was there privately carried and ordained thus Every faithfull one of either sex being come to yeares of discretion Omnis utriusque sexus fidelis postquam ad annos discretionis pervenerit omnia sua solus peccata confiteatur fideliter saltâ—m sâ—mel in anno proprio Sacerdoti injunctam sibi poenitentiam studeat pro viribus adimplere suscipiens reverenter ad minus in Pascha Eucharistiae Sacramentum c. alioquin vivens ab ingressu ecclesiae arceatur moriens Christiana careat sepultura Concil Lateran cap. 21. should by himself alone once a year at the least faithfully confesse all his sinnes unto his own Priest and endeavour according to his strength to fulfill the Penance injoyned unto him receiving reverently at least at Easter the Sacrament of the Eucharist otherwise in his life time let him be barred from entring into the Church and being dead want Christian buriall In which decree are these innovations 1. Solus that it must be private 2. omnia peccata sinnes and all sinnes must be confessed 3. Proprio Sacerdoti to their own Priest where the liberty of choosing the Ghostly Father is taken away And for the time which the Jesuit tells us was the onely thing there concluded on I say there was none decreed onely limited leaving Christians to confesse at other times convenient within the year but not to exceed and be without the compasse of a year Come as often within as the Confessor and his Penitent can agree and meet upon it but not to go over the year and to this head must popish shrift be referred But if Repentance be considered as a work of Grace arising from Godly sorrow whereby a man turnes from all his sinnes to God and obtaineth pardon and so including confession as an evidence of inward sorrow and a mean of reconciliation such a Confession poured out before God or unto God before his Priests is of the same right and institution as Repentance is The grace of God hath ordained in this world repentance to be the approved Physician for sinners 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Just Mart. Resp ad Orthod Q 97. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Id. Dialog cont Tryphon Judaeum saith Justin Martyr And again God according to the riches of his mercy accepteth of him that is penitent for his sinnes as just and without sin That thing then is of Divine Institution which Gods grace hath ordained and of divine power and efficacy which makes a sinner accepted of God as a Righteous person But all this thou wilt say may be done by contrition and confession to God onely without respect unto the Priest I deny not but that it may be and often is effected that way but not alwaies such may be the Condition of the sinner and quality of the sin that pardon which is the fruit of Repentance is not gathered and new obedience which is the fruit of the Penitent is not brought forth without confession to the Priest and direction from him and so to be comprised in this duty also for if the doore of Heaven would ever open upon the former knocking the Priest had keyes committed to no purpose To make this to appeare distinctly we are to consider that to institute may be taken in a twofold sense Jurisâ—o isuiâ—is instituere est vel arbores vel vinâ—â—s in aliquo loco pâ—â—â—â—re ut in conducto fundo si â—onductor suâ â—perâ aliquid necessariò vel utiliter auxerit vel aedificaverit vâ—l instituerit l. Dominus Sec. in conduct ff loc conduct vide Turneb Advers l. 2. c. 13. first to be the cause producer and author of an effect so taken with the ancient Civilians with whom to institute trees or vineyards is to set and plant them In a ground let out if the Farmer by his industry shall have improved it have builded or have set or planted in the Digests And in this acceptation Christ is the Author of the Sacrament of the Eucharist that Vine is of his planting and institution he is the Author and his Ministers to do it by his authority Now Repentance is indeed a work of God but not in God Confession is when God openeth a sinners mouth not his own in that sense Confession is not of divine institution 2. Secondly that is said to be instituted that is commanded and enjoyned so of institution divine that is of divine law and ordinance and that of divine law which is prescribed in the Divine word the holy Scriptures as a law to be observed or as an example to be imitated And Divine ordinances are there delivered by God immediately or by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the men of God inspired by him In which sense Saint Chrysostom interpreteth those passages of Saint Paul not I but the Lord and I not the the Lord 1 Cor. 7.10 12. not as if Christ spake of himself and Paul from himself for in Paul Christ spake what is it then that he saith I and not I Jesus Christ hath delivered some lawes and ordinances in his own person unto us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To. 6.250 Aliquid dicitur esse jure divino duobus modis vel quòd institutum habet in sacris literis idque vel â—xpresse vel certa deductione erutum vel ex mplum continuata ecclesiae pâ—axi omni s culo commendatum Junius in Bellar. controv 7. cap. 10. and some by his Apostles Furthermore a thing may be of Divine right as â—xpresly and formally injoyned in the Scriptures or else as virtually implyed by a necessary deduction and consequence or els as exemplary and ratified by the constant practice of the Church So divine right and institution is accepted in a threefold sense 1. in express precept and command 2. in necessary consequence depending upon some other thing commanded Or. Confession of div ne institution 1. Virtate praecepti 3ly by approved examples in Gods word commended by the practice of the Church We will lay confession unto all of these and see what authority it hath And first for divine command we read in the law that the sinner by divine edict brought his Sacrifice Numb 5. Levâ—t 5. and confessed his sin unto the Priest Thou wilt reply that law was Ceremonial so say I in respect of the Sacrifice but dare not say so in respect of the confession the one being a typical and the other a morall act And think it not strange that one precept may be mixt and composed of Ceremony and morality For is not the law of the Sabbath so the day Ceremonial Diâ—s ceremonialis quies moralis and the rest morall cultus à natura modus à lege virtus à gratia and it may not unfitly be applyed to Confession what is verifyed of the Sabbath 1. Confessio Deo facta est a natura Nature it self teacheth us that a sinner must confesse unto God whom he hath
wronged and this is morale positivum the morall positive part of the law 2. Modus à lege Confâ—ssio mâ—ntalis quae fit Deo est de dictamine legis naturae adjutae quodammodo per fidem Raymand sum tract 4. To confesse unto the Priest This manner of confession was injoyned by God and this is Positivum divinum the divine positive part of the law 3. But Virtus à gratia true confession whether to God Jam donum Spiritus Sancti habet qui confitetur poenitet quia non potest esse confessio peccati compunctio in homine ex scipso Aug. in Ps 1. or to his Priest is from the working of the holy spirit it being fulfilled in this as in all other graces what hast thou O man that thou hast not received The Ceremonial part which consisted in the Sacrifice ceaseth for a Christian hath another Altar and another Sacrifice Ex necessitate Consequentiae Christ Jesus slain upon the Crosse by vertue whereof his Priests assure the Penitent of pardon absolution For the second Confession is of divine right by way of deduction For if the use of the keys in the Ministery of the Priests be divine as it cannot be denied but that they are so and if that use consisteth in absolution and if that absolution ever presupposeth and cannot be denounced without precedaneous confession the consequent will tye them together for the world cannot break the relation that is betwixt Confession and absolution Ratione exempli And for the last a precedent we have in the Acts of the Apostles seconded with the practice of the Church as hath been declared Thou seest Good Reader how confession pretendeth to divine right in a strict sense Jus divinum laxè vel strictè sumptum hoc in S. literis invenitur illud ex earum sive instituto sive exemplis analogia recta ratione deducitur Azorius Instit Mor. part 2. l. 1. c. 2. as injoyned in the Scripture and in a large as a necessary consequent deducted by rational proportion from divine premisses how the same is corroborated by examples set forth in the Scripture and by ecclesiastical practice set forth in the discipline of the Church likewise This I must be interpreted to speak of Confession unto Gods Ministers in generall without respect to the manner thereof privately or publickly performed Which I think is left to the power of the Church to determine There was a time when the publick performance thereof was all in all that was left off and the private doing thereof succeeded in the room to supply that defect and which at the first alteration was esteemed to be no more Sacramentall or of no more necessity for obtaining remission of sinnes than the former So that the course taken herein may well be thought to have the nature of a temporall law which as Saint Austin saith although it be just Appellemus istam legem si placâ—t temporalem quae quâ—mvis justa sit commutari tamen per tempora justè potest Aug. de lib. arb lib. 1. cap. 6. yet in time may be justly changed Canus acknowledgeth confession in its own nature for a divine ordinance but for the Condition thereof secret or open he referreth to be ordered by naturall prudence his words are these Confession of sinnes ought to be made unto the Priest Confessio peccatorum Sacerdoti fieri debet non solùm ex traditione majorum verùm etiam ex Evangelico testimonio quod quidem est de necessitate Sacramenti Secretam verò aut publicam confessionem fiâ—ri prudentiae est naturali relictum quae dictat ut occulta occultè publica publicè jud centur Canus Relect. de poen p. 6. not onely by tradition from our Ancestors but also by testimony from the Gospel and this is of the necessity of the Sacrament But whether Confession should be secret or publick that 's left to natural prudence which willeth that secret sinnes should be judged in secret and those which are publick publickly Michael Vehe frameth to himself this objection Let it be granted that these words whose sinnes soever ye remit c. infer a confession to be made of all sinnes whatsoever which seeing it may be performed two waies privately or publickly and neither way by Christ commanded both would seeme of equall necessity But no man can say that publick confession is necessary and why may not so much be said of private answereth thus We say and affirm neither way of Confession to be necessary by any precept from Christ Respondemus dicimus neutrum confiteâ—di modum â—sse ex praecepto Christi necessarium utrumque autem necessarium sub distinctione liberum est ergo ecclesiae eligere illum vel illum cum autem etiam secretam voluerit esse confessionem ad publicam non tenemur Vehe tract 6. de Sacr. Poen c. 4. and yet both necessary with a distinction The Church then was left to her choise to take which she pleased and seeing she hath embraced to confess in secret we are not tyed to the publick Which two assertions how far they cut the throat of Clancular confession Rome may doe well to consider Confession then in it self may be of Divine right and the manner thereof whether private or publick a Churches constitution and which way the Church should conceive to be most profitable and command the use what am I that should contradict the same to whose benigne censure I submit what I have here resolved concerning the institution SECT II. The Contents The abusive necessity of Confession Tyrannicall inquisition into mens consciences distastfull Confession left at liberty in Gratian's times Schoolmen leaning to the necessity thereof Confession not the onely necessary means for absolution and remission The ends aimed at in Popish confession unnecessary No expresse precept in Scripture for the absolute necessity thereof Confession an heavy burden upon fleshly shoulders Private confession not practised from the beginning Established in the place of the Publick by an edict from Leo 1. The fact of Nectarius abrogating confession with the severall answers and expositions of Roman Writers expended Confession deserted in the Greek Church Divers kinds and formes of Necessity Confession in what cases necessary and the Necessity thereof determined WE are now come to the necessity of confessing a point necessarily to be opened the over-pressing of the same upon mens Consciences hath been thought a kind of Tyranny and hath caused the busie obtruders thereof to be suspected as if they aimed at their own ends and sought not those things that are of Christ Jesus Lording it over the Consciences of the people making their keyes become pick-locks and themselves not Seers but Spies not Judges but Accusers not Physicians but Betrayers not good Samaritans to bind up the wounds but cruel Tyrants to rent them wider More than time it is to consider of these things and to discharge the
VIII Of the Confessary or Priest that receiveth confessions and his authority for the same Divided into two Sections p. 208. SECT I. The vulgarly disesteem of the power of Absolution in the hand of Priests Keys diverse Of 1. Authority 2. Excellency 3. Ministery The office of the Ministerial key in discerning and defining Ecclesiastical and conscientious Consistories The gift of Science in the Priest not properly the Key but the Guide Absolution a judicial act Magistrates spiritual and temporal distinguished in their jurisdiction and ends Bonds of sin culpable and for sin penal Satisfaction expiatory vindictive God forgiveth sins properly and effectively The Priest by way of application and notice as also dispositively qualifying by his function sinners for the same in which he proceedeth as a subordinate cause both declaratively and operatively The priority of binding and loosing on Earth to Heaven in respect of the sensible apprehension in the Penitent not of the purpose and operation in God Power of Absolution primitive in God in his Ministers derivative and delegate A Penitent absolving himself by the finger of Gods Spirit in what sense The power of binding in the Church rather privative than positive and declarative onely p. 211. SECT II. Peter seised of the keys to the use of the Church Power of Absolution conferred and confined unto Priests Laicks using the same not in case of officâ— buâ— nâ—cessity and where they are the parties grieved Boâ—ds of the soul â—nd sin onely loosed by this key The accomplishment â—nd actual donation of this power God remitteth by the Churches act The form of Priestly Ordination Heresie of the Novâ—â—ians denying in the Church power to reconcile Penitents Seed and bellows thereof austerity of those times Absolution in the Priest not absolutely efficacious but as relating to conditions in the Penitent The Priest not secured from failing in the act of absolution The erring key Priestly absolution declarative and demonstrative and in a moral sense energetical Judgments forinsecal are applied declarations of the Law to the fact Absolution a Ministerial act but powerful and judicial but not Soveraign nor despotical The spirit of judgment to discerne and determine how necessary for Priests in the act of absolution Fathers making Priests Judge of the Conscience The exercise of the keys 1. In the word oâ— reconciliation 2. In Prayer ancient forms of absolution expressed in a deprecative manner not indicative 3. In the Sacraments 4. In interdictions and relaxations of publick censures Keys abused at Rome dangerous to Soveraign Majesties and Republicks The superciliousness of Roman Priests in usurping upon Divine right subjecting the power of forgiveness in God to their arbitrements Their preposterous way in absolving first and afterwards in enjoyning Penance The feigned virtue of absolution Ex opere operato destructive of Piety and penitency Conditions requisite in the Penitent to be relieved by the keys and lawful use of Absolution p. 239. CHAP. IX Paternal affection in the Confessary Good for sheep if the shepherd know their diseases Medicinal Confession The grief better healed when clearer opened Ghostly counsel of great importance to a Penitent Great care in the choice of a discreet Confessor Rome's rigid Tenet Absolution denounced by any Priest besides the Ordinary to be invalid The inconveniences thereof The Parochial Priest not to be deserted without just cause and the same to be approved by the Diocesan p. 282. CHAP. X. Many positive precepts without fixed times The practick for times and seasons left to the Churches arbitration Times necessary for Confession when particular persons and consciences are perplexed Times convenient for all Christians 1. When visited with despâ—rate diseases 2. Vpon the undertaking of solemn actions and exploits accompanied with danger and needing special help from God 3. Vpon the receiving of the blessed Eucharist before which Confession to the Priest is alwayes Convenient and sometimes necessary and the neglect thereof in some cases damnable p. 295. CHAP. XI All convenient secrecy apprimely requisite in the Confessary Suspicion of discovery a great enemy to confession Sins already committed with expressions of grief to be concealed The Schoolmen bringing sins de futuro to be committed within the compass of the seal The damnable doctrine of the Jesuites that Treasons and Conspiracies yet plotting against Church or State and confessed to the Priest ought to be shut up in privacy The odious consectaries and inconveniences thereof Examples of sundry Confessors revealing treasons detected in Confession The preservation of Prince Church or State to be preferred before the secrecy of the Seal Sins opened in confession the concealment whereof complieth not with the Priests fidelity to his Prince and Countrey to be discovered Marriage in the Clergy no prejudice to the lawful secrecy of the seal especially if the penalty of the old Canons against the violaters thereof should be revived p. 300. CHAP. XII An Historical relation of the Canons and Constitutions of the Church of England concerning Confession and the practice thereof by some of the chief Members in the same p. 312. OF CONFESSION OF SINNE 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 BE perswaded industrious Reader to stand a little at the Gate and receive this light in the Porch lest a scandal may be taken where none is given The subject the Author of this ensuing discourse treateth upon is a duty of late times laid aside and which through the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and sluggishness of our devotion hath waxed old as it were and wasted it self but now beginneth to peep out from under a cloud of many abuses Inertiâ Caesarum quasi consenuit atque decoxit nisi sub Trajano Principe movet lacertos c. Florus Prolog histor and the sinews thereof requickned with spirits and motion as the Historian said of the decayed Empire of Rome And because the practice thereof is no whit plausible to flesh and bloud it is likely to be opposed by all such that are not guided by the Spirit He foreseeth also that some though otherwise well minded may herein be contrary-minded which may well come to pass by not looking narrowly into the duty it self covered under a mass of inordinances and thereupon crying down the duty because of the abuse But his hope is they will be better perswaded when they shall perceive the same to be defecated and disabused The matter it self is of no small importance and conducing to Repentance foâ— sin and Râ—mission And herein a great and learned Antiquâ—â—y said truly that the chiefest point of the Ecclesiastical state and function it taken up in Repentance it self the use and administration thereof Ecclesiasticae rei functionisque praecipua pars poenitenâ—ià â—jusque usu administratione continetur Dionys Petav. animadvers in Epiphan haeres 59. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gal. 1.10 His care hath been most in separating betwixt the light and darkness the thing it self and the abuse thereof and his aim the reviving of this discipline as it was
his trespass with the principal thereof and add unto it the fifth part thereof and give it unto him against whom he hath â—râ—spassed Materia restâ—tutionis latissima quidem sed valdè necessaria Bâ—ell l. 4. d. 15. Q. 2. The point of restitution is indeed of great latitude and great necessity a doctrine too sowre for the palat of our times and we can no more away with it then with Confession Oh preposterous shame we blush not to commit sin but to confess we blush not to do violence but to restore that speech of Augustine is grounded upon infallible truth The sin is not remi ted Non dimittitur peccatum nisi restâ—tuatur ablatum except what was deteined be restored If thou hast not a mind to augment the principal four-fâ—â—â—â—s Zacheus did yet add â—th thereunto as the Law enjoyned or at least the Principal as reason willeth Lex â—stâ— loquitur in casâ—â— in quo aliquis poenitentiâ ductus vult sadere satisfactionem proximo Lyra. in loc This case of Confession is unto man as damnified together with God and therefore he likewise this way is to be satisfied the offender voluntarily detesting and detecting the fact tendring satisfaction and desiring reconciliation Here the Rhemists exceed the bounds of the Tridentine faith in affirming that a general Confession under the law sufficed not for purging sins and that sinners were bound by a divine positive law to confess expresly and distinctly their sin which they had committed Rhemists An. 10. upon Num. 5. Tom. 1. pag. 333. whom I send to Cardinal Tolet a man of more judgment then all their College to be corrected who ingeniously confesseth that not so much as a purpose to confess was necessary in the old law for my part I verily believe Propositum consitendi non fait necessarium in veteri lege Tolet. tract de confes the same divine law for confession that is in force under the Gospel to have been a law for Gods people at all times and of like necessity to all penitents and that the Priests after the order of Aaron had power to make the atonement as well as those after the order of Melchisedec to grant the absolution both in their several kinds being Ministers of Reconciliation Christ the supreme head of either hierarchy giving in proper person a period to the Levitical Priesthood and investing his Ministers with their authority which seems to be the greater because it shines the clearer and the more substantial because the lesse ceremonious The next but precedent in time unto the former is the submission of Jobs friends and that by special command of God unto him with a direction from God likewise that Job by sacrificing for them should pacifie his incensed anger for God held himself wronged through his servants side and all this should they perform upon pain of his high displeasure the words in the story are these Job 42.7 8 9 10. And it was so that after the Lord had spoken these words unto Job The Lord said unto Eliphaz the Temanite my wrath is kindled against thee and against thy two friends for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right as my servant Job hath Therefore take unto you now seven bullocks and seven rams and go to my servant Job and offâ—r up for your selves a burnt offering and my servant Job shall pray for you and him will I accept lest I deal with you after your folly in that ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right as my servant Job hath So Eliphaz the Temanite and Bildad the Shuhite and Zophar the Naamathite went and did according as the Lord commanded them and the Lord also accepted Job and the Lord turned the captivity of Job when he prayed for his friends Where note 1. As God was offended and his servant Job so the offence must be acknowledged to both that both may be pacified 2. God retains his anger till the party wronged together with him be satisfied 3. Gods wrath incensed against any for wronging hâ—s servants will not be quenched but by his servants means and procurement for his fury provoked by offâ—nding Job must be appeased by Job reconciling Itâ— ad servum meum Job offeret holocauslum pro vobis ita legit Greg. vulg lat assavoir par le moin de Job tellâ—mâ—nt qu'il vous serve comme de Sacrificateur Genev not in Bibl. Gallic They wâ—â—e to offer their sacrifices to Job and Job to God for them so the ancient Latine copies followed by Gregory read Go unto my servant Job and he shall offer an Holocaust for you and those words him will I accept and the Lord accepted Job import no less 4. Pro semetipso Poenitens tantò â—ititùs ex audiri meruit quantò devotè pro aliâ—s intercessit Greg. Mor. l. 35. c. 20. God heareth a man sooner in his own cause that is sollicitous on the behalf of others as Job turned away his own captivity in praying for his friends Thou wilt say but where did Jobs friends confess their sins unto him Canst not thou spell their Confessions in their Sacrifices for what meant those Sacrifices and Jobs intercessions on their behalf but for their sins and how could he offer and pray for he knew not what they then confessed the trespass presented unto him the trespass offering and desired his intercessions that God would be reconciled for their offences The next President is David confessing his sin to Nathan for albeit the Prophet gave him a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and draught thereof in a Parable and made David pass the sentence against himself in thesi and brought it home to his Conscience by a special application uncasing the Parable and shewing that He was the man yet Davids heart thus roused awoke and he cried out I have sinnâ—d against the Lord 2 Sam. â—2 and Nathan said unto Dâ—vid the Lord hath also put away thy sin thou shalt not dye There was no tergiversation no apology no accusing of the instruments but the King wholly took the sin upon himself Thus did not Saul in the case of Agag and Amalek the charge he had from God was the utter subversion of that Prince and State contrariwise the victory gained he spareth the King and maketh a prey of the richest and fattest spoylâ— and being reprehended by Samuel spread a religious cloak over his transgression as if that prey had been reserved for a sacrifice and being further charged by Samuel for disobedience he conveyes the fact away from himself to the people I have obeyed the voice of the Loâ—d and gone the way the Lord sent me but the people c. If any deviation it was in them they were out of the way and would needs spare the best of the cattle to pleasure God with a Sacrifice Proud heart that all this while would take no notice of his sin till he heard his doom deprivation from
and by the same authority be abolished by which it was at first prescribed and for the second how far necessary as an Ordinance Divine and in what sense it may be said to be ordained by God I must send back my Reader to the former Section where the point is stated We will tread the footsteps of necessity in the Schoolmens path and see what will result from thence Necessitas Praecepti Medii with them necessity is twofold 1. As a necessary Precept 2. or a needful mean Now every just command is grounded upon some reason and every lawful mean conduceth to some good In Divine Precepts we are not scrupulous to enquire after the Cause or Reason thereof but where Gods pleasure is to set it down for with us his will passeth for a cause all-sufficient So then it is necessary to salvation to obey all Gods commands or to repent for the disobedience although all his divine Precepts conduce not necessarily thereunto Josh 6.18 At the sacking of Jericho the spoils were devoted to the Lord and the Israelites might reserve nothing to themselves a necessity there lay in obeying the same though the commandment it self was not so necessary In the old Law as I shewed before there was a precept for Confession and in the new a president for the same why should it not then be thought necessary But take this along with you Positive Precepts contained in the Scripture are not to be extended further than the written Word or intention of the Law-giver direct for example God intendeth pardon upon sincere confession of the sin committed which Pardon when it may be had upon confession made unto God himself we extend it not unto Man So again if it may be procured upon a general confession before man we urge not the Delinquent to be particular but if the Conscience cannot be pacified except the pungitive sin be discovered in that case we require a special detection of that sin by name So then if the intended pardon may be compassed by any of these wayes that way is to be reputed necessary for that penitent which served the turn If by none but by all of these all of these then are necessary Moreover Gods word commandeth sins to be discovered to the Priest in termes absolute without further circumstance we dare not therefore extend that precept to the manner thereof whether it should be publick or private of all sins or some followed with remorse of Conscience and whether with the addition of aggravating circumstances or no. I say we lay no necessity of these cases upon any because we have not any express word for our warrant we counsel onely that no man permit sin to lie still in his bosome so long as he feels pain but complain still to his Physician till the cure be perfect Thus for the necessity of Precept The second branch is necessitas medii And we are to judge of that necessity by the end for no mean can be of greater necessity than the end for which it serveth and if the end be found necessary the mean must be thought to be so and in means we are to enquire if the proposed end may be attained by one onely mean or by divers some means may be useful but not necessary as a horse for a journey or simply necessary as wings to flie To apply remission of sins is the end a Penitent proposeth to himself which to compass we say that confession to a Priest is not of absolute necessity as the adequate only mean for faith in Christ who onely hath deserved it is also required nor a necessary concurrent mean for of faith I read but never of Auricular Confession that without faith it is impossible to please God but onely a conditional mean and so the necessity thereof hypothetical in some cases of Conscience to be instanced hereafter for sin in no case may be remitted without God in many without man But if we take confession as a medium utile in that sense we shall ever approve thereof although we resolve confession in it self not to be of absolute necessity for all but a precept binding some sinners and for some special sins onely As the holy Eucharist is a Sacrament of divine institution and singular benefit necessary to some Christians and at some times and the contempt thereof at all times damnable though in it self not simply necessary nor at all times nor to be imposed upon all persons without discretion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 then for all that can be said this Confession challengeth not any such necessity in it self as inherent in the same or any way belonging of soveraign virtue and necessary use but as a condition supposed for the acquiring of some necessary good Necessitas conditionalis seu necessitas consequentiae non est absoluta nec competit subjecto ex natura rei sed solùm consequitur ad talem suppositionem vel conditionem ex qua necessariò infertur id quod ex tali conditione dicitur necessarium necessitate secundum quid lic èt absolutè secundum se est liberum contingens Alvarez de Auâ—il l. 3. Disp 22. n. 40. viz. forgiveness of sins and reconciliation a penitent taking all good courses to ingratiate himself into the favour of God and this is onely conditional necessity and by way of consequence and so far to be urged as we shall find it a cause to promote the same and further we neither require nor urge it And amiss it cannot be that shall promove so good an end nor superfluous that advanceth such a purpose nor a heavy burden that brings so happy a benefit SECT III. The Contents Scrupulous enumeration of all sins decreed in late Councils Circumstances aggravating and altering the property of sin Mill-stones to plain-people Anxious inquisition into each sin with every circumstance a perplexed piece Particular reckonings for every sin a heavy load to the Conscience and without express warranty from God implying difficulty and impossibility and tending to desperation No urgent necessity to be so superstitious in casting up of all sins and the circumstantial tailes thereof Romish closets of Confession seminaries of sin and uncleanness Venial and reserved sins exempted by Rome from the ears of ordinary Priests upon what grounds Strict and specifick enumeration of sins but of late standing in the Church General Interrogatories proposed at the hour of death from Anselme Some sins are specially and by name to be rehearsed in Confession The nature and quality of those sins described and determined WE are now come unto the Contents of Confession namely sins and hence a difference springeth betwixt us and Rome about the extent and latitude thereof Whether forsooth all and every sin committed after Baptisme together with every aggravating circumstance following every sin be to be laid at the Priests feet and whether such an institution of such a Confession comprising all sins together with their remarkeable circumstances to
our sins and the circumstances Moreover who can well endure such hard load to be laid upon the Conscience and so sorely pressed without special warranty from Gods word Luther charged the Pope with this tyrannical imposition without any shadow of authority from holy writ Si res haec fuisset ab hoc Pontifice nuper inventa potuisses illam multò quidem inculpatiùs ejus imputasse tyrannidi verùm cùm à vetustissimis eisdem eruditissimis atque sanctissim's authoribus nec sine Scripturarum testimoniis apertissimè traditum sit frustrà tyrannidem ejus accusas pag. 146. Bishop Fisher confesseth the charge in part to be true if Leo X. then Pope had been the first bringer in thereof but he dischargeth him and laieth it upon the most ancient learned and holiest Authors and that not without testimonies from the Scripture That Prelate saith it but he or some for him must shew it else his assertion will prove a scandall to those ancient and learned worthies Tam apertissime tradita a thing so evident and we so blind that cannot see it sure too much transparency of light hath dazled us We would gladly know for our reverence to ancient learning where not onely any but any one of those Ancients have delivered that all sins with their circumstances are upon pain of salvation to be distinctly confessed to a Priest and that by express order from the Word of God This doctrine of the Church of Rome is sans parallel to any passage of Scripture or testimony of any Father Bellarmine its a chance else would have lighted upon those ancient Records if any such had been extant who of the old Councils saith thus The testimonies of the Councils which we all age Testimonia Conciliorum quae adferemus etiamsi non apertè contineant confessionem esse juris divini contâ—nent tamen antiquam consuetudinem saepè etiam indicant necessitatem confitendi Sacerdoti Bell. l. 3. de Poen cap. 5. although they do not clearly contain confession to be of divine right nevertheless they contain an ancient custome and ofttâ—mes shew the necessity of confessing unto a Priest The contents of this testimony can afford but small comfort and for the Fathers the same man saith thus Although the Fathers say not in express words Confession of all sins to be necessary by divine right Tametsi Patres quos citat Chemnitius non dicant disertis verbis confessionem omnium peccatorum necessariam esse jure divino tamen neque disertis verbis dicunt confessionem omnium peccatorum non esse necessariam jure divino Id. ib. cap. 11. so neither do they say in express words that confession of all sins is not necessary by divine right 'T is true he saith these words of such Fathers as are produced by Chemnitius which are in effect all that are alleaged by himself as by collation may appear And a negative proof from authority will be thought too slack to prove a positive doctrine and in Schools too weak an argument Confession is necessary by divine Law because the Fathers say not to the contrary Affirmative conclusions urged de fide and upon the extremest penalty must be deduced from positive and clear testimonies else their credit may be worthily suspected and how defective this particular is in proofs I appeal to all Pontificious Writers and indifferent Readers yea Canus confesseth that this conclusion Conclusionem Mathematicâ demonstratione planè exploratam haberi non posse afferuntur argumenta quae probant consentanum esse ità fieri oportere Canus Relect. de poen part 6. pag. 902. viz. for the confessing of every particular sin cannot be found out by any Mathematical demonstration but faith being supposed such arguments must be trusted unto which prove it convenient so to be How comes it then to pass that this point is concluded to be necessary where the arguments it stands upon prove it onely convenient and why should that be exposed to be performed upon utmost peril which is at the most but probably confirmed Precise Conclusions de fide must rest upon sure foundations and where salvation and damnation is set upon the head of any precept the same must be evidenced with a constat quod erat demonstrandum as certainly as any Mathâ—matical demonstration 2. Enumeration of every sin a matter of impossibility 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Basil hom 19.3 Our second exception is the impossibility in rendring so exact an account of every sin with the appendix of several circumstances That Law is rejected as Tyrannical or foolish that injoyneth impossibilities It is impiety to affirme the precepts of the holy Spirit to be impossible saith great Basil To confess alwayes before we come to the Communion Bishop Montagu appeal pag. 301. is ofttimes saith the learned Bishop now of Norwich a matter of impossibility to do even impossible to do with particular enumeration of each sin and special circumstance in each sin Aquinas and Scotus saith Beatus Rhenanus two Aquinas Scotus homines nimiùm arguti confessionem â—odiè talem reddiderunt ut Joan Geillerius gravis Sanctus Theologus apud suos saepe testatus sit ut secundum illorum dâ—uteroseis impossibile est consiteri Arg. in Tert. de Poenit. and too subtile disputants have brought confession to such a pass at this day that John Geiller a grave and holy Divine often testified unto his friends that according to their rigid observances it is impossible to make Confession So by these mens inventions and curious injunctions to say no more that which was at first an ease to relieve is now become a snare to intrap the conscience Ignorant and importunate Physicians saith Cassander casting snares upon the peoples consciences Ignari importuni Medici conscientiis hominum quas extricare levare debeant laqueos injiciunt Cassand Con. art 11. which they ought to unwrap and set at liberty And so it must needs be for our sins are as numberless as the sands and though we should be as exact computists as Clavius was who hath cast up into one summe how many graines of sands will fill up the vast concave betwixt earth and heaven we may be out in our account of sin We must not saith Canus put them that sin often to their Arithmetick Non oportere eos qui saepe peccant ad Mathematicos numeros peccatorum multitudinem exactè redigere difficilis sanè propositio sed vera quia vix possibile est iis qui semel in anno consitentur certum numerum peccatorum recensere Canus suprà to bring in an exact number of their offences It is an harsh but true proposition that it is scarce possible for those which confess but once a year to recount the true number of their offences To this end David prayed as well to number his sins as his dayes and was I suppose as scrupulous to confess and lament them as any of our
the use of the Church Power of absolution conferred and confined unto Priests Laicks using the same not in case of office but necessity and where they are the parties grieved Bonds of the soul and sin onely loosed by this key The accomplishment and actual donation of this power God remitteth by the Churches act The form of Priestly ordination Heresie of the Novatians denying in the Church power to reconcile Penitents Seed and bellows thereof austerity of those times Absolution in the Priest not absolutely efficacious but as relating to conditions in the Penitent the Priest not secured from failing in the act of absolution The erring key Priestly absolution declarative and demonstrative and in a moral sense energetical Judgments forinsecal are applied declarations of the Law to the fact Absolution a Ministerial act but powerful and judicial but not Soveraign nor despotical The spirit of judgment to discerne and determine how necessary for Priests in the act of absolution Fathers making Priests Judges of the Conscience The exercise of the keys 1. In the word of reconciliation 2. In prayer ancient formes of absolution expressed in a deprecative manner not indicative 3. In the Sacraments 4. In interdictions and relaxations of publick Censures Keys abused at Rome Dangerous to Soveraign Majesties and Republicks The superciliousness of Roman Priests in Usurping upon Divine right subjecting the power of forgiveness in God to their arbitrements Their preposterous way in absolving first and afterwards in enjoyning Penance The feigned virtue of absolution Ex opere operato destructive of piety and penitency Conditions requâ—site in the Penitent to be relieved by the keys and lawfull use of absolution 3. Persons Tibi dabo IN the next place it comes to be considered who the persons are to whom this Commission is directed the Trustees to whose charge this power is deposited Some throw it open too far extending it to all Christians which if so what need of special offices and functions in the Church He gave saith the Apostle some Apostles Ephes 4.11 some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers Now if all are Pastors and all Teachers then not some and if some are Apostles and some Prophets then not all Others shrink it up and confine it unto Peter or if to his Successors such as they appoint entailing it upon those that sit in the Chaire at Rome But if none but that Chaire be Apostolical Hoc modo Ecclesiae Apostolicae census suos deserunt sicut Smyrnaeorum ecclesia babens Polycarpum à Joanne conlocatum resert sicut Romanorum Clementem à Petro ordinatum edit Teâ—t adverâ— haeres praescript cap. 32. Christus Apostolis omnibus post resurrectionem suam parem potestatem tribuâ—t Cypr. de unit eccles Universam signisicabat ecclesiam Aug. tr 124. in Joan. Ecclesia quae fundatur in Christo claves ab eo regni coelorum accepit in Petâ—o i. e. potestatem ligandi solvendique peccata Id. Tertullian was mistaken in affirming the Chaire of Polycarpus at Smyrna to be Apostolical and instituted by John as well as the châ—ire of Clemens at Rome ordained by Peter and Cyprian in writing how Christ after his Resurrection bestowed the power upon all the Apostles and Saint Augustine that Peter at that time represented the whole Church and againe the Church founded upon Christ received the keys of the kingdome of heaven that is the power of binding and loosing by Peter And Theophylact All they have the power of remitting and binding that have obtained the sacred function of a Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theoph. in Matth. 16. p 94. Paris 1635. as well as Peter for albeit it was said unto Peter onely I will give to thee yet the keys were given to all the Apostles It is the Inheritance of the Church to whose use Peter was seised of these keys and the power executed by all that succeed in the function of Priesthood nor can Peter boast herein to have been anointed with any oyl above his fellows But withall as this oyl descended from Aarons beard to the skirts of his garment so it condescendeth no further for omni soli sacerdoti to all the Priests and to them onely is this authority conferred and confined To this parpose the Oracle of our Divines Bishop Andrews resolveth Serm. of Absolution the Apostles to be three wayes considerable 1. as Christians in general so it was said unto them Vigilate watch 2. or else as Preachers Ministers Priests so it was said Ite praedicate hoc facite Go and preach and Do this Mark 13. ult c. 3. or lastly as Apostles and so personally They were to be witnesses of his miracles and Resurrection Now the power of absolution was not peculiar to them as Apostles nor common as Christians but committed to them as Preachers Ministers Priests and consequently to those that in that function and office do succeed them yet not so committed unto them as if God could not work without them for Gratia Dei non alligatur mediis the grace of God is not bound but free can work without means of Word or Sacrament or Ministers either but ordinarily this is an Ecclesiastical act or course by him established the Ministery of reconcâ—liation to Ecclesiastical persons And if God at any time vouchsafeth by Lay-men that are not such they are Ministri necessitatis non officii in case of necessity Ministers but by office not so Hitherto are Mentis aureae verba bracteata the grave resolves of that learned Prelate at the feet of this Gamaliel we sit and take these Dictates 1. The Apostles received power to absolve as Priests and Ministers of the Gospel and so those that succeed them in that calling 2. That God can and doth remit sins by himself immediately without any subordinate means at all 3. That this power conferred upon Ministers is an ordinary and Ecclesiastical act 4. And that Lay men taking unto themselves this power are Ministers in case of necessity onely and not usual nor called to that office Hereupon saith Ambrose This right is onely permitted unto the Priests Jus hoc solis permissum est Sacerdotibus rectè igitur ecclesia vendicat quae veros Sacerdotes habet Ambr. de Poen l. 1. c. 3. therefore the Church may truly pretend thereunto that hath true Priests The Church then includeth Priests and Priests absolution The poor Christians in the Vandalick persecution were sensible hereof for when the Orthodox Clergie were exiled by the Arrians the People casting themselves at their feet Victor Uticens lib. 2. cried out To whom will you leave us wretches while you go forward to your Crown Who shall Christen these sucklings in the font of the everlasting water Who shall impart unto us the benefit of penance by reconciling and indulgence absolving us from the bands of our sins The Laity could not be in such distress if the grace of absolution had not been inherent in