covenant for salvation that came to ask of him what he should do to be saved the place is Luke 10.25 26 27 28. And behold a certain Lawyer stood up and tempted him saying Master what shall I do to inherit eternal life He said unto him What is written in the Law How readest thou Christ sends him to the Law and you shall see it is not to the Law in a large sence as it comprehends both a covenant of Works and a covenant of Grace but to the Law taken strictly for a covenant of Works it follows therefore ver 27. The Lawyer answering said The Law saith Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all thy strength and with all thy mind and thy neighbour as thy self And Jesus said unto him Thou hast answered right this do and thou shalt live which are the very words of Moses where he describes a legal righteousness From whence I conclude That the Covenant of Works is still good unto Justification the Covenant of Works is still in force else Moses would never have delivered it in that simplicity and with that Authority else Jesus Christ himself would never have directed one unto it to get eternal life by it I answer 1. That Moses indeed did deliver a covenant of Works to the people of Israel as truly as he did a covenant of Grace and that without any caution that I can find in the place where it is delivered and I think I may say also that our Saviour Christ did deliver a Covenant of Works too in that 10. of Luke above-mentioned And 2dly I may add There was very good reason why they might and why they did For that the covenant of Works is still in force all men by nature are under it for it is nothing but the natural law of our creation All men are naturally under a Covenant of works There was indeed a positive Law besides given to Adam but the observing of it needed not have created any trouble to innocent man All men are naturally under a covenant of Works for they are naturally under the Law of their Creation which is the covenant of Works Yea the Saints themselves are not freed from it any further then from the condemning power of it by Christs having suffered the penalty for them That all men are naturally under the Law or under a covenant of Works which are all one appears for that all those whom Christ came to redeem were under the Law Gal. 4.5 which must be meant of the Law strictly taken for a covenant of Works for else none but the Jews and proselyted Gentiles were under the Law as delivered by Moses whereas in that Scripture it is plain that all those whom Christ came to redeem were under the Law therefore it is meant under the Law as a covenant of Works Besides the Apostle in Rom. 7. the first six verses argues thus That the conscience or soul of a man must either be married to the Law as its Husband or to Christ as its Husband and till it is marryed to Christ the Law is its natural Husband but when it is married to Christ the law is its husband no longer therefore till a man come to Christ he is under a covenant of Works therefore all men naturally are under a covenant of Works for no man is in Christ by nature I answer in the third place That it 's true Moses and our Saviour both preached a covenant of Works as well as a covenant of Grace and well might because all men are naturally under it Yet neither our Saviour nor Moses did it with design to make men seek justification by Works but only to burthen mens consciences with insupportable loads of guilt that so they might readily flee to the hope that was set before them in the covenant of Grace which they had together with the covenant of Works in the same Dispensation That Moses did it with this design St. Paul asserts as I have shewn in several places the law entred that the offence might abound and so was a School-Master unto Christ And that our Saviour did it with this design the place quoted in the objection will sufficiently evidence Luke 10.25 to the 28.25 v. Behold a certain Lawyer stood up and tempted him saying Master what shall I do to inherit eternal life Here this Lawyer came not with a good intention for it is said he stood up and tempted our Saviour made the question rather to see what our Saviour would say then to get any satisfaction to himself and in the 29. ver it is said This Lawyer was willing to justifie himself Now how could the pride of this tempting Lawyer be better repressed then by sending him to the Law to a covenant of Works which if he would but set himself in earnest to keep would quickly prick the bladder of his pride and let out that wind with which he was so swoln as to dare come and tempt Christ and justifie himself But now our Saviour takes another course with the Woman of Canaan who after she was tryed with a knock or two with some harsh words so as to be called Dog yet continuing humble and submissive had her faith extolled by our Saviour and is strengthened with the highest consolations as we have the story Matt. 15. from ver 22. to ver 29. Thus God resisteth the proud he hath a Covenant of Works to oppose them withall but he giveth Grace and sheweth Mercy to the humble he hath a covenant of Grace to comfort them with Obj. 5 There is one objection yet more concerning the ceremonial law which I did not mention at the first and it is this Certainly it appears from the ceremonial law that the law of Moses was given to them for a covenant of Works else why had they such multitude of ceremonies imposed upon them if they were not to have life for the observation and doing of them together with the duties of the moral Law And it is very observable that in that place of Leviticus which the Apostle quotes as containing the righteousness of the law the ceremonies are as strictly enjoined as the moral duties of the law are with this badge of the law of works upon them The man that doth them shall live in them Lev. 18.4 5. Ye shall do my Judgements that is say Commentors my judicial Laws and keep mine Ordinances that is say they either moral or ceremonial so in ver 5. You shall therefore keep my Statutes and Judgements which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. Now hence I argue saith the Objector Here you have acknowledged is a covenant of Works described Now here is their whole Dispensation by Moses of laws moral ceremonial and judicial contained therefore their whole Dispensation was a covenant of Works besides if the Law moral alone which you have called the law of Nature he of it self a covenant of Works as it seems to have been to Adam who had but a few other commands besides viz. such as we call Positive and
if every man by Nature be under a covenant of works though a stranger to the Old-Testament or New as having never heard of either being under the law of his creation how much more were the Israelites under a covenant of Works who besides the moral law had the judicial and ceremonial added for them to observe and altogether given them vvith this language of a covenant of Works these ye shall observe which if a man do he shall live in them I am the Lord. I shal add onely one observation more to strengthen the objection and it is this That when St. Paul disputes against the Galatians for embracing a covenant of Works most of his Work lyes in beating them off from the ceremonial law vvhich they were exceedingly addicted to as looking upon the lavv of Moses to be very much of the nature of the covenant of Works and the ceremonial law as a great sign of it there being so much vvork cut out for them in it and verily believing that if they vvere pretty strict in keeping the ceremonial law God vvould justifie and save them Therefore it is very probable that the law of Moses was given to them as a covenant of Works for this reason as well as others that there were so many ceremonies appointed for them to observe most of which it is more then probable the greater number did not understand and so must take up und satisfie themselves with the Work done then which vvhat can look more like a covenant of vvorks for men to do a great many things which they did not understand meerly because God had commanded them Now for answer to this objection and I shall give it in several particulars A. 1 I confess that the ceremonial law proved a great snare and a stumbling-block unto the careless Jews and so to the Galatians for when they found such a great task of ceremonies set them they cared not much to study the meaning of them but took up with the doing of them which to do did not much trouble their hearts or consciences and so placed themselves by it under a covenant of vvorks in their treating with God for Justification 2dly I grant that the ceremonial law was a great burthen and an unsupportable yoke even to those that were good amongst the Jews Acts 15.10 and it is a great piece of the liberty of the Gospel to be freed from it 3dly I grant that the laws moral judicial and ceremonial were given altogether and are included in that place where a covenant of vvorks or the righteousness of the Law is said to be described by the Apostle and I grant in this particular that though the law of nature alone is a covenant of vvorks to those that are in a state of nature though they never received any positive law from God yet that it is possible for a ceremonial lavv or a law consisting of many ceremonies or positive laws to be a part of a covenant of vvorks as we find in Adam's covenant of works there was a Sacrament as some reckon it of the Tree of life and there was a positive law concerning the forbidden fruit which vvere neither of them branches of the law of Nature and he might have been as well forbidden as allowed all the trees save one if the Lord had pleased he might have had a systeme of positive and ceremonial laws inserted in his covenant of vvorks if the Lord had thought good and no wrong had been done him for he was able to have kept them 4thly Yet here I deny that the ceremonial law was any part of a covenant of works though brought in near that place where the righteousness of the law is said by the Apostle to be described and that for this reason which fully answers the objection That the ceremonial law did contain Gospel in it which cannot be said of any branch of the covenant of works I allowed indeed above that the law taken strictly for a covenant of works did preach the Gospel virtually or by consequence as it burthened the sinners conscience and so made him seek further for a righteousness but I said then it is the law taken in a large sence onely as it contains the whole Old-Testament or at least a considerable part of it that teacheth Christ and the Gospel formally and expresly VVhy now the ceremonial law teacheth Christ in many perhaps in all the parts of it if wel understood VVhat could the shedding of so much blood for remission of sins signifie but the shedding of Christs blood for them and us all which is the great mysterie of the Gospel Now if any say they understood it not and yet must do it and so it was all one to them as if it had not singnified any thing at all and therefore must still pass with them as a covenant of works I answer 1 in the words of the Apostle Rom. 3 3. What though some did not believe did not understand must their unbelief and ignorance make the Faith of God that Doctrine of Faith which the ceremonial law preached of none effect or signification But you will say they could not see the blood of Christ in the blood of a sacrifice having no clearer discoveries then they had of Christ I ans I confess I cannot say they could see so much though still so much was contained in it as now we well understand But yet if they could not see so much yet somewhat they might have learned for certainly God appoints no idle useless insignificant ceremonies in his Worship therefore I suppose they might have learnt thus much by their ceremonies and particularly by their sacrifices which I suppose was known even amongst Heathens in their sacrifices that when they killed a Beast for attoning the anger of God here life went for life and God might as well have taken their lives from them as accepted the life of that Beast and so by this they might see that their lives and salvations did depend purely upon the Mercy and Grace of God now this sufficiently weaned them from the law or covenant of works which had no Grace or Pardon in it it was therefore the grossest mistake of all to understand the ceremonial law for a part of the covenant of Works when it was greatly intended to be a Gospel to them 5thly and lastly If yet it were dark and did confound them with the multitude of duties which it imposed Why might it not herein do the good turn that a covenant of Works did for them Which was to make them study and search and long for the pure and clear discoveries of that rich Grace which we now see in the dayes of the Gospel I have now done with this objection also which I of purpose kept out from the rest in which I only considered the moral law as a
is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the Book of the Law to do them Gal. 3.10 2dly The Law is taken in a sence all as large as this is strict and that is for the whole Old-Testament So it is likewise taken in several Scriptures Gal. 4.21 Tell me ye that desire to be under the Law do ye not hear the Law For it is written that Abraham had two sons c. where the whole Book of Genesis is made a part of the Law again in Rom. 3. the Apostle makes the Psalms a part of the Law where having quoted a great part of the 14. Psalm in the 19. ver saith he Now we know that whatsoever things the Law saith c. and so in other Scriptures Now to apply the distinction in answer to the last query The Law strictly taken for a Covenant of Works did only teach Christ virtually and by consequence as it taught them that they could not be justified by its righteousness and thus for ought I know the Law in its accusations taught Christ to the Gentiles as it convinced them of the insufficiency of their own righteousness But now the Law in the second sense as taken for the Scriptures of the Old Testament taught Christ formally and directly though more obscurely then the Gospel teacheth him viz. in Types and Prophecies it were endless to reckon up all the Types Promises and Prophesies of Christ that are in the Old-Testament This way indeed the Law could not teach Christ unto the Gentiles who had not the Scriptures of the Old-Testament It is now high time and yet in this place seasonable enough to answer some other parts of the objection which I proposed at large some pages since which pleads for the Law its being a way of Justification unto the Jews at least before the coming of Christ if not to us now and something of that which remains yet unanswered Obj. 2. The Law was given to the Iews as their covnant is this If the Law was not given to be a way of Justification why is it called a Covenant the Old-Testament or Covenant 2 Cor. 3.14 and the first Covenant Heb. 7.8 expresly said to be made with the Children of Israel when the Lord took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Aegypt For whatever you have argued about Adam's estate of innocency that God made a Covenant of Works with him and that if he would he might have been justified by Works by the Law that since him all men have sinned and the Law was no way of Justification to them Whatever you have argued to this purpose say the objectors yet we find not that the Law was given to Adam but onely to the children of Israel by Moses and given to them as a Covenant therefore called the old Covenant or first Covenant in Heb. 8. out of Jer. 31.31 32.33 34. Therefore it was given them as a way of Justification for certainly the Justification that they were to seeke of God they were to seek in the way of a Covenant therefore in the way of the Law which was their Covenant To this I answer some things by way of concession A. 1. By way of concession in two particulars afterwards some things more concluding And first of all I grant that the Law is no where to my remembrance said to be given to Adam but onely to the children of Israel I am sure usually when mention is made of the giving of the law Where the law is said to be given it is to the children of Israel not to Adam Yet Adam had the Law and it was a Covenant of works to him 1. He had the Law it is likewise noted in the same place as given to the children of Israel by Moses so 2 Cor. 3 7. Heb. 8.9 1 Joh. 17. For the Law was given by Moses Gal. 3.19 Wherefore then serveth the Law It was added because of transgressions and it was ordained by Angels upon Mount Sinai in the hands of a Mediator viz. Moses Though when I make this concession that the Law is not said to be given to Adam but to the children of Israel by Moses I still think it may be easily collected from the Scriptures that Adam had the Law too and that it was to him a Covenant of Works 1. That he had the Law for 1. if Adam as a creature had not the Law written in his heart how came the Gentiles who had not the Law given them by Moses to have it written in their hearts 2. Else as I urged it before it had been no sin for man in innocency to have killed whom he pleased to have lyed forsworn himself to have defiled his own body by Adultery or other uncleanness for where there is no Law there is no transgression 3. If Adam had not the Law before his fall how came he to have it written in his heart presently after as it is certain he had for all other men have it so written and I cannot think that Adam alone wanted this excellency of all mankind neither do I think that he got this advantage by his fall to have the effect of the Law written in his heart which he had not written there before therefore he had it written in his heart before the Fall 2 It was to him a Covenant of works 2. It was a Covenant of Works to Adam in innocency For Adam then had no need of Grace or Pardon before his fall and I have proved that the Law is in its own nature a Covenant of Works and Adam had the Law therefore it was a Covenant of Works to Adam I deny not but Adam might have some positive Laws in his Covenant of Works as we find one viz. that of the forbidden fruit My second Concession is this That the Law was given to the Jews as a Covenant 2d Concession and where-ever mention is made of the Old-Covenant or First Covenant the parties covenanted withall are the people of the Jews So it is in 2 Cor. 3.6.14 in the 6. ver we have mention made of the New-Covenant which is that made by Christ in preaching the Gospel and in the 14th of the Old-Testament or Covenant which is that made with the Jews So in Heb. 8.6 7. the first Covenant is that which Moses was the Mediator of the second or better Covenant is that which Christ is the Mediator of this must not cannot be denyed and I have been often offended at persons that when they make a distinction of the Covenants a first and second old and new they make the first that with Adam in innocency the second the Covenant of grace made with the faithful ever since this though it may be true Divinity yet is not Scriptural or if it be somewhat Scriptural yet it is onely to be drawn by consequence out of the Scripture But there is another determination in this business that is more plainly
for the Gospel yet all of a sudden like men bewitched away they turn to the Law and in effect though not in profession they leave the Gospel From whence again I add new proof as I promised to the first thing proposed in the conviction which is my third observation Therefore certainly mankind is exceedingly addicted to this way of works 3 Obser though not in a-strict way yet in this mixt way which comes all to one at last and must be called by the same Name I say I may justly infer from this one example of the Galatians That mankind is exceedingly addicted unto this way of works For though an argument ab exemplo be not ordinarily cogent yet such an example as this wil of it self almost amount to a demonstration for it is not an example of one man but of a great company of men they were the Churches of Galatia as it is in chap. 1. ver 2. and Galaria was not a Town or a City but a large Countrey that had many Churches up and down in it and these were such as had gladly received the Gospel they had received the Apostle Paul as if he had been an Angel of God even as Christ Jesus they blessed themselves exceedingly in this that they had heard the Gospel from him they received the Spirit by it c. Now notwithstanding all this no sooner do a company of Law-Preachers come that could do no Miracles at all could not convey the Spirit in their Ministry and yet the Galatians are so bewitched and besotted with them through their own natural inclinations to a Legal Righteousness that they fall off to the Law in the sight and view of all those demonstrations and convictions to the contrary and swallow down four several contradictions to boot Ergo hence it evidently appears that men are exceeding apt to run into this way of Justification by Works unless we shall imagine that this inclination in whole Churches of Galatia was some strange kind of special distemper arising from the soyle or some such trifling cause that hinders it from being common to us with them I say I take it for proved and granted from this example which is to me much like an Induction the whole Nation of the Jews the Churches of Galatia that were Gentiles were wholly given to this way therefore this way is mighty natural to mankind and we have all a strong propension and inclination to it but here comes in one considerable objection upon the answering of which the truth of this last Assertion wil be much clearer and that is this You say Object that because the Nation of the Jews and the Gentile Galatians were so much addicted to the way of Justification of Works therefore it is an argument that all mankind is addicted to this way and that we are in danger of running into this way but you do not seem to observe the great snare and stumbling-block that lay in their way to put them upon it and that was the Ceremonial Law which they did not understand as typical of Christ and Gospel-Mysteries but looked upon it as a task of duties which if they did go thorow and do their best to keepe they should undoubtedly please God and be saved Now this Ceremonial Law was given to the Jews and not perfectly out of use when the Galatians were thus led aside by it but was preached up by the devout Jews that were turned to Christianity that if they were not circumcised and kept not the Law of Moses they could not be saved Act. 15.1 Now this the Galatians receiving as true and holding the Gospel with it they did with the Jews too much dote upon Ceremonial Observances and so their Gospel which they professed with it was sowred and spoiled by it but we are not in this danger we know that the Ceremonial Law is down and so we are free from this snare and danger therefore we need not fear lest we run into a Covenant of Works or seek Justification by works This is the objection and you see it is considerable to which I shall endeavour an answer And first of all I answer by way of concession in three particulars Ans 1. 'T is true the Jews had the Ceremonial Law imposed upon them by God and the Galatians by the seduction of false Teachers received it likewise as their duty 2. The Ceremonial Law was apt to prove a snare to all that were under it in leading them into a Covenant of Works For to be set to do a great many things which we understand no meaning almost in how naturally will it teach us to take up with the opus operatum the work done to look no further Which easily mis-leads us into an opinion of Merit especially when we think our selves prettily well to have discharged our selves of the duties of the Moral Law besides 3. Let it be granted that this did actually prove a great snare both to the Jews and Galatians which appears from this that the Apostle when he is rebuking the Galatians for their Legality he instanceth for proofs often in their observing the Ceremonial Law Gal. 4.8 9. I winder saith he that after ye were set free from bondage to Idols by the Gospel of Christ ye should desire again to enter into bondage to ceremonies which there he calls beggarly rudiments and in ver 10 11. saith he Ye observe dayes and months and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain Nay the Apostle instanceth so frequently in the business of the Ceremonial Law that an incurious Reader might think that all thrir fault was but this that they made Conscience of keeping the Ceremonial Law though 't is certain and I have proved it already that this was not the greatest fault they had fallen into for then the Apostle would onely have gone about to convince them that the Ceremonial Law was abolished by the death of Christ or at least that they being Gentiles need not have their Consciences obliged to it which doth not scarce at all appear to have been any part of his design but his main design is to beat them off from a Covenant of works unto which the Ceremonial Law served for an Inlet And indeed this was the nature and genius of their mischievous error they thought as the Jews also did that though they were not so strict as they should be in observing the great weighty duties of the Moral Law yet if they were strict and careful in observing the Ceremonial this would make some amends for their other great defects and herein we see the Ceremonial Law proved a great snare Thus our Saviour chargeth the Jews even whilest it was their duty to keep the ceremonial Law that they placed the observances of the ceremonial Law in the room of their obedience to the moral Law Ye pay tythe of Mint and Annise and Cummin and have omitted the weightier matters
of the Law Judgement Mercy and Faith these ought ye to have done and notto leave the other undone Matth. 23.23 and so in Isa 1. chap. ver 10. And this I think is the judgement of all Divines to have been the error of the Jews and Galatians Now let these three things be granted yet in the 4th place by way of direct answer to the objection Though the Ceremonial Lâ—w were apt to prove a Snare and actually did prove a Snare to the Jews and Galatians yet it was their natural inclination to Legality to a Legal way of treating with God for their Justification and acceptation that betrayed them into this Snare or that made it prove such a Snare to them For else the Ceremonial Law was in its true use and in the design of the Lord when he first gave it a great blessing unto the people of Israel it was a part of that Dispensation which is called their wisdom and their glory in the sight of the Nations Deut. 4.6 I say the Ceremonial Law was not in its own nature unavoidably such a snare as would lead them to a Covenant of Works nor in the design of God who gave it nay it was designed to be to them a sigurative Gospel and therefore though it was somewhat capable of being made use of to such an end to serve the turn and humor of a Legal Spirit yet none but those that were so addicted could have made such a perverse and destructive use of it or if it had been unavoidably I say make the supposition that it had been unavoidably such a dangerous snare to the Jews who had the Ceremonial Law given them from Mount Sinai yet the Gentile Galatians had not such a temptation to receive it with that veneration that the Jews had and having received the Gospel before and stil retaining the profession of it might have been well antidoted against the danger of it and yet they receive it suddenly in this noxious and mischievous use of it And for what reason can we imagine all this to have come to pass but because they were naturally disposed and exceeding apt to catch at any occasion of serving God as it were by the works of the Law or according to a Covenant of Works 5thly I say therefore that though we have not the Ceremonial Law of the Jews to prove a Snare to us yet we have this radicated inclination to a Covenant of Works which betrayed the Jews and Galatians by occasion of the Ceremonial Law into the prosecution of Justification by Works and this I think was formerly evinced from the example of the Jews and Galatians as by an induction 6thly As for the ceremonial Law perhaps it would be granted that if we had such reason to receive it as the Jews had before Christ when it was their duty to observe it or but such a seeming reason as the Galatians after their seduction thought they had perhaps it would be granted that if the case were so with us as it was with either of them that then we should be in great danger to do as they did and to vent that natural Legality or addictedness to the way of works which hath been evinced to be in all men in ceremonial observances Now let but so much be granted and then I have this to offer That though we are free from the ceremonial Law of the Jews know it abrogated by Christ's death yet we may stil have a like danger though not the same nay the Christian Church hath for many hundreds of years I shall not meddle with the present state of things I say the Christian Church hath for many hundreds of years together formerly been under as great a danger from ceremonies as the Jewâ— were in from the ceremonial Law and for proof of this I shal onely quote some passages out of the preface to the Book of Common-Prayer under the title Of Ceremonies why some be abolished and some retained where you have these besides other expressions Some Ceremonies are put away because the great excess and multitude of them hath so encreased in these later days that the burthen of them was intollerable whereof St. Austine in his time complained that they were grown to such a number that the estate of Christian people was in worse case concerning that matter then were the Jews and he counselled that such yoke and burthen should be taken away as time would serve quietly to do it But what would St. Austine have said if he had seen the Ceremonies of late dayes used amongst us whereunto the multitude used in his time was not to be compared This our excessive multitude of Ceremonies was so great and many of them so dark that they did more confound and darken then declare and set forth Christs benefits unto us There are other considerable passages concerning ceremonies in that Preface but this that I have transcribed serves sufficiently for my purpose and I suppose fully takes off the objection that since the ceremonial Law is down Christians cannot be in the same danger that the Jews Galatians were from ceremonies I have yet one more particular to add by way of answer to the objection and it is this in the seventh place That I verily believe though the Jews had had no such Law given them nor the Gentile-Galatians such a Law preached amongst them by the Jews nor had any such ceremonies ever been set up in the Church of Christ as the quotation speaks of yet both the Jews and Galatians and we all have such an inclination to such an earnest desire after the way of Works that without a strict hand over our selves from giving way to this natural disposition we should be all exceeding apt to find out some way or other of venting this humour either by inventing ceremonies and superisttions or doing the duties of the Moral Law superficially and yet resting upon them for our Justification As for duties or good works that are truly good though they may be abused after their performance by a spiritual pride adhering to them nay though they may perhaps be spoiled sometimes by an opinion of merit yet because I cannot think it possible for a man that doth exercise himself to serve God with a perfect heart to turn all his really-good Works into Legal-Works by an opinion of Merit I shal except this from being a third way in which Legality predominant may exert and shew it self But for the other two ways of invented ceremonies or superstitiuâ—s observances and an external obedience to the duties of the Moral Law I think the nature of man is so addicted to the way of Works that though there were no ceremonial Law amongst us at present either from God or men yet men would generally find out one or both of those ways to vent their Legality even to an opinion of merit in them This I shal shew to have been usually practised in the times of the Scripture and since and
covenant of Works for these two reasons 1. For that the ceremonial law neither was nor could be a part of the covenant of Works which the moral law both was and is to all that are under a covenant of works 2dly and consequently I therefore kept off from any consideration of the ceremonial law in my discourses about the law its being given by Moses that so I might have my discourse run clear in the business of the covenant of works and draw a line in it from Adams estate in innocency to the very days of the Gospel which with any mixture of discourse about the ceremonial law would have been broken and disturbed VVhereas now you see the law taken strictly for a covenant of works might have justified Adam but could not justifie the children of Israel and therefore though added to the promise given to Abraham and that in the language of a covenant of works yet was never given with design that they should accept it for such unto Justification which appears from this double demonstration as I may call it a priori a posteriori A priori for that before the law was given there was a covenant of Grace which the law could not come in to disannul and a posteriori for that the very same Moses that brought their law from God out of the Mount did not more truly acquaint them with the nature of a legal righteousness then he did with the righteousness of Faith Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness of faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thy heart c. being a text quoted out of the same Moses Deut. 30.11 which make this argument vvherefore should Moses first describe to you a legal righteousness and tell you as appears by clear consequence out of him that ye cannot attain unto that righteousness and then describe unto you the righteousness of faith but for this end that ye might forgo the one cleave to the other And there are infinite places in other Scriptures of the Old-Testament which give their testimony to Christ and the Righteousness of Faith which sufficiently argue that the Old-Testament never went about to establish a way of Justification by the Law And here I think it may be of great use to search into this place of Moses which the Apostle asserts to contain the description of the righteousness which is by faith that so we may find both that it is so and what this righteousness of faith is The place is Deut. 30.11 to 15. quoted and paraphrased by the Apostle Rom. 10.6 7 8 9. An inquiry into the sense of Deut 30 11 12 in Rom. 10.6 But the righteousness which is of Faith speaketh on this wise Say not in thine heart Who shall ascend into Heaven c. clearly referring to Deut. 30.11 12 as any may see in the Margent of their Bibles Now let us go to that place in Deut. and see what Gospel there is in it and how evident it is that there is Gospel in it The words are these For this commandment which I command thee this day it is not hidden from thee neither is it far off it is not in heaven that thou shouldest say who shall go up for us to Heaven and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it Neither is it beyond the Sea that thou shouldest say Who shall go over the Sea for us and bring it unto us that we may hear it and do it but the Word is nigh unto thee in thy mouth and in thy heart that thou mayest do it This is the whole Paragraph in which the covenant of Grace or the righteousness of Faith is described according to the Apostle Paul But how is the Gospel or righteousness of Faith described here First of all I must separate that which doth not seem to look like Gospel from that which is pure Gospel in this place And here we may observe That the matter of the Gospel spoken of is the law or commandment which he had delivered to them This Commandment which I command thee this day the same which is spoken of as I think there being no visible difference as to matter in Lev. 18.5 the place asserted by the Apostle to contain a legal righteousness it was for matter the law of Moses This Commandment saith he which I command thee this day Again I think it will appear to be meant of the ten commandments because it is added That Commandment which I command thee is not far from thee but is nigh thee even in thy heart and mouth Now the ceremonial law was not written in their heart neither had all the children of Israel nor the generality of them to whom yet this is spoken been taught the law effectually by the Spirit of God so as that should be the sense of these words This Commandment is in thine heart and indeed that is the promise of the new Covenant not of this by Moses but the effect of the Moral law was in their heart for it was in the heart of Heathens If it be objected as perhaps it may by some that the matter of the Commandment which Moses commanded them that day was not likely to be the ten commandments nor that chiefly nor to be the same with that in Lev. 18. because this is in Deuteâ—â—româ— which very word signifies a second Law or a second Edition and giving of the Law and had more Gospel in it then the Law in the first giving of it had I answer 1. by concession That there were indeed two several Covenants which the Lord is said to have made by Moses with the children of Israel Deut. 29.1 These are the words of the Covenant which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the Land of Moab be ides the Covenant which he made with them in Hoâ—eb which a as a Mountain adjoining to if not a part of Mount Sinat 2. That perhaps in this Deutetonomy or second Covenant by Moses there 〈◊〉 mâ—â—â— promises and more of Gospel then in the first Edition of the Law there was But 3dly This doth not hinder but the commandment mentioned in Deut. â—0 might be chiefly for matter of it the moral Law or ten Commandments 't is true there were promises added to encourage unto the keeping of them and there were also terrible threatnings unto the breaking of them all the twelve tribes being divided into two equal parts the one half placed upon Mount Gerizim to bless the people that were obedient to the Law the other half upon Mount Ebal to curse all that brake it Deut 27.11 12 13 But that commandment for the sake of which these promises and threatnings were added was the Law of the ten words or two tables which were twice given to Moses in Sinai and again repeated in this Covenant in the Land of Moab as we may see in Deut. 5. and the very word Deut. signifies a second Law or a second giving of the Law
and this was the Commandment which that day Moses commanded them Lastly Another thing in this Paragraph that will not seem perhaps to some to look like Gospel is this That all the comfort of this Gospel by Moses lies in Doing This Commandment saith he is not far off but in thy heart and in thy mouth that thou mayest do it and so obtain life and justification by it This seems to look right like that place in Levitious so often mentioned where Moses is said to describe a Legal Righteousness The man that doth them shall live in them And so in all the Chapter after there is blessing if they do the command and cursing if they do not this to some may not look like Gospel But yet here is the Gospel and therefore wherein doth it lie VVherein is the Gospel expressed in this place of Deut. or how will it appear I have shewed wherein it cannot lie or doth not seem to lie I will shew yet wherein it must be expressed and wherein it is visibly expressed and that is in that easiness which Moses doth so much insist upon in this Scripture of doing the Commandment The Commandment for the matter of it was perhaps the same with the Covenant of Works and Doing partly at least brought in the reward of it that is Justification But is this the Language of a Covenant of Works think you to fallen man such as the Israelites were The Commandment is easie there are no such difficulties in keeping it as you may imagine ye shall not need to climb as high as Heaven after it nor to coast all Lands and compass the Ocean for it propose no such vast undertakings to thy self for the accomplishment of it for thou needest not the Word is nigh thee in thy mouth that is near yea but nearer yet in thine heart that thou mayest do it and thou mayest do it with ease and sweetness No I have shewn at large that the Covenant of Works or the Law taken strictly as a way of Justification serves now to sinners onely to terrifie their Consciences with laying home its charge it hath no such comfortable words in it nay I shewed out of the Scripture that it is an utter impossibility that the Law should be done by a sinner so as to justifie him A man might as well climb up to Heaven or compass the vast Ocean yea to add another impossibility which the Apostle adds in his Paraphras upon this Text in Deut. a man might as well descend into the infernal Abyss and make a resurrection as be justified by the Law This therefore cannot be the Language of the Law But now take the keeping the Law in a Gospel-sence as perhaps that Rom. 8.4 is to be understood where the righteousness of the Law is said to be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit and then the Gospel in this Scripture is obvious it is easie to keep the Law now even that commandment which Moses commanded them even the Moral Law that is to keep it sincerely not exactly to a tittle but in the substance of it This Word therefore which Moses means when he says The word is nigh thee as the Apostle adds in his Paraphrase must be the word of faith which he preached The Word is nigh thee that is not the Word of the Moral law taken in its utmost exactness to be fulfilled to a tittle this is not nigh thee it is as far as Heaven further then either of the Indies further then Hell it self thou sinner canst never attain unto it to do it But yet the Word of the same Commandment in a moderated sense in the gracious acceptation of God where sincere obedience is accepted for unerring observance of it This Word is nigh thee even in thy heart and in thy month that thou mayest do it and it is saith the Apostle the Word of Faith which we preach this the new creature can undertake with the assistance of God even the keeping the Commandments of God in an Evangelical manner through Faith which works by Love Here thou dost not claim thy wages upon thy doings as if they deserved it or as if they answered the letter of the Law and so thou comest not to the Law for thy Justification but though the great Rule of thine obedience be the Law yet thou goest to the Gospel for thy Justification thou comest by Faith to the Promise and Goodness and Grace of God for thy Justification And indeed there is nothing but Faith will encourage thee in such a keeping of the Law as this is The Law strictly taken will dishearten thee that will thus reason the case with thee VVhat are all thy works what is all thy obedience so long as thoughast broken such and such a Commandment hast omitted such and such a duty What is thy sincerity good for What is thy good meaning and real intention worth I must have a full task performed I must have unerring never-failing obedience or else I must curse thee with all the curses which thou findest written against sinners Now the Soul by Faith thus answereth the Law 'T is true were I to stand to thy award it must be all as thou hast said but I am upon other terms with the Lord for my Justification I am upon terms of Grace and Mercy of which there are no footsteps in thy whole way of Justification and though I was born under thy power yet I have a Saviour that hath freed me from under it by suffering the penalty for my breach of it and now I am assured That if I walk faithfully and deal honestly with God endeavouring in sincerity to walk after the Spirit to do all the Wills of God from the heart my sincere obedience will now be as well accepted as unerring obedience would once have been Thus you see Faith bears off from coming to a legal-Justification and Faith bears up the Soul against all expostulations of the Law with it and against all the accusations of Satan in the Conscienc and yet doth keep the soul intent upon the design of universal obedience to the pure and holy Law of God Faith requires thy obedience to the Law the preaching of Faith doth establish the Law and yet the Law in this moderated sense onely observed requires thee to go or rather takes for granted that thou goest to Grace Mercy and Pardon by Faith for that thou art not an exact Doer of the Law So I have shewn how this place in Deut. seems to speak Law yet must be understood to speak Gospel and what Gospel that is which it speaks Yet I may not expect to go off without opposition in this interpretation and I am sensible that these two or three things will be objected against me 3 Objections against the interpretation of Deut. 30.11 12. 1. That I make Faith too easie a business as if those that could not keep the Law are yet able to
in our own time that is that ceremonies or external services not commanded in the moral Law were invented even whilest there was a ceremonial Law in force and vast numbers since its abolition and both rested upon as also that a superficial performance of Moral Duties is found both in the Scripture and in our own experience to have been rested upon For the latter first How common waâ— it with the Jews in our Saviours time to think that if they kept the Letter of the Law they had discharged their duty contained in that commandment If they did not kill a man they thought they discharged their duty in the sixth Commandment If they did not commit Adultery they had discharged the seventh and so having kept the Law they might expect the Law should justifie them and therefore St. Paul whilst a Pharisee he was touching the Law blameless as he thought which if he had truly been and continued so he might well have expected to be justified by it And so the young Pharisee Matth. 19.20 says of the Commandments All these have I kept from my youth And upon this he rested hitherto I have heard one my self whom I judged a wicked man and so did many others besides me yet sayes he Well I am confident if any Family in such a place have the blessing of God ours hath for we have prayers morning and evening and never a cross or angry word passeth between me and my wife from one end of the week to the other This imperfect obedience to the Moral Law he made the matter of his Justification perhaps even to an explicite opinion of Merit Thus you see men that have any conformity to the Motal Law are apt to place their trust there But now because there are few so strict as St. Paul whilest a a Pharisee was or as the young man was but that there is a consciousness of guilt from the Moral Law therefore they are the lewest Legallists that rest upon their obedience to the Moral Law alone if any do they must help patch up their righteousness with ceremonial observances so that the ceremonial Law whether given by God or invented by men hath most custom and bears up the weight of these mens expectations and I think I may make this assertion at least this guess that there were never any in the world that sought Justification by works but they were much in love with some superstitlons or at least with Ceremonies yea even those who have been most strict in observing the duties of the Moral Law as to the Letter of it yoâ—r greatest Pharisees they are as much for obfervation of Ceremonies as any men in the world How were the Pharisees in our Saviours time addicted to invented ceremonies and superstitions though one would think they had enough ceremonies in their Law already What washings had they invented c. And it is said they taught for Doctrines humane traditions and inventions Mat. 15.9 Wicked men and those that are careless in keeping the Moral Law are for ceremonies to patch up a righteousness Pharisees are for them to have a redundancy of righteousness such as may make sure work yea such as may serve themselves and others too and this cannot well be but by such Works as were not their duty to do and so must be inventions of their own so that however it cometh to pass one way or another both the strict Legalist and looser self-Justitiaries lay the chief stress in pleasing God and seeking his favour upon ceremonious observances I shall instance in one place of Scripture where as I take it there is a ful and lively Description of a Legal-self-Justitiary it is Mic. 6 6 7 8. And wherein is it that he pleaseth himself most or hopes to please God best but in ceremonies that is external services not commanded in the Moral Law and some of those invented Wherewith saith he shall I come before the Lord and how my self before the high God Shall I come before him with Burnt-offerings with Calves of a year old will the Lord be pleased so as to justifie me with thousands of Rams or with ten thousands of Rivers of Oyle Shall I give my first born for my transgression the fruit of my body for the sin of my soulâ— Here you see the poor man offers very fair in his way if he may have it by ceremonious services he wil do any thing he wil suffer the loss of any thing his Estate his Relations yea his dearest Relations his first-born here the man mixeth Heathenish Sacrifices with Jewish ceremonies but you see the maâ— is willing at least seems willing to do any thing The Papists wil whip themselves Baal's Ptiests wâ—â— cut themselves AFTER THEIR MANNER with Knives and Lances till the blood gush out upon them 1 Ki. 18.28 Any thing but BELIEVING These self Justificiaries are quite out in their guess what wil please God They are ready to think with Naamaâ— when he was to be cleansed of his Leprosie that they must do some GREAT THING to be cured 2 King 5 13. They slightly pass over THIS POOR EUSINESS OF BELIEVING as he did his command of washing in Jordan Are not Abana and Parphar Rivers of Damasous better then all the waters of Israel May not I wash in them and be clean saith he so he turned and went away in arage vor 11 12. So saith the legal Spirit Pish what is this Believing I wonder that is a poor thing what onely Believe I 'le offer to God rich Sacrifices Holoenrists and Hecatombs nay thousands of Rams ten thousands of Rivers of Oyle yea my first-born the fruit of my Body this is better then believing in any man's Judgement Any thing but believing But it is better to hear the Lord to declare himself what he is pleased with than go by our own foolish guesses and therefore see the 8. ver of Mic. 6. and the Lord tells us what it is nay the Lord tells us that we know our selves what it is if we would but consult our own hearts ver 8. He hath shewed thee O man what is good and what doth the Lord require of thee but to do Justice and to shew Mercy and to walk humbly with thy God Alas God doth not require all this operous laborious and costly service which men are apt to put themselves upon He loves nothing but truth in the inward parts Serve God honestly trust in him love thy neighbour do Justice shew mercy and this is better then all whole burnt-offerings and sacrifices Mark 12.33 And this I shall shew anon as I have partly already in the exposition of that Deut. 30.11 is believing that is it contains the great mystery of believing in it Not that I have so little of a Schollar as to say or think that shewing mercy is believing or doing justly is believing except in a figurative sense as we put the Name of the cause upon the effect or the Name of the
chief ingredient upon the whole composition We must not so miscall things lest at last we have no Names left us to call things by but I say herein is contained the mystery of the way of believing in opposition to the way of Works But to return What a brave flourish doth Micah's man make with his legal Righteousness What high promises What vast offers doth he make thousands of Rams ten thousands of Rivers of Oyle more then ever any Emperor in the world could set on running Yet these mighty offers doth this man here make to the Lord for his favour in the mean time he misseth passeth by this poor contemptible way of believing Only believe believe and all things are possible Do justly love mercy and walk humbly with thy God No but men that wil merit heaven they must be doing such a number of Duties so many Ave-maries so many Pater-nosters Heathenish vain repetitions they must give themselves so many stripes of a Good-Friday Surely they think God slights plain honesty as an homely thing and that he is taken with gallant gandy magnificent services or else with barbarous cruelties and severities Thus I reckon I have in some sort proved my seventh and last assertion in answer to the objection viz. That men are so far addicted to the way of works that though they had no ceremonial Law at all yet they would be finding out some way or other to vent this humour either in superficial obedience to the Moral law or in full tasks of Ceremonious observances which they could invent for themselves The Heathens did it in barbarous Sacrifices and vain repetitions the Pharisees in divers washings and that Jew in Micah in costly and diabolical offerings so that though we are freed from the Ceremonial law of the Jews and should be freed altogether from the Ceremonies in the Christian Church yet we are not quite out of all danger of seeking Justification by works All now that I can apprehend my self any way engaged to speak unto further upon the second particular in the conviction by way of discovery wherein this legality should lye is That seeing I have asserted that it must consist onely in opinion of Merit I should speak a little to prove that there is such a thing as that commonly in practise in the world of which I shall give a brief proof both in Jew and Gentile which will yet further evince that we are not wholly free from the danger and then I shall come to give some marks and signs of a Legal-spirit That there was such a thing among the Jews Mr. John Smith a late Writer in his select Discourses hath taken very good pains to prove In that Discourse which treats of a Legal and Evangelical Righteousness he tells us That it was a great affirmation of the Jewish Doctors That happiness by way of Merit is far greater and much more magnificent then that which is by way of Mercy and so that they reckoned they are his own words upon a more triumphant and illustrious kind of happiness victoriously to be atchieved by the merit of their own works then that beggarly kind of happiness as they seem to look upon it which cometh like an Alms from Divine bounty And accordingly they held I shal give you the Authors words That the Law delivered to them upon Mount Sinai was a sufficient Dispensation from God and ALL THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE BY HIM for the advancing of them to a state of perfection and blessedness and that the proper end and scope of their Law was nothing but to afford them several wayes and means of merit But yet see what their great brags of Merit came to See what strange Dispensations they gave themselves even such as the Galatians gave themselves whilst they sought to be justified by works for the same Author in the third Chapter of the Discourse mentioned quotes this passage out of the Misna Lib. Maccoth Sect. ult 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the meaning whereof is That therefore the Precepts of the Law were so many in number that so they might single out where they pleased and in exercising themselves therein procure Eternal life or as Obadias de Bartenora expounds it that whosoever shall perform any one of the 613. Precepts of the Law for so many they make in number without any worldly respect for love of the Precept behold this man shall merit thereby everlasting life Here they might have been convinced by those two Arguments which the Apostle Paul useth against the Galatians Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things And he that is circumcised that is professeth to be justified by the Law is a debtor to keep the WHOLE Law And this we find the Pharisees to do in our Saviours time they taught that if a man had devoted what he should have given his Parents to God he was dispensed with from the duty of the fifth Commandment to Father and Mother he might say it was corban that is a gift already given to God Mark 7.11 Matth. 15.5 So that they taught their Disciples to pick and chuse among the Commandments which they would do and which they would leave undone nay to leave out some of the greatest commands of all that they might but fulfil some one of their inventions Here you have seen the presumption of mankind in the business of Merit instanced in the Jews they liked the way of Merit rather then the way of Mercy and yet cheated themselves with this That if they kept any one Law of the 613. that is if they kept it constantly as the same Author tells us they should merit everlasting life And that there is such a thing as opinion of Merit in their serving of God at this day amongst men professing Christianity we may know easily if we hear but what the Papists teach and hold and practise they won the very word Merit that good works are meritorious And if they seem to avoid the thing which we mean by their distinction of Meritum excongruo condigno yet we will easily fasten the Thing upon them For Merit as I have said in the Scripture-notion of it is when a man that doth any action to God expects the Reward of Debt and so demands it at the hands of the Law Now these men profess that they can do more then the Law requires of them they can lay up a stock of good Works that shal serve for others which the Church may dispose of to those that want them and they shall be meritorious for them therefore it must follow that they have done what the Law requires for how can he do works of supererogation which were not demanded of him by the Law and which the Church may dispose of at pleasure who hath not kept the whole Law There is such a thing as opinion of Merit amongst the Papists in their serving of God therefore we may be guilty of it How doth the Pope tell them and
Abraham which worship God in the SPIRIT in a true SPIRITUAL way of Worship and rejoice in Christ Jesus and have no considence in the flesh which they the legal Worshippers have they are fieshly we are after the Spirit and worship God in the Spirit They have considence in the flesh we have none Now what is this confidence in the flesh which the Concision the Dogs and evil Workers had but the true Worshippers had not This the Apostle explains at large in the 4 5 and 6. verses For saith he if any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might TRUST in the FLESH I more What is that of the Flesh wherein he might glory if he would He tells us ver 5. I was circumcised the eighth day of the stock of Israel of the Tribe of Benjamin an Hebrew of the Hebrews as touching the Law a Pharisee or blameless so iâ— follows ver 9. as touching the righteousness which is in the Law blameless that is as touching the letter of the law Moral or Ceremonial This is the matter of fleshly glorying or boasting which you see is made up either of external Rites and Priviledges or the external obedience to the moral law That which he calls flesh is an external thing Now that fleshly and legal are Synonymous or words importing the same thing and so used by the Apostle is not onely clear in this Scripture but in other Scriptures for instance Gal. 3.3 Are ye so foolish having begun in the Spirit that is a Gospel-way are ye now made perfect by the flesh that is will ye end in a legal that is a fleshly way Fleshly and Legal are all one Now the way of the Flesh is an external way made up of outward Rites Ceremonies Priviledges and Performances therefore a legal way is a way in which men please themselves with external Priviledges and Performances I shewed before that those that are addicted to the way of works durst not pretend to an universal conformity to the law in a strict sense of it and yet do seek to be justified by Works therefore they must have some Works to glory in and to uphold their Spirits in a confidence of Divine acceptance Now therefore what can these Works be other then external conformities to the ceremonial or moral law and these ceremonies either as given by God or else superstiously invented by themselves I shall now a little further exemplifie what I then asserted and that by some assistance from the second thing premised in shewing that in all times the evil sort of Worshippers which because they are not Evangelical must be legal have done and do exceedingly please themselves in external Priviledges and Performances in doing which I shall avoid useless repetitions We find The first external priviledge which the Iews gloried in that the Jews who were as well to be condemned for Legality before the dayes of the Gospel as under it there having been always a fleshly and spiritual Seed were exceedingly taken with their being circumcised and of the Seed of Abraham and made a peculiar people to God in the Lump and Body of the Nation which did not hinder at all but for particular persons they might be wicked enough strangers to God and heirs of wrath Thus the Jews as Jews scorned the Gentiles called them Dogs and the sinners of the Gentiles or Nations whereas to be Jews born was nothing but an external Priviledge And therefore the Apostle when he comes to convince them of this folly and vain fleshly boasting he makes no more ado but to cut them off from this stump that they stood upon by that great distinction so frequent in his Epistles of Israel according to the flesh and the true Israel or the true Seed according to the Promise that is Believers All are not Israel that are of Israel saith he and he is not a Jew that is one outwardly neither is that Circumcision which is outward in the flesh but he is a Jew which is one inwardly and Circumcision is that of the heart in the Spirit and not in the Letter whose praise is not of men but of God Rom. 2.28 29. Now that which amongst us may answer to such a fleshly boast as this was of the Jews for I chiefly aim at the usefulness of this Doctrine to our selves may be this viz the Name of Christians and the general Baptism that all amongst us can pretend unto Though this cannot be accounted so great a Priviledge to us now that Christendom is so large as Circumcision and being natural or proselyted Jews was to them who were a single Nation chosen for a peculiar people to God out of all the Nations of the World I come therefore to some other things They gloried also very much in their Temple The second external priviledge the â—â—ws gloried in there is an eminent place amongst many for this Jer. 7.4 Trust ye not in lying words saying The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord are THESE that is THESE BUILDINGS THESE COURTS pointing as it were with their singer at the Buildings of the Temple as much as if they had said See! we have the Temple of the Lord with us and his Worship and Service amongst us and therefore no evil can come to us whatever these Fanatick Prophets threaten us with Now see what a strange infatuation and besottednesse these men were under for they were as wicked as men could be by oppression and blood-guiltiness yea Idolatry it self as you may see in ver 10. Will ye steal murder and commit Adultrey and swear falsly and burn incense unto Baal and walk after other Gods whom ye know not and come and stand before me in this House which is called by my Name and say we are delivered to do all these abominations It this House which is called by my Name become a Den of Robbers in your eyes Behold even I have seen it saith the Lord. Here is a crew of Legal-Worshippers of Carnal-Worshippers that certainly could not pretend to Justification by the strict Law of God yet trusted in the Temple and Temple-Worship ver 8. Behold ye trust in lying words that cannot profit and what those words are you have seen in ver 4. Trust ye not in lying words saying the Temple of the Lord c. No saith the Lord. ver 3. Amend your wayes and your doings and I will cause you to dwell in this place Here is Mercy Grace Pardon here they are put upon the way of believing ver 5 6. For if ye throughly amend your wayes and your doings and if ye throughly execute judgement between a man and his Neighbour if ye oppress not the stranger then will I cause you to dwell in this Land that I gave to your Fathers for ever and ever But else never think that the Temple or Temple Worship can save you or deliver you Ver. 12. Go to Shiloh go unto my place which was in Shiloh
kept themselves from Legal uncleannesses and from eating every thing that was unclean and placed too much in this whilst it was their duty to observe these things The Colossians erred but in making conscience of the Legal uncleanness of Meats Let no man judge you saith the Apostle in meat or drink that is value no man's judgement let no man abridge you of your liberty in it Now for our selves we are wholly free from Jewish Observations about meats and I think pretty free from any Religious Observations at all about meats and if we are forbid flesh in Lent those that are healthy yet the reason which the Law gives is civil and political for the breed of Cattel but if we should come to have our Consciences ensnared to think that flesh were not as lawful in it self all the Lent-time as at another time this were a symptome of Legality venting it self in superstition But now if we go over amongst the Papists what conscientious observations of Meats are there To eat an Egg in Lent is punished with imprisonment c. that upon a religious account which is a plain argument of legality amongst them very rise I might instance in Priests Vestments as I apprehend an high piece of formality very fit to please the humour of a Legal Spirit that for want of substance pleases it self with shadows shews and outsides but I shall not proceed further to touch at things he that hath an eye to see let him look into the Scriptures and he that hath an ear to hear let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches But we may speak freey of the Papists their Superstitions not onely in doing but in putting themselves upon needless sufferings What Pilgrimages and Processionings what Abstinencies and Penances do they put themselves upon wearing Sackcloath scourging themselves What crossings cringings and sprinklings do they impose upon themselves 't were endless almost but to name the kinds of their inventions Yea some of our own people will say over the Creed and ten Commandments for a prayer and when they come as beggars at your door they will say over the Lords Prayer as if it were a charm to the house from all mischief Now I look upon all Superstitions where they are with any seriousness practised as those things which do exactly sit a Legal Spirit for as I have several times intimated your Legallists cannot endure to come at the Law in the spiritual sense of it so none but a Gospel-Spirit doth it is Faith alone that establisheth the Law and obeys the Law Now because the Legallist cannot endure to come up to the true spiritual obedience of the Law and yet seeks to be justified by Works he is fain to find out a thousand things to please himself and satisfie his Conscience with whereby he thinks he makes God amends and we have seen in the instances before us how that though men are as wicked as they could be by lying swearing and committing adultry yea and Idolatry too yet they cryed The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord they thought God must love them because they were Jews especially when they brought him rich Sacrifices and burnt rich Incense and kept all their Festivals in the time and manner appointed Now what then their over-valuing the Commands of the Coromonial Law was that is Superstition to us now For not having such a Law left us by God we find out somewhat like it and place the same considences in it that they did in their Law onely ours is so much the worse by not being of Divine institution I have now only one particular more belonging to this Character of external fleshly service and that is an external partial conformity to the moral Law which is indeed the last and strongest fort of a Legal-spirit As for these external Priviledges or Ceremonies and Superstitious Performances which I have insisted upon they are a slighty thin covering if we come once to try it and rationally to examine it and though people wrap themselves in it yet they cannot bear out any rough argument from galling or pinching through it External conformity to the duties of the Moral Law What defence is it for an Harlot to say This day have I paid my vows to one that can convince her of being a common Whore Prov. 7.14 But now if men have lived in some conformity to the duties of the Moral Law as the young man in the Gospel had done All these have I kept from my youth saith he speaking of the commandments Believe it our Saviour himself shall not by an ordinary word perswade him that he lacketh any thing more Let us see the beld audacious Pharisee in the Parable that goes into the Temple to pray how doth he challenge his acceptance with God and upon what terms We have it in Luke 18.11 God I thank saith he that I am not as other men are extortioners unjust adulterers or even as this Publican I fast twice in the week I give tythes of all that I possess Really the man might well have thanked God as he did had it not been for two things 1. His making comparisons 2 His valuing those things which he mentions as a sufficient Righteousness It was good not to be an Extortioner Unjust an Adulterer it was good to fast and to give tythes of all and he might well bless God that he was enabled to do these things but this was but a partial holiness for all the Commands are not reckoned up here then perhaps it was but an external obedience to these commands that are referred to he was no actual Adulterer but might he not commit heart-Adultery He was no Extortioner or unjust person as he saith But if it were true at all it may be it was onely thus That he was not so in the highest degree perhaps what others accounted injustice and extortion he did not But I need not go upon a Perhaps I will lead the Reader to a certain place of Scripture where the Legallist prides himself and challenges acceptance from God onely upon a partial and external obedience unto some duties of the first Table it is Isa 58.2 3. In the 2d ver we have an high commendation as one would think of them They seek me daily and delight to know my ways as a Nation that did righteousness and forsook not the Ordinances of their God they ask of me the Ordinances o◠of Justice they take delight in approaching to God These are great matters and upon these the Jews grew high and argue the case with God for his acceptance they wonder when they are so good that God should make so little reckoning so small account of them ver 3. Wherefore have 〈◊〉 fasted say they and thou seest not Wherefore have 〈◊〉 afflicted our soul and thou takest no knowledge The Lord answers them in the same verse Behold in the day of your fast ye find pleasure and exact all your
〈◊〉 bour behold ye fast for strife and debate and to smitâ— with the fist of wickedness They did something in oâ— after their Fasts which was contradictory to the nature and design of a Fast they did indeed observâ— the ontside of the duty as ver 5. tells us they dâ—â— afflict their soul they went with heads bowed down aâ— butrush and did spread saâ—kcloth and ashes under theâ— Here was all the outside of a Fast But what saitâ— the Lord wilt thou call this a Fast and an acceptaâ— day unto the Lord Ver. 6. Is not this the fast which I have chosen to loose the bands of wickedness to undo the heavy burdens and to let the oppressed go free and that ye break every yoke Here is a fast indeed all others are but mock-fasts the outside and Formalities of a Fast which when over-much attended use to eat up the substance of a duty Here you see external conformities to the duties of the moral Law may fill men with a pride so far as to challenge divine acceptance making no question but they have well deserved the favour of Almighty God whilst in the mean time they are oppressors and exactors which argues that a legal way in the service of God is a fleshly and external way And besides I observe in this Scripture that we may as well let our Legality run out in Divine Services in duties of Worship as in second-Table-duties and indeed I think that is a worse kind of Legality for it is usually attended with more wickedness than when men take up with being just and true in their dealings with men Thus our rude people if they go to Morning and Evening prayer and join with the Church in the service bymaking their responds and observing the several gestures of sitting standing and kneeling they are ready to please themselves with an opinion that they are very well accepted of God though they are known wicked people I shall now apply the Character though I have done little else all this while but now I shall do it more professedly Wouldst thou know if thou bee'st under the predominancy of this dangerous evil of Legality Then try thy self by this Character The application or uâ—e of the Character How dost thou find thy self affected with any external priviledges Dost set thon but only a due value upon them For though we may not over-value them we must not slight them What conscience hast thou of places days meats Beware of having thy conscience ensnared by them for this wil presently betray thee into legality for first you come to have a conscience of these things and then you let the strength of your spirits and of your devotion run out into them and so they prove as a Wen unto all the true spiritual Worship of God If thou valuest these things beyond the true spiritual Worship of God thou art a Legallist of the worst sort for there are two kinds of Legal persons better then thy self who yet perish But to leave this I come to the external conformities unto the Moral Law the partial obedience to this and mans resting in it and here is the greatest danger of all First sort or Moral Legal 〈…〉 such as dependchiefly upon a partial Motality There are some men that are not far from the Kingdom of God as the expression is Mark 12.34 and think themselves in it and of it that yet are not Now these can be none other but such as have high conformities to the commands of the Moral Law for notwithstanding all the observation of Ceremonies whilst they were in force notwithstanding all the external priviledges that men might have yet without a great conformity to the Moral Law men might be at a vast distance from the Kingdom of God but to be near it not far from it supposes great strictness of life that none shall be able to say Black is that persons eye as the proverb is Now I say there may be many of these that yet are not justified and so have not put themselves upon the right way of Justification Now what can be their ruine Truly nothing but one of these two Either that they know some lust in themselves which they wil not part with or else that they have deluded themselves to think that they are holy enough and so holy as God is well pleased with them Now I am so charitable as to think that when men have come up so high as to be near the Kingdom of God they do not allow themselves in a gross known sin therefore their ruine must arise from hence that they think themselves holy enough and that they have merited the favour of God by being so much better than their neighbours as the Pharisees in the Parable did and this yet is Legality and that which is most properly so called Now though there are many that are near the Kingdom of God and yet perish by Legality A second sort of moral Legallists yet there is a greater number still that are not so high in their conformity to the Moral Law that yet perish by resting in their conformity to the Moral Law such as it is And of this sort I take to be very many of our ordinary people that perish God knows who they are I judge no man but many of our ordinary people that perish who are not high Devotionists nor in any excess superstitious yet use no great endeavours to get to Heaven are at no pains with their hearts to get in Grace to cast out lusts to get the knowledge of God and Christ find no difficulty in Religion understand it not at all to be a Warfare a wrestling with Principalities and Powers a race a great piece of Merchandise wherein we venture all for the Pearl and are often like Merchants in danger of losing all which things I suppose no true Christian can be utterly senseless of all they that they do is this they live a plain quiet life mind their business manage their trade do Justice between man and man which things are good and commendable in themselves and perhaps they may may have Prayers morning and evening in their Families yet such men though this be the whole of their lives wil expect to go to Heaven when they dye they 'l cry God mercy for their fins in a general way and with a Lord have mercy upon them they make no doubt to get to Heaven Now these must lay the stress of their hopes and expectations upon this That they wronged no man they have given every man his own and perhaps have had some duties morning and evening in their Families and therefore that he that made them may well afford to save them Here these men trust upon a conformity to some second table duties and a slighty performance of some duties of the first Table By what I have said I suppose men may examine themselves whether they are guilty of predominant Legality by resting upon an
external or partial performance of the duties of the Moral Law of which I have made two sorts a lower and an higher and I free both from being necessarily superstitious or that their chief danger should arise from thence And for the first sort I ask Art thou careless of getting divine knowledge in the Scriptures Art thou at no pains with thy heart in Religion Dost thou find no difficulties in it Art not thou put to struglings wrestlings sightings yet expectest thou to get to Heaven Why then thou art one of the common sort that perish by resting upon an outward conformity to the Moral Law Again for the higher but unsincere Moralist Dost thou find a difficulty in Religion Is it ready to break thine heart almost with the trouble that it puts thee to Thou art fain to be constant in duties morning and evening and it may be oftner thou art just between man and man it may be thou bestowest much of thine Estate upon the poor and many other good things thou dost perhaps thou hast some time or other parted with some very beloved sin that was to thee as a right eye or a right hand thou hast found Religion costly and troublesome to thee and now thou expectest when ever thou diest to go to Heaven But stay man art thou humble Dost thou see no imperfections in thy self notwithstanding thy superlative holiness beyond thy neighbours Art not thou made sometimes to confess before the Lord and that with great brokenness of heart that thou art an unprofitable servant Art not thou made to admire at the rich Grace of God that he should take pity on thee when thou wast in thy blood That he should have thoughts of love to thee should send his good Spirit into thine heart to move thee and turn thee to himself c If thou hast experience of none of these things be thou as strict as thou wilt so that hone can accuse thee so strict that thine own Conscience doth not loudly accuse thee I tell thee whether thou be superstitious and ceremonious yea orno for it seldom happens but such an one as thou art is so thou art one of those that are indeed not far from the Kingdom of God but yet not in it nor ever shall be whilest thou continuest so thou art a Legal self-justitiary that restest in an external unsincere obedience to the Law of God I have perfectly done with the Character as it is given to discover predominant Legality Yet here I shal enter two cautions one concerning the Moralist the other concerning the Papist A caution concerning the term Moralist For the term Moralist which I use I fear it may give offence to some ingenuous and worthy persons and therefore I thus explain my self that I do not oppose Moral to Spiritual as if the most spiritual Commands of the Gospel were not Moral or as if the most spiritual Saint were not the highest Morallist or as if Morality were a low Principle I know not but I may reduce all the duties of the Gospel to Morality and I think no sober man wil deny them to be Moral Duties But I make use of it as part of that common distinction made betwixt those two kinds of Laws which Moses delivered of which some were only ceremonial and typical and to last but for a time the other Moral that is to say according to the common understanding of it Perpetual though as to the Etymological signification of the Word Moral signifies as much as that which concerns Manners So Moral Philosophy is opposed to all other Philosophy as Practical is opposed to Speculative and in this signification of the Word Moral all the ceremonial Laws whilst they were in use might have been called Moral but because use swayes Language more then the Etymology of Words I here understand the Word Moral purely in opposition to ceremonial or superstitious so as it signifies those duties that are to be performed by us as having a more substantial goodness in their own nature such as Justice Mercy and Prayer c. Now those men that depend for a righteousness upon the imperfect unsincere performance of these duties I call Legal Morallists of which there are evidently two sorts A caution concerning the Papists an higher and a lower there being another sort of Legallists which I have spoken of namely the ceremonious Legallist Now I shall likewise enter a caution concerning the Papists in whom I have instanced often in the matter of Ceremonies and Superstitions and their placing a confidence in them And to shew that I do not delight to disparage so much as any one man much less an whole party of men but that my onely aim is to make true proof of my assertions I shall to do them right quote an Author of their own whereby it wil appear plainly that some of them at least are sensible of the insufficiency of these things viz. Ceremonious and superstitiou Observances yea conformities unto some duties of the moral Law whilst their conformities do not proceed from an universal Charity The Author is Francis de Sales once Bâ—shop and Prince of Geneva who in his Introduction to a devout life in the very first Chapter hath thâ—se Expressions Every one saith he painteth Devotion according to his own passion and fancy He that is given to fasting thinks himself very devout if he fast often be his his heart never so ful of rancour And not daring to moisten his tongue in Wine or Water for sobriety's sake yet makes no difficulty to drink deep of the blood of his neighbor by slander and calumny Another will account himself sull of Devotion for HUDLING OVER A MULTITUDE OF PRAYERS EVERY MORNING though afterwards he give his tongue a liberty to utter offensive arrogant and reproachful speeches amongst his Neighbours and Family One willingly draws an Alms out of his purse to give to the poor but cannot draw Clemency out of his heart to pardon his Enemies Another forgiveth his Enemies yet cares not to satisfie his Creditors but by constraint All these people are devout in the vote of the vulgar yet indeed they are not so at all And then he gives us an handsome allusion The servants of King Saul saith he sought David in his House but Michol having laid a Statue in his bed and covering it with Davids Apparel made them believe it was David himself sick in bed So many persons cover themselves with certain EXTERNAL ACTIONS BELONGING TO DEVOTION and the World believes them truly devout and SPIRITUAL whereas indeed they are but statues and apparitions of Devotion Now God forbid that I should judge such a man as this if he but follow his own directions to be in a way destructive to his soul when he professeth to aim at true SPIRITUALWORSHIP not contenting himself with EXTERNAL ACTIONS onely in the service of God Though still I must needs say notwithstanding such an Author as this amongst them that I
think the Papists do generally ruine themselves by resting upon externals nay inventions in the service of God So much for the cautions and for the Character as it concerns those that are under predominant Legality Now because the same character that will discover it at this height will discover it also where it is in any less degree and for that I have asserted that there is a mixture of Legality in the services of the best Christians and Saints of God I think it good to improve this character yet further for the discovery of that Legality which may be found in the Saints themselves That Legality of the Saints therefore which is discoverable and reprovable by this Character is 1. That I doubt not but some good men have a Conscience of some superstitious observations and I would not for all the world think the contrary lest I should condemn the generat on of the just and think too hardly of some dear Saints of God And I must needs confess there is too much occasion given men to run into this extream of Superstition by the irreverence of others perhaps good men in the service of God How ordinaâ—ily do many sit at prayers in the Church when they are not necessitated by weakness or any other occasion and with their Hats upon their heads Now how easily may this give occasion to others that take offence at this irreverence out of a fear lest they should not be reverent enough in the service of God to approve of kneeling at the Sacrament which I doubt not but many good men may be very zealous for as also forbowing at the Name of Jesus But yet I reckon that good men are in greater danger of Legality in the matter of Moral duties then in ceremonies and superstitions for though I have acknowledged that some good men may have a conscience of some superstitious observations being misled by the care to be sufficiently reverent yet to be greatly superstitious in Gospel-days is a shrewd sign of a rotten heart and so not so incident to good men 2dly For the duties of the Moral Law good mens Legality lies in two particulars 1. When they have performed a duty rightly and spiritually they are apt to reflect upon it with a spiritual pride and ready to lay too much stress upon it and to think that now God must needs grant the Petitions they have asked whereas perhaps they have answer enough in the very sweetness of the duty it self and the communion with God which they have enjoyed in it and therefore if they are not humbled after such a duty to see their great unworthiness notwithstanding all they have done they are so far guilty of Legality Or which is more usual 2dly The Saints too often content themselves with doing their tale and number of duties praying morning and evening perhaps reading so many Chapters but are not spiritual in what they do watching over their hearts that they worship God in a right manner with those spiritual affections stirring in prayer that attention in reading that should be this is commonly known by the name of resting in duties this is â—egality and yet I think that which is found more or less in all the Saints and so far indulged to themselves by some Saints till at last they have a general deadness and benummedness in all their Graces and then they fall into sad complaints of desertions and run into a maze and a Labyrinth of doubts and troubles of mind which perhaps they get not out of for some years together As for those Saints that pick and choose amongst the Commandments that are high-flown in their notions and yet err grosly in matters of common Justice and honesty that are indeed not only slanderously reported or unworthily suspected to be so disobedient to Magistrates with other like irregular Christians I have nothing to say to them here I refer these to the head of hypocritical Legallists that expect to be justified by a parcial obedience to the Commands of the Moral Law these not being spots of Gods Children There are other miscarriages of the Saints in duties that are to be referred to their Legality of Spirit as for instance if they chance through extraordinary occasions to have missed the time of prayer morning or evening to have missed the reading their number of Chapters or doing any good task which they had laid upon themselves then they have a great fear and terror lest God should be angry and displeased with them though indeed Mercy was at ended instead of Sacrifice but such as these belong to another head or character of a Legal Spirit to wit a Spirit of Bondage which I shall come unto anon I have now perfectly done with the first Character as to its explication proof and application both to Legality predominant and that which is found in a less degree in which I may be thought tedious enough Onely I would not leave so much as a cavil without some endeavour at least of an answer to it Now I am sensible that thoughts may arise in some as if this whole particular were impertinent Obj. Whoever thought before may they chance say that Superstition was Legality that a partial performance of the Moral Law either by the less strict or more strict Morallists was Legality If men would seek to be justified by the Law they would endeavour at least to keep the whole Law and if they knew they fell short of it as those prophane wicked men which you mention out of Isaiah Jeremiah and other places that were very wicked did and yet rested in Ceremonious performances and external Priviledges these indeed deserve the Name of wicked men but not of Legallists or such as seek justification by the Law Now to this I answer and I shall say but little more then what I have said before 1. 'T is true none ought to seek Justification by the Law but those that have perfectly kept it hitherto and undertake to keep it for the future part of their lives 2. If any seek justification any other way they do but be-fool themselves 3. But yet the Jews and Galatians did seek justification by Works by the Law ASIT WERE by the Works of the Law else the Apostle had disputed against no adversary And yet they did not pretend to perfect and unerring obedience So I reckon the objection is answered already that men may seek Justification by the Law that have not nor think they have the exact Works of it But yet to give some overplus of answer There being a generation of men that do seek Justification by the Works of the Law yea forasmuch as all men are apt to seek it this way it must be in some kind of actions or other Now I have shewn that these very men that are taxed for Legality by the Apostle viz. the Jews and Galatians they were also taxed for their being so much in love with ceremonies and superstitions and with external
obedience onely to the Moral Law and I cannot learn wherein else their fault of Legality lay therefore this must be their Legality For it is certain they must vent their Legality in somthing in some way or other and I finding no other great way of theirs but one of these three viz. ceremonies superstitions and external conformity to themoral law which all agree in this general nature of an external and fleshly service such as doth not reach the heart conclude that their way branches it self forth onely into these three particulars Besides I have shewn that there was a continual succession of Legallists from the beginning they all agree in this general of external service therefore this must be the very matter of their Legality And for full proof having shewn what is the form of Legality to wit expecting the reward as of Debt or Merit I have found out this form enlivening and quickening this fleshly matter of the Legallists service and obedience to God Thus I have shewn how the ceremonious Jew with his appointed Ceremonies and invented Superstitions Micah in the Book of Judges and the Legal Jew in the Prophesie of Micah made no doubt but to DESERVE very well the favour of Almighty God The Partial Moralists in Isa â—8 wonder that God should not accept of their fastings and take it very heinously when they had so well deserved it that they should be so unexpectedly slighted dis-regarded So would the Papists and our selves many of us wonder that upon crying Lord Lord open to us after we had been so superstitious and ceremonious in his service on earth we should be shut out of the Kingdom of Heaven I come now to the second Character The second mark or sign of a Legal Spirit by which it may be found out is this That it is proud and impatient in the service of God I shall give Scripture-proof that a Legal Spirit is proud and impatient and Scripture-instances For a sinful creature to think that it can merit is pride in it self yet this I have proved already that the Jews and Galatians and all that practise Legality are for the Doctrine of Merit and they make no doubt but they shall very well deserve the favour of God some by their rich Sacrifices and high Superstitions others by their external obedience to the Commands of the Moral Law Surely saith Micah now God will do me good God I thank thee that I am so much better then other men saith the Pharisee and upon this challengeth his acceptance they take it for granted that God cannot but be well pleased with them This is their pride in its direct and formal act But now what if the Lord shew them some dislike Why there we shall see their pride in its effects impatience anger weariness fullenness I gave one instance of displeasure against God in the former haracter Isa 58.3 4. Wherefore have we fasted say they and thou seest not Wherefore have we afflicted our soul and thou takest no pleasure They seem to take it very ill at God's hands Another instance we have in Cain who when he found that God did not accept him with an answer from heaven as he did Abel he is sullen and dogged and falls into an angry and malicious passion Cain was very wroth and his countenance fell Gen. 4.3 4 and in ver 6. God comes graciously to argue him out of this angry and su len fit And the Lord said unto Cain Why art thou wrath and why is thy countenance fallen If thou dost well shalt thou not be accepted Do but as Abel hath done offer in faith offer thy heart with thy Sacrifice and thou shalt be accepted as he was No but Cain 't is like thought he had done well enough in bringing the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord and that he might very well have deserved to be accepted as well as his younger Brother and therefore he continues his wrath and malice and perhaps if he could have had his will at the great God for it was against him that his passion was chiefly stirred he would have discovered the utmost malice against him But because he could not his poor servant and true spiritual Worshipper Abel must rue it and he takes his first opportunity and kills him ver 8. Others again of Cain's gang Legal-Worshippers when they have found that God did not accept them as they thought he might well have done they are quite weary of his service and cry out with those in Malachi chap. 1. ver 13. Ye have said also Behold what a weariness is it And ye have snuffed at it And so Amos 8.5 they cry When will the new Moon be gone and the Sabbath that we may set forth Wheat Will such hypocrites think you pray alwayes Will they alwaies call upon God No where a man doth not sind acceptance he will be at last weary of waiting Now though whosoever comes with faith and love and an hearty-good-will shall be sure to sind acceptance with God yet an hypocrite or a Legal-Worshipper shall never find it and therefore he will be apt ever now and then to grow weary if not quite to cast off the service of God I shall instance in a proud speech of one that was quite weary it was the King of Israel 2 King 6.33 And he said speaking of the Famine in Samaria This evil is of the Lord and why should I wait ouâ— he Lord any longer It seems say Commentators that Elisha had made the King some promise of deliverance from the Famine after a while and the King had waited for the fulfilling it but at last the King seeing the extremity of the Famine upon the woman that eat the flâ—sh of her child he would wait no longer Well and how doth he vent this rage and impatience Why he would take off Elisha's Head Wel and what then Would that cease the Famine No but saith he by his Messenger This evil is of the Lord God deals exceeding hardly and severely with us therefore I le cut off his servants Head A goodly consequence and that which sussiciently argues against whom chiesly his anger was aimed even against the Lord himself Now that this anger impatience and weariness in the service of God is an argument of Legality is clear for that pride is the root of it namely such a pride as by which we think there is very good reason why God should accept of us and no just reason why the Lord should deal thus severely with us which if it doth not contain Legality or opinion of merit in it I despair of making any proof in this business and yet I shall not onely give this proof by way of argument but clear Scripture-proof that this impatiency proceeds from Legality it is in Hab. 2.3 4. Behold the vision is yet for an appointed time but at the end it shal speak and not lye though it tarry wait for it because it will surely
sons a spirit of adoption Having made the spirit of bondage a Character and given you the distinctions upon it I shal briefly shew the inseparable connexion that there is between a legal spirit and it and the very reason how it comes to pass The inseperable connexion between a spirit of bondage and a legal spirit And indeed it must needs be that a legal spirit should be attended with fear and terror for his very way of serving God leads him into it He goes to serve God and to procure acceptance with him by the Works of the Law now the Law as I have shew nis of that nature that it cannot justifie but where there is perfect unerring obedience and therefore to all that seek justification by it and are not surnished with this obedience it can onely prove a Ministration of death terror and desperation So that let the Legallist fancy what he pleaseth at first when he enters upon his way as perhaps he may think to please God and satisfie his own Conscience with offering up some external services either ceremonious or moral and never pretend to keep the whole law and so not to seek justification in the true and proper way that the Law is to justifie yet he shall find himself first reputed and reckoned amongst those that seek Justification by the Law as the Galatians were who yet did not pretend to the proper righteousness of the Law and then he shall find in the next place that because of the imperfection of his obedience the Law is too weak to justifie him and yet it will still shew him his duty and press him to the doing of it and it will discover his defects and sins and the wrath due for them but to allow strength for the fulfilling it self or to procure pardon for any breach of it this it cannot do and so all the effects of the Law upon the Legallist can be only to lash sting and vex him which must needs sill his soul with horror and dread of that God whom hee serves Now I shall not undertake to shew on the contrary how the very nature of the gospel-way must needs produce peace and an holy boldness and confidence in the sight of God though I might shew that out of the very way it self these things would seem to spring or at least that it is very agreeable and suitable to the gospel-way of treating God that it should be accompanied with peace joy and holy boldness in the presence of God for if the great and holy God wil admit any sinful creatures whilst they remain in part sinful into fellowship and holy boldness with himself who can they be other then those that renounce all love to sin abhor themselves by reason of sin and cast themselves for pardon and salvation purely upon his mercy and grace All which I have shewn to be essential to the Evangelical or gospel-way the way of faith and grace which I am contending for Besides we know the gospel way of serving God receives a denomination from faith it is called the way of Faith They that are OF FAITH are blessed with faithful Abraham Gal. 3.9 Now if this way hath so much of faith in it which we know hath affiance in its notion that Faith should deserve to give name to this way as it doth then certainly this way cannot want an holy boldness and confidence in it But instead of insisting upon this way of proof from the very nature and constitution of the Gospel I shall content my self with a few more Scripture-proofs besides what I first mentioned in the entrance of this Character to shew that peace joy and holy boldness in the presence of God are great effects of a Gospel-way of serving God Gal. 5.22 The fruit of the SPIRIT is love joy peace c. By the spirit is meant either the gospel or the holy ghost which is conveighed by it or that better part which is within us called so in opposition to the Flesh or if you will all three and then the sense is this The Spiritual or New-nature within us brought forth by the Holy Ghost in the preaching of the Gospel hath such fruits as these Love Joy Peace c. So Rom. 14.17 The Kingdom of God that is the Gospel where it comes in power is not meat and drink that is it consists not of these chiefly if at all but it is righteousness and peace and joy in the holy Ghost these are the great designs and effects of the Gospel And we know that the Gospel is the great ministration of the Spirit who is given in the Gospel as a Comforter as an earnest of the inheritance as an Advocate within us teaching us to cry Abba Father It were endless to give all the places which make for the proof of this proposition that the Gospel hath great joys and comforts attending it and that the opposite way to it of serving God which is by the Law can have no such thing If it should be here objected that it 's strange Obj. if the Gospel-way be so full of comfort and boly boldness in the presence of God so attended with the Spirit of Adoption as you have declared that there should be so many sad drooping desponding Saints as there are that though they live holily and we cannot but think they are good men yet are not acquainted with any of those comforts durst not call God Father are full of fears and doubts touching the favour of God towards them c. I confess that this is a considerable objection Ans But I must answer it much after the same manner as I discoursed upon that which I might have made the third character viz. that a Gospel-Spirit was vigorous quick and lively in the service of God that a Legal-spirit was weak sluggish and unactive For I meet with the same kind of Christians in this Objection that then I met with who durst not be tried by that character First of all therefore I acknowledge there are many sad souls whom I cannot but think to be godly and true Gospel-saints and so much I acknowledged in giving the second distinction 〈◊〉 this character But Secondly I dare say the Gospel hath comforts for them if they could but receive them which yet the Law hath not in it for the Legallists no the Law is full charged with wrath against them and did they but fully understand what infinite treasures of wrath the Law contains in it self for them there is never a Legallist in the world but would be fuller of horror and desperation than were Cain or Judas Thirdly Setting aside what may be of extraordinary dispensation in the troubles of some Saints I think it 's generally their own fault that they have no more comfort and considence than they have God would have us rejoice Rejoice is the Lord alwaies and again I say rejoice Phil. 4.4 Rejoice evermore 1 Thes 5.16 The Gospel would have us rejoice
transgressions of the Law Now therefore what remains but this that if Jesus will save his people from their sins if he will deliver the Law 's Captives he must make satisfaction to the Law The Law was such a thing as must not be dealt with in a way of violence 't is true when our Saviour came to redeem us from the power of Satan he did that by an holy violence he fought with all the powers of hell upon his Cross and conquered them by force of arms as I may speak and triumphed over them in himself or in his Cross but now the Law must be taken off in a more honourable way for the Law had an authority in it the Law was nothing but the will of God revealed for mans life with a reward and threatnings annexed so that the great God himself stood up in vindication of his own Law that if the Prisoners of it were rescued it must be upon such terms as these which appear what they were by the event That he that is the Saviour of the Law 's Captives must first be made under the Law himself The terms upon which the Law 's captives be delivered God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law And secondly That he must pass thorough a legal Justification himself before he can take others off from the Laws condemnation for being made under it the Law must either justifie him or condemne him which latter it did not for any personal breach that he made of it therefore it must and did acquit him But then for us who were under the curse of the Law if he will deliver us from it he must be made a curse Gal. 3.13 if he will save us from our sins which were invigorated by the Law with a sentence of condemnation all the strength of sin for condemnation being in the Law he himself must be made sin that is as much as an immaculate Lamb could be viz. a sin-offering 2 Cor. 5.21 he was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him that is that we might be made righteous by Gods accepting Gospel conditions instead of legal for our Justification If Christ will redeem us from the wrath of the Law which is the wrath of God the Law worketh wrath Rom. 4 15. truely he must come under that wrath so farr as it was possible for such an innocent person to be under it and we know that he was under as horrible a desertion as ever any that trusted in God was under and that at such a time when he needed the greatest supports even when he hung upon the Cross crying My God My God words of an high saith why hast thou forsaken mee words expressing a most dreadfull desertion Math. 27 46. Not to mention his agony in the Garden which was but a fore-taste of that Cup which he was afterwards to drink off And methinks there is an eminent place for this in Zech. chap. 13. ver 7. saith the Lord there as it were stirring up his wrath against Christ Awake O Sword against my Shepherd and against the man that is my Fellow saith the Lord of Hosts As much as to say there is a man upon earth that is my Fellow and he hath undertaken to rescue the Law 's Captives to redeem them from under the Law Curse and Wrath now awake my Sword against him Here the great God the Lord of Hosts doth as it were set himself in battel array against Christ but what doth Christ now Doth he make resistance doth he redeem his Captives from the Law by forceâ— No though he were equal with God though he were God's Fellow as here the Lord calls him yet he made it not a prey or a robbery to be equal with God so as to hold it fast and stand it out but gave way he knew what he had undertaken to redeem Captives indeed but it was from under the Law the righteous and holy and pure law of God and this must not be violated this must not be resisted He had to do with his Father and there must be no resisting him The Cup which my Father hath given me shall I not drink it John 18.11 Though he were God's Fellow though he were equal to God as it is Phil. 2.6 7 8. Yet he made himself of no reputation he laid aside his equality took upon him the form of a Servant and humâ—â—ed himself and became obedient unto death even the death of the Cross And this was the utmost that the Law could do to him here the Law ended it's rage the Law brought Christ to the Cross and when he ascended the Cross he bare our sins in his own body 1 Pet. 2.24 and being as yet under the Law for the Law pressed him with our sins he carried up the Law as Sampson did the gates of the City upon his shoulders Judges 16.3 he carried up the Law upon the Cross he nailed the Law to the Cross both Moral and Ceremonial as to all it's condemning power as to all that wherein it was a gainst us wherein it was contrary unto us he answerit fully cancelled it and left it behinde him upon the Cross to this very day Christ came down again but the Law could never come down since Col 2.14 Blotting out the hand-writing of Ordinances that was AGAINST US THAT WAS CONTRARY UNTO US and took it out of the way â—ailing it to his Cross Now this was the manner of Christ's enervating the Law and leaving it without strength or obligation upon us to punishment as the expression is Rom 76. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law is made of no strength against us so it might be rendred though the Translation is this we are delivered fram the Law the Law can hold us captives no longer it is made a weak and a vain thing to us having spent all it's rage fury upon Christ for the Law could do no more then it did upon Christ what can the Law do more to a debtor nay to any malefactor then arrest him bring him to trial and execution and all this the Law did upon Christ as our surety and so left no strength or vigour in it self against those whose Surety he was The Law when it fell upon us it left us without strength Rom. 5.6 When we were yet without strength in due time Christ died for the ungodly but when Christ comes to deal with the Law he leaves the Law without strength nay though he offered no affront or violence to the Law yet he left it for dead as it is Rom. 7 6. Now we are delivered from the Law THAT BEING DEAD WHEREIN WE WERE HELD The Law that fell upon us when we were weak was taken by the Captain of our salvation and left for dead nay he made it suffer the same death that it put him to The Law nailed Christ to