Selected quad for the lemma: life_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
life_n aaron_n authority_n type_n 23 3 11.1433 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A31482 Certain briefe treatises written by diverse learned men, concerning the ancient and moderne government of the church : wherein both the primitive institution of episcopacie is maintained, and the lawfulnesse of the ordination of the Protestant ministers beyond the seas likewise defended, the particulars whereof are set downe in the leafe following. 1641 (1641) Wing C1687A; ESTC R8074 96,833 184

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

West IIII. over whom was Hosa North IIII. over whom was Zechariah Over all these it seemeth Benajah the son of Iehoiada the Priest was the chiefe 1. Chron 27.5 Treasurers for the Revenues of the house of God 1. Ch. 26.20 for Cohath Shebuel of Moses ofspring Gershon Iehiel Merare Ahiah Things dedicated by vow Shelomith 1. Chron. 26.26 Over all the Porters was Chenaniah 1. Chr. 26.29 15.22 27. It is to be remembred that beside Zadok the High Priest and Ahimelech the second we finde mention of Hashabiah the son of Kemuel chiefe of the whole Tribe of Levi. 1. Chron. 27.17 So that there was One over the Ark Zadok The second over the Tabernacle Ahimelech The third over the Tribe Hashabiah As over the Levits Ministers Iehdeiah Iudges Chasabiah Officers Shemaiah Singers Heman Porters Chenaniah or Benaiah Agreeable to this forme we read that under Iosias there were three that is Hilkiah Zachariah and Iehiel 2. Chron. 35.8 and that the Levits had six over them 2. Chron. 35.9 Againe under Zedekiah that there were carried into Captivity Seraiah the chief Priest and Zephaniah the second Priest 2. King 25.18 Likewise under Ezekiah at the provision for the Levits portions there were ten of the Levits over whom was Cononiah and Shimei and so Kore over the voluntary offrings and six Levits under him 2. Chron. 31.12 13. c. The forme of government under NEHEMIAH OF whom and Esdras it is recorded that they did all according to Moses institution Ezr. 6.18 Nehem. 10.34 36. There was then Eliashib Nehem. 3.1 Seraiah 11.11 Zabdiel 11.14 The Courses were then but XXII Neh. 12.12 There was then Vzzi Neh. 11.22 Iezrahiah Neh. 12.42 Shallum 1. Chron. 9.17 Under Zabdiel at his hand Adaiah Nehem. 11. ver 12 13. Amasai Nehem. 11. ver 12 13. Vnder Vzzi Shemaiah Neh. 11.15 16. Shabbethai Heh 11.15 16. Iozabad Neh. 11.15 16. Vnder Iezrahiah Mattaniah Neh. 11.17 Bakbukiah Neh. 11.17 Abda Neh. 11.17 Vnder Shallum Akkub 1. Chron. 9.17 Talmon Nehem. 11.19 So that there was 1. The High Priest 2. The second third Overseers of the Priests 3. The Princes of the Priests 4. The Priests 5. The Overseer of the Levits 6. The Princes of the Levits 7. The Levits 8. The Heads of the Nethinims 9. The Nethinims of the Gibeonits Salomons servants A briefe Recapitulation of the degrees observed under the government of the Old Testament with an accommodation thereof unto the New Out of these we gather this Forme to have been I. Moses in whom was the supreme jurisdiction to visit Aaron Num. 3.10 II. Aaron the High Priest Levit. 21.20 Num. 35.28 Nehem. 3.1 Head 2. Chron. 19.11 Prince of the house of God 1. Chron. 9.11 III. Eleazar the second 2. King 25.18 Prelate of Prelats Num. 3.22 Chiefe Overseer or Bishop Ier. 20.1 At his hand It hamar IV. Prince of the Tribe 1. Chron. 27.17 V. Elizaphan Eliasaph Zuriel Prelats Num. 3.24 c. Overseers or Bishops Neh. 11.14 22. VI. In the XXIV Courses set by David The Princes of the Priests Ezr. 8.29 of God 1. Chr. 24.5 of the Sanctuary 1. Chr. 24.5 Elders of the Priests Ierem. 19.1 King 19.1 Heads of the Families 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nehem. 12.12 Chiefe Priests Act. 19.14 VII The Priests themselves Whether at Ierusalem or in the Countrey townes 2. Chron. 31.19 VIII The Overseer of the Levits Nehem. 11.22 IX The Princes of the Levits 1. Chron. 15.5 2. Chron. 35.9 Nehem. 12.22 X. The Head of the Levits Officers The Scribe The Singers 1. Chro. 16.5 Neh. 12.42 The Porters 1. Chron. 9.17 15.22 The Treasurers 1. Chron. 26.24 2. Chr. 31.12 XI The Levits themselves XII The Chief of the Nethinims Nehem. 11.21 XIII The Nethinims of the Gibeonits Ios 9.21 Salomons servants 1. King 9.21 Nehem. 7.60 It is not only requisite that things be done and that they be diligently done against sloth but that they be done continually and constantly To this end it is that God appoints Overseers 1. To urge others if they be slack 2. Chron. 24.5 34 13. 2 To keep them in course if they be well 2. Chr. 29.5 and 31.12 and 34.12.13 3. To punish if any be defective Ierem. 29.26 For which A power of Commanding was in the High Priest 1. Chron. 23.8 18. and 24.6 and 31.13 A power Iudiciall if they transgressed Deut 17.9 Zach 3.7 Ezech 44.24 Under paine of death Deut 17.12 Punishment in Prison and in the Stocks Ier 29.26 in the Gate of Benjamin Ier 20.2 Officers to Cite and Arrest Ioh. 7.32 Act 5.18 This Corporall To suspend from the Function Ezr 2.62 To excommunicate Ezr 10.8 Ioh. 9.22 and 12. 42. and 16.2 This Spirituall Why may not the like be for the government of the Church There is alleaged one only stop That the High Priest was a figure of Christ who being now come in the flesh the figure ceaseth no argument thence to be drawne For Answer whereunto we are to consider that I. This is the Anabaptists only shift That we are to have no Warres for the warres of the Iewes were but figures of our spirituall Battell No Magistrate for their Magistrates were but figures of our Ministers Pastors and Doctors and all by Christs comming abolished II. Christ being as well King as Priest was as well fore resembled by the Kings then as by the High Priest So that if his comming take away the one Type it must also the other If it be said there was in the King somewhat else beside the representation the like is and may bee truely said of the High Priest And that some such thing there was it is plaine by S. Paul who yeelded his obedience to the High Priest appearing before him and acknowledging him a Governour of the People Act. 23.5 that after the Type was expired Which had been meerely unlawfull if there had not remained in him somewhat besides the Figure III. There is no necessity we should presse Aaron For Eleazar being Princeps Principum that is having a saperiour authoritie over the Superiours of the Levits in Aarons life time was never by any in this point reputed a Type of Christ So that though Aaron be accounted such yet Eleazar will serve our purpose As also 2. Chron. 35.8 we read of three at once one only of which was the High Priest and a Type of Christ the rest were not Let them answer then to the other twaine who were Rulers or Chiefe over the House of God Why it may bee I. Out of Dic Ecclesiae the New Reformers tell us we are to fetch our pattern from the Iewes and therefore it seemes they are of opinion that one forme may serve both us and them II. Except there should be such a fashion of Government consisting of inequality I see not in the New Testament how any could perish in that contradiction of Gore which S. Iude affirmeth For his plea was for equalitie and against the preferring of Aaron aboue the rest III. The