after what manner Corporally or Spiritually his Flesh is to be eaten and his Blood drunk And it is a vain pretence of Humility that leads Men to swallow down the most gross Absurdities under a pretence of believing But in the mean time the Papists sin most inexcusably 1st In their wilful understanding of our Saviour as the Capernaits did to speak of his Material Flesh and Blood and of a Bodily manner of eating and drinking thereof 2dly In their violent defending and maintaining of this that the Capernaits denied and condemned We have done with the third thing that was proposed namely That our Saviour in this Sermon is not treating of the Sacrament c. Fourthly We shall add a word of the fourth That our Saviour is here treating of the spiritual eating and drinking of his Body and Blood extra Sacramentum without the Sacrament And this will be evident if we consider that the Manducation here spoken of is an eating 1. That was before the Sacrament was instituted and true Believers did eat his Flesh and drink his Blood when there was no Eucharist to eat and drink them in 2. That is to everlasting Life unto all that so eat Vers 54. 3. That is absolutely necessary to Life and Salvation Vers 53. 4. That unites the Soul unto Christ and Christ unto the Soul Vers 56. These have been brought before to prove that he is not speaking of bodily eating and would come in again here to confirm this 5. The Flesh of Christ is eaten only as it is Meat Now it is not Meat for our Body and Corporal Nourishment but Meat of our Souls and Spiritual Nourishment and only eaten of the Soul spiritually by Faith. In short such as our Hunger is that makes us desire this Meat such as this Meat is that we desire and such as the Life is that is maintained by it such also is our eating of it But the Hunger that makes us desire this Meat is spiritual and the Meat we feed on here is spiritual and the Life that is nourished by it is spiritual and therefore our eating is only spiritual not corporal 6. Our Saviour doth put the matter out of question by expounding his meaning to them and declaring that this eating stands in believing Thus what he calls eating Hic edere Christum est credere in eum atque applicare eum magis magisque ad animos nostros Audita devorandus est intellectu ruminandus fide digerendus Tertul. de Resur Carnis Haec quoties agimus non dentes ad mordendum acuimus sed fide sincerè panem sanctum frangimus partimur Cyprian that he plainly expounds to be nothing else but believing and useth without difference the terms of Eating Coming Believing as synonimous or Words of the same Signification V. 35. here he useth Coming for Eating Believing for Drinking And the proper and natural Consequents of these words I am the Bread of Life are He that eateth me shall never hunger and he that drinketh me shall never thirst But he saith He that cometh to me shall never hunger and he that believeth on me shall never thirst to teach us that he speaks of an eating and drinking which is by Faith. So Vers 47 48. he shews to eat in this Mystery is nothing else but to believe Now I have done with this Argument and from what is said I hope it may be plain and evident to us that our Saviour in this Sermon is not treating of the Sacrament and a sacramental eating and drinking of his Flesh and Blood but of a spiritual eating and drinking without the Sacrament and so here can be no colour of a Foundation for Transubstantiation Yet before I leave this I must add a word to prevent the mistaking of my meaning in what is here said as if I had denied that Believers in the participation of the Sacrament do spiritually eat and drink the Body and Blood of Christ This I have not said but that which I have asserted is That our Saviour in this Chapter is not treating of the Sacrament nor of eating and drinking his Flesh and Blood in the Sacrament Yet tho he doth not here speak of it Believers in the due use of the Sacrament do that which he here speaks of i. e. really and truly eat his Flesh and drink his Blood in the Sense here intended i. e. spiritually by Faith. There is a threefold eating as hath been hinted 1. Sacramentally only 2. Spiritually only Corpus Christi accipitur non Sacramentaliter tantum quod solum Symbolum sed simul spiritualiter quoad rem significatam 3. Sacramentally and Spiritually together And thus the Sacramental eating and drinking of the sacred Symbols when performed in a due manner by true Believers is ever accompanied with this spiritual eating And so tho in this whole Sermon he treats not of the Sacrament yet whatsoever he speaks in it of eating and drinking c. may be accommodated and applied to the Sacrament wherein I say this that our Lord presseth on the Jews is performed by all true Christians and without which the Sacrament is but an empty Ceremony Thirdly They argue from the words of our Saviour Mat. 19.26 With Men this is impossible but with God all things are possible From hence they say altho Transubstantiation be hard for Human Reason to understand yet it is not hard for Divine Omnipotence to effect And Christ made the Bread his Body by the same Omnipotent Power whereby the World was made and the Word was incarnate and made Flesh in the Womb of the Virgin. Thus they argue from the Divine Omnipotence and oppose Omnipotence to all the Absurdities Contradictions and Impossibilities that Transubstantiation is clogged with and exclaim against us as setting our natural Reason in opposition to the Omnipotence of Jesus Christ and even denying his Omnipotence because we deny their Transubstantiation This is their last Argument from the Scripture The Argument wherewith they do most delude simple People and draw them into a blind Belief of Transubstantiation and consequently to the Belief and Practice of all the Abominations and abominable Idolatries that are daily practised in the Mass Now in Answer to it I say 1st That we do not deny or once doubt of Christ's Omnipotence but constantly believe and openly profess according to the Scripture that Whatsoever the Lord pleased that did he in Heaven and in Earth Psal 135.6 Eph. 3.20 in the Seas and all deep places And that he is able to do exceeding abundantly above that we ask or think But then 2dly A potentia ad actum seu a posse ad esse non valet consequentia We deny that it is warrantable to argue from the Power of Christ to the Act or being of a thing without sufficient Indications Significations and Evidences of his Will to perform such an Act or effect such a thing Or that because he can by his absolute Power do such
and whereof he that eateth shall live for ever If it be said this cannot be his Meaning for he delivered this Sermon before his Passion yet speaks of an eating and drinking that was a present Duty so that he could not have this Meaning I say it is true Passiō Christi profuit antequam fuit Beneficia Christi valent tam antrorsum quam retrorsum Ex eo tempore valet ad servandum genus humanum ex quo in Adam est vitiatum Aug. both that Christ spake this before his Passion and the eating he speaks of was a present Duty But what then distinguish between the Time of his Death and the Merit of his Death and the Difficulty is solved He is the Lamb slain from the Foundation of the World. Rev. 13.8 i. e. In regard of the Merit Fruits and Efficacy of his Death and the Faith of Believers Not only before his Passion but before his Incarnation the Fathers did all eat the same Spiritual Meat and did all drink the same Spiritual Drink For they drank of that Spiritual Rock that followed them And that Rock was Christ 1. Cor. 10.3 4. Abraham saw his Day Joh. 8.56 And the Apostle giveth this Account of him Jesus Christ the same yesterday to day and for ever Heb. 13.8 3. In what Respect he here calls them by the Names of Bread Meat and Drink 1. Not in regard of their Nature and Substance As if the very Flesh and Blood of Christ were according to the bare sound of the Words very Meat and Drink such as our Corporeal Food is But 2. In regard of their Effect the saving Benefits of his Flesh and Blood or Passion nourish the Souls of the Faithful and preserve them unto Eternal Life even as Corporal Meat that we eat doth minister Aliment to our Bodies and preserve our Natural Lives And thus as it is the Property of Meat and Drink to maintain the Lives of them that eat and drink thereof and as whatsoever being eaten and drunk doth maintain Life is therefore called Meat and drink So it is the proper Nature of the Fruits and Effects of his Body and Blood to nourish the Souls of them that partake thereof to Eternal Life And therefore for their performing that to Souls which Meat and Drink do to Bodies he calls them by the Names of Meat and Drink 4. What kind of eating and drinking this is that he speaks of Or what our Saviour means by eating of his Flesh and drinking of his Blood What this Manducation of this Spiritual Meat is Per manducationem nihil aliud intelligit quam actum fidei qui consistit in apprehensione applicatione beneficiorum Christi And this is only Spiritual eating by Faith extra Sacramentum without the use of the Sacramental Signs The Romanists confess that he speaks of this kind of eating in this Chapter from the 32d to the 50th verse but then from ver 50. to 59. of eating Orally and Corporally But we say he speaketh only of Spiritual Manducation in this Chapter which doth consist in a partataking by Faith of the Merit and Virtue of his Death the Fruits and Effects of his Passion for us And thus a true Believer eats the Flesh and drinks the Blood of Christ Spiritually when he 1. Believes that Christ's Body was Crucified and his Blood shed for him for the Remission of Sins And 2. Believeth that by this Passion Jesus Christ hath obtained Remission of Sins and Eternal Life for them that do unfeignedly believe in him And when 3. By this true and lively Faith he doth embrace and close with Jesus Christ apply him to himself and from him thus received or manducated receiveth a daily Confirmation and Increase of Spiritual Life and Growth Thus then 1. The Meat our Lord speaketh of is Spiritual Meat 2. This Spiritual Meat is the saving Good prepared for us by the Body and Blood of Christ crucified for us 3. He calls these Fruits of his Passion his Body and Blood because they are obtained by and rise out of his Flesh and Blood sacrificed on the Cross 4. This eating of his Flesh and drinking of his Blood which he calls by the Names of Bread Meat and Drink is a Spiritual manducating or eating by Faith. This is our Saviour's Sense which is embraced by the true Protestants or Calvinists as Bellarmine calls them Secondly The Popish Sense of this Sermon This is hinted before And in short 1. They confess that the kind of Meat he speaketh of is Spiritual Meat But then they affirm 1. That this Meat is truly and properly the true and proper Flesh and Blood of Jesus Christ And 2. That this eating is an Oral and Corporal eating of his true and proper Flesh and Blood. A Manducation that is performed by Mouth 3. That the Flesh and Blood of Jesus Christ is thus eaten orally and corporally by the Communicants in the Eucharist This is their constant Tenet that in the blessed Sacrament of the Altar under the Forms of Bread and Wine the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ are received orally and corporally and that is eaten this is drunk 4. That this Bodily eating and drinking in the Sacrament is the eating and drinking that is properly and primarily meant by our Lord in this Sermon Et de quâ agitur This is the Mind of the Romanists Now in the next Place I am to shew Thirdly That our Lord Jesus Christ in this Sermon is not treating properly of the Sacrament and Sacramental eating and drinking of his Flesh and Blood much less is he here teaching the Popish Doctrine of Oral and Bodily eating and drinking his true and proper Flesh and Blood in the Sacrament In this Point we have the Consent of the Lutherans Hoc caput non proprie per se ad doctrictrinam de Coena pertinet Chemn Harm p. 1134. De spirituali comestione Dominus ait nisi manducaveritis carnem filii hominis biberitis ejus sanguineni non habebitis vitam in vobis De Myst Missae l. 4. c. 14. yea we have the Suffrage of divers learned Papists who quit this Argument and positively affirm That our Saviour in this Chapter doth not treat of the Sacrament As Biel in Can. Missae Card. Cajetan in Thom. par 3. q. 80. Art. 8. Card Cusan Ep. 7. ad Bohemos and many others Insomuch that Maldonatus on John 6.53 complains sadly that some Catholicks chose to think and speak in this Controversy as Hereticks rather than as the Orthodox and tho he forbear to name them yet he gives their Character in these Words Scio Catholicos scio Doctos scio Religiosos ac Probos Viros esse So that by the Jesuits own Confession we have Catholicks and Catholicks that are Learned and Religious and Honest good Men on our side Yet if this be nothing we have not only learned Men but an Infallible Pope voting for us and expounding our Lord's Words as we do viz. Innocent the
3d. under whom Transubstantiation was first decreed who speaking of our Saviour's Words John 6.53 hath these Words The Lord speaketh of Spiritual eating saying Except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no Life in you Now that our Lord Jesus Christ is not here speaking of the Participation of the Sacrament or eating of his Body and Blood in the Sacrament will be evident from these 1. The Sacrament of the Eucharist was not then instituted nor as some think of two years after this or as others who make the Passover v. 4. the third Passover after his Baptism not until more than a full year after And therefore he could not speak of an eating of his Flesh and drinking of his Blood in the Sacrament that was not then in being nor of so long a time after If it be said True indeed it was not then in being but yet he spoke with reference to it and to instruct them beforehand in the Mystery of this Meat which was to be prepared for them in the Eucharist To this I say 1. How could they to whom he spake possibly understand any thing of his meaning when speaking with relation to a thing that was not nor whereof they had either then or before any intimation or least insinuation that such a thing should be They say elsewhere that he spoke plainly and intelligibly and it may very reasonably be supposed that now he spake to be understood and of a matter that might be understood by them but it can hardly be imagined how they could understand this Discourse to be meant of a Sacrament a Sacrament neither before nor then once mentioned nor instituted and in being of a Year or two after 2. Jesus Christ was the Bread of Life at that very time when he preached this Sermon v. 35. I am the Bread of Life v. 48. I am the Bread of Life And again v. 50. Thus he speaks of that which then was before the Sacrament of his Supper was instituted 3. Our Saviour proposeth and presseth the eating of his Flesh and drinking of his Blood as a present and necessary Duty A Duty that all those that were present and heard him were then obliged unto And therefore it must necessarily be granted that this Meat was then in being and might be eaten by the Faithful but they could not then eat it in the Sacrament which had no being nor was instituted This is the first thing that plainly proves that our Lord and Saviour is not here treating of Sacramental eating and drinking the Sacrament was not instituted 2. The eating and drinking which he here speaks of are necessary to Salvation Acts that he makes so necessary Conditions of Life as no Man can be saved without them V. 53. Except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no Life in you It is an eating and drinking without which none can have Life So that if our Saviour mean it of Sacramental eating and drinking no Man can be saved that hath not received the Sacrament And from hence it was that the Fathers who took this Sermon to be meant of the Sacrament being moved by these Words ordered the Eucharist to be given and gave it to Infants as soon as they were baptized as necessary to their Salvation And indeed this doth necessarily follow this Exposition of our Saviour's Words But from this very thing it is evident that our Saviour's Words cannot be meant of Sacramental eating because that Sacramental eating is not absolutely necessary to Salvation so as no Man can be saved except he have once at least taken the Sacrament For many who never ate his Flesh nor drank his Blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist are certainly saved All the Faithful that lived and dyed before the Incarnation of Christ ate the same Spiritual Meat and drank the same Spiritual Drink and are saved as our Adversaries will not deny yet none of them did ever once eat it in the Eucharist The penitent Thief went from the Cross to Paradise immediately yet had never eaten the Sacrament Many thousand Infants and Children of Christian Parents dye one Generation after another before they have once tasted of the Sacrament Are all these Damned There have been and are abstemious Persons who cannot brook the least sup or drop of Wine Must all these who are suspended from Drinking by a natural and sinless Infirmity or Antipathy to Wine be given up for Lost They think to evade the Force of this Argument that falls so convincingly upon them by this sorry shift viz. That our Saviour here speaks of them only who have Means and Opportunities of receiving his Flesh and Blood in the Eucharist which those here instanced in never had But I answer That the Words of Christ are true simply and absolutely without Exception or Limitation And no one can have Life or be saved without a real and actual participation of the saving Benefits prepared for Souls by the Body and Blood of Christ Crucified And this Participation is the only manducation or eating that is meant in this place 3. The eating and drinking of his Flesh and Blood which he here speaks of is always accompanied with Life and Salvation to all those who so eat his Flesh and drink his Blood. See v. 50 51 54 58. A Man may eat thereof and not dye If any Man eat of this Bread he shall live for ever And whoso eateth hath Eternal Life Mark this is an eating whereby all Men whosoever have Life and are certainly saved And therefore this eating is not Sacramental eating with the Mouth nor doth stand in partaking of the Eucharist For many eat and drink in the Sacrament who have no Life nor are saved It is believed by many that Judas did partake in the Sacrament as well as the other eleven yet was the Son of Perdition And it is plain in the case of Hypocrites and Wicked Men who receive the Sacrament again and again may be a hundred times over yet have no Life nor dying so as we may fear not a few do after many a Sacrament are saved But if our Saviour had indeed meant this of Sacramental eating then it would follow that the worst of Men by participating if but once in all their Lives of the Sacrament should thereby have their Salvation infallibly secured Yet here again the Papists would creep out by the help of a pretended Implication in our Saviour's Words viz. That eating and drinking worthily is implyed and to be understood as necessary to the sense of the Words And so when our Saviour expresseth himself in those Terms used v. 50 51 54 58. he means all and only of them who eat and drink his Flesh and Blood worthily But 1. This worthily is their own Addition to our Saviour's Words For our Saviour neither hath it nor any thing that implieth it in these Verses or in this whole Sermon on this Subject
height of Delusion Men may be left to believe a Lie a Lie that hath scarce any Vail to cover it a Lie that hath no Sense or Reason in it a Lie that bears upon its Forehead monstrous Absurdities and portentous Contradictions Verily in this according as was foretold 2 Thess 2.11 we have a visible and tremendous Instance of one of the greatest depths of the Judgment of God upon them Let it warn to beware to watch and pray that we enter not into Temptation Some are confident enough and think they can never so far lose themselves as to take up the Doctrines and Practises of Rome But Sirs we have need to shake off Carnal Security to maintain a holy Fear and watchful Care and live in a continual dependence on God for preventing and preserving Grace and Help in an hour of Temptation and day of Tryal For if once we begin to warp but a little to leave God his Truth and Way and God leave us I know no Delusions so strange and monstrous but we may be given up to believe them even to this that is made up of nothing but portentous Absurdities c. 5. How just a Cause our blessed Martyrs in the Marian Days were engaged in and suffered for Some Protestant Pens and Tongues in our Days have made unhandsome and sinister Reflections upon that noble Army of Martyrs of whom the World was not worthy But a Reflection upon this monstrous Fiction that most of them went to the Stake and sacrificed themselves in Flames in opposition to is enough to clear their Innocency and justify them in their Sufferings in the Consciences of all that are not given over to a Reprobate Mind Secondly Transubstantiation sets before us matter of just Admiration And we may wonder and stand amazed 1. At the monstrous Impudency of the first Founders of it That ever Men bearing the Name of Christians should arrive at such a height of Impudence as to obtrude upon the Christian World the Entertainment and Belief of a Tale and feigned Devise so portentous and prodigious even beyond all the Poetical Fictions of the Pagans I may without any Breach of Charity pass the Censure on Transubstantiation that Ludovicus Vives passed on the Golden Legend viz. That it was written by a Man ferrei oris plumbei cordis who was lost to all Shame and whom nothing could dash out of Countenance So I say Transubstantiation was minted by Men to be wondered at for their Confidence and Impudence 2. At the lamentable Simplicity and Credulity of the first Receivers and Believers of it As it is a matter to be wondered at that any Men could be so impudent to invent it so it is no less wonderful that any Men should have been so very sottish and simple as to receive such a putid Trump into their Belief It is unimaginable how this could be possible if Men had been waking when it came upon them 3. At the horrible Induration of the present Supporters and Maintainers of it This is yet the greatest and most amazing Wonder of all that now after the breaking out of the clear Light of the Gospel and the frequent exposing of this Monster by such a number of learned Men of the Reformed Churches there should still any appear in the patronizing defence and supportation of it Here is infinite Cause to wonder and we might wonder our selves into an inextricable maze if the Holy Ghost had not given us a Clew to lead us out 2 Thess 2.11 Thirdly Transubstantiation presents unto us matter of Commiseration Matter that calls lowd on us for Bowels of Pity and Compassion towards Myriads of Souls in the Papacy 1. That have such grievous Impositions laid upon them and have no other choice left them but either to swallow down such Contradictions and monstrous Doctrines as this or to be sacrificed in merciless Flames 2. That are compassed about with such a thick Mist of Popish Darkness that they do not in the least see or discern this and other Mysteries of Iniquity that fill the Synagogues of Antichrist This is a most deplorable Case and God knows it is the Case of Multitudes at this day in the midst of the Papacy 3. That are running such infinite hazards of their Souls and eternal Estates from one Generation to another It is far from me to think of using that Uncharitableness towards them which they with one Consent practise against us viz. To pronounce all that are in that Communion to be in a State of Damnation This is a Piece of Cruelty that doth no way become Christians There is a Distinction to be made of Persons Times Places and Practices See the excellent Discourse of Mr. Durham on Revel 14. Lect. 3 about the Salvation of Papists But this I say they run an extreme Hazard on many accounts that live and dye in this Communion tho they do not give an explicite Assent to the complex Body of her Doctrine and Worship Even the Adoration of a piece of Bread rising out of Transubstantiation as very God is the grossest Idolatry that can be used Now in all these Respects the common Multitude are the Object of our Compassion and the Consideration of their hard and hazardous Condition should move our Pity Oh Christians Pity them and pray pray that God would open their Eyes reveal this great Mystery of Iniquity unto them and bring them out of Babylon where they are running such an Adventure Pray down the Antichristian State and pray home the poor lost Sheep into Christ's Fold that are in the Pope's Pinfold and Tents of Antichrist Fourthly Transubstantiation brings matter of great Gratitude and Thankfulness unto all our Doors Sirs when we think of this how can we be enough thankful unto our God for his Goodness 1. That we were brought forth from under the Clouds and Darkness of Popery and in the days of the glorious breakings out of the Gospel Diis gratias agere debeo non quia natus est mihi filius sed quod tuis temporibus ipsum nasci contingit When Alexander was born his Father Philip blessed the Gods not so much that he had a Son as that he had him in Aristotle's Days But how should we bless God for bringing us forth in Gospel-Times This is the Priviledge which that eminent German Divine Abraham Bucholâ—zer was so affected with that he always accounted it his great Happiness that he was born after the Light of the Gospel break forth and bred up under Melancthon And Chytreus acknowledged it as a singular Mercy that God had made him a Man a Christian and that he had his Education under those excellent Lights of the Church Luther and Melancthon Let this be thy Song O Christian and say with the Psalmist I will sing unto the Lord as long as I live Psal 104.33 I will sing Praise unto my God while I have my Being who hath brought me forth not in days covered with the dismal Darkness of Popery but crowned with a clear Discovery of the Gospel 2. That we have enjoyed a Freedom from these Popish Impositions while other poor Protestants have had bitter and bloody Storms falling on them If we look back to the last hundredth of Years now past who can reckon up a thousand Part of those Sufferings that have fallen heavily upon the French German Bohemian Hungarian Netherland Polish and Irish Protestants for refusing to admit of and submit to these things Oh! Transubstantiation and other Romish Abominations have cost Millions of Lives and Rivers of Blood while we have sat in a Calm and not once tasted of the Popish Fury and Cruelty 3. That to this day we are delivered from this and the many other grievous Impositions of Rome O what a Complication of Mercies have we in this one great Mercy that after all the Contrivances and Attempts of the Papists for this hundred years we may at this day set up our Stone and call it Eben-ezer saying 1 Sam. 7.12 Hitherto hath the Lord helped us Fifthly Transubstantiation doth moreover suggest unto us matter of daily Supplication and calls us to our Knees to beg with Eyes Hands and Hearts lifted up to Heaven for Protection Preservation and Deliverance from the return and re-enterance of the Religion of this degenerated and Apostate Church that brings this Monster in its Womb which if embraced will destroy and damn our Souls and if rejected will destroy and burn our Bodies to Ashes and cost us no less than our Souls or our Lives I find that there was in the Liturgy of Edward the sixth a Prayer to be delivered from the Usurpation Tyranny and Enormities of the Bishop of Rome which was afterwards taken out to take away as is said the Offence that it gave unto the Papists but verily how much soever it may offend them we have much need to put it into our daily Litanies or humble Supplications and to pray without ceasing that we may never fall back into that most woful lamentable and forlorn Estate that a Return of Popery will quickly plunge and sink us into The Pope solemnly curseth us upon Good-friday whereupon one prayed that he may so curse us still and never bless us more as he blessed us in Queen Marie's Time. To this Prayer let all that have any Love for their Religion any Detestation of the worst of Errors and Idolatries any Concernment for their Souls any Care of their Estates Lives and Posterities and would not run unspeakable Hazards for both Worlds say AMEN FINIS
be said 1. Then the Priest lies in saying This is and should say This shall be my Body 2. Then the great operative and conversive Virtue of these mighty Words lies in the last Syllable um this seems to be the Opinion of Thomas Conversio Panis in Corpus Christi fit in tèrmino prolationis horum verborum Tunc enim completur significatio hujus locutionis in 1 Cor. 11.24 3. Then as the Body of Christ is created in an instant so the Bread is annihilated or ceaseth to be in an instant 4. Then it is either at one and the same instant that the Bread vanisheth and the Body of Christ succeedeth in the room or another instant but it is neither of these 1. Not the same instant For then the Bread and Body of Christ should be both together and at the same time under the same Accidents But this the Papists will not hear of but affirm constantly That first the Bread only and secondly the Body of Christ alone is under the Accidents one after the other but never together 2. Not another instant For then in the interspace the Accidents should subsist without either the Substance of the Bread or Body of Christ under them but they say it is never thus but either the Bread or Body of Christ is contained under the Accidents and to say otherwise would be most absurd And thus if they will be constant to their own Sentiments tho we should grant them their own Sense of our Saviour's Words they will not serve their turn nor be a Foundation to build Transubstantiation upon but contrary-wise will quite subvert this Dagon For there can be no Transubstantiation 1. Before the Words are pronounced 2. After they are pronounced 3. In the time of Pronunciation 4. In any other instant and therefore there can be none at all We have done with their first Argument Secondly They argue from the Sermon which our Saviour preached unto the Capernaits John 6. wherein they say he opens the great Meat and Mystery of the blessed Sacrament of the Altar In which his true Body and Blood or Himself is eaten and drunken under the forms of Bread and Wine which doth necessarily infer a Transubstantiation of the Bread and Wine into his very Body and Blood. The places urged for this are Vers 41. unto Vers 59. but they insist especially on Vers 51 53 55. here say they our Saviour expresly affirms 1. That his Flesh is Bread. Vers 51. I am the living Bread which came down from Heaven If any Man eat of this Bread he shall live for ever and the Bread that I will give is my Flesh which I will give for the Life of the World. 2. When the Jews contended about this Saying as absurd or impossible Vers 52. How can this Man give us his Flesh to eat he again with an ingeminated asseveration affirms That what he had asserted was not only true and no way absurd nor impossible but also that this eating of his Flesh and drinking of his Blood was most necessary and beneficial Vers 53 54. Verily verily I say unto you except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no Life in you Whose eateth my Flesh and drinketh my Blood hath eternal Life and I will raise him up at the last day 3. That his Flesh is Meat and his Blood is Drink indeed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vere Vers 55. For my Flesh is Meat indeed and my Blood is Drink indeed i. e. true Meat and Drink or truly Meat and Drink or very Meat and Drink so that say they it is plain that here he doth not speak improperly but most properly of his Body as proper Meat and of his Blood as proper Drink and of the proper and bodily eating and drinking of his very Body and Blood with the Mouth in the Eucharist And this doth undeniably prove Transubstantiation that the Bread is turned into his real Body and the Wine into his Blood. This is the Argument for Transubstantiation drawn form this Sermon of our Saviour preached at Capernaum Our Saviour having miraculously fed five thousand with five Loaves and two Fishes a great Multitude flocked after him whereupon he took an occasion to preach to them of Spiritual Meat under a Metaphor taken from the present matter as in Chap. 4. he had taken occasion from the Water of Jacob's Well to preach to the Samaritan Woman of the Water whereof whosoever drinks shall never thirst And in this Sermon he shews them 1. That there was a kind of Meat which would endure to everlasting Life which they should seek for rather than the Meat which perisheth 2. Who it is that giveth this Meat 3. What this Meat is viz. his Flesh and Blood. 4. That this is a more excellent Meat than that Corporal Food which they had been fed with and followed him for and than the Manna which their Fathers had eaten in the Wilderness as it was Corporal Food only and received by the Mouth into the Belly and so he here speaketh of it and not as it was a Temporary Sacrament to their Fathers But to come to the Matter lying before us In order to a clear and satisfactory Answer to the Argument drawn hence which they place great Confidence in I shall endeavour to shew 1. our Saviour's Sense in this Sermon 2. The Popish Sense that is put upon it 3. That our Saviour in this Sermon is not treating of the Sacrament and Sacramental eating and drinking of his Body and Blood. But 4. That our Saviour is here treating of the Spiritual eating and drinking of his Body and Blood out of or without the Sacrament And so Transubstantiation will fall to the Ground if they have no better Foundation to fix it upon First Our Saviour's Sense in this Sermon and how we must understand him if we will understand him in the Sense intended by him And here are four Things to be enquired into 1. What kind of Meat this is which our Saviour discourses of to the Capernaits in this Sermon And it is not Corporeal Meat but Spiritual Meat Even as Chap. 4. He speaketh to the Samaritan Woman of a Water whereof whosoever shall drink shall never thirst which is not meant of a Material Water but Spiritual Grace as the Papists do confess Yea this they do freely grant here For tho they will have it to be Material Food and to be eaten Orally and Corporally yet they confess that it is Spiritual Meat Meat for the Soul not for the Belly Mentis non ventris animae non corporis 2. What this Spiritual Meat properly is Now this is Christ himself with all the Benefits and Fruits of his Cross and Passion This Meat is made up of and consisteth in the saving Benefits prepared for us by the Body and Blood of Christ crucified and rising out of his Passion This is the Food Meat Bread which he here speaketh of that giveth Life to the World
regard of Signification or resignificata the Manna and Rock were the same to them that the Bread and Cup are to us to wit Sacramental Symbols of the same Things differing only signis modo significandi 2. This same Meat which they did eat and Drink which they did drink was Spiritual Meat and Drink i. e. not in Nature or Substance but in Signification and Representation Ob spiritualem significationem 3. This same Spiritual Meat and Drink was Christ 1. Not Corporally Substantially and Essentially 2. But Symbolically Symbolum erat Christi representing and exhibiting the same Christ and Grace of Christ to them that the Supper doth to us 4. They ate this same Spiritual Meat and drank this same Spiritual Drink That is 1. All of them ate this same Meat Sacramentally Ore. 2. Some of them i. e. Believers ate it Spiritually also Fide. Thus the Church of the Jews ate the same Spiritual Meat that we do And this doth evidently prove the Popish Transubstantiation to be a meer Fiction 4. Arg. If the Bread be converted into the Body of Christ then not only wicked Men but Dogs and Hogs Rats and Mice may eat the real Body of Christ and consequently according to their Principles have Eternal Life That they may eat the true Body of Christ is plain for they may eat that that remains after the Consecration and after this there remains nothing but 1. The Accidents of the Bread these cannot be eaten 2. The Body of Christ this therefore must be eaten by them What say they to this 1. None of them deny but the Consecrated Host may be eaten by any of these or other Vermin As is evident from the Cauteles of the Mass wherein they do not deny these gross Absurdities or as they call them Inconveniences but appoint certain Rules to be observed about them and go about to salve them 2. But yet they are miserably divided and confounded among themselves Some say that the Mice Rats c. do not eat the Body of Christ others say they do Some that the Body of Christ vanishes as soon as ' ere the Teeth of the Mouse touch the Host some that the Substance of the Bread returns Others that a new Substance is created which the Mouse eats and others God only knows quid mus sumat vel quid manducet what the Mouse eats and what becomes of the Body of Christ when the Mouse eats the Host Thus they are driven to monstrous Shifts And as ill are they set with the Worms and Vermin that breed in the Host when it is over-long kept which are generated either of the Air about the Host or the Accidents of the Bread or of the Substance of the Bread returned or of Matter then created or introduced from some other Body or they know not how Portentu Opinionum 5. If there be any Transubstantiation Then the Body of Christ is daily created Either 1. Out of the Substance of the Virgin. Or 2. Out of the Substance of the Bread. Or 3. Out of nothing But they will not tell us of which 6. If the Bread be turned into the Body of Christ then as often as they Communicate the Body of Christ is 1. Turned into the Substance of their Bodies Or 2. Totally annihilated Or 3. Flyes away to Heaven Or 4. Unknown what becomes of it But 1. Not the First for then they should be Hypostatically united to the Divine Nature 2. Nor the Second as some of them grant 3. Not the Third for then who can tell how many Millions of Christs are this Day in Heaven Therefore no Body knows what becomes of it I have now given as plain a Representation of Transubstantiation as I could as it is received in the Church of Rome with the Sandy Foundations it is built upon and a few of the many Arguments that do clearly evert and overturn it I shall now shut up all in a few Words If it be asked What need was there of this or what use may it be of unto us I say this strange Monster Transubstantiation setteth before us matter First Of Information and may inform us 1. Of the amazing Apostacy of the Church of Rome and those that are devoted to her Communion Here was once a famous and flourishing Church a Church honoured by the Apostle with this high Testimony that her Faith was spoken of throughout the whole World Rom. 1.8 i. e. in all the Churches through the World. And that her Obedience was come abroad unto all Men Rom. 16.19 Thus she was once famous all the Christian World over for her exemplary Faith and Obedience Who could have thought that ever such a Monster as this should have had its Conception in and been born of her Womb and being born have been owned by her taken into her Belief and made one of the most important Articles of her Faith Yet alas so it is Oh how is the Gold become dim How is the most fine Gold changed How is she that was once a pure Virgin and the chaste Spouse of Christ become the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth Rev. 17.5 2. Of the Genius and Nature of Popery or Rome's Religion at this Day It would be a tedious work to describe it in the several Parts and Members of it But we may know a Lion by his Paw and so what Popery is a Religion more after Homer than after the Scripture As Mr. Broughton by this one piece or part of it or from this Monster that is maintained in it This alone if what is said be considered and weighed impartially may give any Man enough of Popery Be a sufficient Disswasive from Popery For if all were well to this and nothing but Transubstantiation with its Appendices lying in the way yet Transubstantiation alone is such a foul mishapen terrible and dreadful Spectrum Hagg or Night-Ghost as is sufficient to fright all that are not either stark blind or stark mad out of their witts already from a thought of looking that way 3. How sadly the Common People are misled and what strange Absurdities and Contradictions they do ignorantly receive and implicitly believe in the thick Darkness they are brought into and kept in What can be more ridiculously absurd than this Fiction Yet through their own wonderful Ignorance and the thin Sophistry of their Leaders it is received without any hesitation by them as a great Mystery and so indeed it is but of Iniquity 4. What strange and strong Delusions Men and Men of Parts and Learning may be given up unto It is not to be denied that many of the Romanists have been Men of vast Parts and Learning nor to be doubted but many of them are so Yet they not receiving the Truth but minding their Secular Advantages and making Religion to serve a corrupt carnal worldly Interest have been given up to such a strong Delusion as to believe this grand Cheat and impose it upon the Faith of others Oh! to what a