had mett with the reward of their dawbing doubling For as I suspected them so I find them like Moab Ierem. 48.11 setled on their lees like the men in Ierusalem Zephan 1.12 frozen in their dreges The second thing I purpose to mention for the further appearance of the abuse of this Comm. here follovveth wheras words argumentes vvill hardly auaile I purpose in the last place to try if sense will be informed for which purpose I will giue you an occular demonstratioÌ„ so as the sense of seing shall be conuinced of the abuse of this Com. That this may be I will set heere before your eyes the whole 4th com intirly as God wrote it in the Tables of stone furthermore as for these things vvhich so many Ministers say are ceremoniouse abolished in this Com. those things I will compasse about with a parenthesis or two halfe moone circles that so you may se which partes of the Com. they hold for Morall which for ceremoniall behould it thus Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it Holy Sixe dayes shalt then labour doe all thy worke But the Scauenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sone nor they daughter thy man seruant nor thy maide nor thy beast nor thy stranger that is with in thy gates for in six dayes the Lord made heauen carth the sea all that in them is and rested the 7th day Therfore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day hallowed it Loe which partes of this 4th Com. they make Ceremoniall abolished to wit all those wordes which are inclosed vvith in the parenthesis for the vvord day this they abolish for a ceremony by these Textes Rom. 14.5 Gal. 4.10 for the vvord Sabbath that they hould for an abolished ceremony by these Textes Col. 2.16.17 Exod. 31.13 and for these words these 7th day is the Sabbath this is that vvhich of all other partes of the commandement they abhorre as a Ievvish ceremony so much for the commandement come we next vnto the reason of the com noted by the vvord for vvhich conteineth a most effectuall persvvasion from Gods ovvne example herin these vvords rested the 7th day doe stand for a Cipher no Minister at any tyme in these our dayes vseing thes vvords as a reason to moue and excite vs to rest on the 7th or 8th day because God rested at that time secondly these vvords the Sabbath day doe stand for a Cipher also for no Minister doth perswade vs in these dayes to sanctify the Sabbath day because God sanctified the Sabbath day to vvit the Saturday Sabbath for it is the Saturday vvhich God hallovved sanctified at the Creation Novv cast thine eye backe good Reader see the com behold vvhat they allow of it to be morall and hovv much of it they will needs haue to be ceremoniall like a cipher did thine eyes euer before behold such a mingle mangle such a hotch potch the 4th com is by these Interpreters become halfe fish halfe flesh A Lynsey wolsey A morrall Ceremoniall Commandement partly lasting partly faded There be many Statute Lavves in this Kingdome t is said many Lavvyers vvill doe much for money but can such an instance as this be showne vvhere the Lavvyers haue by their expositions pleadings so mangled any of the Kings Lawes as haue our diuine Lawyers who in this case haue taken away the key of knowledge Luk. 11.52 How can a mans eyes but abhorre to looke vpon behold any vvriting thus interlaced with parenthessese many hundreth of yeeres after it was written but how should a Christian looke vpon any of Gods ten commandemeÌ„ts vvith any patience to see them or any of them thus mangled defaced vvas God so mindfull to place all the morales by themselues in the Tables of stone to exclud the Ceremonials and vvright them elsewhere as vnsit to be matched vvith the lasting Morals and are there novv so many Ceremoniall words crept into this Morall law We reade in 2. Sâ—m 10.4 how King Hanun tooke Dauids seruants and shaued off the halfe of their beards and cutt off their garments in the midle euen to their buttocks and sent them away me thinke these men could not looke more ill fauouredly disguisedly then doth this 4th com Now it is thus barbared and notched by our late barbers If I would haue a thing vgly done indeed these men shall doe it for me Furthermore the indignity offred vnto this com is such as it is not now onely shamefull to looke vpon but also it is by their corrupt exposition made very non-sense ridiculouse to this purpose let vs collect together so much of this comm as they allovv to be memorall and omit that vvhich they make ceremoniall that is so much as is put within the halfe moone circles see what a peece of senselesse stufe there will be and this then it is Remember to keepe holy Sixe dayes shalt thou labour doe all thy worke But of the Lord thy God thou shalt not doe any worke thou nor thy sonne nor thy daughter c. see if by their distinctions subtilties they haue not picked out the heart and sense of this com by picking out the time Thus for the comm but further for the reason which God hath annexed to his com taken from his resting on the 7th day and from his sanctifying and hallowing of the 7th day this reason I say hath not onely some vvords pickt out of it as had the com but vvhich is more the vvholl reason it selfe as God laid it dovvne vvrote it in Tables of stone is vtterly by them abolished vselesse no mention of it in these our dayes thereby to excite persvvad people to the obedience of the 4th com Wherefore by your eye sight you may behold the abuse of this comm and by your obseruation you may take notice how the reason to the com is nullified two remarkable things to be obserued The consideration of these things me thinke should plead strongly against all the enemies to the Lords Sabbaths that so all their reasons they bring against them should be suspected reiected because by their abolishing his Sabbaths they must needes make such hauocke of Gods 4th com as you see Their textes of Scripture also Col. 2.16.17 and Exod. 31.13 with the rest are to be suspected as corrupted grosly abused by them seeing that they vvill so vrge presse them against the 7th day Sabbath in the 4th com as that by one text of Scripture they will mangle another so vnderstand one text of Scripture as it shall eate out the very bowels of an other so setting Scripture against Scripture the text Col. 2.16 shall eat out the bowels of the 4th com yea this text Col. 2.16 with other the like certain reasons they haue shall picke out the very heart sense of the
it and corrupt it and shall we thinke the Gentiles Heathen that know not God haue retained all the Morall Law perfectly without forgetting any thing therein doe we thinke better of the Heathen Gentiles who haue liued since the giuing of the Law then of the people of God who liued before the Law if the light of nature in the people of God before the Law needed a better light to wit the Law of God to direct their Law and light of nature can the blind light in Heathen people since the Law giue a light vnto the Law if it cannot why then will we rather learne what is morall by the light of nature and lawes of nationes then by the light of lightes the Law of God Should we vrge the practise of any thing that is vn-naturall or which nature abhorreth then there might be some more â—uller for this distinction but since we vrge nothing vn-naturall nor any thing impossible nor any thing harmefull to a Church or State commoÌ„ wealth in this case what grownd should there be to draw vs to the Lawes light of nature suer I am though nature be ignorant of the Lords Sabbath yet enemy vnto it it cannot be for let nature be informed what manner a thing Gods Sabbath is and it will imbrace it for nature abhorreth to profane sacred things of which kind the Sabbath is and nature approueth of a day and this day as well as any other day for Gods worship and for mans refreshment in a rest from laboures why then should we reiect Gods Sabbath because blind nature is ignorant of it and not rather imbrace it because if nature be but taught it it cannot oppose it it will imbrace it I find it that this distinction is merely inuented for the very nonce to thwarte rase downe and roote out Gods ancient Sabbaths for I find nothing else prescribed in the morall Law which they doe reiect by this dinstinction but onely Gods Sabbaths now as well might they reiect the drinking of wine in Lords Supper as the Sabbath day in the 4th com for ther 's the same reason seing that the drinking of wine is not naturall to English men no more then the Sabbath is to Heathen people for wine is not the naturall fruite and liquor of our Country but Beere like as they say the 4th com belongeth vnto vs but as it is the Law of nature but not as it was giuen to the Iewes for so it was Iewish so might they say the institution of the Lords Supper belongeth vnto vs English men but as it is a law in our nature and not as it was giuen to the Iewes Christs Disciples to drinke Beere is naturall to vs but to drinke wine is Iewish for the Iewes vsed wine at their meales as we vse Beere 6. The Apostle Paul telleth vs of a Law written and of a Law of nature the one written in Tables of stone the other in the Tables of the heart the one giuen the Iewes the other to the Gentiles As manie as haue sinned without the Law shall perish with out the Law as manie as haue sinned in the Law shall be iudged by the Law Rom. 2.12.14 I would faine know where the difference lieth betwene these two Laws the Law of nature the written Law of God if vve vvill imbrace no more of Gods written Law then the Gentiles find written in their hearts yea vvhat then are we the better for hauing Gods vvritten Lavv among vs 2. Inasmuch as the Apostle saieth that as manie as haue sinned in the Law they must be iudged by the Law hence it follovveth that all vve Christians who imbrace the written Law we must stand or fall to this written Law and must be iudged by it an other day can we then vvith safety reiect this vvritten Lavv and take the vnvvritten Lavv for the rule of our Liues no surely vnlesse vve could thinke vve should liue by one Lavv be iudged by an other 7. If so much of the Lavv of God be Morall as is found among the Gentiles then is the Ceremoniall Lavv of Sacrifices a Morall Lavv for the Gentiles haue had their Sacrifices thus vve reade that Iupiters Priests brought Bules vvith garlands vnto the gates vvould haue Sacrificed vnto Paul and Barnabas Act. 14.13 Wherefore the light of nature in the Gentiles is no sufficient rule to distinguish Morales from Ceremoniales 8. This distinction is Antichristian for it is against Christ and his Apost es for they euer sent the Churches vnto the vvrittâ—n Law neuer to the vnvvritten Law Mat. 1.18.19 Rom. 3.31 Iam. 2.8.10 Paul saieth hee beleeued all things vvhich vvere written in the Lavv c Act. 24.14 And vvhatsoeuer things are written a fore time are written for our lerning Rom. 15.4 and cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things vvhich are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 and the vvhole Scripture is by inspiration to teach c. 2. Tim. 3.26 in all vvhich scriptures vve are sent vnto the vvritten Lavves the Lavves giuen to the Ievves not vâ—to the vnvvritten Lavves that vvere giuen to the Gentiles the Holy Ghost vvould that vve should borrovv light from the vvritten Lavvs giuen to the people of God but the Authors of this distinction vvill send vs to the vnwritten Laws vvhich are found among Heathen people and Infideles to borrovv ligâ—t from them It seemes then that vve shall borrovv light from darknesse Ye were once darknesse but are now light in the Lord Eph. 5.8 9. If no more of the Law shall bind vs then so much as is found out by the light of nature then Gods word shall not bind properliâ— by of it selfe but that it must borrow strength elswhere as from the Law light of nature or else it shall not bind nor be a Law this is to detract from the Dignity Authority of Gods word for a Minister must not now come with Thus saith the Lord but he must strengthen it with this so saith the Law of nature he must not say onely Thou shalt not steale not commit adultery for thus no man is bound vntill he add this And this the Law of nature 10. If so many of the precepts of the Law onely shall be in force with vs as are allowed of by the Law of nature then it shall follow that so many such qualified men among vs shall stand bound to the first Commandement onely as by the Law light of nature did acknowledge the true God and they are for number a few 3 or 4 in a Country Citty or Kingdome and for quality onely the most lerned and deepest schollers for such onely did acknowledge the true God among the Heathen The reason hereof is that if we must fetch direction from the Heathen to know which precepts we are bound vnto then by like reason must we fetch light from them also to know how many
A Defence Of that most Ancient and Sacred ordinance of GODS the SABBATH DAY Consequently and together with it 2. A Defence of the iiijth Commandement 3. A Defence of the integrity and perfection of the Decalogue Morall Law or X. Commandements 4. A Defence also of the whole and intire worship of God in all the partes thereof as it is prescribed in the first Table of the Decalogue 5. A Discouery of the Superstition impurity and corruption of Gods worship yea and Idolatry committed by multitudes in sanctifying the Lords Day for a Sabbath Day by the iiijth Commandement Vndertaken against all Anti-Sabbatharians both of Protestants Papists Antinomians and Anabaptists and by name and especially against these X Ministers M. Greenwod M. Hutchinson M. Furnace M. Benton M. Gallard M. Yates M. Chappel M. Stinnet M. Iohnson and M. Warde The second Edition corrected and amended with a supply of many things formerly omitted BY THEOPHILUS BRABOURNE Printed ANNO DOM. 1632. Thus saieth the Lord stand in the wayes and behold and aske for the old way which is the good way and walke therein and yee shall finde Rest for your soules Ierem. 6.16 This is that old and that good way Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy c. The vijth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt not doe any worke c. for on the vijth day the Lord Rested Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it Exod. xx viij x. xj Obserue it walke in it For verily I say vnto you vntill heauen earth passe one iote or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law vntill all things be fulfilled Mat. 5.18 Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least Commandements and teach men so hee shall be called the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.19 Whatsoeuer thing I commaund you take heede you doe it Thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought there from Deut. 12.32 Cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them Gal. 3.10 To the Kings most excellent Maiestie CHARLES by the grace of God King of Great-Brittaine Fraunce and Ireland Defender of the Christian faith c. MOST dread and renowned Soueraigne may it please your excellent Maiestie such is the power of Trueth and specially in Religion that they which haue once tasted it cleaue vnto it more then vnto all the hopes of this life besides The Law of thy mouth saith Dauid is better vnto mee then thowsands of gold siluer Psal 119.72 Yea such is the excellency of Gods blessed Trueth as his meekest seruants will stirr in the defence of it the mildest fight before it shall be indamaged by their forbearance I durst not petition your Highnesse nor aduenture these lines vnto your Maiesties consideration vntill I had by diligent studie first so setled my conscience in the certaine trueth of them as my minde gaue me that I am tied in conscience rather to departe with my life then with this Trueth so captiuated is my conscience inthraled to the Law of my God Here therefore I tender this Trueth with my life vnto your Maiestie that vnto your Godly consideration this vnto your clemency mercy and both to the pleasure of the Almighty I remember when the Booke of the Law had bene lost and was found againe by Hilkiah the Priest in the Raigne of Iosiah 2. King 22. that Hilkiah sent it by Shaphan the Chaunteller vnto the King which giueth me to vnderstand that in matters of Gods worship in case failings and corruptions be found out the Supreme power the King is to haue knowledge of it More particularly when the Lords Sabbath was thought to be prophaned by the Disciples of Christ by plucking eares of corne Mat. 12. to whom did the Pharises complaine but vnto Christ the Lord and Master of the Disciples And when in Nehemiahs time the Sabbath was prophaned by treading the Winepresse bearing of burdens Nehem. 13. to whom did Nehemiah turne himselfe but vnto the Rulers Nobles of Iudah for redresse I addresse my selfe therefore vnto your Maiestie humblie beseeching you to take it into consideration 1. That that most ancient sacred ordinance of Gods Sabbath prescribed in the Morall Law and religiously practised by the most anciët primitiue Churches neere 400 yeeres after the Ascention of Christ euen so longe as they retained their brightest purity and which ought religiously to be sanctified to the worlds end it is now prophaned trampled vnder foote 2. That the Decalogue Law of God is not taught maintained in our Church in its fulnesse integrity and perfection but onely partially by peeces 3. That God hath not his whole intire worship seruice prescribed in the first Table of the Decalogue but is denied one quarter or fowrth part thereof weekly 4. That by the common doctrine in our Church the 4th Commandement is wholly frustrate altogether nullified both roote and branch 5. That by most men in our Church there is grosse superstition committed Gods worship is corrupted and by many plain idolatry wrought by keeping the Lords day for a Sabbath by the 4th Com. Amongst other things I haue as I beleeue made these fiue things manifestly appeare in this Booke and now I humbly present them vnto your Highnesse consideration trusting the cause will speake for it selfe and its bare mention will call for a Reformation It was the laudable and Godly care of your deere Father to cause in his time a new Translation of the sacred Bible for the correction of but here and there a word how much more I trust will his suruiuing Sonne Heire be mindfull of such weighty matters as these are Almighty God hath honoured this eternall Law of the 10 Commandements with such honour as he vouchsafed not to any one portion of Scripture besids in all the Sacred Bible for hee deliuered it in most Maiesticall and terrible manner in flaming fyer the earth trembling Moses the people quaking hee spake it proclaimed it with his owne voyce and wrote it with his owne finger in Tables of stone The Eternall Sonne of God whilst on earth bewraied such care of this Law as that hee ratified it and euery iote title of it to the worlds end saying Verily I say vnto you that vntill heauen earth passe one iote or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law till all things be fulfilled Mat. 5.18 The Church of God in this Christian Kingdome honoureth at this day this Law of God for shee hath inrouled it in hir Booke of Common Prayers and ordered that it be deuoutly reade at the Sacrament of the Lords Supper at other times of holy Assemblies I trust therefore your Maiestie will afford this sacred honourable portion of Gods Word your best protection The Law it is the inheritance of the Church as wee reade Deut.
33.4 and who should defend the Churches right if not your Maiestie King Dauid chose this Law for his inheritance as we reade Psal 119.111 and I beleeue so hath your sacred Maiestie defend it therefore Why should the corrupt expositions thereof which the ignorance of former ages haue hatched be still retained Why should one part of this sacred Scripture be retained an other part of the same reiected Why should not God haue his whole and intire worship prescribed in this Law as well as some partes of it you will not indure it that your Coyne be clypped or impaired but count him for a traitour that doth it how thē should you thinke well of him that will clippe impaire this current golden Law of God you cannot indure it that any part of your Royall inheritance of Crowne Lands should be detained from you And how should you indure it that any part of your Spirituall inheritance the Law of God should be withholden from you any longer Why should we serue God by halues any longer The Lords Sabbathes which are a portion of Gods Law and a part of your Maiesties the Churches inheritance now contemned as Iewish and ceremoniall and now prophaned trampled vnder foote I humblie beseech your Highnesse to take a care of As the 5th Commandement is directed vnto inferiours so is the obseruation of the Sabbath in the 4th Cōmandement directed vnto Superiours as M. Brerewood in his Treatise on the Sabbath hath well obserued the care therefore of Gods Sabbathes pertaineth vnto Kings and the 4th Comm. doth in a most eminent sorte oblige Kings Hence no doubt it was that Nehemiah that Godly Gouerner tooke the reformation of the prophaned Sabbath into his care charge Whose steppes may it please you to treade hauing finished the great worke you may to your eternall comfort with him petition Almighty God to be mindfull of this your care zeale for him saying Remember mee O my God concerning this c. Nehem. 13.22 How famouse vnto all ages are those Godly Kings Hezekiah Iosiah the rest for Reformers of Religion for Restorers of the worship of God! Oh that your zeale might equall theirs that it might be left as a monument vnto all posterity that you Restored the worship of God in his Sacred Sabbaths If I be able to compare them none of your Progenitours did euer leaue the like honourable fact to this vpon recorde vnlesse it were they that made the Reformation from Popish Idolatry and that indeed may be compared with this for that concerned the 2th Com. and this concernes the 4th Com. that was a Morall Law and so is this that was touching a parte of Gods worship in the first Table and so is this Two Morall Laws to wit the 2th Com. and the 4th Com. haue bene corrupted for many hundreth yeers together the one by Image worshiping the other by Sabbath breaking as for the former that hath by the Mercy of God bene reformed this hundreth yeers and vpwards euer since we departed from Rome and Gods blessing hath abundantly followed our Church euer since As for the latter we still sticke fast in the myre and remaine still in ignorance blindnesse togeather with Rome to this day and this waiteth for the Reformation of our English Nehemiah Hezekiah or Josiah As it was with the good Kings of Israel and Iudah in restauration of Religion still they left something vndone So our Ancestours though they reformed the corruptions about the 2th Com. yet they left the high places I meane the prophanatiō of the Lords Sabbaths still vntouched No doubt God foresaw it that the reformation of one of his Commandements was worke enough for those his seruants in those gaine-saying times the reformation of the other he hath reserued for these later times oh that these times might be so happie as to take the Time Let not posterity take this Crowne glory The restauration of the integrity of Gods worship and the raising vp againe of Gods Sabbathes call for your Maiesties helpe Helpe O King T is true innovations are dangerouse yet in some case necessary as we see by new lawes daily inacted But this is no innovation it is but the reuiuing of an old Law a long time laine dead and the putting into execution Gods 4th Comm. now and of long time out of vse Neither can it be thought a thing impossible to be done or disaduantageouse vnto your Realme for the change of the Sabbath from the Sunday backe againe to the Saturday that holy Day Gen. 2.3 will not proue I suppose one farthing losse vnto your Subiectes and for your Maiestie it is but your pleasure say the word onely it is done your Maiesties proclamation or the like workes a present Reformation Let me say vnto your Highnesse therefore as once those seruants of Naaman said vnto their Lord when the Prophet bad him but this smale easy thing Goe wash and be cleane If it were a great thing which the Lord requireth of thee wouldest thou not haue done it how much rather when he saith vnto thee wash be cleane 2. King 5.13 I leaue the application To conclude the counsaile of the Lord is to inquire for the old way Ier. 6.16 be pleased therefore to serch the Scriptures and to inquire of your reuerend Bishops and lerned Clergy as they will answer it before God if this be not the old way and the way wherein we must walke to the Worlds end Your Maiesties most humble Subiect THEOPHILUS BRABOURNE To the most Reuerent Arch-Bishops and Bishops of this Kingdome RIGHT Reuerent Fathers in God right graciouse honourable Lords I presume to offer this Treatise of the Sabbath day vnto your graue iudicious considerations as vnto whom it doth more principally appertaine to weigh determine of questions controuercies of such great consequence and whose it is in a most eminent manner to see that all corruptions in Gods worship be reformed all Truethes of God fostered cherished and all the partes of Gods worship duly religiously obserued Amongst other things in this Treatise I humbly desire your Lordshipes to take these fiue into your best deepest considerations 1. That that Sacred ordinance of Gods Sabbath then the which is not any in our Church more ancient commanded by God in his Morall Law ratified by Christ the Sonne of God practised by the Apostles also by the primitiue Churches after them for 300 or 400 yeeres together is now sinfully trampled vnder foote prophaned 2. That the Decalogue 10 Commandements of Almighty God are not wholly and fully taught and maintained in our Church but onely by partes by peeces 3. That God hath not his whole intire worship seruice prescribed in the first Table of the Decalogue but is denied one fourth part thereof weekly 4. That Gods 4th commandement is by the commō doctrine in our Church wholly frustrate and nullified both roote
for counsaile aboute the matter and all their vvites frends should be imployed for to find it out as they vvould haue it if it vvere possible but novv the Tyeth of Gods Lavv or a portion of the tieth at least is detayned from God and from themselues by themselues and here they vvill neither runne nor ride nor aske for Counsaile in this case no nor accept vvelcome it vvhen it is brought thrust in to their heades it giues a man to suspect that these loue more vnfeinedly a good liuing then Gods law Nay I cannot but thinke that if I had tendered vnto some Ministers a liuing of 50l. or 60l. a yeere that vpon no better euidence title then in my former booke I tendred them the Lords Sabbaths I cannot thinke I say that any man in the kingdome could wrest it out of their hands In a word these that are so mindelesse of Gods lavv vvhen they are so mindfull of their owne liuings like as God said vnto his people the Iewes when they neglected the building of the Temple yet were diligent to builde themselues houses Is it time for you to dwell in your seiled houses and this house lie waste Hagg. 1.4 So may I say vnto them Is it time for you yee Ministers to enioy your liuings when the Lords Sabbaths lie waste God must haue a rekoning of you for these things This rule being applied to common people will detect them also Is it so that whosoeuer loueth Gods law in trueth he will with all redinesse willingnesse imbrace the knowledge of the vnknowne partes thereof Then if I shall make it appeare that most men are vnwilling to imbrace the knowledge of the vnknovvne partes of Gods lavv it vvill follovv very suspiciously that most men doe not loue the law of God in trueth what euer they say thinke to the contrary Thus I make it good against them The doctrine of Gods Sabbaths is a parte of the lavv it is the vnknovvne part of Gods lavv Novv the knowledge of this being tendered vnto men they bevvray their vnwillingnesse to be taught instructed in it that two wayes the one is in that vvhen the matter cometh to tryall they admit of insufficient Artificiall arguments for they preferr feeble and weake reasons before strong and able reasones the other is in that they admit of insufficient Inartificiall argumēts for they admit and allow of dissallowable and vnsufficient Testimonyes to decide this controuercy by vvhen these two things are made plaine the case vvill goe cleere against them for a foundation first of all suppose we the point in controuercy to wit this vnknowne parte of Gods Law touching his Sabbathes is as disputable contingent questionable as doubtfull as you will in so much as in your very consciences you thinke it may be it may not be a trueth and that it is as likly not to be true as to be true let all this be granted perhaps there is some reason it shold be granted seeing that it is a point not heard of before by common people neither haue they euer spent any time in the study of the point Well be it so I proceed then For the first to vvit that vvhen the point of Gods Sabbaths comes to be argued people yea Ministers also admit of insufficient arguments preferring them before able strong reasons and this shall appeare by comparing together the reasons brought onboth sides the reasons brought for the Lords Sabbaths among others are these 1. Gods expresse Com. Exod. 20.8 Remember the Sabbath day and In it thou shalt not doe any worke 2. Christ ratified it vvhen he vvith so vehement an Asseueration auovvched the duration of euery iot and title of the Lavv vnto the vvorlds end saying Verily I say vnto you vntill heauen earth perish one iote or one title of the Law shall not escape vntill all things be fulfilled And againe whosoeuer therfore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be called the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.18.19 On the other side the reasons brought against Gods Sabbathes by those which are the enemies therof are these Gal. 4.10 ye obserue dayes and moneths and times and yeeres c. and Col. 2.16 let no man condemne you in meate drinke or in respect of an holy day or of the new Moone or of the Sabbath dayes Novv let these argumēts on both sides be laid into the ballances they for the Lords Sabbath in to the one ballāce they against the Lords Sabbath in to the other ballance and then iudg thou good Reader vvhither hath the greater weight For breuitysake we wil compare onely these two textes Exo. 20.8 and Col. 2.16 The one thou seest is a Commandement and a Morall Commandement it toucheth the very point in question to vvit the 7th day Sabbath yea that the 4th Com. intendeth the seauenth day Saturday Sabbath is so plaine as vvas it neuer doubted of by any The other thou seest is a dissvvasion from Sabbath dayes indefinitly that is from some Sabbath dayes for the Apostle saith not all Sabbath dayes in generall but Sabbath dayes as of some Sabbath dayes in speciall so then this texte toucheth not the point in question to wit the 7th day Sabbath but other annuall ceremoniall Sabbaths if this Text did make ought against the Morall 7th day Sabbath it must speake of all Sabbathes generally in the largest sense that so the Morall Sabbath might be included condemned too but the text doth not mention the note of generallity all neither is it necessarily to be collected for 1. their owne expositers as Perkins Dod Greenham Elton Ames with diuerse others as shall be shovvne doe limite this text vnto some Sabbaths as vnto the ceremoniall yeerly Sabbaths and. 2. The text giueth light vnto it for it condemneth onely such things as neuer vvere vvrote in the Morall Law as meate and drinke and new moones c. and therefore vve iudge the Sabbaths condemned in this Text to be onely such Sabbaths also as vvere neuer vvrote in the 10 Commandements as their yeerly Sabbaths so the vveekly Sabbaths in the 4th Com. stand still vntoucht by this text 3 suppose vve that the Apostle had spake not onely of Sabbaths plurally but also of Sabbaths generally had vsed the particle all saying all Sabbaths yet vve knovv that the particle all is often times restrained in Scripture is not taken in the largest sense that may be witnesse these Scriptures 1. Cor. 6.12 1. Cor. 9.25 1. Corint 10.23.33 1. Cor. 13.2.7 1. Cor. 15.22 vvhereby vve see that this their text Col. 2.16 may be vnderstood of some Sabbaths onely as namely of the yeerly Sabbaths and so ther 's no necessity it should touch the morall vveekly Sabbaths at all Iudge novv good Reader whither of these two textes are more for the purpose for the 4th com it is vnderstood directly of the 7th
Christ vpon the Lords day farre vnlike to the example of God on the 7th day and therefore we may follow the example of Christ and be as vnlike on the Lords day to the example of God on the 7th day as Christ was Against this some Ministers obiect thus that happily the new Sabbath was not yet knovvne the Church being in hir infancy and Christ being newly risen from the dead things were not yet established in the Church c. Herevnto I answer 1. if this new Sabbath was not knowne vpon this first Lords day why then they graunt me what I would haue which is that the Lords day was not constantly weekly kept in the dayes of Christ his Apostles as now they vrge vs to keepe it euery where and so they ouerthrow their owne doctrine 2. This obiection maketh the matter worse then it was before for now they will to maintaine their errour cast blame vpon Christ for if this nevv Sabbath was not knowne to the Church no not this chiefe principall Lords day whose fault was it but Christs in that hee being their Pastour had not taught it them yet no not when it was more then time that they had knowne it that so they might haue kept it The Lords day being instituted by Christ to be kept for a Sabbath day in remembrance of our Redemption as our new Sabbatharians imagine it could not but make as much for the Memory of Christ his death as the Lords Supper did of which Christ saied doe this in remembrance of mee now can any man thinke that Christ could passe ouer the doctrine of this a point of such consequence that in so seasonable a time vvhithout some neglect if there had bene any such thing to be taught them they cannot plead that Christ could not conveniently come at his Disciples erly enough in the morning to haue minded them of it for he rose very erly c. neither wanted he meanes to haue sent them vvord of it for he sent them word by Mary Magdalene that they should goe downe into Galile and there they should see him Mat. 28.1.10 hee might as easily haue sent them vvord also that it was his will that they should keepe that present day for a Sabbath if euer he had intended any such matter 3. I answer that this obiection spoiles all for if through infancy of the Church and the like as some infant-like-men imagine this first Lords day was not instituted for a Sabbath whither I maruaile then vvill they rune for an institution for there is not any mention in the Scriptures of any word of institution nor of any practise or example of Christ or of any of the Apostles about their sanctifying any Lords day after this first Lords day vntill Pentecost day Act. 2. vvhich was 6 or 7 vveekes after this first Lords day so here then is a greater errour for not onely the first Lords day vvas omitted for a Sabbath but also there is no footing for any Lords day kept like a Sabbath for 6 or 7 weekes together after Christs resurrection Thus the further vve serch in to this point the more vaine it doth appeare in so much as it irketh me to blot so much paper as I haue done and must doe to answer to such an idle argument as is the Lords day Sabbath it vexeth me to see men of such able partes for lerning naturall endovvments and so renoumed for sanctity thus to befoole themselues in the defence of such a friuolouse tenet as is this Lords day Sabbath But it fareth with them as I thinke like men that haue had wrong possession a long time when the true owner comes to claime his right yet since they haue possest it so long they will invent somthing to defend it still they vvill find trickes quilites and quirkes in the Lavv to hould possession still against the true ovvner so it is here the Lords day hath thrust out the Lords Sabbath day from possession novv this many yeeres and since it is done the Lords day hath hath had the possession long some culler must be set on the matter somthing must be invented to maintaine possession still though neuer so vvrongfull though neuer so to the shame of the defenders of it But for all this they are redy to reply thus but vvhat is the matter that this Lords day is so often repeated in the Nevv Testament aboue any other day of the vveeke and vvhy vvere such notable vvorkes still done vpon that day as Christ rose then and appeared to his Disciples the Holy Ghost descended Act. 2. Peter preacht and converted thovvsands Paul preacht on that day and here vvas a Collection for the poore on that day S. John receiued a Reuelation vpon the same day now all this cannot but point at something c. Where vnto I ansvver t is true all these doe point at some thing but vvhat is the thing vvhich they point vnto they should tell vs vvhat thing they point vnto not say onely they point at something I doubt not but they point at something but vvithall I beleeue they point at nothing for their purpose to helpe to proue the constant vveekly practise of the Lords day for a Sabbath if they did they vvould not be ashamed to say what they point vnto in particular turning it off thus in generall termes all these point at something In the night time Ioseph had a reuelation concerning Christ Mat. 1.20 Mat. 2.13.14 In the night Christ came vnto his Disciples vvalking myraculously on the Sea Mat. 14.25 In the night time Christ vvas betraied Mark 14.27 In the night time vvas brought by the Angel to the Shepheards those most ioyfull tydinges of a Sauiour borne into the vvorld Luk. 2.8 In the night Paul Silas sung Psalmes vnto God Act. 16.25 In the night Paul preached at Troas raised vp Eutychus falne dovvne dead Act. 20.7.8.9 Novv all these you may say pointed at something indeed true it is But tell vs proue it vnto vs what is that somthing they will not say we must hence learne to keepe Popish Vigiles or holy nightes I trust 2. Whereas they speake of the often repetition of the Lords day in the Nevv Testament the Sabbath day is oftener repeated then it t is true the 4 Euangelists doe euery one of them mention it but all that is but as if it vvere once mentioned onely for the Euangelists doe but mention one the same thing albeit it be 4 times repeated by them all that there are more Sabbath dayes spake of then Lords dayes see these textes Act. 13.14.42.44 Act. 16.13 Act. 17.2 Act. 18.4 Thirdly vvhereas they make some greate matter of it because there vvere so many notable vvorkes done vpō this Lords day this point is much in their mouthes J ansvver 1. the day vvheron notable vvorkes vvere done is vsually put dovvne in Scripture for the more certainty sake novv to
learne more Logicke or confined to their studies for a season that they might grow better acquainted with the holy Scriptures before they be permitted to make publike interpretatiōs of them they let not to damne men to the pit of hell for not keeping this Lords day constantly for a Sabbath and that vpon these idle grownds were it fit to put a sword into a mans hand that knovves not when or vvhere to vse it should these men be betrusted vvith the keyes to shut men out of heauen and to locke men into hell thus causlesly By what hath bene said it appeareth 1. that it can no where be proued that the Lords day was in Christs the Apostles times kept constantly weekly for a Sabbath day 2. That the first Lords day was not kept for a Sabbath day by Christ nor by his Apostles Disciples Wherefore it followeth that if this Lords day was not kept constantly vveekly in the dayes of Christ his Apostles then we are not tyed in conscience in imitation of their examples to keepe euery Lords day vveeke by vveeke as now we doe it is sufficient if vve keepe but some Lords day sometime as one in a yeere or one in thre moneths or one in 6 moneths or the like but a vveekly obseruation is a needlesse growndlesse obseruatiō since it cannot be showne nor proued in the holy Scriptures Thus much touching the Scriptures Novv a vvord or two out of the Histories of the Church We reade it mentioned by Mr. Perkins in his first Volume vpon the 4th com pag. 48. that the Lords day vvhich he there cales Sabbath day was neglected and not obserued by those primitiue Churches which liued next after the Apostles vntill it was established by Christian Emperours c. Thus you see the Lords day vvas not obserued by many of the primitiue Churches for 300 yeeres for so long it was ere Constantine enacted a law for it who was a Christian Emperour Now who can imagine that the Lords day was euer kept in the Apostles dayes weekly and constantly for a Sabbath day when as those Christian Churches who immediatly succeded the Apostles kept it not at all for 300 yeeres together is it credible that those purest Churches should neglect such an ordinance of Christ as the Lords day Sabbath if any such ordinance there had euer bene in the Church No no the vveekly constant obseruation of the Lords day Sabbath it is but a nouelty and lately sprung vp The vse I vvould make of this point is this is it so that the Scriptures doe not bind vs to a vveekly keping of the Lords day but that it is enough if vvee keepe it at some times onely Why then doe Ministers presse the people so hardly to keepe euery Lords day and euery Sunday none excepted may it not in this respect be said of these Ministers as the Lord spake of those Prophets I haue not sent these Prophets saith the Lord ye◠they ranne I haue not spoken to them and yet they prophecied Ier. 23.21 Why are these Ministers more strict then God himselfe why doe they presse to a vveekly practise when Gods vvord speaketh but of a seldome practise Why should vve be tied to keepe the Lords day oftener then did the Apostolike Churches Forasmuch as vve are bound to keepe but some Lords dayes in a yeere vvhy are people hindred in the time of haruest to gather in their corne on the Lords day that vpon payne of damnation if they doe vpon pretense of a breach of the 4th com since they may both worke on euery Lords day all the time of haruest yet keepe some Lords dayes after haruest is done Also in the time of wheat seile barly-seile why may not the husbandman plow his ground some his seede on the Lords day since he may keepe some Lords day in a yeere after these busy times be past In the time of Hay-seile vvhy should not men make their haye on the Lords day seeing they may keepe Lords dayes enough all the yeere after When a Fayer fales vpon the Lords day why may they not keepe it vpon that day or if it fale vpon the Monday why may they not ride to it driue cartes to it on the Lords day the day before it as vvell as Christs Disciples trauailed 15 myles vpon the Lords day and vpon the most eminent Lords day since they may keepe some Lords dayes on the other times of the yeere vvhen there is no fayer It is true I verily beleeue that the 7th day Saturday Sabbath is still in force and that I beare a reuerence a religiouse respect vnto that day and for the conscience and duety I ovve vnto it I doe sanctify the Lords day not for it selfe but for the Sabbath dayes sake vvhich goeth before it giuing God one day for an other by vvay of a change vntill the time of reformation as they did change the Passeouer day Numb 9.1.3.11 It is also true that most of our Ministers hould the 7th day Saturday Sabbath for a ceremony abolished novv could I be perswaded in my conscience that the 7th day Sabbath is abolished as they say they are I doe protest it that I vvould not make any conscience or scruple of doeing the ordenary vvorkes of the 6. dayes vpon the Lords day neither vvould I in any respect of any diuine institution or conscience of the 4th com vvithhold any of my family from doeing the like should I leese my haye in time of Hay-seile or my corne in time of haruest or but hinder my vvorkes there abouts or suffer my conscience to be in thraled for such nifling trifling reasons as these no I trust not the like I say vnto men of all trades occupationes in Citties Townes if they can be satisfied in their consciences before God that the old Sabbath day on the 7th day is abolished then let them not feare or doubt to doe any ordenary workes of their calings vpon the Lords dayes or Sundayes no more then vpon any other dayes of the weeke for there is nothing forbidding them so to doe in all the scriptures nay there is warrant for them so to doe by the Scriptures if they will harken to them rather then to their Ministers for God saith in the 4th com Sixe dayes thou shalt worke c this Lords day is the first day of these Sixe dayes neither vvas this law euer yet repealed 2. Christs Disciples made this Lords day a trauailing day also Christ him selfe trauailed in it too fro as hath bene proued wherefore if vve may receiue instruction from Gods 4th com or if vve may follovv the example of Christ of his Disciples then may vve safly doe the vvorkes of our calings on the Lords day as vvell as vpon any other day of the weeke But herevnto some of our Ministers as those who are so hote for the Lords day Sabbath will
Lords day for it is so indeed 2. If you aske me vvhere vve haue any com to baptize infants my ansvver is that I neuer reade of any yet and therefore I take it to be an indifferent thing at the libertie of the Church to baptise vvhen infants or of riper yeeres if therefore you can shew a Com. for Baptisme of infants vvhich I cannot then is there reason you should also shew a Com. for your Lords day but if you can shew none no more then I then is your Lords day but an indifferent thing and at the liberty of the Church as Baptisme of infants is this is a rule that vvhat is not commaunded nor forbidden that is indifferent so then as the Church may baptise one sooner or later so the Church may keepe your Lords day and they may refuse to keepe it if they please and this is the highest pitch of honour that you can raise your Lords day to that it is an indifferent thing so as the Church may Rest vpon it or vvorke vpon it keepe it or refuse to keepe it at hir pleasure for a commaunded thing or day it is not by your owne confession SECT IV. Thus vve haue showne that of all the Scriptures which they bring for the Lords day they haue neuer a Commandement for it from Christ nor from his Apostles Novv let vs come vnto such kind of Scriptures as they haue for it the first vvhich vve vvill mention shall be the 4th Com. Exod. 20.8 Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it c. Herevnto I answer doe not these men thinke you stand in need of Sampsons strength to drage hale this 4th Comm. vnto the Lords day And of more then Achitophels vvite to make an argument out of this 4th Com. for the Lords day which shall stand by force of necessary consequence whereof they talke so had they not neede of a long rope to tye together this 4th Com. the Lords day the one being two thowsand yeeres before the other the one in Moses his time the other in Christ his time Doth our new ordinance of Baptisme stand by force of the old Law of Circumcision made thowsands of yeeres before euer Baptisme vvas heard of Doth our new ordinance of the Lords Supper stand by force of the old Law of the passeouer made thowsands of yeeres before the Lords Supper vvas euer heard of and how then should this nevv ordinance of the Lords day be proued to stand by force of the old Law for the 7th day Sabbath made thowsands of yeeres before euer this Lords day vvas heard on had not these men fore heads of brasse cast off shame vvit together they could not be so impudent as to vndertake such an absurd taske but this they leane vpon they can but say the vvord and it is done the simple people beleeue all for gospell if once Mr. Yates Mr. Gallard and Mr. Chappell deliuer it as their iudgment it is as if S. Peter S. Iohn S. Paul had said it in expresse vvords thus it is in our Country I beleeue it is no better in other partes of the Kingdome Who vvould thinke that these men should be so audaciously bould as to alter Gods 4th Com. from one day of the vveeke vnto an other be it that Christ had set vp the Lords day for a Sabbath is not his Authority sufficient for it are not all the Textes in the Nevv Testament able enough to iustifie it but they must flie into the Old Testament for a commandement for it can they shevv vvhere Christ or his Apostles did euer ranke this Lords day vnder the 4th com or inioyne it to be kept with reference vnto or conscience of the 4th Com let them shew their necessary consequence for this Furthermore if these men could see but that they cannot so long as they thinke wisedome must dye vvith them vvhilst they goe about to strengthen their Lords day Sabbath by the 4th Com. they therby vveaken it in the sight of all vvise men For besids vvhat hath bene said to this purpose themselues doe bevvray it that their cause is feeble and vvanteth strength supportation for their consciences tell them that the Lords day needeth a Commandement and their eyes tell them that Christ and his Apostles left none for it in all the Nevv Testament vvherefore to make vp that vvhich is lacking by Christ themselues haue supplied it by runing into the Old Testament for a Com. for it thus they intimate that Christ vvas not a perfect Lavv-giuer because he gaue none for the Lords day Sabbath and further they doe bevvray that they cannot finde arguments sufficient enough for the Lords day neither from Christ nor from the Apostles nor in all the Nevv Testament for else they vvould as vvell content themselues vvith such arguments as they find in the Nevv Testament for it as in other new ordinances they doe they rune not into the Old Testamēt to proue the doctrine of the Resurrection of Christ of Baptisme and the Lords Supper Wherefore they bewray that the Lords day is not grownded in the New Testament as is the Resurrection Baptisme and the Lords supper this kind of Sophistry is much like vnto this suppose a Lawyer should affirme it that it is vnlavvfull for an vsurer to take aboue 8. in the 100. and the vsurer should demaund againe of him vvhen that Law was made by vvhom what King vvas the Authour founder of it herevnto the Lawyer should reply it vvas enacted by King Charles a fewe yeeres since c. Suppose againe that the vsurer doubting of the matter should desire him to proue it vnto him by the Statute booke that there was such a Law enacted by King Charles in such a yeere as he spake of if novv this Lawyer could not shew any Statute Law for it enacted in King Charles his reigne but must bring forth an old Statute Lavv enacted by Quene Elizabeth many yeeres before King Charles his birth where in Shee forbade to take aboue 10 in the 100. Would not any man whose eyes are in his heade thinke the Lawyer doth but fumble And thinke here were forgery deceipt in this Lawyer iust so it is with our diuines they say with one voice that Christ instituted this Lords day and that 1630 yeeres a gone yet put them to proue it they can shew no Comm. for it made during the reigne of Christ here vpon earth or in the time of his Successours the Apostles but they rune out for a Law enacted 2000. yeers before Christ or his Apostles vvere borne is not this pretty If I might aduise them they should hould them closse to such Lawes onely and Scriptures as they can find in the New Testament enacted by Christ for the Lords day if it vvere but to saue their credites among wise men But let vs novv come vnto their arguments to see how they vvill proue the Lords day a Sabbath day
lighted vpon men on the Lords day vnto their contempt of Gods ordinances of preaching and prayers performed in that day it is rather to be thought that God punisheth the contempt of his ordinances then the neglect of the day for such as profane the Lords day come not at Church then to serue God vvhen euery body doth serue God it is a signe that they be ordenary contemners of Gods worship seruice most iustly therefore may God plague them for contempt of his ordinances when they are growne to that height of impiety that they dare ordenarily neglect Gods worship yea and vpon solemne times also appointed by the Church and vvhen all men meete together to vvorship God then to shew a contempt is a greater sinne then otherwise so it is rather the contempt of Gods ordinances then the neglect of the day that God punisheth 3. Well nigh all men are perswaded in their consciences that the Lords day is the Sabbath day inioyned by the 4th Comm. albeit in trueth Saturday is the Sabbath day by the 4th Com. now if men doe neither giue God the right day through their ignorance nor yet will giue God a wrong day whereof they are notvvithstanding well persvvaded in their consciences that it is the right day then they sinne against conscience whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 now it is iust with God to plague men if they will neither giue him the 7th day for a Sabbath nor the 8th day neither for so they are guilty of the breach of the 4th Com. in that they giue God no day no Sabbath no not that day vvhich their consciences tell them is Sabbath day thus God may punish them for a sinne against conscience though not for the day sake and hereby it appeareth that their arguing is amisse when they say that God punisheth men for breach of the Lords day for it is rather to be thought that God punisheth for other causes SECT XIX Their second argument fetched from Testimony is from the practise of the primitiue Churches after the Apostles for the Histories of the Church say they make mention that they kept the Lords day constantly Herevnto I answer 1. that it seemeth this practise was not vniuersall in all Churches but onely in some places or not in all times but at some time onely for Mr. Perkins vpon the 4th Com. affirmeth out of the Histories of the Church that the Sabbath meaning it of the Lords day Sabbath was neglected of those Churches which succeeded the Apostles but afterwards it was reuiued established by Christian Emperours And for confirmation hereof he alleageth his Author Leo and Anton. Edict of Holy dayes Whereby it appeareth by the History of the Church also by confession of M. Perkins that this Lords day vvas not kept in the primitiue Churches constantly as now we keepe it in our Churches for it was not kept vntill Christian Emperours established it now the first Christian Emperour that enacted a Law for the Lords day as farr as I can find was Constantine this was about 300 yeeres after Christ so that this Lords day was not onely not kept by the primitiue Churches but also it was not kept in all probability not of 300 yeeres after Christ so that they haue no greate cause to alleage the practise of the primitiue Church for their Lords day 2. I ansvver but admit the primitiue Churches had kept it constātly in all places at all times alwaies yet there is a tvvofould keeping or solemnizing of a day the one is the keeping it a Sabbath day the other is the keeping of it for an Holy day now I deny that they kept it for a Sabbath day for it is most likly that they kept it for an holy day vvhich is more remise and slenderly kept then a Sabbath day and this appeareth 1. by Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesians where he exhorteth both to the keeping of the Sabbath day also to the keeping of the Lords day both in one the same page novv it is not likely that Ignatius did exhorte his people to keepe two Sabbath dayes in a vveeke the Saturday Sunday and therfore it is likely that the Lords day they kept it slenderly as an holy day Againe hee cales the Lords day there the Quene Princesse of dayes where you see he left an higher roome for the Sabbath day accounting it as the King prince of dayes therfore it is likly kept not the Lords day as they did the Sabbath day Yet furher it is to be noted that Ignatius exhorting his people to the keeping of both the Sabbath day the Lords day he refuseth to giue that word vnto the Lords day vvhich he giueth to the Sabbath day vvhich is most proper for a Sabbath day for in exhorting to the Sabbath day he vseth this vvord Sabbatizet but in exhorting to the Lords day he changeth the vvord and vseth this vvord celebret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in liklihood noteth a difference in the vse of these two dayes the one being kept as a Sabbath the other as a Festiuall day 2. It appeareth by a law made by Constantine as any may reade it reported by M. Fox in his booke of Martyres the new Edition pag. 93. thus The Sunday hee commanded to be kept holy of all men and free from all Iudiciary causes from markets Martes fayers all other manuall laboures onely hushandry excepted Where you see the workes of husbandry as plowing the like excepted this might be done in those dayes and in that Church on the Lords day Now Constantine was the most famouse defender of the Lords day of any Emperour would he thinke you haue giuen men leaue to goe to plough carte on the Lords day if hee had esteemed it as a Sabbath day no surely for this is plaine contrary to the very letter of the 4th com In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke no not in earing time nor in haruest Exod. 34.21 wherefore since Constantine gaue leaue to plough sowe the like workes of husbandry on the Lords day it is a manifest thing that in his time the Lords day was not kept for a Sabbath day but rather as a light holy day hereby it appeareth that the patrones of the Lords day haue little cause to glorie so much in the law that Constantine made for the keeping of the Lords day holy 3. It appeareth by this that Constantine made a law for the keeping holy of Friday of Sunday both the Friday because of Christ his passion the Sunday or Lords day because of Christs resurrection For this see Euseb de vita Constant lib. 4. Cap 18. and see Sozom. lib. 1. Cap. 8. these ij dayes were inacted in one the same law in one the same manner whereby you see that the Lords day vvas accounted in the primitiue Churches no more an holy
is this The time of the 7th day it was and also it may now againe if men so please be an helpe and a furtherance vnto these Morall dueties of Rest from laboures and the worship of God commanded in the 4th Comm. for the 7th day furthereth these dueties as time and place doe further all dueties and is it not to be wondered at that men will reiect and abolish such a thing or things as be helpes and furtherances vnto Gods worship and vnto Morall dueties Diuines teach that not onely the dueties expressed in the Decalogue are to be obserued but also all helpes and furtherances vnto those dueties but behold here they reiect as Iewish and Ceremoniall the 7th day which was in ancient time and may be againe an helpe vnto Gods worship and the other Sabbath dueties Yea such an helpe as no other day cā be so fit for no day but it is a sanctified day Genes 2.3 nor a commanded day Exod. 20.8.10 nor that hath Gods president Exod. 20.10.11 I might here alleage the Testimony of many but I will content my selfe with iij or iiij who though no friends to the ancient Sabbath yet herein iustify me Doctour Bownde in his booke of the Sabbath Pag. 40. saith That the 4th Com. can no more be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall then the same liuing creature can be partly a man partly a beast Yea as well may one suppose the second Com. also to be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall To the same effect hee in pag. 36. citeth Wolph Chron. lib. 2. ca. 1. saying but the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes because it is commanded in the Decalogue which conteineth in it nothing ceremoniall nothing typicall nothing to be abrogated M. Richard Byfield in his Doctrine of the Sabbath vindicated against M. Brerewod pag. 88. saith the 4th com is parte of the law of nature and so parte of the Image of God and is no more capable of a ceremony to be in it then God is For conclusion you shall heare doctour Ames speake in the name of all best diuines In his Theologicall Thesis pag. 499. Thus he writeth This is a most certaine rule receiued by all the best Diuines that the morall commandements were thus differenced in their deliuery from the ceremoniales that all onely the morales were proclaimed publikly before the people of Israel from Mount Sinay by the voyce of God himselfe after also were written the second time written as it were by the finger of God that in Tables of stone to declare their perpetuall and immutable continuance Now doe you not heare how these mē affirme it that the 7th day is not to be rekoned among the figures ceremonies of the Iewes that all best diuines hold that all onely morales were wrote in the Tables of stone and that the 4th com is no more capable of a ceremony in it then God is and that you may as absurdly say the same liuing creature is partly a man partly a beast as to say the 4th com is partly morall partly ceremoniall Before I produce their argumēts I desire to propound iiij things more both vnto our opponentes also vnto my Reader The for most is this before they begine their opposition wicked worke I desire them to cast their eyes first vpon the vglinesse of it to viewe it well for they fight not for God blessed for euer but against God my warfare is for God to defend his Title touching his Sabbaths but theirs is alltogether to defeate God of his Title and Sabbaths my strift is to defend Gods law in the Integrity and perfection vnto a iot title of it but their strife is with might and maine to lame Gods law and to clype it as traitoures doe the Kings coyne they will none of the law in its integrity and perfection that so they may serue God by halues by peece-meale An other thing I would propound is this I desire to know of these who are such implacable enemies to the Lords Sabbaths if they haue any Countermand or contrary commandement vnto the 4th com and that in as plaine expresse termes as the 4th com you know that a law enacted in parliament cannot be reuoked but by an other law enacted for the reuersing of it in the court of parliament so it must be in this case for the 7th day Sabbath there was a law to wit the 4th com enacted from heauen in the old Testament they must therefore shew vs a law from heauen againe countermanding it in the new Testament against the 7th day Sabbath or if in case they cannot shew vs A law in exprese words against the Sabbath day the which they cannot doe then if they be enforced in stead of a commandement to flie to reasones consequences made out of textes of Scripture they must make suer that their reasones collectiones and consequences be so cleere and apparent so sound and so necessarily true that they may be as vndoubtedly true as a commandement it selfe the reason hereof is because these consequences must stand in the roome of a commandement for the reuoking of that Sabbath day which was commanded in the 4th com euery sleity probable reason therefore collected out of a text is not enough to ouerturne an expresse commandement yea a morall commandement shall a sleity collection or consequence fetched by mans feeble shallow reason out of these the like textes Exod. 31.13 Rom. 14.5 Colos 2.16.17 ouerturne a sacred time expresly commanded in the morall law Exod. 20.8 God forbid We must shew more loue and honour vnto those 10 commandements which God hath honoured aboue all portions of Scripture by writing them with his owne finger deliuering them by his owne voyce then to suffer them or any parte of them to be snached wrested out of our hands by probabilities likelihoods feeble reasones A man may well doubt of it whither any man or Church may abolish any things expresly commanded in the Morall Law by any collection or consequence of mans reason whatsoeuer yea albeit it be thought of all men to be a necessary consequence for how often doe men take that to be sound of necessary trueth which once within a fewe yeeres after the same men find to be faulty let men know therefore that they who dare attempt so bould an enterprise as to diminish any iot or title of the 10. morales by reasones fetched out of these the like textes Exod. 31.13 and Colos 2.16.17 they must be such reasons as be as cleere as the Sunne in its brightnesse so satisfactory as euery one that heareth them cannot but applaud imbrace them saying God is in these reasones and collectiones the reason hereof is because these reasones and consequences they must beare downe confront an expresse commandement written by the finger of God
but in regard of Christs pouerty it is not vnlikly that he vsed browne or corse bread 2. By the like the Iewes might haue thus absurdly reasoned also whereas the Sabbath day was commanded on Mount Sinay Exod. 20. yea one moneths iourney before they came to Mount Sinay in the wildernesse of Sin Exod. 16.1.23 yea and in an other remote place as in that parte of the world where about Paradise was since the Sabbath was from the Creation hence the Iewes might thus peruersly haue argued saying wee are now in Canaan or in Captiuity in a country that is farr remote from Mount Sinay where the Sabbath was commanded or from the wildernesse of Sin or that parte of the world where Paradise was and where the Patriarkes kept the Sabbath and therfore we here cannot keepe the Sabbath for our Sabbath in this country begineth not at that point of time iust when the Sabbath begineth at Mount Sinay the wildernesse of Sin or about Paradise loe their folly God requireth not a people to begine his 7th day Sabbath when other remote Nations begine theirs but onely thē when by the light of the Sunne which rules the day God begineth to that people his Seauenth day This point is further prosecuted in my former booke but enough too much hath bene here said to this idle argument men haue so little reuerence of God and of his lawes and of his ancient ordinance the Sabbath that they thinke any thing is good enough how idle and ridiculouse soeuer to throw against the same euery frothie conception of an idle braine is matter sound enough to buze and make a noise in peoples eares against that sacred time which God himselfe hath hallowed sanctified honoured amongst his morales SECT VIII A 4th text is that Isa 66.23 From moneth to moneth or from new Moone to new Moone from Sabbath to Sabbath shall all flesh come to worship before me saith the Lord. Whence some collect that the Sabbath here was made a Signe of the euerlasting Sabbath in heauen others would haue it a Signe of the Church vnder the new Testament and of the Church triumphant in heauen both so it being a signe it is abolished Herevnto I answer 1. it is doubtfull what may be the proper sense of this text it being a Prophecy deliuered in Metaphoricall and Allegoricall speeches for instance what shall be meant by these words from new Moone to new Moone it is doubtfull wherefore this text being difficult it is not fit to haue a controuercy decided by it much lesse to haue it vsed to the abolishing of any thing commanded in a morall law it is not meete that the 4th com being vttered in plaine proper speeches should be contradicted countermanded by a Prophecy which is vttered in difficult improper speeches what is this but petitio principij 2. I answer by the word Sabbath here may be vnderstod not the weekly 7th day morall Sabbath inioyned in the morall law but some of the anniuersary ceremoniall Sabbathes which neuer came into the morall law as that Sabbath of the Seauenth yeere or of the fiftith yeere Leuit. 25.10.4 for since the text speaketh of a continuall worshiping of God vnder the new Testament therefore the Sabbath of a yeere is more fit to be a type of it then the Sabbath of a day the 7th day 3. I answer the Sabbath day here mentioned is not made a Signe but rather the other 6 dayes which goe betwence Sabbath and Sabbath for so the text saith from Sabbath to Sabbath that is all the dayes betwene the Sabbaths shall all flesh come to worship c. so then it is not the Sabbath day that was made a Signe but those Six dayes which went betwene the Sabbathes SECT IX A 5th text of theirs is Heb. 4.10.11 where there is mention of a Rest and in v. 9. there remaineth therefore a Rest vnto the people of God Here say they the Sabbath or Rest is made a type of the Rest in the Kingdome of heauen now all types are abolished as ceremonies Herevnto I answer 1. many thinke indeed that here is some greate matter in this text for their purpose but it will proue vpon better examination nothing so for if this Rest here mentioned be a type of heauen it is so farr off from making any thing against the Sabbath day as that it rather maketh for it for the nature of types is to last in the Church vntill the thing typed out by them be come thus all sacrifices lasted vntill Christ our pascall Lamb was comne sacrificed for vs wherefore by like reason if this Rest or Sabbath heere be a type of the kingdome of heauens rest then may this Rest and Sabbath last in the Church vntill we all come to a rest in the kingdome of heauen so then all the time we liue on earth this Sabbath may be kept 2. I answer if the aduersaries to this ordinance of Gods Sabbath could tell how to proue the Rest in the 4th com a ceremony by this text then hereby they must wholly ouerthrow the 4th com for take away rest from laboures as an abolished ceremony and then may men labour in their caleings euery man in his seuerall family in his seuerall field and how then can there be any publike assemblies of the people together in the Church to keepe a Sabbath 3. I answer suppose we that there was a type in the word Rest yet since it speaketh not of a dayes rest but of an euerlasting rest therfore may the yeere of Iubile the 50th yeere be made a type here rather thē the 7th day for there is greater similitude betwene the 50th yeere Leuit. 25.10.11.4.1 and the euerlasting rest then betwene the 7th day Exod 20.8 and the euerlasting rest SECT X. A 6th text they vse which is Numb 28.9.10 where it was commanded vnto the Iewes to offer ij lambes for a Sacrifice on the Sabbath day whence they would collect that if the Sacrifices being a duety of the Sabbath be abolished then is the Sabbath it selfe aboiished Herevnto I answer 1. if the Sabbath day be abolished togeather with the sacrificing of the ij lambes then must for the same reason also be abolished rest from laboures and the morall worship of God in the Sabbath for the sacrificing of the lambes on the Sabbath day hath as much respect vnto rest from labour Gods worship to declare them also to be ceremonies as vnto the time to declare it to be a ceremony abolished 2. I answer that this law of offering ij lambes on the Sabbath day it was aduentitiouse onely added to the 4th com to the Sabbath for a time and therefore no parte of the 4th com nor essentiall Sabbath duety for it was neuer wrote by God in Tables of stone but wrote by Moses as were other ceremonies all after the writing of the moral law was finished and therefore no parte of
note of inference vsed in it Therefore one of the premisses whereof you haue in v. 14. Now the Apostles argument is on this wise If the handwriting of ordinances which is the written Law which commanded meate and drink and holy daies new Moones and Sabbath daies be put out and taken away Then let no man condemne you in meate and drinke holy daies new Moones and Sabbath daies But the handwriting of ordinances is put out and taken away Therefore let no man condemne you in meate drink holy daies new Moones and Sabbath daies The Apostles Minor you haue in v. 14. and his conclusion in v. 16. now forasmuch as it is a rule with Logiceans that there must not be more in the conclusion then is in the premisses hence it followeth that if by the word Sabbaths in v. 16. they will vnderstand the 7th day Sabbath written in the 4th com then by these words handwriting in v. 14. they must vnderstand also the handwriting of the 4th com or else there is more in the conclusion then in the premisses for the premisse v. 14. speaketh but of the haÌ„dwriting of ceremonies writteÌ„ by Moses onely but in the conclusion v. 16. if they will includ not onely the ceremoniall law writteÌ„ by Moses but also a parte of those things written by God in the Tables of stone then in the conclusion I say they haue both Moses his handwriting and also a parte of Gods handwriting and so there is more in the conclusion then in the premisses wherefore to auoid this absurdety they must vnderstand the word handwriting in v. 14. to include not onely the handwriting of the ceremonies by the hand of Moses but also they must vnderstand thereby that parte of Gods handwriting whereby he commanded the 7th day Sabbath which is the 4th com and so you see they abolish the handwriting of the 4th com it selfe and so we shall haue no 4th com at all thus you may see wherevnto the opposition of Gods Sabbaths out of this text Col. 2.16 tendeth namely to the subuersion of the 4th com let them talke what they will of obedience to Gods 4th com and that they haue a respect with Dauid vnto all Gods commandements yet all is but talke and words iudge the Tree by the fruits you see all their endeauors tend vnto the subuersion of one of Gods Morall Lawes and this is the first of my 3. Answers which I tould you I had more to adde Now I come vnto an other of my answers and it is this that they that expound this text Col. 2.16 of the 7th day Sabbath commanded in the Morall Law they doe crosse and contradict their owne Authours such writers of their owne as are of high estimation with them I will produce a fewe of them in steade of many that might be alleaged I will begine with M. Perkins who frameth an obiection of some aduersaries which they make out of these ij textes Col. 2.16 and Gal. 4.10 saying that if we obserue any difference of dayes now in the new Testament then we are no better then Iewes vnto which textes M. Perkines thus answereth That both these places speake of the feasts of the Iewes and of d fference of daies that stands in force by the Iewish ceremoniall Law Cases of conscience Chapt. 16. Sect. 3. Pag. 108. Where you see M. Perkins freeth this text Col. 2.16 from hauing any thing to doe against the Morall Law or against the difference of dayes in force by the Morall Law by saying that it speaketh of a difference of dayes which stode in force by the Iewish ceremoniall Law now the 7th day Sabbath was neuer commanded in the Iewish ceremoniall law but in the morall law Let vs heare also what M. Dod saith in this point he answereth to an obiection framed out of this text Col. 2.16 against the Sabbath day on this wise We must know saith he that here the Apostle speaketh of such Sabbaths as are in the ranke with the meates drinkes whereof the spake before of which sorte were the first day of euery moneth and the first and last daies of euery one of the 3 solemne feastes of the Iewes of these he speaketh in the plurall number and not of the Lords Sabbath day in the singular number which hath a singular excellencie and how euer times change it neuer changeth Dod on the 4th com Pag. 132. In which words you see M. Dod affirmeth that this text Col. 2.16 speaketh onely of the yeerly Sabbaths which the Iewes kept in their 3 yeerly feastes or 3 solemne feastes doth plainly deny that this text saith anything of the Lords 7th day Sabbath which he caleth the Lords Sabbath day in the singular number by way of excellency Of this same iudgement is M. Greeneham in his worke vpon the Sabbath of the same iudgment also is M. Elton vpon the Colossians on this text Col. 2.16 of the same iudgement likewise is Doctour Ames in his Thesis touching the Sabbath To these fiue I might add many more that are of the same iudgement as themselues cannot but know seing they read them dally one more I will add who is newly come forth M. Richard Byfield against M. Brerewood on the Sabbath who saith in expresse words that this text Col 2.16 doth not abolish the Sabbath day in the 4th com but those other Sabbaths c. See him Pag 130. Thus you see that they who would haue the Apostle to speake of the morall Sabbath mentioned in the morall law as M. Chappel his 9 confederates would they are contrary vnto Diuines of greate note of their owne side Obiection say they why doe you alleage M. Perkins and M. Dod and others why they doe not defend your opinion for the 7th day Sabbath doe they Herevnto I answer it is not my purpose in this place to alleage them as if they spake for the 7th day Sabbath but onely for this purpose to shew that they euen thire owne Diuines will not indure it that this text Col. 2.16 should be pressed any further then against the Iewish ceremoniall law and that it concerneth not the Lords Sabbath day spoken of in the 4th com singularly but those yeerly Sabbaths spoken of plurally c. This is all I aime at by alleaging their Testimony now the Testimony of a man against himselfe is euer accounted strong and good for me to produce one of my aduersaries to iustify my cause it is better and more forcible then if I should alleage an â—undreth Diuines that are of the same iudgement with mee and so much for this point My third answer to this text is this suppose we that the 7th day Sabbath were a shaddow of Christ by this text Col. 2.17 yet â—ence vvill nothing follow necessarily but that the Sabbath is abolished as touching its typicalnesse and shaddowish quality that so it shall be no more vsed as a type or as a shaddow of Christ to come but for
thing therein call it an accident or a circumstance of time or what else diminutily you will he did ratifie this litle thing also the 7th day Sabbath the argument is good a minori for if Christ would not haue a title of a letter in the Law altered much lesse an ordinance commanded in the Law as is the 7th day Sabbath I come next vnto the Minor or second proposition and this is most cleerly proued by the words of our Sauiour Christ For truly I say vnto you vntill heauen earth perish one iote or one title shall in no wise passe from the Law vntill all things be fulfilled Mat. 5.18 In which words our Sauiour Christ plainly ratified the very least things commanded in the Law to last for euer for as Chemnitius saith vpon this text iote is a letter of the Hebrew Alphabet of the least value of all other letters in the Alphabet title saith hee is as a pricke to a letter or as a comma to a seÌ„tence whereby we see that inasmuch as Christ would not haue one of the least letters of the Law no nor so much a title of a letter as a pricke is vpon the letter i in no wise to departe from the Law hereby he ratified the very least thing commanded in the Law that Christ ratified the Law vnto a iot and title extendeth to the very least things in the Law more emphatically more voide of exception then if he had said nothing shall passe from the Law Had the 7th day Sabbath bene to be abolished a while after Christ should haue forknowne it well enough then remembring that he would neuer haue here ratified the Law so vniuersally vnto a very iot and title of it This is plaine if we looke but vpon the very next verse vers 19. Whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so he shall be caled the least in the Kingdome of heauen Mat. 5.19 So here then in plaine words you see our Sauiour ratifieth the very least coÌ„mandement yet further Christ intended to ratify not onely the least comman but also the least branch of euery commandement for he ratified not onely the 6th com touching murther but also the least thing therin conteined as rash anger and caling an other foole v. 22. the 7th com hee ratified it to the least iot title of it euen to the adultery of the heart and to a lustfull looke v. 28. the seconp Table of loue Christ ratified it to the vtmost extending it euen to the loue of our enemies v. 44. by all which it is most apparent that our blessed Sauiour intended to ratify this Diuine Law of his heauenly father to the very vtmost vnto the very least thing therin commanded neither can any man I think invent should he study 7 yeeres for it how to expresse himselfe in words more vniuersally emphatically to comprize euery thing vnto the very least of all so as his words should be liable to no exceptions then our Sauiour Christ hath expressed himselfe heere so emphatically so vniuersally and so full are his words heere spoken to that end Thus you haue sene this argument firmly proued neither can I deuise what should be more plaine pregnant for the maintenaÌ„ce of this ordinance of Gods morall Sabbath then this text vttered by our Sauiour Christ but by how much it is the cleerer by so much the more Sathan stirreth vp opposition againstit let vs therefore see what trickes and quillets the wit of man can deuise against it that so all rubbs being remoued our faith may rest vpon this rocke of Christs word the more firmly and securly 1. One answer brought against this argument is this that by the word Law may be vnderstod both the morall and Ceremoniall Lawes But this is an vnwarrantable enlargment of the word law for it is a rule that generall words must be restrained vnto the Subiect matter in hand as in Heb. 7.12 if by the word Law there we should vnderstand both morall and ceremoniall Lawes we should make foule worke wherefore as the word Law in Heb. 7.12 is to be rastained vnto the Leuiticall ceremoniall Law according to the matter there spoken of so must we by the word Law in Mat. 5.18 vnderstaÌ„d onely the morall Law according to the matter here spoken of for as you may se plainly by the context our Sauior speaketh of the morall Law for our Sauiour hauing ratified the Law in generall in v. 18.19 then he descendeth vnto particulars giuinge examples in the 6th com touching murther as in v. 21. in the 7th com touching adultery as in v. 27. in the third com touching swearing as in v. 3. the latter parte of the Chapter is spent in dueties of loue towards our neighbour conteined in the second Table whereby we see our Sauiour spake onely of the morall Law 2. I proue that the ceremoniall Law cannot be here meante for Christ said but in the verse a forgoing that he came not to destroy the Law or the Prâ—phets which phrase our Saniour vseth in this Sermon for the Morall Law onely Mat. 7.12 and neuer otherwise Mat. 22.40 secondly then should Christ haue ratified the ceremoniall Law vnto the worlds end in Mat. 5.18 which is contrary vnto all Scriptures and therfore Christ spake nothing of the ceremoniall Law in this place 3. Since Christ spake here of the duration continuance of the Law for euer it is absurd to thinke that in this case he would ioyne the Morall and the Ceremoniall Laws together as if they were both of a like perpetuity lasting nature and therfore onelie the Morall Law was here meante 4. Can it be thought that Christ should make here in v. 17. an Apologie for the Ceremoniall Law when elswhere he preached against it Ioh. 4.21 Besids since Christ intended a little after to abolish the Ceremoniall Law he would rather haue bene silent now then to say ought that might ratifye it 2. An other answer made against this argument is that the duration of the Law here spoken of by Christ is but vntill Christ his passion noted in those words vntill all things be fulfilled v. 18. for at Christ his passion all things were fulfilled But this answer is very absurd for these words of Christ are a prophecy of the continuance of the Law which prophecy was ratified by a greate Asseueration saying verily or truly I say vnto you c. Now the time when Christ made this prophecy it was not aboue a matter of two yeeres before his passion or there about now who could thinke that Christ should make a prophecy that in such solemne a maner with such an Asseueration that the Law should last continue yet two yeers longer Further if this answer exposition be iustifiable then by the same answer may we now reiect a greate parte of Christs sermon in the mount especially his exposition vpon the Morall
to deale against the enemies of Gods law who would abolish the whole law as Libertines Anabaptists our new vpstart Eatonists they doe defend Gods law to be Morall perpetuall by this text for one Math. 5.18 Nay I know not any text we haue in all the new Testament that is more auailable for this purpose theÌ„ is this one text but if now our diuines will stand to defend these 4 answeres which I haue confuted then why may not any of these Libertines or the rest make the same answers to them when they produce this Text Mat. 5.18 to defend the perpetuity of Gods Law as first why may not these Libertines answer saying by the word Law in Mat. 5.18 may be meant both the Morall the Ceremoniall Laws and so Christ should ratify the Morall Law no more then he did the Ceremoniall Law 2. And why may they not answer also that the duration of the Law here spoken of by Christ is but vntill Christs passion 3. And why may they not answer you also that there are some iotes things in the Law that belong not vnto vs Christianes as in the preface to the Commandements Gods deliuerance of the Israelites out of Egypt And the reason to the 5th com that thy daies may be long in the Land that the Lord thy God giueth thee that is in the Land of Canaan that so you shall not from this text defend all and euery of the tenn commandemeÌ„ts Wherefore either they must withdrawe renounce these 3 answers made to mee or else they must receiue them at the hands of Libertines Anabaptists Antinomians Thus much for my 10th Argument whereby I haue proued that our Sauiour Christ ratified the 7th day Sabbath coÌ„manded in the Morall Law because hee ratified the very least things commanded in the Morall Law ARGUM. XI My eleauenth argument to proue the 7th day Sabbath still in force is because our Sauiour Christ would haue it obserued for about â—0 yeeres after the death of all Ceremonies saying Pray that your flight be not in the winter nor on the Sabbath day Mat. 24 20. and it may be thus framed He that commanded his Disciples to vse all meanes possible that they might not profane the Sabbath day by working trauailing moileing toileing on it for about 50 yeeres after the death end of all Ceremonies hee would haue the Sabbath day sanctified still in force But Christ commanded his Disciples to vse all possible meanes that they might not profane the Sabbath day by working crauailing moiling toiling on it for about 50 yeeres after the death and end of all Coremonies Therefore Christ would haue the Sabbath day sanctified and still in force For the Major or first proposition two things are there in considerable as for the former it is a most cleere case for he that would not haue the Sabbath day profaned he would haue it sanctified and obserued like as in the 7th com in that God would not haue a man commit adultery it followeth that God would haue him liue chastly the remouing of one contrary is the bringing in of the other the forbidding of a sinne is the commanding of its contrary virtue And further he that willeth all possible meanes to be vsed for the auoiding of any euill he would that that euill should be auoided the contrary good brought in so he that commanded all possible meanes to be vsed that the Sabbath day might not be profaned he would not haue the Sabbath day profaned but that the contrary good should be brought in which is that the Sabbath day should be sanctified for to that very end that it might not be profaned but sanctified he appointed the meanes to be vsed now no man commandeth meanes to be vsed for the obtaining of that thing which he would not obtaine The other thing considerable is that he that willed the Sabbath day should be sanctified and kept from profanation 50 yeeres after the death of all Ceremonies he willed that the Sabbath day should be still in force vnto this day the reason hereof is because there was but one proper time for the abolishing of all ceremonies all ceremonies they were abolished together at once therefore whatsoeuer was ratified to be obserued 40 or 50 yeeres after the proper time for the death end of all ceremonies that thing was no ceremony for if it were it should not haue suruiued all ceremonies neither was it abolished with ceremonies as a ceremony for then no care shoul haue bene vsed so long after for its obseruation now if it was not a bolished with ceremonies at the proper time when all ceremonies were abolished then was it no ceremony but a Morall consequently to last perpetually I grant that many ceremonies were in vse in the Church long after they were abolished but it was by connivency and by sufferance onely for the weakenesse of those times but neuer by the authority of the Lord of them as this is for the Sabbath day it was not by conniuency for Christ commanding his Disciples to pray against the profanation of the Sabbath day doth thereby warrant the sanctification of it Furthermore whatsoeuer was authorized to be vsed in the Church 40 or 50 yeeres after Christ his death that is still to be retained vsed in the Church for all things which the Apostles did either erect or continue in the Church for 10.20.30 or 40 yeeres after Christ his Passion not as conniued at but as authorized as a duety those things are still in force in the Church no instance can be showne to the contrary And so much for proofe of the Major I come now vnto the Minor or second proposition this I proue out of Mat. 24.20 But pray that your flight be not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath day Which wordes of our Sauiour doe fully proue my Minor for 1. these words are a commandement of Christs in that he biddeth them pray But pray c. 2. This commandement it was directed vnto his Disciples as you may see Mat. 24.1.2 3dly This commandemeÌ„t was that they should vse all possible meanes to auoid their flight vpon the Sabbath day for there was none other meanes to be vsed for the auoiding of this flight but onely prayers to God for their study care and other humane naturall meanes could doe nothing in this matter for the Preuention of this flight so then prayer being all the meanes that possiblie could be vsed Christ commanded his Disciples to vse all meanes that was possible to be vsed yea since prayer must be accompanied with all meanes indeauores of man if more meanes could haue bene vsed Christ would haue had more vsed 4. This meanes of prayer to God which Christ commanded them to vse was to this end that they might not profane the Sabbath day for so saith the text pray that your flight be not on the Sabbath day Whereby you
haue we done and said much more in defence of the Lords Sabbaths thē they haue said or can say in defence of the Lords day who are patrones of it this Lords day Sabbath were it not the Diana and darling of our time supported by men of learning holinesse and zeale I would say of it that it is the most idle friuolouse thing that cane be invented for besids other defects in it they cannot proue a constant practise of it no nor that it was euer kept weeke by weeke two Lords daies together one after an other in any place nor at any time I can but wonder therefore that any man that hath but either learninge or honesty should after the consideration of these things preferre the Lords day aboue the Sabbath day or neglect the ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath day to imbrace this nouill Sabbath of the the Lords day I haue now finished my 12th last argument as touching the first branch of it wherin I haue proued that the Apostles of Christ did constantly keepe the Sabbath day after Christs resurrection now I am to procede and to proue vnto you the second branch of my Minor or second proposition which is That the primitiue Churches which liued after the daies of the Apostles kept the Sabbath day for 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ And this trueth I shall confirme vnto you by sondry Testimonies 1. I will begine with that which M. Perkins reporteth saying The obseruatiō of the Sabbath was neglected of those Churches which succeeded the Apostles but afterwards it was established by Christian Emperours his Author for it is Leo Anton Edict of Holy daies Perk. in his first volume vpon the 4th com pag. 48. by the word Sabbath M. Perkins vnderstandeth the Lords day Sabbath Now of this Lords day he saith according to his author that the Churches which succeded the Apostles they neglected it vntill it vvas established by Christian Emperours now these Churches were the primitiue Churches for they liued immediatly after the Apostles they liued in the neglect of the Lords day Sabbath for about 300 yeeres after the daies of the Apostles as is gatherable by this that he saith it was established by Christian Emperoures now the first Emperour that established the Lords day was Constantine the greate as saith Hosp Cap. 9. pag. 27. this Constantine liued aboute 300 yeers after the Apostles now for asmuch as these Churches liued about 300 yeeres without the Lords day Sabbath it followeth that they all that time kept the 7th day Sabbath vnlesse we shall vncharitably censure them to haue liued profanly without any Sabbath day all that while which were absurd to thinke many Churches kept both Sabbaths together to wit the Sabbath day and the Lords day as you shall see by and by now can it be thought that some of the Primitiue Churches should be so zealouse as to keepe two daies other some so key could as to keepe none at at all wherefore since these Churches kept not the Lords day therefore it must follow that they kept the Sabbath day thus you see it followeth that the Sabbath day was in vse in the primitiue times for about 300 yeeres after the Apostles so then as the Apostles kept the Sabbath day constantly after Christs resurrection so the primitiue Churches that succeded next after the Apostles they kept it for a matter of 300 yeeres longer 2. My next Testimony shall be out of the Centuries where it is thus recorded Romae conventus ecclesiasticos non fuisse in Sabbato quemadmodum in aliarum terrarum ecclesiis Centur iiij Cap. vj. pag. 477. de ritibus ecclesiae Romanae The summe whereof is this that There was no Ecclesiasticall or Church assemblies vpon the Sabbath day at Rome as there was in other Churches In which words there is an opposition made betwixt the Church of Rome an other Churches to wit Christian Churches aboute keeping of the Sabbath day now it is recorded that there was no Church meetings vpon the Sabbathday at Rome but yet there was Church assemblies vpon the Sabbath day in other Churches abrode in the world so then by this Record it is plaine that the most Churches kept the Sabbath day albeit Rome did not and it is no maruaile that Rome had learned of the Laodicean Counsaile to reiect the yoke of Gods 4th com with the first further ' this Testimony was of what was done in these Churches for 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ so then you see that the Sabbath day was obserued in the most Churches 300 or 400 yeeres after Christ so much for this second Testimony 3. My third Testimony shall be from an acte made by the Laodicean Counsaile in the yeere of Christ 364. Laodicenum Concilium celebratum circa annum 364 sanxit Non oportere Iudaizare Christianos in Sabbatho vacare sed potius operari in eadem die Dominicam praeponendo Sabbatho quod si inventi fuerint Sabbathum Judaeorum observantes anahemate ibidem feriuntur Hospin de origin Fest Chap. 9. pag. 27. The summe whereof is this The Laodicean Counsaile held about the yeere 364 made a Law that Christianes should not Judaize rest vpon the Sabbath day but rather worke vpon it that they should praeferre the Lords day aboue the Sabbath day And if so be any were found obseruing the Iewes Sabbath they should be excommanciated or accursed By this Law then it appeareth that the Sabbath day was in vse in those times for else this Law had bene made in vaine which forbad Christians to kepe the Sabbath day any more vpon paine of excommunication for gouernes doe not enact Lawes against nothing 2. Note that as the Sabbath day was in vse in those times so also it was in vse amōgft Christianes for this law as you see was bent against the practise of Christianes forbidding Christianes to keepe the Sabbath day whereby we see that in these times the Sabbath day was honoured among Christianes 3. Note that vnto this time Christianes did honour the Sabbath day with or aboue the Lords day this I gather from hence because this Counsaile ordeined that for time to come Christianes should preferre the Lords day before the Sabbath now they neded not to haue made a law to bind Christiās to preferre the Lords day before the Sabbath day if they had done so before the making of this law this is a remarkabl thing that in these times the Sabbath day was had in such honour with Christiās as it was as highly or rather more highly set by then the Lords day was 4. Note the time this Law was made 364. yeeres or there about after Christ whereby we see that the Sabbath day was in vse amongst Christianes for nere 400 yeeres after Christ A digression by the way shewing 1. the Invalidity of this Laodicean Counsaile Decree made against the Lords Sabbaths 2. The Originall of the Lords day Sabbath 3.
The time when and the persones by whom the ancient Sabbath was first throwne downe First of the first that this Decree made against Gods Sabbaths is not to be regarded or esteemed shall thus appeare because it was an vngodly act decree for they made a Law directly against Gods Law for God said Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it but they decreed that no Christianes should obserue the Sabbath◠day to sanctify it and therefore this Counsaile was guilty of that brand of that wicked one Prophecied of by Daniel Who should speake words against the most high and thinke that he may change times Lawes Dan. 7.25 Now this Counsaile did here change times to wit sacred times sanctified of God the Sabbath day and decreed that this time should now be profaned men yea Christians should profane it by working on it further they changed this day for an other day to wit the Lords day casting downe sinfully the Sabbath day setting vp in its roome and preferring aboue it superstitiously the Lords day And as this decree against the Lords Sabbaths was vngodly in them so was it Schismaticall also for they now begane not onely to decline from ancient purity but also to rend Chureches and to diuide betwixt Church and Church Christianes Christianes for other Churches which liued about their time together with them kept that ancient ordinance of Gods Sabbath as we haue proued already out of Perkines and out of the Centuries and as you may perceiue by those Testimonies which you shall see by by and other Christanes kept the Sabbath also euen among themselues as appeareth by their law inacted against Christians for keeping the Sabbath day thus it appeareth they rent themselues both from those other Churches liuing then with them and from Christianes then in their owne Church also You shall see by and by also how this Counsaile hath made a rent from the Churches whereof those famouse lights Athanasiius Ignatius were Bishopes which liued before this Counsaile therby you shall perceiue how they haue made a Schisme rent also from the most ancient and purest Churches that liued before them Neither is any man to wonder at this for if we consider what was Prophecied of this Church of Laodicea whereof this Counsaile hath its name we can expect no better from it for of all the 7 Churches which Iohn wrote vnto in his Reuelation this of Laodicea it was the worst and therefore saith Christ because thou art luke warme neither could nor hote it shall come to passe that I will spue thee out of my mouth Reuel 3.16 Christ here forteld them that it should come to passe that he would spue them out of his mouth as most loathsome vnto him and thinke you that they did not well deserue it at this time when they begane to make a Schisme rent from other the Churches of Christ and to change Gods time and to enact lawes against Gods Law considering therefore what an vnzealouse Church Christ foretould this Laodicean Church should be it therefore is not to be regarded what they decreed against Gods Sabbaths Yet further if we shall note the time wherein this Counsaile liued and made this decree their decree will grow more suspitiouse and lesse to be regarded for it was 364 yeeres after Christ about which time begane the Mysterie of iniquity to worke for the purity of the primitiue Churches begane to decline and be Ecclipsed then superstition popery begane to insinuate it selfe and creepe into the Churches for those pure Churches of the primitiue times are compared to a riuer the which the further off it runneth from the spring heade the more filth it gathereth so it was with these Churches for as you may reade in Perkins his Demonstration of the probleme about the 300 and 400 yeeres after Christ then begane Images to creepe into Churches The Crosse to be adored Invocation of Saints prayers for the dead Pilgrimage Purgatory Single life of Ministers Monkery Monasticall profession c. Till at last they had corrupted the second commandement by Images Crucisixes and the breaden god now what maruaile that they had also corrupted the 4th com and abolished the Lords Sabbaths when those times had corrupted the second commandement wherefore their decree made neere 400 yeers after Christ is to be suspected because then was the time of the Churches declining and faleing away from their former purity A second thing to be obserued by the way from the decree of this Counsaile is to note the Originall and first vpspringing of our new Sabbath caled the Lords day as a sole Sabbath and generally receiued The pite out of which it was digged is the Laodicean Counsaile the Antiquity that can be alleaged for it it is no higher thë 364 yeeres after Christ for 1. vntill about the time of this counsaile since hitherto this Lords day was neuer generally receiued in the Christian Churches for the Churches whereof Perkins speaketh wich liued immediatly after the apostles they neglected the Lords day for a matter of 300 yeers vntill Christian Emperours established it it is true that Constantine enacted a Law for the generallobseruatiō of the Lords day which was 300 yeeres after Christ and so a matter of 64 yeeres before this Counsaile but in Constantines time the Lords day was not kept as a sole Sabbath for the Sabbath day was then kept also as by by we shall proue by Athanasius who liued in Constantines time 2. Vntill the time of this Counsaile and since the Lords day was neuer receiued and kept for a sole Sabbath as now it is for before the time of this Counsaile the Sabbath day and the Lords day were both kept together in many Chuches as you shall see by those Testimonies which by by I shall produce out of Socrates and from Jgnatius but now at the time of this Counsaile begane the Sabbath day to be reiected and also the Lords day to be set vp as the sole Sabbath without any other and now the Lords day must forsooth be preferred before the Sabbath day and so you see the first Originall of our Lords day Sabbath to be a sole Sabbath was this Counsaile of Laodicea The third and last thing to be obserued is that here we take knowledge of the persones by whom the Lords Sabbaths were first throwne downe and of the time when they were first throwne downe The persōes that did commit this horriblefact they were that lukewarme people of the Church of Laodicea none others durst attempt to change Gods times to make a sacred time become a profane time but these the time when it was in that declined time to wit 364 yeeres after Christ the former times which were the more pure times they durst not lay violent hands of Gods ordinance thus we see when by whom Gods Sacred Sabbaths were rooted out of the Church Thus my digression finished I returne
whence I came 4. My fourth Testimony shall be the words of M. Perkins and Doctour Prideanx M. Brerewood For M. Perkins he moueth a question to know who changed the Iewes Sabbath And then his answer is this It is commonly thought saith hee that the Iews Sabbath was changed into this Lords day by Christian Emperours long after the Ascention of Christ Perk. in his Exposition vpon the first Chapter of the Reuelation and verse the 10th In which words M. Perkins doth deliuer though not his owne yet the common opinion and iudgment of others now the common opinion is saith hee that the Iewes Sabbath was changed long after Christ his Ascention and that by Christian Emperours so then it is the common opinion that the Sabbath day lasted in the Churches a long time after Christ his Ascention euen 300. yeers For Doctour Prideaux saieth he in his worke vpon the Sabbath pag 140 Annon Sabbathum Iudaeorum oum Iudaeis sine scrupulo murmure obseruarunt Apostoli caetus in Sabbatho coactos libentissime instituerunt Annon insequens Ecclesia tam Sabbathum hoc quam diem Dominicum per aliquot annorum decursum sacris conventibus distinauit Notiora sunt ista quam vt probatione indigeant The summe whereof is this did not the Apostles saith hee obserue the Iewes Sabbath with the Iewes without the least scruple making did they not most willingly appoint assemblies on the Sabbath day and did not the Church which followed them appoint both the Sabbath day the Lords day for holy assemblies for diverse yeeres these things are so well knowne that they need not to be proued By whose Testimony you see that the Churches which followed the Apostles they obserued and kept the Sabbath day for diuerse yeeres this is so plaine by History that it needeth not any quotations or profe For M. Brerewood Professor in Gresham College in London in his Treatise of the Sabbath day against M Bysield pag. 77. thus writeth And little doe you know saith hee of the ancient condition of the Church if you know it not that the ancient Sabbath did remaine was obserned together with the Lords day by the Christians of the Easterne Church aboue 300 yeers after Christs death c. And againe The Sabbath of the 7th day was religiously obserued in the East Church 300 yeeres more after our Sauiours passion That Church being a greate parte of Christendome Thus by the iudgement of those who are well seene into the Histories of the Church it is a plaine case that the Sabbath day was religiously obserued and that by Chrïstians for more then 300 yeeres after Christ 5. My fifth Testimony shall be that recorded by Zanchie out of Sozomen the summe whereof is this That those of Constantinople almost all others haue Ecclesiasticall Assemblies to heare Gods word on the Sabbath day on the Lords day Zanchie vpon the 4th com Thes 1. Here you see that not onely at Constantinople they kept the Sabbath day but also almost in all other Churches the Sabbath was kept 6. My sixth Testimony shall be out of Socrates the summe whereof is this Assemblies were wonte to be in the Churches euery weeke vpon the Sabbath day vpon the Lords day Socrat. Chap. 8. lib. 6. againe At Cesarea Cappadocia in Ciprio vpon the Sabbath day vpon the Lords day the Presbiters Bishopes did euermore interpret expound the Sciptures Socrat. Cap. 21. lib. 6. here you see a weekly obseruation of the Sabbath day a constant practise of Presbiters and Bishopes to expound the holy Scriptures vpon the Sabbath day But before I proceed any further it shall not be amisse to answer a doubt that may rise in the minds of some that reade these Antiquities may they say what did the primitiue Churches keepe two Sabbath daies euery weeke for it seemeth so because they kept both the Sabbath day and the Lords day For answer hereto we must know that howbeit they kept two daies yet it is not to be thought that they kept them both for Sabbath daies resting from labour all day long according to the 4th com for 1. This were more then euer God required in his morall Law to rest two daies in Seauen 2. Jgnatius put a difference betwixt the Sabbath day and the Lords day as betwene the King and the Quene for he caled as you shall see by by the Lords day the quene of daies hereby intimating that the Sabbath day whereof he spake also in that place was the King of daies 3. The Christianes against whom the Laodicean Counsaile enacted that law forespoken of they honoured the Sabbath day aboue the Lords day as there we shewed 4. Many Churches of Christianes they kept not the Lords day at all for 300 yeeres together as we haue showne out of Perkines 5. In Cōstantines time he gaue leaue for men to goe to plough and other workes of husbandry on the Lords day as else where we haue showne by all which it is more then manifest that the primitiue Curches though they kept the Lords day yet they kept it not for a Sabbath day or like the Sabbath day but rather much like as we now keepe a common Holy day or a lecture day wherin we come to Church heare the word of God but we keepe not the whole day in a rest from laboures in conscience of the 4th com thus you see albeit they kept two daies in a weeke yet but one onely was kept for their Sabbath the other was kept lightly and partially they kept these two daies in a weeke then much like as we now kepe the Lords day and some light Holy day or the Lords day a Eecture day when they fall both in one weeke 7. My seauēth Testimony shall be that of Athanasius who liued about the time of Constantine 300. yeeres after Christ who in his Homilie de Semente saith thus Wee assemble together in the Sabbath day not as if we were infected with Iudaisme but therefore wee meete together in the Sabbath day that we may worship Iesus the Lord of the Sabbath Centur. iiij Cap. vj. pag 410. In which words we see what was the practise of the Christian Curches in the daies of Athanasius for then they kept the Sabbath day as we see here Furthermore it is worth our obseruation to consider that Athanasius doth not onely barely auowch it that they then kept the Sabbath day but moreouer he doth Iustify defend their keeping of it for whereas some might obiect vnto him saying but doe your Churches keepe the Sabbath day still why that is Iudaisme c. of this mind was the Laodicean counsaile that liued not long after Athanasius and it seemeth that this slaunderouse opinion of the Sabbath was creeping into the Church in the daies of Athanasius growne to ripenesse within a matter of 60. yeeres after him for now the Laodicean counsaile durst cale it Iudaisme in
to rest in or for man if not for both I rather thinke for man for as for God he rested no more on the 7th day then on the 8th 9th and 10th daies and so euery day after but to man it might be otherwise he might rest on the 7th day and worke on the 8th 9th and 10th daies c. yea many holy daies God hath made since the Creation Leuit. 23. but it can no where be showne that he made any for himselfe but alwaies for man yet more plainly that God sanctified the 7th day for mans vse it shall appeare by the 4th com Exod. 20.11 where the Lord vseth a reason to perswade vs to rest on the 7th day and it is this because God himselfe rested on the 7th day blessed it and hallowed it which reason is drawne from the Sanctification of the 7th day at the Creation Genes 2.3 as if the Lord had said you shall rest on the 7th day because I blessed it and sanctified it at the Creation for the selfe same end hereby then it appeareth that the 7th day at the Creation was sanctified with reference vnto man yet further it shall appeare by the words of our Sauiour Mark 2.27 saying The Sabbath was made for man c. it is plaine then that when God made the Sabbath at the Creation he made it for man thus it appeareth that the Sabbath was from the Creation Herevnto some answer that the Sabbath at the Creation was exemplary indeede but not obligatory vntill the 4th com was deliuered in the wildernesse But the vanity of this distinction shall thus appeare 1. If the law of the Sabbath the 4th com did not bind vntill it was deliuered on Mount Sinay then did none of the other Nyne com bind neither vntill they were deliuered on Mount Sinay vnlesse you will say that the Law had not euer tenn commandements in it and that the law is not of a Copulatiue nature 2. It were most strange to suppose that God should giue an example more then 2000 yeeres before any should follow it for wherefore are examples but for to be imitated 3. When our Sauiour said The Sabbath was made for man Mark 2.27 he meaneth not that it was made at the Creation for an example vselesse but for mans vse as to rest in it c. 4. Can any man thinke it that God should sanctify the 7th day and so make it an holy day at the Creation and then suffer it to be profaned and polluted for 2000 yeeres after vntill the Isralites came into the wildernesse or can any man thinke that God should make a Sabbath day at the Creation for the people of the Iewes onely who were not a people distinct of nere 2000 yeeres after and not for the Patriarkes also who liued before the flood or can we thinke that the Fathers before the flood had Sacrifices and no Sabbaths that they had the worship of God and no time allotted for it or can we thinke that the Church of God from the Creation had no day set aparte for a thankfull holy remembrance of the Creation of the world vntill they were come into the wildernesse II. My second reason to proue that the Sabbath was from the Creation is because the 4th com must be supposed to be as ancient as are the other nyne commandements of the Decalogue for the Decalogue is holden of all to be as ancient as the world and so it must be for else the Law were not of a copulatiue nature the 10 commandements were not linked together as a chaine of many linkes for one linke to wit the 4th in midest of the chaine should be wanting contrary vnto Iam. 2.10 contrary to the doctrine of all Diuines 2. If the 4th cō were not as ancient as the other 9 commandements then it must be absurdly supposed that the Decalogue had not alwaies 10 commandements in it as it had Deut. 10.4 If then the 4th com be as ancient as are the other 9 commandements then the Sabbath therein commanded must be as ancient as is the Morall Law which is for antiquity from the Creation It may be obiected that there is no mention of the Sabbath day vntill the Law was giuen vpon Mount Sinay Exod. 20. or at soonest in the wildernesse of Sin Exo 16.1.23 well be it so but doth it follow that because it was not sooner mentioned it was not therefore sooner in vse the Law against murther it is not mentioned at the soonest vntill after the murther of Abell Genes 4.15 but will it thereof follow that there was no Law against murther before Kaine killed Habel we know many things there were which were not recorded for else the world could not conteine the bookes Ioh. 21.25 on the contrary for so much as we find that the Sabbath was in vse Exo. 16.23 before the 4th com was giuen on mount Sinay Ex. 20.1.8 it is therefore the most likly that it was from the Creation for if it had not its first originall at Mount Sinay when can it be thought to haue its begining but at the Creation together with the other commandements of the Decalogue III. My third reason that the Sabbath was from the Creation is because we find not the Spirituall workes of the Sabbath day particularly expressed in the 4th com giuen vpon Mount Sinay Exod. 20. nor yet in the mention of the same Law before in the wildernesse of Sin Exo. 16. which is an argument that the Sabbath day was in vse and the manner how to sanctify it was well knowne vnto the Iewes before either of these Lawes were written Exod. 20. or Exod. 16.5.23.28 otherwise God himselfe would in some of these textes haue expressed particularly vnto them after what manner and where withall they should sanctifie this day The same is also confirmed by the first word of the 4th com Remember Remember the Sabbath day to sanctify it signifying that they knew before and could cale it to minde againe how to Sanctify the Sabbath day and therefore touching this point the Lord needed not say any more vnto them but Remember it c. I haue often maruailed in my selfe why it should please God so punctually expresly to mention the corporall obseruation of the Sabbath in resting from bodily laboures and be so silent as it were in the Spirituall dueties of the Sabbath which are the more excellent doubtlesse the reason is because the Sanctification of the Sabbath did not then begine when the Law was giuen Exod. 20. or Exo. 16. but that it was an ancient ordinance of Gods long before in the Church in the memory of all men before the giuing of the Law as were the other Morales in the Decalogue so as they knew how to sanctify the day and with what dueties I confesse it that the Lord vseth the word Sanctify in the 4th com which doth in generall imply the particular meanes and waies of sanctifying the day but it doth not
haue done neuerthelesse because he was but weake in his kingdome Ioab strong it might haue made a commotion in his kingdome much hurly burly blood shed hazard of his Crowne now in this exegency extremity Dauid did neglect to doe for a season what he knew he should haue done would haue done most gladly but that the times would not beare it Thus you haue seene a dispensation in two examples A third instance shall be that of the omission of circumcision you know it was a Law that euery man child of 8 dayes old should be circumcised Genes 17.12 Now though the Israelites knew this yet they circumcised not their children for 40. yeeres together euen all the time they were in the wildernesse as you may reade Iosh 5.5 So here againe was a dispensation for a season in a case of necessity A fourth instance shall be that of Dauids eating the Shew-bread Dauid knew that the Shewbread was to be eaten by the priest onely neuerthelesse Dauid in a case of present hunger did eate the Shewbread contrary to the Law Christ doth iustify him in it Mat. 12.3.4 so here againe is a dispensation in a case of necessity A fifth example shall be that of the Disciples plucking and rubbing eares of corne on the Sabbath day which was not lawfull to be done on the Sabbath day Neuerthelesse in a case of present necessity they did plucke and also rubb the eares of corne which was else vnlawfull to be done and Christ iustisied it so here againe you see a dispensation in some case By all which instances it is more then manifest that exceptiones and dispensationes from something commanded may be in some cases These instances doe put an answer into our mouths against them who cry out saying since you know it are perswaded that Saturday is the Sabbath why keepe you it not c I answer Dauid knew it to be his office to slay the murtherer and Dauid knew that he should not eate Shewbread now tell me why Dauid the rest did not doe what they knew And so much for the former question and now I come vnto the latter SECT III. In this Section I shall come more particularly to the point in hand here I shall shew you that in a case of necessity such as know that the Sabbath day is still in force may neglect it for a season vntill the time of reformation so be they giue God for it an other day in the meane while by way of a change And this J shall proue vnto you by two arguments The former is this that the Sabbath day may be changed in a case of necessity because it may be neglected or profaned in a case of necessity And thus I frame it ARGVM J. That which may be neglected in a case of necessity that may be changed in a case of necessity But the Sabbath day may be neglected in a case of necessity Therefore the Sabbath day may be changed in a case of necessitie By changing the Sabbath day I meane nothing else but this that we giue God the Sunday in steade of the Saturday for a season the 8 day for the 7th or to keepe the Lords day with our Church for a season in the roome of the Sabbath day like as if a King should prorogue his Coronation day and by reason of the plague or other necessity should keepe its solemnity on an other day then the accustomed day So I come to the profe of the Major or first proposition but I may spare labour it is cleere enough of it selfe none I thinke will deny it for it is a lesse euill or losse to God if I may so speake to chang a day with him then to take a day from him or neglect a day like as it is a lesse losse to a man to chang a shilling with him in a case of necessity though it be a light clypt shilling for an heauy waity one then it is to take a shilling from him or then it is to neglect to paye him a shilling which I owe him But happily some may obiect that there may be no changings in Gods ordinances Wherevnto I answer that the contrary is true for whereas the Passeouer was to be in the first moneth of the yeere Leuir 23.5 The godly king Hezekiah changed the day of the Passeouer from the first moneth of the yeere vnto the second moneth of the yeere in a case of necessity as you may reade ij Chron. 30.2.3 Wherefore there may be some changes in Gods worship in some case as in a case of necessity And so much for the Major I come next to the profe of the Minor or second proposition and here I am to proue that the Sabbath day may be neglected or profaned in a case of necessity and this I proue 1. Because other dueties may be neglected omitted in a case of necessity the neglect wherof were sinnes as well as the neglect of he Sabbath day if omitted out of the case of necessity for exāple Moses might neglect to punish some kind of adultery Diuid might omit to execute Ioab for his murther The Israelites might neglect circumcisiō for a seasō Dauid might eate the shewbread in a time of hunger all which we haue inlarged in the Section before this Now the omission or neglect of all these were sinnes out of the case of necessity as well as the neglect of the Sabbath day and therefore there is the like reason of all 2. I proue it by this that our Sauiour Christ did allow his Disciples and others to neglect and profare the Sabbath day in his time in a case of necessity As for his Disciples when they profaned the Sabbath day by plucking eares of corne and by rubbing of them it being done in a case of present hunger our Sauiour iustisied them in it Mat. 12.1.2.3 c. As for others our Sauiour iustified them when they profaned the Sabbath day by moyling toyling to lift a beast out of a pit on the Sabbath day it being a case of necessity Mat. 12.11 3dly I proue it by the Testimony of all Diuines who are of iudgment that a man may profane the whole Sabbath day by hard painfull laboures if it be in a case of necessity as to quench an howse on fyer on the Sabbath day or to fly before the enemy he pursuing vs to saue our life or to resist the invasion of a forraigne enemy on the Sabbath day 4thly I proue it by this that The Sabbath was made fur man not man for the Sabbath as our Sauiour saith Mark 2.27 Now if that when man is in an exegency extremity he must rather obserue the Sabbath then prouide for his owne safety then the Sabbath should not be made for man but contrarily man should be made for the Sabbath this Christ doth expresly deny saying that man was not made for the Sabbath wherefore of the
necessity why should there not be like reason of things that were so like But herevnto happly some will obiect that the Passeouer day was a Ceremony but the Sabbath day you hould to be a Morall and therefore ther 's not like reason Wherevnto I answer that this is a friuolouse obiection for 1. God hath aswell permitted a dispensation in morales as in ceremoniales for God by Moses permitted a dispensation against the 7th commandement in some kind and that too vpon worse conditiones then is our present case of necessity as shall appeare for Diuorce was permitted for the hardnesse of the Iewes heartes but our dispensation shall appeare to be a better case condition then that to be a more warrantable necessity as you shall see when we come to it by by 2. I answer be it that because the one was a Ceremony and the other a Morall that therefore God had lesse regard vnto the Ceremony then he hath vnto the Morall yet this maketh but a difference betwixt them of lesse more the one being lesse regarded the other more regarded Now this difference hindreth not the argument Magis minus non variat speciem as Logiceans speake a peece of siluer of nyne pence is like a peece of siluer of twelue pence they being both siluer though the one be a lesser peece the other a greater peece now if it be permitted vnto A Debitor to exchang with his Creditour giue him sixe pence in stead of his nyne pence in a case of necessity then by like reason proportion euery man will iudge that it is permitted vnto him in like case to giue him a nyne peny peece for a peece of twelue pence but especially if the necessity for the greater chang doth exceed the necessity for the lesser chang this is our case for the chang of the Ceremoniall Passeouer day which is the lesser might be vpon this one necessity if a mā were in a farre iourney but our chang of the Sabbath day which is the greater is vpon a necessity consisting of 4 branches as you shall see by by which as they exceed the other in number so also in weight if they be compared together By which demonstration you see this obiection though common yet friuolouse And thus much for profe of the consequence or first proposition I come now to proue the Minor or second proposition to wit That the passeouer day might be neglected and an other day kept in its roome for a season in a case of necessity for profe of this see Numb 9.5 where the Isralites kept the passeouer in the 14th day of the first moneth according to the time appointed of God at its first institution as you may see v. 1,2 and Leuit. 23.5 and Exod. 12.2.6 now it so fell out that some men in the Congregation were defiled by touching of a dead corpse and so they were debarred from keeping the passeouer at that time with the Congregation Herevpon they came before Moses Aaron for counsaile Moses not knowing what to doe in this case he repaireth to God for direction wherevpon the Lord maketh him this answer If any among you shall be vncleane by reason of a dead body or be in a long iourney he shall keepe the passeouer in the 14th day of second moneth c. Numb 9.6.7.8.9.10.11 So hereby you see that howbeit the passeouer was by its prime institution to be kept in the 14th day of the first moneth yet in a case of necessity the time was changed from the first moneth vnto the second moneth and so the daies and times commanded in the Law at the prime institution were neglected and profaned by those which had this necessity vpon them the cases in which the passeouer time was changed were 1. If a man had touched a dead corps 2. If a man were from home in a farre iourney and thus much for profe of the Minor Neuerthelesse to this argument some doe answer thus that it is true indeed that there was a dispensation for the passeouer day but it was giuen by God himselfe but so is not your dispensation for the Sabbath day for there is no exception that can be showne for the chang of the Sabbath day in the Scriptures as their is for the passeouer day Herevnto I reply that this answer is very absurd for it denieth all argumentation collectiones from the Scriptures for they will not grant the question vnlesse it be proued by an expresse text of Scripture in so many words for they will haue an expresse dispensation in so many words showne for a chang of the Sabbath day in the Scriptures as well as there is a dispensation to be showne for the passeouers chang in the Scriptures Furthermore if they will not grā that the Sabbath day may be changed now because the passeouer day might be changed in old time how will they doe to proue that we may baptize infants now because they did circumcise infints in old time for ther 's no expresse word of God for either they must both be inferred by collection from other Scriptures yet further wherefore is it that S. Paul sendeth vs to the things written in the old Testament if we may not collect and learne from them to doe the like in like cases Whatsoeuer things are written a fore time are written for our learning Rom. 15.4 After the Law for the passeouer was giuen there fell out extraordinary occurrences in which Moses could not tell what to doe wherefore he had recourse vnto God for direction Numb 9.10.11 So after the Law for the Sabbath was giuen there is falne out an extraordenary occurrence the Sabbath hath bene profaned now for 1000 or 1200 yeeres now how to worke a reformation hereof we are at our wites ends we cannot now a daies haue such recourse vnto God as Moses had for direction wherefore now we must to the Lawe to the Testimonies and borrow light from former presidents Finally I shall proue it vnto you that we may extend this dispensation of the passeouer day further then it is expressed by Gods dispensation in Numb 9.10.11 so be we doe it by like reason for this end note that the Lord gaue leaue to chang the the passeouer in these two cases 1. If a man had touched a dead corps 2. If a man were in a farre iourney but the good King Hezekiah keeping the passeouer long after he fell into other extremities and straites and he could not keepe the passeouer on the 14th day of the first moneth but profaned it and made a chang vnto the 14 day of the second moneth and that vpon these two occations 1. Because hee had not Priests enough sanctified or because the Priests were not sufficiently sanctified 2. Because the people were not come vp together to Jerusalem or had not assembled themselues at Ierusalem as you may reade ij Chron. 30.2.3 Now these two extremities reasons of Hezekiah
indeed that Reformation must begine at the head His Maiestie the Reuerend Bishopes and ParliameÌ„t are they that cane doe this greate worke Neuerthelesse priuate persones and single persones may be helpers The Master builder layes the stone but inferiour persones hewe the stone and single persones carry stone to the building His Maiestie and ParliameÌ„t enacteth Lawes yet often and againe those Lawes take their originall in the Country from priuate persones and single persones who foreseeing the necessity of such Lawes acquainting their brethren therewith they rune from man to man till at length they come to the King himselfe All therefore I desire thee as a priuate person to doe is but this first pray to God instantly and constantly to make knowne this doctrine of his Sabbath to all persones and so in time vnto his Maiestie and other Reformers vnder him and that God would incline both His and all mens hearts vnto a publike and generall Reformation Secondly vse all meanes possible within the compasse of thy caleing that may any waies tend vnto a reformation to this end after thou hast well studied the pointe then speake of it freely as occation serueth vnto all whom it doth concerne let the Lords Sabbaths haue thy good word let them haue thy countenance and all possible furtherance that so the light of this trueth may be conveighed from man to man vntill it be spread all ouer the Kingdome vntill it hath reached vnto the Pallace of the King and Parliament house When the Lords Tabernacle was to be made euery one of a wiling heart brought something therevnto some brought gold siluer some blew silke skarlet some oyle for the light some rammes skines and badgers skinnes so euery one would haue an hand in that gloriouse and sacred worke Now the Lords Sabbaths are to be reedified let euery one bring something therevnto and if they cannot afford gold and siluer yet let them bring something a skine or two or a little oyle for the light a man cannot afford God and his cause lesse then his good word and countenance and his good word may proue as oyle for the light for it may procure much light this is all which I desire of priuate persones and thus they may serue very vsefully for the Lords building as hewers of stone for the building or as bearers of stone to the Master builders or as oyle for the light and this is all I desire of single persones who say I am but one c. why one may light a Candle which may giue light vnto twenty and one may kindle a fyer that may warme a greate many and so much for common persones Further we must know this Exhortation concerneth not onely common persons but it reacheth vnto the very chiefe it belongeth vnto Laiety and Clergy both it concerneth common Ministers neerly but it concerneth the Byshopes and Fathers of the Church more neerly it concerneth the Commons of the land neerly but it concerneth the Gentrie and Nobilitie more neerly and his Maiestie most neerly for by how much God hath aduanced any in Authority aboue others by so much this Reformation more neerly concerneth them or him and in case they neglect it the greater account they shall haue to render vnto God at that day The 4th com it was as hath been showne most principally giuen vnto Superiours c. And Nehemiah reproued the Nobles and Rulers of the land for the peoples profanation of the Lords Sabbaths Nehem. 13.17 Let the Commons speake for a reformation let the Magistrats make reformation and so I come vnto the Motiues I. In the first place we will consider of the greatnesse and so of the difficulty of this reformation that so many men may be moued to put too their helpe Since the daies of the Apostles I cannot call to minde that euer the Church of God made any reformation comparable to this of the Lords Sabbaths vnlesse it were that one remarkable reformation touching the second commandement begune by that worthy instrument of Gods glorie Martine Luther if the euill eye of the inviouse man will giue me leaue to say so The greatnesse whereof may appeare 1. Because it concerneth all men without exception for there is no man liuing in the Church but the obseruation of the Sabbath concerneth him and that in a speciall sorte 2. It will be the greater because it hath layne buried now aboute twelue hundreth yeeres euen since that wicked and Schismaticall decree of the Counsaile of Laodicea Anno 364 which rente the Churches a sunder one from an other the younger from the more ancient and pure Churches as touching the obseruation of the Lords Sabbaths Now an old sore is not easily cured the myracle of Christ was the greater vpon Lazarus because he raised him from the dead when he had bene so long buried that he stank againe the Lords Sabbaths haue bene now so long dead and buried that they stinke againe in mens nostriles through their want of a true Sente the reuiuing and raising of them vp againe therefore will be a worke of greate difficulty 3. It will be the greater because it is like to meete with mighty and greate oppositiones for what greate worke was euer attempted that had not as greate oppositiones when the Wales of Ierusalem were builded what oppositiones and when the Temple was reedified what oppâ—sitions and no doubt but at the reedifying and raising vp againe of the Lords Sabbaths there will be no smale oppositiones Now greate workes and difficult workes as they stand in neede of the helpe of greate men so they neede the helpe of many men to one Captaine or Generall there are hundreths and thowsands of common soldiers it is needfull therefore that euery priuate man should put to his hand and his voyce for the reedifying of the Lords Sabbaths and by how much the more difficult by so much the more neede there is of a generall assistance and the aide of all men II. In the second place we will consider of the Honourablenesse of this reformation and this will appeare by the Honourablenesse of the thing to be reformed to wit the Lords Sabbath touching which first we will consider of its antiquity this ordinance of Gods Sabbath of all others it is one of the most ancient for it is of the age of the world it being instituted at the Creation Genes 2.3 If therefore the honourablenesse may be valued by the antiquity what can be more honourable for nothing is more ancient who would not haue an hand and a voyce in the raising vp againe of so ancient and honourable an ordinance of Gods as is his sacred Sabbath Secondly we will consider of its constant obseruation a longe all times and ages from before the giuing of the Law vpon Mount Sinay vntill 300 or 400 yeeres after Christs ascention for as we haue formerly proued the Sabbath day was in vse in the Church before the giuing of the Law and so also
it was in vse after the giuing of the Law vntill Christ yea and it was in vse in the daies of the Apostles by the Apostles themselues after Christâ— and also it was in vse in the primitiue Churches after Christ for 300 or 400 yeeres euen so long as the Church retained its best purity and vntill corruptiones and popery begane to creepe in now if we shall value the honour of the Sabbath day by the honourable estimation that the Church of God had constantly for thowsands of yeeres of it before Christ and if we shall esteeme of its honour by the honourable estimation which the Christian Churches had of it for neere 400 yeeres after Christ then doubtlesse the Sabbath is an honourable thing and the reformation of it will be no lesse honourable and who vvould not put hand and voyce to such an honourable reformation Thirdly we will consider how Almightie God hath honoured it this will appeare in these particulares 1. God honoured it by his owne obseruation of it at the Creation for God himselfe rested vpon the Sabbath day Genes 2.3 2dly God honoured this day and time aboue all daies and times in that he blessed hallowed and sanctified this day as we reade Genes 2.3 Exod. 20.11 and so made it an Holy day 3dly God honoured this day by commanding it by his owne immediate voyce vpon Mount Sinay and by placeing it amongst the other Morales and giuing it there also an eminent and chiefe place for hee put it into the first Table of the Decalogue and after that caused it carefully to be laid vp and preserued in the Arke with the other Morales 4thly God honoured this day by taking it vnto himselfe in a speciall sorte caling it his day as myne holy day Isa 58.13 And the Sabbath of the Lord Exod. 20.10 whence it is caled the Lords Sabbath Emphatically VVherefore since God rested on this day let vs indeauour a reformation that we his children also may rest on this day and since God hallowed and sanctified this day let vs vse all good meanes that we may hallow and sanctify this day also since God deliuered this day by liuely voyce let vs vse our toungs voyces for it and since God placed it amongst the other Morales set it eminently in the first Table let not vs suffer it to be thrust out amongst the Ceremonies and seing God gaue it an high place in the Morall Law let not vs suffer it to be thrust quite out of place so as now it should haue no place at all in the Morall Law wher 's your courage wher 's your zeale for God if you can indure these things If Christian men loue to haue their hands in an honourable worke then let them cast aside shame and feare and such like carnall affectiones and let them armed with courage and zeale speake for God and defend his Sabbaths and cale for a reformation the worke is honourable for it is honoured with Antiquity with the constant practise of Gods Church that also of the purest primitiue Church and with speciall honour done vnto it by Almighty God himselfe Yet further this Sabbath is in Scripture expresly called an Holy day To morrow is the Rest of the Holy Sabbath vnto the Lord Exod. 16.23 Isa 58.13 and one reason thereof may be because at the Creation God blessed it and sanctified it Genes 2.2.3 And so made it an Holy day Now no day of all the 7 no not the Lords day was euer sanctified by God or caled an Holy day Yea God had many anniuersary Sabbaths as we read in Leuit. 23. Yet doe we not read that euer God blessed sanctified any of them as he did this Sabbath of the 7th day So highly God honoured it This difference therefore of this day from others is as the difference of Sacramentall bread from common bread and as was the sacred Temple from common howsen and who would not labour the reedifying of such an holy and honourable thing III. In the third place we will consider of the necessity of this Reformation and here If vntill a reformation be made diuerse sondry verses of the holy Scripture yea in the 10 commandements be as so many verses rent out of the Scripture or quite blotted out of the booke of God or stand but as so many Ciphers And also the Decalogue or Morall lawe is not taught and maintained in our Church nor in any Christian Church besids in its integrity and perfection but onely lamely and maimedly If vntill a reformation the whole 4th commandement is vtterly and wholly abolished both roote and branch If vntill a reformation be made the Land and Kingdome wherein we liue with all other Christian Churches doe liue in the weekly profanation of the Lords Sabbaths and transgression of the 4th commandement If I shall shewe vnto you that vntill a reformation be made we sanctify a common and profane day and profane a sanctified and holy day And Gods worship will languish and profanesse inuade vs And that a Romish Relique is honoured in stead of an ordinance of Gods And that Gods worship is daily neglected yea and corrupted with many other euiles If I shall proue vnto you that vntill a reformation the sinne of Idolatry is committed by many in the Land if I say I shall make these things plainly appeare vnto you then I trust you wil say with me that it is high time that euery man lay too his helping hand for a reformation that speedily I. For the first of these there are not many verses in the Decalogue or 10 commandements and yet there are no lesse then fowre whole verses in the 10 commandements which be as so many verses rent out of the Scripture or blotted out of the booke of God or stand but for so many Ciphers and they are these verse the 8th verse the 9th and verse the 10th and verse the 11th of the xx Chapter of Exodus for the Sabbath day there specified we haue not and the 7th day there specified we haue not and the Sixe daies for working daies there specified we haue not and the 7th day wherein God rested and the which God blessed and sanctified we haue not These things we haue more largly proued in the former parts of this booke therefore a touch of them here is enough Wherefore seeing we haue not in vse the things specified and commanded in those iiij verses therefore those iiij verses be as if they were rent out of the sacred Bible or blotted out of the booke of God or stand but for Ciphers Now is it not high time to stirre when the Scriptures of God are thus abused for we haue but the brann or huske that is the bare words of the 4 verses as for the flower kernell which is the sense and the things meant by those words in these verses this we haue not II. Furthermore that the Decalogue or Morall law is not