the diuine in the abstract also by reason of the simplicity thereof For this proposition is as true and proper he deity is omnipotent as this God is omnipotēt yea euen omnipotency it selfe And againe Humanity and a man is mutable 34 Of the person expressed by the proper name and that name Rule 4 which noteth both the natures or by a name signifying the office of a mediatour as well the things which are proper to the one or to the other or to both the natures together may truely and properly be spoken as Christ is omnipotent also Christ is man Christ died Also Christ is a redeemer a mediatour Also the mediator is God is man is immortall died redeemed vs. 35 Of the person signified by a name of one nature Rule 5 the things which are proper therevnto may truely and properly be spoken as This God or onely begotten sonne of God is eternall and omnipotent Also This man or the sonne of man was borne in the last daies Rule 6 died 36 Those things which are proper to the wholle person cannot be spoken but by a Synechdoche a part taken for the wholle of one nature signified either by an abstractiue or concretiue name as The flesh quickeneth God redeemed his Church 37 Wherefore this saying of Leo each forma worketh that which belongeth to it selfe we with Damas say to be all one with this and that properly Christ worketh according to each forme 38 So where Iohn said his blood washeth vs from sinne and Christ saith my flesh is meate indeede also where it is said to quicken and that it is to be worshipped those wordes are put for concretiues namely the flesh of Christ for Christ incarnate and the blood of Christ for Christ by his blood 39 For he which said he that eateth my flesh hath eternall life the same said He that eateth me he shall liue by me And he which writ his bloode washeth vs from sinne the same expounding himselfe saith Christ shall wash vs from our sinnes by his blood And they which taught that Christs flesh was to be worshipped they also expressed the cause namely not because it was flesh but because it was flesh of God and therefore that Christians do worship not flesh properly but God incarnate 40 Of the person signified by the name of the one nature Rule 7 the things that belong to the other nature may indeede truely and really be spoken but yet improperly and figuratiuely by communicatiō of the proprieties As the sonne of man it both in heauen and on earth at once Also the onely begotten and Lord of glory was crucified 8. Rule 41 Here of followeth another of the one nature signified in a concretiue name the thinges propper to the other may truely be spoken by reason of the person togither noted yet not really but onely in respect of the name As God taken in the formall signification died man is eternall 42 Wherefore we say that those thinges are praedicated or spoken by communication of the proprieties which beeing proper to one of the natures are made common also to the other in the concrete by the mutuall manner of praedication namely while they are really attributed to the person wereof each nature is a part 43 For seeing Christ most truely and really is both God and man we doubt not to say and with the wholle Church to teach that he suffered namely for example sake according to the one nature and suffered not namely according to the other 44 And seeing the scripture saith both that God is immortall also that the same died was crucified we teach that in the former speech the name of God is taken essentially in the latter hypostatically or personally and therefore that both these are true in the speach concerning Christ but that both of them are spoken of the same in a diuerse manner of praedicatiō 45 Whatsoeuer things we reade to haue beene really giuen to Christ in time after the vnion the same may truely and really be spoken of the person in respect of the humanitie therfore also of the humanitie it selfe but it is to be vnderstood that they cannot be spoken in respect of the divinity and being signified by a concrete name but onely by communication of the proprieties An example of the first Esai 11. the spirit of wisdome shall rest vpon him c. An example of the other Ioh. 3. He hath giuen vnto him his sonne who is from heauen whōe the father sent his spirit aboue measure For he as he is the onely begotten sonne cannot be said to haue really receiued the spirit but onely by communication of the proprieties 46 But the thinges which we confesse were giuen after this manner were not the essentiall proprieties of God but onely gifts of creation and as they call thē habituall graces which belong partly to the perfection of Christs humaine nature partely to the perfecting of the office of a mediatour partely to the honour of the head of the Church 47 For the essentiall proprieties of God are vnited most really with the humaine nature in the same person but they are not really communicated to it in it owne verie essence 48 For to omitte almost infinite of other reasons testimonies of the Apostles aūcient Fathers what things Christ receiued as Man in the essence of his humaine nature he receiued the same that he might as beeing head deriue thē into his mēbers as Athanasius Cyril are witnesses seing he therefore sanctified himselfe that we also might be sanctified and the oile was powered vpon Aarons head that it might runne downe on al his members euen to the skirts of his clothing 49 And who except a mad man would saie that the essentiall proprieties of God are deriued vnto vs. 50 The cause also why Christ as he is God cānot be said to haue receiued gifts of creation is by Cyrill assigned to be this Because as God he needed them not Therefore if also as he is mā he receiued the essentiall proprieties of God really communicated vnto him he cannot then be said to haue receiued the created gifts of the holy ghost For to that ende serueth a finite power in him which is indued with an infinite power really communicated vnto him Finis
remembrance of it and to waigh in their minds to what ende they were baptized or what they haue obtained of God by baptisme what also they promised to God therein whereby they may the more be confirmed in faith and grow vp into the communion with Christ and bee made more carefull of performing their dueties For baptisme is not bestowed on vs for remission of originall sinne onely or our sinnes past but of all the offences of our whole life euē as the pulling out of the waters is a signe of a newe life not for one day but for al our time as the Apostle saith Rom. 6.4 VVe are buried with him euer into his death by baptisme that as Christ rose from death by the glory of his father so we should alwaies walke in newnesse of life Wee were once washed with outward water but the blood of Christ is a continuall streame washing and cleansing vs daily from our sinnes VIII By whome baptisme ought to bee administred Wee beleeue also that holie baptisme is to bee administred by those by whome also the gospell is preached For to whom Christ said Goe into the whole worlde and preach the gospell to them he also said Baptizing them in the name of the father and the sonne and the holy ghost teaching them to obserue whatsoeuer is commaunded you IX Errors Therefore we condemne all aswell auncient as late herisies which haue at anie time beene scattered against the sound doctrine of baptisme Seleucus and Hermias who baptized with fire The Cerdonians and Marcionites who vsed another forme of words then that which was prescribed by Christ baptized in the name of another God then of the father sonne and holy ghost those also which baptized in the name of Iohn or any other man the Cataphriges who baptized dead mē with all Donatists and Anabaptists who rebaptize them which come vnto them which denie that infants ought to be baptized and those also that denie baptisme to be true vnlesse there bee added exorcismes spittle salt and other cerimonies deuised by men CHAP. XVI Of the Lords supper BY that which we haue saide of the communion with Christ and of the worde of the gospell of the sacramentes in generall and of Baptisme may easilie be gathered what our faith is concerning the Lordes Supper I. The sacrament of the supper is an instrument of the holie ghost to helpe forvvard the communion with Christ and with the church We beleeue that the sacrament of the supper is not onely a testimonie of our communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and with the whole church but also an instrument of the holie ghost to confirme helpe foreward the same the Apostle saying the bread vvhich we breake 1. Cor. 10.16 is it not the communion of the Lords bodie the breaking and the taking of the blessed bread he calleth the communion of the Lordes bodie because they which eate with an actuall faith in the Lorde doe ioyne in communion with the Lord and with his flesh and blood as also they that imbrace the word of the Apostles in faith do receiue a communion with the Apostles that cōmunion is with the father and with his sonne Iesus Christ II. A confirmation of the former opinion For as baptisme is an instrument to begin this communion because by it wee are borne againe in Christ so is the supperinstituted to make perfect the same because in it wee are fedd or nourished with the flesh and blood of Christ that we may growe vp in him as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 12.13 vve are all baptized into one bodie and we all drinke of one drinke into one spirite III. The increase of our communion with Christ is the principall end of the Lords supper There are also other endes of the institutiō of the Lords supper namely that beeing admonished both by the words signes which represent vnto vs Christs death and his blood shedd for vs we should reuerently esteeme of the benefite of our redemption as the Apostle saith As oft as yee shall eate of this bread 1. Cor. 11.20 yee showe the Lords death And therefore the ende is that we may be confirmed in the faith concerning remission of sinnes we may be nourished into hope of a blessed resurrection wee maye giue thanks to him for so great a benefite we may be stirred vp to repentance and lastly we may openly before the whole congregation renue our couenant begunne with God But sith all these things tend to this that we may more more be vnited to Christ be made one with him and he more feelinglie liue in vs and we in him being now made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone therfore we doubt not but the supper is principally instituted for the increase of this vniting and communion with Christ wherein our saluation is made perfect and accomplished Whereunto it also tendeth that bread and wine are the nourishments of the bodie so as wee may hold it for most certaine the flesh and blood of Christ is the same in nourishing of our soules preseruing thē in life that the bread and wine is to our bodies IV. The bread why it is called the bodie of Christ Whereuppon we may also vnderstand why Christ called this bread his own body namely not for that it is either properly his verie true bodie or that there is any such body cōtained within it or also that it is onely a bare signe of his bodie broken and dead for vs but that it is a sacrament for sacraments saith Augustine take vnto them the names of the things whereof they be sacraments and therefore an instrument also of the holie ghost to communicate vnto vs the true body of Christ to confirme vs in his communion Like as for the same cause the Apostle also called baptisme not the signe of regeneration Eph. 5.26 but the vvashing water it self of regeneration namely because that by this washing of water through the worde as by a fitt instrument Christ by the working power of his spirite doeth inwardly wash and cleanse vs and begett vs a new V. The true and substantiall body of Christ is spoken of the bread but improperly and figuratiuely Wherefore we doubt not but in the words of the supper the true and naturall bodie of Christ is spoken of the bread especially sith it is added for expositions sake which is giuen for you So that it is most truely said that the bread is Christs bodie euen that true bodie which was giuen for vs but yet this is improperly figuratiuely sith in verie deede the bread was not giuen for vs but the verie bodie of Christ whereof the bread is a sacrament VI. The bodie of Christ is not in the bread reallie and properlie Hereby we are also confirmed in this opinion that as the bread is not properlie the verie bodie of Christ but a sacrament thereof so also Christ is not
in the bread reallie and properly For in sacraments the thinges whereof they bee sacraments are not really included although they borrowe their names of the things as in baptisme the matter is apparent and out of all question in which no man saith that the blood of Christ by which we are washed from sinne or the verie regeneration it selfe is included as also in the worde of the gospell the thinges are not therein really included which by it be declared Nowe sacraments be visible words And Christ said not my bodie is in this that is in the bread but in a farre other manner of speach as This that is this bread is my bodie Now if any wil say that this is all one in sense it will follow if the bodie of Christ bee really in the bread then the bread is really properly and substantially the bodie of Christ And if this be impious to bee spoken neither do wee thinke that the other can godlily be affirmed Yet we denie not but it is in it sacramentally in that sense that wee say remission of sinnes and saluation and life is in the worde of the gospell which it declareth and offereth But sith the common sorte haue vsed to drawe such manner of speaches to superstition wee iudge that those speaches are altogether to bee foreborne and auoided and the simple plaine phrases of the scriptures to be vsed VII In the supper are giuen not onely the signes but also the things signified by them Now this is setled in vs without all controuersie that although the bodie and blood of the Lord are not that is do not existe in their owne substance and in verie deede and properly in the bread and wine but are in heauē yet notwithstanding with the verie distribution or giuing of the bread and wine there is truely offered vnto all men the true flesh of Christ to be eaten and his blood to be drunk not simplie but in as much as his flesh was betraied vnto death for vs his blood shedd for the remission of our sinnes For the words are manifest which Christ speaketh in Iohn of the eating his flesh Ioh. 6.53 and drinking his blood if any man will haue life in him and that which the Apostle saieth euē iumping with the words of Christ He which eateth the bread and drinketh the Lords cupp vnworthilie he is made guiltie of the true bodie and blood of the Lord. Neither doubt we but Christ as he plainely commaunded the bread to bee eaten so also by adding immediatly This is my bodie he closely commaunded tha to bee eaten aswell as the bread but yet each of them in a diuerse manneri VIII None but the faithfull doe truely eate Christs true flesh But albeit the flesh of Christ be offred vnto all in the supper to be eaten yet we beleeue that it is truely eaten of the faithfull only both because they alone haue communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and others haue not neither by receiuing the bread are made partakers of him and also because they alone haue the spirite of Christ by vertue of whom onely the flesh of Christ is truely communicated yea and also because they alone doe bring true faith without which the same cannot bee truely receiued and eaten For Christ giueth not his true bodie to bee truely and indeed eaten but only to them which do aswell beleeue that the same was betraied for them vnto death and his blood shedd for remission of their sinnes as those wordes to bee true This is my bodie IX That hypocrites eate Christs bodie sacramentallie By the way we denie not but hypocrits also lacking the true and iustifying faith in receiuing and eating the breade as a sacrament of the Lords bodie may be said to eate the very true bodie of Christ also namely sacramentally not truely and indeed Euen as the Apostle saith al the Corinthians 1. Cor. 6.11 which were baptized with water were sanctified iustified namely sacramentally as is aboue said though not all of them were truely made such X. There bee three kinds of men that eate and therefore diuerse sorts of eating Thence also we learne that there are three kindes of men which may be called into question whether they eate the flesh of Christ or eate it not The first is of such as receiue the bread as common meate and not as a sacrament They eate not the true bodie of Christ in any respect and are the true Capernaites their eating is meere carnall And others of the contrarie side receiue not the bread yet not vpon contempt but onely beleeue in the gospell and their eating is meere spirituall Lastly there are others who not contenting themselues onely with faith in the gospell do also receiue the bread not simplie as the first sorte as bare bread but as a sacrament of the Lords bodie Whereuppon it comes to passe that they are said to take and eate sacramentally But sith this may bee done aswell of the the godly and faithfull as also of vngodly hypocrites yet in a diuerse manner of the one sort by faith of the other without true faith therefore we also say that the vngodly hypocrites do eate it onely sacramentally but the faithful do eate it both sacramētally truely and spiritually and therefore to saluation XI The true body of Christ is eaten onely by faith Seing then wee say that the true bodie of Christ is reccaued onely of the faithfull both sacramentally and also truely we meane that it is eaten not with the mouth of the body but the mouth of the minde and with a heart indued with faith that by meanes of the holie ghost which worketh in vs and applieth whole Christ vnto vs. For it is the meate of the minde saith Cyprian not of the bellie And Ser. de caen 1. Cor. 12.13 The flesh profiteth nothing as Christ saith and Augustine expoundeth but it is the spirit which quickneth And the Apostle teacheth Ioh. 6.63 By one spirit we are all baptized into one bodie and haue bin all made to drinke into one spirite And if that all true coniūction with Christ be through the holy ghost though he with his bodie do remaine in heauen and we vpon the earth it followeth that this eating must bee after the same sorte For what else is it to eate then to receiue vnite vnto thee meate for the nourishment of that part to which it is ordained after a due sort But the flesh of Christ as hath beene said is food of the minde not of the bellie Neither vndoubtedly is the flesh of Christ otherwise eaten then in respect that it was killed for vs and made bloodlesse as the words do sound and the breaking of the bread doth represent and that truely also euen as the passeouer and all the sacrifices were eaten But now his body liueth and can not bee without blood as at the first supper it was neither without blood nor dead And
therefore wee cannot without sacriledge affirme that it passeth properly that by the mouth into our bodies And to what ende also as the sacrament of bread is giuē without wine the wine without bread so in the supper the bodie is giuen without blood and the blood seuerally without the bodie but that wee might know that these his owne substances as they are properly in heauen doe not passe through our mouthes but are receiued onely by a faithfull remēbrance effectually stirred vp by the holy ghost For this did the Lord himselfe require saying doe this in remembrance of me and in saying This is my bodie which is giuen for you For in speaking thus he required in them faith whereby they might beleeue this and beleeuing might eate that is might apply it vnto themselues for the food and life of their soules Wherefore wee hold assuredly that they eate the flesh of Christ truely and not by an imagination who beleeuing that it was giuen vnto death for the cleansing of their sinnes doe with a faithfull minde imbrace the same for such a sacrifice applie it vnto themselues And they which thus eate the bodie of Christ as dead wee doubt not but they are more and more ioyned to the now liuing quickning bodie of him according to his owne promise Ioh. 6.56 who first said He which eateth my flesh and afterward added abideth in me and I in him XII The opinion of the corporall eating to be reiected as vaine and vnproffitable Moreouer sith this manner of eating the flesh of Christ namely by faith is both sure and profitable to saluation And the other namely of eating it with the bodilie mouth cannot be prooued out of the holy scripturs and admit that somewhat might probably be alleadged for it yet it is not necessarie nor cā any thing at all profite the soule but bringeth with it into the church many mischiefes monstrous herisies idolatries stirres schismes dissolution of congregations yea makes christian religion to be a scorne and derision to infidells we therefore beleeue that piety willeth al of vs contenting our selues with that kinde of eating which in the supper is made by faith and by the spirite wee should not regard the other kinde but bidding it farewel we should reuerently imbrace brotherly charitie and peace to which ende also the supper was instituted Nether indeed cā the vse of those kinde of speaches be suffred in any other sense then in this as we vse to saye that what we vnderstand by hearing the words with our eares the same we learne by our eares But to bring in phrases not vsed in the scriptures especiallie such as bee not onely vnprofitable but also pernitious hurtfull wee thinke it altogether vnlawfull XIII That there is a true presence of Christ in the supper but it is spirituall Now by this which we haue saide both of the true vnion and the true eating it may easilie be seene what wee ought to beleeue of the true presence Wee hold therefore that if we be truely and indeed vnited with Christ so with his flesh and blood and if we truely eate his flesh and drinke his blood then the same Christ not onely in his deitie but also in his flesh and blood is present vnto them that are vnited vnto him and do eare his flesh and drinke his blood For what can be more present to thee then that which thou eatest and drinkest and to which thou in thine owne substance art coupled and from which as from thy head life and motion is imparted to thee as into a member XIV Such as the vnion and eating is such is the presence namely spirituall But as both the vnion and the eating are made by the spirite and by faith so also wee beleeue and haue beene taught that the presence is no other then spirituall and is in men that are indued with the spirite of god with faith and therefore that this kinde of presence cannot bee letted by any distance of place though neuer so great XV. A thing is present or absent so farre forth as the same is perceiued or not perceiued For neither the neerenesse nor the farnesse of the places maketh a thing to be present or absent but the participation or not participation of the same thing The sunne though it be verie farre distant from vs yet it is said to bee present and it is truely said to be in our eyes when as we are made partakers of it Againe it is absent whē as either ouershadowed with cloudes Aug. ad vol. Epi. 3. Col. 10. or gone into the other hemispheare we cannot see it To a man starke blinde the light thereof is neuer present though it shine euen into his eyes as likewise excellent musicke to one that is deafe or the sweetenes of an oration to an vnlearned man God is also said to be farre from the vngodlie because he is not perceiued of them by faith whenas notwithstanding in his owne essence he is not farre from any of vs. For in him wee liue and are mooued and haue our being Therefore so farre forth as a thing is perceiued or not perceiued of vs either by the naturall part or by the senses or by the minde or any other waye so far also is it said to be present or absent XVI VVhat kindes of presence we denie and vvhat kindes we graunt Wherefore albeit we disallow that the substance of the bread being changed or wasted into nothing there should succeede in place thereof the true flesh of Christ and that so to bee present vnto vs that vnder the accidents of bread should lie hidden the true substance of Christs bodie and albeit we also denie the flesh of Christ to be really and in it owne substance present in the bread which bread hath no other vnion with his flesh but the sacramentall vnion which is made by a misticall relation and albeit wee also gainsaye that he is present to the wicked which haue not that spirituall communion with him nor can bee said truely to eate his flesh And albeit we doe not graunt such a presence of Christs bodie namely that he is now present with the faithful vpon earth in the time of the supper visibly to bee seene of them as he was in the first supper present at the table visibly to be seene of his Apostles for this doth plainely disagree not onely frō the nature of the body of Christ but also frō the scripture it selfe but do graūt that he is present with them onely in an vnuisible manner and such a manner as is not to be perceaued by our senses Lastly albeit wee detest that presence wherein some doe faine the flesh of Christ really in it owne substāce to be euerie where yet wee beleeue and acknowledge such a presence as is no lesse essentiall for the things which are truely present vnto vs seing we are indeed made partakers of them then spirituall for the manner wherein
feet themselues are Is then the vnion which the soule hath with the head dissolued because out of the head it is wholly also in the feet 8 Finally that all things which haue bin spokē of this personal vnion may more plainely be declared I add these also The soule is Hypostasis to the eyes to what eyes such as they are namely instruments vsed for sight not for hearing on the other side to the eares for hearing not for seing So the word was Hypostasis to the humaine nature not to destroy death which was a propertie of the word but to suffer death which was a propertie of the flesh Lastly it is Hypostasis to the flesh not to this end that the flesh should bee it and such like which of which sort the word is but it should be it and such like which and of which sort it is it selfe either by nature or by grace reallie put into it which they call infused or habitual grace For the grace of this vnion is this that it is taken into this vnitie of person This same doctrine of ours is confirmed by those things which are deliuered both by the scriptures and the fathers concerning the office of the mediatour that is concerning the end of his incarnation Many ends of this incarnation are noted of the fathers in the scriptures and particularly of Anselme in his booke intituled Cur Deus homo why God is man but the principall and immediate ende was not simplie that the vvorde God might saue vs for he could haue performed it by his omnipotencie and by his onely commaundement without taking flesh but that hee might by such meanes saue vs from death namely by death of his owne person and by his owne resurrection might raise vs to life according to that of the Apostle to the Hebr. 2. ver 14. That by death he might destroye him vvho c. And in the 2. to Tim. 1.10 VVho hath abolished death and hath brought life c. To which the old church consented saying vvho by dying destroyed death and by rysing againe repaired life Leo the first declared this end saying The sonne of God tooke our flesh that by one nature he might dye by the other he might not dye Therefore he tooke vpon him flesh to this principal ende that for the performing of our saluatiō he might doe such thinges by that flesh which of himselfe being in the forme of God hee could not performe as to suffer and to dye For to kill death simply he could by himselfe haue done it but to kill it by death he could not in himselfe doe it without taking mortall flesh into vnitie of his person Wherefore the vvorde did not take flesh that by the flesh it might doe such actions as were the proper actions of it selfe but that it might worke our saluatiō by such meanes namely by the owne proper actions ioyned with the actions of our flesh Vpon the 12. chapter The 8 aphorisme Concerning this true and essentiall vnion of vs and of our owne flesh with the flesh of Christ there is a notable place in Cyrill vpon Iohn lib. 10. cap. 13. Col. 500. We denie not but wee are spiritually ioyned to Christ by true faith and sincere loue but that wee haue no manner of coniunction with him according to the flesh that we flatly denie and affirme it to bee cleane against the scriptures For who euer doubted but Christ is so the vine and we the braunches that from him we draw life vnto our selues Heare what Paule saith Wee are all one bodie with Christ for though we are many yet in him we are one for wee all are partakers of one bread Doth he perchaunce thinke that the vertue of the misticall benediction is vnknowne vnto vs Which being in vs doeth it not also make Christ to dwell in vs corporally by communication of the flesh of Christ For why are the members of the faithfull the members of Christ know ye not saith hee that your members are the members of Christ shal I then take the members of Christ and make them the members of an harlott God forbidd Our Sauiour also said He which eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me and I in him whereby wee maye consider that Christ is in vs not onely by dwelling in vs which is perceiued by loue but also by a naturall participation For euen as if one take waxe melted by the fire mingle it with other waxe likewise melted so as of them both hee make but one thing so by this communication of the bodie and blood of Christ he is in vs and we in him For otherwise this corruptible nature of the body could neuer be brought to incorruption and to life vnlesse the bodie of naturall life were ioyned vnto it Beleeuest thou not me telling thee this Beleeue I pray thee Christ himselfe Verily verily saith he I say vnto you vnlesse yee shall eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood yee shall haue no life in you He which eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and I will raise him at the last day Thou hearest him plainely crying out that we shall haue no life vnlesse we drinke his blood eate his flesh In you saieth he your selues that is in your bodie By life may well bee vnderstood the flesh of life for that doth raise vs vpp at the last daye And so need I not think it an vncurrant speach to say the flesh of life being made flesh of the onely begotten sonne is brought to the vertue of life and therefore cannot bee ouercome of death And therefore being made in vs putts death from vs For gods onely begottē sonne is neuer absent from it whereuppon because he is one with his flesh I saieth he will raise him vp Why then should it be denied that we are called braunches according to the flesh May it not fittly be said that the vine is his humanitie and we the braunches for the identitie or likenesse of our nature For the vine the braunches are of the same nature So both spiritually and corporally are wee the braunches and Christ the vine Thus farre Cyrill In this whole text Cyrills purpose was to shew that Christ not onely according to his deitie as his aduersaries the Nestorians did thinke but also according to the flesh was the vine from which life flowed into vs as braunches and cōsequently that we as braūches were ioyned not onely to his deitie but also to his humanitie and so to his flesh doe draw life and all our spirituall nourishment not onely from his deitie but also from his flesh And the reason is brought from the Hypostaticall vnion which maketh the word his flesh taken into vnitie thereof to bee but one person one and the same Christ one and the same vine Therefore that we cannot be ioyned to the deitie of Christ but also we must be vnited to his flesh nor can we
who can be able to stād in the battaile and to continue the same The breast where the vitall partes lye must bee armed round about with the breast-plate of righteousnes I say of righteousnes of faith especially and of a good conscience For who is able to stand to coape with so many and so great enemies in the battaile vnlesse he bee persuaded that God standeth his helper and fauourer by him and doth from his heart hate iniquity against which loueth righteousnes for which the battaile is begunne We must haue our loynes girt about with the girdle of trueth and our feete shodd with the knowledge of the gospell of peace that is it behooueth vs to bee so armed on all partes with the knowledge loue and might of the trueth that we must be euer ready and prepared to fight for the gospell holding in our left hand the shield of faith wherewith we may receiue and quench all the fiery darts of the aduersarie but in our right hand the sword of the word of God wherewith the enemie may bee driuen back and wounded VVe shall indeed vse the shield of faith if against al the sophismes and subtelties of heretikes wee hold fast those principles of faith whereof we spake howsoeuer wee bee to seeke in refelling their fine and subtle quirks then haue we vse of the sword of the word if we conuince the enemies by apparent testimonies of scriptures and reasons drawne by necessary consequence from them to which purpose it preuailes not a little if wee cast at the enemies sharp pointed darts stinging arrowes out of the quiuers of the auncientest fathers as also we see those laeter fathers themselues haue done bringing forth the testimonies and arguments of their predecessors against heretikes VVe must therefore take vnto vs this whole complete armour of god with earnest praier vnto him that in these troublesome and euill daies wee may be able to withstand so manie diuers and mightie enemies and in the ende we may triumph ouer them 9 To the preseruation of the cittie and safetie of each cittizen howe needfull it is that the cittie being cleane voide of all the enemies fauourers hirelings close workers and traytors may liue the more safely and quietly who that hath any sight at all in things past and present can be ignorant Therefore the church gouernors and magistrats must take great care that according to the Apostles discipline it may heedfully be lookt vnto what doctrine each one professeth and what life he leadeth they which being taught and admonished will not amend to let them bee made knowne to the whole congregation openly separated from the holy assemblies and from the conuersation with the other faithfull least by their contagion others should also be infected or least as the Apostle saieth a little leuen marre the whole lump But to euery of the faithfull let such obstinate men be as Ethnicks and Publicanes and let this saying of Iohn bee kept if any man come vnto you bringing not this doctrine namely which the Apostles haue deliuered concerning the sonne of God and concerning the foundations of christian religion him receiue not into house nether bid him god speed This discipline is perpetuall in the church of which Tertullian in apolog the 39 chapter speaketh The magistrate further is to punish by Gods commandement according to the qualitie of their faults or blasphemies 10 That which in the ende wee said concerning the last duetie of each cittizen the same is also in this businesse which wee haue in hand verie easie to bee knowne I would it were as easie to bee performed Our faith therefore which we giue and promise in Baptisme must constantly bee kept vnto our prince Christ Iesus to our last ende yea if need be euen to the spilling of our blood and our liues And therefore that doctrine which by the writings of the Prophets and Apostles by the manifest principles of faith and also by common consent of the whole auncient church wee knowe assuredly to bee the doctrine of Iesus Christ the same wee must hold and keepe with a most constant faith against all new opinions neither must we onely keepe them in our mindes but also freely confesse the same with our mouths and openly professe that we will neuer bee willing to decline from the same and so we must professe it that vnlesse wee doe it wee can hope for no saluation For vvith the heart it is beleeued vnto righteousnesse but vvith the mouth confession is made vnto saluation VVith God indeede who seeth the hearts of men onely faith shall bee sufficient but with men and for mens sake the free confession and profession thereof is also necessarie Hee vvhich is ashamed of me before men I vvill also bee ashamed of him before my father said the Lord Iesus Christ For we while we are in this world must set forward the glorie of God the name of Christ and saluation of our neighbour and it is meet that we should make knowne to the whole church what manner of religion wee follow and with what faith we are by Gods grace indued that it may be euidently knowne who be the members thereof Whereuppon the same Lord stirring vs vp to this confession added He which confesseth me before men him will I also confesse before my father And therfore we must neither be allured by commodities to betray Christ neither must we be skared by threatnings and punishments from free confessing of him but rather fixing our eyes vpon the same Lord the captaine and perfecter of our faith who with a willing gladnes suffred the torment on the crosse not caring for the reproch sitteth at the right hand of the throne of God we must constantly runne out our purposed race For he vvhich endureth vnto the ende shal be saued By these tenne pointes noble Earle I hope I haue declared the right meanes by which in this so great diuersitie of opinions about the way of saluation in so great inuasion mighty power of euill spirits and in so cruell tyrannie of the deuill euerie one may prouide for the safetie of him and his I haue now almost 34. yeares by Gods good gift done my endeauour that I might my selfe follow the same course and besides the holie scriptures which do teach apparently that it is according to Gods will I haue learned by experience of many yeares that it is a heauenlie and excellent waye For vppon the very same occasion leauing the Babylonicall captiuitie I gatt me into the free churches of Christs kingdome as into defensed citties First to the churches in Rhetia where I liued eight months and more afterwards vnto Geneua where likewise I abode nine months From thence I came to Strausburgh where then florished the French church and there I liued and taught 11. yeares but not without some conflict after the death of that ornament of the whole cōmon wealth and parent of the schoole Iames Sturmius and the
promised by grace to saue vs. WHen therfore the first earthly man by his owne fault had fallen into so miserable an estate through disobedience and together with him all his posteritie which had sinned in him and were in deede to bee conceiued in sinne and to bee borne the children of wrath we beleeue that god of his meere grace and fauour promised vnto Adam and Eue and in them to all mankinde an other man from heauen Gen. 3.15 1. Cor. 15.47.48 Mat. 1.20 Luc. 1.34 Ebr. 4.15 Ios 7.14 that should be the true substance of verie woman but cōceiued without the seede of man so should be born of a virgine without sinne in whome as in another head of mankinde consisting of a diuine and humaine nature beeing the true image of the father and full of the holie spirite that should bee supplied which in Adam the first head by his owne fault was decaied that is that hee the second man in the name of all vs which were to bee ingrafted into him by his spirite Rom. 6.5 11.17 and by a spirituall regeneration should become flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone Io. 5.6 Eph. 5.29 Phil. 2.8 Rom. 5.19 Eph. 2.13.14 should most perfectly bee obedient vnto god and by his obedience and death should take away sinne should appease the wrath of god should redeeme vs iustifie vs sanctifie vs and gouerne vs by his spirite should indue vs with true libertie and with power to do god and lastly should saue vs glorifie vs to eternall life II. The promise of redemption by Christ was verie necessarie For Adam not as a priuate person but as the parent and originall of all mankinde as he was indued with a righteousnesse which he should haue dispersed into all his posteritie as hereditarie for which cause it is vsed also to be called originall righteousnes so by his disobediēce in stead of righteousnes he brought vppon all men great iniquitie and a spring of all sinne and in stead of eternall life eternall death Therefore there was neede of an other head from whome through his obedience that true and heauenlie righteousnesse holinesse and life might bee deriued into all the members This same is Christ III. To what ende that promise was made presently after the transgression And wee beleeue that this promise was made immediatlie after the transgression euē from the beginning of the worlde and afterwards oft times mētioned to the holy fathers declared yea and confirmed and sealed by diuerse and sundrie meanes signes and sacraments that not onely wee which were to bee borne after the comming of the Messias but also all other which from the first creation should beleeue in this promise and in true faith should imbrace the Sauiour which was to come might by that faith bee made partakers of the following redemption might bee iustified and saued IV. As manie as beleeued in Christ that vvas to come from the first beginning were saued Wee beleeue therefore that as manie since the making of the world as beleeued in Christ promised and to come they were ingrafted vnto him by this faith made partakers of his following obedience of his passion death and redemption that they did eate his bodie that was to come and to bee betrayed and dranke his blood that was to bee shedd and finallie that they were all christians and indued with the spirite of Christ and saued vnto eternall life as well as we V. Errors Therefore wee condemne and abhorre all those which saye that none were saued that were before the comming of Christ and that those fathers receiued no promises concerning eternall saluation but onely concerning things temporall CHAP. X. Of the law I. The law of Moses came betweene the promise of redemption by Christ and the accomplishment thereof and to what ende BVt betweene the promise of redemption by Christ made first vnto Adam after more manifestly declared aswell to others as most especially to Abraham sealed with the sacrament of circumcision and confirmed as it were by the death of Isaac his first begotten offered for a sacrifice and established by an euerlasting couenant betweene the accomplishment of the fame promise the lawe was giuen which Moses deliuered the people which came of Abrahams seed beeing gathered together and wonderfully encreased of whome also Christ should be borne and beeing also deliuered out of the bondage of Egypt by a wonderfull meanes that God might haue a church knowne and visible and separate from other nations and gathered together in one certaine place in which church that promise concerning Christ made vnto the fathers might be kept safe and an acceptable seruice of God maintained euen vnto the comming of the true promised redeemer The law I say deliuered by Moses from God vnto his church came betweene containing three kindes of commandements Morall by which the life and pietie of euerie one should bee directed Ceremoniall with the forme whereof the church should bee gouerned in her outward seruice and religion and iudicial pertaining to the gouernement of the whole common wealth in matters politick and oeconomicall that by these meanes the people of God of whome Christ was to come might both bee restrained from the prophane manners idolatries of wicked nations might be kept within their duetie and obedience to Gods will and finallie might be vpholden in the faith and hope of the promise to bee performed concerning the true redemption by Christ and so might bee prepared more and more for the receiuing of Christ and so in that people God might be glorified II. VVhatsoeuer was necessarie to be done for saluation is contained in the law of God To let passe then the two latter parts of the lawe which doe not appertaine to vs and to speake onely of the former wee beleeue that in that law as it is declared in the bookes of Moses the Prophets and Apostles 2. Tim. 3.16 al things which are necessary to saluation are so perfectly set downe and Gods will Deut. 2.4 5.22 12.32 which he will haue vs to do in his word so reuealed as nothing can be added or taken from it III. The law of the Decaloge or ten commandements is a declaration of the law of nature and a picture of the image of God We also beleeue that this law is a declaration of the lawe of nature which was written in the heartes of the first men perfectly of others imperfectly and but in part and therefore by this law is condemned whatsoeuer is not agreeable to that image of God whereunto man was created and is commaunded whatsoeuer is agreeable to the same For God would shew by that law what man was in his first estate and what hee was made in the second estate and what manner one he ought to be and further what he should afterwards be in the third estate in parte and vvhat perfectly in the fourth by Christ so that the lavve is nothing else but a
that they may auoide condemnation XI Errors Therefore wee condemne those which reiect the law out of the church as vnprofitable and not pertaining to christians and againe those which teach that a man may either wholie or in part bee iustified by the lawe fith it was rather giuen Io. 1.29 to shutt vp all men vnder sinne and to leade them to Christ who alone taketh away the sinnes of the world And this is brieflie our confession of the law deliuered from god by Moses and declared by the Prophets vvhich prepareth disposeth and bringeth men vnto Christ Rom. 10.4 and therefore Christ is ende thereof as the Apostle writeth CHAP. XI Of Christ the redeemer I. A summe of the faith of the person and office of Christ the redeemer WHen therefore the fullnesse of time was come Gal. 4.4 wherein the promise of redemption made vnto the first man was to be accomplished by the second God the euerlasting father sent his onely begotten sonne and eternal and therefore true God of the same nature vvith the father made of a vvoman alone and vvithout the seede of a man and therefore true man but vvithout sinne and so true Christ made subiect to the lavve and therefore circumcised that he in most perfect obedience might fulfill that lavv in the name of vs all made obedient to his father euen vnto death namely for vs for he being vvithout sinne deserued not to die that he might redeeme those which vvere vnder the law and all the elect euen by his obedience by his death and bloodshedding that is by a sacrifice of exceeding vertue for it vvas the blood of God and a most effectuall ransome that he might I saie redeeme vs from sinne to the old image of god to perfect righteousnesse yea from death to eternal life and from the kingdome of Satan to the kingdome of God and that we might receiue adoption of children and so in the ende bee taken into full and perfect possession of the heauenlie inheritance as sonnes and lavvfull heires And lastlie that he might gather together all thinges in heauen and in earth vnder one head and ioyne them to himselfe Eph. 1.10 for the glorie of God the father II. Christ the redeemer is true God and true man We beleeue therefore Iesus Christ to be the onely begotten sonne of God Ioh. 1.14 Mich. 5.2 Phil. 2.6 1. Ioh. 5.20 Mat. 1.1 and so the sonne in nature consubstantial and coeternall to the father and lastlie true God almightie also true man of the true seed of Abraham and Dauid conceiued vvithout the help of a man Heb. 4.15 Mat. 26.35 but onlie by vertue of the holie ghost in the vvombe of the virgine and vvithout sinne and borne of her indued vvith a true soule and a humaine minde and made like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onelie excepted so that he is true God of the substance of the father Ath. in sym begotten before all vvorldes and true man of the substance of his mother borne in the vvorld III. Onely the Sonne to be both God and man and onely Christ But so vve beleeue that the sonne of God is both true God and true man and therefore the true Christ and him alone vve confesse to bee such sith vve read that neither the father neither the holie Chost but onelie the vvorde it selfe vvas made flesh Ioh. 1.14 and the Apostle saieth that the sonne onelie vvas made of a vvoman and that he onelie suffred Gal. 4.4 although to the creation of the nature vvhich the sonne tooke vppon him not onely the Sonne but the Father also and the holy ghost vvere all concurrent IV. That the sonne vvas made man without anie change of himselfe but onely assuming to himselfe humaine nature And vvee beleeue that the sonne of God vvas made man vvithout making any confusion of the diuine and humaine natures vvithout his conuersion into flesh or anie chaunge in the flesh onely by assuming of the humaine nature into the vnitie of that person and as Athanasius speaketh In sym not by conuersion of the godhead into flesh but by taking of the manhood into God so that that vvhich he vvas he did by no meanes leese or let goe but that vvhich he vvas not he tooke vppon him as the Apostle saith Ieb 2.16 the sonne tooke on him the seede of Abraham and as he teacheth that as the sonne taking vppon him vvas not chaunged into the thing taken for God cannot be chaunged at all but remained the same that he vvas trulie distinct from the thing assumed and taken So that seede taken on him vvas not turned into the thing that tooke it but was vnited with the diuine nature into the vnitie onely of the same person according to that saying The word was made flesh The flesh therefore remained flesh and was not changed into the word V. Nether one nature tooke on it another nature nor one person another person but the person of the sonne of God tooke on him mans nature Whence also wee vnderstand that neither the diuine nature common to the three persons nay indeed one and the self same nature of them all did take on it humaine nature nor one person tooke on it another person but onelie another nature For neither did the sonne of God take on him any sonne of Abraham but the seed of Abrahā that is humaine nature spreading from Abraham therefore wee acknowledge not two persons in Christ but onely the same alone by which all thinges were made and which was so perfect before it tooke on it the seede of Abraham that by the same taking it is not made anie other or anie perfecter person or yet indeed any whitt vnperfect VI. The humaine nature was not taken to make a nevv person in Christ or to make perfect the former but onelie to be coupled and vnited to his eternall and most perfect person For albeeit we acknowledge two natures in Christ the diuine and humaine yet we doe not admit that the humaine was therefore assumed that either a new person compounded of that this as of the parts should be made in Christ or that the former and the eternall person should bee made the perfecter by the coupling of a newe nature but onelie that mans nature beeing taken into vnitie of that most perfect and euerlasting person the sonne of God remaining the same that he was might be made that he was not and might haue what to offer vnto his father for vs. And therefore we doe not simplie allow it if one saye so the person of Christ is compounded of the diuine and humaine nature as the person of a man consisteth of a soule and a bodie But we allow the vsuall phrase in the church that Christ clothed himselfe or was clothed with our flesh Whereupon Augustine saith Christ came downe from heaven as a naked man comes downe a hill but he went vp againe clothed with our flesh as vvith
ignorant of nothing he is able to do all those things which pertaine to his office yea and such things as cannot bee performed of anie created substance but onelie of God himselfe may bee done by him by the power of his deitie yet his humaine wil alwaies working therewithal euermore by consent and as it were by desire so that in all the actions of Christ as he is God pertaining to our saluation alwaies his soule in some sorte ioyneth it selfe thereunto by loue by desire and will as also in all things which he did as man the deitie was alwaies concurrent yea euen in his death and passion not that the deitie suffred but that it willed both the passion and death of Christ and added to his passion and death an infinite power euen to cleanse vs of our sinnes To conclude concerning the two natures in Christ and the vnion and proprieties of them wee beleeue whatsoeuer hath bin determined in the Nycene Constantinopolitane Ephesian and Calcedonian counscels against Arrius Apollinaris Nestorius and Eutyches and in the sixt Synode against the Monothelites XIII Tvvo kindes of actions in Christ and all those things which we read that he did suffred were done indeede according to the trueth of the matter and not after a vaine shew or illusion Now from the person of Christ and his natures and the vnion of the natures to passe ouer peculiarly to his actions and his office First we beleeue that as there are two true natures in Christ whereof each hath had and hath her true and essentiall proprieties coupled together euen as the natures are also vnited but not confounded together so there are two kinds of actions which our Lord Iesus Christ is said partlie to haue performed and partlie wil yet performe for our saluatiō some wherof proceed from his deitie and some from his humanitie and the same partlie haue bin partly are so ioyned together and yet distinct that each of their formes as Leo speaketh alwaies worketh with communiō of the other The word performing those thinges which are of the worde and the flesh those thinges which pertaine to the flesh Moreouer as those thinges which Christ did and doeth by vertue of his diuine nature were true and not fained deeds for he truelie reconciled vs to his father he truelie forgiueth sinnes truely sanctifieth and regenerateth So whatsoeuer we read that he did or suffred for vs according to his humanitie wee beleeue that he did and suffred all those things truelie and indeed and not onelie in a vaine shew and as some speak an appearance onelie XIIII A declaration of the former opinion Wee beleeue therefore that Christ as hee was truelie conceiued of the seede of Dauid and truelie borne true man and did truelie eate drink performe other humaine deeds so also that he truelie kept the law for vs 1. Pet. 4.1 Luc. 24.36 that he truely suffred in the flesh and died and rose againe from the dead in the same flesh and ascended with his visible palpable humain bodie circumscribed with true and certaine dimensions into the true and created heauen placed aboue all these visible heauens Act. 3.21 and ther of his free wil worketh abideth til such time as hee returne againe in the same visible body truely from heauen to iudge the quick and the dead and that he truely desireth our saluation in heauen and hath a care ouer vs his spirituall and liuelie motion and feeling worketh in vs Eph. 1.22 4.16 as his members and lastly that he gouerneth the whole church XV. The fruites of the obedience passion death and resurrection of Christ And wee beleeue that Christ by his perfect obedience deserued eternal life not only for himselfe but also for vs by his passion death he satisfied for our sinns in his flesh he redeemed vs out of the hands of Satan the tirannie of death and the bondage of sinne he reconciled vs to God in himselfe and made vs his beloued that in him wee might bee deemed righteous with the father and by his resurrection and ascension into heauen hee obtained also for vs both the resurrections Apo. 20.5 as Iohn speaketh the first and the latter and that in our name he tooke vnto himselfe possession of the heauenlie in heritance Eph. 1.20 and sitteth at the right hand of God that is hath taken to himselfe power ouer all things in heauen and in earth So that in asmuch as he is our Mediatour and is man he hath obtained of his father the secōd place is appointed head of the church aswel which is in heauen as which is on earth that from him and euen from his flesh is conuaied by his holie spirite whatsoeuer pertaineth to the quickning and to the spirituall life of vs to all those which as members are fastened vnto him their head And therefore wee acknowledge beleeue confesse that in Christ alone is placed our whole saluation redemption iustice fauour of God and eternall life 1. Cor. 1.30 according to that saying VVho of God is made vnto vs wisedome and righteousnesse and sanctification redemption Also be is our peace Also Eph. 2.14 Ier. 23.6 Eph. 1.7 Col. 1.19 1. Ioh. 5.11 Iehouah our righteousnesse In him vvee haue redemption by his blood forgiuenesse of sinnes Also it pleased the Father that in him all fulnesse should dwell Also life is in his Sonne And therefore we know that the promise concerning redemption which was made vnto the first man did receiue accomplishment in this other man Iesus Christ so that whosoeuer will bee made partaker of it he must needs be ioyned to his head Christ be made a member of him For we haue redemption and saluation not onelie by him as a Mediatour but also in him as our head This is our faith cōcerning Christ the redeemer his person natures and office and the saluation of mankinde fulfilled and laide vp in him XVI Errors Therefore we condemne all aswell the ancient as later heriticks which euer taught or teach the cōtrarie Arrius Photinus namelie Seruetus and all other vngodlie men of that crewe which denie the true deitie of Christ the Cerdonians the Marcionits the Valentinians the Maniches the Priscillianits the Apollinarists and the rest which do oppugne the true humanitie of Christ some denying that Christ came in the flesh and that hee had true flesh and doe contend that he brought a phantasticall bodie from heauen or that hee was conceiued of the elementes and not of the seede of Abraham and that hee was not borne of a woman others graunting him indeede a true humaine flesh but yet depriuing him of a reasonable soule and substituting his deitie in place of his soule Also the Neitorians which denied the true vnion of the humaine nature with the person of the Sonne did set downe two persons in Christ and two Sonnes the Sonne of God and the Sonne of man We likewise condemne the
as the sacramentall signe whenas the matter of the sacrament is that which the signe that is obiect to our senses makes to come into our thought not to fall into our hands or mouth neither those likewise which do consider nothing in the sacraments but what they see with their eyes or which will haue them onely tokens or badges by which we are discerned from other people or bare signes and not the instrumeÌ„ts of the holy ghost by which he worketh mightily in vs and confirmeth vs in the communion of Christ And we condemne them which institute new sacraments other then them which Christ instituted and those which tye the grace of God and the things signified by the sacraments to the sacraments so that euerie one which receiueth the signe should be said euer to receiue truely the thing it selfe CHAP. XV. Of Baptisme BEsides that which we haue spoken of the sacraments in generall we also especially beleeue and confesse of Baptisme thus I. Baptisme what it is and vvhat are the effects of it Baptisme Mâ—t. 28 1â— first is a sacrament of the new couenant wherewith all men which either hauing professed true repentance of their finnes doe also professe faith in Iesus Christ and so in God the father Cor. 7.14 the sonne and the holie ghost or at least are beleeued to appertaine vnto the couenant Act. 19.5 1. Cor. 6.19 through the faith of their parents but especially they which truely doe belong vnto the couenant as beeing now incorporated into Christ are sealed by him that they should be no longer their owne men but his by whome they are called into the societie of the couenant and consequently into one bodie with him and all the Saintes and into participation of all spiritual heauenly good things Eph. 1.12 Eph. 5.26 Apoc. 5 Tit. 3.5 Rom. 6.4 Mar. 1.4 and are cleansed by this Baptisme as the water of regeneration from al their sinns by vertue of Christs blood and buried into the death with Christ that as he rose froÌ„ death by the fauour of the Father so wee should walke in newnesse of life whereupon it hath bin vsually called the sacrament of repentaÌ„ce for the remission of sinnes the sacrament of faith the seale of the couenant the water of regeneration the washing away of sinnes the sacrament of new life II. The vertue of Baptisme takes place only in the elect and they onely are baptized vvith water and with the holy ghost But though all these things are said of baptisme and are truely attributed vnto it as to the holy ghostes instrument to worke these things and that therefore all which are baptized are truely said to be made and to be such sacramentally yet we beleeue that it is not indeed and really performed but only in the elect which are indued with Christs spirit sith they onely doe beleeue rightly and do truely belong vnto Christ and to his misticall body And therefore that all are baptized indeede with water but the elect onely with the spirit and all doe receiue the signe but not all are made partakers of the thing signified offred by baptisme but onely the elect III. Of what parts the whole sacrament of Baptisme consisteth And we beleeue that vnto the making of the whole sacrament of Baptisme those two thinges are sufficient which Christ instituted namely the simple element of water wherewith the parties are washed either by dipping in or by sprinkling vpon and that forme of words wherewith Christ taught them to baptize that is In the name of the father the sonne and the holy ghost nether did the Apostles as we are perswaded vse any forme of words or added any thing else vnto the water IV. The yong infants of the faithfull are to bee baptized We beleeue with the whole ancieÌ„t church that vnto the sacrament of Baptisme are to be admitted not onely they that are of discretion which hauing professed repentaunce of their sinnes doe also professe faith in Christ but also the yong children of such sith they are to bee accompted to belong to the couenant 1. Cor. 7.14 as the Apostle saieth The children of the faithfull are holie especially seing God hath no where altered that commandement which he gaue to Abraham for the marking of all with the figne of the couenant euen the children of the faithfull Mat. 19.14 nay he said Suffer litle children to come vnto me for of such is the kingdome of heauen V. How farre forth Baptisme is necessarie in the Church and how needfull to euery one to saluation Wee beleeue that Baptisme is altogether necessarie in the church as a sacrament instituted of Christ and which the church cannot be without so that where it is not vsed if it may bee vsed there wee acknowledge no church And we thinke it so necessarie vnto euerie one to saluation that yet notwithstanding if one dye not washed with the water for defect or want of a minister and not vpon contempt we beleeue he is not therefore coÌ„demned or wrapped in eternall destruction For the children of the faithfull are therefore saued because they are holy and vnder the couenant of God and men growen are saued because they beleeue in Christ with a true faith which indeed can suffer no contempt of the commaundements of Christ VI. Baptisme once rightly receiued ought not to be taken againe Furthermore we beleeue that as circumcision was done onely once in the flesh so the Baptisme of water which succeeded circumcision Col. 2. being once rightlie and lawfully receiued ought not againe to be repeated VVee say that it is rightly and lawfully administred when first the doctrine of the gospell concerning the true God Christ and his office goeth before according to Christs institution and then the parties are baptized with water and that of a lawfull minister in the name of the father the sonne the holie ghost Rom. 6.4 For Christ also once died and was buried and wee are baptized into his death and are buried with him by Baptisme Act. 19.5 neither doe wee reade that the Apostles euer did rebaptize anie except those which Paule did baptize who had not bin rightlie baptized VII The vertue of Baptisme is perpetuall Now although wee come but once to the sacrament of baptisme yet wee hold that the matter of this sacrament and the vertue thereof is perpetuall which vertue is nothing else but the verie planting into Christ and so the participation of his benefites the washing away of sinnes and regeneration which dailie more and more is made perfect by the holie ghost For the Apostle saith Eph. 5.26.27 that he cleanseth the church by washing of vvater through the worde that he might make it vnto himselfe a glorious church without spott or wrinkle 1. Ioh. 1.7 And his blood cleÌ„seth daily froÌ„ all sinne And therfore we thinke beleeue that the faithful being content with once receiuing of the sacrament ought daily to bee occupied in
it in the flesh as being a fello-worker with the deitie in his humaine will consenting to the diuine and pronouncing the wordes thy sinnes are forgiuen thee as also Leo the first Epist 10. c. 4 so expoūdeth it to Flauianus saying each forme namely of God and man worketh with communion of the other that which is proper to it selfe as the word working that which is proper to the word the flesh performing that which belongeth to the flesh To forgiue sinnes vvas the proper action of the diuine nature and to saye thy sinnes are forgiuen thee of the humaine Thus farre he VI. Jn Christ alone is offered the forgiuenesse of sinnes and of the elect alone indued with faith it is receiued But like as in Christ alone our mediatour redeemer as the head of the whole church we haue redemption by his blood and remission of sinnes so as without Christ there is none so also wee beleeue that onely the elect indued with true repentance and true faith and ingrafted into Christ by the holie spirite as mēbers to their head are made partakers therof and therefore although forgiuenes of sinnes bee declared vnto all manner of men by the gospell yet to the reprobate as vnrepentant and vnbeleeuing they are not forgiuen but by their owne fault and blame their sinnes do still remaine VII All sinnes at once are forgiuen to the faithfull elect Wee also beleeue that as Christ by his one oblation satisfied not for some but for all our sinnes so also is offred vnto vs that are truely penitent of Christ and in Christ by the gospel the forgiuenes not only of some of our sinns but also of them altogether and the same cōmunicated to vs by the holie ghost and receiued by faith Mat. 18.23 c. seing God declared by a parable that he forgiueth all our debt not part of it VIII Forgiuenesse of sinnes is bestowed in the church onely receiued by faith onely and that onely in this life Lastlie to make an ende we beleeue that as in Christ alone is found remission of sinnes so the same also is disposed and bestowed in the church onely and as it was purchased for vs by the merits and blood of him alone so also it is receiued by true faith in Christ only without our owne meritts and as in this life onely the gospell is preached and by it forgiuenesse of sinnes declared to the repentant and beleeuers so also we can onely in this life be made partakers thereof seing after this life there is no place lefte for faith and repentance and therefore that the church by her ministerie can do nothing for the obtaining of forgiuenesse for men after they be departed this life Cyp. ad Demetr as Cyprian also saieth VVhen a man is once gone hence there is no place for repentance no effect of satisfaction Here life is either lost or gotten here he must prouide for saluation by seruing of God and by the effect of faith IX A confirmation of the former doctrine by the order of the creede According to these three pointes we interpret this article of forgiuenes of sinnes in the creede as first that after the article of the church communion of Saints is placed this article to teach vs that without the church remission of sinnes is not bestowed nor hath any place Againe that the same is placed after the confession of our faith in God the father the sonne and the holy ghost and of our faith wherein we beleeue the church to be holie to consist of the societie and communion of Saintes to wittnesse vnto vs that not for our owne merites but by our faith in the father sonne and holie ghost and because wee are in the church and haue communion with all the Saints therefore we daily obtaine forgiuenes of our sinnes And finally by this placing of the articles of faith we may well beleeue and confesse that after forgiuenesse of sinnes obtained in this militāt church there is no more to be looked for of the dead but the resurrection of the flesh and life euerlasting X. Errors Thus wee condemne the error wherein some do teach that after the fault forgiuen there remaineth a debt to be paied for the punishment and this punishment being eternall death by penitencie is chaunged into temporall paines which we must abide either in this life or after death in purgatorie vnlesse wee bee deliuered thence by masses indulgences and other helps Secondly we condemn their blasphemie which seeke for forgiuenesse of sinnes any where then in Christ and doe so teach Likewise them which would prooue that the same may bee applied to themselues and receiued by any other meanes then by true faith and by the holie spirite Wee condemne also their sacrilegious doctrine which teach that God doth forgiue alwaies to the faithfull all their sinnes but euer retaineth some of them which are to be satisfied for by fasting almes deeds prayers and other works of our owne or else by the oblations of other men and sacrifices of priests CHAP. XXVIII Of the state of souls after death and of the resurrection of the dead I. Mens soules doe neither dye with their bodies nor sleepe after they are loosed from the bodie nor lye still out of heauen or hell nor be tormented in purgatorie WE beleeue that our soules doe neither dye with our bodies nor being loosed frō our bodies do sleep or not sleeping do lye still in some close place both out of heauen and hell nor yet are tormented in purgatorie but that out of the body also mens soules do liue vnderstand desire and that the soules of the godly do raigne with Christ in heauen and of the vngodly are tormented in hell with the deuills the Lord himselfe saying of them when the godly and mercifull men do decay that is depart out of this life they that is their soules Luc. 16.9 shall be receiued into euerlasting habitations Luc. 23.43 Luc. 16.23 Act. 1.25 and teaching in another place that they are with him in paradise but of the other by shewing an example of the rich glutton that they goe downe into hel that is into the place appointed for euerlasting fire as we also read of Iudas there to be tormented II. That the places be diuerse where the soules of the faithfull and the vnfaithfull do liue after the deaths of their bodies Nowe seing the condition and state of the soules of faithfull and vnfaithfull men is so diuers we also beleeue that the places into which they passe are diuers that is to say euerlasting tabernacles ◠Pet. 2.4 or heauen paradise ordained for the godlie and hell and the deepes prepared for the wicked sith to one of these places the scripturs attribute an immeasurable light and to the other exceeding darkenesse which Christ called vtter darkenesse and sith the Lord saieth Mat. 8.12 Ioh. 17.24 that he desireth that where he himselfe is there should also bee
same godly man eateth sometime worthily sometime not worthily enough as in the 1. to the Corinth 11. it appeareth And the vngodly also which receiue onely the element and not the thing of the sacrament are not all of one sort For among them are also conteyned the Hypocrites of whome we spake eveÌ„ now We thought good therefore here to ioyne a more plaine and cleare distinction There be two kindes of men which like as they come to the hearing of the word so may they come to receiue the supper of the Lord the vngodly and the godly Againe of the vngodly some are wholly and simplie wicâ—ed as Atheists Godlesse men also Iewes and Turkes and all such as knowe nothing and beleeue nothing of all those thinges which they heare by the preaching of the gospell or see to bee done by the administration of the Sacraments nay they rather laugh at and coÌ„temne all such matters These if they come to the Lords table they neither eate nor drinke anie thing else but bread and wine and that also not as they are sacrameÌ„ts for they know not of what thinges they are sacraments but onely as they are of their owne nature namelie bread wine For euen so also at the preaching of the gospell they receiue nothing but bare words and the sound of the words Another sort are indeed and before God wicked though they are not so in respect I meane in profession or in sight of men such as are the hypocrites in the church who are not indued with the true and liuelie faith which is proper to the elect but haue onely a temporall and an hypocriticall beleefe These comming to the supper doe indeed eate and drinke no more then the former that is bread wine The reason is because they haue no true faith by which alone Christs body is truely eaten For all this the difference betweene these and the other is not little 1 For the former seing they beleeue none of all the things which they heare concerning Christs bodie in the supper nor perceiue anie thing with their mindes as little do they eate the true bodie of Christ but onely with the mouth of the bodie they eate bread as common bread But the other seing that by their onely historicall hypocriticall and temporall beleefe they vnderstand in their minde and in some sort doe beleeue the things which are spoken and done therefore by the same beleefe and minde they may bee saide in some sort to receiue and in some sorte to taste the bodie of Christ offred in the word and sacraments although they doe not in verie deede eate it seing they do not swallow nor retaine the same for this properlie is to eate in the stomacke of their soule for nourishment of their spirite but rather do spue or vomitt out the same being tasted and after a sorte receiued downe For so also we read in the 6 to the Heb. of those temporary professors that they tasted the heauenlie gifte and good word of God as if he had said they tasted indeed and that also by the gift of the holie ghost but being tasted they cast it vp againe And in the parable of the seede the temporary ones were said to receiue the seede of the word but that they kept it not and therefore brought forth no fruite by it These things cannot be said of the first sort of these wicked ones which are most true of the second sort namelie these temporarie hypocrites Let this then bee the first difference hereuppon followes another difference betweene the eating of those and these 2 They seing the bread which they take into their mouthes they nether acknowledge nor beleeue it to bee a Sacrament of Christs bodie therefore they take it and eate it not as a Sacrament but as common bread and therefore can they not be said to eate the bodie of Christ sacramentallie But these take the bread not as common bread but as a Sacrament of Christs bodie and for that cause are said to eate Christs bodie though not in verie deede seing they lack the mouth and teeth of true faith yet to eate it sacramentallie by an argument drawne as they call it à coniugatis they eate the Sacrament as the Sacrament of Christs bodie therefore they eate Christs body sacramentally and so farre forth as it is a Sacrament because they eate not Christs bodie in verie deed but onely the Sacrament thereof Hereupon followeth that expositioÌ„ wherof we spake before that it is not vngodlie to say simply and absolutely that the hypocrites do eate not onelie the Sacrament but also the thing of the SacrameÌ„t that is not onely bread but also the verie bodie of Christ But in what sense namelie in that wherein the Apostle said all they of Corinth in their first state were vncleane vngodlie c afterwards he said they were not onely vvashed which some might haue interpreted onelie of the water of baptisme but also sanctified and iustified when notwithstaÌ„ding they were not all made truelie such but as yet there lacked not some hypocrits amoÌ„g them So all they which professing faith in Christ doe come to his supper and eate the SacrameÌ„t of the Lotds bodie are saide also to eate the Lords true bodie by reason of the sacramentall vnion which causeth that he which receiueth the signe is by the church iudged to haue receiued also the thing signified because there is no fault either in the institutor of the Sacrament or in the Sacrament it selfe but that he which hath receiued eaten the one might haue also receiued and eaten the other sith Christ by the minister doeth truelie offer them both and the soundnes and trueth of the Sacrament dependeth not vppon our faith but vppon Christs institution So that if we receiue not the whole Sacrament but onely the signe without the thing signified the fault is in our owne selues who receiue one part with the mouth of our bodie and cast away the other part by our infidelitie for an hypocritical faith is infidelitie separating those thinges which God would haue to be ioyned By these thinges it appeareth what difference is in the eating of those that are simplie wicked the hypocrites although neither sort can bee said truely to eate Christs true bodie For such only do truely eate Christ who are also truely ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuelie faith with which alone the elect are indued They which are dead corporallie can no longer eate corporall meate how then should they which are dead spirituallie bee fedd with spirituall foode And onelie the faithfull doe therefore liue because by a liuelie faith they are ioyned vnto Christ which is our life as members to their head as braunches to the vine as the boughes to their tree And if as Cyprian saieth it be meate of the minde not of the bellie surely it is eaten vvith the teeth not of the bodie but of a faithfull minde which onely the godlie can doe If