of Justification best known to him that hath it Object THe Scriptures commending the righteousnesse of Abraham and other Patriarks doth rather make 〈◊〉 sure and certaine of their salvation then themselves Ans No mans salvation can be better knowne unto 〈◊〉 then to himself for as the life of the body is more felt where that life is then of others which only see the body to live so faith which is the life of the Soule as the Scripture saith the just shall live by faith is better apprehended of those that have the possession of it then of such as only behold it Again in vain doth the Apostle exhort us to labour to make our calling and election sort 2 Pet. 1. 10. if it could not be accomplished Obj. The Apostle exhorteth us to work it out with feare and trembling Phil. 2. 12. Ans The Apostle in that place doth not deny but that it may be wrought out he therefore exhorteth us so to demeane our selves as that we doe not presume of any worthinesse in our selves that may deserve it and therefore he also exhorteth them that stand to take heed lest they fall 1 Cor. 10. 12. lest being secure of our election which is certaine and infallible in regard that whom God loveth he loveth unto the end We sinne presumptuously trusting to Gods election and therefore the Apostle exhorteth us to work it out with feare and trembling least we being circumvented of Satan who can transforme himself into an Angel of light to deceive us and so be prevented of that which we vainly hoped for Obj. When may a man be certain of his election or salvation Ans When he regardeth not sinne in his heart and untill When a man may be assured of his salvation then he cannot for the Prophet David speaking by experience saith that so long as he regarded sinne in his heart the Lord would not beare his prayers Psal 66. 18. so that when we feele in our selves that we are throughly dead unto sinne and to all the affections and desires of the same it is impossible that we should be certaine of our election for in this it may be said as of the Commandements that he that keepeth them all and offendeth in one that is he that keepeth them all but one is guilty of the breach of all in regard that the charge was to keep that one as well as all the rest So he that in his affections is dead to all manner of sins but one which he still desireth to retaine being his darling sinne and that either for profit or pleasure is in the same respect guilty of all it being probable that he would breake the rest upon the like termes in which state and condition a man cannot be fully assured of his salvation SECT 10. How a man is said to sinne and yet sinneth not Object SVppose that a man should finde in himself that he is dead in his affections to all manner of sinne yet this man so long as be liveth will sinne how can be then be assured of his salvation Ans I have told you that was the maine reason why the Apostles did give the exhortation to worke it out with feare and trembling yet neverthelesse though such a man sinne daily so is be not with a desire and affection but in respect of the flesh â—usting against the Spirit yet may he be assured of his salvation for the Apostle affirmeth touching his owne person being in the same predicament that it waâ— not he that sinned but sinne or the corruption of his owne nature that dwelled or remained in him Rom. 7. in which Chapter he maketh an absolute distinction betwixt them who may be assured of their election and them that may not and that in respect of mens affections and desires to sinne or not to sinne where making himself the president he confesseth that in him that is in his nature there dwelleth no good thing and that to will was present with him but how to performe that which was good he found not and that the good which he would have done he did not Whereupon he maketh a second conclusion that it was not he that did it but sinne c. So that the reason of the Apostle thus excusing himself in sinning was because he had a delight in the Law of God in the inwardman And that he had no pleasure in those sins which he daily committed through the infirmity of his flesh and the temptations and allurements provoking him thereunto from Sinne is made gâ—eater or lâ—sse in respect of the delight which is taken in sinning which he desired deliverance so that albeit his so sinning he doth not doubt of his election but was assured of it as appeareth in the 25. vers by Jesus Christ who had taken away one guilt of such sins And from this argument of the Apostle we may conclude that it is not sinne that procureth damnation to any one but meerly the delight which men take in the action of sinne And therefore the Apostle describing the blessed estate of a The blâ—ssed state of a regenerate man regenerate man saith that he sinneth not neither can sinne which is so spoken in regard he taketh no delight or pleasure in that sinne so committed by him and so is not imputed unto him as sinne The same Apostle also saith that there is no condemnation Rom. 8. 14 15 16 17. to such as walâ— not â—fâ—er the flesh but after the Spirit Rom. 11. 1. And that as many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sonnes of God and if Sonnes then Heires and Co-heires with Christ so then as many as are such may claime such a title and priviledge And contrariwise them that are not such are not to enioy such priviledges or prerogatives CHAP. XI The eleaventh Chapter treateth of their tenent of Free-will SECT 1. THe Pelagians were of opinion that they could without the grace of God doe some good worke or act by which they put a thick wall betwixt them and the fire of Gods Spirit lest they should be heated thereby and warmed with love To which opinion the Roman Catholicks consent whose assertion is Obi. That a man naturally without faith or without the speciall assistance of God can performe some Morall good workes if no temptation let Ans Both these assertions is sufficiently confuted in that one sentence of our Saviour Joh. 15. 5. Without me you can doe nothing yet to cleare the point more fully I will lay down all their arguments by which they vindicate their assertions and answer â—o each particular and to this purpose SECT 2. THey urge the words of the Prophet Isaiah Chap. 1. 19. If ye will consent and they ye shall eate the good things of the Land As also Exod. 15. 26. If thou wilt give care unto his Commandements As also Exod. 19. 5. If ye â—ill heare my voyce and keep my covenant From these and such like places they argue
and have also received it according to the direction and institution of Christ and his Apostles I answer thus That originall sinne is not simply taken away in Baptisme but Oâ—iginall sin not taken away by Baptisme only in respect of the guilt It is taken away formally but not materially There be two things to be considered in originall sinne as first the disagreement and repugnancy it hath with the Law of God and the guilt of the punishment the latter way originall Two things to be considered in originall â—â—â— sinne is remitted and released in Baptisme it shall never be laid to the charge of the truly faithfull members of Christs Church as the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect Rom. 8. 33. but the other remaineth still in Gods Children as the Apostle Paul confesseth of himself Rom. 7. 23. I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde but yet though it remaine and have a being in the faithfull yet it doth not raigne and exercise the power of an absolute Monarch to make its will their law To which purpose the Apostle exhorteth the Romans that they would not suffer sinne to raigne in their mortall bodies to obey it in the lusts thereof SECT 6. The Virgine Mary borne in originall sinne Obj. YOu will surely confesse that the Virgine Mary was borne without originall sinne it being for the honour of Christ Ans The Apostle acquainteth us that whatsoever the Law saith it saith to them that are under the Law that every mouth may to stopped and all the World be culpable before God but the Virgine Mary was under the Law and blameable as others were and therefore guilty of originall sinne She was also made righteous by faith for she called Christ her Saviour in her Song Luk. 1. 47. the Apostle also saith that we were all the children of wrath and if all then the Virgine Mary and so borne in originall sinne the Scriptures also discovereth divers infirmities Divers infirmities in the Virgine Mary in the Virigine Mary as Luk. 2. 48. in finding fault with Christ whom she had formerly acknowledged to be her Saviour 2. Her interrupting of Christ in his Sermon Mat. 12. 46. 3. In her prescribing a time for Christ to shew a Miracle for which she procured a rebuke from him Joh. 2. 2. upon which reasons and testimonies of Scriptures describing her infirmities we inferre that the Virgine Mary was conceived and borne in originall Christ only exempted from originall sin sinne as others are and Christ only is exempted of whom only the Apostle saith He was in all things in like sort tempted and yet without sinne Heb. 4. 15. CHAP. XIII Treateth of the Popish distinction of Mortall and veniall Sins SECT 1. Objection THough concupisence be a corruption of our nature yet it is but a veniall sinne or at the most partly mortall and partly veniall for when our desires are without reason then it is a mortall sinne but when they are reasonably required it is but a veniall sinne Ans The distinction of Mortall and veniall Sinnes being understood in their sence that some sinnes in the condition and qualities thereof are mortall and some veniall is contrary to Scripture which maketh death the wages of sinne Rom. 6. 23. that is of all But to the faithfull t is true through Gods grace Hoâ— sinâ— are veniall and noâ— all sinnes are veniall and shall never be laid to their charge and so no concupisence is mortall otherwise there can be no reasonable coviting of any other mans things for reason â—s grounded upon the Law of Nature against which is all concupisence therefore the coveting of any thing which is our neighbours being a transgression of the Morall precept is in its owne nature mortall SECT 2. No worthinesse to be attributed to our selves from any gift of Nature ANd if we rightly understand our selves it is contrary to the nature of a true Christian to justifie or vindicate himself in any thing that may tend to his owne glory and praise by ascribing any worthinesse to himself from any gifts of Nature that is resident in him or to endeavour to lessen or mittigate a sinne but rather to acknowledge himself to be altogether sinfull and uncleane which was the qualities of all the holy men of God as the Scriptures doth plentifully expresse for if we did but truly conceive what sinne is there is none which we ought to esteeme little or veniall unlesse it be comparatively seeing there is none so small but that without repentance is able to sink the soule to eternall The danger of the smallest sin damnation who will think that a slight wound which giveth a sudden in-let to death but should we grant this errour of all other sinnes they are most dangerous both for their frequency and security the one increasing them to a large heap and the other so covering them that we see not how they wrong us so as we see the raine that falls in smallest drops moystens the earth and makes it more slimy and dirty then a shower which descends violently which washeth away but sinketh not in And as the smallest letters are more hartfull to the sight then they that are written with a text pen so those sinnes which are esteemed as small and veniall and we take no notice of may soonest prove our fatall overthrow And for the better progresse in this question we will observe Three degrees in the nature of sinne the degrees which are to be considered in the nature of sinne which are three viz. Appetitus assentio actio The appetite or first desire 2. The perfect assent 3. The action Now the very appetite is restrained in the Morall precept although it doth not yeeld to the desire if it doe but tickle us with a delight it is sufficient to make us guilty for our Saviour saith that He that looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart Mat. 28. where if we observe our Saviour meaneth not in these words he that looketh and lusteth but he that looketh to lust that is he that looketh upon a woman as an object to kindle or set an edge to his lust or to give way unto it in the least degree which instance suiteth with the first degree of sinne which is the appetite and not within All concupisence forbidden the bounds of consent or action By which it is evident that all concupisence is forbidden yea that which hath the least inclination of the will though no consent be given SECT 3. Concupisence of two sorts good and bad Obi. ARe those thoughts which are in the minde without any consent of the will to be counted as sin before God Ans We are to distinguish betwixt concupisence and desire Good concupisence of two sorts which is either good concupisence or bad the good is of two sorts either
perfectly good or imperfectly good such as is now in man mixed with many infirmities and imperfections which is either naturall in man as the coveting and desiring of meat and drink and other things necessary for the use of man or supernaturally wrought in man by grace as is the love and desire of vertue or it is mixed partly naturall and partly supernaturall as Matrimoniall concupisence for procreation which hath both a naturall cause or being and is likewise guided by grace unto a right end and none of these kinds of good and commendable concupisence is sinne Evill concupisence is of three sorts 1. As Idle roving and Evill concupisence of three sorts impertinent thoughts which the mind may easily reject 2. Violent cogitations which sticketh more closely and nearely as the immoderate desire of meat and drink and such things as belong to the necessity of nature as sumptuous apparrell and the like 3. There are filthy and uncleane cogitations as lasciviousnesse envie vain-glory and the like The first of these may be compared to thin Clay that sticketh or cleaveth not the second to tough Clay that sticketh fast and the third to uncleane and stinking Myre and Mud otherwise the first motion is not voluntary as a certaine preparation of the affection the second is with the will but the same not obstinate as when it commeth to ones minde to revenge himself when he is hurt but the third kinde is so outragious that it will not be ruled by reason as when a man is carried to revenge himself without measure The first of these can be no more ruled by reason then such things as hapneth to the body as when one yauneth when he seeth another yaune or suddenly winketh when one putteth their finger towards anothers eye c. SECT 4. Obj. ARe these idle wandrings being without respect to any certaine object sin and so forbidden in the Morall precept seeing the Morall precept aymeth at a certaine object as thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house c. Ans If we doe reject these thoughts at the very first moving of them and yet if so they carry some staine and guilt in them in regard children which have no such evill thoughts yet are not cleane before God being conceived and borne in sin as in Psal 51. 5. and which is also most evidently confirmed by the death of Infants as I have formerly shewed sin being the cause of death Therefore the best solution is that those cogitations which doe vanish before the minde be affected be not comprehended in the precept as actuall sins untill the will of man in some degree give consent till then sinne is only in the conception but not in the birth as the Apostle James saith When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sin Jam. 1. 15. but as it is the first fruit of originall sinne together with that native corruption they are contrary to the precept for the Morall Law being grounded upon the Law of Nature which was perfect in man by creation before his fall and from which perfection originall sinne being a defect It may well be concluded that though they doe not come to reckoning before God if they presently vanish before the will and affection be inclined unto them yet doe they shew the corruption of our nature and although they breake not into a a flame yet they are sparkes that flye upward but if those sparks doe not break into a flame they shall never burn us nor be laid unto our judgement for if the will assent not concupiscence shall never hurt But this is through Gods meere mercy for otherwise Original sinne enough to condemne us this very originall corruption is enough to condemne us And thus I have shewed the distinction of sinnes veniall and yet not veniall in their proper nature in respect of their greatnesse and smalnesse but not to be permitted for these reasons SECT 5. Why originall corruption is not to be permitted 1 IN respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6. 23. The wages of sinne is death as also in that it is a transgression of the Law 1 John 3. 4. and every transgression of the Law is under the Curse Gal. 3. 10. 2. In respect of the infinite Maiesty of God who to offend can be no veniall sinne of it selfe considering his perfect and absolute righteousnesse which cannot abide the least blemish and imperfection Therefore in regard of the perfect righteousnesse and infinite Maiesty of God no sinne against him can be veniall as in the sudden motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised yea though there be no further purpose or intendment of hurt is notwithstanding guilty of judgement Matth. 5. 22. So then we admit of a distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes The distinctâ—oÌ„ of mortall and veniall sinnes if it be understood not of the nature of sinne but of the qualities of the persons for unto them that believe all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercy of God Rom. 8. 1. There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus but to the wicked and unbelievers all their sinnes are mortall Rom. 6. 23. to them the stipend and wages of sin is death Now if we trace this originall and spaune of sinne unto the birth we shall find it in action which action proceedeth from the conception of the will to enioy the thing desired as the Apostle James saith When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne Jam. 1. 15. SECT 6. Five things to be considered in every sinfull act ANd in every sinfull act there are five things to be considered as Actus Peccati Culpa Macula Reatus Poena 1. The very act of sin 2. the fault 3. the blot 4. the guilt and 5. the punishment 1. The act of sin as it is an act is not alwayes evill for there Sin as it is an act is not alwayes evill is the same act in substance in sin as in doing that which is honest as in adultery there is the like externall act as in lawfull Matrimony so that onely the fault which is in respect of the circumstances which are not observed make the difference 2. The second thing to be considered is Culpa the faultinesse of the action which is committed by the not due observing of the Circumstances which are these First Quid what it is that hee Nine things to bee considered in the faultinesse of an action doth whether it be lawfull or not lawfull honest or not honest 2. quantum the quantity must be considered as one may steale much or little or raile sparingly or with a full mouth 3. quoties how often for he that committeth the same sinne often is more blameable then he that doth it seldome 4. qualiter after what manner whether willingly or unwillingly whether he be quicke or slow in doing of it 5. Cum quo with what instrument as he that smiteth with a
the Spirit ergo they are perfect Ans This Argument proceedeth from that which is simpliciter simply and absolutely of the Spirit to that which Secundum quid after a sort is of the Spirit The workes of the faithfull are not absolutely the workes of the Spirit but they be so the workes of the Spirit as they be also our workes so they are pure as they proceed of the Spirit but impure and imperfect as they be our workes Obj. They which are conformable to Christ have perfect works but the faithfull are conformable in this life to the Image of Christ Ergo. Ans The proposition is only true of those which are perfectly conformable but so are not the faithfull in this life but only in part as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 13. 12. Now I know in part c. And as our knowledge so our obedience both imperfect Obj. There is no condemnation to the faithfull Rom. 8. 1. therefore their workes are perfect Ans The argument followeth not for the priviledge of the faithfull and their exemption from condemnation dependeth not upon the perfection of their workes but upon the perfection of Christs righteousnesse imputed to them by faith Obi. Christ at his comming shall render to every man according to his workes but it standeth not with Gods Justice to give a perfect reward unto imperfect workes therefore the workes of the regenerate because they shall be perfectly rewarded are perfect works Ans The obedience of the faithfull shall be perfectly rewarded not according to the Law of workes but according to the Law of faith whereby the righteousnesse of Christ is imprinted and rewarded in them being theirs as fully as if they were their owne 2. Christ shall also judge according to their workes not as causes of their reward but as testimonies and lively arguments of their faith SECT 4. Obj. THe Scriptures ascribeth perfection to the workes of the Saints as it is said of Noah Gen. 6. 9. that he was a just man and a perfect man in his time Hezekiah also saith I have walked before thee with a perfect heart 2 King 20. 3. Ans These and the like sayings must be understood of the perfection of the parts of obedience not of the degrees of perfection that is the faithfull doe even exercise their obedience in every part of the Law but not in a perfect degree or measure 2. They are said to be perfect only in comparison of such as are weake and imperfect 3. Their sincerity and perfection is understood as being opposite to dissimulation and hypocrisie that their hearts were perfect towards the Lord that is unfainedly without dissimulation in which sence the Prophet David saith Judge me according to my innocency c. Psal 7. 8. Obi. The Apostle saith Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not 1 Joh. 3. 9. The faithfull being borne of God cannot sin Ans The Apostle in that place doth not understand the dwelling of sin but the reigning of sin for otherwise he should be contrary to himself who had said before Chap. 1. 8. If we say we have not sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us So they which are borne of God sin not that is sin though it remaine in them it reigneth not in them as the Apostle saith Though we walke in the flesh we are not after the flesh 2 Cor. 10. 3. neither was the Law given to justifie men thereby for the Apostle saith That by the deeds of the Law shall no flesh be justifled in his sight for by the knowledge of the Law commeth the knowledge of sin Rom. 3. 20. this then is the end and use of the Law viz. 1. It sheweth what God is viz. one that loveth Justice and hateth iniquity 2. It is a glasse wherein we may see that Image after which man was at the first created which now is defaced in him by sin 3. It is a rule and line after the which we should square our lives and actions 4. It sheweth the corruption of our natures and so it is a The end and use of the Law Schoole-master to bring us unto Christ So that this is the profit of the Law First to convince a man of his infirmities 2. To drive him to seeke the medicine of grace in Christ CHAP. XV. Treateth of the Popes dispensing with the Morall Law SECT 1. ANother of the Popish Tenents is That the Morall Law or any precept thereof may be by humane authority dispensed withall to which purpose the Popes Cannonists doe give to their Terreine god an infinite and unreasonable power these being their conclusions viz. Papa potest dispensare contra jus divinum The Pope may dispence against the Law of God 2. Contra jus Naturae Against the Law of Nature 3. Contra novum Testamentum Against the New Testament 4. Contra Apostolum Against the Apostles 5. Papa potest dispensare de omnibus preceptis veteris novi Testamenti The Pope may dispence with all the precepts of the Old and New Testament and that for these reasons following each of which shall receive its answer their first reason being this viz. SECT 2. Obi. AS amongst men the Law-giver may dispence with his Law so God that gave the Morall Law is therefore above the Law and may dispence with it And if God may dispence then the 〈◊〉 of the Church may certainly dispence because they are in 〈◊〉 â—â—ead Ans 1. As to that concerning humane Lawes which tend to The Law giver cannot dispence in human Lawes as to over throw them the common good the preservation of the Publique State the maintenance of peace and justice the Law-givers cannot so dispence as to over-throw the end of those Lawes as it shall be lawfull to disturbe the publique State or the like for this were to evert the very scope and end of the Law But yet in particular cases they may dispence as that where an order is that every one shall watch which is intended for the good of a City yet some may be dispenced withall and exempted from watching who may more necessarily be imployed for the common good for here although the letter of the Law be not precisely kept yet the intention of the Law-makers is observed which is to seeke and procure the common good So likewise universally the Lord neither will nor can dispence against his Law as to make it lawfull to have other gods to take Gods name in vaine and the like for this were for God to deny himself to be just 2 Tim. 2. 13. and to make it lawfull in generall to violate the precepts of the first and second Table were to deny his owne Justice and so consequently to deny himself for God is most true yea Justice it self and the Law is a perfect rule of justice yet in the particular determinations Exod. 3. 22. 22. 35 36. of the Law the Lord doth dispence as with Abraham sacrificing of his Son Gen. 2. 2. the Israelites
faith The faith of Miracles of Miracles touched by the Apostles 1 Cor. 13. 2. If I had all faith so that I could work miracles and remove mountains 3. There is fides Historica an Historicall faith which beleeveth The Historicall faith all things to be true which are written in the Scripture in which sence the Apostle James saith the Devills beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true that the Scripture speaketh of God and of his Justice Power Judgement and rewarding of the righteous as may be gathered from their owne expressions as I know thee who thou art even the holy one of God Mark 8. 7. in which expression the Devill did both acknowledge Christ and God as also Mat. 4. 6. It is written he shall give his Angels charge over thee where he acknowledgeth that the Scriptures shall be fulfilled as also Mat. 8. 29. Art thou come to torment us before the time In which they doe acknowledge Gods Justice as also Job 1. 9. where Satan saith Doth Job serve God for nought hast thou not set an hedge about him c. by which they acknowledge a reward to be given to the righteous 4. The faith of faiths or the justifying faith which the Apostle The justifying faith Paul maketh mention of Gal. 2. 20. viz. In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me and this faith is the life of the Soule whereby he that beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himself the merits of Christs death And the difference betwixt these four sorts of faith are The difference of these faithâ— these the 1. Apprehendeth the essence and being of God 2. The faith of Miracles his power 3. The Historicall faith his truth and 4. Namely the justifying faith his mercies SECT 5. These faiths not one and the same in substance Obj. THese foure sorts of faith are not the same in substance they differ only in property which as the Gospel is contained and included in the Law as a tree in the seed Ans If that were true then it were possible for them which have the one to have the other and so Devills also which in some sort beleeve as I have shewed should also be capable of justifying faith And as to that you say that justifying faith is contained in the Morall Law we are to distinguish of the Law The Law distinguished for it is sometimes taken more largely either for all the Scriptures of the Old Testament as Luk. 16. 17. It is more easie for heaven and earth to passe away then that one title of the Law should faile So Joh. 15. 25. It is written in their Law they hated me without a cause which testimony is found in Psal 35. 19. or else the Law is taken for all the Book of Moses and so the Law and the Prophets are named together Mat. 7. 12. This is the Law and the Prophets but the Law sometimes is taken more strictly for the Morall Law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. 7. I know not sinne but by the Law and so the Apostle opposeth the law of works to the law of faith Rom. 3. 27. Now as the Law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sence both contained and commanded in the Law for the Lord spake of Christ by the Prophets Luk. 1. 7. and Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had ye beleeved Moses ye would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of me Joh. 5. 15. but as the Law is strictly Justifying faith not contained in the Morall Law taken for the Morall Law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements in the decalogue so we deny justifying faith to be in the Morall Law and that for these reasons following SECT 6. The Law and the Gospel differ in nature and substance 1. IN regard that the Morall Law and the Gospel differ in very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man and the other is revealed and wrought by grace the first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the Law doe by nature the things contained in the Law Rom. 2. 14. the other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2. 24. We are justified freely by grace the Argument then may be framed thus The Morall Law is grafted into the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall then all men shoule have faith which the Apostle denyeth 2 Thes 3. 2. faith then in Christ belongeth not to the Law 2. The effect of the Law of workes and the Law of faith are They differ in effects divers for the one worketh feare and the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but ye have received the spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba father Rom. 8. 17. The same Apostle also saith that the letter killeth but the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2. 6. thus then the argument standeth The same thing cannot be the instrument of contrary things of life and death peace and terrour love and feare for a fountaine cannot send forth salt water and sweet Jam. 3. 12. but the Law is the minister of dread of feare and terrour ergo not of life and peace and so consequently not of the faith of the Gospel which bringeth all these 3. The same thing doth not make the wound and give a plaster to cure it the Law doth shew us our sinnes faith by grace in Christ healeth them The Law reviveth sinne without the Law sinne is dead Rom. 7. 8. But we are dead to sinne and alive to God through Jesus Christ our Lord Rom. 6. 11. the same cannot make us dye to sinne and revive sinne the Law doth the one therefore not the other 4. The Preachers publishers and givers of the Law and the Gospel were divers the Law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ Joh. 1. 17. but if justifying faith were commanded in the Law then grace also should come by the ministry of Moses that gave the Law and so prove the Scriptures false 5. The qualities and conditions of the Law and the Gospel are divers the Law promiseth life to him that worketh Moses thus describeth the righteousnesse of the Law that the man which doeth these things shall surely live thereby Rom. 10. 5. but the Gospel requireth not the conditions of working but beleeving to him that worketh not but beleeveth in him that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4. 5. if then faith were commanded in the Law to beleeve should also be a work
so that it maketh directly against the Pelagians who deny sinne to be a deprivation of nature but say it is a corrupt imitation whereas it appeareth by the Text that even in the very youth and first age when we are not so apt to imitate there is evill and corruption in the heart Again sinne is the cause of death for if Adam had not sinned he had not dyed but it is most evident that Infants dye which if sinne were not the cause then were the Scriptures false which The death of Infants an evident demonstration of originall sinne saith the wages of sinne is death Now what other sinne can procure an infants death which hath not sinned according to the similitude of Adams transgression viz. actually unlesse it be originall sinne which certainly is a most infallible demonstration that children are borne in originall sinne In the next place I will shew you what it is SECT 3. Originall sinne described ORiginall sinne is an inherent corruption of our nature powred out into all the parts of the minde by the guilt of Adam who was not only the Progenitor but also as it were the root of mans nature for the Lord committed those gifts to Adam which he intended to bestow upon mans nature which when he had lost he lost them not only for himself but also for his while posterity by meanes of which we bring forth the workes which are called the workes of the flesh Gal. 5. 19. Now to the further description of originall sinne we finde in Scripture the cause the subject and the effect of it 1. The cause as I said before was Adams fall as we may see The cause of originall sin Rom. 5. 15. 1 Cor. 15. 21. as also by the suggestions of the Devell Gen. 3. 4. as also through Adams Free-will whereas he might have refused 2. The subject of it we take to be the old man with all his The subject of originall sin power minde will and heart for in the minde there is darknesse and ignorance of God and his Will as appeareth by the words of our Saviour Mat. 12. 34. O generation of vipers how can ye being evill speake good things The Apostle also saith that the carnall minde is at emnity with God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither can be Rom. 8. 7. The Apostle James also testifieth the same in these words Let no man say when he is tempted that he is tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with evill neither tempteth he any man but every man is tempted when he is drawne away of his owne lusts and inticements then when lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne c. Jam. 1. 13 14 15. 3. The fruits of originall sinne are either internall or externall The fruits of originall sin internall as ungodly affections or evill concupisence which the Apostle termeth Idolatry 2. Externall as wanton lookes prophaine speeches and devillish actions as in Mat. 15. 19. Out of the heart proceedeth evill thoughts c. which procureth a cauterised conscience the which procureth the wrath of God and eternall damnation as the Apostle testifieth where he saith that the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse and unrighteousnesse of men that holdeth the truth in unrighteousnesse for which thing sake the wrath of God is come upon the Children of disobedience Col. 3. 16. Joh. 8. 24. Rom. 5. 12. 18. Jam. 1. 15. SECT 4. Of Concupisence THe Pelacians doe hold this tenent in the generall that Concupisence was not sinne in any man and so doe the Papists generally in particulars viz. that concupisence after Baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by Commandement and that it is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is only so called because it comes of sinne and inclineth to sinne each of their Objections shall be propounded and answered Questions propounded and answered touching Concupisence And first in answer to the Pelagians objection that hold it in the generall that concupisence which is the first fruit of originall sinne being to will or to desire without the externall action is no sinne to which purpose they argue thus viz. Obj. Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupisence or to will is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sin Ans The Apostle saith that we are all by nature the children of wrath therefore because we are so by nature by the same reason it should be no discommodity unto us to be the children of wrath which would be a meere madnesse to conceive Obj. Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire of such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrary are not evill but such is the concupisence to meat and drink and the like ergo Ans Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill Concupisence how evill and how not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat and drink for as it was naturall for Eve to desire to eate of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so it is likewise with these naturall motions if they be immoderate and inordinate they are evill SECT 5. How Sinne is to be measured Obj. THat which is not in mans power to avoyd is no sinne but not to covit is not in mans power ergo it is no sin Ans Sin is not measured by the necessity and liberty of Nature How sin is to be measured but by the disagreement which it hath with the Will of God 2. When God first printed the Law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto him in his power to keepe 3. Though man by his voluntary corruption hath lost his power and liberty yet God fore-goeth not his power and right in commanding but that Concupisence is sinne Concupisence is sinne it is most evident by the Morall Law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne As also the Apostle who urgeth the same argument saying I had not known sin but by the Law for I had not known lust except the Law had said thou shalt not covit Rom. 7. 7. Thus much touching the objections of the Pelagians next in answer to the Popish objections Obj. The objection which the Papists make touching concupisence is viz. That it is taken away by Baptisme to whom I returne this answer viz. Ans The subjects which they and many other Societies admit Popish objections touching concupisence answered to Baptisme are not at that time of their admittance fit members or subjects to receive that Sacrament of initiation into the Church of Christ which in its due place I shall fully prove But as to such persons as are meete Members
also to the Scribes and Pharisees and others of the Jewes ver 23. terming them Vipers Mat. 12. 34. children of the Devill Joh. 8. 44. by reason of their uncleane thoughts and ungodly actions and yet these sinned not of absolute necessity as we may instance in Pharaâ—h Exod. 7. 22. where it is said that Pharaoh did not hearken to Moses as the Lord had said From which instance we may collect that it was necessary that Pharaoh should not have harkened to Moses because the Lord had fore-told so much who cannot be deceived but Pharaoh was not forced or compelled thereunto SECT 9. Two sorts of necessity THere are two sorts of necessity viz. a violent necessity which forceth and compelleth and there is a conditionall necessity when a thing is said to be necessary another thing presupposed So Pharaohs disobedience and obstinacy was the second way necessary upon the proposall of Gods presience but the first way it was not necessary The first of these is coactive the second is voluntary the first neither justifieth a man if he doe well being forced thereunto nor condemneth him if he doe evill but the second hath place in both for by it the righteous have praise whose obedience in respect of Gods ordinance is necessary and infallable and contrariwise the wicked are condemned who sinne willingly notwithstanding Gods presience considered in some sort it is also necessary As our Saviour said concerning Judas It is necessary that offences should come but woe be to him by whom they come Mat. 18. 7. It was necessary that Christ should suffer being the determinate counsell and fore-knowledge of God Act. 2. 23. but Judas did not know that he was appointed to be the man that should act that treason but he did it voluntarily out of his covetous affection to money as doth evidently appeare by his owne expressions What will ye give me and I will betray him unto you Mat. 26. 14. Again it was necessary that the Prophets and Wise men should be killed crucified scurged and persecuted by the Jewes as Christ had foretold Mat. 23. 34. but neverthelesse the Jewes did it out of a voluntary hatred they had to Christ and his Gospel as plainly appeareth in Scripture CHAP. XIIII Treateth of the power of a regenerate man in point of sinning SECT 1. Objection TOuching which the Papists affirme that the precepts and Commandements of God to a man regenerate justified and in the state of grace are not impossible to be kept Ans In answer to which it is requisite first to lay open the point touching the extent of the truth therein contained and then to answer to their objections 1. We are to consider a four-fold state and condition of man A four-fold estate and condition of man first as he was created in a perfect state before his fall when it was possible for man to have kept the Law and have conformed himself in perfect obedience to the will of his Creator 2. But man considered in his corrupt estate before he be regenerated and restored can by no meanes keep the Law as the Prophet saith Can the Black-a-moore change his hew or the Leopard his spots Jer. 13. 23. so the Apostle Whatsoever is not of faith is sin Rom. 14. 23. And we are not able of our selves to think any thing as of our selves 2 Cor. 3. 5. 3. In the restored estate of man by Regeneration and new Birth the Law is partly possible to be kept and partly impossible It is possible two wayes 1. By the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ who hath fulfilled the Law for us for he needed not to have fulfilled it for himself as he suffered not for himself for he was perfectly holy and just even from his conception by the communication of the Divine Justice for the Apostle saith Rom. 10. 4. Christ is the end of the Law that is the fulfilling of the Law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth 2. The Law is possible to be kept of the regenerate in respect of the incoation or beginning of obedience internall and externall as the Apostle saith This is the love of God that we keep his Commandements 1 Joh. 5. 3. for he which is without this being of righteousnesse that is without regeneration and saith he knoweth and serveth God he is a lyar c. SECT 2. The power of Regeneration NOw this regeneration and incoate obedience being wrought in the faithfull by the Spirit of God though it doe not wholly extirpate and root out sinne yet it keepeth it so under that it reigneth not in them and doth so revive them that they labour to resist sinne and to live according to the Law of God which obedience though it be in it self imperfect yet it is accepted of God by faith in Christ in whose perfect righteousnessâ— whatsoever is imperfect in our obedience is perfected and our imperfections pardoned Yet even in those regenerate ones the Law is impossible to be The Law impossible to be kept of the regenerate in respect of that perfect on which God requireth kept in respect of that perfection which God requireth and therefore the Prophet David saith Psal 143. 5. Enter not into judgement with thy servant for in thy sight shall none living be justified the faithfull then doe both imperfectly keep the Law committing many things against it 2. In those things wherein they doe keep the Law They have some imperfection as the Prophet Isaiah saith Chap. 64. 6. All our righteousnesse are as a stained clout with Deut. 27. 16. Mat. 5. 21 22. 28. Act. 15. 10. Rom. 7. 8. 24. 25. 1 Cor. 2. 14. Jam. 2. 20. But there is great difference betwixt the regenerate and the The difference betwixt the â—â—ns of the regenerate and the unregenerateâ— unregenerate even when they sin 1. In that Gods purpose standeth to save the Elect though they sometimes slip but so it is not with the other 2. Their repentance in the end is cortaine so it is not in the unregenerate 3. Even in the sins of the regenerate there yet remaineth some seed of faith which is not utterly extinguished nor they wholly given over but the wicked and unregenerate are wholly sold over unto sin and their very conscience is polluted and defiled with it 4. The glorious state of the Saints in the next life their obedience shall be perfect and they shall be wholly conformable to the Will of God and then we shall be just not only by the imputative Justice of Christ but by a proper essentiall Justice and then we shall fully be made like unto the Image of Christ as the Apostle saith Rom. 8. 29. Those which he knew before he also predestinated to be made like the Image of his Son SECT 3. Obj. IN the next place their Objections shall be cited and answered in order their first objection being this viz. The works of the Spirit are perfect but good workes in the regenerate are workes of
lyeth slayeth the soule SECT 7. We ought not to conceale the truth AGain as one ought not to lye so ought he not to conceale the truth either publickly or privately as when one suffereth his neighbour to be overcome in judgement where he by his testimony might deliver him To which purpose may be applyed the saying of the Wise-man Prov. 24. 11. Deliver those that are drawne to death and wilt thoâ— not preserve those that are led to be slaine And of this kinde is that usuall negligence and over-sight of men that privately doe not tell one another of their sins which duty is reproved by the Law Levit. 19. 17. Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart but thou shalt plainly rebuke thy neighbour and suffer him not to sin he then which suffereth his brother to sin in drunkennesse prophanesse swearing or whatsoever else and holdeth his peace therein offendeth against the rule of charity and is found before God to be an hater of his brother Upon which text one useth this Simile for the further clearing of the point If saith he thou shouldest see a man walking in the dark without taking heed where thou knowest there is a pit and holdest thy peace what manner of one shouldest thou shew thy self The like is also when a man casteth himself headlong into vice and vanieâ—h himself in thy hearing of his evill doings and yet thou praisest him and smilest to thy self CHAP. XIX Treateth of simple Fornication and marriage of their Priests c. SECT 1. THese Popelings also affirme That simple Fornication ought not to be punished by humane Lawes and that it is an unjust human Law to take away Strumpets and simple Fornication their reasons shall be produced and answered First say they Object Civill Lawes are only to restraine such sins whereby Justice is violated and injury done unto another but in Fornication there is no act of injustice there is no person there to whom any injustice can be done Ans There is a manifold wrong committed in single Fornication 1. They offer wrong and dishonour to Christ in making the members of Christ the members of an Harlot 1 Cor. 6. 15. 2. They injure themselves in sinning against their owne bodies in defiling and polluting them 3. They doe wrong unto their posterity bringing upon them the shame of Bâ—stardy making them illegitimate and disabling them to inherite SECT 2. Human Lawes ought to forbid Fornication Obj. IF humane Lawes should punish Fornication it would give occasion to Adultery â—nâ—est c. seeing the most of a Common-wealth are weake and imperfect and if they were restrained from this smaller vice they would fall into greater inormities Ans Seeing God hath appointed a remedy against Fornication and all other uncleanesse by lawfull Matrimony why then should men make themselves wiser then God and seeke to cure one evill by another for in this manner is the Divine order perverted amongst men by restraining of Marriage in their Priests and giving way to Fornication and therefore it is no marvell if such unlawfull lusts doe reigne amongst them Obj. Human Lawes are not to forbid all sins because men makeing a Law cannot give preserving grace to keep it and this was the cavse why Moses Law did not forbid all vices because there was no grace given or help ministred to avoyd them therefâ—râ— some things was permitted amongst them as to take Vsâ—ry of the Gentiles to give a bill of divorcement and such like Ans By this reason human Lawes should forbid no sins because Gods Word and not mans Lawes giveth grace to aâ—stâ—ine from any sin 2. Neither is there any sin forbidden in the New Testament against the Morall Law which is not prohibited in the Old as may appeare by our blessed Saviours interpretation of the Law Mat. 3. wherein he giveth no new Law but only expoundeth the old 3. Though Moses Law gave no grace to keep it yet because it was a Schoole-master to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3. 19. it was fit it should be a perfect Law and containe a strict rule of all righteousnesse that men the rather should be driven unto Christ seeing themselves to come farre short in the performance of it as it ought to be 4. The tolleration of some things amongst the Israelites for their hardnesse of heart sheweth not a defect in the Law but an interpretation in them that could not be subject to the perfect rule of the Law 5. Concerning the punishment of Fornication it was not omitted in Moses Law for although Fornication with one was recumpensed with Marriage and paying of the Dowry Deut. 22. 24. yet if a Daughter in Israel did play the Whore she was stoned to death ibid. vers 21. And seeing the Law saith There shall not be a Whore amongst the Daughters of Israel Deut. 23. 17. how dare any defend the tollerating and suffering of Whores in Christian Common-wealths SECT 3. Of their injoyning of single life to their Priests TO this former tenent of theirs may be added their not tollerating of their Priests to marry injoyning them single life as more agreeable to their Orders which they think is defiled and Marriage of Mâ—nisters â—â—â—â—ll polluted by marriage which opinion is quite contrary to the Apostles doctrine who calleth it the doctrine of Devills to forbid marriage 1 Tim. 4. 1. 3. and also giveth liberty to every man to avoyd fornication to have his wife 1. Cor. 7. 2. As also that Marriage is honourable amongst all men Heb. 13. 4. so that this practise of theirs doth not only contradict the Apostles doctrine but giveth occasion to Adultery Fornication and other uncleane lusts by their restraining the remedy against these inormities which is lawfull and honest Marriage and so they are apparent transgressors of the Commandement giving themselves over to all filthinesse which hypocrisie and dissemulation of theirs was notably discovered in the suppression of their uncleane Cages and Cells here in England there being many hundred sculls of Infants found in feying of the Moats which did compasse their religious buildings which without doubt was begotten by meanes of their restraint afore mentioned SECT 4. Of Swearing by Saints and other Creatures Obj. ANother of the Popish tenents is That it is lawfull to sweare by Saïnts or other Creatures for proofe of which they instance the words of Christ Mat. 23. 21. Whosoever sweareth by the Gold of the Temple sweareth by the Temple and him that dwelleth therein Ans Our Saviour in that place doth not justifie swearing by Creatures but confuteth that nyce distinction of the Pharisees who thought it was nothing to sweare by the Temple but by the Gold of the Temple ver 16. and sheweth that in so doing they could not avoyd swearing by God because it was the place of his Habitation and so they did in such an Oath take the name of God in vaine for otherwise if our Saviour should have allowed swearing by Creatures as by heaven saying He
which we confesse a rare thing to be deserned such we may despaire of because the Apostle forbiddeth us to pray for them 1 Joh. 5. 16. and those for whom the Lord did forbid Jeremiah to pray for Chap. 14. 11. and those for whom our Saviour saith he prayeth not for Joh. 17. 9. what hope was there for these when he forbid to pray for them who if any was to pardon them 2. Though we in charity are to hope the best even of the greatest sinners yet this followeth not that all of them may have grace to repent We judge according to that we see but the Lord seeth the heart and knoweth from the beginning who are his and who are not Now on the contrary side that some in this life are so hardned that they cannot repent and are so incorrigable and without hope of remission of their sins may thus appeare The sin against the Holy Ghost is irremissable as our Saviour saith He that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven Mark 3. 29. therefore there are some in this life which cannot repent neither can have their sins forgivâ—â— them Againe a remarkable testimony of rejection is declared in such as wilfully make away themselves by an untimely death SECT 15. Obj. THe sin against the Holy Ghost is said to be irremissable or unpardonable not because it cannot at all be unpardoned or forgiven but because it is hardly forgiven Ans In answer to this objection the place of the Apostle may be urged who saith that it is impossible for such to be renewed by repentance Heb. 6. 6. so then that which is impossible is not only hardly done but not at all 2. The Free-knowledge and Decree of God concerning the rejection of some is unchangeable and cannot be altered but God hath fore-seen some to be damned and decreed them to be rejected as Judas is called the childe of perdition Joh. 17. 12. therefore it is not possible for such to come to repentance to be saved for those things which are not predestinated cannot be obtained but Cod hath not decreed repentance for such as are rejected and reprobâ—te ergo they cannot repent and where there can be no repentance there can be no remission of sins but some have such hearts they cannot repent Rom. 7. 5. therefore the sins of such are irremissable and cannot be forgiven as one speaking concerning Judas saith that repentance in him was in vaine in regard he had sinned against the Holy Ghost Obj. If it be so that God hath chosen a certaine number to be saved and the rest to be damned then we may live as we list if we be appointed to be saved we must be saved if not we must of necessity be damned Ans We ought not so to reason with our selves but rather We ought to stâ—ive â—o maâ—e â—uâ— calling and election sure strive to make our calling and â—lection sure for who knoweth whether he be elected to salvation or no thou maist for the present be a grievous sinner and yâ—â— belong to the remnant of the election of grace as may be instanced in the Apostle Paul and the Thiese on the Crosse for where sin aboundeth there grace doth superabound but shall we therefore sin that grace may abound no saith the Apostle God forbid for so long as we continue in sin we are the servants of sin and who knoweth the day of his death that he may take his owne leasure to repent and it is a great signe of a reprobate thus to reason and to hazzard his Salvation on so desperate a point It is true if God have appointed thee to be saved thou shalt be saved otherwise not but let us not in the meane time despaire of our selves but use the meanes that God hath appointed to call the Elect for whom God hath called to the end he hath also called to the meanes to obtaine the end albeit some at the eleventh houre therefore whosoever thou art that despisest the meanes maist also be sure never to obtaine the end The cause why I have so long insisted upon this point is in regard I would have it sufficiently opened to every Christian it being the most absolute cause of difference betwixt Christians the clearing of which I am confident will give much satisfaction to the minds of many which are unsetled in this particular which is the hearty desire of the publisher hereof CHAP. IIII. Treateth of the use of the Morall Law SECT 1. IT is reported that those under the notion of Antinomians are such people as deny the use of the Morall Law since the publishing of the Gospel To the clearing of which point we are to consider of the Law of Moses in generall and of the differences of them 1. The Law of Moses delivered unto the children of Israel The Law of Moses of three sorâ— were of three sorts viz. Morall Judiciall and Ceremoniall the first doth prescribe a persect rule of righteousnesse discerning Morall things that are right and just from them that are contrary both towards God and Man in externall and internall duties requiring obedience under paine of everlasting death 2. The Ceremoniall Law concerned such rites and services as Ceremoniall belonged to the externall worship of God prescribed unto that people both to distinguish them from other Nations of the world and to be signes and simbals unto them of the Spirituall grace in the New Testament to be fulfilled by the Messiah 3. The Judiciall Lawes belonged to the Civill State which Judiciall were such ordinances as contained rules of equity for the judgeing and deciding of Civill controversies and questions and decreed punishments for the transgressions against both the Morall and Ceremoniall Lawes and kept the people under obedience As touching the difference of these Lawes the Morall are The Morall Law grounded upon the Law of Nature generally grounded upon the Law of Nature and so are not the other 2. They are perpetuall to endure for ever and so doe not the other 3. The Morall requireth both externall and internall obedience the other only externall the Morall Law was given as principall and the other Lawes were to give place unto them and were the end unto which the other tended and yet these three sorts of Lawes are not severally but joyntly handled by Moses so that amongst the Moralls are found some Ceremonials and amongst the Judicials both Morall and Ceremoniall Lawes this being the difference betwixt the Morall Law contained in the Commandements and the other that the first was delivered by the Lords owne voyce to the people and the other was received by Moses from God SECT 2. 2. AS touching the validity of these Lawes 1. The Ceremonials The validity of Moses Lawes are utterly abolished so that there is now no placâ— for them under the Gospel neither can they be revived without derogation to the Gospel of Christ as the Apostle saith If ye be circumcised Christ
shall profit you nothing Gal. 5. 2. for when the body is come the shadow must be abolished but the Ceremonials were shadowes the body is Christ Col. 2. 17. their Temple signified the Church of God their holy place Heaven their Sacrifices the Passion of Christ their expiations the remission of sins these things then being fully exhibited and fulfilled in Christ have now no more place in the Church Again the Ceremonials served only for that carnall people To what end Ceremonies served which were as children kept in bondage under the rudiments of the world Gal. 4. 3. but now we are no longer under tutors and governours the time appointed by the Father being expired but are set free and redeemed by Christ Another reason for the abolishing of them is in respect of that people to whom they were prescribed as a marke and cognizance to discerne them from all other Nations but now this distinction being taken away and the wall of partition being broden downe both Jewes and Gentiles being made all one in Christ that also is abolished which discerneth them from other people for the causes being changed for the which the Law was made there must needs also follow an alteration of the Law it self As Of the juditiall Law for the Judicials they are neither abolished nor yet with such necessity to be injoyned the equity of them bindeth but not the strict severity they doe not hold affirmatively that we are tyed to the same severity of punishment now as was inflicted then but negatively they doe hold that now the punishment of death should not be adjudged where sentence of death is not given by Moses Christian Magistrates living now under Christ the prince of peace Isa 9. 6. that is of clemency and mercy may abate of the severity of Moses Lawes and mittigate the punishment The severity of the judicial Law to be abated of death but they cannot adde unto it to make the burthen more heavie To shew more rigor then Moses becommeth not the Gospel to extend more favour is not unbeseeming of which two assertions these are the reasons 1. The first is urged from Lukes Gospel where our Saviour Example reproveth his Disciples because they would have had fire to have come downe from Heaven upon the Samaritans by which we are shewed that vengeance is not alwaies to be taken on them that offend because oftentimes clemency is more profitable both for patience in the offended and amendment in the offendâ—r and that by the example of our Saviour Luk. 9. 54. The Son of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to save them 2. In that example of Christ who suffered the woman taken Example in Adultery to escape without punishment of death Joh. 8. 11. from which may be inferred that the Adultresse now is not to be put to death but to live rather to be reconciled to her Husband or to come to repentance in which instance our Saviour doth not abrogate the Law against Adultery but refuseth only to meddle with the Magistrates office And albeit Christ did not exercise the Magistrates office in his owne person giving unto Caesar the things that was Caesars according to his owne direction yet in this case it had not been impertinent to have given directions to have had her before the Civill Magistrate as in another case he did send the Leaper to the Priest Mat. 8. 4. if it had pleased him to impose still the severity of the Law yea our Saviour sheweth by this answer Let him that is amongst you without sinne cast the first stone at her Joh 8. 7. so that he would not have them such straight executors of the rigour of the Law of Moses upon others but rather be severe Judges of themselves and with charitable affections to support the frugality of others to which they themselves were subject unto SECT 3. THe difference betwixt the time of the Law and the Gospel The difference of time to be considered must be considered then they received the spirit of bondage to feare but now the spirit of adoption Rom. 8. 15. Then they which came neare the Mount where the Morall Law was given were stoned or strucken through with a Dart whether man or beast Heb. 12. 20. but it is not so now then the blood of Abel called for vengeance but the blood of Christ now calleth for mercy and so speaketh better things then that of Abel ver 24. therefore to mittigate the severity of Moses Law in some cases yet not leaving sin unpunished nor by connivance cherished it is more sutable to the profession of the Gospel of peace and mercy 4. The continuall practice of the Church sheweth as much The practice of succeeding Churches decline thâ—m to bâ— mitigated that the rigour of Moses Judicials is mittigated the Apostle only willing the infectious man to be excommunicated 1 Cor. 5. 5. by which it seemeth there was no Law in force to put such to death neither therefore was the Law cruell then neither now doth the Gospel seeme to be desolate but in them both the benignity of God appeared yet by a divers dispensation Then by the death of the body the people was rather parged from their sins then condâ—mned but unto us sin is not purged by corporall punishment but by repentance The death of the body then served aâ— an expiation of their sins prefiguring the death of Christ Gal. 3. 13. but now the expiation of sins is by repentance and remission of sins in Christ Now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospel even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now As to the continuance of the Morall Law it is yet in force The Morall Law yet in force and is not abrogated in respect of obedience which thereunto is still required under the Gospel but in respect of the curse and â—alidictioâ— which Christ hath taken away so that it is most true which our Saviour saith He came not to dissolve the Law but to fulfill it Mat. 5. 17. he hath fulfilled it in his owne person in keeping it â— In paying the punishment which was due by the Law to the transgressors thereof 3. By inabling us by his grace to walk in obedience to the Law SECT 4. Obj. THe Morall Law only prescribeth duties concerning God and our Neighbour and speaketh nothing of man toward himself 2. It forbiddeth perjury whereas blasphemy and heresie was â—s needfull to be forbidden 3. The precepts of the Sabbath is only expressed whereas there were divers other Feasts as of the Passeover Pâ—nticâ—ast and others which the Israelites were bound to keep 4. The duty of Parents is commanded but not the the love of Parents againe unto their children 5 The inward act of Murder is not forbidden as the inward act of Adultery namely concupisence therefore there is not a sufficient enumeration in the Mâ—rall Law of all Morall
duties Ans The Morall Law is perfect and every way sufficient as may appeare by the generall contents thereof in prescribing all kinde of duties both towards God and man 1. Aâ— these things are to be performed by us to â—â—rrâ—â—â— Governours namely fidelity reverence and obedience so likewise the like duties but in a higher nature and degree are required towards God as 1. Fidelity in acknowledging him to be the only God which is commanded in the first and second Prâ—â—ept 2. Reâ—â—râ—â—â—â— in the third not to prophane his glorious name 3. Obedience and Service which is performed in consecrating the Sabbath Day holy unto Gods Worship Againe as to our Neighbour our duties are either speciall towards those to whom we are bound by any speciall kinde of benefit as we are in our Parents and Superiours which is required in the fifth precept or generally towards all men in forbeaâ—ing to doe them any hurt 1. Either in deed as in their single persons concerning their life or their coupled persons touching their Wife or in their Goods we must not steale as also in words where fals witnesse bearing is forbidden either in heart as in the tenth Commandement yea there can be no duty rehearsed either by God or Man which is not comprehended under some of these therefore the decalâ—gue containeth a perfect Law Again it was not necessary that any particular precept should be given as touching the duties of a man towards himselfe both because nature is not corrupted in such duties but that a man still retaineth love to himselfe as it is in our love towards God and our Neighbour as also in that the rule of our love one toward another is taken from a mans love towards himselfe he shal love his neighbour as himselfe And the Apostle saith That no man ever yet hated his owne flesh this is therefore presupposed as granted of all and as a ground to the rest that a man loveth himselfe 2. The Law giveth instance in the more generall and noâ—orions Transgressions such as at the first would be acknowledged of all and therefore because perjury is more generall and more easily discerned then blasphemy and heresie under that the rest are understood 3. The other Festivals were memorables of particular benefits which concerned the Israelites only as the Passeover and â—east of Tabernacles of their deliverance out of Aegypt but the Sabbath was a memorable benefit of the Creation which concerneth all Nations and therefore it only was to be inserted into the Morall Law 4. The love of Parents towards their children though it be naturall yet the duty of children towards their parents is more agreeable to the Law of Nature and the contrary namely their disobedience more unnaturall and therefore instance was to be given in this rather then in the other and besides the name of Father and Son being relatives the duty of each towards other are reciprocall and one may be inferred upon the other 5. Concupisence is expresly forbidden rather then the first motion of anger and revenge First because it is harder to resist the motion of Concupisence then of rage and revenge and we are more apt to sin by that then this 2. Because the inward wrath and purpose of revenge beginneth with a desire For there are two things in revenge as 1. That which we pursue 2. The pursuit it selfe that which we pursue we judge to be evill and so hate it but the action of pursuit we think to be good namely to seek revenge and so we desire it Seeing then that all kinde of coveting and desire is forbidden even that also is included from which rage and revenge taketh its rise or beginning SECT 5. Obj. IN the next place it is requisite to consider of the perpetuity and continuance of the Law for in some places the Scripture saith that Christ came to fulfill the Law not to destroy it Mat. 1. 17. and in other places as though the Law was abrogated as Rom. 6. 14. Ye are not under the Law but under grace with Heb. 7. 12. If the Priest-hood be changed there must of necessity be a change of the Law Ans For the solution hereof this is to be added here though How the Lawes of Moses are in force and how not the question be partly answered before And first in relation to the Ceremoniall Law which was prescribed unto the Jewes to be observed in the Worship of God it is wholly abrogated 1. The body being come the shadow is to be done away 2. These Ceremoniall observations were tyed to a certaine place as 1. To the Tabernacle 2. To the Temple of Solomon but now the Worship of God is not tyed to a certaine place as at Jerusalem where the Temple was Joh. 4. â—â— 3. Other Sacraments are instituted as Baptisme and the Lords Supper ergo they are to be abrogated 4. The Ceremonies doe binde the observers to keep the whole Law but Christ having freed us from the bondage ergo 5. The Ceremonies were a wall of partition and distinction betwixt the Jewes and the Gentiles but now that distinction is taken away all being one in Christ 2. Touching the Pollitick and judiciall Lawes of Moses neither doe they absolutely binde now 1. In regard that many of them were particular to the pollicy of that Common-wealth as the Lawes concerning their inheritances and possessions which were not to passe from Tribes They also shewed the fashion and manners of their Country as in building their houses with slat roofes Deut. 22 8. of these positive constructions there is now no use amongst other Nations 2. The condition of all people are not alike some are more stubborne and obstinate some more civill and tractable and therefore some have need of more strict and severe Lawes then others one kinde of pollitick Law then cannot serve all Nations 3. The Gospel which is perpetuall prescribeth not a certaine forme of Government to all Nations neither overthroweth their severall pollicies but in generall commandeth obedience to higher powers Rom. 13. 1. ergo much lesse the Law which was to be changed but the judiciall Law is not abrogated in respect of the substance end and universall equity which is punishing of vice and maintaining of peace 3. The Morall Law is not now in force in respect of Justification How the Morall Law is not in force Rom. 3. 28. A man is justified by faith without the workes of the Law but it bindeth in respect of obedience we are bound to keep all the precepts of the Law but yet in respect of the terror of the Law and manner of obedience to which we was to be obedient and subject for feare of punishment we are freed from it and therefore the Apostle saith The Law is not given to a righteous man 1 Tim. 1. 9. because they of love rather then feare doe yeeld their obedience and so are a Law unto themselves But this is a priviledge only of the regenerate as
for carnal and unregenerate men they are stil under the curse and terrour of the Law according to that saying Cursed is every one that continâ—eth not in all things that are written in the booke of the Law to doe them SECT 6. BUt though the Morall Law be now in force and bindeth us The difference beâ—wixt the Law and the Gospel to obedience as well as it did the Jewes yet there is a great difference betwixt the Law and the Gospel as 1. In the knowledge and manifestation thereof for by the Morall Law we have some directions by the light of nature but the knowledge of the faith in Christ by the Gospel is revealed by grace 2. The Law teacheth what we should be by faith and grace in Christ we are made that which the Law prescribeth which the Gospel effecteth in us 3. The conditions are unlike the Law tyeth the promises of eternall life to the keeping of the Commandements the Gospel to the condition of faith apprehending the righteâ—â—snesse of Christ 4. The effects are divers the Law worketh terrour the Gospel peace and comfort the Law striketh terrouâ— by the manifestation of sin as the prodigall Childe confessed I am not worthy to be called thy sonne it causeth us to goe afarre of with the Publiâ—an as not worthy to come neare to the presence of God but the Gospel hath two other contrary effects for it comforteth and alureth as our Saviour saith Come unto me all ye that are weary and heavie laden and I will refresh you Mat. 11. 28. and they that finde not the Law and the Gospel to work these their contrary effects doe shew that they neither understand the Law revealing sin nor the Gospel giving remission of sins the one being Lex timoris the law of feare and the other Lex amoris the Law of love and these two Lawes have also a three-fold difference viz. The law of feare maketh its observer servile the law of love maketh free 2. The first is kept by constraint the other willingly 3. The first is hard and heavie the other easie and light CHAP. V. Treateth of Gods seeing sin in the Elect. SECT 1. THere are other opinions also which are attributed to them under the notion of Antinomians which I hope are but aspersions cast upon the Professors of Christ but however I shall propound the charge which they are accused with and returne an answer to it Obj. 1. The first is that God doth not will not nor cannot see any sin in his justified ones which they gather from the text Num. 23. 21. 2. Though the children of God sin never so grievously yet God is not so much as angry with them for it much lesse doth he chastise them for it As also that the Morall Law is of no use at all to a Releever nor rule for him to walke or examine his life by and that Christians are free from the mandatory power of it and that it is as impossible for a childe of God to sin as for Christ himselfe and that to aske pardon for sin is no lesse then blasphemy Ans As I have made appeare that the Morall Law is yet in force so also in the other that God doth not will not nâ—r cannot see any sin in his justified children I answer by thiâ— demand viz. Whether David was one of Gods elect sanctified ones David did repent of his sin or no if he was why then did the Lord reprove him for his Adultery and Murder by the Prophet Nathan and what was the cause of his writing the 51. Psalm with 2 Sam. 14. 15. I wil be c. if he commit iniquity I wil chastise him with the rod of men 2. As to that they say it is as impossible for a childe of God to sin as it is for Christ himselfe I advise them to take notice of what is affirmed by them viz. that they may sin grievously as before mentioned now that it is possible to sin grievously and yet to be as free from sin as Christ to me is a paradox like to which is the other That the children of God need not to aske pardon for their sins and that it is no lesse then blasphemie so Peter and others repented of their faylings to doe for thus they make the Apostle Peter a blasphemer in weeping and repenting for his inconstancy Mat. 26. 75. now to acknowledge that a man may commit grosse and grievous sins and yet terme him a blasphemer if he repent of them is manifestly to declare themselves reprobates for the Scripture saith that he only that confesseth his sins shall finde mercy and therefore the Prophet David saith I said I will confesse my sins unto the Lord and so thou forgavest the wickednesse of my sin In which wards there is both sin confessed and repented of with a pardon annexed as the fruit of his confession and repentance The same Prophet also saith If I regard sin in my heart the Lord will not heare my prayer Which words doth also declare the detestation which the Lord hath of sin even in his very elect As also Rev. 2. 16. where the Lord speaking to his Church saith Repent or else I will come unto thee quickly c. the Apostle Paul also The Lord requireth repentance under the Gospel saith that godly sorrow worketh repentance never to be repented of a Cor. 7. 10. the Apostle Peter also exciteth Converts to repentance Act. 2. 38. I hope these Tenents are but aspersions cast upon the people of God undeservedly by the enemies of God but if there he any such I desire them in the name and feare of God to renounce such blasphemous Heresies and that they will An admoâ—â—tion be no more a scandall to the true professors of Jesus Christ and not hence forth to give occasion to the enemies of God to blaspheme A word saith Salomon to the wise is enough and being spoken in due season is like apples of gold in pictures of silver Prov. 25. 11. CHAP. VI. The sixth Chapter treateth of such tenents as are most scandalously imputed to such as are now under the notion of Anabaptists in this Nation but if there be any such opinionist now extant he is answered as followeth SECT 1. Object FIrst it is imputed to them aforesaid that no day ought Severall Tenents laid downe and answered Of he obserâ—â—â—â—on of the Lords day to be kept holy in that the Apostle saith Let no man judge you in respect of an holy day c. Ans The observation of dayes are not simply prohibited by the Apostle sed cum opinione cultus vel necessitatis but with an opinion of placing Religion and necessity in them The Jews kept their Sabbath as making observation of the day a part of Gods Worship and they held it necessary to keep that day unchangeable it was also unto them a Type and Figure of their Spirituall rest But Christians now keep not the Lords day
in any of these respects either as a day more holy in it selfe then others or as of necessity to be kept but only for decency and order because it is meet that some certaine day should be kept and set apart for the Worship of God Aâ— in practice of Phisicke in pollitick Affaires and in the trade of Husbandry there is a lawfull observation of dayes but to make some fortunate and some unfortunate and to depend wholly upon the Aspect of Sâ—arres is a vaine and idle thing So likewise in the practice of Religion as dayes may be superstitiously kept so they may also be distinguished for order and decency sake for other good uses as to observe seasons of the yeare for tilling of the earth and for the administration of Phisick to the body of man as also to observe convenient times for civill businesses and the like SECT 2. THe error of Community was first maintained by the Heathen Of community for Plato held that all things ought to be common the same also was held by the Hereticks called Apostoloci and attributed Severall objects answered touching community in those dayes to them under the notion of Annabaptists which particular I cannot beleeve of them but if in case any of them be of that judgement I hope these reasons following will convince them of that error Obj. The Apostles had all things common at Jerusalem Act. 2. 44. c. ergo Ans That custome then was easie because they were few and necessary for if they had not sold their possessions and so made the common use they by violence should have been stripped of them but now there is neither the like facility or necessity 2. That community was voluntary not imposed upon any for it was in their choyces whether they would sell their possessions or not as Peter said to Annanias Act. 5. 4. After it was sold was it not in thy owne power c. 3. Neither were all things common amongst them they had some things private and peculiar to themselves as Mary had her proper house and dwelling in the City Act. 12. 12. 4. This was not the generall custome of the whole Church for in Achaia and Macedonia there was gatherings made for the Saints at Jerusalem it was then particular for that place and peculiar for that time and therefore a generall rule for all times and places cannot be taken from hence 5. Neither were things so indifferently common as that every man might take what he would but the things in common were distributed as every man had need Act. 5. 35. Obj. Christ saith to the young man in the Gospel Mark 10. 21. Goe and sell all that thou hast and give to the poore ergo we must doâ— the like Ans That was a personall precept and belonged to them times for the Apostles did leave their parents and their houses but we are not commanded to doe the like Besides our Saviour Vâ—lessâ— Christ be in composition so said to shew how farre he came short of the perfection of the Law and to humble him that thought so well of himselfe againe he saith not make thy goods common but give unto the poore SECT 3. Obj. ALL things are yours saith the Apostle to the Corinthians 1 Cor. 3. 11. all things therefore ought to be common Ans The Apostles meaning in that place is that all things were ordained for their good whether life or death things present or things to come 2. He speaketh not of a common possession of all things in right but that they are common to use they had Jus ad rem non jus in ree right to the thing not in the thing Obj. He that gathereth much hath nothing over and he that gathereth little had no lack 2 Cor. 8. 15. Ans The Apostle in that text thus inferreth upon this condition out of your abundance at this time supply their lack that their abundance may be also for your lack that there may be an equality as it is written he that gathereth much c. ver 14. Now the Apostle in that place doth not speake of confused community and equality in possession of things but in the use of them and that not at all times but when the necessity of our brethren requireth it and such community is yet required and therefore his exhortation is that like as in the gathering of Manna one helped another and that which any gathered over went to make up his part which had gathered lesse so the supersluity and abundance of the rich should supply the necessities and wants of the poore for otherwise if it were Gods will that all things should be common amongst men then would it be no sin to steale nor could there theft be committed seeing that no man could take any thing wherein he had not as good an interest as him he tooke it from which is contrary both to the Law and the Gospel To the Law as in Exod. 22. 1. where it saith If any man steale an Oxe he shall restore five Oxen and the doctrine of the Gospel forbiddeth all kinde of theft and stealing Ephe. 4. 28. Let him that stole steale no more but rather labour with his hands c. Again that it is lawfull for Christians to retaine a severall right and property in those things which they possesse may thus appeare 1. In that the Scripture alloweth Contracts as buying and selling as Abraham bought a burying place of Ephroâ— Gen. 23. David the threshing-flore of Araunah 2 Sam. 24. but there can be no such Contract where there are not distinct properties in things SECT 4. Obj. THe examples of the Old Testament belong not unto us Ans That is no lesse then Blasphemy seeing the Apostle saith that whatsoever is written is written for our instruction Rom. 15. 4. but there is also the like warrant in the New Testament as that the Disciples of our blessed Saviour bought such things as were necessary Joh. 4. 8. 6. 5. 13. 29. 2. The giving of Almes are every where commanded in Scripture but men are not to give Almes of such things as are not their owne But if no man have any peculior property in things but one man have as much interest as another men could not not have where withall to give neither should there need any almes at all 3. Riches are the gift of God Prov. 10. 22. The blessing of the Lord maketh rich And Chap. 22. 2. The rich and poore meet together the Lord is the Maker of them all So that it is evident the Lord alloweth distinct properties and proportions without which none could be richer then another 4. The Lord himselfe appointed that the Tribes with their severall Lots and possessions should be distinguished and therefore the fact of Naboth is defended and justified because he would not part with the inheritance of his fathers 5. Many other examples may be produced not only out of the Old Testament but also out of the
and path Religious then rich he would have his Ministers like burning and shining Lamps to the illumination and salvation of his people but the Devill tels them this is a soure strict and precise way and it is not meet that such admired eminency of Noble or learned parts should be confined to such obscuriâ—y that such rare gifts and depth of knowledge should intermixe amongst a number of rude ignorant and uncapable Clownes and therefore he labours yea and prevailes with almost all of them to raise their spirits to higher hopes and to plunge presently into the current of the times and be made some body in the The worlds principle world And hereupon their hearts being ravished with the pleasing apprehensions of worldly glory and humane greatnesse represented by Satan in the most illustring formes to their ambitious imaginations they resolve fearfully against their owne soules to follow the streames and to plot all meanes and wayes of preferment disclaiming all occasions that tend to precisenesse studying only to understand the world and to negotiate for advancement And upon this very score it was that the boone Athâ—â—ian-like The practice of our Aâ— beâ—iâ—n blades blades of the times derided Doctrine and use in Sermons as poore and beggerly edifying plainesse foolishnesse of Preaching knowing that by so doing they should ingratiate themselves into the times and please those great ones who had rather have their eares tickled then their Consciences touched to have pillowes sowed under their armes that they might lye more soft upon their beds of security then to have the keene arrowes of Righteousnesse and Truth fastned in their sides by the faithfull Ministers of Jesus Christ to drive them to sincerity And thus have those daubers made shipwrack of their Consciences by their base flattering and depending on such great ones who have also been made hereby enemies to Professors and their owne Soules SECT 3. Obj. VVEll but to proceed where we left what shall follow in case the Offender be dampnified by the Church to pay a certaine sum and he refuse Ans The party so refusing to be ordered by the Church doth thereby declare his contempt to the power given to it by Christ upon which he is to be ejected the Church and so reduced to the state and condition of a Heathen man and a Publican Obj. But must the Plaintiffe then lose his money Ans He hath then no other meanes to obtaine it then by the Wherein the Maâ—istraâ—e is câ—ncerned Lawes of the Nation by which the Civill Magistrate ruleth Obj. Wherein consisteth the power of the Magistrate Ans He hath to doe in all things of a civill Cognizance or that goe out of their Spirituall condition into a Morall offence as injustice evill transgression into tumult or disturbance of publick and private peace actually or expresly and not interpretatively for so the Nations interpreted the Jewes as troublers of the State and the Jewes Christ and his Disciples as movers of sedition The Papists and Prelates interpreted the Non-conformists or reproached Puriâ—ans as factious and tumultuous so as in any thing of a Morall or Secular Cognizance which the Magistrate hath cleare rule for to walke by from the Word of God and not otherwise and in so doing he ought to act because he is the best Legislater and Interpreter and can best resolve in things touching publick liberty but otherwise all manner of differences whatsoever which may happen in the Church without the limits of a Morall offence may and ought to be decided in and by the Church it selfe as hath been fully proved Obj. Ought not Church businesses to be determined by voyces Ans We never read of any such conclusion made by any How Church â—usineâ—â—ssâ— may be concluded Church mentioned in Scripture as that every particular member was asked apart touching his nilling or willing in such controsie neither is it probable that any such course was used by them but rather the matter being fully debated by some eminent persons as it is usuall in Courts of Parliament c. As also it was by Peter and James Act. 15. that then all the reall body will willingly condiscend to ratifie and confirme it Obj. It cannot be imagined that every case will be made so cleare as that the Church will condiscend as you would have them and if so how would you have the peoples thoughts expressed in such cases Ans It may be done by lifting up the hand or dividing themselves into two bodies or by I or no as it is usuall in Parliaments or Committees Obj. But what if there be an equality of parts as many for as against what will ensue Ans What will ensue in the Court of Parliament in the like case or in your Assembly of Divines and therefore the same course you would take in such courses aforesaid we will take the same in this and thus have I stopped your moâ—th with your owne morsell SECT 4. Obj. MAy not every Member present at such a meeting speake to the point in question if he please Ans Yea he may doe so as in like case may be done by any Member of Parliament or other Counsâ—ll but it ought to be done according to the Apostles rule viâ— with dâ—cency and order and to avoyd conâ—usion as much as may be Obj. I have observed at some of your meetings an horrible confusion Ans Such disorders I hope will speedily be reformed in our An example of the Apostles for deciâ—ing controversiâ—s Brethren to which purpose we have a notable example in that Dispute beâ—wixt the Apostles â—lders and Brethren at Jerusalem concerning the matter of Circâ—mcision Act. 15. who at the first did as you say of our Brethren Dispute confusedly but whilst they did so they had much Dispute to little purpose as appeareth by the seventh verse of that Chapter untill way was given that they might speake by course whereupon Peter being commonly the first in such matters began to open the case apart by himselfe the rest of the Apostles and Elders being silent as may appeare by the same verse and yet we may perceive that the multitude termed the Brethren ceased not to speake confusedly untill Peter had ended his speech and that they gave audience to Paul and Barnabas untill which time the text doth not render them silent by which passage is really demonstrated unto us the fruitlesse issues of confused discourse as also the fruitfull effects of decency and order for we read as soone as Paul and Barnabas had delivered themselves to whom the Brethren is said to give audience the Apostle James being the next which spake did in few words gâ—ve the multitude satisfaction And from hence we are taught the order and method which Who ought 〈…〉 made use of in Church 〈◊〉 we ought to use upon any occasion of businesse which may concerne the Church as first to make choyce of them whom we conceive is the most judicious and that
union and communion we have also further directions from them how this Temple or Fabrick may be kept from pollution within or ruine without viz. how it may be preserved from corruptions in Doctrine or outward behaviour as by Pastors Elders c. who are to teach and over-see 1 Tim. 5. 17. yea all Pauls Epistles doth chiefly tend to that purpose Now Christian friends I beseech you consider seriously in what a condition you are now in for to destroy this Temple is really to destroy your selues both in Body and Sovle for if you disclaime your bodies to be materials of that fore-mentioned Fabrick or Temple it most of consequence follow that you also disclaime Christ who hath his residence there for as the Spirit of a Saint is included in his naturall body so is Christ included in that Spirit by which they are made one but you by disclaiming your bodies to be of that Temple doe thereby deprive your spirits of the Spirit of Christ and he that hath not the Spirit of Christ is none of his Rom. 8. 9 c. And if not Christs who doe you belong unto if not to Satan True I doe acknowledge most of your bodies to be Temple proofe fit stones to be put into the fabrick but know that so long as you lye in such distinct â—eapes out of the building as you doe and not put into the worke so long you cannot be possessed of the Temple Spirit And hence it is that there are such diversities of spirits amongst you Againe I doe also acknowledge that many of you are so excellent 〈◊〉 in â—â—â—â—logy that you stand 〈◊〉 â—â—re in need of externall 〈…〉 man oâ— Mâ—ke 〈◊〉 Accademian of an Accidence or 〈◊〉 or a skilfull Musician of a Gam-ut in regard the one could subsist and the other practise if there were of none of them to be had they being so practicall in the Theory as that they are become naturalized unto them yet goe to any of these parties and inquire of them by what meanes they came to these abilities and experiments and the Accademian will tell you it was first by learning his A. B. C. and so on by gradations as to his Accidence Grammer c. The Song-man and Musician will tell you it was first by learning their Gam-ut and so on to other Musicall proportions the strong man will you it was first by breast Milke c. by which he gained his strength But yet none of these before mentioned will despise their small beginnings or are so ignorant as to think any other can come to the like knowledge or strength by any other meanes however they will acknowledge them to be the naturall or most usefull meanes to attaine such knowledge or strength Therefore albeit you think your selves strong men in Christ and can digest the strong meat of the Word and have the Spirituall or Logicall knowledge of the Scriptures of the hidden or deep secreets of God in Christ Jesus and are able to comprehend the height and depth of the Scriptures yet doubtlesse you are not ignorant that there are also babes in Christ which stand in need of the Word that they may grow thereby 1 Pet. 2. 2. and that you your selves were sometimes such Despise not therefore the meanes by which you have attained to your present knowledge and by which you have been nourished up to your present stature in Christ Reject not therefore the letter of the Scriptures or the Ordinances of hearing the Word or receiving the Sacraments experienced Paul could tell you that he had not knowne sin but by the letter of the Law And Christ admonisheth us to search the Scriptures and saith they testifie of him Joh. 5. 39. The Author to the Hebrews also saith that he that commeth to God must first know that God is Heb. 6. 1. c. we are also taught that the Scriptures were written for our instruction Rom. 15. 4. yea we are admonished to be mindfull of those sayings which the Prophets and Apostles have written as to a sure word of truth 2 Pet. 1. 19. c. Now whereunto tendeth all these exhortations if the letter of the Scriptures be of no use The like may be also said of the Word preached and of the Sacraments Wherefore was it that the Apostles used such meanes to build up Saints in the holy faith or why are such presidents of their left upon record unlesse we should receive them as presidents to imitate Againe why did they exhort us to be followers of them as they were of Christ 1 Cor. 11. 1. unlesse it be to practice what Christ and they did But they did preach and exercised the Sacraments as by baptizing Beleevers and of that of the Lords Supper witnesse the Acts of the Apostles and 1 Cor. 10. 1â— 11. 20. as also Christs owne practise and imitation Mat. 26. 26. 28. 12. I say if these Ordinances be not to be practised by the now Christians who are they prescribed you will reply they were requisite for them times which were only shadowes of these but now God will burne up all such drosse in his Church To which I answer though the Lord hath promised to burne up all the drosse in his Church yet hath he not therefore promised to burne up his Church with them Againe every shadow hath its substance and every substance its shadow and albeit these Ordinances be as the shell to the kernel yet must the kernel have its shell to ripen in or it will never increase to its maturity If you can deny Christ a Church Militant you may also deny the use of Ordinances but the Holy Ghost hath and doth manifest that the fleshly tabernacles of the Saints are his Temple as I have shewed therefore so long as there shall be Saints upon earth so long wil Christ have a Church Militant which Militant Church can no more subsist without Ordinances then a spirit in a dead body You wil reply we are not attained to perfection and therefore for us to make use of Ordinances were againe today the foundation of Repentance from dead workes and of faith towards God My answer is Albeit you have much knowledge in the secrets of God yet are you not composed all of Spirit you have as wel a carnall part as a Spirituall part The Apostle Paul found in himselfe as well the Law of the Flesh as of the Spirit Rom. 7. 33. c. which fleshly substance you are to conforme to such Ordinances which Christ hath instituted in his Church Militant whilst you are Members thereof True it is Antichrist hath polluted them as much as lay in him both in the doctrinall and traditionall paâ—â— of them which by Gods assistance I have much if not altogether purged and cleared from their Antichristian drosse and reduced them to their primative purity out of that masse of corruption they were involved in To which Lawes and Ordinances of your Master Christ I hope you wil yeeld a willing
then make better tryall of mans obedience then in forbidding that which is good But to the point in question if all were alike saved by the death of Christ why then are the termes of election and Predestination used so frequently in Scripture SECT 5. Object VVHat is meant by the word Election and Predestination Answ Predestination is the eternall decree of God whereby he determined with himself what he would have become of every What election is in the generall man for men are not since the fall of Adam created to the like estate and condition but for some eternall life and for others eternall death is appointed whereby Gods free election is made manifest seeing it lyeth in his will what shall be the estate and condition of every Nation whereof the Lord sheweth a token in the whole issue of Abraham as we may read Gen. 24. 37. Deut 32. 8. Psal 147. 20. There is also a certain speciall election wherein appeareth Of particular election more plainly the grace of God seeing that of the same Stock of Abraham God rejected some as Ishmael and Esau and at length most of the Tribes of Israel unto whom the entery of life were shut before them by his just yet by his incomprehensible judgement In the next place it is requisite to shew the effect that Gods The effects of election and reptoâ—ation election and reprobation worketh and 1. Touching the elect whom God in his mercy hath appointed to salvation for his own righteousnesse sake and not for their desert Those he guideth by the grace of his holy Spirit Rom. 8. 14. c. 9. c. As many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God as also the Prophet Isai All those that I have called by my name I have created fashioned and made for my honour Isa 43. SECT 6. NOw as the elect are led guided and directed by the Spirit of God so on the contrary are the reprobate by the spirit of Sathan who is the God of the world or worldly-minded men and hence it is that Christ telleth the wicked Jewes That they were of their father the Devill Joh. 8. 44. whose workes they did so that as on the one side the elect indeavoured to doe the will of God their Father so the other the will of their father the Devill And those sort of people are compared by the Prophet Isaiah Sâ—mpromes of the sonnes of Sathan to a raging Sea that cannoe rest whose waters foameth with myre and gravell for they have no peace with God Isa 57. 20. The Prophet David also considering of their estate and condition Psa 73. 4 5 6. giveth this reason for it viz. The Lord suffereth them to come to no perill of death but they are lusty and strong they come in no danger like other folke neither are they plagued like other men Their eyes swell with fatnesse and they doe even what they lust they have riches in possession and they call their Lands by their owne names And this is the cause saith he that they be so holden with pride and overwhelmed with cruelty these are they that talke against the most highest which say Tush how shall God perceive it is there knowledge in the most high Can he heare our Swearings see our secret Wheredomes and Adulteries Doth he take notice of our prophaning the Sabbaths or of our quaffing and drinking of healths of villifying Professors with reproachfull tearmes of Schismaticks and Hereticks and the like surely no. Such as these were Cain Cham Ishmael Pharaoh Ammon Their predecessor Saul Absolom Antiochus Herod Pilate Judas the traitor and many others who brought upon themselves eternall condemnation The same Prophet David also describeth the end of such men with another reason of it in these words namely That the Their end Lord hath set them in slippery places and cast them downe and destroyed them by which meanes how suddenly doe they consume and perish and come to a fearefull end yea even as a dreame so doth he make their image to vanish SECT 7. Object IF God have reprobated and cast them off how can they doe any other the cause of sinning therefore is not in them but in God who leaveth them to themselves how doe those Scriptures agree then where the Lord saith that he delighteth not in the death of a sinner Ezek. 33. 6. And O that Israel would obey me c. with O Jerusalem Jerusalem how often would I have gathered thee together and ye would not Mat. 23. 37. As also that he willeth not the death of a sinner and other while that some are ordained of old to condemnation as in Jude vers 6. Judas also is called the sonne of perdition Joh. 17. 12. Ans To the Answer which hath formerly been made to such Sundry arguments answered touching rejection a question as this may be added this answer of the Prophet Jeremy The Lord is more righteous then to be disputed with Jerem. 28. 6. And the Prophet Isaiah saith We are in the hands of the Lord as the Clay in the hands of the Potter Isa 47. 9. And the Apostle saith Hath not the Potter power over the Clay and of the same lump to make one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Rom. 9. 21. Again Who art thou that replyest against God ver 20. Was there unrighteousnesse in God in loving Jacob and hating Esau God forbid ver 14. For he will have mercy on whom he will have mercy and compassion on whom he will have compassiâ—n ver 15. and whom he will he hardneth so that there is vessels of wrath and vessels of mercy as in ver 22. 23. for otherwise why should these phrases be used in Scripture CHAP. III. Treateth of hardning the heart SECT 1. Objection IF God harden the heart of a sinner how can he chuse but sinne seeing that by nature we are all the children of wrath Ans In every action the â—nd and meanes must goe together the cause doth never follow the effect but the effect the cause and in one and same action there is a double cause as 1. The instrumentall cause moving 2. God separating from the instrument yet giving power of motion to the same and so the wicked may be said to be the instruments of God yet not God the cause of their wickednesse and therefore one saith Deus agit per malos non in malis God worketh by evill men not in evill men God therefore may be said to be the cause of the action but God is no way the author of sinne not of the quality of the action Gods decree is no cause of their sinning but the voluntary inclination of the will unto evill being neither forced nor by any violence compelled and therefore no evill is either to be attributed to God or his decreâ— 2. Again God is no way the author of sinne seeing he neither tempteth nor perswadeth unto it Jer. 1.
13. neither hath he commanded it but forbidden it in his Law neither doth he worke with them that doth evill for all that God doth is good and so there is none good but God Mark 10. 19. neither doth the Lord approve sin being done Psal 84. Thou art a God that hatest wickednesse So then if God neither move to sin nor commend it being done nor yet assist the actors of it he can in no wise be said to be the author of sin 3. If God should cause sin then every man should sin of necessity and so his punishment should be unjust being forced to sin but God who cannot be deceived hath not brought upon any a necessity or willingnesse of sinning for it cannot be that by whom men rise from sin by him they should fall into sin God that is good cannot be said to be the cause of evill for then he should be contrary to himself Again if God should be any waies the Author of sin then it should be no sin for whatsoever God doth is good nay not to doe that which the Lord willeth is sinne Yet seeing 1. God is said in Scripture to harden the heart which betokeneth an action and likewise in other termes as God is said to give some over to vile affections as in Rom. 1. 26. and to send upon some strong delusions that they should not beleeve the truth 2 Thes 2. 11. and to make the heart fat the eares heavie and to shut the â—yes Isa 6. 10. all which phrases implyeth an action or opperation it is therefore requisite to shew what the hardnesse of heart is 2. By what meanes it is effected or procured and 3. In what respect God may be said to work in the action SECT 2. 1. IT may be described negatively by the unaptnesse of it to any The qualities and inseparable adjuncts of a hard heart Reader examine thy selfe by these ten Simptomes thing that is good being neither passive active or apprehensive of any good thing it is neither moved by prayers nor giveth way to threats it is unthankfull for benefits unfaithfull in Counsell unshame fac'd in evill things there is no activity at all to any good thing it remembreth nothing that is past but wrongs and injuries nor hath any fore-cast for the time to come unlesse it be to seeke revenge 2. It may be described by the inseparable companions thereof viz. the blindnesse of the mind for as ignorance blindeth the understanding so hardnesse of heart blindeth the will and affections as the Apostle saith speaking of the Gentiles Having their cogitations darkned through the ignorance that was in them because of the hardnesse of their hearts Eph. 4. 18. both which concurred in Pharaoh who shewed his blindnesse in saying he knew not Jehovah and his hardnesse of heart in adding neither will I let Israel goe Exod. 5. 3. The third property of the hardnesse of heart is thiâ— that it not only a great and grievous sin but also the punishment of sin 1. That it is a sin the Apostle sheweth Heb. 3. 12. where he saith Take heed brethren least therein at any time in you be an evill heart to depart from the living God And that it is a punishment of sin the Apostle testifieth also Rom. 1. 21. because saith he when they knew God they did not glorifie him as God And therefore it followeth ver 29. That God gave them over to their own hearts lusts Now the qualities and inseparable adjuncts of hardning the heart are these viz. 1. Blindnesse of judgement and understanding as Isa 6. 10. where the Lord saith Make the heart of this people fat c. lest Reader examine thy selfe by these Simptomes they should see with their eyes and heare with their eares and understand with their hearts and be converted and I should heale them 2. They are obstinate and wilfull and refuse to be admonished and instrâ—cted and say unto God Depart from us we desire not the knowledge of thy wayes Job 1. 14. 3. They delight in doing of evill and make a sport of sin Prov. 2. 14. which rejoyce in doing of evill and delight in the frowardnesse of the wicked 4. They regard not to doe things honest in the sight of God but contrarily contemne and despise them that doe such things as Prov. 18. 3. When the wicked commeth then commeth contempt 5. They are incorrigible and past all hopes of amendment Prov. 1. 30. They would none of my counsell but despised all my corrections 6. They are not ashamed of most vile sins as Jer. 3. 3. Thou hast a Whâ—res forehead and wouldest not be ashamed 7. When the Lord smiteth them they feele iâ— not neither have they any feare of Gods judgements whom the Wise man compareth to those that sleep on the Mast of a Ship and as drunken men that are stricken and knoweth it not Prov. 23. 24. 25. 8. They are growne to such an evill custome of sinning that they can doe no other as the Prophet saith Can the Black-a-more change his hew or the Leopard his spots then may they yet also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Jer. 13. 23. So that the sins of such seeme to be inexpiable as the same Prophet saith that the sins of Judah were written with a Pen of Iron and with the point of a Diamond Chap. 17. 1. 9. They wax worse and worse of whom it is said Rev. 22. 11. He that is filthy let him be filthy still and as they increase in sins so doe they treasure up wrath against the day of wrath and so treasure up Gods judgements against themselves Rom. 2. 5. 10. They are rejected and cast out of the presence of God and left to themselves such an one was Saul of whom it was said That the Spirit of the Lord departed from him and an evill spirit from the Lord vexed him 1 Sam. 16. 14. And thus have I shewed what the hardnesse of heart is SECT 3. 2. IN the next place I am to shew by what meanes it is effected How the hardnesse of the heart is effected and procured of which subject there are varieties of opinions I shal give you the most materiall of them Some are of opinion that the Lord hardneth the heart by way of manifestation instansing in Pharaoh where the Lord by his plagues and judgements declared how hard Pharaohs heart was But this cannot be the sence of it for so God might be said to commit any other sins when he doth manifest them and bring to lâ—ght and though the expression might serve upon that occasion yet it faileth in other places as Deut. 2. 30. where it is said that God hardened the heart of Sihon King of the Amorites and Joshua 23. where the Lord is said to harden the hearts of the Canâ—aâ—itâ—s and Rom. 9. 15. God hath mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will hâ— hardneth in these places it cannot be expounded that God hardned that is