Witchcraft Witches justly punished with death for their fals beleef that they can doo such mischief and a wil or purpose to act it their Trade being neerer to a new Religion then a Craft or Science Such as are content to be poor may easily resolv to Censure be honest so thos that hold Hel to be no real place and Devils meer Metaphors must of cours deny Witchcraft yea many who pretend to be wise pious professors are too incredulous of Witches contrary to the faith of al Gods People Exod. 22 18. both Jews and Christians who wil not suffer a Witch to liv as God commanded The best is only privat persons deny it but al public Princes and Christian Common-wealths make strict Laws against it Saul destroied Wisards and such as had familiar Spirits yet in distres caused a Witch of Endor to rais Samuel as the spectre seemed with whom he consulted Serjeant Glyn who at last Lent Assises in Cornwal condemned eght Witches upon pregnant presumptions and personal confessions can scientiously satisfy any Man that ther be such impious confederats with Satan els al Laws and Magistrats that question them for their fals imaginations or intentions to work mischief if they can doo none were most unjust and to execut them bloody De Regno purae Caliginis Of pure Darknes Kingdom BEside al Soveraign powers Divine and Human precited Eph. 6. 12. Mat. 12. 26. Mat. 9. 34. Eph. 2. 2. John 16. 11. the Scriptures specify rulers of this Worlds Darknes even the Kingdom of Satan and Principality of Beelzebub over Devils or Phantasms in the Air as Satan is stiled Prince of the power of the Air and Prince of this World becaus he rules in this Worlds darknes So they under his dominion in opposition to the Faithful caled Children of the Light are properly Children of Darknes The Kingdom of Darknes is a confederacy of Deceivers who Kingdom of Darknes to get dominion over Men in this World devise erroneous doctrins to extinguish the Light both of Nature and Scripture p. 333. c. therby to seduce silly Disciples and so disprepare them for the Kingdom of God to com Fabula narratur mutato nomine de te Let the name changed be The tale is told of thee The darkest part of Satans Kingdom is without Gods Church among such as beleev not in Christ yet doth not the Church like the Land of Goshen enjoy al Light necessary to the work injoined by God but as Men born blind hav no Idaeâ— of any bodily Light nor can any conceiv greater then he hath perceived somtimes by his own senses so is it with the Light of the Gospel and understanding too that none can imagin any greater degree therof then he hath attained Ther be four causes of spiritual Darknes 1. By abusing or abolishing the Scriptures Light for weer 1 Caus not knowing the Scripture the chief is wherto almost al the rest are consequent or subservient wresting it to prov Gods Kingdom so oft cited to be the Church or multitud of Christians now living or that shal rise at last day but the Kingdom of God was first erected by Moses ministry over the Israelits so saith he but none els cald his peculiar People which after ceased when they refused to be longer governed by God and chose Saul Since which time God had no proper Kingdom by pact or covenant but only as he ever was is and shal be universal King of al Creatures ruling according to his absolut Wil and infinit Power Nor are any now under any King or Kingdom by pact sav our secular Soveraigns til Christ shal com again to reign eternaly on Earth Succedaneal to this said error is that Christ now in Heaven hath som one Man or Assembly by whos mouth he speaks givs Laws and which represents his Person This regal power under him the Pope claims generaly over al the Church but in particular stats the Pastors or Presbyteries of thos places which begets such darknes in Mens understandings Hence results another error that a Christian Kingdom had need to receiv his Crown by a Bishop as if the claus of Dei gratia depended on that Ceremony So al Ecclesiastics assume the title of Clergy caling al others Laity or People simply Hence also arose the distinction betwen Emperors Civil Laws and Popes Canons which last were but bare Canons or Rules voluntarily received by Princes til Charlemaign becam Emperor but afterward as the Popes power increased becam commands or Laws and Emperors allowed them For the Pope pretending al Christians to be his Subjects makes it capital for any not to be of Roman Religion but tolerats Jews Mahometans and Pagans to enjoy their own Rites if they offer no scandal A secund abuse of Scripture is turning consecration into conjuration or inchantment for to consecrat is to offer giv or dedicat decently and devoutly any thing to God by separating it from common use or prophane to be holy and peculiar for Gods service by his Ministers hands but when Papists pretend to change the nature or quality of a thing as in the Lords Supper to make Bread and Wine by saying this is my Body this is my Blood to be Christs very Body and Blood it must either be Gods extraordinary work which 't is not being doon daily and frequently or a vain impious conjuration wherby they would hav Men beleev a change of Natures contrary to the testimony of their sight and other senses If the Aegyptian Sorcerers who turnd their Rods to Serpents and Waters to Blood or at least to seem so had made no change in shew but only outfaced the King that they were Serpents which looked like Rods would not al Men tax them for Liers Thus Priests tel the People that they hav turned Bread into a Man nay a God requiring Men to worship it which is gross Idolatry The words this is my Body or represents my Body can extend soly to the Bread which Christ consecrated with his own hands for he said not the Bread wherof any Priest shal say this is my Body shal be instantly transubstantiated into it nor was this doctrin harched in the Church of Rome til under Innocent the third not 500. yeers ago when the Popes power was at highest and Peoples darknes heaviest that Men could not see the Bread they eat specialy being stamped with Christs figure on the Cross as if the very wood was transubstantiated which they ate together with the Body So at Baptism they use many Charms in name of the holy Trinity with the sign of the Cross at naming ech Person as in consecrating holy Water the Priest saith I conjure thee Creature of Water in the name of God the Father Almighty and Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord and by virtu of the holy Ghost that thou becom conjured Water to driv away al the Enimies powers c. The like is doon in Benediction of Salt and Hony mixd therwith
one Man speaks to another prohibiting Adam to eat of the Tree of knowledg and upon disobeying exiled him out of Eden from enjoying eternal Life wherto he was created had he not sinned Gen. 7. 7. Afterward he punished his Posterity for their Vices al sav egth Persons in whom his Kingdom consisted with a deluge Gen. 8. 18. of Waters but his first Kingdom by solen compact was with Gen. 17. 7 8. Abram in thes words I wil establish my Covenant between me and thee and thy Seed after thee for an everlasting Covenant to be a God to thee and them and wil giv thee and thy Seed al the Land of Canaan wherin thou art a Stranger for an everlasting possession In memorial herof he instituted Circumcision Exod. 19 5 〈◊〉 8 caled the old Covenant as the sign or Sacrament therof The same Covenant God renewed by Moses at Sinai they being newly becom a Nation which is expresly stiled tho the name of King and Kingdom not before used a Kingdom of Priests and holy People for they promised to doo as the Lord commanded which argues their peculiar consent compact or covenant but al the Earth is the Lords by power property and precedent So 't is a cleer case that by Gods Kingdom is meant a civil Common-wealth instituted by Subjects consents for regulating their behaviour both toward God their King in obeying his Laws toward one another in point of Justice and toward Forreners in peace or war This was properly a Kingdom when God was King of Israel which befel to no People els and the high Priest after Moses his sole Lieftenant or Viceroy whence 't is forecaled Regnum Sacerdotale a 1 Pet 2 9. Kingdom of Priests and by St. Peter Sacerdotium Regale a Roial Priesthood sith none but the high Priest might enter Sanctum Sanctorum only once a yeer to inquire Gods Wil 1 Sam. 8 7 c. of him Many mo places prov the same as when the Elders greiving at Samuels Sons corruption required a King to rule them Like al Nations God said they did not reject Samuel but himself that he should not reign over them Thus God was their King and Samuel only delivered what he dictated So saith 1 Saâ— 12. 12 Samuel when ye saw Naash King of Ammon com against you ye said to me a King shal reign over us when the Lord God was King After they had rejected God and broken the Covenant by that revolt or rebellion chusing another King the Prophets foretold his restitution that it shal be in Zion Davids Throne at Jerusalem on Earth See Isai 24. 23. Ezâ—k 20. 33 37. Micah 4. 7. So saith the Angel Gabriel of Christ He shal be great and caled the Son of the most high and the Lord Luk. 1. 32 3â— shal giv him his Father Davids Throne and he shal reign over the hous of Jacob for ever and of his Kingdom shal be no end This is a Kingdom on Earth for whos claim Christ was crucified as an enemy to Caesar and on his Cross inscribed Jesus of Nazaret King of the Jews being in scorn Crowned with Thorns So 't is said of the Disciples That they did contrary Acts 1â— 7. to Caesars Decrees saying ther is another King one Jesus Therfore Gods Kingdom is real no metaphorical Monarchy and so taken in both Testaments When we say For thine is the Kingdom power and glory 't is understood by force of our Covenant not by right of his power So it were frivolous to pray Thy Kingdom com unles it be meant of Gods Kingdoms restauration by Christ which was interrupted by the Jews electing Saul Nor is it proper to say the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand or thy Kingdom com if it had stil continued for Gods Kingdom of Power is every wher In sum Gods Kingdom is a civil Monarchy which consists Summary in the Israelits obedience or obligation to observ thos Laws which Moses first should bring from Sinai and what the high Priest afterward shal deliver before the Cherubins in Sanctum Sanctorum which being cast off by electing Saul the Prophets foretold should be restored by Christ and we daily pray for its redintegration thy Kingdom com acknowledging the right of it in adding For thine is Kingdom Power and Glory for ever Amen The proclaiming herof was the Apostles Preaching wherto Men are prepared by Gospel-Teachers and to promiss obedience to Gods government is to be in the Kingdom of Grace becaus God givs such power to be his Subjects gratis when Christ shal com in Majesty to judg the World and actualy govern his own People which is caled the Kingdom of Glory If Gods Kingdom caled for its gloriousnes and celsitud the Kingdom of Heaven were not a Government which he executs on Earth by Vicars or Vicerois who deliver his commands to the People ther needs no digladiation who it is by whom God speaks to us nor would Priests trouble themselfs with spiritual jurisdiction nor any suprem Rulers deny it them From this literal interpretation of Gods Kingdom ariseth Holy what a genuin Exposition of the word Holy signifying what in Monarchies Men cal public or the Kings property who is the public Person or Representativ of al his Subjects As God King of Israel is stiled the holy one of Israel and the Jews Gods People a holy Nation So the Sabbath Gods day is a Holy day the Temple Gods hous a holy Hous Sacrifiâ—es Offerings Tiths Gods Tributs Holy duties Priests Prophets Annointed Kings Gods Ministers holy Men the celical Spirits Gods Messengers holy Angels or the like For wherever holy is taken properly ther is stil somwhat signified of property got by consent For al Mankind is Gods Nation by property of power but Israel only an holy Nation by Covenant In saying Halowed be thy Name we pray for Grace to keep the first Commandment to hav no other Gods but him The word Prophane is usualy taken in Scripture for common Prophane what and consequently the contraries holy and proper or peculiar must signify the same thing but figurativly such as liv godly giving themselfs to devotion as if they forsook the World are caled Bonhoms That which God makes holy by appropriating it to his own Sacred what use is stiled Sacred or Sanctified as the seventh day in the fourth Commandment and the elect in the new Testament are said to be sanctified as indued with the spirit of godlines That too which Men dedicat or giv to God for his public service Churches Chapels with their Utensils Priests Victims Oblations external Rites of Sacraments c. is stiled Sacred or set apart to God Now ther be divers degrees of sanctity or holines when things are sequestred or consecrated for Gods neerer service thâ—n others as al the Israelits were a holy People peculiar to God yet Levies Tribe more holy and Priests among Levits more but the high Priest most holy so Judea was a
is drawn by his own concupiscence 1. John 2. 16. S. John tels us That the lust of the flesh lust of the ey and pride of life is not of the Father but of the World This Tenet makes God wors then the Devil whos tentation may be resisted but Gods powerful effectual Decree cannot be frustrated Prosper saith If this were charged on the Devil he may in som sort cleer himself sith he can compel none to sin what madnes then is it to aspers that on God which cannot justly be imputed to Satan Tertullian saith He cannot be accompted Author of sin who is Avenger and Condemner of it nor can he be a just holy God saith S. Basil nor Judg of the World if he decree sin sith 't is al one to say God is Author of sin and to aver he is not God The defenders disclaim this Tenet in direct terms being so harsh to Christian ears but deliver it in truth by necessary consequence For they avouch the Decree of Reprobation to be absolut and inevitable nor can Reprobats be saved tho they doo al the works of Saints sith God created them to this very purpos that they should sin els he could not attain his principal ends to manifest his mercy in saving the elect and execut his justice in damning Reprobats who are eternaly decreed to sin even to death Thus say Piscator Marlorat Zanchy and many mo This is by cleer consequents to make God the Author of sin which is ordinarily imputed to thos who hav not such interest or influence in production of it as this assertion ascribes to God The Devil is caled the Father of lies and semblably of al sins 1. John 3. 8. 10. els as sinners are stiled his Sons and sin a work of the Devil which the Son of God cam to loos Yet the Devil only egs or excites Men by outward suggestions and inward tentations to sin which is al he can doo but if God necessitats by his absolut Decree and after determinats by his powerful secret working in Mens Souls and disposing or overruling their Wils that they cannot but sin and perish he doth infinitly more then barely suggest intice or perswade which is horrid to imagin So wicked Men are reputed Authors of their sins becaus they plot purpos chuse and commit them as immediat Agents but if God overrules their projects and purposes by an uncomptrolable decree that they must needs doo as they doo and dy tho they would fain doo otherwise and be saved he is chiefly the Author and they only secund Actors or subordinat Instruments under him Haply they hav free power in it self but no free use to doo as they list sith God determins their actions by his Omnipotent Wil. Evil Counsilors and Allurers to sin are also esteemed causers and punished with others which commit crimes by their instigation as Jâ—zabel was guilty of Nabaths murder for counsiling and contriving it but they say God doth even inforce it by an Almighty Decree which cannot be resisted therfore he is much more the chief author and actor then meer abetter or accessary If a King shal procure a Subjects ruin by plotting his offens as Henry 7. is said to seek Edward Earl of Warwicks destruction by contriving his escape out of London Tower al men wil charge him as Author of his crime and death much more God if he design the sin and damnation of Reprobats So saith Moulin who wil not abhor a King that to hang a man by Law plots to make him a Thief or Murderer that he may seem to doo it justly For he shal not only make an innocent wretched but wicked too and destroy him for that offens wherof he is Author So dissembling Tiberius decreeing Sejanus Daughter to death caused the Hangman first to deflower hir because their Laws forbad Virgins to be strangled yet was he chief Author both of hir rape and ruin If then God Decrees to damn millions upon millions and shal caus or permit the Devil first to defile them that he may justly destroy them is not he the chief caus of their sins so wel as sufferings Al Men grant God to be sole Author of Mens conversion and salvation yet doth he no more in procuring it then thes Men ascribe to him in reprobation and damnation For he absolutly and antecedently from eternity decreed to sav the elect and by irresistible means to work faith repentance and final perseverance for their salvation and accomplishment of his Decree semblably he peremptorily decreed as they say to damn Reprobats leading them on by an insuperable power and immutable providence from sin to sin til they hav made up a ful measure and in fine inflicts vengence for acting what he appointed What difference then in thes courses or why shal not God be reputed Author of the ones sins so wel as of the others salvation The Fathers held it a parallel case an therfore made sin an object only of Prescience bending their Arguments against this perilous position of an absolut antecedent irrespectiv irresistible inforcing Decree of Reprobation Dr. Vsher relating the Church â—â—st of Gotâ—â—sâ— p 138. of Lyons answer to Seotus against Gotteschalc hath thes words whoever saith ther is a constraint or necessity of sinning laid on any Man he grosly and grievously blasphems God making him to be the Author of sin nor can al the quaintest wits in the world avoid it Howbeit to shew fair play and scan this point at ful al their Defenses Devises Shadows Similituds Evasions and Elusions shal be amply agitated and aptly answered 'T is said ther is a duple Decree 1. Operativ by which God 1 Devise positivly works his purpos and this would infer him to be the Author of sin 2. Permissiv by which he only Decrees to let it com to pass and this doth not make him Author of sin which is al that they maintain If it be al 't is wel let that be tried Answer Indeed God permits al sin els could be none if he would effectualy hinder it as he left Adam in the hand of his own Alâ—s 14 16. counsil to stand or fal So he suffred the Nations to walk in their own wais And stil suffers al Men to slide into sundry sins not becaus he stands in need of sin to set forth his glory but becaus he is suprem moderator of al knowing how to bring good out of evil and specialy becaus he made Man as Tertullian tels a free creature undetermined either way in his actions til he determins himself and may not be hindered from sinning by Omnipotence becaus he ordained otherwise Nor doth a permissiv Decree caus sin being meerly extrinsecal to the sinner which hath no influence on it If they intend nothing els in good earnest then a bare permission 't is granted but their main conclusion fals to ground and the debat at an end Heâ—ce their chief Coryphees reject this distinction as a fiction of
one in in ech of the seven Asian Churches to whom he directed his Episties For Bishops as Fathers ordeined Presbyters but not they Bishops nor can Sons ordein Sons without a Father or Bishop who is superior both in precedence of place and preeminence of power as is proved The twelv Apostles and seventy Disciples had equal charge Luke 10. 1. or Commission to preach the Gospel cure Diseases and cast out Devils yet the twelv superior to the seventy as al know Som too boldly say Both were one order becaus caled Disciples sit liber Judex let St. Luke decide it After this relating to what he premised of the Apostles he appointed other seventy Disciples also If other then not the same nor doth community of general title argu identity of special order or specifical Office For Apostles were caled Disciples but the seventy no Apostles and Matthias one of them was chosen Apostle as to an higher degree yea Dorotheus flatly avers that they were subordinat to them and many afterwards made Diocesan Bishops who succeded the twelv and Presbyters the seventy as al Antients Jeronimo non exempto unanimosly vote and inform Men who hav forfeted their Faith or resigned it to Faction fear not to vent untruths among the Vulgar being sure the simpler sort wil be seduced for lack of learning and their Proselits apt to accept shadows for substances or counterfet copper for current Coin But St. Austins saying to Julius the Heretic wil wel suit such Sectists Hath time so confounded al things is darknes turn'd to light or contrarily that Pelagius Celestin and Julius can see but Hilary Cyprian and Ambros becom blind semblably are al Fathers Councils and Ecclesiastic Writers blind Beetles not to perceiv how primitiv Churches not long before their dais were governed but Calvin Cartwright and Knox such Lynces to see so far into a Milston what was acted so many ages before their births without any Perspectivs of Human Histories a strange instinct if not inspiration Let St. Austins admonition shape the conclusion 'T is fit Christians should prefer Antiquity before your Novities and rather adhere to their solid Judgments then to your shalow fancies The Answer to nine Questions propounded at last Parliament to the Assembly of Divines touching Jus Divinum in Church Government is built on the proofs or Principles precited 1. That Elders and Elderships in Scripture were sacred Officers representing the Church 2. That Christ hath a temporal Kingdom wherof secular Magistrats are Vicegerents and a spiritual committed to Church Officers as 't is said Aaron and his Sons shal wait on the Priests Office and a Bâ—shops Numb 3. 10. Office is a good work for they are contra distinct and may 1 Tim. 3. 1. not confound their powers Say that Magistrats must guard the Church by positiv Laws yet not rule in it nor they to meddle with secular affairs 3. That no Independent congregational Elderships are Jure divino 4. That Christ gav the Keis to his Apostles and their spiritual successors but not to Mat. 16 19. Mat. 18 18. John 20 23. al Members of the Church Al which are tru Positions if the head Rulers be included els 't is no Church Government of divine Institution For no Societies Companies Colleges or Corporations can be complet without their several Heads as right Episcopacy is a regulated Presbytery but single Presbytery without a Bishop who may not be secluded or separated Episcopat beheaded 'T is said That in the black Moneth a headless Hors wanders the streets with a chain about his neck which haply now is fulfilled if the Church becom an Anarchical Acephalon and the World an Antipodical Anarchy That answer hath two main defects 1. In not declaring the whol truth that the Apostles were Heads or Presidents over al Presbyters and before their deaths deputed Bishops to be ordinary Rulers themselfs being extraordinary in their steads 2. In not explaining whether Lay-Elders may be admitted among Church-Officers which seems to bee a mungrel mixture But al Sects learn that craft of Satan to concele what makes most against them Certes Episcopat and Elderships are Correlats nor can ther be a tru Presbytery without a Prelat Whence Mr. Calvin at Geneva when they reformed Religion and had expelled their Popish Prelat Soveraign of the State offered to readmit him if he would renounce the Papacy but upon refusal erected this new form of Ministers and Laics to draw in joint yoke together to pleas his Popular Patrons He wished as his felows did to hav Protestant Prelats as in England or Superintendents which are analogical Bishops as elswher for they are truly Christian yea of Apostolic Institution not Anti-Christian unles Antichrist be the head and many hundreds suffred Martyry under Pagan tyranny beside som here in the Marian persecution therfore such aspersions savour more of ignorant malice then tru charity for it may sincerly be said sans scandal that Episcopacy stood established in this land ever since the dawn of Christianity under Lucius a Brytish King almost An C. 180. 1500 yeers both by antient and later Laws from age to age So that if the primitiv form of Church government be retained it cannot be exiled for if Titus Timothy and the rest were ruling Elders over Presbyters it should be so stil yet 't is not simply unalterable if weighty causes require an abolition Epiphanius rightly reputed Aerius an Heretic though it be no point of Faith but Faction and such since stiled Schismatics for opposing Episcopacy sith if it should be granted which can never be proved that 't is a meer Human Ordinance of Apostolic Men yet possession and prescription of 1500 yeers sans violence or usurpation is enough to instal it in a firm right free from extirpation if their be any sure setled state on Earth For St. Jerom no friend to that Order for his teen against John the proud Patriarch of Jerusalem under whos Jurisdiction he lived long at Bethleem Juda freely agniseth that the peace of particular Churches cannot be conserved without it being the best means to suppress Schisms Sects and Heresies which swarm like Locusts in the open Sun Many abuses are crept up specialy in committing too much power to Lay. Chancelors and detracting divers priviledges from Presbyters beside excessiv avarice of som Bishops which reigns in scarlet Robes so il as in lawn sleevs al which may be reformed and pristin procedings restored without weeding out pure Wheat with Tares Cockles and Darnel which wise Husbandmen wil not doo but what disorders may grow upon its utter eradication as al alterations are perilous none but Gods alseing Ey can foresee To sum up al thes are Oraculous verities 1. That Christ Summary during life kept al rule in his sole power but after Resurrection commended it to his Apostles by a Triple charge to Peter Feed my Sheep 2. That when Beleevers increased they erected Elders every wher to officiat under them 3. That
natural line from David to shew how he is his Son after the Flesh Matthew the Legal to specify how for default of Jeconiahs Issu he succeeded in Davids throne as tru Heir and King of the Jews rightly so caled Nor can they name any of their Nation neerer in succession yet wilfully cried we hav no King but Note Casar a forren Conqueror So tho Christ was not Salomons natural Son nor is promised to be yet was his Legal or Regal by Salathiel and Davids genuin by Nathan Here the sudden decay of Salomons Kingdom for ten Tribes in Rehoboam and the two other in Jeconiah with al his Roial race warns al how ominous the sins of carnal and spiritual whordom be For Salomon to stablish his posterity and satisfy his Luxury multiplyed Wifes and Concubins contrary to Gods command who made one Woman for one Man to be one Flesh but to pleas them permitted Idols in a holy Land and at last fel to Idolatry wors then Harlotry which was perilous to his own Soul had not God given Grace to repent and pernitious to al his posterity The last concluds al from Zerobabel Son to Pedaiah 5 Sect. Grandson to Salathiel to Christ wher Matthew recompts by Abiud alias Hananiah 1 Chr. 3. 19. Josephs Forefathers in number nine but Luke from Rhesa alias Meshullam secund Governor after the Captivity whom Philo cals Rhesa Mesciola numbers Maries Progenitors eighten just twise so many At end of which line rests one difficulty becaus Matthew cals Joseph Son to Jacob Luke to Eli which is fairly reconciled for Jacob was his Natural Father Eli Legal So in Christs Natural line deduced from Mary by Luke Joseph only is not Natural Father but so supposed as he saith Hence 't is cleer how meet he was to doo the work wherto he was consecrat For Zechary cals him Gnâ—mith Jehovae the Lords felow Zech. 13. 7. Job 19. â—5 Isai 7. 14. which St. Paul intâ—rprets equal with God in regard of his Deity but Job Goel my Kinsman in respect of his Humanity as foretelling his Incarnation in which sens he is stiled Shiloh signifying that skin or tunicle which incloseth Embryons Isaiah terms him Immanuel God with us implying both Natures in one Person Jobs title Goel from Gaal i. Redemit vel vindicavit imports a Redeemer or Revenger for by the Law to redeem an Inheritance belonged to the next Kinsman as also to revenge his Blood so our Heritage being lost by sin and Adams Of-spring slain by Satan our next Kinsman a Son of Adam coms to ransom the one and expiat the other yea to perform what no Typical Redeemer or Temporal Revenger ever could doo For Men might kil him which slu their Brethren if they found him out of a Refuge City yet could not restore them to life but Christ flu the Murderer Satan found out of refuge and as a peerless Conqueror gav life to his Brethren even al the Sons of Adam that shal beleev in him One rub rests to be removed how Josephs Ancestors can Quest be clyped or computed Christs Progenitors either Natural or Legal and why recited in his Pedigree Surely they are not properly so termed sith he was but supposed 〈◊〉 Father yet inserted for special purpos to stop or satisfy al Cavils exceptions and objections For if only Maries descent had bin displaied Men might say what matters it for his Mothers Prosapy His Father was a Carpenter basely born and bred If Josephs soly others would object what 's that to Christ who issued not from his loins or linage But when both their stock Fathers are so evidently drawn from Jessâ—s root the mouth of malice and malediction must needs be musâ—ed or bungd up nor can detraction derogat or deny his Regal right from David Thus tho the two Evangelists vary in maner of Accompt or form of words yet they agree pointly and precisely in the matter and truth of things without the least clashing or contradicting one another A Series or Synopsis of the premisses wil make al circumstances more obvious to every Ey or common Capacity St. Luke draws Christs Golden line of Genealogy on Summary which runs the whol Book of God comprising 77. Generations 1. God 2. Adam 3. Seth. 4 Enos 5. Cainan 6. Mahalaleel 7. Jared 8. Enoch 9. Methusalem 10. Lamech 11. Noah 12. Sem 13. Arphaxad 14. Salah 15. Eber 16. Peleg 17. Reu or Regu 18. Sarug 19. Nahor 20. Terah In both which Sections he walks alone in the third St. Matthew and he go hand in hand reckonig the natural line to David by direct descent 21. Abraham 22. Isaac 23. Jacob 24. Juda 25. Pharez 26. Ezrom 27. Aram 28. Aminadab 29. Naasson 30. Salmon 31. Booz 32. Obed. 33. Jesse 34. David 35. Nathan 36. Matatha 37. Mainan 38. Melea 39. Eliakim 40. Jonan 41. Joseph 42. Juda 43. Simeon 44. Levi 45. Matthas 46. Jorim 47. Eliezer 48. Jose 49. Er. 50. Elmodam 51. Cosam 52. Addi 53. Melchi 54. Neri 55. Salathiel 56. Pedaiah 57. Zerobabel In this fourth Section from David he runs apart except in the three last links whom St. Matthew cites caling Salathiel Jâ—coniaâ—s Son as successor or next of kin but Luke stiles him Son to Neri being so by Blood and Birth In the last Section thes 58. Rhesa 59. Joanna 60. Juda 61 Joseph 62. Sâ—mâ—i 63. Mattathia 64. Maath 65. Naggi 66. Esli 67. Naum. 68. Amos 69. Mattaâ—hâ—as 70. Joseph 71 Joanna 72. Melchi 73. Levi 74. Matthat 75. Eli 76. Mary 77. Christ Thus he recites the Natural line only sav that he saith Joseph was of Eli not Son that is belonged to him as Son in Law having espoused his Daughter Mary Christs Mother Now Matthew handles the Legal Regal line to prov him lawful King of the Jews or next of kin from Jeconiah to sit on his Father Davids Throne So if Lukes twenty first Patriarchs be annexed to his Genealogy both wil be complet from Adam to Christ in their several wais or intentions which are divers but not advers one to another Matthew in the Legal line cites thes after David Salomâ—n Roboam Abâ—â— Asa Jehosophaâ— Joram Ozia Joatham Achaz Ezekiah Manasse Amon Josia Jehoichim Jeconiah Salathiel Zerobabel Abiud Eliakim Azor Sadoe Achim Eliud Eleazer Mattham Jacob Joseph Christs supposed Father Wher next to Jâ—coniah he reckons Salathiel and Zerobabel before Abiud but omits three successiv Kings of Juda after Ozia Joas Amazia Azaria beside Athalia the usurping Queen and Pâ—daiah Zerobabels Father purposly to make a Tesserad ecad of just fourten generations in ech of his three spaces or Sections which is no falsity or forgery to cut off or abridg som links of the long line From Adam to David the Parents are one but from David to Joseph Matthew numbers twenty seven and Luke to Mary twenty three in their differing reckonings Al Penmen of the holy Ghost Prophets and Evangelists Note pursu the right line of Genealogy til they
that Christ went into the Wildernes freely and the carying to or fro was a very Vision as St. Lukes words in the Spirit apertly indicat or demonstrat Ob. Satan entred into Judas Iscariot who communed with Luk 22 3. 4. the chief Priests and Captains how to betray Christ Ergo Satan is a Spirit Sol. Satan signifies Enimy who is said to enter into Judas when he intertained a traâ—terous hostil intention to sel his Lord and Master for Satan cannot be said to enter before he harbored any such hostil design and 't is impertinent to say he entred in afterward therfore his wicked plot or purpose and Satans entring was one and the same thing but Incorporeal real Spirits be none Why then did not Christ and his Apostles instruct silly Quest People so plainly that they might no more doubt the truth therof Becaus such questions are more curious then salutiferous Answ and it may so wel be asked why he gav faith piety and obedience to som only but not to al which he could so easily doo Hereto reason may be rendred that as God when he brought the Israelits into Canaan did not instantly destroy al Neighbor Nations but left som as thorns in thâ—ir sides to awaken their industry and piety so Christ in conducting us toward his Heavenly Kingdom did not destroy al difficulties of natural questions but left them to whet our industry intellect and Judgment his chief scope being to shâ—w this one Article that he is Christ Son of the living God sent to sacrifice himself for sins and at next coming to reign gloriously over the Elect and to sav them from their Enimies eternaly Ther be Angels or Spirits good and evil but not incorporeal Confession such as Men suppose they see in the dark or a dream or vision which the Latins cal Spectra and took for Demons Yea ther be corporeal Spirits subtle and invisible yet not that they possessed any Mans Body and Saints Bodies shal be such viz. spiritual as St. Paul cals them Howbeit the doctrin of incorporeal Spirits prevailed in the Church and Introduced Exorcism which is not fully extruded Then were many Demoniacs but few mad Men now many mad Men but few Demoniacs which proceds not from any change in Nature but only of Names It may be asked whether the bad Spirits be they comparatly 〈◊〉 coporeal or incoporeal shal realy torment the damned with fire for ever or what els they doo Another Relique of Gentilism not brought in but left Images when they gav their names to Christ is Image-worship not instituted by Moses or Christ being meer Ideas Idols Phantasms Conceipts or Representations of extern Bodies extant in their Brains from the Organ of Senses though they seem realy without us being like things in a dream which intruth are nothing as St. Paul tels For tho their metal or mattet Gold Silver Copper Stone Wood be somwhat yet the very Figure or Sculpture which they honored or adored was a meer figment having no habitation existent of it self but only in the motions of Mens brains the worship of which is in Scripture flat Idolatry or Apostasy from God who was the Jews sole King and Moses his first Lieftenant His prime Law was that they should hav no other Gods but or beside himself The next that they should make no carved Image of their own invention to worship it For 't is al one in deposing a King and setting up another whether he be set up by a Neighbor Nation or the Subjects To honor is highly to valu any Persons power by comparing him with others but none can compare with God therfore we dishonor him by any valu less then infinit Honor properly is internal in the heart but Mens thoughts which appeer outwardly in words and actions by praying genuflexion obeying serving are signs of honoring commonly caled worshâ—p latinly Cultus Worship is duple 1. Civil du to Men as to Kings by Subjects Worship to Masters by Servants Fathers by Sons Pedagogs by Scholars Captains by Souldiers c. 2. Divine which we render to God soly or things consecrat to his service To seek a distinction of Divine and Civil worship in the words Latria Doulia and not in the worshipers intention is very fallacy or foppery For ther were two sorts of Servants 1. Such as their Masters had absolut power to kil upon discontent or disobedience as Slavs with their issu who were caled Douloi and their service Doulia being sold like Beasts 2. Thos that served spontaneously for hire or hope termed Thetes Domestic Servants upon mutual Covenants Both kinds hav their labor appointed by others and such stiled Latres as work for others So latria signifies al service in general but doulia only of Bondmen both are used promiscuously in Scripture to signify Gods service sith we al are his Sons Servants and Slaves in al which sorts is contained not only Obedience but worship with fit words and gestures An Image is the representation of somthing visible finit Image what and figured which is a quantity every way determiend so ther can be no proper Image of God Angels Spirits or Souls sith they hav no definit dimensions but only of visible bodies in fantastic forms shapes or seemings The species or shew of things in water by reflexion or refraction or of the Sun and Stars in the Air which are not wher they seem to be nor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or figures the same with that of the Objects 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 termed Ideas Idols Phantasms or Apparitions whence one inward Sens is stiled Imagination for a man can Fiction what fancy shapâ—â— he never saw like Dreamers as Poets fain Centaurs Chimera's and other Monsters so can he frame them in matâ—er of wood clay stone metal stiled Images not to resemble any real thing but only som phantastic Inhabiters of the devisers brain sith ther is a similitud of one to the other as 't is painted carved melted or moulded in matter by Art like the Image of that Idol conceived in nature Image in an ampler acception implies any resemblance of one thing by another as a King is caled Gods Image and an inferior Magistrat a superiors yea Pagans adored such for Gods as had no semblance of the Idol in their phansy as an unhewn stone for Neptune and Images of the same Saint diametraly differ yet serv their turn wel enough as names doo in History to present the Persons described Idol is extended farther in Scripture Idol what to signify Fire Sun Star or any other Creature visible or invisible worshiped as God but to put worship and Image together divers doctrins wil occur To worship an Image is Idolatry voluntarily to doo such extern acts as are signs of honoring either the matter wood Stone metal or phantasm of the brain for which it was formed or figured or both together as one animat compound of both Body and Soul To be bare before a Prince or
or thin For Mans Soul they say 't is created by pouring in and poured in by creating what 's that For the caus of Sens they make an ubiquity of Species or shews of objects which appeering to the Ey make sight to the Ear hearing to the Palat tast to the Nostril smelling and to the rest of the Body feeling For the caus of willing to doo any act they make the faculty or wil it self doo somtime one thing somtime another making the Power caus of the act as if on should assign Mens ability to doo any things the very â—aus of good or evil acts Yet oftimes they put their own ignorance to be caus of natural events or effects but disguised in other words as when they make Fortune a caus of contingents wherof they know no caus or when they ascribe effects to occult qualities not known to them nor as they sâ—rmise to any els or to Sympathy Antiphaty Antiperistasis specifical properties which neither signify the agent producing nor operation produced being only Clokes to cover ignorance Their Moral and Politic Philosophy hath the like or greater Politics absonances for if any doo injury or injustice contrary to Law they say God is prime Caus of the Action but not of the injustice or deviation this is vain Philosophy as to say that one makes a right and crooked line but another the incongruity or inconformity This distinction was devised to defend the doctrin of Free wil not subject to Gods wil. Why not to vindicat God from being Author of sin notwithstanding Quaere his absolut irrespectiv Decree to Reprobat men who must needs sin Aristotle defines Good and Evil by mens appetit which may seem tru sith every one is ruled by his own list or lore but in a Common-wealth the measure is fals wher not mens privat appetits but public Law of the State is sole Rule yet their doctrin soly practised wher every one doth what seems good in his own eys To make lawful mariage unchast or impure as they doo who deny it to the Clergy under color of continual chast continence to attend at the Altar and administer the holy Eucharist is vain Philosophy wherby they make mariage a moral vice and themselfs by abstaining spiritual like the Angels in Heaven From Aristotles Civil Polity they cal al Common-wealths sav the popular such as then Athens was Tyranny and al Kings Tyrans so they termed thirty Legislators set up by the Lacedemonians who subdued Athens thirty Tyrans and Democraty liberty yet Tyran truly taken signifies simply a Monarch but when that Government grew odious in all Greece it was branded with the Popular hatred of Tyranny and when Kings were expeld from Rome they did the like So when the same men are displeased with Democraty or Aristocraty they nickname the first Anarchy the last Oligarchy or Tyranny of a few Hence riseth another error of Aristotle that Laws not men should govern as if men wil be ruled by words or paper and not by men which hav power by the Sword to punish or put them to death giving life to the Laws this is a pestilent pernitious error wherby they seduce men so oft as they like not their Governors to rais war against them which the Clergy cherisheth Another error in Civil Philosophy which they never learned of Pagans is to extend the Law the Rule only of actions to mens very thoughts and Consciences by examination or inquisition of what they hold tho they conform in Words and Actions Herby they are forced to answer the truth of their thoughts or an untruth for fear of punishment Another error not drawn from Heathens is that a privat Man without the CoÌ„mon-wealths authority may interpret the Law by his own Spirit but are not Scriptures wher they are a Law made a Law by the CoÌ„monwealths authority and consequently a part of the Civil Law So they which impropriat Preaching to one certain Order of Men wher the State leavs it free commit the like error for if the State forbids me not to Preach none els can If I be among Judians or Infidels shal I being not in Orders think it sin to Preach Christ Jesus or expound Scriptures In such cases of necessity say they wher is no Ministry it may be doon without mission as wherever a dispensation is du for necessity ther needs none when no Law forbids it Ergo to deny thes functions to whom the civil Soveraign denies them not is to take away lawful liberty The Schoolmens writings are mostly insignificant terms or trains of strange barbarous words otherwise used then in common Latin language which would pose Cicero Varro or any Grammarian of antient Rome For let any try whether he can translat them into any modern Toung which if he cannot how can that be intelligible in Latin which is not so in other languages Howbeit this insignificance of speech is no fals Philosophy but both a quality to hide the truth and make Men think they hav it being skild in School-notions and so desist from farther serch of it in others He saith elswher what kind of felicity God ordains for them that devoutly serv him one shal no sooner know then enjoy being Quaere jois now so incomprehensible as the School-mens words beatific Vision unintelligible but doth not that signify to enjoy the perpetual presence of the divine Trinity as Men delight in ech others company face to face Which if Christ must reign on a new finit Earth with his Saints for ever none ever shal doo For beatific Vision is to see the blessed Trinity face 4 Caus to face in his eternal mansion The last caus of spiritual Darknes is to mix uncertain Traditions and untru Histories like the golden legion of fals fictious miracles in Saints lifes of Ghosts Goblins and Apparitions alleged by Romish Doctors to varnish their Doctrins of Hel Purgatory Exoâ—cisms and such like Which tho som pious Fathers Pope Gregory 1. St. Bernard c. broched yet they were Men and might take it on trust from others as Beda also did but if any speak it of their own knowledg 't is no confirmation of such vanity but a detection of their fraud fallacy or frailty The suppression of tru Philosophy by Men that hav no authority nor sufficient study may be joind with the introduction of falsâ— for our late Navigators and al learned Men acknowledg Antipodes as it appeers daily more that yeers and dais are determined by the Earths motions yet such as only supposed it heretofore were punishd by Ecclesiastic power What reason had they Is it becaus 't is contrary to tru Religion That cannot be if the opinions be truâ— let the truth be first disquired by competent Judges or refuted by such as pretend to know the contrary Is it becaus they disturb Government or Religion established Let the Teachers be silenced or punished by civil Rulers who can chastise disobedience in thos that teach