Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
law_n	punishment_n	sin_n	transgression_n	4,361	5	10.4522	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A23663	A discourse of the nature, ends, and difference of the two covenants evincing in special, that faith as justifying, is not opposed to works of evangelical obedience : with an appendix of the nature and difference of saving and ineffectual faith, and the	Allen, William, d. 1686.; Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.	1673 (1673)	Wing A1061; ESTC R5298	108,111	235

thus accompanied with and perfected by Works was the Scripture ful●illed which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for Righteousness And if so then the Justification by Works together with Faith of which St. Iames speaks here is a Justification before God and not before Men only and to a Man 's own Conscience For of such a Justification doth the Scripture in Gen. 15. 6. speak which is here cited by St. Iames. Nor doth this that Faith accompanied with Obedience is imputed for Righteousness at all derogate from the Obedience and Sufferings of Christ in reference to the ends for which they serve Because the whole Covenant and all the parts and terms of it both Promises of Benefits the Condition on which they are Promised are all founded in Christ his undertaking for us and all the Benefits of it accrue to us upon our Believing and Obeying upon his account and for his sake We are in him who of God is made unto us Wisdom Righteousness Sanctification and Redemption 1 Cor. 1. 30. For which cause also he is called the Lord our Righteousness Not as if his personal Obedience to the Law was so formally imputed to us as that we should be reckoned to have kept the Law in his keeping of it which hath been the Opinion of some for if that had been so there would have been no more need that Christ should have suffered for us than there was that he shoud have suffered for himself who had no sin for neither should we if we had perfectly kept the Law in him or in his keeping of it CHAP. II. For what Ends the Law was added to the Promise I Now come to shew in the next place for what end the Law of Mo●es was added to the Promise And before I do this in particular I shall note only in general that it was not added to cross or confront the Promise or God's Design in it but to be subservient to it Gal. 3. 21. Is the Law then against the Promises God forbid For it is not to be thought that God would prevaricate in his Design so that when he had once made a new Law of Grace for the saving of faln Man he would yet afterwards give any Law but what should one way or other subserve to the same end if Men do not deprive themselves of the intended benefit by perverting it And therefore to be sure God did not intend to revive the Old Covenant of Works made with Adam in Paradise in the after promulgation of the Law of Nature which we call the Moral Law already broken He did not therein come to demand his full debt of Innocency in Mans broken and bankrupt condition or to let him know that he would without any other condition than perfect incency cast him into prison until he had paid the utmost farthing For if he had then the Law indeed would have been against the Promise which declares quite otherwise It is true the Law of Nature as it is a perfect Rule of Natural Righteousness founded in God's Nature and Man's Nature doth of it self require perfect innocency and can require no less being suited to the Nature of Man in its perfect state But when God brings this Law forth and sets it before Men that are now faln from that state as he doth in the promulgation of it it is to let them know indeed what they once were and from whence they are fallen and how unhappy their condition now is according to the Tenour and Terms of that Law and that it would have continued so for ever if God had not made a new Law of Grace to over-rule that Law and to let all know that they shall still remain in that condition that wilfully exclude themselves from the benefit of the Law of grace by not performing the Condition of it and not to let them know they should have no better terms from him than that Law affords them nor to make their perfect keeping of it the condition of their Justification But the Law of Moses entirely taken in all its parts was rather given as an Appendix to the Promise both as a Rule of the material part of that Obedience which God would now require of the Israelites in conjunction with their Faith in the Promise and as a Motive to that Obedience This in general The Question is put Gal. 3. 19. Wherefore then serveth the Law And the Answer there is That it was added because of transgression until the Seed should come And it was added because of transgression in more respects than one 1. It was added to discover Sin to make that known to be Sin which was so of it self and in its own nature before the promulgation of the Law For by reason of that grievous Wound which Man got in his Understanding by the Fall and by reason also of a Progressive Degeneration in Mankind the Natural Sense of Moral Good and Evil was to a great degree worn out of the minds of Men. For the repairing of which decay a promulgate Law the ten Commandments answerable to the Law of pure Nature in the Spirituality of it was set on foot in the World And by this Law came Sin and Duty to be more clearly known than they were before Rom. 3. 20. By the Law is the knwoledge of Sin Rom. 7. 7. I had not known Sin but by the Law For I had not known Lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet 2. The Law was added not only barely to make known that to be Sin which was so●of it self before but to set it out in it's Colours to make it known in the horrid nature and consequence of it that Men might be the more afraid to have to do with it The Law entred that the offence might abound That is that by that means it might be rendred the more Criminous and Demeritorious That Sin by the Commandment might become exceeding sinful Rom. 5. 20. 7. 13. 3. The Law as it discovered Sin and made it more criminous and the people the more sensible of guilt and more apprehensive of their obnoxiousness to punishment was given to set off so much the more the Glory Beauty and Desirableness of God's Grace in the Promise of pardon and Salvation Rom. 5. 20. The Law entered that the offence might abound But where Sin abounded Grace did much more abound By how much the more Sin appeared Sin and was enhanced and aggravated and rendred manifestly mischievous by a Promulgate Law by so much the more grace appear'd to be Grace in all its Glory that brought deliverance from it Rom. 5. 21. That like as Sin hath reigned unto death viz. by the Law that being the strength of Sin 1 Cor. 15. 56. Even so Grace might reign through Righteousness unto eternal life through Ie●us Christ our Lord. After Christ came the rest which he gave was so much the more sweet to these Iews who received him by how much they

and what else pertained to his Mediatory Office because these are the things by which the Nations of the Earth became blessed in him which was the thing expresly promised That such things were implyed in the promise appears not only by the reason of the thing but also from St. Paul's testimony Acts 13. 32 33. We declare unto you glad tidings how that the Promise which was made unto the Fathers God hath fulfilled the same unto us their Children in that he hath raised up Iesus again I do not say that Abraham from a Promise that was but so generally expressed as that was could apprehend in particular what the Messias should both do and suffer though they were wrapt up in it He apprehended so much by it in general that God would send the Messias into the World and that he would send him upon such terms as that his coming should be matter of great benefit to the world Abraham had such a prospect of this though at that distance as made him rejoyce and be glad So saith our Saviour himself Iohn 8. 56. Your Father Abraham rojoyced to see my day and he saw it and was glad And the promise to Abraham as it was a Promise of sending Christ to be the Saviour of the world was expressive of the greatest love For in this was the love of God manifested towards us because God sent his only begotten Son into the world that we might live through him Herein is love not that we loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins 1 Joh. 4. 9 10. A Propitiation for our sins That is one that by his Death hath procured favour having taken off that sore displeasure which God by his Law had declared against all the transgressors of it For the wise and just God did not think the righteousness of his Government and the honour and reputation of his Law would be sufficiently salved and his great hatred of sin sufficiently manifested without some considerable satisfaction given for the dishonour done to Him and his Law by Mans transgression And yet that this might not be exacted at the hands of the guilty in executing the curse of the Law on them themselves he was most graciously pleased to accept of the sufferings of his own dear Son instead of what the sinners themselves were to have undergone He hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us Gal. 3. 13. Christ suffered for sins the Iust for the unjust or in their stead 1 Pet. 3. 18. Upon account of which undertaking of Christ for us all the benefits of the Covenant do accrue to Man What ever is required of Man by way of condition of his acceptation with God becomes accepted to that end upon account of Christ's suffering And His Intercession in Heaven through which all our sincere though otherwise imperfect performances become acceptable to God and rewardable by him is made in the virtue of it For the whole Covenant it self is founded in the Blood of Christ which he shed for the remission of sins Therefore it is called the New Testament in his Blood Mat. 26. 28. And his blood the Blood of the Everlasting Covenant Hebr. 13. 20. 2. It contained a Promise of Iustification or remission of sin through Christ unto all that should so believe as thereupon to repent of their former folly and become sincerely obedient for the future For that is necessarily implyed in the Promise of blessed●ess to the Nations in Abrahams Seed it being impossible men should be blessed without Remission of sin which consisteth in removing the curse of the Law in remitting the penalty Blessed is the man whose iniquity is forgiven and whose sin is covered Psal. 32. 1. St. Paul acquaints us that this blessing of the New Covenant was declared to Abraham in the Promise Gal. 3. 8. The Scripture foreseeeing that God would justifie the Heathen through Faith preached the Gospel before unto Abraham saying In thee shall all Nations be blessed 3. It contained in it tacitly a Promise of Divine assistance unto men in their endeavours to fulfil the condition of the Promise For God in promising blessedness to the Nations through Abrahams Seed therein promised all that was absolutely necessary for him to vouchsafe to make them blessed and without which they could not be blessed And if so then he therein implicitly promised to assist the endeavours of men to perform the condition of the Promise without the assistance of whose grace they cannot savingly believe repent and obey And so it should seem the Old Testament-Church understood Gods subduing of sin as well as his pardoning of sin to be comprized in the Promise to Abraham Mich. 7. 19 20. He will subdue our iniquities and thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the Sea Thou wilt perform the truth to Iacob and the mercy to Abraham which thou hast sworn to our Fathers from the days of old And Christ his turning men from their iniquities which he doth accomplish by appointing them means by assisting them in the use of them to that end is part of the blessing contained in the Promise made to Abraham and was so reckoned by St. Peter Acts 3. 25 26. Ye are the children of the Prophets and of the Covenant which God made with our Fathers saying unto Abraham And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed Vnto you first God having raised up his Son Iesus Christ sent him to bless you in turning every one of you from his iniquities 4. It implicitly or somewhat obscurely contained in it a Promise of eternal Life I say implicitly For I do not find that eternal Life was expresly promised to Abraham But yet that was expresly promised him from which the hope of eternal Life might well be inferred As first Blessedness through his Seed the Messias And secondly That God would be a God to him and his Seed For blessedness is a happiness that runs parallel with the duration of Man's immortal Soul And God's Promise of being a God to Abraham carried in it a Promise of a happiness worthy of God to bestow such as everlasting Life or happiness is And therefore he was not ashamed to be called their God meaning Abraham Isaac and Iacob because he had prepared for them a City meaning that in so doing he had answered that title of relation of being their God and done like himsel Heb. 11. 16. And upon these and the like Revelatio●s of of God's mind to him Abraham looked for a City which hath foundations whose Builder and Maker is God and a heavenly Countrey Heb. 11. 10 16. If Abraham did but use his reason about these Promises as he did about reconciling God's Promise that in Isaac his Seed should be called with his command to sacrifice him Heb. 11. 17 18 19. he might discern eternal Life in them though but very obscurely in comparison of

Person from suffering those temporal evils which were threatned in this Covenant against those which did not continue in all things written in the Book of it Neither Sacrifices nor Legal Purifications Sanctified but unto the purifying of the flesh and to their temporal concerns only Heb. 9. 9 10 13. And here we may observe a five-fold difference in reference to Remission of Sin between the first Covenant and the Covenant of Grace 1. They differ in the nature of those Sacrifices by which Atonements were made and upon which forgiveness was promised The blood of the Sacrifice of the first Covenant was but the blood of Bulls and of Goats and the like Heb. 10. 4. But the Blood of the Sacrifice of the second Covenant is the Blood of Christ the Eternal Son of God So that the nature of the Sacrifices of the two Covenants upon which the Promise of the pardon of Sins was granted doth differ as much as the blood of Beasts and the Blood of the Son of God differ 2. Those two sorts of Sacrifices pertaining to two kinds of Covenants differ in the proportion of Efficaty and Virtue to accomplish their respective ends and effects There is a greater richness of proportion in the Blood of Christ to free the Cons●ience from the guilt of Sin or obligation to Eternal punishment than there was in the blood of Beasts to free the Delinquent person from temporal punishments This is plainly intimated in Heb. 9. 13 14. For if the blood of Bulls and of Goats and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean sactifieth to the purifying of the flesh how much more shall the Blood of Christ who through the Eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God purge your Conscience from dead works to serve the living God 3. They differ in the nature of the pardon promised in each of the Covenants respectively The Redemption granted in the first Covenant was but temporal as the Covenant it self was it was but from evils temporal But Christ Jesus by his Atonement hath obtained Eternal Redemption for us Hebr. 9. 12. 4. They differ in respect of the Sins made pardonable by each Covenant respectively There were many sins for which the first Covenant granted no pardon upon any terms whatsoever They that despised Moses Law died without mercy Heb. 10. 28. But the Covenant of Grace makes promise of the pardon of the greatest sins upon Repentance All manner of Sin and Blasphemy except the Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost are pardonable upon Repentance This difference is set down Acts 13. 39. And by him all that believe are justified from all things from which ye could not be justified by the Law of Moses We may well suppose that the first Covenant did finally condemn some which the Covenant of Mercy pardoned David in the matter of Vriah did that which was unpardonable by the first Covenant it was a Fact to have been punished with death by the Law but that there was none but God that could duly inflict it upon him in his capacity and yet upon his Repentance it was pardoned as to his Eternal concerns as well as temporal by virtue of God's Covenant of Mercy On the other hand a man probably might be so righteous in the Eye of the first Covenant as not to be visibly blameable and yet even then he obnoxious to the curse of the Everlasting Covenant Paul while he was Saul and in the state of unbelief was even then as touching the righteousness which is in the Law blameless as he himself saith Phil. 3. 6. So different were these two Covenants that him whom the one condemned the other might justifie and likewise justifie him whom the other condemned 5. They differed in respect of the Condition to be performed on Man's part for the obtaining of pardon Pardon was promised i● the first Covenant upon condition of doing only without reference to Faith but so are not the pardons of the New Covenant Gal. 3. 11 12. But that no man is justified by the Law in the sight of God it is evident for the Iust shall live by Faith And the Law is not of Faith but the man that doth them shall live in them So much concerning the first Part of the Sanction of the first Covenant Come we now to the second The other part of the Sanction of this Covenant did consist in the curse of it denounced against the breakers of it Though it 's true that every Man is under a condemnation that would be Eternal until he comes to be absolved by Virtue of the Law of Grace yet more than temporal death was not expresly threatned for breach of the Political Covenant as such 1. For first A violent death inflicted by the hand of the Magistrate for Capital Offences is called the Curse Deut. 22. 23. He that is hanged is accursed of God or is the Curse of God 2. Christ who did not suffer Eternal punishment for Man's Sin did yet suffer the curse of the Law in that he was hanged on a Tree Gal. 3. 13. It is true indeed that by that temporary suffering of his he redeemed us from Eternal punishment which we were obnoxious to 3. Those who Apos●atize from Christ and reject his Gospel merit sorer punishment than what was inflicted on them that despised Moses Law and yet sorer punishment for kind they cannot suffer if Eternal punishment had been the penalty of that Covenant as such Heb. 10. 28 29. 4. As the Promises of that Covenant when particularly expressed did appear to be but temporal so the curses of it appear to be no other in the particular enumeration of them As for instance a violent death inflicted by the hand of the Magistrate was the punishment threatned for many Capital Offences Such as was Idolatry Blasphemy Witchcraft working on the Sabbath invading the Priests Office and for being a false Prophet also for Murder Adultery Sodomy Buggery Man-stealing Cursing or Smiting of Parents or being stubbornly rebllious against them and some other And a cutting off from among the people whether by God's hand immediately or by Mans I determine not was the penalty threatned for eating leavened Bread within the time prohibited for not purifying ones self when unclean for profaning holy things for ones eating of the Sacrifice with his uncleanness upon him for offering Sacrifice any where but at the Tabernacle for eating of Blood and for eating of the fat of the Sacrifice for neglecting to keep the Passover and for not afflicting the Soul in the day of general Atonement and for several other Offences And those Offences for which cutting off from among the people is threatned being less criminous than the former we have no reason to think the penalty of cutting off from among the people to signifie more if so much than the suffering of a temporal death As we may observe how the Israelites various punishments are exprest for their manifold crimes in the Wilderness by God's overthrowing them

was but temporary and being old was ready to vanish and to give place to a New and Everlasting Covenant Chap. 8. 13. 2. That the first Covenant was faulty or defective or else there would have been no place sought for a second ver 7. 3. That the Promises of that first Covenant were not of such things as men stand in need of to make them everlastingly happy as those better Promises of the second Covenant are ver 6. 4. And yet more particularly that in this New Covenant there is promise of such a forgiveness of sins as that iniquity shall be remembred no more ver 12. whereas the first Covenant did not promise any such pardons All that it promised was a forgiveness only as to the concerns of this life otherwise their sins were still kept upon the File to be taken away if ever taken away by the Mediatour of the New Testament by means of his death for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first Testament Chap. 9. 15. But in those Sacrifices which were but the Sacrifices of the first Covenant there was a remembrance again made of sins every year Heb. 10. 3. And now by all these reasonings of the Apostle put together it sufficiently appears that the unbelieving Iews did expect Justification and Eternal Life only upon the terms of the first Covenant and that they held that Covenant as comprehending the Covenant of Circumcision to be the Covenant of Eternal Life And indeed this last mentioned Error of theirs in holding the first Covenant to be the Covenant of Salvation did in a manner contain in it all the rest mentioned before which did naturally grow out of it For if that had been the Covenant of Salvation then it would have followed that the Sacrifices of that Covenant had been sufficient and the death of Christ needless and that Circumcision and keeping the Law of Moses would have been necessary to the salvation of the Gentiles c. And now after all this considering what Erroneous Opinions the incredulous Iews held about the Law and about Circumcision and considering in what sense they asserted Justification by the Law and by Circumcision it will be no difficult thing to understand exactly in what sense the Apostle doth every where deny Justification to be by the Law or by the works of the Law For doubtless St. Paul's denial of Justification and Salvation to be by the Law or works of the Law is to be understood in the very same sense in which the incredulous Iews against whom he disputed did hold these to be attainable thereby For else his reasonings would have been beside the question under debate between them And therefore we must take our measure of St. Paul's sense in the Negative part of the Question by his Adversaries sense of it in the Affirmative And if so then in his denying Justification and Salvation to be by the Law or by works of the Law we must understand him to deny a freedom from the Eternal Punishment to be attainable by Legal Sacrifices And also to deny that the Promise of Eternal Life was made upon condition of Literal Circumcision and a Literal Observation of the Mosaical Law without being by Faith renewed in the inward frame Moral constitution of the Soul And likewise to deny Eternal Life to be attainable by the terms of their Political Covenant the Promises whereof were not made upon condition of believing but of doing The Law is not of Faith but the man that doth those things shall live in them Gal. 3. 12. For these and such like were the Opinions which those J●ws did hold as I have shewed and these were the things in which St. Paul opposed them They divided and separated Circumision and the Law in the letter of them from the Spirit of them both claiming Justification by the Letter alone And they divided the Law from the Promise rightly understood and looked to be justified by Works of the Law without Faith in the Promise rightly understood They looked for the M●ssias indeed but not to become a Propitiation for Sin or to establish a New Covenant of Salvation but to further their Temporal and Eternal Felicity in the way of their Obedience to the Political Law But then it doth not in the least appear that St. Paul in denying Justification to be by the Law in the sense thus explained doth also thereby deny works of sincere Obedience to God to concur with Faith in Man's Justification in all respects And if any shall yet suppose that St. Paul in denying Justification by Works in the Jews corrupt sense doth also on the by deny all Works of Evangelical Obedience to bear any part of the Condition on which God promiseth to justifie Men through Christ such a Supposition if admitted would make his Doctrine herein inconsistent not only with the Faith of the holy Men of Old who were wont to express the Condition of the Covenant of Merey by loving God and keeping his Commandments but it would also make him inconsistent with himself and his own Doctrine and the Doctrine of other Apostles as I doubt not but plainly to make appear before I have done with this Discourse There is one Character of Works given by which you may certainly know what Works they were which St. Paul denyed Men were justified by and they were such Works which were apt to occasion boasting Ephes. 2. 9. Not of Works lest any man should boast Rom. 4. 2. For if Abraham were justified by Works to wit in the Jews sense by Circumcision in the flesh to which St. Paul alludes ver 1. he hath whereof to glory but not before God but only before Men who were not Circumcised as he was For the unbelieving Jews who sought and expected Justification by Circumcision and other Legal Observations did glory over the poor Gentiles that were destitute of those Works which consisted in the outward Priviledges which the Jews had and looked down upon them with contempt though some of them were much better than themselves such as Cornelius whom they looked upon as unclean This boasting humor of the Iews over the Gentiles is described and reproved Rom. 2. from ver 17. to 29. Now the Doctrine of Justification by Faith of obtaining pardon by anothers undertaking for us to wit Christ Jesus and of being accepted with God through him upon our sincere though otherwise imperfect obedience which sincere Obedience too is not performed without his special Grace and assistance takes away all occasion of boasting in reference both to God and Men and laid the Iews as low as the Gentiles and made St. Peter a Jew to say But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Iesus Christ we shall be saved even as they Acts 15. 11. And therefore when St. Paul had said that now the righteousness of God without the Law is manifested even the righteousness of God which is by Faith of Iesus Christ unto all and upon