dig to make a drayne in a Meadow Ibidem Owen 66. 67. Hutt 103. Dy. 37. a. Co. 1. Inst 53. 2 Leon. 174. Lessee builds a new house 't is wast to suffer it to decay not if the Lessor builds it after the Devise Ibidem Co. 1. Inst 35. s. Hutt 103. Whether Tenant by the Curtefie were punishable for wast by the Common Law Or not Vide Co. 2. Instit 299. 145. The first Statute that gave prohibition of wast and damages against Farmers was Marlbcapâ— 23. And where the Statute says vastum c. non facient 't is to be understood also non permittent vastum and so 't is in the Condition of a Lease Co. 2. Inst 145. None can claim to be dispunishable of wast in a particular Estate but by deed because 't is the Lessor's disherison Co. 2. Inst 146. Dyâ— 281. a. Lessee of a Mannor commits wast in a Tenement escheated the Lessor shall declare in wast of a Lease of the Tenement and maintain it by special Matter Co. 2. Inst 146. At the Common Law to prevent wast by Guardian Tenant in dower or by the Curtesie the Party might have a Prohibion to the Sheriff and by that he might have a posse Comitatus and so it may be done at this day And such Remedy as is against them at the Common Law is against Farmers c. by Marlb ca. 23. Co. 2. Inst 299. Vide Stat. 10 R. 2. c 14. If a Lease be made to A. for his own life Remainder to him for the life of B. or where a Remainder for years is upon an Estate for life there if A. does wast it shall be punished because himself had both Estates and in the latter case the Remainder shall not destroy the Term for years Co. 1. Instit 54. 2. Inst 301. The Husband that holds in Right of his Wife Lessee for life does wast the Wife dyes the wast is not punishable because the Husband held not but in his Wife 's Right and the Estate was her's Clifton's Case ibidem Co. 5. Rep. 75. b. Although Tenant in Tail after possibility of Issue extinct be dispun of wast yet if he grant over his Estate it is punishable in the Assignee ibidem 302. Tenant by Statute Merchant Staple or Elegit though they have but a Chattel are not within the Statute of Glocester 1. 5. Executors shall be punished for wast done in their own time not in the Testators He that holds a third or fourth part pro indiviso is within the Act. Tenant for years assigns upon Condition the Assignee does wast and he enters for that Condition the Action must be against the Assignee Ibidem Tenant for Years or Life assigns and takes the profits and does wast the Action lyes against the pernor of the profits by 11 H. 6. c. 5 Co. 5. Rep. Booth's Case 77. Tenant assigns the Term except the Trees Wast is done in the Trees the Action lyes against the Assignee Co. 5. Rep. Saunder's Case Lessee commits Wast and then assigns Wast in the Tenant shall be maintained against the Lessee and the place wasted and treble Damages shall be recovered against him Non Tenure general is no Plea in Wast but special non Tenure is Assignment and no Wast done before the Assignment or Wast done by the King's Enemies or Tempest or Lightning is not punishable Co. 2. Inst 302. 303. The Tenant shall answer for permissive Wast unless in such case where he could not prevent the Wast as where he is ousted by Cotssee of a Statute entred into before his Lease and that Cotssee does wast or by any precedent Title ibid. 303. Feme Tenant in Dower of a Mannor and Copy hold commits Wast the Action lies against the Tenant in Dower Ibid. 303. Femes Coverts and Infants shall answer for Wast done by Strangers though some have held the contrary and so shall the Wife for wast done by the Husband for Lease made to them for Life if she agree to the Estate Ibid. 303. Where the Wast is done Sparsim in houses Woods or Meadow there the whole shall be recovered ibid. 304. One may have an Action of Wast in the Tenct after the Term is determined by Expiration Death or the Act or Wrong of the Tenant and theresore if the Term end hanging the Writ it shall not abate because maintainable for the damages but if the Tenant surrender after the Wast done no Writ is maintainable for the Lessor cannot by his own Act alter the form of the Action Ibid. 304. The Heir cannot maintain an Action for Wast done to the Ancestor because the damage belongs not to him yet if two parceners be and wast is done and one of them dyes and wast is done again one Action shall be maintained for both and the Writ shall say both Wastes were to both their Disherison but the Judgment shall be for the place wasted to them both and for the damages severally in their several Tenures Ibid. 305. Guardian shall not be punished for Wast done by Strangers unless it be such as he might have prevented and would not for then qui non prohibet jubet ibidem 305. If the Gnardian commit Wast he shall by Gloue ' Ca. 5. lose the Wardship and single Damage and if it be done so near his Age as he could not bring his Action of Wast or had not notice of it then he shall recover treble damages upon the said Statute as a common person shall Ibidem 306. Wast upon the Stat. of Glouc ' Ca. 5. lyeth not in Ancient Demesne because they cannot award a Writ to the Sheriff to inquire Ibid. 306. Owen 24. contra In an Action of Wast by two in the Tenuit if one relinguisheth it barrs both not so of an Action in the Tenet Ibid. 307. A. has B. and C. in his Wardship Ratione Custodiae and commits Wast in the Lands of B. yet he shall not lose the Wardship of C. because the Wast was not to his Disherison Ibid. 306. At the Common Law there lay an Estrepement after Judgment Glouc. c. 13. gives it Pendente placito and may be sued out with the Original If the Tenant alien pendent the Plea the Estrepement may be against him and his Alienee and the Defendant shall not have his Age in it And tho the Statute says Du Tenement in demand yet in the Scire Facias to execute a Fine in a Quid juris clamat or in Wast an Estrepement may be had yet no Land is demanded in the Writ Upon the Statute the party shall recover damages after delivery of the Lands Co. 5. Rep. 114. b. It lyes before or after Judgment in Wast and the Sheriff may take the Posse Comitatus to prevent the Wast Co. 2. Inst 328. 329. In Wast the Process is Summons Attachment Distress and then upon default a Writ ad Inquirend ' and the Sheriff by the Statute is to go in Person and with the Jury view every place in every
Dy. negat Tenant for Life Remainder for Life Wast is done he in Remainder surrenders Wast lyes Co. 5. Rep. 76. b. Mo. pl. 64. Co. 5. Rep. 76. b. 2 Cro. 68. b. Tenants in Common cannot joyn in Wast in the Tenet but Joynt-tenants or Parceners may and also Tenants in Common in the Tenuit being only to recover Damages Ibid. Mo. f. 383. Mo. pl. 110. 127. He in Reversion by way of use brings wast against the Feme Tenant for Life of the same use she pleads that the place was left so ruinous at the death of her Husband Quod reparare non potuit and adjudged a good Plea Mo. Pl. 158. Wast assigned in permitting Sea-walls to be ruined whereby c. if not done by sudden violence as if a small breach were and he permits it grow greater it seems wast Et per omnes the permitting Decay in the Banks of the River is wast Mo. 173. 187. 200. Dower Tenant pleads ne unque seisie que Dower and Issue of it Demandant prayed a Writ of Etrepement because great part of his Coppice wood and the Husband dyed not seized so she cannot have damages yet it seems Etrepement lyes not because Damage lyes in the Action Mo. Pl. 186. Wast and the Writ was quod fecit vastum in terr' In the Count assigns wast in cutting Trees and adjudged it maintained not the VVrit but if it had been assigned of digging Clay c. it had Mo. Pl. 200. VVast and Count of VVast done contra prohibitionem after the Estrepement sued upon a Formedon Defendant pleads Quod non fuit vastum contra prohibitionem Issue Verdict and Judgment pro querente Mo. Pl. 1. or 245. 'T is VVast to take away a Partition c. fixed by the Lessee to the Free-hold sic of Benches or Glass-windows to take away Doors of the Houses if they be outer doors for defence of the houses not in ward for Separation of Chambers Mo. Pl. 315. One that had power to make a Joynture of third part makes her Joynture of a third part undivided And this held by Popham not according to the Power which was to be sans impeachment of wast and against the Tenant in common wast lyes not so it should have been done in Severalty by Popham fo 374. But that is denyed by Mo. fo 387. 388. And that wast lyes against the Tenant in Common of a third part also by Popham the Proviso being to do it Sans Impeachment c. And he makes an Estate for Life with Remainder 't is disjunctive by reason of the Remainder whereto More answers that 't is but the effect of the Law not the word of the Party and then Remainder were created before so he must make it by operation of Law Sans Impeachment c. or make none Also 't is not eadem sans Impeachment c. but the Remainder does at present hinder the Action and it is not like Cases upon 32 H. 8. there Tenant in Tail shall not make a Lease for three Lives in Possession So another way to satisfie the Statute Perrot's Case Mo. Pl. 506. Tenant for Life Remainder for Life tho Wast in the Tenant for Life be dispunishable yet the Chancery will by Injunction bind him to do no wast and such a President cited temps R. 2. Mo. Pl. 748. Error to reverse a Recovery in Lancaster and pendant it a Writ of Estrepement granted and so resolved 't is grantable in a Scire Facias Holland c. against Jackson and Ogden sic vid. 2 H. 6. 13. Estrepement granted in Scire facias on a Judgment in a Formedon Mo. Pl. 850. Resolved that great Birch is used in the Country as Timber and esteemed in Law as Timber and 't is wast in the particular Tenant to cut them and so in Cro. are black Thorns in some Countrys Countess of Cumberland's Case Mo. Pl. 1099. 1 Cro. 283. 2 Cro. 126. Writ of Wast in two Towns Count of Wast in three Towns ill but è contra if less be in the Count than is in the Writ 't is good pro tanto Earl of Cumberland against Countess Dowager Cumberland Mo. Pl. 1185. To convert a Horse Mill to a Hand Mill or a Corn Mill to a Fulling Mill is though it be better for the Reversion and the reason seems because it alters the Evidence City of London against Groyme Mo. Pl. 1230. 2 Cro. 182. Lessee covenants to repair at his own Cost and the house being out of Reparation put Timber on the Land to do it and held a bar for the Covenant takes not from him the Liberty the Law gave him but it seems the Court was of another opion Mo. Pl. 80. vid. Dy. 196. b. 314. a. Lease except Trees Lessor grants and sells the Trees to Lessee he cuts them resolved first Lessee has but special Property in Trees till severed and then Lessor may take them be it by Wind or wilfully unless Doatards Secondly Sans Impeachment of wast gives no interest but that is contra to Co. 11. Rep. 82. 83. Popham 195. Dyer 184. b. Thirdly such Interest has Lessee in Timber of Houses if blown down to take to rebuild but if he pulls them down Lessor may take it Fourthly by the sale of Trees to the Lessee they are not so re-united but the Lessee is absolute Owner of them for he has not an equal Interest in them and the Land to extinguish as if Feoffor sells the Trees to Feoffee Fifthly Wast may be in Glass tho in the Lessee's own setting up fixed by Nails or otherwise and so in Wainscot set up by the Lessor or Lessee and fastned either by Nails or otherwise to remove it if nailed Harlakenden's Case Co. 4. Rep. 62. 63. 64. Lessee deviseth the Term Executors do wast and then assent to the Legacy Wast lyes against them in the Tenuit and so if the Grantee on Condition do wast and then the Grantor enters for the Condition yet wast in the Tenuit lyes against the Assignee on Condition And if the Lessee unlawfully open a Mine and not that Term except Mines if after the Assignee dig in it 't is wast in him though the first began it for the Exception is void And resolved first Lessee may dig in Mines opened before not open new Secondly if it be of the Land and all Mines he may open new Mines Sanders Case Co. 5. R. 12. b. Wast lyes against an Occupant for he is within the words of the Statute for he holds Pur Terme de auter vie and it is against all Tenants for Life But it lyes not against Tenant by Elegit Statute Merchant for they hold not but come in by Act in Law Co. 6. R. 37. b. Lessee for years Sans Impeachment of Wast accepts a Confirmation for Life the Priviledge is gone because the Estate whereto it was annexed is removed Co. 8. R. 76. b. If the Sheriff go and see the place wasted and cause the Jury to have the View he may
demands a Debt or any thing by Deed he shall not be Barred but by deed or a thing of as high a nature AS Trespass for taking of an Apprentice it is no Plea to say he discharged him â—â—â—â—out speciality Mich. 22 H. 6. The same Law in Debt upon an Obligation it is no Plea for the Defendant to say that the Plaintiff hath received parcel at such a place depending the Writ Judgment 7 E. 3. The same Law in Debt upon Arrearages of Account the Defendant Pleaded Arbitrement it is no Barr because that Debt upon Arbitrement is not of so high a nature as Debt upon Arrearages of Account for there he cannot wage Law The same Law in Debt upon an Obligation it is no Plea to say that he hath paid the Summ in demand to the Plaintiff because that he ought if he will avoid the Deed to say that he hath the Plaintiffs Release or Acquittance to shew The Disseisor Levies a Fine with Proclamations the Five years pass the Disseisee is bound afterwards the Disseisor reverseth the Fine by a Writ of Error then the Disseisee may enter and yet he was once Barred Vide Barr pro tempore Where a man shall Plead a Barr which shall comprehend one matter in fait and where it shall comprehend two matters IF a man Pleads in Barr an Arbitrement he ought to say where the Submission was and also where the Award was made and so to make the Plea certain But when he Pleads a Plea which comprehends two matters he ought not to shew the certainty until the Plaintiff hath Traversed one of them Of Barrs perpetual A Woman is bound to me in an Obligation and I afterwards take her to Wife I am once Barred and allwayes Barred Tenant in Tail leaves Assets which is Pleaded against him who is Heir both he and all his Heirs are Barred for ever A man is bound to pay the Abbot of Westminster and his Successors every year Twenty shillings the Abbey being dissolved he is discharged of the Twenty shillings for ever Also if a man be obliged to keep my Court in Dale I purchase all the Copy-holds and Free-holds of the said Mannor he is discharged from keeping the said Court for ever See Pleas and Pleadings Cinque-Ports AN Elegit to extend Lands within the Cinque-Ports was directed to the Constable of Dover But he would not extend so that the Plaintiff was compelled to have a Certiorari to remove the Record out of the Kings-Bench into the Chancery And from thence by Mittimus sent to the Constable to make Execution Custom 's and Prescriptions ALI Customes against Cannon-Law are to be Tryed at Common-Law and not in the Ecclesiastical Courts Customs are payable to the King by the Common-Law the Reasons why they are so paid see in Davies Rep. fo 9. ct 10. Le case del Customs See the difference between Malum in se etmalum prohibitum and how the King may Pardon it but not licence it to be done 11 H. 7. fo 12. et Davies Rep. fo 73. Where Debt or damages are recovered in a Court-Baron the Bailiff ought not to sell the Goods of the Defendant and deliver the money to the Plaintiff But to impound them and keep them as pledges until the Defendant makes his agreement but where it hath been the use of the Court to award a Levari facias it is good by Custome Where the younger son in Burrough-English dyes the Middle Son not the Eldest shall have the Land The same Law for Customary or Copy-hold Lands It was the Custom of the Kings-Bench every Term once or twice to send the Coroner of that place to the Marshal to view the Prisoners that are in the Marshals Custody by Commititur or matter of Record and if any of them are wanting that he could not find them there then to mark their names in his Coroners Book and to inform the Court thereof And thereupon the Court did pose the Marshal who was to inform the Justices what was become of those Prisoners And if he found not sufficient cause of excuse the Court would Record their escape against the Marshal And the abusing of an Office is the escape of Prisoners in the Marshal an abuse of his Office and just cause of Forfeiture If an Alien have a son that is also an Alien and after the Father is made free and then hath another Son and after purchaseth Lands and dyes The second Son born after the Freedom shall be Heir and not the Eldest by the Common-Law and usage of the Realm And also if there be three Brothers and the middlemost purchaseth Lands and dyes without Heir of his Body the Eldest Brother shall inherit and not the Youngest By the Custom of London a Feme Covert that is to say a Sole Merchant may sue and be sued in absence of her Husband Bulstrode part 1. fo 14. where you may read of three sorts of Customs that are void and against Law 1. a Custom against Justice 2. a Custom against the Benefit of the Common-Wealth and 3. a Custom that is to the Prejudice of a third Person Custom and usage in the intendment of the Law is such a usage as hath obtained the force of Law and is binding to such particular place as Gavelkind in Kent and Burrough-Euglish in many Corporations in England When the Custom of the Realm is the Common Law WHen it is the Common-Law a Custom ought not to be alleadged or Pleaded But an Action against a Carrier Hoyman Common Hosteler and for negligently keeping of Fire the Plaintiff may declare upon the General Custom of the Realm or not at his Election And note That a Custom is always Local and to be alleadged in one certain place but a Prescription is personal and ought to be alledged in some persons certain as in such a man his Ancestors or Predecessors or those whose Estate he hath 22 H. 6. 22. A Prescription is always to be of such a thing and in such manner as may be intended to have a lawful and legal commencement or otherwise it is not good but a Custom may be contrary to the Rules and Maxims of the Law as Borough-English Gavelkind Copy-hold Tenures So Lands devisable by Custom So that the Custom be reasonable Co. 6. Gatewards case lib 5. Perimans Case None can prescribe but who hath Fee but all other Estates derived out of the Fee as Lessee for years Life or at Will ought to prescribe in him who hath the Fee Gatewards case ubi supra A Lord prescribed that he and all those whose Estates he hath in the Mannor have hitherto used to have a Herriot after the death of any Tenant for life or for years within the Mannor and good notwithstanding the Estates of the Tenants have no continuance 21 H. 7. 15. Prescription ought not to be in the Negative but if it be in the Negative with an Affirmative it is good 14 H. 6. 3. 22 H. 6. 36. 11 E. 4
any other Title or to have any other Action to recover the Land than that by which he hath recovered and by the same reason that he shall not have a Cessavit he shall not have Eschete If a man hath Rent in Fee he may distrain or have a Writ of Annuity and if he brings a Writ of Annuity and hath Judgment to recover although that he sues not out Execution yet he shall never distrain for the Rent afterwards Tenant in Tail discontinues for Life and dyes and the Tenant for Life aliens in Fee and the Heir bring in consimili casu and recovers now by this Judgment he shall never have a Formedon of the same Land c. The disseisor enfeoffs the disseisee by deed indented upon Condition or makes a Lease for Life by Deed indented this is a good Conclusion to the disseisee to demand his Right and the Reason is that by the Deed indented the disseisee hath affirmed the Estate of the Disseisor which is as much as if he had confirmed his Estate before the Feoffment In Debt upon an Obligation the Defendant pleads a Release upon which the Plaintiff is Nonsuit afterwards the Plaintiff brings a new Action of Debt the Defendant shall be estopped to say that he was deins age or that the Obligation was made per minas But it is otherwise if the Plea be discontinued An Essoin is cast for the Tenant in a Writ of Dower yet the Tenant shall be received to say that he hath been allways ready to render Dower and because that an Essoin may be cast for a Stranger this Essoin is no Estoppel for an Estoppel shall be good to every intent but because an Essoin may be cast for a Stranger as well as for the Tenant himself it shall be said an Estoppel I bring an Assise of Mortdancestor and recover when in Truth I have no Right c. yet the Wife of the same Father shall be endowed c. Also in Avowry Tenant for life Aliens in Fee the Wife of Tenant for Life shall be endowed against the Feoffee Also Tenant in Tail is bound by Statute and makes Feoffment Execution against the Feoffee Of some Estoppels none shall have advantage but those who are parties or privies AS if I loose Land by Erroneous Judgment or false Verdict those that are Strangers shall have no advantage But of some Estoppels every one shall have advantage As Bastardy certified by the Bishop User of Action is no Estoppel to prejudice an other viz. Heir c. AS a man grants a Rent Charge in Fee to an Abbot and his Successors or to a Feme-Covert and her Heirs if the Abbot or Husband brings an Action it shall not prejudice the Successor or the Wife In no Case one person shall estopp another but in Dower AS where a Woman demands Dower and she hath Writings touching the Inheritance of the Heir for in debt it is no Plea to say that the Plaintiff is indebted to the Defendant in ten pounds because that it cannot be tryed by the Original 3 H. 6. In every Case where I am Barred of Land as if it be found that I am not next Heir this Estoppel shall pass with the Land and every one that claims the Land by me shall be Estopped but of other Lands it shall be no Estoppel against me 33 H. 6. IF I bring a Praecipe quod reddat by the name of Richard when my name is John and recover by default against the Tenant and afterwards I bring another Writ by my right name against the same Tenant he shall not estopp himself by that Recovery So if I have misnamed the Tenant in the first Record because he shall not be grieved by it Mich. 33 H. 6. contra per Prisot contra per Fortescue 34. By Prisot none shall be received to plead an Estoppel against another but he that pleads may be estopped by the same plea and this is where both parties are parties to the Record otherwise not For if I bring an Action by the name of Robert when my name is John against one that pleads with me if afterwards I sue him by the name of John he shall estopp me by that Record but against a Stranger I shall not be estopped by it by Prisott and by Fortescue 30 H. 6. 26 H. 6. 14 E. 4. contra Bastardy certified against me or found against me every Stranger shall estopp me because that every Stranger is estopped to say that I am mulier But if I am certified mulier a Stranger shall not be estopped by it to plead special Bastardy because that it may be that I am a Bastard in our Law and a mulier in the spiritual Law but not è contra No Stranger shall take advantage by an Estoppel but where the Estoppel extinguisheth the Right AS if a Man makes a Lease to me for Term of years of my own Land and the Term passeth and he enters and grants a Rent Charge in Fee and afterwards I recover against the Grantor the Land by default the Grantee shall not falsify the Recovery by Estoppel A Stranger shall not take advantage of an Estoppel in fait if it be in the Realty but by matter of Record it is otherwise A Man takes a Lease of Lands for years or for Life of which Lands he himself â—s seâ—sed in Fee or in Tail at the time of the Lease made if it be by Deed indented he is estopped to say that he had any Estate or Right in those Lands at the time of the Lease The same Law if a man be disseised and takes a Lease of the disseisor for a term of years of the same Lands by Deed indented But if a man takes a Lease for term of life of his disseisor he shall not be thereby estopped notwithstanding it be by Deed indented because that by the Livery he is remitted and the Lease is void ut dicitur quaere tamen for the Indenture is strong against him but if it be indented it is cleer Law but if it be by Fine it shall be an Estoppel because that the Estoppel takes effect before his Entry Or if Livery be made out of the Lands within View c. If a man makes a Lease by Deed indented to one of his own Lands now he is concluded after the Lease determines the Lessor enters by force of the conclusion and a stranger comes in aid of him the Lessee shall punish the stranger for this Trespass and he shall not conclude him by force of the Lease because he is wholly a stranger to the Judgment per totam Curiam 14 H. 6. But quaere if he justify as servant if he shall conclude himself Fines and Recoveries A Fine was Levied of Lands in two Counties and but one County mentioned in the Fine yet because it was for the uses declared in an Indenture which did mention the Lands in the other County all the Lands mentioned in the Indenture did pass If
to cut Beeches is wast Lopping Oak Ash or Elme or any thing to prejudice Trees is wast Making Charcoal of wood is wast Felling Timber to repair voluntary wast is double wast To dig for Gravel Stone c. is wast unless for Reparation of the house To suffer a Sea-wall or against a River to decay is wast To take Timber c. to make new Fences is wast Tenant cuts Trees for Repair and sells them though he buyes them again and employs them 't is wast Burning a house by Negligence or Mischance is wast 1 Inst 53. 40. E. 3. 15. b. Willows cut in view of the House is wast 40 E. 3. 25. b. So to cut Hasels in a Wood where there is no other Timber If one grants in his Leafe that Wast shall be redressed by Neihgbours and not by Plea yet he may bring an Action of Wast for the place wasted is not otherwise recoverable 1 Inst 53. a. If the Tenant repair houses before any Action of Wast be brought the Action of Wast is not maintainable but he must not plead Quòd non fecit vastum but the special matter 38 Ass 1 Reparation after the Writ brought not pending the Action seems no Plea 1 Inst 55. D. None shall have wast unless he had the immediate Inheritance yet an other may joyn with him against Tenant by the Curtesie with the surviving Partner Joyntenant for life with him that hath the Fee Where the Estate is determinable the Wast is general as Tail becomes Tail after possibility c. The Heir cannot have it of Wast in his Ancestors time nor a Bishop of his Predecessor nor shall Executors be punished for Testators wast Aunt and Neece may joyn 45 E. 3. 8. b. Gift to two and the Heirs of one he that hath Fee cannot have Wast against his Joyntenant but his heir may if wast after if the other survive if the Reversion be not continued in the same it was at the time of the wast done the Action is gone though taken back again 1 Inst 53. D. Wast lyes against Tenant by the Curtesie and in Dower though they have assigned unless the Reversioner have assigned also All others shall answer for their own wast unless Guardians And if the Guardian assign it lyes against the Assignee Guardian shall not answer wast by an other because 't is poenal unless he is Joynt-Guardian If one recovers against him under Age he recovers the Land else only Damages Infants Feme coverts c. shall answer Wast c. done by Strangers and she for her Husband Co. 1. Inst 53 b. 54. a. Husband Tenant for Life in his Wives Right does wast she dyes 't is dispunishable but if tenant for years in her Right not because the marriage is a Gift of it to him Tenant for Life grants his Estate on Condition Grantee does wast Grantor entâ—rs Wast lyes against the Grantee and the place shall be recovered Lord not punishable for wast done by his Villein before Entry Occupant punishable generally or specially Tenant afsigns and takes the Profits wast lyes against the Tenant Wast done sparsim in Woods or Houses all is to be recovered No Action of wast lyes against Guardian in Socage but Trespass or Account 3 Cro. 357. If Lessee take Trees c. to repair houses 't is not wast though he was not bound to repair them as his Lessor covenanted to repair them for if it was sans Impeachment of wast for the houses as the house was ruinous at his Entry and this for that Favour the Law gives to houses of Habitation Co. 1. Inst 54. b. a. Dyer 194. 198. b. Brook 463. Tit. Wast Lease of lands he may dig in open Mines and if it were of lands and mines if any were not open he can open none new but if none were then open he may open new ones Co. 1. Inst 54. b. 5 R. 1. 2. Tenant for Life makes Feoffment wast is done 't was upon Condition Lessee enters for Condition broken Lessor shall have wast So Successor of a Bishop shall have Wast on his Predecessors Lease for wast done in time of Vacation So if Lessee for Life be disseised and wast done if he enters he shall be charge able for the rest yet in none of these cases had the Lessor any Reversion in him at the time of the wast as regularly he ought but these cases stand upon their particular Reasons 1 Inst 13. b. The Aunt and Neece joyn in Action of Wast done in the old Sisters Life the Aunt alone recovers the damages Co. 1. Inst 233. b. Tenant for Life makes a Lease for years and enters upon his Lessee and consents to a Recovery in Wast against him the Lessee for years shall be for ever excluded for of necessity the place wasted must be recovered but if he had granted a Rent charge and committed Wast and the land recovered the Rent had continued Co. 1. Inst 233. b. Perkins 844. Tenant for Life does wast and grants over his Estate Lessor releaseth all wast to the Grantee it shall discharge the Lessee Idem of Tenant in Dower or by the Curtesie for besides the Privity that endures if the Lessor should maintain his Action he should recover Locum vastatum against the Grantee contrary to his own Release Co. 1. Inst 269. b. Lessee does wast and then surrenders 't is said the Lessor shall maitain wast but the Book seems to be misprinted and that it should be shall not maintain c. for by his own Act he hath determined his Action in part Co. 1. Inst 285. 5 Rep. 12. b. Wast brought against Tenant pur auter vie in Ass he dyes pending the Writ it shall not abate but proceed for the damages because altered by Act in Law but if Baron and Feme Tenants in Tail special bring Wast and she dies without Issue pendente brevi so as the Husband becomes Tenant in Tail apres possibility d'issue extinct it shall abate because all wast must be ad exheredationem And note that Release of actions real bar wast and so doth Actions personal for he shall not apportion his own Action Co. 1. Inst 285. a. One devises Lands by the general words Bosc ' Maherem ' Miner ' Carbon ' in tam amplis modo forma as the Lessee habuit or habere potuit the Lessee opens a Mine and cuts Trees to use about it the cutting is wast for the Trees were not granted it being a Lease nor do they pass as incident to the Mine it not being open And Hobard holds that if the Mine had been open at the time of the Lease it had been wast Hobard 234. Darcy against Ashwich Hutton 190. 191. Lessee cannot change the nature of the thing devised and therefore not turn Meadow into Arrable or Wood into Pasture dry up an ancient Poole suffer a Park pale to decay destroy a stock of Deer Fish c. but may better a thing in the same kind and therefore may
Town but he may inquire at any Town and there cannot be less than twelve of the Jury Co. 2. Inst 140. or 146. Articuli super Chartas gives an Action of Wast against the Escheator or Sub-Escheator if they do wast in any thing that comes into the King's hands with a Respondeat superior ' Co. 2. Inst 571. Wast may be in distruction of the Game of Deer or Pigeons though all be not destroyed so to stop the holes of Dove-houses to stop Coney burroughs but to dig Stones Marle or stub up old Thorns or plough a Hop-ground is not Ow. 36. 67. Co. 1. Inst 51. K. 2. Leon. 222. Adjudged That if Houses or Ground-sills be putrified for not scouring a Ditch Wast lyes In Domibus pro non escurando c. Ow. 43. To stub up Thorns is not wast unless growing in a hedge-row or on a Wood or old Thorns of fifty or sixty years growth Ow. 67. 1 Inst 53. One made a Feoffment to the use of himself for Life and to another in Fee and was punishable in Wast by him in Remainder therein tho in the Dr. and Stud. 't is said if Feoffment be to one for Life he is not punishable for Wast Ow. 91. 25 Eliz. Com. Banco Rot. 603. Rayer con ' Durat One entred into Bond not to commit Wast and the permitting a house ruinous at the time of the Lease to fall was a Forfeiture of the Obligation such Wast is not punishable if there be no Bond nor Covenant against it Owen 29 Eliz. Glover against Pike It seems that a Quod ei deforceat will lye upon a Recovery by default in a Writ of Wast against Tenant in Dower c. But because the default was after Appearance and so a Contempt it lay not in Elmer's Case not because Damage on the Prin ' or that Wast is a personal Action Vide 3 Cro 263. 2 Rolls 102. 2. 104. 4. Damage Owen 101. p. 33. El. Co. Baneo Rot. 1125. Elmer against Thatcher 1 Inst 355. 198. 2. r. 68. b. Lessee for years waves Possession and a Stranger commits Wast the Lessor shall have wast against Lessee and so if Lessee assigns and continue in Possession and does wast the wast shall be against him Ow. 141. When the Writ to enquire of wast is Awarded upon Nichil dicit there the Command in the Writ that the Sheriff go to the place wasted and enquire c. is but Surplus and the Sheriff needs not go thither but may enquire of it in any place in the County because the wast is confessed but if the Writ be to enquire at the Grand Distress upon Westm 2. 24. There such Command is necessary and the Sheriff must go to the place because that must better appear upon the view yet the Entry in both cases is Per visum Juratorum Pop. 24. Dy. 204. a. Hutt 44. 3 Cro. 18. 290. When the Interest of the Inheritance is in one person and the Lease for years in another though by several Demises part at one time part at another time yet one Action of Wast lyes and so if Lessor have but two third parts of the house in which the wast is done he shall assign wast to be done in the whole for it cannot be done in part but 't is to all and though not in all yet it goes to each part But 14 H. 8. where one lets several Leases of the same Lands to one person not one but several Actions Pop. 24. 25. 3 Cro. 290. 14 H. 8. 12. b. Lease for Life without Impeachment of Wast Lessee has an Interest in the Trees c. and may give them and shall have them whoever cuts them and shall have Trespass against a Stranger that cuts them contrary to Co. 4. 63. a. Dy. 184. a. Hob. 132. Pop. 195. Co. 11. 82. b. Dy. 47. b. Co. 1. Inst 224 a. 2 Cro. 216. When the Wast is confessed by Nil dicit the Writ to enquire is not to enquire of the Wast as it is when the Judgment is upon the Distress by the Statute but only of the Damage Hutt 44. Tippin against Rives Trenching a Meadow whereby it is meliorated is not wast but building a new house is because it puts the Lord to more charge and so is planting a Hop-ground because it alters the Lord's Inheritance Dyer 361. b. Hutton 19. 103. Hob. 234. 1 Inst 53. f. By Fitzh and Baldwin Ch. Inst One Joynt-tenant shall have Wast against his Companion by the Equity of the Statute cum duo vel tres c. but not Parceners because they were compellable to make Partition and not denyed p. 27. H. 8. Pl. 37. Wast Et inter alios Arbores white Thorns each valued at 6 s. 8 d. Defendant pleads that they were for Hedge-boot and House-boot Plaintiff says there were black Thorns enough besides and as to the Hedge-boot is taken that there were not enough besides and found there were as to the House-boot the Defendant demurs and the Plaintiff enters a Nolle prosequi on the Demurrer and Cur. advisare vult on the Verdict and no Judgment given Co. Entr. 708 709. Pl. 11. Wast and Issue of a Confirmation and in the Venire facias was omitted Et Interim Terram illam videant wherefore obj they cannot take the Inquest Responds they may the Issue here being for a collateral thing and the Estate not to be enquired of P. 7. E. 4. Pl. 2. Wast against Baron and Feme and she received in his default pleads an Assignment by them and till then no Wast And it seems she shall have the Plea though it appear she can lose nothing And for Damages she shall not be received Trin. 9. E. 4. 15. Vid. 22. E. 4. 35. a. 21. H. 6. 46. 4. or 40. 42. E. 3. 22. 6. Wast brought by two and one summoned and severed and the other recovers the moyety of the place wasted and the Moyety of the damages quoad the VVillows Assize for wast Cur ' advisari vult P. 12. E. 4. Pl. 1. If one does wast and repairs before Action brought he may plead it and excuse himself but if the Condition of a Bond be not to do wast and he does wast and re-edifies yet Debt lyes for the Bond was once and ever forfeited 20 E. 4. 18. b. Lessor sells Trees Vendee cuts them Lessee's Cattel eat the Germines no Wast for he not bound to fence them in against the Lessor's own tortious Act. Tr. Mo. 9. Lease for years Remainder for Life Tenant for years does wast Action of Wast lyes So if Lessor covenant that he will not sue Lessee for wast within two years yet after the two years he may sue him for wast done within them But if Tenant for Life be Remainder to Baron and Feme in special Tail Feme dyes without Issue wast lyes not otherwise if the Remainder in Fee were to the Baron because the Tenants in Tail after Possibility were merged by the Fee per Browne quod tamen
take the Inquisition at another place Co. 8. R. 15 2. b. Lease for Life Sans Impeachment of Wast per parol mult ' alterâ—at ' and not resolved whether the Priviledge be good without deed but resolved if the Priviledge be void without Deed yet the Estate is good as an Estate without the Priviledge Co. 9. R. 9. a. 10. b. In Wast for cutting down a tree nothing shall be recovered but the Circuit of the Root and not according to the Latitude of the Branches Co. 11. R. 50. a. Lease for years Sans Impeachment c. Lessor confirms his Estate for Life the Term is merged and he punishable for wast so lease pur auter vie Sans Impeachment c. Remainder in him for his own Life it merges his first Estate c. he is bare Tenant for Life punishable for wast Co. 11. R. 83. b. Term expires Lessee continues in Tenant at Sufferance and does voluntary wast his Lessor also being Tenant for years brings Action upon the Case and adjudged it lyes and not Trespass as objected by Littleton it ought to be and the rather here because the Plaintiff being but a Termor subject to Wast ought to sue his Action to have as much in Damages as he may be charged over West against Trend 1 Cro. 135. vid. Co. 5. r. 13. b. Error of a Judgment in wast assigned first because the Wast being assigned in several things entire Damages are taxed which ought not to be for some of them be Pettits not punishable and the Court is to judge Sed non allocatur being found not intended any of them Pettit Secondly thirteen Jurors enquire and they not an Inquest of Office as Writ to enquire of Damages for Attaint lyes but that seemed well enough also Thirdly the Wast is assigned in cutting twenty Trees and the Jury found him guilty but of two and yet no Misericordia pro Resid ' But Barkley held it well for when they find any part of the same thing assigned there needs no Miserecordia pro resid ' But if they find wast in some things and no Wast in any part of one thing as if Wast assigned in Domibus Boscis and they find it in part in Domibus and none in Boscis he shall be in Misericordia pro Boscis but where they find a less number of trees than assigned Jones and Cro. doubted K. uxor against Fitzh 1 Cro. 299. 327. Eradication of white Thorns is wast not succidendo and vendendo unless they grow in places for defence of Cattel and it be so averr'd 2 Cro. 126. Lease for years with House-boot and Hay-boot sine impetitione vasti as good as sine impetitione vasti and traverse to the whole not the House-boot and Hay-boot Ley against Eyre 2 Cro. 226. or 216. Wast and Counts general of wast done ad exhered ' 't is found that the Defendant was Lessee for years Remainder to D. Sans Impeachment of Wast who is dead and if the wast was committed in the Life of B. yet good amover for though then no Action lay and B. might have licensed him to do wast yet now he may count of it as Wast immediately done to himself Bray against Tracey 2 Cro. 688. Wast and Counts of a Lease for Life Defendant pleads 't is part of an Hospital whereto the Plaintiff presented him for life it seems it lyes not for he is in from the Foundation and though in but for Life the person has the time no Revertion in him 21 H. 6. 2. Wast by an Abbot and Counts of a Lease by the Predecessor and assigns wast general without saying whether in the Predecessors time or his own and good for were the wast committed in the Predecessors time the Successor shall punish it and so is 42 E. 3. 22. And if the Predecessor had released it yet the Predecessor may punish it for being in the Realty the Predecessor could only release for his own Life eod Libr. E. 3. yet there 't is doubted if an Agreement had been made with the Predecessor for the wast if it had not been a Bar. And in 21 H. 6. where one justifies to cut Ashes for Fire-wood could be had and that per Curiam yet note in the end of the Case t is pleaded and that no under-wood was there And in this case 't is held by some that Ashes Oaks c. under twenty years growth may be taken for Fire-boot c. but denyed by others for they are Ashes and 't is held that Lessee Sans fait may take House-boot c. as well as if by Deed and that if Lessor in the Deed of Lease granted that he will require the House Lestue may take Trees in his default and pleaded it in Bar of the wast and so seems Dyer 198 b. 124. a 24 H. 6. 46. 47. 48. The Summons Attachment and Distress all retorned nihil and whether a VVrit to enquire of the VVast shall be awarded no VVrit being retorned served or an Alias distringas multum dubitatur alter catur but at last the VVrit was awarded To inquire of Wast vide 41. or 14. H. 6. 2. b per Roll. If Baron and Feme Tenants in Common of a Term be and wast is done wast lyes against her after his Death quod alii concesserunt Trav. denyed Et vide F. N. B. 59. Baron and Feme Tenants for Life she shall not be punishable after his Death for VVast done by him 46 E. 3. 25. vid. Case 21 H. 6 56. a. b. H. 6 25. b. VVast and assigns wast in cutting down so many Oaks and in cutting down the Springs that came up from the Roots again Resolved this is double wast and so may be double Assignment and is not a double Assignment of the same wast and treble Damages shall be given for each cutting tho by some it can be recovered but once 2 H. 12. a. b. Tenant in Dower or by the Courtesie grants over their Estate yet the Husband shall maintain an Action of Wast against them but if he assigned his Reversion his Assignee must have it against their Assignee Co. 1. Inst 316. a. F. N. B. 45. Two bring an Action of VVast one releases it bars both if it be in the Tenuit wherein Damages only are to be recovered not if in the tenet where locum vastatum is to be recovered also Co. 1. Inst 355. b. In Co. 1. Inst 't is held of one side and denyed by the other that an Attachment lyes upon an Inquiry of wast But 1 Cro. 't is held clearly that it does And F. N. B. fays it was fo resolved by the Court 2 H. 4. But his Opinion is contrary Co 1. Inst 355. b. 1 Cro. 299. F. N. B. 107. c. The Reversion must continue in him that brings the Action at the time of the Action brought because 't is said Ad Exheredationem and it must be in him at the time of the wast done unless in special Cases as Tenant for Life
706. Pl. 9. 700. Pl. 7. Feoffment to the use of A. for Life without Impeachment of wast and power to cut and sell Trees and make Leases Remainder for Life to B. with the same power Latch 163. 268. Poph. 193. 706. Pl. 9. A. makes a Lease and dyes quaere whether B. may cut the Trees not agreed but ' t is agreed that the Clause Sans Impeachment gave an Interest and A. might have done what he would with the Trees but not his Executor after his Death because it was an Interest annexed to his Estate and determined with it the doubt of the Remainder chiefly seems to be because the Lease ariseth partly out of the first Feoffment and partly of the Lessors Estate for Life Note the Lease was excepted the Trees and the Exception good because Tenant for Life had an Interest by the Sans Impeachment Secherval versus Dale Latch 163. 268. c. as before Lessor brings wast against Lessee for Trees of the Plaintiff the Lessor himself cut them 't is a good Bar and therefore in Trespass by the Lessee against Lessor for the cutting he shall recover only for the Fruit and Shade because not charged over as if a Stranger had cut them he should Co. 13. r. 96. 70. M. 10. H. 7. Pl. 3. 2 E. 4. 2. or 7. b. In wast for digging Gravel Defendant justifies by Command of the Lessor no plea for 't is the Lessee's Land pur temps not the Lessors so he could not command him also 't is per parol and without Deed and against the Tenant for Life yet dict such a Command to cut Trees good because not the Lessee's but Lessor's and that is agreed in Co. 11. R. 48. b. H. 2. H. 7. Pl. 20. M. 10. H. 7. Pl. 3. Feoffee to use Cestuy que use makes a lease for years according to the Statute R. 3. The Reversion remains in the Feoffee for the Statute does but give Authority to Cestuy que use to dispose as where one wills that his Executor shall sell if Lessee commits wast the Feoffee shall bring the Action tho no Privity because they could not have any so shall the Lord in Escheate maintain Wast yet he had not Privity Mi. 5. H. 7. Pl. 11. H. 8. H. 7. Pl. 1. Tr. 26. H. 8. Pl. 131. or 31. 'T is wast to pull down or suffer a wall to go to Ruine be it made of Wood Mud or Stone or be it within the house for Separation or without for Inclosure so to destroy wood of hasle or willow not to cut them Husbandly To cut Fruit Trees in an Orchard and destroy them is wast not if they grow in Hedges and Closures and if a house be ruinous at the Entry 't is no wast to suffer it to decay otherwise if not ruinous at the Entry but where 't is held ploughing Meadows is no wast 't is no Law Hob. 234. Ow. 66. M. 10. H. 7. Pl. 3. 4. In an Action of Wast in the Tenuit an Accord is a good Plea because only damages to be recovered not in the Tenuit because locum vastatum is to be recovered also Co. Entr. 706. 707. Pl. 9. H. 11. H. 7. Pl. 7. P. 13. H. 7. Pl. 3. Co. 6. R. 44. a. Upon Scire facias of a Judgment in wast one may have a Writ of Estrepement or in any Suit where no Damages are to be recovered but not Scire facias of wast committed after the first Scire facias because he might have had Estrepement at first But for wast after Estrepement a Scire facias lyes to shew Cause why he committed the wast and a Scire facias lyes in Assise for wast done after Judgment not before Judgment because he cannot recover Damages for its after verdict but in a Formedon not because he might have had Estrepement and Pl. 20. Error of a Judgment in Assise and the Piaintiff in the Error prayed an Estrepement and could not have it because he may it seems have Scire facias for damages done after the Judgment c. But questioned per Fennel because by the Statute he finds Security in the Writ specified to answer for all the Damages Mich. 14. H. 7. Pl. 20. but vid. 32 or 33 H. 6. b. a. In Scire facias of a Fine Estrepement lyes Lessee does wast in a corner of a Wood only the part not the whole shall be recovered but if he do in the whole Wood and there be plots of ground within the Wood that shall be recovered with the Wood. Tsin 15. H. 7. Pl. 21. Furnaces Fatts Posts Rails c. fixed to the Free-hold by Lessee for years 't is hâ—ld by some that if he remove them during the Term 't is no Wast quod qu. But agreed that if he leave them there till the Term ended he cannot remove them Vid. 42 E. 3. 6. a. 6. M. 20. H. 7. Pl. 24. Trin. 21. H. 7. Pl. 4. Owen 70. Lease Absque impetitionc vasti in Wast he shall plead that in Excuse but if the Lease at first were given and then a grant after that he shall not be punished in Wast it is not pleadable in Bar but to bind as a Covenant Vide divers such Cases 21 H. 7. 30. Tenant for life grants his Estate to one Parcener in Reversion and her Husband 't is no Surrender and if the Baron and Feme do wast the other Sister shall bring a Writ in all their names and the Baron and Feme shall be summoned and severed M. 2. H. 7. Pl. 60. In wast by Lessor the Lessee pleads not guilty and gives in Evidence a grant to cut c. to repair c. And per Brook Pollard and Elliot it was no wast but ought to have been pleaded and not given in Evidence for thereby the Advantage thereof is lost Ad quod Bradnet concessit but held it wast but not punishable Wast and he held that if a Lessor covenant to repair and do not Lessee may do it and deduct it out of the Rent And if one covenant to repair a ruinous house if he do not 't is wast but he may take Trees else it had not yet in that case he might have repaired it and taken Trees to do it though not bound to do it And at Common law Lessee might take Boots but if excessive it is Wast Lessee suffers Posts Pales c. to decay it is wast Trin. 12. H. 8. Pl. 1. or 4. Wills WIl ls and Testaments were originally proved at the Common Law as Perkins confesses and Leonard says they are by the Curtesie of England proved in the Spiritual Court not de communi jure nor in other Nations and in divers Mannors the Lords have the Probate at this day Co. 5. Rep. 73. b. 16. a. 9. Rep. 38. a. 5. Rep. 30. b. Issue at Common Law for Lands devised by Will and the question whether a Will or not and now they moved at the Spiritual Court to it which will blemish the Evidence at the
Plea in Abatement of the Writ before the default saved 40 E. 3. 2. In a Writ of Aiel Besaiel and Cosinage one shall not plead to the points of the Writ after he hath pleaded in Barr but it is otherwise in an Assise of Mortd ' ancestor as it seems 40 E. 3. 19. Where the Writ abates in part by the Act of the Court and where it is abated by the Parties own Confession As if an Executor brings an Action de clauso fracto de bonis asportatis in this case the Writ shall abate for part and as to the rest it shall be effectual But where the Writ is abated by the Plaintiff it is reason although that it be of his own Conusans that if it abate that the whole shall abate In Assise against two the one pleads in Barr as to a moiety the other pleads jointenancy with a third person the Plaintiff may choose him who pleads in Barr for his Tenant and confess that his writ is false for the other part In Assise against two the one is Tenant the other is Disseisor which Disseisor makes default the other accepts his Companion Tenant with him and pleads in Barr the Plaintiff dissables the Tenant and doth not answer to the Barr for in this case he hath accepted a Tenant which is not Tenant As if Praecipe quòd reddat be brought by two where one is a Bastard or by two persons as Heirs where one of them in truth is not Heir in these cases the whole Writ shallabate because that that is meerly false whichis supposed to be true Two Executors bring an Action of Trespass of Goods carried away in the life-time of the Testator and also of Trees cut down here the Writ is good notwithstanding that the Executors cannot have the Writ for the Trees cut down and if they pray to have an other Writ for the Trees cut down then the whole Writ shall abate quod nota A Defendant or Tenant cannot abate a Writ by his Act but the Act of the Plaintiff or Demandant and the Act of God and also the Act of an Estranger may abate the Writ In a writ of Ravishment de gard by the death of the Infant the writ shall not abate Tenant by Statute-Merchant is disseised the disseisor lets for life the Tenant by the Statute brings an Assise the Lessee dyes the writ shall not abate because he shall recover all in damages But it is otherwise where he is to recover the Freehold because in that case he cannot have the effect of his Judgment A Writ of Admesurement of Common is brought by one against three depending the writ the Plaintiff and one of the Defendants exchange their Lands to which the common is appendant if the writ shall abate it seems not because that notwithstanding the exchange the Plaintiff may have the effect of his Suit which is that the Common may be admesured and at all times pending the writ the Plaintiff and the Defendant who made the exchange were Tenants and the Writ of Admesurement granted between them by reason of their Tenure for there was no mean-time between the parting from the Free-hold in one Acre and the taking the Free-hold in the other Acre and that very instant that the Freehold of the one Acre was parted from the other was vested so that there was cause of Admesurement between them as well after the exchange as there was before A Writ of Admesurement is brought against three one hath nothing in the Common so that the Writ ought to abate because that non-tenure is a good Plea in this Action yet if he that hath nothing before any exception be taken to the Writ purchaseth an Acre of Land by which he ought to have Common in the same Land the Writ is made good As in Praecipe quod reddat brought against him that hath nothing and pending the Writ he purchaseth the same Lands the writ is good So it seems the writ is good notwithstanding no time between the exchange ergo à forciori when there is no mean instant But by the better opinion it seems that the writ shall abate notwithstanding that the party may have the effect of his Suit for that ground is not obsolutely general as Praecipe quòd reddat is brought against me and I have nothing in the Land and pending the writ the Land descends the writ shall abate I bring an Action of wast by reason of the reversion or a Quid juris clamat depending the writ I alien the same Reversion and after purchase the Reversion again yet the writ is abated If a writ of Partition or Nuper obiit be brought and pending the writ the demandant aliens and retakes the Estate to him yet the writ shall abate And yet in all these cases the Plaintiff may have the effect of his Suit But that which causeth the writ to abate is the Act of the Plaintiff for the writ depending he hath aliened that which gives him his cause of Action and therefore the writ shall abate as in the cases aforesaid for as to the Plaintaiff's part his own Act shall abate the writ and not the Act of God nor of the Law except in some cases and as for the Defendants or the Tenants part his own Act shall not abate the writ but the Act of God or of the Law may for if the Tenant aliens depending the writ yet the writ shall not abate but the Demandant shall recover and he that comes in by the Tenant shall be bound by that Recovery And if an exchange had been made by the Plaintiff with a stranger who had nothing in the Common the writ should have been abated without question So for that Acr◠which he had when the writ was brought he cannot maintain his writ for put the case that the day the writ was purchas'd the Plaintiff had not any Land by which he ought to have common and afterwards pending the writ he purchas'd an Acre of Land to which the Common is appendant this shall not make the writ good which was nought from the beginning When the writ is made abatable by the Act of the Plaintiff or Demandant Videlicet by his aliening of that thing which gives to him the cause of Action if he pending the writ doth purchase the same again it shall not revive the writ nor make it good WHere the Grant shall be good ab initio although it was incertainat the commencement Note If a Parson will Grant to me all the Wooll which he shall have for Tithe the next year to come this Grant is good and yet the quantity of the Wool is incertain at the time of the Grant But because it may be reduced to a certainty after the Grant it was held good enough 21 H. 6. 43. And so if a man will Grant to me the Perquisits of his Court this incertain Grant is good causâ quâ suprà 21 H. 6. 43. The same Law is where a Feoffment is
ad distringend ' d'per Ballivum Dni ' Regis The Limitation of this distress to the Kings Bailiff is void and it is good to give a power of distress to I. S. the Grantee and his Bailiffs Bacons Elem. of Law 15. Error IF a Writ of Error be brought and allowed And the Plaintiff in the Writ of Error dyes pendente breve Errore the Plaintiff in the Action may sue out a Scire facias against the Executors or Administrators of the Plaintiff in the writ of Error without mentioning the Writ of Error for that it is no Supersedeas but only to privies and not to Strangers When a Writ of Error is allowed Execution upon the former Judgment ought not to be awarded For by the writ of Error the Record it self is Removed and the Court hath nothing whereupon to award Execution Yet supersedeas the safest way If a man Levy a Fine sur Conusance de droit Come Ceo c. And suffer a Recovery of the same Lands and there is Error in them both He cannot bring Error first upon the Fine because by the Recovery his Title of Error is discharged and released in Law inclusively But he must begin with the Error upon the Recovery which he may do because a Fine executed barreth no titles that accrue de puisne tempus after the Fine levied and so restore himself to his Title of Error upon the Fine If a man levyeth a Fine where he hath nothing in the Land which inureth by way of conclusion only and is executory against all purchases and new titles which shall grow to the Conusor afterwards And he purchaseth the Land and suffer a Recovery to the Conusee and in both Fine and Recovery there is Error this Fine is Janus Bifrons and will look forward and Barr him of his Writ of Error brought of the Recovery And therefore it will come to the reason of the first case of the Attainder That he must reply that he hath a Writ also depending of the same Fine and so demand Judgment Execution IN Escape against the Sheriff The Case was That a Prisoner being in Executition the Gaoler lets him out of Prison about his occasions and after the Prisoner returns to the Goal and another Sheriff comes in and then the Prisoner escapes and comes no more It was held That an Action did not lye against the last Sheriff for the Prisoner was utterly discharged of the Execution by the first permissiom of going at large by the Gaoler The Sheriff may not break open the doors of any man to execute a Fieri facias much less a Landlord to distrain by the same reason Judgment in Debt against three and a Capia's ad satis faciendum against the Principal the Sheriff retorns non est inventus upon which issued a Scire facias against the Sureties and before the retorn the Principal came into Court and prayed his Body might be taken in Execution which was done accordingly Mich. 10 Jacobi in C. B. And with this agrees the Course of the Court of King's-Bench and divers Presidents of this Court A Writ of Error was brought 4 November retornable 10 January whereupon the Court was moved for Execution because it seemed to be but for delay in regard the Retorn is so long and with this agrees 4 H. 6. an Execution was granted by the Court Mich. 16 Jac. in C. B. Of Estoppels and Conclusions HE who claims nothing by him that was estopped shall not be estopped As two jointenants are disseised the disseisor lets to the one now he is stopped to say that he hath another Estate than for Life Afterwards he to whom the Land was so let dyes the other Jointenant shall have the Land and he shall not be by that Deed estopped for he claimed nothing by him who was estopped by the Survivor If I am named W. B. and I bring my Action by the name of I. B. and recover by that name afterwards if I will bring my Action against another person by my right name he shall not estop me by that Recovery of the same name for if I had been estop'd I should not have had my Action against the other person but he that is party may estopp me well enough 26 H. 6. 30 H. 6. et 10 E. 4. contr Where he in Reversion or Remainder claims nothing by Tenant for Life he shall not be estopped AS the Father disseiseth the Son and Levies a Fine thereof to a Stranger where Recovery is had against the Father and afterwards the Father dyes the Son enters or he that recovers or he that was party to the Fine between him and the Son brings an Assise and the other pleads the Fine or Recovery by way of Estoppel this is no Plea because that notwithstanding that the Son is privy to him that was estopped yet he claims nothing by him Where there is Lord and Tenant and the Lord lets his Seigniory to one for Life the Tenant for Life of the Seigniory distrains the Tenant and he bring an Action of Trespass against him and he justifies for that he holds of him by ten shillings of Rent and the other traverses it and it is found against the Lord for Term of Life This shall be no Estoppel to him in the Reversion If a man pleads a Plea in which he confesseth a thing that is not material it shall not be an Estoppel As if a man voucheth one as Son and Heir to such a person and when he comes he is bound to warranty by his own Deed yet may say afterwards in an Assise of Mortdancestor that the same person which I vouched before as Son and Heir is a Bastard for the words Son and Heir in his voucher are not material The same Law in a Writ of Trespass brought by one Executor of Goods taken out of his possession Where a writ of Debt is brought by an Executor who counts of a duty due to himself there the word Executor is not material and he shall not be estopped but he may say afterwards that he never was Executor nor ever administred as Executor If a man will plead a Record to estopp him that was privy he ought to shew what end the Action had AS if I bring an Action against you in which Action you plead that at anotheâ—â—ime viz. such a day c. I brought an Action of Trespass against you and the Defendant pleaded Villenage and the Plaintiff confest it he ought to shew further by force of which he was nonsuited and to shew what end the Plea had and demand Judgment if against that he shall be answered Where a man hath Judgment to recover Land by that Judgment he shall be estopped to claim any other Title than he hath by the Recovery AS if a man recover by Writ of Right Sur disclamer if the Tenant ceaseth afterwards he shall not have a Cessavit to recover the Land though he sues not out Execution for he shall be estopped to claim
two persons having several Interests in Lands acknowledg the note of a Fine before a Judg and then one of them dyes The Conusee may for all that proceed with his Fine against the other alone for the death of the other is no impediment for the Conusans of every one is against himself and shall work for so much as he can pass A man and his Wife acknowledged a note of a Fine before Commissioners the 26 th of March by Dedimus potestatem and the wife dyed 27 th of the same month and the next day being the 28 th Composition was made in the Alâ—enation-Office upon a Writ of Covenant Retornable in Hillary Term before and the Kings Silver was entred as of the same Hillary Term and so the Fine was past and ingrossed And in Easter Term the Heir of the Wife moves against the Fine But upon debate it was agreed the Fine should stand Tenant in Tail Levies a Fine with Proclamations and 5 years pass in his Life-time Yet this shall not Barr his Issue A man of full age and his Wife being but 19 Levy a the Fine of Inheritance of the Wife whereby an Estate is conveyed to the Husband and Wife in Tail and the Remainder to the right Heirs of the wife and many exceptions taken against the proceedings by the Heir to the Wifes inheritance viz. I. S. as that the said Feme was not of full age at the time of the Fine Levied and other undue means committed in getting out the Son Yet by the whole Court the Fine was held good Law for Facta valent multa que fieri prohibentur If there be Tenant for Life the Remander in Fee to an Infant and they both Levy a Fine and afterwards as to the Infant the Fine is Reversed yet the Conusee shall have the Land for the Life of the Tenant for each may pass and give what he lawfully may If there be two Jointenants and one of them suffer a Recovery declaring the uses of the whole this shall bind but only a Moiety unless the consent of the other Jointenant can be proved Heir IF an Heir be sued upon a Bond and Lands are proved to descend unto him from his Ancestor you must have a special Writ to enquire what those lands are worth to be delivered to the Plaintiff at a reasonable extent and price and if the Heir confess the Action and shew what Lands come to him by descent Then his Body and all other his Lands and Goods and Chattels are free from that Execution but if he deny the Action and plead Riens per descent or it go by default against him then Execution shall be against Body Goods or other Lands And the Declaration shall be in the Debet and Detinet as though it were his proper Debt Outlawries and Outlaws OVtlawry was pleaded in Barr and day given before when the Defendant reversed it the Defendant shall not be condemned for Failer of Record but Respondouster Green against Gascogne vide Title failer of Record Yel 36. Outlawry in the Kings Bench reversed by Error in the same Court but that is for Error in Fact not in Law as if no Outlawry lay in the Case and if Process of Outlawry lie in an Action upon the Case for turning a Water-Course vide P. 10. H. 7. pl. 15. Dy. 195. b. 196. Original in Debt called the Defendant Nuper de Lond. Exig called him de Lond. is erroneous for it must pursue the Original without Variance and the Original was against Lancelot the Exigent was against Lancelot ill 3 Cro. 49. vid. 50 95. 104. 116. 172. Error of a Judgment in Debt and Outlaw'd 2. on it against 2. where the Sheriff return'd quod non habent bona out catalla quod summon ' potuer it should have been per quod c. 2. it should be nec eorum aliquis het ' 3. the Original is against Lancelot A. and the Exigent is against Lancelot A. 4. 't is said in Hastings and it should be in Hustingis de Com. plac revocetur Lancelot vers ' Jones 3. Cro. 50. An Outlawry was reversed because it was against Lewellin with a single l and now the mean Process against Llewellin with a double Ll and it was against two and returned quod non sunt inventi and not nec eorum aliquis Llewellin against Watkins vide M. 2. R. 3 4 13. pl. 16. 3 Cro. 85. 104. 49. 50. 116. 198. 240. 248. 205. M. 21. H. 7. pl. 37. Exigent names no place where the Sheriff is to have the Body and that adjudged Error to reverse the Outlawry For the Sheriff cannot tell in what County to carry him Cesar against Stone 3 Cro. 104. Outlawry reversed because the Party was Indicted in Com. Somerset and supposed to be of London and the Capias awarded to the Sheriff of Somerset where it ought to go to the County where he lives Rorset's Case 3 Cro. 179. vid. Dy. 295. b. vid. M. 1 E. 4. pl. 2. One Outlawed of Felony assigned his Term and then reversed the Outlawry the Grantee shall maintain Trespass for the Profits taken in the mean time between the Assignment and the Reversal of the Outlawry For though it was then the King 's yet it is now as if no Outlawry had been at all Ognell's Case 3 Cro. 270. vide 218. Accord Outlawry is not reversed but by pleading without Writ of Error per tot Cur. though there be apparent Faults in it 3 Cro. 274. vide Co. 1. Inst 259. b. One is Outlawed and has his Term sold and then reversed the Outlawry he shall be restored to the Term it self not the Money Otherwise if sold on a Fieri Facias c. quod vide plus Title Exec. Eyre against Woodfare 3 Cro. 778. Co. 5. Rep. 90. b. 1. Acc. pl. 285. In Debt against an Executor the Defendant pleads that the Testator was Outlawed and doubted if a good Plea because the Testator may have some Goods not forfeited by Outlawry as simple Contract c. but on the other side such special Ass shall not be intended to Com. next he has nothing Wooley against Brade 3 Cro. 575. 851. Outlawry reversed because the Writ was Teste Edmund Anderson so wanting a Title had no Teste which is the Warrant of it Growdy and Juham 3 Cro. 592. Judgment against two in Debt C. and B and Capias only against one and he Outlawed whereupon was brought Error and reversed it because the Capins should have gone against both Also 't was not per Judiâ— ' Coron ' Beverly against Beverly 3 Cro. 648. Debt against the Sheriff on an Escape where the Case was that the Party was Outlawed after Judgment reversed it by Error within the Year and because he assigned not any Error the Plaintiff took out a Capias utlegatum and the Sheriff took him and let him go and resolved for the Plaintiff and in Co. 1. Report of this Case the difference is taken of an Outlawry
and discharged Three are bound in one Bond and every of them joyntly in the whole the Obligee afterwards gets Judgment against one of them and brings his Action against the other This Recovery is no Barr for it is no Satisfaction of the Debt but an Execution is a good plea in this Matter Obligation dated 8th of December 78. and doth not say the Year of our Lord God nor the Year of the King's Reign the Date is void and the Obligation good without Date and the Plaintiff may count how the Bond was delivered to him any day when he pleases Reg. 1. Acts and Statutes in pleading need not be recited wholly only the particular Branch that concerns the Matter in Hand because every Branch is an Act of it self Secus of a Record for that is grounded upon an Original and Judgment and ought therefore to be entirely recited when pleaded in Bar. If Tenant in Tail of a Manor whereunto a Villain is Reguardant discontinue and die and the Right of the Intail descend to the Villain himself who brings Formedon and the Discontinuee pleadeth Villanage This is no Plea because the Devesting of the Manor which is the Intention of the Suit doth include this plea because it determineth the Villanage Reg. 2. Pleadings must be certain that the Adverse Party may know whereunto to answer or else he were at a Mischief which Mischief is remedied by Demurrer If tenant in Ancient Demeasne be disseized by the Lord whereby the Seigniory is suspended and the Disseizee bringeth his Assize in the Court of the Lord. Frank Fee is no plea because the Suit is brought to undo the Disseison and so to revive the Seigniory in Ancient Demesne If a Man be Attainted and Executed and the Heir bring a Writ of Error upon the Attainder and the Corruption of Blood by the same Attainder be pleaded to interupt the conveying in of the same Writ This is nâ— plea for then he were without Remedy ever to reverse the Attainder If Tenant in Tayl discontinue for Life rendring a Rent and the Issue brings a Formedon and the Warranty of his Ancestor with Assets be pleaded against him and the Assetts is laid to be no other but his Reversion with the Rent This is no plea because the Formedon which is brought to undo the Discontinuance doth inclusively undo this new Reversion in Fee with the Rent thereunto annexed If a Man be attainted of two several Attainders and there is Error in them both there is no reason but that there should be a Remedy open for the Heir to reverse those Attainders being Erroneous as well if there were twenty as one And therefore if in a Writ of Error brought by the Heir of one of them the Attainder should be a plea peremptorily And so again if in a Writ of Error brought of the other the former should be a plea these were to exclude him utterly of his Right and therefore it should be a good Replication to say That he hath a Writ of Error depending of that also And so the Court shall proceed but no Judgment shall be given until both Pleas be dismissed and if either Plea be found without Error there shall be no Reversal either of the one or the other and if he discontinue either Writ then shall it be no longer a plea And so of several Outlawries in a Personal Action If Tenant in Tayl of two Acres make two several Discontinuances to several persons for Life rendring Rent and bringeth a Formedon of both and in the Formedon brought of W. Acre the Reversion and Rent reserved upon B. Acre and so contrary it seems to be a good Replication that he hath a Formedon also upon that depending whereunto the Tenant hath pleaded the Descent of the Reversion of W. Acre and so neither shall be a Barr And yet there is no doubt but if in a Formedon the Warranty of Tenant in Tayl with Assetts be pleaded it is no Replication for the Issue to say that a Precipe dependeth by J. S. to evict the Assetts An Attorney may plead not informed to an Action if his Client doth not give him order to plead otherwise For this will save the Attorney Damages in a Writ of Deceit if it should be brought against him In an Action of the Case if the Defendant plead to issue upon one part and Demurrer to the other part the Demurrer ought to be argued first because the Jury at the Tryal may give Intire Damages for the whole Scire Facias against Manucaptor ' they plead that after Judgment against the Principal viz. 6th die anno the Principal brought a Writ of Error whereby the Record was removed into the Exchequer and that pendente br ' de Errore the Principal rendred himself to the Marshal and there died and this he is ready to prove c. This Plea is nought because the Rendition ought to be tried by the Record Secondly The plea is double and imports two Issues the one the Rendring and the other the Death 3. The bringing the Writ of Error is a Supersedeas to the Execution and the Execution being suspended during the Error undetermined and depending the Bail was not sufficient Authority to bring them in So that his Rendition is in vain and nothing worth and the Death is only answerable which if true is a Discharge of the Bail Reg. 3. In all Imperfections of Pleading whether it be in Ambiguity of Words and double Intendments or want of Certainty and Averments the plea shall be strictly and strongly taken against him that pleads it For Ambiguity of Words If in a Writ of Entry upon Disseisin the Tenant pleads Joynt-Tenancy with J. S. of the Guift and Feoffment of J. D. Judgment del brief the Demandant says That long before J. D. any thing had the Defendant himself was seized in Fee Quousque predict ' id super possessionem ejus intravit and made a joynt Feoffment whereupon he the Demandant re-enter'd and was seized until by the Defendant alone he was disseized This is no Plea because the word intravit may be understood either of a Lawful Entry or of a tortious and the hardest against him shall be taken which is that it was a lawful Entry therefore he should have alleadged precisely that J. D. disseisivit Reg. 4. So upon Ambiguities that grow by References if an Action of Debt be brought against J. F. and J. B. Sheriffs of London upon an Escape and the Plaintiff doth declare upon an Execution by Force of a Recovery in the Prison of Ludgate sub Custodia J. S. and J. D. then Sheriffs in 1 H. 8. and that he so continued sub Custodia J. B. and J. G. in 2 H. 8. and so continued in Custodia J. F. and J. P. in 3 H. 8. and then was suffered to escape J. F. and J. P. plead that before the Escape at such a day Anno superius in narratione specificat ' the said J. S. and J. D.
pleaded it at first Also if the Plaintiff plead a Feoffment upon Condition to J. S. and that the Condition is broken and that thereupon he entred the Defendant may say that he released to J. S. after the Condition broken and then he enfeoffed him A Man pleads a Feoffment in Barr in Assize of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff saith that he Let to him for Life and afterwards he made a Feoffment by which he entered the Tenant may well say that after the Lease and before the Feoffment the Plaintiff releas'd to him This is no Departure because that it is pursuant and yet it might have been said at first 1 E. 4. Quare Impedit against a Bishop he pleads that he claims nothing but as Ordinary and demands Judgment c. The Plaintiff replies that such a day he presented to him such a person whom he refused to which the Bishop rejoyns that the Church was void and shews how and that thereupon he collated by Laps Judgment c. This is no Departure 35 H. 6. In Assize the Defendant pleads a Lease of the Plaintiff for Years which is yet in being the Plaintiff shews the Alienation of the Tenant the Tenant saith that the Plaintiff released to him after the Lease This is a Departure by Marten 3 H. 6. Precipe quod reddat the Tenant pleads that J. S. was seized of the same Lands and that they were devised to him in Fee by Force whereof he entred and gives Colour c. The Plaintiff saith that J. S. was seized and that he died seized and that the Lands descended to him as Son and Heir and that he entred cum hoc that he will averr that the said J. S. was within the Age of 21 Years at the time of the Devise The Tenant rejoyns that the Custom is that every Infant of the Age of 15 Years may Devise and that he was of the Age of 15 Years at the time of the Devise The Court was of Opinion that it was a Departure 37 H. 6. In Assize the Tenant pleaded the Dying seized by Protestation of his Father The Plaintiff said that J. S. was seized and enfeoffed him and so seized c. To which the Tenant replied that his Father by Protestation died seized and that J. S. did abate and enfeoff the Plaintiff and that the Tenant as Heir to his Father entered and was seized by Fortescue This is no Departure because the Tenant hath maintained his Barr and hath only added new Matter to maintain it 37 H. 6. If a Man plead a Gift in Tayl in Barr and the Demandant reply ne dona pas if he shew a Recovery in Value it is no Departure In Assise the Tenant pleaded hors de son Fee the Plaintiff shewed that the Tenant held of him issint de son fee and the Defendant shewed a Release of all Right This is a Departure because this plea was a Barr 5 H. 7. In Formedon the Tenant pleaded ne dona pas the Demandant shewed a Recovery in Value issint dona The Tenant shall not plead a new Barr because that that would be a Departure quod nota 21 H. 6. Reg. 12. In all Pleadings where you claim as Legatee you must surmise the Consent of the Executor as cui quidem dimissioni idem J. S. consentivit After Verdict the Plaintiff dies viz. before the day in Bank in Error brought this is assigned for Error and the Plaintiff per Attornatum suum pleads that he was alive 't was tried and found that he was dead Argued by Mr. Allen That there was no Tryal proper for the Cause for that the Issue was joyned by a Stranger and that there ought to be a Scire Facias against the Executors or Administrators of the Plaintiff and that the Writ of Error is discontinued But per totam Curiam the Tryal is good and the Judgment revers'd for that Error in fait Mich 14 Car. 2. in B. R. Dove vers ' Dinkey Quare Impedit IN Quare Impedit to present by Turns to an Advowson in Gross Three Judges were of Opinion that the Commencement how it came presentable by turns must be shewed But two Judges were of a contrary Opinion Leek against Coventry 3 Cro. 111. A Viccarage and none presented to it for one hundred and sixty Years Resolved that all Viccarages are taken out of the Parsonage and are not remitted to them by Non-usage without some Act. Robinson against Beadle 3 Cro. 873. Quare Impedit by the King against A. he pleads that the King made a Lease for Years to J. S. and during the Term J. S. presented him c. And it was moved that he being Incumbent could not traverse the King's Title without making one for himself but shew that he came in by Usurpation during the Lease but in the Writ it was excepted that the Patron and Ordinary are not named but only the Incumbent which they ought to be in all Cases but that of Collation but because the Defendant shews that he came in during the Term in which Term the King could have no Right it was adjudged for the Defendant Regina versus Middleton vide Co. 7. rep 26 27. 25 H. 6. 62. a. 3 H. 4. 2 3 11. Writ against the Incumbent only adjudged ill and abated by 46 E. 3. vide 7 E. 3 11. 7 H. 4 26. Writ against the Incumbent only good 1 Leon. 44 45 46. vide 47. E. 3. 10 11. Quare Impedtt and Counts of an Advowson appendant that 't is become void and he presented J. S. The Defendant pleads that 't is in Gross and Let to him and that he presented J. S. absque hoc that 't is appendant the Traverse is good but where the Count is of an Advowson in gross c. and the Defendant pleads that 't is appendant there the Presentment is traversable not that it appendant For the Presentment makes it in gross Seignior Buckhurst against Epm. Winton 1 Leon. 154. In a Quare Impedit by Tenant for Life Exception was taken because he counted of a Presentment only in himself and laid not any in his Lessor but adjudged good For the Lessor may lay a Presentment on his Lessee therefore 't is good for the Lessee Palmes versus Epm. Peterborough 1 Leon. 230. Co. 5. rep 57. b. 3 Cro. 518. vid. M. 7 E. 4. pl. 22. con 8 H. 5. 4 Accord Quare Impedit against the Bishop and J. S. and Judgment they joyn in a Writ of Deceit and avoid the Judgment for Non Summons and of that a Writ of Error brought and assigned that they could not joyn and Adjourned Guilliams against Blower sed vide 3 Cro. 65. They joyn in a Writ of Error on a Judgment in a Quare Impedit 1 Leon. 293. One that had a Benefice was presented to another and then purchased a Dispensation it came too late and so the first was void and if that be such as that it avoids the last quaere Vnderhill against Savage 1
Affidavit that he was sick yet no day but he pleaded al pais 3 Bulstr 316. on default Judgment and no day Ben. 151. Debt for Scavage and declares that the Mayor Aldermen c. time out of mind have so much for Scavage and the defendant brought so many Boards whereby so much was due defendant waged Law and on demurrer adjudged it lyes not on this debt grounded on a Custom Ma. c. of London against Delpester Tr. 26. Ca. 2. b. r. Wast DEvise to one for Life Remainder to A. in Fee Tenant for Life does wast he in Remainder shall have an Action of Wast but the Writ must be special and shew that he was the Reversioner by Devise not generally ex assignatione Hutton 110. Lease excepting wood and underwood Lessee cuts Timber it seems an Action of Wast lyes not because the Wood was devised and so not within the Statute Dyer 19. a. 1 Leon 61. In Wast it seems that the defendant if he never attorned may either say que riens passa and give in Evidence that he never attorned or plead it Dyer 31. a. 231. a. b. In Wast for cutting and selling Trees the selling must be answered as well as the cutting for that is traversable Dyer 75. b. 90. b. Co. 1. Inst 53. Hob. 104. If an house be ruinous at the Lessee's Entry 't is no wast to suffer it to fall but to pull it down 't is and 't is wast in the Lessee to cut Timber to re-edifie such an house per Dyer but I suppose not for if the house fall by Tempest the Lessee may cut Trees to repair by Co. 1. Inst 53. b. 54. a. contrary to Dyer 36. a. Co. 4. Rep. 63. a. 11. 81. a. The general property of Trees remains in the Lessor and the Lessee hath but particular Interest to take them and in Dyer 't is said the Lessor cannot grant them without the Lessee's License But Co. 11. Rep. 't is said 't is good to take effect after the Lease which is yet a doubt upon Waller and Pettit's Case Dyer 36. a. b. Co. 4. Rep. 36. b. 11. Rep. 48. b. 81. 1 Cro. 199. Wast assigned quòd amputavit decapitavit quadragiâ—ta Fraxinus viginti Vlmas and adjudged it well lyes Dyer 55. a. Wast assigned Succidendo quercus the Truth was he did not lop and top them he may plead Nul wast fait and give the special matter in Evidence Dyer 92. a. Upon the Retorn of the Summons 't was said quòd quer ' obtulit se quarto die per Attorn ' without naming him and though he was named in the assigning of the Wast yet 't was Error and so it was that the Estate was not set forth in the Writ though it was in the Action of Wast Also he shewed one Tenant for Life by way of use the Reversion to him and said not spectaâ— ' vel pertinen ' Dyer 93. b. Wast may be assigned in destroying the Planks and Managers in a Stable but then they must be averred fixed to the Free-hold And so of letting a Brick-wal fall but it must be averred that it was covered 1 Inst 53. a. Dyer 108. Wast by a Bishop moved to abate the Writ because 't was ad Exheredationem ipsius Episcopi where it should be ad Exheredationem Ecclesioe but no Resolution given Mich. 10. H. 7. Pl. 8. Ad Exheredationem ipsius A. B. Ecclesioe de S. Mich. 42. E. 3. 22. b. Dyer 129. a. Lessee of an house and Wood covenanted to repair the house at his proper Costs and took Timber to repair it he is not charged with Wast but in Covenant he is The same Law if the Lessor had covenanted to repair it and the Lessee had took Trees on his default Vide 21 H. 6. 47. a. Lessee may plead in Bar of Wast that the Lessor granted the Repair and he took the Trees to do it in his default Dyer 198. b. 314. a. Dr. and Stud 66. b. Perkins § 738. Plow Com. 29. Dyer 32 a. A. makes a Lease to commence in futuro and before the Lease commences infeoffs B. The Lessee does wast B. brings wast supposing quod tenet ad terminum c. ex Assignatione A. de quo idem defend ' tenuit c. and good there being no other forme though he never held of A. for his Term was never commenced in A's time Dyer 206. b. Hutton's Reports fo 110. Lessor grants the Reversion to A. who grants it to B. the Lessee assigns the Term to C. Form of the Writ denyed per Justic ' utriusque Banci Dyer 208. Scire facias of a Fine and Writ of Estrepement sued one that purchased wood long before the Scire facias is hindred to fell it Quoere what Remedy Dyer 110. b. In wast assigned in taking a Furnace fixed to the Soyl the defendant pleaded a Devise of it by the Termor and removal of it by the Executor's Assent It seems no Plea being doubted if the Plaintiff ought not to have Judgment for the wast confessed Dyer 272. b. Owen's Rep. 70. Wentworth's Office of Executors fol. 36. Quid Juris Clamat was brought upon a Fine and after Judgment and before Execution a Writ of Estrepement awarded Dyer 325. b. In wast for cutting Trees the defendant pleaded quòd fuerunt aridoe cavoe putridoe in culminibus non existentes sufficiens Maheremium pro edificiis Two Judges held it ill because not said non portantes fructus nec folia Dyer contra it tantamounts But agreed non existen ' sufficiens maheremium ad edificand alone ill for it may be fit for other uses And to other he justified to make Posts for Inolosures and that ill because not shewed that all those Trees were so employed Dyer 332. More pl. 246. A. and B. Joyntenants for Life Reversion to B. make a Lease they shall joyn in wast And so if Tenant for Life and he in Reversion make a Lease they shall joyn and Tenant for life shall recover Locum vastatum he in Reversion damages 1 Inst 42. a. b. 1 Leon 49 To cut down Timber is Wast to suffer the young Germina to be destroyed is Destruction so if one when he has cut a Sale-wood lets the spring be spoiled or stubs it up Cutting Willows Beech Maple c. that stand in defence of the house and stubbing up a quick set Hedge is destruction for all which an Action of Wast lyes 1 Inst 53. I. K. L. M. To suffer a ruinous house to fall down that was so at one's Entry is not wast ytt he may take Timber and re-edifie it but if he pull it down it is wast To destroy Glass Wainscot Doors Furnaces c. fixed to the Free-hold is wast Cutting Fruit-trees in the Orchard or Garden is wast otherwise not If a house be blown down by Tempest Lightning c. the Tenant must in convenient time repair it Destroying the Stock of Dove-houses Warrens c. is wast Where Timber is scant
makes a Feoffment on Condition VVast is done and he enters for the Condition Lessor shall have wast fo if Lessee of a Bishop commits wast in time of Vacancy the Successor shall have the Action so if Tenant for Life be disseised and wast is done and the Tenant re-enters Lessor shall have wast yet he had no Reversion Note 't is no plea for Lessee in wast to say generally that Lessor had no Reversion c. but must shew how he lost it But in wast by Assignee of the Reversion such Plea general is good vid. 39 E. 3. 19. 20. Wast by Successor of a Bishop or wast done in the Predecessors time quaere sc bon for laid ad exheredationem Ecclesiae Co. 1. Inst 356. a. vid. 1. H. 4. 26. Opinion that Successor of an Abbot or Prior shall have wast for wast done in the Predecessors time or if a Bishop Parson c. that can make Executors Vid. 71 E. 3. 53. b. 43 E 3. 8. 49 E. 3. 26. Successor of an Abbot not chargable for wast of a Predecessor In wast if the Plaintiff's Reversion determine either before or pendant the Suit his Action is gone but if it be pendente the Suit it must be so specified Ewer against Moyle Yel 141. In Wast the Plaintiff declares Quod cùm seisitus fuit and let for years the Defendant had wasted and though not said of what Estate seised so it might be for Life yet being ad exheredationem and that alledging of Seizin but Surplus held by most good enough Sir Walter Astoâ— against Sweten hall 3 Cro. 47. Wast assigned in the house where it appears the Plaintiff has but two parts of the Reversion yet good he cannot assign it otherways Wast inquired of by the Sheriff where it was confessed by Nihil dicit yet no Error Warnford against Haydock 3 Cro. 290. Wast against a Husband Tenant for life in right of his Wife dead not being in the Tenet or Tenuit ill also the Writ is Quod fecit vastum and being in her right it should have been fecerunt vastum But by Co. 1. Inst this Wast is dispunishable by her death otherwise if it had been a term for years Co. 1. Inst 54. P. Note the Estate was made to the use of the Wife for Life yet Action lyes Sackervil against Bagnell Con. to Dr. and Student Co. 3. Cro. 356. 357. In wast the plaintiff prayed a writ of Etrepement against the Tenant and his Servants and at last a Warrant against both though doubted at first if it lye in this Action though it do in Writ of Entry c. Anderne against Anderne 3 Cro. 393. F. N. B. 61. In a Writ of Entry sur disseisin done to himself the plaintiff prayed a writ of Etrepement doubted if allowable because in that Action he is to recover Damages but because Non constat whether the Tenant be able to satisfie him if he pull down his Houses granted Wright against Pearcy 3 Cro. 484. 774. Tenant in cutting three hundred Oaks Defendant as to two hundred justifies that the House was ruinous and he cut and employed them in repairs and for the other hundred he cut them to have them ready to repair Tempore opportuno adjudged an ill Plea on Demurrer for so every Lessee might â—ut where there is no Necessity Grey against Stanfeild 3 Cro. 593. vid. 498. 499. Waâ—t the writ was general and that the woman held c. ex dimissione A. her former Husband and counted that A. enfeoffed B. to the intent a Rocovery be had against him to the use of A. for Life Remainder to the woman for Life which was done accordingly and for this Judgment against the Plaintiff for the writ ought to have been recited for the Husband could not let to the Wife but she is in by the Husband and so has the Estate from the Feoffee Green feild against Dennis 3 Cro. 722. A. le ts to B. B. assigns to C. and D. D. assigns to E. except the Trees then 't is enacted by Parliament that the Heir of the Body of A. shall have the Land A. being dead leaving three Daughters who took Husbands one of them dyes the other two and their Husbands quitt the Tenant by the Curtesie brings wast against C. and E. in the Term the Term being ended adjudged first the Writ good notwithstanding the setling the Estate by the Statute without shewing the special Title and secondly without joyning the Tenant by the Curtesie because he not intitled to the Damages non locum vastat And thirdly the Writ supposes quod tenuerunt which implies a Joynt-tenancy now they appear Tenants in Common good because the Land at first one and entire but if wast can be committed in the Trees excepted by the Lessee not agreed but in Co. 5. Rep. adjudged it does and the Exception void Sir Roger Leuknor against Freed 1 Leon. 48. 3. Cro. 17. Co. 6. Rep. 12. b. Lessee for Life and he in Reversion make a Lease wast is committed they shall joyn and Tenant for Life recover Locum vastatum and he in Reversion the damages Lessee for Life Sans Impeachment c. Wast is committed by a Stranger the Lessee in Trespass shall recover no Damages for the Trees cut but only for the Entry for the property of the Trees remaining in the Lessor 1 Leon. 49. Co. 1. Inst 42. a. p. 27. H. 8. p. 36. Lease of Lands exceptis arboribus grossis super Praemissa crescentibus Trees then little grow great and are cut if wast Semble non per Anderson for they were excepted whereas great and not only what were great at the time of the Lease Garrock versus Cliffe 1 Leon. 61. A. le ts to B. for years and during the Term le ts to C. for years by Indenture to commence presently B. commits wast A. brings a Writ against B. the Defendant cannot plead nul wast nor can he plead that the Lessor had nothing for the Plaintiff will estop him by the Indenture and though the Count be general of a Lease and says not per Indenturam yet a Replication that by Indenture is no departure but a coroborating of the Declaration 1 Leon. 156. Tenant for Life is disseised and Disseisor commits wast he in Reversion shall maintain an Action of wast against Tenant for Life yet note that by the disseisin the Reversion was out of him 1 Leon. 264. If wast be assigned in a whole wood sparsim if the Jury have view of the out-side of the wood 't is good without entring and viewing of every part and so of a house otherwise if the wast were assigned in certain part of the wood or Rooms in the house 1 Leon. 267. Feoffment to the use of himself and wife for Life Remainder to his own Heir he dyes she commits wast the Writ must be general Quas tenet de hereditate c. non ex dimissione for she comes in by the Statute 2 Leon. 222. vid. Co. Entr.