by the said R. B. lawfully ingendred then liuing and the plaintife said that hee ought not to bee barred from his action for he said that after the making of the said writing before the said feast namely the 12. of Iune anno c. the said plaintife at M. in the countie of Lancaster tooke to wife the said I. and they had issue betwixt them H. Bolde and after before the said feast the said I. and the said B. dyed the said H. being the sonne of them both at the time of the death of the said I. being then full liuing and after and before the said feast namely the twelfth of Iune the saide H. B. at B. aforesaid dyed and the defendant hereupon did demurre in law And the question was whether this word tunc in the condition should be referred to the time of the death of the wife and it seemed to Mountague and Baldwin that it should not but that it ought to bee referred to a time certaine for euerie tunc relateth to his quando but they thought that it should bee referred to the feast which is certaine and not to the death of the woman which is vncertaine but Shelley and Knightley thought otherwise For in diuers cases relation shall not bee made ad proximum antecedens as if a man make a lease for life the remainder in taile the remainder ouer to I. S. in forma praedicta this shall not bee referred to the estate taile which doth next preceed because it wanteth the word heires to make an estate tayle and therefore it shall be referred to the first estate Which later opinion if it bee lawe then by our law si may signifie and may make other wordes to signifie an vncertaine cause of the accomplishment of a condition h 28. H. 8. 14. Dy. Boldes C. And whereas hee hath said that sometimes it signifieth a certaine cause as if the iudge doe giue iudgement for me So likewise it signifieth a certain cause in our law 7. Si signifieth a certaine cause at the common law for 8. E. 4. the case was this An action of debt was brought vpon an obligation by the Dutchesse of Suffolke the defendant said that it was endorsed with this conditiō that if the defendant should stand to the arbiterment of the said Dutchesse touching all maner of suits c. betwixt him one B. that then the obligation should be void c. And this was admitted to be good and thereupon it may be concluded that si sometimes in our lawe importeth a cause certaine as the Dutchesse in this case was a certaine cause of the arbiterment i 8. E. 4. 1. 9 Dutchesse de Suffolke C. So 23. Eliz. the case was that two were bound to stand to the arbiterment of two if they did make their awarde within two daies after the date or making of the said obligation and the obligation bore date die Sabbati ante prandium and the award was made the same day post prādium and this was held to be good because it shall bee intended that it may be made at any time after the date of the obligation vntill two daies immediatly following be past And as in 8. Si by the common law may signifie an vncertaine euent the ciuill law so likewise by our law si whether it be expressed or implyed may signifie an vncertaine euent for if a rent be graunted for life to I. S. the remainder to him that shall first come to Paules the next day in the morning this remainder is good though it be vpon a si implyed if I. S. dye not before the next day and if one come to Paules the next day in the morning and if hee which commeth thither be a person able to take by the graunt k Assis pl. 47. Perk. 13. sect 56. And whereas he saith that by their law it signifieth 9. Si. signifieth a condition by the common law a condition or a conditionall disposition so it doth likewise in our law as it is well recited in my Lord Dyers reports out of Bracton Scito quòd vt modus est si conditio quia causa And as l 4. Mari. 139. Dy. to his conceited case of the puerperie I take his reason to bee verie good that benig na interpretatio facienda est in fauorem libertatis Codicgnost What say you now sir Nomomathes I say that as for such a paradoxical fantasie Non persuadebis etiamsi persuaseris 2 Diuision But I pray you resolue me this If I sel to another certain land for an hundred pound vnlesse another the next moneth following doe giue more for it by fiue pound at the least whether doth this word vnlesse make a condition or it is an idle clause and vneffectuall Codicgn I take it clearely to make a good condition for though the sale be pure and vnconditionall 1 The word nisi or vnlesse doth sometime signifie a condition at the ciuill law yet it is resoluble and defeasible vpon a condition contingent m l. 2. §. si in diem ff pro emp. for the words following may qualifie and gouerne a direct graunt or deuise as if the testator say I deuise vnto A. a C. li. for the making of my tombe n l. quib diebus §. fi ff de condi de mon. or if he said I deuise vnto him a hundred li. pro eura liberorum meorum sustinenda or if he said I deuise vnto him so much to endow certaine poore maydens or to ransome certaine prisoners out of captiuitie here there is no condition implyed but onely a limitation or modification to what intent or purpose the deuise is o l. mille C. de epi. et cle So if the testator say I deuise to Titius C. li. 2 Law is a modification or limitation of a graunt is made which I will shall be paied vnto him out of my money which I haue in such a place as namely in such a closet or such a chest if in the closet or chest there bee no money then there is nothing due but if there be a lesse summe yet all the mony is due by reason of the intent p l. quidam testamento ff de leg 1. l. Lucius ff de ali ciba And if the testator deuise to euerie one of his free men a seuerall certaine yearely maintenance out of his landes in Dale if his landes in Dale be not sufficient for these seuerall maintenances yet they ought to be supplyed of his other landes q l. Paulo Callimacho §. fi de leg because the adiection and mentioning of the place was onely vsed for a certaine demonstration of the lande which should bee charged with payment and not for the taxation or restraint of the legacie for legatum non restringitur But if a man deuise ten pound to his daughter vntil she mary by this is intended a yearely paiment of x. li. r
I substitute the one of them to the other that is if the one die the other shall haue all and the mother nothing at all t Gazalup verb. substitutio brem loqua Anglonomoph I haue noted in your wordes Codign two thinges which haue no small coherence and agreement with matters of our Law First in that by will according to your Law an entrie may be limitted to a straunger 2. In that ye hold that he which defeateth the estate of him that breaketh the condition shall defeat his whole estate and shal entirely claime the possession Which two assertions I shall seuerally prooue by cases of Law beginning with the first A man seised in fee of landes deuisable 3. By Will according to the common Law an entrie may be limitted to a stranger did deuise them to one for terme of his life and that he should be a Chapplein and that he should chaunt for his soule all his life time and that after his decease the tenements should remaine to the Cominaltie of a certaine village to finde a chappleine perpetuall for the same tenements and he died and the deuisee entred and held the landes sixe yeares and was no chappleine and the heire of the deuisour outed him and he brought an Assise And it seemed to the Court that the limitation that he should be a chappleine was no condition and that the heire could not enter for then the remainder should be defeated which may not be because by the intent a perpetuall chappleine ought to found u 29. Ass pla 17. Whereby it appeareth that they in the remainder were to take aduantage in this case of the breach of the thing that was to be done and not the heire So in Fitz Iames his case the clause of entrie was limitted to him in the remainder for breach of the condition by the particular tenant for it was helde that the limitation might determine the estate and that being determined he in the remainder might enter uu 13. et 14. Elizab. Com̄ 403. Newyses case Also 34. E. 3. the case was that a man had issue a sonne and a daughter and deuised land deuisable to one for life vpon condition that if the sonne should disturbe the tenant for life that the land should remaine to the daughter and the heires of her bodie the father dieth the sonne disturbeth the tenant for life who dieth the daughter brought a Formedon and it was allowed a 34. E. 3. Formedon pla vlt. But yet the aduantage of 4. The aduantage of entrie limitted to a stranger is in the late reports doubted of entrie by vertue of the limitation is not in other late reportes so cleare but hath been greatlie doubted of Stubes being Cestuy que vse deuised to his wife certaine land during her life ita quòd non faceret vastum the remainder to his yonger sonne in taile and died after the Statute of 27. of ioyning the possession to the vse is made the woman dieth the question was who should enter for the condition broken the heire the feoffees or he in the remainder b 3. Mar. 117. Dy. And an other case was equally doubtfull Wilford was bound in an Obligation without daie of payment limitted and deuised his land to his executors vppon condition that if they did not paie the said summe according to the obligation that the deuise should be voide and that then A. should haue the land to him and to his heires vppon condition that hee paied the money Wilford died A. died the executors are requested to pay the money and they would not pay it the question of the booke left vndecided is whether the heire of A. may enter into the land and paie the money c 3. Mar. 128. Dy. In like maner land in Gauelkind was deuised to the eldest sonne vpon condition that he should paie 100. li. to the wife of the deuisour he fayled of the payment it was questioned by Manwood whether the yonger sonne might enter into the moitie as by an implied limitation d 15. Eliz. 317. Dy. But touching such entries by force of some speciall limitation or condition Mast. Frowike giueth a good rule 21. H. 7. that an estate of inheritance can not cease by vertue of a condition broken onelie but there ought to be also an entrie But otherwise it is of a particular estate and the reason is because such an estate may be determined by word as by surrender and by the same reason it may cease by the wordes of the condition e 21. H. 7. 12. per Frowike Now that the 5. That the entrie for the condition broken defeateth the whole estate whole estate of the feoffee or donee is defeated by the breach of the condition and the entrie of the partie may be prooued by diuerse authorities in our Law and that there can be no fraction of the condition 14. Elizab. all the Iustices agreed And so was iudgement giuen in Winters case that by the graunt of the reuersion of part of the landes with which a condition runneth the condition is wholie confounded because it is a thing penall and entire and may not be apportioned nor diuided f 14. Elizab. 308. Dy. And 33. of Henrie the eight according to Mast. Brookes report it was helde for Law that if a man giue land in taile or lease it for life rendring rent with a condition for default of payment to reenter now if he lease part of the land to the donour or lessour or if the donour or lessour enter into part of the land he cannot enter for rent behind after but the condition is wholie suspended because a condition cannot be apportioned or diuided Therefore some scruple may with good reason be made of the case 16. Elizab. in my Lord Dyers reportes A man leased land for yeares vppon condition that the lessee should not alien the land to anie person without the assent of the lessour nor any part of the land the lessour giueth licence to alien part and the lessee alieneth the residue without licence it was adiudged that the lessour may enter notwithstanding the dispensation of the condition ex parte g 16. Elizab. 334. Dy. Howsoeuer 5. Edw. 6. be to the same purpose that a man enfeoffed two vppon condition to make backe a lease for life to the feoffour the remainder in fee to a straunger the one of them onelie maketh estate accordingly And by the opinion of manie this is good for a moitie by the dispensation of the partie who might take aduantage of the condition by his acceptance of estate h 5. Ed. 6. 69. Dy. For 23. Elizab. the case was such A man was bound in an hundred pound to giue to the obligee the moitie of all the fishes taken by his water-mille he tooke twentie one fishes and gaue tenne to the obligee and an action of Dette was brought vpon the obligation and the plaintife recouered
because he did not giue vnto him the moitie of the other fishe This was adiudged in the Kinges Bench. But now suppose that the condition doth extende onelie to some particular estates whether shall the other estates depending bee totallie defeated by the breach of the condition And surelie our Law is that the breach of the condition shall defeat no estate but onelie that whereunto it is annexed For the case was 3. Mar. that a man deuised land to his wife vppon condition that shee should bring vp his eldest sonne the remainder to the second sonne The elder sonne entreth for the condition broken hee shall onelie defeate the estate of the wife And if the tenant for life and hee in the remainder ioine in a feoffement vppon condition that if such an acte be not done that the tenant for life shall reenter this doth not defeate the entire estate of the feoffee i 3. Mar. 125. Dy. And if a gift of land be made in taile the remainder to the right heires of the donee vppon condition that if hee alien in fee then the donour may enter if the donour enter for the condition broken the estate taile is onelie defeated k 11. H. 7. 6. 13. H. 7. 23. 10. H. 7. 11. So if a man lease land for life by deede indented the remainder ouer in fee rendring a rent with clause of reentrie for non payment by the tenant for life and to reteigne the land during his life If hee enter for the condition broken he shall haue the land onlie during the life of the tenant for life l 29. Ass pla 17. Nomomath I giue yee great thankes for the vnwearied continuance of your paines and though I bee in questioning at a non-plus yet I see your inuention and memorie are not grauelled nor dryed vp parched as it were with summers drought I praie you therefore let vs still conuerse together vnder one roofe within my walles there is no Sinon no Dauus no Momus but chast learning cabboned with frugall contentment that if God doe still vouchsafe the Moone-diall of this darksome life with the reflexe of his intellectuall illumined influence this triple-wheeled clocke may still be kept in motion by the diuine agilitie of his Lawfauouring spirit A TABLE OF THE Sections or Diuisions of the principall pointes matters and questions which are handled in euerie Dialogue The Diuisions and principall contents of the first Dialogue of Prohibitions and Consultations The 1. Diuision 1. THe originall of tithes is inquired of 2. The councell of Constance is said to haue condemned Wicklife for holding tithes to bee pure almes The 2. Diuision 1 The originall of tithes is demonstrated to be by the law of God 2. God his deputies for the receipt of tithes are set downe 3. The heathens which knew not God had great regard of of paying tithes 4. Lucullus is specially commended for the paying of tithes 5. Camillus is likewise commended for his diligence in procuring tenth to be payed 6. The Romanes carefull in paying first fruits 3. Diuision 1 Whether Parsons ought to haue no more liuing then tithes 2. It is denyed by the Canonist that they ought to haue no more liuing 4. Diuision 1 A lay man by the Canon-law may prescribe in paying a speciall portion in lieu of tithes 2. The ciuill lawe agreeth thereunto 3. By the common lawe a man may prescribe in paying a temporall recompence in lieu of tithe 5. Diuision 1 Two sortes of tithes are set downe by the Canonist some feudall some ecclesiasticall 2. The Church onely holdeth conusaunce of the right of tithes by the Cannon lawe 3. The king of Fraunce his edict touching tithes is sette downe 4 That by the Canon law where the question of tithes is facti and not iuris the examination thereof may belong to a laye iudge 5. Where the suite of tithes is betwixt clergie men though it bee meerely possessorie yet it be longeth to an ecclesiasticall iudge by the Canon law 6. Diuision 1 The nature of feudall tithes is opened by the Canonist 2 Charles Martle is accused of Church-pillage 3. The Canonist telleth a strange tale of Charles Martle 4. It is thought of Nomomathes to bee but a fable 5. One of the ancient statutes of England is compared with the aforesaid edict of the king of Fraunce 6. The common law agreeth with the Canon in the attributing of the decision of the right of tithes to the spirituall iudge 7. Where one parson may sue a spoliation against the other in the spirituall court 8. The executors may bee sued in the spirituall court 9. Of what trees tithes may bee demaunded by the statute of 45. E. 3. 10. That the rent payed for tithes vpon a lease for yeares is a laye chattell 7. Diuision 1 A precept issueth with a monition vnder payne of excommunication for the due satisfaction of tithes 8. Diuision 8 The degrees which the Canon law obserueth in punishing offences in the clergie 2. Two sorts of excommunication sette downe by the Canonist 3 The compulsorie statutes of England for payment of tithes are mentioned by the barrister 4. Impropriate tithes at the common law are compared with feudall tithes 9. Diuision 1 The Ordinarie ex officio may cite men to pay tythes 10. Diuision 1 Two sortes of heretickes formatus and suspectus 2. In what cause the wife and children of heretickes shall enioy their landes 3. Heretickes by the ciuill law not punishable by fire 4. The Canonist poasteth the punishment of heretickes to the common law 5. The professor of common law bandeth backe againe the punishment of heretikes to the Canon law 11. Diuision 1 What thinges may bee tearmed Church-land by the ciuill law 2. Of Churchyards the spirituall Court shall hold iurisdiction by the common lawe 3. The right of gleabe lande is triable by the common law 4. Lands deuised not subiect to the iurisdiction of the ecclesiasticall Court 5. Suites for chattels real must be in the spirituall court 12. Diuision 1 That ius patronatus by the Canon law is determinable in the ecclesiasticall court and that it passeth by the word ecclesia 2. The diuers significations of the word ecclesia at the common lawe 3. The interest of the Parson patron and Ordinarie in the Church is shewed 4. What thinges doe make a patron by the Canon law 5. Ius patronatus is one of the proper obiects of the common law 6. That an aduowson lieth in tenure 13. Diuision 1 Punishment pro laesione fidei concerning a temporall acte is not to be adiudged in the ecclesiastical Court 2. Periurie in an ecclesiasticall court punishable in an eclesiasticall court 3. Lindwoods authoritie touching punishment pro laesione fidei in temporall matters at the ecclesiasticall law is not admitted 4 The barrister disproueth the generall citations of Bishoppes ad Sacramenta praestanda by the common lawe 5. Nomomath encountreth him in this point 6. The ciuill law agreeth with the Canon in matter
any wayne ouer such a bridge being fraught with carriage shall paie iiij d' and the partie causeth all the thinges in the wayne when he commeth to the bridge to be caried ouer the bridge on mens backes here is no defraudation of the Law But if he should giue iiij pence for the cariage ouer the bridge but not currant money now the Law should be defrauded e Io. in §. penult Insti de â—dop And when a man is preiudiced by the fraudulent dealing of an other man he may by our Law haue an action against him which is called actio doli an action of Deceit Canonolog Indeede the difference of Dolus is vsed likewise in our Law And we haue a rule of that which you haue tearmed dolum bonum 3. The same difference the common Law obserueth Frangenti fidem fides frangatur eidem f 23. q. 1. noli existimare C. de pac l. cum proponas in glo Accur And likewise an example of it vsed in our law namelie of Salomon who did vse such cunning betwixt the two harlots in searching out who was the true and naturall mother of the child But the deceit which of you hath ben tearmed dolus malus is in our Law nomen reatus which it doth punish as being done against the Law for qui peccat non peccat de legis authoritate g 23. q. 4. qui peccat Anglonomoph That deceit which of ye both 4. Dolus malus punishable at the common Law by an action vpon the case or a writ of Deceit hath been tearmed dolus malus doth not in our Law escape punishment but for the more strong inhibiting and repressing of it it doth afforde a double remedie against such as endammage others by deceit namelie either a writ of Deceit or an Action vpon the case For if a man plaie with an other at dice and he hath false dice with which he plaieth and winneth the other mans money he that loseth his money in such sort may haue an Action vpon the case for this deceit And in other like cases an Action vpon the case or a writ of Deceit will lie at the pleasure and election of the plaintife And if I present one to a Church whereof I am Patron to the Ordinarie and one T. disturbeth me wherefore an other man purchaseth a Quare impedit in my name retournable in the Common place I not knowing thereof against the said T. and after causeth the writ to be abated or me to be nonsuit in the action I may haue a writ of Deceit against him h 5. 5. E. 3. Quare impedit 37. 20. H. 6. 20. Fitzh nat bro. 96. A. And in euery case an action vpon the case is maintenable against him which sueth an originall in the name of the plaintife against his will i 7. H. 6. 45. So if a man forge a statute merchant in my name sue a Capias therupon whereby I am arrested and had in execution I may haue a writ of Deceit against him that forged it k 19. H. 6. 44. 58. 34. H. 6. 19. Fitzh Nat. be 96. B. So if the Warden of an Infant vouch one by couin who is not sufficient or pleadeth some bad plea wheras he might haue pleaded a better plea the Infant shall haue a writ of Deceit against him and shall recouer the full value in dammages l 9. E. 4. 34. And 11. H. 6. a writ of Deceit was brought against an Attourney for acknowledging a satisfaction whereas his master was not in truth satisfied m 11. H. 6. 34. And in a Praecipe quod reddat if the Shirife retorne the tenant of the land to be summoned whereas in truth he was neuer summoned whereupon the tenant loseth by default vpon the Graund cape retourned Now the tenant may haue a writ of Deceit against him that recouered and against the Shirife for his false retourne n Fitzh Nat. bre 97. C. But the writ of Deceit in this case doth not determine the right of the land but doth only defeat the iudgement o 35. H. 6. 44. 18. E. 4. 11. 33. H. 6. 43. 41. E. 3. 2. 43. E. 3. 31. 50 E. 3. 18. And 5. E. 4. is that no dammages in this case shall be recouered against the Shirife but he shall be onelie fined p 5. E. 4. 49. And if a man recouer in a writ of Wast by default whereas the defendant was neuer summoned the defendant in this case may haue a writ of Deceit q 20. E. 3. Disceit 5. 29. E. 3. 54. 48. E. 3. 59. 19. E. 2. Disceit 56. 19. E. 3. Disceit 3. And if a man bargaine with an other and assume vpon consideration to enfeoffe him of certaine land and he enfeoffeth an other he to whom the assumpsit was made may haue a writ of Deceit r 20. H. 6. 36. 16. E. 4. 9. Fitzh Nat. br 98. F. or an Action vpon the case at his pleasure Å¿ 3. H. 7. 14. 2. H 7. 11. And if one sell to an other a Horse which he knoweth to haue a secreat disease in his bodie or selleth certaine quarters of Graine which is full of grauell a writ of Deceit lieth t 20. H. 6. 36. So 13. H. 4. a writ of Deceit was brought for selling a certaine quantitie of wooll and warranting it to be 50. sackes whereas it wanted of that measure the defendant pleaded in barre that it was weyed before the sale and that the seruants of the plaintife being his factors did accepr it and caried it beyond the sea whereupon the plaintife demurred u 13. H. 4. 1. And if a man lose his land by default in a Praecipe quod reddat whereas he was neuer summoned and die his heire may haue an action of Deceit and shall haue restitution of the land uu 8. H. 6. 5. per Rolfe 15. E. 3. Disceit 43. 18. R. 2. Disceit 50. Fitzh Nat. bre 98. Q. And 1. E. 3. in the booke of Assises it is said that if a recouerie in such case be had against the father by default whereas in truth the father was dead at the time of the recouerie the heire may auoide this by writ of Disceit or Error a 1. Ass p. 16. And whereas there be two tenants for life the remainder to the heires of one of them and they both lose by default being not summoned and the tenant for life dieth the suruiuor shall haue a writ of Disceit for the whole Otherwise it had been if the recouerie had been against the tenant for life onelie by default b 8. E. 3. Disceit 7. Nomomath You haue sufficientlie discussed 7. Diuision the point of deceit Now I would craue your opinions of an other matter Suppose that a man by slaunderous and opprobrious speeches is impeached and his good name impaired this being but a verball iniurie whether doe your Lawes inflict punishment vpon such
l. legatum ff de annu lega because the worde vntill doeth signifie in this case a limitation And though there ought to be a multiplcation of paiments yet there is a limitation ad tempus nubēdi that afterward the paiment shall not be due but if a mā deuise to his daughter his lands which he bought of Cornelius vntill she marie this signifieth not a yerely legacie because subiect a materia non patitur vt sit multiplicabile But it onely signifieth an extinction of the legacie whē the mariage is accomplished For if a man deuise his land in Dale to A. vntill he be Shirife of London as soone as he is Shirife of London the legacie is determined and immediatlie reuerteth to the heire ſ L. fi C. de leg For as it is in the power of the Testatour to make the legacie begin at a certaine time so likewise it is in his power to make it end at a certaine time Nomomath You haue put good and perspicuous diuersities betwixt a condition and a limitation I pray you Anglonomoph shew what your Law determineth of this difference Anglonomoph The verie same difference is 3. A difference betwixt a limitation and condition at the common Law in our Law which by cases shall be explaned A man graunteth to an other his manour of B. so that he paie 10. li. yearely to the lessour during the life of the lessour and if the said rent be behind that then it shall be lawfull for the lessour to distraine for it in the lessees manour of S. the lessour hath a franktenement in the rent sub modo depending vpon the will of the lessee and the lessour and there is a limitation implied by Law though not verbally expressed t 3. E. 3. 15. Assise 172. So if a man make a Lease to one for life paying the first six yeares 3. quarters of corne and if he will hold it longer a C. s. the word If in this case maketh but a limitation u 15. E. 3. Execution 63. So if a rent of 5. pound be graunted to I. as long as the grauntour his heires or assignes shall hold the manour of W. this was adiudged to be a freehold in the grauntee but yet with a limitation uu 10. Ass pla 8. Br. Estates 31. as long as the grauntour should hold the manour of W. So if a man graunt a common in his land in Dale when he putteth in his beastes or graunteth an estouer of Wood when he commeth to his manour of D. the grauntee hath a freehold but qualified with certaine limitations a 17. Ass pla 7. So it is if the king graunt an office to I. S. donec bene fideliter se gesserit b 3. Ass pla 9. et 6. So if land be leased to one quamdiu se bene gesserit c 37. H. 6. 29. So if a man deuise his land to his eldest sonne in taile with seuerall remainders in taile and that the partie morgaging incumbring entangling or aliening the land shall be clearelie discharged excluded and dismissed touching the intaile and the conueyance of the intaile shal be of no force vnto him this is not a condition but a limitation for if it were a condition the right heire might enter for the breach and defeat all the meane remainders in taile which is not consonant to the intent of the Deuisour d 13. et 14. Eliz. Com̄ Newyses c. 403. And whereas you haue said that a man by way of limitation may deuise money to be paied out of his chest or coffer and if there be no money in the chest or coffer there is no money due our Law dealeth 4. The common Law is more ample and large then the Ciuil law in matter of limitation more amplie and beneficially in like cases For if a man graunt to me an annuitie of x. li. to receiue out of his coffers if he haue neither coffers nor money in thē yet his person shal be charged with the annuitie e Fitzh Nat. bre 152. A. 9. H. 6. 17. because the graunt it selfe induceth a charge vpon the grauntour Yet an annuitie may be graunted with a limitation as if an annuity be granted to take at euery time as often as the grauntour shall come to his manour of S. or as often as the grauntee shall come to the house of the grauntour f 14. E. 4. 4. So if I graunt an annuitie of x. li. out of my land in Dale and I haue no land in Dale this graunt is not void but my person shall be charged g 9. H. 6. 53. per Newt et Cot. Nomom Pause here Anglonom What is Canonologus drowsie or entred into some dreame Canonolog I was neither drowsie nor dreaming but the eies of my mind were somewhat closed and shut as the hares be when she watcheth for the houndes for if I could haue taken any aduantage of the speeches of my two companions I would not haue been so long silent But in truth our Law in the matters of condition before handled hath no other oracle but the Ciuil Law if hereafter there happen any variance I will not conceal it from you Nomomath Let me then aske you this question 3. Diuision Codicgn A man deuiseth to R. x. li. and if he wast or spend it then he deuiseth vnto him x. li againe Suppose that he do spende twentie pound whether may he afterward demaunde 10. li. because the deuise is indefinite Codicgnost The deuise is not indefinite 1. Rursus or the word againe signifieth once againe by the Ciuill Law for this word againe signifieth as much as once againe according to the rule of our Law Rursus verificari potest in vna vice h l. fidei commiss §. si quis ff de leg 3. Otherwise it might be that the executor should be charged to the full value of all the goodes of the Testatour For if the deuisee were an Acolastus though the executor were by the executorship a Craesus yet all would not serue Anglonomoph Your reason is good but yet I would not be peremptorie in this matter for it is not in our Law so cleere For two Iudges were opposed against other two in the like case There is a Prouiso in a Lease that 2. How farre forth a word of restraint is to be extended at the common Law neither the lessee nor his assignes shall not alien to any without the assent of the lessour but onely to the wife or the children of the lessor and the lessee alieneth to one of the sonnes of the lessour It was left ambiguous whether the restraint were now determined i Mar. 152. Dy. Nomomath Let this be the case I am bound to paie you twentie pound if your ship come 4. Diuision from Russia and after the ensealing and deliuerie of the bond we make this condition that the twentie pound which I did before owe
betwixt the laps and the kinges presentment q Ibid. fol. 21. It is answered by some that the ordinarie may present one who shall be remouable at the kings will and some thinke that he shal sequester the profites of the benefice to serue the cure but in some case the King may not surcease his time as if the tenant for terme of life do forfeit his estate to the king if he be not seised during his life hee may not afterward seise it qq 8. H. 5. Trauers 47. but in this case the reason is because hee can haue no other estate then he which forfeiteth and he which commeth in of the estate of an other can haue no greater right then he had for if a man haue land in the right of his wife or in the right of a Church hee can not haue it otherwise then the Church or the wife hath it r 18. E. 3. 20. so if there be Lord and tenant and the tenant alieneth in mortmaine and the Lorde entreth yet hee shall haue onely such right in the land as he hath in the seigniorie notwithstanding that the statute do say Quod proximus dominus intrabit retinebit in feodo ſ 39. E. 3. 38. 50. E. 3. 21. l. 5. E. 4. 61. For this is grounded vpon naturall reason and naturalia sunt immutabilia and the princely prescription must bee maintained bona fide Wherefore the Duke of Sauoy which had the Cittie of Nice in pledge of the French King did vniustly withhold that Cittie frō the king being the lawful owner then because hee had inueterate possession in the same for by the ciuil law a man may not prescribe in a pledge t l. 9. C. de pl. act Deci. 3. consi 108. and Iouius is likewise angrie against the king of Fraunce himselfe for keeping Perpinianum in the like sort Parum sincera fide saith he veteris pacti conditionem multis cauillationibus inuoluebat u Iou. lib. 1. for it is true that Cephalus saith in quaestione valde dubitabili non est praescriptio x Ceph cons 102. But surely bonafides is requisite in such matters of prescription except it be apparāt that the will of God is for the prescription Wherefore Bellarmin confesseth that the Turke doth lawfully possesse such thinges as hee hath taken from vs because God his will is that for our sins we should be cast out of the land wherein we and our ancestors inhabited a Bellar. 5. contr But he doth not possesse them bonafide because hee can not by any speciall meane conuey them particularly to himselfe for as Doctor Gentilis hath well obserued An Turcae opinio latrocinantis cogitat de iusta voluntate Dei b Alb. Gentil lib. de iu. bel 1. 22. Aratus the Sicyonian was so strong and peremptorie for the title of prescription that hee did not thinke it conuenient to remoue or take away from the vsurpers any thing that they haue violently taken from the owner if they haue had possession during the space of fiftie yeares onely c Cicer. 2. de offic Prescription hath alwayes beene of force to hinder these that had right to pursue their clayme Wherefore Demosthenes sayth well Hee that hath helde an other mans landes or goodes a long time should not please himself therewith but impute it to fortune which hath hindred the lawfull owners d Demosth ad maca Is any thing more to bee laughed at then that which is said of some interpreters of the law who are not to bee laughed at that the kingdome of Spaine may now be claimed by the Romane Emperour by reason of his ancient imperiall right whereas it is manifest that sithence the time of the ancient Romane Emperours it hath beene a long time possest of the Saracens a long time of the Spaniards The fifth Chapter That by the consent of all nations consent principally maketh a lawfull mariage IF a man should examine the seueral rites circumstances and ceremonies of the diuers people of the worlde in the knitting and celebrating of mariage he might as well number and obserue the diuerse-couloured spottes of the Chamaeleon for euery nation hath had in this by some fatall lotte both their custome and chaunge of custome I will onely endeuor to proue that which is conteined in my assertion that by the consent of all nations c. The definition of thinges is alway the best proofe therefore it is good to beginne this discourse with the definition of mariage Mariage is the lawfull coniunction of man and woman conteining an indiuiduall societie of life and the participation of diuine and humane right a 30. q. c. nullam where it is said a lawfull coniunction nothing els is meant but a free consent executed by the contract which as it is the beginning of the definition so it is the ground of the mariage and these wordes conteining an indiuiduall societie of life do signifie that they shall continue foreuer together as long as they liue Howbeit the rule of the common Law do in this sauour of the irregular Religion Post contractum matrimonij ante carnalem copulam possit alter altero inuito religionem intrare b Gazalup in verb. nuptiae And for the further proofe that the ground of mariage is consent there be three thinges by the Canon Law required to mariage c Codi ap C. vlti c. 27. q. 2. Fides Proles and Sacramentum Fidelitie which is put in the first place is the hart of mariage and it springeth of consent and therefore if a man do contract with a woman in this sort Contraho tecum si te pro quaestu adulter andum exposueris this is no contract of mariage because it is contra bonum fidei which consisteth in this that neither of the maried couple shall break the bond of mariage but shall faithfully and vnitedly obserue it Likewise Progenie is an other thing that mariage requireth and therefore it can not be a good contract of mariage if it be made in this forme Contraho tecum si generationem prolis euites or si venenum sterilitatis accipias because mariage was instituted of God for the solace of man and the multiplication of mankind by children Thirdly a solemne promise is requisite in mariage and therefore if a man do contract with a woman donec ditiorem vel pulchriorem habeat faeminam this is no good league of mariage because it is contrarie to the oath of an indiuiduall societie And so if any man in a foreine land sucking as yet the smoak of the Popes Tobaccho be a votarie to Religion and a bondslaue to his cloyster for England the Lord be praised is at this day as free from Monkes as it is from wolues Three things are required at his handes namely chastitie obedience and the abdication of propertie as well in landes as in goodes d Gazalup in verb. matrimon But that
the glorie of God for though God moued them to doe well and some of them confessed Est deus in nobis agitāte calescimus illo yet before the end he left them because vainglory was their end and so they did their suite at a wrong court But now let vs particularly examine the obseruation as wel of the gentiles and Christians of these commaundements and ordinaunces The obedience that children ought to giue to their parents hath bene straitly commaunded by God and seuerely enioyned by Emperours a Exod. 20. v. 12. Deut. 5. v. 16. Acto 4. 19. Pompon l. 2. ff de iust et iur pius Imperat l. 1. C. de alen lib. and Homer diuinely according vnto the wordes of this precept doeth threaten that the life of disobedient children shall not be long b Homer in Iliad Plato hath an excellent speech to this purpose He which mainteineth his parents whē they are old in his house let him thinke that his house shal be neuer be possessed of the like ornament c Plat. lib. 11. de legi therefore it hath beene ordeined of God that children which were disobedient to their parents should be punished of the magistrate d Deuter. 21. v 18. his iudgement is thus set downe If any man haue begotten a stubborne and froward child which will not obey his father mother being corrected continueth still in disobedience let thē bring him to the elders of the citie and to the iudgement gate and the father shall say to the people this our sonne is stubborne and despiseth our admonitions and giueth himselfe to riot and incontinencie then the people shall stone him and he shall dye that the euill may bee taken from the middest of you Yea euen they which had only curst their parents were adiudged to death In former time hee that had slain his father or mother grandfather or grādmother was first bet with rods vntil the blud trickled downe then being thrust into a sacke together with a dogge a cocke and a snake hee was throwne into the bottome of the sea and by Pompeis law it was prouided that if the sea bee not neare he should be throwne out to deuouring beasts At Rome this fact was not heard of till L. Ostius did slay his father which happened after Hannibals warre e Plut. in Rom. l. 1. Et l. paena ff ad l. Pomp. de parricid Cicer in oration pro Rosc Amerin et in orator And Plato his law is that if a man in his furie or madnes do kill his father or mother and they before their death do pardon him the fault yet he is to be adiudged guilty of slaughter of impietie of sacriledge f Pl. lib. 11. de legi But what shall wee say of Orestes who did slay his mother because she did slay his father though there bee diuers opinions which do acquite Orestes as namely the opinions of Cicero g Cicer. in Milon Paterculus h Paterc lib. 1. and Quintilian i Quintil. lib. 5. c. 11. yet against them are Socrates k Plat. in 2. Alcibiad Diodorus l Diodor. l. 5. Aristotle m Aristot l. 2. Rhetoric c. 5. but why shold we depend vpon the iudgement of man in this case when it is manifest that the iudgement of God was in the highest degree if we respect the paines of this life onely executed vpon Orestes for he was plagued with madnesse a terrible signe of the reuenging wrath of God And murder hath beene so much detested that a beast which had slaine a man was commanded to bee stoned and that his flesh should not bee eaten n Exod. 21. v. 28. and by the ciuill law if a man be bitten of an other mans dog the owner of the dog is chargeable vnto him that is hurt because hee did not tie vp his dogge or musle him o l. 1. §. sed etsi canis ff si quadrup pauper fecer therefore Solon deuised a pretie punishment of such wronges namely that the dogge who had by byting hurt any man should haue a clogge of foure foote tyed to his necke and so should be yeelded vp into the hands of him whom he had hurt which Plutarch calleth bellum commentum ad securitatem p Plut. in Solon They which had killed a man in Greece did vsually flie to forreigne princes and there if hee who was slaine was a stranger they vsed to sitte at the threshold of the dore with his head couered with the sword wherewith he was slaine if hee were one of the same countrie the sword was brokē in two and the point of the sword was helde vnder one arme the hilt vnder the other q Sophocl a lamentable sight no doubt but done to this purpose that they which had slaine the men might by these forraine princes haue expiatiō of their fault which expiation was fully as bad or rather worse thē the murther for the princes who were to expiate thē did by inchantments inuocate and make suite to the wicked spirites that they may absolue them from the fault which is done by sprinkling them seauen times with water the predecessor of the Popes holiwater and to this feate seauen garments were therewith sprinckled then they kill a swine a fitte sacrifice for the deuill then they call vpon Iupiter Hospitall praying him that he wold not vexe with furie the party that had offended thus the absolution is worse then the offence and like to that of the merry Monke Absoluo te ab omnibus benefact is tuis peiorem te relinquo quà m accepi r Erasm in colloqu Then there are boughes spread along the houses that the deuill might tread soft Some of them washed themselues in the sea till they had almost drowned themselues murder is the forerunner of death and that foolish solemnitie Catullus glaunceth at Nec genitor Nimpharum abluat Oceanus Likewise Ouid Ah nimium faciles qui tristia crimina caedis Fulminea tolli posse putatis aqua after this manner Adrastus fled from Thebes to Tydeus Peleus fled to Patroclus when hee being but a boy had slaine Clesonynus a boy likewise Paris though he had stolne away Helena the wife of Menelaus yet when hee had slaine Antheus Antenors sonne whom he loued he fled to Menelaus a great iudgement of God his very enemie for expiation like to that iudgement of the almighty executed vpon Cosby an Irish-man who when he had slaine the towardly Captaine the Lord Burgh sought by-pathes and had thought to haue fled from the slaine body as farre as the Sunne is from the Moon but the Lord put a ring into his snowt and brought him backe againe almost as neere to the murthered Lord as the grasse is to the earth a fit admonition for these times wherein homo sacra res per iocum occiditur ſ Senec. lib. de ir In Egipt and Babilon he which had