pleased to give a copy thereof in writing to his people and in them to his whole Church for ever The Morall law therefore of which we speak in this place in its proper and restrained sence is not every rule of right reason but only that which is naturally engraven upon the conscience So that the Schooles have well distinguished the rules of right reason into three kinds First there be some so common and obvious as that man retaining humane reason cannot erre in them as that God is to be loved good to be embraced evill to be avoided and such like practicall principles ex terminis evidentia and all conclusions necessarily and immediatly flowing from the same And so Morall saith b Non omnia decalogi praecepta sunt de lege naturae strictè acceptà lib. 3. sent dist 37. q. 1. art 2. con 1. Duo praecepta negativa primae tabulae sunt de lege naturae propriè â—b con 2. Gab. Biel extends it selfe but only to two Commandements of the decalogue Thou shalt have no other Gods but me and Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine For it being a naturall principle nay c Quod Deus fit est primum principium complexorum Bradvv de causâ Dei lib. 1. cap. 12. the first and ground of all the rest that there is a God those practicall conclusions are known of themselves without farther teaching Lawes thus Morall are utterly undispensable even by God himselfe who cannot deny himselfe Secondly some of these rules and directions of manners are not so obvious and manifest of themselves yet such as every vulgar and mean capacity may easily find out even by the light of nature as that parents are to be honoured that God is publikely to be worshipped with d Secundae tabulae praecepta sunt de lege naturae non strictè sed largè accepta Biel ib. con 3. the precepts of the second table These are not so plaine and evident as the two former and therefore men doe the more easily erre in them as we see by the practice both of heathens and of the ignorant Christians These may in particular cases be dispensed with e Non rapiebant alienum quia Deus erat superior verus Dominus omnium bonorum Aegypti totius univer sitatis ita poterit transferre Dominium infilios Israel Biel. ib. Dub. 4. by changing the nature of the things about which they are conversant as hath already been shewed Thirdly some of the rules of right reason directing mens actions are yet more dark and obscure then the former and therefore are known only to wise men or by revelation Such are all good positive lawes superadded to those of the decalogue either by God or man and may be stiled Responsa prudentum the answers of the wise In this last and largest construction of Morall all the Holy rites prescribed by Moses being appendices to the fourth commandement and all the Iudicials appendices to the severall precepts of the first and second table may be termed Morall The question therefore is not of this kind of Morality but of the two former only viz. Whether the law of the Sabbath be either a principle in nature known and evident of it selfe or at least such as every man that hath the use of pure naturall reason may without revelation easily find out For that it is under positive precept in the fourth Commandement was never doubted We must in the next place understand how we speak of the fourth commandement in this question whether of the whole and every part thereof or of one or more parts and clauses And first there are that say that according to the law of God and rules of right reason there ought not to be in the time of the Gospell any distinction of daies as being directly contrary to Christian liberty So our Anabaptists Perfestists Libertines On the other side there are that affirme every letter and Syllable therein to be Morall as the lews and such Christians as in this particular doe Iudaize expresly as the Familists and others together with our rigid Sabbatharians who although they stand not for that very day of which the commandement speaketh the seventh from the creation as the others yet keep the Lords day as being a seventh intended also in the commandement and to be observed in all things according to the sound of the letter by all men in all ages which is no better then implicit Iudaisme And herein they stand for ought I know alone unlesse they will claime kindred of the ancient Hereticks the Ebionites There are others in the third place that affirme the fourth commandement to be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall And this is the most generall voice of Divines ancient and moderne Protestants Papists Lutherans Calvinists except those before named But this their agreement is not without great disagreement some affirming in one sence some in another some of more some of fewer branches of the commandement Many in the Popish Schoole with some Protestants especially Lutherans put morality in two clauses the first is Remember thou keep holy the resting day where a day is commanded say g Morale est sanctificare unum è septem Baldvv c. de Sab. casu 2. Manet hoc morale esse nimirum aliquod tempus vel diem aliquem singulis septimanis ad exercitia divina peragenda tribuendum Conradus Dietericus dom 17. post Trin. Morale est quod sacra requies die septimo non determinatè hoc vel illo sed uno è septem piè observanda est Thum. in expl d ee they in generall They second is the seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God wherein say they the former generality is restrained and determined to be one of seven But k Evanescant nugae pseudoprophetarum qui Iudaic â opinione populum superioribus saeculis imbuerunt nihil aliud asserentes nisi abrogatum esse quod caeremoniale erat in hoc mandato id vocant su â linguâ septimae diei taxationem remanere vero quod morale est nempe unius diei observationem in hebdomade Calv. instit lib. 2. c. 8. Calvin and all those that insist in his steps flye from this as from false doctrine and Iudaisme I meane this latter assertion for they joyne with them in the former and acknowledge a morality for a set day but say they the determination to one in seven or five or ten c. is wholy arbitrary and in the power of the Church to prescribe And herein Calvin hath the voices of many both Papists and Lutherans One thing more must be added that when Divines put morality in the first clause Remember thou keep holy the resting day those words may undergoe a twofold consideration for they may be taken Either formally as they lye in the commandement and thus considered they are not Morall because they speak of that particular Sabbath given unto the Iewes even the
others or if any doe few I presume will believe him therein Secondly if the Christian Holyday were to consist of a certaine determinate number of houres either the new Testament which alone speaks of this day or the Church of Christ who alone observes it would have directed us where to begin those houres and where to end them For the Iewes were expresly so directed but neither the new Testament nor the Church of Christ hath given any such directions If any say we need no such new information in this point having already the same which the Iewes had in the fourth Commandement we shall I hope give him satisfaction in the answere to the first Argument of the precedent chapter which it doth concerne Thirdly if a Lords night be to be sanctifyed as well as the day this night and all the parts thereof must differ from other nights by some speciall appropriation to the Lord as the day differs from other daies But how can this be unlesse we rest not at all that night in our beds or serve God by dreames and visions Which to affirme were notoriously absurd Ob. If any man demand how did the Iewes then keep their Sabbath from evening to evening Sol. I answere that the reason is not the same for the very corporall rest of the Iewes was simply and of it selfe a Sabbath daies duty so that it was as unlawfull for them not to Rest in their beds that night as to work about their callings that day which I think no man will affirme of Christians under the Gospell Fourthly there is no morall law in nature nor positive law in Scripture but is in it selfe possible to all men in all parts of the world in regard of the thing commanded But a naturall day-Sabbath as it is made to consist of a day and a night is absolutely impossible for some men in some parts of the world in regard of the thing commanded in some parts there being nothing but day and in other places nothing but night for a long space together This is so apparent as needs no proofe Therefore c. Ob. It is objected that the Iewes also by this rule might have been as we say perplext had they at any time travailed towards either of the Poles Vnto which I answere Sol. First that the Iewes were in a manner confined unto the land of Canaan except in cases of necessity for the blessing and promise was annexed thereunto being therefore stiled the Lords Land Commerce indeed they had with other nations which proved their ruin but for any voyages they made or Colonies they deduced we read none Solomon it is true sent a navy unto Ophyr which is Peru as most conceive or as Iosephus some place in the East Indies Iehosaphat attempted the like but his ships were broken at Ezion Geber 1. Kings 22 48. For though Solomons navy found prosperous successe intending therein the glory of Gods house yet Iehosaphat having no such warrantable grounds failed in his expectation Some think that the Iewes travelled and tâ—â—ded into that part of the Indies which at this day we call New-England for there they finde a harbour which the natives call Nahum-Keik the harbour of him that comforts or of him that repents It 's usuall in this language to have contrary significations But let it be granted that they meet with some Hebrew words in that tongue what nation is there in whose language you may not make the like observation Say also that the Iewes travailed into the East and west Indies for Gold and Spices I think it easy to shew that those parts of the world in which are either continuall day or night were not known untill after Christ and the destruction of Hierusalem In a word had the Iewes at any time travailed into such places where they could not have kept their Sabbath from evening to evening it had been sinne unto them For when a man shall by any voluntary action of his own cast himselfe into an utter impossibility of fulfilling any positive precept of the law of God it becomes evill unto him though otherwise it be both lawfull and commendable The case therefore is not the same with the Iewes and us in this point they being precisely bound both to places and houses from both which Christ hath set us free The objection is of no weight Fiftly to make the night part of the Lords day to be observed by the Church of Christ is contrary to the ground of the institution thereof which is the Resurrection of Christ For Christ rose not in the night but early in the morning and being risen his Resurrection hath no night But how can the night remember us of that which hath no night If we keep the night before we solemnize not Christs resurrection for he was not as yet risen if the night after we seeme to be enemies of his resurrection as if the Sunne of righteousnesse were set the second time whereas r Rom. 6 9. Christ being risen dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him If any man say he keepeth not the night as a part of the Lords day the memoriall of Christ Resurrection but as a part of his Sabbath in the fourth Commandement He seemeth expresly to forsake Christ and to cleave to Moses and being weary of being a Christian defires to turne Iew. Sixtly A night Sabbath is contrary to the end of the Institution under the Gospell which was Gods publique worship in the congregation for other use thereof we find not in holy Scripture If any man object collections to be made for the poore private prayers and christian exercises c. we shall God willing speak thereof also in its place But night assemblies for the publique worship except in time of persecution are contrary to the Apostles Rule * 1. Cor. 14.40 let all things be done decently and in order Experience in former ages hath made it manifest what abuses were practised under such pretences Ob. If any man say that the publique was appointed for the day and the private for the night Sol. First there is no such rule in Scripture Secondly the Church hath no such custome Thirdly private night-conventicles are as little nay farre lesse to be trusted then publique meetings in the night Lastly the practice of the primitive Church was utterly without any set number of houres and there was much variety in their observation sometime they began their publique worship on Saturday after supper as in Syria and Aegypt Some-time they began their Lords day about the s Tempus publici conventûs fuit Anteluâ—anum Con. Antis cap. 11. dawning the time as they conceived of Christs Resurrection others also began upon satturday noon and held on untill Sunday morning At this day our Sabbatharians are devided in this point some affirming from evening to evening others from morning to morning others from midnight to midnight so that their position of a twenty-foure houres Sabbath
which I answere that such outward worship in publique coÌ„gregations should not have been required in that state of innocency for then the whole world should have been but one temple and all men therein but one Congregation as the glorified Saints make but one Quire whose antheme is day and night Praise Honour Glory and Power be to him that sitteth on the throne Wee may well conceive that if Adam had not fallen our estate should have been much like though much inferiour to the Saints in glory I know that b Aquin. pare 1. q. 44. art 31. Schoolemen commonly teach that Adam in the state of innocency should have beene a priest a Prophet and a King having to this purpose a personall kind of knowledge imparted unto him enabling him to be the head and teacher of all mankind But this being grounded upon a false principle viz That his originall righteousnesse of which his knowledge was a part was a supernaturall endowment superadded to the estate of pure naturalls must needs be a consequent like the antecedent out of which it is deduced Order then should have been in that estate for so there is amongst the Angels but no division of men into pastorall charges and congregations which neither are amongst the Angels nor shall be hereafter amongst the glorified Saints The precept therefore of the Sabbath to be observed by Adam in Paradise was in all respects superfluous Ergo. Secondly it is generally affirmed by c In principle mundi ipsi Adae Evae legem dedit ne defructu arboris plantatae in medio paradisi ederent quae lex iâ— sufficeret se esset custodita Tert. ad Iud. Divines ancient and moderne that Adam in the estate of innocency had but one positive law imposed upon him even that of the forbidden fruit neither doe we read of more in Scripture And this we commonly say with d Hoc tam leve preceptum ad observandum tam breve ad memoriâ retinenduÌ„ tanto 〈◊〉 inju titiâ violatum est quanto saciliori possit obser vantia custodiri Aug. â—e Câ—vâ—t l. 14. c. 15. S. Augustine made his disobedience the greater God requiring no more at his hands but if Adam had a commandement to observe the Sabbath God gave him more positive Lawes then one Ergo. If any man say he needed no positive law for the Sabbath being bound thereunto by the light of nature for nature teacheth men to keepe holy unto God those daies upon which they have received greatest mercies for this guided even the Heathens to their holydaies Answere I answere indeed that nature teacheth men thankfully to acknowledge Gods mercies but how and in what manner it must be done or that the same day must be kept holy upon which we receive them nature teacheth not For by this reason Adam should have kept the sixt day for in it he received from the hands of God an helper meet for him in it he and his wife received a blessing upon their Creation and full power and dominion over all creatures being thereby enstalled the happy Princes of the whole world Object If any say that though God did all this for them on the sixt day yet he had not given the operative power of propagation to the whole creation till the seventh day and without this their former day was nothing worth Answere I answere that indeed a In hoc discordat nostra translatio ab alia quam augustinus exponit nostrâ enim translatione consummatio operum oscribitur diei septimo in alia diei sexto utâ—â— autem veritatemâ—â—here potest distinguenda est rei duplex perfectio c. super sent l. 2. c. â— 15. 9 3. Aquinas both in his summes and upon the sentences affirmeth as much There is saith he a two-fold perfection the one wherein things receive their perfect being this all things had upon the sixt day the other which regardeth not the being but only the operation of things in being this was bestowed on creatures the seventh day for then God resting from giving being unto things began to set nature to the worke of propagation but any man may see First that this is only said without any ground Secondly that he was forced thereunto by labouring to reconcile the vulgar translation with that of Saint Austin the one reading in the seventh day the other in the sixt day God ended his worke Gen. 2.2 But what a small fly this is to choak so great a Camel will soone appeare for the text meaneth not that God did any thing upon the seventh day as Aquinas conceived but that b Inde ab hoc die destitit ab omni opificio Trem. in iâ—cum when the seventh day was come all things were finished nothing being defective either in regard of the first or second perfections of which the distinction speaketh Adam therefore had all things perfected and so delivered into his hands on the sixt day And c Hoc loco non dicit Deus rebus ipsis benedixisse sed diei Est 2. Dist 15. art 9. one observes rightly that the text saith God blessed the day not the creatures so that if it were true that nature binds us to keepe those very daies on which we have received mercies Adam was obliged to the Friday which I thinke no man will presume to affirme Thirdly whatsoever was commanded Adam in paradise was universally commanded unto all mankind in all their generations for we were all in Adam neither had our first parents any personall or temporary precept but the Law of the seventh-day Sabbath is of no such universall extent neither is it still in force The first appears because the d So Moses The Lord hath given you the Sabbath Exod. 16.29 So Nehemiah thou madest knowne unto them thy holy Sabbath by the hand of Moses thy servant Neb. 9.14 So Ezek. 20.12 reckoning up Gods favours to that nation saith moreover I gave them also my Sabbaths Scriptures doe ever appropriate the Sabbath as a peculiar rite prescribed the Iewes The second is also manifest for we observe not at this day that Sabbath which is said to have been given Adam which we must have done had it been commanded in paradise unlesse we could shew expresse precepts given to Adam to the contrary but such a countermaine certaine it is Adam never received Fourthly that which is eyther naturall or commanded in Paradise before the fall was not to be abrogated by Christ in the fulnesse of time the reason hereof is because that fulnesse of time wherein Christ came and did all things appertaining to the Messias is to be reckoned from the promise of the seed which was not made till after the fall that therefore which preceeded this promise appertained not to the Messias either to establish or abolish but the observation of that Sabbath which is pretended to have been commanded Adam in paradise is abrogated by Christ as he is the Messias even that day on
revelation From hence to clude that therefore God appointed them the Sabbath is no good consequent for God appoints men many duties but prescribeth no certaine time of performance For time is no part of the worship but an accident and adjunct thereof left for the most part to discretion and opportunity I hope that no man will deny but that God is publikely worshipped amongst us upon Holy-daies Wednesdaies and Frydaies and yet God never sets us thosetimes From the worship thereof to inferre the time is no good deduction But let all be granted that God both prescribed worship and time the Sabbath at most is but a positive precept as the sacrifices also were no morall duty which is the thing aimed at in this question and shall be handled in that which followeth Lastly the testimonies of the learned are not and as I conceive cannot be very many and those that are may easily be reconciled To begin with Philo the very addition which is given him that he is a Iew is sufficient exception against his testimony And so for M. Broughton it may be reputed a part of his Rabbinicall learning to which he was so much addicted M. Calvin is not constant to himselfe in this point for in his book of a Perpetuam islam cessationem Iudaeis repraesentahat unius diei ex septem observatio Cal. inst l. 2. c. 8. Institutions he plainely speaks thereof as given to the Iews by Moses b Videtur Deus per diem septimum populo suo delineâsse futurū sui Sabbathi in ultimo die perfectionem Ibid. not by God to Adam Catharinus and Alcuinus are held but Innovators amongst the Schoolemen in this point and are generally forsaken of all their followes Lastly that of Zanchius is but a fancy of his own and that also far fetched and thus much of the first question CAP. V. The second question is proposed whether the letter of the fourth Commandement be a morall precept A Law being once enacted we take into consideration the binding power thereof for all lawes doe naturally bind all such upon whom they are imposed untill it doth appeare that they be repealed Hence though Critickes say lex à legendo yet Divines take up another Etymology lex à ligādo it s therefore a law because it doth oblige But all Lawes being not of the same kind doe not bind after the same manner neither as they are lawes nor as they are intended by the lawgivers This is most true not only of humane lawes whose authors are men but of such also as proceed immediatly from God himselfe For there be some lawes of his which oblige all people nations and languages upon the face of the whole earth even every son of Adam Others of them are prescribed either to particular persons or some one people nation only some of them also are of perpetuall and everlasting continuance never to be revoked others were ordained only for a certaine period of time Lawes of the first kind are properly stiled morall which are in both the forenamed respects universall the dictates of nature and included in the divine essence which is not subject to any shadow of change Lawes of the latter kind are all the ceremoniall and judiciall ordinances The second question therefore is whether the fourth commandement of the Decalogue be a morall law binding all men throughout all ages to the end of the world or whether it were given only to the Israelites till the fulnesse of time and exhibiting of the Messiah The affirmative seems to some men as cleer as the day it selfe and to be a point of that high consequence in religion as that we ought rather to suffer as Martyrs then to quit this truth We will therefore muster up all such arguments as make to this purpose CHAP. VI. The arguments for the affirmative are propounded and enforced ANd first it is alleadged that all the commandements of the Decalogue are morall being parts and branches of the law of nature But the fourth commandement is one of these placed in the very heart of the rest spoken by Gods owne mouth written by Gods own finger and that in tables of stone to teach us their perpetuity laid up with the rest in the Arke therefore the fourth commandement must needs be morall Secondly if this be not morall as well as any of the rest not only Moses but God himselfe who placed it so might seeme purposely to confound things of different natures intending as it were to breed distractions in the Church as we see at this day But this is no way to be imagined for God is the author of peace and not confusion therefore doubtlesse the fourth commandement is equally morall with all the rest Thirdly that which is naturally written upon the hearts of the very heathen themselves must needs be morall but the whole fourth commandement is thus naturally written Ergo. First the Sabbath must be the seventh day for this number was ever reputed the number of perfection and the holy number not only a Cyprian de Spiritu S. S. Cyprian so cals it but Homer also Hesiod and Callimachus Secondly the whole day was spent even by heathens after an holy manner in publique worship and private contemplation Thirdly they also observed their Sabbaths with severe strictnesse from all manner of works Their Idolatrous Priests affirmed that the holy daies were polluted if any work were done in them By all which it is plaine that the very Heathen observed the Sabbath not by revelation for this they never had but by the very light of nature therefore c. Fourthly that commandement is moral which hath all the characters of morality As first that it appertaines to all nations in all ages Secondly that the more understanding amongst the Heathen approved and taught it Thirdly that it may be discerned by reason rightly informed Fourthly that it containes something which is necessary to humane nature to attaine its end and finall happinesse Fiftly that it is such as if it were observed with the rest would make the conversation of man compleat without the addition of any other law but all these markes of morality are to be seen in the fourth commandement The two first are apparent by the precedent argument for it was ever observed approved and taught by Heathens in all ages The third is a necessary consequent of the former for if the Heathens observed it this their observation must needs proceed from reason rightly informed The fourth no man can be so wicked as to deny for if any thing be necessary to bring men unto everlasting happinesse it is the observation of the Sabbath The last also is evident for if all the rest of the Decalogue together with this were observed what need we any other lawes either of God or man Ergo. Fiftly that commandement is morall whose reasons are morall but such are the reasons in the fourth commandement As the first which is taken from the equity
the motions of sinne are set on work by the law Besides if the rule given were a certaine Maxim then on the contrary that law against which humane corruptions doe least rise which without question are the Commandements of the first table should be least Morall which I think no man will affirme But to passe by this I would gladly know against what in the Sabbath mans corruptions be so rebellious I doubt not but you will say against the strict and holy observation thereof but the manner how the law bids is one thing and the manner how the day is to be observed is another of which we shall also speak in due place To the ninth taken from experience in forraine parts in the first place I answere that the reformed Churches of God beyond the seas are much beholding unto you for branding them with laying religion on the back setting up Atheisme and Epicureisme And I believe many of this judgement are as free from those evils as any Sabbatharian in the world But strange it is that some men cannot vent their novell fancies unlesse like new wine they break the old bottles of love Perhaps you will say men will take liberty to be prophane when all tye of conscience is taken off as when the Morality of this law is denied But we must know that the conscience is not let loose as is supposed but only bound in another way as we shall see hereafter It hath ever been the custome of all sorts of people thus to palliate their errours under the titles of holinesse To the tenth the Homily is very briefe in this point the Summa totalis is this First that although God be at all times to be glorified for his mercies yet his pleasure is there should be set time for this purpose Secondly that this Commandement given in the Decalogue doth not bind us Christians as it did the Iewes Thirdly that whatsoever is found in the Commandement appertaining to the Law of Nature as a thing needfull to the setting forth of Gods glory ought to be received of all men Lastly that the set time of Gods publique worship ought to be on one day of seven This indeed which is last seemes to be something but seemes only for it must receive construction according to the foundation on which the Homily buildeth viz. that nothing herein is Morall but what appertaineth to the law of nature Seeing therefore that this particular cannot be deduced out of the Law of nature the Homily never intended it for Morall Ob. It will be said that then the Homily doth contradict it selfe for if nothing but what is naturall must be retained and one in seven be not naturall how can the Homily affirme that one in seven must for ever be observed and that by the will and commandement of God himselfe Sol But for answere hereunto first let it be considered that the Homily speaks by way of exhortation ad populum and in treatises of this nature every passage is not rigorously to be pressed for advantage in disputation This favour must be yeelded to all the popular tractates of the ancient Fathers else many things may well be quarelled at in them Secondly let the passage it selfe be well construed and the Homily clears it selfe for it saies indeed that Gods commandement was so to the Iewes but the Christians have followed this example voluntarily and of their own choice and if of their own choice then doubtlesse not by any necessity of Morall precept To the eleventh what if the Church retaine and read this amongst the Moralls Doth she not also appoint by her Liturgy Leviticus and Deuteronomy to be read amongst other parts of Scripture Or doe we thinke with the Maniches that the old Testament is not the word of God or with the Anabaptists that it appertaines not unto vs. We retain and read the Ceremoniall law in our congregations not so much for the Ceremonâ—es themselves which are vanished away as for those eternall truths of which they were shadowes And as we retain and read them so we also pray unto God for his mercy and grace that wee may fulfill and practise them so farre forth as they doe concerne us There be therefore two things which we aske in that short petition following the commandement First that our hearts may be graciously inclined to sanctify all such times as are set apart for Gods publique worship Secondly that as long as we live here in the vale of misery and sinne we may be enabled by his grace to keep a perpetuall spirituall Sabbath in righteousnes and holines and peace of conscience all our daies To the twelfth this takes deep impression amongst the vulgar who have been taught their ten Commandemens perhaps for their prayers from their cradles and therefore stand for this tanquam pro aris focis But in one word to give them satisfaction the argument is denied for there are and ever will be ten Morals though the letter of the fourth be Ceremoniall That God must have his set and appointed Sabbaths which is the essence life spirit of that Commandement is for ever Morall though the circumstances expressed in the text be Ceremoniall And this is no novell assertion but the common doctrine of all antiquity And therefore a S. Chrys Hom. 40. in Math. S. Chrysostome speaking of this commandement insteed of Remember to keep holy the seventh day reads remember to keep a spirituall Sabbath And b Aug. in Exod lib. 20. cap. 172. S. Augustine expresly saith that the nine rest as they are literally set downe are doubtlesse to be observed in the new Testament but that one of the Sabbath was given under the vaile of Moses and mystically commanded His reason is out of the text when Moses saith he returned from God out of the mount and had received from him the patterne of the Tabernacle and all holy things he speaks to the people only of the Sabbaths observation by which it appears that this was given only as the head of the Ceremonials c Alia quippâ— nona sicut praecepta sunt in novo testamento observanda minimè dubitamus illud autem unum de Sabbatho adeo iâ— Mysterio praeceptum fuit ut hodiè à nobis non observetur sed solum quod significabat intuemur Inter omnia illa decem praecepta solum id quod de Sabbatho positum est figuratè observandum praecipitur Aug. ad Ian ep 119. In istis decem praeceptis exceptâ Sabbathi observatione dâ—catur mihi quid non sit observandum à Christiano Aug. de spirit lit c. 14. The same Father disputing in another place how the Commandements of the Decalogue were a killing letter as well as the Ceremonies makes frequent distinction between this one of the Sabbath and the rest affirming that not only this but those nine also were a killing letter So that St Chrysostome and St Augustine acknowledged ten commandements Morall but with our
nothing more then when they come to specificate their tenent and shew how it is divine Sure it is that whatsoever is of divine ordination must be so either from God the Father in the law of nature or some positive precept of the old Testament Or from God the Sonne in some precept of the Gospell or from God the holy Ghost inspiring the Apostles * Iohn 16.13 leading them according to the promise of Christ into all truth Some therefore affirme a divine institution of the Lords day from God the Father grounding themselves upon the morality of the letter of the fourth commandement But this savouring too much of Iudaisme and the commandement speaking precisely of another day is generally exploded Others therefore pretend an institution from God the Sonne by Evangelicall law but being required to shew some word of Christs establishing this observation faile in their proof and are taken upon a Nihil dicit The third opinion therefore is now become most universall viz. That it is an institution from God the holy Ghost in and by the Apostles And this tenent is wisely taken up it being such a hiding place out of which men cannot so easily be drawn as out of the former especially considering that they extend to this purpose Apostolicall inspirations to the uttermost latitude for they were inspired say they what and how to teach the Church in all things And these inspirations whensoever they became notified to the Church were and are to be esteemed divine institution whether written or not written in Scriptures wherein they seeme to imitate young Respondents in Philosophy who use to shelter themselves under the secret qualities of naturall things which they know their Opponents cannot easily discover Or rather they are glad to plow with a Popish Heifar Tradition of which a Sacra nostrorum anchora est ubi nulla suppetat nostrarum falsitatum probatio Spal 2. de repub c. 11 ◠51. Spalatensis saith It is the very sacred anchor on which our men rely when they know not how otherwise to defend their falsehoods and against which themselves also have made ample invectives For the better clearing therefore of this point it is necessary something be said First of Apostolicall inspirations Secondly of Apostolicall traditions Concerning the first the Apostles we all know sustain'd a threefold person For we may consider them either as Apostles by extraordinary mission sent to plant the Gospell or as ordinary Pastors to govern the Churches already planted or thirdly as private persons As Apostles they were infallibly inspired with all truths upon all occasions which might plant the kingdome of Christ and bring men unto the obedience of the faith the end of their mission being to beare abroad Christs name Acts 9.15 To this purpose they were also furnish't with the gifts of Tongues Miracles Healings Discerning of Spirits being immediatly directed by the holy Ghost As Pastors they had a twofold worke First to perform the duties of the man of God exhorting reproving correcting instructing in righteousnesse Secondly as Elders to rule well erecting such goverment in their planted Churches as might best sort with the times and states in which they lived Thus considered no doubt but they were also inspired but not in like manner nor measure as before For their inspirations as pastors were only such irradiations influences and concurrences of the Spirit as are afforded at this day to the Pastors of the Church unlesse by some personall miscarriages they procure unto themselves spirituall derelictions Thus the spirit is at this day present in all Ecclesiasticall Synods nay even with private ministers using the right meanes in their places even in their privat labours For the promise of Christ reacheth also unto them and he is present with them unto the end of the world Where notwithstanding we must remember that as all dictates of Ecclesiasticall Synods or dictates of private Pastors are not to be esteemed divine precepts because they are subject to error as daily experience makes it manifest even in such persons and assemblies as are most regular nay when their resolutions are most conformable to the word of God yet they are not divine ordinances So it must be conceived of the Apostles considered as the Churches Pastors without any impeachment at all to their Apostolicall dignitie We know that even the Apostles considered as Pastours were subject to mistake as appeares by b Gal. 3.11 St Peter who living at Antioch as a Pastour was iustly reproued by S. Paul how ever c Hoc excedit modum fraternae correptionis quae Praelatis à subditis debetur Aquin. in 4. sent dist 19. art 2. Stap. de Doct. princip c. 14. Stapleton and Aquinas gloze it for not walking as behoved a Pastor or Minister of the Gospell And in another place Paul and Barnabas consulting the Churches Pastors in what manner and with what company they should set about the worke of the Ministry dissented from one another and d Acts 15.39 that in such heat as it makes it apparent they were not both if either directed by the Spirit but as God by his providence overruleth affections bringing by them his owne purposes to passe Nay plaine also it is that although as they were Apostles they delivered nothing but what they had received yet as Pastors and governours of particular Churches they delivered some things of themselves not as dictates of Gods spirit So e 1. Cor. 7.6 V. 12. V. 25. V. 40. S. Paul I speake this by permission not of commandement to the rest speak I and not the Lord and I haue no commandement of the Lord and I giue my iudgment and againe after my iudgment Neither is f Non est consilium divini-spiritus sed pro eius maie state praeceptum Tert. Exhor ad Castit Tertullians glosse to be regarded for he was now infected with Montanisme when out of that Scripture to condemne all second Mariages as unlawfull he saith it is no advise but a binding precept for the Apostle speaks of himselfe and his owne judgment as contradistinct unto the Lord and the spirits revelation Ob. If any man say why then doth he adde that * V. 25. he hath obtayned mercy of the Lord to be faithfull and againe * V. 40. I thinke also that I haue the spirit of God Resp g Haec non absque Ironiâ dicta qua Pseudo-Apostolos taxat qui Paulum traducebant quasi alienus à spiritu Christi esset indignus qui coeteris Apostolis annumeretur Martyr in locu◠Peter Martyr will giue him satisfaction saying it was to adde the more weight and authority to his words in opposition to the false Apostles who were crept into the Church of Corinth and undervalved S. Pauls judgment But observe whether S. Paul to vindicate his reputation against them saith more or as much as some of our adversaries say of themselves upon all occasions when their dictates come to be
the Lords day by servile works hath beene ever thus blasted whether done about sun-rising that day and being a matter of no great importance or after evening prayer in the afternoone to take away all evasions from the circumstance of time Of this there hath beene much and lamentable experience ever since the Kings Declaration he being confuted as it were herein by the King of Kings Ninthly The consent of the whole Church ever since Constantines time as appeares by the Edicts of that Emperour with sundry Synodicall constitutions in all ages many wholsome statutes made to this purpose in all parts of the Christian world The Fathers also haue been large in the same argument utterly condemning even those speeches and conferences which withdraw our mindes from the serious meditation of what we haue heard in the congregation a Chrys Ho◠5. c. 1. Math. S. Chrysostome hath much to this purpose which he doth also illustrate by two familiar similitudes The one of men that goe into the hot Bathes for their health as soone as they come out they retire themselues to rest and sweat in their beds least by going abroad about their businesse they depriue themselues of the benefit of their bathing The Lords day is as it were the day of the soules spirituall bathing in the living and wholsome waters of the word of God and the blood of Christ. This day therefore should be a most retired day wherein we should be secluded frō all earthly things least we depriue our selues of the wholsome profit thereof The second is of Scholars at Schoole when they haue their tasks sett them they labour and beat upon it the whole day and all is little enough Vpon the Lords day we sitt at Christ feet in his Schoole to be taught from his mouth What we haue heard from him in the Congregation must be our worke the whole day after unlesse we affect to be like broken vessels which receiue much but retaine little S. b Aug. in Ps 32. Augustine also bitterly inveighs against sports and pastimes upon this day and by name against Dancing saying a man were better upon the Lords day goe to plough By which it seems he condemnes all kinde of works and recreations concuring with that c Oportet Christianos in laude Dei gratiarum actione usque ad vesperam perseverare Syn. Tur. c. 4. Synod held at Tours in France which faith that Christians ought upon the same day to persevere in the praises of God and in giving of thanks untill the night To which purpose runnes the unanimous consent of all those worthies in the Church of England which haue treated on this subject almost since the Reformation CAP. XXIII The Arguments for the Negative are also related THE Negatiue also is supported by sundry reasons First that which is not under any Law Naturall or Positiue can be no essentiall duty unto which the conscience is bound under the penalty of sinne for where there is no Law there can be no Transgression But cessation from work upon the Lords day is under no Law Naturall or Positiue not naturall for it is neither a principle in nature knowne unto all men nor any conclusion to be deriv'd from any naturall principle I meane such a totall cessation as is here questioned For that men should haue times of rest and refreshing is naturall that God should haue part of our time sequestred for his worship is also naturall but neither the question nor arguments produced intend this naturall rest but an artisiciall kinde of cessation which our Sabbatharians haue fancied unto themselues and cannot be knowne unto us unlesse by Revelation Neither is it under any positiue precept for then it might be shewed in some Evangelicall writer and we need not fly to the Law and the Prophets of the old Testament to which satisfaction will soone be given Secondly Nothing commanded the Iew as a Ceremonie under Moses is or can be an essentiall duty of Religion unto the Christians in the time of the Gospell And the reason is plaine for the ceremoniall law was the application of things in their own natures indifferent to mysticall and holy uses and otherwise there could be no distinction between Morall Ceremoniall But that utter and totall cessation from works here spoken of was a ceremony commanded the Iew under Moses hath already been manifested Therefore c. Thirdly That which is not in it's selfe in its own nature an act of Religion cannot be in its selfe and its own nature a universall Christian duty binding all men under the penalty of sinne But an utter cessation from bodily labour upon the Lords day is not in its selfe and its own nature an act of Religion for then it must be some part of Gods worship inward or outward wherewith if rightly performed God is well pleased But God saith M. Calvin is not taken with any bodily rest and cessation of his creatures precisely and of it selfe considered upon what day soever which I think all men of sober mindes will acknowledge it cannot therefore be of it selfe a Christian duty upon the Lords day If any man say it is a part of Gods worship being an ordinance commanded by him Let him shew us any such command for the Christian festivall and I will subscribe Fourthly that which of it selfe doth no way further our spirituall edification in Christ is not a Christian duty binding the conscience upon any day But corporall rest from the works of our lawfull callings doth no way further our spirituall edification For if * 2. Tim. 4.8 Bodily exercise profiteth nothing bodily cessation profiteth lesse If any man say it helpeth much to Edification for by this meanes we may wholy attend the things of God I answer that is not the thing in question for then it edifieth not by and of it selfe but by and through the holy exercises If it be further said that it doth edifie remembring us of our spirituall rest required of us and the eternall rest promised unto us I answer that this Edification proceedeth not from the d Significatio alia est divina seu à Deo rebus addita a◠ob signationem cultum ut significatio Sacramentorum alia humana ecclesiastica hominū instituto rebus addita utsit occasio memorandi rem gestam illa est necessaria haec libera significatio dominicae est humanitūs Parae in Ro. 14. thing it selfe but as affix't thereunto by our own inventions and institutions And so the Surplice the Crosse standing at the Creed all Church Ceremonies doe edifie which yet of themselues are not Christian duties Fiftly if Christian liberty extend it selfe to things of greater consequence carrying with them far greater shew of divine command then doubtlesse we are much more free in things of lesse importance But we are left free under the Gospell to many things of greater weight as Vowing Fasting Preaching Catechizing receiving the Sacraments Confession
Iewes resting from their servile worke to sanctify the seventh day S. g Illud unum de Sabbato usque adeo figuratà diei septimi observatione apud Israelitas velatum fuit in mysterio praeceptum fuit quodam Sacramento figurabatur ut hodie a nobis non observetur dug quest sup Exod. l. 2. q. 172. Austin affirmeth the Sabbath to be a part of the vaile of Moses h Pro die sexto in Hebraeo diem septimum habet arctabimus igitur Iudaeos qui de otio Sabbathi gloriantur quod iam tunc in principio Sabbathum dissolutum sit Hieron tradit Heb in Gen. S. Hierome observing the Hebrew text to bee in the seventh day God ended his worke inferres that therefore the Iewes had little reason to glory in their Sabbath rest because God himselfe did not rest that day I commend neither his antecedent nor his consequent but by this it appears that in his opinion there was no Sabbath commanded or observed in Paradise And more expresly in c. 20. i Haec praecepta iustificationes observantiam Sabbathi dedit dominus in deserto Hieron in cap. 20. Ezek. Ezek. Adde to these k Neque cerre ulla corporis circumcisio illis fuit quia neque nob is est neque Sabbathorum observation quia neque neâ—is est Euseb lib. 1. c. 4. Eusebius in his ecclesiasticall history and l Proinde videtur non temerè interpretibus scripturae diligentioribus praedicendo fortè dominum sanctificasse Sabbathum cum ab exordio rerum sanctificâsse legitur Bulling Praefat. de Sab. Feriâ—â— Bullinger affirming it to be the opinion of the most diligent and accurate expositours of holy scriptures of what sort soever And lastly whereas it is said that Zanchius thinkes that Adam kept holy the first seventh day in Paradise and had Christ in shape of a man to be his preacher I will oppose none other then Mr Perkins that Adam sinned and was cast out of Paradise the sixt day Adde hereunto those a Nehem. 13.8 Exod. 20.31 Ezek 20.12 places of scripture which speak of the Sabbath as given to the Iewes by Moses as a part of his Leviticall covenant with which how this other opinion can agree I understand not b Quod Moses diem septimum nominet quomodo Deut orhem is sex diebus creavit hic est temporarius ornatus quo hoc praeceptum populo suo ornat nam ante Mosen hoc non invenitur neque de Abraham c. Luth. To. 7. epist ad amic vid. Epiph haeres 8. Luther I am sure affirmes that when Moses naming the seventh day addeth that God rested the seventh day having made the world in sixe did it to set it out to the people to whom it was then commanded for before Moses no such observation is to be found either in Abhaham or any of the Patriarches Chap 3. Wherein is briefely declared what is to be thought of the present Question IN this question so hotly debated on both sides I never conceived it of any great consequence which way soever the ballance fell For though they that affirme the question thinke it to make much for the morality of one in seven yet all me know that c Evane scant nugae Pseudo prophetarum abroragatum esse quod ceremoniale erat in hoc mandato remanere veró quod morale est nempe unius diei observationem in hebaomade Calvin Instiâ— lib. 20. c. 8.33.34 Calvin who is their greatest enemy in this joynes with them in the other as well 〈◊〉 he may without coÌ„tradicting himselfe especially if we speake of Adam and the Patriarches after the fall Indeed had it been given our first Parents in Paradise and state of innocency as it must universally have bound all men so neither could it have been in any thing ceremoniall relating unto Christ to bee abolished by him as is alleaged in the third and fourth arguments and wee must still have kept that day on which God rested But if it were in practice only after the fall so were many other ceremonies Altars Sacrifices washings circumcision which yet are not therefore morall but only positive precepts and forerunners of the ceremoniall Law to be established in the hands of Moses Ob. If any man say there is not the same reason because the Law of the Sabbath was afterwards made one of the ten words written in the tables of stone which since it cannot be affirmed of Sacrifices Circumcision c. seemes to make a great difference Ans I answere that the Sabbath being in the Decalogue Sacrifices all other ceremonialls were there also for the Sabbath is there placed as the Summum genus and short epitome of the whole ceremoniall Law as d Ex hisduebus iocis Levit 19. Levit. 26 manisestum est Sabbatho annexum fuisse aultum taber naculi nec modo res fuisse coniunctas insolubili vinculo sedotium à laboribus debuisse reserri ad sacrificia Calvin in Exod. Calvin hath well observed and long before him S. e PostaquaÌ„ descendit Moses de monte opera â—ommendantur rabernaculi coÌ„struendi vestis sacerdotalis de quiâ—â—â—â— faciendis antequam aliud praeciperet locutus est adpopulum de Sabbahi observatione Aug. q. Exod. â—â— 2. q. 72. Austin To the question therefore the whole seemes to move upon two hinges matter of fact and matter of faith The matter of fact is what Adam did or should have done in the state of innocency but this and all such of like nature since Adam stood not are meere speculations knowne only to the Almighty by that part of his infinite wisdome whereby hee beholdeth all possibilities of things The matter of faith may bee thought to be the text of Scripture alleadged out of Genesis Which is not so for not the text but the interpretation is here only questioned how it is to bee understood for circumstance of time only in which case though sundry interpretations be brought none can be said to be de fide as long as all accord with the analogy of faith Vpon those words in the beginning God made Heaven and Earth S. Austin saith they may have a two fold interpretation f Video vere potuisse dict quicquid horum diceretur sed quid horum in his verbis 〈◊〉 cogitaverit non ita video Nemo mihiiam molestus sit dicendo mihi non hoc sentiâ— Moses quod tâ— dicis sed hoc sentit quod ego dico Aug. 1.12 Con. c. 24. 25. The first that God made all things visible and invisible in that perfect and glorious frame in which now they are The second that he made the rudiments of all things out of which they were in their severall orders extracted I see saith the Father both may be true but which only was in Moses mind when he wrote the Story I see not nay who is able so perfectly to know as to affirme this was it
sanctificatio una qua sanctificatum est a Deo altera qua praecipieâ—atur Israeli Sanctificatio Deiest quâ dics septimus statim initio est quieti deputatus consecratus sanctificatio Israelis est diem septimum â— Deo quieti sanctificatum pro sancto habere Mus praecept 4. Musculus that there is a twofold sanctification of the Sabbath For both God sanctified it and Israel sanctified it God sanctified the Sabbath when presently from the begining he deputed and consecrated the seventh day unto rest Israels sanctifying was the keeping holy that day which God had long before deputed to be kept According to this twofold sanctification there is a twofold respect of the word Remember For in the commandement they are bid to remember the ground of the seventh-daies destination to this holy use from the begining In that of Deuteronomy they are bid remember the immediat ground or reason of the actuall institution and observation of the day The word therefore Remember in the commandement hath not as is supposed primarily any reference either to the works of God or to the finishing of those works but secondarily inclusively only as being the occasion of Gods destinating the day to be in time to come the Churches Sabbath which they are primarily and immediatly commanded to remember And in that other place Remember hath respect unto their deliverance out of Egypt as being the primary and immediat reason of the Sabbaths institution actuall observation And indeed if wee will speake of things as they are wee shall finde that the Sabbath could not congruously have been instituted and observed untill this time of their deliverance For now God makes to himselfe a glorious Church which before lay hid in private families in the midst of Idolaters without Ceremony without sanctuary and therefore without Sabbath for Sabbath and Sanctuary are relatives in Moses a Levit. 19.30 Ye shall keepe my Sabbaths and reverence my Sanctuary No Sanctuary no Sabbath Now and not till now God hath a separated people unto himself and the Sabbath we know was given them as a pledge and seale of this separation Therefore the Prophet Speaking of the great favours of God to this people as distinguished from others saith b Ezek. 20.12 moreover I gave them my Sabbaths to be a signe betweene me and them that I am the Lord that sanctify them Where first the prophet speakes of them Emphatically he gave his Sabbaths to them and none but them to be a signe between him and them and none but them that he doth sanctify them and none but them and all this when he lifted up his hand unto them to deliver them Secondly he speaks of Sabbaths in the plurall number meaning all their three sorts of Sabbaths of daies months and yeares all which are made the signes and pledges of their separation That this is the common exposition of that place by all but himselfe is confessed by a Aliqui consent dici hic Sabbatha in plurali ut significet triplex Sabbathum primum dierum quod proprie dicebatur Sabbathum secundum mesium tertium annorum nam Sabbata haec o ania dedit Deus Iudaeis in signum salutis quietis danâ—â— per Christum Cor. Lap. Cornelius à Lapide the Iesuite as great an enemy to this destination as any other But if any list to be contentious herein declining this place as they doe that of the Colossians as if the prophet spake not of their weekly Sabbath but only of their other feasts the words of b Neh. 9.13.14 Nehemiah seeme to me as cleare as the noone-day saying thou madest knowne unto them thy holy sabbath the weekly sabbath and commandest them precepts and ordinances and lawes by the hand of Moses thy servant God we see made known now unto them not unto their fathers this weekly Sabbath by the hand of Moses his servant Ob. If any say it was now made known unto them only by way of remembrance reviving that old ordinance of his which had now been a long time intermitted by reason of their bondage in Egypt Sol. I answere that our Sabbatharians when it serves their purpose tell us that this law of the Sabbath and the practice thereof was ever on foot from the begining amongst the very heathen by the light of nature and that from hence the number of seven came to be so highly magnified amongst them if this be so it s in vaine to tell us now that the Sabbath was either forgotten or neglected especially in Egypt where all kind of knowledge at this time flourished how can that be revived which never perished Ob. You will perhaps reply to that place in Nehemiah that the whole morall law was given unto Israel by the hand of Moses in the wildernesse may we from hence conclude that therefore they never were in the world till then in precept or practice Sol. I answere that the text it selfe puts a remarkable difference between the other commandements of the decalogue and this of the Sabbath named there as the head of the Ceremonials and Iudicials For those words thou madst known unto them thy holy Sabbath and commandedst them precepts and ordinances and laws by the hand of Moses thy servant cannot in any congruity be understood of the morals which are immediatly engraven upon the conscience and I thinke are no where said to be made known by the hand of Moses But let this be granted yet let it be considered what he saith in the words immediatly going before Thou camest downe also upon mount Sinai and spakest unto them from heaven and gavest them right judgements and true lawes good statutes and commandements and then I conceive we may well conclude that when he addeth and thou madest knowen unto them thy holy Sabbath and commandedst them precepts and ordinances and lawes by the hand of Moses thy servant either he meaneth the same lawes spoken of immediatly before which were such a tautology as I think cannot be paraleld in Scripture or that the text apparently distinguisheth between the morals in the thirteenth and the ceremonials and Iudicialls of which the Sabbath was head in the fourteenth verse Ob. Fiftly it is objected that the words of the commandement in the twentieth of Exodus have expresse relation to the words of the story Genesis the second and that therefore the word Remember bids them look back to what God had appointed from the begining Now the words of the commandement speake not of any destination but of an institution therefore that also in Genesis must so be understood Answ I answere that since the booke of Genesis was written after the law was given as most of the learned acknowledge and were very easy to be demonstrated the contrary is most true that the words Gen. the second have relation to the words of Exodus the twentieth as being first written in the tables of stone and from thence transferred by the historian Neither doth the word
of the law giving men sixe for one for God ever was and ever will be alike liberall to all men in all ages in this kind The second drawn from Gods interest in the seventh day The Seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord and what sons of Adam are exempted from giving God his owne The third is Gods example proposed for our imitation for all men are bound by the very light of nature to be followers of God as deare children The fourth is the promise which is made therein For it will be as blessed a day or a day as full of blessing unto us if we sanctify it as ever it was to the Iews God being not lesse good nor his grace lesse powerfull nor his promise lesse sure The fift is the ease refreshing of our servants and beasts to whom Christians must not be lesse mercifull then the Iews Lastly the Sabbath taught them that they were the Lords people and no man will say but that we also are so by as many and by more strong tyes and relations then were ever any Ergo c. Sixtly the law Ceremoniall and Iudiciall were given only to the Iewes and such as were circumcised but the fourth commandement was directed not only to those within the covenant but also to strangers and aliens The strangers within thy gates And upon this ground a Neh. 13.16 Nehemiah reproved the Tyrian Merchants which were strangers therefore c. Seventhly from the words of Christ in the Gospell b Mat. 24.20 pray that your flight be not on the Sabbath day Those words were spoken to the disciples foreshewing that if their flight should happen to befall them on the Sabbath their affliction would thereby be increased But if the fourth commandement be not Morall what addition of sorrow had it been if their flight had befallen them that day Christians and such were the disciples need not trouble themselves about a law Ceremoniall Thus then That commandement the breaking whereof might justly grieve a Christian forced thereunto by flight is doubtlesse morall but the fourth commandement is such therefore c. Eightly that commandement against which humane corruptions doe especially arise and band themselves both in the Godly and the wicked must needs be morall but our corruptions doe chiefly fight against the Sabbath as the Godly feele by experience in themselves and experience doth also make evident in the wicked of the world therefore c. Ninthly that cannot be a truth of God which overthrowes all religion le ts in Atheisme Epicureisme and all prophanesse no good tree can bring forth such evill fruit But that doctrine which denieth the morality of the Sabbath overthroweth all religion le ts in Epicureisme and Prophanesse as appeares in those Churches wherein it is taught in forraine parts Ergo. Tenthly that wich the Church of England teacheth in her Homilies ought to be held for truth by all the obedient children of that Church but the morality of the Sabbath is that which the Church of England teacheth in her Homily of the time and place of prayer as will appeare to every one that will read the same Therefore all the obedient children of the Church of England ought to acknowledge it to be true Eleventhly if you make the fourth commandement Ceremoniall you make the Church of England guilty of Iudaisme For that Church which readeth to her children a Ceremoniall Law and commands them to kneele whilst it is read in acknowledgment of their subjection thereunto and at the end to pray Lord have mercy vpon us and incline our hearts to keep this law cannot but be a Iewish Church But the Church of England thus teacheth her children Ergo. Twelfthly unlesse the fourth commandement be morall there will be but nine commandements in the Decalogue which is contrary not only to the received opinion of all men but to the calculation of the whole Catholique Church in all ages and is no meane Sacriledge to affirme Ergo. Thirteenthly that which is taught by men which are most spirituall and alone discerne the things of God must needs be true and so on the contrary But the Morality of the Sabbath is taught by men that are most spirituall the contrary by men that are carnall therefore c. Lastly we have the authority of all our English writers almost ever since the reformation unto this time neither was it hitherto ever contradicted for at least these threescore and ten yeares unlesse by Papists Anabaptists or Familists Ergo. CHAP. VII In which are set downe the arguments for the negative THe negative tenent hath also its arguments which in the next place must be produced and First it is alleadged That commandement over which Christ was absolute Lord as he was the sonne of man is not morall for a morall precept is part of Gods eternall law over which the sonne of man can have no power being made under the law But Christ as the sonne of man was Lord of the Sabbath as himselfe upon two sundry occasions hath twice told us Math. 12. Mark 2. To these Texts these exceptions have been made 1 Excep 1. That this phrase doth no more import the Sabbath to be a ceremony then the same used by the Apostle doth conclude the dead and the living to be a ceremony for he rose againe that he might be the Lord of the dead and of the living But this is to play with the ambiguity of the word it 's one thing to be Lord of the Church to guide governe perfect quicken raise glorify her for this is the meaning of the Apostle upon which that in the Ephesians may seeme as a comment Eph. 1.20.21.22 And another thing to be Lord of the Law or constitution to moderate dispence order alter abolish for in what other construction can any one be said to be Lord of a law 2 Except 2. It is said that Christ did not intend by these words of his any such Lordship because he did not then abrogate the Sabbath Nor is this to the purpose for never any man yet dreamed that Christ did in those words abolish the Sabbath for both it and the rest of the legall ordinances were in force till they were nailed with him to the Crosse 3 Except 3. It is excepted that our Saviour in those words doth only dispence with his Disciples in that particular case and challenge to himselfe the power and prerogative of expounding the Law against the Pharisees who pretended only to the Chayre and to give interpretations of the Law But to satisfy this also and to cleare the Text we affirme 1 That Christ doth not there or in any other place ever dispence with the law in himselfe or any other for he took upon him the form of a servant and came not to break the Law but to fulfill it 2 That in those words Christ doth not intend to expound the law only for this he had done before by the example of David and by the
place in Hosea 3 That he doth therefore begin a new argument against the Pharisees consisting of two things the first of the end and intention of the Law which was the good of man the other from his own office which was to be head both of men and Angels and therefore being to dispose of all things which tended unto mans good 4 That he intended by those words to rectify their superstitious conceits of the Sabbath As if he had said you magnify the Sabbath as if it were one of the greatest of all the commandements a maine end of mans creation but you must know that it was made for man and not man for it as were all the legall rites and ceremonies And if this be so I that am the Messiah am by my office Lord of the Sabbath and can and will abrogate the same in due time And that this abrogation of the law of the Sabbath was that which our Saviour did there at least insinuate unto them is plaine if we compare the text with that other of S. Matthew where he tels them that he is greater then the Temple having absolute jurisdiction a Templum Sabbatho serviebat ipse autem dominus erat Sabbathi Mald. in locum and Lordship over all Legall and Mosaicall rites Secondly that for which no man is to be censured and condemned is not a Morall Law for the Law of nature teacheth us to condemne the transgressors of all Morall precepts but no man is to be judged or condemned for the Sabbath b Col. 2.16 Col. 2.16 If any man say that the Apostle speaketh of the other feasts of the Iewes which also are called Sabbaths not of the seventh-day Sabbath in the commandement I answere First that he contradicts all Ancient and Moderne expositions Secondly that in all other places of Scripture where mention is made of their Sabbaths the weekly Sabbath is also included Nehem. 20.33 Esai 1.13 Hose 2.11 why not here Thirdly the Apostle had reason to have excepted this especially considering that his doctrine in that place is a doctrine of liberty for in cases of this nature unlesse men have their bounds set them they easily turne their lawfull and warrantable liberty into unwarrantable licentiousnesse Fourthly it is not likely nor agreeable to any rule that when all which are denominated are expressed as Sabbaths that which doth denominate viz. the weekly Sabbath should be excepted but on the contrary Fiftly the enumeration of the text is sufficient New-moones Holydaies What Ceremoniall feasts had the Iewes distinct from their weekly Sabbath which stands not under one of these heads Either therefore the Apostle useth tautologies which is not likely his discourse being in that place Polemicall a Multa festa habebant Iudaei quaedam quotanuis celebrari oportebat quaedam ineunte quolibet mense quaedam fingulis septimanis ut SabbathoruÌ„ haecomnia tanguntur ab Apostolo hoc in loco Salisbut in locum Or that Tripartite enumeration of new-moones holy daies Sabbath daies includeth also the weekly Sabbath Lastly the weekly Sabbath which the Iewes observed and circumcision were the two maine heads of Iudaisme for which in those times the Seducers so much contended therefore this weekly Sabbath is there especially to be understood Thirdly that which is a shadow of good things to come whose body was Christ cannot be a morall law for morall duties are eternall verities no fleeting and vanishing shadowes But the Sabbath in the fourth Commandement was such a shadow of good things to come As hath in part appeared by that place of the Apostle Heb. 4. and shall be farther evidenced in that which followes and hath generally been taught by all a Epâ—ph l. â— hae 8. Antiquity Ergo. Fourthly that which cannot be deduced out of the principles of naturall reason rightly informed without revelation cannot be Morall But the sanctifying of the Sabbath as it is set downe in the letter of the fourth commandement cannot be so deduced For first naturall reason cannot teach us that one of seven must be observed much lesse that it must be the seventh from the creation or that it must be one of seven in imitation of Gods rest For though men by the light of nature may know the creation and that God was the Creator I will adde though it be impossible the order how things were made yet that all this was done in sixe daies which is the ground of the Sabbath naturall light cannot reveale Neither can nature teach that a whole day from evening to evening is to be kept holy For this is the rule of the Sabbath in the fourth commandement which is rather against nature For nature teacheth to calculate from morning to evening as b Aquinas 1 â— 2. ae q. 74. Art 3. ad Sextum Aquinas sheweth nor doth nature shew us that straight exact resting from all manner of works as the Commandement and the exposition thereof given by Moses doth require If any man say that some shreads of all these were found amongst the Heathen in practice and that they were doubtlesse guided thereunto by the light of nature He speaks nothing to the purpose The question being not of their practice but the principles of naturall reason which must be produced and the deduction made according to those principles Now let any Philosopher or Divine laying aside his Bible make the demonstration out of meere naturall principles erit mihi magnus Apollo Fiftly which is also a Manifestum est itaq non aeternum nec spirituale sed temporale fuisse praeceptuÌ„ quod aliquando cessaret Tert. advers Iud. Tertullians reason whatsoever is de facto abrogated and abolished for practice whether by Christ or his Apostles cannot be morall for precept For whatsoever is morall must be perpetuall but the letter of the fourth Commandement is thus abolished for practice For first not the seventh from the creation but the eight is observed Secondly this eight was never observed by the Christians as the Iews observed their seventh neither for time from evening to evening nor for manner in any respect Lastly we keep not our day upon the same reason and ground with theirs as in memory of the creation of the deliverance out of Egypt of the fall of Mannah but of Christs resurrection Nor to the same end to represent unto us our spirituall rest in Christ For the faithfull have already obtained that for parts though not degrees neither was the Lords-day ever appointed to Shadow out unto us the eternall consummation thereof in Heaven The letter therefore of the fourth Commandement is in all the branches thereof vanished and abolished Ergo. Sixtly that which is morall admits no dispensation upon any ground of necessity Charity Piety or what else soever And this b Chrysost Hom. 40. in cap. 12. Math. St Chrysostome makes good saying in those things which are altogether unlawfull as whatsoever is forbidden by a morall Law 〈◊〉 excuse whatsoever
can be pleaded to make it lawfull A man must not lye no though it be a holy fraud Commit Idolatry Rebellion Murther Theft to save his life nay his soule or a thousand soules But the fourth Commandement admits of many excuses and dispensations and that when neither Charity Piety nor necessity require I never heard a Physitian blamed for tending his Patient on the Sabbath though not in extream danger nor a Sheepheard condemned for following or folding his flock upon that day yet the folding of Sheep is neither a worke of Piety towards God nor mercy to the cattell which would be better unfolded only it 's a matter of profit to the owner The c Laurent in Tert. advers Iudaeos ex Rabbinâ—s in Ios c. 6. Iewish Rabbins tell us that the children of Israel never kept but the first Sabbath during their whole pilgrimage in the wildernesse No man will say they were forced by necessity to this long intermission d Chrysost ib. St Chrysostome is of opinion e Abraham cuÌ„m consensiâ— occidere filiuÌ„ non consensic in homicidium quia debitum erat eum occidi per mandatum Die qui est dominus vitae mortis Aquin 12. q. 100. art 8 ad 3. how justly I say not that our Saviour in his own person brake the Sabbath when no occasion compelled him thereunto As when he made clay with his spittle for the blind mans eyes If any object that even morall lawes admit of dispensations as in the case of Abraham who was commanded to sacrifice his owne sonne and of the Israelites who were also commanded to robbe and spoile the Egyptians The f Communitèr dicitur quòd Deus mutare potest materiam praeceptorum sed manente materiâ non potest dispensare Vig. c. 15. v. 7. Schoolemen have long since untied this knot distinguishing between the dispensation of the law and the mutation or change of the thing concerning which the commandement is given And this change of the thing may be made in regard of some of the commandements by the omnipotent soveraignty of the Lord but not in others God by prerogative royall over all create beings may call for any mans life by the hands of whom he pleaseth as in Abrahams case He may likewise deprive any man of his propriety in any of his goods and so give them as a prey to another as in Israels case But God cannot change the matter of other Commandements as make himselfe more Gods then one or worthy to be dishonoured So then in the forenamed particulars there was no dispensation in the commandement but an alteration in the things And the reason of this distinction is plaine for had the Egyptians continued the lawfull owners of their Iewels and ray ment the Israelites must have been theeues keeping them from them without their consents God can no more make theft to be no theft then deny himselfe Object But perhaps you will say that the matter of the fourth commandement is also changed in the former instances the law not dispensed with at all Ans I answere that the matter of the fourth commandement is the seventh day the sanctifying thereof the forme but how the seventh day can be changed and not be the seventh day to the Physitian or sheepheard or any other is not imagineable Omne quod est dum est necessariò est Whatsoever hath being whilest it hath being must necessarily be that which it is Seventhly whatsoever is contained under the name of legall sacrifice in the old Testament is not morall for not only the Leviticall sacrifices but even those which were offered by Adam and the Patriarches were Ceremoniall But the Sabbath is referred unto this head by g Mat. 9.13 vide Mald. in locum In voce Misericordiâ Synecdoche est notando nam sub hoc nomine Christus omnia humanitatis officia comprehendit ut nomine sacrisicâ—â— omnes caeremonias quiequid est externum Marlor Christ himselfe disputing with the Pharisees and citeing against them the Prophet Hosea For as under mercy are comprehended all works of love to our neighbours so under the title of sacrifice are contained all the rites of the Mosaicall Law Eightly that Commandement for the observing whereof man was not made is not Morall h Ordinatur homo ad Deum non per interiores actus mentis sid etâ—am per exteriora opera quibus divâ—â—am servitutem prositetur ista opera cultus Caeremonia vocatur Aquin. 1. 2â— q. 99. art 3. in corp for therefore God made man that by the observation of the Morall Law he should beare his own image in the world serving him in righteousnesse and holinesse to the glory of his Creator But man was not made to keep the Sabbath in regard of any circumstances of the commandement but on the contrary the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Therefore c. Ninthly that Law which determines Ecclesiasticall rites and ceremonies prescribing set times of holy worship and the outward solemnities there of is not Morall but Ceremoniall This I take to be a Theologicall Maxime among all sorts i Lex Caeremontalis est quae praescribit riâ—us Ecclesiasticos externas Caereinonias sacrificia vasa loca tempera But. loc com of Divines the reason is because the law Morall being the same with that of Nature doth not descend to any particular circumstances But the fourth commandement prescribes and determines set and particular times of holy worship and the outward solemnities of the same saying the seventh is the sabbath in it thon shalt doe no manner of work Therefore c. Lastly may be produced many witnesses of all kinds * Ignat. Ep. ad Magnes Ignatius saith that old things are passed away applies it to the Sabbath in the fourth Commandement k In quibus fingulis lex non dicam impossibilis infirma sed planè ià m mortâ—ae Orig lib. 6. in Rom. cap. 8. Origen upon these words of the Apostle the law was weak through the flesh expounds it of the Ceremoniall law which saith he understood according to the letter and so observed was weak and not able to doe us good His first instance is in the law of the Sabbath l Tertul. adversus Iudoeos Tertullian calleth it a Temporall Sabbath m Iam temporegratic revelatâ— observatio illa Sabbathi quae unius dici vacatione figurabatur ablata est ab observatione fidelium Aug. in Gen. ad lit lib. 4. c. 11. S. Augustine doth every where distinguish the fourth from the other as being Ceremoniall and not belonging to the new Testament n Hier. lib. 28. in Galatas S. Ierome makes it a Iewish observation o Literalis illa observatie Sabbathi sonantis requiem non dantis indictus saerisifciorum ritus interdictus porcinae carnis esus pluvia est ex illa nube Mosi descendens sed nolo in hortum meum descendat Bern.
serm 50. in Cant. S. Bernard sticks not to say that the literall observation of the Sabbath was one of the precepts which Ezechiel calls not good and numbers it with the Law against Swine-flesh p Damascen de fide orthod lib. 4. cap. 4. Damascen is large and particular in this point shewing where and how it was Ceremoniall q Quies ab operibus licet non amplius sit in Christianismo praecepta ficut scribit Apostolus Col. 2. necessaria tamen est instituta ab Ecclesiâ propter imperfectos Luth de bonis operibus Luther saith plainly that the outward Rest of the Sabbath is not commanded us Christians under the Gospell and alleadgeth for proofe the Prophet Isaiah cap. 66. and the Apostle S. Paul Colos 2. r Evanescant nugae pseudo-prophetarum qui Iudaicâ opinione populum superioribus saeculis imbuerunt nibil aliud asserentes nisi abrogatum esse quod ceremoniale erat id vocant diei septimae taxarationem remanere autem quod morale est nempe untus diei objervationem in hebdomade atqui id nihil aliudest quam in Iudaeorum contumeliam diem mutare diei sanctitatem eandem animo reâ—inere Calv. inst lib. 2. c. 8. Calvin sharply confuteth the maintainers of a seventh day Sabbath for false Prophets and Iewes All the Protestants by what names soever distinguished follow these their leaders except a few in comparison in the Church of England which have all started up since the daies of Queene Mary And therefore s Bellarm. de cultu Sanctum lib. 3. c. 10. Bellarmine setting downe the Doctrine both of the Lutherans and Calvinists reduceth all to these heads First they affirme that the Law of God requires us to keep some daies holy Secondly that those daies are not determined by the Law of God but that this determination is left wholy to the Church Thirdly that those daies which the Church shall determine are not in themselves more holy then other daies Fourthly that this determination of the Church doth not bind the conscience but in case either of contempt or scandall Now if this be the Doctrine both of the Lutherans and Calvinists they cannot affirme the fourth Commandement to be morall For if so then God had determined a set day and time wherein to be worshiped then one day had been more holy then another being set thus a part by God himselfe for his holy use and then also all mens consciences had been bound to the observation thereof even out of the case of contempt and scandall If any man suspect Bellarmines honesty in this his report of Lutherans and Calvinists let him shew wherein he hath unfaithfully collected I am sure Amesius who hath taken upon him to weakeÌ„ enervate his whole Doctrine toucheth not upon this It were an endlesse piece of worke to set down the particular writers of the reformed Church I will only name Bullinger and Pellican and that in those places where they purposely treat of this subject Because the common evasion is that heretofore the Protestants of all kinds were so taken up with the common adversary of the reformation that they never sufficiently studied this point a Seimus Sabbâ—thum esse Ceremoniale quatenùs coniunctumest cum sacrificiâ—s reliquis Iudaâ—cis Caeremoniis quatenus alligatum est tempori Caeterùm quatenus Sabbatho reli gio pietas â—opagatur iusâ—us oracretinetur in Ecclesiâ ipsà charitas proximo servatur perpetuum non temporale est Bul. dec 2. ser 4. Bullinger therefore writing purposely of this subject saith we know that the Sabbath was Ceremoniall as joyned and annexed to the Sacrifices and other Iewish rites and as confined to a set time b Die septimo vacandum catenùs morale est quod sâ—ato tempore domino vacandum sit quod ne deferatur ob occupationes temporarias Caeremoniale decretum est ut septimum diem non praetereat quocunâ— tandem die supputare incipias Pell in Exod. 18. Pellican likewise thus expresseth himselfe A seventh-daies rest is so farre Morall as that God must have a certaine time appointed for his worship but that we must not let slip the seventh day wheresoever we begin to reckon is Ceremoniall I know arguments from humane Authority are unartificiall and that some men are so wise in their own conceits as that they stick not to cry down all others when they oppose their fancies The immediat symptome of singularity This therefore shall suffice CHAP. VIII In which the question is stated and explained THe Morality of the letter of the fourth Commandement is thus eagerly maintained even with way wardnesse to make way only to that which concernes the Lords day of which we will also speak God willing in its place For there being neither precept nor practice in the Scripture nor any other good record for that which hath of late yeares been imperiously thrust upon the consciences of men in that point the broachers of those doctrines were of necessity to shelter themselves under the letter of the fourth Commandement And indeed this hiding place being once granted them we could never be Iewish enough in Sabbatizing But if it be made appeare that this is but a pretence only and a covering of Fig-leaves the nakednesse of their doctrine will soon be seen and that they have though unawares laid snares and ginnes for mens consciences therein For the opening now of this point we must first enquire what a Morall law is And then how the fourth Commandement is Morall and how not Lastly what be the particular Ceremonies therein contained Morall is derived a Moralus sunt de illis quae secundum se ad honos mores pertinent cum autem humani mores dicuntur in ordinâ— ad rationem quae est proprium principium humanorum actuum illimores dicuntur boni qui coÌ„gruunt rationi Aq. 1. 2. ae q. 100. art 1. in corpore from Mores which signifies manners That therefore in a large and generall construction of the word may be said to be a Morall law which doth any way prescribe concerning the manners of men Now the manners of men being good or evill as they either agree or disagree with right reason a Morall Law is that which prescribeth a man to governe himselfe as right reason neither blinded nor corrupted doth require Hence it is that the Law Morall is the Law Naturall for that only is right reason not corrupted which God imprinted in the heart of manin the creation with an indeleble character never to be blotted out And therefore the reliques thereof remaine ever since the fall of Adam in the worst of the heathen This kind of law is alwaies in force though it never be proclaimed because it commandeth those things that are of themselves simply good and forbids those things which are of themselves simply evill Yet because it was much obscured in mans heart the fall of Adam making us the children of darknesse God was
time should be set apart not Morall in regard of the letter in which it is expressed If therefore the proposition be of the sounds and syllables of the Decalogue so that whatsoever is written in the letter thereof is affirmed to be Morall it is utterly untrue For what think you a Jllud in primo praecepto quieduxit te c. illuà in quinto ut diù vivaâ— c. of those words in the very front of the Decalogue I brought thee on t of the land of Egypt and out of the house of bondage are they Morall If any say these words are a preface no law he speaketh nothing to the purpose for the proposition in question is universall of whatsoever is written in the tables of stone with Gods own finger Besides give us liberty to exclude from being morall whatsoever is not a law and thereby the reasons of the fourth Commandement will be denied Morality for the reasons of any Law are no more the law it selfe then the preface thereof Indeed there is an implicit Morality in that preface Egypt being a type of the Kingdom of Sathan the house of Bondage the dominion of sinne and under the deliverance of these are contained the rest of Gods mercies to his Church If such a morality as this be all they seek for in the law of the Sabbath no man I presume will gainsay them herein But to give an other instance what shall we think of that clause in the fifth commandement That thy daies may be long in the land which thy Lord thy God giveth thee I am sure it is no principle in Nature nor conclusion flowing from any naturall principle nature can only say God will blesse all dutifull and obedient Children but that it shall be with this or that particular blessing as this is nature cannot teach us Besides this is only a positive and conditionall promise not universally and perpetually performed therefore not Morall And farther let us consider not only what is promised but to whom and it will appeare that those words concerned b Nullo modo ad nos possumus accommodare Luther tom 7. Epist ad Amicum the Iewes only and the land of Canaan and are applyable to us only by way of proportion I am not Ignorant how some labour to patch up a Morality in these words perhaps because they find them written in the tables of stone But their distinction of old in yeares and old in grace though otherwise of good use is in this place of no validity For the promise is without equivocation of long life in the earth as the Apostle expounds it Ephe. 6.3 But what speak we of things circumstantiall Our adversaries confesse the taxation of the seventh day to be Ceremoniall though the very heart of the Commandement and written with Gods own finger Although therefore it be written in tables of stone and that by Gods own finger and that in the very heart of the whole Decalogue which also is pressed that therefore it must be Morall must needs be acknowledged no good consequent unlesse men have a mind to play fast and loose with this argument Ob. Oh! but this commandement is in the very heart of the Decalogue Sol. To which I answere that if by the heart of the Decalogue we understand the midst then c Philo deleg Philo the Iew tels us that the first Commandement is the heart of the whole being written part in the first part in the second table But if by the heart we understand that which gives life to all the rest so the first commandement Thou shalt have no other Gods but me is the very vitall spirit of the whole Law of God Ob. Yea but the Decalogue was spoken with Gods own mouth and so were not the rest this therefore must needs be Morall Sol. Not to trouble the reader about the manner of Gods delivering the ten Commandements I briefly answere that the Ceremonials and Iudicials were also spoken by Gods own mouth so that herein there is little difference save that he delivered the Decalogue publikely in the audience of all the people the rest only apart but still face to face and mouth to mouth And the reason hereof is given in the text not to be any precedency in the lawes themselves but fear in the people being no longer able to hear the voice of so great and terrible a lawgiver When therefore Moses presseth this circumstance Deut. 5. 22. thus he spake and added no more d Quod refere Moses Deum nihil adjecisse eo perfectam vitae regulam decem praeceptis comprehendi significat Calv. in Deut. 5. v. 23. Calvins glosse which was the common marginall note viz. that these ten words are perfect directions needing no additions is indeed true but comes short of the meaning of the holy Ghost in that place for the true reason of that clause is expresly set down in the words following when you heard the voice out of the midst of the darknesse you came unto me and said if we heare the voice of the Lord our God any more we shall dye As if Moses should have said you heard but these ten words he added no more and you were thus afraid What if he had held on as he began So that it is their feare at that time of which Moses puts them in mind to beget in them an awfull reverence of God and heedfull observation of his Law and is nothing to our purpose To the second by placing the fourth commandement being Ceremoniall amidst the Morals in the Decalogue there is neither confusion of things nor distraction of the Church unlesse by accident as the law begets sinne through our own corruptions For will any man say that in Leviticus and Deuteronomy Moses did purposely confound things to distract the Church this were blasphemy and yet Morals and Ceremonials are commonly mixed in those Scriptures Nay we may with more reason affirme that had not this law of the Sabbath been thus place we might justly have complained of confusions and distractions For it being a Commandement mixtly Ceremoniall it could not without distraction have been ranged amongst the meerly Ceremonials and on the other side it being mixtly Morall reason requires it should be e Si quaeratur quare aliae Iudâ—â—orum festivitates praecipiebantur in decalogo diâ— quòd fuerunt tantum Caremoniales Sabbathum autèm magismorale est quum Caeremoniale Greg. de 10. praeceptis Caeremoniale islud determinabat naturale Greg. de Val. tom 2. disp 7. q. 7. p. 4. set amongst the meerly Morals in honour to the Morall parts thereof For the Morall and Ceremoniall parts thereof cannot well be severed one from the other the generall which is Morall from the particulars which are Ceremoniall Lastly though it were in no respect morall yet the Law of the Sabbath being that wherein is f The Lord prescribeth the feasts of the old Testâ—mentin these words Remember that thou keepe holy
concludeth not To the fift briefly both propositions are faulty The first that whatsoever is backt with a Morall reason is a Morall Law for what think you of the Law of the first fâ—uits No man I think but will say it was Ceremoniall yet the reason given of it is morall n Prov. 3.6 Honour the Lord with thy substance So the reason of the fift commandement is it Morall or Ceremoniall If Ceremoniall then how standeth it writen in the tables of stone If Morall then that which is Morall may be the reason of a law Ceremoniall and so the proposition is not true ex gr o Deut. 26. â— Thou shalt not kill the damme with the young that thy daies may belong in the land c. The second proposition is also faulty for let the reasons of the Commandemen be well scand and they will come farre short of that Morality which is pretended Aske naturall reason at best refin'd what proportions were fit to be observed between God and man would it answere we must have sixe for one and not rather on the contrary or any other what principle of naturall reason can guide us to the number of six herein God you say hath interest in the seventh but this is the question let this interest be discovered by naturall light we will grant the Morality All men are as much bound to follow Gods example in resting as the Iewes but First we deny that this example of God is or may be known by the light of Nature Secondly that it is there proposed to all men in their generations being given particularly to the Iews only For the commandement speaketh not of the seventh but of that seventh from the creation wherein the Church followes not Gods example keeping the first of these seaven For unlesse we rest that very seventh in which God rested we no more resemble his rest then a man that hath a ladder resembles Iacob that had a vision of a ladder But God hath promised a blessing unto our rest as well as unto theirs for the Lord even blessed the seventh day to the right observers thereof But the text is strained for though God hath promised alway to blesse his own ordinances in the publique worship yet for any blessednesse to be communicated to the day or affixed to one more then to another we read not That servants and beasts should now rest and be refreshed is confessed to be Morall but that they should have rest upon such and such a day just so many houres from all manner of imployment was partly Ceremoniall partly judiciall as hath bin said Which also farther appears because it is added o Levit. 26.5 as a reason of the seven yeares rest which I think no man will say was Morall neither doe I see why the one should not hold as well as the other Lastly true it is that the Sabbath was a token unto them that they were the Lords people and that we under the Gospell are also the Lords people is most true But was not Circumcision also a badge unto them that they were the Lords people must Circumcision therefore be Morall and perpetuali God forbid We see therefore the vanity of this argument likewise To the sixt first if by strangers we understand all that are aliens from the commonwealth of Israell plaine it is that the Sabbath was no more given unto them then Circumcision for it was a signe of Gods covenant and God never covenanted with the Heathen Moses was the Law-giver of the Iewes neither doth any law bind the Gentiles because Moses gave it but because only it is written on their hearts If by stranger we understand bondslave or sojourner not yet made Proselyte the commandement indeed speaks of him but not to him of him for his ease and restraint not to him for his observation such were not obliged unlesse first adopted as appears in the law of the Passover If any say why then did Nehemiah threaten the Merchants of Tyre for breaking the Sabbath day I answere he did it not because he thought them bound to keep the Sabbath but because a Ne quid occâ—rreret Israelitis ante oculos contrarium c. Cal. in Deut. 5.15 they occasioned the breaking of it amongst the Iews and offended against the present goverment of the state For if Nehemiah conceived those Tyrians to be under the Sabbath why did he shut the gates to keep them out he should rather have compelled them to come in and constrained them to keep the Sabbath being now under his power and jurisdiction To the seventh how superstitious the people of the Iews were in their observation of the Sabbath even in case of life and death notwithstanding they had the example of divers of Gods Saints their predecessors to the contrary as of b Elias fugit à facie Iezabel die Sabbathi Anton. tit 9. Elias and Iudas Machabeus and how their superstition continued not only when the City was destroyed by Titus and Vespasian but long after as appears by the history of the Iew in Rome that would not be taken up out of a Iakes because it was his Sabbath what advantages the enemies of that nation took from their superstition in this kind is evident of it selfe Our Saviour therefore in the Scripture glanceth at their superstitious and d Quod malum luxuriae hoc nomine significatum est quia haec erat nunc est pessima Iudaeorum consuetudo Aug. de Cons Evangelist c. 75. lib. 2. luxurious observation of the Sabbath foreshewing that it should be no small promoter of their lamentable destruction e Orate ut fuga vestra fit expedita nullis impedita remoris vel tempestatis vel religionis Marl. in locum so the best and ancientest Expositors c Sabbatha sancta câ—lo de stercore surgere nolo Laziard in hist universali But you will say what was this to the Disciples that they should pray against it I answere that the Christians also observed the Sabbath among the Iewes f Dicet aliâ—uis Iudaei sciebant licere in Sabbatho fugere ut vitam morti â—riperent Respondeo Iudaeos plerosque hoc ignorâsse vel putâsse fugere quidem fas esse hostibus insequentibus aliter esse â—efas Bar. in locum till the Gospell was sufficiently preached and the Synagogue was honourably buried Some therefore that were weak amongst theÌ„ might be entangled in that superstition Others that were stronger might be hindred and prejudiced in their safety by those that were contrary minded and all were bid to pray against the judgement of God which hanged over the head of the bloody City and whatsoever might in any degree further and increase the same though themselves were not engaged therein To the eight the riseing of mans corruption against any law gives no true estimate of the Morality thereof It is generally the effect of lawes of restraint to beget an appetite in men to the thing forbidden
earnest when he condemned the Orthodoxe of those times for Carnalists and that guided thereunto by the very heresy that he had sucked from Montanus as appears by a treatise of his written to this purpose Our new prophesies saith he are refused not that Montanus and his two Prophetesses Priscilla and Maximilla preached any new Deity or denied Christ or overthrew any rule of faith and hope but that they plainly teach that men should fast more and marry lesse And in the words immediatly going before he describes his adversaries by stuft puddings or sausages d Ptlagii nomen non sine lande altquâ posui quia vita eius à multis praedicatur Aug. retract 11. c. 33. Mark 13.22 Pelagius also the professed enemy of Gods grace whose heresy overthroweth the very Basis of Christs kingdome was not only in outward shew and formality but indeed a man of a well governed life and blamelesse carriage S. Augustine that damned his doctrine extolled his conversation nay it is the generall marke of false Prophets to come in the rough garments of austerity sheeps cloathing innocent outsides else it were impossible they should deceive so many nay almost the very elect This therefore must needs be a most deceitfull ballance to weigh any mans doctrine in To draw therefore to a conclusion e August ad Hier ep 11. S. Augustine unto S. Hierome saith I confesse vnto your brotherhood that I have learned to give such reverence and honour to the books of Canonicall Scripture only that I most firmely believe none of the pen men thereof to have erred in the least things so that when I meet with ought in their writings which seemes contrary unto truth I presently think that either the book was false printed or that the Translators were mistaken or that I my selfe understood it not aright But all other authors I so read as that though they excell in learning and holinesse yet I think nothing true because they so thought it but because they make it appear to be true by those Canonicall Authors or probable reasons at the least f Doct. Twist praef con Armi◠A learned man also of these times hath spoken so home in this point that nothing more need be added thereunto If at any time saith he the Lights of the Church think not the same things but dissent one from another in divers points and those of moment in religion what is to be done But to try all things and to hold that which is good But how may we doe this shall our labour be to search which Side was more docible and desirous to learne had more humble minds did more tremble at Gods word were more obsequious to the guidance of his spirit were more ready to renounce themselves and their own wisdomes worshipped God with greater fear and reverence were more frequent and earnest in their daily prayers fasted oftner to keep the body in subjection were more exercised in the reading of the word and meditating therein Who sees not this kind of touchstone of Ecclesiasticall doctrine to be neither commanded of God nor approved of men nor to be attempted with any hope of good successe God forbid that as often as we dissent one from another we should presently object to the adverse part that they neither fear God nor serve him nor doe his will For neither are we able to dive into mens hearts and the better we our selves are the more conscious of our sins more ready to amplify our own misdeeds more mild and mercifull in censuring of others Leaving therefore this kind of search which after many obscure and slippery Meanders gives but a doubtfull issue and scarce ever brings us to the truth what remaines but to bring the dictates of the greatest Divines to the Law and to the Testimony If they indure not this tryall those other are but popular and gawdy shewes wherewith simple people are deluded Let this be the tryall It were easy to answere the weightiest arguments against which nothing can be said with an answere ad hominem as they call it against whom whatsoever he be some exception or other may be taken But though the persons of the Teachers may not be weighed in this ballance yet their doctrines may Because therefore the adverse part doth so highly advance theirs of the Morality of the Sabbath for pious and religious as if without it holinesse it selfe could not subsist in the world and so farre depresse the contrary as if it were the only floodgate to let in Atheisme It will not be amisse briefly comparing each with other to see which doth most advance Gods glory most edify his Church give most life to religion and bring most comfort to a Christian mans conscience Suppose therefore one should tell us in effect this The fourth commandement is wholely and meerely Morall only indeed there be some Appendices thereof which concerned the Iewes viz. the day spoken of in the commandement the seventh from the creation whereas not that Seventh but a Seventh which the Lord should choose is Naturall and Morall and the strictnesse of the Rest which was injoyned them in kindling of a fire This indeed is in a sort permitted Christians under the Gospell Yet men may doe well to forbeare even this and to dresse their meat over night all the rest of the Law binds us strictly nay more then ever it did the Iewes We must therefore remember not to doe either by our selves or those that belong unto us the least servile work from Saturday sunset till Sabbath-day sun-set or as others from Saturday midnight till next day midnight or as others from Sabbath-day sun-rising till Munday sun-rising for a naturall day of twenty-foure houres must precisely be observed In all this time all works words and thoughts are to be abandoned which may at any time else be done spoken or had so that both in publique and private we be imployed only in the holy things of God Therefore the publique exercise being ended for a Sermon must of necessity be heard neither may men satisfy themselves with the common Liturgy of the Church if they purpose to sanctify to the Lord an holy Sabbath The publique exercise I say being ended a short meale may be made for this is no day to feed the body in and to make a feast on this day is utterly unlawfull After dinner see that you fetch not your wonted walkes or any way recreate your selves or have any communication but of holy things and what was delivered in the Congregation If any man not acquainted with the mysteries of Godlinesse deliver you a message or letter upon that day you may receive it of civility but see you neither dispatch the businesse nor think thereon untill next morning upon paine of sinne Be sure also to take your notes and repeat to all such as shall assemble themselves what you have writen and so repaire unto the evening Sermon which also must be heard either at
bread the not Ploughing of their Land in the yeare of Iubile were necessary duties of the ceremoniall worship so was the outward rest in the fourth Commandement This I take to be k Sabbathum commendatur primo populo in otio temporalitèr ut figura Aug. ad Ian ep 119. Colebatur Deus Sabbatho in ipsâ exteriori quiete ab operibus servilibus quia quiescebant ad repraesentandam divinam quietem à creatioone mundi Cajet in Aquin. 22. q. 122. art 4. generally agreed upon Secondly It is also out of question that this utter cessation which was unto the Iewes a duty of Religion permitted them notwithstanding first works of piety for the Priests saith our Sauiour * They oblerved their rest as being properly and simply and in its selfe a Sabbath dayes duty But vve c. Willeâ— Syn. 9. Gen. Cont. q. 7. breakethe Sabbath and were blamelesse Secondly works of mercy both to men and beasts It was lawfull on that day to heale the diseased as appeares both by our Saviours practice and those defences which he makes for himselfe justifying his practice against the calumniations of the Pharisees It was lawfull also to * Math. 12.3 help a beast out of the ditch to * Math. 12.11 giue him meat * Luk. 13.15 Elias fugieâ—at die Sabbathi Antoâ—â—n tit 9. to leade him to the water which be our Saviours owne instances upon the former occasions Thirdly works also of necessity were allowed them whether they were the necessities of nature or casuall or accidentall necessities as defending themselues from unexpected incursions of their enemies The lawfulnesse of works of this kind they learned from deare bought experience as appeares by Iosephus and the history of the Macchabees Thirdly I conceiue it also to be evident that whereas works of mercy and of necessity be of two sorts some which are of extreame necessity which cannot be deferr'd if we hope to preserue the being of our selues and others some which are only of moderate and convenient necessity which may be put off though with some losse and detriment The Iewes were allowed not only the former but those also of the latter kind unlesse such as were by name expressely forbidden them Those were three First Iournying They were not to goe out of their places this day Exod. 16.29 This they afterward interpreted of themselues to be 2000. paces or two Italian miles which they called a Sabbath-daies Iourny concerning which God never delivered any thing unto them in his word As therefore in other things they superstitiously contracted the Law and made it straighter then ever God intended so in this they extended it and made it larger then the Letter of the Law could beare Ob. If any man say that Christ himselfe journyed upon the Sabbath day with his Disciples when they passed through the fields of Corne which surely he would not haue done had all journying on that day been forbidden Resp The answere is easie if we compare the Evangelists together For that which * Mat. 12.1 S. Mathew * Mark 2.23 S. Marke call the Sabbath * Luk. 6.1 S. Luke cals the second Sabbath after the first By which it appeares for the latter Evangelists doe ever expound the former that this Sabbath was some anniversary Festivall not the weekly Sabbath secondly They were not to kindle a fire upon this day in all their habitations Exod. 35.3 This also was an absolute precept admitting of no exception unlesse in cases of Piety Charity and extteame necessity Ob. If any man say that it had relation only to their dressing of meat or service of the Tabernacle on that day Resp First the Text is against him which forbids in that place all manner of worke upon paine of death and giues instance in the kindling of fire without reference to the dressing of their meat or any other addition whatsoever Secondly they had an expresse prohibition for matters of Cookery upon the Lords day Exod. 16.23 and therefore the day before was the Preparation to the Sabbath Thirdly they were forbidden to carry Burthens on the day of their Sabbath too and fro as appeares by * Nehem. 13.19 Nehemiah the Prophet * Ierem. 17.21 Ieremiah These therefore excepted the Iewes were permitted any workes whatsoever which were of convenient though not of extreme and eminent necessity This conclusion appeares both by our Saviours doctrine and practice By his doctrine in those Maximes delivered to this purpose * Math. 9.13 I will haue mercy and not sacrifice * Mark 2.27 The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath By his practice * Math. 12.3 when he justified his Disciples for plucking the eares of corne on the Sabbath day though mistaken by the Pharisees For I beleiue no man will say that they were in extreme necessity that they must either haue starved or fainted or incurr'd any incurable disease The Text tels us they were hungry and the place was not farre from the City When our Saviour vsually healed men diseased upon that day and most of them carried their greife many yeares I think no man will say the diseases would haue killed them or growne mortall had they not been taken upon the very instant But to giue instance in a thing beyond exception when he commanded those whom he healed to take up their beds and to carry them to their owne houses was this any worke of extreme or pressing necessity Or might it not haue been deferred with little or no inconveniency at all Ob. If any man say that Christ gaue such extraordinary dispensations to some such particulars to make his Miracles the more glorious and conspicuous Sol. I answer First with m Iraeneus adversùs Valent cap. 16. Irenaeus that our Saviour never did any thing which was contrary to the Law of the Sabbath which God commanded his people by the Ministery of Moses And the reason hereof is evident for he was made under the Law and performed perfect and entire obedience thereunto Neither can any man shew any particular in the Law Morall Ceremoniall and Iudiciall which he alwayes observed not and therefore doubtlesse he was as farre from dispensing with others as he was in dispensing with himselfe Supposing therefore that this had been a meanes to make his Miracles more illustrious yet had the thing in its selfe been repugnant to the Law he neither would haue permitted it in any much lesse haue commanded it so often though to haue gayned both credit to his doctrine and glory to his Miracles He well knew that evill is not to be done that good may come thereof But that which is thus supposed hath no ground or shew of truth For I conceiue it to be more rationall to affirme that the differring of the taking up of their beds and carrying of them to their owne houses the next day upon notice given thereof a greater concourse of people would haue been gathered
together to haue seene the sight and to haue gloryfied God for the same But I doe not obserue that our Saviour affected either ostentation or publication of his Miracles but pro renatâ shewed his glory in them as occasions offered themselues By this therefore which hath been said our third Conclusion doth appeare viz. That the Iewes might lawfull haue done whatsoever was not only of absolute necessity but also of conveniency unlesse in such things as were expressely forbidden them Fourthly It s also as I conceiue out of question that Christian liberty hath freed us by the Gospell from some part at least of the burthen of the Sabbath in regard of the strictnes of that rest which was commanded the Iewes This proposition is found in expresse tearmes in our Sabbatharians Treatises unlesse in some one or two who would perswade Christian people to Super-Iudaize Keeping the Lords day in a stricter and more precise manner then ever the Iewes kept the Saturday Sabbath But this being a strange fancy and almost singular I trust this fourth conclusion also will passe without contradiction And there is good reason it should for not only the rest of the Sabbath but the strictnesse of that rest was Typicall as hath been already shewed prefiguring that accurate holinesse which God requires of his people and that fulnesse of joy and perfection of happinesse unto which Christ admits us that belieue his Gospell Besides the whole Christian Church in all ages hath delivered this for an undoubted truth and b Vacent tanquam Christiani Qui inventi fuerint Iudatizare anathema sint Con. Load c. 29. abhorred a Iewish resting on the Lords day and ever accursed it where they found it By this then it is plaine that in the time of the Gospell we are not only allowed the same things on our day of rest which were permitted the Jewes upon their Sabbath but even those things also which they were expresly inhibited And if this be so it must needs follow that since no particular works are forbidden us as were forbidden them and in generall works either of absolute extreme or of moderate and convenient necessity are allowed us as well as them no restraint at all lies upon us in things appertaining to common life Fiftly there is notwithstanding a cessation from works required of Christian people under the Gospel upon all daies of their publique worship and Assemblies For nature her selfe teacheth all men saith c Natura dâ—ctat aliquanâ—ò vacandum quieti orationi Dei. Gers de decem praecept Gerson sometimes to rest from their owne imployments and to spend that time in the praises of God prayer to him This is evident of it selfe and therefore there is scarce any Nation so barbarous void of reason which obserues not this Law written in their hearts by sequestring sometime or other to such rest The Turks nay the Indians haue their Sabbaths And indeed these two viz to attend Gods publique worship and at the same time to follow our own imployments are incompatible and imply a contradiction as on the other side to be taken up with our owne affaires and neglect Gods publike worship is open irreligion and prophanenesse This conclusion therefore will passe for currant upon both sides also Sixthly Although the Law of nature in the Generall and Morall part of the fourth Commandement requires us to rest upon the day of Gods publique worship yet how long we are bound to abandon the labours of our callings either before or between or after the publique worship is neither set down in Scripture nor can be determined by the Law of Nature Generall directions the light of every mans conscience will suggest unto him and may be deduced out of the writen word concluding that whatsoever may hinder either the worship it selfe or our profiting thereby should be forborne and avoided But when we descend to practice no generall rule is or may be given For as they say Practica est multiplex and no Law can justly be framed of Particulars in this kinde For all men are not alike of themselues that which may be an impediment to one may not hinder another more time is allow'd some men though to dispatch but a little businesse then others need haue for weighty matters How therefore to governe our selues therein we must haue some other direction besides the generall rule and dictate of nature Ob. If any man say that the case is already overruled by Moses in the Commandement which requires a whole dayes rest of twenty foure houres of all men whatsoever Resp I answer that this is to proue a thing unknown by that which is more unknowne For the Christian Church knowes no such commandement of Moses as being her children under the Gospell the letter of the Law of Moses being wholy ceremoniall as hath formerly been shewed Seventhly Therefore it must needs be that the determinate time of cessation from works together with the manner in regard of the strictnes thereof is wholy left to the power and wisdome of the Church and Magistrate It is therefore the common direction of the Casuists d Quilibet eâ— die abstine at ab omni labore aut mercatione aut alio quovis laborioso opere secundum ritum consuetudinem patriae quam consuetudinem Praelatus spiritualis illius loci cognoscens non prohibet quod si aliqua super talicoâ—â—uetudine â—â—bietas occurrat consulat superiores Gers de Decal praecepâ— that men abstaine from the works of their severall callings according to the custome of the place in which they live and if any scruple happen to arise herein they should consult with their Superiors in the Church and Communâ—â—y who only may dictate unto them their pleasures herein And thus hath it been in all ages of the Church with great variety contrariety of Lawes and constitutions as the state of the times wherin they lived required How it was before Constantines time who was the first ChristiaÌ„ Emperour the History of the Church doth not shew but very imperfectly This we may be assured of that had their cessation from works been such as at this day is pressed on mens consciences by our Sabbatharians CoÌ„stantine might haue sau'd his labor in ordering this point Constantine having begun divers Synods in particular nationall Churches followed together with sundry Lawes of Kings and Princes in their Territories dominions some restraining others enlarging the peoples liberty For when some had brought the people even to a Iewish superstition equaling if not exceeding that which is now required by the Adversaries Others taught the people to stand fast in this part of their Christian liberty For proofe whereof I will only trouble the Reader with two instances Synodus e Quia ersuâ—sum est populo die dominicâ cum caballis bobus vehiculiâ—itinerari non debere neque ullam rem ad victum comparare c. Syn. Aurel. 32. c. 10. Aurelianensis Can.
Lord vnlesse we also adde thereunto sundry actuall performances the time and manners whereof they also shew us If therefore any difference be it is that we must be wholy taken up with such performances during the whole Sabbath for 24. houres and turne meere Euchites upon the day which is not required in other dayes But that the Sabbath is of no such length hath been already declared and that God giues no such continuate taskes of holy performances shall I hope before we part be made evident Secondly d Finis non seper est de substantià praecepti neque secundùm veros Theologos cadit sub praecepto Med. Inst Non idem est finis praecepti id de quo praeceptum datur Aquin. 1.2 qu. 100. art 9. ad 2. the end is not comanded by that Law in which the meanes are prescribed for though the precept of the end include also the precept of the meanes yet not on the contrary This proposition is laid downe by the Moralists as an undoubted maxime and doth evidently appeare For example when we are commanded to heare the word we are not by the force there of commanded to beleeue in Christ Iesus yet * Rom. 10.17 Faith as saith the Apostle cometh by hearing That rule which commandeth to beate downe the body and to keepe it in subjection doth not require of vs the vertues of humility chastity c. but on the contrary these being the end require the other as the meanes But the law of sanctifying a holy Sabbath is a law of the meanes whereby we are taught and enabled to serue the Lord in the private duties of holinesse and to exercise in our selues the graces of faith hope loue c. This also is plaine of it selfe and requires no farther proofe For why doe we resort to the congregation on the Lords day But partly to be instructed by the word partly to be inflamed with the loue of God and zeale unto his service the whole weeke after as well as to tender him our publike homage in acknowledgement of his soveraigne dominion Thirdly no affirmatiue precepts are to be extended beyond that which the letter doth containe though it be otherwise in precepts which be negatiue For example honour thy father and mother when we know what it is to honour our Superiours we haue the whole latitude of this Law It is not so I say in negatiues as appeares by our Saviours confutation of the Pharisees glosses upon the seventh Commandement But the law of the Sabbath is an affirmatiue precept and prescribes the publique worship of God in the congregation therefore is not farther to be extended Fourthly if all duties of piety and mercy whatsoever were commanded by the law of the Sabbath then were there no difference at all between this and the other precepts of the Decalogue at least for that day so that upon one day of every weeke the other Commandements were needlesse and superfluous But this is not to be affirmed Ob. If any say that one and the same duty may be under divers precepts Resp I answer that though this be most true yet must we not confound the Law of God and make an intricate maze thereof to the entangling of mens consciences for the Decalogue is said to be ten words ten for their number words for their distinction I denie not that one and the same duty may be under divers precepts but then they are diversly considered as referred to divers ends The object of different commandements may be materially the same but formally distinct So temperance and sobriety may be both under the sixt and under the seventh precept under the sixt as meanes of preservation of breath under the seventh as the helps unto chastity and mortification But what formality can distinguish the duties of holinesse on the Lords day from the same duties on other daies I know not if you say to sanctifie the Sabbath the question is begged and so nothing said Fiftly were the whole practice of Religion both publique and private the duty of the Lords day then it would follow which is also affirmed that to obserue the Lords day were impossible to any man in the state of corruption For I think no man unlesse he be some braine-sick Perfectist will challenge to himselfe such a measure of holinesse though but for a day But that the law of the Lords day is thus impossible being not a Legall but Evangelicall observation of positiue command for all such are light yokes and easie burthens is utterly untrue Therefore c. Sixtly nothing but what is naturall and eternall is commanded in the fourth precept of the Decalogue binding us under the Gospell but that private and personall acts of religion should be performed by us precisely upon this or that day of publique worship in that manner as is required is not naturall and eternall binding us under the Gospell For the Law of nature prescribes only in generall not any thing for any time or day or manner in particular Seventhly that which is no where spoken of much lesse commanded in the new Testament bindes not the conscience of any under the Gospell but the private exercises of religion upon the Lords day are not spoken of much lesse commanded in the new Testament For then such commands were easily shewed all men would readily submit themselues thereunto Eightly this manner of observation seemeth to change the nature of the Lords day from being the Christian Feast and transformeth it rather into a day of Fast humiliation For let their doctrine of Sabbathizing be compared to the doctrine of fasting and we shall finde them the same saue only that a totall abstinence from all things wherein nature delighteth is required in the one but not so in the other But we must not metamorphize the Lords day which is and ought to be the Christian mans Festivall wherein he should not only inwardly but out wardly also rejoice in the Lord his God Ob. If any say that the true beleiver takes no greater comfort then in the exercises of humiliation nothing being so sweet unto him as the teares of contrition Resp I answer that what the * Heb. 12.11 Apostle speaketh of affliction in generall That afterwards it yeeldeth the peaceable fruits of righteousnesse to them that are exercised thereby is true also of the day of humiliation of the bruising of the soule in particular the affliction is one thing the fruit thereof another this ioyfull that for the present grievous and doth not so well sort with the nature of the Lords day Vpon which ground it was expresly forbidden the e Hoc ab omni ecclesiâ Orientali Occidentali observatum contra haereticos Can. Apost 61. Christians by Antiquity to fast upon the Lords day Ob. But is it not lawfull then for a man to repent and be converted unto God comming out of the state of sin into the state of grace through the troubles and anguishes
without which there must needs follow a manifest Schisme in the Church rent in the State and also in the world if some in some places obserue one day Sabbath others in other places another day That there is no such ground of uniformity as the word of God to whom all men owe and professe there ready subjection as for mens constitutions though upon never so good groundes there are others as wise good as they at least in their owne opinions which will take liberty to vary from them That therefore it is fit God himselfe should shew us not only the specificate proportion but the particularity of that specification That in such designations as these the will of God is made manifest unto us sometimes by his words sometimes by his works so that if the Scripture were silent as it is not yet this is a generall direction that the work of God done upon any day is and ought to be the ground of its hallowing If therefore we discerne one day to be preferred before another in some great and notable work naturall reason teacheth that day of all others to be chosen for our publique Sabbath That thus stands the case both in regard of the Iewish and Christian Sabbath God having marked out unto them their Sabbath by the work of creation ours by the work of resurrection That there needs no such recourse notwithstanding to the works of God having so expresse a Text as that of the second of Genesis for the making good whereof against the fond Dreame of Anticipation may be brought whole Iuries of Fathers and moderne Divines And reason it selfe averreth it by an unanswerable Dilemma for that passage must be written either before the Law and then God must reveale to Moses before hand what he meant to doe in the Mount which is not probable or after the law and then what reason had Moses to speak there of in the story since it was so fully declared in the Tables That of those three things before spoken of the time in generall the proportion in speciall and taxation in particular the first only is generally received for Moral the other two are Positiue rather then Ceremoniall for what need of Ceremonies in Paradise That the specification of one in seven was ceremoniall only respectiuely to the rest of the seventh day not of the seventh it selfe for what ceremony can be found in the time indefinitely considered which is one of seven That the Iewes resting upon their seventh did prefigure Christs rest in the graue in which fence also it is abolished but not our rest from sinne here and from misery hereafter for these were common to the Iewes together with the Christians The rest therefore of the day was partly Morall partly Ceremoniall but not that one in seven should be sanctified for that this is simply Morall we haue the full cry of the Schoole-men themselues That the particular taxation of this one in seven more then of another was also Positiue not Ceremoniall for there is the same taxation of one in seven under the Gospell and yet no Ceremony is put therein nay God having as it were chalked it out unto us by his works it may well be reputed Moral As therefore God commanded the Iewes their day so hath he also appointed us ours even the first day of the week for our Christian Sabbath That herein the wisdome of God is most remarkable in his Law saying not Remember the Seventh day but Remember the Sabbath day the day of Rest to sanctifie it For by this meanes we also keep the fourth Commandement in sanctifying the Lords day For as the Jewes were tyed to the observation of the Sabbath and had one of he seven preferred unto them So we haue also our Sabbath and one also of seven prescribed us That though we take not the Lords day as it is such a day of seven from the Commandement yet the rest and sanctification thereof we justly deriue from thence That undoubtedly the Gospell doth not allow a worse proportion of time for the worship of God nor a worse manner of observing it then the law did and a greater doth not well stand with our ordinary callings That seeing the day of the Creatours rest is abolished none of the seven can be more proper for a Christian mans observation then the day on which his Redeemer rested whom the * Mark 2.23 Scripture stiles Lord of the Sabbath For God marked it out unto the Apostles to whom the translation of the day appertained by the resurrection of Christ a work no way inferiour to the Creation This therefore is the day which the Lord himselfe hath made faith the Prophet Psalme 118. ver 4. That although there be no expresse proofe in Scripture yet sufficient it is to proue an institution from the continuate un-inrerrupted practice of the Church which cannot be casuall and indeed nothing else can satisfie any whose judgment and conscience cannot be overawed by the ordinance of the Church That therefore we must remember this to be our Christian Sabbath for so we may justly call it though neither Scripture nor Antiquity so stile it because all acts of Parliament and Proclamations of the State so entitle it being I say our Sabbath we are to sanctifie it in all points as the Iewes did theirs both for the time which must be 24. houres and for the rest doing nothing which may be an avocation from holy things As for sports and pastimes howsoeuer the guilded titles of Christian liberty honest recreations and the like be put upon them yet it may justly be feared least prophanesse and luxurie be thereby intended and a wide gapp set open to all licentiousnesse That all men know how syncere soever the mind of the Magistrate be how greedily the vulgar are set upon these sports how incroaching upon liberty how undiscreet in enjoying it how impatient of any restraint therein On the other side that the Saints delight in consecrating a Sabbath gloriously unto the Lord so that when others instead of refreshing toyle themselues in May games or Morricedaunces or worse finding perhaps their own pleasure therein the Saints finde nothing so sweet as the Lords statutes nothing so ravishing as the refreshings of the holy Ghost nothing so amiable as the Assemblies of their Brethren being made thereby more painefull and conscionable in their severall callings the whole weeke after How these things which seeme thus handsomely contrived doe hang together like a rope of sand consisting of some truths more falsehoods most uncertainties let the indifferent Reader judge It is true that God created Adam in Paradise but not true that the creation of the world was made knowne unto him by revelation for then to what pupose was his excellent knowledge in which he was created and which many preferre beyond that of Solomons imparted unto him That God commanded the first seventh day to be his Sabbath is very improbable for what needed Adam a