Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
law_n	punishment_n	sin_n	transgression_n	4,361	5	10.4522	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15529	Theologicall rules, to guide vs in the vnderstanding and practise of holy Scriptures two centuries: drawne partly out of Scriptures themselues: partly out of ecclesiasticall writers old and new. Also Ænigmata sacra, holy riddles; or misticall cases and secrets of diuinitie, with their resolutions. Foure centuries: the vnfolding whereof layeth open that truth that concerneth saluation. By T.W. preacher of the word.	Wilson, Thomas, 1563-1622.	1615 (1615)	STC 25798; ESTC S120090	119,259	364

yet was not God substantially which is but one wheras a wicked man of corrupt nature and manners may be and is a God representatiuely in respect of his office and power being a Magistrate and executing the iudgments of God Psal. 82.6 I haue said yee are Gods AEnig 41. Who was hee that had neither Father nor Mother being but a meere man and was a man ere he was a child and how that may be Resolution This man was Adam who came into the world not by naturall generation as other men but by supernaturall creation wherein he was made euery way perfit in graces members proportion stature c. AEnig 42. How are Kings and beggers equall while they liue Resolution They are equall by profession being both worshippers of one God Eph. 4. and by creation being both the workman-ship of God in these two things they quarter Armes being for degree and gifts very vnequall AEnig 43. How can he be but one man in whom all men at once were Resolution Adam was but one man personally his person was but one and singular but God so decreeing it he was all men potentially and orginally as Leui was when Abraham was Heb. 7. 9.10 so all men were when Adam was because they all were in his loynes Also Adam being the head and root of our kinde though himselfe were but one person yet he bare and susteined the persons of all men who were to stand with him or to fall with him as the euent declared AEnig 44. Who was he that needed not sinne if he would yet must needs sinne and how this may be Resolution It was Adam created with perfect liberty of will who might alwaies haue chosen righteous things if he would and therefore when he sinned he sinned freely his will of it owne accord inclining it selfe to eat of the forbidden tree yet God hauing decreed his Fall not as it is a sinne but as a meane to effect his own counsell to the praise of his name in the iust punishing of the reprobate for sinne and in the mercifull sauing of the Elect by Christ. Hence it is that there was a necessitie that he should sinne a necessitie I say in regard of the euent by Gods decree the first cause yet no necessitie in regard of Adams will the second cause which had power not to haue done it AEnig 45. Who is he that sinned ere hee had any euill concupiscence Resolution It was Adam who was created holy without any euill lust yet God not confirming his will he freely yeelded vnto an euill temptation outwardly suggested and so euill concupiscence came in as a punishment of his voluntary disobedience and now it is become to all his issue the root of all their sinnes Rom. 7.7 Iam 1.14.15 Adam sinned actually first and then originally we sinne first originally and then actually AEnig 46. How can the fault of one make all other men sinners without iniustice Resolution The fault of one of vs cannot doe it because our sinnes be personall hurting our selues or some few other The Soule that sinneth shall die Ezech. 18. but Adam being the originall and beginning of man by God ordinance when he sinned all men sinned in him his sinne was the sinne of the whole and by the guilt of his disobedience imputed all were made sinners and miserable Ro. 5. 12.19 If in case of high treason earthly Princes punish children with their Fathers without iniustice how much more may God doe this and yet not doe vniustly AEnig 47. How can one offence being done in a moment bring eternall death vpon all men without iniquitie Resolution The act of Adams disobedience being but one and of short continuance also the obiect of his sinne but meane yet an euerlasting God being offended in that one act the guilt thereof bindes him and his to punishment for euer if it be not pardoned Rom. 6.23 It standeth with iustice that an eternall paine bee rendred to the offence of an eternall essence and sinnes are to be measured by the dignitie of the person against whom they are commited AEnig 48. How was it that Adam did liue after he had eaten the forbidden fruit yet he was threatned that hee should die the death if he did eat Resolution Adam hauing sinned by eating the threatning of death was fulfilled because vpon his fault his soule was spiritually dead and his body thenceforth liable to naturall death and to all miseries as fore-runners thereof God reptiued him and spared the full execution of the sentence to commend his abundant mercy and patience in giuing him both space and occasion of repentance 2. Pet. 3. Ro. 2.4 AEnig 49. What is that which at once is both sin the cause of sinne and the punishment of sinne and how may this be Resolution It is originall lust which is properly sinne being a transgression of that Law which saith Thou shalt not lust Ro. 7.7 and fighting against the gouernment of the Spirit in a renued soule Ro. 7. 21.22 Also it is the punishment of Adams willing and witting disobedience and the cause of all other sinnes which do arise out of that bitter root Iames 1.15 AEnig 50. What is that one thing that at once is both most happy and most miserable of all other things Resolution It was Adams fall which in its owne nature and in regard of the effects which followed enfolding all men within sinne and euerlasting death was the most miserable thing that euer hapned no euill like to it for extent and force But in regard of the euent which fell out by the maruellous wisdome and goodnes of God it did accidentally prooue as one saith of it foelix crimen an happy fault giuing occasion to the redemption of the elect by Christ incarnate purchasing a constant and heauenly felicitie AEnig 51. How can one who is like to God offend by desiring to be as God Resolution Adam in his creation was like God that is perfectly iust and wise as a creature might be wherewith not being contented but aspiring to be as God that is equall to him this was his horrible offence Gen. 3. AEnig 52. Now is it said we all sinned in Adam yet the woman was in the transgression Resolution The woman indeed was first in the transgression for she entised and deceiued hir husband 1. Tim. 2. 14. yet it is written that wee sinne in Adam not in Eaue because the man being the principall agent in generation sinne is rather deriued by him into his ofspring 2 Though Eue were first yet Adam was more in fault because of his greater preheminence in dignitie of sexe and excellencie of graces whereby he was enabled and bound to haue kept himselfe and Eaue both from sinning therefore the denomination is from the man as more excellent AEnig 52. How is it that our first parents did not know good and euill till after their sinne yet were created with perfect

knowledge Resolution They were created with perfect speculatiue knowledge but experimentall knowledge of good or euill till after their fall they had not for then they saw to their cost what a great good they had lost and what a great euill they had found Gen. 3.7 Aenig 54. How do our soules become sinnefull if they be of God created without sinne Resolution There bee two opinions touching the creation of the soule some thinke they are created immediately by God of nothing and at their creation be ininfused into the body Now after this opinion we must say that soules being created good are at the Instant of their Creation destitute of Gods grace and inclining to sinne come into sinnefull vncleane bodies where they qiuckely draw vnto them contagion and filth of sinne as sweete liquor is corrupted by being put into a mustie vessell The second opinion is that our soules come from the soules of our parents as our bodies from their bodies and as one candle takes light of another If we embrace these opinions we must say that the whole man both body and soule be corrupt and sinfull by carnall or fleshly generation parents begetting children in their owne likenesse naughty and vicious as they be Gen. 5. 3. Adam be got a sonne in his owne likenesse Hence it is that the corruption of nature is in Scripture so often called by the name of flesh Rom. 7.5 and 8.1.2.3 c. The best strife is about the driuing out of sinne not about the entring in labour how to haue it mortified and pardoned AEnig 55. How may one bee a sinner that neuer thought spake nor did amisse Resolution It is an Infant newly borne who being without all actuall sinne yet is a sinner by originall transgression Adams transgression being imputed to it and together with the want of perfect righteousnesse being through inherent corruption of nature proane to all euill Rom. 5. 13.14 and so vnder death AEnig 56. What is that that is a sinne yet is not the transgression of any commandement Resolution It is naturall corruption which because it hindereth the perfect loue of God and of our neighbor is equally forbidden in euery commandement which striketh at the roote the whole law being spirituall and because it is an vniuersall transgression therefore it is not forbidden specially in any one commandement as many thinke AEnig 57. What thing is that which God neuer made Resolution It is sinne and death which bee the effects of Sathans malice and Adams fall Gen. 3. 1. and not the workes of Gods hand who suffereth and ruleth them but created them not For all was good which hee made very good Gen. 1. verse last AEnig 58. What is that that doth turne blessinges into cursinges and how may that be Resolution It is sinne which to them in whom it raignes causeth such thinges to bee snares as in their owne nature are blessings giuen of God for our welfare AEnig 59. What is that that hath a name yet may not be named Resolution Generally it is all sinne which is so filthie a thing as it ought not to bee named but with detestation particularly it is Idolatry Fornication and Couetousnesse these may not be named without dislike Psalm 16. 4. Ephes. 5. 3. AEnig 59. What is that which hath lost his stinge yet hath a sting Resolution It is sinne and death which haue lost their sting towardes the faithfull for whom Christ died but still keepe a sting to bite and kill the vngodly withall 1. Cor. 15. Rom. 6. 23. AEnig 60. How can God loue and hate men before they be without iniustice Resolution In Scripture Gods decree to loue is called loue because it is a part of loue to purpose to giue vs vnto his Sonne in whom we are beloued and accepted Also his decree not to loue to saue by Christ is called his hatred because it is an effect of hatred not to meane one good God being said to loue and to hate when he doth such things as men vse to doe who haue these affections It were iniustice and absurditie both actually to loue or to hate actually those which yet haue no actuall being but to decree vnto actuall loue and hatred men before they be this is no iniustice in him whose will is the perfect rule of all iustice Rom. 11. AEnig 61. How can God chuse one man to life and refuse another without respect of persons seeing all were a like good by Creation and alike euill by corruption Resolution Persons in phrase of Scripture signifies outward qualities as riches pouertie country parentage learning and such like by which things if God should be mooued to chuse one to life and to reiect another hee should bee a respecter of persons but when all men were alike in Adam to appoint one man to obteine saluation and not another out of his owne will euen because it so pleased him to the glorie of his owne iustice and mercy This is no respecting of persons AEnig 62. How can God foresee and fore-ordaine all things which be and happen yet not be the author of sinne Resolution God-fore seeth and fore-appointeth all thinges that happen euen sinnes themselues which should not happen if he were willing to hinder them yet not as they are sinnes but as they' are meanes to effect the righteous counsell of God for the good of the elect or for the punishment of the wicked as the selling of Ioseph by his brethren the betraying of Christ by Iudas be examples hereof Gen. 45.5 Act. 2.23 God so purposeth and disposeth sins to iust endes as that hee mooueth eggeth perswadeth none to sinne Iam. 1. 13. God tempteth no man AEnig 63. How may one be chosen yet not be saued Resolution One may be chosen to an outward function either Ciuill as Saul or Ecclesiasticall as Iudas yet not be saued being not chosen to sanctification of the spirit 1. Pet. 1.2 AEnig 64. How can God decree Death for sinne yet not will the death of a sinner Resolution Death as it is the stipend of sinne hath the consideration of God and therefore is decreed of God but as it is simply the destruction of the Creature thus God hath no pleasure in it As a mild and iust King ordaines torture and prisons for preuention to keep from offending or for penaltie of offendors yet hath no delight in the paine of his subiects so doth God AEnig 65. How can it bee written that God will haue all men to be saued yet very many men bee vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Resolution When the Word saith that God will haue all men to be saued the meaning is not of euery one in particular for then none should be damned because none can let his will but some of all sorts some poore some rich some Kings some priuate men some Iewes some Gentiles c. while other some