I am now speaking of the Moral Law for the Ceremonial Law is of another nature But that which we call the Moral Law is immutable perpetual and everlasting And the reason is God being immutable and unchangeable in his nature and his will the Law which is the declaration of his nature and will must needs be immutable perpetual and everlasting Hence are those expressions Psal 119.142 Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness and thy law is the truth And vers 144. The righteousness of thy testimonies is everlasting Hence also is it that our Saviour saith One iota and tittle of the law shall not pass away Mat. 5.18 The Law of God is of eternal equity and therefore it cannot pass away 3. Every reasonable creature is necessarily and indispensably under the authority of the Law There are two things implied in every Law 1. A Declaration of the Will of the Law-giver 2. An Obligation upon the persons to whom the Law is given to obey and keep the Law Now every reasonable creature is under the obligation of the Law It implies a contradiction for God to make a creature and not to make him under a Law for he who is not supreme must needs be subject to the will of him who is supreme Either the creature's will must be a law to it self or else Gods will must be a law to it the creature's will cannot be a law to the creature because it is a created will and there is an increated will which is above it the creature receives its being from another and therefore must needs be under the will of him and under the dispose of him from whom it receives its being It is impossible for God to make a creature and not that creature to be under an obligation to love fear serve and obey his Maker 4. The fourth Proposition is this God justifies no person nor receives any person into actual favour and acceptance with him without a perfect righteousness answering exactly to the law And the reason of this depends upon the former Propositions The righteousness that is in the Law is the Transcript and Copy of Gods Holiness now God requires holiness in the creature answerable to his own Holiness The righteous Lord loveth righteousness Psal 11.7 God being righteous in his nature requires righteousness from the creature The Law of God is immutable perpetual and everlasting and God doth indispensably require righteousness from the creature Rom. 10.5 Moses describes the righteousness of the law that the man that doth these things shall live by them The Law gives life to none but where it is fulfilled the man that doth these things shall live by them It is true the Law of the Covenant of Works did not only require perfect obedience but it also required personal obedience The Law of the first Covenant did not admit of obedience by a surety but it required that a man should obey the Law in his own person But this is dispensed with in the second Covenant The second Covenant accepts of obedience from a surety but obedience is still required yea perfect exact obedience God justifies no person but where there is a perfect compleat righteousness every way answering the rule of the Law It is not possible that the righteousness of the Law can be disanulled and therefore there must be a righteousness answering the righteousness of the Law Hence is that expression Rom. 3.26 God is just and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus God must find out a righteousness somewhere before he justifies any person 5. The fifth Proposition is this No man since the Fall can fulfil the righteousness of the Law or perform that obedience which the Law requires Hence is it that the Apostle tells us Rom. 8.3 that The law is weak through the flesh The plain meaning of that Scripture is this The Law would justifie men in case men could keep the Law but no man is able to keep the Law and therefore he cannot be justified by it The Law is weak that is it is weak as to Justification The Law is able to justifie no man but this weakness of the Law is through the flesh The weakness is not on the Laws part but on mans part that he is not able to keep the Law Man since the Fall cannot keep the Law and so the Law is weak through the flesh Man since the Fall is become carnal and fleshly And the Apostle tells us in the same Chapter Rom. 8.7 The carnal mind is enmity against God for it is not subject to the law of God neither indeed can be Man by his Fall hath weakened himself man hath lost his power to fulfil the Law and so cannot possibly attain to life by the Law 6. The sixth and last Proposition is this If God justifie any person he must find out and prepare a righteousness of his own and bestow that upon men for their Justification Therefore since man cannot fulfil the Law himself and God will not dispense with the righteousness of the Law God if he please to save men must find out some other way how the Law may be fulfilled And this was the way God found out The Son of God must take to himself the nature of man and in the nature of man must fulfil the righteousness of the Law And thus Christ is said to be the end of the Law for righteousness Rom. 10.3 The Law which was never fulfilled before was perfectly fulfilled by Christ The complement of the Law says a Learned man lyes in this That our sins are pardoned for Christs sake and that the Righteousness of Christ is imputed to us whenas he is our Head and we are his Members Hence is the righteousness of the law said to be fulfilled in us It is an emphatical expression That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.4 Not that it is possible for a Believer to fulfil the righteousness of the law in his own person but a Believer being one with Christ fulfils the righteousness of the law in the person of his Head The Son of God taking humane nature doth perfectly fulfil the law in the humane nature assumed So that now in Christ who was made under the law for us there is found such a righteousness as is every way answerable to the law and this Righteousness of his is imputed to Believers Therefore is Christ said to be made of God to us righteousness 1 Cor. 1.30 And We are made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 In the first place Vse 1 Learn from hence the reason why it is impossible that any man should be justified by a righteousness of this own by an inherent righteousness the reason is If a man be justified by an inherent righteousness a righteousness of his own working he must produce such a righteousness as is perfect and exact and every way answering and conformable to the law The Law of God admits of no
not able to pay so that whatever the debt is the surety who is ingaged stands under an obligation to see it satisfied Christ then becoming our Surety all that obligation that lay upon us from the law is now derived upon him Now Christ brings himself under this obligation to the law two ways 1. By his own free consent and stipulation to the Father He that is otherwise free if he enter into Bonds and Covenants to discharge anothers debt become an engaged person Though he were free before he is now no longer free but becomes engaged by his own voluntary consent Thus Christ who was free and disingaged in himself did enter into a Covenant and agreement with the Father to undertake our cause and to do and suffer what was necessary to be done and suffered in order to our Salvation Heb. 10.7 Then I said Lo I come in the volume of the book it is written of me To do thy will O God When Christ saw the Fathers heart was set on the Salvation of man and that for that end the Father was willing Christ should undertake the cause and business of their Salvation Christ was as willing as the Father was and he saith Lo I come to do thy will Hence is it that the Counsel of Peace is said to be between them both Zac. 6.13 The Father to speak after the manner of men propounds and the Son consents so that the Son who was free and disingaged in himself brings himself under an obligation by his own free promise and stipulation Hence it is that Christ becomes the Head of the second Covenant the second Adam and all the Elect are his seed and Christ undertakes for them Isa 53.10 2. Christ brought himself under obligation to the Law by his own voluntary assumption of our nature for that end that he might become subject to the Law in it This the Apostle sets forth at large Phil. 2.6 He was in the form of God and counted it no robbery to be equal with God but he made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men and being found in fashion as a man he humbled himself and became obedient Here are two things by which the Apostle sets forth the greatness of Christs Condescension 1. That he being in the form of God and who might have continued in the form of God only yet that he was pleased to take upon him the form of a servant and become true man this is one part of his condescension The other part of his condescension is that he would take upon him the form of a servant and become man for this very end that he might become obedient and that he might perform all the acts of obedience in the humane nature assumed Christ was not bound to take our nature at all but he might have continued always in the form of God only or if he will take our nature he was not bound to take it in that servile way so as to be bound to all acts of obedience but here was the greatness of Christs condescension as he will take our nature so he will take it for that end that in our nature he may obey and fulfil the Law for us And therefore it is emphatically expressed in the Original 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Factum seu redactum sub lege He was made obedient and so in the Text He was made under the Law Christ was made or reduced under the Law so some render it Christ was reduced to that state and condition as to be in a state of subjection to the Law whereas he was naturally above it Christ was made or reduced under this power and authority of the Law by his own free consent whereas naturally the Law had no such power or authority over him 3. The third and last Proposition is this For Christ to be under the Law is to be under the Judirisction of the Law and to be actually subject to it Christ having put himself under the obligation of the law the law hath full power and authority over him and the law requires perfect and exact obedience from him as it doth from any other man and Christ doth now stand bound and obliged to yield and perform that obedience which the law requires Hence Christ is called Isa 42.1 the Fathers servant he is said to love the Father to do and keep the Fathers commandments Joh. 14.31 15.10 Christ as man was under a law of love and obedience to his Father he was also subject to his Parents after the flesh he submitted to the Baptism of John and gives this reason for it Thus it becomes us to fulfil all righteousness Mat. 3.15 Christ being made man becoming our surety and being made under the law for us was bound to all the moral Duties which the law requires and so to fulfil all righteousness for us And the reason of it is If Christ had left any thing undone that the law requires of us then there had been so far a defect in that which was to become our righteousness for the obedience of Christ was to be the matter of our righteousness Rom. 5.19 By the obedience of one shall many be made righteous The law accepts of nothing but a perfect compleat righteousness therefore if Christ had left any thing to be done that the law requires to be done there had been so far a defect in that which must be our righteousness for Justification therefore Christ was obliged to all that obedience which the law required from us 2. I come now to the second thing to shew wherein the greatness of the love of Christ doth appear and discover it self in his being made under the Law I shall lay down several Propositions for the clearing of this 1. The love of Christ in being made under the law appears in this In that Christ in respect of his Original right was free from all subjection to the law Christ in respect of his person and his Divine nature was above the law Christ as he was God was Supreme and the Author of the law as he was the second person in the Trinity so he was equal to the Father and of equal authority with him It is true the humane nature in Christ was a creature and therefore in a state of subjection as every creature must necessarily be supposed to be But then we must consider that although the humane nature of Christ be a creature and considered simply so is in a state of subjection yet Christ in respect of his Original right is free from all subjection And this may be evidenced from these following Considerations 1. Although it be true that the humane nature in Christ be a creature yet the humane nature hath its subsistence in and by that person who is Divine and increated And hence is it that the Schoolmen do deny that Christ is to be called a Creature There is a
great difference between these two Propositions to say That the humane nature in Christ is a creature and to say that Christ is a creature for Christ is the name of the person that subsists in both natures Therefore though it be true Christus est nomen personae in duabus subsistentis naturis that one of the natures in Christ is a creature yet the person is Divine and no creature and therefore the Apostle saith Rom. 9.5 that Christ though he came of the fathers concerning the flesh yet he is over all God blessed for ever Although Christ as to the flesh and in respect of his humanity came of the Fathers and we say truly and properly his humanity is a creature yet his person is Divine and Christ is still God blessed for ever 2. We must know that the humane nature of Christ never in any moment of time subsisted of it self or by it self but always had its subsistence in the Divine person and the reason is this If we should suppose the humane nature at any time subsist in it self out of the Divine person that would necessarily infer there were two persons in Christ which is most contrary to the Doctrine of the Scriptures Therefore although we do suppose the humane nature simply in it self considered to be a creature and in a state of subjection yet considering that the humanity was always personally united to the Divinity and the humane nature never subsisted out of the Divine person we must conclude that Christ was no otherways in a state of subjection than what he brought himself into by his voluntary condescension Therefore the Apostle tells us He emptied himself and took upon him the form of a servant and became obedient As it was part of his condescension he would take upon him the form of a servant so this was another part of it he would become obedient for our sakes 3. We must consider it was a voluntary act in Christ to assume our nature Christ took our nature indeed but he was not bound to it it was his own free and voluntary act that he did assume it 4. We must also consider that Christ did not lose the Digniey of his person by his assumption of our nature He was the Son of God before his Incarnation and so he was after he was God before he took mans nature and so remained still It is true Christ in the state of his Humiliation was content to have the Glory of his Divinity hid and obscured for a time and this is that the Apostle calls his emptying himself But yet Christ did not neither could he divest himself of his Divinity neither did he lose the essential Dignity of his person He was the Son of God and God after as well as before his Incarnation 5. Christ might if he had pleased without running such a course of obedience here on earth have glorified the humane nature when first he assumed it For this is granted by Divines That Christ by virtue of the personal Union had a natural right unto Glory The Son of God incarnate and become man continues to be the Son of God yea the natural Son of God And hence is it the School-men do truly say That Christ-man is the natural Son of God Therefore the Apostle tells us That Christ is more excellent than the Angels because he hath obtained a more excellent name by inheritance than they Heb. 1.4 And what name is this to be the Son of God Consider vers 5. To which of the Angels said he at any time Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Now the Apostle tells us Christ had this name by inheritance that is he was naturally the Son of God and therefore naturally an Heir to all the Father was possessed of Now as he was the Son of God before his Incarnation so he did not cease to be the Son of God by his Incarnation Therefore Christ had a natural right to Glory and might if he had pleased have glorified the humane nature when he assumed it Now then as the result of all that hath been said follows That Christ would become and put himself into a state of subjection and obedience this was for our sakes and it was his voluntary condescension so to do Nay the Apostle tells us expresly in the Text He was made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law So that it was for our sakes Christ put himself into this state of subjection and it was his voluntary condescension so to do We may not suppose Christ was necessitated to be in this state of subjection True indeed it is said of Christ as man and Mediator That the Father is greater than he Joh. 14.28 and Christ as man is under God as his Head 1 Cor. 11.3 The head of every man is Christ and the head of the woman is the man and the head of Christ is God But then we must still remember 1. It was at Christs liberty whether he would have become man yea or no. He was not bound to take our nature till he did freely of his own accord ingage to do so 2. Remember inequality of Office makes no inequality of Person or Essence although Christ as Man and Mediator be inferiour to the Father in a state of subjection to the Father yet that makes him not to be inferiour to him as to his Person or Essence Consider Christ as the second Person in Trinity he accounts it no robbery to be equal with God that is with the Father Consider him as God so he and the Father are one Now that he who was equal with God and so above all Authority should take upon him the Office of Mediator and put himself into a state of subjection this was marvellous condescension O stand and admire this love How great was his love that would come to serve and obey who was Lord of all and had all obedience of right due to him from all creatures 2. The greatness of Christs love in being made under the Law appears in this That although Christ was free from the Law yet by his own voluntary condescension he made himself subject to the Law as much as any of us This the Apostle sets forth Heb. 2.11 12 13. For both he that sanctifies and they who are sanctified are all of one for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren Saying I will declare thy Name unto my brethren in the midst of the Church will I sing praise unto thee And again I will put my trust in him and again Behold I and the children which God hath given me Christ doth here put himself into the rank of his brethren and he performs the same duties in common with them To praise God in the Congregation to trust in God to obey God all these are moral duties now Christ having assumed our nature performs these duties in common with the rest of his brethren 3. The third Proposition is
this The love of Christ in his being made under the Law appears in this That Christ took upon him the whole debt of obedience which the Law requires Our Saviour teaches us expresly That he came to fulfil the law yea the whole law Mat. 5.17 Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets I came not to destroy but to fulfil Christ came to fulfil the law and how what a part of it nay the whole law Our Saviour explains himself to this purpose in the next words Verily I say unto you Till heaven and earth pass one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled All the law every part and tittle of it was fulfilled in and by Christ It is the observation of Divines That Christ fulfilled the natural Law and the Law of Moses most perfectly By the natural Law they understand all the moral Duties comprehended in the Ten Commandments and by the Mosaical Law they understand those Rites and Ordinances of Worship which were in a peculiar manner given to the Jewish Church Thus Christ was circumcised and presented to the Lord in the Temple and they offered a Sacrifice for him according to that which is said in the Law A pair of Turtle-doves or two young pigeons Luk. 2.22 23 24. Christ also observed the Ordinance of the Passover and as Christ observed all the Legal Ordinances so he submitted to the Ordinance of Baptism which was to be a standing Ordinance under the Gospel and he gives this reason for it Thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness Mat. 3.15 Behold Vse from what hath been spoken the infinite Humility of the Son of God Christ that was Lord of all was yet content to become a servant Christ was the Fathers servant and he was our servant 1. He was the Fathers servant Isa 42.1 Behold my servant 2. He was our servant therefore he is said to be a Minister of the Circumcision Rom. 15.8 that is a Minister to the Jewish Church And he saith of himself he came not to be ministred unto but to minister Mat. 20.28 How did Christ minister Christ is said to minister as he doth work and do those things which do concern our Redemption and Salvation He is a Minister for us a Minister to accomplish the great work of Redemption and Salvation Christ was made under the Law that he might redeem us who were under the Law Christ became a Servant as he took upon him the Office of Mediator and as he obeyed and fulfilled the Law for us Now this is a Rule in Divinity Tota person a propter assumtam servi formam facta nobis est serva Zanch. Actiones sunt suppositorum That Christ is Mediator according to both his Natures so that the whole person by means of his taking on him the form of a servant is become a servant to us It is the Person that humbles himself it is the Person that obeys it is the Person that suffers in and by the humane nature assumed Actions belong to persons Now that so great a Person as the Son of God was should become a Servant a servant not only to the Father but to us what an instance of humility is this that the God of Heaven should come down from Heaven to serve what an instance of humility is this It is Calvins observation upon Phil. 2. He made himself of no reputation or he emptied himself This expression is to be understood of whole Christ as he is God manifested in the flesh though this agrees to him in respect of his humane nature only For we must know that whereas there is but one person consisting of both natures he that was the Son of God truly and really God equal with the Father did yet contain and keep in the rays of his own glory whenas in our flesh he did take upon him the form of a servant this humility of Christ should teach us great humility And the Apostle presseth humility upon us on this very account Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus how so who being in the form of God thought it no robbery to be equal with God but made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men and being found in fashion as a man he humbled himself and became obedient Here is the great Pattern of humility saith the Apostle he who was in the form of God took upon him the form of a servant he that was above all obedience took upon him to be obedient Should Christ who was in such a height of excellency so debase himself as to take upon him the form of a servant and become obedient and should we lift up our selves How unlike doth this make us to our Head Let us study the great condescension and abasement of God incarnate who though he were Lord of all yet put himself into the form of a servant to obey and serve for us and then see whether there is such reason we should think so highly of our selves stand so much upon our own dignity and honour Christ was content to lay aside his honour and to have the glory of the Divinity unseen for a time that he might be a servant to the Father and to us in working out our Salvation If we would be like our Lord and Head we ought to be content to lay aside our own honour and glory if we may any way be serviceable to him or his interest The humility of Christ should teach us great humility The end of the second Sermon SERMON III. Gal. 4. vers 4. But when the fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law I Mentioned a third Proposition wherein the love of Christ in being made under the Law did appear and shall now prosecute it a little further 3. The love of Christ in being made under the Law appears in this That Christ took upon him the whole debt of obedience which the Law required Now there are two things which the Law of God requires of us 1. The Law requires habitual purity and sanctity of nature 2. The Law requires actual obedience to whatsoever is commanded by it 1. The Law of God requires from the creature habitual purity and sanctity of nature God made man upright man was created at first in a state of Integrity Man in his original constitution had not the least inclination to any thing that was evil but mans will and affections in their primitive constitution were inclined to good It is true man had liberty of will and it was possible for him to sin otherwise he had never sinned but man was not in his original constitution as he was first framed by God inclined to the least evil nay man had that rectitude put upon all his faculties as that in respect of his original constitution his nature was
so framed by God as that it was set and inclined to do that which was good for otherwise it could not have been said of man as it was said of all the other Works of God that God beheld all the things which he had made and behold they were all good very good If man had not been made with such a frame and constitution at first as that he had not the least inclination to evil but that he was framed and made so as that he was fitted to do good it could not be said of man as of other the Works of God That they were good but God made all things very good so also did he make man Man was made upright according to the Image of God and this is that which is commonly called Original Righteousness Man was indued at first with original righteousness now God creating man in such a state of Purity and Righteousness at first he doth still require that purity and righteousness from man in which he was at first created for God may justly expect that from man which first he gave him God created him in a state of Purity and God expects man should retain that purity in the inward frame and disposition of his heart And therefore Divines observe As Original sin is forbidden so Original righteousness is commanded in the last Commandment when it is said Thou shalt not covet 2. The Law requires actual obedience to whatsoever is commanded by it The righteousness of the Law speaks on this wise That the man that doth these things shall live by them Rom. 10.5 The Law requires that there should be a doing an actual performance of the things that are commanded by it and the Law saith Cursed is every one that continues not in all things that are written in the book of the Law to do them Gal. 3.10 Now our Saviour sums up the duty of the Moral Law in those two great Precepts the first is That we should love the Lord our God with all the heart and with all the soul and with all the mind and the second is That we should love our neighbour as our self Mark 12.30 Now Christ being made under the Law for us took upon him all this debt of obedience which the Law required of us 1. Whereas the Law of God requires purity and integrity of nature the Lord Jesus assuming our nature adorns and invests it with all that habitual purity and sanctity which the Law of God requires Hence was it that Christ took up our nature without sin brought original righteousness into it and hath preserved it in a state of purity all along Christs Conception and Nativity were without sin therefore is he said to be that holy thing which should be born of the Virgin Luk. 1.35 The inward dispositions of Christs soul were such as the Law of God required to be therefore is the Law said to be in his heart Psal 40.8 And in general it is said of him that he was holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 7.26 That in him was no sin 1 Joh. 3.5 That he was a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1.19 All these things speak the Purity and Sanctity of his nature that Christ in the inward frame of his nature answered that habitual purity the Law of God required and called for 2. Whereas the Law required actual obedience to what is commanded by it Christ being made under the Law for us left no part of the Law unfulfilled Christ did perfectly perform in thought word and deed what the Law commanded He fulfilled the Law as to every branch of it this we heard before that not one iota or tittle of the Law was to pass away till all was fulfilled All was perfectly and exactly fulfilled by Christ Hence is it that he is called the holy One and the Just Acts 3.14 Hence also is it that he challengeth the Jews Which of you can accuse me of sin Joh. 8.46 And it was prophesied of him before That he had done no violence neither was any deceit found in his mouth Isa 53.9 Christ performed all duties towards God and all duties towards man 1. For duties towards God He loved his Father perfectly feared him perfectly obeyed him perfectly Hence is it said of him He always did the things that were pleasing in his sight Joh. 8.29 And therefore when he came to dye he could say I have glorified thee on earth I have finished the work that thou gavest me to do Joh. 17.4 2. As for duties towards man Christ was so exact in all moral Righteousness that in the matter of paying Tribute though he knew he was not in strictness bound to it yet to prevent offence and avoid all appearance of evil he would work a Miracle rather than leave it undone Mat. 17.24 4. The fourth Proposition to illustrate the greatness of the love of Christ in being made under the Law for us is this Christ having taken upon him the whole debt of obedience which the Law required persevered and continued in the course of his obedience till all was finished Hence is it said of him He became obedient unto death even the death of the Cross Phil. 2.8 Christ was obedient all along his obedience lasted throughout his whole life he was obedient unto death It is an emphatical expression He was obedient unto death that is his obedience continued through the course of his life and continued unto death and his death was the last act of his obedience Hence was it when our Saviour came to dye he used this speech It is finished He had finished all that obedience which the Law had required and his Father had injoyned him The Law requires constant perpetual obedience as well as perfect obedience The Law requires obedience not only in one time and season but in the whole of our life Now there was no failing in any part of Christs obedience to the law at any time He was never found guilty of any sin in the whole course of his life Hence is that expression Isa 53.9 In him was found no violence neither was any deceit in his mouth And as he was never found guilty of the least sin so he persevered in all acts of obedience to the last Hence is it said Joh. 4.34 His meat and drink was to do the will of him that sent him and to finish his work 5. The fifth Proposition is The greatness of Christs love in being made under the Law appears in this In that what Christ did in a way of obedience to the Law it was for us Hence is it said that Christ is made sin for us and we are made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 Christ took upon him our person Christ sustained the persons of all the Elect Christ did that for us which we should have done Hence is it that Christ is said to be the second Adam The obedience which Christ performed to the Father was in
will for the most part depend one upon another and the former Proposition will be introductory and leading to them that do succeed Before I come to lay down those Propositions that do immediately concern the Doctrine of Christs Satisfaction it self there are some Propositions to be laid down that are preliminary and necessary to make way thereupon 1. The first Proposition then is this Man was created under a Law of service and obedience to his Maker Man when first he came out of the hands of God must needs see himself in a state of inferiority unto God he saw that God was above him and that he had received his being from God and that receiving his Being from God he must necessarily be in a state of inferiority and subjection to him Man also saw that having received his Being from God he was under a vast obligation of gratitude love and service into God who had given him Being and such an excellent Being man also saw that receiving his Being from another and not having it from himself it was most just and reasonable that he should be under the will of him who gave him his Being and not under the conduct and government of his own will These deductions do naturally flow from the principles of right reason which we must suppose to be in man in his primitive estate 2. The second Proposition is this That man was every way fitted and qualified to give obedience to the Law of his Creation Man we know at first was created after the image of God in Righteousness and true Holiness and man being cloathed with the image of God was every way fitted to give to God that obedience which the Law of his Creation required from him Mans mind or understanding was filled with light and knowledge whereby he clearly understood what the will of God and what his own duty was Mans will also as it was first created had no obliquity in it but was inclined to good his affections were all regular God made man upright as the Scripture speaks Eccles 7.29 Every thing was upright most upright in man in his first Creation there was nothing out of order in him the will of man was then upright It is true although the will of man was made upright and good at first yet it was not made immutably good but that it was possible for man to decline from good to evil otherwise it had not been possible for man to have fallen and sinned but sin and fall he did and that we know by our own sad experience But yet though man was not created at first in an impeccable estate but that it was possible for him to sin yet he was created in so perfect a state that it was possible for him not to have sinned Tale erat adjuâ—orium quod desereret cùm vellet in quo permaneret si vellet non quo fieret ut vellet Aug. Hence is that of Austin Adam had that help and assistance given to him at first which he might desert when he would and in which he might have abode and continued in case he would but he had not that help and assistance whereby he should so will 3. The third Proposition is this God to lay a further ingagement upon man to persevere in the course of his obedience entred into a Covenant or stipulation with man promising him life in case of obedience and threatning him with death in case of disobedience This we have expressed in that known Text Gen. 2.16 17. And the Lord God commanded the man saying Of every tree of the garden thou mayst freely eat But of the tree of knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death Here we have a positive Law supperadded unto the natural Law the Law of mans creation and there is a threatning annexed to deter man from breaking this Law in which threatning also there is a promise supposed to be included in case man did not break it for if God threatned man in case he did eat that he shall dye this is to be supposed if he did not eat nor transgress this command he should not dye else the threatning had been in vain Now we must know that man by virtue of the natural Law the Law of his creation was bound to observe this positive Law of God And the reason is because man being a creature must necessarily be under the will and at the dispose of him that makes him and therefore must necessarily be obliged to observe his Creators will in all things that he shall declare to be his will therefore it pleasing God to give out this positive Law concerning the not eating of the Tree of knowledge of good and evil as a tryal of mans obedience man by virtue of the natural Law the Law of his creation is bound to give obedience to God in this positive Law of his For man as he is a creature is bound to give obedience to the Law and Will of his Creator in that way God requires and expects it of him and God having manifested this to be his Will the Law of his creation obligeth him to testifie his respect and obedience to God according as he hath discovered his mind to him 4. The fourth Proposition is this That man sinning God is highly offended with him by reason of sin Sin is most displeasing to God upon several accounts 1. Because sin is most contrary to the Nature and Will of God 1. Sin is contrary to the Nature of God Psal 5.4 Thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness neither shall evil dwell with thee Hab. 1.13 Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil and canst not look on iniquity 1 Joh. 1.5 God is light and in him is no darkness at all God is perfection and sin is imperfection God is purity and Holiness it self and sin is a defect of that purity therefore the nature of God is most diametrically opposite to sin 2. Sin is contrary to the Will of God The Will of God is expressed and declared in his Law Now the Law of God commands rectitude nothing but rectitude The commandment is holy just and good Rom. 7.12 Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness and thy law is truth Psal 119.142 Now sin is a deviation from that rectitude which the Law requires sin is a perfect contradiction to the will of God revealed in his Law 2. Sin is most displeasing unto God because it is a casting off of Gods Authority This we must necessarily suppose that God being infinitely superiour unto man and the Author of mans Being must needs have the most perfect and absolute authority over man Now man when he sins when he takes upon him to sin acts according to his own will and takes no notice of the Divine Law and so consequently casts off Gods Authority Man when he sins acts after that manner as if so
consummate and compleat sorrows and pains which our Saviour did suffer and undergo for our sake In Psal 22. which is certainly a Prophecy of Christ and a description of his sufferings we have these sufferings notably set forth in vers 1. My God my God why hast thou forsaken me and vers 14. I am poured out like water all my bones are out of joynt my heart is like wax it is melted in the midst of my bowels my strength is dryed up like a potsherd and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws and thou hast brought me into the dust of death He that thinks this is spoken of some ordinary sufferings which are common to other men must needs have a very slender consideration of these things certainly they are more than common ordinary sorrows that drew such expressions from our Saviour in whose person here the Psalmist speaks our Saviour then tasted of supernatural death he did undergo the pains of Hell for us Now that I may unfold a little more particularly and distinctly how it was that Christ suffered the pains and torments of Hell for us I must do it in some particular Propositions and I would speak of this a little for these two ends 1. That we might more fully understand what it was that we deserved by our sins 2. That we might admire the love of Christ so much the more that he should suffer such pains and torments for us that we might be delivered from them 1. Our Saviour suffered the greatest and most inexpressible dolors anxieties and perplexities in his mind for us and yet without sin no sorrows were ever like to his sorrows Hence is that expression Mark 14.33 He began to be sore amazed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to be very heavy or He began to be afraid and grievously troubled The first word properly signifies to be struck with fear or to be astonished with fear our Saviour was as a person astonished this is the proper import of the word This amazement as we express it was such a passion as was stirred up in our Saviour by which from the sudden commotion of all the faculties of his Soul he was as a person astonished all over in a fear astonished at the greatness of the things he had to suffer neither dâ—d this astonishment speak any imperfection of Holiness in the humane nature of our Saviour but only demonstrated the greatness of his sufferings for it is possible that the mind by some sudden and vehement commotion from some terrible object may be so occupied and taken up that there may not be the free exercise of the thoughts for the present and yet this without sin this was the case of our Saviour he was like a person astonished at the greatness of the sufferings that he was to undergo and that he saw coming upon him all the faculties of his Soul were moved and stirred in him at the torrent of Divine wrath that he saw ready to break in upon him 2. The second word used by the Evangelist is He began to be amazed and very heavy This word is well rendred by our Translators very heavy for I find that Phavorinus renders the Substantive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phavorinus sadness of soul He began to be amazed and very sad Now concerning this fear and this grief that our Saviour underwent I shall speak more particularly hereafter but before we proceed to that I shall make some use of what hath been already opened Learn from hence in the first place Vse 1 how great an evil sin is nothing shews more clearly what an evil sin is than those great sorrows and sufferings of our Saviour that God should cast so innocent a person as Christ was in himself meerly because he was our Surety and took upon him the guilt of our sins into such great sorrows and inexpressible dolors both in soul and body this shews what an infinite evil sin is and how much God hates it and what it is that we deserve by it We may slight sin and think it a light and trivial thing but O let us stand by the Cross of Christ a while and see what it was that the Son of God and God suffered in our nature consider what grief what anguish what trouble and perplexity of soul he underwent and then we shall see that God doth not look upon sin as such a slight and trivial thing whatever we may do Would God have exposed his own innocent Son who was so near to him who was so tenderly beloved by him who always pleased him and who never offended him to so much ignominy to so much contempt and shame to so much pain grief and sorrow had he not hated sin infinitely had not his soul been infinitely set against it O when we find our hearts begin to play and dally with sin it is good for us to soak our hearts in the meditation of Christs sufferings to take a turn at the Cross of Christ and behold the Son of God incarnate made a spectacle to men and Angels and bearing the wrath of God to expiate the guilt of our sins Learn from hence what remains still to be suffered by Vnbelievers those dolors those sorrows Vse 2 those torments of soul and body that death which Christ hath not suffered for them remains still to be suffered by them in their own persons for the sentence of the Law must take place therefore unless thou have suffered in a surety thou art liable to suffer in thy own person the sentence of the Law is In dying thou shalt dye dye nuturally and dye spiritually taste of natural and supernatural death therefore unless thou have suffered this in a surety thou art liable to suffer this in thy own person Now all Unbelievers who are guilty either of positive or negative unbelief have no part in Christ or his sufferings 1. They who are guilty of positive unbelief such as reject Christ and will have nothing to do with him as they said We will not have this man to reign over us these have nothing to do with Christ and his sufferings 2. Such as are guilty of negative unbelief such who do not believe on Christ who do not close with him who do not embrace him by a lively faith all such have no part in Christ and in his sufferings therefore it necessarily follows that that which Christ hath not suffered for them remains still to be suffered by them in their own persons Joh. 3. ult He that believeth not on the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him O how should this make every soul of us to tremble lest we should be found out of Christ Canst thou bear the terrour of the first death when the sting of it is not taken away Or canst thou bear the fear of supernatural death to have thy soul separated from God for ever If thou hast not a part in Christ and in his death thou art liable to both