wallowing in the mire And thus farre of this second controuersie and so much shal suffice concerning sinne
end vse of the couenant of works is that men by it may be iustified and saued or otherwise condemned The couenant of works had this vse in Adam before his fall that Adam by it might be iustified and liue After the fall it hath the same vse in the vnregenerate elect and reprobate to wit to iustifie and saue them or to condemne them And for as much as it can not iustifie them because of their corruption Rom. 8. 3. it followeth that it must necessarilie condemne them And the verie vnbeleeuing and vnregenerat doe otherwhiles feele this condemnation in themselues Of this vse read Rom. 3. 19. where he sayth that by the law Euery mouth is stopped and made obnoxious to the condemnation of God And of the experience of this condemnation reade Rom. 7. 10. I saith he when the commandement came was dead that is condemned in my conscience so that I felt in my selfe present condemnation and death And albeit this first vse of the couenant of works be cōmon to al vnregenerat elect and reprobate yet this wants not some difference for in the elect the acknowledgmēt of sin and condemnation which they haue by the couenant of works is vnto them a preparatiue to imbrace the couenant of grace but in the reprobate it is the way to extream desperation Thus far of the first vse The second end of the couenant of works is this It 2. End of the couenant of works serues to driue on and to stir vp al beleeuers to march on forwardes in all faith and godlinesse This vse it hath I say in the regenerat who in the legall couenant or morall law doe desire principallie to behold as in a glasse euermore first the holinesse maiestie and iustice of God 1. The vse of the morall law to the beleeuers Ro. 7. 12. Therefore the law is holy and the commandement is holy iust good Next they see here that which they call the originall holines and iustice of man to wit 2. the same which was in the creation which is defined to consist of iustice holines and wisdome Thirdly they behold here that life eternall which was to follow that 3. first originall iustice Fourthly they see that corruption and vnrighteousnes which is now in nature after mans 4. fal but this they see by consequent as we say one contrary is discerned and knowen by another for while we consider first that infinit iustice of God next our original iustice which are properlie discerned by that glasse of Gods law and couenant of works by the light and brightnes of these I say we may take a view of the grosse darknes filthinesse and deformitie of our corrupt nature For this cause it is said Ro. 3. 20. By the law commeth the knowledg of fin Fiftly they see herein Gods wrath kindled against y t deformitie of nature so contrarie both to Gods iustice to mans original iustice For this cause it is said Rom. 1. The wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all the vngodlines and vnrighteousnesse of men and Rom. 4. The law causeth wrath Sixtly and lastly they behold how present death followeth that wrath of God Ro. 1. 32. Which men though they knew the law of God how that they which commit such things are worthie of death yet not onelie doe the same but also fauour them that doe them Chap. 7. 9 10. When the commandement came I dyed The regenerate when they consider these things in the law and couenant of workes they are forthwith terrified with that heauie spectacle 1. of their sinne 2. of the wrath of God against sinne 3. of eternall death which followeth Gods wrath And then doe they more more relinquish and renounce 1. that legall righteousnes required in the couenant of workes 2. that originall iustice and all opinion of free-will 3. that life and safety which followeth that legal righteousnes of works And hauing renounced all confidence in these thinges with like in deuour they follow hard after Christ by conuersion and faith to this end that they may finde in him first that mercie of God in Christ contrarie to that iustice of God secondlie they seeke for that imputatiue iustice as they call it so contrarie to their owne righteousnes to that originall iustice of the law or of works Thirdly they labour for that sanctification and regeneration that so they may bring forth the fruites of the spirit Fourthly they waite for to attaine that life eternall which is giuen vs of Gods free grace in and by that imputed righteousnes of Christ If we were possest in this life of a perfect faith in Christ A perfect faith we haue not and so of perfect holines then I graunt the beleeuers should not need this terrible glasse of the law and of the couenant of works But because vnbeleefe still resteth in this our nature and the reliques of that inherent contagion still abide in vs and for that so long as wee liue here neither our faith nor holinesse can be perfected Therfore to weaken more more our vnbelcefe and inherent sinne in vs and more and more to increase faith and holinesse we haue euer need of this terrible glasse as a continuall seuere Schoolemaister which euer casting many feares before vs may driue vs to the faith of Christ and to sanctimonie of life Now then seeing it is euident that there is a double vse of the couenant of workes the answer to the question aforegoing is easie For this we auouch that as touching the former vse the couenant of works is abolished to them which are vnder grace To this the Apostle pointeth when he saith Ro. 6. 15. Yee are not vnder the law but vnder grace Gal. 4. that he might redeeme them which were vnder the law Rom. 7. Being dead to the law we are now free from the law 2. Cor. 3. 11. For if that which should be abolished was glorious But as for this second vse it is not abolished This distinction is commonlie receiued that the law legall couenant is abolished as it is a condemning tyrant and not to be abolished as it is a Schoolemaister to chasten vs and with terrours to driue vs vnto Christ For this second vse we haue an example in Paul after his regeneration Ro. 7. 14. c. For when he considers in the glasse of Gods law the spiritualitie that so I may speak the holines and goodnes of the law first next his owne carnalitie to vse that worde and rebellion and lastly death it selfe first he breaks forth into these wordes Miserable man that I am who shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Next he flieth to the mercie of God in Christ Iesu saying I giue God thanks in Christ Iesus And 2. Cor. 5. 11. Paul sayth of himselfe he was inforced and mooued forwardes to doe duties in his calling because of the terrors of the Lord set downe and offered vnto him in and by
vnder the couenant of works in respect of vs for being vnited to that diuine nature it is become a mediatour for vs to make intercession and peace betweene God offended and man offending For Christ our Mediatour albeit he be God and man in that personal vnion yet was he made subiect to the couenant of works and to the course of the law for vs properly in respect of his humane nature that as the Apostle speaketh he might redeeme vs from the law and the curse of the law See Gal. 4. 4. and 5. After that the fulnesse of time was come God sent his Sonne made of awoman made subiect to the lawe to redeeme them which vvere vnder the lawe And Galath 3. ver 13. But Christ saith he hath redeemed vs from the curse while he was made a curse for vs. Christ therefore our mediator subiected himselfe vnto the couenant of works and vnto the lawe for our sake and did both fulfill the condition of the couenant of works in his holy and good life euen in the highest degree of perfection as being God and man euen that most holy one of God in one person and also he did vndergoe that curse which was denounced against man in that couenant of works if that condition of good and holy works were not kept for in the couenant of works ye haue together with the promise of life to him who doth well a commination of euerlasting death to him who doth not well For this cause Christ our mediator both did wel according to the promise died also according to the curse denoūced Wherefore we see Christ in two respect to wit in doing suffring subiect to the couenant of works to haue most perfectly fulfilled it that for our sake whose mediator he is become It may be demaunded Had it not beene sufficient for our good and to the end he might redeeme vs if he had only liued well and holily and not also so to haue suffered death for vs I answer it had not sufficed for all his most holy righteous works had not satisfied the iustice and wrath of God for our sins nor merited the mercie of God reconciliatiō righteousnes life eternal for vs the reason is for that the iustice of God did require for our breach of Gods couenant that we should be punished with death eternall according to the condition denounced and annexed to the promise of that couenant Therefore no good works of our owne or of any Mediator for vs after the breach of that couenant of works could haue satisfied the iustice of God which of necessity after asort required the punishment and death of the offender or certainly of some mediator in his steed If then all the good holy works of the Mediator could not satisfie that wrath and iustice of God for sin it is cleere they could not meritany new grace or mercy of God for vs. But you will say that the good and holy works of Christ our Mediatour haue wrought some part at least of that satisfaction whereby Gods iustice was appeased for vs and some part of that merit whereby Gods fauour was purchased for vs I answer these works did serue properly for no part of satisfaction or merit for vs for that to speake properly the death of Christ and his passion onely did satisfie Gods iustice and merited his mercie for vs. If anie will yet further demaund May we not diuide the satisfaction and merit of Christ into his doings and suffrings that we may speake on this manner Christ by his death and passion hath satisfied Gods iustice and by his good and holy works he hath merited Gods mercie for vs that so satisfaction may bee ascribed to his death and merit to his workes that the righteousnesse wherewith wee are iustified before God may bee partly the satisfaction which Christ perfourmed by his death for vs partly the merits which he obtained by his works for vs I answer to speake properly the satisfaction and merit which is by the only passion of Christ both He saith we are iustified only by the passiue righteousnesse of Christ was and is our righteousnesse or the satisfactorie and meritorious death of Christ or the satisfaction which was by Christs death or the merit of his death or the obedience of Christ as being obedient to his Father vnto the death the death also of the Crosse to bee short that iustice of Christ which he obtained when in his passion he satisfied his Fathers wrath this is our righteousnesse For we may say that either the death of Christ or his satisfaction or his merit or his obedience or his righteousnesse is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse For all these are taken for one and the same thing But here it may bee replied If the works of Christ cannot properly procure for vs any satisfaction nor merit nor anie part of satisfaction or merit then it may bee demaunded What hath beene and what is the vse of Christs works or of his actiue obedience or of the obedience of his life I answer that the holinesse of the person The actiue obedience of Christ or the righteousnes and holinesse of his person and life how it is the ground of the satisfactorie and meritorious passion of Christ of Christ and of his natures diuine and humane and of his works is the verie ground or foundation of the satisfaction and merit which wee haue in the passion of Christ that is the excellencie and worthinesse of that person and of his works did cause that his passion was both satisfactorie and meritorious for if this person which suffered had not beene so holy and excellent as also his life so pure and godly it is most certaine that his passion could neither haue satisfied Gods wrath nor merited mercie for vs. For which cause the Apostle Heb. 7. 26. speaking of this ground of this meritorious passion of Christ saith that such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy blamelesse vndefiled separate from sinners and made higher then the heauens And thus farre of Christ and how hee may bee said to be vnder the couenant of works And that he was not vnder the couenant of grace the matter is so cleare that it needs no disputation For the couenant of grace was made in him and established in his bloud and the promise in the couenant of grace is made to them which were vniust and dead in sinne because of the breach of that couenant of works and lastly Christ not vnder the couenant of grace the condition in the couenant of grace is faith in Christ the mediator Wherfore if ye respect either the ground or condition or promise of the free couenant Christ can not be said to bee vnder it And thus farre of both couenants of them which are vnder the couenant of God either of works or of grace CHAP. V. A comparison of our iudgment and of the Aduersaries concerning both these
iustification which is by Christ onely by the grace of God only by faith only for al these haue one respect and purpose Obserue then here by the way what the palpable blindnesse of the Papists is in this cleere light of the Gospell Popish blindnes First they see not how nature is plainlie lost as touching sanctitie Secondly they know not the sole grace and mercie of God neither do they vnderstand what the excellency is of Christs merit Thirdly they perceiue not how that couenant of works is abolished to them which are in Christ as touching iustification Fourthly they conceiue not that the only couenant of grace is made with mankinde after the fall speciallie now after the incarnation of Christ in the Gospell and that vnto iustification and life eternall Fiftly they see not that the works of free will as they call them if there were any such to be duties only and testimonies of thankefulnesse according to the first institution of the couenant of works which be done by the strength of nature but ascribe some speciall meritorious vertue vnto them Wherefore we conclude concerning these men that albeit they be not iust of one minde with those old Iewes against whom the Apostle disputed in the Epistle to the Romans yet they hold much on their side striuing to defend that nature is in part good and holy so contending against the pure and only grace of God and to diuide iustification and The popish iustification mans saluation betweene Christ and Gods free grace the vertues and workes of nature whereas notwithstanding these two nature and grace can neuer stand together in the worke of our saluation For whosoeuer shall conioine or make a mixture of grace and nature in this matter shall quite ouerthrow and extinguish grace which either is alone or not at all as Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of works for otherwise grace were no more grace And in the Epistle to the Galathians he doth purposelie dispute against those Iewes which did couple together in the matter of iustification the guifts and works of nature with Christ with the grace of God and with the Gospell And these Iewes as I iudge the Papists seeme most to resemble I meane those Iewes against whom he wrote in the Epistle to the Galathians For in that other epistle to the Romans he disputeth against such Iewes as did openly deny Christ and reiect him but to the Galathians his disputation is against such Iewes as were not content with Christ only but would haue Christ and the law ioined together Thus far of the comparison betweene Paul and vs on the one side the old Iewes and the Papists on the other Now because it will be demanded what Paul thought of the works of regeneration and what we and what the aduersaries thinke also therefore I will touch this question in few wordes Here then some one will say did Paul then in that disputation to the Rom. and to the Galathians oppugne the works of grace and regeneration I answer Paules chiefe purpose in that disputation is against the works of nature which the Iewes thought to be holy and iust and also meritorious he did not reiect the works of regeneration as they be duties and testimonies of thankfulnesse vnto God but in that respect commends them Rom. 6. 7. 8. Chapters and in other places But as touching the cause of iustification he would not haue these workes as we call them of regeneration coupled with the grace of God or with Christ or with faith as anie cause or as part of anie meritorious cause of saluation To this purpose he saith Rom. 4. that Abraham himselfe being regenerate was not iustified before God by anie works of his regeneration And Rom. 6. hauing commended the works of sanctification in the end vers 23. where he attributeth death to the merit of sinne hee doth not there notwithstanding ascribe life eternall to the merit of the works or fruits of sanctification but when he had said that the wages of sin is death he doth clearely auouch it that eternall life is the free gift of God in Christ Iesu In which place if the Apostle had beene of this iudgement that the works of regeneration be in anie respect meritorious assuredly he would not so passe ouer the commendation of the works of regeneration specially for that this heere is principally intended Wherefore the Apostle to the Romans so reiecting the works of nature which the couenant of works requireth yet hee vnderstandeth also all kinds of workes morall and naturall going before grace and faith as also all ceremoniall works and the very fruits of regeneration which follow grace and faith that faith onely Christ only grace only may herein be all in all Thus far of S. Paules iudgment We at this day are of one and the same mind with the Apostle concerning works of regeneration Our aduersaries granting there be such works ascribe too much vnto them for they will not haue them to be duties and testimonies onely of thankfulnesse vnto God but also that they be meritorious causes of that iustification which they call the second iustification Again we are to remember that the aduersaries iudgment concerning works of regeneration is that they proceed not onely from infused grace and first iustice as they speake but also from nature and free-will which works together with that iustice in respect whereof also they account good works meritorious as was before The popish opinion of good works shewed so ascribing their good works in part to that their first grace and in part to free-will And thus farre of this comparison wherby it appeares whether we or our aduersaries haue the better or the more sound iudgment concerning both couenants of the grounds of both nature grace and Christ as also of the effect of both which we call mans iustification And lastly for that this is the most fundamentall point of true religion we may hereby discerne also whether we or the aduersaries haue the religion and worship of God the more purely soundly established amongst vs. CHAP. VI. Of the written Word or of the written Couenant of God THe word in both couenants was for a long time in the world euen from Adams time till Moses vnwritten deliuered as from hand to hand and continued by a liuelie voice for I passe ouer such matters as Ioseph recordes to be ingrauen in columnes before the floud as also the Apocryphals of Henoch And whē as in continuance of time corruptions grew by these traditions and the puritie of the doctrine of the couenant could not thus be preserued and y t God would no longer follow the former course onely he beganne in Moses time to ordaine and to publish another forme to wit this to preserue and to continue the puritie of the celestiall doctrine in written books approued and sealed by diuine authoritie and testimonie the more to commend his written word vnto men
cause an enmitie betwixt vs and God but dooth a little staine iustice which they place in charitie and they say it A popish veniall sinne spots it a little wherefore this sinne say they is soone pardoned and expiate with a light punishment as in this life with the repetition of the Lords prayer the smiting of the breast satisfactiō or penance imposed by the priest or which men do of thēselues voluntarily vndergo After this life all venial sinnes be expiat in purgatory if they be not pardoned in this life by the meanes before expressed They say veniall sinne is twofold the first veniall sin is so called because it is so by nature and for the substance Venial sin 2. of it as an idle word or immoderate laughter The next veniall sinne they say is that which is not so by nature but for some imperfection for that sin by nature is mortall but because it is imperfect for the measure or quantity of the euill therefore it is veniall This imperfection say they is twofold for this imperfection is either by reason of the will as when there is not a full consent of the will vnto a secret motion of concupiscense In this kind of venial sinne they reckon all euil secret motions which stirre in the affection before the mind can think of them and which get not any full consent of the will as the motions of lust of anger of enuie c. Oragaine there is an imperfection in respect of the matter of the sinne to wit when the matter is so small and light that it makes the sin veniall as for example if a man steale a half-peny or some such trifle wherby the neighbour is little or nothing touched and charity is not violate And they go about to proue their opinion concerning veniall sinne by diuers kindes of arguments First by testimonies of the scripture and of the Church next by reasons of their owne in refutation of which arguments my Popish arguments for veniall sinne meaning is not to insist For veniall sinne they cite Mat. 12. 32. Whosoeuer shall speake against the holy Ghost it shall not be forgiuen him neither in this world nor in the world to come Therefore say they there is a kinde of sinne which shal be pardoned after this life and the same is venial sin which is purged with the fire of purgatory But let Mark chap. 3 29. bee the interpreter of this phrase which Mathew hath in this place Whosoeuer saith he shall blaspheme against the holy Ghost shal neuer haue forgiuenes but is culpable or guilty of eternall damnation Therefore where Mathew saith neither is this life nor in the life to come it is the same as if he said It shall neuer be forgiuen him They bring also the place which is Mat. 5. 22. Whosoeuer is angry with his brother vnaduisedly shal be culpable of iudgment and whosoeuer saith vnto his brother Raca shal be worthy to be punished by the Councel and whosoeuer shal say foole shal be worthy to be punished with hell fire There are here 3. kinds of sins say they of which he adiudgeth one kinde only worthy of hell fire wherefore the two former are to be expiat with some light punishment and therfore be veniall sinnes I answere this place teacheth vs that there is an inequality first of sinnes next of punishments and those also spirituall and infernall which Christ expresseth here by an allusion to ciuill and politique penalties which were vnequall They reason also on this wise No man say they will denie that one sin is lesser then another by nature Therefore Popish reasons for veniall sin is not the lesser sinne veniall by nature I answer it followeth not for that the least sinne by nature meriteth eternall death and eternall punishment albeit not the greatest punishment For we deuie not the inequalitie of the paines of the damned Next say they is not one sin lesse then another in quantity And therefore is it not veniall in respect of the imperfection thereof I answer it followeth not for euery sin howsoeuer imperfect meriteth eternal death or if it be venial it is not for the imperfectiō of it but for Christs sake and his satisfaction for it Thirdly they say is not that sin veniall which doth not destroy or ouerthrow iustice charity or inherent grace But there are some sinnes which doe not ouerthrow or extinguish iustice Ergo there be some venial sinnes The assumption is proued The iust man fals 7. times in the day and riseth againe Behold here one sinneth and yet ceaseth not to be iust I answer The proposition is false for that very sinne which doth not extinguish the grace of Christ and inherent holines that very sinne by it owne nature is mortall And in that it is pardonable and doth not abolish holines that is not to be imputed to the sin it self but to the free mercy of God in Iesus Christ CHAP. XXVIII The controuersie concerning the sinne against the holy Ghost THE aduersaries say there be 6. kindes of this sinne The first sinne is presumption when a The Papists say there be six kinds of the sinne against the holy Ghost man presumeth ouermuch of the grace of God and of faith in the meane while denying his faith by his works This is the man whom Iames taxeth in his Epistle Chap. 2. vers 14. and after Thesecond is desperation contrary to presumption this was Cain and Iudas sin The third is to impugne the knowne truth hereto belongs the blasphemie against the holy 3 Ghost this was the sinne of the Pharasies Matth. 12. The fourth is to enuy or to repine at the graces of God in our 4 brethren this was the sin of the Iewes which did repine and grieue at the grace of God giuen the Gentiles The fift is obstinacy when as a man shal persist in a known sin with an obstinate mind This was Pharaohs sinne and 6 the obstinate Iewes The sixt is finall impenitency when as any shall die in contempt of the sacrament of penance and of any satisfaction imposed vpon him by Ecclesiasticall order Of this they vnderstand that place 1. Ioh. 5. 16. There is a sin vnto death I do not say that ye should pray for him They say a man sins against the holy Ghost al these waies and that all these sins be inexpiable and that these sins are called irremissible because they bee seldome and hardly forgiuen as men seldome and hardly repent them of these sins But the last which is finall impenitency they thinke that onely is properly sayde to be impardonable because it is neither forgiuen in this life nor after this life And this is their iudgment of the sin against the holy Ghost But we auouch that the scripture doth teach vs there is but one sinne only against the holy Ghost Matth 12. 32. Mark 3. 29. Luke 12. 10. called the blasphemy against the holy Ghost Ye haue a description
religious and wise I hope shall finde them as iudicially comfortably and compendiously set downe and knit together as any one thing of this kinde as yet extant in the English tongue Next as for the argument of this booke our effectuall calling is one principall linke of the golden chaine of the causes of our saluation And it is the very first in the execution of Gods eternall decree of our election which manifesteth the euerlasting loue of God in Iesus Christ vnto the heart of euery beleeuer that almightie God should loue him being his enemie seeke him and finde him when he wandered in the maze and vanitie of his owne minde quicken him when hee lay dead in sinne loose him when he lay fast bound in the bonds of death inlighten him when he sate in extreame darkenes giuing him the spirit of grace and of faith by the Gospell to attend his holy calling and in time to reioyce with an exceeding ioy Rom. 5. 2. 3. therein Lastly for the translation albeit I haue not followed the authors words yet haue I endeuoured faithfully to deliuer his meaning in the plainest forme and in words most in vse among the people Horat. art non verbum verbo curabis reddere fidus interpres The Lord giue it a blessing wheresoeuer it shall rest among Gods elect of both these kingdomes Now right Worshipfull Maister Scot I come vnto yourselfe your most christian and holy loue in these cold and euill times as vnto all the Saint so specially to this good seruant of Christ like as it comforted him greatly in his latter dayes so assuredly it shall much refresh your owne heart not onely all your life but also much more I doubt not in the very houre of death There be three infallible notes knit together in one Scripture to iustifie our pretious faith vnto our owne hearts that we may be truely perswaded we are possest of that faith which shall iustifie vs before God loue to the brethren hospitalitie of loue and christian sympathie to the Saints in their 1. 2. afflictions Loue to the holy members of Christ 3. is often commaunded and commended in Ioseph in Moses in Nehemias in Daniel in Dauid who being aduanced to great dignities yet esteemed they nothing more then the good of the Church and to become seruiceable as it were by all meanes to the Saints To loue the seruants of Christ and to be beloued of * Rom. 15. 31. Philip. 1. 9. them it is as Saint Iohn saith an infallible argument that God hath taken vs by the hand loosened our * 1. Iohn 3. 8. bands and translated vs from death to life and from * 1. Pet. 2. 9. darknes into the glorious light of God All that talke of Charitie doe not loue the Saints that is the liuing members of Christ on earth We may discerne our loue to be sound by these notes First it is a flame which comes downe from God into our a Rom. 5. 5. Luk. 7. 47. hearts kindling as it were within vs and giuing vs no rest till we performe duties to the Saints And this is that which the Apostle meaneth when he willeth vs to b Heb. 10. 24. stirre vp one another vnto a paroxysme of loue Secondly hence it comes to passe that loue to the Saints being neuer colde is neuer idle in well doing and therefore proceedes the second note which the same Apostle calles c Heb. 6. 10. labour 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Psalm 16. 4 5. of loue for that this loue trauailes by all meanes possible to doe good to the members of Christ Thirdly next this loue is sincere d Rom. 12. 9. voide of all dissimulation Fourthly and lastly it is e Hebr. 13. 1. Act 2. 42 46. constant consuming as a fire all offences f Phil. 1. 9. 10. and cannot bee quenched The second marke in the same Scripture of our most holy faith is g Hebr. 13. 2. hospitalitie of loue as the Syriack translation hath it not of lucre The Lord gaue often h Rom. 12. 10. 11 1. Pet. 4 9. 1. Tim. 3. 2. 15. 20. charge by his Apostles concerning this foreseeing the necessitie and afflictions of the Saints in the tenne bloodie persecutions which euen then began and were to follow The practise Hilariter excipere affabiliter tractare amiâ—â— dimittere of this we see commended in all ages in Abraham and Lot receiuing Angels they receiue them cheerefully they intertaine and vse them courteously they dismisse them louingly So did Bethuel Eleazar so did Iethro Moses so did Manoah the Angell of God so did the good olde man of Gibeah the Leuite and his wife so did Obadiah the Prophets so did the widow of Zarephath Elias so did the Sunamite Elisha so did Mary often receiue Christ so did the Tanner and Cornelius Peter Lydia and the Iayler the Apostles Aquila and Priscilla Paul Phebe and Stephanus many and Gaius the whole Church at Corinth All these are Chronicled in the booke of God as most memorable presidents for all ages The third note of the precious faith of Gods elect in the same place annexed is Christian sympathy to the seruants of Christ in all their afflictions This grace is found when loue hath set on fire our very i Matth 9. 36. Philip. 1. 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bowels as the holy Ghost speaketh that in all their passions it fils vs with a feeling and a tender compassion This stirres vp men to k Matth 25. 36. visit the members of Christ in all their miseries to consider l Psalm 41. 1. wisely of their afflictions to m Rom. 12. 15. mourne when they mourne to n Rom. 12. 13. distribute to their wants and so to proceede on to the duties of instruction admonition consolation instant and o Iam. 5. 13. 20 feruent in prayer and to adde confession of sinnes with fasting if the state and heauines of the affliction so require These things I write vnto you right Worshipfull first not so much for your instruction as for the edification and confirmation of others in this frozen age wherein carnall and selfe loue and all iniquitie increaseth and loue to the Saints decreaseth and waxeth cold as Christ hath p Matth. 24. 12 forewarned vs a manifest signe that sauing faith faileth in most places euen where it is professed most Secondly I write thus vnto you for that you haue been taught of God as I heare to practise these things and to obserue the Canons of Christ in his Gospell concerning loue to the Saints This holy seruant of Christ Maister Rollocke if he were liuing could and would testifie of your sincere loue when you intertained him into your owne familie respecting his wants with all compassion and tendernes of heart The most prouident ruler of Heauen and earth which hath shed by the working of his holy spirit this precious loue into your heart will fully
authenticall Wherefore it resteth that the Hebrue edition of the old Testament and the Greek of the new Testament is only authentical CHAP. XX. Of the Translations of the old Testament NOw it resteth that we speake of the Translations of the old and new Testament And first of the translations of the old Testament The old Testament was first written in Hebrue and afterwards translated into diuers languages specially the Chaldee and Greeke First concerning the Chaldiacke translation next of the Greeke and for the Chaldiack we be to consider first what manner of translation it is Secondly by whom this was done Thirdly what authoritie this hath For the first the Chaldiacke translation is rather a Paraphrase then a translation word for word The Rabbins call this Authors of the Chaldee paraphrase paraphrase the Targum For the second point by whom this Paraphrase was set forth Rabbi Aquila translated the * Fiue bookes of Moses Pentateuch and this they call Onkelos the rest of the bookes of the old testament were translated partly by Rabbi Ionathan partly by Rabbi Ioseph * blind Caecus they liued not long before Christ or about Christs time For the third point The Chaldee paraphrase with the Ancients was euer of great note and authoritie specially that part of the Pentateuch for as for the rest of this Paraphrase one * Praefat. in Biblia complu tensia Ximenius a Cardinall auoucheth it to be full of Iewish fables and of the vaine conceits of the Thalmudists And thus farre briefly of the Chaldee paraphrase Now touching the Greeke translation of the old testament there were diuers translations of it into the Greeke tongue Some number nine translations Of these the first and principall is that of the Septuagint which those 72. Ancients did at the appointment of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus for whereas * Lib. stromat Clemens Alexandrinus writeth that the Scripture was translated long before into Greeke and that Plato had read the same it is not like to be true for neither Plato nor anie of Pythagoras sect euer saw the sacred Scriptures To speake then of the interpretation of the seuentie interpreters and to bind our selues to certaine questions sixe in number the first may be this whether there was euer any Greeke translation set forth by the 72. interpreters Secondly if there were anie when it was done Thirdly of what bookes Fourthly how this was done Fiftly what authoritie this translation is of Sixtly whether this be the true translation of the 72. Interpreters which we haue at this day For the first question the answer is easie for there is no doubt but that there was a Greeke translation by the 72. interpreters for that all antiquitie accords to this This is testified by a Lib. de mensuris ponderib Epiphanius b De praeparat euangel Eusebius c In dialog cum Tryphone Iustin Martyr with many others And as for the second question the answer also to it is easie for all men doe agree that this translation was done in the raigne and at the appointment of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus this write and auouch these men Ioseph Philo d In Synopsi Athanasius Epiphanius Tertullian e In historia sua de hacipsare Aristaeus and manie others And for the third question what bookes were translated by them the answer is not so easie for some thinke they translated but the fiue bookes of Moses only Of this mind is f In proâ—â—io antiq Ioseph and Ierome seemes to incline this way Others say they translated all the Scripture and this is likest to be true For first it is not like that king Ptolomie could haue contented himselfe with the Pentateuch only Secondly the Apostles of Christ vsed the Greeke translation in citing testimonies out of the prophets but in the Apostles time there was none other translation but that of the Septuagints Thirdly there had beene no matter of admiration in that this worke was done with such expedition if the Pentateuch onely had beene translated and finished in the space of 72. dayes for they say his translation was miraculous Fourthly Chrysostome and Theodoret among the Fathers are of this iudgement Wherefore it is best we hold this as most probable that all the old Testament was translated by them And as for the fift question what authoritie this translation had Hereunto men answer diuersly For some ascribe too much to it as * In lib. de mensuris ponderib Epiphanius who saith they were not interpreters only but in a manner Prophets Augustine is too much in the commendation of it he saith It was done by a speciall dispensation of God and thinks it to be set forth by diuine inspiration Others ascribe not so much to it * In praefat in Pentateuchon Ierome saith against Epiphanius they were no prophets And often in his Commentaries he taxeth it not onely as corrupted but as verie faultie in it selfe which thing he would neuer haue don if he had thought this worke had beene done by diuine inspiration What authoritie soeuer this translation is of assuredly it can haue no more then what may by good right be giuen to an interpretation for we may not auouch it to be giueÌ„ by the inspiration of God nor make it of equall authoritie with the Scripture As touching the sixt question some thinke that the old translation of the Septuagint is as yet extant but to Old translation of the 70. be so corrupt that it is no wisdome to correct either the Hebrue or Latine copies by it Bellarmine is of this mind Others affirme that the ancient translation of the 72. interpreters is lost and that this which wee haue is mixt and verie corrupt This also they proue by an induction of certaine places corrupted First the Greeke Bible numbers from the creation of the world vnto the floud 2242. yeares as we may see which Augustine Eusebius and Nicephorus in his chronologie but the Hebrue veritie saith the number of yeares be 1656. therefore the Greeke number exceedes the Hebrue in yeares 586. Secondly from the floud to Ahraham the 72. interpreters reckon of yeares 1082. but according to the Hebrue text of Gods word there be no more yeares but 292. so the Greeke exceedes the Hebrue veritie 790. yeares Thirdly in the Greeke copie Adam is said to haue liued 230. yeares and in some bookes 330. when he begat Sheth but the Hebrue Bible saith Adam begat Sheth when he was 130. yeares old Fourthly according to the Greeke copie Methusalem liued fourteene yeares after the floud which is verie ridiculous for where liued he or how was he kept from the waters In the arke That cannot be for but eight soules onely entred into the Arke among whom Methusalem is not reckoned The Hebrew bible speakes farre otherwise of Methusalems Methusalems life and death yeares and age for by it we gather that he died that verie yeare the deluge came on the
1. 13. For I did it ignorantly through vnbeleefe This ignorance is either of the law or of the fact The ignorance of the law is to be ignorant of Gods will Of this Sin speaketh Christ Luke 12. 48. He that hath not known his masters wil hath done things worthy of stripes shall be beaten with few stripes This was also Paules ignorance when hee blasphemed and persecuted the Church of Christ 1. Tim. 1. The ignorance of the fact is when a man knowes not what he doth And a man may be said not to know what he doth or to erre in the Sin of ignorance fact either when he doth a thing negligently or when a thing is done by him as we say by fortune or chance or rather by the ineuitable prouidence of God An example of sinne of negligence may be this as when a ship is lost by the negligence of the Gouernour or maister thereof An example of a sinne by fortune or Gods prouidence may be as when one casting a stone killeth a man passing by of whom he neuer thought for this sinne in the old Church the cities of refuge were appointed Numb 35. 23. Thus farre of the external sinne of commission which proceedes of errour or ignorance The externall sinne of commission followeth which is committed in knowledge or as we say wittingly and this is when a man knoweth that hee doth euill hereof speakes Christ Luk. 12. 47. That seruant who knoweth his masters will and doth it not shall be beaten with many stripes This sin is either of infirmitie or of contumacie An example Actual external sinne committed willingly of a sinne of infirmitie is in Peter who three times denied his Lord and maister for feare of death and persecution An example of a sin of contumacie we haue in Iudas the traitor Againe a sin of contumacie is either done in hypocrisie as when a man is not openly rebellious but hides his sinne vnder the cloake of hypocrisie this the Apostle taxeth Rom. 2. 5. Thou saith he after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent doest treasure vp wrath against the day of wrath Againe it is an open rebellion or pride when a man ioynes to his contumacy pride against God himselfe for which cause he is said to sinne with an high hand Numb 15. 30. This manifest rebellion and Heresie pride is either against the second Table of the law as open murther knowne adulterie and this is the lesser contumacie but if it be a proud rebellion against the first Table the sinne is intolerable And of this latter kind is Open rebellion heresie first when as a man in a proud obstinacy wil defend anie opinion against the manifest truth of Gods word Of all the sinnes before specified this is one property that a man may repent of them or for them all whereupon followes another property that they are all pardonable But if ye adde to knowledge pride frowardnesse a malicious heart striuing against the holy Ghost inlightening a man teaching inwardly then the great sinne ariseth which they call the sinne against the holy Sinne against the holy Ghost Ghost the propertie whereof is this that hee which so sinneth cannot repent him of his sinne whereupon it followeth that this sinne is impardonable And this sin is called irremissible not for that the greatnesse of it exceeds the greatnes of Gods mercy grace in Christ but VVherefore impardonable because finall impenitence is the reward and punishment which by Gods iust iudgment is inflicted vpon this sinne Read of this point Matt. 12. 21. Heb. 6. 4. 5. and chap. 10. 26. 1. Ioh. 5. 16. And thus farre of actuall sinne Now it remaineth to see what the aduersaries say of actuall sinne Here the greatest controuersie is of the diuision of actuall sinne into mortall and veniall We auouch that euery sin by nature is mortall that is that the guilt Sinne mortall veniall a popish doctrine of eternall death followes it And that if any sinne be veniall that is may find pardon of God this commeth to passe not for that it is so by nature but of Gods meere mercie in Iesus Christ Many scriptures approue our assertion Ro. 6. 23. The wages of sin is death He speakes here of sin in generall and of eternall death Matth. 5. 19. Who soeuer shall breake one of the least of these commandements and shall teach men so heshall be called the least in the kingdome of God that is he shal haue be of reckoning in heauen Obserue then here how for the least sin a man deserues to be shut forth out of heauen Deut. 27. 26. Cursed be he that abideth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law Therefore there is no sinne which deserueth not the curse or malediction of God For in that the law denounceth an execration against euery sin there is no exception we see of anie euen the least sinne I am 2. 10. Whosoeuer shall keepe the whole law and yet fayleth in one point hee is guiltie of all Therefore if ye rest in any one sinne against the law ye sinne against the whole law and stand guiltie of all sinnes which are committed any way against the law So there is no cause why wee should measure our guilt by anie one sinne euen the verie least For euen the verie least sinne we liue and lie in without faith repentance The least sinne merits hell caries with it the guilt euen of the greatest sinnes as may clearely appeare by that place of Iames. Matth. 5. 26. Thou shalt not depart thence till thou hast paid the vtmost farthing Therefore God in his accounts respecteth euen the least parts of sinne and the smallest sinnes that are The tenth law condemnes euen the least motions of concupiscence Matth. 22. 37. Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thine heart with all thy soule and with all thy mind Therefore the law requires an exact or perfect obedience Wherefore he that offendeth euen in the least point is a transgressor of the law and that euerlasting curse followeth the breach of the law if redemption be not purchased by Iesus Christ Matt. 5. 18. Till heauen and earth perish one iote or one tittle of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled Note here there shal not passe away one iote or one tittle that is the least branch of the breach of the law which shall escape without satisfaction either by our selues or a mediator And thus far touching our iudgment of this matter The aduersaries for actuall sinne respecting it either according to the greatnesse thereof or for the punishment it deserueth they diuide it into mortall and veniall They cal that mortall sinne which doth extinguish charity Mortal sin defined of Papists or iustice making vs enimies vnto God and therefore guilty of eternall death They call that veniall sinne which doth not quench charitie and iustice nor doth not
nor only a generall promise touching Christ but much rather a speciall mercy and a speciall promise that is mercy offered in the Gospel not in common to all but peculiarly to me or to thee For albeit the promises and sentences of the Gospell be conceiued generally yet it is certaine that they are to be receiued particularly by euery one as if they were spoken to euery one in seuerall as for example Ioh. 3. the promise of the couenant of grace is conceiued generally in these words Whosoeuer beleeueth in the Sonne shall not perish but haue life euerlasting This promise is indeed generally conceiued but it is to bee vnderstood particularly and singularly by euery one as if it had beene spoken to me or to thee If thou beleeuest in the Sonne thou shalt not perish but haue euerlasting life The Apostle 1. Tim. 1. doth vnderstand this generall sentence namely that Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners no otherwise then if it had beene pronounced onely concerning himselfe whereupon he doth apply it particularly vnto himselfe assuming by name that he is the sinner and concluding How the beleeuer is to make a syllogisme in forme at the least secretly that Christ came into y e world to saue him by name We may make trial of this thing by those promises that are made specially in the Gospell to saue certaine men as to the man sicke of the palsie Matt. 9. to the woman that was a sinner Luk. 7. to the Adultresse Ioh. 8. to Zacheus Luk. 19. to the thiefe Luk. 23. For the Spirit of Christ when any generall promise or sentence touching Christ and his mercie is alleaged doth no lesse particularly now apply the same to euerie man by speaking inwardly to the heart of euery one then at that time Christ did by his liuely voice apply those particular promises to some certaine persons Roman 3. Whē the righteousnes of God is said to belong to al beleeuers and that without distinction it is plainly signified that that righteousnesse is offered to men of euerie sort and condition and also propounded to euery seuerall person 1. Tim 2. after he hath admonished that wee are to pray for all men he addeth that God will haue all men to be saued and come to the knowledge of the truth Out of which it followeth that in the publishing of the Gospell God hath respect not onely of all men in common but also distinctly of euery seuerall person which regard also he will haue vs to haue in our prayers What neede many words For if there were nothing els that did The mercie of God in Christ offered generally to all the world particularly applied to euery one by the Spirit is the obiect of iustifying faith teach this the administration of the Sacraments alone hath force enough in it to proue that the mercy of God in Christ is offered specially to euerie one For in both the sacraments the seales of that mercy are giuen and offered to euery one seuerally And let this suffice to shew that speciall mercy as it is called is the obiect properly of iustifying Faith against which our aduersaries hold The obiect of iustifying Faith being made to bee a generall mercy it followeth that faith in the opinion of our aduersaries is generall and not a speciall assent For seeing there is only a generall mercy propounded generally to the Church and not offered particularly to the seuerall members therof how can any particular man challenge that particularly to himselfe which is not spoken and offered particularly But we affirme that iustifying faith is that whereby euery beleeuer doth particularly not onely assent to the promise that it is true in it selfe but also apprehends with the heart the promised thing and applies it properly to himselfe For this being made plaine that the mercie of God was particularly offered to euery one it followeth that faith must be particular But for the proofe hereof there are almost infinite testimonies of the Scriptures we will be content but with a few Gal. 2. 20. And the life that I now liue in the flesh I liue by faith in the Sonne of God who loued me and gaue himselfe for me Marke here he doth by faith peculiarly apply to himselfe the Sonne of God and his life his loue and his death Neither is there any cause why any one should say that this might be lawfull for the Apostle who had some extraordinary reuelation of that thing but that it is not lawfull to the common sort of Christians in as much as the Apostle doth in this place beare the person of euery Christian and beleeuing man Rom. 8. For I am perswaded that neither death nor life c. Marke here that speciall trust and particular application is pointed at by the verbe of the singular number Beside that which is cited out of Habakuck by the Apostle The iust shall liue by faith doth sufficiently insinuate a speciall faith for thereby is signified that euery iust person doth liue by his faith that is by a speciall assent to and application of the righteousnesse of God in Christ Matth. chap. 9. a particular faith is commended to the man sicke of the palsie to whom it was saide Sonne be of good comfort thy sinnes be forgiuen thee Ioh. 3. when it is said He that beleeueth in the Sonne hath eternall life that verie same speciall faith is signified which is when euerie one doth assent particularly to and apply to himselfe euerlasting life offered to himselfe What neede manie words The same thing doth that verbe I beleeue which is found in the Apostles Creede teach For to beleeue is there specially and particularly to beleeue Out of the generall mercy and generall faith of the aduersaries followeth the vncertaintie of particular faith and of Gods peculiar grace which they defend For it is easily discerned that vncertaintie doth follow necessarily out of that generality first a doubtfulnesse of mercy then of faith For when as mercy is propounded and offered not specially but generally and when there is onely a generall assent of faith how can I be certaine of that mercy which pertaines not certainly by name to me But that there is a certainty of faith against which they hold first it easily appeareth by those things which haue The certainty of faith beene spoken of Gods speciall mercy and speciall faith For seeing mercy is offered particularly to thee and to me c. and I againe assent particularly to it now am I certaine of that mercy that it is mine specially seeing I doe already by faith and speciall application possesse it For Christ dwelleth in our harts by faith that is we now possesse Christ and doe enioy him as present Of this speciall certainty see Rom. 4. 16. The inheritance is of faith that it may be by grace to the end the promise may be firme to the seed And in the same Chapter ver 18. Which Abraham against hope beleeued
false that the certaintie of speciall grace is a speciall prerogatiue of some certaine men For if iustifying faith be reckoned among the common good things and gifts of all Christians and this speciall certaintie be the propertie of iustifying faith with what face dare any deny this gift of speciall certainty to the common sort of Christians Is it because it was reuealed but to some certaine and few of them that their sins are forgiuen as to that man sicke of the palsie to that sinner to Zacheus to the thiefe is therefore this gift of certainty no other but special and extraordinary Nay wee haue alreadie said that the speciall mercie of God is no lesse now promised and offered to euery seuerall and particular person as to me and to thee then it was offered in times past to those men by Christs expresse words Fourthly the holiest men say they haue bewrayed with a lamentable voice at the very point of death do bewray dayly the vncertaintie of their saluation Therefore there is not that certaintie of mercy and life which wee say there is I answer there is much difference betweene that which is and that which ought to be This argument doth only conclude that which is that is that there is an vncertaintie but it concludes not that there ought to be an vncertaintie nay it concludes against it that it ought not to be For they that weepe and lament for the vncertaintie of their owne saluation doe therby declare that there ought not to be an vncertainty but our aduersaries doereckon the vncertaintie of our owne saluation among the chiefe Christian vertues Secondly I answer that out of that complaint of holy men being ready to giue vp the Ghost the certainty of speciall mercie M. Rollock argueth of the conflicts of the godly in their death that they haue a good faith doth neuer a whit the lesse follow then the vncertaintie For that speech riseth out of that warre that is betweene the Spirit and the flesh betweene faith and vnbeleefe betweene certaintie and vncertaintie Wherefore it is no lesse an argument of certainty then of vncertaintie nay it argueth that in that warre certaintie hath the vpper hand Fiftly they say the best may fall from grace and faith therefore what certaintie can there be of speciall mercie and saluation I answer They which are indued onely with temporarie grace and faith both may indeed fall and doe fall away but they which are indued with true iustifying faith and with regenerating grace can neither Of falling from grace fall away totally nor finally Now that comes to passe not in regard of the men themselues for of their owne nature they are prone to finall and totall defection such is their infirmity and weaknesse but it comes to passe by the nature as I may speak of that grace and gift of God which is giuen in Christ Iesus For the gifts and calling of God are such as that hee cannot repent himselfe of them Rom. 11. Sixtly they obiect testimonies of Scripture these chiefly which commēd vnto vs care thought endeuor for the keeping and preseruing of grace As He that standeth let him take heed least he fall 1. Cor. 10. 12. Also 2. Cor. 6. 1. Paul exhorts the Corinthians that they receiue The Papists cite it thus euer but falsly for the text is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. so it is against them Phil. 2. not grace in vaine To conclude Christ admonisheth that we should watch and pray To say nothing of those places wherein feare is commended to vs as Rom. 11. Thou standest by faith be not high minded but feare And in another place Worke out your saluation with feare and trembling Out of these and the like places they say followeth doubting of a mans owne grace and saluation for why should there be such commandements giuen vnlesse it might be so that one might fall from grace and faith and therefore that he ought to doubt of his owne grace and saluation I answer that out of these and the like places Christian care feare how good it followeth that there is no perseuerance in grace vnlesse there bee ioyned a care thought and labour to keepe grace For care and thought is set God so ordaining it to bee as it were the keeper and watchman to grace forbidding that a man fall not into carnall securitie which is the enemie of grace and this thought and care is giuen with grace yea and it selfe is a kind of speciall grace and a companion of grace which neuer departeth from her side for where grace is there is alwayes surely some thought and care to retaine that grace which is neuer all quite lost euen as grace it selfe is neuer wholy lost for it is euer in proportion to the grace For when there is great grace there is great care when there is but a small grace the care is but little And because God knoweth how necessary this care is which is y e companiō and preseruer of grace therefore doth he so often in the Scriptures stir vs vp vnto care commendeth it vnto vs. And all these exhortations are nothing els but so many outcries as it were wherby this care which we said is the watchman and keeper of grace is stirred vp prouoked to do her dutie that is to keepe grace and to driue away carnall securitie which is an enemie to grace and which would except care stood vpon her watch vtterly abolish grace it selfe as faith regeneration righteousnesse and life Therefore out of these and the like places care and not doubting vertue and not vice doe follow For doubting hath beene euer reckoned in the Scriptures among the worst euils of most enmitie to God man Now let vs speak of the subiect of iustifying faith what that is according to the mind of our aduersaries They Subiect of iustifying faith with Papists make the mind only to be the subiect and in the mind onely one facultie properly which is that that iudgeth and assenteth to the truth of any sentence But of the will and heart they speake nothing when yet iustifying faith doth chiefly belong to the heart as wee haue said before For the parts of the nature of iustifying faith they make not so manie as we For as touching knowledge which is the first part of iustifying faith either they say y t Parts of the nature of iustifying faith with Papists it is not necessary or els that some obscure knowledge will suffice which thing they labour to proue by this reason There is say they a double assent of the mind wherby we consent to the truth of any sentence The first assent is when we consent vnto it for some reason or cause and this is termed knowledge this assent doth necessarily require knowledge to goe before it to the truth whereof we assent The latter assent is when we assent to the truth of a sentence not for some
they say that hope is not simply and absolutely certaine for there is nothing more vncertaine then these things in which they place some or rather the chiefe cause of the certainty of hope Concerning the absolute certainty of hope these bee some testimonies of Scripture Psal 31. In thee O Lord haue I hoped let me not be confounded for euer He that trusteth in the Lord shall be as mount Sion which shall not be moued for euer Psal 125. Rom. 5. We reioyce vnder the hope of the glorie of God And after Hope maketh not ashamed Rom. 8. We are saued by hope Phil 1. 20. According to my earnest expectation and hope that I shall not be ashamed Rom. 9. Whosoeuer beleeueth in him shall not be confounded And thus much of hope CHAP. XXXIII Of Charitie or Loue. AMong the principall effects of Faith charitie is reckoned in the next place after hope and Paul knits them together as the three special graces of the holy ghost Faith hope charitie 1. Cor. 13. There are three saith he faith hope and charitie and the greatest of these is charitie The Apostle knits these together and we do not seuer them specially for that Gods loue is a certaine bond vniting vs to God together with the bond of faith which is the primary and principal For this cause Peter saith that our communion with Christ now absent from vs doth consist loue faith And this moueth vs in the third place after faith to intreat of Charitie in this treatise of our effectuall calling And charitie or loue proceedeth from that sweet apprehension and taste of the Lord for that taste stirs vp in the heart an exceeding loue of the Lord VVhence loue proceedeth and of our neighbour for the Lords sake And when as Charitie hath receiued this life by Faith it becomes the instrument of Faith whereby it worketh other effects of the Spirit as the gifts of knowledge of prophesying of tongues and of miracles These also are the instruments meanes wherby iustifying faith worketh but the principal is loue for which cause it is said Gal. 5. that faith worketh by loue and loue with the works or fruits thereof among all signes and testimonies giues the surest euidence Loue the best euidence of faith vnto faith If this be compared with other graces of Gods Spirit it must be preferred before them all for it hath the third place after Faith Therefore if ye set aside Faith and hope loue hath the first place of all the graces of y e holy Chost and is as it were the soule of all gifts which followe after it For this cause the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. 13. hauing numbred diuers gifts of the holy Ghost saith That if these graces wanted loue they were either as dead or as nothing or should profit nothing Whereby he giues vs to vnderstand that all other vertues haue no soundnesse in them if ye seuer them from loue but to be onely certaine dead shadowes of vertues We may therefore iustly call charity the life of all gifts and graces which follow it If the aduersaries had contented themselues with this prerogatiue of Charity they had not erred but for that Popish charitie they auouch it to be also the life and forme of faith herein they sin greatly that faith rather contrarily is the life of charity for that without Faith there is no man hath but the dead shadowe of Loue. Wherefore the faith of Christ is the principall life or soule both of charity and of all other vertues for without it they are all but vaine and counterfeit and very sinnes before God for whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The primarie obiect of loue is the same with the obiect of faith and hope For what wee first apprehend by faith and next expect in hope the same we embrace in Obiect of loue loue The secondary obiect of loue is our neighbor whō we loue in and for the Lord. The subiect of loue is the heart for we loue with the heart as the Apostle speaketh Loue out of a pure heart 1. Thess 1. 5. The nature thereof is not in knowledge nor in hoping but in louing In loue two things are principally to Nature of loue be respected first a diligent endeuour for the prescruation of that we loue next an earnest affection to be vnited and conioyned with it both which we see are to bee respected in the loue of God and of our neighbour The properties of loue are many 1. Cor. 13. 4. c. For whereas loue is there is a heape of vertues for Charitie is neuer alone in any man but hath euer many other vertues as companions handmaids attending on it Of the premisses ye may gather some definition of faith as namely that Loue is an holy endeuour for the preseruation of that which is beloued whether God or man with an earnest desire Loue defined to be vnited vnto it For loue is that bond as the Apostle speaketh whereby the members of the body are knit together And it serues also in some sort and place to vnite vs vnto God and Christ notwithstanding that the communiō of Christ the head of his body the church be principally to be ascribed vnto faith And in this respect loue goes before iustification and is a branch in our effectual calling euer going together with faith hope repentance For which cause principally I thought good to speak of it briefly in this Treatise after faith and hope for that faith wherein we say consisteth the second part of our effectuall calling hath these for inseparable companions faith hope repentance after which followes our iustification by order not of time but of nature But in another respect loue followes iustification and appertaineth to the grace of regeneration but of this we shal speake in fit place Now to returne to our purpose the definition giuen before is not so much of loue it selfe as of the worke and function thereof For Loue is properly an affection holy A larger definition of loue or sanctified and not so onely but also supernaturall caried vp to loue those things which are aboue nature and exceed all naturall affection for like as faith is of those things which excell all naturall knowledge and apprehension and hope is of those things which excell all naturall expectation so Loue also is of those things which be aboue the reach of all naturall affection For as wee haue often before admonished this our new-birth in Christ Iesus is not so much a restoring of vs to that image of Adam which he had before his fall as vnto the image of Christ who is a spirituall and an heauenly man in whom and by whom we haue not onely so to speake a naturall sanctitie or holinesse but also doe receiue from him a certaine heauenly and supernaturall vertue and efficacie infused into all affections and powers of the soule But this our supernaturall condition as yet