required to obedience be denied him Naye rather why doth he excuse him selfe when he canne impute the hardenesse of heart to none but to hymselfe Therefore the wycked that are wyllyngely readye to mocke them oute yf the myght are throwen downe wyth the force of them whether they will or no. But the chefe profite towarde the faithfull is to be considered in whome as the Lorde woorketh all thinges by his spirite so hee leaueth not the instrumentes of his worde vseth the same not without effecte Let this therfore stande whyche is true that all the strength of the godly resteth in the grace of God accordyng to that sayinge of the Prophete I will geue them a newe heart that they maye walke in them But thou wylte saye Why are they nowe admonyshed of their duetye and not rather lefte to the direction of the holy ghoste why are they moued wyth exhortation sythe they canne make no more haste than the styrrynge forwarde of the holy ghooste woorketh why are thei chastised if at any tyme they be gone oute of the waye syth they fell by the necessarye weakenesse of the fleshe O man what arte thou to apoynte a lawe for God If it be his pleasure that we bee prepared by exhortation to receiue the selfe same grace whereby is wroughte that the exhortation is obeied what haste thou in thys ordre to bite or carpe at If exhortations and rebukynges dyd nothynge els profyte wyth the godlye but to reproue them of synne they were euen for that thing onely to be compted not alltogether vnprofitable Nowe for asmuche as by the holy ghooste woorkynge inwardly thei muche auaile to enflame the desire of goodnesse to shake of sluggyshnesse to take awaye the pleasure and venymoâ—â—s swetenesse of wyckednesse and on the other syde to engendre a hatred and irkesomnesse therof whoe dare cauill that thei are superfluus If any manne require a plainer aunswere let him take thys God woorketh after twoo sortes in hys electe inwardly by his spirite outwardely by his worde By his spirite by enlyghtninge theyr myndes by framinge their heartes to the loue and keepinge of iustice hee maketh them a newe creature By his worde he stirreth them to desire to seke and atteine the same renuinge by them bothe hee sheweth fourth the effectuall woorkinge of his hande accordinge to the proportion of his dystributioÌ„ When hee sendeth the same woorde to the reprobate thoughe not for their amendement yet hee maketh it to serue for an other vse that bothe for the present time thei maie bee pressed with witnesse of conscience and maye againste the daie of iudgemente bee made more inexcusable So thoughe Christe pronounce that no manne commeth to hym but whome the Father draweth and that the electe do come when thei haue hearde and learned of the father yet doothe not hee neglecte the office of a teacher but with his voice dylygentlie calleth them whome it necessarily behoueth to bee inwardely taughte by the holly Ghoste that thei maie any thinge profyte And Paule teacheth that teachinge is not in vaine with the reprobate bicause it is to them the sauoure of deathe to deathe butte a swete sauoure to God Thei be verye laborious in heapinge together of testimonies of Scripture and that they dooe of purpose that when thei canne not oppresse vs wyth weyghte thei maie yet with numbre But as in battelles when it commeth to hande strookes the weaker multitude how muche pompe and shewe soeuer it hath is with a fewe strippes discomfyted and putte to flyghte so shall yt bee verye easye for vs to ouerthrowe them wyth all theyr route For bycause the places that they abuse agaynste vs when they are ones dyuyded into theyr ordres do meete vpon a fewe specyall poyntes wee shall wyth one aunswere satysfye many of them therefore yt shall not bee needefull to tarrye vpon dyssoluynge euerye one of them partycularlye Theyr cheefe force they sette in the commaundementes whyche they thynke to bee so tempered to oure strengthes that what soeuer ys proued to bee requyred by the one yt necessarylye foloweth that yt maye bee perfourmed by the other And therefore they runne throughe euerye of the commaundementes and by them doe measure the proportion of oure strengthe For saye they eyther God mocketh vs when hee chargeth vs wyth hollyenesse godlynesse obedyence chastitie loue and mekenesse and when hee forbiddeth vs vncleannesse ydolatrie vnchastenesse wrathe robberye pryde and suche lyke or hee requyreth onely those thynges that are in oure power Nowe we maye dyuyde into three sortes in manner all the commaundementes that they heape together Some requyre oure fyrste conuersion to God some speake symply of the keepynge of the lawe some commaunde vs to contynue in the grace of God that wee haue receyued Fyrste lette vs speake of them all in generalitie and then descende to the specyall sortes To extende the power of manne to the commaundementes of the lawe hathe in deede longe agoe begonne to bee commune and hathe some shewe butte yt proceded from mooste rude ignoraunce of the lawe For they that thynke yt a heynous offence yf yt bee sayde that the keepynge of the lawe ys ympossyble do reste forsoothe vpon thys moste stronge argumente that ells the lawe was geuen in vayne For they speake in suche sorte as yf Paule hadde noe where spoken of the lawe For I beseache them what meane these sayinges that the lawe was sette bycause of transgressions That by the lawe ys the knoweledge of synne That the lawe maketh synne that the lawe entred that synne myght abounde was yt meante that the lawe was to bee lymyted to oure strengthes leaste yt shoulde bee geuen in vayne or rather that yt was sette farre aboue vs to conuince oure weakenesse Truelye by the same mans defynition the ende and fullfyllynge of the lawe ys Charytye Butte when hee wysheth the myndes of the Thessalonians to bee fylled wyth charitie hee dothe sufficientlye confesse that the lawe soundeth in oure eares wythoute profyte vnlesse God inspire the whole summe thereof in oure heartes Truelye yf the Scrypture dyd teache nothynge ells butte that the lawe ys a rule of lyfe where vnto wee oughte to frame oure endeuours I woulde also wythoute delaye agree to theyr opinion but whereas yt dothe dylygently and playnely declare vnto vs the manyfolde vse of the lawe yt ys conueniente rather to consyder by that interpretation what the lawe maye doe in manne For so muche as concerneth thys presente cause yt teacheth that so sone as yt hathe appoynted what wee oughte to dooe the power to obeye commeth of the goodnesse of God and therefore moueth vs to prayer whereby wee maye requyre to haue it giuen vs. If there were onelye the commaundemente and no promise then were oure strengthe to be tryed whether they were sufficient to aunswere the commaundement but syth ther are promyses ioyned wythall whiche crye oute that not onely oure aide but also all oure whole power consysteth in the
God Let therfore appere in our head the very fountayne of grace froÌ„ whome according to the mesure of euery one it floweth abrode into all his members By that grace euery one from the beginnynge of his fayth is made a Christian. by whiche that same man from his beginnyng was made Christ. Agayne in an other place there is no playner example of predestination than the Mediatour himselfe For he that made of the seede of Dauid a man righteous that neuer should be vnrighteous without any deseruynge of his will goynge before euen the same he dothe of vnrighteous make them righteous that are the membres of that hed and so forth as there foloweth Therefore when we speake of Christes deseruyng we doe not say that in him is the beginnyng of deseruyng but we clymbe vp to the ordinance of God whiche is the firste cause thereof bycause God of his owne mere good will apointed him Mediatour to purchace saluation for vs. And so is the deseruyng of Christ vnfitly set agaynst the mercie of God For it is a common rule that thinges orderly one vnder an other doe not disagree And therefore it maye well stande together that mans iustification is free by the mere mercie of God and that there also the deseruyng of Christ come betwene which is conteyned vnder the mercie of God But agaynst our workes are aptly set as directly contrarie both the free fauour of God and the obedience of Christ either of them in their degree For Christ could not deserue any thyng but by the good pleasure of God and but bycause he was apointed to this purpose with his sacrifice to appease the wrath of God and with his obedience to put away our offences Finally in a summe bicause the deseruynge of Christ hangeth vpon the only grace of God whiche apointed vs this meane of saluatioÌ„ therfore as well the same deseruing as that grace is fitly set against all the workes of men This distinction is gathered out of many places of the Scripture God so loued the world that he gaue his only begotten sonne that who so euer beleueth him shall not perish We see how the loue of God holdeth the first place as the soueraigne cause or original theÌ„ foloweth fayth in Christ as the second or nerer cause If any man take exception and saye that Christ is but the formal cause he doth more diminish his power than the wordes may beare For yf we obteine righteousnesse by fayth that resteth vpon him then is the matter of our saluation to be sought in him whiche is in many places playnely proued Not that we first loued him but he firste loued vs and sente his sonne to be the appeasyng for our sinnes In these wordes is clerely shewed that God to the ende that nothing should withstand his loue toward vs apointed vs a meane to be reconciled in Christ. And this worde Appeasyng is of great weight bycause God after a certayne vnspeakeable manner euen the same time that he loued vs was also angry with vs vntil he was reconciled in Christ. And to this purpose serue all those sayenges He is the satisfactioÌ„ for our sinnes Againe It pleased God by hym to reconcile all thinges to hymself appeasyng himselfe through the bloud of the crosse by him c. Agayne God was in Christ reconcilyng the worlde to himselfe not impuâ—yng to men their sinnes Agayne He accepted vs in his beloued sonne Agayne That he might reconcile theÌ„ bothe to God into one man by the crouÌ„e The reason of this mysterie is to be fetched out of the first chapter to the Ephesians where Paule after that he had taught that we were chosen in Christ addeth therwithal that we haue obteined fauour in him How did God beginne to embrace with his fauour them whoÌ„ he loued before the making of the world but bicause he vttered his loue when he was reconciled by the bloud of Christ For sithe God is the fountaine of al righteousnesse it must needes be that maÌ„ so long as he is a sinner haue God his enemie his iudge Wherfore the beginning of his loue is righteousnesse such as is described by Paule He made him that had done no sinne to be sinne for vs that we might be the righteousnesse of God in him For he meaneth that we haue obteyned free righteousnesse by the sacrifice of Christ that we should please God which by nature are the children of wrath by sinne estranged from him But this distinction is also meante so oft as the grace of Christ is ioyned to the loue of God WherupoÌ„ foloweth that he geueth vs of his owne that which he hath purchaced For otherwise it would not agree with him that this prayse is geuen him seuerally from his father that it is his grace and procedeth from him But it is truely and perfectly gathered by many places of the Scripture that Christ by his obedience hath purchaced vs fauour with his father For this I take for a thyng confessed that if Christ hath satisfied for our sinnes if he hath suffred the punishmeÌ„t due vnto vs if by his obedieÌ„ce he hath appeased God finally if he beyng righteous hath suffred for the vnrighteous then is saluation purchaced for vs by his righteousnesse whiche is as much in effecte as to deserue it But as Paule witnesseth we are reconciled and haue receiued reconciliation by his death But recoÌ„ciliation hath no place but where there went offence before Therefore the meanyng is that God to whome we were hateful be reasoÌ„ of sinne is by the death of his sonne appeased so that he might be fauorable vnto vs. And the comparison of contraries that foloweth a litle after is diligently to be noted As by the traÌ„sgression of one man many were made sinners so also by the obedieÌ„ce of one many are made righteous For the meaning is thus As by the sinne of AdaÌ„ we were enstranged from God ordeined to destruction so by the obedience of Christ we are receiued into fauour as rigteous And the future time of the verbe doth not exclude present righteousnesse as appereth by the processe of the texte For he had sayd before that the free gift was of many sinnes vnto iustification But when we saye that grace is purchaced vs by the deseruyng of Christ we meane this that we are cleansed by his bloud and that his death was a satisfactioÌ„ for our sinnes His bloud cleaÌ„seth vs froÌ„ sinne This bloud is it that is shed for remission of sinne If this be the effect of his bloud shed that sinnes be not imputed vnto vs it foloweth that with that price the iudgemeÌ„t of God is satisfied To which purpose serueth that sayeng of Iohn the Baptist Beholde the lambe of God that taketh awaye the sinne of the worlde For he setteth in comparison Christ agaynst all the sacrifices of the law to teache that in him only was fulfilled that whiche those figures shewed
there speaketh in the persone of a maÌ„ regenerate I speake not of this that he vseth these wordes Euell Sinne that thei which wil speake against vs may not cauil against those words but whoe can denie that a striuing against the lawe of God is euell whoe can denie a withstanding of Iustice to be sinne Finally whoe wâ—ll not graunt that there is a fault where is a spiritual miserie But al these thinges are reported of this disease by Paule Againe we haue an assured demonstration by the law by whiche this whole question may easily be discussed For we are coÌ„maunded to loue God with all our heart with al our soule with al our powers Sithe al the partes of our soule ought so to be occupied with the loue of God it is certaine that they satisfie not the coÌ„maundement that conceiue in their heart any desire be it neuer so litle or suffer any such thought at all to entre into their minde as maye withdraw them from the loue of God into vanitie For what are not these the powers of the soule to be affected with sodeine motions to coÌ„prehend with wit to coÌ„ceyue with minde Therfore when these do open a way for vaine or corrupt thoughtes to entre into them do they not shew that they are euen so much voide of the loue of God Wherfore who so confesseth not that all the lustes of the flesh are sinnes and that the same disease of lusting which they call a fedyng is the well spryng of sinne he muste needes denie that the transgression of the lawe is sinne If any man thinke it an absurditie that all the desires wherwith man is naturally moued in affection are vniuersally condeÌ„ned wheras they be put into man by God the author of nature We answer that we doe not condemne those desires that God hath so engrauen into the minde of man at the firste creation that they can not be rooted out without destroyeng the very nature of man but only outragious and vnbridled motions that fight against the ordinance of God But nowe sithe by reason of the peruersnesse of nature all her powers are infected and corrupted that in all her doynges appereth a continuall disorder and intemperance bicause the desires can not be seuered froÌ„ such intemperance therefore we say that they are corrupt Or if you like to haue the whole summe in fewer wordes we teache that all the desires of men are euell and we accuse them to be gilty of sinne not in that that they are naturall but for that they are inordinate and we call them inordinate bycause no pure or cleane thynge can come out of a corrupte and vncleane nature And Augustine dothe not so much varie from this doctrine as he appereth in shewe while he somwhat to much feareth the enuie that the Pelagians labored to bryng him into he sometime forbeareth to vse the name of sinne Yet where he writeth that the law of sinne still remaynyng in the holy ones the onely giltinesse is taken awaye he plainely sheweth that he doth not so much disagree from our meanyng We will alleage some other sentences wherby shal better appere what he thought In yâ— second boke against Iulian This law of sinne is both released by the spiritual regeneration abideth in the mortal flesh released herein bicause the giltnesse is taken away in the sacrament whereby the faithfull are regenerate and it abideth bycause it worketh the desires agaynst whiche the faythfull doe fight Agayne Therfore the law of sinne which was also in the membres of so great an Apostle is released in baptisme but not ended Agayne The lawe of sinne of which yet remainyng the giltinesse is in baptisme discharged Ambrose called wickednesse bicause it is wickednesse for the flesh to lust against the Spirit Againe Sinne is dead in respect of that giltinesse wherin it helde vs and euen beyng dead it still rebelleth til it be healed with perfection of burial And yet playner in the v. boke As the blindenesse of heart is bothe a sinne whereby menne beleueth not in God and also a punishment of sinne whereby a proude heart is chastised with worthy correction and the cause of sinne when any thyng is committed by the errour of a blinde heart so the lust of flesh agaynste whiche a good spirit lusteth is bothe sinne bycause there is in it disobedience agaynst the gouernement of the minde and also the punishment of sinne bycause it is geuen for recompense to the deseruynges of the disobedient and the cause of sinne in manne when he consenteth by defection or in manne when he is borne by infection Here wythout anye doubtefull speache he calleth it sinne bycause when errour was ones ouerthroweÌ„ and the truth coÌ„firmed he lesse feared sclaunderours reportes As in the .xlj. Homelie vpoÌ„ Iohn where doâ—tlesse he speaketh according to the true meaning of his mind he sayth If in the flesh thou serue the law of sinne do that whiche the Apostle himself sayth let not sinne reigne in your mortal bodie to obey the desires therof He sayth not let it not be but let it not reigne So long as thou liuest sinne must needes be in thy meÌ„bres at least let Reigne be taken from it Let not that be done whiche it commaundeth They that defend that luste is no sinne are wont to obiecte that sayeng of Iames Lust after that it hath conceiued bryngeth forth sinne But this is easily confuted For vnlesse we thinke that he speaketh of only ill workes or actuall sinnes euell will it self shall not be accompted sinne But where he calleth mischeuous deedes and wicked offenses the ofsprynges of sinne and geueth vnto them the name of sinnne it doth not by and by folow thereof but that to luste is an euell thyng and damnable before God Certaine Anabaptistes in this age deuise I wote not what phreÌ„tike intemperance in stede of spirituall regeneration sayeng that the children of God restored into the state of innoceÌ„cie now ought no more to be carefull for bridlyng of the luste of the fleshe that the Spirit is to be folowed for their guide vnder whose guidyng they neuer goe out of the way It were incredible that mans minde could fall to so great madnesse vnlesse they did opeÌ„ly and proudely babble abrode this doctrine Truely it is monstruous But it is mete that suche should suffer the punishment of suche blasphemous boldnesse that so haue persuaded their minde to turne the truth of God into a lie Shal al the choise of honestie and dishonestie righte and wronge good and euell vertue and vice be taken awaye â–ª Suche difference saye they coÌ„meth of the cursednesse of olde Adam from whiche we are exempted by Christe So nowe there shal be no difference betwene fornication and chastitie playne dealyng and sutteltie truthe and lyeng iustice and extortion Take awaye vayne feare saye they the Spirit will commaund thee no euell thyng so that thou boldly and without feare yelde thee to
Dauid that righteousnesse is imputed to maÌ„ without workes bycause Dauid pronounceth the man blessed whose iniquities are forgeuen whose sinnes are couered to whom the lord hath not imputed his offenses Without doubt by blessednesse he there meaneth righteousnesse And sithe he affirmeth the same to stande in the forgeuenesse of sinnes there is no cause why we shuld otherwise define it Therefore Zacharie the father of Iohn the Baptist singeth that the knowlege of saluatioÌ„ consisteth in the forgeuenesse of sinnes Whiche rule Paule folowyng in his Sermon whiche he made to the Antiochians concernyng the summe of saluation as Luke reporteth it concluded in this maÌ„ner by him forgeuenesse of sinnes is preached vnto you and euery one that beleueth in him is iustified from all these thinges from whiche ye could not be iustified in the lawe of Moses The Apostle so knitteth the forgeuenesse of sinnes with righteousnesse that he sheweth that they be bothe all one Whereupon he rightfully reasoneth that the righteousnesse is freely geuen vnto vs whiche we obteine by the louyng kindenesse of God Neyther ought it to seme a strange vnused speache that the faithful are righteous before God not by workes but by free acceptation sithe bothe it is so oft found in the Scripture and the old authours also do sometime so speake For Augustine sayth thus in one place The righteousnesse of the saintes in this worlde standeth rather in forgeuenesse of sinnes than in perfection of vertues Wherewith agree thte notable sentences of Bernard Not to sinne is the righteousnesse of God but the righteousnesse of man is the merciful kindenesse of God He had before affirmed that Christ is to vs righteousnesse in absolution and therefore that they only are righteous that haue obteyned pardon by mercie Hereupon also foloweth this that by the only meane of Christes righteousnesse we obteine to be iustified before God Which is asmuch in effect as yf is were sayd that man is not righteous in himselfe but bycause the righteousnesse of Christ is by imputation enterpartened with him whiche thyng is worthy to be heedefully marked For that trifling errour vanisheth away to saye that man is therefore iustified by faith bicause fayth taketh part of the Spirit of God by whiche he is made righteous which is so coÌ„trarie to the doctrine aboue taught that thei can neuer be made to agree together For it is no doubt that he is voyde of his owne righteousnesse that is taught to seke righteousnesse without himselfe This the Apostle affirmeth moste plainely when he writeth that he which knew no sinne was made for vs a propitiatorie sacrifice to cleanse awaye sinne that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him You see that our righteousnesse is not in vs but in Christ and that it belongeth to vs only by this title bicause we be partakers of Christ bicause we possesse all his richesse with him And it maketh nothing to the contrarie that in an other place he teacheth that sinne was condeÌ„ned of sinne in the flesh of Christ that the righteousnesse of the lawe might be fulfilled in vs where he meaneth no other fulâ—illing but that which we obteyne by imputation For the Lord Christ doth in such sort coÌ„municate his righteousnesse with vs that after a certayne maruelous maÌ„ner he poureth the force therof into vs so much as perteineth to the iudgement of God It appereth that he did no otherwise meane by the other sentence which he had spoken a little before As by the disobedieÌ„ce of one man we weare made sinners so by the obedience of one man we are iustified What is it els to set our righteousnesse in the obedieÌ„ce of Christ but to affirme that hereby only we are accompted righteous bicause the obedience of Christ is imputed vnto vs as if it were our owne Therefore me thinkes that Ambrose hath excellently well shewed how there is an example of this righteousnesse in the blessing of Iacob For as Iacob hauing not of himself deserued the preeminencie of the first begotten sonne hid himself in the apparell of his brother beyng clothed with his brothers cote that sauored of a most swete smell he crept into the fauour of his father and receiued the blessing to his owne coÌ„moditie vnder the persone of an other so we doe lie hidden vnder the precious purenesse of Christ our elder brother that we may get a testimonie of righteousnesse in the sight of God The wordes of Ambrose are these Wheras Isaac smelt the sauour of the garmentes paradueÌ„ture this is meant thereby that we are not iustified by workes but by faith bicause fleshly weakenesse hindereth workes but the brightnesse of faith whiche meriteth forgeuenesse of sinnes ouershadoweth the errour of deedes And truely so it is For that we may appere before the face of God vnto saluation it is necessarie for vs to smel swetely with his odour to haue our faultes couered and barred with his perfection The .xii. Chapter ¶ That to the end we may be fully perswaded of the free iustification we muste lift vp our mindes to the iudgement scare of God ALthough it appereth by most euideÌ„t testimonies that all these thinges are true yet we shall not clearely perceiue how necessarie thei be vntill we haue set before our eyes those things that ought to be the groundes of all this disputation First therfore let vs remeÌ„ber this that we purpose not to speake of the righteousnesse of a worldly iudicial court but of the heauenly iudgement seate that we should not measure by our owne small portion by what vprightnesse of workes Gods iudgemeÌ„t maye be satisfied But it is maruelous to see with what rashnesse and boldnesse it is commonly debated Yea and it is to be seen howe none doe more boldely or with fuller mouthes as the sayeng is prate of the righteousnesse of workes than they that are either monstruously sicke of open outwarde diseases or bee ready to burste with inward vices That commeth to passe bicause they thinke not vpon the righteousnesse of God wherof if they had neuer so litle felyng they wold neuer make so greate a mockerie of it And truely it is out of measure lightly regarded wheÌ„ it is not acknowleged to be such and so perfect that nothyng be imputed vnto it but euery waye whole and absolute and defiled with no vncleannesse suche as neuer was and neuer shal be able to be found in man It is in deede easy and redy for euery man in Scholes to talke vaynely vpon the worthynesse of workes to iustifie men But when they come into the sight of God such dalliances must auoide bicause there is earnest doyng vsed and no triflyng strife about wordes To this to this I saye we must apply our minde if we will profitably enquire of true righteousnesse how we maye answere the heauenly iudge when he calleth vs to accompt Let vs thinke him him a to be iudge not such a one as
Christ the sonne of God is oures and we likewise are in him the sonnes of God and heyers of the heaueÌ„ly kingdome beyng called by the goodnesse of God not by our owne worthinesse into the hope of eternal blessednesse But bicause they do biside these assayle vs as we haue sayd with other engines goe to let vs goe forward in beatyng awaye these also First they come backe to the promises of the lawe which the Lord did set forth to the kepers of his law and they aske whether we wil haue them to be vtterly voyde or effectuall Bycause it were an absurditie and to be scorned to say that they are voyde they take it for confessed that they are of some effectualnesse Hereupon they reason that we are not iustified by only faith For thus sayth the Lord And it shal be yf thou shalt heare these commaundementes and iudgementes and shal kepe them and do them the Lord also shall kepe with thee his couenant and mercie whiche he hath sworne to thy fathers he shall loue thee and multiplie thee and blesse thee c. Agayne If ye shall wel direct your wayes and your endeuors yf ye walke not after strange Gods yf ye do iudgement betwene man and man and goe not backe into malice I will walke in yâ— middest of you I will not recite a thousand peces of the same sorte whiche sithe they nothyng differ in sense shal be declared by the solutioÌ„ of these In a summe Moses testifieth that in the lawe is set forth blessyng and curse death and life Thus therfore they reson that eyther this blessyng is made idle frutelesse or that iustification is not of fayth alone We haue already before shewed how if we sticke faste in the lawe ouer vs beyng destitute of al blessing hangeth only curse which is thretened to al transgressors For the Lord promiseth nothyng but to the perfect kepers of his law such as there is none found This therefore remaineth that all mankinde is by the law accused and subiect to curse the wrath of God from whiche that they maye be loosed they must needes goe out of the power of the law and be as it were brought into libertie from the boÌ„dage therof not that carnall libertie whiche should withdraw vs froÌ„ the kepyng of the law should allure vs to thinke all thinges lawfull and to suffer our lust as it were the stayes beyng broken with loose reynâ—s to runne at riot but the spiritual libertie whiche may comfort and rayse vp a dismayed and ouerthrowen conscience shewyng it to be free from the curse and damnation wherewith the lawe helde it downe bond and fast tied This deliuerance from the subiection of the law and Manâ—mission as I may cal it we obteyne wheÌ„ by fayth we take holde of the mercie of God in Christ whereby we are certified and assured of the forgeuenesse of sinnes with the felyng whereof the law did prick and bite vs. By this reason euen the promises that were offred vs in the lawe should be all vneffectuall voyde vnlesse the goodnesse of God by the Gospell did help For this condition that we kepe the whole law vpoÌ„ which the promises hang and wherby alone thei are to be performed shal neuer be fulfilled And the Lord so helpeth not by leauyng part of righteousnesse in our workes and supplyeng part by his mercieful bearyng with vs but when he setteth only Christ for the fulfillyng of righteousnesse For the Apostle when he had before sayd that he and other Iewes beleued in Iesus Christ knowing that man is not iustified by the workes of the lawe addeth a reason not that they should be holpen to fulnesse of righteousnesse by the fayth of Christ but by it should be iustified not by the workes of the law If the faythfull remoue from the law into fayth that they may in fayth finde righteousnesse which they see to be absent from the law truely they forsake the righteousnesse of the lawe Therefore now let him that list amplifie the rewardinges whiche are sayd to be prepared for the keper of the law so that he therewithall coÌ„sider that it coÌ„meth to passe by our peruersnesse that we fele no frute thereof till we haue obteyned an other righteousnesse of faith So Dauid when he made mention of the rewardyng whiche the Lord hath prepared for his seruantes by and by descendeth to the reknowledging of sinnes wherby that same rewarding is made voyde Also in the xix Psalme he gloriously setteth forth the benefites of the law but he by by crieth out Whoe shall vnderstand his faultes Lord cleanse me froÌ„ my secret faultes This place altogether agreeth with the place before where when he had sayd that all the wayes of the Lord are goodnesse and truth to them that leaue him he addeth For thy names sake Lorde thou shalt be mercifull to my peruersnesse for it is muche So ought we also to reknowledge that there is in deede the good will of God set forth vnto vs in the lawe if we might deserue it by workes but that the same neuer coÌ„meth to vs by the deseruyng of workes How then Are they geuen that they should vanish awaye without frute I haue eueÌ„ now already protested that the same is not my meaning I say verily that they vtter not their effectualnesse toward vs so long as they haue respect to the merit of workes and that therfore if they be considered in themselues they be after a certayne maÌ„ner abolished If the Apostle teacheth that this noble promise I haue geuen you commauÌ„dementes which who so shal do shall liue in them is of no value if we stand still in it and shal neuer a whit more profit than if it had not ben geuen at all bicause it belongeth not euen to the most holy seruauntes of God whiche are all far from the fulfillyng of the lawe but are compassed about with many transgressions But when the promises of the Gospel are put in place of them which do offre free forgeuenesse of sinnes they bryng to passe that not only we our selues be acceptable to God but that our workes also haue their thanke and not this only that the Lord accepteth them but also exteÌ„deth to them the blessinges whiche were by couenant due to the keping of the law I graunt therefore that those thinges whiche the Lord hath promised in his lawe to the folowers of righteousnesse holinesse are rendred to the workes of the faythfull but in this rendryng the cause is alway to be coÌ„sidered that powreth grace to workes Now causes we see that there be three The first is that God turnyng away his sight froÌ„ the workes of his seruaÌ„tes which alway deserue rather reproche than praise embraceth them in Christ and by the only meane of faith reconcileth them to himself without the meane of workes The secoÌ„d that of his fatherly kindnesse and tender mercifulnesse he lifteth vp workes to so great
a crooked figure as men sometime speake mingle him selfe with the multitude as one of the people but rather seuerally confesseth his owne gyltinesse humbly fleeth to the sanctuarie of forgeuenesse as he expresly sayth When I coÌ„fessed my sinnes the sinnes of my people And thys humblenesse Dauid also setteth out with his own example when he saith Entre not into iudgement with thy seruant bicause in thy sight euery one that liueth shall nat bee iustified In suche manner Esaie prayeth Loe thou art angry bicause wee haue sinned the worlde is founded in thy waies therefore we shal be saâ—ed And we haue been all filled with vncleannesse al our righteousnesses as a defiled cloth and wee haue al withered away as a leafe our iniquities do scatter vs abroade as the winde and there is none that calleth vpon thy name that rayseth vp himselfe to take holde of thee bycause thou hast hidde thy face froÌ„ vs and hast made vs to pine awaie in the hande of oure wyckednesse Now therfore O Lord thou art our father we are claye thou art our fasshioner we are the worke of thy hand Be not angry O Lord neither remembre wickednes for euer Behold loke vpon vs we ar al thy people Loe how thei stand vpoÌ„ no affiance at al but vpon this onely that thinking vpon this that thei be Gods thei despire not that he wil haue care of them Likewise Ieremie If our iniquities answer against vs do thou for thy names sake For it is bothe most truely most holyly written of whome soeuer it be which being written by an vnknoweÌ„ author is fathered vpon the Prophet Baruch A soule heauy deosolate for the greatnes of euel croked weake a hungrye soule fainting eies geue glorie to thee O Lord. Not according to the righteousnesses of our fathers doe we poure out praiers in thy sight aske mercie before thy face O Lord our God but bicause thou art merciful haue mercie vpon vs bicause we haue sinned before thee Finally the beginning also the preparing of praieng rightly is crauing of pardoÌ„ with an humble plaine confession of fault For neither is it to be hoped that euen the holiest man may obteine any thinge of God vntil hee bee freely reconciled to him neither is it possible that God may be fauourable to any but theÌ„ whom he pardoneth Wherfore it is no maruel if the faithful do with this keie opeÌ„ to theÌ„selues the dore to pray Which we learne out of many places of the Psalmes For Dauid wheÌ„ he asketh an other thing saith Remembre not the sinnes of my youthe remember me according to thy mercie for thy goodnesses sake O lord Again Loke vpoÌ„ my afflictioÌ„ my labore forgeue al my sinnes Wher we also see that it is not enough if we euery seuerall day do cal our selues accoÌ„pt for our new sinnes if we do not also remeÌ„bre those sinnes which might seeme to haue been long agoe forgotten For the same Prophet in an other place hauing coÌ„fessed one haynous offense by this occasioÌ„ returneth eueÌ„ to his mothers wombe wherin he had gathered the infectioÌ„ not to make the faulte seme lesse by the corruptioÌ„ of nature but the heaping together the sinnes of his whole life how much more rigorous he ys in coÌ„demning himself so much more easy he maye finde God to entreate But although the holy ones do not alwaye in expresse woordes aske forgeuenesse of sinnes yet if we diligently weie their praiers whiche the Scripture rehearseth we shal easily finde that which I say that thei gathered a minde to praie of the only mercy of God so alwaye toke their beginning at appeasing him bicause if euery man examine his owne conscience so far is he froÌ„ being bold to open his cares familiarlie with God yâ— he trembleth at euery coÌ„ming toward him except that he standeth vpoÌ„ trust of mercie pardon Ther is also an other special confession wher thei aske release of peines that thei also praie to haue their sinnes forgeuen bicause it weare an absurditie to will that the effecte to be takeÌ„ awaye while the cause abideth For we muste beware that God be fauourable vnto vs before that he testifye hys fauoure wyth outwarde signes bycause boothe hee hymselfe wyll keepe thys ordre and yt should lytle profyte vs to haue hym benefytiall vnlesse oure conscience feelynge hym appeased shoulde througely make hym louelye vnto vs. Whyche wee are also taughte by the aunswere of Christe For when hee hadde decreed to heale the manne sycke of the Palsey hee sayde Thy sinnes are forgeuen thee lifting vp our mindes therby to that which is chefely to be wisshed that God first receiue vs into fauoure and then shew forth the frute of reconciliation in helping vs. But byside that speciall confession of present gyltynesse wherby the faithful make supplication to obteine pardon of euery speciall faulte peine that general preface which procureth fauour to praiers is neuer to be omitted bicause vnlesse thei be grounded vpon the free mercie of God they shall neuer obteine any thing of God Whereunto maye be referred that sayeng of Ihon If we confesse oure sinnes he is faithfull righteous to forgeue vs and cleanse vs from al iniquitie For which cause it behoued praiers in the time of the law to be hallowed with expiatioÌ„ of bloode that they might be acceptable and that so the people sholde be put in minde that thei are vnworthy of so great a prerogotiue of honour til being cleansed from their defilinges thei shold of the onely mercie of God conceiue affiance to praye But wheras the holy ones seme somtime for the entreating of God to allege the helpe of their owne righteousnes as when Dauid saith Kepe my soule bicause I am good Again Ezechias RemeÌ„bre lord I beseche thee that I haue walked before thee in truthe haue done good in thyne eyes by such formes of speaking thei meane nothing els than by their very regeneratioÌ„ to testifie theÌ„selues to be the seruants childreÌ„ of God to whom he himselfe pronounceth that he wil be mercifull He teacheth by that prophet as we haue already seen that his eies are vpon the righteous his cares vnto their praiers Againe by the apostle that we shal obteine whatsoeuer we ask if we kepe his coÌ„maundemeÌ„ts In which sayenges he doth not value praier by the worthines of works but his will is so to stablish their affiance whose own coÌ„scieÌ„ce wel assureth theÌ„ of an unâ—ayned vprightnes inocenci such as al the faithful ought to be For the same is taken out of the very truth of God which the blindeman that had his sight restored saith in Ihon that God heareth not sinners if wee vnderstaÌ„d sinners after the coÌ„moÌ„ vse of the scripture for such as wtout al desire of righteousnesse do altogether slepe rest vpoÌ„ their sinnes forasmuch as no heart can
of God vnlesse that so excellent a benefite should come vnto them from els where than from themselues Also how could the right of priesthode remaine in force among them who by filthinesse of sinnes were abhominable to God vnlesse they had ben consecrate in a holy head â–ª Wherefore Peter doth very aptly turne that sayeng of Moses where he teacheth that the fulnesse of grace the taste whereof the Iewes had taken vnder the law was geuen in Christ Ye are sayeth he a chosen kinred a kingly priesthode For to this ende tendeth that turnynge of the wordes to shewe that they to whome Christ appered by the Gospell haue obteined more than their fathers bicause they are all endued bothe with priestly and kingly honour that trustyng vpon their mediatour they maye freely be bolde to come forth into the sight of God And here by the waye it is to be noted that the kingdome whiche at length was erected in the house of Dauid is part of the law conteined vnder the ministerie of Moses Wherupon foloweth that as well in all the kinred of the Leuites as in the posteritie of Dauid Christ was set beâ—ore the eyes of the olde people as in a doble loking glasse For as I sayd euen now they could not otherwise be before God eyther kinges or priestes which were both the bondslaues of sinne of death defiled by their owne corruptioÌ„ Hereby appereth that that sayeng of Paule is moste true that the Iewes were holden as vnder the keping of a Scholemaister til the sede came for whose sake the promise was geuen For bicause Christ was not yet familiarly knowen they were like vnto children whose weakenesse could not yet beare a full knowledge of heauenly thinges but how thei were by ceremonies as it were led by the hand to Christ is before spokeÌ„ may be better vnderstand by many testimonies of the Prophetes For although it was coÌ„maunded them to come dayly with newe sacrifices to appease God yet Esaye promiseth that al their sinnes shal be cleansed with one only sacrifice Wherewith Daniel agreably sayeth The priestes apointed of the tribe of Leui did enter into the Sanctuarie but of the only priest it was ones sayd that by an othe he was chosen of God to be a priest for euer according to the order of Melchisedech At that time the anointing with oyle was visible but Daniel by his vision pronouÌ„ceth that there shal be an other manner of anointyng And bicause I will not tarry vpon many examples the authour of the Epistle to the Hebrewes eueÌ„ from the .iiij. chapter to the xi doth largely and plainely enough shew that the ceremonies are nothing worth vaine til we come to Christ. As concerning the ten coÌ„maundementes that lesson of Paule is likewise to be kept in minde that Christ is the ende of the law vnto saluation to euery one that beleueth And an other lesson that Christ is the Spirit that quickeneth the letter whiche of it selfe slayeth For in the first of these two he meaneth that righteousnesse is vainely taught by commaundementes vntill Christ doe geue it bothe by free imputation and by the spirite of regeneration Wherefore he worthyly calleth Christ the fulfilling or ende of the law Bycause it should nothing profit vs to knowe what God requyreth of vs vnlesse he did succour vs faynting and oppressed vnder the yoke and vntolerable burden In an other place he teacheth that the lawe was made for transgressions that is to bryng menne to humilitie beyng proued gilty of theyr owne damnation And bycause this is the true and only preparation to seke Christ what so euer he teacheth in diuerse wordes do al very well agree together But bicause he then was in contentioÌ„ with peruerse teachers which fained that we do deserue righteousnesse by the workes of the law to confute their errour he was compelled somtime to speake precisely of the bare lawe whiche yet otherwise is clothed with the couenant of free adoption But now it is good to know how being taught by the morall law we are made more inexcusable that our owne giltynesse maye moue vs to craue pardon If it be true that we be taught perfectioÌ„ of rightousnesse in the lawe then this also followeth that the absolute keping thereof is perfect righteousnesse before God that is whereby a man maye be demed and accompted righteous before the heauenly throne of iudgement Wherfore Moses when he had published the law doubted not to protest before heauen and earth that he had set before Israell life and death good and euell And we maye not denie but that the reward of eternal saluation belongeth to the vpright obedience of the lawe as the lord hath promised it Agayne yet it is good to examine whether we performe that obedience vpon desert whereof we may conceiue a trust of that reward For to what small purpose is it to see the rewarde of eternall life set in kepynge of the lawe vnlesse we further knowe whether we maye by that waye attaine to eternall life But herein the weakenesse of the law doth shewe it selfe For bycause that kepyng of the law is founde in none of vs al we are excluded from the promises of life and doe fall into curse onely I doe not nowe tell what doth come to passe but what needes muste so come to passe For where as the doctrine of the lawe is far aboue the power of manne he maye in deede a far of loke at the promises but yet not gather any fruite of them Therefore this one thing remayneth that by the goodnesse of them he may the better weye his owne miserie while he considereth that all hope of saluation beyng cut of death dothe certainely haÌ„g ouer him Do the other side do presse vs terrible penal lawes which do holde entaÌ„gled fast bound not only a few of vs but euery one without exceptioÌ„ they presse vs I say do pursue vs with vnappeasable rigour so that we may se most present death in the law Therfore if we loke only vpoÌ„ the lawe we can do nothing but be discouraged be confounded despeire for asmuch as by it we are al damned cursed kept far of from the blessednesse that he offreth to them that worship him Wilt thou say then Doth the lord so mock vs â–ª For how finally doth it differ from mocking to shewe forth a hope of felicitie to allure exhort men vnto it to protest that it is layed open for vs wheÌ„ in the meane season the entrie vnto it is forclosed impossible to be come to I answere although the promisses of the lawe in so much as they are conditional do hang vpon the perfect obedience of the law which can no where be found yet are they not geuen in vaine For when we haue lerned that they shal be voide and of no effect vnto vs vnlesse God embrace vs with his free goodnesse without regarde of
hathe made an ende of them doth so no thing diminish their holynesse that it rather setteth them fourth and maket them glorious For as they shold haue geuen but a vaine shewe to the olde people vnlesse the power of the deathe and resurrection of Christe had beene shewed therein so if they hadde not cessed wee coulde not at this daye discerne to what purpose they were ordeyned Therefore Paule to proue that the keepinge of them nowe is not onely superfluous but also hurtefull teacheeh that they weare shadowes whereof wee haue the bodye in Christe We see therefore howe in the abolishinge of them the trueth shyneth better than if they did still a farre of and as it were with a veile spred before shewe a figure of Christe that hathe already playnelye appeared 〈◊〉 therefore the veile of the Temple at the deathe of Christe was torne in twoo peeces and fell downe bycause nowe the true and expresse image of the heauenly good thynges was come to lyghte whyche before had been but vnperfectly begonne wyth darke rude draughtes as the authore of the Epistle to the Hebrues saythe Herevnto serueth the sayeng of Christe that the lawe and the Prophetes were vnto the tyme of Ihon and that from that tune forwarde the Kyngdome of God beganne to bee ioyefully preached not meaninge that the holy fathers were without the preachynge that conteyneth the hope of saluation and of eternall lyfe but bicause a farre of and vnder shadowes onely they dyd beholde that whiche wee at thys daye see in the full lyghte But why it behoued that the Churche of God shoulde clymbe vp hyer from those firste instructions Ihon the Baptist declareth for that the lawe is geuen by Moses but grace truth beganne by Iesus Chirste For althoughe the purginge of sinnes were truely promised in the olde sacrifices the Arke of the couenant was a sure pledge of the fatherly fauoure of God yet all this had been but a shadowe if it had not ben grounded vpon the grace of Christe wherin is sounde perfect and eternal stedfastnesse Let this then remaine sure that although the ceremonial vsages of the lawe haue cessed to be obserued yet by the ende of them it is that better knowen how great was the profite of them before Christes coÌ„minge wyth in takinge awaye the vse of them hathe sealed the force effecte of them with his deathe Somwhat more harde is the point that Paule noteth And he hath renued you together with him when ye were deade by sinnes and the vncircumcision of your fleshe forgeuinge you of all your offences blotting out the handwriting that remained in the decrees against vs whyche was contrarie vnto vs and he hath taken it awaye fastninge it to the crosse c. For he seemeth to stretche the abolyshinge of the lawe soÌ„what further that nowe we haue nothing to do with the decrees therof For thei erre that expond it onely of the lawe morall whose vnappeassable rigoure rather then doctrine thereof thei thinke to be taken away Some more deepely weying the wordes of Paule do espie that it is proprely spoken of the lawe ceremoniall and doe shewe that this worde Deuill doth more than ones so signifie in Paule For to the Ephesians he saith thus He is our peace that maketh both to be one that maketh voide the law of coÌ„maundementes consistinge in the decrees that he might make two in himselfe into one new man It is no doubt that he speaketh ther of the ceremonies for he calleth it the partition wherwith the Iewes were seuered from the Gentiles wherefore I graunt that those first expositors are rightfully reproued by these but yet mee thinkes that these do not sufficientlye well set fourth the minde of the Apostle For I like not at all to haue these two places compared together in all pointes when his purpose was to aduertise the Ephesians of their adoption into the felowship of Israel he teacheth that the stoppe is taken awaye whereby they were before tyme kepte asunder that was in ceremonies For the vsages of washinges and sacrifices wherewith the Iewes were made holy vnto the Lorde did seuer them from the Gentiles But in the epistle to the Colossians whoe seeth not that 〈◊〉 â—oucheth a hyer misterie In deede the point of the disputation ther is of Mosaicall obseruations whervnto the false Apostles did laboure to driue the Christian people But as in the Epistle to the Galatians he fetcheth that controuersie further of and as it wer bringeth it back to the first heade therof so doth he also in this place For if in the ceremonies you consider nothing els but a necessitie of that vse of them to what purpose was it to call it a handwriting against vs moreouer to set the whole summe in a manner of our redemption in this that it shold be caÌ„celled Wherefore the matter it selfe trieth out that here is some more secret thing to be considered And I truste that I haue atteined the naturall vnderstandinge of it if at leaste this be graunted me to bee true which in one place is most truli written by Augustine yea that he hath taken out of the plaine wordes of the Apostle that in the Iewish ceremonies was rather a confession than a cleansinge of sinnes For what did thei ells by sacrifices but confesse theÌ„ selues in their conscience gylty of death that did put cleansinges in their place What did thei with their cleansinges but testifie them selues to be vncleane And so was the handwriting of their sinne and vncleannesse oft renewed by them but ther was no discharge in that testifying thereof For whyche cause the Apostle writeth that at lengthe by meane of the deathe of Christe was perfourmed the redemption of the offences that remayned vnder the olde Testamente Therefore the Apostle dothe woorthyly call the Handwritinges againste those that obserue them for asmuch as by them ther did openly sâ—ale to their owne damnation vncleannesse And it hindereth not that they were also partakers of the same grace with vs. For this they obteyned in Chryste not in the ceremonies whyche there the Apostle dothe seuer from Christe bicause being at that time vsed they did obscure the glorie of Christe Thus learn we that the ceremonies if they be consydered by them selues are well and fittly called handwrytynges againste the saluation of men bicause they were as solemne instrumentes that testified their beinge bounde When the false Apostles wente aboute to binde the Christian Churche to them againe Paule did not withoute cause admonyshe the Colossâ—aus by fetchinge their signification of them further of to what poynte thei shoulde fall backe agayne if they suffered them selues in such sorte to be yoked by them For there withall was the benefite of Christ wrested awaie from them in as muche as he hauinge ones perfourmed the eternall clensinge hathe vtterly abolyshed these dayly obseruations whiche were onely of force to seale sinnes but coulde do nothing
children of God But by their opinion onely Monkes shall be the children of the heauenly father thei onely shall be bold to call vpon God their Father what shall the Churche do in the meane season it shall by like righte be sent awaie to the Gentiles and Publicans For Christe saith If ye be freindely to your friendes what fauoure looke you for thereby doe not the gentiles and publicans the same But we shall be in good case forsoth if the title of Christians be lefte vnto vs and the inheritaunce of the kingdome of heauen taken awaye from vs. And no lesse stronge is Augustines argument When sayth he the Lorde forbiddeth to commit fornication he no lesse forbiddeth to touche the wife of thine enemie than of thy frende When he forbiddeth thefte he geueth leaue to steale nothyng at all eyther from thy frend or from thine enemie But these two not to steale and not to commit fornication Paule bryngeth within the compasse of the rule of loue yea and teacheth that they are coÌ„teyned vnder this commaundement Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe Therfore eyther Paule muste haue ben a false expositour of the lawe or it necessarily foloweth hereby that our enemies ought also to be loued euen by commaundement lyke as our frendes Therefore they doe truely bewraye themselues to bee the chyldren of Satan that do so licentiously shake of the common yoke of the children of God It is to be doubted whether they haue published this doctrine with more grosse dulnesse or shamelesnesse For there are none of the olde wryters that doe not pronounce as of a thynge certayne that these are mere commaundemeÌ„tes And that euen in Gregories age it was not doubted of appereth by his owne affirmation for he without controuersie taketh them for commaundementes And how foolishly do thei reson They say that they are to weighty a burden for Christians As though there coulde be deuised any thing more weighty than to loue God with al our heart with al our soule with al our strength In coÌ„parison of this lawe any thing maye be compted easy whether it be to loue our enemy or to laye away all desire of reueÌ„ge out of our minde In deede all thinges are hye and harde to our weakenesse euen the leaste tittle of the lawe It is the Lord in whome we vse strength Let him geue what he commaundeth and commaunde what he will Christian menne to be vnder the lawe of grace is not vnbrydledly to wander without law but to be graffed in Christ by whose grace they are free from the curse of the lawe and by whose spirite they haue a lawe written in their heartes This grace Paule vnproprely called a lawe alludyng to the lawe of God agaynst which he did set it in coÌ„parison But these men do in the name of the law dispute vpoÌ„ a mater of nothyng Of lyke sorte it is that they called Ueniall sinne bothe secrete vngodlynesse that is agaynste the firste table and also the direct transgressyng of the laste commaundement For they define it thus that it is a desire without aduised assent which resteth not long in the heart But I say that it can not come at all into the heart but by wante of those thynges that are required in the lawe We forbidde to haue strange gods When the minde shaken with the engines of distrust loketh aboute els where when it is touched wyth a soden desire to remoue her blessednesse some otherwaye whense come these motions although they quickely vanish awaye but of this that there is some thyng in the soule empty to receyue such tentations And to the ende not to drawe out this argument to greater length there is a commaundement geuen to loue God with all our heart with all oure mynde wyth all our Soule yf then all the powers of our soule be not beâ—te to the loue of God we haue allready departed from the obedience of the lawe Bicause the enemies that doe therein arise against his kingdome and interrupt his decrees do proue that God hath not his throne well stablished in our conscience As for the laste commaundement we haue alredy shewed that it properly belongeth hereunto Hath any desire of minde pricked vs we are alredy gilty of couetyng and therewithall are made transgressors of the law Bycause the Lord doth forbid vs not only to purpose and practise any thyng that maye be to an others losse but also to be pricked and swell with couetyng it But the curse of God doth alwaye hange ouer the transgression of the lawe We can not therefore proue euen the very least desires free froÌ„ iudgement of death In weyeng of sinnes sayth Augustine let vs not brynge false balances to weye what we liste and how we list at our owne pleasure sayeng this is heuy and this is light But let vs bryng Gods balance out of the holy Scriptures as out of the Lordes tresorie and let vs therein weye what is heuy rather let vs not weye but reknowledge thinges alredy weyed by the Lord. But what sayth the Scripture Truely when Paule sayth that the rewarde of sinne is death he sheweth that he knewe not this stinkyng distinction Sithe we are to muche enclined to hypocrisie this cherishement thereof ought not to haue ben added to flaâ—ter our slouthfull consciences I would to God they would consider what that sayeng of Christ meaneth He that transgresseth one of the leaste of these commaundementes and teacheth men so shal be compted none in the kingdome of heauen Are not they of that sort when they dare so extenuate the traÌ„sgression of the law as if it were not worthy of death but they ought to haue considered not only what is coÌ„maunded but what he is that coÌ„maundeth bicause his authoritie is diminished in euery transgression how litle so euer it be of the lawe that he hath geuen in coÌ„maundement Is it a small matter with them that Gods maiestie be offended in any thing Moreouer yf God hath declared his will in the law what so euer is contrarie to the law displeaseth him Will they imagine the wrath of God to be so disarmed that punishement of death shall not forthwith follow vpon them And he himself hath pronounced it plainely if they would rather finde in their heartes to heare his voyce than to trouble the clere truthe with their vnsauorie suttelties of argument The soule sayth he that sinneth the same shall die Againe whiche I euen nowe alleged The reward of sinne is death But albeit they graunt it to be a sinne bicause they can not denie it yet they stande stiffe in this that it is no deadly sinne But sithe they haue hetherto to much borne with their owne madnesse let them yet at leÌ„gth learne to waxe wiser But if they continue in dotage we wil bid them farewel and let the childreÌ„ of God learne this that al sinne is deadly bicause it is a rebellion agaynst the will of God whiche of
tus which wheÌ„ he goeth about or at least faineth that he goeth about to extoll the greatnesse of the grace of Christ vtterly abolissheth the promises as if they were ended together with the lawe He layeth for him that by the fayth of the Gospell there is brought vnto vs the accomplishment of all the promises as though there were no difference betwene vs and Christ. I did in deede euen nowe declare that Christ left nothyng vnperformed of the whole summe of our saluatioÌ„ but it is wrongfully gathered thereupon that we do alredy enioye the benefites purchaced by him as though that sayeng of Paule were false that our saluation is hidde in hope I graunt in deede that we by beleuyng in Christ do also passe froÌ„ death to life But in the meane season we muste holde this sayeng of Iohn that although we knowe we be the children of God yet it hath not as yet appered till we shal be like vnto him that is till we shall see him suche as he is Therefore although Christ offer vnto vs in his Gospell present fulnesse of spirituall good thinges yet the enioyeng thereof lieth still hidde vnder the kepyng of hope till beyng vnclothed of the corruptible fleshe we be transfigured into the glorie of him that goeth before vs. In the meane time the holy ghoste biddeth vs to reste vpon the promises whose authoritie ought with vs to put to sileÌ„ce all the barkinges of that filthy dogge For as Paule witnesseth godlynesse hath a promise as well of the life to come as of the life present For which reason he boasteth that he is an Apostle of Christ accordynge to the promise of life that is in him And in an other place he putteth vs in minde that we haue the same promises whiche in the olde time were geuen to the holy men Finally he setteth this for the summe of felicitie that we are sealed vp with the holy spirit of promise but yet we do no otherwise enioye Christe but so farre as we embrace him clothed with his promises Whereby it cometh to passe that he in dede dwelleth in our heartes and yet we wander in yourney abrode from him bicause we walke by fayth and not by sight And these two thinges do not ill agree together that we possesse in Christ all that perteineth to the perfection of the heauenly life and yet that faith is a beholdyng of good thinges that are not seene Only there is a difference to be noted in the nature or qualitie of the promises bicause the Gospell sheweth with her finger that thing which the lawe did shadow vnder figures And hereby also is their errour conuinced whiche do neuer otherwise compare the lawe with the Gospell but as they compare the merites of workes with the free imputation of righteousnesse Although in deede this comparison of contraries be not to be reiected bycause Paule doth oftentimes vnderstand by the name of the lawe a rule to liue righteously wherin God requireth of vs that whiche is his not geuing vs any hope of life vnlesse we in al pointes obeye it on the other side adding a curse if we do neuer so litle swarme froÌ„ it that is in such places as he disputeth that we do freely please God are by pardon reckened righteous bicause the obseruation of the law wherunto the reward is promised is no where found Therfore Paule doth fitly make the righteousnesse of the law of the gospel contrarie the one to the other But the gospell did not so succede in place of that whole lawe that it shoulde brynge any diuerse meane of saluation but rather to confirme and proue to be of force what so euer the law had promised and to ioyne the body to the shadowes For when Christ sayth that the lawe and the Prophetes were vntill Iohn he maketh not the fathers subiect to the curse whiche the bound seruantes of the lawe can not escape but rather only that they were instructed with certayne â—udimentes so as they stayed a great way beneath the heygheth of the doctrine of the Gospell Therefore Paule callyng the Gospell the power of God to saluation to euery beleuer by and by addeth that it hath witnesse of the lawe and the Prophetes But in the ende of the same Epistle although he shew that the litle of praise of Iesus Christ is the reuelation of the misterie kepte secret in euerlastyng times yet he doth qualifye that sayeng with adding an expositioÌ„ teachyng that he is openly shewed by the writynges of the Prophetes Wherupon we gather that when we are to entreate of the whole lawe the Gospell differeth from the lawe only in respecte of the playne disclosyng thereof But yet for the inestimable flowyng store of grace whiche hath ben layed open for vs in Christ it is not without cause sayde that at his commyng the heauenly kingdome of God was erected in earth Nowe betwene the lawe and the Gospell came Iohn whiche had an osfice that was meane and of affinitie to them bothe For though when he called Christ the lambe of God and the sacrifice for the cleansyng of sinnes he shewed forth the summe of the Gospell yet bicause he dyd not expresse that same incomparable streÌ„gth and glorie which at length appered in his resurrection therefore Christ sayeth that he was not egal to the Apostles For so do those wordes of his meane yâ— though Iohn excell amonge the sonnes of womeÌ„ yet he that is least in the kingdome of heauen is greater than he Bicause he doeth not there commend the persones of men but after he had preferred Iohn before all the Prophetes he auaunceth the preachyng of the Gospell to the hiest degree whiche preachyng we see in an other place signified by the kyngdome of heauen But whereas Iohn himselfe dothe answere that he is but a voice as though he were inferiour to the prophetes he dothe not that for fayned humilities sake but meaneth to teache that the propre office of the Embassadour was not committed to him but that he only executeth the office of an apparitor as it was forespoken by Malachie Beholde I sende Elias the prophet before that the great and terrible daye of the Lorde doe come And truely he dyd nothing els in the whole course of his ministerie but endeuour to get disciples to Christ as also Esaye proueth that this was enioyned hym from God And in this sense Christ is called a candell burnyng and shinyng bycause the broade daye had not yet appered And yet this is no let but that he maye be reckened among the publishers of the Gospell like as he vsed the same Baptisme whiche was afterwarde deliuered to the Apostles But that whyche he beganne was not fulfilled but by the Apostles with free procedynge after that Christ was taken vp from them into the heauenly glorie The. x. Chapter ¶ Of the likenesse of the olde and newe Testamenâ— BY the thinges aforesaide it may now appere euideÌ„tly that all
the olde testamente dyd shewe onely an image in abscence of the truthe and a shadowe in steede of the bodye But the newe testament geueth the truthe present and the sounde bodie it self And this difference is mentioned commonli whersoeuer the new testament is in comparison set againste the olde but it is more largely entreated of in the epistle to the Hebrues than any where els There the Apostle disputeth againste them whiche thought that the obseruations of Moses lawe might not be taken awaye but that thei sholde also drawe wyth them the ruine of all religion To confute thys erroure he vseth that whiche had been forespoken by the Prophete concerning the presthoode of Christe For whereas there is geuen hym an eternall presthoode it is certaine that that prestehoode is taken away wherin newe successors were dayly put in one after an other But hee proueth that the institution of this newe prestehoode is to be preferred bicause it is stablished with an othe He after addeth further that in the same change of the preestehoode is also conteined the change of the Testament And that it was necessarie so to be he proueth by this reason for that the weakenesse of the law was such that it coulde helpe nothing to perfection Then he procedeth in declaring what was that weakenesse euen this that it had certaine outwarde righteousnesses of the fleshe whyche could not make the obseruers of them perfect according to conscience that by sacrifices of beastes it coulde neither wipe away synnes nor purchase true holynesse He concludeth therefore that there was in it a shadowe of good thynges to come but not the liuely image of the thinges them selues and that therefore it had not other office but to bee as an introduction into a better hope whiche is delyuered in the Gospell Here is to bee seen in what poynte the couenant of the lawe is compared with the couenant of the Gospell and the ministerie of Christe with the ministerie of Moses For if the comparison concerned the substance of the promisses then were there greate dyfference betweene the twoo testamentes but sithe the poynte of oure case leadeth vs an other waye we muste tende to thys ende to fynde oute the truth Let vs then set forth heere the couenant whiche he hathe stablished to be eternall and neuer to peryshe The accomplyshment therof whereby it atteineth to be stablished and continuing in force is Christe Whyle suche establyshment was in expectation the Lorde did by Moses apointe ceremonies to bee as it were solemne signes of the coufyrmation Nowe this came there in question whether the ceremonies that were ordeyned in the lawe oughte to geue place to Christe or no. Althoughe these ceremonies were in deede onely accidentes or verylye additions and thynges adioyned or as the people call them accessarie thynges to the couenaunte yet bycause they weare instrumentes or meanes of the admynistration thereof they beare the name of the couenaunte yt selfe as the lyke ys wonte to bee attributed to other Sacramentes Therefore in summe the olde Testamente is in thys place called the solemne fourme of confyrmynge the couenaunte conteyned in Ceremonies and Sacrifices The Apostle saythe that bycause in yt ys nothynge perfecte vnlesse wee passe further therefore yt behoued that they shoulde bee dyscoâ—tinued and abrogate that place myght be geuen to Christe the assurer and mediatore of better testament by whome eternall sanctification is ones purchaced to the elect and the transgressions blotted oute that remayned vnder the lawe Or if you like it better thus That the olde testament of the Lorde was that whiche was deliuered wrapped vp in the shadowish and effectual obseruation of ceremonies and that therfore it was but for a time bicause it did but as it wer hang in suspense vntyll it myght staye vpon a more stedfast and substantiall confyrmation and that then onely it was made newe eternall after that it was consecrate and stablyshed by the bloode of Christe Wherevpon Christe calleth the cuppe that he gaue at his supper to his Disciples The cup of the newe testament in his bloode to signifie that then the testameÌ„t of God attemeth his trueth by whiche it be coÌ„meth newe and eternal when it is sealed with his bloode Hereby appeareth in what sense the Apostle saide that in the scholynge of the lawe the Iewes were brought vnto Christ before that he was shewed in the flesh And he confesseth that thei were the children and heires of God but yet suche as for their yonge age were to be kept vnder the custodie of a schoolemaster For it behoued that ere the sonne of righteousnesse was yet rysen their sholde neither be so great brightnesse of reuelation nor so great deepe sight of vnderstandynge Therefore God so gaue them in measure the light of hys worde that thei saw it as yet farre of and darkely Therfore Paule expresseth this sclendernesse of vnderstanding by the terme of yonge age whiche the Lords wil was to haue to be exercised with that elements of this worlde with out warde observations as rules of instruction for children vntyll Christe shoulde shyne a broade by whom it behoued that the knowledge of the faithfull people shoulde growe to full age This distinction Christe him selfe meant of when hee saide that the lawe and the Prophetes were vntyll Ihon and that from thenseforth the kingedome of God is preached What did the lawe and the Prophetes open to men of their time euen this thei gaue a taste of that wisedome which in time to come sholde be plainely disclosed and thei shewed it before as it were twinclingely shyning a farr of But when it came to passe that Christ might be pointed to with the finger then was the kingedome of God set open For in him are laied abroade the treasures of al wisdome and vnderstanding whereby wee atteine euen in a manner into the secret closettes of heauen And it maketh not against vs that ther can scarsely any one be found in the Christian Churche that in excellencye of faith maye be compared with Abraham or that the Prophetes excelled in suche force of spirite that euen at this daye thei lighten the whole worlde withall For oure question is not here what grace the Lord hathe bestowed vpon a few but what ordinarie disposition he vsed in teachinge his people suche as is declared in the Prophetes them selues which were endued with peculiar knoweledge aboue the rest For euen their preaching is dark and enclosed in figures as of thinges a farre of Moreouer howe meruellous knoweledge soeuer appeared in them aboue other yet forasmuche as they wer dryuen of necessitie to submit them to the common childish â—â—struction of the people thei them selues also were reckened in the nuÌ„bre of children Fynallye there neuer chaunged any suche clere sfyght to any at that tyme but that it dede in some parte savoure of the darknesse of the time Whervpon Christ saide Many kinges and Prophetes
freewoman is a figure of the heauenly Hierusalem from whense procedeth the gospell That as the seede of Agar is borne bonde whiche maye neuer come to the inheritance and the seede of Sara is â—orne free to whome the inheritaunce is due so by the lawe we are made subiect to bondage by the Gospell onely we are regenerate into freedome But the summe commeth to this effecte that the olde testamente dyd stricke into consciences feare and tremblinge but by the beneâ—ite of the newe testament it commeth to passe that thei are made ioyefull The olde did holde consciences bounde vnto the yoke of boudage by the lyberalitie of the newe thei are discharged of bondage and brought into freedome But if oute of the people of Israel thei obiect againste vs the holy fathers who sithe it is euident that they were endued wyth the same spirit that we are it foloweth that thei were also partakers both of the selfe same freedome and ioye We answer that neither of bothe came of the lawe But that when thei felte them selues by the lawe to be both oppressed with estate of bondage and weried with vnâ—â—â—eâ—es of conscience they sâ—ed to the succoure of the Gospell and that therefore it was a peculiar frute of the newe testament that beside the common lawe of the olde testament they wer exempted from these euels Moreouer we wyll denye that they were so endewed wyth the spirit of freedome assurednesse that they did not in some part fele both seare and bondage by the lawe For howe soeuer they enioyed that prerogatiue whyche they had obteined by grace of the Gospell yet were they subiect to the same bondes and bâ—rdens of obseruation that the common people were Sithe therefore they were compelled to the carefull keeping of those ceremonies whyche were the signes of a scholing muche like vnto bondage and the handewritinges whereby they confessed them selues gylty of synne did not discarge them from being bonde it maye rightfully be saide that in comparison of vs they were vnder the testament of bondage and feare while wee haue respecte to that common ordre of dystribution that the Lorde then vsed wyth the people of Israel The three laste comparisons that we haue recited are of the lawe and the Gospell Wherfore in them by the name of the Olde testament is meant the Lawe by the name of the Nwe testament is meant the Gospell The fyrste stretched further for it comprehendeth vnder it the promises also that were published before the lawe butte whereas Augustine denyeth that they oughte to be reckened vnder the name of the olde testament therein he thought very well and meant euen the same thynge that we do nowe teache for hee hadde regarde to those saâ—enges of Hieremie and Paule where the olde testament is seuered from the woorde of mercye and grace And thys also hee very aptelye adioyueth in the same place that the chyldren of promise regenerate of God whyche by faythe woorkynge throughe loue haue obeyed the commaundements do from the beginning of the worlde belong to the newe testament and that in hope not of fleshly earthly and temporall â–ª but spiritual heauenly and eternal good thinges principally beleuing in the mediatore by whome thei doubted noâ— that the spirite was not munstred vnto them bothe to do good to haue pardon so oft as they sinned For the same thinge it is that I minded to affirme that all the Sainctes whome the Scripture reherseth to haue been from the beginning of the worlde chosen by God were partakers of the selfe same blessing with vs vnto eternal saluation This difference therfore is betwene oure diuision and Augustines that oures according to that sayeng of Christe The lawe and the Prophetes were vnto Ihon from thenseforthe the kingdome of God is preached dothe make distinction betweene the clerenesse of the Gospell and the darker dystribution of the woorde that wente before and Augustine doothe onely â—ouer the weakenesse of the lawe from the strength of the Gospell And here also is to be noted concerning the holy fathers that they so liued vnder the olde testamente that they steyed not there but allwaye aspired to the newe yea and imbraced the assured partakinge thereof For the Apostle condemneth them of blindenesse and accursednesse whiche beinge contented with present shadowes did not streâ—ch vp their minde vnto Christe For to speake nothinge of the rest what greater blindenesse can be imagined than to hope for the purginge of sinne by the killinge of a beast than to secke for the cleansing of the soule in outward sprinkling of water than to seeke to appease God with colde ceremonies as thoughe he were muche delited therewith For to all these absurdities do thei fall that sticke fast in the obseruations of the lawe without respect of Christe The fifth dyfference that we may adde lyeth in this that vntill the comming of Christe the Lorde had chosen out one nation within why the he woulde keepe seuerall the couenant of his grace When the hyest did dystribute the nations when he deuided the sonnes of Adam saith Moses his people fell to his possession Iacob the corde of his inheritance In an other place he thus speaketh to the people Beholde the heauen and earth and all that is in it are the Lord thy Gods He cleaned onely to thy fathers he loued them to choose their sede after them euen your selues oute of all nations Therefore hee voâ—tchesaued to graunte the knoweledge of hys name to that people onely as yf they onely of all men belonged vnto hym he layed hys couenant as it were in theyr bosome to them he openli shewed the presence of his Godhed them he honored with all prerogatiues Butte to omitte the reste of his beneâ—ites and speake that whiche onely here is to oure purpose he bounde them to hym by the communycatynge of his woorde that hee might be called and coâ—mpted their God In the meane season he suffered other nations to walke in vanitie as though they had not any enter course or any thynge to do wyth hym neither dyd he to helpe their destruction euen them that which was onely the remedie namely the preachinge of hys woorde Therefore Israel was then the Lordes sonne that was hys derlynge other were straungers Israell was knowen to hym and receyued into hys charge and protection other mere leâ—te to their owne darkenesse Israell was sanctified by God other were prophane Israell was honoured wyth the presence of God other were excluded from comming nye vnto him But when the fullnesse of time was come appointed for the restoringe of all men and that same reconciler of God and men was deliuered in deede the particion was plucked downe whiche had so longe holden the mercye of God enclosed within the boundes of Israel and peace was preached to them that were farre of euen as to them that were nere adioyned that being together reconciled to God they might growe into one people Wherefore
the beginning And here by the way it shal be profitable to touch what these formes of speakyng do differ from the promises of the law I cal promises of the law not those which are eche where coÌ„monly writteÌ„ in the bokes of Moses for as much as in them also are found many promises of the Gospel but those which properly belong to the ministerie of the law Such promises by what name so euer you list to cal them do declare that there is reward redy vpon condition if thou do that which is coÌ„maunded thee But when it is sayd that the Lord kepeth the couenaÌ„t of mercie to theÌ„ which loue him therin is rather shewed what maÌ„ner of men be his seruantes which haue faithfully receiued his couenant than the cause is expressed why the lord should do good to them Now this is the manner of shewyng it As the Lord vouchsaueth to graunt vs the grace of eternal life to this end that he should be loued feared honored of vs so whatsoeuer promises there are of his mercie in the Scriptures they are rightfully directed to this and that we should reuerence and worship the author of the benefites So ofte therefore as we heare that he doth good to them that kepe his law let vs remeÌ„ber that the children of God are there signified by the dutie whiche ought to be continual in them that we are for this cause adopted that we should honor him for our Father Therfore lest we should disherite our selues from the right of adoptioÌ„ we must alway endeuor to this wherunto our calling tendeth But let vs againe kepe this in minde that the accoÌ„plishment of the mercie of God hangeth not vpoÌ„ the workes of the faithfull but that he therfore fulfilleth the promise of saluation to them whiche answer to their callyng in vprightnesse of life bicause in them he acknoweth the natural tokeÌ„s of his children which are ruled with his Spirit vnto good Herunto let that be referred which is in the xv Psalme spoken of the Citezens of the Church Lord whoe shal dwel in thy tabernacle and whoe shal rest in thy holy hill The innocent in haÌ„des of a cleane heart c. Agayne in Esaie Whoe shall dwel with deuouring fire He that doth righteousnesse he that speaketh right thinges c. For there is not described the staye whereupon the faythfull may stand before the Lord but the manner wherewith the most merciful father bringeth theÌ„ into his felowship therein defendeth streÌ„gtheneth them For bicause he abhorreth sinne he loueth righteousnesse whoÌ„ he ioyneth to himself them he cleanseth with his spirit that he may make theÌ„ of like fashion to himself his kingdome Therfore if the question be of the first cause wherby the entrie is made open to the holy ones into the kingdome of God froÌ„ whense they haue that thei may stand fast abide in it we haue this answer ready bicause the Lord by his mercie both hath ones adopted them perpetually defendeth them But if the question be of the manner then we must come downe to regeneration and the frutes therof which are rehersed in that Psalme But there semeth to be much more hardnesse in these places which do both garnish good workes with the titiÌ„e of righteousnesse affirme that man is iustified by them Of the first sort there be very many places where the obseruinges of the coÌ„maundementes are called iustifications or righteousnesses Of the other sort that is an exaÌ„ple which is in Moses This shal be our righteousnesse if we kepe all these commauÌ„dementes And if thou take exception say that this is a promise of the law which being knit to a coÌ„dition impossible proueth nothing There be other of which you caÌ„ not make the same answer as this And that shal be to thee for righteousnesse before the Lord to redeliuer to the poore man his pledge c. Againe that which the Prophet sayth that the zele in reuenging the shame of Israell was imputed to Phinees for righteousnesse Therfore the Pharisees of our time thinke that here they haue a large matter to triuÌ„ph vpon For when we say that when the righteousnesse of faith is set vp the iustificatioÌ„ of workes geueth place by the same right they make this argument If righteousnesse bee of workes then it is false that we are iustified by faith only Though I graunt that the commaundementes of the law are called righteousnesses it is no maruell for they are so in deede Howebeit we muste warne the readers that the Grecians haue not fittly translated the Hebrue word Hucmi Dikaiomata righteousnesses for coÌ„maundemeÌ„ts But for the worde I willingly release my quarell For neyther doe we denie this to the law of God that it conteineth perfect righteousnesse For although bycause we are detters of all the thinges that it commaundeth therfore euen when we haue performed ful obedience therof we are vnprofitable seruaÌ„tes yet bicause the lord hath vouchsaued to graunt it the honor of righteousnesse we take not away that whiche he hath geuen Therefore we willingly confesse that the full obedience of the lawe is righteousnesse that the kepyng of euery coÌ„mauÌ„dement is a part of righteousnesse yf so be that the whole summe of righteousnesse were had in the other partes also But we denie that there is any where any suche forme of righteousnesse And therefore we take away the righteousnesse of the law not for that it is maymed and vnperfect of it felfe but for that by reason of the weakenesse of our flesh it is no where seene But the Scripture not only calleth simply the coÌ„maundemeÌ„tes of the Lord righteousnesses but it also geueth this name to the workes of the holy ones As when it reporteth that Zacharie his wife walked in the righteousnesses of the Lord truely wheÌ„ it so speaketh it weyeth workes rather by the nature of the law thaÌ„ by their owne propre estate Howbeit here againe is that to be noted which I eueÌ„ now sayd that of the negligence of the Greke translator is not a law to be made But for asmuch as Luke wold alter nothing in the receiued traslation I will also not striue about it For God hath commaunded these thinges that are in the lawe to men for righteousnesse but this righteousnes we performe not but in keping the whole lawe for by euery transgression it is broken Wheras therfore the law doth nothing but prescribe righteousnesse if we haue respecte to it all the seueral coÌ„maundementes therof are righteousnes if we haue respect to men of whome thei are done thei do not obteine the praise of righteousnesse by one worke beinge trespassers in many and by that same worke whiche is euer partly faulty by reason of imperfection But now I come to the second kinde in which is the chefe hardnes Paul hath nothing more strong to proue the righteousnesse of faiâ—he than that whiche is written of Abraham that his faithe was
other sense thought our heart must be cleāsed of al desires al our strēgths must be gathered vp drawē together to this only purpose Thei which haue gone most far before other in the way of the Lord are yet very far from this marke For though they loue God with their minde and with sincere affection of heart yet they haue still a great part of their heart and soule possessed with the desires of the fleshe by which they are drawen back and stayed from goyng forward with hasty course to God They do in deede trauayle forward with great endeuor but the fleshe partly febleth their strengthes and partly draweth them to it self What shall they here do when they fele that thei do nothing lesse thā performe the law They wil thei couet they endeuor but nothing with such perfection as ought to be If they loke vpon the law they see that whatsoeuer worke they attēpt or purpose is accursed Neyther is there any cause why any man should deceiue himself with gathering that the worke is therefore not altogether euell bycause it is vnperfect and therfore that God doth neuerthelesse accept that good which is in it For the law requiring perfect loue condēneth al imperfectiō vnlesse y rigor of it be mitigated Therefore his workes should fal to nought which he wold haue to seme partly good he shal finde that it is a transgression of the law euen in this bicause it is vnperfect Loe how al our workes are subiect to the curse of the law if thei be measured by the rule of the law But how shold thē vnhappy soules cherefully applie thēselues to work for which thei might not trust that they colde get any thing but curse On the otherside if beyng deliuered frō this seuere exacting of the lawe or rather from the whole rigor of the lawe thei heare that they be called of God with fatherly gentlenesse thei wil merily with great cherefulnesse answer his calling folow his guiding In a summe they which are boūd to the yoke of the law ar like to vn̄dseruāts to whō are apointed by their lordes certain taskes of work for euery day These seruāts thinke that thei haue done nothing nor dare come into the sight of their lordes vnlesse they haue performed the ful taske of their workes But childrē which are more liberally more freemālike handled of their fathers stick not to present to them their begonne half vnperfect workes yea those hauing some fault trusting that they wil accept their obedience willingnesse of minde Although thei haue not exactly done so much as their good wil was to do So must we be as may haue sure affiāce that our obediēces shal be allowed of our most kinde father how little soeuer how rude vnperfect soeuer thei be As also he assureth to vs by the prophet I wil spare thē saith he as the father is wont to spare his sonne that serueth him Where this word Spare is set for to beare with al or gētly to winke at faultes forasmuch as he also maketh mention of seruice And this affiance is not a litle necessarie for vs without which we shall go about all thinges in vaine For God accompteth himselfe to be worshipped with no worke of ours but which is truely done of vs for the worshipping of him But how can that be done among these terrors where it is douted whether God be offended or worshipped with oure worke And that is the cause why the author of the Epistle to the Hebrues referreth all the good workes that are red of in the holy fathers to faith and weyeth thē only by fayth Touching this libertie there is a place in the Epistle to the Romaines where Paule resoneth that some oughte not to haue dominion ouer vs bicause we are not vnder the lawe but vnder grace For when he had exhorted the faithfull that sinne should not reygne in their mortal bodie and that they should not geue theyr members to be weapons of wickednesse to sinne but shoulde dedicate them selues to God as they that are alyue from the deade and theyr members weapons of righteousnes to God and whereas they might on the other side obiect that they do yet carry with them the fleshe full of lustes and that sinne dwelleth in them he adioyneth that comforte by the libertie of the law as if he shold say Though they doo not yet throughly fele sin destroyed the righteousnes yet liueth not in thē yet ther is no cause why they shold feare be discouraged as though they had ben alwaidispleased with thē for the remnantes of sin forasmuch as they ar by grace made free from the law that theyr workes shuld not be examined by the rule of the law As for them that gather that we may sinne because we ar not vnder the law let thē know that this libertie perteineth nothing to them the ende wherof is to encourage to God The third part is that we be bound with no conscience before God of outward thinges which are by them selues indifferent but that we may indifferently sometime vse thē and sometime leaue them vnused And the knowledge of this libertie also is very necessary for vs for if it shal be absent there shal be no quiet to our consciences no ende of superstitions Many at this daye do thinke vs fonde to moue disputation about the free eating of fleshe about the free vse of dayes and garmentes and suche other smale trifles as they in dede thinke them but there is more weight in them than is commonlye thoughte For when consciences haue ones cast thē selues into the snare they entre into a long and combersome waye from whence they can afterwarde finde no easy way to get oute If a man beginne to doubt whether he maye occupye linnen in shetes shertes hankercheifes and napkines neither wil he be out of doubt whether he may vse hempe and at the last he wil also fal in doubt of maters for he will waye with himselfe whether he can not suppe without napkins whether he maye not be without handkerchifes If any man thinke deyntye meate to be vnlawful at length he shal not with quietnesse before the Lorde eate either brounebreade or common meates when he remembreth that he may yet susteine his body with bacer fode If he doute of pleasaunte wyne afterwarde he will not drinke deade wine with good peace of conscience last of al he wyl not be so bolde to touche sweter and cleaner water than other Finally at the length he wil come to this point to thinke it vnlawfull as the common sayinge is to treade vppon a strawe lying a crosse For here is begonne no lyghte stryfe but this is in question whether God will haue vs to vse these or those thinges whose will ought to guide al our counsels and doynges Hereby some must needes be carried with desperatiō into a confuse deuouryng pit some must despising God and casting away
wer not first moued to the see of Rome Beside thys that it is certaine that this is most vaine what man shall thynke it likely that suche a commendation of the see of Rome proceded from the aduersary and enuier of the honor and dignitie thereof But verily it behoued that these Antichristes shoulde be carried on to so greate madnesse and blindenesse that their lewdenesse might be playne for all men to se at least so many as will open theyr eyes But the decretall epistles heaped together by Gregorie the .ix. agayne the Clementines and Extrauagantes of Martine dooe yet more openly and with fuller mouth ech where breathe forth their outragious fiercenesse and as it were the tyrannie of barbarous kinges But these be the oracles by which the Romanistes will haue their papacie to be weyed Hereupon arose those notable principles whiche at this day haue euery where in the papacie the force of oracles that the Pope câ—Ì„not erre that the Pope is aboue the Councels that the Pope is the vniuersall Bishop of al Bishops and the Supreme head of the Chirche in earth I passe ouer the much absurder follies which the foolishe Canonistes babble in their scholes to which yet the Romish diuines do not only assente but do also clap their handes at them to flatter their idole I wil not deale with them by extremitie of righte Some other man would against this their so great insolence set the saying of Cipriane which he vsed among the Bishops at whoe 's councell he sate as chiefe None of vs calleth hymselfe Bishop of Bishops or with tirannous feare coÌ„pelleth his felow Bishops to necessitie to obey He would obiect that which a litle afterwarde was decreed at Carthage That none shoulde be called Prince of Priestes or chiefe Bishop He woulde gather many testimonies out of Histories Canons out of Sinodeâ— many senteÌ„ces out of the bokes of old writers by whiche the Bishop of Rome shoulde be brought down into the felowship of the rest But I passe ouer al these least I should seme to precisely to presse them But let the best patrones of the see of Rome answere me with what face they dare defende the title of vniuersal Bishop whiche they se so oft to be condemned with curse by Gregorie If Gregories testimonie ought to be of force they do therby declare that Antichrist is their Bishop because they make him vniuersal The name also of hed was no more vsual For thus he sayeth in one place Peter is the chiefe meÌ„ber in the body Iohn Andrew Iames the heds of particular peoples yet they all are members of the Chirch vnder one hed yea the holy ones before the law the holy ones vnder the law the holy ones vnder grace are set among meÌ„bers altogether makyng vp the body of the Lord no maÌ„ euer willed to haue himselfe called vniuersal But wheras the Bishop of Rome taketh vpoÌ„ hymselfe the power of coÌ„maunding that thing smally agreeth with that which Gregory saith in an other place For wheras Eulolius Bishop of Alexandria had said that he was coÌ„maunded by hym he answered in this wise I pray ye take away thys worde of coÌ„maÌ„ding froÌ„ my hearing For I know what I am what ye be In place ye be to me brethreÌ„ in maners ye be to me fathers Therefore I coÌ„maÌ„ded not but I cared to tel you those thiÌ„gs that I thought profitable Wheras he so extendeth his iurisdiction wtout end he doth therin great and haynoâ—s wrong not only to the other Bishops but also to al particular Chirches which he so teareth plucketh in peces that he may bilde his seate of their ruines But wheras he exeÌ„pteth himself froÌ„ al iudgemeÌ„ts and wil so reigne after the maner of tirantes that he accompteth his own only lust for law that verily is so hainous so far froÌ„ ecclesiastical order that it may in no wise be borne for it vtterly abhorreth not only from al feling of godlinesse but also from all humanitie But that I be not coÌ„pelled to go through examine al thinges particularly I do agayne appelle to them the wil at this day be accoÌ„pted the beste and most faithful patrones of the see of Rome whether they be not ashamed to defende the present state of the papacie which it is certaine to be a hundred times more corrupt than it was in the times of Gregory and Bernard which state yet dyd then so much displease those holy meÌ„ Gregory eche where complayneth that he is to muche diuersly drawen away with forein busynesse that he is vnder the color of Bishoprike brought backe to the world wherin he serueth so many cares of the world as he neuer remembreth that he serued when he was a lay man that he is pressed downe wyth tumulte of worldly affaires that hys mynde is nothing raised vp to thinges aboue that he is shakeÌ„ with many waues of causes and tossed with tempestes of troublesome lyfe so that he may worthily say I am come into the depth of the sea Truely among those earthly businesses he might yet teach the people with Sermones priuately admonishe and correct such as it behoued order the Chirche geue counsell to his fellow Bishops and exhort them to their dutie beside these thinges there remained some time to write and yet he lamenteth his calamitie that he is drowned in the depest sea If the gouernement of that time was a sea what is to be sayed of the papacie at thys tyme For what likenesse haue they together Here be no preachinges no care of discipline no zele to the Chirches no spirituall doing finally nothing but the world Yet this maze is praysed as though there could nothing be founde more orderly better framed But what coÌ„plaintes doth Bernarde poure out what grones doeth he vtter when he loketh vpon the faultes of hys age What then would he doe if he behelde thys our age of iron and worse if any be worse than iron What obstinate wickednesse is thys not only stiffly to defende as holy and diuine that which all the holy men haue with one mouth condemned but also to abuse their testimonie to the defense of the papacie whiche it is certaine that they neuer knew of Howbeit of Bernardes tyme I confesse that then the corruption of all thynges was so great that it was not much vnlike our tyme. But they are without all shame that fetche any pretense for it out of that meane age that is the tyme of Leo Gregory and such other For they doe lyke as if one to stablyshe the Monarchie of Emperoure would praise the olde state of the Empire of Rome that is woulde borrowe the praises of libertie to set forth the honor of tyranny Finally although al these things wer grauÌ„ted them yet there ariseth of fresh a newe strife for them when we deny that there is a Chirche at Rome in whiche suche benefites may be resident when we denie that there is a
was more nerely shewed to menne sins he hath ben truely deliuered of his Father such as he had ben promised For Baptisme doth testifie vnto vs that we cleansed and washed the Supper of thankesgeuing testifieth that we be redemed In water is figured washing in blood satisfaction These twoo thinges are founde in Christ whiche as Iohn sayth came in water and blood that is to say that he mighte cleanse and redeme Of whiche thing the Spirite of God also is a witnesse Yea there are three witnesses in one Water Blood and Spirite In water and blood we haue a testimonie of cleansing and redeming but the Spirite the principall witnesse bryngeth vnto vs assured credit of suche wytnessing This hie mysterie hath notably well ben shewed vs in the crosse of Christ when water and blood slowed oute of his holy side whiche side for that cause Augustine rightfully called the fountaine of oure Sacramentes of which yet we must entreate somwhat more at large There is no doute but that more plentifull grace also of the Spirite doth here shewe fourth it selfe if you compare tyme with tyme. For that perteineth to the glory of the kingdome of Christe as we gather out of many places but specially out of the .vii. Chapter of Iohn In whiche sense we must take that sayeng of Paule that vnder the lawe were shadowes but in Chirst is the body Neither is it his meaning to spoyle of their effecte the testimonies of grace in whiche Gods will was in the olde tyme to proue hymselfe to the Fathers a true speaker euen as at thys day he doth to vs in Baptisme and in the holy Supper But onely his purpose was by waye of comparison to magnifie that whiche was geuen vs least any shoulde thynke it maruaylous that the Ceremonies of the lawe were abolished by the comming of Christ. But that same schole doctrine as I may also brefely touche thys by the waye is vtterly to be hissed out wherby there is noted so greate a difference betwene the Sacramentes of the olde and newe lawe as thoughe those did nothing but shadowe out the grace of God and these do presently geue it For the Apostle speaketh no lesse honorably of those than of these when he teacheth that the Fathers did eate the same spirituall meate which we eate and expoundeth that same meate to be Christ. Who dare make that an empty signe whiche deliuered to the Iewes a true communion of Christe And the grounde of the cause which the Apostle there handleth doth plainly fight on oure side For that no man trusting vpon a colde knowlege of Christe and emptie title of Christianitie and outwarde tokens shoulde presume to despise the iugemente of God he sheweth fourth examples of Gods seueritie to be seen in the Iewes that we shoulde knowe that the same peynes whiche they haue suffred hang ouer vs if we folowe the same faultes Nowe that the comparison mighte be fitt it behoued that he shoulde shewe that there is no vnegalnesse betwene vs and them in those good thinges wherof he die forbidde vs to boste falslye Therefore firste he maketh vs egall in the Sacramentes and leaueth to vs not so muche as any smal pece of prerogatiue that might encourage vs to hope of escaping vnpunished Neither verily is it lawfull to geue any more to our Baptisme thaÌ„ he in an other place geueth to circumcision when he calleth it the seale of the righteousnesse of Fayth Whatsoeuer therefore is at this day geuen vs in our Sacramentes the same thyng the Iewes in olde tyme receiued in theirs that is to say Christ with his spirituall richesse What power our Sacramentes haue the same they also felte in theirs that is to saye that they were to them seales of Gods good will towarde them into the hope of eternall saluation If they had ben apt expositors of the Epistle to the Hebrues they would not haue so ben blynded But when they red there that sinnes were not cleansed by the Ceremonies of the law yea that the olde shadowes had no auayling force to righteousnesse they neglecting the comparison which is there handeled while they toke holde of this one thing that the lawe of it selfe nothing profited the folowers of it though simply the the figures were voide of truth But the Apostles meaning is to bring the ceremonial law to nothing vntill it come to Christ vpon whom alone hangeth al the effectualnesse of it But they will obiecte those thinges whiche are red in Paul concerning the circumcision of the letter that it is in no estimation with God that it geueth nothing that it is vaine For suche sayenges seme to presse it down farr benethe Baptisme Not so For the very same might rightfully be sayd of Baptisme Yea and also the same is sayd firste of Paule hym selfe where he sheweth that God regardeth not the outwarde washing wherby we enter into profession of religion vnlesse the minde within be both cleansed and continue in cleannesse to the ende againe of Peter when he testifieth that the trueth of Baptisme standeth not in the outwarde washing but in a good witnessing of conscience But he semeth also in an other place vtterly to despise the circumcision made with hande when he compareth it with the circumcision of Christe I aunswere that euen in this place nothyng is abated of the dignitie of it Paule there â—isputeth against them whiche required it as necessarie when it was nowe abrogate Therfore he warneth the faythfull that leauing the olde shadowes they should stande fast in the truth These maisters sayth he instantly call vpon you that your bodies may be circumcised But ye are spiritually circumcised according to the soule and body Ye haue therefore the deliuerance of the thing in dede which is much better thaÌ„ the shadow A man might take exceptioÌ„ to the contrary say that the figure is not therfore to be despised because they had the thing in dede forasmuch as that putting of of the old man of which he there spake was also amoÌ„g the Fathers to whoÌ„ yet outwarde Circumcision had not ben superfluous He preuenteth this obiectioÌ„ wheÌ„ he by and by addeth that the Colossians were buried with Christ by Baptisme Wherby he signifieth that at this day Baptisme is the same to ChristiaÌ„s which circuÌ„cisioÌ„ was to the olde people therfore that circuÌ„cisioÌ„ can not be enioined to Christians wtout wroÌ„g done to Christ. But that which foloweth and which I eueÌ„ now alleged is harder to assoyle that all the Iewishe Ceremonies were shadowes of thinges to come and that in Christ is the body but most hard of all is that whiche is entreated in many chapters of the Epistle to the Hebrues that the blood of beastes atteined not to consciences that the law had a shadowe of good thinges to come not an image of thinges that the folowers of it obteined no perfection of the Ceremonies of Moses and such other I goe backe to
And we knowe what Moses eche where saith Iniquitie shal be cleansed sinne shal be putte awaie forgeuen Finally we are very well taught in the olde figures what is the force and effect of the death of Christe And this point the Apostle setteth out in the epistle to the Hebrues very fytly taking this principle that remission is not wrought withoute shedynge of bloode Whervpon he gathereth that Christ for the abolishing of sinne appeared ones for all by his sacrifice Againe that he was offred vp to take awaie the sinnes of manie And he hadde saide before that not by the bloode of goates or of calues butte by his owne bloode hee ones entred into the holy place finding eternall redemption Nowe when he thus reasoneth If the bloode of a calfe do sanctifie accordinge to the cleannesse of the flesh that muche more consciences are cleansed by the bloode of Christ from deade workes it easily appeareth that the grace of Christe is to muche diminished vnlesse we graunt vnto his sacrifice the power of cleansinge appeasing and satisfieng As a little after hee addeth This is the mediator of the new testament that the◠whiche are called maie receiue the promise of eternall inheritance by meane of death for the redemption of sinnes goinge before which remained vnder the lawe But specially it is conuenient to weye the relation which Paule describeth that he became curse for vs. c. For it were superfluous yea and an absurditie that Christ shoulde be charged with curse but for this entent that he payinge that which other did owe shoulde purchace righteousnes for them Also the testimonie of Esaie is playne that the chastisement of our peace was laied vpon Christ and that we obteined healthe by his stripes For if Christe had not satisfied for oure sinnes it coulde not haue been saide that he appeased God by takinge vpon him the peine wherevnto we were subiect Wherewith agreeth that whyche foloweth in the same place For the sinne of my people I haue striken him Let vs also recite the exposition of Peter which shall leaue nothing doubtful that he did beare our sinne vpon the tree For he saithe that the burthen of damnation from whiche we were deliuered was laide vpon Christe And the Apostles do plainely pronounce that he payed the pryce of raunsome to redeeme vs from the gyltinesse of deathe Being iustified by his grace through the redemption whiche is in Christ whome God hathe set to be the propiciatorie by faith which is in his bloode Paule commendeth the grace of God in this point bicause he hath geuen the price of redemption in the deathe of Christ and then he biddeth vs to flee vnto hys bloode that hauinge obteined righteousnesse we maye stande boldly before the iudgement of God And to the same effecte is that saieng of Peter that we are redeemed not by golde and siluer but by the precious bloode of the vnspotted Lambe For the comparison also woulde not agree vnlesse with that price satisfaction had ben made for sinnes for whiche reason Paule saith that we are preciously bought Also that other saieng of his wold not stande together Ther is one mediator that gaue hymselfe to bee a redemption vnlesse the peine hadde ben caste vpon him whiche wee had deserued Therefore the same Apostle defyneth that the redemptino in the bloode of Christ is the forgeuenesse of synnes as if he shoulde haue saide that wee are iustified or acquyted before God bycause that bloode aunswereth for satisfaction for vs. Wherewyth also agreeth the other place that the hande writinge which was against vs was cancelled vpon the crosse For therein is meant the payment or recompense that acquyteth vs from gyltinesse There is also great weight in these wordes of Paule If we be iustified by the workes of the lawe then Christe dyed for nothynge For hereby we gather that we muste fetche from Christe that whyche the lawe woulde geue yf any man can fulfyll it or whyche is all one that wee obteyne by the grace of Christe that whyche God promysed to oure woorkes in the lawe when he sayde He that dothe these thynges shall lyue in them Whyche he no lesse playnely confyrmeth in hys sermon made at Antioche affyrmeth that by beleuynge in Christe we are iustified from all those thynges from whiche we coulde not be iustified in the lawe of Moses For if the kepinge of the lawe be righteousnesse who can denie that Christe deserued fauoure for vs when takynge that burden vpon hym he so reconciled vs to God as yf we our selue had kept the law To the same purpose serueth that whiche he afterward writeth to the Galatians God sent his Sonne subiecte to the lawe that he mighte redeeme those that were vnder the lawe For to what ende serued that submission of his but that he purchaced to vs righteousnesse taking vpon hym to make good that whyche we wer not able to pay Hereof cōmeth that imputation of righteousnesse without woorkes wherof Paule speaketh bycause the righteousnesse is reckened to vs which was founde in Christ only And truely for no other cause is the fleshe of Christ called our meate but bicause we finde in him the substance of life And that power proceedeth from nothinge els but bicause the Sonne of God was crucified to be the price of our righteousnesse As Paule sayth that he gaue vp hymselfe a sacrifice of swete sauoure And in an other place He died for our sinnes he rose againe for our iustification Hervpon is gathered that not only saluatiō is geuen vs by Christe but also that for his sake hys father is now fauourable vnto vs. For there is no doubt that that is perfectli fulfilled in him which God vnder a figure pronounceth by Esaie saieng I wil do it for mine owne sake for Dauid my seruantes sake Whereof the Apostle is a right good witnesse where he saith Your sinnes are forgeuen you for his names sake For though the name of Christ be not expressed yet Ihon after his accustomed manner signifieth hym by thys pronoune He. In whiche sense also the Lorde pronounceth As I liue bicause of my father so shall ye also liue bycause of me Wherewith agreeth that whiche Paule saith It is geuen you bicause of Christe not onely to beleue in him but also to suffer for him But to demaūd whether Christ deserued for himself as Lombard the other scholemen do is no lesse foolish curiositie thā it is a rash determination when thei affirme it For what neded the sonne of God to come down to purchace any new thing for himselfe And the Lord declaring his own counsel doth put it wholy out of doubt For it is not said that the father prouided for the cōmoditie of his sonne in his deseruinges but that he deliuered him to death spared him not bicause he loued the worlde And the