Selected quad for the lemma: life_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
life_n believe_v jesus_n son_n 11,603 5 5.7419 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A85698 A relation of a disputation between Dr Griffith and Mr Vavasor Powell. And since some false observations made thereon, by Dr Griffith (or one of his symonicall brethren) to keep up the crack'd credit of their bad calling and cause. As also to reflect upon Mr Moston (whom they suppose to be the author of that relation) Mr Powell, and others. This therefore is to shew briefly the falsitie of those animadversions: and withall to justifie that syllogisme (objected against by him) by good authors, examples and arguments. Griffith, George, 1601-1666. 1653 (1653) Wing G1998; Thomason E686_1 11,644 16

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

the_o syllogism_n consist_v all_o of_o negative_n answ_n the_o syllogism_n do_v not_o consist_v of_o all_o negative_n much_o less_o or_o mere_a negative_n for_o the_o word_n not_o join_v with_o the_o subject_n in_o the_o major_n do_v not_o make_v a_o negation_n but_o only_o a_o medium_n infinitum_fw-la imply_v a_o affirmative_a word_n uncertain_a and_o unlimited_a and_o so_o the_o word_n not_o be_v to_o be_v take_v in_o the_o minor_a proposition_n and_o so_o the_o most_o wife_n and_o solid_a logician_n take_v it_o for_o a_o affirmative_a predicati_fw-la infiniti_fw-la 2._o the_o syllogism_n must_v be_v negative_a in_o matter_n &_o for_o i_o before_o that_o rule_n be_v verify_v neve_n negativis_fw-la etc._n etc._n vel_fw-la ex_fw-la meris_fw-la negativis_fw-la nil_fw-la concluditur_fw-la but_o this_o syllogism_n be_v not_o so_o for_o the_o minor_a proposition_n as_o before_o be_v a_o absolute_a affirmation_n but_o you_o be_v not_o qualify_v etc._n etc._n the_o great_a prophet_n jesus_n christ_n who_o be_v perfect_a wisdom_n shall_v be_v produce_v against_o the_o doctor_n herein_o joh._n 3.36_o he_o that_o believe_v not_o shall_v not_o see_v life_n the_o minor_a proposition_n must_v be_v but_o you_o jew_n believe_v not_o ergo._n you_o jew_n shall_v not_o see_v life_n so_o joh._n 5._o 23._o he_o that_o honour_v not_o the_o son_n honour_v not_o the_o father_n the_o minor_a must_v needs_o be_v but_o you_o jew_n honour_v not_o the_o son_n ergo._n you_o jew_n honour_v not_o the_o father_n the_o like_a argument_n you_o find_v by_o paul_n a_o better_a disputant_n than_o doctor_n griffith_n rom._n c._n 4_o etc._n etc._n 8._o let_v the_o doctor_n deny_v these_o to_o be_v true_a argument_n if_o he_o can_v and_o if_o he_o acknowledge_v these_o i_o be_o sure_a he_o must_v acknowledge_v the_o other_o for_o there_o be_v no_o more_o negative_n in_o the_o other_o then_o in_o these_o but_o the_o doctor_n who_o will_v wave_v scripture_n mere_o to_o cavil_v against_o and_o occult_a the_o truth_n may_v object_v that_o the_o minor_a be_v not_o express_v in_o the_o text_n what_o do_v granger_n in_o his_o syntag._n do_v oft_o supply_v that_o part_n of_o the_o syllogism_n which_o be_v want_v and_o it_o be_v rational_a so_o to_o do_v tho_o do_v it_o follow_v it_o be_v not_o right_a argue_v sure_o the_o dr_n will_v understand_v if_o a_o man_n shall_v say_v all_o doctor_n and_o minister_n that_o subscribe_v not_o the_o engagement_n &_o acknowledge_v the_o present_a power_n shall_v be_v eject_v if_o the_o minor_a proposition_n be_v not_o express_v yet_o i_o suppose_v the_o doctor_n will_v conceive_v that_o it_o do_v concern_v he_o but_o its_o probable_a he_o will_v cavil_v against_o that_o law_n the_o sstroake_n of_o which_o by_o friendship_n he_o now_o avoyd_v as_o much_o as_o he_o do_v against_o this_o syllogism_n because_o that_o will_v touch_v his_o profit_n as_o much_o as_o this_o do_v his_o credit_n but_o 3._o because_o the_o dr_n conceive_v that_o mr_n moston_n &_o mr_n powell_n do_v not_o understand_v or_o else_o wrong_v burgerdicius_fw-la and_o keckerman_n let_v we_o see_v what_o be_v their_o verdict_n herein_o and_o for_o who_o they_o will_v find_v burg._n instit_fw-la leg._n lib._n 2._o chap._n 8._o pag._n 178._o faith_n si_fw-mi negatio_fw-la sit_fw-la pars_fw-la medij_fw-la bone_fw-la syllogismus_fw-la es_fw-la duabus_fw-la negatibus_fw-la conficitur_fw-la exempt_a great_a quod_fw-la non_fw-la sentit_fw-la non_fw-la est_fw-la animal_n planta_n non_fw-la sentit_fw-la ergo._n planta_n non_fw-la est_fw-la animal_n see_v further_o there_o as_o also_o in_o keck_n edit_fw-la 6_o pag_n 419._o who_o give_v the_o same_o example_n as_o above_o so_o tho._n granger_n in_o his_o syntagm_n logic._n lib._n 3._o cap._n 10._o pag._n 265._o so_o saunders_n and_o other_o i_o may_v add_v here_o the_o opinion_n of_o four_o or_o five_o of_o the_o best_a logician_n i_o know_v in_o wales_n who_o have_v this_o syllogism_n propound_v to_o they_o yea_o one_o of_o the_o best_a scholar_n that_o be_v at_o the_o dispute_v that_o day_n who_o adhere_v in_o his_o judgement_n in_o other_o thing_n rather_o to_o the_o doctor_n then_o to_o mr_n powell_n say_v it_o be_v a_o good_a syllogism_n but_o suppose_v the_o syllogism_n have_v not_o be_v true_a in_o form_n yet_o consider_v what_o learned_a alstedius_n faith_n in_o his_o aencyclopedia_n print_v an._n 1630._o pag._n 437._o max._n materia_fw-la necessaria_fw-la libera_fw-la est_fw-la a_o legibus_fw-la formae_fw-la syllogisticae_fw-la itaque_fw-la syllogismus_fw-la saepe_fw-la numero_fw-la concludit_fw-la necessitate_v materiae_fw-la ubi_fw-la forma_fw-la non_fw-la est_fw-la bona_fw-la aquila_n non_fw-la capit_fw-la muscas_fw-la and_o as_o for_o the_o doctor_n syllogism_n or_o who_o ever_o else_o they_o be_v they_o differ_v very_o much_o from_o mr_n powell_n for_o they_o be_v mere_a negative_n to_o be_v not_o his_o second_o if_o they_o can_v be_v find_v as_o they_o be_v lay_v down_o in_o any_o figure_n yet_o they_o be_v not_o in_o the_o first_o figure_n as_o he_o be_v and_o therefore_o the_o doctor_n or_o his_o amanuensis_fw-la shall_v leave_v off_o blind_a the_o people_n with_o their_o captious_a vicious_a fallacious_a argue_v and_o receive_v the_o syllogism_n more_o true_o and_o proper_o retort_v upon_o themselves_o thus_o 1._o syllog_n no_o unreasonable_a creature_n be_v to_o be_v take_v to_o be_v in_o capacity_n to_o dispute_v but_o dr_n griffiths_n and_o his_o brethren_n be_v unreasonable_a creature_n ergo._n dr_n griffiths_n and_o his_o brethren_n be_v not_o to_o be_v take_v to_o be_v in_o capacity_n to_o dispute_v or_o thus_o that_o which_o be_v according_a to_o the_o word_n of_o god_n be_v not_o to_o be_v speak_v against_o but_o dr_n griffiths_n and_o his_o brethren_n practice_n be_v to_o be_v speak_v against_o ergo._n dr_n griffiths_n and_o his_o brethren_n practice_n be_v not_o according_a to_o the_o word_n of_o god_n and_o so_o likewise_o the_o three_o syllogism_n in_o the_o same_o manner_n thus_o you_o see_v dr_n griffiths_n by_o christ_n and_o paul_n way_n of_o reason_v and_o by_o the_o best_a logician_n yea_o by_o his_o own_o witness_n find_v guilty_a of_o ignorance_n or_o forgetulnes_n in_o logic_n and_o by_o that_o time_n the_o dr_n have_v read_v this_o and_o further_o consider_v he_o may_v possible_o be_v sorry_a he_o give_v heed_n to_o the_o cavil_n then_o put_v into_o his_o head_n by_o a_o young_a sophister_n new_o come_v from_o oxford_n sed_fw-la dolus_fw-la &_o fraus_fw-la patrocinaniur_fw-fr nemini_fw-la i_o shall_v conclude_v with_o the_o say_n of_o two_o learned_a godly_a man_n who_o the_o doctor_n will_v call_v father_n if_o they_o do_v not_o whip_v he_o as_o he_o deserve_v chrysostomus_n non_fw-la solùm_fw-la ille_fw-la veritatis_fw-la proditor_n est_fw-la qui_fw-la palàm_fw-la mendacium_fw-la pro_fw-la veritate_fw-la agnita_fw-la loquor_fw-la sed_fw-la etiam_fw-la be_v qui_fw-la veritati_fw-la agnitae_fw-la pertinaciter_fw-la resistit_fw-la et_fw-la augustinus_n nimis_fw-la perversò_fw-la se_fw-la ipsos_fw-la amant_fw-fr qui_fw-fr ideò_fw-la alios_fw-la errare_fw-la volunt_fw-la ut_fw-la ipsorum_fw-la errorer_n lateant_fw-la haec_fw-la est_fw-la prima_fw-la mali_fw-la labes_fw-la hinc_fw-la corruit_fw-la omnis_fw-la antique_a pietatis_fw-la honos_fw-la sed_fw-la bonis_fw-la dicat_fw-la malè_fw-la seque_fw-la mentiri_fw-la neget_fw-la tamen_fw-la viget_fw-la vigebit_fw-la victa_fw-la vincit_fw-la veritas_fw-la here_o truth_n through_o weak_a one_o do_v prevail_v when_o error_n in_o strong_a hand_n do_v fail_v reader_n pass_v by_o or_o correct_v what_o fault_n have_v herein_o escape_v finis_fw-la