in the regencie of the Queen mothers Blanch the mother of St. Lewis of Francis the second Charles the ninth Lewis the thirteenth and Lewis the fourteenth 20. Neither have the French better observed the other part of the It has been ill observed by the French Salique Law for the descending of the Crown to the heirs male for Pepin having put King Childerick into a Monastery had not any colour of title but as he was chosen by the Parliament of Paris so that it seems the Parliament of Paris may do what the King and general Assembly cannot and alter the most fundamental constitutions of France which forsooth at other times are immutable and Hugh Capet to make his title good against Charles of Lorrain the right Masculine heire of Pepin did derive his pedigree from one of the daughters of Charlemain son of Pepin Nor could Lewis the ninth a most religious Prince be resolved in conscience till he was satisfied that by his Grandmothers side he was descended from the right heirs of Charles of Lorrain But I wonder with what face these Frenchmen can urge the Salique Law against others and yet practise the contrary themselves For Charles the eight having married Anne the Dutchess of Brittain and by that title possessed the Dutchy by whom he had Claude married to Francis the first who had issue Henry the second who had issue Francis the second Charles the ninth Henry the third and Hercules Elizabeth married to Philip the second of Spain and Margaret married to Henry the fourth Now Francis Charles Henry and Hercules dying without issue legitimate I would know how against the Salique Law Charles and his posterity should have a title to Britain and yet King Philip and his posterity be debarred of it by vertue of this pretended Salique Law CHAP. III. Of the Municipal Laws of England before 1640. 1. TEmporal or Secular Laws are made to preserve men so long as Of Temporal Laws and incidently of the Municipal Laws of this Nation they live in this world in unity and peace one with another and these do not bind in conscience only but injoyn corporal and pecuniary mulcts for not observance or transgressing them The Municipal Laws of this Kingdom are either the Common Law which are general usages of that long continuance that they have quite lost their prime institution That they were not brought in by the Conqueror is most evident Common Law or Generall usage for the Conqueror swore to observe the good approved and antient Laws of this Kingdom and that the Subjects might the better observe Proem 8. part of Sir Ed. Cokes Reports their duty and the Conquerors Oath he caused twelve the most discreet and wise men in every shire throughout all England to be sworn before himself that without swerving either ad dextram or ad sinistram they should declare the integrity of their Laws without concealing adding or in any sort varying from the truth and Aldreb the Archbishop that crowned him and Hugh the Bishop of London by the Kings commandement wrote that which the Jurats had delivered and these by Publick Proclamation he declared to be authentick and under grievous punishment to be inviolably observed And that 441 years before the incarnation of Christ Mulumutius of Preface 3. report some called Dunvallo M. of some Dovebant did write two Books of the Laws of the Britans the one called Statuta Municipalia and the other Leges judiciariae which is as much as to say the statute-Statute-Law and common-Common-Law And 356 years before our Saviour Mercia Proba Queen and wife of King Gwintclin wrote a book of the Laws of England in the British tongue calling it Marchenleg King Alfred or King Alured King of the West-Saxons 871 years after Christ wrote a book of the Laws of England calling the same Breviarum quoddam quod composuit ex diversis legibus Trojanorum Graecorum Britanorum Saxonum Danorum In the year after our Saviour 653. Sigabert or Sigisbert Orientalium Anglorum Rex wrote a book calling it Legum instituta King Edward of that name the third before the Conquest ex immensa legum congerie quas Britanni Romani Angli condiderunt optima quaeque selegit ac in unam coegit quam vocari voluit Communem legem But whether these latter were the Laws which are now used in England under correction may be question made because the Authorities cited are from such obscure and uncertain Authors that no great credit is to be given to them nor are those Books except Alfreds and Edwards which are obsolete and out of use with us and so have been these 600 years any where to be found whereby it may appear that they have any affinity with the Common-Law But it does most certainly appear out of most authentical Records that time out of mind before the Conquest there had been Sheriffs for the Writ of Assise and every other Original Writ to whom they were directed except to the Coroner in special cases who stands in place of the Sheriff and for Trials by the Oath of Twelve men and that the Writs of Assise and other Original Writs were retornable into the Kings Courts and that there had been a Court of Chancery for all Original Writs to issue out and none other and that those Mannors that were in the hands of S. Edward the Confessor are to this day called Ancient Demesne All which does more copiously and fully appear in this Proeme to the Third Part of the Reports And that the Chancery Kings Bench Common Pleas the Exchequer be all the Kings Courts and have been time out of memory of man so as no Proem Rep. 8. man knows which of them is antientest Afterward in the Proeme to the Ninth Part of his Reports out of the Mirror of Justices which treats how the Land was governed almost twelve hundred years since having spoken of the Courts of Parliament Chancery Kings Bench Common Pleas and the Exchequer he descends to the Justiciarii Itinerantes or Justices in Eire The Kings do right to all men by their Justices Commissioners itinerant assigned to have Conusance Justices Itinerant sec 6. of all Pleas. In aid of such Eires the Sheriffs Turns and View of Frankpledges are necessary c. Then he treateth of the Sheriffs Turn That the Sheriffs of antient Sheriffs Turn sec 7. Ordinance do hold general Assemblies twice a year in every Hundred whither all the Freeholders within the Hundred are bound to come by the service of their Feifs or Fees that is to say once after Michaelmas and another time after Easter c. Leets or Courts of View of Frankpledge are Assemblies ordained Leets or view of Frank-pledge sec 8. once a year not only of Freeholders but of all in the Hundred as well Denizens as others except Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors and all Religious people and Clerks Earls Barons Knights Married women Persons dumb and deaf diseased Bastards and Lepers and
your souls sad rather then instructed you with sound and wholesome Doctrine it seemed good to us being met together to send to you Barnabas and Paul who had ventured their life for the Name of Christ With them we send Judas and Sylas who shall speak the same words It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and us not to impose more necessary burden then these things upon you That ye abstain from things offered to Idols and Blood and things strangled and from fornication and that ye will that which ye would other men should do to you From this one Commandment it is manifest That a man should restore every man his right neither is there need of any other Law-book This he should remember who sits a Judge over other men That he should not give that judgment upon other men which he would not have given upon himself After the Gospel of Christ was preached many Nations as also the English by Faith joyned themselves to the Word of God Some Bishops and other famous men as well in England as other Regions held a Council of wise men and these men taught by Gods mercy imposed upon every sinner a pecuniary mulct and left the power of exacting it to the Magistrates without any offence to God having obtained leave onely to the betrayer and forsaker of our Lord they did not judge fit that this light punishment should be inflicted because they deemed such a man not worthy to be spared as well because God would have such contemners of him unworthy of all mercy as also that Christ Gods Son would not have mercy on them that betrayed him to death and he bid them to worship God before any other They therefore in many Synods constituted punishments for all sins and commanded them to be written These Laws have I Alfred the King gathered together and commanded to be written a good part whereof our Ancestors have religiously observed there are also many things worthy to be observed of us with like Religion in this age yet some there are which seem less profitable to us by the advice of wise men I have altered some I have made new And because it may seem rashness for any one to command to be written more then his own Decrees as also it would be an uncertain thing how they would be esteemed afterward of which we make great account Whatsoever are worthy to be observed in the acts of Inas my Kinsman of Offa King of the Mercians or Ethelbert who was the first of Englishmen that was baptized I have collected them all and the other left And in taking them I Alfred King of the West-Saxons have used the counsel of the most wise men and it hath pleased them all to judge them worthy to be kept Of the Priviledge of the Church Cap. 2. If any man guilty of any crime shall flee to a Religious house if that belong not to the Farm of the King or some Honorable family let him there remain three nights in which let him heed his salvation unless in the interim he return into favor And if any one shall during that time weaken him with fear of stripes bonds or wounds let him be free as the custom of the Nation is with the price of his head and with fine and the damage of violation of the liberty of the Church with One hundred and twenty shillings to boot Of the Priviledge of Sanctuary Cap. 5. We do further grant this peace to every Church consecrated by a Bishop If an enemy afflict another and he implores help of the Temple let him in seven days be taken out by no man if for hunger he can live so long and not opened his way by force If a man does otherwise let him be held a breaker of the King and Church and also of a more grievous crime if he shall have stoln any thing thence If the Governor have more then ordinary occasion to use that place provide for him in another house which has not more doors then that which shuts the Church and let the Governor take care that in the mean time he gets no meat But if he will give his arms into the power of his adversaries let them keep him safe thirty days and then give him into the hands of his kindred Also the freedom of the Church is if any guilty man flee to the Church before he be accused and there confess it in Gods name he shall be remitted half of his mulct Of Sacriledge Cap. 6. If a man steal any thing in a Church let him pay the value of the thing stolne and that punishment belonging to that value and that hand wherewith he stole be cut off if he will redeem his hand and it be granted him let it be with the price of his head If a man steal upon a Sunday Christmas-day Easter-day Holy Thursday or upon a Communion-day let him pay double as also in the Fast of Lent Of them who steal money out of Churches 8. If any man shall take money out of a * * Church Minster without the Kings leave or the Bishops he shall pay 120 shillings half to the King half to the Bishop and the Lord of the Church Of the Fighting of Priests 21. If a Priest slea any man let all he has acquired be confiscate and the Bishop degrade him and let him be thrust out of the Church unless the Lord of the house will forgive him the price of his head Of him who binds himself to God or enters into Religion 28. If any other accuse a man entred into Religion or bound to God that he hath not performed something of those things which he has mentioned let him give a Fore-oath in four Churches and the other if he will justifie himself let him do it in twelve Churches Of Fight 38. This Chapter gives a Priviledge for the honor of the Church in case of Manslaughter to him who flees thither Of Mass-Holidays 39. All Freemen have freedom granted them on these Holidays but not Servants The twelve days in Christmas the day on which Christ subdued the Devil the Anniversary feast of S. Gregory and seven days before Easter and seven days after the Feast-days of S. Peter and S. Paul In Autumn the whole week which is before the Feast of Mary the Feast-days of all Saints and the four Wednesdays in Ember-weeks let servants have all holy liberty given and freedom that they may spend all their endeavor upon the benefit of those things which they have heretofore received in Gods name or for whatsoever benefit he shall hereafter earn The League of King Edovard and Guthrun Preface THese are the institutions of King Alfred and King Guthrun and then King Edoard and King Guthrun made in those very times when the Danes and English made league and bound themselves that those things which are afterward recited should be often amplified and increased to the common benefit of the Realm
Before all things they propounded one God to be devoutly and holily worshiped and that there should be no Heathen worship c. Therefore they first decree that the peace of the Church be kept within Cap. 1 the walls holily and inviolably and also that tranquillity which is delivered into the Kings hand Furthermore if any man shall renounce the Christian faith so as by words or deeds he advance the Heathen worship he shall forfeit the price of his head or the punishment of the Law according to the offence If a man entred Religion or bound to God by promise steal or fight or forswear or commit adultery he shall forfeit the price of his head or suffer punishment for transgressing of the Law according to the nature of the crime at least he shall satisfie God according to the rules of the Church and be cast into prison if he cannot find Sureties If a Priest upon Feasting-days or Fasting-days shall go astray if it be among Englishmen let him be fined thirty shillings but if it happen among the Danes let him pay half a mark If a Mass-priest upon appointed days provide not Oil or deny Baptism as the use is among the English let him be fined and with the Danes the breach of the Law is twelve * * Quaere the value of an Oran Oran If any man of Religion commit any thing worthy of death let him be taken and held to the Bishops judgment Of Incest Furthermore it seemed good to the wise men that of men guilty of Incest the King shall have the higher and the Bishop the lower unless he shall abundantly make recompence to God and men and shall perform what is enjoined them by the Bishop If two brethren or two of the same alliance commit fornication with the same wife let them be fined the value of their head or be punished for the transgression of the Law according as is meet and as the crime deserves If a man condemned to death desires ingenuously to confess his sins to a Priest let it be granted him And let all men Gods laws so follow that they obtain Gods mercy and be acquitted of wise men If a Dane pay not his Tythes let him undergo the punishment of the breach of the Law let an Englishman be fined If a Dane withhold what is due to Rome let him be punished for the breach of the Law let an Englishman be fined If any Dane pay not to the Candles let him be punished for breach of the Law let an Englishman be fined If a Dane shall not pay the just Alms of the Plough let him be punished for breach of the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Law let an Englishman be fined If a Dane shall suppress or retain any Divine Laws or Duties let him be punished for breach of the Law let an Englishman be fined If any man wilfully wound another offering Divine service let him be guilty of death but if he shall die let him be outlawed and all Ministers of Justice apprehend him hurt or unwilling And if it were his fault that he was stricken or did against Gods law or resisted the King if a man so flatter himself let him be without recompence or as we say he has the means in his own hands Of working on Holidays If a Dane sell any thing upon Sunday let him forfeit the thing and twelve Ora's an Englishman thirty shillings If a Freeman do any work upon an Holiday let him forfeit his freedom or be fined and punished for breach of the Law let a Servant be beaten or be made to fear being beaten If a Dane shall make his Servant work upon a Holiday let him be punished for breach of the Law and an Englishman be fined Laws Ecclesiastical made by King Aethelstan Who began to reign in the year of our Lord 924. I Aethelstan King by the prudent counsel of Walshelmes mine Archbishop and other my Bishops command all Governors that are in my Government in the name of God and all his Saints and for their good will towards them that before all things they pay just Tythes as well out of our property as the duties of living creatures and fruits of the earth and that all Bishops Ealdermen and Sheriffs do the same thing And I will that my Bishops and Sheriffs who sit in judgment upon other men that they observe this rule and that they finish all these things upon the day we have appointed viz. the Anniversary of S. John Baptist beheaded Further when we think with our self what the most excellent Father Jacob said to God I will offer my tythes and a peace-offering to thee and what the Lord spake in the Gospel To the all-having man shall be given and he shall abound We moreover may think on those things which are so terribly written in this very book If you will not pay your tythes giving us only the tenth part the nine parts shall be taken from you Also we are admonished that Heavenly things are more excellent then Earthly and eternal things then our frail bodies Whensoever therefore ye hear what the Lord commands and what we ought to follow those things only I would have you to do which you can justly and lawfully prepare Of Church-breaking Cap. 5. Concerning the Ordal see Versteg an Seld. annal Anglo lib. 2. cap. 8. and Lamberts pref Saxon laws Cap. 23. And we command concerning Church-breaking if he be a man of the threefold * Ordal let him give satisfaction as is rehearsed in the Judgment-book Of them willing to undergo the Ordal If any man will undergo the Ordal then let him come three days before the Mass-priest hallow it and feed himself with bread and salt and water and worts before he go to Trial and let him go to Mass every day and The trial of the Ordal was either to be soused over head and ears in cold water or to thrust his hand a cubit deep into boiling hot water or to go barefoot or hold a burning hot iron in the Triers hand If they neither shak'd the rope to be pulled out of the water nor burned nor scalded their hands or feet they were acquited offer his gift and upon the day he shall undergo the Ordal let him take the Eucharist and swear that he is innocent and knows nothing of the wickedness whereof he is accused If it be of cold Water that the Question made let him be plunged over head and ears half an ell in the water but if it be of Iron let him hold it three days before he put it out of his hand And the Accuser shall proceed to follow the oath he made before and both shall fast by the command of God and the Bishop and let there be on neither side above twelve men but if the Accused comes with more then twelve men then unless they will depart let the Ordals be void And upon each Friday let every one of Gods Ministers in every Church
have their origination from God we Introduction have already in its proper place asserted And that these Kingdoms thus created by God have periods alterations and conversions set by him which cannot be foreseen or prevented by man is certainly as cleer and evident as the former and often owned by God himself in Sacred Writ as well over his own people as others But that therefore any man or men should therefore endeavour to make alterations in Kingdoms is like to a man who becaufe all men naturally die thinks he may kill any man and father the fact upon God And if God even over his own peculiar people did for the sins of the Kings and people especially the Israelites so often convert the line of the Kings then can it not in reason be expected in this Iron and much more sinful Age that God should every where continue a fixt and certain succession of Kings according to the ordinary course of Nature viz. Primogeniture But that therefore the Pope or any other creature may arrogate to themselves a right or power superior to the Law of Nature is no less absurd then that a Son may kill his Father because all Fathers have periods set by Nature which they cannot pass And that all Subjects do by birth owe a natural subjection to rightful Princes in whose dominion they were born which relations can never be dissolved but by God himself we have in their proper places demonstrated Yet may the exercise of this power be suspended so long as such Subjects come into the power of other Princes whether it be by conquest or otherwise and do owe them a temporary obedience so long as they continue there and their posterity born in their dominions owe such Princes a natural obedience which can never be dissolved And also that since there is no other Judge under Heaven to decide the controversie of Princes but their swords which can never be alledged by any Subjects who have Laws to decide their differences such decision is good as to the exercise of any Princes power over all them who fall under ir and all Subjects born in such exercise of power or dominion become natural Subjects to any Prince who by conquest acquires the dominion of another we have also demonstrated in its proper place Yet whether it were of old that Popes did arrogate to themselves this right of deposing Temporal Princes or debarring them of their right which about this time was frequently asserted by and practised by the Popes and which Pope Alexander was pleased to confer upon the Conqueror against all Right and Law to the manifest prejudice of Eadgar Athelin let us see the Epistle of S. Eleutherius to King Lucius as it is cited in chap. 17. of S. Edovards Laws In the year from the passion of Christ 169. or 156. our Lord Eleutherius the Pope wrote to Lucius King of Britain at the Petition of the King and Peers of the Kingdom of Britain You have required of us that the Roman Laws and of Cesar be transmitted to you which you would use in the Kingdom of Britain We can always reprove the Roman Laws and those of Cesar but not at all the Law of God For ye have by Gods mercy of late received into your Kingdom of Britain the Law and Faith of Christ you have of your self in your Kingdom sufficient Authority from whence through Gods grace by the advice of your Kingdom to make a Law and by it through Gods patience you shall rule the Kingdom of Britain And you are the Vicar of God in your Kingdom according to the Kingly Prophet The earth is the Lords and the fulness of all the world and all who inhabit therein And again according to the Kingly Prophet Thou hast loved Justice and hated iniquity and therefore thy God hath anointed thee with oyl of gladness above thy fellows And again according to the Kingly Prophet God is thy Judgement c. Therefore neither the Judgement nor Justice of Cesar for they are sons of the King Christian Nations and people of the Kingdom who live under your Protection and Peace and Reign and are according to the Gospel Even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings c. But they are Nations and your People of the Kingdom of Britain and who divided you ought to congregate recall nourish hold with your hand protect and rule into one for concord and peace and to the Faith and to the Law of Christ and his holy Church and always to defend it from evil doers and malitious men and its enemies Wo to the Kingdom whose King is a boy and whose Princes eat together in the morning I Do not call a King because of his small and tender age but because of his folly and iniquity and rage according to the Prophet King Men of blood and deceitful shall not live out half their days c. By eating we understand the Pallat by the Pallat Luxury by Luxury all things filthy and evil according to King Solomon Wisdom shall not enter into the soul of the evil doer nor shall dwell in a body subject to sins Rex dicitur à Regendo non à Regno A King thou shalt be so long as thou rulest well which thing if thou wilt not do the name of King shall not remain in thee and thou shalt lose the name of King which God forbid God Almighty grant to you so to Rule your Kingdom of Britain that you may Reign with him for ever whose Vicar you are in the Kingdom aforesaid who with the Father and Son c. Of the Right and Ecclesiastical freedom of Asylum's Cap. 1. That is to say Peace to the holy Church Of whatsoever forfeiture any one is guilty this time and he can come to the holy Church let him have peace of life and member and if any one hath set his hand against that which the Mother-Church shall require whether it be an Abby or Church of Religion let him restore that which he hath taken out and one hundred shillings for forfeiture and concerning the Mother-Parish-Church twenty shillings and concerning a Chappel ten shillings And according to the peace of the King in the Laws of the Mercians he shall make amends with En perchenâ—laâ— one hundred shillings accordingly as of Heinefare and prepensed lying in wait Of Peter-pence or Romescot Cap. 18. A Freeman who hath Field-Beasts valued at thirty pence shall pay a Peter-peny For four pence which the Lord shall give all his Borderers and his Boner and his Servants be quit A Burger who hath of his proper goods so much as shall be esteemed half a Mark let him pay a Peter-peny He who in the Law of the Danes is a Free-man and hath field-cattel which are valued worth half a Mark in silver ought to give a peny to St. Peter and for that peny shall all be quit who reside in his Demains Of them who do not pay the Roman
Tribute or of St. Peter Cap. 20. Who shall deny the peny of St. Peter the peny let him pay by the Justice of the Church and thirty pence forfeiture and if he will be impleaded concerning it by the Justice of the King let him forfeit to the Bishop thirty pence and forty shillings to the King Of Religion and the publick Peace 51. First of all we Ordain above all things That one God be worshipped all over our Kingdom and the one Faith of Christ be always kept inviolate c. The Laws are Translated out of the Original set forth by Mr. Abraham Whelock in his Appendix to the History of Bede from page 150. to 107. Sir Ed. Coke in Caudrys Case cites a quare Impedit 7 Ed. 3. tit 19. where it is agreed that no man can make an appropriation of any Church having cure of souls being a thing Ecclesiastical and to be made by some person Ecclesiastical but he that hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but William the first of himself without any other as King of England made appropriation of Churches with cure to Ecclesiastical persons wherefore it does follow he had Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Here is nothing but argumentum à facto ad jus and a man may as well infer that Saul Jeroboam and Azariah did offer sacrifice and burn incense and therefore they had Sacerdotal power in them or that King John did give the Crown and received it again from him and therefore the Crown of England is holden of the Pope Ecclesiastical Laws made by Henry the first Who began to Reign in the year of Christ 1100. THese at last are the happy joys of the long wished for peace and liberty Proem by which the glorious Cesar Henry doth shine forth to his whole kingdom in Divine and Secular Laws written Institutes and Exhibitions of good Works Moderate Just Valiant Prudent whom God may make to command with happy auspices and healthful prosperity of body and minde with his famous wife Maud the second and their children for ever and the everlasting peace of this Nation His Epistle to all his Leigmen 1. Henry by the Grace of God King of Englishmen to all Barons and his Leigmen French English health Know that I by Gods mercy and the Common Counsel and consent of the Barons of the Kingdom of England am Crowned King of the Kingdom aforesaid and because the Kingdom was oppressed by unjust exactions I in respect of God and the love which I have towards you all first of all make the Church of God free so that I will neither sell nor let to farm nor after the death of an Archbishop or Bishop or Abbot will take any thing of the Demesns of the Church or her men until the successor be come in c. Of the propriety of Causes Cap. 5. In all Causes Ecclesiastical and Secular legally and in order to be handled some are Accusers some Defenders some are Witnesses some are Judges In every discussion of honesty fitting men are to be joyned together and that without any exaction until the quality of the Causes and the intention of the Accused the manner of Witnesses and election of Judges be weighed with upright scrutiny Let there be no foreign Judgements nor celebrated by their improper Judge in place or time nor in a doubtful case or the party accused being absent the sentence being pronounced notandum that for all if the accused had competent warning and lawful leave of answering and defending he be not denied or impleaded or outlawed or circumvented by some stealth or judged by deceit If he be satisfied in the Witnesses Judges and Persons If he consent to the Judges or hurt or contradict It is not altogether so in Ecclesiastical business as Secular in Secular business after that any is called shall come and begin to plead in the Court it is not lawful to go back before the Cause be determined although they shall agree but in Ecclesiastical business it is lawful to go back in the Cause aforesaid If a man suspect a Judge or think himself oppressed surely Judges ought not to be so nisi quos impetitus Elegerit Neither may any one be heard or give judgement before that they be chosen and he who refuses to consent to the elected let no man communicate with him until he obey but if in judgement there arises dissention among the parties of which a strife comes forth let the sentence of the more prevail It is Enacted in the Cause of Faith or of any Ecclestastical Order he ought to judge who neither takes reward nor is of another Law and will do nothing without an accuser For God and our Lord Jesus Christ did know Judas to be a Thief but because he was not accused therefore he was not rejected and whatsoever he acted among the Apostles for the dignity of his Office remained firm As also Clerks ought not to receive Laiks Accusers so ought not Laicks to receive Clerks to be Accusers of Clerks in their Accusations and Informations and Witnesses ought to be legitimate and present without any infamy or suspition or manifest spot because they cannot rightly accuse Priests who cannot be Priests nor of their Order nor is it needful to Judge a man before he hath had lawful Accusers present and accepts a place of defence to wash out his crimes And it is our pleasure as often as many crimes are objected to Clerks by Accusers and they cannot make good one of the first of which they are accused they shall not be admitted to the rest And a Bishop shall not be condemned unless by seventy two Witnesses nor the Archbishop be judged of any A Presbyter-Cardinal Note the preheminence of a Bishop in England at this time above a Cardinal shall not be condemned unless by forty four Witnesses a Deacon-Cardinal shall not be condemned unless by twenty six Witnesses nor a Sub-Deacon under seven nor let the greater despair for the force of the lesser men and there always the Cause may be Pleaded where the Crime is admitted If a man stricken will he may plead his cause before his Judge and if he will not before his Judge he may hold his peace and as for men stricken as often as they desire respit let it be granted And every man which objects a crime let him write that he will prove it and if before he be changed he will not follow he is convinced no crime is to be accounted But if he will prosecute if he shall not prove what he objects let him undergo the penalty which he brought the Apostle says Against a Presbyter a writing is not to be received without two or three approved witnesses how much more against Bishops if these things be observed of Presbyters and other faithful men If any one will accuse any of the Clerks in an accusation of Fornication according to the precept of St. Paul two or three testimonies are required from him but if he
excommunicated or damned who differ in some things from the doctrine of the Pope who appeal from his decrees and hinder the execution of the ordinances of him or his Legates Although the Sesession of the Church King and Kingdom of England The reformation of King 1 d. was not Schismatical from the Papacy were an Act of Schism yet being done in the Reign of H. 8. one of the greatest favorers of the Papacy that ever was King of England and to his death as great an assertor of the Rites Ceremonies and Religion of it and in such a state independent from the Church of Rome was the Church and Kingdom at the time of Edwards Reformation whatsoever therefore his Reformation was yet could it not be Schismatical Whatever the Romanists pretend to unity and peace in their Church yet The rites and ceremonies of Edwards reformation were more uniform then before it is most manifest that in the Realm of England and Dominion of Wales in several places were used divers forms of Prayer commonly called the Service of the Church viz. that of Sarum of York of Bangor and Lincoln but also of late divers and sundry forms and fashions were used in the Cathedral and Parishes Church of England and Wales as well concerning the mattens or morning prayer and evening song as also concerning the holy Communion commonly called the Mass with divers and sundry rites and ceremonies concerning the same and in the administration of other Sacraments of See preamble to the Statute of 2 3. Ed. 6. Cap. 1. That the Scriptures Lords Prayer and Creed should be read in the English tongue is no new thing in England the Church whereas the service enjoyned in the Reign of Ed. 6 was uniform in all places of England and Wales as well in Parish Churches as Cathedrals In the Reign of King Ethelbald in the year of our Saviors incarnation 748. in a convocation held in the Prouince of Canterbury Cuthbert the Archbishop of his Clergy did Enact that the sacred Scriptures should be read in their monasteries the Lords Prayer and Creed taught in the English tongue Speed in the Reign of Ethelbald para 4. page 343. and how much it was against the Word of God and the custom of the ancient Church to use a tongue unknown to the people in common prayer and administration of Sacraments see the conference at Westminster an primo Eliz. which were never yet answered that I know of If any thing Heretical had been contained in the common Prayer administration Edwards reformation was not Heretical of Sacraments c. made in the Reign of Ed. 6. it would have been sufficiently shot at having so many adversaries at home and abroad but no such crime was ever that I ever heard of imputed to it if there be let the adversaries of it yet shew it affirmanti incumbit probatio If then not onely the Kings and supreme powers always under the old Covenant King Edwards Reformation was warrant-able materially and formally had this right of invoking the high Priest and other Priests and if God always punished the Kings of Judah and Israel for suffering the people to commit Idolatry and if God himself so often commends the zeal and reformation of Jehoshaphat Hezekiah Asa Josiah c. and if ever since Christianity the Bishops by that Divine Canon to Timothy have always had in 1 Tim. cap 2. their particular Churches right of composing publick Liturgies and in national Synods a right of composing publick and national Liturgies And the Liturgy of Edward being composed and received by the Bishops of the Church of England to that end convened and assembly by the King this Liturgy being neither schismattical nor containing any thing heretical is both for matter and form warrantable Object If the Sacriledge and extention of the civil Jurisdiction in giving the civil Magistrate licence to take cognizance of the publique Liturgy and administration of the Sacraments be objected The answer is easie Let the Courtiers and Parliament answer for it the Church was patient not agent in them The Church of Rome having robbed the poor laity of one half of the institution of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and kept the people in such The King and Church had great reason to make Reformation in Religion stupid ignorance that in the publick worship and service of God they should neither use their reason nor understanding by imposing it upon them in an unknown tongue as if in the publick worship and service of God he were not to be served by intellectual and rational creatures and had filled the Mass with more prayers to the Virgin Mary and Saints which could no ways relieve them and so at best super fluous and vain there was great reason in the King and Church to a make a reformation of the Religion and publick Worship and Service of God Of Queen Maries Ecclesiastical Laws Although King Ed. were a Prince of transcendent Vertue and Learning far above his years yet doubtless his youth was not onely much abused in his Reign where a man might have seen all the woes pronounced by God upon that Nation where the King is a childe or where a company of men in Parliament arrogate to themselves the Politick capacity of a King abstracted from his person but also at his very death caused not without suspicion of poyson was he deluded upon specious pretences by his whole Councel but principally by the Duke of Northumberland to make way for the Lady Jane Gray in the time of his sickness married to his fourth son Guilford Dudley to declare the said Lady Jane the rightful heir and successor to the English Monarchy to the manifest wrong and injury not onely of Queen Mary and Elizabeth afterward Queens of England but also of Mary Queen of Scots heir to Margaret the eldest daughter of Henry the seventh whereas the Lady Janes Title was descended from Mary the younger daughter of H. 7. yet it so pleased God that this unjust Will should onely bring destruction both to the Lady Jane and her husband whereas the Ladies Mary and Elizabeth and the Posterity of Mary Queen of Scots did all succeed and enjoy the possession of the English Diadem of which they were debarred by this Will of King Edward That the Title of Head of the Church was continued by Queen Mary appears by the Parliament begun and holden at Westminster the fifth of October in the first year of her Reign in the first and second session of it where she is stiled our Gracious Soveraign Lady Mary by the Grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith and in Earth Supreme Head of the Church of England and Ireland but in the second Parliament of her Reign being holden at Westminster the second of April the first year of her Reign the Title of Supreme Head of the Church of England and Ireland is not mentioned Declares
compos mentis and tell him he would instruct and teach him the most excellent dictate of Reason in the world viz. That there is one God infinitely good who is to be worshiped and served by man And that this God requires of every man that in that state wherein he hath made him he would not willingly do that to another which he would not have done to himself would not this poor ignorant man deride this Master of Reason and tell him he knew this as well as himself But suppose he should be so impudent as to deny this since Grotius is not in case I would desire Mr. Hobbs to prove it or give a right reason thereof and learn this man his Dictate of Right reason Well but let us see whether this Canting thing be worth the name of a Definition Omnis definitio est exclusio aequivoci If the Law of Nature be the Dictate of Right reason then does the Law of Nature exclude every thing else from being the Dictate of Right reason or this cannot be the definition of it I would know now of Mr. Hobbs whether all Arts and Sciences and Prudent actions be the Laws of Nature or not If they be the Laws of Nature then is every Inscientifical and Imprudent man an Unjust man If they be not the Laws of Nature and so not the Dictates of Right reason then let Mr. Hobbs shew what else does dictate them Nor is Mr. Hobbs less happy in defining a Pact upon which he grounds his Civitas It is just therefore that this man who Cap. 18. Art 4. makes all Science to be from Definitions only or Subjects without Predicates without which it is impossible there can be a Proposition and all Science to be from the memory which is common to all Beasts as well as Mr. Hobbs for so the Oxe knows his owner and the Ass his masters crib it being only retained in the memory excluding the Understanding should so rashly define things and understand them no better To believe there is a God to be worshiped and served and that no man should wilfully in that state and condition wherein God hath made him do that to another which he would not have done to himself is that Law which God hath engraven in the mindes of all mortal men wise and unwise learned and ignorant noble and ignoble in their wits and is the foundation and basis of all Humane society And this is that first and universal cause from which all moral virtues the dictates of Right reason from this cause do more genuinely and naturally flow then any Proposition in Geometry does from the Axiomes or Principles of it For what man is there in this world of what estate and condition soever but desires not to be wronged and injured Let not him then in that state wilfully wrong or injure any other of what estate soever If he be a Subject and desires to be protected in his life and fortune by the Laws of his Country from the violence and oppression of other men let not him abuse or violate the Laws of his Country to the wrong or oppression of another If he desires every man should keep promise and do justly by him let not him break his word and deal unjustly with another Is he a King he would not willingly be disseised or oppressed by another let him not therefore disseise or injustly oppress another Does any King desire not to be invaded or oppressed by his Subjects let not him therefore oppress his Subjects If he had been a Subject he would have desired protection from his Prince by an equal and moderate distribution of known Laws let him therefore equally moderately govern his Subjects by known Laws And from this Law did always men desire though ignorant of the manner to worship and serve GOD although they misplaced the Deity in the Sun Moon an Oak Apollo Jupiter c. And this is that Law which shall judge and condemn the immoral actions and vices of men in all Ages especially in this latter Age because they sinned against the Light or Law of Nature engraven in the minds of all men Now whether these men being Christians in name yet having cast off all Christian society and not being of any Christian church or religion that I ever heard of should not be content here but although they scarce agree in any thing else proceed so far as to make the Laws of God subject and depending upon the reasons and phantasies of men and not to tell them where their reasons shall begin if not at the Laws of God but every man left to go a whoring after his own inventions For what can then restrain man where his Reason is become superior to the Laws of God and to make all humane society to have its origination from the pacts and wills of men have not been as great enemies not only to Christian religion but also to all humane society as the malice of the Devil could invent let any sober unbiassed man judge or if all the confusions and distractions in Christendom to the shame and scandal of Christianity have not had their origination from this pretence Nor hath this sensless resolution of all things into Reason ended only in the distractions of State but also been the first source and fountain from whence all these distractions and confusions in the Church have arisen without any possible hope of ever reconciling them where these principles are continued Hence it is that the venerable and highest Authority of the sacred Scriptures are become the subject of all Tavern-discourses and every man that scarce understands any reason must forsooth have a reason given him why the Scriptures are the Word of God And yet in all other Authorities whatsoever men will deride the folly of others who go about to prove them by Reason for Reason is begotten alwaies from Authorities and Principles and therefore cannot Authorities and Principles be begotten from Reason I have been often almost astonished to consider how such sensless blasphemous and ridiculous things should meerly from the authority of the Assertors be imposed upon and received by the world without contradiction whereas narrowly looked into one would scarce believe the Authors had ever understood Logick or one leaf in Aristotle And for my part if I could not ultimately resolve the Dictates of my Reason as a Christian into plain places of Scripture so well as any Geometrician could any Proposition of Geometry into the Principles of Euclids Elements I would be content to let them wander for ever without any termination rather then admit them the Scriptures to be a creature of a creature and the subject of every wild phantastical conceit and opinion And if I could not ultimately resolve the reason of all my moral actions as a man into the Law of Nature which God has engraven in mens minds and not into the wills of men I would be content to conclude with Carneades that men have at divers times
his tail for his Second Ground is That the nature of Man reacheth not to the perfection of Government But what does our Author here mean by Freemen if by Freemen he understands men free to do what they list then our Author leaves them as he found them and has done nothing at all but if these Freemen be subject to their Trustee so far as he apprehends it fit and necessary for the good of the Commonwealth then I believe we shall finde them as very slaves as any our Author Ground 9. makes So that after all this ado our Author has made a multitude of slaves or he has made nothing at all And thus hath our Author endeavored to shew why men desire to live in Community viz. By having nothing common at all The Eighth GROUND Of the Authority given to an Absolute Governor and of Vnder-sorts of Government Author NOw comes our Author with a dog in a line his Absolute Governor tyed up to certain Laws and Limits which he has no right to transgress Observ What is this our Authors Absolute Governor Why the Roman Dictator was worth ten of this for he had power of life and death of disposing of all Offices at his own will and pleasure without the controlment of any either Senate or People Consul or Tribune and this power to continue during the exigence and danger of the Commonwealth Yet so far was the Dictator from being an absolute Governor that he was the while but a Minister of the Peoples which was plain in Fabius Maximus for Plutar. in vita Fabii Liv. lib. 22. though he were chosen Dictator yet during the danger of the Common-wealth the People made Minutius equal to him And so was the Athenian Archon who though chosen for Ten years and called a Judge and chiefest of power in the Commonwealth yet as Bodin observes cap. 8. fol. 80. de repub was not the Majesty of the Commonwealth in him but he a Provider and Procurator of the People and was bound to give an account of his Government And the reason why the Dictator and Archon were not absolute Governors is plain because this power was not immediately in them from God but delegate and constituted from another And any power that makes any thing may alter it for Unumquodque dissolvi potest eo ligamine quo ligatum est Well but let us see what manner of beast our Authors Absolute Governor is Why our Author tells you he is an Absolute Governor but restrained and tied up to certain Laws and Limits Which is a contradiction and impossible for in being absolute he is freed from all Laws and Limitations And now I will tell our Author that if his absolute Governor be tied up to any humane Limits or Laws he has so little power that it is impossible for him to protect and defend his rational people For suppose the Laws he is restrained to be as many as are contained in the body of the Civil Law our Statutes and all the Acts and Ordinances made since 1641. and twenty times more yet would not this be sufficient for an absolute Governor For all these are finite and mens actions are infinite and therefore Enemies may find out such ways to invade this free people as this absolute Governor cannot find in his Laws where he has power to oppose them and so this rational freeborn people must be left destitute if any Enemy may be found who can outwit them and find a way to oppress them out of the Laws and Limits which they have given their absolute Governor And who will desire any greater advantage against another then to have him look always one way or what Enemy desires more against another then against such a one whose absolute Governor is tied up to certain Instructions and those known to themselves And Laws are things which must be in esse And how can any man tell to day what may happen to morrow but Princes must to morrow and next day and every day steer their course according as the wind and storms shoals and deeps c. represent themselves which no man can possibly foresee Well let us see what the restriction of any one thing in the Supream Prince may bring upon himself and Subjects Let us look upon a King of England after the Act of Parliament De tallagio non concedendo an Act of Parliament is the Act of the King in Parliament As when the Lords and Commons present any Bill to the King and he passes it this is an Act of Parliament which is no more a Law of the Lords and Commons then the Laws passed at the Petition or Rogation of Coelius Cassius Sempronius c. were the Laws of Coelius Cassius and Sempronius And let every King expect that whatsoever the Subject can get of the King by hook or crook he will hold that as fast as the King shall any flower he leaves in his Crown Well then if Edward the First will not pass this Law he gets not a groat of his Subjects in England towards the relief of his oppressed Subjects of Aquitain in France which Sir Edward Coke in his Comment upon this Statute observes Well then the Scots in the year One thousand six hundred and forty having-transgressed all Laws of God and Humanity as well as the Borders and Bounds of their own Countrey raise Arms the second time and make an invasion upon us and seise upon Berwick and Newcastle but though the Kings hands were tyed up yet the Divine Vengeance of Heaven shall overtake them and their Countrey by a hand they could so little fear as I believe few of them knew whether there were any such or no. And now oh you who have not forced all mankinde from Humane brests come and stand amazed with horror for the most deplorable condition of the most Pious the most Religious the most Just the most Chaste Vertuous and Serenest Prince that ever swayed the English Scepter and not to be parallel'd by any Countrey whatsoever The Scots having invaded this Nation to treat with them a second time was too too much an indignity for their Natural Soveraign besides it was an affront not to be endured by the Englishmen That their Countrey must be made a prey to such Locusts and Caterpillers whensoever they will pretend grievance in Kirk and Discipline To restrain them by force it could not be without raising money By this Statute the King they say can raise none but by Parliament and to call a Parliament in this mad conjuncture of times was judged by himself and Council to be a means to increase the power of the Scots by the Parliaments joyning with them to the endangering himself and his Posterity Well then what is to be done what stand still and look on while these hungry Vermine devour and make a prey of his afflicted Subjects No the King to make his goodness appear above his own danger calls a Parliament where not deceived in his
the Father may alter them and the Son sell them Primogeniture being so sacred a thing that Esau was said to be a despiser of his Gen. 25. 34. birthright that he set it at a price to save his life and being due by the Law of Nature he could not transfer it to Jacob by any act of his yet was it just with God because he despised it to transfer it to Jacob. 17. The submission to the will of one Man or one Council then becomes the Cap. 5. art 7. will of them all when every one of them obliges himself by pact to one another not to resist the will of this Man or this Council to which he hath submitted himself Observ Here is nothing to pass or to be transferred from one Man to another and therefore here can be no pact and here I would fain know how to bind and to be bound can be the same thing which Mr. Hobbs here makes But every Man binds himself forsooth and therefore every Man may when he will disoblige himself for unumquodque dissolvi potest eo ligamine quo ligatum est 18. The Right of punishing is then to be understood to be given to any one Cap. 6. art 5. when every one doth covenant that he will afford no help to him who shall be punished Observ What power of life or death is here any more then if a company of Men contract one with another that they will afford Mr. Hobbs no relief if another Man will kill maim or punish Mr. Hobbs that then this Man hath a power over Mr. Hobbs his life and person and this Right forsooth he will call gladium justitiae Art 6. 19. Having made the Temporal power to have its origination from the Inventions Pacts Wills and policies of Men he makes it Judge of all Cap. 6. art 11. Doctrins and Opinions of Faith and this from convenience for saies he If one may command any thing upon pain of Temporal death and another forbids it upon penalty of eternal death it will follow not only innocent Citizens may be punished but the City it self be dissolved for no Man can serve two Masters Observ I would know how this granted could Christianity be preached when the Temporal Laws every where did forbid it Our Savior saies Whoso hateth not Father and Mother and Wife and Children and Brethren St. Luke 14. â—6 St. Math. 10. 28. and Sisters yea and his own life he cannot be my Disciple And if Temporal powers command any thing contrary to the Laws of God we ought not to feare them that can kill the Body but are not able to kill the Soul but rather to feare him who is able to destroy both Body and Soul in Hell 'T is true indeed no Man can serve two Masters who may with equall Right command the same thing but a Man may serve two Masters who do not with equal Right command the same thing as a Tenant who owes Homage to his Lord is the Lords Man of life and limb and of earthly worship and ought to be true and faithful to him saving Littleton Hom. cap. 1. the Faith he owes to his Soveraign Lord the King and so every servant ought to obey his Master in all things which do not contradict Gods nor his country-Country-Laws and so ought every Man to submit himself to Temporal powers in all things if they be not repugnant to Gods Laws And let any Man see whether the whole scope of this Article be not to make all Faith and Religion as well as Society a meer invention and policy of Man and humane constitution and Creature of a Creature nor is the danger he makes so much to be feared for Ecclesiastical Powers have nothing to do with Secular jurisdictions 20. There are some doctrines held he saies by which Citizens are impowered Annot. art 11. Cap. 6. to deny Obedience to the Civitas and to fight against Supreme Princes and Powers and that by Right yea it behoves them and this belongs to the power which many do attribute to the Prince of the Church of Rome in aliena Civitate and to the power also which Bishops otherwhere out of the Church of Rome ascribe to themselves Observ I do not know nor did ever hear that any Bishops out of the Church of Rome did ever ascribe to themselves this Power Nor are there any Bishops in the Western Churches of Christendom out of England Ireland Sodorensis Episcopus and the Isle of Man if those in Scotland were not which is a question and sure this Hierarchy never challenged any such Power But why does this Man take such care for peace and quiet when as by his own principles he justifies all the actions of the League in France against Henry the fourth for Henry the third never gave nor sold the French Monarchy to Henry the Cap. 9 art 13. fourth nor did the Duke of Mayne and his party upon the death of Henry the third oblige themselves by pacts one to another that the will of Henry the fourth should be the will of them all 21. It is most manifestly false and contrary to the practice of the Cap. 5. art 9. whole world where Men are not condemned to slavery that servants have Cap. 8. art 5. no property against their Masters for where servants are not slaves they may both sue or implead and be sued or impleaded nay they may sue their Masters for Debt or not performance of Covenants c. 22. Where he makes the Fathers power not to arise from Generation but Cap. 9. art 1. that Art 7. Children are subject to their Father no otherwise then Servants are subject to their Masters is so wild and groundless an opinion that it is not worth an answering 23. It is he saies a seditious opinion that Faith and Sanctity are not acquired Cap. 12. art 6. by reason and study but alwaies supernaturally infused and inspired and yet he saies Cap. 18. Art 4. prope finem There is but one way to Science i. e. by definitions but this way to Faith does hurt Observ How these two are consistible I do not understand 24. Jus is contrary to Lex Cap. 14. art 2. prope finem Observ Therefore by the 4. Axiom lib. 1. Euclid Jus naturae is contrary to Lex naturae By Art 1. cap. 4. Lex naturalis est Lex divina And therefore by Art 2. cap. 14. Lex divina is contrary to Jus divinum which is most abominable Blasphemy Nay he says * Cap. 8 ar 10. and oftentimes in hi. s Preface Jus divinum positivum is the Scripture and here Lex divina positiva to be the Scripture So that he makes contraries to signifie the same thing Observ Lex naturae cannot be contrary to Jus divinum nor different but only in this Jus divinum is an absolute right in God to will or command any thing to be a Law of Nature and
law of Nature All Ecclesiastical right is by divine positive institution By the 5. Propos it is not from any Humane law therefore by the 1. Notion it is by Divine positive law or institution 7. By the 2. Notion all Humane laws are made by men but it is impossible Jus primi occupantis is not from any humane law by the 4. Notion that men should make laws where no men are therefore cannot Jus primi occupantis be from any Humane law 8. This right of first possession not being only due before Gods revelation Nor from divine positive laws of himself in the Scriptures but also where they are not believed or received it cannot be by the 4. Notion from Gods divine positive laws 9. All Right by the 1. Notion being either from the law of Nature It is from the law of nature or some Divine positive or Humane law and this right by the 7. Propos not being from any Humane law and by the 8. Prop. not being from Divine positive laws it is by the 1. Notion due by the law of Nature It is proved lib. 3. cap. 11. that Subjection is natural and therefore no Annot. natural Subject can put himself out of the power of his Soveraign And by consequence this right of first occupying or finding by any Subject or Subjects is the right of the Soveraign in whose power such Subject or Subjects are and such Subjects are the Instruments of occupying or invention by which this right does accrue to the Supreme Power 10. Jus Gentium is a right which every Nation hath to send Ambassadors Jus gentium is from the law of nature to mediate Peace with any other although in publick hostility with them And this right not being topical but general by the 3. Notion it is from the Law of Nature 11. The Usufructuary right which separated persons for Gods divine The right which separated persons for the worship and service of God have to tythes is from the law of nature worship and service have to Tythes is not only general and therefore by the 3. Notion due by the Law of Nature but also being due and yet by no Humane Law and being due as well where Gods positive Institutions are not believed and received as where they are This right by the 1. Not. is due from the Law of Nature and by consequence the detaining of them by the Laity is a violence upon the Law of Nature for no Humane Law can dispence with the Law of Nature 12. The right of Subjects is either an Usufructuary right or a right Jus subditorum twofold Proprietatis or Usufructuarium is from humane laws of Propriety Jus Proprietatis is when any Subject or company of Subjects have by some Law a right to any individual thing excluding all other but him from whom this right is derived viz. the Supreme Power of the place An Usufructuary right is when any man or men have no right of Property to the thing but only a right to the profits arising from it as a Parson Vicar Judge and Fellows of Colledges have no Property in the Parsonage or Vicarage-house or glebes Judges place or Fellowships of Colledges And these rights neither being due from any Law of Nature nor any Divine positive Law are by the 1. Notion from the Temporal or Humane Laws of every Nation 13. Jura sanguinis nullo jure civili dirimi possint Nor is Primogeniture The right of Primogeniture is due by the Law of Nature only preferred where Gods revelation of himself in the Scriptures are received but where they are not received Their right therefore of Primogeniture is from the Law of Nature 14. It is true that Divine Laws oblige all men alike and so Humane No Divine or Humane laws give Right or Property to any man quà homo but quà talis Laws oblige all Subjects alike But the Right or Property created by Divine or Humane Laws by the Definition is in some man or men excluding all others but him or them from whom it is derived Right or Property therefore being such a mans excluding all others it cannot be where it includes all men either as Men or Subjects Thus the Legislative right is from the Law of Nature but every man as man hath not this Lawgiving right So Jus primi occupantis is from the Law of Nature but every man is not Primus occupans And so the right of Primogeniture but every man is not First-born c. And so Gods divine Laws in the Scriptures oblige all men alike but yet do not they give to all men alike the right of Preaching the Gospel Administration of Sacraments c. but only to such separated persons so qualified And so Humane Laws oblige all Subjects alike but they do not give Right or Property to all alike but to one man or more excluding all other 15. That is Right or Property which is such a mans or mens excluding How Community and Right or Property differ others That is Community which is common to one man as much as another as the Common Road the Air or Sea-water c. CHAP. II. Of Laws 1. AS in all Arts and Sciences there must be some Axioms and Principles Introduction which must prove those Arts and Sciences and these must be first granted and be the reason of those Arts and Sciences and yet no reason can be given of them before any man can deduce any thing from thence for no mans Reason can work upon nothing So in all just and legal actions there must always be some Law given which is superior to the Agents reason and the reason that such an act is just or legal and where there is no Law there can neither be Justice nor transgression It is not therefore the will or fancy of any Agent that makes any action just or legal but the doing of it in conformity to the precept of him who by right commands or permits it which makes it just and legal Et oportet neminem Regula sapientiorem esse legibus And if private mens wills judgments or reasons should be the rule of their actions what one Subject is there of a thousand that would be content with that condition wherein the Law has placed him It is not therefore what I or another judge fit or desire but the directing our actions in common to the rules and precepts of our Superiors by which we may hope to enjoy peace and unity and be before God Angels and Men truly accounted just and virtuous 2. All Laws may be divided into Divine Humane Ecclesiastical or Division of Laws Despotical 3. All Divine Laws are twofold either Natural engraven in the Divine Laws how manifold minds of all Mortal Men whereby they are to worship one God and by all just means to preserve peace with Men or supernatural viz. extraordinarily revealed by God in the Old and New Testament
4. All Divine Laws are created and derived from that divine and From whence all Divine Laws are derived eternal Right which was inseparably in God before any such Laws were created by him 5. Humane Laws are threefold viz. Secular Temporal or Civil such are the Laws of every Country or Gamacal viz. the Laws of the How manifold are Humane Laws Husband or Paternal viz. the Laws of Parents to their Children 6. All Humane Laws are derived from that Right or Power which From whence derived the Law of Nature creates in supream Powers Husbands and Parents 7. They are called Humane Laws because they are made by Men Why called Humane Laws who by the Law of Nature have a Right to make or create them 8. All Ecclesiastical Laws are derived from that Right or Power From whence Ecclesiastical Laws are derived which by divine positive institution our Saviour Christ left to his Church to continue untill his second coming again 9. Ecclesiastical Laws are so called because they only relate to the discipline of the Church and worship and service of God Why so called 10. Despotical Laws are derived from the Right or Power Despotical Laws from whence derived which every Master of a Family hath over his Servants which Right or Power is created by Secular or Temporal Laws of the place where the Family is 11. Two things must necessarily precede every Law or it hath no What must precede every Law Obligation viz. the Legislative Right and the Declaration of it So that Jus divinum is one thing and Lex divina another and Jus naturale is one thing and Lex naturae another And so is Jus Humanum and Lex Humana and Jus Ecclesiasticum and Lex Ecclesiastica And he that will confound these things cannot possibly ever write clearly upon the subject 12. Humane and Despotical Laws are vindicative or oblige to corporal What Laws are vindicative punishment in this world 13. Only Humane Secular Temporal or Civil Laws are distributive and create property among Men in their Estates What Laws are distributive 14. Neither Divine nor Ecclesiastical Laws are vindicative but oblige in Conscience only What Laws are neither distributive nor vindicative * How Men come to be punished Temporally for not observing Ecclesiastical Laws 15. Although Ecclesiastical Laws as we shall prove in the next chap. bind in Conscience only and therefore cannot impose any Corporal mulct or punishment yet the Secular Laws do as if a Man be excommunicated he shall have no advantage or relief in any plea by the Common Law a Lit. vil sect 201. and by the Common Statute Law whoso is adjudged an Heretick or Blasphemer shall be burnt yet neither Common Law nor Statute Law take cognisance of either Excommnication Heresy or Blasphemy before the Statute of the 2 H. 5. 7. In curia Christianitatis id est Ecclesiae in qua servantur leges Christi cum tamen in foro Regio servantur Leges mundi saies Linwood who saies moreover b Com. Stat. de circumspecte agatis That the Probate of Wills and Testaments de consuetudine Angliae not de jure communi belong to the Court-Christian But whether Linwood saies true or not Hen. 8. began by the Statute Law to encroach upon the Rights of the Church and by confounding the jurisdictions both of Church and State making himself head of both has opened such a gap to let in all Schisme and dissention that the Common-Lawyers and Statute-Laws have upon the matter devoured all Church-rites and power nor are either the Common or Statute-Laws now in much more esteem then the Ecclesiastical Nor is it less then a Divine judgment upon those men who have so extravagantly attributed both powers to be in the King Between Supreme Head and Supreme Governor I understand no difference for if the Supreme Governor hath not supreme power or right of command then necessarily must such a Governor be an Usurper or unjust Invader in words only but indeed in their practice have denied him the exercise of the one or the other power and ascribed them both to themselves and Courts subordinate to the King That these men I say should be themselves and all the Courts in as little esteem as Ecclesiastical Rites and Constitutions and the King God knows upon what account for no colour of pretence was ever yet so much as reasonably pretended violently restrained from the exercise of any either Ecclesiastical or Civil power among us Here do not I admit of Mr. Hobbs his division of Civil Laws into Sacred Annot. and Secular Did ever man before hear of Sacred Civil Laws Sacred Laws are those Civil Laws he says which belong to Religion that is Cap. 14. art 5. the Ceremonies and Service of God and are called Ecclesiastical Secular Laws are those he says which are wont to be called Civil by a general name For though Ecclesiastical Laws be made by Men and therefore not Sacred as he says yet is the power by which they are made from Divine positive institution and therefore cannot have any right or power from Civil or Secular sanctions which at highest cannot amount to more then Humane 16. A Law differs from Counsel as my Understanding differs from How a Law differs from Counsel my Will my Will is that which imperates all my actions my Understanding informs my Will whether the doing or not not doing such an act be good or bad just or unjust reasonable or unreasonable A Law is the declared will of him who by right commands Counsel the reason advice or discourse of them to whom he who by right commands refers any thing to be debated who are usually called the Council whether the willing or passing such a thing into a Law will be probably convenient or inconvenient either to him or his Subjects CHAP. III. Of Virtue 1. THat Virtue is not always placed in a mean between two extremes Introduction Virtue is not fited always in a mean between two extremes and those extremes to be Vices according to the opinion of the antient Philosophers I do subscribe to Mr. Hobbs cap. 3. art 32. de Cive And that from the reason he there gives viz. that Fortitude in a good cause is a virtue although it be in the extreme Nor does quantity in giving be it much little or indifferent make Virtue but the cause of giving To these may be added Gratitude and Patience Justice and Obedience which are not placed between any extremes But if I assent to Mr. Hobbs in this I cannot less dissent from him where cap. 3. he makes Virtues to be the Laws of Nature and cap. 2. art 1. the Law of Nature to be the Dictate of Right reason For 2. Virtue is the doing or forbearing any action as it is dictated by What is Virtue Right reason from the Law of a Superior or from some Notion known to
least Liberty and that which in other men is termed Anger in them is called Pride and Tyranny Besides in private men it is enough that they themselves do well but Princes must have a care that neither they nor their Ministers do ill 6. Tibi soli peccavi says the Psalmist Psal 50. Humane Laws are the The Supreme power is not obliged by his own Laws organs or instruments of the Power that governeth they cannot therefore extend themselves to bind him from whom they are derived for Omnis potentia activa est principium transmutandi aliud Besides the Prince may free other men from the obligation of the Laws and therefore much more himself And if Supreme Princes were obliged by their own Laws then were Humane Laws as well as the Laws of Nature eternal and immutable which is absurd nor could Humane Laws protect Subjects when any thing happens which comes to pass every day that was not foreseen at the making of the Laws Humane Laws are made to oblige and preserve the governed necessitate coactionis but they cannot have any obligation upon Lawgiver who is the Supreme power unless a man will grant that an Effect may be prime and superior to the Cause Nor were ever other Governments subject to their own Laws No man hath any thing proper against the Supreme power 7. No Subject hath any Property except Ecclesiasticks but by the Laws of his Country But by the precedent Proposition no Supreme Prince can be obliged by his own Laws and therefore no Subject can have property against him If any Subject had property against the Supreme power then could not the Supreme power impose a Forfeiture of Goods in case of Praemunire Attaint Conviction of Treason or Felony But the Consequence is false and therefore the Antecedent is false That any man hath any property against the Supreme power Besides there could no Fine nor Fine and Recovery be levied or suffered if he in Reversion or Remainder had property against the Supreme power Nor could an Act of Parliament enable Tenant for life to make sale of his Estate It is remarkable that the Children of Israel should not be content to Annot. have God to reign over them immediately who did himself give them Laws being enquired of by the High-Priest Samuel might well say therefore unto them Ye shall cry in that day because of your King which not ye shall choose but which ye shall have chosen you and the Lord shall not hear you in that day 1 Sam. 8. 18. For Gods ways and actions are always perfect whereas by the reason of humane frailty the best mans actions are subject to imperfections But if it seems grievous to any man that he holds his goods at the will of another let him consider that God since Adam did never give any Nation but only the Children of Israel Property but always used the mediation of his Vicegerents And since Property must be derived from some Humane act for the Law of Nature gives none but to Supreme Princes and therefore the possessions of Kings are called Sacra patrimonia because Kings have no Superior but God Almighty Proedium Domini Regis est directum dominium cujus nullus Author est nisi Deus How Sir Ed. Co. Com. on Lit. p. 1. 6. much better is it for Subjects to hold of one Man then of many For nothing can be objected against one but will have more force against many And let any man shew me in these last five hundred years any Subjects estate taken from him without due and legal proceeding by the act of any of the Kings of England and I will shew him five hundred who not being liable to any punishment by Law have been ruined themselves and their families in seven years and that for observing the Laws and against the will of the King Obj. But many Actions have been brought against the King which if no Annot. 2. man hath Property against him may seem inconsistent Answ But the question here is not what the King may do but what he hath done Not what the King may declare Law but what he hath already declared Law 8. Majesty is from the Law of Nature immediately but the power Power of Magistrates from him of Magistrates is not so but mediately that is from him who hath the Supreme power Magistracie is the instrument or organ by which Majesty is conveyed to every place whither its own power is extended And as Majesty is restrained to the Laws of Nature and is accountable to God for all the omissions and transgressions of them so Magistrates are restrained to Humane Laws and ought to give an account of their actions to him that hath the Supreme power And as no man can offer violence or contempt to Humane Majesty but it is a contempt and violence to the Majesty of Heaven so no man can offer violence to or contemn Magistrates but it is done to Humane Majesty from whence their authority is derived Wherefore Subjects must submit to Governors who are sent by Kings 1 Pet. 2. 14. By this Proposition it is evident that although Supreme power cannot Annot. be divided yet the exercise of it may For where a King is an Enfant he cannot exercise his power who can neither act any thing nor expres what he would have done nay it is impossible for the best and wisest King that ever was to exercise his power every where for one body can be but in one place at once though the power thereof may be diffused every where as the light and influence of the Sun is diffused every where although the body of it can be but in one place And the exercise of power by Magistrates is like Gods governing the world by natural causes who being the first Mover of all things produceth natural effects by the order of second causes Jethro his counsel to Moses therefore is to be taken Thou wilt surely weare away both thou and this people that is with thee for this thing is too heavy for thee thou art not able to perform it thy self alone Exod. 18. 18. 9. Quando lex aliquid alicui concedit concedere videtur id sine quo res The Right of calling Assemblies belongs to Christian Kings ipsa esse non potest where any Law Divine or Humane does give any thing it gives all the means by which this otherwise could not be had And that God by the Law of Nature has given Kings a power to protect their Subjects we have sufficiently demonstrated but it is impossible Princes should protect and govern their Subjects if they might not rule their actions Now all actions and motions are either regular or irregular All regular motions and actions may be reduced to one certain beginning where the beginning is not one and certain there they may be called commotions or confusions rather then motions or regular actions But all Assemblies are motions and therefore they
must be reduceable to some one certain principle or they are irregular or commotions If then Christian Princes have not a right of calling Assemblies but others as well as they then must it either necessarily follow that Christian Princes have not power sufficient to govern and protect their Subjects and that their Subjects motions cannot be regular and orderly but confounded and irregular and so the law of nature and the end for which God ordained Princes inverted For my part I will not dispute the Power of God in the planting of the Church either under the old or new Law how that he did dispence with the actions and motions of his People and Ministers and set Father against Son c. and that to make his Power known he would plant his Church notwithstanding all Temporal Powers whatsoever but this I do affirm that God after the deliverance of the Israelites out of Egypt did give to Moses only this right of calling Assemblies as appears clearly by Numb 10. 2. for only to him is the charge of making the Trumpets to call the congregation together It is true that vers 8. the sons of Aaron shall blow with their Trumpets but neither Aaron nor the Priests had any Power to make them but only Moses they must therefore have them from him and be his Instruments and this Power was given to Moses as the supreme Magistrate and not as High Priest for Aaron was then High Priest being before consecrated Levit. 8. Nor was this Right given personally to Moses but as a Law to last for ever If any allegation be made against Moses because he was a Priest it must cease with Ioshua and the Kings after him who were none for Ioshua by virtue of this ever lasting Law did call an Assembly of all the Tribes and therefore of Levi to Sichem and vers 28. dissolved it After him did David Joshua 24. 18. 1 Chro. 15. 4. 11. call the High Priest and other Priests not to consult of any secular affair but about the removing the Ark and afterward 1 Chron. 23. 2. he gathered together all the Lords of Israel with the Priests and Levites and as he called them together so his dismissed them 1 Chron. 16. 43. The like did Solomon when the Temple was dedicated called the Assembly 2 Chron 5. 2. dissolved it cap. 7. 10. The like did Asa when Religion was restored and a solemn Oath of association for the restoring of it Jehosophat did it when 1 Chro. 15. 2 King 10. 20. 2 Chro. 34. 29 30. 2 Chro. 29. he proclaimed a publick Fast 2 Chron. 20. 3. Jehu assembled them when a solemn Sacrifice was to be performed Joash in a case of Dilapidations Josias when the Temple was to be purified and a mass of superstition to be removed Hezekiah made a law for the Priests and all their brethren to assemble and in conformity to that law they did assemble nor was this v. 15. Assembly for any other thing then to cleanse the house of God and for the affairs of the service of God being things meerly spiritual And since that God hath promised that Kings shall be nursing fathers and Queens nursing mothers to his Church it must be meant of Christian Kings for this could not be of Josias because he was a King at the time of this prophecy or before it could not therefore be meant of him for the prophecy is de futuro Kings shall be c. Nor could it be meant of the Kings of Judah after him for they were all Idolaters and persecutors of Gods Church It was therefore meant of Christian Kings And how Kings can be Kings or Supreme powers without this right I do not understand Nor can that saying of our Saviour's causing of wars and distraction be otherwise reasonably understood but only where Kings and Supreme powers have not received the Faith And that Christian Kings did generally exercise this power after they became Christians we shall shew hereafter 10. He is a rightful Supreme Governor who is a Sword-bearer that is Who is arightful Supreme Governor whom God hath chosen to be his Minister who hath not taken the sword excited thereunto neither from any ambitious or spightful passion or affection either of himself or other men That may make and abrogate Laws determine all Controversies by himself or such Judges as he shall appoint choose Magistrates and Councellors and in whom is the power of making War and Peace Nor did God give Kings to them only over whom he did reign by Covenant but also to Heathens who had not known him as to the Persians Syrians Assyrians c. he gave Cyrus Hazael Nebuchadnezzar c. And all antique History speaks only of the Government by Kings as Justin says Principio rerum gentium nationumque imperium penes Reges erat before any other Government was usurped and made by Men. 11. He is a Tyrant who is a Sword-taker who in stead of executing Who is a Tyrant the wrath of God upon offenders against all Law kills and murders them who are not of his own faction who hath no power from God but only force from the wills of inconstant and seditious men As Hos 8. 4. says They have set up Kings but not by me they have made Princes and I knew it not Nor is it the Command of One which makes Tyranny The Grecians themselves called the Council of the Thirty after the Athenians were subdued by the Lacedemonians the Thirty Tyrants of Athens I am confident there was never any thing so wildly and variously Annot. 1. ghessed at as the manner how Dominion and Power came into the world by those men who derive all power from the People originally Bodin cap. 6. de Rep. p. 46. makes all Dominion to be gotten at first by force and pag. 46. d. he says It is very like that without greatest force and breaking down the Laws of Nature Liberty could not be taken away And many men will not distinguish between Force and Power but only in the possession And sure Athaliah was as much possessed of the Crown of Judah and as quietly as any King before or after her for six years and yet I do not find Jehojadah or the people reprehended for restoring Joash And the children of Israel did not rebel while they could quietly place 2 Chro. 13. 7. Jeroboam over them but Jeroboam was declared a Rebel after he was possessed 12. When they over whom God hath given power shall submit themselves What is a rightful Government to that power this is a rightful Government When all who owe their subjection shall accept and receive the Laws of him who by Right that is by Birth Revelation Lot First possession or just Conquest ought to command As the Children of Israel answered Joshua All that thou commandest we will do and whithersoever thou sendest we will go According as we hearkened unto Moses in all things so will we
unto thee only the Lord thy God be with thee as he was with Moses Whosoever he be that does rebel against thy commandment and will not hearken unto thy words in all that thou commandest him he shall be put to death Jos 1. 16 17 18. 13. Anarchy is like a vacuum in Nature so abhorrent that the World The state of Man out of power is Tyranny will rather return into Chaos then suffer it And therefore Cicero lib. 3. de legibus says truly Sine imperio neque domus ulla nec civitas nec gens nec hominum universum genus stare nec ipse denique mundus potest 'T is no wonder therefore if seditious men when they have put themselves out of power are glad to submit to Tyranny rather then be overwhelmed with the Chaos and confusion of Anarchy Yet it is said Judg. 17. 6. 21. 25. In those days there was no King in Annot. Israel but every man did what was right in his own eyes So it may seem that men may subsist in an Anarchy It is true indeed there was no man that was King in those days in Israel nor was there then that absolute necessity of one for God had given them Property and did govern the Israelites and they did enquire judgment of God who did answer cap. 20. 18. And men did in those dayes commerce and exchange one with another which is evident by Micha's contracting with her Levite-Priest for ten shekels of silver by the year a suit of apparel and his victual ch 17. 10. 14. Princes do transgress their power when they command any Wherein Princes do transgress their power thing contrary to what God hath commanded or derogatory to the worship and service of God when they make unjust War when they pronounce Judgment not according to the declared and known Laws but punish either by passion or to please factious men as in the Earl of Straffords Case or pass sentence against one unheard as in Cromwell Earl of Essex his Case I say not punish upon passion or to please men For as the state of Annot. affairs may be stated Princes may punish though not in a Judicial manner as when Subjects are in Arms against their Soveraign Nor do I think that any uninterested Casuist will deny that Henry the Third of France did justly put Henry Duke of Guise to death though not judicially the Duke having taken Arms against him and made him flie out of Paris fomented seditions against him and taken pensions of the King of Spain to maintain war in France and become so popular as the King had no means to proceed legally against him 15. * How careful Princes ought to be in commanding or making of Laws The perfection of Government consists first and chiefly that the Governor have a perfect and indubitable Title against which no just exception can be taken Secondly that the Governor makes it his chiefest care that the Religion or Worship and Service of God be duly administred And thirdly that he does endeavor by known and established Laws to administer Judgment and Justice indifferently to his Subjects with careful moderation of the severity of the Laws whereas men by no fault of theirs incur the severity of them And lastly by all just and due means to endeavor the preservation of his Subjects from the oppression and violence of Foreiners and to maintain Peace and Commerce with his neighboring Nations Such was our Government before our unhappy differences and such by Gods grace do I hope to see it again 16. It were a fine may-game to be a King if Kings might make their How careful Princes ought to be in commanding or making Laws Will the rule of their actions It is true indeed God hath not in all things commanded Kings what Laws they shall govern their Subjects by yet this natural law are all Princes obliged to that their Laws by which they govern do more relate to the good of their Subjects in general then their own particular interest And no question but a King commits a more grievous sin doing any unjust thing to any of his Subjects then if another had done it in regard of the relations which are between them as a Fathers doing an unjust thing to his Child is a greater sin then if another had done it by how much by the Law of Nature he ought to have done well to his Child rather then another Princes therefore by the Law of Nature in governing ought to have more respect to the general good of their Subjects then their own particular interest Yet is Magnificence a Royal virtue and therefore ought not the Revenues of the Crown to be parted with by which it should be maintained Nor would it conduce to the benefit of the Subjects in general to make the Revenues of the Crown poor Where Majesty grows contemptible the exercise of Regal power is never permanent Princes therefore ought to have a great care that by their vices prodigality of the Revenues of the Crown remiss governing or by so giving it over to others that they so much neglect it in themselves as to make themselves vile and contemptible 17. Though God hath not commanded Kings in all things what are Princes ought not to be obeyed when they command in derogation of Gods Majesty 1 Sam. 12. 14. vers 25. the Laws by which they shall govern and therefore divers Kings govern their Subjects by several Laws as their Subjects differ in nature and manners Yet hath he forbidden all Kings to make Laws derogatory to his Divine Majesty Samuel therefore threatens Saul as well as the Israelites that if he or they disobey God and do wickedly they shall perish both they and their King And it was to Saul that God said that Rebellion was as the sin of witchcraft and stubborness as the wickedness of idolatry Nor was the sin of the Israelites in committing idolatry under the Kings of Judah and Israel the less though the King commanded it Nor did God scarce 1 Sam. 15. 23. ever shew a greater miracle then in delivering the Three Children and Daniel disobeying the Kings wicked commandment Princes therefore ought not to be obeyed in commanding things derogatory to the Majesty of God 18. Nor ought Princes to be obeyed when they command any thing Or contrary to Religion contrary to Religion for The kingdom of Heaven and the righteousness thereof is first to be sought But the kingdom of Heaven is only to be sought by Faith and Religion Daniel therefore sinned not when he obeyed not Darius in praying to God Nor do all our Parliamentary Laws add any thing to the obligation of mens worship and service of God in the Unity and Form of the Church of England for men were as much obliged in Conscience before such Laws as after Not but that Kings ought to have as great or greater care of preserving unity and peace in Gods Church as in their
came under one Monarch or King again for the Royal dignity of a Monarch or King from whence all subordinate dignities tanquam lumen de lumine are derived without any diminution will suffer no division Regia dignitas est indivisibilis quaelibet alia derivativa dignitas est similiter indivisibilis The most woful event that fell out in this Kingdome when Gordobug divided this Kingdom between his two Suns Ferrex and Porrex and what heavy event came to pass untill it was reduced again under one Monarch let our Histories tell you and letting pass others I cannot overpass the miserable estate within this Kingdom under the Heptarchy untill all was reunited under one Soveraign and this is the reason that in England Scotland and Ireland the Royal dignity is descendible to the eldest daughter or sister Sir E. Coke Inst 4. 243. c. Regia dignitas est indivisibilis 2. Of these Governments Monarchy is the best as appears by reason by How many ways Monarchy is the best Government the consent of the world by the institution of God and his commanding obedience only to this Government and by woful experience 3. Monarchy in reason is the best Government for the dignity and Monarchy is the best Government in reason majesty of one man is more easie to be maintained then of many The ills that follow from bad Monarchs are no worse than what do and alwaies did happen from the best of humane Laws viz. mischiefs to particular men Nor can the mischiefs which happened to Silus Sabinus Sillanus c. who not well brooking the powers of Tiberius and Caligula Emperors as bad as who were worst had been over lavish of their tongues in vilifying the power of the Caesars and magnifying that of the Senate and probably had they been able would have advanced the power of the Senate to the abdication of Caesars be compared with the inconveniences which came upon the Senate and people of Rome in those times of Silla and Marius of Caesar and Pompey Besides factious and discontented persons cannot hope for that encouragement in their designs where the supreme power is in one individual person as where it is compounded of many The freedome and liberty of the Subject is more under one then more for it is easier to obey one then many The common people of Rome never enjoyed so much liberty as under the Emperors and therefore when after the death of Caligula the Senate endeavored to restore Rome to her antient liberty as they Sueton. in vita Claud. cap. 10. called it and extinguish the name and power of the Caesars and to that end had seised upon the Capitol they aided by the Preterian coherts continued the power of their Emperors in Claudius and the day and night wherein the Senate would not receive him was the cause of much trouble which Josephus notes l. 19. c. 30. 4. By the consent of the world for every where in the known world By the consent of the world before 1641. either in Europe Asia Africa or America over Christians Mahumetans and Infidels except the State of Venice the usurped power of the Cantons in Switzerland the State of the Neatherlands the Hans-towns Genoa and Geneva who seek protection of the Emperor and Kings of France this Government is established 5. By God himself for he never instituted any Government either in By Gods owning it only Priesthood Judges or Kings but only this nor commands obedience to any other Can a man touch the Lords anointed and be guiltless 1 Sam. 26 9. And submit your yelves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreame c. St. Pet. 2. 13. Feare God honor the King And I counsel thee to keep the Kings commandments and that in regard of the oath of God And therefore what thing an Unite is in numbers the Minde in the faculties of the soule a Centre in a circle the same is God the most omnipotent King in the world simple in unity indivisible in nature most holy in purity placed by an infinite interval far remote above the fabrick of the highest Heaven joyning this perspirable region with the celestial and intelligible keepes and preserves from ruine as by a secure care the whole universe framed and compounded in such admirable order and harmony to whose great example ought every good King who is the Unite the minde and centre of his kingdome that hopes to govern and preserve his subjects not only safe but honest and happy wholly to betake himself 6. By woful experience I do not find any mans life except the destitute and deposed Princes Arthur Ed. 2. Rich. 2. Hen. 6. and his sonne By wofull experience Ed. 5. and his brother herein and in many other things doubtless more unhappy then private men and the Duke of Clarence after conviction and attainder thought by the consent of Ed. 4. to be drowned in a Butt of Malmsey and Cromwell Earle of Essex condemned and executed unheard in Parliament see a remarkable passage herein by Sir Ed. Co. Insti 4. fo 37. 38. Queen Katherine fifth wife to H. 8. Mary Queen of Scots and the Earl of Strafford or estate taken away by any of the Kings of England for these last 500 years in an extraordinary and extrajudicial manner If the dissolution of the Abbies by Hen 8. be objected I answer it was usual in Parliament to alter many things in the Common law as the statute de donis conditionalibus made a great alteration in the Common law for before all estates which were not for life and under were either in fee absolute or conditional and so the Statutes which gave power of entry where before no remedy was to be had by Common law but by a Cui in vita And to Jointenants to compell others to sue a Writ of partition c. In case of life the ordinary way of trial was by Peers the Nobility by the Nobility and the Commons by the Commons but a Parliament being a body compounded of heterogenial and dissimilary parts viz. King Lords and Commons could not be Peers to any man which was the usual way of Trial with us neither were the Estates so taken from Abbots c. but that they enjoyed them or a full value in lieu of them during their lives so that by this act no wrong was done to any man living Yet it is true which Sir Ed. Co. saies in his Comment upon Magna charta chap. 1. Quod datum est Ecclesiae datum est Deo what was given to the Church was given to God which by the Law of God Numb 16 37 38. is unalterable nor can be be employed to any profane or common use So that I am confident I may safely affirm that the Subject in seaven years under the Long Parliament suffered extraordinarily and extrajudicially five hundred times more then all their Ancestors in 500 years before did
done in Church is against conscience no minding of what is their duty all their talk is judging their superiors and this buzzed into the heads of light and inconstant men begets all the talk of the Country and is beleeved with the same Faith they beleeve the Gospel or their Creed and if Authority shall endeavor to suppress the further growth of such seditious practice by punishing the Authors it will be deemed by the well-affected no less then an invasion upon the liberty of the subject and persecution of the Gospel 6. If Lex lata had any obligation upon the Legislator then were the Creature subject to the Creator and the Father obliged to what he commands That supream Princes are obliged by their own Laws is a seditious opinion his Son and the Master to what he bids his Servant and God to what he commands Man which is absurd nor is it less absurd that the supreme power should be obliged by the Laws given to Subjects They who assert that supream Princes are obliged by their own Laws should do well to make their Children shooes and cloathes to serve them when they are men For as mens vices and manners vary so must humane Laws But men neither consider themselves nor Princes in asserting this For Princes are in a more vile condition then the poorest man not to have the freedom of will and they themselves are left to the rigor of the Law without hope of mercy How can any man accuse Hen. 7. for his rigid exacting the penal laws when by this opinion he had not power to remit any thing of them And why do men tax H. 8. for a cruel man and a Tyrant because he put so many men to death for not acknowledging his headship of the Church the not subscribing the six Articles c. if he were obliged by his own Laws Nay they do not allow Queen Mary a power to releive any Protestant given over to the secular power by Bishop Bonner From this very opinion sprang all the miseries for these last 18 years Scots had liberty to invade us but the King was obliged by his own Laws not to relieve his oppressed and afflicted Subjects This was that which gave the Turks first entrance into Christendom for while the wrangling Grecians not content with their rightful Emperors place usurpers in their rooms who to gratifie them again and to strengthen themselves against the right heirs care not what they grant their well-affected Subjects which so weakned the power of the Grecians that contesting with their Emperors about their liberties and priviledges which their usurping Emperors had granted them and neglecting their common and at first despised enemies the Turks they were all overcome in a short time by a handful of men obedient to their Prince And what private man can assume to himself the knowledge of good and evil that is ascribe to himself a power over his Superior by judging whether he hath transgressed the Law or not And let any man shew that ever our Parliaments as they call themselves Councils of State or Safety were ever obliged by their own Laws and I will submit that rightful Princes are obliged by their own Laws 7. There is nothing more to be wished in this world then that the That supreme power may be moderated Will of them which command might be moderated and restrained to Reason as that Kings Fathers and Masters should never exact any thing of their Subjects Children and Servants but what were reasonable But it is impossible that the Supreme power can be moderated unless it be divided or subject to the Moderators It is therefore a seditious opinion That Supreme power may be moderated 8. All right that any Creature hath to any thing is either from the That any man has any thing proper against the Supreme power Law of Nature or from some Humane Law but no Subject can have Praedium directum cujus nullus author est nisi Deus Sir E. Co. Com. Lit. pag. 1. b. qui dominium non habet dominus non est And he that holds of none is Lord of all which no Subject can be It is therefore a seditious opinion That any Subject hath any thing proper against his Soveraign 9. There has not any thing for more then this last Century caused so That the people may reform where Princes will not much dissention and bloodshed among Christians to the shame of Christianity as the specious pretence of Reformation The Turk either restrained by God or not willing to be an Enemy to Mankind hath been only a spectator not actor in this Tragedy The end doth sanctifie the means was a doctrine generally received among these Reformers if the end were Reformation it was no matter by what means it was brought to pass Hence it was that every where in the Western world men disposed to sedition made Reformation their pretence No Prince must use his power to restrain them if he do Calvin gives them a lesson Abdicant se potestate terreni Comment on Dan. 6. 21. Principes dum insurgunt contra Deum immo indigni sunt qui censeantur in hominum numero potius ergo oportet conspuere in illorum capita quam illis parere ubi sic proterviunt ut velint spoliare Deum jure suo Earthly Princes do divest themselves of power when they set themselves against God yea they are not worthy to be accounted in the number of men Men ought therefore rather to spit upon their heads then obey them where they deal so saucily as if they would spoil God by their right And Luther Ab omnibus hominum legibus exempti sumus libertate nobis Christiana per Lib. de captiv Babil de baptismo baptismum donata We are freed from all Laws of Men liberty being given us by Baptism Et scio nullam rempublicam feliciter legibus administrari I know there is no Commonwealth happily governed by Laws And Turpe enim est iniquiter servile Christianum hominem qui liber est aliis Cap. de matrimonio quam coelestibus divinis subjectum esse legibus It is a filthy and unjust servile thing that a Christian man which is free should be subject to any Cap. de sacrord but Heavenly and Divine laws And whether these mens followers have not well practised their Lectures wheresoever they have been tolerated either in Germany Bohemia Austria Upper and Lower Hungaria Transilvania Sweden France England Scotland Low-Countries Geneva c. let any man who hath read the Combustions of Christendom judge and the Anabaptists and all other Sects may from their principles justifie all their actions 10. There is nothing more manifestly commanded by God in the That temporal good follows in order to spiritual Old and New Testament then obedience to Temporal Princes yet there is nothing more endeavored to the shame of Christians then by pretence of Religion to usher in Rebellion By
this opinion are all Christian Princes made in a worse condition then Infidel or Mahumetan and subject to the Spiritual powers in their Temporal jurisdiction But mutato nomine a new generation of men have sprung up and changed Bonum temporale sequitur in ordine ad bonum spirituale into The wicked have no right to their goods and It is lawful for the children of Israel to rob the Egyptians 11. The King is greater then the Singulars and less then all his Subjects Rex major singulis c. is a seditious opinion is a Fools bolt shot at such random that it is not worth the measuring whether it be near the mark or not For not only all Subjects owe their obedience as much as every one but never was any Prince universally rejected or disobeyed by his Subjects 12. See Sir Ed. Coke 3. par Inst pag. 9. On si homme leva guerre encontre That Subjects may upon any prerence levy war without consent of the Supreme power a seditious opinion See Calv. case 11 12. nostre Seignieur le Roy This was High Treason by the Common Law for no Subject can levy War within the Realm without authority from the King for to him it only belongeth And a little after If any levy War to expulse strangers to deliver men out of prisons to remove Councellors or any other end pretending Reformation of their own heads without warrant this is a levying of War against the King because they take upon them the Royal authority which is against the King 13. Let no Prince ever hope for obedience from his Subjects who Negligence in the worship of God takes no care that God be duly served by them For where the fear of God is not men will not honor their King but are disposed to sedition 14. Honor is nothing else then the estimation of anothers power Contempt of the Regal power disposes men to sedition viz. That a man hath power to protect reward and punish another And prudent Princes ought so to maintain the reputation of this in their Subjects that it may be received and believed of all For besides that ill men will where there is no fear of punishment become more licentious generally all men ambitiously where they are not restrained by fear desire to insult over their Superiors Aesop gives an Item of this last in the Fable of the Logg which Jupiter gave the Frogs for their King when they became fearless of it every one jumped insultingly upon it And examples of the former are clearly seen in men who condemned for offences to death they penitently acknowledge their faults and desire forgiveness of that Power that puts them to death whereas scarce any offender fearless of punishment did ever submit and ask forgiveness for it Princes therefore ought principally to take care how either by their vices remiss Government or otherwise they make their persons or power contemptible for when power is contemptible the exercise of it is never permanent 15. If the Age tends to worse and men of this latter Age have been Concessions of Princes to their Subjects disposes them to sedition worse then in the precedent as men generally hold and if Princes power in Ages when Mankind did not so fast degenerate into all forbidden wickedness were not sufficient at all times to restrain the seditions and disorders of their Subjects then is it a most unreasonable thing in Princes to indulge this ambitious desire of their Subjects by granting them liberties and priviledges which they had not before And if any man can shew that ever any where in the world Princes did make their Subjects better by granting them a more then usual liberty but only made them more arrogant to demand more until their Majesties and Authorities became so contemptible that in stead of governing their Subjects they must be content to have what terms their Subjects please to impose upon them or to reject them which in the end they will assuredly do I will be content to believe Princes do prudently by granting to their Subjects all their real Prerogatives and retaining only or some small matter more then the empty Title 16. It is not only the office of a Prince that good Laws be made but If Laws be not carefully executed that they be carefully put in execution There is no man who does not will and desire to be happy but few men who are daily sollicitous and industrious to attain to happiness It is the part of foolish men only to will and wish but the part of prudent men to do wisely A man shall see it in a family where the Master only commands and never looks to the doing that in a short time though he commands much he will have little performed And where Subjects have gotten a licentious habit of neglecting or transgressing Laws it will prove a hard thing to reclaim them whereas they might have been easily preserved in their obedience by careful execution of the Laws 17. There is nothing more dangerous in Church or State then Innovation Alterations of Laws It is therefore the most secure way of governing when mens manners and vices do not require new Laws by the antient and received Laws of a Nation This will secure the Prince from the imputation of Tyranny he may better hope to preserve a strong house built upon a sure foundation then by destroying it to undertake to build another which he either knows not how to finish or having built it cannot hope it will be better then the other or cannot tell whether it will be of any continuance but falling will overwhelm him in the ruine of it Besides the Subjects from the example of their Prince will become studious of innovation and censure whatsoever Laws he prescribes in lieu of the old ones Those he gives if they please one will displease another it will be the only talk of the City Country and Market If he punish any opposer for it is not possible but disadvantage will be to many and the loser will speak he shall by all his faction be cried up for a Martyr and Patriot of his Country and Laws It will make Subjects diffident of their condition and fearful that having Property by the old Laws they shall lose all by new ones Yet there is nothing in this world can secure men and make their condition permanent For what is usually objected by seditious men against their Prince viz. the invading and not suffering freeborn Subjects to have the benefit of their antient Laws and Customs was imputed a crime to our late King who was persecuted by his own Subjects because he adhered to the known and received Laws of the Land for after the year 1642. there was not any Petition presented to the King by one or both Houses of Parliament but was against the established Laws of this Nation But no question it was not the Kings adherence to the Laws but the iniquity
man can oblige or subject himself to any The Masters power does not arise from the Servants subjecting himself man or creature by any Act of his will for no Act of any mans will can have any power of himself Omnis potentia activa est principium transmutandi aliud every active power is the cause of alteration in another body the Act therefore of a mans will can make no obligation in his body who does will it Besides it is against all rules of relation that to bind and to be bound can be in the same thing therefore it is much more absurd to suppose the whole man should be obliged by a part of himself that is by his will Add hereunto that if a man be obliged to his will then is the most wilful man the most just man and every man is obliged to do any thing because he hath willed it then which there is nothing can be more immoral and destructive to all society with mankind 8. If the Masters power did arise from the Servants subjecting himself to him which is an Act of the Servants will then an Act of the Servants Nor from the Masters accepting his Servants submission Annot. will may have a power and obligation upon his Master which is absurd for this makes the Master to obey his Servant Yet in usual speaking voluntas is confounded with conatus as wee say that God did accept Abrahams will for the deed in that he was willing to have offered up his son Isaac whereas in proper speaking God did will or command Abraham to offer up his son and Abraham did obey that is receive or accept Gods will and did endeavor not will for it had been unnatural and murder in Abraham to have willed without cause the death of Isaac to have done it when God restrained him and so God was pleased to accept of Abrahams endeavor to have pleased him And so when any servant does endeavor to do his Masters will though he be not able to perform it yet ought the Master to accept it because he does what he can not to do any act of his own will but to perform an act of his Masters 9. But suppose the Declaration of the Servants will does evade into The Masters power does not arise from the Servants promise his promise given to his Master yet cannot the Masters power arise from thence because men are obliged to the performance of their promises by the Law of nature only and that Law does oblige only in Conscience but the Masters power obliges to corporal punishment I say therefore that no Masters power arising from any Act of the Servants will or promise nor from the Masters acceptance no Regal power can arise from the Princes acceptance of their Subjects submission for a great family is a kingdom and a little kingdom is a family saies Tho. Hobbes cap. 8. art 1. de Cive 10. If the Masters Power did arise from the Law of Nature then were The Masters power does not arise from the Law of Nature the power of a Master over his servant eternal and incommunicable but the contrary of this is evident in all places of the world for there is no place where the Power of Masters is not only dissolvible by the Laws and consents of the Master and Servant but where it is not slavery there the Masters power is terminated to years moneths weeks daies or houres c. which expiring the relations of Master and Servant are dissolved the Masters power therefore is not from the Law of Nature 11. If the Masters power did arise from Divine positive institution Nor by Divine positive institution then where Gods revelation of himself in the Scriptures is not received and believed have Masters no power over their Servants But this is evidently false for not only before Gods revelation of himself in the Scriptures had Masters every where power or dominion over their Servants but also every where in the world Masters have power over their Servants as well where the Scriptures are not received as where they are The Masters power therefore does not arise from Divine positive institution 12. Nascitur servus says Aristotle most truly There was no man that From whence the Masters power does arise was ever born in the world unless a posthumous King but was born in a threefold subjection first to the Laws of God secondly to the Laws of his Parents and thirdly to the Laws of his Country And the Laws of every Country obliging men to the performance of their pacts and contracts the Law of the place is the efficient cause by the Contract of the Master and Servant being the instrumental causes of the Masters power and not only gives the Master a power over his Servant but also obliges the Master to perform all his promises specified in the Contract to his Servant It is evident therefore that where there is no precedent Humane Law Annot. obliging there cannot be any Family for the Law by the Masters Contract with his Servant gives him the power over his Servant All Grotius his Government then founded upon the Contracts of Men is utterly false and by consequence no one true Proposition can follow from thence Yet truly it is an error pardonable in him who with his first milk sucked in this Popular principle No question but he was a man as eminent in Humane learning as any man of this last Age and I doubt not but of a sincere and peaceable disposition It is the excellency of Truth that it is plain and easie to be perceived whereas Falshood with all art and learning is rendred more obscure by how much more is added to it And it is strange for a stander by to see what monstrous absurdities Grotius runs into to uphold his fabrick For he makes God at the Creation and Flood lib. 2. cap. 2. par 2. to give Mankind a natural right viz. all men alike over all things and this natural right to be immutable by God himself and yet without giving lib. 1. par 10. any reason for it he makes it mutable by the will of man and Dominion which he there says was brought in by the will of man he says is Jus naturale too So Jus naturale does signifie that which God gave to mankind and Jus naturale does signifie that which mans will brought in contrary to what God gave to mankind then which what can be more absurd But Mr. Hobbs cap. 2. art 9. makes a Contract the act of two or more Annot. 2. mutually transferring their rights and a Pact to be when one or both is trusted and he who is trusted does promise that he will perform and supposeth the Civitas institutive to take its first being from the Pacts of men Which will not help him for such Pacts as well as Contracts receive their obligation from precedent humane laws And therefore all his book de Cive which is
have reference to Subjects who are born Diversity in Hereditary Monarchies for in Aristocracies and Democracies there neither is or ever was any original right or power in them but their Conventions do necessarily depend upon an antecedent act of them or the major part of them to meet at a certain time and place Where therefore such Assemblies are dissolved sine die they are totally dissolved however this dissolution happens nor does any man owe them obedience any longer but his or their title who next possesseth is good enough against them and all others who cannot make a superior or more just claim Nor can this have any reference to men born in Elective Monarchies for the Election depending upon the wills of men viz. the Electors who originally had no right of Election any Possession brought in against such Election by the will of man is title equivalent to it nor do Subjects in conscience owe obedience but to him who is possest or can make a superior claim by a true descent from him against whom no just title can be taken 10. Bodin in his Republique makes a Quaere Whether it were better Wherein consists the liberty of the Subject for Subjects ro be governed by few Laws with a reservation in the breast of the Judge or some special Court to redress extraordinary abuses which cannot be comprehended in the Laws or so to multiply Laws that no man should be punished where he could evade the Laws And determines for the former and the reason he gives is That Laws be they never so many are finite but mens actions are infinite and therefore though never so many Laws be made yet may men find evasions out of them to abuse and wrong other men whereby this multiplicity of Laws will rather ensnare other men than avoid the end for which they were intended It is a folly much incident to Englishmen that they place not only Freedom in serving many Masters but Liberty in many Laws Let any man take a survey of the statute-Statute-Laws and Ordinances made since Henry the Eighth his dissolution of Monasteries to this year 1660. and see if they be not four times more than all the Acts made before only to the liberty of the Lawyers Fees for the ensnaring of the Subjects it being no doubt the greatest liberty of the Subject to be governed by few Laws and these the same in all places if it were possible 11. The power of Parents being from the law of nature Childrens Of subjection of children to parents subjection to them is due from the law of nature Solon having written the Athenian laws being asked why he did decree no punishment upon him who should kill his Parent answered There was no man so detestable as to think to do such an act He therefore did wisely not to make any law against that which was never heard of lest by doing so he should not so much forbid as admonish Children to it And what a curse did Canaan contract upon himself for but discovering his Fathers nakedness Gen. 9. 25. And no question Gods blessings and cursings are never more efficaciously pronounced than out of the mouths of Parents And To honor thy father and mother is the first Precept to which there is a promise of reward annexed viz. That thy days may be long in the land c. 12. Although the power of Masters over their Servants be created by Of servants to their masters positive humane laws and therefore subjection of Servants to their Masters is caused by humane laws Yet does not this exclude the obedience and subjection which is due from Servants to their Masters by the law of nature and Divine positive laws but Divine laws do include the subjection due from Servants to their Masters in thesi or general and the laws of every Country ex hypothesi or particular As Thou shalt not steal is from the law of Nature but that the doing of such a thing is Theft depends upon the particular laws or usages of every Nation And no question but Servants generally when the Apostles wrote were no other than Slaves over whom their Masters had not only absolute dominion of whatsoever was theirs but also power of life and death and that by no consent or submission of theirs And if such Servants ought to count their Masters worthy of all honor how 1 Tim. 6. 1. much more ought Servants to thank God and willingly to serve and honor such Masters who not only command over them not against their consents but also command such things as they may easily perform 13. Although this subjection be last in expression yet it is first in Of subjection to Ecclesiastical powers intention For if this subjection or obedience had not been due before any obedience to Temporal commands how could the Primitive Christians have met in dens and caves in daily Prayers and Breaking of bread whenas Temporal powers did not only not permit but forbid it Nor did God ever shew such terrible vengeance upon any disobedience and presumption as he did upon Corah Dathan and Abiram Num. 16. and their Competitors although their pretences were very fair forsooth That all the multitude were holy every one among them and the Lord was among them and Moses and Aaron did lift up themselves against the congregation of the Lord They though none of the tribe of Levi nor separated persons could offer sacrifice and burn incense to the Lord as well as Aaron or any Priest And no doubt but spiritual crimes are in their kind much worse and displeasing to God than carnal whatsoever offenders do pretend And let us see what manner of men these pretended Reformers are which teach otherwise and consent not to the wholsom words even to the words of our Lord Jesus Christ and to the doctrine which is according to godliness They are proud knowing nothing but doting about questions and strife of words 1 Tim. 6. 3 4 5. from whence cometh envy strife railings evil surmisings perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth supposing that gain is godliness from such withdraw thy self O my soul enter not into their secrets 14. In all Humane Society or Society which is created by the law of Diversity Nature viz. of Supreme Powers and Subjects of Husband and Wife of Parents and Children the relations are indissolvible only by God in those individual persons in whom the offices are nor can they be aliened transferred either by any act of themselves or any power else All Society created by Humane laws or Legal Society is alienable not only by the act of God and by the Laws which created it for Unumquodque dissolvi potest eo ligamine quo ligatum est But also by the act of the Master and Servant for Omnis consensus tollit errorem Christian Society does differ from either Humane or Legal for though the cause of Christian power be by Divine positive
and for the reason De terra vero Salica nulla portio haereditalis mulieri veniat sed ad virilem sexum tota terrae haereditas perveniat Bodin de rep p. 745. 13. For the authority of it the learned do not agree by whom it was The authority of it by D'-Avila made nor whether any French King ever made any such or not D'avila in the beginning of the first book of the Civil wars in France recites the most probable conjecture which is That the French when they left their habitation to seek fresh quarters sate down at the river Sala which divides Misnia Westward from Turingia and there forsooth did agree to choose themselves a King and did make Constitutions which should be fundamental and unalterable ever after and those Constitutions being made at the river Sala are called Salique Laws 14. There is no story of Guy of Warwick Amadis de Gaule or the Dun How probable Cows rib but is of as much authority and probability as this For can it be imagined that a company of Rogues and Thieves going to rob and thieve at Gads-hill should agree at Greenwich to make unalterable Laws for their government and succession before they were possessed of any thing and what they make their Laws of is nothing but what they shall rob and cheat other men of 15. But Bodin will not undertake to tell by whom or when it was made Bodin's opinion it is strange you will say that making up his discourse almost of Histories he hath nothing to say for this he only saies it is not new as many men think but engraven in the most ancient tables of the Salians in these words De terra vero salica c. ut supra So Bodin names neither by whom nor when Para. 12. this Salique Law was made Did ever man infer so fondly that because the Salian women did not inherit therefore the French Crown cannot descend to women But mark now if this be a consequence The women of the Land of Salia do not inherit and therefore no female can inherit the French Monarchy then if the men of the Land of Salia will alter this constitution the descent of the French Monarchy is altered by an Act of the men of Salia for Cessante ratione legis cessat lex and sublata causa tollitur effectus In their contest with the Popes the Kings of France say they hold their Crown of God whereas if Bodin says true they hold it by a Law written in the Tables of the Salians I can say no more for the authority of this Law unless I should repeat the same things again out of De Serres and other learned French Historians 16. This Law cannot be altered by the King and Estates general The eternity of it I had thought that only the Laws of Nature had been unalterable It is a rule that Unumquodque dissolvi potest eo ligamine quo ligatum est And if this Salique Law be a constitution of Man by that power which made it a constitution by that power it may be altered 17. De terra vero Salica nulla portio haereditatis mulieri veniat sed ad virilem The reason of it sexum tota terrae hereditas perveniat Now let any man that is in his wits or understands any thing of the nature of a Law judge whether there be any shadow of reason in this For a Law is the rule or direction of him who does govern to be observed by them who are governed How then can the Crown of France descend according to the customs of the Salians if the French Crown be not subject to the men of Salia and they had given the King and his successors this unalterable Law of not descending to the female but where this country Salia should be I could never find so much as the name in any Geographer or Historian ancient or modern Sure the Romans so curious in searching and describing of Countries would not have overseen it especially the Emperor Julian warring so long in those parts of Germany not above sixty years before they suppose Pharameund departs out of Salia for to seek better quarters in Gaule 18. The two main parts of the Salique Law are That the Crown shall The two main parts of the Salique Law descend to the next heire male and if the heire be ana infant that the next Prince of the blood who is a Major shall during his minority be his Guardian and Regent Yet Bodin is fearful that the Salique Law was not bar enough against our Ed. the third being never before heard of saies Hailâ—n he saies pag. 745. Whenas the controversie concerning the Crown of France was between Philip Earl of Valoys and Ed. the third King of England Philip defended the Salique Law by the Voconian which ordained by the consent of the Fathers and Princes that in that controversie no man should use the authority of forrain Lawes but every one should study for his profit the Salique Law But when the question was 1563 whether Charles the ninth were a Major at fourteen years of Age currant or compleat the Parliament of Paris would have taken upon them to decide it when Charles sends them word I do not mean that you should deale in any thing but with the administration of good and speedie justice to my subjects understand hereafter that you are not confirmed in your offices by me to be my Tutors or Protectors of my Realm nor Governors of my City of Paris as hitherto you have perswaded your selves Besides Charles the seventh Anno 1420. was adjudged to banishment and unworthy to succeed in any of the signories of France by all the Courts of the Parliament of Paris And so about 7 years since was the Prince of Condi and so was Henry the forth by all the three Estates at the general assembly at Bloys Anno. 1588. So that is is evident that this immutable Law is not so inviolably kept by the French themselves when it does not serve their turn How should the Voconion Law oblige against Ed. the third and not the Acts of Parliament of Paris and general Assembly at Blois oblige against Charles the seventh and Henry the fourth for ubi eadem est ratio ibi idem est jus 19. There cannot be a more imprudent act then to make any one Ward The imprudence of the Salique Law to him who is his next heire especially to a Crown which frees any one from all attainders what then can be more imprudent then this part of the Salique Law which gives the pupil King into the hands of the next heire who murthering him makes way for himself to the Kingship By our Country Laws no man could be Guardian to the person of a Ward but the next of blood to whom the inheritance could not descend But this part of the eternal Law has not of late been observed by the French Nation whereas the contrary hath been
those that are Deciners elswhere to enquire of the offences personal and of all the circumstances of offences done in those Hundreds of the wrong done by the Kings or Queens ministers and of the wrong done to the King and the Commonalty But this ought not to be done by Bondmen or Women but by the Oath of Twelve Freemen The County-Court which the Sheriffs hold from moneth to moneth County-court sec 9. or from five weeks to five weeks according to the greatness or largeness of the County Of Court-Barons and Hundred Courts Court-Baron c. sec 10. The other mean Courts are the Courts of every Lord of the Fee c. Pipowders sec 11. Courts of Pipowders And that from day to day speedy Justice be done to Strangers in Fairs and Markets as of Pipowders according to the Law of Merchants Court of Admiralty The King hath soveraign jurisdiction upon Admiralty sec 12. the Sea Courts of the Forrest The Kings Ministers of his Forrests have Courts-Forest see 13. power by authority of their office to swear men without the Kings Writ for safeguard of the peace and the Kings right and the common good c. He treats of the Professors of the Law as Counters who are Serjeants and Pleaders Of Attornies Of Ministers of Justice as Viscounts Coroners Escheators Bailiffs of Hundreds c. And also by the antient Kings Coroners were ordained in every County and Sheriffs to keep the Peace when the Earls were absent from their charges and Bailiff in lieu of the Hundredors c. Of the Prerogatives of the King as of Deodands Alienation to Aliens Teeasure found Wreck Waif Estray Chattels of Felons and Fugitives Honors Hundreds Soakes Gaoles Forrests chief Cities chief Ports of the Sea great Manors These held the first Kings as their right and of the residue of the Land did enfeoff the Earls Barons Knights Serjeants and others to hold of the King by Services provided and ordained for defence of the Realm It was ordained that the Knights Fee should come to the eldest by succession of heritage and that Socage Fee should be partable between the Male-children and that the Liege-Lords should have the Marriage He treateth in the first Chapter of Crimes and their divisions of the crime of Majesty of Fausonnery of Treason of Burning of Homicide of Felony of Burglary of Rape c. In the second of Actions of Judges of Actors c. In the third of Exceptions dilatory and peremptory that is Pleas to the Writ and in Bar c. of Trial by Juries and by Battel of Attaints of Challenges of Fines c. In the fourth of Judgments and therein of Jurisdiction of Process in criminal causes and in Actions real personal and mixt So as in this Mirror you may perfectly and truly discern the whole Body of the Common Laws of England Thus far Sir Edward Coke Mr. Lambert in his unfolding the difficult things and words in his translation of the Saxon Laws says King Alured when he had made a League with Guthrun the Dane having followed the most prudent counsel given by Jethro to Moses first divided England in Satrapias Centurias Decurias He called Satrapiam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to divide He called Centuriam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Decuriam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a company of Ten men and by those names they are called to this day And that no man might be ignorant the Decuria did consist of Ten men whereof all of them were pledges that every one should be forth-coming to any Action in Law and if any one did any damage the other were bound to make it good and from hence the other nine were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Free-pledges we in the Pleas of Courts call them Francos plegios The tenth man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called the Decurio or Tithingman by which name he is most known to the Eastern English at this day Others call him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 others call him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the first or chief Surety or Pledge The Kentish men call him Borsholder corruptly for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the first Surety Centuria or a Hundred was made up of ten Decuria's as one Hundred is made up of ten times ten This viz. Hundred the men beyond Trent called by another name not unknown to the common people 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wapentac Alured then further ordained That every man of free condition should be enrolled in some Hundred and be conjoined into some Ten-men company That of lesser businesses the Decurions or Court-Leet might judge and if any weightier matter were it should be deferred to the Hundred or County-Court Lastly that the Alderman and Sheriff I take it he calls them Senator Praepositus should compound the most difficult Suits and of greatest moment in that frequent Convention from all parts of the Shire or County And what the manner of judging was King Etheldred in the fourth Chapter of his Laws which he enacted in a full Senate or Parliament at Vanatnigum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Woodstock expounds almost in these very words In all and every Hundred let there be Assemblies and that Twelve elderly men of free condition together with the Sheriff Praeposito be sworne that they will not condemn the Innocent or absolve the Guilty So that Mr. Lambert seems to be of opinion that the common-Common-Law had its origination from King Alured or Alfred who was King of all England and a most victorious pious prudent and glorious Monarch about the year of our Lord 890. And from a most deplorable condition by reason of the Danish invasion and robbery reduced it to a most quiet calm and laid that foundation upon which the body of the Common-Law is since builded But whosoever was the first Founder and Establisher of them certain it is they were antient and Laws which better suit to the nature and disposition of English-men then any other that are or ever were in the world would do 2. As those general Usages or Customs which are generally observed Particular Usages are called the Common-Law so there are almost infinite particular Usages Prescriptions and Customs in several parts of this Nation which are observed as Laws by the Inhabitants of those places and to all intents and purposes have the effect of Laws 3. Statute-Laws are Acts of Parliament which are neither general Statute-Law nor particular Customs but are Laws made by the Kings of this Land in Parliament upon sundry and diverse occasions according to the then occasions as they represented themselves For although all innovations are dangerous and therefore if it were possible no doubt it were best that humane Laws as the Laws of Nature might be immutable and eternal but as God hath created all things transitory and nothing in this world the same the next
at all So that it may be rather termed a Representative of the Free Corporations then a Representative of the Freeborn people of England The House of Commons therefore cannot be a Representative of the Freeborn people of England But suppose them the Representatives of the Freeborn people of this Nor the Supreme Authority of the Nation Nation yet cannot they be the Supreme Authority of it for no power can act beyond the power of its being I say therefore that no Representative can be supreme or superior to the cause of its being The House of Commons therefore cannot be granting it the Representative of the Freeborn people of this Nation the Supreme Authority of the Nation But if the house of Commons be not sent by the people and their Representatives Who creates them and by what right do they make a house of Commons Before we answer this Quaere wee will see of what sorts of men a house Of what sorts of men the house of Commons is compounded of Commons is compounded A house of Commons is compounded of three sorts of men viz. Knights of Counties Citizens sent by Cities and Burgesses of Corporations Barons of the Cinque Ports are the same thing differently expressed with Burgesses of Corporations Now that all Cities Burroughs Corporations and Cinque Ports are not so jure naturali nor by any inherent birthright but from their Charter which is nothing else but the Kings grant is so manifest that I think no man in his wits will deny But all Cities and Corporations are not alike in priviledges but more or less as they are impowred by their Charter or Grant of the King Some Corporations have Liberties Priviledges and are impowred to send Burgesses others have Liberties and Priviledges but not qualified to send Burgesses nay some Cities have Liberties and Priviledges but not endewed with this right of having Representative in the house of Commons as the Cities of Durham and Ely And as neither Cities nor Burroughs are endewed with these their Liberties What creates the house of Commons and Priviledges by any inherent birthright so neither are the Counties nor Inhabitants endewed with any right of sending Knights of their Counties by any inherent birthright for then had all the Counties a like right one as another and all the Inhabitans a like vote and they mighr create representatives as often as they should see occasion But all these are most evidently false for we have shewed before that not only the division of this Nation into Counties was an act of the Kings but all Counties are not alike endewed with this Priviledge some Counties in Wales sending but one and the County of Durham none at all Nor have all men a like vote in electing and yet as much subject to Laws made in Parliament as other men but men only who have 40 s. yearly freehold rent nor can these 40 s. a year men when they will send their representatives What then does impower these to send representatives Why let Sir Ed. Coke say Inst 4. p. 1. Knights of Shires Citizens of Cities and Burgesses of Burroughs are respectively elected by the Counties Cities and Burroughs by force of the Kings Writ So that the Kings Writ is the first and efficient cause of the pag. 28. house of Commons as well of the Knights as Citizens and Burgesses the Commons cannot begin nor be dissolved without the King in person or representation If then Rebellion be as the sin of Witchcraft as the Holy Ghost saies Annot. and if crimen lesae Majestatis be the highest crime and impiety as all Lawyers hold and if Gratitude be one the chief of all Moral virtues as all men hold for si ingratum dixeris omnia dixeris no man who is an ingrateful man but has rendred himself as if he had committed all manner of wickedness How impious then is it for men only from the Kings grace endewed with this high favor to convert it in opposition and derogation of that power and person from whence they originally received it But they say if the Commons did it then was it done by the people and so just and not to be questioned as if the people were not a thing to be governed and all as much subject to the King and Laws as every one or that a thing just or unjust in it self were more just or unjust because more or fewer did it Will any man say the crucifying of our Saviour was therefore just because many of the Jews did it or that a rout or riot is therefore lawful because done by many men or that it is not paricide or regicide if many Sons and Subjects kill their Parents and King As all the Members of both houses are created by the King so cannot The Parliament cannot begin but by the King these Members be formed into a body but by the King either by his Royal presence or representation By representation two waies either by a Guardian of England by Letters Patents under the great Seal when the King is in remotis out of the Realm or by Commission under the great Seal of Inst 4. p. 6. England to certain Lords of Parliament representing the person of the King he being within the Realm in respect of some infirmity This House is so far from being the Supreme Authority of the Nation The Jurisdiction of the Commons House that they are not a Court of Judicature nor can impose an Oath or take any mans Examination Yet Sir Ed. Coke says Inst 4. 28. that the House of Commons is to many purposes a distinct Court because he says they cannot be prorogued or adjourned but by its self yet gives no more It is true indeed that to many purposes among themselves they do judge their Members and Elections and have a Committee for Religion but these things are more of custom whether good or bad I cannot tell then of any original right that I know or ever heard of And Sir Ed. Coke Inst 4. 11. says They being the general Inquisitors of the Realm have principal care in the beginning of Parliaments to appoint Committees of Grievances both in Church and Commonwealth of Courts of Justice of Priviledges and of Advancement of Trade They have been wont too ever since the Statute de Tallagie non concedendo of course to grant the King Aids in extraordinary cases The House of Peers assisted as aforesaid are the Supreme Court of The Jurisdiction of the House of Lords Judicature in this Nation not only to judge whether matters presented to them by the Commons be fit or requisite for the King to pass into Laws as Monsieur Bodin well observes who disputes this better then any of our English Lawyers that I know of has done but also of Writs of Error and of matters of Fact either not determinable in other Courts or else when though they are determinable in other Courts yet in regard of nicety or
cum populi multitudine copiosa ac omnibus adhuc in eodem Parliamento personalit ' existent ' votis Regiis unanimiter consentientibus praeceptum decret ' fuit quod Monasterium Sancti Edmundi c. sit ab omni jurisdictione episcopor ' com' illius ex tunc imperpet ' funditus liberum exemptum c. Illustris rex Hardicanutus pred' regis Canuti filius haeres success ac sui patris vestigior ' devotus imitator c. cum laude favore Aegelnod ' Dorobornensis nunc Cantuariensis Alfrici Eborac ' episcopor ' aliorumque episcopor ' suffragan ' nec non cunctorum regni mei mandanorum principum descriptum constituit roboravitque praeceptum were Acts of Parliament Ibidem Rex Eldredus convocavit Magnatos Episcopos Proceres Optimates ad tractandum de publicis negotiis regni And this was a Parliament Inst 4. p. 3. But none of these you will say have the obligation of Laws upon us Well let us see those Acts of Parliament which have and what is the difference By the way no Acts of Parliament are now nor these 400 years have had the force of Statute-Laws in England but those made in Henry the Third's time and since And what was the first and great Act of Magna charta but Henry by the grace of God King of England Lord of Magna Charta an Act of Parliament Ireland c. We have granted to God and by this our present Charter have confirmed for us and our heirs for ever That the Church of England shall be free and shall have all her whole rights and liberties inviolable We have granted also and given to all the Freemen of our Realm for us and our heirs for ever those Liberties underwritten to have and to hold to them and their heirs of us and our heirs for ever Note this great Charter which made the Church and Nota bene Kingdom of England the most free in the world was a free and voluntary act of an English Monarch in Parliament And all that violation and destruction of all those happy Grants and Concessions both in Church and State have been made by a cursed conspiracie of a factious and seditious company of men falsly and most injuriously arrogating to themselves the name of Parliament without and against the Kings good mind and pleasure Charta Foresta was Henry by the grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland Duke of Normandy and of Guyen c. We will that all Forests which King Henry our Grandfather afforested shall be viewed by good and lawful men c. Statutum Hiberniae was nothing else but Henry by the grace of God King of England c. To his trusty and welbeloved Gerard son of Maurice Justicer of Ireland greeting Commanding him to cause the Customs recited in the Act and used in England to be proclaimed and streightly kept and observed in Ireland Statutum de Anno Bissextili was The King unto the Justices of the An. 21. H. 3. Bench greeting c. The Statute intituled Assisa panis cervisiae was An. 51. H. 3. The King to all to whom these presents shall come greeting We have seen certain Ordinances c. Stat. de Scaccario The King commandeth that all manner of Bailiffs Sheriffs An. 51. H. 3. and other Officers as well Justices of Chester c. Statutes made in the Parliament at Marleborough wherein the King An. 52. H. 3. made these Acts Ordinances and Statutes underwritten which he willeth to be observed for ever firmly and inviolably of all his Subjects as well high as low Statute of Westminster the first were the Acts of Edward the son of An. 3. Ed. 1. Henry c. by his Council and the assent of Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons and all the Commonalty of the Realm c. the King ordained and established these Acts underwritten which he intendeth to be necessary and profitable unto the whole Realm First the King willeth and commandeth that the peace of Holy Church and of the Land be well kept and maintained in all points and that common right be done to all as well poor as rich without respect of persons c. Statutes made at Gloucester where our Soveraign Lord the King for An. 6. Ed. 1. the amendment of the Land and for the relief of his people c. hath provided and established these Laws underwritten willing and commanding that from henceforth they be firmly observed within the Realm Statute of Rutland hath no other title then The King to his Treasurer An. 10. Ed. 1. and Barons of the Exchequer and to his Chamberlains greeting c. Articuli super Chartas were Grants in Parliament made by the King An. 20. Ed. 1. at the request of the Prelates Earls and Barons assembled in Parliament Note the Commons are not so much as named in these Acts of Parliament The Statute of Quo Warranto made at Gloucester and Statute de Protectionibus An. 30. Ed. 1. An. 33. Ed. 1. made at Westminster the King only speaks Stat. de conjunctim Feoffatis The King unto all to whom these c. An. 34. Ed. 1. greeting And after the recital of the things contained in the Act it is said In witness of which thing we have caused these our Letters Patents I my self being Witness at Westminster Statute of Amortising of Land made by Ed. 1. only the King speaketh Ordinatio pro statu Hiberniae made 17 Ed. 1. the King speaketh by the assent of his Council Statute Ne Rector prosternat arbores in coemiterio only the King speaketh and neither Council nor Parliament mentioned An. 35 Ed. 1. Statute for Knights hath no other title then Our Lord the King hath An. 1. Ed. 2. granted c. And Stat. de frangentibus prisonam 1 Ed. 2. hath nothing to create it a Law but The King willeth and commandeth and neither Parliament nor Council named in either of them Articuli Cleri made at Lincoln the King and his Council are named An. 9. Ed. 2. The Statute of York was made by the King by the assent of the Prelates An. 12. Ed. 2. Earls Barons and Commonalty there assembled So that in these three Kings reign although the King did enact them in Parliament yet the manner was different almost in all In Ed. 3. his time was the form of enacting Laws truly defined and An. 1. Ed. 3. much used by him and the subsequent Kings At the Parliament holden at Westminster King Edward at the request of the Commonalty and by their Petition made before him and his Council in the Parliament and by the assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and other great men assembled at that Parliament hath granted c. In the next Parliament holden at Northampton the Laws are made by An. 2. Ed. 3. him and by the assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and other great
men and all the Commonalty assembled in Parliament Statutes made at Westminster were enacted by the King his Prelates An. 4. Ed. 3. Earls Barons and other of the same Parliament at the request of the Commons Statutes made at Westminster The King by the assent of the Prelates An. 5. Ed. 3. Earls Barons and other great men of the Realm at the request of his people granted and established c. Statutes made at York were enacted by the King in Parliament upon An. 9. Ed. 3. the Petition of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses Statute of Money made at York was enacted by the King with the An. 9. Ed. 3. assent of the Prelates Earls and Barons and the Commons not so much as named Statutes made at Westminster were made and established by the King An. 10. Ed. 3. with the assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and other Nobles of this Realm and at the request of the Knights and Commons Statutes of Purveyors made at Westminster were enacted by the King An. 10. Ed. 3. with the assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and also at the request of the Knights of the Shires and the Commons by their petitions put in the said Parliament Statutes made at Westminster were to the honor of God and of Holy An. 14 Ed. 3. Church by the assent of the Prelates Earls Barons and other assembled at Parliament And see almost all the Acts of Parliament in Ed. 3. his time after in Rich. 2. Hen. 4. Hen. 5. Hen. 6. Ed. 4. Rich. 3. the King always made the Law and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal did assent at the instance request or petition of the Commons or by the King with the assent of the Lords and Commons which was not or but rarely used unless in Rich. 2. his time In Hen. 7. his time the Commons got to have their assent as well as the Lords in passing Laws And this manner of passing Laws continued generally until Edward the Sixth's time where they were sometime made by the King with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament and sometime by the Parliament But the form of enacting Laws by the King and the Lords Spiritual Temporal and Commons assembled in Parliament was seldom or never used before Queen Maries time So that it is as clear as the Sun at noon-day That a King of England Sessions of Parliaments do not derogate from Regal Power by the ancient usages of this Nation is as free and absolute in the Session of Parliament as out And the Act of a King in Parliament is the free and voluntary Act of an absolute Monarch for the Act of the King in Parliament passed by the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and at the Petition of the Commons is not less the act of the King because it is so passed unless a man will deny that my Will being a faculty of my Soul cannot imperate an act if it takes information from my Understanding or Reason Reason and Understanding being in proportion to the Will as Counsel is to a Law King Charles of Sacred memory commends to his Son the then Prince of Wales in his last Letter and Admonition to him though for his own particular he had little Reason God knows so to do the frequent use of Parliaments as the best means by which Laws may be received of the Subjects and diffused to all parts of the Nation and to hold a right understanding between the King and his Subjects But as nullum medicamentum est idem omnibus nay the same Medicine at one time may kill the same person which at another time may cure him And that thing which at one time may be a very probable reason of an action at another time may be none at all or quite contrary to Reason So in Reasons of State that may be a very probable reason at one time which may be none at all or perhaps destructive at another time As Henry the Third had great Reason of State to form a House of Commons and endue it with large priviledges to secure himself against a stubborn and rebellious Nobility But King Charles had not the same Reason of State to indulge the House of Commons contriving the destruction of himself the Church and Nobility Laws and Liberties of this Nation Edward the First had great Reason of State to call a Parliament and to pass the Act De Tallagio non concedendo for otherwise as the state of affairs then stood he could neither get money to assist his Friend and Ally the Earl of Flanders nor relieve his distressed Subjects in Aquitaine oppressed by the French King which Sir Edward Coke in his Comment upon this Statute observes but King Charles had not the same Reason of State to call the Parliament in 1640. who instead of assisting their natural Sovereign against a Rebellious Rabble of Mungrel Hebrides and Lysisks give them Three hundred thousand pounds to be exported out of the Kingdom for their Brotherly assistance Edward the First had great Reason of State to pass the Statute of Mortmaine when as men were so superstitiously given that no man thought he could merit Heaven if he gave nothing to the Church whereby such large Revenues accrued to the Church that the third part of the Revenues of the Nation was in Church-mens hands who pretending exemption from the Temporal Power if some remedy were not taken the King would probably be left destitute of means to protect himself and his Subjects yet is there not now that Reason of State when in a Sacrilegious age all the Patrimony of the Church goes to wrack and ruine and men of Badges of Sacriledge make marks of Saintship It were endless to enumerate how Reasons of State vary with the times It must suffice that there be means always in the Supream Power to remedy and cure the maladies and mischiefs of State as they arise and represent themselves Yet it is a remarkable thing That they who oblige Kings and Supream Powers to their own Laws will never be obliged by either their own or any Laws of God if ever the Supremacy comes to be vested in them and let any man shew me in Five hundred years one time wherein the Kings of England did alter the Laws out of Parliament and I will shew him an hundred times in seven years where men arrogating to themselves the name of Parliament have altered the Laws without the King They who oblige Supream Powers to Humane Laws the Conditions must oblige God too to such things as is contained in those Laws and Conditions or else it is impossible for Powers to protect their Subjects But Corruptio optimi est pessima there were never so vile things done as have been by Parliaments or by men calling themselves so Sir Edward Inst 4. page 37 38. Coke being always mightily in love with Parliaments gives instances but in two viz. Thomas Cromwel Earl of
over their Servants is generally restrained every where as well among Mahumetans as Jews and Christians where men are of the same faith So that Masters cannot put their Servants to death as Masters for any crime If they otherwise punish them unjustly the Servants have their remedies by the Laws of their Country Object 1 But who shall judge whether this be contrary to the Laws of God or his Country the Master or the Servant I say not the Servant Object 2 But if the Servant may not judge yet has he not a Conscience as well as his Master I answer That Ignorance and an ill-set Conscience excuseth no more from doing what he ought and Servants actions in general ought to be done about the Masters persons or affairs in which it is a very hard matter for the Master to command any thing contrary to the Law of God or his Country But if the Master does command his Servant to do any act in prejudice to another if it be not so much as the Master cannot make satisfaction as to kill or maim another the Laws do make a favorable construction of what is done by the Servant as Servant and punish the Master as commanding and not the Servant as doing in order to such commands In a Masters commands to a Servant is usually implied a Warranty which secures the Servant for doing what he commands him 18. It is Injustice in any man to tell another that he gave such a price Injustice in Commutation for such a commodity whenas he gave not so much thereby to deceive another who believes him and gives him thereafter to a greater value then the thing is worth I say this is a sin of injustice in the Seller for in Lying he did falsifie the Law of the God of Truth to the damage of the Buyer 19. In Justice commanded no man ought to do more or less but to the Of permissive Justice in a King utmost of his power ought to do what is commanded him in that formality as it is commanded In Justice permissive it is not always so but the utmost or rigid exacting of what is permitted is highest injury As a King is permitted to execute his Laws but the rigid executing of all Laws against all Offenders at all times without any consideration of inability or other circumstance of person time or place is highest injury to his Subjects For it is impossible though Laws should be general and not respect the persons but the good of the Subjects that all Laws can at all times be alike observed by all Subjects And therefore though it be permitted to a King to execute all his Laws or else he should have none to be executed yet in the execution of them he ought to weigh circumstances of person time and place whether it were the malice or defence of the person offending or whether he were able to fulfill such Law or not c. Or otherwise Summum jus est summa injuria 20. As a King so ought not a Subject rigidly to exact of another In a Subject whatsoever is by Law permitted him at all times As a Tenant by sterility of the year inundation of waters c. is so damnified that he is not able fully to satisfie his Landlord but to his utter ruine I say in such case the Landlord ought to remit of what by rigor of the laws he might justly take Or if in such case the Landlord shall rigidly exact his utmost due to his Tenants ruine when it is not the Tenants fault such exaction such summum jus est summa injuria A man is permitted to sue any man for triflings tres passes of pedibus ambulando c. yet if upon all occasions a man shall sue every man that steps out of the footpath such a man will be counted a wrangling knave and such suing summa injuria Yet is not the Law in fault but the men for if it were not permitted to men to exact their rents and sue for small trespasses then would no Tenant pay rent nor should any man be secure of enjoying what he is possest of 21. It is true that Aristotle says That he is a just man that keeps the laws Who is a just man Eth. lib. 5. cap. 2. 3. and that he is an unjust man who commits contrary to laws and that therefore one Justice contains all other virtues God having made Man as well a sociable as reasonable creature and a free Lord of all his actions whose will may freely imperate his actions not as it is with irrational creatures whose objects determine their actions as he pleaseth neither did ever yet in this world any man do any act virtuous or vitious but it was freely in his own choise whether he had done it or not And by making him sociable made him more excellent then the other creatures of this orb We do not therefore look for Justice in so large a sense as Aristotle here takes where every particular or personal virtue may be taken for Justice 22. We take that virtue to be Justice which conduceth to the preservation The excellency of Justice of Society for other personal virtees as Temperance Chastity Frugality c. although not as virtues yet may they be found in other creatures which is only proper to Man and wherein Man does excell all other creatures And no question but that the meanest Servant uprightly and conscientiously performing the trust and command which his Master commands him is as just and honest a man as the greatest man whatsoever 23. Nor is it less true that Aristotle says That he that commits any Who is an unjust man thing against the Laws is an unjust man and so the commission of any thing against the Laws is a sin of injustice and every sin a sin of injustice But by reason of humane frailty it is very difficult if not impossible for the most just man not to be an unjust man where injustice is taken in such a latitude And in this sense the most just and righteous Subject that ever was stands in need of Gods mercy and the Kings But the injustice we look for we take in a more restrained notion not every unlawful act done upon ignorance or passion c. but where men premeditately and wilfully make the laws of God or man a cloke and pandar to shelter and hide their unjust and illegal actions They that tread under foot all Sacred and Civil sanctions intended for the conservation of peace and society among men to set up themselves above all laws of God or man and to make way for their own lusts in stead of Divine and Humane laws They who the Prophet David says imagine mischief as by a law Such men such actions are Psal 94. 20. most properly unjust men and acts of injustice 24. Injustice differs from Injury only in agencie and patiencie in him How Injustice differs from Injury who does and in
Yet this can be no objection by those men who ascribe all infallibility to the Pope and that all his Acts and Decrees are to be received and obeyed by an implicite faith as Divine oracles Well but suppose these determinations of the Pope were not concerning matters of Faith as no doubt they were not then how comes the Pope because he is infallible in the Faith that he takes upon him to be Judge and Determiner of those things which no ways appertain to it but are as much where Christianity is not planted as where it is Object Yet it will be objected That if the Church be not Judge of what conduceth to the peace and safety of the Kingdom and Church then who shall and so farewell to all Government and peace in Church or State But before I answer this Quaere I would be resolved one Question or two Who shall be Judge whether the Pope or a General Council be superior Who shall judge whether in any Determination of the Popes it be concerning matter of Faith or not or whether it be determined in Gathedra or not In the many Schismes of the Papacy who should judg who was the true Pope or who shall judg whether Alexander the tenth be now the true Pope or who ever gave the Cardinals who were an humane institution many hundred years after our Saviour this power of Election of the Pope that whosoever they should so elect should be universal Bishop and St. Peters successor Although I might justly insist hereupon nor can these things upon these mens principles who maintain the Popes infallibility at least in my understanding be solved and so are they for all their boast of unity among themselves in as much confusion and dissention even in their very principles as other men yet am not I ashamed to give an account of my obedience both to my Church and King Answer I say that God hath made man a sociable intellectual and reasonable creature and endewed him with an immortal soule potentially capable of eternal happiness Nor will God be served by man having so made him only by a base servile feare and without the intellectual and rational faculties of the soule and therefore has engraven by nature in the heart of every man certain rules by which he is to direct his actions which are the first principles and foundations upon which I honor my Parents King and them who are set over me for my direction in order to my eternal good And although that out of the Church and not being preserved by humane Laws I can neither hope for safety in this world nor salvation in the world to come yet who he is from whom all humane Laws are derived or what is the Church in which I must hope for salvation there is no visible Judge under Heaven but only mens consciences to direct them viz. those directions which God either by nature has given to men or revealed supernaturally in the Scriptures Nor does a mans conscience thus informed leave him after it be informed who it is from whom he ought to expect protection and to whom he owes his obedience as well spirituall as temporal for though there be no visible means for men to hope for peace in Church or State yet does it not follow that by all men all things which may be commanded for the Laws of the Church and State are to be observed as the Laws of Church and State as if the Church command men to worship Images or any creature for the Creator which under the old Law it many times did nor do I understand how it can be excused in the Church of Rome or if men be commanded by higher powers immoral things as to dishonor them or their Parents or whenas temporal powers command things plainly derogatory to the ghostly power of the Church or the Church commands things contrary to the duty men owe to their King and Country which we daily see both the one and the other do which makes some men in their passion ultimately resolve their Temporal and Ecclesiastical obedience into the Church others into the secular power and many deny all obedience to either and set up themselves or something else in stead of either But though mens affections carrie them several waies yet ought not all reason therefore and conscience to forsake all men for although I ought not to judge either King or Church if they command any thing they ought not yet have I and every man else a conscience to direct them whether I ought to do all things whatsoever commanded by King or Church Nor ought men to be frighted out of their consciences viz. the Law of God by nature informing them or his Law supernaturally revealed by his grace directing them because a perverse company of Schismatical and seditious men have abused all Temporal and Ecclesiastical Laws and Powers by pretending conscience Nor will a blind obedience in all things to the Church of Rome cause unity and peace among Christians although it be so much magnified by them for let any man read the lives of H. 4. 5. 6. and 7. and Frederick 1. and 2. Emperors whenas the whole Empire was of the Roman Catholick Religion and see if ever greater broyles were in the Christian World and let them judge whether Obedience to the Popes by so great a part of the Empire were not the cause of them or whether all the Wars in Christendom caused by Boniface the eight and Julius the second were not against Christians in the communion and form of the Church of Rome But where secular or ecclesiastical Laws do plainly command things not plainly derogatory to Gods Law for where they do God is in all things to be obeyed before man so as it is doubtful whether they do repugne Gods Law or not then certainly the best way is to submit to them for a mans conscience wrong informed does not excuse him from any Article of his duty and if it may be the Laws do repugne Gods Law it may be they do not and in controverted and doubtful cases the Law is alwaies presumed to be on the Governors part Nor shall any mans conscience ever excuse him if the Laws either of Church or Country do command things repugnant to Gods word from the duty and obedience he owes to them in all things where they do not repugne it Nor does it free any man from his subjection to higher power but where he cannot submit he ought to suffer And no question that where two evils unavoidable happen the least is to be taken as if a man in the communion of the Church of Rome be reduced to that necessity of simply conforming himself to all things used in the Church of Rome although his conscience cannot digest many things or be excluded out of the visible Church of Christ he had better be of such a Church then of none at all Sure God never affixt such infallibility to men how great or good soever
their submission to the Church of Rome But on the contrary when Austin first arrived in England he stayed in the Island of Thanet until he knew the Kings pleasure and offered not to preach in Kent until he had the Kings licence to preach throughout his Dominions c. Neither was there any Appellant from the Conversion of the English he says to Rome until Wilfrid Archbishop of York who notwithstanding pag. 60. that he gained Sentence upon Sentence at Rome in his favor and notwithstanding that the Pope did send express Nuntio's into England on purpose to see the Sentence executed yet could he not obtain his restitution or benefit of his Sentence for six years during the reigns of Egbert and Alfred his son yea Alfred told the Popes Nuntio's expresly That he honored Spelm. concil an 705. them as his Parents for their grave lives and honorable aspects but he could not give any assent to their Legation because it was against reason that a person twice condemned by the whole Council of the English should be restored upon the Popes Letter And after he says That after Alfred and pag. 62. Theodore were both dead Theodore was the Archbishop of York that opposed Wilfrids Donation from the Pope and continued it so long as he lived we find the Sentence of the Pope and Wilfrids Restitution still opposed by the surviving Bishops in Alfreds Sons reign c. Neither were there any Appeals to Rome from that time until after the Conquest in the reign of Henry the First by Anselm Archbishop of Canterbury 8. See Comment Lit. sect 648. pag. 344. where it appears by our All Bishopricks were of the Kings foundation originally and donative books and divers Acts of Parliament that at first all the Bishopricks in England were of the Kings foundation and Donative per traditionem baculi id est the Crosier which was the Pastoral staff annuli the ring whereby he was married to the Church King Henry the First being requested by the Bishop of Rome to make them elective refused it But King John by his Charter bearing date quinto Junii anno decimo septimo When they became eligible and by what power granted that the Bishopricks should be eligible So that all Bishopricks were not only at first of the Kings foundation and Donative but afterwards became eligible from no other cause but the Kings Charter 9. That the sacred character of Priesthood does not free men from The Kings of England before the Couquest did exercise their Regal power over all persons in all cases the subjection due to the Laws of their Prince and Country is not only evident by many examples in Sacred Writ and by almost infinite precepts and examples of Gospel and holy Martyrs in primitive times but also by a concurrent consent of all Histories where Christianity hath been planted And that these powers have been justly exercised by the Kings of England before the Conquest among the many Laws of Ina Withred Alfred Edward Athelstan Edmund Edgar Athelred Canutus and Edward take these of Canutus Si quis sacra tenens pejerasse convictus fuerit ei manus praeciditor ni dimidiatam Lambert Saxon laws lex 33. f. 113. sui capitis astimationem domino atque episcopo dependerit neque vero deinceps qui juret dignus putandus est nisi quidem Deo cumulatè satisfecerit atque ab ejusmodi in posterum nefario scelere abstinendi fidejussores admoverit If any in Holy orders be convict of Perjury let him be branded on the hand unless he shall pay to the King and Bishop half the price of his head Neither shall he afterward be esteemed worthy to take an Oath unless he shall have abundantly satisfied God and shall have given Sureties that afterward he shall abstain from such wickedness Si quis eorum qui arae deservierint alicui mortem obtulerit omni cum divini lex 36. 114. tum humani juris patrocinio excludatur nisi quidem cum exilio cumulatè id sceleris compensarit atque caesi etiam cognatis satisfecerit aut saltem una cum hominibus qui jurent idoneis omnem criminis suspicionem diluerit Hanc vero quae Deo hominibus debetur compensationem intra ter denos idque cum fortunarum suarum omnium discrimine dies aggreditor If any one who serves at the Altar shall kill any man let him be excluded from the protection of Divine and Humane laws unless with his banishment he may abundantly satisfie that wickedness and shall also give satisfaction to the kindred of him who is killed or at least together with sufficient men who shall give Law-gager their oaths shall wash away all suspition of the crime And let him go in hand to make this compensation which is due to God and men within thirty days and that upon the forfeiture of all his fortunes Si eorum qui arae deservierint aliquis hominem occiderit aut insigne aliquod lex 38. ibid. perpetrarit flagitium gradu honore dispoliatus proinde atque ei Papa circumscripserit habitandi locum exulato ac cumulatè compensato Sin is crimen fuerit inficiatus excusatio tripla esto Atque in hanc quae Deo hominibus debetur compensationem intra ter denos aggrediatur dies ab omni legis commoditate destitutus habetor If any one who serves at the Altar shall kill a man or commit any foul offence despoiled of his honor let him be banished the place of his habitation and make abundant satisfaction yea though the Pope make it void But if he deny the crime let his excuse be threefold and if within thirty days he does not endeavor to give this satisfaction which is due to God and man let him be outlawed Si quis sacris inauguratus rei capitalis obnoxius extiterit comprehenditor lex 40. 115. atque ut tandem episcopo criminis admissi poenas dependat asservator If any one in Holy orders be guilty of any capital crime let him be apprehended and fafely kept until he be punished by the Bishop for the crime committed Si quis sacrum ordinem atque vivendi formulam commutarit pro ipsa lex 46. 116. ordinis dignitate sive capitis aestimatione mulcta legis violatae poena sive rebus suis omnibus compensato If any one shall change his holy order and form of living for the dignity of the order or price of the head let him be fined for punishment of the violation of the Law or forfeit all he hath But how far this good Prince was from having any spight to Holy Orders or men separated to the Worship of God and Service at the Holy Altar he does enact Siquis sacris initiatus incoláve in iis quae ad fortunas Law 37. fol. 114. vitamve ejus spectarint decipiatur tum ei rex ni is aliunde habuerit loco Patroni cognatorum esto Fraudator
Plate Jewels and Treasure of the Churches and Religious Houses within the Realm and compelled the Clergy to give him the one half of one years value of all their Ecclesiastical promotions and dignities But such was the felicity of this Prince that neither Pope nor Clergy durst openly oppugne him but in the 27. year of his Reign at the request of Boniface 8. says Martin he set John Baliol adjudged by Edward before King of Scotland at liberty And having conquered Scotland in the 33. year of his Reign Robert Bruce procured an Instrument from the Pope that the Kingdom of Scotland was holden of the Church of Rome and therefore required the King to desist from the prosecution of his Wars there But how little King Edward regarded this Instrument and what answer he returned to the Pope you may read in our English Chronicles nor do I finde that ever more prosecution was made by the Pope in this Kings life-time 20. From this time until Henry the Eighth the Kings of England and In the reign of Hen. 4. the Popes kept so good correspondence that they never went so far as Excommunication or Interdiction on the Popes part and how far the Kings did restrain the Popes jurisdiction in their several reigns after the Conquest shall be shewed in Chap. 3. Yet I cannot pass over one thing of the whole Hierarchy of the Church of England except only the Bishop of Carlisle who all factiously and traiterously conspired or adhered to Henry the Fourth his unjust Usurpation and Deposition of their Soveraign Richard the Second CHAP. II. Of Ecclesiastical Laws made by the Saxon and Danish Kings before the Conquest I Inas by Gods gift King of the West-Saxons by the advice and instruction Inas began to reign in the year of Christ 712 died 727. of Cenredes my Father and Heddes my Bishop and Eorkenwoldes my Bishop and with all my * Counsellors Earls Ealdermen and them of best birth of the Wisest of my people and eke in a great Assembly of Gods Servants did religiously study as well for the health of my soul as for the common profit of our Kingdom that right Laws of Marriage and just Judgment be firmly established through every folk and that hereafter it shall not be lawful for any Ealderman or any under our rule to make void these our Dooms or Judgments Cap. 1. Of the Rule of Gods Servants First we command that Gods Servants have a right rule of living After that we command all folk to observe these Laws and Dooms or Judgments Cap. 2. Of Children A Child shall be baptized within thirty days after it be born if that be not done let thirty shillings be forfeited If that it die before it be baptized he shall forfeit all he hath Cap. 3. Of working upon Sunday If a Slave work on Sunday by his Masters command let him be free and the Master shall pay thirty shillings But if the Servant did his work without command of his Master beat his hide or make him to fear a hide-beating If a Free servant do any work without his Masters bidding let him forfeit his freedom or sixty shillings and a Priest double so much Cap. 4. Of First-fruits First-fruits shall be paid upon the Mass of S. Martin he who shall not then pay them shall forfeit forty shillings and pay twelvefold the value of the fruits Cap. 5. Of Church-Priviledge or Sanctuary If any man guilty of death flee to the Church let his life be spared and let right be done to him And if any man deserving stripes implores help of the Church let him be remitted his stripes Cap. 6. Of Fighting If a man strike in the Kings house he shall forfeit all he hath and let it depend upon the Kings judgment whether he shall lose his life If one strike in a * Cathedral Church Minster he shall pay one hundred and twenty shillings c. Cap. 62. Of First fruits Every man shall pay First-fruits for the Roof and Hearth where he shall be upon the day of the birth of our Saviour Cap. 75. Of the killing of Godfather or Godson If any one shall slay his Godson or his Godfather he shall compensate so much to his next of kin as the compensation due to his Lord had been And this payment to the value of him which is killed shall be increased or lessened accordingly as the payment to the Lord for the Servant killed should have been performed If it be the Kings Godson which is killed he shall satisfie the King and his kindred but if the next of kin kills him he shall pay to the Godfather so much as should have been paid to the Lord for the slaughter of his Servant If he be a Bishops son he shall pay half so much Ecclesiastical Laws made by King Alfred or Alured who began to reign in the Year 871. The Preface GOD did speak these words to Moses and thus said I am the Lord thy God I led thee out of Egypt land and of the house of bondage Thou shalt not choose other Gods before me Do not take my Name in idleness for I will not hold him innocent who on idleness taketh my Name Remember thou keep holy the Seventh day Do thy work on six days and on the Seventh rest thou and thy son and thy daughter thy servant and handmaid and thy work-cattel and the stranger that is within thy door For on six days Christ made heaven and earth sea and all things thereon were created by him and rested on the Seventh day and therefore the Lord hallowed it Honor thy Father and thy Mother whom the Lord gave thee that thou maist live long on earth Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not steal Thou shalt not commit adultery Nor report false witness of thy neighbor nor covet thou thy neighbors inheritance without right Nor work golden gods or silver Thou shalt constitute these Judgments If a man buy a Christian man he shall serve six years the seventh let him be free without cost With the same vestment he came in with the same let him go out if he have a wife let her go out with him if his Lord gave him his wife she and her * * Children bearns are the Lords But if the servant shall say I will not part from my Lord nor from my wife nor from my children nor from my work then let his Lord bring him to the door of the Temple and there let him bore his ear with an eal for a sign that ever after he is his servant If any man sell his daughter for an handmaid he shall not use her as an handmaid he shall use her courteously neither shall he sell her to other folk and if she be negligent let him be pacified let him set her free to stranger folk if he ally her to his son in marriage let him give a garment the reward of her modesty and endow
sing the 50. Psalm for the King and for all that will as he willeth and for all other who deserve well of him If a man accuse another of any crime let him make him recompence unless he did it upon * * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Procession-days and if he do so afterward let it be as before it was Ecclesiastical Laws made by King Edmund Who began to reign in the Year 940. EDmund the King in the Solemn Feast of Easter gathered to London a great company as well of Ecclesiasticks as of the People There was Oda and Wulstan Archbishops and many other Bishops that they might as well take care for the health of their own souls as for the souls of them committed to their charge Of the Man who hath vowed Chastity Cap. 1 First they who are entred into Religion and who should give Gods people an example of virtue to imitate according to their Order be they Men or Women let them live chaste But if they shall not do it then let the Canon punish them that is let them forfeit all they have in the world and if they mend not their manners not be buried in the Sanctuary Of Tythes and Church-scot Every Christian which shall not pay his Tythes his First-fruits and his Alms let him be accursed Of him who shall defloure a Nun or commit Adultery If a man shall carnally know a Nun let him be as if he had killed a man or be denied Burial in the Sanctuary and let the same Law be to him who commits Adultery Of Re-edifying the Church We will that every Bishop at his own costs shall repair the House of God and also minde the King that all Gods Houses be well adorned which thing is very behooful Of men Perjured and worshiping Heathen Gods They who are Perjured and offer Heathenish sacrifice shall be for ever shut out from things pertaining to God unless they soon repent and mend their manners Ecclesiastical Laws made by King Eadgar Who began to reign in the year of our Lord 959. THe Laws which Eadgar the King in a great Assembly ordained to the glory of God the ornament of himself and the profit of all his Nation First let the Church of God enjoy all its rights and immunities and let every man pay his Tythes to each Church to which he is subject whether it be of Plow-land or Inland of men of free condition or lands of Villains Of Church-tribute If a man of free condition hath a Church upon his freehold which hath a place of Burial belonging to it let him bestow one third part of his Tithes upon the Church but if there be no place of Burial about the Church let the Lord of the ground give to the Priest of the nine parts what he will And let the Church-tribute of every Church be paid out of the lands of all Freemen Of Tithes And let every one pay tithes of young living creatures before Pentecost and the tithes of the fruits of the earth before the * * Sure it is meant the Autumnal Equinox for no tithes can be renewed before the Vernal Equinox and Church-tribute at the feast of S. Martin If any one shall not pay let him incur the punishment expressed in the Doom-book And if any one shall not pay his tithes as we have set down then may the Kings Sheriff and the Bishop and the Mass-priest of the Church meet and take the tenth part due to the Church and return the ninth part back again to him without thanks as to the other eight parts let the Lord have one half the Bishop the other Let this be though he be the Kings man or of free condition Of the Hearth-penny And let the Hearth-penny be paid before the Feast of S. Peter and if it then be not paid let him carry that penny and thirty pence more to Rome and confirm by a certain Certificate in writing that he did detain it and let him pay over and above one hundred and twenty shillings to the King If afterward a man shall not pay it and carry the penny and thirty pence to Rome he shall pay two hundred shillings to the King but if he shall make default the third time he shall forfeit all he hath Of Festival and Fasting-days Let every Sunday be held a Feasting-day from noontide of Saturday until the twilight of Munday he which will not celebrate it let him undergo the penalty in the Judgment-book and other Feast-days shall be bidden and let all Fasting-days be held with all godliness Canons set forth under King Edgar THese things which follow belong to the Constitutions of King Edgar concerning the Manner of Life of Men ordained to Gods service 1. We teach that the Minister of God do zealously serve and minister to God and intercede to God for all Christian people and that every one of them be faithful and obedient to their Superiors and unanimous in common necessity affording help to one another before God and men and that they be firm and faithful to their Secular Lords 2. And we teach that every one give another honor and that the younger do religiously pay love and obedience to the elder and that the elder do diligently instruct the younger 3. And we teach that at every Synod every year be had Books and Vestiments agreeable to the service of God and Ink and Parchment to write their Constitutions and moreover a Three-days assembly 4. And we teach that every Priest coming to the Synod have his Clerk and man fed at his hand or faithful in service and none unknown or given to folly and let them all come together in the faith and love of God almighty 5. We also teach that if any ill happen to a Priest or any one do him wrong it be referred to the Synod and let all take it as offered to them all and bring help that reparation may be made according to the will of the Bishop 6. And we teach that the Priest make known to the Synod if any in his Parish be found contumacious against God or who does nourish any grievous sin and that he is not able or dares not produce him to amendment for fear of the world 7. And we teach that among Priests there be no strifes and wrangling nor let them be deferred to the Secular power but let them be composed among themselves or if need be put off to the Bishop 8. And we teach no Priest whether consecrate at Benedict shall forsake his Church at his own will but have it for his rightful wife 9. We also teach that no Priest meddle with those things which belong to another Priest whether in his Church or Parish or acquaintance or fraternity nor in any other thing belonging to him 10. And we teach that no Priest take away the Scholar of another not having first asked leave of him to whom he belonged 11. And we teach that every Priest diligently learn to increase the learning
to amendment The same Law shall be to a woman whether she were Wife or Concubine 20. If any one married commit adultery with the lawful wife of another or any wife with the lawful husband of another let either of them fast seven years viz. three in bread and water and four as the Confessor shall teach and lament their transgressions as long as they live 21. If any woman shall take to her two brethren in marriage one after another they deserve judgment and to be put to most strict penance as long as they live as their Confessor shall instruct them and dying the Priest confer upon them the due obsequies of Christians if they shall have promised this that they would have longer done their penance if they should longer have lived 22. If any one shall have continued in the exercise of any sin all his life-long without any repentance we know not what counsel we can imagine for this man unless to leave him to Gods judgment nor can he be absolved 23. If a woman be betrothed to a man it is not lawful for another to marry her if any man does let him be excommunicated 24. If any man takes away by deceit a Wife or Virgin for his Concubine against her will let him be excommunicated 25. If any one shall entice away the Waiting-woman of another to lie with her and shall lie with her against her will if he be in Orders he shall lose the dignity of his Order but if he be a Laick he shall be excommunicated from every Christian thing 26. If a Virgin be betrothed and before marriage be made a Captive or by any other accident be carried away from him to whom she is betrothed and it happen that afterward she come into the sight of her Spouse leave being first asked they may cohabit carnaliter because she was taken from him against her will 27. If a woman shall enter into Religion and afterwards returning to worldly vanities shall take the administration of a family thinking with herself that she may satisfie God from whom she hath turned aside out of her goods this can in no wise be unless she turn away from the custom of her sin and return to Christ that she may lead her life as her Confessor shall instruct her and always carefully amend her trangression 28. If a Mass-priest or Monk kill a man let him lose the dignity of his Order and fast ten years viz. five with bread and water and all the other five three days in every week in the rest let him enjoy meat and while he lives diligently lament his crime A Deacon eight years with bread and water and the other as abovesaid A Clerk six years whereof four with bread and water A Laick five years three with bread and water ut supra 29. If any man kill a man in Orders or his next Cousin he shall forfeit his land and goods and shall be done to as the Pope shall appoint and moreover shall always lament 30. If a Mass-priest or Monk be wantonly lustful or violate matrimony let him fast ten years and always lament a Deacon seven a Clerk six a Laick five So be it 31. If a Mass-priest or Monk or Deacon hath a lawful wife before he took Orders and having left her entred into Religion yet afterwards raging in lust shall privily take her let every one of them fast as for man-slaughter and moreover vehemently lament 32. If a Mass-priest or Monk or Deacon or Laick or Clerk shall commit fornication with a Nun let every one fast as is meet for his Order as for homicide and as long as he lives abstain from flesh and a Nun ten years as also a Mass-priest and always lament the fact 33. If any one would have any carnal knowledge of a Nun and she would not let him fast one year with bread and water for his wicked thought If a man would know carnally the lawful wife of another and she would not let him fast one year for his impious thought with bread and water 34. If any man would know the lawful wife of another and she would not let him fast three Lents with bread and water viz. the first in Summer another in Autumn and a third in Winter 35. If any one would have to do any unlawful thing with a woman let him fast forty days in bread and water 36. If a man shall have taken another with his daughter let him compound with the harlot and either of them fast a year upon Wednesdays and Fridays on other days they may eat any meat but flesh and imbrace their own wedlock 37. If a man know carnally a beast let him fast fifteen years viz. eight in bread and water in the other seven three Lents in every year and upon Wednesdays and Fridays as long as he lives and always lament his sin 38. If a man defile himself voluntarily let him fast three years and in every one of them forty days in bread and water and abstain from flesh upon every one except Sunday 39. If any one kill another with witchcraft let him fast seven years viz. three years in bread and water and on the four other three days in every week in bread and water and alwaies lament 40. If any man shall have given a disease to another let him fast three years viz. one in bread and water But if he chance to die thereof then let him fast seven years as is here ascribed and alwaies lament his misdeeds 41. If any one uses witchcraft to procure love and therefore compound any drugs or amorous potion to eat or drink or use Negromancie if he be a Laick let him fast upon Wednesdaies and Fridaies half a year in bread and water but upon other daies let him enjoy meat that is not flesh A Clerk one year ut supra three days in every week in bread and water A Deacon three years ut supra A Mass priest five years whereof one in bread and water and on every Friday of the other in bread and water and on the other days let him abstain from flesh 42. If any man against nature and against the good creature of God any waies defiles himself let him lament whilst he lives what he hath perpetrated 43. If any one overlaies an infant in sleep whereof it dies let him fast three years one of them in bread and water and in the other two three daies in every week But if it shall happen from drunkenness he shall be more grievously punished as his Confessor shall teach and the delinquent alwaies lament 44. If an infirm infant dies a Heathen and this came to pass by fault of the Priest let him lose the degree of his Ordination and diligently make compensation And if it hapned through the negligence of his friends let them fast three years viz. one in bread and water and the other two three daies in a week and alwaies bewail it 45. If any shall sell any Christian to
in himself from the seed of the Devil And if he hath misled any one out of the way that he might make any gain thereof let him carefully reduce him to the right way This is that which I will If he shall have provoked any one to sin let him do to him what is necessary viz. Let him reclaim him from his sins and again lead him in the right way He who diligently dehorts another from his sins renders his own the lighter 17. This judgment every one by the councel of his Confessor may give himself who with a constant mind will break off his sins and correct them viz. Let him distribute for Gods love all he hath let him leave with them lands country and all the desirable things of this world and serve the Lord day and night and endeavor by all the power he can against his worldly desires all the daies of his life What then is left that by exhorting others he gathers to him for the study of godliness by all possible means he can Here in these following shall be said how any Sick man may redeem his declared Fast 18. Every man may redeem the fast of one day with one penny and any one may redeem the fast of one day with two hundred and twenty Psalms and any one may redeem the fast of twelve moneths with 30s. or by setting free any one of that price And for one daies fast let him sing six times Beati and also six times Pater noster and for the fast of one day let that man bend his knee and bow himself to the ground sixty times saying Pater noster And also a man may absolve the fast of one day if in his prayers to God he through all his members lift up himself to God by true confession and right faith and fifteen times sing Miserere mei Deus and also Pater noster fifteen times Then is a lightening of the sins of the whole day granted to him 19. Any man may absolve a seven Winters fast in one year if he daily shall sing the Psalms of the Psalter and do the same at night and fifty on the evening one Mass may absolve the fast of twelve daies and with ten Masses the fast of four moneths may be bought off and with thirty Masses the fast of a whole year may be bought off if any man will out of true love to God intercede for himself and confess his sins to his Confessor and amend those things as he is bidden and alwaies afterward avoid them Of the Penance of Mighty men 1. Thus a mighty man and having many friends may by the help of his friends mitigate his penance First in the name of God and by the testimony of his Confessor let him manifest a right faith and forgive all who may have sinned against him and make his confession without any omission of his sins and endeavour to repent and take his penance with much grief 2. Then let him lay down his Arms and unprofitable things and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and taking his staff in his hand let him go diligently barefoot and let him use hair-shirts nor come on a bed but lie in a cottage and do this the number of seven years and prepare himself three years on this manner and take to his aid twelve of his companions let them fast three daies with bread crude pottage and water and let him get as well as he can to finish the work seven times an hundred and twenty men who may every one of them fast for his sake three daies so the number of these Fasts will amount to so many Fasts as there are daies in the seven years 3. When any one fasts let him distribute the dishes wherein his meat was to all the poor men of God and in the three daies of his Fast let him lay aside all worldly business and day and night as often as he can go to Church and diligently watch there in Alms light and cry to God and beg remission of sins with a sorrowful spirit and bended knees Also let him often stretch himself upon the sign of the Cross now standing upright now prostrate upon the ground and let every mighty man learn sincerely to weep and deplore his sins and also on those three daies feed as many poor men as he can upon the fourth let him stoop down to wash their feet and let there upon the same day be celebrated for the Penitent so many Masses as any one can by any means perform and on the time of the Masses let him be absolved and then let him take the Eucharist unless that through too much guilt he be so hindred that he dares not take it Yet let him promise for the future as much as in him lies alwaies to do well and whilst he lives by Gods help to avoid injustice so as he may alwaies and rightly hold his Christendom and renounce Heathenism Minde O ye Ministers of God his words and diligently correct his works that so he may set up all Justice and by the help of God as much as in him lies destroy Injustice It is very necessary he should perform that to God even in the least thing which he hath promised 4. This is the lightening of the penance of Great men who abound in many friends But it is not granted to an Indigent man to proceed so It is therefore expedient more strongly to exact this of him and that as is meet that every one should wash away his sins and undergo himself his correction Scriptum est enim Quia unusquisque onus suum portabit These Canons are set out in the Original by Abraham VVheelock and by him translated into Latine in his Addition to the History of Bede between the Laws of King Edgar and Ethelred pag. 65. until 88. Ecclesiastical Laws made by Canutus who began to reign in the year of our Lord 1016. THis is the Decree which Canutus King of England of Denmark and Norway by the counsel of the wise men to the glory of the Immortal God the ornament of the Royal Majesty and the utility of the people hath ordained at Winchester upon * * Christmas day Midwintertide 1. First of all let all men devoutly and holily worship only one God and strictly hold themselves to one rule of Christian religion and obey with all faith and observance King Canutus 2. And protect Gods Church and defend it and frequent it as well for the health of our soul as the commodity of others It is meet that one peace be comprehended in all Christian Churches and also that all Christian men have it in great veneration For Gods peace is to be wished for before other things next after that the Kings peace is to be kept It is therefore very meet that the peace of the Church of God and the tranquillity delivered into the Kings hand be alwaies kept inviolable If any man shall violate either let him be fined and suffer death
unless the King shall forgive it But if any one shall ever hereafter break the peace of the Church of God so as he kill a man within the walls of a Church let it be inexpiable and all men for the love of God persecute him as an enemy unless he flee from thence to some Asylum that the King may suffer him to enjoy his life after he had abundantly given recompence to God and man Which if he shall do and pay to Christ and the King the price of his head then let him be inlawed And then if he go about to make compensation and the King suffer it let him pay the whole mulct of the Church which is in the name of the breach of the Kings peace and purge the Church and be ready to perform what is meet to the Kindred and Lord of him who is killed and be very diligent to return into Gods favor 3. And if any man break the peace of the Church and do not kill any man let him make compensation according to the nature of the crime whether he did strike or stole or committed any other wickedness First then let the mulct be paid according to the nature of the crime and the excellency of the Church For there is not one and the same terrene dignity of all Churches although all are of the same Divine consecration Those crimes which may be expiated if done in a Mother-church let them pacifie the King that is with five pounds in English money and a Middle-church with an hundred and twenty shillings and that is the Kings fine and if it be a lesser where there is little Service and hath a church-yard with sixty shillings and if a Field-church without a church-yard with thirty shillings 4. All Christian men ought principally to be very careful that Gods Holiness and Orders and Places consecrated to him be religiously observed and to give a due respect to every degree For let them understand that will or can much and more is it that the Priest hath to do for the benefit of the people if he rightly consider it much is the Supplications and more is the Consecrations by which in consecrating Baptism and the Eucharist the Devil is beaten and driven back and Angels do incompass holy things and defend their deeds and through Gods power the Priest does sustain them as often as he does truly serve Christ That is it they do all the while the Priest doth from his soul beg of Christ and earnestly request of him those things which are necessary for the life of the people They therefore for the fear of God ought to be preferred in dignity before other men 5. And if any man accuse a Priest Regular and he is conscious of no such crime let him celebrate the Mass and take the Eucharist thereon if he fear not to do it and it shall free him from the calumny of one man But if there be a threefold accusation having taken the Eucharist if he presume to do it and having joined himself to two of his Order let him blot out all suspition of the supposed crime If any one shall accuse a Deacon being a Regular of a crime by a single testimony the Deacon conjoining himself with two of his Order may free himself from the crime But if there be a threefold accusation against him the Elders of that Order being assembled let him free himself of the crime If any accuse a Country-Priest who hath bound himself in no Order of Religion let him purge himself as a Deacon living by rule If any man who serves at the Altar be accused of a crime and is so friendless that he cannot get one who will swear with him let him eat the execrated bread and let God judge of the thing unless it be lawful by taking the Eucharist to free himself from the crime If any man in holy orders be accused of capital Broils so as that he were the author or counsellor of the death of another let him be acquitted by offering himself to the kindred of them who were so beguiled or slain and if he hath no kindred let him betake himself to his companion or fast until he be lean and eat the execrated * * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bread and let God give judgment thereupon But let not a Monk anywhere with right accuse another of breach of friendship or pay any thing for feuds for he hath rejected whatsoever he might acquire by the right of kindred when he first bound himself to the rule he professes If a Mass-priest be not very upright in taking of witness or be forsworne or be the author or counsellor of any theft let him be dispoiled of the dignity of his function and be deprived as well of all society and friendship as honor unless he shall give abundant satisfaction to God and man as he shall be commanded by the Bishop yet let him give security that afterward he shall not commit such things But if he will purge himself let him do it by the triple purgation or according to the nature of the crime An exhortation to Churchmen to live well 6. And we command that every one of all Orders do diligently and holily keep the Religion of his Office especially the Servants of God Bishops and Abbots and Monks and Nuns and Canons do bend their minds to their duty and live according to their Rule That they often call upon Christ day and night and pray for all Christian folk And we pray and teach all Gods Ministers especially Priests as they obey God they favor chastity so that they may shun Gods wrath and avoid the flames of hell And certainly they know it is not lawful for them to satisfie their lust to accompany any woman And they who will abstain from flesh and nourish chastity shall obtain Gods mercy and with equal right enjoy a heap of earthly honor as though he were a man of free condition * * Although this be in the Saxon in this Chapter yet both Mr. Lambert and Wheelock in their translations have placed it in the 7. Chap. And that every Christian man for the fear of God does restrain the unlawful lusts of the flesh and obey the commands of Gods law Of forbidden Matrimony Cap. 7. And we teach and pray and command on Gods name that no Christian man whatsoever does marry within the sixth degree of his kindred nor does take to wife the widow of his kinsman who was within the sixth degree nor that he marries any within the like degree to her who was his wife nor his Gossip nor a Vestal Nun nor one Repudiate let no Christian man marry And lastly he who shall carefully imbrace Gods laws and study to keep his soul from the flames of hell let him not be a follower of Harlots nor have more wives then one and that she be his bewedded wife Of paying Tithes 8. And let every one every year pay justly his dues
to God That is Plough-alms fifteen nights after Easter the Tithes of young living creatures at Whitsuntide and the Tithes of the Fruits of the earth at the feast of All Saints But if any one will not pay his Tithes after the manner aforesaid viz. of the tenth acre of Plough-land then let the Kings Sheriff the Bishop the Lord of the Soil and the Priest of the Church meet and no thank to him restore the tenth part to the Church to which it was due and leave the ninth to him As concerning the other eight parts let the Lord of the Soil have one half and the Bishop the other be he the Kings man or any Nobleman's Of Peter-pence 9. And the money due to Rome is to be paid upon the feast of S. Peter He who shall not pay it shall pay that penny to the Bishop and thirty pence beside and two hundred and twenty shillings to the King Of First-fruits 10. Let the First-fruits be paid at the feast of S. Martin and if a man shall forbear he shall give them elevenfold to the Bishop and two hundred and twenty shillings to the King Of the Tithes belonging to the Church of a Freeman 11. If a Freeman hath a Church upon his Demesnes which hath a Church-yard then it shall be in his power to confer upon his Church the third part of his Tithes But if there be no Burying place belonging to the Church then may the Lord of the Soil give the Priest so much of the nine other parts as shall seem good to him and let the Hearth money be first paid to the Church by every Freeman Of money for Lights 12. And let money be given to Lights thrice every year First upon the feast of Easter let one halfpenniworth of wax be imposed upon every Hide of land and so much again upon the famous feast of All Saints and the like to be done upon the feast of the Purification of S. Mary Of the money called Symbolum animae and of Burial 14. And it is meet that after a grave be opened the Burial-money be forthwith told out And if a man bury one dead out of the bounds of his parish yet shall the Burial-money notwithstanding be restored to the Church to which of right it did belong Of Gods right in observing Festivals and Fasts 15. And let every one defend all Gods right all he can Let him celebrate Festival and Fasting-days also Sunday keep a feast from Saturday noon to Munday light and let every man abstain from bodily labor Of Sunday 16. And we expresly forbid any Market to be kept or any Convention of the people to be made upon a Sunday unless there be urgent necessity And also let every man upon a Holiday abstain from hunting and all bodily labour Of Fasts 17. And we command that every man observe all these Fasts whether of the Ember-weeks or Lent or any other Fast with all godliness And to fast all the days of S. Mary and the feasts of all the Apostles but of Philip and James we command not to be kept Fast because of the Festivity of Easter And upon every Friday if it be not a Festival fast And let no man fast from Easter until Whitsuntide or from Christmas until the Octaba's of Epiphany unless he were willing or injoined by the Priest Of the times of Vacation 18. And we forbid the Ordal upon all Festivals Ember weeks and other right Fasting days and all Pleadings at Law from the feast of the Anniversary of the coming of our Lord until eight days after Epiphany and from Septuagesima until the fifteenth day after Easter And indeed the wise men have ordained that the Annual feasts of S. Edward and S. Dunstan be religiously observed of the Englishmen upon the 15. Kalends of April and 15. Kalends of June Let every Christian man upon these solemn feasts as is meet be peaceable and free from all fraud and malice And if any one did owe any thing to another whether in the nature of pledge or compensation let him either repay it before these days or soon after An Exhortation to Confession and Penance 19. And we command for Gods love that all Christian men understand those things which are necessary for the good of their souls For a time will come when we would rather have obeyed Gods will when we had time given us then to have enjoyed all the goods which all men enjoyed in the world Certainly a reward will be given to every one of us according to the deeds of every one Then woe be to the miserable which in their life deserved the eternal punishments of hell And therefore that we may diligently avoid our misdeeds let us ingenuously confess our sins and abstain from all wickedness for the future and duly compensate and command those Laws to others which shall not be grievous to obey This is right Judgment and with God acceptable and he is truly blessed which by rule shall judge For Almighty God the Creator of all things created us all and with an inestimable price redeemed us viz. with his own life poured out upon us An exhortation to the Eucharist and honest life Cap. 19. And let every Christian man do all those things which conduce to his health and be very careful of his Christendom And he which will do all things necessary for the good of his soul which all ought to do must understand that thrice at least every year he must prepare himself to receive the Eucharist and he who trusts that he shall be acceptable must rightly observe all his words and deeds and religiously keep his oath and faith given and do justice all he can in all parts of our Dominion and diligently follow Gods justice in word and deed So then at length all of us shall abundantly obtain Gods mercy Of Fealty to the Lord. 20. Further we will follow what we teach others always to be faithful to our Lord and defend his honor with all our might and obey his will For whatsoever we shall do to our Lord in right and vertue will be to our self a great ease For in this thing God the Creator of all things and Lord will be faithful to us It is therefore very meet that Lords govern their servants with reason To worship God from the heart and faith 21. And we greatly admonish all Christian men that inwardly from their heart they love God and that they stedfastly hold Christian religion and devoutly obey Gods teachers and diligently learn Gods law and contemplate it and often and much follow it to the profit of themselves That men throughly learn the Lords Prayer and Apostles Creed 22. And we teach that every Christian man so learn that at least he throughly understand the right Faith the Pater noster and Apostles Creed For with one of these every Christian man does pray to God and with the other profess a
often gone out of the Church and Priests houses having restored the thing taken away let him abjure the Province and not return and if by chance he shall return let no man presume to entertain him unless he have leave from the King Of breaking the Peace of the Church If any one shall violently infringe the Peace of the Church the Justice Cap. 7. belongs to the Bishops but if one guilty in avoiding their Judgement or arrogantly contemning it shall despise it let the complaint thereof be brought to the King within forty days and let the Kings Justice make him give Security and Pledges if he can get them until he first give God afterward the Church satisfaction But if within one and thirty days either by his friends or acquaintance or by the Justice of the King he cannot be found out the King shall Outlaw him by the word of his own mouth i. e. he shall be excluded out of all protection of the King But if after he shall be found and can be retained let him be restored alive to the King or his head if he shall defend himself Lupinum enim gerit caput which in English is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the common and general Law concerning all men Outlawed Of the Tithes to be restored to the Church of Sheep and Hoggs 8. The tenth sheaf of all kinde of corn is due to God and therefore to be restored to God And if any one hath a company of Mares let him restore the tenth colt to God he who hath but one or two for every single colt one single peny In like maner who hath many Cowes the tenth calf who hath but one or two for every calf one single halfpeny and who make Cheese give to God the tenth but if he make none milk the tenth day In like maner the tenth Lamb the tenth Fleece the tenth Cheese the tenth Butter and the tenth Hogg Of Bees In like maner the tenth of the profit of Bees as also of under-Wood In some these two Chapters are joyned of Meadow and Waters and Mills Parks Warrens Fishponds tender Sprouts and Gardens and Merchandize and all other things which God shall give the tenth part is to be restored to him who gave the nine parts together with the tenth who shall have detained it let him be compelled to restitution by the Justice of the Bishop and King if need be For these things St. Augustine hath Preached and are granted by the King Barons and People but afterwards by the instinct of the Devil many have detained it and Priests careless of growing rich did not care to take pains to get them because they had sufficient means of living For in many places now there are three or four Churches where then there was but onely one and so they began to be diminished Of them who are judged to be brought to Judgment or Water by the Cap. 9. Justice of the King In that day wherein Judgment ought to be done let the Minister of the Bishop and his Clerks come thither and in like manner the Justice of the King with Legal men of that Province who may see and hear that all things be rightly done and whom the Lord by his mercy will save let them be quit and freely depart and whom the iniquity of the fault the Lord shall not condemn let the Justice of the King do justice upon them But the Barons who have their jurisdiction of their men let them see that they do so concerning them as they incur not displeasure with God and offend not the King And if a Suit does arise concerning men of other Baronies in their Courts let the Justice of the King be present because without it the Suit cannot be determined If any of the Barons hath not Justice in the Hundred where the Plea shall be holden it shall be determined at the next Church where the Judgment of the King shall be saving the Right of those Barons Of Romescot 10. Every one who shall have Thirty pence of current money in his house of his own property by the Law of England shall pay a Peter penny and by the Law of the Danes half a Mark But that penny ought to be summoned upon the Feasts of the Apostles Peter and Paul and collected at the Feast which is called To the Bonds so that it be not detained beyond that day If any one shall longer detain it let complaint be brought to the justice of the King because this penny is the Alms of the King and it is justice he cause this penny to be restored and the forfeiture of the Bishop and King But if a man hath more houses let him restore the Peter-penny for that wherein he resides upon the feast of Peter and Paul the Apostles Of the Office of the King and of the Right and Appendixes of the 17. Crown of the Kingdom of Britain And the King because he is the Vicar of the highest King and to this purpose ordained that he may both govern and rule the terrene kingdom and people of the Lord and above all things the holy Church and that he defend the same from wrong-doers and destroy and root out workers of mischief Besides these Sir Ed. Coke in Cawdries Case instances in King Kenulph for that King Kenulph by his Letters Patents with the consent and councel of his Bishops and Senators of his Kingdom did give to the Monastery of Abingdon in the County of Berks and to one Ruchnius then Abbot of the said Monastery c. a certain portion of his Country c. and that the said Ruchnius c. should be ever free from Ecclesiastical right or jurisdiction and that the Inhabiters of it from thenceforth be kept under the yoke of no Bishop or their Officials but in all events of things and discussions of causes they be subject to the Decree of the Abbot of the Monastery aforesaid And that this Charter was above * * Counting to the time Sir Ed. Coke wrote 850 years since which was in the year 755. and after confirmed by Edwin of Britain King and Monarch of Englishmen and this Grant did continue until the dissolution of the Abby by Henry the 8. So that the Kings of this Nation have not only of antient time been Nursing fathers to Gods Church and have exercised their Regal power over the persons of all their Subjects in all cases but have even dispensed with and conferred Episcopal jurisdiction But this was only matter of fact and done but only in one place nor was it ever established by a Law before the Statute of Lollard and by Henry the Eight and the First of Eliz. Yet it was afterward as shall appear in the next Chap. used by divers Kings and often adjudged by the Judges before Henry the Eighth CHAP. III. Ecclesiastical Laws made by William the First who began to reign in the year of Christ 1067. THat Nations and Kingdoms
the Lord of the Ground go with the Priest and without thanks take away and restore to the Church what shall belong to it and leave the Ninth part to him who would not pay the Tenth let them divide the rest into two parts let the Lord have one half the Bishop the other be he a Kings man or another Romfeath ought to be restored upon the Feast of St. Peter in bonds he who shall keep it beyond that time let him restore that penny to the Bishop and thirty pence let him add to the King 50 s. Who shall keep Cherisceat beyond the Feast of St. Martin let him restore it to the Bishop and pay eleven fold and to the King 50 sol Who married shall commit adultery let the King or Lord of him have the superior the Bishop the inferior Who shall commit perjury upon holy things * * Laying his hand upon the book I think let himlose his hand or half his were viz. half the Cap. 11 price of his head and this is common to his Lord and the Bishop Who shall bear false witness let him not afterwards be admitted for witness but restore to the King or the Lord of the Soyl Helfeng ' * * Neither Mr. Lambert nor Whelock give any construction of Helfeng that I can finde Who shall kill a man in Orders or malign him let him make him amends as is right and the amends of the Altar according to the dignity of his Order to the King or Lord sufficient breach of the peace or deny it with full purgation Plena lada neget If any man guilty of death desires confession let it never be denied him but if any man shall do it let him pay the King one hundred and twenty shillings or swear with five men that he did it not If a free-man work upon Holy days let him amend his helfeng and at least diligently make composition with the Lord. If any man by force holds the Rectitudes of God Rectitudines Dei let a Dane pay lahite an Englishman full witam or deny it with eleven * * Or twelve in Mr. Seldens Ms and Mr. Whelocks if he should there wound any man let him amend this and restore full witam and redeem his hand of the Bishop or lose it If he kill a man let him be outlawed and every man that desires right follow him with clamor if it comes to pass that he be killed by this that he resisted right if this thing be verified let him be unrevenged He who shall make a breach of his Order let him amend it according to the dignity of the Order wera Wita Lahilita * * Lastita Mr. Seldens Mr. Whelocks Ms and with all mercy Let every widow be without a husband twelve moneths afterwards she may choose whom she will and if within a year she take a husband let her lose her Morgangifan * * Dower and all her money which she had from her first husband and let her husband forfeit to the King the price of his head or to whom the King shall grant it If a man unjustly hold a fugitive of God let him restore him to right and pay to him whose he shall be and satisfie the King according to Legergild If any man hath a man excommunicated or keep him outlawed and all his forgiveness and all amendment commonly made better by Christ and the King is utterly lost wheresoever the Law of God shall be refused to be justly kept according to the word of the Bishop and it will be expedient that he be compelled by the Secular power Because Justice and Secular distriction are necessary for the most part in Divine Laws and Secular Institutes for that otherwise many men cannot be recalled from their ill ways many will not be inclined to the worship of God and observance of the Law from whence by the much infesting of ill men it is provided for the profitable dispensation of peace that the more weighty pleas and things more to be punished be brought to Justice alone or the mercy of the Prince that pardon may be more abundantly had to men desiring it and punishment to sinners but in causes which may be amended for the compassion of the Saints it is permitted that the earthly Lords by their leave may presume to take pecunial amends according to the Law of the Countrey Of the kindes of Causes Cap. 21. There are also some kindes of Causes put before as we have said to be more freely expedited in the amendment of which the King does more particularly communicate wheresoever they are done in Divine or Secular things over Kings men and Ecclesiastical and of Barons men and he hath totally or particularly * * Or acephalos âcefalos pauperes sive socham of which are Adultery Fornication homicide in a Church breach of the peace or order or Christianity or Legality if it be needful to be done by the Secular power that right may be done De Christianâ consuetudine locutionum secundum quod sunt 64. Towards the latter end interline 25. and end A Priest who leads a regular life in a simple accusation may swear alone in a threefold with two of his Order a Deacon in a simple compellation may accompany himself with two Deacons in a threefold with six A Countrey Priest may purge himself as a regular Deacon a Priest accused by his Bishop or Archdeacon may swear himself the sixth of lawful Priests as they are prepared at Mass Of killing a Minister of the Altar 66. If any should kill a Minister of the Altar let him be outlawed before God and man unless he repent with worthy satisfaction and justly compound with his parents or throughly deny it with purgation of his head * * Werilada and begin this within thirty nights before God and man above all he hath If any Minister of the Altar kill any man or if it be extraordinarily declared by bad actions let him be both deprived of his Order and go on Pilgrimage as the Pope shall enjoyn him and amend the work But if he will purge himself he may do it triply but unless he shall begin this within thirty nights let him be outlawed before God and men If any man any ways afflict any man Ordained with stripes or bonds let him make him amends as is meet and to the Bishop the amends of the Altar according to the dignity of his Order to the King or Lords sufficient breach of the Kings peace * * Mundbrecho or deny it with sufficient purgation * * Plenlada If any man condemned to death desires to be confessed let it never be denied him but if any man should deny him let him give the King in satisfaction one hundred shillings or swear with six men that he did not do it If any man by force takes away Gods rights let a Dane amend with Lah sliht full Wytam with
with the Opinion of Learned men That the marriage with his Brothers wife was contrary to the Law of God and void The King not expecting the Popes sentence anno 1533. marries his beloved Anne but such love is usually too hot to hold for about two years after he cut off her head yet the King did not wholly renounce the Papacy but still expecting the Popes sentence The Pope for the reasons aforesaid not desiring to end the business The slow proceedings of the Pope but to expect advantage from time reduces the matter into several points or heads which he would have particularly disputed and at the time of the Kings marriage with Anne was not got further then the article of Attentates in which the Pope gave sentence against the King that it was not lawful for him to put away his wife by his own authority without the Ecclesiastical Judge For which cause the King in the beginning of 1534. denied the Pope his obedience commanding his Subjects not to pay any money to Rome nor to pay the ordinary Peter-pence This infinitely troubled the Court of Rome and they daily consulted of a remedy Some thought to proceed against the King with censures and to interdict all Christian nations all commerce with England But the moderate counsel pleased best to temporise with him and to mediate a composition by the French King K. Francis accepted the charge and sent the Bishop of Paris to Rome to negotiate a Pacification with the Pope where they still proceeded in the cause gently and with resolution not to come to censures if the Emperor did not proceed first or at the same time with his forces They had divided the cause into twenty three articles and then they handled whether Prince Arthur had had carnal conjunction with Queen Katherine in this they spent time till Midlent was past when the 19. of March news came that a Libel was published in England against the Pope and the whole Court of Rome and besides a Comedy had been made in presence of the King and Court to the great disgrace and shame of the Pope and every Cardinal in particular For which cause all being inflamed with choler ran headlong to give sentence which was pronounced in the Consistory the 24. of the same month That the marriage between Henry and Katherine was good that he was bound to take her to wife and that in case he did not he should be excommunicated But the Pope was soon displeased with this precipitation For six days His rash censure repented of after the French Kings letters came That the King was content to accept the sentence concerning Attentates and to render obedience upon condition that the Cardinals whom he mistrusted should not meddle in the business and that persons not suspected should be sent to Cambray to take information â—and and the King had sent his Proctors before to assist in the Cause at Rome Wherefore the Pope went about to devise some pretence to suspend the precipitate sentence and again to set the cause on its feet But the King so soon as he had seen it said It was no matter for the Utterly loses the obedience of England Pope should be Bishop of Rome and himself sole Lord of his Kingdom And that he would do according to the antient manner of the Eastern church not leaving to be a good Christian nor suffering the Lutheran Heresie or any other to be brought into his Kingdom From that time forward Henry the Eighth of a zealous Assertor of the No anger lost between the King Pope Papacy both by pen and purse became the first and greatest Opposer of it of all the Western Christian Princes for the Eastern Christian Princes except sometimes the Emperors of Greece and the Kings of Holy Land did seldom or never submit to the Papacy in her Spirituals yet did he afterwards seed to be reconciled to the Pope even by means of his Nephew Charls the Fifth Nor were the Popes much behind hand with him For besides Clement's petty Excommunication Paul the Third Anno 1538. thundred out such a terrible Excommunication against him as the like was never heard of which deprived him of his kingdom and his adherents of whatsoever they possessed commanding his Subjects to deny him obedience and Strangers to have no commerce in the kingdom and all to take arms against and persecute both him and his followers granting them their states and goods for their prey and their persons for slaves But the Popes anger ended in words whereas the Kings deeds took place against the Pope But what there was in all the Kings reign which might be called Reformation What was the Kings Reformation I do not understand For whatsoever the King took from the Pope except Peter-pence he ascribed to himself If the Pope would be Head of the Catholique Church the King would be Head of the Church of England If the Pope challenged Annates and First-fruits of the Bishops and Clergy the King would do no less If the Pope did give Abbots and Priors power being Ecclesiastical persons to make divers Impropriations to their benefit the King will take a power to take them all away and convert them into Lay-fees and incorporate them so into particular mens estates that they shall never return to the Church more Nor had he any love or desire of Reformation of the Church but only to the Church-lands for all the Rites Ceremonies and Religion of the Church of Rome was continued and that with such bloody cruelty that a Stranger going over Smithfield one day and seeing two men there executed one for denying the Kings Headship of the Church and another for subscribing to the Six Articles cryed out Bone Deus quomodo hic agunt vivi hic suspenduntur Papistae ibi comburuntur Antipapistae And so zealous did he continue herein that Pope Paul the Third after he had fulminated so dreadfully against him Hist Conc-Trid fol. 90 proposed him for an Example to be imitated by Charls the Fifth Although such was the temper of this Prince that he never spared man The exclusion of the Papai jurisdiction was an act of the King Kingdom and Church of England in his rage woman in his lust nor any thing which might be called sacred in his avarice yet so absolute was he that his Divorce was attested by both the Universities at home besides that at Paris abroad his freeing himself and the Nation from the jurisdiction of the Pope was not only assented to by a Synod and Convocation of all the Clergy of England but the English and Irish Nobility did make their submissions by an Indenture to Sir Anthony Sellinger then chief Governor of Ireland wherein they did acknowledge King Henry to be their lawful Soveraign and confessed the Kings Supremacy Bram. Vind. of the Church of England p. 43. in all causes and utterly renounced the Pope But Divorce banishing the Papal authority
28. H. 8. 7. for the establishment of the succession of the Imperiall Crown of this Realm that concerneth a Prohibition to marry within the Degrees expressed in the said Act. Stat. 31 H. 8. 9. authorising the King to make Bishops by his Letters Patents Stat. 32 H. 8. 38. concerning precontracts of Marriages and touching degrees of consanguinity Stat. 35 H. 8. 3. for ratification of the Kings Stile The corporall oath made in the Stat. of 35 H. 8. 1. that every Subject of this Realm should be bound to take against the power authority and jurisdiction of the See of Rome Stat. 37 H. 8. 17. That the Doctors of the Civill Law which were married might exercise Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction So much of that Statute of the first Ed. 6. 1. as contains certain Provisions Pains Penalties and Forfeitures for and against such as should by open preachings expresse words sayings writing printing overt-deed or act affirme or set forth That the King of this Realm for the time being is not or ought not to be the supreme head in earth of the Churches of England and Ireland nor of any of them or that the Bishop of Rome or any other person or persons other than the K. of England for the time being is or ought to be supreme head of the same Churches or any of them as in the said Act more at large may appear It is enacted that these clauses and other of the foresaid Act concerning the Supremacy and all and every branch article words and sentence in the same sounding or tending to the Derogation of the supremacy of the Popes Holiness or the See of Rome and all pains penalties and forfeitures made against them that should by any means set forth or extol the said Supremacy should from thenceforth be utterly void It did moreover generally repeal all clauses sentences and articles of every other Statute made since the 20 H. 8. against the supreme authority of the Popes Holiness or See Apostolick of Rome The Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons professing themselves reduced and received by their Majesties intercession to the unity of Christs Church and obedience of the Apostolick See of Rome and the Pope governing the same did make humble suite to their Majesties to be Intercessors that by authority of the Popes Holiness and by the ministration of Cardinall Poole by dispensation tolleration or permission respectively as the case shall require be abolished these Articles following and generally all others when any occasion shall so require may be provided for and confirmed 1. That all Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches Hospitalls Colledges Schooles and other such foundations now continuing made by authority of Parl. or otherwise established according to the order of the Lawes of this Realm since the Schisme may be confirmed and continue for ever 2. That Marriages made infragradus Prohibitos consanguinitatis affinitatis cognationis spiritualis or what might be made void propter impedimentum Publicae honestatis justitiae or for any cause prohibited by the Canons only may be confirmed and children born of those Marriages declared legitimate so as those Marriages were made according to the Lawes of the Realm for the time being and be not directly against the Lawes of God nor in such case as the See Apostolick hath not used to dispence withall 3. That institution of Benefices and other promotions Ecclesiasticall and dispensations made according to the form of the Act of Parliament may likewise be confirmed 4. That all Judiciall Processes made before any Ordinaries of this Realm or before any Delegates upon any Appeals according to the order of the Lawes of this Realm may likewise be ratified and confirmed 5. That the Lands and Goods of Bishopricks Monasteries Chanteries c. dispersed abroad to sundry persons by gift exchange purchase c. according to the Lawes of the Land for the time being shall so continue It was enacted that the title of supreme head of the Church never was nor could be attributed to by any King or Governor It was enacted that all Bulls Dispensations and Priviledges obtained before the 20 year of H. 8. or any time since of the See of Rome and not containing matter prejudiciall to the Imperiall Crown or Lawes of this Realm should be put in execution This Statute did restore the Pope and Apostolick See together with the Jurisdiction the Bishops had in the Realm to all the Authority they had before the 20 of H. 8. It is a very remarkable thing that this Statute does affirme that nothing done or moved in this Statute should be prejudicall to the Liberties of the Crown before the 20 of H. 8. and that the Statute of 24 H. 8. 12. and the Statute of 25 H. 8. cap. 20. which takes away all Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction from the Pope and vests it in the King should be but declaratory of the ancient and common Law of this Land See Coke de jure Regis Ecclesiastico 28. a. b. 31. one of these must necessarily be false Thus did Queen Mary restore by Parl all the Papall Jurisdiction which Description of Queen Mary was exercised before the 20 of Henry the 8. and would have restored all the Abbey and Chantery Lands taken away by her Father and Brother had it been in her power but many alienations descents and purchases having been made of them she was not able to performe it being a Princess no doubt wondrous free from sacriledge zealous and constant in her Religion mercifull when her Religion was not concerned and just Her mercy appears in her not only pardoning all the Councell who had subscribed to her disinheriting but it was thought she would not have taken away the life of the Lady Jane although guilty of so high a crime as having actually invaded the Crown if the Duke of Suffolk her Father formerly pardoned by the Queens meer grace had not most unjustly and unthankfully excited her Subjects against her which together with Wiats Rebellion for her own security did necessitate her for her own security to execute her Her justice appears in this the Lord Sturton having been at variance with one Hargill and his Son Gentlemen knocked the poor Gentlemen on the head and after cut their throats and buried their bodies in a Pit 15. foot deep hoping this villainy would never come to light or if it did he assured himself of the Queens favour being zealously addicted to the Popish Religion which did him not good for the Queen abhorred and rejected all mention of Pardon for him only he had this grace that the other Murderers were hanged in a hempen but he in a silken halter Ecclesiasticall Lawes made in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth IT is declared that in the Reign of H. 8. divers good Lawes and Statutes Anno 1. Eliz. cap. 1. were made as well for the utter extinguishing of all usurped and forrein Powers and Authorities of this Realm and other her dominions and Countries as also for the restoring and
of them or by any Generall Councell wherein the same was declared heresie by expresse and plaine words of Scripture or such as should be determined Heresie by the high Court of Parl. with the assent of the Clergy in their Convocation This Statute revives the 23 H. 8. 9. 24 H. 8. 12. 25 H. 8. 20. 25 H. 8. 21. 26 H. 8. 14. 28 H. 8. 16. So much of the Act of the 32 H. 8. 38. concerning precontracts of Marriages and touching degrees of Consanguinity as by the 2 Ed. 6. 23. was not repealed the 37 H. 8. 17. the 1 Ed. 6. 1. This Act repeales the Statute of the 1 2. Ph. M. 6. the 1 2 Ph. M. 8 except those things touching the Premunire in the said Statute It repeales the 5 R. 2. 5. the 2 H. 4. 15. the 2 H. 5. 7. made for the punishment of Heresies by fire and faggot This statute repeales the statute of the first of Mary and the 2 and revives Stat. 1 Eliz. cap. 2. the statute of the 5 6 of Ed. 6. for the uniformity of Prayer and administration of the Sacraments with the alteration or addition of certain Lessons to be used every Sunday of the yeere and the forme of the Letany altered and corrected and two sentences only added in the delivery of the Sacrament to the Communicants If any Parson Vicar or other whatsoever Minister that ought or should say or sing Common-Prayer mentioned in the said Booke in such Cathedrall or Parish-Church or other places where he should Minister the same in such manner and forme as is mentioned in the said Booke refuse to doe the same or use any other forme or shall preach declare or speake any thing in derogation of the said booke or any thing therein contained or any part thereof and shall thereof be lawfully convicted according to the Lawes of the Land by the Verdict of 12 men or confession or notorious evidence of the fact shall forfeit to the Queene c. for the first offence the profits of one whole yeere next after such conviction of all his spirituall Benefices and suffer imprisonment for the space of six moneths without Bayle or Mainprize If any such person once convicted concerning the Premisses shall after such conviction offend and be thereof lawfully convict shall suffer imprisonment for the space of one whole year and be deprived ipso facto of all his spirituall promotions and that it shall be lawfull for all Patrons and Donors of such Spirituall promotions to present or collate to the same as if the person or persons so offending were dead If any person be convicted the third time of the premisses he shall ipso facto be deprived of all his spirituall promotions and shall suffer imprisonment during life Any person that shall offend and be convicted inform aforesaid concerning any of the premisses not being beneficiall or having any spirituall promotion shall for the first offence after such conviction suffer imprisonment for the space of one whole year without Bail or Mainprise and for the second offence after lawfull conviction shall suffer imprisonment during life If any person shall doe or speak any thing in derogation of the book of Common-prayer or disturb or interrupt any Parson Vicar or other Minister in any Cathedrall or Parshi Church or Chappel in the celebration of the Common-prayer or ministration of the Sacraments or shall compell or cause any other Service to be celebrated being thereof lawfully convict shall for the first offence forfeit to the Queen c. the summe of one hundred Marks and for the second offence the summe of four hundred Marks and for the third offence he shall forfeit all his Goods and Chattels and suffer imprisonment during life If any person shall for the first offence be convict of the premisses in form aforesaid and shall not pay the sum to be paid by virtue of his conviction that instead thereof he shall suffer imprisonment for the space of 6. moneths without Bail or Mainprise and he that shall not pay for the second conviction shal suffer imprisonment for the space of 12. moneths without Bail or Mainprise Every person shall having no lawfull or reasonable excuse to be absent diligently and faithfully endeavour to resort to the usuall places where Common-prayer and such Service of God shall be used upon Sundayes and other dayes appointed to be kept holy and there abide orderly and soberly during the time of Common-prayer Preaching and other Service of God upon pain of punishment by censures of the Church and twelve pence to be levied by the Church-wardens to those of the poor of the Parish by way of distress The Ordinaries and all other Officers Ecclesiasticall as well in places exempt as not exempt within their Diocess have power and authority by this Act to correct and reform and punish by Church censures all who shall offend within their Jurisdictions The Justices of Oyer and Determiner or Justices of Assise in open and generall Sessions have power to hear determine and punish these offences yet so that every Arch-bishop and Bishop in their severall Diocesses by virtue of this Act may associate or joyn themselves with the said Justices No person shall be molested for any offences abovesaid unlesse he be indicted at the next generall Sessions next after such offences are committed All Lords of Parliament for their third offence shall be tried by their Peers Chiefe Officers of Cities and Boroughs have the like authority to hear and determine the offences aforesaid as the Justices of Assize and Oyer and Determiner have Arch-Bishops Bishops their Chancellors Commissaries Arch-Deacons and other Ordinaries having any peculiar Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction have by virtue of this Act power in their Visitations Synods and elsewhere within their Jurisdictions to enquire and take the accusations and informations of all the offences aforesaid and to punish the same by Admonition Excommunication Sequestration or Deprivation and other censures in like form as heretofore has been used by the Queens Ecclesiasticall Laws Any person offending in the premisses and punished therefore by the Ordinary having a testimoniall thereof under the Ordinaries Seal shall not for the same offence be convicted before the Justices and likewise punished for the first offence by the Justices he shall not again receive punishment of the Ordinary Such Ornaments of the Church and of the Ministers shall be reteined Anno 5 Eliz. cap. 1. and be in use as was in this Church of England by authority of Parliament in the 2 year of the Reign of Ed. 6. untill other Order shall be taken by authority of the Queen with the advice of the Commissioners appointed and authorised under the Great Seal of England for causes Ecclesiasticall or of the Metropolitan of the Realm It was enacted That whatsoever person inhabiting in the Queens Dominions who by word or deed should maintain that the Bishop of Rome had any authority or jurisdiction in any of the
School-master presuming to teach any thing contrary to this Act and being thereof lawfully convict shall be disabled to be a Teacher of Youth and shall suffer imprisonment without Bayl ot Mainprise for the space of a year No Ordinary or their Ministers shall take any thing for the allowance of any Schoole-master All offences aforesaid and all offences against the first Eliz. 1. 5 Eliz. 1. 13 Eliz. 2. c. are inquirable into by the Justices of peace and other Justices named in the said Act within a year and day after such offences committed Justices of Oyer and Terminer of Assiize of Goale-delivery in their limits Justices of Peace in their Quarter-sessions have power to hear and determine the offences aforesaid except Treason and Misprision of Treason Every person guilty of any offence against this Statute other then Treason Misprision of Treason which shall before he be indicted or at his Arraignment before Judgement submit and conform himself before the Bishop of the Diocess where he shall be resident and before the Justice of Peace where he shall be arraigned or tried having not before made like submission shall upon his recognition of such submission in open Assises or Sessions in the County where such person shall be resident be discharged of all the said offences The forfeitures of the moneys limited by this Act shall be divided into three equall parts whereof one third part to the Queen to her use another for the relief of the poor in the Parish where such offence is committed to be delivered by warrant of the principle Officers in the receipt of the Exchequer without further warrant from her Majesty the other third part to such person as will sue for the same in any court of Record in which no Essoin or Protection or Wager of Law shall be allowed He that shall forfeit such summes as are specified in this Act and be not able or shall not pay the same within 3. moneths after Judgement shall be committed to prison and there remain untill he have paid the said summes or conform himself to goe to Church He that usually on Sunday shall have in his house the Divine Service as it is established and be thereat usually present and not obstinately refuse to come to Church and shall at least four times in the year be present at the Divine Service in his Parish Church or in some open Church or Chappell of ease shall incur no damage nor danger by this Act. Every Grant Conveyance Bond Judgement and Execution of covetous purpose to defraud the Queen or any other person shall be holden utterly void Tryall of a Peer for any Treason or misprision of Treason by this Act shall be by his Peers This Act nor any thing contained therein is said not to extend to take away any or abridge the authority or jurisdiction of the Ecclesiasticall Censures for any cause or matter but that Arch-Bishops and Bishops and other Ecclesiasticall Judges may do and proceed as before the making of it All Jesuits made within or without the Realm since the Nativity of St. Stat. 27 Eliz. cap. 2. John the Baptist in the first year of the Queen shall within 40. dayes next after the Session of Parliament if they be not wind-bound depart out of England and other the Queens Dominions If any Jesuit Seminary Priest or other such Priest Deacon or Religious or Ecclesiasticall person whatsoever born within the Dominions of the Queen and made since the feast of the Nativity of St. John in the first year of the Queen or hereafter to be made by any Authority from the Church of Rome shall after the said forty dayes after the Session of Parliament other then in such speciall cases as in this Act is expressed be found in any of the Queens Dominions every such person shall be adjudged a Traitor All they which shall receive any such Jesuit or Priest after such time shall be adjudged a felon without benefit of Clergy If Any Subject of England then being or after shall be of or brought up in any Colledge of Jesuits or seminaries already erected or to be erected out of the Realm shall not within six moneths next after Proclamation in that behalf made in London under the broad Seal return into this Realm and within two dayes after before the Bishop of the Diocesse or two Justices of the peace of the County where he shall arrive submit himself to her Majesty and her Lawes and take the Oath set forth in the first year of her Reign That then every such person which shall otherwise return shall be taken and deemed as a Traitor Whosoever shall any wayes send relief to any Jesuit or seminary beyond the seas or give any maintenance to any Colledge of Jesuits or Seminaries shall incur the danger of a Premunire None during the Queens life shall send his or her Child or other person except Merchants or such only who serve in their Trade as Merchants or Mariners beyond the Seas without the Queens speciall licence or under four of the Councells hands upon the penalty of one hundred pounds Every offence committed against this Act may be heard and determined as well in the Kings Bench as also in any County within this Realm or any of the Queens Dominions where the offence shall be committed or where the offendor shall be apprehended This Act shall not extend to any Jesuit c. before mentioned as shall within the said 40. dayes or within 40. daies after he come into the Realm submit himself to some Arch-bishop or Bishop of this Realm or to some Justice of Peace within the County where he shall arrive and doe thereupon truly and sincerely before the Arch-bishop Bishop or Justice of Peace take the said Oath set forth the first of Eliz. and under his hand confesse afterward to continue in due obedience to the Queens Lawes made or to be made in causes of Religion Peers shall be tried by their Peers for any offence made Treason Felony or Premunire by this Act. Any person being a Subject of this Realm which shall after the said 40. daies know any such Jesuit or Priest c. and shall not discover the same to some Justice of Peace or Higher Officer within 12. dayes every such person shall be fined and imprisoned according to the Queens pleasure and every such Justice of Peace or higher Officer which shall not discover the same within 28. dayes to some of the Queens Councell or to the President or Vice-president of the Queens Councell established in the North or Marches of Wales then he or they so offending shall forfeit 200 Markes Such of the Privy Councell President or Vice-president abovesaid to whom such information shall be made shall thereupon deliver a note in writing subscribed by his own hand to the party by whom he shall receive such information testifying that such information was made to him All such Oaths Bonds and Submissions as shall be made by force of
with the sword all stubborn and evill doores But whatsoever the Queene or Church did declare the Lawyers would The Lawyers exception of the Statute of 1 Fliz. cap. 1. not lose so much Grist as this Stat. of the first of Eliz. brought to their Mill and therefore the fourth conclusion in the 3 part Institutes 43 is That when an Act of Parliament is made concerning things meerly spirituall as Heresie c. yet the Act being part of the Lawes of the Land the same shall be construed and interpreted by the Judges of the Common-Law who usually confer with those that are learned in that profession so that all Spirituall jurisdiction doth utterly vanish whensoever the Temporall power shall doe any thing in derogation of it and in truth ever since the Statute of the first of Elizabeth all cognizance not only of Heresie c. but the cognizance of the worship and service of God and administration of Sacraments have upon the matter beene determined at quarter-Sessions and assizes and since ths uniting of all forraigne jurisdiction in the Crowne many places in England that were not in ordinary Episcopall jurisdiction and immediatly under the Pope are become out of all cure of Soules and for ought can be known are not any part of any Christian Church If the Queen be supreme Governor in all Spirituall cases under Christ then are not Bishops and Priests immediately Christs Ministers but the Queens Nay then may she ordain confirm and consecrate the Sacraments which the Church of England Art 37. King James Spot Hist anno 7 Regni doth deny The preamble of the first of Eliz. cap. 1. Is a supplication of the Lords Obsecrable things in the 1. 2. chap. 1 Eliz. Spirituall and Temporall and Commons that those things therein might be passed into a Law whereas the Lords Spirituall a a Camb. Eliz. Reg. 16. being nine nor were there then fourteene alive and all who were present not only stiffly opposed it but were all of them deprived because they would not conform thereunto and take the Oath of Supremacy made by that Act. In the 2. chap. Pag. 36. 1 Eliz. there is a very strange clause viz. The Queenes Majesty the Lords Temporall and Commons assembled doe in Gods name earnestly require and charge all Arch-Bishops and Bishops and other Ordinaries that they endeavor themselves to the utmost of their knowledge that the due execution of that Law may be had throughout their Diocesses and Charges as they will answere before God for such evills and Plagues wherewith God may justly punish his people for neglecting this good and wholsom Law and yet the Temporall powers by this very Law have power to heare and determine all things in it as well as the Spirituall whereas Praeces lachrima sunt arma Ecclesiae all alwaies the Church formerly did supplicate protection from the temporall powers The Queene did not make an alteration and change in the Religion and By what degrees Religion was charged Service of God on a suddain but by degrees for for a whole moneth or more after the death of Queene Mary the Roman Religion continued in the same state it did before upon the twenty seventh of December leave was granted to have the Epistles Gospells ten Commandements the Lords Prayer Creede and Letany in the English tongue The two and twentieth of March when the Nobles and Commons were met in Parliament the entire use of the Lords Supper viz. in both kindes was allowed and the Law made to that intent in Edward the sixts dayes revived and put in new force The twenty fourth of June the Sacrifice of Masse was abolished and the Liturgy in the English Tongue established by Parliament In July the Oath of Supremacy was propounded to the Bishops and others and in Aug. Images were removed out of Churches and broken ot burnt Cambd. Eliza Reg. 39. From the first of Eliz. untill the eleventh yeere of her Reigne no person How the Laws made for conformity to the Service of the Church were observed of what perswasion soever at any time refused to come to the publique Divine Service celebrated in the Church of England being so evidently grounded upon the sacred and infallible word of God that the Bishop of Winchester in his answere to Tortus page 42 is not afraid to affirme positively that the Pope Paulus quartus which is misprinted for it should have been Pius quartus if the Queene would have acknowledged his authority would have been so kinde as to have established all the Rites and Ceremonies now used in the Church untill the Bull published against the Queene by Pius the Fift whereby he excommunicated her and deprived her of her Kingdome and forbad all her Subjects upon like penalties to be so hardy as to obey her Admonitions Lawes or Commandements and did absolve all men who had upon any occasion taken their oath to her of all fealty and service due unto her by reason of her Government which Bull produced no other effect then the severe Statute made the thirteenth yeere of the Queene against all men who should endeavor to put it or any such in ure or execution or should receive or take any absolution or reconciliation from the Church of Rome But afterward these Parliament Laws for the conforming to Divine Service established became as much disobeyed by another generation of men called Puritans and therefore the Statute of the thirty fift of Elizabeth cap. 1. was made expresly against them yet would they never be restrained untill they upon pretence of Reformation brought a desolation upon both Church and State Shee was truly pious who daily as soone as she rose set a part some time Of the virtues of Queen Eliz. for the worship and service of God afterwards at set houres retired her selfe into her private Closet frequented the Chappell duly upon Sundaies and holydaies nor was there ever any Prince that with greater devotion was present at divine Service In black aray and after the manner of the former ages she heard attentively Lenten Sermons although she would often say what she had read of Hen. 3. her predecessor That she had rather devoutly speak to God in Prayer then hear others discourse eloquently of God in their Sermons and of the Cross the blessed Virgin and of the Saints shee thought reverently nor did shee ever speake of them without a certain reverence nor patiently heare others speake of them without the like * to these may justly Camb. Eliz. Reg. 14. be added a wisdome and prudence in Government so far above her sex that certainly shee in that kinde is not to be parallell'd by any of her masculine predecessors and these vertues were crowned with that felicity that all along her long Reigne shee was most passionately and obsequiously hononred by her Subjects a rare thing among Islanders and not to be found in any time before her in any of her Predecessors Yet sure
she was rather carefull to conserve peace at home then to maintain it abroad and was more mindfull of the present age then of posterity and sure that King that succeeded her might justly expect to finde a hard taske so to Govern as to preserve the love and obedience shee had for besides her prudence and frugality in Government and expences she was single had not any kindred in the Nation which were any charge to her whereas the King succeeding not only having a Queen but also Posterity must multiply expence whereby hee shall lose the affections of his Subjects from whom it must be raised or abate of the magnificennce which is necessary for the reputation and Regality and which every Monarch ought especially to be carefull of for Where Majesty or Power is contemptible the exercise of them is never permanent Ecclesiasticall Lawes made by King James THis Statute doth Enact That all Statutes made by Queene Elizabeth Anno 1. Jac. cap. 4. against all Jesuites Priests and Seminaries made in the Church of Rome and all those Statutes made against all manner of Recusants be put in due and exact execution Every Recusant that shall conforme himselfe to the Lawes and Ordinances of the Church of England and repaire to Church and continue there during the time of divine Service and Sermon according to the true intent of the statute in that case made in the time of Queen Elizabeth shall be discharged from all penalties of Recusancy so long as he continues in such obedience and conformity The heir of any Recusant who is no Recusant shall not incur any penalty for the Recusancy of his ancestor if at the death of any Recusant the heire of the Recusant be a Recusant and after become conformable to the Lawes and Ordinances of the Church and take the oath of Supremacy made in the first yeere of Q. Eliz before the Archbishop or Bishop of the Diocess then every such heir shall be discharged of all penalty hapning in respect of the Recusancy of his Ancestor If the Heire of any Recusant bee within the age of sixteene yeeres at the death of his Ancestor and after become or bee a Recusant that then hee shall not bee discharged from the penalty of Recusancy untill hee submit to the Lawes and Ordinances of the Church and take the said oath of Supremacy in manner and form expressed 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Where any seisure shall be had of the 2 parts of any Lands or Tenements c. for the not payment of the 20. l. due and payable for each moneth according to the Statute in that case lately made * in such case two third parts shall goe to the payment of the said twenty pound a moneth the third part shall not be extended by the King nor forfeited by the Recusant where any seisure hath beene made by the King and the debt or duty by reason of Recusancy not paid then the King may continue the seisure untill the residue of the debt be fully satisfied and discharged The King and his Heirs shall not seize nor extend any third part descending to any such heirs or any part thereof either by reason of the Recusancy of such heir or the Recusancy of his Ancestor Every person under the Kings obedience which at any time after the end of the session of that Parliament shall send any childe or other person under his Government into any parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings obedience to be resident in any Colledg or house of any popish Order or Profession whatsoever or repair to the same to be instructed in the popish Religion or in any sort to professe the same shall for every such offence forfeit to the King the summe of one hundred pounds and every person so passing or sent beyond the Seas in respect of himselfe or her selfe only and not in respect of his or her posterity be made incapable to inherit or purchase in any of the Kings Dominions If any person borne in any of the Kings Dominions at the making of this Act were in any such house or Colledg to be instructed in the popish Religion and should not return into some of his Majesties Dominions within one yeere next after the session of that Parliament and submit himself as is aforesaid shall be in respect of himselfe only and not in respect of his heirs and posterity utterly uncapable of inheriting or purchasing within any of the Kings Dominions Provided that if any such person shall afterward become obedient and conformable to the lawes and ordinances of the Church of England and repaire to Church according to the true intent of the said statutes and ordinances and continue so to doe that then every such person shall be discharged of such disability No woman nor any childe under the age of twenty one yeeres except Saylors and Ship-boyes or the Apprentice or Factor of some Merchant in trade of Merchandize shall be permitted to passe over the Seas without License from the King or six or more of the privy Councell under their hands upon paine that the officers of the Port that willfully or negligently did suffer any such to passe and did not enter the names of such passengers so licensed shall forfeit their office and all their goods and chattels and that every owner of any ship or vessell that shall willfully carry over seas any such person without license shall forfeit his ship or vessell and all the tackle and every Mr. or Mariner of or in any such ship offending as aforesaid shall forfeit all their goods and suffer imprisonment by the space of 12 moneths without baile or mainprize No person shall keepe any Schoole or be a Schoole-master out of any of the Universities or Colledges of this Realme except it bee in some publick or free Grammer-Schoole or in some such Noblemans or Noblewomans Gentlemans or Gentlewomans house as are not Recusants or where the said same Schoole-Master shall not be licensed by the Archbishop Bishop or Guardian of the Spiritualties of that Diocesse upon paine that as well the schoole-master as the party that entertains him shall forfeit for every day so offending the sum of forty shillings the one halfe to the King the other to him who shall sue for the same in any of the Kings Courts of Record in Westminster by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in which no Essoine Protection or wager of Law shall be allowed Because some popishly affected did repaire to Church monethly whereby Stat. Anno. 3. Jac. cap. 4. they did evade the penalties imposed by precedent Parliaments as is alledged It was therefore Enacted That if any Recusant so conformed shall not once a yeere at least after the Session of Parliament receive the Sacrament in the Church of that parish where he or she usually abides or if there be no Church then in the Church next adjoyning shall forfeit for the first yeere the summe of twenty pounds for the second yeere
forty pounds and for every yeere after the summe of sixtie pounds untill hee or shee shall receive the Sacrament as aforesaid and if he or she who hath received the Sacrament as aforesaid shall after offend in not receiving the Sacrament as aforesaid by the space of one whole yeere that then he shall forfeit for every such offence the summe of sixty pounds the one moity to the King the other to him who will sue for the same in any of the Courts of Record in Westminster or before any Justices of Assize or before Justices of Peace at their generall Quarter-Sessions by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information wherein no Essoyne Protection or Wager of Law shall be allowed The Churchwardens and Constables of every Towne Parish or Chappel for the time being or some one of them or if there be none then the chief Constables of the Hundred where such Town Parish or Chappell is or one of them as well in places exempt as not exempt shall once every yeere present the monthly absence from Church of all popish Recusants within such Townes and parishes and shall present the names of every of the children of the said Recusants being above the age of nine yeeres and as neere as they can the age of the said children as also the names of the Servants of the said Recusants at the next generall or quarter-Sessions of that shire limit division or liberty All such Presentments shall bee Recorded in the said Sessions by the Clerke of the Peace or Towne-clarke for the time being without any Fee and for default of every such Presentment the said Churchwardens Constables or High-constables shall forfeit twenty shillings and for default of recording such presentment without a Fee the Clerke of the Peace or Town-clerke shall forfeit 40. s. Every Presenement made by any Churchwarden constable or High-constable as aforesaid whereby any Recusant shall happen to be convicted shall be rewarded by having 40. s. to be levyed out of such Recusants goods and estate in such manner as by the more part of the Justices shall be ordered by warrant under their hands and seales The Justices of Assiize and Justices of Quarter-sessions have power to heare and determine of all Recusants as well for not receiving the Sacrament as for not coming to Church and have also power to make Proclamation that the body of every such offendor shall be rendred to the Sheriff of the county or the Baylif or keeper of the Goale of the liberty before the next Assizes Generall or Quarter-sessions and if then the offendor shall not make his appearance upon Record that every such default shall be deemed as a sufficient conviction by verdict of 12 men This Statute recites the penalties imposed by the 29 Eliz. 6. upon a Recusant convict and that every conviction shall be certified into the Exchequer as is in the statute of 23 El. 1. concerning Recusants monethly forfeitures yet by this statute the King may refuse the 20 l. a moneth and take the 2 parts of the Recusants lands yet the King shall not take into his two parts the Mansion house nor shall demise nor lease over the 2 third parts or any part thereof to any Recusant nor to the use of any Recusant and whosoever shall take any lease of the King of such lands shall give such security as the Court of Exchequer shall allow not to suffer any waste to be committed upon the Premisses For the better tryall how the Kings subjects stand affected in point of loyalty and due Obedience it is Enacted That after the end of the session of Parliament any Bishop of the Diocesse or any two Justices of peace whereof one of the Quorum within the jurisdiction of their sessions may require any person of the age of 18 yeeres or above being or which shall bee convict or indicted for any Recusancy except noblemen and noble women for not repairing to Divine service according to law or have not received the Sacrament twice within the yeere next past or any person passing through the County or Liberty and unknowne except as is before excepted that being examined by them upon oath shall confesse or not deny himself to be a Recusant or shall confesse or not deny that he hath not taken the Sacrament twice within the yeere to take this Oath hereafter upon the holy Evangelists which said Bishop or two Justices shall certifie in writing subscribed with his or their hands at the next generall or Quarter-sessions the Christian name Sirname and place of abode of every person which shall take the said Oath which Certificate shall be there Recorded and kept among Records of the said sessions If any person other then noblemen and noble women shall refuse to answere upon Oath to such Bishop or Justices of Peace or take the said Oath duely tendred then the said Bishops or Justices of Peace shall commit the same person to the common Goale without Baile or Mainprize untill the next Assizes or quarter Sessions where the said Oath shall be againe tendred unto them by the Justices of Affize or Justices of Peace or the greater part of them and if such person shall then refuse to take the Oath he shall incur the penalty of a praemunire except women Covert who upon refusall shall only be committed to the common Goale there to remain without bail or mainprize untill they take the said Oath The Tenour of the Oath I A. B Doe truly and sincerely acknowledg professe testify and declare in my Conscience before God and the World that our Soveraign Lord King James is lawfull and rightfull King of this Realm and of all other his Majesties Dominions and Countries and that the Pope neither of himselfe nor by any Authority of the Church or See of Rome or by any other meanes with any other hath any power or authority to depose the King or to dispose of any of his Majesties Kingdomes or Dominions or to authorize any forreigne Prince to invade or annoy him or his Countries or to discharge any of his subjects of their Allegiance and Obedience to his Majesty or to give licence or leave to any of them to beare Arms or raise tumults or to offer any violence or hurt to his Majesties Royall Person State or Government or to any of his Majesties Subjects within his Majesties Dominions Also I sweare from my heart that notwithstanding any Declaration or Sentence of Excommunication or Deprivation made or granted or to be made or granted by the Pope or his Successors or by any authority derived or pretended to be derived from him or his See against the said King his Heires and Suceessors or any absolution of the said Subjects from their obedience I will beare faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors and him and them will defend to the uttermost of my power against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever which shall be made against his or their Persons their Crowne and Dignity
by reason or colour of any such Declaration or Sentence or otherwise and will doe my endeavor to disclose and make known unto his Majesty his Heirs and Successors all Treasons and Traitrous Conspiracies which I shall know or heare of to be against him or any of them I doe farther sweare That I doe from my heart abhorre detest and abjure as impious and Hereticall this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes which be excommunicated or deprived by the Pope may be deposed or murdered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever And I doe beleeve and in my Conscience am resolved That neither the Pope nor any person whatsoever hath power to absolve me of this Oath or any part therof which I acknowledg by good and full authority to be lawfully ministred unto me and doe renounce all Pardons and Dispensations to the contrary And all these things I doe plainly and sincerely acknowledg and sweare according to these expresse words by mee spoken and according to the plaine and common sense and understanding of the same Words without any Equivocation or mentall Evasion or secret reservation whatsoever And I doe make this Recognition and acknowledgment heartily willingly and truly upon the Faith of a Christan So helpe me God Unto which Oath so taken the said Person shall subscribe his or her name or marke No Indictment to be had or found for not repairing to Church or for not receiving the Sacrament according to Law nor any Proclamation Outlawry or other proceeding thereupon shall be avoyded discharged reversed for default of forme other then by direct Travers to the point of not coming to Church or not receiving the said Sacrament If any Person so Indicted afterward submit and conform himselfe and become obedient to the Lawes of the Church of England and heare Divine Service according to the Statute in that case made and publiquely receive the Sacrament according to the Lawes of this Realm that then every such person may reverse and discharge the said Indictment Every subject of this Realme that shall passe out of this Realme and voluntarily serve any forreign Prince State or Potentate not having taken this Oath as aforesaid shall be a felon If any Gentleman or person of higher degree or any person or persons which hath born or shall bear any office of Captain Lieutenant or any other Office in Camp Army or Company of Souldiers shall after voluntarily serve any foreign Prince State or Potentate before he shall become bound by obligation with two such sureties as shall be allowed by the Officers which by this Act are limited to take such bond unto the King in the summe of 20 l. at least with condition to the effect following shall be a Felon The Tenor of the Condition followeth viz. That if the within bounden c. shall not at any time then after be reconciled to the Pope or Sea of Rome nor shall enter into or consent unto any practice plot or conspiracy whatsoever against the Kings Majestie his Heirs and Successors or any of his or their Estate or Estates Realms or Dominions but shall within convenient time after knowledge thereof had reveal disclose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors or some of the Lords of his or their honorable Privie Councell all such practices plots and conspiracies That then this obligation to be void The Customer and Controller of every Port Haven or Creek or one of them and their Deputies and none other may receive such Bond to the uses aforesaid and minister the Oath aforesaid taking for such bond six pence and no more and for such oath nothing which said Customer and Controller shall Register and certifie such Bond and Oath so taken into the Exchequer at Westminster once every year upon penalty of 5 l. for every Bond not so certified and 20 s. for every Oath not so certified If any person put in practice to absolve or perswade any of the Kings Subjects from their naturall obedience to his Majesty either within or without the Dominions or upon the Sea c. or to reconcile them to the Pope or Sea of Rome or any other Prince State or Potentate that then every such person their Aiders Counsellors and Abettors shall be adjudged Traitors and every person which shall willingly be absolved or reconciled as aforesaid shall be adjudged a Traitor The last branch shall not extend to any person which shall be only reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome and shall return into this Realm and within six dayes after before the Bishop of the Diocess or two Justices of Peace joyntly or severally submit himself to his Majesties Lawes and take the Oath of Supremacy made in the first year of the Queen * and also the Cap. 1. Oath mentioned in this Statute Where Oathes are so taken the Bishop and Justices shall at the next Generall or Quarter-sessions certifie upon the penalty of fourty pound All persons who offend against this branch of the Statute shall be indicted and tried by the Justices of Assize and Goal-delivery of that County for the time being or before the Justices of the Kings Bench and there be proceeded against according to the Laws against Traitors as if the offence had been committed in the same County If any Peer of the Realm shall happen to be indicted of any offence made Treason by this Act he shall be tried by his Peers If any person shall not resort weekly to some usuall place of Divine Service any Justice of Peace in the Limit Division or Liberty where such person shall dwell may give a Warrant to the Churchwarden of the Parish upon proof or confession made before him to levy twelve pence for every such default by distresse and sale of the Goods of the offendor and for default of such distress the said Justice may commit the offendor to prison untill payment be made No man shall be impeached upon this clause except it be within one moneth after such default made No man being punished according to this branch shall for the same offence be punished by forfeiture of twelve pence upon the Law made in the first year of Queen Eliz. This Statute repeals the two branches of 35 Eliz. 1. the first beginning and for that every person having house or family is in bounden duty to have speciall regard of the Goal governance and ordering of the same and so forth to the next clause beginning thus provided neverthelesse that this Act shall not in any wise extend to punish or impeach any persons for relieving c. ending with these words any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding In lieu whereof every person which shall willingly maintain relieve or keep in his house any servant sojourner or stranger which shall not repair to some usuall place of Divine service according to Law by the space of one moneth not having a reasonable excuse shall forfeit ten shillings for every such moneth Every person which
seized into the Kings hands for his Recusancy or any part thereof Every covicted Popish Recusant not married in some open Church or Chappel or otherwise then according to the Church of England by a Minister lawfully authorized shall be disabled to have any estate of Freehold by Curtesie of England And every woman being a popish Recusant convict which shall be married in other form then as aforesaid shall be disabled not only to claim any Dower or Joynture but also the Widowes Estate and Frankbanck in any customary Lands whereof her Husband died seized and likewise from having part of her husbands goods by virtue of any custome of any County City or Place And if a man be married contrary to the true intent of this Statute to a woman who hath no Lands or Tenements whereby he may become Tenant by Curtesie he shall forfeit 100 l. to be paid as aforesaid Every Popish Recusant which shall have a child born and shall not within a moneth after cause it to be baptized by a lawfull Minister according to the Lawes of the Realm in some usuall place of Baptisme or if by infirmity the child cannot be brought to such place then to be baptized by some Minister within the moneth if he beliving by the space of a moneth or if he be dead then Mother of such Child shall for every such offence forfeit one hundred pound one third part to the King the other to the Informer who will sue for it the other third part to the poor of the said Parish to be recovered in any of the Kings Courts wherein no Essoine c. shall be allowed If any Popish Recusant not being excommunicated shall be buried in any place other then the Church or Church-yard or not according to the Ecclesiasticall Lawes of the Realm That the Executors or Administrators of every such person so buried knowing the same or the party that so burieth him shall forfeit twenty pounds to be paid as aforesaid If the children of any of the Subjects within this Realm the said children not being Souldiers Mariners Merchants or their Apprentices or Factors shall be sent or goe beyond seas without licence of the King or six of the Privy Councell whereof the principall Secretary to be one under their hands and seals that very such child shall take no benefit by any gift conveyance descent devise or otherwise untill he being above the age of eighteen years take the oath mentioned in an Act made that Session intituled An Act for the better discovery and repressing Popish Recusants c. before some Justice of Peace of the County where such Parents of such Children as shall be sent did or shall inhabit In the mean time the next of kin who is no popish Recusant shall enjoy all the said Lands c. untill the person so sent shal conforme himself and take the said oath receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and then he who hath received any profit as aforesaid shall restore the goods or value to him who shall so conform himself He that shall so send his child beyond seas shall forfeit one hundred pounds to be recovered as aforesaid No convict popish Recusant shall present to a Benefice with Cure Prebend or grant an Advowson or collate or nominate to any Free-school or Donative whatsoever The Chancellor and Scholars of the University of Oxford when any such become void shall have the nomination presentation collation and Donation of any such Benefice Prebend or Ecclesiasticall Living School Hospitall and Donative in the Counties of Oxford Kent Middlesex Sussex Surrey Hampshire Barkshire Buckinghamshire Gloucestershire Worcestershire Staffordshire Warwickshire Wiltshire Somersetshire Devonshire Cornwall Dorcetshire Herefordshire Northamptonshire Pembrokeshire Carmarthenshire Brecknock-shire Monmothshire Cardiganshire Montgomeryshire and the City of London so long as the Patron shall remain a Recusant convict The Chancellor Scholars of the University of Cambridge shall have presentation c. to all such Benefices aforesaid being in the Counties of Essex Hertfordshire Bedfordshire Cambridgshire Huntingtonshire Suffolk Northfolk Lincolnshire Rutlandshire Leicestershire Derbishire Notinghamshire Shropshire Cheshire Lancashire Yorkshire the County of Durham Northumberland Cumberland Westmorland Radnorshire Denbyshire Flintshire Carnarvonshire Angleseyshire Merionethshire Glamorganshire so long as the Patron shall continue a Recusant convict If the Chancellor and Shollars of either University shall nominate or present Quaere who shal have the next presentation nomination to any such Benefice c. any person who hath any other Benefice with cure of souls every such nomination and presentation shall be void A convicted Recusant shall neither be Executor or Administrator nor Gaurdian in Chivalry or Socage The next of kin of the children of Recusants convict to whom the Estate cannot descend who shall usually resort to Divine Service according to the Lawes and receive the Sacrament shall have the Guard and education of the children and of the Lands and Tenements holden in Knights-service untill the full age of 21 years and of the Lands in Socage as Guardian in Socage and of Customary Lands by copy of Court Roll so long as the custome shall permit the same and in every of the said places shall yeeld an account of the profits to the Ward All Grants of Wards either of the King or any other to any Popish Recusant shall be void No person shall bring from beyond Sea print sell or buy any Popish Primers Ladies Psalters Manuels Rosaries popish Catechisms Missals Breviaries Portals Legends and lives of Saints containing superstitious matter upon penalty of fourty shillings to be forfeited as aforesaid viz. one third part to the King an other to the Informer who will sue the other to the poor of the Parish where such book shall be found Justices of peace in their Limits Mayors Bayliffs chief Officers in Corporations may search the hous of every popish Recusant convict the hous and lodging of every person whose wife is a popish Recusant convict for popish books and Relicks of Popery And if any Altar Pix Beads Pictures or such like popish Reliques or any popish books shall be found as in the opinion of such Officers shall be thought unmeet for such Recusants they shall presently be defaced and burnt if meet to be burnt All Armour Gunpowder and Munition whatsoever any popish Recusant convict hath or shall have in his own house or in the hands of others shall be taken from them by warrant of four Justices of peace at their Generall or Quarter-sessions other then such necessary weapons as the four Justices shall think meet for defence of the said Recusants in defence of their houses and the said Armour and Munition so taken shall be kept at the costs of the said Recusants in such places as the four Justices shall appoint If any such Recusant which hath such armour c. or any person who hath any such armour c. for the use of such Recusant shall refuse to declare unto the
Monarchy Aristocracy Democracy I answer that God hath made Man upright but he hath sought out many inventions Therefore let Aristocracies Democracies answer for themselves anciently there was no Government in the world but Monarchy nor does God ever command obedience to others and the very Athenians for above 800 years could find a Government under Kings hereditarily before any footsteps of Aristocracy or Democracy was ever heard of in the world nor did they ever transgress the bounds of Europe unless in the Carthaginian State and when the Magi usurped in Persia It was Pride in the Romans and Grecians who not only esteemed all the world barbarous besides themselves and all Kings to be of the kinde of ravenous beasts but were the first inventers of these Aristocracies and Democracies and made all Power in Government to be Artificial and Political not only in the exercise which is true but also in the cause This Jus Politicum was of a more large extent with the Grecians then the Jus Civile was with the Romans For the Grecians esteemed that to be Jus Politicum which is common to all Men conjoyned with any society the Romans called that Jus Civile which is proper to any City So to buy and sell was by the Grecians called Politick the Romans called not those things Civil unless to sell by such a measure and at such a time the Romans called the Cloaks and other habits of vestments used by themselves and other people civil But let any Man judge whether these Men Mr. Hobbs White and Grotius being Christians and two of them very learned Men do reasonably not only to reject all precepts and examples of Sacred writ and all Testimonies of the consent of the present World and Testimonies of all most antient Histories from the examples of those most unreasonable Men besides the case between them is as unlike as can be For though they agree that this Jus Politicum or Civile is so as well in the cause as exercise and all power to be originally with the people yet by the people did neither Romans nor Grecians understand a company of Men in a rout or promiscuous parity but they who were Civitate donati nor did ever the People of Athens or Rome acquire their Dominion from the people subject to them by do or dedi and not dabo or faciam as these men feign all power to be originally deduced but by rapine extorting it from their rightful Kings in whom it undubitably was If it be questioned how originally this power came into the world if not Annot 3 by the Pacts of Men or consent of Families I answer Rem teneo modum nescio for the manner of it how it came originally I am not bound to give an account where the Scriptures and most antient Historians do not confirm it it is enough that I having proved it to be natural and Gods Ordinance it was never otherwise especially having the practice of the present world and the Records of all prophane and sacred History 14. It is true indeed that the Humane Laws and the exercise of Regal Not only Kings but Kingdoms have their being from God and by the Law of Natore Power is Politick Voluntary and Artificial but that these Laws are received and exercised in those places where they ought to be which makes Kingdoms is expresly said by the Prophet Dan. cap. 4. in three places The most Highest ruleth in the kingdoms of men and giveth it to whom it pleaseth him ver 7. And it was Nebuchad-nezzars punishment for his pride that he should have his dwelling with the beasts of the field untill he knew that the most Highest ruleth in the kingdoms of Men and giveth it to whomsoever he will ver 25 and 32. So that it is evident not only Kings but Kingdoms not only their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their Right but also Government is from God immediately and that this is a Declaration of the Law of Nature not only long before God by the Prophet Daniel speaks this were Kingdoms upon the earth but also no Kingdom or King which at the time that this was spoken that did receive or believe Gods Revelation of himself in the Scriptures Kingdoms therefore or the exercise of Regal Power is Gods Ordinance as well where the Scriptures are received as not and due by the Law of Nature and by consequence the obstinate resistance of Kings in their Government by their subjects is a violence upon the Law of Nature 15. Sir Francis Bacon in his life of Henry 7. relates that Perkin Warbeck How many waies Regality comes to pass by the often affirming himself to be Richard Duke of York second son of Ed. 4. did at last believe himself to be so indeed The violent and frequent usurpations of usurpers in this Island and some other Northern and European Region hath invested such a habit in Men that renouncing reason as well as all faith and belief of God in the Scriptures they with much confidence affirm nothing but possession or possession and submission of Subjects to be requisite with Kings Both which do no more make a rightful King then a Mans Deseisin Abetting or Intruding into the signiory of another and the Tenants attorning to him does make him rightful Lord of the Mannor But neither humane Laws nor Man nor any thing under Heaven can endue any Creature with a power over anothers life and fortune who is of the same kind with himself and without which there can be no supreme power and by consequence no society among Men. There are but four waies by which Regality can happen First When it is immediately and expresly given by God as it was to Saul David Solomon Hazael Cyrus c. Or Secondly derived from him who had Regality truly vested in him but this derivation must not be from the Election Adoption or the will of him who was invested with the Regal Power which at highest cannot amount higher then a humane Law which by the 3 para of this chap. cannot create Regal Power It must therefore be derived by Primegeniture which is derived from a higher cause then humane Laws for jura sanguinis nullo jure civili dirimi possint Or Thirdly by Lot which we have shewed to be by the Law of Nature Or Lastly Jure Primi Occupantis if its Occupant be capable thereof for Man being a sociable creature by Nature and society according to Aristotle being contained in many divided parts therefore in the society of Men there must be unum quid quod imparet alterum Lib. 1. cap. 5. Pol. quod pareat But whether Aristocracy and Democracy be unum quid that may jure imperare to me is a question neither of them being any Institution of God or from the Law of Nature but brought in by unjust usurpation and violence and against the universal consent and practice of the world for above Three
thousand years I do exclude Conquest to be any cause of Regal power where God does not give it For either this Conquest must be made by power or force If it be made by power or one who is Gods Sword-bearer no new power ariseth from thence but only a dilatation of the exercise of the old which was formerly in him But if it be done by Sword-takers then is it no other then unjust usurpation and robbery The World being large and the Men in it alwaies ambitious I will not undertake to answer for the matters of fact which Men have done in all Ages nor do I doubt but that oftentimes the alterations and conversions of Government have happened from the will of God Object But it is evident by the Prophet Daniel c. 4. 23. 25. that God ruleth in the kingdoms of men and giveth them to whomsoever he pleaseth And if that he were pleased to make Saul David Solomon and Jeroboam who reigned over his peculiar people and Hazael Cyrus c. who knew not God Kings and yet neither by Lot Primogeniture from a rightful King or by right of First possession then for ought is known these alterations which have otherwise happened and do come to pass in the world may be from the will and gift of God Sol. I answer If it may be Gods will that these alterations and confusions happen in the world it may not be Gods will affirmanti incumbit probatio Let them therefore or they that make these alterations and confusions prove that Gods will and not their own perverse will was the first cause of them It is true and I grant that God does oftentimes for the punishment of a Nation convert the succession of their Kings into another line yet did he never so far chastise any Nation as to subject it to an Aristocracy or Democracy So it is necessary offences come yet shall that never excuse them by whom they come And so it many times happens that men cannot avoid Gods judgments and die it is no consequence therefore that men should run themselves into them or kill themselves It may be it is Gods will that my Father should die or that he will destroy my Country and Laws c. It does not therefore follow that a man may kill his Father destroy his Country or endeavor to subvert the Laws thereof Men are not alwaies obliged to conform their wills to Gods will but to do what he wills and commands them I am obliged to pray for my Parents and Country when it is Gods will they should be destroyed It was Gods will that Jeroboam for Solomons sin should be King of ten 1 King 11. 13. Tribes of Israel yet because the Tribes did will it and not upon Gods command he pronounced them eternal Rebels and Jeroboam a Rebel because 1 King 12. 19. he took it upon those terms 2 Chron. 13. 6. Nor do we find that ever Israel joyed good day after For the policy of Jeroboam to continue Comparethese times with these and see the event his dominion over them must be preferred before Gods worship and service in order thereunto Jeroboam must take counsel and make Calves which he says brought the Children of Israel out of Egypt any Priests were good enough to sacrifice to them no matter whether they were Priests or of the Tribe of Levi the lowest of the people would serve the turn 1 King 12. 32 33. yea forsooth Jeroboam himself could hold forth to the people and burn incense which before was peculiar to the Priests But it is a strange thing that this invented policie of Jeroboams for the keeping of the ten Tribes in their obedience to him should be the cause of so wonderful a Captivity 2 King 17. 21 22 23. that to this day it is unknown what became of them and their posterity 16. Parum est jus nisi sunt qui possunt jura gerere And men have always The miseries of men when the Supreme power is rejected or unknown by woful experience found that all Tyranny of a rightful and known Prince is not to be compared with the miseries and calamities where the Prince is not known or rejected but every popular and ambitious Man arrogates and usurps to himself what should be justly ascribed to the lawful Prince Nor does the calamities of miserable men in such a condition end so but God no where shewed so great a judgment as upon those men viz. Corah Dathan and Abiram who rejected their rightful and known Prince Num. 16. Nor does he ever denounce a more dreadful judgment then upon those men who resist Higher powers Rom. 13. How great then will his judgment be upon them who reject them 17. He is a natural Prince of right or by the Law of Nature who Who is a Natural Prince de jure truly prescribes from such Ancestors that no mortal creature can make any just exception or superior claim And so great a Lover of Men and Truth is God that scarce in all the world was it not known in any Nation who was the rightful Prince thereof when his Subjects did reject him 18. It is true that there is no visible power under Heaven but only Where there are diversities of titles which is to be preferred mens Consciences that can direct them where Titles of Princes come in question But where diversity of Titles are alleadged that which is truly and indubitably most antient is the best for it is a true rule in all descents whatsoever that Dormit aliquando nunquam moritur jus But this must be jus apparens for De non apparentibus de non existentibus eadem est ratio Whether the Title of the Heir general or Heir male be better we shall treat more at large in Cap. of Succession 19. Jus is duplex Proprietatis Possessionis And that this Right is Who is a Natural King de facto and not de jure divisible as well in Regality as private mens Estates is demonstrated by para 4. of this Chap. And if it be true as it is that no Being can be superior or better then the Cause of its being then will it necessarily follow that all Kings who inherit from Usurpers cannot have a better title then that which the Usurpers had so long as a superior or better claim can be made by another Nor do I fear to affirm Hen. 4. Hen. 5. and Hen. 6. were natural Kings of England and did inherit the Crown of England de facto but not de jure 20. Although nothing which is naught in the beginning can be How Usurpation may be bettered bettered by the continuance of time yet may Usurpation although naught in the beginning be bettered in time viz. if the Usurpation be of that continuance that it outlives all claim that can be justly made by another for Possession is title sufficient against all men who have no jus ad rem Hence it