in his second Apologie writeth thus And this meate is called with vs that is Thankesgiuing c. whereof none other may be partaker but he which both beleeueth those things to be true which we say also hath bene purified with the washing which is giuen for the remission of sinnes and regeneration and also so liueth as CHRIST hath appointed For wee take not these things to be common and wonted bread and accustomed drinke but euen as the word of God IESVS CHRIST our Sauiour was made man and had both flesh and blood for our saluation Euen so in like maner wee haue bene taught that the meate which is hallowed by the prayers of the word that we receiued of him and by which our blood and flesh by a change made are nourished is both the flesh blood of the same CHRIST which was made man For the Apostles in their Commentaries which be called the Gospels haue left in writing that CHRIST did so command them and that he said when he had taken bread and giuen thankes Doe this in remembrance of me This is my body And that when he had taken the cup and giuen thankes hee said This is my Blood Partly the other words of this testimoniall doe affirme the trueth of his body and chiefly because by a similitude taken of the two natures in CHRIST he declareth that there be also two natures in the Sacrament namely of the outward signe and of the flesh Blood of IESVS CHRIST Alike vnto this is spoken in Irenaeus in his 4. booke For how say they againe that the flesh commeth into corruption doth not receiue life which is nourished of the body and Blood of the Lord Therefore let them either change their opinion or else abstaine to offer the things which are aforesaid but our opinion is agreeing to the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and this Sacrament againe confirmeth our opinion For wee offer those things that be his preaching agreeably the partaking and trueth of Flesh and Spirit For euen as the bread which is of the earth receiuing the calling vpon God is now no more common bread but a Sacrament of thanksgiuing made of two things earthly and Heauenly so also our bodies receiuing the Sacrament of thankesgiuing be not now corruptible because they haue the hope of resurrection The same man in his fift booke and because wee be his members and are nourished by the creature he giueth vs the creature making his Sonne to arise and raining as he listeth the same Cup which is a creature he confirmed to be his Body by which he increaseth our bodies When therefore both the Cup mixed and the bread made receiueth the word of God it is made the Sacrament of the blood and body of CHRIST whereof both the substance of our flesh is increased consisteth how then doeth he denie that the flesh is able to receiue the gift of God which is life Euerlasting seeing it is nourished with the blood and bodie of CHRIST These words of Irenaeus albeit not very dark yet wil they be more plaine if we adde certaine things to them out of S. Augustine August tit de consecrat dist 2. He in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus and is found De consecratione distinct 2. writeth thus This is it that we say and that by al meanes we labour to proue that the Sacrifice of the Church is made two maner awayes that it consisteth of two things Of the visible forme of Sacraments and the inuisible flesh and blood of our Lord IESVS CHRIST of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST As the person of CHRIST consisteth of God and man since CHRIST himselfe is very God and very man because euery thing conteineth in it selfe the nature and trueth of those things whereof it is made But the sacrifice of the Church is made of two things of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST There is therefore the Sacrament and the substance of the Sacrament the bodie of CHRIST S. Augustine repeateth that comparison between the person of CHRIST and the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and therein hee saith plainely that the trueth and nature of the bodie is conteined The same man De consecrat distinct 2. Idem ibidem Whether is this mysticall Sacrament of the Cup made in figure or in trueth The trueth saith My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Else how can it bee a great matter The bread that I shall giue is my flesh for the life of the world vnlesse it bee very flesh But because it is not godly that CHRIST should be deuoured with teeth the Lords will was to haue this bread and wine in mysterie to be by his power made his flesh and blood in veritie by the consecration of the holy Ghost and to be daily offered mysticallie for the life of the world That like as his true flesh is created of the Virgin by the holy Ghost without the companie of man so by this same Spirit the same bodie mystically is consecrated of the substance of bread and wine The body of CHRIST is both trueth and figure Trueth in that the bodie and blood of CHRIST by the power of the holy Ghost is made by the strength thereof of the substance of bread and wine And the figure is that which outwardly is perceiued The same man in the same title Idem ibidem They that eate and drinke CHRIST eate and drinke life To eate him is to be refreshed to drinke him is to liue That which is visiblie taken in the Sacrament is eaten and drunke spiritually in very trueth Idem ibidem The same man in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus in the same title saith But we in the forme of bread and wine which we see do honor inuisible things namely flesh and blood Neither doe we alike take these two formes as we did take them before the consecration seeing that we faithfully confesse that before the consecration they be bread and wine which nature hath framed but after the consecration they be the flesh blood of CHRIST which the blessing hath hallowed He againe vpon the 54. Psalme Vntill the world come to an end the Lord is aboue yet for all that the Lords trueth is also here with vs For it is fit that the body in the which he rose againe should be in one place but his trueth is spred euery where He also in his Epistle to Irenaeus CHRIST is bread of the which hee who so eateth liueth for euer whereof hee himselfe saith thus And the bread which I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world And he expoundeth it how it is bread not onely according to the word whereby all things liue but according to the flesh that hee tooke for the life of the world For mans flesh which was dead through sinne being knit
to pure flesh incorporat made one with it doth liue by his spirit euen as one bodie by his owne spirit But he that is not of the body of CHRIST liueth not of the Spirit of CHRIST Hitherto Augustine hath plainly inough proued the trueth and nature of the body of CHRIST in this Sacrament Hilar. de tri lib. 8. Hilarie in his 8. booke of the Trinitie I would know now of them that alledge vnitie of wil between the Father and the Sonne whether CHRIST nowadayes be in vs by trueth of nature or by agreement of will For if the Word be verily made flesh and wee receiue the word verily flesh in the Lords meate how should a man not suppose him to remaine naturally in vs which being borne man tooke to himselfe an vnseparable nature now of our flesh and hath mixed the nature of his owne flesh with the nature of eternitie vnder the Sacrament of his flesh to be partaked among vs And a little after Therefore whosoeuer wil denie the Father to be naturally in CHRIST let him first denie either himselfe to be naturally in CHRIST or CHRIST to be in him because the Father in CHRIST and CHRIST in vs do make vs to be one thing in them If CHRIST therefore did verily take the flesh of our bodie if the same man which was borne of the Virgine Mary be verily CHRIST and we verily take vnder a mysterie the flesh of his body and thereby shal become one because the Father is in him and hee in vs How is the vnitie of will alledged seeing the naturall propertie by meanes of the Sacrament is a Sacrament of perfect vnitie Also a little after For those things which wee speake of the naturall trueth of CHRIST in vs vnlesse we learne of him we speake foolishly and wickedly For he saith My flesh is meat in deed and my Blood is drinke in deed Hee that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood remaineth in mee and I in him There is no place left of doubting of the trueth of Flesh and Blood For now it is verily Flesh and verily Blood both by the confession of our Lord himselfe and also by our Faith and these things being receiued by eating and drinking doe worke that effect that both wee be in CHRIST and CHRIST is in vs. Is not this trueth Let it happen vnto them not to bee true which denie IESVS CHRIST to be very God And soone after And so by a Mediator the perfit Vnitie should be taught when as wee abiding in him hee should abide in the Father and he abiding in the Father should abide in vs and so should we clime to the vnitie of the Father when hee is naturally according to his birth in him we also should be naturally in him so long as he abideth naturally in vs. And that this natural vnitie is in vs he hath thus witnessed He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me and I in him And by and by he addeth This is truely the cause of our life for that we haue CHRIST remaining in vs carnal men according to the flesh whereas wee shall liue hereafter by him after the same sort as he liueth by the Father If we therefore liue naturally by him after the flesh namely hauing taken vpon vs the nature of his flesh how hath he not the Father after the spirit naturally in him since he liueth by the Father And he concludeth To this end be these things rehearsed by vs because the heretiks affirming falsly the vnitie of wil onely betweene the Father and the Sonne vsed for the example of our vnitie with the Lord as though we were vnited to the Sonne and by the Sonne to the Father only by obedience and will of Religion and no propertie of naturall fellowship were granted to vs by the Sacrament of his flesh and blood whereas in deed the mysterie of the true and naturall vnitie should be taught both for the honour of the Sonne of God that is giuen vs and for the Sonne carnally abiding in vs and wee knit corporally and vnseparably in him Hilarius doeth manifestly teach the true and naturall partaking of the flesh of CHRIST in the Sacrament And as plainely doeth Cyrillus witnesse the same in the 10. Cyrillus lib. 10. cap. 13. booke chap. 13. when he saith Yet wee denie not that wee be ioyned spiritually in CHRIST by a right faith and sincere loue but that wee haue no maner of ioyning with him according to the flesh that truely we vtterly denie And soone after But doth hee happily thinke that the vertue of the mysticall blessing is vnknowen to vs which when it is wrought in vs doth it not also make CHRIST to dwell corporally in vs by the partaking of the flesh of CHRIST For why be the members of the faithfull the members of CHRIST Know ye not saith he that your members be the members of Christ Shal I therefore make the members of Christ the members of an harlot Our Sauiour also saith He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood remaineth in me and I in him whereby it ought to be considered that CHRIST is in vs not onely by that accustomed qualitie which is perceiued by loue but also further by a naturall partaking For euen as if a man shall melt waxe by the fire and mingle it with other waxe which is likewise melted so that one lumpe may seeme to be made of both So by the communion of the body and blood of CHRIST he is in vs and wee in him For this corruptible nature of the bodie could not otherwise be brought to vncorruption and life vnlesse the body of naturall life should be ioyned thereto The same man also in his 4. Idem in Io. lib. 4. cap. 14. booke vpon Iohn the 14. chapter doeth witnesse For truely it behoueth that not onely the soule should ascend into blessed life by the holy Ghost but also that this rude and earthly body should be brought againe to immortalitie by a taste feeling and meate like vnto it The same man in his 11. book vpon Iohn cap. 27. The Sonne Idem in Io. lib. 11. cap. 27. as man is made one with vs corporally by the mystical blessings but spiritually as God And a little after For we receiuing corporally and substantially as it hath bene said the Sonne of God which is made one by nature with the Father be made pure and glorified being partakers of the nature that is from aboue The same man in the same book vpon the 26. chapter Idem eodem lib. cap. 26. For to the end therefore ye might knit euery one of vs among our selues and God although wee differ both in body and soule yet hath he found a meane agreeable to the determination of his Father and his owne wisdome For he blessing with his owne body through the mystical communion them that beleeue doth make vs one bodie both with himselfe and also among our selues For
as oft as they of old time treat of the Sacrament they all apply to the Sacrament the vvords of our Lord vvhich are spoken in the sixt chapter of Iohn My flesh is verily meat my blood is verily drinke The bread which I will giue is my flesh and vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. Which things shal be proued by their ovvne sayings before alledged and also by those that shall follovv Neither are they to bee allovved that deny this chapter of Iohn to be referred to this Sacrament seeing so great a troupe of vvitnesses be against them But the opinion of them seemed more probable vvho as they iudge this Euangelist to set forth the humanitie of Christ lesse then the rest and his diuinitie more amply so doe declare that these things vvhich are rehearsed by the other Euangelists concerning the institution and outvvard ceremonie of this Sacrament are not at all mentioned of Iohn but that he openeth expoundeth more plainly vnto vs the true and right vnderstanding of them And it is plaine that the mindes of the Capernaites vvhen the Lord said My flesh is verily meat And vnlesse ye eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. vvere much offended and troubled and therefore leauing him departed for they vnderstood him too grosly and after the common sort But his Tvvelue Apostles that taried by him being admonished and lift vp to a more higher meaning and of more Maiestie heard of him The words which I haue spoken be spirit and life Vpon this it commeth to passe that all the old vvriters do flie the common iudgement and vsuall vnderstanding in those vvordes This is my body and vvhich the Lord spake of eating his flesh and follovv a more diuine vvay of vnderstanding them and more agreeable to the Sacraments as they themselues affirme Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Hom. 83. Chrysostom vpon Matthew 26. hom 83. expounding the vvords of the Supper Take ye eate ye this is my body c. doth aske this question Why were they not troubled vvhen they heard this And he ansvvereth Because he had taught them alreadie many and great things concerning this point before Wherefore also hee did not confirme that vvhich they had often before perceiued And not long after hee addeth Hee himselfe did also drinke of it least at the hearing of those vvordes they should say What do vve then drinke blood and eate flesh and vpon that might be troubled For at the first also when he spake of these matters many vvere offended onely for the wordes Lest therefore this should then also haue happened he did this first himselfe that hee might bring them to the partaking of these mysteries vvith a quiet minde We be taught here by Chrysostom that the Apostles were not troubled when they heard the Lord say Take ye eat ye this is my body Because they had bene alreadie taught before hovv that which vvas spoken ought to be vnderstood namely where others were offended as it is in Iohn said This is a hard saying they abode and had learned It is the Spirit that giueth life the flesh profiteth nothing The wordes that I haue spoken vnto you are spirit life that is to say as the same Chrysostom in the same place expounded it they are spiritually to bee vnderstood which selfe thing the Lord himselfe confirmeth by his owne deed vvhen hee did eat the same bread drinke the vvine vvith them lest they should thinke vpon any base or common matter but should be brought to the partaking of the mysteries with quiet minds It is no hard matter to perceiue by this that Chrysostom vvriteth in this place that it is one way a body that Christ himselfe called his body when he said Take ye eat ye this is my body the which he also receiueth himselfe together with his disciples and another vvay to bee his proper body which was fed vvith the other The one did eat the other was eaten after a diuers sort either of them is called his body To this purpose maketh also that vvhich Clemens Alexandrinus schoolemaster to Origen Clemens Alexand lib. inscrip Paedagogus teacheth in his booke intituled Paedagogus when he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The blood of Christ is two maner of wayes the one fleshie whereby vve are vvashed the other spirituall vvherevvith we haue bene anointed Hierom. in Epi. ad Ephes ca. 1. Whom Hierom follovving vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians the first chapter saith The blood and flesh of Christ saith he is vnderstood tvvo maner of vvayes that is either that spirituall and heauenly whereof he himselfe spake My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke And vnlesse you eate my flesh and drinke my blood you shall not haue euerlasting life Or else the flesh and blood that vvas crucified that was shed vvith the speare of the souldier There bee tvvo things that Hierom teacheth in this place That those vvords in the 6. chap. of Iohn do appertaine to the Sacrament euen as Chrysostom doth and that the flesh that vvas crucified doeth differ from that vvhich is in the Sacrament vvhich he calleth Spirituall Diuine The same man vpon Leuiticus and is to be seen De consecrat Idem in Leuit. de consecrat dist 2. dist 2. Of this sacrifice vvhich is by miracle vvrought for the remembrance of Christ it is lavvfull to eate but of that which Christ offered vpon the Altar of the Crosse it is of it self lavvful for no man to eat A plaine and manifest distinction Augustin in lib. senten Prosperi August in lib. Sent. Prosperi It is his flesh vvhich couered with the forme of bread we receiue in the Sacrament and his blood which vnder the forme and tast of wine we drinke that is to say the flesh is the sacrament of flesh and blood is the sacrament of blood By flesh and blood being both inuisible spirituall intelligible is betokened the visible sensible body of our Lord Iesus Christ full of the grace of all vertues diuine Maiestie Who seeth not hovv plainly Augustine putteth a difference between the proper body of Christ which he termeth visible and sensible and that flesh which we receiue in the sacrament vvhich he affirmeth to be inuisible spirituall intelligible and a signe of the other body Idem in Epist. ad Iren. The same man in his Epistle to Irenaeus You shall not eat this body which you see and drinke that blood which they that shall crucifie me shall shed The same truely and not the same The same inuisiblie and not the same visibly He putteth a difference when hee saith Not this body and againe The same not the same The maner of the difference is the same inuisibly which hee termeth before the inuisible body namely the Sacrament of the body and not the same visibly or the visible body which is referred to the proper body for this body
wheresoeuer it be is visible The same man in his booke Sent. Prosperi Idem in lib. Sent. Prosperi Christ was once offered in himselfe yet is hee daily offered in the Sacrament which is thus to be vnderstood That in the outward shewing foorth of his body in the distinction of all his members very God and very man did but once hang vpon the Crosse offering himselfe a liuely sacrifice to the Father The body which is in the Sacrament hath neither outward shewing forth of the body nor distinction of members but his proper body neuer wanteth his distinction of members Idem in Ps 33. The same man vpon the 33. Psalme And he was caried in his owne hands But my brethren who can vnderstand how this might be done in a man For who can be caried in his owne hands A man may well be caried in other mens hands in his owne hands no man is caried How it may be vnderstond in Dauid himselfe according to the letter we shall not finde but in Christ wee shall finde it For Christ was caried in his owne hands when he commending his owne body said This is my body for that body was caried in his hands and afterward expounding himselfe better he saith And hee was caried in his own hands How was he caried in his owne hands Because when he ment to cōmend that body and blood of his hee tooke into his hands that which the faithfull knew and he caried himselfe after a sort when he said This is my body In saying that body was caried in his hands and he tooke into his handes that which the faithfull knew and he bare himselfe after a sort he doeth declare that this saying is not to be vnderstand simply of one selfe body but that body that did carie was one namely his proper bodie and that which was caried another to say the Sacrament of his body The same man vpon the 98. Psalme Idem in Psal 98. It seemed a hard saying to them when he said Vnlesse a man do eate my flesh hee shall neuer haue euerlasting life They tooke it foolishly imagined of it fleshly and thought that the Lord would haue cut certaine pieces out of his bodie to giue them and they said This is a hard saying They themselues were hard not the saying for if they had not bene hard but humble spirited they would haue said within themselues He speaketh not this without a cause there is may hap a certaine hid Sacrament in it They would haue taried with him meeke spirited not hardned and haue learned of him that which those that remained did learne when they were gone For when his Twelue disciples abode with him after their departure they seemed to bewaile to him the death of them because they were offended at his wordes and gone backe But he instructed them said vnto them It is the Spirit that quickeneth for the flesh profiteth nothing The words that I haue spoken to you are Spirit and life Vnderstand you that spiritually which I haue spoken to you You shall not eate this bodie which you see neither shall you drinke the blood which they shall shed that crucifie me I haue commended to you a certaine Sacrament If it be spiritually vnderstood it will giue you life Although of necessitie it must be ministred visiblie yet must it bee vnuisibly vnderstood where hee saith Not this bodie which you see c. And I haue commended a certaine Sacrament vnto you hee maketh a plaine distinction betweene the two bodies whereof one is properly his body the other the Sacrament of his body Idem de doct Christ. lib. 3. The same man De doctrina Christiana lib 3. Vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood yee shall haue no life in you Hee seemeth to command a hainous and wicked thing therefore it is a figure commanding that wee must communicate with the passion of the Lord sweetly and profitably lay vp in remembrance that his flesh was crucified and wounded for vs. If we following the letter do vnderstand it as the words doe properly sound Hee seemeth saith he to command a hainous thing therefore hee saith it is a figuratiue speach and ought not to be vnderstood of the eating of his proper body but of the Sacrament of his body which is after a spirituall sort the body of Christ Idem ad Bonifac Epist. 23. The same man to Boniface in the 23. Epistle For so wee speake as when Easter draweth nie wee say To morrow or the day after is the passion of Christ whereas indeed he suffered so many yeeres before and that passion hath not at all bene made but once For vpon very Easter day we say This day the Lord rose againe whereas so many yeres are past since he rose againe Why is none so foolish to reproue vs say we lie in so saying but because we call these dayes according to the similitude of those in which these things were done so that it is called the same day which is not the same but by the course of time is like that and it is said to bee done that day for the ministring of the Sacrament which was not done that day but long before Was not Christ once offered in himselfe and yet in the Sacrament not onely at all the solemnities of Easter but euery day he is offered to the people And hee lieth not that being asked the question doeth answere that he is offered For if the Sacraments should not haue a certaine likenesse of those things whereof they be Sacraments they should be no Sacraments at all And of this likenesse they take the names oftentimes also of the things themselues Euen as therefore after a certaine sort the Sacrament of the body of Christ is the body of Christ and the sacrament of the blood of Christ is the blood of Christ so also the sacrament of faith is faith We see also in this place that the proper body of Christ which was once offered is discerned from that sacrament which is daily offered and after a sort is the body The same S. Augustin Idem de consecrat dist 2. as it is to be found De consecrat dist 2. Whether is this mysticall sacrament of the cup vnder a figure or vnder the trueth The trueth saith My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke else how shall it be a great matter The bread which I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world vnlesse it be very flesh in deed But because it is not lawfull to deuoure Christ with teeth the Lords will was that this bread and wine should be made potentially in a mysterie his flesh and blood verily by the consecration of the holy Ghost and should be daily offered mysticallie for the life of the world That euen as very flesh was made of the Virgin by the holy Ghost without the company of man so also by the same through
meat saith he is bread but the vertue in it doth quicken and he declareth that this vertue of the bread doth sanctifie and strength of the water is made by grace not naming it with one word but describing it more fully with many wordes saying That these things be done by faith and hope and the perfection of the mysteries Idem in Anacephaleosi and calling vpon of the sanctification for the perfection of saluation The same Author rehearseth almost the same words in Anacephaleosis Cyprian de Coena Dom. The same was also Cyprians opinion There is giuen saith he an immortall food differing from common meats retaining the shape of bodily substance but prouing by inuisible working that the presence of a diuine povver is there Thou hearest the presence of a diuine povver thou hearest an inuisible working that is to say the grace of God Againe By the wonted effect of things the weakenesse of our faith being aided is taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternal life is in the visible sacraments And againe Euen as in the person of Christ humanitie was seene and diuinitie hid so into the visible sacraments vnspeakeably doth the diuine substance powre it selfe Againe These words be spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearce the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse faith be added The bread is food the blood is life the flesh substance the body the Church A body for the agreeing of members in one bread for the conformitie of nourishment blood for the working of quickning flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken In this place Cyprian witnesseth that this sacrament is called flesh and blood for the working of the quickning and for the propertie of the humanitie which Christ tooke that is the proper vertue thereof namely spirit and life And foorthvvith he addeth Christ doth othervvhile call this sacrament his body otherwhile flesh and blood othervvhile bread with the corporal nature whereof according to these visible things he hath communicate the portion of euerlasting life And againe The sacraments as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doeth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries These termes which Cyprian commonly vseth The diuine povver The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life The diuine substance The diuine Maiestie what other thing doe they set out to vs then that which Augustine said that according to his Maiestie according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace Christ is with vs euen vnto the end of the world especially since that he shutteth out the carnall sense and requireth a spirituall as we haue in another place more fully expounded Neither thought Cyrillus any othervvise writing in this sort to Calosyrius Cyril ad Calos For that we should not abhorre flesh and blood being set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that be offered turning them into the trueth of his proper flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may be found in vs. That trueth of body which Cyprian calleth The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life the same doth Cyrillus terme the force of life a body of life a quickening seed meaning the spiritual power grace as he expoundeth himselfe vpon Iohn lib 4 ca. 17. Idem in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 17. saying thus Euen as a little leauen as Paul saith doth sowre the whole lumpe so a little blessing of God doth draw the whole man into himselfe and doth fill him with his grace and in this sort doeth Christ abide in vs and we in Christ By this meanes he reiecteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say the eating of mans flesh and withdraweth the minds of the faithfull from vntrue meanings worldly thoughts and affirmeth to Euoptius Idem ad Euopt that this mysterie is receiued in an onely pure and exquisite faith as we haue mentioned before For it is necessary that such an eating be spirituall and made by grace Athanasius was of this opinion Athanas de Pecca in Spiri Sanct. In his booke of the sinne against the holy Ghost he writeth in this sort For this cause made hee mention of the Ascension of the Sonne of man into Heauen that hee might withdraw them from a corporall imagination that they might afterward learne that the heauenly meate that commeth from aboue and the spirituall food which he giueth is called the flesh of Christ For the wordes that I haue spoken to you saith he be Spirit and life Which is asmuch as if he should say The body which is shewed and slaine shal be giuen for the food of the world that it may be spiritually distributed in euery one and bee made a preseruation for all to the resurrection of eternall life For this cause sayeth Athanasius mention was made of the Ascension of the Sonne of man that he might call vs away from corporall imagining of his presence and might aftervvard learne that the grace or spirituall povver which he termeth the heauenly meat comming from aboue and spirituall food and affirmeth that it is spiritually distributed is called the flesh of Christ To these agreeth Chrysostome vpon Matthew cap. 26. Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Homil. 83. Hom. 83. Will ye not see saith he with what a chearefulnesse of minde Infants doe snatch the breast with what appressing do they fasten their lips to the nipples Let vs with no lesse desire come also to this Table and spirituall nipple of this cup yea rather with a greater coueting let vs like sucking babes sucke the grace of the Spirit Idem ibidem Let vs haue one griefe and heauinesse of heart if we be depriued of this spirituall food The same man in the same Homily saith That it is an insensible thing which is giuen vs in this sacrament but by things sensible euen as in Baptisme These be the words Since therefore he saith This is my body let vs haue no doubt but beleeue and behold it with our vnderstanding For no sensible thing is deliuered vs from Christ but by sensible things and yet all things which he deliuered be insensible So also in Baptisme by water which is a sensible thing that gift is granted but that which is wrought in it namely regeneration and renuing is a certaine intelligible thing For if thou haddest bene without a body hee would haue giuen thee the gifts barely without body but because thy soule is ioyned to a body in sensible things to be vnderstood are giuen thee O hovv many do now a daies say I would I might see his forme and shape I would I might see his garments also his shooes I would I might see Thou doest therefore see him touch him eat him thou desirest but to see his garments but he giueth thee himselfe not only that thou maiest
the which notwithstanding either they meant to signifie some other honour and reuerence meet for holy matters then that which is cōmanded of God when he saith Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serue So that worshipping may be defined to bee of two sorts the one wherewith we worship God himselfe The other wherewith we worship the prescribed signes diuine mysteries according to that saying Worship yee his footstoole which thing most men vnderstand to be spoken of the arke of couenant other interpret it to be of the humanitie of Christ Or admit that there is one manner of worshipping in both places wee might say that the flesh of Christ is to be worshipped though it bee a creature for the diuinitie ioyned therewith that the arke of couenant was to be worshipped for the presence of the diuine maiestie which God himselfe promised should be there present After the which sort also we may worship the sacrament of Thankes-giuing for the vnspeakeable and inuisible grace of Christ ioyned therewith as Augustin saith not honouring that which is seene and passeth away but that which is beleeued and vnderstood This also is worthy to be marked that the worship in old time was not done by the idle lookers on but by them which did receiue the mysteries and were made partakers of their grace For he that worshippeth receiueth to him it is the body of Christ not to him that worshippeth receiueth not For to this intent was that meat ordained that wee worshipping should eate and not that wee should worship it when others eate Thus much bee said concerning the worshipping But in that it is denied that euill men can eate the body of Christ which thing should necessarily be done if the spirituall vertue grace be ioyned with the bread it may be answered That there is a distinction to be vsed For if we haue regard to the very nature of the sacrament the diuine povver can by no meanes be absent from the signe in that it is a sacrament serueth to that vse but if we regard the manners inclination of the receiuer it is not life grace to him vvhich othervvise of the ovvne nature is both because the vvickednesse of euill men cannot be partaker of so great a goodnesse suffereth it not to bring forth fruit but contrariwise to them is it death damnation For euen as diuers kinds of meats bee of their owne nature wholesome but if they be put into diseased bodies they increase the euill and oftentimes shorten their time not through their nature but through the fault of the receiuer so also commeth it to passe in the sacrament vvhose proper vertue is alvvayes present till it hath performed the office thereof although an euil man when he receiueth it cannot be partaker of so great goodnesse nor perceiue any fruit thereof Cyprian de Coena Domini confirmeth the very same Cyprian de Coena Dom. The sacraments truely saith he as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries But albeit the sacraments permit themselues to be receiued or touched of vnworthy persons yet for all that they cannot be partakers of the Spirit whose infidelitie or vnworthines doth resist to so great an holinesse And therefore these gifts to some be a sauour of life to life and to some a sauour of death vnto death For it is altogether right that the despisers of grace be depriued of so great a benefit that the puritie of so great grace should haue no dwelling in the vnworthy Augustin against the letters of Petiliane lib. 2. August cont literas Petill. lib. 2. cap. 47. ca. 47. Therefore remember that the maners of ill men do nothing hurt the sacraments of God to make that either they be not sacraments at all or be lesse holy but the hurt is to the ill men themselues that they should haue them for a testimony of damnation and not for a helpe to saluation The same man in his fift booke of Baptisme Contra Donatistas cap. 8. Idem de Bapt. lib. 5. For euen as Iudas to whom the Lord gaue a sop made place for the deuil in himselfe not by receiuing that which was euil but by ill receiuing it So euery man that receiueth vnworthily the sacrament of the Lord maketh it not euill because he is euill or that he receiue nothing because he receiueth it not to his saluation For it was the body of the Lord the blood of the Lord also to them to whom the Apostle said He that eateth vnworthily Idem contra Crescen lib. 1. cap. 25. eateth drinketh his owne iudgement The same man contra Crescen lib. 1. cap. 25. Albeit the Lord himselfe say Vnlesse a man eate my flesh and drinke my blood he shall haue no life in him doth not the same Apostle teach that this becommeth destruction to them that vse it ill For he saith He that eateth the bread and drinketh of the cup of the Lord vnworthily is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. Behold how diuine and holy mysteries do hurt those that vse them ill Why not Baptisme in like maner By these many other places it is euident that the sacrament of Thankesgiuing asmuch as pertaineth to the nature of the sacrament is verily the body and blood of Christ and is verily a diuine and holy thing albeit it be receiued of the vnvvorthy where notwithstanding they be not made partakers of the grace holines thereof but they draw thereout death and damnation For neither doth so great a goodnes remaine in them or enter into them to the intent to remaine but to condemne them Neither doeth the touching of the Lords body any more profit them then it did the Iewes that crucified Christ to touch his body that was hallowed alwaies indued with his grace Wherefore let this be certaine that the sacraments as long as they be sacraments doe retaine their vertue neither can they be separated from it For they alwayes consist of their parts heauenly and earthly visible and inuisible inward outvvard whether good men or euill worthy or vnvvorthy receiue them And also that change of signes and passage of elements into the invvard substance which wee often find in the old writers can by no meanes stand if we separate the vertue from the signe or would haue the one receiued apart from the other But this is so to be vnderstood as long as the signe serueth to that vse and is applied to that end for the which it was ordained according to Gods word For if we apply it to other vses and abuse it contrary to Christs institution either it is no sacrament at all or else it ceaseth from being a sacrament Therefore they commit no light offence which do not direct the signes of bread and wine to that end which Christ ordained them
who wil thinke those distant from this naturall vnion which be vnited in one CHRIST by the vnion of one CHRISTS bodie For if all we eat one bread we be made all one body And within few wordes after But that this bodily vniting to CHRIST is attained by the partaking of his flesh Paul himselfe againe doeth witnesse disputing of the mysterie of godlinesse the which saith he hath not bene knowen to the sonnes of men in other generations as it hath bene reueiled now to his holy Apostles and Prophets in the Spirit that the Gentiles be coheires and ioyned in body and equall partakers of the promise in Christ The same man to Calosyrius Idem ad Calosyrium For that wee should not be afraide of the flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God submitting himselfe to our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that bee offered turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that the body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may bee found in vs whereupon he addeth Doe this in a remembrance of me Hitherto Cyrillus Cyprianus de coena Domini Cyprian of the Supper of the Lord This bread not in outward apparence but in nature changed by the mightie power of the Word is made flesh which the Lord did reach to his disciples And in the same place Who euen to this day createth and sanctifieth blesseth and diuideth to those that take it godly this his most true and holy bodie Hieron in Matth. de consecrat dist 2. Hierom vpon Matthew De consecrat dist 2. He tooke bread which is the comforter of man and passed to the true Sacrament of Passeouer That as Melchisedec for a figure therof before had done when he offered bread and wine he should represent it in the trueth of his bodie and blood Chrysost in Io. Hom. 45. Chrysostom vpon Iohn Hom. 45. But that not onely by loue but euen in very deed wee should be turned into that flesh he worketh the same by the meate which hee hath giuen vs. For when he ment to bring his loue vpon vs he ioyned himselfe to vs by his body and made himselfe one with vs that the body might be knit with the head The same man Homil. 61. Idem Hom. 61. Therefore that we should be this not only by charitie but in very deed should bee mingled with that flesh this is brought to passe by the meat which hee hath giuen vs. Chrysostom hath also many other sayings to the same meaning Those things that S. Ambrose writeth in his 6. Ambros lib. 6. de sacra cap. 1. booke the first chapter of the Sacraments do agree with these Euen as our Lord IESVS CHRIST is the true Sonne of God not as men be by grace but as a Sonne of the substance of the Father so is that which wee take the very flesh of CHRIST and they drinke his very blood as he himselfe said And a little after Then when his disciples could not away with the talke of CHRIST but hearing that he would giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke they went away But Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life and whither should I goe from thee Lest therefore any moe should say this as though there should be a kinde of lothsomnesse of blood but that the grace of redemption might remaine therefore receiuest thou the Sacrament in a similitude but thou obteinest the grace and vertue of the true nature The same man in his 4. booke the 4. Idem lib. 4. cap. 4. cap. Thou seest therefore how effectuall in operation the word of CHRIST is If then there be so great efficacie in the word of our Lord IESVS CHRIST that that should begin to bee which was not How much more is it of effect to make those things to be that were before and to be changed into another thing And so that which was bread before the consecration the same is become the body of CHRIST after the consecration because the word of CHRIST doeth change the creature And so of bread is made the body of CHRIST and the wine mixed with water in the cup is made blood by the consecration of the heauenly word But perhaps thou wilt say I see not the forme of blood But it hath a likenesse For euen as thou hast taken the likenes of his death so also doest thou drinke the similitude of his blood that there should be no abhorring of blood and yet the price of our redemption wrought Also before the wordes of CHRIST the cup is full of wine water after the words of CHRIST haue wrought there is the blood made which hath redeemed the people Therefore marke how the word of CHRIST is able to make alteration in all things Beside CHRIST himselfe doeth testifie that wee doe receiue his bodie and blood of whose fulnesse and testimonie we ought not to doubt Likewise peraduenture thou saiest I see another thing How prouest thou that I do receiue the bodie of CHRIST This remaineth yet for vs to proue that this is not it which nature hath fashioned but it that blessing hath hallowed and that there is greater force of the blessing then of nature because nature it selfe is also changed by the blessing Also But if the blessing of man was of such force that it could turne nature What doe we say of the very heauenly consecration whereas the very wordes of the Lord our Sauiour do worke For this Sacramēt which thou receiuest is wrought by the words of CHRIST But if the word of Elias was of such force that it could bring fire from heauen Shall not the word of CHRIST be of power to change the kinds of elements Eusebius Emyssenus de consecrat dist 2. Eusebius Emyssenus likewise who was in yeeres before Ambrose doth witnes in these wordes the opinion which was then had of the Sacrament and it is had De consecrat dist 2. Whereupon the heauenly authoritie confirmeth That my flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Let therefore all doubt of misbeliefe be laid aside because hee that is author of the gift is likewise witnesse of the trueth For the inuisible priest doeth turne with his word by a secret power the visible creatures into the substance of his bodie and blood saying thus Take ye eate ye this is my body and the hallowing being repeated Take ye drinke ye this is my blood Therefore euen as the height of the heauens the depth of waters and largenesse of earth had their being of nothing suddenly at the becke of the Lord that commanded so with the like power in the spirituall Sacraments when power commandeth effect obeieth How great therefore and wonderfull benefits the force of the heauenly blessing doeth worke How it ought not to seeme a new vnpossible matter to thee that earthly and mortal things bee turned into the substance of Christ aske thy selfe that art
of thy heart and especially receiue it whole Christ with the thirstie draught of the inward man Eusebius declareth by this similitude what maner of change is made in the sacrament how earthly things be turned into the substance of Christ and what maner of substance that is without doubt like vnto that change wherewith wee be altered in our Baptisme and such a substance as wee put on in the bath of Regeneration when we be borne the children of God and made a new creature and new men when we passe into the body of the Church where in our outward part nothing is changed but all inwardly and for that cause calleth he it spirituall food which we behold in faith touch with minde take with the hand of our heart and receiue with the thirstie draught of the inward man Ambros in Epist ad Hebr. de consecrat dist 2. With this agreeth that that Ambrose writeth vpon the Epistle to the Hebrewes and is repeated De consecrat dist 2. In Christ was once a mighty sacrifice offered for an euerlasting Redemption vvhat doe vve then doe vve not dayly offer him yes but in remembrance of his death and it is but one sacrifice not many for Christ vvas once offered and this sacrifice is a paterne of that Ambrose saith plainely that that true sacrifice vvas once offered but this sacrifice is offered euery day and hee declareth in vvhat sort it is one sacrifice and not one vvhen he saith that this is a paterne of that The same man in his booke of Mysteries saith Idem in lib. de Myst. In that sacrament is Christ because it is the body of Christ it is not then a corporall but a spirituall food vvhereupon the Apostle also saith of the figure of it That our fathers did eate the same spirituall food for the body of God is a spiritual body the body of Christ is the body of the diuine spirit These things cannot be said of Christes true and proper body namely that it is a spirit for a spirit hath not flesh and blood vvhich that body hath as the Lord himselfe did vvitnesse before his disciples Feele yee and see you saith he for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me haue Idem de Sacr. lib. 4. Wherefore the same auctour De sacramentis lib. 4. saith thus Thou seest therefore hovv mighty in operation the vvord of Christ is If then there be so great force in the vvord of the Lord Iesu that those things should begin to be which were not hovv much more is it of force to make those things remaine which were and yet to change them into another thing The heauen was not the sea was not the earth was not But hearken to him that saith He spake the word and they were made he commanded and they were created Therefore that I may ansvvere thee it was not the body of Christ before the consecration but after the consecration I tell thee it is now the body of Christ He spake the word and it was made he commanded and it was created Thou wast thy self but thou wast an old creature after thou wast consecrated thou didst beginne to be a new creature Wilt thou know how new a creature Euery one is saith he a new creature in Christ Ambrose taketh his argument à maiore By the word of God new things are made then is it no marueile if things which now be and remaine are changed into another thing by his word vvhich thing is done in Sacraments Examples of the first are Heauen the Sea the Earth of the later man which before he be regenerate is an old creature but after regeneration by force of the word albeit he be the very same he vvas before namely a man still yet he receiueth an invvard change and of an old is made a new creature Like vnto this he affirmeth the change in the sacrament to bee when as both bread remaineth and yet getteth to it selfe a nevv substance that is to say a new dignitie That same thing doth hee yet more fully expound in his sixt booke writing thus Idem de sacrament lib. 6. Peraduenture thou mayest say How is it very flesh for I see a similitude I see not the trueth of blood in deed First of all I told thee of the vvord of Christ that it worketh as of force to change and alter the appointed kindes of nature Moreouer when the disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee vvould giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therefore any moe should so say but the grace of Redemption should remaine Therefore thou takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest attaine the grace and vertue of the true nature At the last he addeth to make vp the matter And thou which receiuest bread art made partaker in that spirituall food of the diuine substance We learne by the authoritie of this so great a man that that which we take in the sacrament is a spiritual not a corporall food neither that that flesh is to be taken after the maner of his proper flesh as the Capernaits did and vvith offence went backe but together with the outvvard signe we obtaine the grace and vertue of the true nature and receiuing the bread are partakers of his diuine substance And here also we see that Ambrose was of the same opinion that Emissenus was and far otherwise vnderstandeth both the alteration which is made in the sacraments and also the very terme of substance then it is either taken in proper speach or as Philosophers do naturally speake Idem de offic lib. 4. cap. 48. To the same purpose serueth also that which he writeth in his booke De officijs lib. 4. cap. 48. Here is the shadovv here is the image there is the trueth the shadow in the Lavv the image in the Gospel but the trueth in heauen In time past the Lambe was offered the calfe vvas offered Novv is Christ offered but he is offered as man as taking his Passion but hee as a Priest doeth offer himselfe here as in an image but there in trueth where hee maketh intercession for vs as an aduocate vvith his Father Hee putteth a difference in the one oblation from the other And albeit both after their maner be done in deed yet this vvhich is solemnized in the Church is done in an Image but the trueth it selfe remaineth as an Aduocate for vs vvith the Father And this place of Ambrose doeth seeme to be like to that place of Origen vpon the 38. Origen in Psal 38. Psalme vvhere he intreateth of that saying of Paul For the Law hauing a shadow of those good things to come hath not the very Image of the things c. And thus he vvriteth But if any man can passe from this shadovv let him
come to the Image of the things and see the comming of Christ made in the flesh Let him behold that hie Priest both novv offering sacrifices to the Father that shall hereafter offer And let him vnderstand all these things to be the Images of spirituall things and that heauenly things be noted by corporall Offices It is therefore called an Image vvhich is receiued for the present time and may be discerned by the nature of man If thou canst vvith thought and mind pearce the heauens and follovv IESVS vvho hath pearced the heauens and is novv present before the face of God for vs there shalt thou find those good things of vvhich the Lavv had a shadovv and Christ shevved the Image in the flesh vvhich are prepared for the blessed vvhich neither eye hath seene nor eare heard nor ascended into the heart of man vvhich things vvhen thou shalt see thou shalt vnderstand that he that vvalketh in them and continueth in desire and earnest affection after them such a one vvalketh not novv in an Image but in the very trueth it selfe Origen writeth to the learned and practised and therefore not easie to be vnderstood of all men Notvvithstanding he shevveth plainely that the sacrifices vvhich be here offered be Images of that trueth vvhich pearced to heauens and abiding before the face of God is intercessor for vs And therefore that the Images of the trueth be one thing and the very trueth another And that although these Images haue also their trueth yet this differeth from that proper trueth vvhich vve shall there indeed attaine to vvhen vve follovving Christ shall pearce the heauens vvhere hee abideth the vvhich after a sort vvee also enioy here while in our deuout meditations our mindes being lift vp to heauen we behold those secret good things He also vpon Matthew cap. 15. Idem in Mat. cap. 15. saith Neither is it the material bread but the word that is spoken ouer it that profiteth to him that eateth not vnvvorthily of the Lord. And these things are spoken of the figuratiue and mysticall body Many things beside may be said of the Word which was made flesh Here Origen doeth declare that the true flesh that is to say the true nature of man which Christ being the Word tooke vnto him to bee one maner of flesh and an other thing to bee his figuratiue and symbolical body with which words he calleth the Sacrament To this purpose serue the wordes that he writeth Contra Celsum lib. 8. Idem contra Celsum lib. 8. We obeying the Maker of all things for his great benefits bestovved vpon vs when we haue giuen Thankes are fed with the loaues set before vs which by intercession and prayers are made a certaine more holy body These words A certain more holy body do not agree to the proper body of Christ but they agree to the sacrament of Thankesgiuing which after a certaine maner is his body The same man vpon Leuiticus Homil. 7. Idem in Leuit. Homil. 7. expoundeth the same matter more plainely saying But you if ye be the children of the Church if you bee indued with the mysteries of the Gospel if the Word made flesh dvvelleth in you acknowledge you these things which we speake that they be the Lords lest peraduenture he that is ignorant be ignorant still Acknowledge that they be figures which be written in the holy Volumes therefore examine them as spiritual not carnall men and vnderstand those things which bee spoken For if you take those things as carnal men they hurt you and doe not nourish you For there is also in the Gospel a letter that killeth The killing letter is not onely found in the olde Testament There is also a letter in the nevv Testament that can kill him which will not spiritually marke those things that bee spoken For if thou follow this that hath bene spoken according to the letter Vnlesse ye eat my flesh and drinke my blood this letter slayeth Seeing then the Authors euery where referre these wordes to the sacrament and Origen commandeth so much to flee the letter as to say that it killeth Who seeth not that Christes flesh is in the sacrament one way to bee vnderstood and another according to the letter and in proper speech Epiphanius in Anchorâ—to is of the same opinion Epiphanius in Anchorato where he saith For wee see that our Sauiour tooke into his hands as the Gospel coÌ„taineth that he rose in the Supper and tooke these things and when hee had giuen Thankes he said This is mine c. And we see that it is not equal nor like neither to the Image that is in flesh nor to his inuisible Godhead nor to the features of his members for this is of a round fashion and without sence as much as to the povver of it selfe appertaineth And therefore his will was to speake by grace This is mine c. And euery man beleeueth his saying for he that beleeueth not that he is true as he hath said hee is fallen from grace and health But that which we haue heard wee beleeue that it is his for vve know that our Lord is altogether sence all indued with sence all God all moouing all working all light all incomprehensible but yet he that hath giuen vs this with grace Epiphanius doeth in this place endeuour himselfe to proue that man being made after the Image of God hath in deed the Image of God not according to the proper nature of diuinitie but after grace and vseth the similitude taken of the Sacrament of Thankesgiuing the which according to the proper nature of a body he denieth it to be the body of Christ since it hath neither the forme of a true body and lacketh feeling and mouing and yet it is verily beleeued to be his body by grace Cyprian de Coena D mini Cyprian also in his sermon of the Supper of the Lord doeth very godly and plentifully reason to the same effect out of the which I haue thought sufficient to touch these fevv places For none of the Fathers haue more extolled the dignitie of the Sacrament and shutting out all carnall sence more plainely declared the true vnderstanding of so great a mysterie An vnconsuming meat saith hee the Master did set before his disciples neither were the people bidden to a sumptuous and cunningly dressed Banquet but there is giuen an immortall food differing from common meates retaining the shape of bodily substance but prouing by inuisible vvorking that the diuine vertue is present Againe There did sometime arise a question as it is read in the Gospel of Iohn of the noueltie of this word and at the doctrine of this Mysterie were the hearers amazed vvhen the Lord said Vnlesse you eate of the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you Because certaine for that they did not yet beleeue nor could vnderstand went backe for that it seemed
to them an horrible and hainous thing to feed vpon mans flesh thinking hee had spoken this after that sort as though they should haue bene taught to haue eaten his flesh sod or rosted and cut in pieces whereas the flesh of his person if it should bee deuided into morsels could not haue bene sufficient for all mankinde which being once spent Religion should seeme to perish vvhich should not haue aftervvard a sacrifice remaining any longer But in such like thoughts flesh and blood profiteth nothing because as the Master himselfe hath expounded These words be Spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearse the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse Faith be added too The Bread is food the Blood is life the Flesh substance the Body the Church A body because of the agreeing of members in one Bread for the conformitie of nourishment Blood for the effect of life giuen Flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken Also hee sayth This common bread beeing changed into flesh and blood doeth procure life and encrease to the bodies and therefore by the accustomed effect of things the weakenesse of our faith is aided and taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternall life is in the visible Sacraments and that we be knit to Christ not so much by corporall as by spirituall passage Also this bread which hee reached to his disciples beeing changed not in forme but in nature by the omnipotencie of the Word is made flesh and euen as in the person of Christ the humanitie was seene and the diuinitie hid so into the visible Sacrament vnspeakeably doeth the diuine substance powre it selfe Also the Master truely of this Institution sayd that Vnlesse wee should eate and drinke his blood we should not haue life in vs instructing vs by a spirituall lesson and opening our vnderstanding to so hidden a matter that wee should knowe that our eating is an abiding in him and our drinke as it were a certaine incorporation by submitting our seruice and ioyning our willes and vniting our affections Also hee sayth Among the guests of the Lords table the natural man is not admitted whatsoeuer flesh and blood doeth appoint is shut out from this company it sauoureth nothing it profiteth nothing whatsoeuer the finenes of the sence of man doth goe about Cyprian hath these and many other places to the same purpose The very words of Cyprian doe sufficiently declare that which belongeth to our purpose How the Letter is not to bee followed in these things which be spoken of this mysterie how the vnderstanding of the Flesh is vtterly to be shunned and all things to be referred to a spiritual sense That there is the presence of the diuine power in this Bread the effect of euerlasting life and that the diuine substance is powred thereinto that the words are spirit and life that a spirituall lesson is giuen that this Body this Blood and Flesh this substance of body ought not to be taken after a common sort nor as mans reason doth appoint but to be named thought of beleeued for certaine excellent effects powers and properties ioyned thereto which be euen within the body and blood of Christ by nature namely that it doeth both feede and reuiue our soules and prepareth our bodies to resurrection and immortalitie Cyrill in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 14. The same opinion hath also Cyrillus who though he affirme in many places the trueth and nature of the body of Christ to be in the Sacrament yet hee is in opinion that it is a spiritual and diuine matter and not to be vnderstood after the manner of men For first he declareth that the same maner of eating is set foorth in the words of the Lords Supper which the Lord himselfe signified when he said Vnlesse you eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. For so he writeth in his 4. booke vpon the 14. Chap. of Iohn Where after he had spoken somewhat of them that did say How can this man giue his flesh to be eaten hee addeth these words Therefore they ought first to haue set the rootes of faith in their minde and then to seeke for those things that are to be sought for of man but they before they would beleeue did seeke importunately For this cause therefore the Lord did not open how it might be but exhorteth to seeke it by faith So to his disciples that beleeued he gaue the pieces of bread saying Take ye and eate ye this is my body The cup also in like maner he caried about saying Drinke yee all of this This is the cup of my blood which shall be shed for many for the remission of sins Thou seest manifestly that by no meanes he would declare the maner of the mysterie to them that sought it without faith but to them that did beleeue and did not seeke it he plainely declared it Likewise in cap. 21. Idem in cap. 21 vpon these words This is a hardsaying thus he saith And such as want sharpenesse of wit are wont to abhorre knowledge which should be sought with great study and much labour but yet the spirituall man accustomed to the Lords doctrine as to great dainties doth continually sing How sweet be thy words vnto my throat yea aboue hony to my mouth But the naturall Iew doeth thinke this spirituall mysterie full of foolishnesse and where by the Lords words he is stirred to an higher vnderstanding of things yet he falleth still to his accustomed madnesse Likewise in his cap. 22. expounding these words Doeth this offend you Idem in cap. 22 c. hee writeth on this sort For ignorance many which followed Christ not vnderstanding his words were troubled for when they heard him say Verely verely I say vnto you vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you they thought Christ had called them to the cruel maners of beasts and stirred them to eate the rawe flesh of a man and to drinke blood which be euen horrible to heare For they had not yet knowen the maner of this mysterie and the godly ministration thereof Also in the 24. chapter Idem cap. 24. The words therefore that I haue spoken to you bee spirit that is spirituall and of the spirit and life that is to say they be of the liuely and naturall life Idem ad Calosyrium The same mans words are rehearsed to Calosyrius which follow For least we should abhorre flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailty powred into the things offered the power of life turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine seed that giueth life might be found in vs. By these and many other places in Cyrillus we be lift vp from the letter to the spirite from the sence of the naturall man to a more hie vnderstanding of a spirituall mysterie It must not
be thought here that we eate the rawe flesh of a man or drinke his blood but that the words bee spirituall and spiritually to bee vnderstood that they be termed flesh and blood but ought to be vnderstood of spirit and life that is to say of the vertue of the Lords flesh that giueth life And therfore saide hee that the povver of life was put into the outward signes Idem in Ioan. lib. 11. cap. 26. and called it by an apt signification the body of life The same man vpon Iohn lib. 11. cap. 26. doth expound somewhat more plainely how wee be coupled corporally both with Christ and with our selues and that by the partaking of the sacrament although we be seuered both in body and soule It must be considered saith he whether to the vnitie of consent and will wee may also finde a naturall vnity by which we shall be lincked among our selues and we all vnto God For peraduenture we are ioyned also with corporall vnion although we be seuered one from another that ech one apart hath his being and distance of place For although Peter and Paul be one by vnity in Christ yet Peter is not Paul Afterward within few words hee thus concludeth The originall therefore and the way whereby wee bee partakers of the holy Ghost and vnited to God is the mysterie of Christ for we bee all sanctified in him Therefore that hee might vnite vs one to another and euery one to God although we bee seuered both in body and soule yet hath hee found a vvay agreeable to the counsell of his Father and to his ovvne wisedome For hee blessing those as beleeue with his body through the mysticall communion doeth make vs both with himselfe and also among our selues one body It is plaine that Cyrillus spake not of the same kind of body when he saith Although they bee seuered in body and soule yet they which beleeue through the body of Christ and by the mysticall communion be made one body with Christ and betvveene themselues For euen as the faithfull being ioyned in that spirituall body are one body although their proper bodies remaine seuered Euen so also wee being ioyned with Christ in that spirituall body are made one body with him although his ovvne proper body bee farre distant from our bodies Let vs adde one place more taken out of this Father Idem in lib. ad Euop Anat. 11 which is in his booke Ad Euoptium Anath 11. where he speaketh thus of Nestorius Doeth not he pronounce this mysterie to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a deuouring of mans flesh and violently driue the mindes of the faithfull without conscience into false interpretations and with mans inuentions take those things in hand which are receiued by an onely pure and vnsearchable faith Cyrillus doth in this place obiect against Nestorius That to maintaine this error he did speake too grosly of the Sacrament as though the faithfull doe properly therein eate mans flesh which by the Greeke word hee calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But such kind of thoughts hee termeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say as Budaeus doeth interpret it counterfeite not right not sincere For so much as here is no place for such kinde of worldly and common imaginations We ought to thinke the like of Theophylactus who although in some place he may seeme to haue follovved a more grosse opinion as vpon Matthew the 26. Chapter whose words wee haue aboue rehearsed wherein he seemeth to denie that the bread of the Sacrament of thankesgiuing is a figure of the Lords body but the very body indeede yet when he saith It is no figure he meaneth that it is not onely a figure as in another place where vpon Marke and Iohn it is read for else hee should haue repugned against all the olde Writers and that is not likely who throughout terme this Sacrament a figure an image a signe and patterne Besides in that he said it was the body in very deede his meaning was not to haue it taken after a worldly and common sort as it shall manifestly appeare by those things that follow for he writing vpon these words in the sixt Chapter of Iohn Theophylac in Ioan. cap. 6. The Iewes therefore did striue among themselues saying How can this man giue vs his flesh to eate saith thus It behoueth vs therefore after that wee heare vnlesse yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man yee shall haue no life in taking the heauenly mysteries to keepe stedfast and vnwauering faith and not to be inquisitiue how For the naturall man that is hee that follovveth mans carnall and naturall thoughts is not apt to conceiue such matters as bee aboue nature and spirituall and euen so he doth not vnderstand the spirituall eating of the Lords flesh whereof who so bee not partakers shall not bee partakers of euerlasting life And by and by hee expoundeth thus these words Hee that eateth my flesh c. In this place vve learne the Sacrament of the communion For he that eateth and drinketh the Lords flesh and blood abideth in the Lord himselfe and the Lord in him for there is a new mixture made and aboue reason so that God is in vs and wee in God Here the Author teacheth that faith must be had in the mysteries and not to be inquisitiue how and therewithall he remoueth apart mans carnall or naturall thoughts and requireth onely a spirituall meaning and commendeth a more hie maner of eating For he addeth not long after vpon these words This is a hard saying who can heare him c. But see their folly For their duetie had been to haue asked and learned those things whereof they were ignorant But they drew backe and did expound nothing spiritually but all things as they outwardly appeared For in as much as they heard of flesh they thought he would compell them to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is deuourers of flesh and blood But because we vnderstand it spiritually neither wee bee deuourers of flesh and yet be we sanctified by such meate By and by also expounding this It is spirit that quickeneth thus he writeth Because as we haue often sayd they that carnally expounded such things as Christ spake were offended he sayth When those things that I speake are spiritually vnderstood that onely bringeth profit but the flesh that is to say to expound them carnally profiteth nothing but is occasion of offence So therefore such as heard carnally those things that Christ spake were offended He addeth therefore The words which I speake are spirit that is to say they be spirituall and life hauing nothing that is carnall and bringing euerlasting life Let vs adde hereunto those things which he writeth vpon Marke 14. cap. 1. For the bread is not onely a figure and a certaine patterne of the Lords body but it is turned into the very body of Christ For the Lord sayth The bread which I will giue is
vpon the Crosse out of his side and this body which in the mysterie of Christes passion is daily solemnized of the faithfull and that blood also which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull is a mysterie of that blood wherwith the whole world was redeemed Hee confirmeth that also by the authoritie of Hierom and after rehearsall of this place The blood and flesh of Christ is vnderstood two maner of wayes either that spirituall c. thus he concludeth With no small difference hath this doctour made a distinction of the body and blood of Christ For in that he saith that the flesh or blood which are daily receiued of the faithfull are spirituall and yet that the flesh that was crucified and the blood which was shed with the souldiers speare are not said to be spirituall nor diuine he doeth manifestly signifie that they differ as much one from another as do spirituall things and corporall visible and inuisible diuine and humane and that those things which differ from themselues are not all one But the spirituall flesh which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull and the spirituall blood which is daily giuen to the faithfull to drinke doe differ from the flesh that was crucified and from the blood that was shed with the souldiers speare as the authoritie of this man doth witnesse Therefore they be not all one For that flesh which was crucified was made of the flesh of the Virgin framed together of bones and sinevves and seuered with the features of the members of a man quickned with the spirit of a reasonable soule indued with reason into a life proper to it selfe and motions agreeable to the same But on the other side the spirituall flesh which feedeth spiritually the people that doe beleeue after the forme that it beareth outwardly is made of the graines of corne by the handes of the workeman framed together of no sinewes and bones seuered with no varietie of members quickened with no reasonable substance nor can exercise any proper motions For whatsoeuer giueth the substance of life it is of a spirituall force and of an inuisible working and of a diuine power Againe of the wordes of Augustine he concludeth in this maner By authoritie of this doctour intreating of the Lords wordes of the sacrament of his body blood we be manifestly taught that those wordes of the Lord be to be vnderstood spiritually and not carnally as hee himselfe sayeth The words which I speake to you bee spirit and life Namely the words of eating his flesh and drinking his blood for he spake it vpon that occasion whereat his disciples were offended Therefore that they should not bee offended the heauenly Master calleth them back from the flesh to the Spirit and from a corporall sight to inuisible vnderstanding We see therefore the food of the Lords body and the drinke of his blood are after a sort his very body and his very blood namely in that they be Spirit and life Hee addeth againe after the matter proued Therefore we see that there is a great difference betweene the mysterie of the body blood of Christ which is now receiued of the faithfull in the Congregation and that body which was borne of the Virgin Mary which suffered which was buried which rose againe which ascended into heauen which sitteth at the right hand of the Father For this that is ministred in the way is to be taken spiritually For Faith beleeueth that which it seeth not and spiritually feedeth the soule and doth reioyce the heart and giueth euerlasting life and incorruption while that is not minded which feedeth the body which is crushed with teeth which is broken in pieces but that which by faith is spiritually receiued But that body wherein Christ suffered and rose againe is his owne proper body taken of the Virgin Maries body able to be felt and seene euen after his resurrection as he himselfe said to his disciples Beholde my hands and my feet for I am euen he handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue Bertram writeth many things to this purpose but let it suffice that wee haue touched thus much Which mans exposition and manner of disputing vpon the Sacrament is in mine opinion diligently to be wayed and imbraced for tvvo respects First because hee sticketh to the authoritie and testimonie not onely of those fathers of whom he hath repeated a few but also many moe I might say of all the most auncient Secondarily because that where the credit of the man was so much that he was prouoked to write by a most famous Prince and his writing published abroad and in sight of all men he was praised of many reprehended of none or noted of any one spot of erronious doctrine whereby it came to passe that before these new grosse and naturall transubstantiation makers sprung vp the doctrine of Bertram touching the Sacrament was allovved by the iudgement of euery man that was best learned Albeit this terme of transubstantiation being indeed new not necessarie yet perhaps might haue some place as the word Trans-elementation if they had not brought in another change of the substances then a sacramentall and that which the auncient fathers did vnderstand which is brought to passe the former substance remayning still But they not satisfied with the noueltie of the terme haue inuented a monstrous interpretation For they appoint the very proper body of Christ to be in the Sacrament and plucke from it the true properties of a mans body whereas it should seeme that Aquinas himselfe was not ignorant of the distinction aboue mentioned Aquin. 3. parte Sum. q. 76. art 3. For he writeth 3. part Sum. q. 76. art 3. on this manner Christ is whole vnder ech peece of the formes of Bread and Wine not onely when the hoste is broken but also when it remaineth whole neyther is there distance of parts one from another as the eye from the eye or the eye from the eare or the head from the feete as there is in other bodies organicall for such maner of distance is in the true body of Christ but not as it is in this Sacrament He affirmeth the true body of Christ to bee one which is organicall and hath difference of members which also hee denyeth to bee in the Sacrament and that to be another which is in the Sacrament and wanteth varietie of members which thing if he meant of the spirituall body as the old writers did speake he iudged right but if hee meant to signifie any masse of flesh without forme it is a great absurditie and contrarie to the opinion of all the old writers Lombardus Lombardus also Author of the sentences concerning the verie and proper flesh of Christ lib 3. Sentent Dist 3. saith thus Christs flesh that was taken is neither heauenly nor of the aire nor of any other nature then of such as all mens flesh is Since
here which proper nature of the flesh also he hath dilated plentifully by a Periphrasis to exclude altogether such a manner of presence to establish his presence in the sacraments by grace power Augustin teacheth vs by the Lords words that his true and proper body is ascended into heauen euen whole but the grace of that body we receiue by the sacraments which is neither consumed by biting nor perished by eating Idem in Psal 65. To this agreeth that the same Author writeth vpon the 65. Psal The murtherers dranke the same blood by grace Idem in Ioan. tract 26. which they shed through madnes The same man vpon the Gospel of Iohn tract 26. Giue eare to the Apostle I would not saith he haue you ignorant bretheren that our Fathers were all vnder a cloud and all did eate one maner spirituall food Spirituall truely all one but corporall another for they did eate Manna we another thing but the same spirituall meat that wee doe And they all dranke the same spiritual drinke yet they one thing we another in outward appearance which notwithstanding did signifie all one in spiritual power He calleth the sacrament spirituall food for the spirituall power ioyned therewith which power also was in the sacraments of the old testament albeit our outward signes and theirs were diuerse The spiritual power was all one in both That of a body to bee borne at his time This of a body alreadie borne suffered and raysed againe So Manna was to them the bodie of Christ as the sacrament of thankes-giuing is now to vs. For this spirituall power Augustin also called it as we said before a spirituall inuisible and intelligible body wherby is signified the visible body of the Lord and able to be felt Hereunto also belongeth that saying of the same Author The body of Christ is both trueth and a figure Trueth while the body blood of Christ by the power of the holy Ghost in power of the same is made of the substance of bread wine but a figure is that which is outwardly seene The meaning of these words be that the substance of bread wine be made the body of Christ for the power of his body giuen to them by the holy Ghost The same man in Psalme 77. Idem in Psal 77. Their meate and drinke therefore in mysterie was all one with ours yet in signification not in outward appearance for the selfe same Christ was figured to them in the rocke but to vs he was made manifest in flesh But hee saith That God was not well pleased with them all In that he saith not with all there were some then there in whom God was pleased And albeit the sacraments were common to all yet his grace which is the power of the sacraments was not common to all This place of Augustin if it bee well weighed doth much helpe to vnderstand how Christ is present in the sacraments For he ioyneth together these two Signification and Grace which hee affirmeth to be the strength of the sacrament To these agree those things which Ambrose writeth lib. 6. de Sacramentis Afterward Ambros de Sacra lib. 6. when the Disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee would giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therfore any moe should so say as though there should be a kind of loathsomenes of blood but that the grace of redemption might remaine thou therefore takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest obtaine the grace and vertue of his true nature Ambrose doth plainely teach how it is true flesh For hee hath noted both The figure where hee saith thou takest it in a similitude and the inward strength because vndoubtedly it giueth the grace and vertue of the true nature Which place being diligentlie marked the residue which be found of his may easilie be expounded The same man in his booke De ijs qui initiantur mysterijs Idem de ijs qui initiantur mysterijs Christ is in that sacrament because it is the bodie of Christ Therefore it is not a corporall but a spirituall food whereupon the Apostle speaketh of the figure of it that our fathers haue eaten spirituall meate haue drunke spirituall drinke For the body of God is a spirituall body The body of Christ is the body of a diuine spirit By these words of Ambrose we be admonished what manner of body this is and why it is so called because it hath the spirituall vertue of the true bodie For these termes Not a corporall but a spirituall food and The body of the heauenly spirit bee most aptly applied to the grace and vertue of his true bodie Which thing also Eusebius Emissenus confirmeth de consecrat Dist 2. Eusebius Emissenus Seeing hee meant to take from our eyes the body taken of the virgin and would place it aboue the starres it was necessary that in the day of his supper the sacrament of his body blood should be consecrated vnto vs to the end that that might bee worshipped continually in mysterie which was once offered for a ransome for vs that seeing a daylie and vnceasing redemption did runne for the saluation of all men it might be a continuall oblation of redemption and that continuall sacrifice might liue in memorie and might euer be present in grace a true perfect and only sacrifice to be esteemed in faith not to be iudged by forme nor outward sight but by the inward affection It is manifest by the wordes of Emissenus that the body that was taken of the Virgin was taken from vs and was placed aboue the starres and therefore that the sacrament of the same was necessarily ordayned that that true perfect and onely sacrifice which vvas once offered vpon the Crosse might liue continually in memory and might alvvay be present in grace that vve should not cease to remember continually the benefit of our perpetuall redemption neither haue any cause vvhy vve should require the presence of his flesh seeing vve feele the presence of the same by grace to be of no lesse efficacie vvhich is to bee esteemed by faith not to be iudged in forme or outward appearance but n the inward affection Idem ibidem And that which he writeth immediatly after in the same place For the inuisible priest doth turne with his word by a secret povver the visible creatures into the substance of his body blood saying thus Take ye eate ye this is my body c. And least we should imagine it a more grosse substance or that called againe which he said before was taken avvay he alledgeth foorthvvith the example of Regeneration saying Hovv great benefit therefore the force of the heauenly blessing doth worke and hovv it ought not to be a nevv and vnpossible matter to thee
say This is my body when he gaue the signe of his bodie Chrisostome And Chrysostome vpon the 26. of Matthew Homilia 83. For if Christ be not dead whose figure signe is this sacrifice Finallie of some it is called a figure and a badge as of Origen and Chrysostom of some other an example patterne and image as of Ambrose Basill and Origen wherefore not without cause it hath also the name of that thing whose figure badge and patterne it is Wherefore it is the more to be maruelled what commeth into their mindes that cannot abide to haue it called a figure nor doe acknowledge any figure in the words of the Supper but doe reprochfully call them that doe acknowledge it figure framers whereas it is plaine for all that that all old writers did so call it and that by those words of the Lords supper the Lorde did consecrate the Sacrament of his body this being manifest also that after the letter proper manner of speech the bodie of Christ signifieth one thing and the Sacrament of his bodie another And if it shall not be a figure it shall neither be a signe nor a sacrament And so such as be ready to call other men sacramentaries they themselues doe take away the sacraments altogether Therefore let no man doubt but this sacrament is both a figure and therefore doeth also take the name of that thing whereof it is a figure We said there was another thing which the auncient Fathers acknowledging in this sacrament would haue it verily to be the Lords body and that is the vertue of the body it selfe that is of force and giueth life which vertue by grace and mysticall blessing is ioyned with the Bread and Wine and is called by sundry names where the matter it selfe is all one Of Augustin an intelligible inuisible spirituall body Of Hierom diuine spirituall flesh Of Irenaeus a heauenly thing Of Ambrose a spirituall foode and body of a diuine spirit Of other some such like thing And this also doth make much the more that the sacrament is most worthy to haue the name of the true body and blood seeing not onely outvvardly it showeth forth a figure and image of it but also inwardly it draweth with it a hid and secret naturall propertie of the same bodie that is to say a vertue that giueth life so that it cannot now be thought a vaine figure or the signe of a thing cleane absent but the very body of the Lord diuine indeede and spirituall but present in grace full of vertue mightie in operation And it hapneth often that the names of the thinges themselues be giuen to their vertue and strength We say leauen is in the whole lumpe wheras a small quantitie of leauen cannot spread so farre abroad but the strength and sharpenes of the leauen We say that the fire doth warme vs when the heate of the fire doth it we being a good way off from the fire Likewise that the Sunne is present doth lighten burneth nourisheth when indeede the heat of the Sunne doth it and the Sunne himselfe cannot goe out of his spheare So is a King said to be in all his realme because of the power of his dominon Neither doth the scripture want these examples for we often meet with them Wee will at this time bee content with one of them but very manifest Christ spake of Iohn saying He is Helias because he was indewed with the vertue or power of Helias the angell vnto Zacharie witnessing the same and saying Hee shall goe before him in the spirit and power of Helias Likewise therefore as Iohn was Helias because he had the spirit and power of Helias So the Lords bread is the body of Christ because it hath his grace and liuely power ioyned therewithall But that this is not a fained or a lately sprung opinion but was receiued and allowed of the auncient writers we wil confirme it by their open testimonies partly reciting some of the forenamed places and partly adding other Augustin vpon Iohn tract 27. If therefore yee shall see the Sonne of man where hee was before What meaneth this by this hee answereth that which had troubled them by this he openeth the cause why they were offended by this plainely if they would vnderstand For they thought that hee would haue giuen among them his body but he said that he would ascend into heauen euen whole When ye shall see the sonne of man ascend where hee was before surely euen then shall ye see that hee giueth not his body in such sort as ye imagine surely euen then shall yee vnderstand that his grace is not consumed by biting nor perisheth by eating The same man out of the sermon of the words of the Lord and it is rehearsed de consecrat Dist 2. The faithfull doe know how they do eat the flesh of Christ Euery man taketh his part whereupon the parts bee called the grace it selfe by parts hee is eaten and he remayneth all whole by parts he is eaten in the sacrament and remayneth all whole in thy heart The same man vpon Iohn tract 50. Thou hast Christ both at this present and in time to come presently by signe presently by the sacrament of Baptisme presently by the meate and drinke of the Altar Thou hast Christ presently but thou shalt haue him alway for when thou shalt goe from hence thou shalt come to him that said to the thiefe This day shalt thou be with mee in Paradise And soone after The poore shall yee alway haue with you but mee shall yee not alwayes haue Let good men receiue this also and not be troubled for he spake of the presence of his body For according to his maiestie according to his prouidence according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace that is fulfilled which he hath spoken Behold I am with you daily euen vnto the end of the world But according to the flesh which the Worde tooke vpon him according to that that hee was borne of the Virgin according to that that hee was taken of the Iewes that he was fastned to the tree that hee was taken downe from the Crosse that he was wrapped in linnen clothes that he was laid in the graue that hee appeared in his resurrection yee shall not haue him alwaies with you Why Because according to the presence of his body he was conuersant with his Disciples fortie dayes and they being in his company and seeing him and not following him he ascended into heauen and is not here for he is there hee sitteth on the right hand of the Father These be Augustins words Whereas he said before that Christ is present with vs by faith and by the sacraments afterward he said that he is present with vs by Maiestie by vnspeakeable and inuisible grace and so that is fulfilled by him which hee spake Behold I am with you to c. But according to the proper presence of the flesh that he is not