of the law giving men sixe for one for God ever was and ever will be alike liberall to all men in all ages in this kind The second drawn from Gods interest in the seventh day The Seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord and what sons of Adam are exempted from giving God his owne The third is Gods example proposed for our imitation for all men are bound by the very light of nature to be followers of God as deare children The fourth is the promise which is made therein For it will be as blessed a day or a day as full of blessing unto us if we sanctify it as ever it was to the Iews God being not lesse good nor his grace lesse powerfull nor his promise lesse sure The fift is the ease refreshing of our servants and beasts to whom Christians must not be lesse mercifull then the Iews Lastly the Sabbath taught them that they were the Lords people and no man will say but that we also are so by as many and by more strong tyes and relations then were ever any Ergo c. Sixtly the law Ceremoniall and Iudiciall were given only to the Iewes and such as were circumcised but the fourth commandement was directed not only to those within the covenant but also to strangers and aliens The strangers within thy gates And upon this ground a Neh. 13.16 Nehemiah reproved the Tyrian Merchants which were strangers therefore c. Seventhly from the words of Christ in the Gospell b Mat. 24.20 pray that your flight be not on the Sabbath day Those words were spoken to the disciples foreshewing that if their flight should happen to befall them on the Sabbath their affliction would thereby be increased But if the fourth commandement be not Morall what addition of sorrow had it been if their flight had befallen them that day Christians and such were the disciples need not trouble themselves about a law Ceremoniall Thus then That commandement the breaking whereof might justly grieve a Christian forced thereunto by flight is doubtlesse morall but the fourth commandement is such therefore c. Eightly that commandement against which humane corruptions doe especially arise and band themselves both in the Godly and the wicked must needs be morall but our corruptions doe chiefly fight against the Sabbath as the Godly feele by experience in themselves and experience doth also make evident in the wicked of the world therefore c. Ninthly that cannot be a truth of God which overthrowes all religion le ts in Atheisme Epicureisme and all prophanesse no good tree can bring forth such evill fruit But that doctrine which denieth the morality of the Sabbath overthroweth all religion le ts in Epicureisme and Prophanesse as appeares in those Churches wherein it is taught in forraine parts Ergo. Tenthly that wich the Church of England teacheth in her Homilies ought to be held for truth by all the obedient children of that Church but the morality of the Sabbath is that which the Church of England teacheth in her Homily of the time and place of prayer as will appeare to every one that will read the same Therefore all the obedient children of the Church of England ought to acknowledge it to be true Eleventhly if you make the fourth commandement Ceremoniall you make the Church of England guilty of Iudaisme For that Church which readeth to her children a Ceremoniall Law and commands them to kneele whilst it is read in acknowledgment of their subjection thereunto and at the end to pray Lord have mercy vpon us and incline our hearts to keep this law cannot but be a Iewish Church But the Church of England thus teacheth her children Ergo. Twelfthly unlesse the fourth commandement be morall there will be but nine commandements in the Decalogue which is contrary not only to the received opinion of all men but to the calculation of the whole Catholique Church in all ages and is no meane Sacriledge to affirme Ergo. Thirteenthly that which is taught by men which are most spirituall and alone discerne the things of God must needs be true and so on the contrary But the Morality of the Sabbath is taught by men that are most spirituall the contrary by men that are carnall therefore c. Lastly we have the authority of all our English writers almost ever since the reformation unto this time neither was it hitherto ever contradicted for at least these threescore and ten yeares unlesse by Papists Anabaptists or Familists Ergo. CHAP. VII In which are set downe the arguments for the negative THe negative tenent hath also its arguments which in the next place must be produced and First it is alleadged That commandement over which Christ was absolute Lord as he was the sonne of man is not morall for a morall precept is part of Gods eternall law over which the sonne of man can have no power being made under the law But Christ as the sonne of man was Lord of the Sabbath as himselfe upon two sundry occasions hath twice told us Math. 12. Mark 2. To these Texts these exceptions have been made 1 Excep 1. That this phrase doth no more import the Sabbath to be a ceremony then the same used by the Apostle doth conclude the dead and the living to be a ceremony for he rose againe that he might be the Lord of the dead and of the living But this is to play with the ambiguity of the word it 's one thing to be Lord of the Church to guide governe perfect quicken raise glorify her for this is the meaning of the Apostle upon which that in the Ephesians may seeme as a comment Eph. 1.20.21.22 And another thing to be Lord of the Law or constitution to moderate dispence order alter abolish for in what other construction can any one be said to be Lord of a law 2 Except 2. It is said that Christ did not intend by these words of his any such Lordship because he did not then abrogate the Sabbath Nor is this to the purpose for never any man yet dreamed that Christ did in those words abolish the Sabbath for both it and the rest of the legall ordinances were in force till they were nailed with him to the Crosse 3 Except 3. It is excepted that our Saviour in those words doth only dispence with his Disciples in that particular case and challenge to himselfe the power and prerogative of expounding the Law against the Pharisees who pretended only to the Chayre and to give interpretations of the Law But to satisfy this also and to cleare the Text we affirme 1 That Christ doth not there or in any other place ever dispence with the law in himselfe or any other for he took upon him the form of a servant and came not to break the Law but to fulfill it 2 That in those words Christ doth not intend to expound the law only for this he had done before by the example of David and by the
time should be set apart not Morall in regard of the letter in which it is expressed If therefore the proposition be of the sounds and syllables of the Decalogue so that whatsoever is written in the letter thereof is affirmed to be Morall it is utterly untrue For what think you a Jllud in primo praecepto quieduxit te c. illuà in quinto ut diù vivaâ— c. of those words in the very front of the Decalogue I brought thee on t of the land of Egypt and out of the house of bondage are they Morall If any say these words are a preface no law he speaketh nothing to the purpose for the proposition in question is universall of whatsoever is written in the tables of stone with Gods own finger Besides give us liberty to exclude from being morall whatsoever is not a law and thereby the reasons of the fourth Commandement will be denied Morality for the reasons of any Law are no more the law it selfe then the preface thereof Indeed there is an implicit Morality in that preface Egypt being a type of the Kingdom of Sathan the house of Bondage the dominion of sinne and under the deliverance of these are contained the rest of Gods mercies to his Church If such a morality as this be all they seek for in the law of the Sabbath no man I presume will gainsay them herein But to give an other instance what shall we think of that clause in the fifth commandement That thy daies may be long in the land which thy Lord thy God giveth thee I am sure it is no principle in Nature nor conclusion flowing from any naturall principle nature can only say God will blesse all dutifull and obedient Children but that it shall be with this or that particular blessing as this is nature cannot teach us Besides this is only a positive and conditionall promise not universally and perpetually performed therefore not Morall And farther let us consider not only what is promised but to whom and it will appeare that those words concerned b Nullo modo ad nos possumus accommodare Luther tom 7. Epist ad Amicum the Iewes only and the land of Canaan and are applyable to us only by way of proportion I am not Ignorant how some labour to patch up a Morality in these words perhaps because they find them written in the tables of stone But their distinction of old in yeares and old in grace though otherwise of good use is in this place of no validity For the promise is without equivocation of long life in the earth as the Apostle expounds it Ephe. 6.3 But what speak we of things circumstantiall Our adversaries confesse the taxation of the seventh day to be Ceremoniall though the very heart of the Commandement and written with Gods own finger Although therefore it be written in tables of stone and that by Gods own finger and that in the very heart of the whole Decalogue which also is pressed that therefore it must be Morall must needs be acknowledged no good consequent unlesse men have a mind to play fast and loose with this argument Ob. Oh! but this commandement is in the very heart of the Decalogue Sol. To which I answere that if by the heart of the Decalogue we understand the midst then c Philo deleg Philo the Iew tels us that the first Commandement is the heart of the whole being written part in the first part in the second table But if by the heart we understand that which gives life to all the rest so the first commandement Thou shalt have no other Gods but me is the very vitall spirit of the whole Law of God Ob. Yea but the Decalogue was spoken with Gods own mouth and so were not the rest this therefore must needs be Morall Sol. Not to trouble the reader about the manner of Gods delivering the ten Commandements I briefly answere that the Ceremonials and Iudicials were also spoken by Gods own mouth so that herein there is little difference save that he delivered the Decalogue publikely in the audience of all the people the rest only apart but still face to face and mouth to mouth And the reason hereof is given in the text not to be any precedency in the lawes themselves but fear in the people being no longer able to hear the voice of so great and terrible a lawgiver When therefore Moses presseth this circumstance Deut. 5. 22. thus he spake and added no more d Quod refere Moses Deum nihil adjecisse eo perfectam vitae regulam decem praeceptis comprehendi significat Calv. in Deut. 5. v. 23. Calvins glosse which was the common marginall note viz. that these ten words are perfect directions needing no additions is indeed true but comes short of the meaning of the holy Ghost in that place for the true reason of that clause is expresly set down in the words following when you heard the voice out of the midst of the darknesse you came unto me and said if we heare the voice of the Lord our God any more we shall dye As if Moses should have said you heard but these ten words he added no more and you were thus afraid What if he had held on as he began So that it is their feare at that time of which Moses puts them in mind to beget in them an awfull reverence of God and heedfull observation of his Law and is nothing to our purpose To the second by placing the fourth commandement being Ceremoniall amidst the Morals in the Decalogue there is neither confusion of things nor distraction of the Church unlesse by accident as the law begets sinne through our own corruptions For will any man say that in Leviticus and Deuteronomy Moses did purposely confound things to distract the Church this were blasphemy and yet Morals and Ceremonials are commonly mixed in those Scriptures Nay we may with more reason affirme that had not this law of the Sabbath been thus place we might justly have complained of confusions and distractions For it being a Commandement mixtly Ceremoniall it could not without distraction have been ranged amongst the meerly Ceremonials and on the other side it being mixtly Morall reason requires it should be e Si quaeratur quare aliae Iudâ—â—orum festivitates praecipiebantur in decalogo diâ— quòd fuerunt tantum Caremoniales Sabbathum autèm magismorale est quum Caeremoniale Greg. de 10. praeceptis Caeremoniale islud determinabat naturale Greg. de Val. tom 2. disp 7. q. 7. p. 4. set amongst the meerly Morals in honour to the Morall parts thereof For the Morall and Ceremoniall parts thereof cannot well be severed one from the other the generall which is Morall from the particulars which are Ceremoniall Lastly though it were in no respect morall yet the Law of the Sabbath being that wherein is f The Lord prescribeth the feasts of the old Testâ—mentin these words Remember that thou keepe holy
which I answere that such outward worship in publique coÌ„gregations should not have been required in that state of innocency for then the whole world should have been but one temple and all men therein but one Congregation as the glorified Saints make but one Quire whose antheme is day and night Praise Honour Glory and Power be to him that sitteth on the throne Wee may well conceive that if Adam had not fallen our estate should have been much like though much inferiour to the Saints in glory I know that b Aquin. pare 1. q. 44. art 31. Schoolemen commonly teach that Adam in the state of innocency should have beene a priest a Prophet and a King having to this purpose a personall kind of knowledge imparted unto him enabling him to be the head and teacher of all mankind But this being grounded upon a false principle viz That his originall righteousnesse of which his knowledge was a part was a supernaturall endowment superadded to the estate of pure naturalls must needs be a consequent like the antecedent out of which it is deduced Order then should have been in that estate for so there is amongst the Angels but no division of men into pastorall charges and congregations which neither are amongst the Angels nor shall be hereafter amongst the glorified Saints The precept therefore of the Sabbath to be observed by Adam in Paradise was in all respects superfluous Ergo. Secondly it is generally affirmed by c In principle mundi ipsi Adae Evae legem dedit ne defructu arboris plantatae in medio paradisi ederent quae lex iâ— sufficeret se esset custodita Tert. ad Iud. Divines ancient and moderne that Adam in the estate of innocency had but one positive law imposed upon him even that of the forbidden fruit neither doe we read of more in Scripture And this we commonly say with d Hoc tam leve preceptum ad observandum tam breve ad memoriâ retinenduÌ„ tanto 〈◊〉 inju titiâ violatum est quanto saciliori possit obser vantia custodiri Aug. â—e Câ—vâ—t l. 14. c. 15. S. Augustine made his disobedience the greater God requiring no more at his hands but if Adam had a commandement to observe the Sabbath God gave him more positive Lawes then one Ergo. If any man say he needed no positive law for the Sabbath being bound thereunto by the light of nature for nature teacheth men to keepe holy unto God those daies upon which they have received greatest mercies for this guided even the Heathens to their holydaies Answere I answere indeed that nature teacheth men thankfully to acknowledge Gods mercies but how and in what manner it must be done or that the same day must be kept holy upon which we receive them nature teacheth not For by this reason Adam should have kept the sixt day for in it he received from the hands of God an helper meet for him in it he and his wife received a blessing upon their Creation and full power and dominion over all creatures being thereby enstalled the happy Princes of the whole world Object If any say that though God did all this for them on the sixt day yet he had not given the operative power of propagation to the whole creation till the seventh day and without this their former day was nothing worth Answere I answere that indeed a In hoc discordat nostra translatio ab alia quam augustinus exponit nostrâ enim translatione consummatio operum oscribitur diei septimo in alia diei sexto utâ—â— autem veritatemâ—â—here potest distinguenda est rei duplex perfectio c. super sent l. 2. c. â— 15. 9 3. Aquinas both in his summes and upon the sentences affirmeth as much There is saith he a two-fold perfection the one wherein things receive their perfect being this all things had upon the sixt day the other which regardeth not the being but only the operation of things in being this was bestowed on creatures the seventh day for then God resting from giving being unto things began to set nature to the worke of propagation but any man may see First that this is only said without any ground Secondly that he was forced thereunto by labouring to reconcile the vulgar translation with that of Saint Austin the one reading in the seventh day the other in the sixt day God ended his worke Gen. 2.2 But what a small fly this is to choak so great a Camel will soone appeare for the text meaneth not that God did any thing upon the seventh day as Aquinas conceived but that b Inde ab hoc die destitit ab omni opificio Trem. in iâ—cum when the seventh day was come all things were finished nothing being defective either in regard of the first or second perfections of which the distinction speaketh Adam therefore had all things perfected and so delivered into his hands on the sixt day And c Hoc loco non dicit Deus rebus ipsis benedixisse sed diei Est 2. Dist 15. art 9. one observes rightly that the text saith God blessed the day not the creatures so that if it were true that nature binds us to keepe those very daies on which we have received mercies Adam was obliged to the Friday which I thinke no man will presume to affirme Thirdly whatsoever was commanded Adam in paradise was universally commanded unto all mankind in all their generations for we were all in Adam neither had our first parents any personall or temporary precept but the Law of the seventh-day Sabbath is of no such universall extent neither is it still in force The first appears because the d So Moses The Lord hath given you the Sabbath Exod. 16.29 So Nehemiah thou madest knowne unto them thy holy Sabbath by the hand of Moses thy servant Neb. 9.14 So Ezek. 20.12 reckoning up Gods favours to that nation saith moreover I gave them also my Sabbaths Scriptures doe ever appropriate the Sabbath as a peculiar rite prescribed the Iewes The second is also manifest for we observe not at this day that Sabbath which is said to have been given Adam which we must have done had it been commanded in paradise unlesse we could shew expresse precepts given to Adam to the contrary but such a countermaine certaine it is Adam never received Fourthly that which is eyther naturall or commanded in Paradise before the fall was not to be abrogated by Christ in the fulnesse of time the reason hereof is because that fulnesse of time wherein Christ came and did all things appertaining to the Messias is to be reckoned from the promise of the seed which was not made till after the fall that therefore which preceeded this promise appertained not to the Messias either to establish or abolish but the observation of that Sabbath which is pretended to have been commanded Adam in paradise is abrogated by Christ as he is the Messias even that day on
serm 50. in Cant. S. Bernard sticks not to say that the literall observation of the Sabbath was one of the precepts which Ezechiel calls not good and numbers it with the Law against Swine-flesh p Damascen de fide orthod lib. 4. cap. 4. Damascen is large and particular in this point shewing where and how it was Ceremoniall q Quies ab operibus licet non amplius sit in Christianismo praecepta ficut scribit Apostolus Col. 2. necessaria tamen est instituta ab Ecclesiâ propter imperfectos Luth de bonis operibus Luther saith plainly that the outward Rest of the Sabbath is not commanded us Christians under the Gospell and alleadgeth for proofe the Prophet Isaiah cap. 66. and the Apostle S. Paul Colos 2. r Evanescant nugae pseudo-prophetarum qui Iudaicâ opinione populum superioribus saeculis imbuerunt nibil aliud asserentes nisi abrogatum esse quod ceremoniale erat id vocant diei septimae taxarationem remanere autem quod morale est nempe untus diei objervationem in hebdomade atqui id nihil aliudest quam in Iudaeorum contumeliam diem mutare diei sanctitatem eandem animo reâ—inere Calv. inst lib. 2. c. 8. Calvin sharply confuteth the maintainers of a seventh day Sabbath for false Prophets and Iewes All the Protestants by what names soever distinguished follow these their leaders except a few in comparison in the Church of England which have all started up since the daies of Queene Mary And therefore s Bellarm. de cultu Sanctum lib. 3. c. 10. Bellarmine setting downe the Doctrine both of the Lutherans and Calvinists reduceth all to these heads First they affirme that the Law of God requires us to keep some daies holy Secondly that those daies are not determined by the Law of God but that this determination is left wholy to the Church Thirdly that those daies which the Church shall determine are not in themselves more holy then other daies Fourthly that this determination of the Church doth not bind the conscience but in case either of contempt or scandall Now if this be the Doctrine both of the Lutherans and Calvinists they cannot affirme the fourth Commandement to be morall For if so then God had determined a set day and time wherein to be worshiped then one day had been more holy then another being set thus a part by God himselfe for his holy use and then also all mens consciences had been bound to the observation thereof even out of the case of contempt and scandall If any man suspect Bellarmines honesty in this his report of Lutherans and Calvinists let him shew wherein he hath unfaithfully collected I am sure Amesius who hath taken upon him to weakeÌ„ enervate his whole Doctrine toucheth not upon this It were an endlesse piece of worke to set down the particular writers of the reformed Church I will only name Bullinger and Pellican and that in those places where they purposely treat of this subject Because the common evasion is that heretofore the Protestants of all kinds were so taken up with the common adversary of the reformation that they never sufficiently studied this point a Seimus Sabbâ—thum esse Ceremoniale quatenùs coniunctumest cum sacrificiâ—s reliquis Iudaâ—cis Caeremoniis quatenus alligatum est tempori Caeterùm quatenus Sabbatho reli gio pietas â—opagatur iusâ—us oracretinetur in Ecclesiâ ipsà charitas proximo servatur perpetuum non temporale est Bul. dec 2. ser 4. Bullinger therefore writing purposely of this subject saith we know that the Sabbath was Ceremoniall as joyned and annexed to the Sacrifices and other Iewish rites and as confined to a set time b Die septimo vacandum catenùs morale est quod sâ—ato tempore domino vacandum sit quod ne deferatur ob occupationes temporarias Caeremoniale decretum est ut septimum diem non praetereat quocunâ— tandem die supputare incipias Pell in Exod. 18. Pellican likewise thus expresseth himselfe A seventh-daies rest is so farre Morall as that God must have a certaine time appointed for his worship but that we must not let slip the seventh day wheresoever we begin to reckon is Ceremoniall I know arguments from humane Authority are unartificiall and that some men are so wise in their own conceits as that they stick not to cry down all others when they oppose their fancies The immediat symptome of singularity This therefore shall suffice CHAP. VIII In which the question is stated and explained THe Morality of the letter of the fourth Commandement is thus eagerly maintained even with way wardnesse to make way only to that which concernes the Lords day of which we will also speak God willing in its place For there being neither precept nor practice in the Scripture nor any other good record for that which hath of late yeares been imperiously thrust upon the consciences of men in that point the broachers of those doctrines were of necessity to shelter themselves under the letter of the fourth Commandement And indeed this hiding place being once granted them we could never be Iewish enough in Sabbatizing But if it be made appeare that this is but a pretence only and a covering of Fig-leaves the nakednesse of their doctrine will soon be seen and that they have though unawares laid snares and ginnes for mens consciences therein For the opening now of this point we must first enquire what a Morall law is And then how the fourth Commandement is Morall and how not Lastly what be the particular Ceremonies therein contained Morall is derived a Moralus sunt de illis quae secundum se ad honos mores pertinent cum autem humani mores dicuntur in ordinâ— ad rationem quae est proprium principium humanorum actuum illimores dicuntur boni qui coÌ„gruunt rationi Aq. 1. 2. ae q. 100. art 1. in corpore from Mores which signifies manners That therefore in a large and generall construction of the word may be said to be a Morall law which doth any way prescribe concerning the manners of men Now the manners of men being good or evill as they either agree or disagree with right reason a Morall Law is that which prescribeth a man to governe himselfe as right reason neither blinded nor corrupted doth require Hence it is that the Law Morall is the Law Naturall for that only is right reason not corrupted which God imprinted in the heart of manin the creation with an indeleble character never to be blotted out And therefore the reliques thereof remaine ever since the fall of Adam in the worst of the heathen This kind of law is alwaies in force though it never be proclaimed because it commandeth those things that are of themselves simply good and forbids those things which are of themselves simply evill Yet because it was much obscured in mans heart the fall of Adam making us the children of darknesse God was
the Sabbath day Doct. Hollands Apology for the Queenes day folded up the whole Ceremoniall worship for so Sabbath is sometimes taken it might well challenge its place amongst the Moralis both in the Tables and in the Arke that so the whole Law Morall and Ceremoniall might at once be preserved together unto which Gods covenant did equally oblige the people of the Iewes To the third that this Commandement is naturally engraven upon the hearts of the Heathen is utterly untrue And whereas it is said in confirmation thereof that the Heathens generally admired the number of seven we nothing doubt thereof but to inferre that therfore they acknowledged the Sabbath for a naturall law were too loose a consequence The number of three was I thinke in as great esteem amongst them as the number of seven it were a pittifull inference therefore they naturally discerned the blessed Trinity The like may be said of the number of ten may we therefore say they knew there were ten commandements It is true that g Clemens Alexand Strom. lib. 5. Clemens Alexandrinus brings many authorities out of Homer Hesiod Callimachus to prove that the very Heathen knew the seventh day was to be kept holy But how As Naturall and Morall Nothing lesse but to shew that the wisest of the Heathens were theeves of holy things having stolne them out of Moses writings for these they had translated Or Israels practice and this is the maine scope of that place alleaged out of the fift book of his Stromata and therefore he doth not only instance in the seventh-day Sabbath but in the article of the Trinity the resurrection of the body the fire of the last day and the judgement following Besides that the Heathen in all ages gave great heed unto numbers is confessed But whence Not from any light of nature which directed them but partly from the delusions of Sathan in Sorcery Geomancy and curious arts partly from Pythagorean superstition and partly from their own experiments observations To insist a little upon the latter whence did they admire the number of three but that they observed there were three principles of every naturall body matter forme privation three kinds of soules that informed those bodies vegetative sensitive and rationall three sorts of good things which compleated the happinesse both of soule and body three regions of the soule like the three regions of the aire and thus they collected tria sunt omnia all things consist of three The number of ten was also in esteem and because ten is the greatest amongst the unites they conceited this to be the number of greatnesse even to the tenth egge of an hen and the tenth wave of the Sea But the Poet sets down their observations men have i Hic numerus magno tunc in honore fuit Seu quia tot ligiti per quos numerate solemus Ovid Fast 3. ten fingers women goe with child ten months when we have told unto ten we must begin again with the unites As for the number of seven they held it sacred and the number of perfection but k Gellius Noct. Attic. lib. 3. cap. 8. Gellius shews out of Varro whence they made that collection as seven Planets seven starres the Moone varieth her course by sevens mans conception in the womb is absolved in seven daies all his proportions are perfectly formed in seven weekes he is safely borne in seven months but he that is borne in the eight month never lives every seventh yeare is their climacterical the arteries of mans body keep a kind of musicall motion to the number of seven and a world of such stuffe Not only the Heathens but the Fathers themselves have exercised their wits but wantonly this way l Ego ad Deum potius argumentabor hune modum temporis ut decem menses decalogo magis inaugurent hominem ut tanto temporis numero nascamur quanto disciplinae numero renascimur Sed cum septimo mense nativitas plena est facilius quam octavo honorem Sabbathi agnoscam Tertul. lib. de Anima â— cap. 37. Tertullian speaking of mans nativity in the seventh and tenth month though he will not superstitiously attribute any thing to the force of numbers yet he dares say that God by the tenth would acquaint man with the ten Commandements and by the seventh honour the institution of the Sabbath m Septenarius iste numerus ex quaternario ternario constans habet ex partibus suis excellentiam maximam ternarius Creatorem propter Trinitatem enunciat quaternarius Creaturam propter quatur Elementa Cyp. de Spiritu Sancto S. Cyprian also speaking of the giving the Law upon the day of Pentecost saith there is a great mystery contained in that number for seven times seven with the addition of one unity makes the Pentecost in which the nine and forty are an embleme of this life and the unity of the life which is to come And that you may think he had great reason to call it the holy number he proves it to be so from the parts of which it doth consist foure and three for three is the number of the holy Trinity by whom all things were created and foure the number of the Elements of which they were made with much more to this purpose But what poore speculations are these to sway any mans reason in a point of Religion I leave to the judgement of any sober minded man It borders upon superstition and Cabalisticall Iudaisme to be observant of numbers which the holy Ghost hath not commended unto us for mysticall as the weekes of Daniell and the number of the beast To the fourth the letter of the Sabbath hath not one much lesse all those characters of Morality which are set down not to question the things themselves That God should have tribute of our time for publique worship was never by any man denied to be naturall and morall but for the determination of one in seven of this one more then of another that it must be a whole naturall day of twenty foure houres that it must be thus and thus observed and all these grounded upon Gods rest at the Creation hath no character of Morality at all That the wiser of the Heathen taught and practised most of them is confessed but as stolne amongst other holy things as hath been shewed The Law of the Sabbath appertained not to all nations neither did God give it unto mankind in Adam nor was it ever intended to any but to the Iewes as an especiall pledge to distinguish them from other nations That those things which are laid down in the letter of the law are necessary directions unto perfect happinesse hath lesse ground then the former for let any man shew how the number of seven doth guide to happinesse more then three five ten or to begin the day rather at night then in the morning or to doe no manner of work till this appear this argument
concludeth not To the fift briefly both propositions are faulty The first that whatsoever is backt with a Morall reason is a Morall Law for what think you of the Law of the first fâ—uits No man I think but will say it was Ceremoniall yet the reason given of it is morall n Prov. 3.6 Honour the Lord with thy substance So the reason of the fift commandement is it Morall or Ceremoniall If Ceremoniall then how standeth it writen in the tables of stone If Morall then that which is Morall may be the reason of a law Ceremoniall and so the proposition is not true ex gr o Deut. 26. â— Thou shalt not kill the damme with the young that thy daies may belong in the land c. The second proposition is also faulty for let the reasons of the Commandemen be well scand and they will come farre short of that Morality which is pretended Aske naturall reason at best refin'd what proportions were fit to be observed between God and man would it answere we must have sixe for one and not rather on the contrary or any other what principle of naturall reason can guide us to the number of six herein God you say hath interest in the seventh but this is the question let this interest be discovered by naturall light we will grant the Morality All men are as much bound to follow Gods example in resting as the Iewes but First we deny that this example of God is or may be known by the light of Nature Secondly that it is there proposed to all men in their generations being given particularly to the Iews only For the commandement speaketh not of the seventh but of that seventh from the creation wherein the Church followes not Gods example keeping the first of these seaven For unlesse we rest that very seventh in which God rested we no more resemble his rest then a man that hath a ladder resembles Iacob that had a vision of a ladder But God hath promised a blessing unto our rest as well as unto theirs for the Lord even blessed the seventh day to the right observers thereof But the text is strained for though God hath promised alway to blesse his own ordinances in the publique worship yet for any blessednesse to be communicated to the day or affixed to one more then to another we read not That servants and beasts should now rest and be refreshed is confessed to be Morall but that they should have rest upon such and such a day just so many houres from all manner of imployment was partly Ceremoniall partly judiciall as hath bin said Which also farther appears because it is added o Levit. 26.5 as a reason of the seven yeares rest which I think no man will say was Morall neither doe I see why the one should not hold as well as the other Lastly true it is that the Sabbath was a token unto them that they were the Lords people and that we under the Gospell are also the Lords people is most true But was not Circumcision also a badge unto them that they were the Lords people must Circumcision therefore be Morall and perpetuali God forbid We see therefore the vanity of this argument likewise To the sixt first if by strangers we understand all that are aliens from the commonwealth of Israell plaine it is that the Sabbath was no more given unto them then Circumcision for it was a signe of Gods covenant and God never covenanted with the Heathen Moses was the Law-giver of the Iewes neither doth any law bind the Gentiles because Moses gave it but because only it is written on their hearts If by stranger we understand bondslave or sojourner not yet made Proselyte the commandement indeed speaks of him but not to him of him for his ease and restraint not to him for his observation such were not obliged unlesse first adopted as appears in the law of the Passover If any say why then did Nehemiah threaten the Merchants of Tyre for breaking the Sabbath day I answere he did it not because he thought them bound to keep the Sabbath but because a Ne quid occâ—rreret Israelitis ante oculos contrarium c. Cal. in Deut. 5.15 they occasioned the breaking of it amongst the Iews and offended against the present goverment of the state For if Nehemiah conceived those Tyrians to be under the Sabbath why did he shut the gates to keep them out he should rather have compelled them to come in and constrained them to keep the Sabbath being now under his power and jurisdiction To the seventh how superstitious the people of the Iews were in their observation of the Sabbath even in case of life and death notwithstanding they had the example of divers of Gods Saints their predecessors to the contrary as of b Elias fugit à facie Iezabel die Sabbathi Anton. tit 9. Elias and Iudas Machabeus and how their superstition continued not only when the City was destroyed by Titus and Vespasian but long after as appears by the history of the Iew in Rome that would not be taken up out of a Iakes because it was his Sabbath what advantages the enemies of that nation took from their superstition in this kind is evident of it selfe Our Saviour therefore in the Scripture glanceth at their superstitious and d Quod malum luxuriae hoc nomine significatum est quia haec erat nunc est pessima Iudaeorum consuetudo Aug. de Cons Evangelist c. 75. lib. 2. luxurious observation of the Sabbath foreshewing that it should be no small promoter of their lamentable destruction e Orate ut fuga vestra fit expedita nullis impedita remoris vel tempestatis vel religionis Marl. in locum so the best and ancientest Expositors c Sabbatha sancta câ—lo de stercore surgere nolo Laziard in hist universali But you will say what was this to the Disciples that they should pray against it I answere that the Christians also observed the Sabbath among the Iewes f Dicet aliâ—uis Iudaei sciebant licere in Sabbatho fugere ut vitam morti â—riperent Respondeo Iudaeos plerosque hoc ignorâsse vel putâsse fugere quidem fas esse hostibus insequentibus aliter esse â—efas Bar. in locum till the Gospell was sufficiently preached and the Synagogue was honourably buried Some therefore that were weak amongst theÌ„ might be entangled in that superstition Others that were stronger might be hindred and prejudiced in their safety by those that were contrary minded and all were bid to pray against the judgement of God which hanged over the head of the bloody City and whatsoever might in any degree further and increase the same though themselves were not engaged therein To the eight the riseing of mans corruption against any law gives no true estimate of the Morality thereof It is generally the effect of lawes of restraint to beget an appetite in men to the thing forbidden
the motions of sinne are set on work by the law Besides if the rule given were a certaine Maxim then on the contrary that law against which humane corruptions doe least rise which without question are the Commandements of the first table should be least Morall which I think no man will affirme But to passe by this I would gladly know against what in the Sabbath mans corruptions be so rebellious I doubt not but you will say against the strict and holy observation thereof but the manner how the law bids is one thing and the manner how the day is to be observed is another of which we shall also speak in due place To the ninth taken from experience in forraine parts in the first place I answere that the reformed Churches of God beyond the seas are much beholding unto you for branding them with laying religion on the back setting up Atheisme and Epicureisme And I believe many of this judgement are as free from those evils as any Sabbatharian in the world But strange it is that some men cannot vent their novell fancies unlesse like new wine they break the old bottles of love Perhaps you will say men will take liberty to be prophane when all tye of conscience is taken off as when the Morality of this law is denied But we must know that the conscience is not let loose as is supposed but only bound in another way as we shall see hereafter It hath ever been the custome of all sorts of people thus to palliate their errours under the titles of holinesse To the tenth the Homily is very briefe in this point the Summa totalis is this First that although God be at all times to be glorified for his mercies yet his pleasure is there should be set time for this purpose Secondly that this Commandement given in the Decalogue doth not bind us Christians as it did the Iewes Thirdly that whatsoever is found in the Commandement appertaining to the Law of Nature as a thing needfull to the setting forth of Gods glory ought to be received of all men Lastly that the set time of Gods publique worship ought to be on one day of seven This indeed which is last seemes to be something but seemes only for it must receive construction according to the foundation on which the Homily buildeth viz. that nothing herein is Morall but what appertaineth to the law of nature Seeing therefore that this particular cannot be deduced out of the Law of nature the Homily never intended it for Morall Ob. It will be said that then the Homily doth contradict it selfe for if nothing but what is naturall must be retained and one in seven be not naturall how can the Homily affirme that one in seven must for ever be observed and that by the will and commandement of God himselfe Sol But for answere hereunto first let it be considered that the Homily speaks by way of exhortation ad populum and in treatises of this nature every passage is not rigorously to be pressed for advantage in disputation This favour must be yeelded to all the popular tractates of the ancient Fathers else many things may well be quarelled at in them Secondly let the passage it selfe be well construed and the Homily clears it selfe for it saies indeed that Gods commandement was so to the Iewes but the Christians have followed this example voluntarily and of their own choice and if of their own choice then doubtlesse not by any necessity of Morall precept To the eleventh what if the Church retaine and read this amongst the Moralls Doth she not also appoint by her Liturgy Leviticus and Deuteronomy to be read amongst other parts of Scripture Or doe we thinke with the Maniches that the old Testament is not the word of God or with the Anabaptists that it appertaines not unto vs. We retain and read the Ceremoniall law in our congregations not so much for the Ceremonâ—es themselves which are vanished away as for those eternall truths of which they were shadowes And as we retain and read them so we also pray unto God for his mercy and grace that wee may fulfill and practise them so farre forth as they doe concerne us There be therefore two things which we aske in that short petition following the commandement First that our hearts may be graciously inclined to sanctify all such times as are set apart for Gods publique worship Secondly that as long as we live here in the vale of misery and sinne we may be enabled by his grace to keep a perpetuall spirituall Sabbath in righteousnes and holines and peace of conscience all our daies To the twelfth this takes deep impression amongst the vulgar who have been taught their ten Commandemens perhaps for their prayers from their cradles and therefore stand for this tanquam pro aris focis But in one word to give them satisfaction the argument is denied for there are and ever will be ten Morals though the letter of the fourth be Ceremoniall That God must have his set and appointed Sabbaths which is the essence life spirit of that Commandement is for ever Morall though the circumstances expressed in the text be Ceremoniall And this is no novell assertion but the common doctrine of all antiquity And therefore a S. Chrys Hom. 40. in Math. S. Chrysostome speaking of this commandement insteed of Remember to keep holy the seventh day reads remember to keep a spirituall Sabbath And b Aug. in Exod lib. 20. cap. 172. S. Augustine expresly saith that the nine rest as they are literally set downe are doubtlesse to be observed in the new Testament but that one of the Sabbath was given under the vaile of Moses and mystically commanded His reason is out of the text when Moses saith he returned from God out of the mount and had received from him the patterne of the Tabernacle and all holy things he speaks to the people only of the Sabbaths observation by which it appears that this was given only as the head of the Ceremonials c Alia quippâ— nona sicut praecepta sunt in novo testamento observanda minimè dubitamus illud autem unum de Sabbatho adeo iâ— Mysterio praeceptum fuit ut hodiè à nobis non observetur sed solum quod significabat intuemur Inter omnia illa decem praecepta solum id quod de Sabbatho positum est figuratè observandum praecipitur Aug. ad Ian ep 119. In istis decem praeceptis exceptâ Sabbathi observatione dâ—catur mihi quid non sit observandum à Christiano Aug. de spirit lit c. 14. The same Father disputing in another place how the Commandements of the Decalogue were a killing letter as well as the Ceremonies makes frequent distinction between this one of the Sabbath and the rest affirming that not only this but those nine also were a killing letter So that St Chrysostome and St Augustine acknowledged ten commandements Morall but with our
Lord vnlesse we also adde thereunto sundry actuall performances the time and manners whereof they also shew us If therefore any difference be it is that we must be wholy taken up with such performances during the whole Sabbath for 24. houres and turne meere Euchites upon the day which is not required in other dayes But that the Sabbath is of no such length hath been already declared and that God giues no such continuate taskes of holy performances shall I hope before we part be made evident Secondly d Finis non seper est de substantià praecepti neque secundùm veros Theologos cadit sub praecepto Med. Inst Non idem est finis praecepti id de quo praeceptum datur Aquin. 1.2 qu. 100. art 9. ad 2. the end is not comanded by that Law in which the meanes are prescribed for though the precept of the end include also the precept of the meanes yet not on the contrary This proposition is laid downe by the Moralists as an undoubted maxime and doth evidently appeare For example when we are commanded to heare the word we are not by the force there of commanded to beleeue in Christ Iesus yet * Rom. 10.17 Faith as saith the Apostle cometh by hearing That rule which commandeth to beate downe the body and to keepe it in subjection doth not require of vs the vertues of humility chastity c. but on the contrary these being the end require the other as the meanes But the law of sanctifying a holy Sabbath is a law of the meanes whereby we are taught and enabled to serue the Lord in the private duties of holinesse and to exercise in our selues the graces of faith hope loue c. This also is plaine of it selfe and requires no farther proofe For why doe we resort to the congregation on the Lords day But partly to be instructed by the word partly to be inflamed with the loue of God and zeale unto his service the whole weeke after as well as to tender him our publike homage in acknowledgement of his soveraigne dominion Thirdly no affirmatiue precepts are to be extended beyond that which the letter doth containe though it be otherwise in precepts which be negatiue For example honour thy father and mother when we know what it is to honour our Superiours we haue the whole latitude of this Law It is not so I say in negatiues as appeares by our Saviours confutation of the Pharisees glosses upon the seventh Commandement But the law of the Sabbath is an affirmatiue precept and prescribes the publique worship of God in the congregation therefore is not farther to be extended Fourthly if all duties of piety and mercy whatsoever were commanded by the law of the Sabbath then were there no difference at all between this and the other precepts of the Decalogue at least for that day so that upon one day of every weeke the other Commandements were needlesse and superfluous But this is not to be affirmed Ob. If any say that one and the same duty may be under divers precepts Resp I answer that though this be most true yet must we not confound the Law of God and make an intricate maze thereof to the entangling of mens consciences for the Decalogue is said to be ten words ten for their number words for their distinction I denie not that one and the same duty may be under divers precepts but then they are diversly considered as referred to divers ends The object of different commandements may be materially the same but formally distinct So temperance and sobriety may be both under the sixt and under the seventh precept under the sixt as meanes of preservation of breath under the seventh as the helps unto chastity and mortification But what formality can distinguish the duties of holinesse on the Lords day from the same duties on other daies I know not if you say to sanctifie the Sabbath the question is begged and so nothing said Fiftly were the whole practice of Religion both publique and private the duty of the Lords day then it would follow which is also affirmed that to obserue the Lords day were impossible to any man in the state of corruption For I think no man unlesse he be some braine-sick Perfectist will challenge to himselfe such a measure of holinesse though but for a day But that the law of the Lords day is thus impossible being not a Legall but Evangelicall observation of positiue command for all such are light yokes and easie burthens is utterly untrue Therefore c. Sixtly nothing but what is naturall and eternall is commanded in the fourth precept of the Decalogue binding us under the Gospell but that private and personall acts of religion should be performed by us precisely upon this or that day of publique worship in that manner as is required is not naturall and eternall binding us under the Gospell For the Law of nature prescribes only in generall not any thing for any time or day or manner in particular Seventhly that which is no where spoken of much lesse commanded in the new Testament bindes not the conscience of any under the Gospell but the private exercises of religion upon the Lords day are not spoken of much lesse commanded in the new Testament For then such commands were easily shewed all men would readily submit themselues thereunto Eightly this manner of observation seemeth to change the nature of the Lords day from being the Christian Feast and transformeth it rather into a day of Fast humiliation For let their doctrine of Sabbathizing be compared to the doctrine of fasting and we shall finde them the same saue only that a totall abstinence from all things wherein nature delighteth is required in the one but not so in the other But we must not metamorphize the Lords day which is and ought to be the Christian mans Festivall wherein he should not only inwardly but out wardly also rejoice in the Lord his God Ob. If any say that the true beleiver takes no greater comfort then in the exercises of humiliation nothing being so sweet unto him as the teares of contrition Resp I answer that what the * Heb. 12.11 Apostle speaketh of affliction in generall That afterwards it yeeldeth the peaceable fruits of righteousnesse to them that are exercised thereby is true also of the day of humiliation of the bruising of the soule in particular the affliction is one thing the fruit thereof another this ioyfull that for the present grievous and doth not so well sort with the nature of the Lords day Vpon which ground it was expresly forbidden the e Hoc ab omni ecclesiâ Orientali Occidentali observatum contra haereticos Can. Apost 61. Christians by Antiquity to fast upon the Lords day Ob. But is it not lawfull then for a man to repent and be converted unto God comming out of the state of sin into the state of grace through the troubles and anguishes
pleased to give a copy thereof in writing to his people and in them to his whole Church for ever The Morall law therefore of which we speak in this place in its proper and restrained sence is not every rule of right reason but only that which is naturally engraven upon the conscience So that the Schooles have well distinguished the rules of right reason into three kinds First there be some so common and obvious as that man retaining humane reason cannot erre in them as that God is to be loved good to be embraced evill to be avoided and such like practicall principles ex terminis evidentia and all conclusions necessarily and immediatly flowing from the same And so Morall saith b Non omnia decalogi praecepta sunt de lege naturae strictè acceptà lib. 3. sent dist 37. q. 1. art 2. con 1. Duo praecepta negativa primae tabulae sunt de lege naturae propriè â—b con 2. Gab. Biel extends it selfe but only to two Commandements of the decalogue Thou shalt have no other Gods but me and Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine For it being a naturall principle nay c Quod Deus fit est primum principium complexorum Bradvv de causâ Dei lib. 1. cap. 12. the first and ground of all the rest that there is a God those practicall conclusions are known of themselves without farther teaching Lawes thus Morall are utterly undispensable even by God himselfe who cannot deny himselfe Secondly some of these rules and directions of manners are not so obvious and manifest of themselves yet such as every vulgar and mean capacity may easily find out even by the light of nature as that parents are to be honoured that God is publikely to be worshipped with d Secundae tabulae praecepta sunt de lege naturae non strictè sed largè accepta Biel ib. con 3. the precepts of the second table These are not so plaine and evident as the two former and therefore men doe the more easily erre in them as we see by the practice both of heathens and of the ignorant Christians These may in particular cases be dispensed with e Non rapiebant alienum quia Deus erat superior verus Dominus omnium bonorum Aegypti totius univer sitatis ita poterit transferre Dominium infilios Israel Biel. ib. Dub. 4. by changing the nature of the things about which they are conversant as hath already been shewed Thirdly some of the rules of right reason directing mens actions are yet more dark and obscure then the former and therefore are known only to wise men or by revelation Such are all good positive lawes superadded to those of the decalogue either by God or man and may be stiled Responsa prudentum the answers of the wise In this last and largest construction of Morall all the Holy rites prescribed by Moses being appendices to the fourth commandement and all the Iudicials appendices to the severall precepts of the first and second table may be termed Morall The question therefore is not of this kind of Morality but of the two former only viz. Whether the law of the Sabbath be either a principle in nature known and evident of it selfe or at least such as every man that hath the use of pure naturall reason may without revelation easily find out For that it is under positive precept in the fourth Commandement was never doubted We must in the next place understand how we speak of the fourth commandement in this question whether of the whole and every part thereof or of one or more parts and clauses And first there are that say that according to the law of God and rules of right reason there ought not to be in the time of the Gospell any distinction of daies as being directly contrary to Christian liberty So our Anabaptists Perfestists Libertines On the other side there are that affirme every letter and Syllable therein to be Morall as the lews and such Christians as in this particular doe Iudaize expresly as the Familists and others together with our rigid Sabbatharians who although they stand not for that very day of which the commandement speaketh the seventh from the creation as the others yet keep the Lords day as being a seventh intended also in the commandement and to be observed in all things according to the sound of the letter by all men in all ages which is no better then implicit Iudaisme And herein they stand for ought I know alone unlesse they will claime kindred of the ancient Hereticks the Ebionites There are others in the third place that affirme the fourth commandement to be partly Morall partly Ceremoniall And this is the most generall voice of Divines ancient and moderne Protestants Papists Lutherans Calvinists except those before named But this their agreement is not without great disagreement some affirming in one sence some in another some of more some of fewer branches of the commandement Many in the Popish Schoole with some Protestants especially Lutherans put morality in two clauses the first is Remember thou keep holy the resting day where a day is commanded say g Morale est sanctificare unum è septem Baldvv c. de Sab. casu 2. Manet hoc morale esse nimirum aliquod tempus vel diem aliquem singulis septimanis ad exercitia divina peragenda tribuendum Conradus Dietericus dom 17. post Trin. Morale est quod sacra requies die septimo non determinatè hoc vel illo sed uno è septem piè observanda est Thum. in expl d ee they in generall They second is the seventh is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God wherein say they the former generality is restrained and determined to be one of seven But k Evanescant nugae pseudoprophetarum qui Iudaic â opinione populum superioribus saeculis imbuerunt nihil aliud asserentes nisi abrogatum esse quod caeremoniale erat in hoc mandato id vocant su â linguâ septimae diei taxationem remanere vero quod morale est nempe unius diei observationem in hebdomade Calv. instit lib. 2. c. 8. Calvin and all those that insist in his steps flye from this as from false doctrine and Iudaisme I meane this latter assertion for they joyne with them in the former and acknowledge a morality for a set day but say they the determination to one in seven or five or ten c. is wholy arbitrary and in the power of the Church to prescribe And herein Calvin hath the voices of many both Papists and Lutherans One thing more must be added that when Divines put morality in the first clause Remember thou keep holy the resting day those words may undergoe a twofold consideration for they may be taken Either formally as they lye in the commandement and thus considered they are not Morall because they speak of that particular Sabbath given unto the Iewes even the