Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
law_n john_n sir_n thomas_n 39,857 5 10.5851 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A59975 The Case in law and equity of Tristram Wodward, Esq. for the mannors of Tuddington, Harlington, and Tyngrith, and other lands in the county of Bedford / reported to the Commissioners of Obstructions by Mr. St. Nichlas the councell for the Common-wealth. St. Nichlas, Thomas. 1652 (1652) Wing S346; ESTC R37140 13,482 26

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

council_n for_o the_o commonwealth_n such_o conveyance_n as_o he_o have_v in_o his_o custody_n or_o can_v come_v by_o as_o be_v make_v by_o the_o lady_n jane_n cheyne_n decease_v in_o the_o 29_o of_o eliz._n to_o pooley_n and_o glenham_n and_o from_o the_o say_v pooley_n and_o glenham_n to_o thomas_n earl_n of_o cleveland_n or_o to_o any_o other_o for_o his_o use_n to_o be_v make_v use_n of_o in_o the_o defence_n of_o the_o commonwealth_n title_n and_o then_o to_o be_v safe_o redeliver_v to_o the_o say_v m._n penington_n copia_fw-la examinatur_fw-la edw._n noell_n may_v 27._o 1652._o by_o the_o commissioner_n for_o remove_v obstruction_n in_o the_o sale_n of_o delinquent_n land_n and_o estate_n whereas_o the_o cause_n upon_o the_o petition_n and_o claim_v therein_o of_o tristram_n wodward_n esquire_n out_o of_o the_o estate_n of_o thomas_n earl_n of_o cleveland_n one_o of_o the_o person_n name_v in_o the_o act_n entitle_v a_o act_n for_o the_o sale_n of_o several_a land_n and_o estate_n forfeit_v to_o the_o commonwealth_n for_o treason_n to_o the_o manor_n of_o tuddington_n harlington_n and_o tyngrith_n in_o the_o county_n of_o bedford_n come_v according_a to_o former_a order_n to_o a_o hear_v this_o day_n and_o the_o certificate_n or_o repert_a of_n mr_n st_n nicklas_n of_o council_n for_o the_o commonwealth_n make_v in_o this_o case_n be_v read_v and_o council_n for_o the_o petitioner_n be_v hear_v what_o they_o have_v to_o offer_v in_o reference_n to_o the_o say_a claim_n and_o the_o same_o be_v have_v in_o serious_a debate_n and_o consideration_n it_o be_v upon_o the_o question_n resolve_v that_o the_o claim_n of_o the_o say_v tristram_n wodward_n esq_n to_o the_o say_a manor_n of_o tuddington_n harlington_n and_o tyngrith_n be_v dismiss_v copia_fw-la examinatur_fw-la edward_n noell_n that_o the_o act_n of_o parliament_n for_o sale_n of_o delinquent_n land_n do_v appoint_v all_o just_a claim_n both_o in_o law_n or_o equity_n to_o be_v hear_v determine_v and_o allow_v the_o reason_n of_o learned_a lawyer_n why_o the_o claim_n of_o the_o say_v tristram_n wodward_n esq_n be_v just_a in_o law_n and_o equity_n i_o be_o of_o opinion_n that_o the_o plaintiff_n m._n wodward_n ought_v to_o have_v a_o decree_n for_o the_o land_n and_o profit_n since_o the_o death_n of_o the_o lady_n cheyne_n 12_o jacob._n of_o those_o parcel_n of_o land_n whereof_o the_o fine_n sur_fw-fr concessit_fw-la be_v levy_v 20_o eliz._n and_o 27_o eliz._n and_o whereof_o the_o recovery_n be_v suffer_v 24_o eliz._n for_o that_o the_o lady_n power_n be_v interrupt_v from_o make_v the_o lease_n for_o 30_o year_n of_o those_o parcel_n notwithstanding_o the_o deed_n to_o pooley_n and_o glemham_n suppose_v to_o be_v make_v by_o the_o lady_n cheyne_n 29_o eliz._n be_v true_a deed_n but_o i_o suspect_v those_o deed_n to_o be_v false_a antedate_a deed_n make_v of_o purpose_n to_o bring_v the_o reversion_n to_o the_o earl_n of_o cleveland_n the_o lady_n chain_n heir_n contrary_a to_o the_o intent_n of_o the_o lord_n cheyne_n in_o the_o deed_n of_o 13_o eliz._n wherefore_o i_o be_o also_o of_o opinion_n the_o plaintiff_n ought_v to_o have_v a_o decree_n for_o the_o reversion_n of_o all_o the_o rest_n of_o the_o land_n after_o the_o expiration_n of_o the_o lease_n for_o 30_o year_n make_v by_o the_o lady_n cheyne_n 10_o jac._n to_o sir_n john_n crofts_n to_o begin_v from_o her_o death_n 12_o jac._n which_o end_v the_o 16_o of_o april_n 1644._o i_o be_o also_o of_o opinion_n that_o the_o land_n and_o good_n of_o eliz._n cheyne_n be_v good_a and_o valuable_a consideration_n in_o equity_n for_o thomas_n cheyne_n her_o husband_n to_o convey_v his_o own_o land_n to_o the_o plaintiff_n who_o be_v sister_n son_n of_o elizabeth_n cheyne_n by_o the_o say_a bargain_n and_o sale_n make_v 6_o jac._n and_o that_o the_o land_n mention_v in_o the_o deed_n of_o bargain_n and_o sale_n aught_o to_o be_v decree_v for_o the_o plaintiff_n in_o equity_n according_a to_o the_o conveyance_n and_o covenant_n of_o thomas_n cheyne_n i_o be_o also_o of_o opinion_n that_o the_o new_a assurance_n make_v 11_o jac._n by_o thomas_n cheyne_n to_o sir_n thomas_n pelham_n sir_n john_n hungerford_n and_o other_o do_v in_o law_n raise_v the_o use_n to_o the_o plaintiff_n and_o his_o child_n be_v make_v for_o marriage_n between_o the_o plaintiff_n and_o his_o wife_n the_o daughter_n of_o sir_n edmund_n pelham_n and_o kinswoman_n of_o thomas_n cheyne_n and_o of_o the_o lord_n cheyne_n and_o that_o the_o conveyance_n of_o 11_o jac._n and_o the_o statute_n of_o forty_o thousand_o pound_n be_v good_a in_o law_n and_o equity_n edward_z atkins_n july_n 18._o 1645._o i_o be_o of_o opinion_n that_o for_o those_o parcel_n of_o land_n wherein_o the_o lady_n power_n be_v interrupt_v by_o the_o fine_n of_o 20_o and_o 27_o eliz._n and_o by_o the_o recovery_n of_o 24_o eliz._n and_o for_o the_o profit_n thereof_o since_o the_o death_n of_o the_o lady_n the_o plaintiff_n ought_v to_o be_v relieve_v in_o equity_n albeit_o the_o deed_n to_o pooley_n and_o glemham_n shall_v fall_v out_o to_o be_v true_a deed_n but_o those_o deed_n seem_v to_o be_v false_a and_o antedate_a after_o the_o lady_n chain_n revocation_n of_o her_o limitation_n 35_o eliz._n and_o therefore_o i_o also_o conceive_v that_o the_o plaintiff_n ought_v to_o be_v relieve_v for_o the_o reversion_n of_o all_o the_o rest_n of_o the_o land_n after_o the_o expiration_n of_o the_o lease_n for_o 30_o year_n which_o be_v now_o end_v and_o the_o great_a estate_n in_o land_n and_o good_n of_o eliz._n cheyne_n the_o plaintiff_n aunt_n whereof_o she_o be_v defraud_v be_v great_a and_o valuable_a consideration_n for_o thomas_n cheyne_n to_o convey_v this_o reversion_n after_o the_o 30_o year_n to_o the_o plaintiff_n be_v the_o sister_n son_n of_o eliz._n cheyne_n and_o i_o think_v that_o the_o bargain_n and_o sale_n to_o the_o plaintiff_n 6_o jac._n regis_fw-la and_o the_o new_a assurance_n 11_o jac._n regis_fw-la and_o the_o statute_n of_o 40000_o pound_n ought_v to_o be_v decree_v for_o the_o plaintiff_n in_o equity_n according_a to_o the_o covenant_n of_o thomas_n cheyne_n i_o hold_v that_o the_o lady_n cheyne_n by_o the_o deed_n of_o 13_o eliz_n have_v only_a power_n to_o make_v one_o limitation_n and_o no_o more_o and_o therefore_o that_o limitation_n of_o the_o use_n of_o the_o recovery_n of_o 13_o eliz._n in_o the_o bottom_n of_o the_o deed_n of_o 35_o eliz._n be_v void_a and_o idle_a if_o those_o deed_n to_o pooley_n and_o glemham_n be_v make_v 29_o eliz._n and_o true_a deed_n which_o i_o conceive_v be_v repugnant_a to_o those_o deed_n 35_o eliz_n and_o also_o to_o the_o last_o will_n of_o the_o lady_n cheyne_n which_o declare_v that_o she_o never_o make_v any_o limitation_n nor_o ever_o intend_v to_o make_v any_o without_o power_n of_o revocation_n if_o those_o deed_n to_o pooley_n and_o glemham_n have_v be_v true_a deed_n it_o be_v not_o probable_a that_o sir_n john_n crofts_n the_o lady_n chain_n commissioner_n will_v have_v omit_v the_o prove_v of_o they_o at_o the_o find_n of_o the_o lord_n chain_n office_n in_o 35_o eliz._n or_o have_v suffer_v the_o lady_n cheyne_n to_o have_v omit_v the_o plead_n of_o they_o in_o the_o exchequer_n 36_o eliz._n neither_o will_v the_o earl_n have_v omit_v the_o prove_v of_o they_o in_o his_o own_o office_n 12_o jac._n regis_fw-la after_o the_o death_n of_o the_o lady_n cheyne_n nor_o in_o the_o court_n of_o ward_n council-table_n and_o chancery_n where_o he_o have_v be_v call_v to_o prove_v they_o it_o appear_v that_o the_o earl_n in_o the_o court_n of_o ward_n plead_v the_o plaintiff_n bargain_n and_o sale_n and_o consideration_n to_o bar_n thomas_n cheyne_n and_o therefore_o it_o will_v be_v a_o kind_n of_o contradiction_n for_o the_o earl_n to_o plead_v in_o chancery_n against_o the_o plaintiff_n that_o now_o the_o consideration_n be_v not_o valuable_a i_o be_o of_o opinion_n that_o the_o clark_n undue_a enter_v up_o in_o the_o dismission_n at_o large_a in_o the_o court_n of_o ward_n against_o thomas_n cheyne_n that_o the_o court_n be_v satisfy_v of_o the_o earl_n title_n to_o be_v good_a and_o sufficient_a in_o law_n without_o any_o such_o word_n or_o warrant_v in_o the_o order_n for_o dismission_n and_o after_o plead_v the_o same_o at_o the_o council-table_n and_o in_o chancery_n against_o the_o plaintiff_n be_v undue_o do_v and_o aught_o to_o be_v suppress_v the_o lord_n cheyne_n take_v the_o fee-simple_n from_o the_o lady_n chain_n heir_n give_v by_o the_o deed_n of_o 6_o eliz._n and_o settle_v it_o upon_o his_o own_o heir_n by_o the_o deed_n of_o 13_o eliz._n after_o the_o expiration_n of_o the_o lady_n chain_n estate_n do_v clear_o show_v that_o he_o mean_v his_o wife_n shall_v leave_v the_o reversion_n after_o 30_o year_n to_o his_o heir_n