it ought to touch this blood alwayes But then Heires of the Wife of the Father purchasor shall have it if others fail because Wives by the marriage after the purchase are of Aliance to the blood and not of the blood of the Purchasor otherwise it is of marriage which precedes the Purchase And so no marriage is to be regarded but that of the Father and Mother of the Purchasor and no marriage after shall make a man inheritable to this Land By the Court Wast assigned in digging of Gravell suffering Houses to bee uncovered whereby the Timber rotted and permitting a wall of stone to fall to ruine and a Meadow to lie continually overflowne and covered with water Sir Thomas Wrothes Case KIng Henry the eight granted and Annuitie of 20 l. to Sir Thomas Wroth for his life Tr. 15. El. in the Excheq Petition to be Usher of the Privy Chamber to the Prince Edward his Sonne without the words Pro nobis heredibus successoribus nostris And dies and after E. 6. dies The question was if the Annuity should be determined by it or if notwithstanding it the Annuity shall have his continuance And it was adjudged that the Annuity continues during his owne life and he shall have the arrerages 1. If the King reciting a thing executed which is not materiall as for the good service which he hath done grants an Annuity c. there the party in pleading shall not take averment of it by 21. E. 4.48 and 26. H. 8.1 But otherwise it is if the thing be materiall and executory as that he hath released there he ought to averre that he hath released it which is in benefit of the King 2. The not doing of the service here to the Prince shall cesse the Annuity as well as if the service had bin appointed to the grantor himself as an Annuity granted by the King to a Physician or Schoolmaster for to give Physick or teach a Stranger shall determine by not doing of it which is the cause of the grant and executory as the Annuitie it self is 3. The discent of the Crowne and State Royall to the Prince makes him King and alters the degree of his Person because another Majestie there and requires Officers of greater Honour to doe service to his politicke body And therefore by this Act of God the Law discharges Sir Thomas Wroth from his service and therefore without averment that he had served King Edward all his life time is not to purpose otherwise if the service be feaseable to his naturall body onely as Physick Surgery Musick Grammer c. for the naturall body alters not by assumption of the Royall estate from its infirmities 4. That the death of the King E. the 6. hath not determined the Annuity although that the service be discharged by the death of the Person to whom it is to be done For this discharge cometh by the Act of God otherwise it were if by the Act of the Party as if he had withdrawn himself from the Princes service when he was Prince So of an Annuity granted for life pro consilio impendendo to the Grantee which dyeth yet the Annuity remains but shall cesse by refusall of the Grantee for to give when he is required because his default and the Grantor hath not means by Law to compell him to give counsell 5. The Grantee of the Annuity is good although that it wanteth these words his Heirs and Successours for that it is granted in the body Politick and charges this body which never dies but alwayes hath continuance as a Grant of an Annuitie or Obligation made by the Abbot and Covent is good without successor because the Corporation charged which alwayes continues otherwise it is of a naturall body for there the Heire shall not be charged if he is not named and hath asserts as by Obligatton of his Father grant of Annuity or warranty because as the body naturall which grants is taken away by death so shall his charge be if the King without words heires and successors grant to one licence to Alien and die the Grantee cannot Alien in the time of another King 2. E. 3. and 3. E. 3.29 For that it is a licence onely otherwise of a licence which implies an interest as to an Abbot of a Purchasor in Mortmaine for there the King gives his Signiory upon the matter as it seemeth 2. H. 7.6 Inheritance of the King or a thing in which he is intituled of Common right as Lands Conusans of Pleas out of the Kings Courts or account by a Sheriffe shall not passe against the Heires and Successors of the King without speciall words Heires and Successors as the grant of a County Absque compoto nobis reddendo yet he shall account to the Successor because it is Executory of Common right to the Crowne otherwise of a thing newly created or a grant which is executed presently in the party yet the perception is Executory as a grant of a Faire Market Warren c. without words Heires and successors good Pension or Annuity granted by the King untill he be promoted by us are spoken in the politick body by which the Heire may promote and then the Pension is extinct by Sanders cheif Baron who said as Plowden reported was resolved by the Sages of the Law 1. Mar. that Patents without words pro nobis hered successoribus nostris granted for the corporall exercise of an Office or service are ordered to be good Eiston against Studd A Woman Tenant in fee P. 16. El. in the Common Pleas Eiect firme taketh Husband and the Husband and Wife levies a Fine Sur Conusans de droit come ceo the Conusee grants and renders the Land to the Husband and Wife and the heires of their bodies the remainder in fee to the right heires of the Wife the Husband hath issue by the Wife and dyes the Wife taketh a second Husband and they leavy a Fine to their owne uses for the terme of their lives without impeachment of wast the remainder to the Husband and his heires for sixty yeares Remainder in tayle to their issue the remainder in fee to the right heires of the Wife and the issue of the first Husband enters for the forfeiture made by this second Fine by the Statute of 11. H. 7. Cap. 20. And adjudged no forfeiture and yet is directly within the words but not within the intent for that the Joincture and advancement came not originally from the Husband or any of his Ancestors to the Wife but on the contrary from the Wife to the Husband yet the Land shall be chargable to Statutes and Recognisances which the Conusee had acknowledged before and to the dower of the Wife of the Conusee which grants and renders it But yet is not within the intent of the Statute because the advancement cometh not from the Husband nor his Ancestors and therefore to restraine Women to dispose of their inheritance after the death of
Court of a Steward is a disseisen of his Fee For the doing of matter of labour is a claime of the Commodity for his paines So an Executor which hath a Terme devised to him upon Condition that he pay 10 l. to a Stranger payes the 10 l. this is consent and execution of the Legacy So the educating of the Children here determines her Election that she taketh the Terme as a Legacy and her grant after reproves it not but argues her inconstancy If a Termer be indebted to one in a hundred pounds and maketh his Will and by it devise his Terme to his Sonne and leaves assets to pay the debt the Executor cannot sell the Terme to pay the debt but shall pay it with the assets that he hath in his hands Adjudged because he ought to perform all the Will scilicet Debts and Legacies if there are assets If the Executor disagree in Deed to a Legacy certain this shall be presently in the second Devisee of this bequest of a thing incertain to the Executor as of 20 l. and the Testator oweth 40 l. and dies having Plate Oxen Horses of every of them to the value of 20 l. this is not executed untill 40 l. paid for he may Alien which of them he will and the others have no remedy if there be no more assetts and may pay and carve to himself before any other as it is in 12. H. 4.21 because he is neerest to himself And therefore the Execution of the Terme devised here shall not be hindered by the not payment of the Legacies to others nor Lease given to his Executor ought to be sold and then in Legacies it is reason that Executor shall have preferment A gift to his Executor of all his goods for performance of his Will is no devise and a void gift because the Law giveth them without these words As if a Man devise in Fee his Land to his Son and Heire it is voyd because he shall have it without the devise by discent So for to prescribe for to distrain for Rent service voyd because he may distrain without prescription A devise of Fee tayle to his Heire is good because it is another Estate then he should have by discent So here the Estate devised to the Wife which is but percell of the Estate scilicet during the Nonage of the Heire is good because severed from that which the Law would have given to him and the Clause for educating his Children is not a thing Testamentory nor Legecy to the Children but is an intent annexed to the devise made to the Wife by which she by her entry hath the Estate devised to her as Legatory And the Execution to the Wife is also to the Son because a devise although the Estates are severall and is of the same effect as if her Estate had bin devised to another with the Remainder to her Son and agreement or assent shall not be apportioned as attornment by Tenant for life to the Grantee of the Reversion for life extends to him in Remainder So notice given by Tenant for life to the Lord shall serve to him in Remainder in Fee to compell the Lord to avow upon him after the death of the Tenant for life So Rent accepted by an Infant at full age of his Lessee for yeares hath made good the Remiander over An Intruder cannot gain such Possession against the King upon which he may maintain an Action of Trespasse because the King may punish him 19. E. 4.2 and be shall not be doubly punished but against the Lessee of the King one may gain such Possession that he may punish a Stranger trespassor yet he shall not gain no Estate from the Crowne for the Freehold which irremoveablely rests in the Crowne And the King shall not alleadge Intrusion with a continuando but divers dayes vicibus because he gaineth not any Possession by wrong scilicet by the Intiusion against the King Walsinghams Case H. 15. El. in the Excheq Intrusion TEnant in tayle of the Kings gift maketh a Feoffurent in fee to a stranger and after is attainted of Treason and executed having issue and after this attainder is confirmed by Parliament with severall rights and interests of Strangers And it was adjudged that the Feoffee continuing his estate by the Feoffment after the attainder shall be an Intruder and this Judgement was afterwards affirmed in a Writ of Error brought in the Exchequr Chamber But the contrary was adjudged in the Common Pleas 17. El. between Conway and Moulton that tenant in tayl shall not forfeit any thing First That the Feoffment of tenant in tayl had not discontinued nor devested the estate of fee in Reversion out of the King because it is but a matter in Deed which is tortious otherwise it is of a rightfull matter of Record as a Recovery upon a good title or rightfull matter in Deed as a Remitter or Condition performed As Alienee of tenant in tayle of the gist of a common person infeoffs the King by Deed inrolled which regives to the first tenant in tayle which dyes the issue euters it is a Remitter and therefore the Reversion in fee is devested out of the King and restored to the first doner because a former right matter in Deed and in Law concurr together So Lessee for life to have fee if he doth such an act after the Lessor grants by Deed inrolled the Reversion to the King the Lessee for life performes the Condition which is older then the title of the King this older title matter in Deed and operation in Law thereupon shall take the Reversion out of the King without other Suit or Circumstance because bound with the Condition and the fee simple ought to vest in him at the same instant that he performes the Condition or never But no tortious act as Disseisen Intrusion c. may take the Reversion out of the King Secondly That by the Feoffment he hath not given the fee determinable because he had it not nor an estate for life of the Feoffee but onely an estate for his owne life and so the Reversion in tayle continues in him which shall be forfeit by the Attainder and by consequence the estate of the Feoffee determines by the death of the Feoffor but the Feoffee hath an estate for the life of the Feoffor discendable and his heire shall be a speciall occupant of this estate in base fee simple Thirdly That the King shall have the estate tayle in point of Reverter for that he had the pure fee before and two fees of one thing cannot be together in one person otherwise in severall persons and then the King shall have the Land discharged of the estate tayle and by consequence of all estates charges and incumbrances derived out of it as Leases warranted by the Statute and then the laving in the Statute for a thing before determined is void as of a Lease voidable made by such tenant in tayle which the issue hath made good by the acceptance of the rent and after of the estate tayle Escheated for Treason or is determined for default of issue So that the King hath in point of Reverter there the Release shall be void and he hath nothing by the saving of the Statute Adjudged in Austins Case otherwise it is when the King hath it in point of forfeiture as if the Reversion be to a stranger fol. 559. b. What Livery and Seisen is and the validity of it fol. 554. a. Estate tayle shall not be in abeyance nor any thing which another cannot have for abeyance is onely for the benefit of a stranger because it cannot vest immediately 556. a. 562. a. Estates in fee are three First Pure fee Secondly Fee determinable thirdly Base fee which shall be in one when the pure fee is in another fol. 557. a. An estate tayle shall not be to anothers use fol. 555. a. yet if tenant in tayle bargain and sels the Land by Deed inrolled the Bargainee shall have see executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. which cannot be except the use shall be raised first out of the estate taile and so the estate tayle shall be to another use fol. 557. b. A Disseisor or Intruder upon the possession of tenant in tayle of the Kings gift gaines not except the estate for life of tenant in tayle and therefore if he dye seised the issue in tayle shall enter upon this discent as I beleeve fol. 558. a. The Father maketh a Lease for life to his Son the Remainder for life to her which shall be his Wife at the time of his death this is a good Remainder and shall be in abeyance untill the Wife be knowne fol. 562. a. Saving in a Statute contrary to the Explanation is voide Puton and Hides Case and Austins Case of a Lease and the Duke of Norfolks Case fol. 564. a. The possession shall be awarded upon a Bill of Intrusion which is but Trespas in its nature 561. a. Tenant in tayle grants his estate there waste is dispunishable during the life of tenant in tayle because it is not but onely a priviledge annexed to it Estates passe to the Grantee and amount to words of dispunishable of waste and not because he hath a greater estate then for the life of tenant in tayle So 42. H. 3.21 waste dispunishable in tenant for life because the Lestor released all his right that he had in the same Land and that he or his heires would not demand any right in the same nor claime nor challenge for the terme of the life of the tenant for that it amounts unto a Lease without impeachmeat of waste fol. 556. A Writ of Error abated by the death of the Lord Chancellour because his Christian name and Sir-name and Keeper of the great Seale were put into the Writ fol. 564. b. FINIS
this shall remain is a limitation of time when this shall vest and not a condition by Hinde and Montague 6. Admitting that it be a condition yet a remainder may depend upon a condition By Hales Hinde and Montague and adjudged accordingly 7. The Plaintiff hath not conveyed to himself Title to have benefit of the breach of the condition if it be broken By Montague Pollard Serjeant for the Plaintiff Except that the Form of the Plea is sufficient 1 Because he doth not aver his continual residence after the Remainder happened but after his entry which may happen to be long time after and so although that he hath performed the words of the condition which hath not satisfied the intent thereof yet he hath not performed the condition because the intent was That he should have all the Mannor So 21. H. 6.10 A man is bound that his Feoffees of the Mannor of D. should grant a Rent of 40. s. to the Plaintiff He had three Feoffees and two of them grant the said Rent to him and there all the Justices said That it shall be intended all the Feoffees so that alwaies the intent of the condition ought to be as well performed as the words of the condition and here the intent of the condition appears to be That Hospitality shall be kept upon the Grange continually from the beginning to the end of the Term which is the death of the Husband and the Wife and here he hath not shewed that he entred within as short time as he conveniently could after the death of the Husband and Wife and therefore because he hath not shewed and averred this he hath not shewed the performance of the condition and therefore his plea is not good For in all cases where the time is issuable he ought also to shew it certainly and therefore in 32. H. 6. it is held That if a man plead a Lease for years made to him that he ought to shew what day the Lease was made because it is issuable So in 33. H. 6.44 In debt by an Executor the Defendant saith That the Testator made the Plaintiff and one R. his Executors at L. the which R. is alive and not named judgement of the Writ and the Plaintiff confessing it saith That after this time last assigned by the Plaintiff that the Testator made the Plaintiff his sole Executor in Middlesex and the Defendant saith That after this time last assigned by the Plaintiff that the Testator made the Plaintiff and R. his Executors after this time and the Plea of the Defendant was not held good for that the day on which the Plaintiff and R. were made Executors is uncertain So 3. H. 6.33 In Trespass the Defendant pleads in Bar the day of the retaining of the Plaintiff who traverseth the Bar and the Defendant enforced to shew the day certain Matter in Law As to the matter in Law it seemeth to him that the Remainder is void because it ought alwaies to be limited to take its effect after the partricular estate ended and not during the particular estate for if it be limited and appointed to take its effect during the particular estate then it shall be utterly void As if A. Leases to B. for life the Remainder for life and if B. dies that it shall remain over to a stranger in Fee this Remainder is void for that it is appointed to take effect immediately after the first estate for life ended for if the Remainder in Fee should commence then it shall avoid the Remainder for life so if a Lease be made to two the Remainder over in Fee after the death of the first of them this Remainder is void because the Survivor shall have the Land So in the principal case it is given to the Baron and Fem for their lives the Remainder to the eldest son for life upon conditon That if the eldest die living husband and wife that then it shall remain to the Defendant for life which cannot be for the first estate at this time continues and if the Remainder shall be good it drowns the estate of husband and wife and therefore the Remainder void and also for that it is limited to commence upon condition which enures alwaies in privity therefore if a lease for life be made rendring rent and upon condition That if the Rent be arear that then it shall remain to a stranger in Fee if the Rent be arear and not paid the remainder is void for the Remainder which commence upon condition is not good otherwise it is if an estate be made for life upon condition That if the Tenant for Life dies it shall remain over this Remainder is good because that it commenceth upon the Determination of the I state the which is certain and therefore no condition because conditions are alwaies incertain and may be performed or broken and as our Law is for to know the time certain when the things pass from one to another and namely Free-hold because the Law hath it in greater estimation then other things and so to prevent contention hath ordained Ceremonies to be used as in every Feoffment Livery and in every Grant Reversion or Rents c. That Attornment shall be made the which are points certain containing time and by them Estates pass Rules to know when Remainders are good The Law hath appointed that every Remainder shall have three things by the matters aforesaid as Notes and Rules certain for to discern when good The first is an Estate precedent made at the same time that the remainder Commences and that the particular Estate continue when the Remainder vests and that the remainder be from the Donor at the time of Livery and if any of the said three things fail the Remainder is void And therefore for the first point if the Lessor confirm the state of his Tenant for years the Remainder in Fee this Remainder is vold for that the Estate for years was made before the Remainder So if a Lessor disseise his Tenant for Life and after makes a new Lease to him for Life the remainder in Fee this Remainder is void because it is a Remitter to his Estate So an Estate precedent was not made at the time of the remainder and therefore the Remainder is void So the Heir endows his Mother Remainder in Fee by reason of Relation and so the precedent Estates are made before the Remainder appointed Secondly That the particular Estate continue when the remainder vests as 21. H. 7.12 per Frowick Lease for Life upon Condition That if he doth not such an Act that his Estate shall cease and that then the Remainder over is void because the Estate precedent is determined before the Remainder appointed and the Remainder must vest during the particular Estate Thirdly because the Remainder passes from the Lessor at the time of the delivery as Hales Hinde and Montague say and as it is proved by the Cases before cited So Perkins 12. and 19.
to the Livery So in the case of Plessington 6. R. 2. where the Condition was That if the Lessor die within the Term the Lessee shall have for life and there holden that his estate shall be enlarged if the Lessor die So Disseisen to the use of I. passeth not a Free hold of I. to I. without his agreement so here A remainder passeth when W. died not before by force of the words annexed to the Livery So by Litl a confirmation to the Husband and Wife Tenants for life passes the remainder to the Husband yet it passeth not at the time of the first Estate and the diversity where Fee upon Condition is appointed to privy and whereto a stranger is but a conceit which is worth nothing 29. according 24. to the contrary and is privity because it reserveth out of both so it shall bind him in remainder and also he in remainder shall have waste and so is privy to the particular Estate and the Lessor also and the words then which shall remain shall not be intended presently to destroy the particular Estate but shall remain as a remainder ought to divest then and is to be executed after their deaths as if Donee in Tail doth such an Act then to remain to his right heirs which vests when the Act is done and after the Tail ended shall be executed and not presently upon the Act done to avoid the Tail so here There is not any repugnancie or prejudice to any but a thing when it is done made in prejudice of another shall be void as a remainder that he shall have the land in the life of the particular Tenant So 21. E. 4.44 The King discharges an Abbot That he shall not be a Collector when any Titles should be granted by the Clergy of England and Canterbury Grants Tythes provided that the Collector returned by the Bishop shall not be discharged by the King and the Bishop returns the Abbot Collector there holden that the Grant by the Clergie in this point viz. to charge persons exempt is void because it is in prejudice of others And so the remainder here shall be void rather then a shranger shall have prejudice by it but for defaults in the pleading the Plaintiff ought to recover Hinde Justice to the 3. exception the death of the particular Tenant shall not be shewed which is onely conveyance of the execution of the remainder and is not Traversable nor Issuable To the first and Second exceptions he needs not shew his continual residence after the Remainder is fallen nor the day of his entry because it is a Condition subsequent and goes in defease of his Estate and he which hath benefit by it ought to shew it as 29. H. 6.22 the Grantee of an annuity pro concilio impendendo shall have the Annuity without shewing that he hath given Councel for that the shewing of it is not beneficial to him and the denial of Councel defeats the Annuity so he agrees to the diversity in case of Annuity 15. H. 7.1 bont fol. 25 by Pollard when one shall be promoted and therefore the shewing hereof that which is surplusage and the imperfectness of it shall not make the Bar vitious and the Remainder here by him commenceth not upon Condition but it is a limitation and explanation from the time that it first begun for nothing or words makes a Condition but such which restrains the thing given as If I. Lease for life upon Condition That if the Lessee die or maketh waste and I. recover the place wasted or any parcel of it That I. shall enter into all for it is a Condition for that part in which no waste is done because it restrains and defeats that part And if it be a Condition here yet the Remainder thereupon is good if it commenced and vested at any time during the particular Estates 24 29. 32 34. for when he hath Fee-Simple he may Condition with it as he pleaseth if it be not against Law as if I. Lease for life upon Condition That I. S. paies to me 20. l. that I. shall enter then the Remainder is void because the entry avoids the first estate and then no particular estate continues upon which a Remainder may depend Brown Justice to the same purpose The entry of the Defendant shall be intended immediately for this is the most common intent and a Bar good to a common intent shall be intended that he entred presently after his Title accrued and to the matter in Law hold that the remainder shall be good upon Condition Montague Chief Justice to the same intent The entry of the Defendant shall be intended presently for this is the most common intent and a Bar good to a common intent is good as 21. E. 4.83 in Assize the Tenant pleads a discent to him as Son and Heir and he entred and it was held good yet the Father of the Plaintiff might have abated and died seised and then the Plaintiff is in as Son and Heir in which case the Tenant might not enter But this is not intendable but the most common intent is That the Tenant entred immediatly after the death of of his Father So 9. E. 4.12 in Debt against five Executors at the Distress 3. makes Default 2. appears and pleads Recovery against them two of 300. and that more they had not in their hands Exception taken That because by intent there should be five Executors two might have abated the first suit and so the Recovery not duly had but holden good because it may be that then they two onely administred and then they did lie against them two onely and the most common intent is that it might be so rather than at first to lose advantage to have abated the Writ and therefore the Plea in Bar was held good and Execution duly had and if it were otherwise the Plaintiff ought to have shewed it So 21. E. 4.8.1 In formidon in discender The Tenant pleads the release of the Demandant without Warranty in Bar yet might be made by him in the life time of the father and then it is no Bar but it shall be intended to be made after the death of the Father if the Demandant replies not to the contrary but if he which pleads in Bar is bound at a time certain he ought to shew the day of his Act certainly 24 26 27. as the day of entry for Mortmain so that it may appear to be within the year So if one justifies for Common between Lammas and Candlemas So if one justifies by Warrant by Licence by Authority he alwaies ought to shew the time certain of his justification so that pleading in abatement of the Writ or a plea after the last continuance ought to plead certainly and these are observed as principles in our Law but he which pleads in the Negative ought not to plead certainly If he would dwell c. It is like that it is not a Condition here because it is not
Discender if it be out of the words yet it shall be taken by equity although it be penal to some man for here it restrains the Liberty of Tenant in Tail because it was for to redress false Covin for to advance right and justice and benificial to the weal-publick As W. 2. cap. 3. gives a cui in vita upon a recovery by default which was a wrong to the Wife and therefore gave Cui ante Divortium by equity So Marlebridge cap. 6. De primogenith and of Feoffment yet if the first Son dies and he infeoffees the second Son or Levy a Fine it shall be taken by equity because it redresses Covin which the Law abhors So 1. H. 7. cap. 1. gives a Formedon in Remainder against Pernors of Profits and 14. H. 7.31 and after 178. scire facias for to execute a Remainder against the taker of the Profits shall be maintainable by equity No judgement was ever given in this case for this default viz. because he had not shewed certainly how he was Heir and in special for that it was issuable and Title given is certain Note that all the Justices held the case here within the words of the Statute of 11. H. 7. And if it were not within the words that yet it was within the equity of the Statute And they held also that the Heir may enter immediately that is to say in the life of Tenant in Tail but no judgement was given Dive against Maningham ONe was in prison in execution upon a Recognisance of Debt M. 4 E. 6 In the Common Pleas in debt taken according to the Statute of 23. H. 8. cap. 6. and the Defendant being a stranger made an Obligation to the Sheriff indorced with Condition That the prisoner should save him from dammage against the King and the Conusee and also that he should be alwaies at his commandment as a true prisoner to appear before the justices and the King at Westminster or elsewhere within this Realm And it was adjudged a void Obligation by the Statute of 23. H. 6. c. 10. 1. For that the prisoner was not bailable but excepted by the Statute which in this point is not but an affirmance of the Common Law 2. For that That the third branch of the Statute which maketh all Obligations vold taken for any the causes abovesaid against the form there expressed extends as well to the second branch in which the exception is as to the first for the generalty abovesaid and also by the intent of the Statute to suppress the extortion of Sheriffs in this behalf 3. Although it shall not be so yet he taketh the Obligation colore officii as Sheriff of his prisoner and so within the Statute 4. No day or place of appearance is limited in the Condition so the form appointed by the Stat. is not observed 5. Other things are mixt in the Condition with the apparance as that he shall save harmless and this shall be intended there for all things and at all times 6. He had but one surety and the Statute speaks of surety of sufficient persons in the plural number by Montaigue fol. 63. 7. The Obligation here is void by course of the Common Law for that the Condition is against the Law for the party is not bailable 2. H. 4.9 The Extent ought to precede the Liberate here are both in one Writ yet in nature they are several but the Writ remains good for the extent and the other is surplusage 7. H. 4. 44. for Toll not paid the Writ was Tolloneum asportavit illud solvere recusavit asportavit is void because surplusage and it abates not because he refused to pay for that is sufficient and be the Writ good or bad in Law it shall stand in force until it be Reversed by Error because an ancient Record 37. H. 6. 1. the Sheriff took a single Obligation for to let one to Mainprise which is not Mainpernable it was void because he took colore efficii which is taken alwaies in ill part and implies that the thing is done by pretence of Office but not yet duely and their office is but a vail and shadow to falsity Virtute officii or Ratione officii taken in good part because it is alwaies where the Office is just which causeth the thing it is pursuant to the office Obligation is void where the condition is contrary to Law as to be saved harmless if he kils a man or doth commit trespass so here the Obligation is void by the Common Law because it was to save the Sheriff harmless for wrong done against the Law as is the letting the Prisoner at freedom he being one which is not Bailable So 2. H. 4. 9. A Baily by withernam takes the Beasts of the Defendant and afterwards re-delivers them to the Defendant upon Obligation given to him by the Defendant for the saving of him harmless wherefore holden void because it was to aid the Baily for this wrong in the re-delivery of the beasts to the party for he ought to have detained them untill c. And afterward Mollineux Hales and Brown Justices argued to the same purpose Montague Cheif Justice It is likely to me that the Plaintiff shall be barred for an Act which is general in particularity or particular in a generality which is all one as in 13. E. 4. 8. That all Corporations and Licences made by H. 6. shall be void So that all Bishops or Justices shall do such an Act shall be pleaded but a general Act which extends to every man not but the Justices ought to take Conusance thereof but if this Act hath several branches concerning several matters yet contained in one Chapter there he needs not recite all but this onely which concerns him and maketh for his purpose for every branch is a several Act by it self But a Record shall not be pleaded inter alia for it is intire upon one Originall and one Judgement upon it but ought to plead certainly all the Record when it is pleaded in Bar because the Record is the matter of substance and the effect of the Bar which ought to be plain and perfect when the Record is but conveyance and induction to the Bar or Action it is sufficient to reciteithis which is the cause of the Action as 34. H. 6. 48. A Tenant by Elegit makes avow in â—…eplegiare for that he had execution as Tenant by Elegit and made a Lease reserving Rent for which being arear he avowed he needed not shew the Record because the Lease onely is traversable and is the effect of the Avowry and the execution by Elegit is the Record from which it issues which is nothing but conveyance to the effect and therefore it sufficeth to begin at the Execution upon Damages recovered without pleading how lie brought his first Action and what answer the Defendant made or such like So in the 19. H. 6. 29. a Bill of Deceit against an Attorncy for
to some purpose and not to be void because it is made to some purpose as 21. H. 6.8 one may plead a Lease for years and a release as a Feoffment So 7 H. 6.7 and 22. H. 6.42 The Feoffment of a Joynt-Tenant as a confirmation So 9. H. 7.2 The King by Parliament confirms the estate of the Patentee dat conceditur he may use it as a Grant or confirmation So in 21. H. 7.23 Obligor may plead a Grant That it shall not be sued before M. in Bar or have a Covenant for it So here the party uses this as a Demise of the Land and not as a Grant of the Reversion for the Reyersion of the Land compriseth the Land as Litl fol. 106. after fol. 161. a release of all the land to him in Reversion is good So 5. H. 5.8 A Lease for years and after a grant of the rent this changes the reversion So Litl fol. 150. recovery of the land against Tenant for life will divest the reversion So 19. E 4.9 Writ of Covenant and the Concord is of the land to pass the reversion So Quid jur is clamat recites That the land was granted before the reversion was So before fol. 149. Formed on shall say de uno messuagio where the Reversion was granted in Tail So a Reversion in Fee Granted to a Termor he hath the intire Term presently in Possession for the reversion of the land comprises the land in substance one word will pass the thing by another word having the same sence yet varying in name because one same thing and intent of the party as 2. H. 6.4 before fol. 134. and afterwards f. 170. reverter for remainder So 3. H. 6.6 makes a Testament and commits Administration is an Executor So 20. H. 7.11 Retorn for revert by the Grant by Grant of the Church Advowson passes 14. E. 4.2 by Grant of the name of a Clerk a presentment passeth So before fol. 151. by Stagnum molendinum the Soil passes and the thing contained in the premises named in the Habendum by another name containing the same in substance is good So a Grant of the nomination of an advowson Habendum the advowson good So Manerium Habendum the services So mannor by Fine Habendum one acre of this in Fee he shall have the acre in Fee and the Mannor for life because it wanteth limitation of the estate in the residue of the Mannor So a Gift of a Mannor Habendum the reversion in Fee of one acre which is in Lease for life good Fee for the acre and for life in the Mannor because no estate is expressed in it So Litl fol. 120. confirms the estate of Lessee for life Habendum the land in Fee good because in the estate land was contained So a Joint-Tenant confirms to another Habendum the land to him and his Heirs the Fee will pass the Habendum may limit the estate to a stranger not named before in the premisses as 13. H. 7.17 a Devise to I. Habendum to him in Fee after the death of the Wife of the Devisor not named before hath an estate by implication of the intent of the party So 5. E. 3.17 a man gives land Habendum in Franck marriage with a Daughter So a Lease to A. Habendum to him for 20. years the remainder to B. in Fee good because the intent of the parties therefore a fortiori here the Habendum may explain the intent of the parties in the premisses Dieâ— Serjeant for the Plaintiff A reversion is Jus sine possessio revertendi nomen verbale quasi terra revertens after the particular estate ended proved by W. 2. of Advowsons of Churches and prayer to recite the reversion if he shall overlive the Tenant for life and bringeth wast good 14. E. 2. Fines saith remanera and not revertera where a reversion was granted before fol. 157. a reversion granted in Tail Formedon in remainder lyeth because the entire estate is not given Fitzh nat br 118. D. 10. E. 2. the Heir grants the other two parts with a third part in Dower cum acciderit reversion of Dower pass 33. H. 8. cap. ultima the not making of Leases in reversion is expounded That they shall not make Leases beginning after the first ends ad firmum dimiserunt imply that the parties intend that it shall enure as a Lease of the Demeasne for properly a man may not be Farmor of a reversion not have an Ejectione firma of a reversion No Attornment needs upon a Lease for years because it is a Contract interpretationem apportet esse benignam ut res valeat as 30. E. 2. Discendera pro Remanera 6. E. 2. recipe pro re-entry So a gift to one for life post ejus decessum to 1. in Fee good remainder for the manifest intent an Habendum giveth an estate which was not given before and to a stranger not named before and alters the estate given in the premisses as a Confirmation to Husband and Wife or to Tenant for life remainder in Fee to another good Litl 129. So Habendum by moity Litl 66. makes Tenants in common 8. E. 3.427 by the better oppinion a gift to two Habendum to one for life and after his decease to another in Fee the one shall have the entire for life onely notwithstanding the Joyncture in the premisses Otherwise fol. 153. if it be comprised within the Grant good in the Habendum as a Grant De dispositione Ecclesiae habendum advocationem grants de Soil the Wood habendum the Wood defundo domus habendum domum Manerium habendum the advowson appendant good but a Grant of Common out of the land habendum the land or herbage of a Park habendum the Park and such like are not good because not comprised in the premisses Stamford Justice rules of Exposition First deeds shall be taken most beneficially for the Grantee Secondly they shall not be void where the words may be applyed to any intent Thirdly words shall be applyed viz. expounded to the intent of the parties and not otherwise The intent directs gifts rather then the words as 41. E. 3.6 16. H. 7.10 by Fineux Grantee of annuity pro consilio hath divers faculties yet the Councel shall be given in such a faculty as was intended 9. E. 4.22 one bound to pay Recepta recipienda shall not pay what he received not but that which he hath received because the intent is taken more forcibly then the words 7. E. 3.7 Lessee of of a house which may for his profit make houses there within may not pull down or make waste for the intent was not so Sanders Justice to the same intent with the Plaintiff Exposition of Deeds shall be reasonable without wrong to the Grantor as a Grant of Corrody Estovers and Common for all Beasts he shall not have with Goats and with the largest advantage to the Grantee as a Disseisor releases all his right to the Termor he hath for his life
shall not have it from him because once attached in him as the Kings Villain and his wife are Joynt-Tenants for years the Villain dies his wife hath the Lease by Survivor this found by office takes away the interest of the wife as the entry of the King should in the life of the Villain and upon Cesser thereof the Kings Title once vested is not taken away because Nullum tempus occurit Regi by Dier by Weston where Titles of the King and of others concur in one instant the King shall be preferred as Land discends to a villain his Lord enters after this found the Ideot of the King shall have the Land and laches of entry shall not prejudice the King yet both Titles at once in the Lord because born Villain to the King because born Ideot by relation of office to it So if the husband be intituled to be Tenant by the courtesie and his wife after this found Ideot this takes away the Title from the Husband for ever for the Heir shall be in ward therefore if holden of the King or shall have it out of the Kings hands if not holden because the Title of the King to the Free-hold of the Land by the custody of it during the life of the wife shall take away by relation of the Office the Title of the husband which before the Office was found was vested in the husband Fish against Brocket TEnant in Tail Levies a Fine with Proclamations M. 4. 5. El. in the K. Beâ—ch Error whereof the one was recorded to be made the seventh day of June which day was Sunday and dies the issue brings Error and Reverses all the Proclamations but the Fine remains good at the Common Law and shall be a Discontinuance adiudged and this Proclamation could not be made as it is Recorded because it is no day in Court and the Fine and Proclamations are several Records and might have been avoided by Plea Sir Iohn Ratcliffs Case IF an Infant be made Knight in the life of his Ancestor P. 6. El. in the C. of Wards and the Ancestor dies he shall not be in Ward for his body for by this degree he is admitted to be able to do Knights Service and the wardship is due in respect of imbecility to do it he shall not pay the value of his marriage but his land shall be in Ward by the Statute of Magna Charta c. 4. so if he be made Knight being in Ward or before the same Law is if he be made Knight when he is in Ward 2. E. 6. Brook Gard 42. and 72. at the Common Law an Infant made Knight shall be out of Wardship for land and body Say against Smith and Fuller LEase for 10. years by indenture from Michaelmas last past the Lessee Grants P. 6. El. in C. P. Repleviâ— That he will pay 1000. Tiles to the Lessor or a summ in gross at the end of the Term the Lessor grants That if the Lessee pays the said 1000. Tiles at the end of every 10. years from thenceforth next ensuing That then he shall have a perpetual Demise and Grant of the premisses from ten years to ten years continually and inconsequently beyond the memory of man and adjudged good except onely for the first ten years for the incertainty of the begining continuance and ending of the other ten years For the second ten years begins not until the condition which is precedent to it be performed for this cannot ever be performed for all the ten years that ever shall be precedes the payment and the payment precedes the Lease and so the Condition impossible Also he cannot pay the same Tiles that he hath paid at first Also the payment at a day after the Term ends is good because that the Lease Commences from M. and so M. day is not part of the Term. Every contract to make good a Lease for years ought to have certainty of begining continuance and ending of the Term all which ought to be known at the begining of the Lease and if any of them fails it is not a good Lease because it wants certainty by Brown a Lease Conditional is good untill the Condition broken because the Estate precedes and the Condition is subsequent A condition to have a Lease gains not the thing until it be performed as the needle precedes the threads as he ought to marry my daughter before the time limited otherwise he shall not have the 100. l. which I promised So 7. E. 3.308 before fol. 25. if he will hold over eight years to him and his Heirs shall pay twenty pounds yearly Debt lyeth for the Lessor for the Rent within eight years because the Lessee hath but a Term for the Condition precedes the Fee-simple by Litl fol. 81. Lessee for five years upon Condition That if he doth such a thing within two years he shall have Fee but no law by Dier because he hath not Fee until the Act done Referrence to time certain is as much as express nomination of the time contained in the reference as a Lease for ten years and so from ten to ten during an hundred years a good Lease for an hundred years 29. H. 8. So I make a Lease until I. S. shall be imprisoned by the Statute of W. 1. cap. 20. So I make a Lease for years rendring 5. l. yearly and after I grant the Rent and Reversion to B. until he hath received of the Rent 20. l. it is all one as if I had granted the Reversion for 4 years because he shall receive 20. l. in 4. years and so the referrence contains such certainty from the time of the Lease certainly limited for the number of years may commence or determine upon incertainty very well as a Lease for 20. years after that the Lessee shall do such an Act good So for 20. years if the Coverture between I. S. and his wife so long continue good So 4. E 6 before fol. 6. and 13. 14 H. 8 11. A Lease for so many years as I. S. shall name and he names so many years in my life good for so many years that my Executor shall name not because he cannot name in my life and so it is not a Lease in my life and the certainty ought to be known in my life But a lease untill I. S. who hath Execution of a Statute Merchant until he is satisfied thereof no good Lease because Terminus contains certainty and there it is uncertain how long the Lease will endure So a Lease for three years and so from three years to three years during the life of I. S. is good for six years onely because those onely certain and the end of the number of years intended ought to be known at the begining So a person Leases for five years and so from 5. years to 5. years during his life is good for 10. years onely yet he continues person above ten years Dier said That he knew it Adjudged
and the Son and within his Charge So Litl fol. 4. the Donor shall pay Rent untill four degrees past upon a gift in Free-marriage upon another gift not because the Daughter advanced and the husband from thence forth undertakes to find his wife all necessaries I promise 20. l. to one if he marries my Daughter he shall have Debt for it in our Law because the Daughter is advanced and so consideration proceeding from Nature is a sufficient Consideration in our Law 22. E. 3. ass pl. 70. Fitz. nat br fol. 44. a. and 120. r. Doctor and Student 105. And so the Consideration here of A.B. for provision for his issues males good is a good Consideration to change the use of the land Second Consideration For the continuance of the Land in the name of the Baintons good to raise an Use and Males continue their Sir names and Females change them by marriage and the Male is most Soveraign 40. E. 3.37 2. H. 4.1 27 H. 6.8 and the Female and all inheritance is subject to the will of another 17. E. 4.5 I promise 10. l. to a laborer for to repair a high way or to a Surgeon for to cure such a man he shall have an action of Debt because it is Charity Doctor and Student 105. Third Consideration The good will and fraternal love wich he hath to his bloud and his brothers which is the nearest degree of bloud after Parents and issues good considerations here and so it seems by the better opinion in 20. H. 7.10 but is not there adjudged and they that joyn in bloud by nature joyn in love and therefore if the youngest enter after the death of the Father the elder shall have no action against him conrrary to 21. H 6.15 by Portington because the Law intends that he entred as a friend to preserve the inheritance in his absence because so near in bloud the Law intends as near in love So Littl f. 93. and 40. E. 3.24 no discent of the Puisne or any of his issues shall take away the entry of the eldest for the cause aforesaid So Litl f. 160. Warranty Collateral Bars without assets because the Law presumes that he will advance him as much as he hath prejudiced him by the Warranty So no battail between Brothers or Cosens in a Writ of right But a Nuper obiit lieth against Brothers and Sisters in Gavel-kind where their ancestor died seized or a Wriâ— De rationabili part against him which enters into all which Writs are to try bloud onely So a Juror is Brother or Cosen to one party a good challeng in every action for the affection which the Law presumes the one hath towards the other 21. E. 4.33 And Bromley said That 11. H. 4.12 by Tirwit and Cascoigne by the ancient usage all the bloud of him which was Murthered should draw the Felon found guilty in an appeal of Murther by a long corde to execution for the loss which all the bloud had by the Murther of one of them and for the revengement of his death and love that they had to him that was killed Fourth Consideration Consideration was the Marrige had between Edward Bainton and Agnes his wife Remainder upon Natural Consideration shall preserve the particular estate made without Consideration which precedes it but not on the contrary if the estate upon natural Consideration precede the other estate as A. Convenants with B. in Consideration that B. will marrie his Daughter to stand seized at the time of the Marriage to the use of himself for life after to the use of I. in Tail afterwards to the use of B. and his wife the Daughter of A. is a good use to I. without consideration for the Marriage is private and several Considerations for the estate of B. and his Wife because the Remainder to I. precedes the estate to B. and his Wife but if the Remainder to I. had been after the estate of B. and his wives the estate there had been void to I. but money might have been given in Consideration of all the estates In Mordants case 21. H. 7.19 No use was raised there because the Covenant was in the future Tense and also incertain and therefore was put to his Writ of Covenant there Good and sufficient Consideration raiseth an Use without Deed so a Deed raises Uses if there be any Consideration for it is made to some effect or otherwise should be void because you shall not have an action of Covenant here because an action of Covenant lieth upon a Covenant only in the preter or future Tense and not in the present Tense 1. Contract or Agreement for Lands or Chattels is by the Law First by Writing Secondly by Words First An agreement by writing without Consideration is not Nudum because a man hath great consideration and deliberation in passing things by Deed and the writing his sealing and delivery of it signifies fully his will is sufficient consideration that Land shall pass as his will is and shall bind the party without thinking what cause he hath to do it Secondly an Agreement by word without consideration is Nudum and binds not because words passes from a man suddenly and without advisement many times as 17 E. 4.4 I promise to give you 20. l. for to make your sale of new it is Nudum pactum if it be by Deed you may have Action of Debt upon this Deed and the Consideration there is not examinable and the cause of the Deed is not inquirable for every Deed imports in it self a Consideration without the will of the party which makes the Deed. So 11 H. 4.33 A Carpenter by word without writing undertakes to make a new house and no consideration for the making of it is Nude if it be by writing it is good So 45. E. 3.24 for that the Plaintiff demanded a Debt upon a contract for marriage money by Deed an action lies at the Common Law because there it becometh a Lay Contract by the Deed in Court Christian if it had been without Deed because the marriage which is the consideration is a thing Spiritual 14. E. 4.6 15. E. 4.32 which books are against the opinion of Thorp in the said case in 22. ass before fol. 35. Nudum pactum est ubi nulla subest causa praeter conventionem sed ubi subest causa fit obligatio parit actionem Information for Mines THe King shall have all the Mines of Gold and Silver in the Lands of his Subjects H. 10. El. in the Excheq by the Prerogative of his Crown and not by the proprieity of the Soil although it be not recited in the Treatise of Prerogative and albeit the Oar thereof in anothers land toucheth others Free-holds and inheritance which is proved by three reasons First for the excellency of the matter which being more excellent is appropriated by the Law to the person most excellent viz. the King So the King hath by the Common Law Whales and
the Devise shall be void So of an infant which maketh his will publisheth it and dieth at ful age it is not of any effect because death without good Commencement giveth not effect And so the Commencement and the intent of it is to be considered in every act So the Disseisee of two acres in Dale releaseth all his right in all Lands in D. and delivers the release as a scrowle to be delivered the first of May as his Deed the Disseisor before the first of May disseises him of another acre and the release is delivered the 10. of May the right as to the 3. acre shall not pass because the first livery was void to this intent so the consummation of it which is the second livery So I have a Reversion of two acres that I. S. holdeth for life after I purchase the Reversion of another acre which I. S. holdeth for life after I. S. Attourns to B. for all three the third acre passeth not for Attornment passeth not more then was contained in the intent of the first Grant And so here That which is not in the intent at the begining Commencement of the grant shal not be in the intent at the consummation of the same but if he had published his will after he had purchased the new Land there it may be all might pass for by the new publication his intent shall be taken That all that which the words contain at the time of the publication will pass and by him if a man Devise a thing by a name certain as the Mannor of D. or white acre and after purchase the same it shall pass for it shall be taken that he intended to purchase it or otherwise the Will shall be void to all intents 39. H. 6 18. But here when he hath 10. acres and Devises all his Lands they are satisfied in passing of the 10. acres and there is no meaning by the words for the land purchased after the Will because the thing is not named certainly as the Mannor of Dale or White-acre Also he may not Devise the 12. acres because by Dier the Statute 32. and 34. H. 8. cap. 1. and 5. intend that the Devisor shall be seized at the time of the making of the will because it speaks of having Lands which he may Devise and here he hath not those at the time of the Devise Quaere of the case where he Devises by special name and after purchases it because of the word having Second point if the Land vests in the Heir of the Devisor where he dieth in the Life of the Devisor Manwood for the Defendant Because it is more consonant to the will of the Devisor and reason That the effect shall take place and the form perish rather then both should perish together as Devisee for life the Remainder over dies in the life time of the Devisor it is a good Remainder and shall have the immediate possession which is the effect yet the form was for to have by Remainder So if a Dean die or a woman Covert taketh another husband before their Devisor dies yet they are especially named Land shall vest in the new Dean and his Successors and in the woman which is now the wise of another according to the intent because it cannot according to the words and if the intent of a man in Conditions shall be performed as 4. H. 7. by Joy he ought to infeoff the survivor and his heirs onely where the other dieth a fortiori the intent in Wils shall be observed where the words cannot and the effect here is that the Heir shall have the Land and it is the form of the limitation that he shall have it by discent 21. R. 2. Remainder Ecclesiae-Sancti Andreae in Holborn good And Parson shall take because it was comprehended in the Devise although he was not named Lovelas and all the Justices besides Walsh to the contrary For by the death of the Devisee the Devise is countermanded for that the Devisee is not in rerum natura when the Devise took effect and in all gifts be they by Devise or otherwise there ought to be a Donee in esse capable when the thing ought to vest or otherwise the gift is void and the word Heirs limits the estate and not the persons which shall take and enables the Devisee as well to alien as to permit it of Discent for a Discent to the Heir is but a thing subsequent to the estate of Fee-simple first vested in the Devisee and a thing at his pleasure And things of sequel which ensue if the estate had been vested first as are Discent Dower Escheat are not good causes to make things vest in others then those to whom limited And therefore the heir shall not have the land here no more then the woman shall have dower or Lord Escheat if he had died without heir which should be so if it had vested in the Devisee And therefore if a man Devise a Lease or goods to I. S. which dies and afterwards the Devisor dies the Executor of I. S. shall not have them The speaking to the Son of the Devisee That he shall be his heir c. is void for that the Statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. gives licence and authority to every man to Devise his Lands by his last Will and Testament in writing and those are sufficient in themselves for to make the thing devised pass and not regard words without writing by all the Justices but if he had published the Testament of new the Devisee should have the 12. acres in this case for that it had been as it were a new Testament but not his heirs Delamer against Barnard A Man in 13. H. 8. makes a Feoffment to the use of himself and his wife in special Tail Remainder to the husband in general Tail 10 El in K B â—…r Remainder in Fee to the brother of the husband and after in 26. H 8. The husband maketh a Feoffment to A. which infeoffs the Brother being in Remainder in Fee 2. E. 6. The brother infeoffs the Defendant the Husband dies the heir of the first Feoffee enters to revive the use to the Wife and adjudged lawfull 1. By the Feoffment of the Husband in 26. H. 8. all the estate of the Feoffee to use is drawn out of him and setled in the second Feoffee and by consequence all the uses which were created out of the first Fee-simple are discontinued and shall not be revived untill a re-entry of the Feoffee after the death of the husband and that he may enter then notwithstanding the Feoffment of the Brother 2. The Feoffment of the Brother in Remainder is not warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. cap. 5. for that he hath not use in possession nor in esse but only a right which he could not grant neither shall it be executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. but onely may pass by Livery by way of
Ouster during the coverture because by this he continues all his estate but that part of the State taken from him by the disseisin by the Eiectione Firme And the stranger may have Eiectione Firme for his Moity as two oyntenants for life and to the heires of one of them looses by default the one shall have right and the other a Quod ci deforceat and the Moity of the terme is not suspended for then it shall not survive Parson Patron and Ordinary make a Lease for yeares of Gleeb-land the Parson dyes the Lessee is made Parson and dyes his Executors shall not have the residue of the terme because the terme was extinct by the freehold of the Land which the Parson had in him because both in his owne right and to his owne use yet in severall capacities But by Dier it shall not be extinct because he hath the terme in his owne right and in Capacity of his naturall body and the Inheritance as Parson which is another Capacity But where the Lessor hath the terme of yeares as Executor to the Lessee it is not extinct but the terme when the Lessor dyes shall be revived Bracebridge against Clouse A Man seized in Fee of a Mannor maketh a Lease of forty Acres parcell of the Mannor for forty yeares if the Lessee shall live so long and after by Poll makes a Lease of the sayd forty Acres to J. S. for seventy yeares J. S. grants his terme to the Wife of the Lessor and a stranger the Husband makes a Feoffment in fee by Indenture of the Mannor and moreover grants by it all his other Lands and Tenements in the same Village to the Feoffee and his heires and this Feoffment was to the use of the Feoffor and his heires and dyed his Wife dies the first Lessee for yeares dyed within the forty yeares the stranger entred into the whole forty Acres and upon an Ouster by the heire of the Lessor brought E. Firme And adjudged that he shall recover for his owne moity and shall be barred for the moity of the Wife 1. That the Lease for seventy yeares is good for so many years which are to come of it after the death of the first Lessee yet is without Deed for that the Lessor in respect of his Reversion in fee may contract with another for any estate to be derived out of the Reversion and shall take effect then and not stay untill the forty yeares are extinct be effluction of time for the Condition if he shall live so long is a limitation which determines the estate otherwise it is of a Collaterall Condition for although that the terme be finished by it or by surrender or forfeiture the second terme shall not commence untill the terme be incurred for that hee had not power to contract for the possession during the first terme in respect of any such possibility of the breach of Condition surrender forfeiture c. As upon a Lease for life for the incertainty of the determination of the estate by his death and for the possibility which was at the time of the Contract that the Lease shall be executed before the death of Tenant for life by his surrender forfeiture c. As the Lessor maketh a Lease for life and after maketh a Lease to another for one and twenty yeares to commence presently Tenant for life dyes or surrenders the second Lease shall commence presently But if one make a Lease for forty yeares by word defeasible upon Condition to be performed by the Lessor and incontinently makes a new Lease for forty yeares by word this is void yet the first Lease is avoided by performance of the Condition or is surrendered because there is no possibility that it will be executed in respect of the Collaterall Condition But if the second Lease be by Indenture it is good by Estoppell And if it be by Deed Poll with Attornement the Reversion will passe 2. By the first Lease of forty yeares the forty Acres were severed from the Mannor for a time for that the Lease was executed by entry but the Reversion and Francktenement is parcell of the Mannor but the Lease for seventy yeares not nor may be executed by entry during the first Lease but is executory after this determined then of this Lease for seventy yeares the Lessor hath not any Reversion then this is not severed from the Mannor but continues parcell of it because it is executory and not executed by entry and then when the Lessor maketh a Feoffment of the Mannor the Reversion which depends upon the Lease for forty yeares passe as parcell of the Mannor which Reversion may be parcell of a thing in possession But not contrary discharge the moity of the terme for seventy yeares which is extinct by the Livery that gave the possession otherwise it were if the terme had beene executed at the time of the Livery except the Husband made Livery in this Land leased for the Land is severed by the Lease and here the execution of the possession to the use in an instant shall not revive the terme which was extinct before by the Livery Lessee for yeares before entry hath not possession so that a Release to him before entry is not good but he hath onely an Interest and right which is grantable or forfeitable before entry the Lessor shall not have Rent untill he hath waved the possession or the Lessee enters because presently the Lessor is adjudged occupier 28. H. 8.14 3. The grant of all his Lands and Tenements shall passe the terme because it is his Land for the time and for that hee had not any other Land there or otherwise the words would be void and therefore the opinion of Brook was denyed to be Law 7. E. 6. which is contrary but if he had other Lands there then it may be that the terme will not passe 4. He had Judgement for one Moity and was barred for the other where he demanded the whole which is not good bâ— Plowden but should have been barred for all if exception had been taken to it for that he might have had a better Writ for the Moity Vernon against Manners CHallenge of the Array because the Sheriffe which made it is Cosen to the Tenant in the ninth degree M. 14. 15. El. in the Kings Bench. Adjudged good he can shew how he is Cosen 21. E. 4.75 And notwithstanding the Tenant be seized in right of his Wife to whom the Sheriffe is not inheritable for by reason of Cosenage it shall be intended favourable and although that he cannot inherite the Land demanded yet he may inherite other Land as he ire to the Tenant Smith against Stapleton LEase for life to Husband and Wife P. 15. El. in the Kings Bench. Replevin Remainder in tayle to N. T. their Son a stranger levies a Fine Sur Conusans de droit come ceo que il ad de son done aâ— N.T. the Son which grants and renders the
their Husbands is contrary to the intent of the Statute and the intent ought to be thought on because the Purviewe extends not further then the intent of the makers of the Statute as the Wife infeoffs the Father of him with whom she intends to marry for to regive the Land to them after their intermarriage for lives or remainder in tayle to the Wife the Father doth so they have issue the Wife after the death of the Husband levies a Fine to other uses their issue may not enter yet it is with in the words of the Act of 11. H. 7. because the Father gave it to them But this cometh from the Wife her selfe by circumstance And the Father was but as an Instrument of it and therefore out of the intent of 11. H. 7. which restraineth the generalty of the letter of the Statute and maketh the Cases within the words out of the penalty of the Statute by the intent of the Makers As Infants and mad Men are excepted out of the Cases of Fellonies made by any Statute so neither those nor a Fem covert shall be concluded in the intent of the Statute which maketh them accessary which shall give them Meat Drink or other ayde to them which shall commit such an Act. So if a bargaine for Land be made before a Writ brought against him and the suite depending Livery and Seisen is made It is not Champarty 19. R. 2. because he ought to performe the bargaine made upon just consideration notwithstanding W. 2. Cap. 49. and Articul super Chart. Cap. 11. So a barr fee is within the letter but not the intent of the Statute of 32. H. 6. cap. 10. because appointed to the Sheriffe in the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court for his labour and attendance when the Prisoners are brought to their delivery 21. H. 7.16 So Wreck if a Man Dog or Car escapes alive shall be kept that the party may have his goods if he claimes within the yeare by W. 1. cap. 4. is intended of such things which will endure so long and not perish in the meane time as are Lemans Oringes c. So a rent granted by tenant in tayle for a release of right in other Lands is good 44. E. 3.21 because for the benefit of the estate tayle And W. 2. De donis c. intends not to restraine that which amends the estate tayle So Parsonages and Vicarages are within the words but out of the sense and intent of 1. E. 6. cap. 14. which inlargeth the words of the Statute and maketh that Cases within the like mischeife shall be within the Purview by equity as by the Book of entrys fol. 406. a man shall recover double damages for costs sustained with force by equity of 4. H. 4. cap. 8. which gives this for disseisen of the Land So that Executor which cometh first by distresse shall answer by equity of 9. E. 3. cap. 5. which speaketh of Executors by equity of Gloucester the Lessor shall have wast against the Lessee for half a yeare or for twenty weeks which pleads yeares So 1. E. 6. cap. 12. which takes away Clergy for stealing Horses takes it away also for one Horse because included in the Plurall Number and therefore Plowden disallows 2. E. 6. cap. 33. which taketh away Clergy for the stealing of one Horse as a superfluous Statute and was made in vaine And so 1. E. 6 cannot of Law but morall vertue which reforme the Law and the other equity is Quasi equality because in the like reason in the like Law Sobye against Molins TIthes shall be payd for the Boughs of Hornebeame H. 17. El. in the Kings Bench. Attachment upon prohibition Hasell Sallows Maple and such Trees which are not fit for building and so of the Trees themselves although that the Trees and Boughs are above the age of one and twenty yeares for they are not great Trees which are exempted and priviledged of Tithes by the Statute of 45. E. 3. cap. 3. or rather by the Common Law in affirmance of which this Statute was made as appeareth 50. E. 3.10 But Tithes shall not be payd for Ashes Oaks and Elmes Beech and such like Trees which are fit for building and of the age of twenty yeares nor for the Branches of them which are of the age of twenty yeares Quere if the Branches are within such age as the Timber trees which use to be lopped and lopt if Tithe shal be payd for them and it seemeth Tithes shall be payd of them by the Book The use at this day is upon suggestion to have a prohibition that the party shall be bound by Obligation or Recognisans to the King to preferr a Bill of attachment against the party which sues in the spirituall Court if he requires it and upon it to declare and joine issue or demurr upon the right of Tithes and award consultation which Plowden held vicious First for that the Defendant is not Actor and therefore may not have consultation upon such proceedings Secondly For that the Judgement upon the Attachment ought to be to acquit or attaint the party of the Contempt and not proceed upon the right of Tithes Thirdly For that the Plaintiffe cometh into the Court voluntarily Scilicet by his Recognisans to exhibit his Attachment where he ought to be brought in voluntarily by Process Fourthly Because the suggestion of the Attachment is false Fifthly For that if the Plaintiffe will not proceed the Defendant hath no remedy but a Recognisance forfeited to the King But Plowden held it to be the best course after the prohibition that the Defendant sues out a Scire facias against the Plaintiffe Quare consultatio concedi non debeat And upon this the Plaintiffe may declare and the matter shall be tryed and the Defendant may have consultation and then he will be an Actor Sanders and Archers Case ARcher gave Poison to Sanders to Poison his Wife H. 18. El. the Report of the opinions of Dyer Cheife Justice and Barham Justices of Assises in Warw. and Sanders gives this to his Wife in a roasted Apple which did eate part of it and gave the residue to their daughter being an Infant and after the Wife recovers and the Infant dyes and it was adjudged Murder in Sanders for which he was hanged but not in Archer for he was acquit to be no accessary to this Murder First For that Sanders had an evill intent of Murder at the beginning of his Act to kill his Wife and therefore the consequent of his Act by which the Daughter dyes shall be adjudged according to the commencement So if a man shoots at one and kills another or lyeth in waite to kill one and kills another otherwise it is where he hath no ill intent of killing any as to lay poyson to kill Rats and one eates of it and dyeth Secondly The consent of Archer to kill the Woman may not bee conjectured further then he gave it
woad that he may do his pleasure then the King shall have an action upon the agreement and if he doth not weigh it is the folly of the Collector Griffith the Kings Sollicitor Agreement or concord executed with satisfaction in deed or with accord or means for recovery of recompence is a good bar in Trespass Executory is not howbeit it is the mutual assent of the parties because it giveth neither recompence action nor remedy whereby to obtain recompence and therefore it is not but a void communication and nudum pactum as in 20. H. 6. In Trespass the Defendant pleads concord between them That he shall pay 20. s. to the Plantiff at a day to come it is not a bar because it is not satisfaction nor recompence for it because he shall not have debt after the day so 9. E. 4.19 in Trepsass upon 5. R. 2. Defendant pleads accord That the Plantiff should re-enter and have the land and that the Defendant deliver to the Plantiff all the Evidences concerning the land and said that the Plantiff had entred and that he had delivered all the evidences unto him It is no bar for it intends the proper evidences of the Plantiff and so no satisfaction of the wrong but if it conveys to him Title to the evidence then it is a good bar so in 15. H. 6. in Trespass against him by the Plantiff he pleads That they agree that if the Defendant doth his endeavor for to agree them for a Trespass by the Plantiff to S. That then c. and saith That he did his endeavor so that they are accorded it is no plea because no satisfaction but if he saith That he hath accorded them at his own costs it is a good bar Gawdy the elder for the Defendant Arbitrement which is Executory 9. E. 4.51 Fitz. H. 4. Br. 3. accord is a good bar in Trespass because he may have debt at the day appointed for the payment of the summ agreed to be paid in recompence and so the Trespass is converted into another thing viz. Debt by the Arbitrators which are judges of it and so accord countervails satisfaction in facto otherwise it is of a concord executory 6. H. 7.11 because the pleading of the concord confesseth a wrong and it is not reason that the Plantiff in an action thereupon should be barred without satisfaction And so shall the King be satisfied here Also in concord the wrong to be recompenced precede the agreement but here the agreement precedes the wrong supposed and cometh not after the wrong as in concord and therefore this case may not be resembled to the case before of accord Incertaintie at the beginning which may be reduced to certaintie by matter ex post facto countervaileth certaintie ab initio as a man leaseth all his Acres in D. paying for every one 12. d. it is a good reservation because when the Acres are measured the Rent shall be certain so a gift of two Acres of the one for Life and of the other in Fee by the Feoffment of the one he shall have Fee in this ab initio so Lessee of white-acre and Black-acre for life the remainder of the one in Fee to a stranger and the Lessor licences him for to cut Trees in White-acre now he shall be adjudged to have the remainder of this Acre ab initio so the thing which at the commencement was incertain is made certain So in Wheelers case 14. H. 8.17 So a Lease for so many years as I. S. shall name is good when he shall name the years So 17. E. 4.1 A. bargains that B. shall have his wheat when he hath viewed it if he please paying 4. s. the Acre good contract if he paies when he carrieth it away yet the quantity and summ incertain at the first so here when the Collector hath weighed the woad And therefore this conditional agreement doth countervail an agreement certain at the beginning And where acts ought to be performed strictly yet in divers cases the performance of the intent and not the words good for it countervaileth the performance of the words So here But performance of the words and not of the intent is not good as Lit. fol. 182. of conditions upon a Feoffment for to give again to I. S. and his wife in special Tail and they die and the Feoffees make an estate to their issue and the heirs of his father and mother good because the intent of the condition is performed So 17. E. 4.3 Obligation upon condition to infeoff I. S. and he Lease for years and Release in Fee it is a good performance and a good Feoffment and yet the words of a condition shall be performed as strictly as a Statute Bradshaw the Kings Attorney The mutual assent of the parties upon a thing incertain is in Law but a vain communication before the certainty known as in 37. H. 6.8 A man promises in marriage with his daughter so much as I. S. shall arbitrate The party which shall marry his daughter shall not have it if he marry her until I. S. hath made his award and appointed it for before that it is reduced into certainty it is but a vain communication So in 20. H. 6. A man Leases to A. for so many years as B. shall name he cannot enter into the land before that B. hath named the number of years And the witness of the Defendant which saith That he found suerties and hath not shewed who or what as he ought is wanting both in the name and ability of the sureties which the Court ought to adjudge of as in 22. E. 4.40 A man that was bound to shew a sufficient discharge of an annuity pleaded that he had offered to shew it to him and he refused to see it and held no good plea. Agreement according to the Statute in issue shall be intended general viz. certain and special viz. incertain in evidence proves not the issue neither is it pursuant to the issue as in 31. H. 6. Upon non est factum pleaded in debt witnesses say That it was delivered at another place then it did bear date whereupon the Defendant demurred and the Plantiff was barred because this proved not it to be his Deed for the delivery shall be intended where it was dated and the witnesses prove the contrary and so the evidence warrants not the issue so in 18. H. 6.16 One deed of Lease for life without Livery given in evidence shall not maintain upon Free-hold pleaded the issue so in 14. E. 3. Upon traverse of a gift in Tail the witnesses prove that another made the gift and awarded that the Plaintiff should be barred so if he had pleaded the general agreement in bar and special in the rejoinder it is a departure as in 6. H. 7.8 In Trespass the Defendant pleaded a descent to him and the Plaintiff said That after the Defendant infeoffed him and the Denfendant said That it was upon condition and for breach
Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in Life passes from the Lessor presently although it vests not presently but here the Remainder passeth not presently because the Condition precedes the Remainder as 15. H. 7. 1. if A. Grant to B. That when he is promoted to a Benefice or do such an Act he shall have an Annuity there he shall shew his Promotion if he demands his Annuity because it is a Condition precedent and to him which maketh the Grant but if he Grants an Annuity until he be promoted there he shall not shew it because the Promotion is subsequent to the Annuity and will defeat the Annuity and therefore it shall be shewed by the other party which is contray So 7. E. 3.10 A Lessee for eight years rendring 10. s. yearly and if he holdeth over to him and his heirs an action of Debt is maintainable during the Term for the Rent is a Chattle because the Fee passeth not presently for that the Condition precedes the Fee So 6. R. 2. a Lease to two for years upon Condition That if the Lessee aliens within the Term or die he shall have Fee it is holden that the Fee passeth not presently because the Condition precedes it which Cases prove That the Remainder passes not out of the Lessor at the time of the Livery albeit that the Condition precede the Remainder and proves also That the Remainder Commenceth upon Condition and proves also That the Remainder is appointed to begin after the Commencement of the particular Estate the which is contrary to the grounds of Law and therefore and for the said other causes the Remainder shall be void And so for the insufficiencie of the matter of the Bar and Form also the Plaintiff shall recover Cook Serjeant to the contrary As to the two Exceptions which have been moved That the Plea is not good because he shews not that he hath been resiant after the deaths of the Husband and Wife alwaies nor what day he entred Sir I take it That it shall be taken that he entred immediately after the death of the Husband and Wife for the Defendant hath pleaded by way of Bar and if the Bar hath matter of substance and is good to a common intent it sufficeth although it be not good to every special intent and therefore in the Case of 33. H. 6. fol. 24. where the Defendant pleads That the Testator made the Plaintiff and one R. his Executor Judgement c. The Plea was good without shewing that he was made after that the Plaintiff was made sole Executor because it shall be intended after So 10. H. 7. 15. by Keble in Trespas the Defendant pleads his Free-hold good because good by Common intendment yet the Plaintiff might have an Estate for years and it may stand with his Bar and by which he may punish the default but such special matter will not be intended So 6. E. 4.1 in Debt upon an Obligation the Defendant saith That he hath done such things as was contained in the Indenture and at Issue and found for the Plaintiff and spoken to in Arrest of Judgement because the Defendant said not that the two Covenants were all and so had not alleadged the performance of all but held good because by Common intent there shall not be intended more then two Covenants if the Plaintiff shew not the contrary So 3. H. 6.4 in Formedon he gave not prima facie a good Bar because it intends a general gift and yet it may be That the Land was recovered in value and then the Plea is not apt for other Land was given So 3. H. 6.3 In Debt nothing in their hands pleaded by Executors good yet it may be that other goods first not the Testators at the day of his death are come to their hands in place instead of other goods So 21. H. 6.17 In Assise the Defendant was in by discent where he had a mean Title which tolled the Assise of the other shall not be void by the said recovery but this shall not be intended without shewing so discent and entry in Bar good yet it may be that a stranger abated and dyed seised and the Heir could not enter but if shall not be intended without shewing specially but when a thing Commenceth in respect of the time then the certainty of the time shall be shewed fol. 24.27.33 as 20. H. 7.12 by Rede A Servant which demanded 20. s. Sallary for his service by the year ought to shew the expiration of the year because the Action is given in respect of the year past and the time is parcell of the cause of the Demand and precedes the Demand but here the time pursues the Remainder and is not cause of the Remainder and therefore we ought to shew it so certainly as where time gains a thing for here it goeth in defeasance of the thing and therefore the Bar is good notwithstanding the said two Exceptions besides it seemeth to me the Remainder is good For first he hath an Estate here upon which the Remainder may be grounded here the remainder is appointed thereupon but the cause wherefore the Remainder shall not be good is alleadged in two great points viz. because the Fee passeth not presently forth of the Lessor and also for that the Remainder cannot pass upon Condition And it seems to me That the Remainder passeth out of the Lessor presently howbeit that it vests not presently as in Litl 81. A Lease for five years if he pay within the first two that then he shall have Fee the Fee passeth out of the Lessor presently so the Remainder to the right Heirs of I. S. in life and a Remainder may Commence upon Condition as a Lease for life upon Condition That I. S. Marry my Daughter during the state for Life which shall remain to him is good because he hath an Estate upon which it may be grounded So 34. E. 3. Devise for Life upon Condition That if the Heir to whom the Reversion discends disturbs Tenant for Life or his Executors of their Administration That then the Land shall remain to the Daughter of the Devisor and to her Heirs and dyeth Tenant for Life dyeth the Son of the Daughter brings his Formedon against the Heir because he disturbs the Tenant and also the Executors of the Tenant traverse it and at issue and upon this issue is joyned which should not have been so if the Remainder had not been good Also if Assent as 18. E. 4. 12. by Catesby ante 8. post 31. to the Diseisen made before to anothers use may Traverse the Free-hold from one to another à fortiori a condition may namely where the Franck-Tenement precedes to which a Condition may be annexed Morgan Serjeant for the Plaintiff The Plea is not good because it doth not shew the day in certain of the death of W. nor of the Husband and Wife but he argued not this Also it is not good because he shewed not the
by default against her and her husband had not any other remedy then a Writ of Right before the Statute of W. 2. cap. 3. which gives a Cui in vita and before W. 2. cap. 3. a faint Recovery against Tenant for life bound him in Remainder Litl Release 112. because the Law presumes the Title and case true So a Recovery upon a faint Title by a man of Religion was out of the penalty of the Statute of Religiosis untill W. 2. cap. 23. made a Recovery without Title in such plight as a Feoffment in Mortmain was for the truth supposed by the Law to be therein So here the Recovety is intended to be true and therefore the Plaintiff ought to shew matter if there be any to prove the contrary As in 11. H. 4.19 if the Tenant in a precipe vouch one of the Demandants he ought to shew cause because otherwise the Law will presume that he hath not cause against right So 15. E. 4.4 Contrary entry by Title general averment of Covin by the Plaintiff in Dower was not held good Matter in Law As to the matter in Law it seemeth here that the case is clear out of the words and penalty of the Statute of 11. H. 7. cap. 30. For although 27. H. 8. hath executed the Possession to the use yet this case remains here so as if 27. H. 8. had never been made and the Wife had continued Tenant in Tail in use and out of the words of the first branch because he hath an Estate Tail in the use in the land but hath not an Estate in the land in the use and the Statute speaks of an Estate in the Land and this Hereditament or use which is the matter and substance and the use it self which is the confidence of the thing differ But one may not have the state in Land and use also because suspended yet two may to the use of one of them as Husband and Wife to the use of the Wife and so it shall be intended here Also the first branch speaks of lands c. of Inheritance or purchase of the Husband but here the use is a new thing which Commenceth now and was not in being before and so is not the inheritance or purchase of the Husband and therefore out of the Statute as a Rent granted to one out of lands to the use of the Wife of the Grantor or if the Husband gives a signiory in Tail to the Wife for her Joyncture and the Tenancie Escheat and the Wife suffer a faint Recovery this is forth of the Statute So the Husband makes a Feoffment upon Condition to re-enfeoffee him and his Wife in Tail the Wife suffers a faint Recovery this is out of the Statute because the Feoffment of the Land from the Possession of the Husband and was her purchase and not the purchase of the Husband or his Inheritance for the Condition which is the cause of the gift is a new thing is not within the second branch because the Wife had nothing here of the gift of any of the Ancestors of the husband Nor the third branch because the wife had not possession by the Statute nor by the Feoffees to the use of him in Reversion but he in Reversion hath the present Title and so the Statute shall be intended and therefore he may enter presently If Tenant for Life suffer a faint Recovery but 11. H. 7. saith Enjoy according to their Title intends that he shall not Enter until after the death of his Ancestor because he hath no Title in the life of his Ancestor And therefore when the Wife assents to the Ravisher 6. R. 2. gives title of entry saying habeat titulum intrandi c. intends that he shall not have it in the life of the Ancestor And if the makers of the Statute of 11. H. 7. had intended that the issue in Tail should have entred presently they would have given to him Title by such like words as the Statute of 6. R. 2. hath but the end of the clause which saith That they shall enjoy according to their Title expresses that they intented not so For which causes it is probable that the Defendant is out of the penalty of the Statute and that the Plaintiff might not enter and so shall be Barred Whiddon Serjeant for the Plaintiff Because the Defendant hath said whose Heir he is he shall be taken that he is Heir special for a Plea which hath two intendments shall be taken most strongly against him which pleads it as 3. H. 7.2 in Trespass Release generally is no Plea because it may be taken to be delivered before the Trespass or after So 3. H. 7.8 and 9. and 26. H. 8. Entry to avoid Warranty Collaterall pleaded in Bar is no Plea because it may be intended after the discent for he may enter in the life of the Ancestor or after Also the Plaintiff need not shew how he is Heir because he was once seised by entry But if he had brought a formedon upon the Estate Tail he should because by way of Demand as 6. E. 4.1 Executor brought Trespass for a thing taken out of his Possession he shall not shew his Testament but if he Demands a thing whereof he had not ever possession he shall It is not needfull to shew Covin certainly which is a secret thing and the Law doth not enforce one to shew a thing when by intendment of Law it lieth not in his Conusance as 20. H. 7.7 A woman shall have Dower of a Rent Charge without shewing the Deed of the Grant because it belongeth not to her So the Lord shall have Covin generally for the Ward where his Tenant aliens and re-taketh for life the Remainder to his Heir being it lieth secretly in the breast as suspicion lieth for that he may justisie imprisonment for suspicion of Felony without shewing of the cause of his suspicion So 33. H. 6.5 In Trespass a man buys in a Market Overt the Plaintiff said That the said buying was by fraud between the Defendant and a stranger generally without shewing any thing speciall of the Covin and the Plea the e admitted good So in a Precipe against the Lord of ancient Demeasne and Tenant the Lord shall shew that he is Lord and this Action is brought against him by Covin generally So 9. E. 6.41 He which alleadges Covin ought to shew cause of the Covin and the cause is for that the Recovery or Title was tryed by Verdict because to say that it was by Covin shall not be intended true against a Verdict But Covin generally may be averred against a Recovery not gainsaying or default because this is cause of the Judgement and no Triall Wherefore in this case a man shall aver that this was by Covin generally And as to that which hath been said That execution ought to be shewed of the Recovery that needs not For the Statute speaketh only of the Recovery and without Execution it shall be
a Recovery as a Fine is without Attornment for the habere facias seisinam recites cum A recuperavit seisinam suam c. because the Husband raised the use First it is his purchase and so within the words of the Statute and if not yet it shall be within the equity and nevertheless it is penal Sanders for the Defendant The Statute here is penal because it goeth in avoidance of Estates and abridges power and therefore not equitable And for this Statute of W. 2. cap. 14. before fol. 17. expectet emptor for Warranty because he vouches an Infant and yet it is adjudged 18. E. 4.16 If he maketh a Feoffment over this Feoffee shall vouch because penall against one shall not extend to another So by 32. H. 8. cap. 33. The dying seised of a disseisor without peaceable possession before for five years shall not take away the Entry of the disseisee yet if one Abator die seised within five years this discent shall take away the Entry And so if Tenant for life be disseised and the disseisor die within five years and the Tenant for Life dieth he in Reversion or Remainder may not Enter because he was no Disseisor to them and to the discent they had no Title to Enter but the Tenant for Life and taken strictly because it abridgeth the Liberty given by the Common-Law By inheritance is understood Land by dicent as it is proved by a case in 7. H. 4.5 and a cui in vita abated because it was quam clamat esse jus Hereditatem suam whereas it was his own purchase And by 4. H. 5. cap. 3. which speaketh of Lands by purchase or by discent and the disjunctive prove the difference between the words Purchase intends Land by gift or purchase which is by Title Disseisen is not purchase because without Title Now because the Plaintiff hath in the Replication said That the Grandfather of the Defendant was seised in Fee for to prove the Defendant to be within the first Branch the Plaintiff ought to shew here how the Husband of the Defendant came to the Possession for the manner of coming to the Land is Issuable because it may be by Discent Purchase or Disseisen And a Joincture made by a Disseisor to his wife is out of the Statute Recovery without Execution is not a discontinuance Harris Serjeant argues to the same intent And he taketh also that Covin cannot be where the Title is good except that wrong be done by him which hath the Title and this ought to be shewed for here in respect that the Title is confessed to be good in this That it is not traversed nor confessed and avoided this Recovery may not be averred to be by Covin for this avernment is repugnant in it self and it cannot stand together to say that she did right by Covin And as to the Statute he taketh the case here to be out of the words of the Statute And note thou that he argued to all the other points moved to the same purpose that they were arguod before Molineux Justice It is a vain thing to aver this specially which is apparant as the Covin and therefore when the Tenant infeoffes his Son within age by Collusion the Lord shall seise him for a Ward without shewing this Collusion specially So if the Husband will confess an Action the Wife shall have Dower by the Common Law proved by recital W. 2. cap. 4. For it is intendable by the Law to be Covin apparant but it was doubted if the Recovery had been by Default but here the Action had been tryed by the Verdict of 12. men the cause of the Covin ought to have been shewed because the Law giveth credence to it As 5. H. 7.20 Upon an Attaint no Supersedeas shall be granted because the Law presumes the Verdict to be true untill the Reversal be tryed upon Error in Deed or Record so that the Law hath an indifferent judgement of it viz. to be true or false And so the Covin averred in the avoidance of the trial by Verdict shall be shewed certainly for the credence given to the Verdict Also Covin upon a good Title is prohibited because the Statute of 11. H. 7. is generall And so Covin generally averred here without falsifying of the Title is good as 4. H. 7. cap. 20. saith That if a Recovery be pleaded in Bar of a popular Action the Plaintiff may aver it was by Covin generally by the Warrant of the Statute As to the second exception the Stat. expounds it self to be intended of a Recovery without execution Every Fee-simple is an inheritance and then she had an use in the inheritance of her Husband and held that the Wife held the inheritance of her Husband that is to say his Land in use joyntly with her Husband and so within the words of the Statute and if not it shall be within the equity and intent of the Statute and he took without question that the Heir in Tail might enter presently and our the Wife which is Defendant and so held the Plaintiff should recover Hales Justice to the same intent And first to the Covin the Replication is good without shewing cause of it And the Statute is for frail inconstant women and will not make them Judges if the Title of Action be good or not 18. R. 2. cap. 17. gives receipt to him in Reversion where the Tenant for Life is impleaded by Covin of the demandants that the Tenements shall be recoverred and he in Reversion because it speaks generally of Covin 2. H. 6.14 and 11. H. 4.3 For this cause there it sufficeth to say That Tenant for Life pleaded faintly and pray to be received without shewing cause otherwise it is of Covin at the Common Law and 11. H. 7. would have limited the pain to fained recoveries expresly if it had intended so much And the Statute prohibits the Covin onely be the Title good or faint for faint Recoverie by Covin the issue in Tail may falsifie before Warranty made 20. years after the Disseisen yet it commenceth by Disseisen by the intent As if the Father Disseiseth the Son to the intent to make a Feoffment with Warranty to Bar his Wife Recovers against one which outs the Tenant by Covin yet she had not good Title of Dower is a Disseiseress and Covin is apparent here because he never took view voucher essoin or other delays which he might The Statute saith That the Recovery shall be void whereby it is not intended that it shall be executed and shall not be intended to be by Disseisen without shewing The words of 11. H. 7. explain the intent That such Wives who have Lands in use or use in Lands are within the Statute Recovery against Tenant in Tail was good onely for his life before this Stat. and therefore comprises use here because the Stat. shall not be made in vain for Tail in use may do as great prejudice as Tail in possession and so the
intent shall aid the obscurity of the words in Construction of words but if it be not within the words yet it shall be taken by equity because it restrains Liberty that the Common Law gave to the prejudice of another as here of Tenant in Tail to bind their issues by recovery or Warranty So Marlebridge cap. 6. speaks of a Lease for years for to defraud the Lord of Ward yet if it were for Life or in Tail taken by equity So W. 2. cap. 1. speaks of 3. gifts in Tail yet 4. H. 5.6 and 19. H. 6.74 comprise by equity all manner of intails because it restrains liberty of breaking the intention of the Donor suffer by the Common Law So W. 2. cap. 3. gives receipt to the Reversioner by equity to the Remainder for the Common Law which may not suffer him to be received suffers a wrong and this Statute remedies it So 13. R. 2. cap. 17. gives receipt for faint pleading by equity receipt by equity shall be for faint defending So an Administrator shall have account by equity of the Statute where it is given to Executors onely So 1. H. 7.3 gives an Action of Forgery of false Deeds by which the Title and Possession of another are disturbed in the Copulative by equity if the Title onely be disturbed and therefore the disseisee which hath not but onely a right shall have an Action in 4. H. 6.26 because where the Law defective suffers a thing which is a wrong to another and a Statute redresseth it there things in the like mischief shall be taken by equity in the like purview So here because it is made in avoidance of Covin therefore it is beneficial to the Common-wealth Brown Justice argued to the contrary for 2. causes in the Pleading The one was for that the cause of the Covin was not shewed for howbeit that the Statute speaks generally of Covin yet it refers the pleading of this to the Common Law and therefore because the cause of Covin was not shewed the replication was nought The other cause was for that the Plaintiffs have not shewed how the Wife Plaintiff was Heir and therefore may not be seised in Tail as it was pleaded And as to the execution he held that it was not necessary to be shewed And as to the matter in Law he held the case here within the words of the Statute and if it were not yet he held them within the equity for that the Statute was made in avoidance of Covin which is to be abhorred and therefore the Statute is benificial to the Common-wealth But for the said defaults in the replication he held that the Plaintiffs should not recover Montague Chief Justice Title amends not Covin for it may be upon a good Title and therefore the books are If a Wife recover Dower against A. who by Covin enters and outs the Tenant as in 15. E. 4.4 yet she is a Disseisoress and by 8. H. 4.6 where the issue in Tail recovers against A. who by Covin Disseise the Discontinuee yet 18. H. 8.5 is not remitted although his Title good but is a Disseisor by reason of the Covin The Title of a man shall not be tryed between strangers where he which hath the Title is not party nor shew Covin because it is a thing secretly determined to the prejudice of another as Joyntenancie on part of the Plaintiff the Defendant which pleads this shall not shew of whose Feoffment for that that he may have knowledge of it by presumption of Law on his own part here H. 21. E. 4.78 and 19. H. 6.32 So 19. H. 79. he which pleads a Deed which belongeth not to him shall not be enforced to shew it a man may aver Covin generally where averment is given by Statute or Common Law as the Statute of 13. R. 2. giveth receipt for faint pleader and may alleadge it generally when he prays to be received So a Termor for years by the Statute of Gloucestor shall be received and aver Covin generally and faint pleading and Covin is all one So 8. H. 6.7 In Assise the Tenant makes default one shall answer for him as Baily he appears and disallows him and saith That he will make default the Bailiffs comes and Demands Conusance of this default made by Covin for to take away their Conusance generally and holden good So 10. H. 6.15 In Formedon one Demandant agrees with the Tenant in Challenge which he made to a Juror the other Demandant avers the Challenge to be made by Covin generally and good So if one pleads imprisonment in excuse of his default or sale in a Market overt the other avers That it is by Covin generally or if he pleads a Feoffment the other avers That it was by Champerty generally and so may aver Covin given by the Statute or Common Law generally where the cause of it may not be special if it may be special otherwise it is 7. H. 4.15 in scire facias the Wife received pleads a recovery by a stranger upon a not denial and execution against him it is but the acknowledgement of the Tenant and his own Act and so Covenous Faint recovery against Tenant in Tail which dies before execution the issue is remitted and the Recovery not executory against him and so is defeasable yet the Covin in the Recovery which is as a Condition is cause of the forfeiture of the State as a Feoffment upon Condition not to infeoffee I. albeit that he within age infeoffees I. and so the State is defeasable yet he hath broken the Condition And as to the other exception taken for that it was not shewed certainly how he was Heir Montague held the Replication nought for Replications Titles Pleas in abatement of Writs and Estopples ought to comprehend certainty the Replication forceth the party to issue and therefore shall be certain because the Court nor the Jury may not be inveigled or troubled for the incertainty of the Replication which maketh the issue ordained and provided that they should be certain But a Bar which is certain to a common intent is good for a man shall plead in Bar an Estate without shewing how it is not good as it is holden 2. E. 4.26 and every Replication ought to shew contrary matter to the Bar and then ought to take Traverse or confesse and avoid the Bar. And here the Bar is good and the Replication contains a misbehavior of the Wife of the Defendant by which here Estate is void and then the Plaintiff ought to make him able for to take benefit of the misbehavior of the Defendant and here the Heir pleads this ability certainly the Bar which is plainly confessed is not plainly avoided for it appeareth not here how the Plaintiff is cosen to G. T. pretoxtu quorum premissoy refers to him which is said before onely as it is expounded 7. H. 6.51 in a Bill of Debt against the Warden of the Fleet. 4. H. 7.13 where one binds himselfe That he
will not claim nor enter into the said land in bar that he entred not nor claimed the Plaintiff replies that he claims he ought to say how viz. That he came to the Land and claimed and entred So in 5. E. 4 6. in Replication the Plaintiff ought to shew how he is next of bloud to the Woman ravished with consent to the ravishment So for Mortmain how he is Ld. So for receipt how he came to the reversion by special conveyance to the things which the Statutes give by general words as here Titles alwaies ought to be certain because he that makes Title is by this an Actor and an Actor ought to plead certainly by Hales fol. 51. b. If a Wife which hath a Joyncture by her Husband suffers a faint recovery contrary to 11. H. 7. if the Daughter enter the Son born after shall not out her during the life of the Wife By Montogue he may enter presently and save because the Statute saith he shall enjoy it according to his Title therein and the Title is Tail which is devolved to the Son and after f. 1â—… But the Daughter because prima de sanguine â—…ring because the Wife assents to the Ravisher shall hold against the Son born afterwards and there it is Fee-simple In 5. E. 4.6 So 9. H. 7.25 the Daughter shall hold the Remainder appointed to the right Heirs against a Son born afterwards because it is vested in the Daughter as a purchaser because it is Fee-simple to which the Son afterwards born hath not right for the Land was never in any of his Ancestors before Et possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit c. of Fee-Tail not but it discends to the youngest Son of the half bloud So a Bastard eign-abate in Fee-simple Land and dies without interruption and his issue enter he shall hold against the Mulier puisne 39. E. 3.38 Of Land entailed it is otherwise so it is a great difference between Fee-simple and Fee-Tail and according to the Proverb One shall beat the Bush and another shall have the Bird. As 9. H. 7.24 and 25. A man hath Lands by the Mother and aliens upon Condition and dies without issue the Heir of the part of the Father enters for the Condition broken the Heir on the part of the Mother outs him 14. H. 8.18 by Portman if a Remainder in Tail be once executed the issue in formedon shall declare upon the Gift immediately for all passes at one time and upon one Livery But in 20. Ass Ph. ultima it was shewed of a Reversion after Seisen or making Title by grant of the Reversion he which makes Title is alwaies Actor and ought to plead certainly So 2. H. 6.14 A Patentee sheweth his Letters Patents if he maketh Title by them Words alwaies if they are ambiguous and obscure in Statutes have been expounded according to the intent of the makers as W. 2. cap. 3. speaks when a man amiserit per defaltam is expounded when the Husband and Wife lose by default because the Law alwaies was that the Wife may enter if the Husband alone lose by default So W. 2. cap. 1. Et si finis super hujusmodi tenementa imposterum levetur ipse in re sit nullus The Words seem to make a Fine void but yet it is not void but is a discontinuance and void as to bar the right of Tail So the Statute of Gloucester cap. 3. saith Whereof no Fine is levied intends by husband and Wife for they may well levy the marriages of Women and their Estates and advancement by this are greatly favoured in our Law for 14. H. 8.7 The Wife shall recover her Land given causa matrimonii praelocuti if the Feoffee will not marry her So shall have all Free-hold after Divorce So a Wife shall have a Cui ante divortium to recover the land lost by the Husband and Wife by default before the Divorce So 11. H. 7. intends to punish women if they will recompence this favor of the Law with wrong to the disinherison of Heirs here the Wife hath an Estate in the use and by his inhereditament and the Land and Use also is the inheritance of the Husband and therefore within the words of the Statute because an Use is an Hereditament For 5. E. 4.7 possessio fratris of an Use good for the Sister also if she hath the value of 40. s. in Use 15. H. 7.13.5 E. 4 7. and by Litl 108. he shall be sworn in Assizes by the Common Law and Statute of Pernors of Profits and other Statutes have admitted an Use for an Hereditament and the Land and use also is the inheritance of the Husband for an inheritance is such an Estate as the Heir may inherit as he may here and every Fee and Tail by purchase or discent is inheritance by Littleton and Britton contains many errors As to the Case of cui in vita in 7. H. 4. before fol. 47. by those of the Chancery and also by the Register Original 232. is the one the other quam clamat esse jus hereditat c. The Feoffees here were seised to the use of the husband and every of them hath an entire Use for between Husband and Wife are no moieties and after the execution of the possession to the Use By 27. H. 8. The Parliament made the Conveyance of the Land from one to another and the Feoffees are Donors for when a Gift is made by Parliament every one by it is privy and assents to it yet the thing shall pass from him which hath most right and most Authority to give it As in 21. H. 7.32 He to whose Use and the Feoffee joyn in a Feoffment it shall be said the Feoffment of the Feoffee for they have most Authority for to give this So Tenant for Life and he in a Reversion joyns in a Feoffment it shall be adjudged the Livery of the Tenant for Life So if one seised in Fee and another which hath nothing joyns in a Feoffment it shall be said the Feoffment of him which hath right and the confirmation of the other So here it shall be said the Gift by Parliament of the Feoffees and the assent and confirmation of all others For if any other shall be adjudged the Donor the Parliament should do wrong to the Feoffees in taking the thing from them And an Act of Parliament will not prejudice any man as 19. H. 6.62 the Rector of Edington had an exemption from Tythes by the Kings Grant he afterwards agrees to the Act which granted Tythes to the King and so was one of the Grantors yet shall not take benefit by this but shall be discharged For the Common Law saith That none shall be damnified by such general Act made by the Parliament and therefore W. 2. cap. 1. Gifts upon Condition shall not take away right Pattent in London but that remains to this day with protestation to sue in the nature of a Formedon in
to the first nor cannot pass by the second Lease for that is severed for the time by 38. H. 6. fol. 38. That a thing in possession may not be parcel or appendant to a thing in Reversion as a Lease for life of a Mannor except the services of I. S. it is not parcel of the Mannor But is a signiory in gross and the Land shall be demanded at the common Law and not in the Court of the Lord by Bromely But here quere if the acceptance of the second Lease be a surrender of the first and the severance by the second Lease and then the severance by the exception is determined and so the Mannor passes entire as it was at the commencement 3. If the recitall of one part of the Statute which maketh for him which recites it be sufficent 4. If the pleading of a surrender or grant to the King by deed inrolled generally without shewing of the enrollment specially be good 5. The King is seised Jure Coronae of Lands coming to him by the dissolution of Monasteries the Tenant pleads a Lease for fifty yeers in Bar and after by his rejoynder pleads that the said Lease is made good for twenty one yeers by the Statute of 31. H. 8. this is a departure for that the state cometh after the Lease otherwise it is of a thing pleaded in affirmance of the Bar which precedes it 6. That the second Lease made by an Abbot within the yeer of the making of the Statute of 31. H. 8. to one which hath a Lease for yeers of it before without the reservation of the Ancient Rent then it shall be good for twenty one yeers only from the making of the second Lease per curiam Bromley The Lessee for yeers accepts of a new Lease within one yeer after the making of the Statute of 31. H. 8. cap. 13. Admitting this second Lease to be good by the same Statute yet it is a good surrender of the first Lease for that the second Lease was once good and shall be expounded to be viod by the Statute as to the King and after the Land comes to the Kings hands and not ab initio and so he shall not avoid the operation of the Common Law in the Surrender And by the Common Law the taking of a second Lease is a surrender of the first for both Estates may not be in one and the same person at one and the same time For if the Lessee for fourty yeers taketh a new Lease for twenty yeers upon condition that it shall be void if he doth not such an Act the condition broken avoids the second Lease But not with such relation that it shall take away the Surrender of fourty yeers because it was once executed absolutely So if a recovery is had of Land the which is afterwards reversed by error which avoids the recovery yet it doth not so avoid it that the Recoveror shall be punished by Trespas for the issues taken in the mean time two points upon the Statute here first the second Lease is not so void by the first branch of the Statute so that at the time of the second Lease made the first Lease hath his continuance but was determined and the Statute is in the copulative and then it is not determined by the making of the second Lease which then had his continuance then was not determined finished or expired according to the words of the Statute Secondly the second Lease for fifty yeers is abridged to one and twenty yeers by the second branch for contrary to equity it will destroy the former Lease and the second also And so that the same Lease exceeds not twenty one yeers express in the Statute extends to the terme abridged and not to the intire new term to make the clause conditional but to make the State abridged good for one and twenty yeers and shall be as a double repetition of the first clause only and be also a declaration of the State and expounded in the future tense that it shall not exceed twenty one yeers which is all one with the words for twenty one yeers as in a writ to the Shereist to seiz goods for the King Ita quod nullus adea manum apponat And in the Statute of Gifts conditionall Ita quod non habeat potestatem alienandi The word So is not conditional but maketh a plain declaration of the thing before by the words of the Statute sometimes expounded contrary to the text to make this agree with reason as by 25. E. 3. cap. 16. after fo 205. by the exception of non-tenure of parcel no Writ shall abate but for the quantity of non-tenure which is alledged expounded by 5. H. 7.7 where the thing demanded is severall as Acrâ—s for in a precipe of a Mannor if the Tenant pleads non-Tenure of parcel all the writ shall abate because an intire thing and there the demandant ought to have an exception in the writ because it is contrary to reason that a man shall demand the intire mannor against one which is not Tenant but of parcel of that which he endevors to recover So Praerogativa Regis is for the Tenure of him in Capite where the King shall have Primer seisen of all his other Lands yet 30. H. 8. and after fol. 204. for Soccage in Capite he shall not have because it is contrary to reason that such a small Tenure should be so greatly charged So W. 2. cap. 21. gives entry to the Heir yet he shal not have the arrerages in the life of his father old natura brevium 138. and this exposition is contrary to the text because the text is contrary to reason to give an action to the Heir for a thing in consideration of another thing not due to him So Glouc. cap. 3. for warranty with assets 21. H. 7.10 11. H. 4.21 the things taken by equity is expounded contrary to the principall Perveyance Instans est unum indivisibile in tempore quod non est tempus nec pars temporis ad quod tamen partes temporis copulantur Townsends Case A Woman Tenant in tayle taketh husband who maketh a Feoffment in 20. H. 8. to the use of himself and his wife for their lives the remainder over the wife is not temitted Adjudged 1. For that she cannot avoid the discontinuance by entry as she might after 32. H. 8. cap. 28. but hath an action viz. cui in vita given to her to recontinue the possession which she useth not but cometh to the possession by another mean she ought to take it in such order and with such appendances as the Law limits to such mean the mean which she useth here is 27. H. 8. and as the Statute appoints the possession to her she shall be adjudged in and not otherwise although she be a Fem Covert For Coverture or Infancy is not materiall here for it is not excepted in the Statute And the Statute of 27. H. 8. of
the Statute And when the Statute appoints place order and form of suits and before what person it shall not be altered As by W. 2. cap 11. an Accomptant found in Arrearages shall be imprisoned in the next Goal although it be in another County 27. H. 8. before fol. 17. So by Westminster 2. cap. 3. Second deliverance shall be sued out of the same Court where the first Replevin was granted and not elsewhere So 31. E. 3. c. 12. Error in the Exchequer shall be corrected before the Chancellor and Treasurer and therefore not before others So an Affirmative because general implies a Negative exclusively so all Actions shall be sâ—ed in Wales and not elsewhere is implied here as by W. 2. cap. 4. he shall vouch in Quo die deforceat as if he were Tenant and included and not otherwise and therefore shall not vouch in scire facias where it is the first Writ because he cannot vouch there before fo 113 So the issue in Tail shall not be remitted because he hath the use as a purchaser by 27. H. 8. for the Statute of 27. executes the possession in the same manner as he had the use which implies and not in any other Mannors before fol. 114. So by 31. H. 8. Leases made by Abbots after this Stat. adjudged void when Abbies came after to the King by dissolution because the Statute saith That the King shall have it as it was then which implies a Negative and therefore the King shall not have them now in Reversion by making of such Leases or before he hath them in possession On the part of the Plaintiff it was argued to the contrary And they agreed to the cases of voucher in a Quod ei deforceat of the Execution of the use and of the committing of an accomptant to the next Gaol for where an Act maketh a new thing Affirmative and gives to them Authority to do that which they could not before there they shall be in the order limited by the Statute and not otherwise and at the Common Law there was not any voucher by the demandant nor any coming to the land by the use nor any power given to Auditors to commit an Accomptant to prison and therefore there that which is limited by such Stat. ought to be pursued accordingly but where the Action which was before at the Common Law is given by any Statute in any case where it did not lie before there this Action is suable in all Courts therefore used by the Common Law before if there are not express words to restrain it for where one Act affirms a former before there the last Affirmative destroies not the first nor takes any thing from the Jurisdiction of the first but declares That they have power So 34. and 35. H. 8. hereby the Affirmative takes not away the Jurisdiction of other Courts given to them by 27. H. 8. for uniting Wales and England Sanders against Freeman THe Conusee of a Fine brings a Quidjuris clamat against Husband and Wife M. 3. and 4. Eliz. in the C. P. Quid juris clamat Tenants for life in the right of the Wife and pleads that they were seized in Tail in the right of the Wife and shew how and thereupon are at issue the Jury finds a private Verdict for the Defendant and after in open Court contradicts it and found for the Plaintiff for they were charged openly in Court and ought to give their Verdict there openly and the other was but matter of courtesie to ease the Jurors and not of necessity for the Plaintiff could not have been nonsuited upon it otherwise upon a verdict given in Court and by this Plea the estate for life was at the will of the Plaintiff A Verdict secretly given to the Justice out of Court is not a Verdict because taken of courtesie when Jurors agree for their ease until aptly pronounced in Court for at every verdict the Plaintiff is demandable and then may be nonsuited but there he is not and therefore the last open Verdict shall stand Also the Inquest may change their Verdict given in Court if mistaken or not plain in Law or for other reasonable cause immediatly perceived as to find not guilty and immediatly guilty because they may be mistaken this was received in the Kings Bench. So 4 H. 4.2 In Conspiracie acquit one and found another guilty because it was contrary in it self they may find both guilty and good Dutchie of Lancaster HENRY 8. 4. Eliz at Serj. Innâ— makes a Lease for one and twentie years under the great Seal of the Dutchie and dyeth after E. 6. being within age maketh a new Lease to a stranger under the same Seal for 21. years after the Determination Surrender c. of the first Lease and dies and by all the Justices Queen Elizabeth could not avoid this second Lease for the nonage of the King E 6. howbeit he was seized of the Dutchie in his natural body because he hath the imbecillity of infancie yet this is invested and adorned with the dignity of the body politique of the King which is utterly void of such imperfections A Lease by the King within age of Dutchie land is good although he was seized of the Dutchie in his natural body which hath the imbecillity of infancy because he hath the natural body invested and adorned with the estate and dignity Royal by conjunction of the body politique to it which is utterly void of such imperfections and so when both bodies remain in one person all the bodies shall have the properties qualities and degrees of the body politique which is the most worthy and no Act of the King made as King shall be defeasable by any disability in his body natural and therefore the letters pattents of the King within age good So a gift of the King by Thorp 36. ass pl. 54. So 6. E. 3.291 the King shall have right of seisen of his ancestor within age So the King hath by purchase or discent in capacity of his natural body when he is King or before that he was King and being given this within age good and shall pass by the Letters Pattents onely and without Livery because he may not make Livery in his natural body disjoined from the politike body which are in one and the same body and indivisible and it is contrary to the dignity Royal for a King to make livery in proper person and Livery is matter in fact and the King must have his Acts recorded So the King need not demand rent reserved upon his land by a common ancestor but shall not enter if the Condition be broken until it be found by Office if he purchases and sels before he is King and within age if King also then otherwise it is yet after he is King he shall avoid it by his nonage before but shall not enter without Office because his person which had right of entry before hath now the estate Royall united which
which ought to pay it 13. E. 4.6 The Title of the King appeareth yet he is not party the Court of Office shall adjudge for him Stamford cap. 29. fol. 96. Fitzh nat br 38. E. 31. 6. H. 7.12 and 11. H. 4.71 by customes the custom of London to retain a pledge cujuscunque fuerit until he pays binds not the King 35. H. 6.35 nonsale in market overt 35. H. 6.28 and Doctor and Student 40. nor Wreck Waise nor Stray binds not the King 35. H. 6.26 27. Custom that all distresses taken within his Mannor shall be impounded there binds not the King 21. E. 3 4. by Statutes which binds not the King where he is not named yet he shall take advantage of them As of the Stat of Waste of 9. R. 2. c. 3. of Error and attaint by him in reversion upon a recovery against Tenant for life And of W. 2. c. 7. fol. 140. If the King as Heir to his mother brings asur cui in vita the Plea shall not be delayed by the Nonage of the Heir the King not named is not restrained by Magna Charta cap. 10. upon which the Ne injuste vexes is founded for to avoid incroachment That if the King incroach more then he ought he hath no other remedy then by Petition The King bringeth a Quare impedit in the Common Pleas good notwithstanding Magna Charta quod communia placita c. 31. E. 3.18 E. 3.22 before fol. 240. Plenarty no Plea against the King 43. E. 3.14 Non obstante W. 2. cap. 5.32 H. 8. cap. 2. Of Limitations binds not the King The King may not suffer a Common Recovery for to Dock the Tail as a common person may because no precipe or Covenant lieth against him 12. H 7.12 by Constable So the King shall be in a worse condition then a subject or common person to bar the issue Anthony Brown Justice The name of King drowns the Sir-name of the King and includes it and his proper name also and this word of substance by it self may not be omitted in purchases Pattents or Writs Land given to Henry the seventh omitting King giveth nothing to him omitting his name of Baptism So a gift by him by these words in the Pattent Rex concessit That the name Politick of the King includes his natural name and when this name is conjoyned to his natural person it altereth the quality and degree of the person natural in the estimation of the Law So if that he be within age he shall be adjudged of full age and his attainder frustrate when he is King that the greater removes the Imperfection of the Lesser before fol. 138. the body politick hath the preheminence of the natural body as Land given to the King by the name of Baptism and of King also as to Henry the King and to his Heirs this shall go in succession as the Crown and if he dieth without issue the Heir of the part of his mother which hath the Crown shall have the Land also because this name King being the greater shall have the greater preheminence in the purchase and shall draw the land with him So that his brother of the half bloud being King shall have it yet here the King shall take in such body and in such estate and condition as the Donor limits and not otherwise So if a Gift had been made before the Statute to the King and the Heirs of his Body he had taken Fee Conditional as another Common person That if he dies without issue the Donor should enter without Office And if the King before the Stat. giveth to one and his Heirs of his body there the King shall not have the Reversion more then a Common person should have and there his Donee might alien after issue because the person of the King shall not rule the estate of the land but on the contrary for to make Remitter right and possession ought to discend to one person simul and semel 19. H. 6.59.58 and 45. before the Statute after Issue the Donee might do all acts of a full Fee because then he had full Fee and inheritance and not before 5 6 7 and 8. E. 3. And the words in the Statute hath given prius facia non extenditur intends not the Donees made by the Donors before the Statute but of alienations made by the Donees before the Statute and lawfully and after issue as a Lease for life and release of Tenant in Tail before the Statute good and barred the issue in Formedon after the Statute because it was not voidable neither before nor after the Act if it was according to the power that the Common Law permitted to them 44. E. 3. But the Statute extends as to Alienations after the Statute where the Gift was before So as to the Alienation before the Statute if it were not lawfull as a woman Tenant in Tail taketh Husband having issue they alien before the Statute the issue shall have a Formedon after the Statute that is a discontinuance to the wife because Covert and when she dies a right discends to the issue but if they have aliened by Fine it is good and bars the issue because there it is duly made in respect that she is examined 4. E. 2.12 H. 4.7 before the Statute the King might not Alien before issue had as a Common person might not because the King could not do wrong and his Prerogative could not alter his estate yet the person of the King might alter the course of the thing as purchase of the King shall discend to the eldest daughter onely but if land discend to the King another or Gavel kind to him and his brother the King shall have but the Moity but this Moity shall discend to his eldest Son onely because the quality of the person may alter the discent not the estate be it Fee or Tail So that the estate shall be in the King as in another before fol. 234. and before issue had the Donee could not alien after issue he might and this mischief and other Acts of the Donee the Common Law permitted to Bar issues and the Donor until remedied by the Statute So the Common Law permits other wrongs as Lessee to make waste So if one Joynt-Tenant takes all the profits of the land the other is without remedy at the Common Law Doctor and Student fol. 32. So if the King kill a man So disinheriting of another as here post prolem is a wrong suffered by the Common Law which otherwise the issue should have had and if the issue had not issue then the Donor before the Statute the Donor had not a Reversion yet the land reverted to him as land escheated to the Lord neither had he a Reversion after the Statute of W. 2. c. 1. Yet no word in the Act divides the Statute but the Construction of the Statute ex consequenti divides the estate for to execute the will of the Donor by the intent of
copulative for to make words to stand with reason and with the intent of the parties as the Obligee shall pay 10. l. if he infeoff not him or his Heirs when he cometh to I. intends yet words disjunctive in sense That he shall infeoff him if he be living and if dead then his Heirs because he cannot have an Heir during his life so here a Covenant to make a Lease at a time to come to him and his Assignes Copulatively shall be taken disjunctively viz. to him if he be alive and to his Assignes if he be dead So 4. Mar. before 171. A. and B. Grants a Rent Charge of 20. s. out of all lands which they both have the Grantee shall have several 20. s. out of both their lands and yet the Grant was out of the lands which were to A. and B. 19. H 6.3 I release all actions which I have against A. and B. if he hath any actions against either of them they are gone So Arbitrators 2. R. 3.18 may make Arbitrement of actions joynt and several where one and two others submit themselves to their arbitrement because it literally couples them yet in sense goes to them severally And so in the Common case in Indenture of bargain and sale which Covenants to make a sure estate or deliver evidences to the Bargainee and his heirs within two moneths and he dies before he ought to make the estate to his Heirs because impossible to be performed literally viz. joyntly for in his life he cannot have Heirs that thing which another doth by my authority is my act As if I demise That I. S. shall sell my land or authorize my Steward to demise it or my Baily to sell my sheep which doth it so it is my alienation demise and sale by him So the second Executor shall be immediate Executor and in such degree to the first Testator as the first executor was as chosen by the first executor by force of the Authority given to him by the first Testator which intends the same or otherwise all contracts would be destroyed by the Common Law in a short time viz. after the death of the first executor because administrators could not have actions given to the intestate untill 31. E. 3. cap. 11. proved by 10. E. 3.2 the executor of an executor because executors have not those actions by the Common Law but by Statute and because by equity they were not to be extended to an executor of an executor but the action of Debt was put in the Act in 25. E. 3. cap. 5. not of necessity because the Law gave it to an executor of an executor before but for to take away the doubt that some had of it and so an executor of an executor may have all actions that the Common Law gives to the first executor and so may have actions of Covenant and if not they should have it by equity of the Statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 5. Admitting that the word Assignee was void or omitted out of the Covenant yet this Lease here shall be made to the executor for that the intent which is the chief thing to be considered in every agreement was such which shall be performed so near as may be or the words shall not be effectual and the chief effect of the agreement was the estate which should be made not the person to whom but if the Tenant bind himself and Covenant to do corporall service to the Lord he cannot to the Heir or executor because it must be done to the body of the Lord and if I perish the thing also perisheth The intent performed and not the words good as in the cases of Litl fol. 82. That the Feoffee shall re-infeoff the Feoffor and his Wife and the Heirs of their two bodies before fol. 6. And it is not requisite alwaies that in agreements every thing ought to be performed according to the words for if the Mortgagee accept of another thing in another place good Litl f. 79. So if the Obligee cometh not to the place at the day appointed to receive his summ he hath not lost it 7. E. 4.4 but 19. H. 8 12 if the Obligee sue for the penalty the Obligor ought to shew that he was ready at the day and place and say that he is yet ready So payment of a lesser summ at another place Perk. fol. 145. or before the day 10 H. 7.14 good So Litl fo 77. upon a Mortgage the Heir or Executor of the Feoffer shall pay at a day certain and Litl fol. 76. the Feoffee of the Feoffee pays at the day good because he hath interest in the Land So 17. E. 3. ass pl. 2. the Disseisor Grants by Indenture That if the Disseisee paies unto him 10. l. such a day that one release which the Disseisee hath made to him shall be void and before the day the Disseisor makes a Feoffment and at the day 10. l. was paid to the Feoffee Words performed and not the intent as it may be in some cases yet the agreement is not performed as 21. H 6.10 before fol. 23. one binds himself that his Feoffees of the mannor of D. shall Grant out of it 40. s. annual Rent to the Plaintiff he hath 3. Feoffees and two Grants it is nought because he intended that all should do it for there but two parts of the Mannor are charged So 3. H. 7.4 one bindes himself to infeoff me of the Mannor of Dale he infeoffs an other of parcel and afterwards me of the Mannor he hath performed the words but not the intent which was That I shall have all the Mannor as then it was So before fol. 21. and 23. si vellet inhabitare residens c. during the Term intends all the Term. So 10. E. 4.16 the words of a verdict true yet the verdict false because he brought Annuity as Abbot and prescribe so without naming of him parson where he had the annuity in right of his Parsonage as Parson Impersonee the new Lease here shall be in the Executor of the Executor to the use of the first Testator because the Title of Covenant cometh to him derived from the first Testator and that which is done in perfermance of the Covenant ought to be in him in such degree as the Covenant was in him So 11. H. 6.11 An Executor assignes Auditors to one which was an Accomptant to the Testator and he is found in arrearages the Executor shall have Debt in the Detinet onely because the Debt shall be in him as Executor and hath a respect to the foundation So 32 H. 8. and Doctor and Student 92. One hath a Villain for years as an executor the Villain purchaseth hands the executor enters it shall be to the use of the Testator and assets in his hands because the Villain which was the cause of it was to such use So here the Covenant which was the cause of the Lease cometh to the executors in right of the
Extinguishment Also the Statute of 1. R. 3. extends to cestui que use in possession and not in Remainder or Reversion where they are derived out of one entire estate created by Feoffment for although that the uses are several yet the estate is entire which shall not be divided but he may make a Lease for years to commence after the particular estate determined which is Executory and divides not the estate but where the estate and uses also are several as a Lease for life to the use of one for life and the Reversion granted to another for life to the use of anther for life c. There he in Reversion may grant the Reversion by the Statute of 1. R. 3. for that it is in possession by reason of the severaltie of Estates Cestui que use by the Common Law cannot meddle with the Land for if he doth the Feoffee may punish him in Trespass And if the Feoffee will not permit Cestui que use for to receive the profits he hath no remedy but in the Court of Conscience for the land was so fully to the Feoffee by the Common Law as if no use had been of it And by the Statute of 1. R. 3. cap. 5. Cestui que use in possession onely may meddle with the Land for to make Feoffment Lease c. and the Feoffee is onely seized of the whole Fee to the use of Tenant for life or in Tail during his life or the estate Tail 4. H. 7.18 And the Feoffment of Cestui que use or in Tail or for life is warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. and pass the Fee until a Re-entry both by the letter and intent of the Statute for if a woman Covert was Cestui que use the husband might make a Feoffment and good during Coverture by the intent of the Law and the Statute which giveth to the husband during Coverture direction of the things of his wife and yet the claim of the Feoffees were not onely to his use but to the use of him and his wife 6. H. 7.3 So two joynt Cestui que uses in Fee the one maketh a Feoffment of the moity of the Land and good and binds the Feoffees yet were not onely seized to the use of him but by the intent of the Statute hath a moity of the Use presently and may give or Lease the moity of the Land where the estates are several and uses also every part granted by the Statute or several uses issuing out of one estate the several possessions of several uses may not divide the estate because there entire yet there Cestui que use in Remainder in Fee may make a Lease for years to Commence when his use shall be executed because then the lessor shall have interest in the possession and the Franck Tenement of the Feoffees shal not be taken away nor their estate will be divided but an estate for life or greater he in Remainder cannot make without the dividing of the estate or taking away of the Free-hold because it passeth presently and is not executory as a Lease for years is if the Feoffees to use makes a Feoffment upon Consideration or not to one which hath notice of the first use otherwise if Cestui que use maketh a Feoffment to such a person upon Consideration with notice or without Consideration and notice there all the first estate out of which all the uses do rise is taken from the Feoffees and a new estate is made by authority of the Statute the which new estate shall be to uses newly expressed or intended and not to the first use but by this all the ancient uses are discontinued the reason seemeth to be before that one use cannot be raised out of another The release of Cestui que use to the Disseisor of his Feoffees good and bars them of entry 14. H. 8.7 and 27. H. 8.29 a Disseisor infeoffs Cestui que use which infeoffs a stranger by this the right of the first feoffees is gone although that no use was in Cestui que use at the time of the Feoffment as if Cestui que use had released to the Disseisor But Plowden saith That the greater doubt will be here if the estate Tail was here determined if the first Feoffee might enter because the right of the use in fee was extinguished by the Feoffment of him in Remainder But here for that the particular estate in use continues which may not be defeated by him in Remainder this is good without doubt by some the entry of the first Feoffee shall gain the Fee-simple by the discharge of the use in Fee to himself for that it was extinct in the possession of the last Feoffee as of a rent which he in remainder had in the land before his feoffment this shall be extinguished in the Land by his Feoffment so of the use and by others the entry of the first Feoffee shall revive the use in Fee-simple to him in Remainder which was the Feoffor for that they could not have this at the time of the Feoffment made because not in esse but was discontinued at this time by Cestui que use in possession in Tail and by Plowden and Bromley he shall revive the use in Fee to the last Feoffee for that this passeth to him by the Livery and the first Feoffee hath nothing in the Land to his own use but onely to the use of the Feoffor And it was not his intent that the first Feoffee should have it to his own use but that the second Feoffee should have it and so by his re-entry he shall revive the use to the last Feoffee by the course of the Common Law for that the last feoffment was by the Common Law and not Warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. for the cause aforesaid but this point was left at large and if before R. 3. Cestui a que use disseises the Feoffees and infeoff others upon which the first Feoffees to use enter they shall be seised to the use of the last Feoffees because Cestui que use had given his interest to them and his intent appeareth that they shall have it and the first Feoffees shall not hold to their own use because it is a Collaterall thing annexed to the person touching the Land and not as a Rent issuing out of it And use is but confidence that the Feoffees to use shal do for the Feoffor as he would do if himself was seized and so it is a difference between a use and a Rent which Rent is only by reason of the Land but use also is annexed to the person Stowell against Zouch DIsseissor Levies a Fine with Proclamations the Disseissee dies after three years H. 11. El. in the common Pleas Entry sur Disseiseâ— and within the five years his Heir being within age the five years incur after the Heir commeth of full age and within one year after his full age enters And adjudged that his Entry
Land to him for fifty foure yeares rendring Rent hath issue and dyes before any Proclamation made and after the Proclamations passe and after the Husband and Wife dyes Adjudged that the Lease is good against the issue of N. in tayle by reason of the Rent otherwise it were if the Rent had not been reserved First The Lease had not been voyd against N. T. the Father himselfe if he had survived the Husband and Wife if it were by words notwithstanding it be a present contract because it depends upon an estate for life which is uncertaine when it shall determine otherwise it is if the first had been a Lease for yeares which containe certainty there the second Lease shall be voyd for the first terme except that it be by Deed poll with Attournment in which case it shall enure by way of a grant of the Reversion if the party will use it so or by Indenture or Fine which are matters of Estoppell Secondly The Lease is but voidable against the issue because of the Rent which is a recompence otherwise it is of a charge for it shall be voyd by the Remitter and inasmuch as this contingent Lease is not avoided but continues during the Proclamations the Statute of 32. H. 8. maketh this a barr against the issue during the terme Thirdly A Lease by word made by the Husband and Wife is the Lease of the Husband onely and not of the Wife possession without title is sufficient to make an Advowry for dammage feasant protection pleaded for part and Inter alia good by the Rule of the Court A Fine pleaded by way De finalie Concordia facta fuil and not that he levied a Fine and also pleaded that it was acknowledged in the Kings Court without saying in the Common pleas is good and 22. H. 6.13 A Fine is a Record although it be not ingrossed and shall be executed Fourthly How and in what degree this Lease passe at the beginning by the Fine The estate of N. not altered by the Fine of a stranger which had not any right or Estate in the Land but is Estopped for his life to say otherwise but that he receives fee simple by the Fine Leases by word by Deed Poll by Indenture are to be considered how they shall enure As if a Lease be made by words without Deed of Lands by one that hath see simple for one and twenty years to commence presently rendring a rent and after the same day maketh a new Lease by Paroll to another for the same terme or for a lessor terme the second Lease is void although that the first Lessee surrenders or forfeits because at the time of the first Lease he hath not but a Reversion and no interest in him to contract for the possession And he that will by contract make another possessor of the thing ought to be proprietor of the same himself As if one sells a Horse upon condition that the Vendee shall pay him forty shillings at Easter and after he sells the Horse to a stranger and after the first Vendee payes not the forty shillings at Easter and the Vendor reseiseth the Horse the second Vendee shall not have the Horse because the Vendor had him not at the time of the sale the Condition only inables him not to contract for the property and possession which he then had not but if the Lessee for one and twenty years be and the Lessor the same day grant the Reversion by Deed for twenty one years to commence presently it is good with Attournment and he shall have the Reversion during the first Lease and the Rent as incident thereunto because it is another thing then the possession So a Lease by word for years to commence after the first year is good because it is of another thing then the first Lessee had because the second Lessee is to have the possession after the first possession and interest expired A man leases for one and twenty years in possession and presently maks a Lease of it for one and thirty years by word this is good for the last ten years and Executory for it for a Lease for years is Executory and severall for every yeare and day and is as to execution as severall contracts And therefore such contract may be good in part and void in part So if he Leases for 21. years to commence 10. years after and he maketh a Lease for 31. years to commence presently it is good for the first 10. years and void for the last 21. years for that he had contracted before and was certain although that the first Lease were forfeited or surrendred otherwise it is if the first Lease had bin incertain as a Lease for life there the second Lease had bin good after the Tenants life not during his life although he surrendred or forfeited unlesse it had bin by Fine or Indenture because Estoppels if the second Lease for the same years be by Deed Poll there the reversion with the rent pass by Attornment by the demise of the land by the name of Land if the possession cannot as a Reversion upon an Estate for life passeth by bargaine and sale of the land by Deed inrolled and the Grantee may use his Deed as he pleaseth and therefore may use it as a Grant of a Reversion with attornment otherwise it is if it be by word because the Reversion for years cannot be granted by word But if Lessee for years will use a Leas Poll as a present Leas where he hath not attornment the Leas is void although the first surrendred or forfeited as it is if it were by word because a contract by Deed Poll passeth not that which another then injoyes But if the second Lease were by Fine or Indenture and the first surrendred or forfeited it is good for if one leases land to me which he hath not at the time by Fine or Indenture and after purchase it or it desends to him I may enter and occupy by Estoppell and I shall be compelled by Estoppell to pay the Rent because every one is concluded to say but that the land passeth in possession for fourty five yeares by Estoppell and shall be good in estate to have the other yeares because they are not incurred in the life time of the Tenants for life for if the Lease for fourtie five yeares had been by word and the particular Tenant for life had died the Lessee should have it against the Lessor If the estate given by the Fine is defeated the Fine shall be void although the Proclamations passe after for the Fine is the Principall and the Proclamations but accessary to the Fine as Tenants in taile disseised levies a Fine to the disseisor Sur conusans de droit or sur release and dies there the issue if he enters before all the Proclamations are passed is remitted and is not harred for that 32. H. 8. which saith that Fines after Proclamations bars tayle intends of Fines remaining
18. E. 3. 15. a gift to one and his first begotten Son and he hath no Son then but afterwards he hath is a good Remainder to his Son So 39. Assise Pla. 20. a gift to Husband and Wife and to one Heir of his body is a good Remainder yet no Heir to the gift if he be in being when the Possession in Law is cast upon him but a Remainder limited upon contrariety is not good fol. 24. according but the other cause that Litl assigns for that it vests not at the time of the Livery is no cause as is proved by the cases aforesaid because after the Alienation and gift it may not remain to another And the other cause that Litl alleadgeth is because it vests not at the time of Livery which is no cause So a gift to A. and his Heirs so long as B. shall have heirs of his body Remainder to C. in Fee is void for the contrariety because a Remainder cannot depend upon a Fee determinable So a Lease for life to A. upon Condition That if B. pay 20. l. to the Lessor that then immediately it shall remain to B. is void for the contrariety because A. ought to have it during his life But if it were to remain after the death of A. to B. then it were good because no contrariety there and here if W. dies living the Husband and Wife that then it shall remain to to the Defendant is not intendable immediately in their lives but that it should remain as it ought to remain viz. after their deaths and so there is no contrariety and therefore good As to the Condition which is subsequent if he would dwell there c. because it hath two intendments the one that he should inhabite there all the Term and the other to some time during his life shall be taken strictly and the more strongly against the Lessor viz. That he inhabites there at some times during his life which sufficeth as the Feoffee upon Condition for to pay 10. l. to the Feoffor and no time is limited he hath during his life So to serve him in such an Office and saith not how long he hath during his life Harris Serjeant to the same purpose And as to the Exceptions he said That a Condition subsequent and which goeth in the Defeasance of the Estate as here he that claims the Estate shall not shew it but the other which will defeat the Estate But where the Condition precedes the state he shall shew who shall have it because enabled thereunto as if I grant a Rent Charge upon Condition That he shall do such an Act there the Grantee shall avow for the rent without shewing the thing done because it is a condition subsequent and defeats his Estate But if I grant That if he doth such a thing that then he shall have the rent he shall not avow without performance shewed because he is enabled by this to the rent 14. H. 8. Wheeler Grants his Term to one upon Condition That he shall obtain the good will of the Lessor and then shall have it he shall not have it until he hath shewed the performance of the Condition and he affirms the remainder upon Condition to be good Hales Justice If he would c. is a Condition and that the Plea is insufficient because the Defendant hath not averred his continual residence after the Remainder happened for during the Term shall be intended all the Terms as it shall be in reservation of rent or Covenant to repair a house during the Term 27. H. 8. 19. by Audley so the Feoffees shall be intended all the Feoffees and if he hath a reasonable excuse he ought to shew it fo 272. viz. That he was 200. miles distant at the time of the Survivor of the Husband and Wife and entred so soon as he had notice which he shall shew in certain that the Justice may trie it as 22. E. 4. 27. Tenant for Life Leases for years and dies The Lessor bringeth Trespass against the Lessee who saith That in as short time as he could after that he had notice of the death of the Tenant for Life he chased his beasts forth of the land and said also that the Trespass was between the death of the Tenant for Life and the chasing out of the beasts and held no plea for by the death of Tenant for Life the Lease for years was determined and no man bound to give him notice and there it is holden that he ought to say That such a day he chased out the beasts and might shew that the Lessor died in another County and so he could not have so soon notice and this shall be tried by the Justice if the avoidance was in reasonable time So in this case the day of his Entry for the knowledge of the Jurors ought to be set forth common intent is that which hath more vehement presumption and intendment then any other intent hath as 3. H. 6. 3. before 26. fully administred all goods which were the Testators the day of his death good yet might have goods were not the Testators which are assets after the Debts paid but the most common intendment is That he had no other goods except those which were the Testators but intendment indifferent the more strong intendment the one way or the other and therefore ought to be pleaded in Bar as 13. H. 8. 15. by Willoughby the life of cestui que vie is pleaded in a Lease for another life which is indifferent if he be alive or not So if he pleads a release made after the Obligation it is not good if he shews it not by express words that it was delivered after it shall be intended that it was delivered when it bears Date But on the other part it shall be intended also That the other would not bring an Action if it were delivered after and therefore shall be shewed which intendment stands indifferent so here A Demurrer all times after the Remainder happens or not is incertain and therefore because he hath not shewed this the Plea is nought As to the matter in Law it seemeth to him that the remainder is good for a man may pass the thing in question when where and how he will if it be not against Law nor repugnant as here the limitation if the remainder is not against Law for the remainder need not pass forth of the Lessor so 29. for upon the Agreement first had by Act made afterwards Franck-Tenement or remainder may be transferred and devested from one vested in another as a Lease for life remainder for life upon condition That it shall be void if he doth not such an act the remainder before the Condition broken is in him when broken it commeth to the Lessor So a rent or Reversion passeth by Attornment not by the Grant presently So 1 H. 7.31 by Brian a remainder to the K. when the Deed is inrolled then it shall pass and relate