TWO SERMONS One on the Subject of Justification The Other on The Imputed Righteousness and Imputation of Faith to Righteousness by which we are Justified Preached Occasionally at the Merchants-Lecture in Pin-makers-Hall in Broad-street And Printed at their Desire By Walter Cross M. A. LONDON Printed by and for John Astwood at his Printing-House behind St. Christophers-Church in Thred-needle-street the back-side of the Royal Exchange 1695. SERMON I. ROM IV. 5. But to him that worketh not but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly THese words are to be consider'd both relatively and absolutely that we may in order comprehend their full sense and importance The relation they bear to the Apostle's scope and design is that of a proof and confirmation of the grand Doctrine of the Gospel which is That no man is nor can be justified by his own Works or Righteousness the only way of being justified is by the Righteousness of God The Apostle on very good ground supposes such an opposition and disjunction between them two as admits no medium for we cannot be justified without a Righteousness and that Righteousness must be either our own or anothers God's or Man's It is the Negative branch of the Doctrine the Apostle doth earnestly contend for in this 4th Chap. without any appearance of Carnality but disputes with strenuous dint of Argument and closely connected Topics with the terms of his proposed Doctrine whereof this in the Text is one either an immediate Argument thus He that worketh not or is ungodly cannot be justified by his own Works but he who is justified by Grace is one that worketh not or is ungodly Erg. Or rather a Confirmation of an immediate Argument before brought thus Maj. He that is justifi'd by Faith is not justifi'd by Works Min. But Abraham was justified by Faith Erg. Abraham was not justified by Works The Assumption being confirm'd from Scriptures Testimony Gen. 15. he proceeds to prove the grand Proposition thus Maj. He to whom righteousness is imputed of Grace cannot be justified by Works Min. But to him that is justified by Faith righteousness is imputed of Grace Erg. He that is justified by Faith cannot be justified by Works The assumption is frequently asserted in Scripture v. 16. It is of Faith that it might be by Grace The grand Proposition he supposes evident from the opposition between Grace and Debt in v. 4. for when a person is dealt with on the account of Works i. e. any thing in him or done by him it is debt his due I mean the reward but when a Man is dealt with of Grace the reward is proportion'd to the Favour and Good-will of the Donor or Judge the Goodness of the Judge on the Bench and the arraigned Person at the Bar are very opposite therefore to be treated according to this opposite goodness must be an opposite treatment This opposition or repugnancy in v. 5. he illustrates and confirms thus Maj. Where the subjects causes effects or manner of efficiency are opposite there the things themselves are opposite Min. But in Justification by Works and Faith of grace and of due the subjects causes c. are opposite Erg. The Nature of the Justifications are opposite The grand Proposition is a Maxim in Logic or Natural Light taken for granted The assumption is illustrated and confirmed in these four Verses 1. The Subjects to wit a godly and an ungodly Man a righteous and an unrighteous a Worker and a Non-worker 2. The Causes the grace favour and good-will of the Governour and the merit labour obedience and righteousness of the Subject 3. The immediate effect of this Free-grace or way of its efficiency which differs from the Method of Justice measuring its distribution by Law for the former imputes a Righteousness or as in Ch. 5. gives a Righteousness viz. in a way of accompt and reckoning that by virtue thereof and its satisfaction to the Government it may consist with governing goodness to bless the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputes righteousness without works The latter finds an inherent righteousness in the person and therefore his Justification is only an Authoritative declaration of what he is a surrender of the Honour that is his due and he proves this by David's Testimony asserting the former Justification to be a Pardon or Forgiveness As if he had said It 's call'd a Justification because that Pardon is the effect of an Imputed Righteousness Free-grace first gives by way of Account an Interest in Christ's Righteousness and conveys the Right or Interest thorough Faith Secondly Pardons on the account of that Righteousness which gives just ground for the denomination of Justification and this Name is entertain'd as the proper Name for our Pardon in the Gospel that it may be a constant Memorial of our Obligation to Christ for our Pardon and of the difficulty that there was to render a Pardon consistent with the Law and Honour of the Law-maker and Governour One chief end of this added Testimony of David's to the Example and Pattern of Abraham is to prove that we are not justified by Works from the Nature of gospel-Gospel-Justification viz. David says it 's a Pardon tho' it 's a Justification in respect to Christ's Righteousness it 's a Forgiveness with respect to our own Unrighteousness This proves the Subject also of Gospel Justification to be ungodly for we need and receive a Pardon not as righteous or godly but ungodly And the reason why the Apostle gives the sense of David's words to be the Imputing of a Righteousness is because it was inconsistent with a necessary just Law and a just Governour and Judge who cannot do violence to a righteous Law to pardon or not to impute sin until there be first a Righteousness imputed and by showing this to be the sense of it he thereby proves that our Justification is of Grace because Free grace is the only cause of the Imputation of that Righteousness It is not for Christ's sake that his righteousness is imputed for that were to say that the same thing was for the sake of it self his Merit for his Merits-sake and Righteousness for his Righteousness-sake But as Christ is the Free-grace of God's Gift so is his Righteousness without any interveening Merits and that has made me think the influence of Christ's Merit to use the accustom'd Phrase terminates on the Law or Legal constitution not on the Divine Nature God is the God Author and Owner of all Grace nothing has chang'd his mind into a more gracious temper and hence the Imputation of righteousness is only ascrib'd to Grace but Justification is ascrib'd to Grace not immediately as imputation is but at second hand Justified by his Grace thorough the Redemption Ch. 3.24 Hence something may be said for an Imputation of Righteousness from Eternity tho' not for Justification from Eternity and may be this is the reason why another Phrase is made use of for the transitory temporary Act viz. Faith
be willing * Jan. Aug. To. 3. lib. 2. c. 9. 3. It would be Grace restoring to Adams condition to be able to do good or evil 4. This distinction of sufficient and efficacious grace Jansenus says Augustine nor none of the Latin Fathers knew nor any general Council ever did determine †To. 3. lib. 2. c 29. About 5 for grace to have its efficacy from the corrupt will of Man is enmity to be the Author of Love from sufficient grace it is not that brings not forth the effect there is nothing else in the will of Man If it be another addition of grace the former was not sufficient and indeed where it s not able to conquer the will of man and bring forth its effect to make man willing it is not But this were to leave the Question about justifying grace and to dispute about sanctifying grace A 4th Argument is from the nature and the kind of justifying acts As to its Original it 's gracious as to its Obiect it 's pardon put these two together a gracious pardon and it supposes the Object under great guilt and misery For 1. Grace is goodness in all its variety and fulness when the Lord proclaims his own graciousness Exod. 34.6 He describes it by abundance of Goodness and Truth tenderness of mercy and longness of suffering and this as the spring of pardoning grace Keeping mercy for thousands forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin Where the person is just by a constituted Law there is no need of such amplifications of Goodness for if it be an easie Law the grace was in making law and not in justifying by the Law 2. Grace is goodness flowing from the Heart of the Giver it s called gratia gratum faciens because it renders the person acceptable and lovely in the sight of God hence it bears the name of Love thorough the Book of Canticles Chap. 8.6 Set me as a seal on thy heart as a seal upon thine arm So is every object of Free-grace his Love is fixed on them and hence the arm of his Power protects them But this Love of Grace is incomparable it s stronger than Death for at once it delivers from a legal and spiritual Death the guilt and the power of sin and him that hath the power of Death that is the Devil as cruel as the Grave that devours all before it The Coals thereof are coals of fire no waters can quench it nor floods drown it And as its full so its free If a man would give all the substance of his house for love it would be utterly contemn'd A 3. Ingredient of grace is mercy pardoning grace and mercy are but different names of the same thing and suppose the Object in a miserable condition Rom. 11.32 God hath concluded them all in unbelief that he might have mercy on all And this mercy is preventing mercy for the Apostle speaking to the very same purpose Rom. 10.20 says I was found of them that sought me not I was made manifest in them that askt not for me And yet farther Rom. 9.11 He shews that all the causes conditions and motives of Mercy are to be sought for in the disposition of the Author and not the disposition of the subject That the purpose of God according to election might stand not of Works but of him that calleth But the Name grace seems to import somewhat higher than all this it speaks exclusiveness of conditions Rom. 3.24 Being justified freely by his grace that is saith the Neat Witsius without any cause or condition 2. It speaks fulness John 1.16 Of his fulness we have received grace for grace Colos 2.10 In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily and ye are compleat in him And it speaks perseverance for the Covenant of Grace contains the sure mercies of David Psalm 89.33 Though I visit their iniquities with stripes nevertheless my loving-kindness will I not utterly take from them It speaks the Object in a most wretched condition Isa 57.1 7. I won't contend for ever neither will I be always wroth though my anger hath an end my mercy hasn't for the spirit would fail before me and the souls which I have made as they cannot convert themselves so they can't bear my endless wrath For the iniquity of his Covetuousness was I wroth and smote him I hid me and was worth and he went on frowardly in the way of his heart A most desperate Condition the easiest law in the world could speak no comfort to him but grace can I have seen his ways and will heal him I will lead him and restore comforts to him Tho' there be no matter in the subject to bring Comfort out of my grace hath a creative power I create the fruit of the lips peace to him that is far off c. Lastly Soveraignity is an ingredient in grace We read of grace upon the Throne a Throne of Grace all pure grace Where the Transactions and Dipensations are according to Law there is no place for over-ruling Soveraignity but this justification is a dispensation from a Throne of Grace and the very end of it is to glorifie that grace verses 16 17. It is of faith that it might be by grace All Laws and transgressions of Laws all Dispensations of Providence and Permissions all Manifestations of other Attributes are for the discovery of the height of this Throne All is for the praise of the glory of his Grace And the whole of this grace receives a lustre in its first preventive act towards a sinner for as he is God of all Grace he calls us into his eternal glory If all the other streams of grace finds us in our sin and guilt elective grace redeeming grace calling and converting grace why should it be supposed or conjectured that pardoning grace doth not find us so to when the very formality of the object is sinfulness The Text tells us t is a covering of sin a not imputing of sin a forgiving of Iniquity a blotting out our transgressions a removing of them from us as far as the East is from the West an act that renders God a Peerless God and therefore supposes our condition worst Who is a God like unto thee Micah 7.18 that pardoneth iniquity and passeth by the transgression of the remnant rf his Heritage he retaineth not his anger for ever because he delighteth in mercy he will turn again he will have compassion upon us he will subdue our iniquities and cast all their sins into the depth of the Sea The only Use that I shall make of this is to linners who are in their Ungodliness and without Works and whose Consciences tells them so the doctrine speaks this to you that you have as great reason and as great encouragement to come to this throne of Grace and to sue out for a pardon in the Name of Christ as any others There was an universal command to the Apostles to preach the Gospel to
change in the divine nature to turn him out of an angry temper into a gracious kind and merciful one for the gift of the Son flow'd from the unchangeableness of his Love but God as Supream King and Governour by a just Law well and wisely establish'd could not in Honour admit Rebels to the Priviledges he design'd for them without a satisfaction made to the Government which must be what the Law required and that required Death and as our Death begins with a mortal nature and encreases thorough sickness and weakness until it be compleated in a Death-stroke or some violence prevent the gradualness so Christ became like us in all things excepting sin one drop of Christ's Blood one day of his humility had dignity enough in in it but he was to pay what the Law required and the Law obtained all its ends in him This may help us to understand these Phrases used very rudely that God loves the elect when sinning as well as when praying It s true as he is God for there is no change in him but not true as our God or Governour and the Language of Scripture is in this latter sense as he manifests himself thorough Law or Gospel these being Rules of his dispensations and glasses of our knowledge 5. On the other hand though we obey the Law in some measure and have a measure of suffering which is acceptable to God thorough Christ if we have faith in him yet this comes in as no satisfaction to that primitive Law for we are not oblig'd to do what he did for us it comes in as a preparing us for a possession in a holy Society where no unclean thing can enter so the imputation of Christ's obedience takes not away the necessity of our obedience more than his passive takes away the necessity of our suffering or dying It 's appointed for all once to dye though Christ died and it s appointed for all to obey though Christ obey'd neither our suffering nor our obedience comes in as a part of that righteousness that first Law requir'd of us as belonging to the covenant of Works the breaking of this clay vessel either by Death or what 's equivalent is necessary for our habitation in another Sphere where this cannot enter blessings of that would be a torment to this constitution Sufferings are necessary to make us sensible what we deserve and what our Saviour suffer'd for us Holiness and Righteousness is necessary by precept and as a means to fit and prepare for that possession 3. Thorough a congruity as a fruit and an effect of that image of God begun to be drawn in us by reason of which when in its perfection it may be said The Law is not made for a righteous man and we read of no Law given to Adam but Ceremonial Laws the nature of God is the first Law the Moral Law reveal'd is but a Copy of that divine temper and when it s perfectly writ in a Man's Heart without any blot mistake or defect to live holily is to live as he list and by reason of this disposition of Soul a Saint can never be said to be without law yet if we take law for an external Command swaying by the force of its sanction against the stream of Inclination a man is neither of the Law nor under the Law The 2d and last Head propos'd was about the sense of these words Faith imputed to Righteousness about which there are these three Opinions Some say that Faith is taken objectively Faith comprehending Christ's Righteousness is put for it or Faith in justification is always valued as comprehending Christ's Righteousness 2. Others say that God out of his Gracious Acceptation takes faith for the Righteousness Blessedness is due to we say Christ's Righteousness comes in the room of that they that Christ merited that faith should be taken for it The 3d. Which my judgement embraces is that faith is reckon'd of God the mean of Application or Instrument of conveyance of Christ's Righteousness to us Imputation applied to Faith is a note of Distinction implying a double use of Faith the one is by inhesion and so it sanctifies us the other is by imputation and so it justifies us because it is the ceremony of Seisin by which we are invested with and entitled to the righteousness of Christ this suits best with the former Metaphor of imputation in Books of accompts for 't is not only usual and necessary to transfer and impute Estates in Books of Accompts where great Funds and Banks are but there is given to the person who is made Creditor a Bank-bill or Tally bearing the value of the transferr'd summ so that bit of Stick or Paper thorough imputation if we compare it with these Bank-Books makes the Man worth so much money as the transfer'd summ is so in the Lamb's Book of Life there 's not only a transferring of his righteousness to us but there is given out this Bill or Tally of Faith to us by which we are entitled to it There are many Arguments which may both prove and explain this 1. It is without doubt that all our priviledges are convey'd one way Faith bears the same relation to them all Rom. 4.16 It 's said the inheritance is of Faith that it might be by grace now Heb. 11.1 Faith 's call'd the substance of things hop'd for Substance saith Tho. Aquin. is the beginning of a thing that necessarily at last infers the whole that 's in our English an Earnest now if Faith be an earnest of Heaven it bears the like relation to other priviledges as Rev. 2.17 We read of a white stone and in the stone a New Name that was the stone of absolution the Judge anciently instead of speaking his Sentence convey'd it by the giving of a white or black stone so if Faith be the earnest of our hopes it 's the stone of our pardon it 's the Ring of our Marriage with Christ it 's the Winte Raiment Feast and New Name of our Manumission by justification out of Slaves we are made Freemen and Faith is the mean and instrument of Investiture with it 2. This sence of it removes a considerable difficulty among Divines the Question is since Justification is a transitory act of God and terminates upon the Creature what it is that he doth when he justifies or what bears the room of the justifying sentence most say the Word of God the Gospel but there 's a great distinction between the voice of the Law and the voice of the Judge the Law says Whosoever believes shall be justified but the voice of the Judge is thou John or Thomas art absolv'd it s a particular positive and authorative Application of the Law Mr. Baxter thinks that God proclaims some publick Sentence among the Angels but that 's a groundless Notion this seems to me most reasonable that the gift of Faith being such a fruit of his special grace that he gives to no sinner but
justified by his grace Thus we see the Scripture lays an Emphasis on each of them the gift of Faith the nature of Faith the object of Faith and indeed this Bill would be but a counterfeit one if it wanted any of these Properties or Relations 1. It must be receiv'd from him that hath the power or else it is not valid By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justifie many 2. It must be in true form rightly dictated that is its nature or not valid 3. The divine constitution the Law of Heaven has made it have such a relation to Christ's righteousness the riches of his Grace and the Wisdom of the constitution shines in the fitness of the instrument for our Souls are an open begging hand a vast Appetite It crys daily who will shew us any good some good things I want some more good and this Faith clasps the hand on Christ offer'd determines and centers the desire as on an Object that has all fullness in him full satisfactâ—on and â—o build a relation and union of right upon an union of nature a Communion upon a cement of Union honours the Wisdom of the contriver So we see all these three must be in a valid Bank-bill it is not worth a Farthing in it self a bit of Paper ink'd but relatively to such a Summe suppose 1000 l. it 's worth so much its very form consists in relation to that summe that 's its Object it signally bears it and if rightly drawn and receiv'd from the right owner their Constitution and the Law will make me Possessor in due time If any of these qualifications be wanting it is not worth a Farthing 1. Drawn in true forms 2. Bearing relation to its proper Object 3. Receiv'd from him who has the riches in his power to give And I find our Catechim and Confession insists as much on this as any Conf. c. 11. Nor by imputing it self the act of believing or any other Evangelical Obedience but by imputing the Obedience and Satisfaction of Christ unto them they receiving it by Faith which is the Gift of God 11. Thus it s the alone Instrument of Justification i. e. they are not justified until the Holy Spirit doth in due time actually apply Christ unto them Our lesser Catech. Q. How are we made partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ R. By the effectual application of it to us by his Holy Spirit for which they quote Tit. 3.5 6 7. Q. How doth the Spirit apply the Redemption c R. By working Faith in us and thereby uniting us to Christ in our effectual calling I may from thence form this Argument Maj. When Christ and his benefits are applyed to us we are justified Min. But when God effectually calls Christ and his benefits are applyed to us Erg. When effectually call'd we are justified It is granted that Faith is the fruit of effectual Calling and it cannot be deny'd that relations viz. Justification Adoption flow as suddenly from their Foundations as effects can from their efficients Or thus Maj. The imputing Faith to Righteousness is an application of Christ and his benefits Min. But the Spirit by working Faith applys Christ and his benefits Erg. The Spirit by working Faith imputes Faith to Righteousness But I need no other Testimony but Scripture that way the Faith of Miracles temporally sav'd that way saving Faith justifies but by the Spirits working the Faith of Miracles when he saw their Faith it was certainly a miraculous Gift distinguishing and characterizing the persons to be heal'd to give him that Faith was to say thou art to live to be cured there was no cooperation of the creature to a Miracle Further compare C. 4 5. and we find imputing Faith to Righteousness and giving a Righteousness are the same but Objections are not to be answer'd as Bullets in war with the like but explication and distinction For the 1. The reason the nature or exercise of faith is insisted on in Scripture so much is for our instruction if the faith that God has given be that which entitles to Heaven and Happiness 2. The reason the object is so much intimated is to prevent a most dangerous error that the World is most liable to viz Leaning on our own righteousness such fools to take the Bill for the Summ But its certain the owner and proprietor must be the conveyer I challenge to show what he doth else that looks like it For the 2d I propose these two Distinctions 1. Between the state of justification and particular acts of pardon or between the state of adoption and particular blessings in possession the former is convey'd thorough the gift of faith the latter thorough the exercise of faith a man gets right by the receiving of a Bill from the Proprietor but when he comes for such a part of it he brings his Bill and shows it and writes a receipt on the back of it Tho' we are but once justified we daily pray Lord forgive my debts and once adopted we daily pray for more enjoyment of what is due to that title 2ly With Mr. Frost I propose a double instrumentality of Faith one on the givers part another on the receivers so it is with Bills too the Proprietor conveys his right and the Receiver afterward pleads his right so it is with faith God conveys Christ and his Righteousness thorough it and we plead for the benefit and use of it as we need daily But this I shall retain that from the first gift of saving Faith which turns us from ungodly to godly we are justified and adopted persons which entirely throws out that legal conditionality that among Socinians has thrown out Christ's satisfaction and among Arminians has impair'd and delay'd its vertue toward sinners until they come with something in themselves a conformity to a new Law And also Antinomianism which is a denomination that comprehends all Errors dishonourable to the Law or Law giver and whatever Doctrine is against the necessity stability and perfection of the Law of God is of this kind whatever Doctrine removes the necessity of the Law removes the necessity of Christ's satisfaction and what Doctrine removes perfection from the Law of God removes the Glory from God's Holiness but to suppose one under the Law sav'd and that Law neither fulfill'd nor satisfied by the personor his Surety is to suppose the Law changeable not necessary if Christ only fulfill'd the mediatorial Law and not that we were under then that Law and Government bult on it was remov'd and chang'd without satisfaction If the grand influence of Christ's righteousness by the Mediatorial Law was to get it chang'd for an easier and less perfect we must either say the influence of Christ's satisfaction did terminate on the nature of God and make a change in his temper from anger to mercy and perfection of holiness to indulgence in carnality or say that the Father and Son were of two different minds but the latter thorough his obedience gain'd him to his mind for what has influence on God as Govenrour has influence on the Law Administrations of Government must be rul'd by the Law and what has influence on the Law for our good must fulfill its precepts or satisfie its sanction The Law has no other Language and if Christ did neither the influence must not terminate on the Government but on the nature God or Fathers person in the Godhead But the Scripture informs us That God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh that the righteousness of the Law might be fulfill'd in us In us says Vastius by application but in Christ by inhesion in us by imputation but in Christ personally says Calvin Muscus Beza Rollock Fulke Cartwright Elton says Dr. Jacomb all Protestants he adds his active and has passive as if they had obey'd it in their own Persons the Law is wholly fulfill'd in him and that very righteousness is ours in a Law sense and so fulfill'd in us 3ly It overthrows Libertinism for if the same grace sanctifies that justifies they can never pretend to the one that want the other 4ly Popery that makes justification and sanctification one that differ as far as the Category of Quality and Relation I have no place for futher use than to intreat every one as they love their own souls and long for pardon of sin not to quench or provoke the Holy Spirit of God for that is his Errand as well as sanctification 2. As ever they would enjoy this free spirit be diligent and conscientious in all Ordinances that are ministrations of the Spirit he is to be reciev'd in the bearing of Faith 3. Study this imputed righteousness of Christ until thou experience most deep humility and most sweet comfort from it Rom. 11.19 Thou standest by faith be not high minded but fear thou depends entirely for faith and righteousness on another thou wast prevented in thy ungodliness when thou receiv'd that gift 2. How much will God do for thee when thou art his Son and Servant if he did so much for thee when an eremy Rom. 5.9 Much more then being now justified by his blood we shall be sav'd thou hast now given to thee at once a perfect and an everlasting righteousness a total forgiveness of all thy sins a work of holiness God has engaged to perfect Vale. FINIS Grant me this there was never any thing so well done by man wherein there is not room for further industry Calv.
Justification requires Legal Righteousness Evangelical Justification requires Evangelical Righteousness i. e. Faith and Repentance in sincerity and perseverance And this last qualification comes in least they should be under a necessity to hold a man pardon'd one time of his Life and yet be afterward condemn'd thorough after back-sliding and falling from Grace Some of them hold final falling away and so an once justifi'd man may be eternally damn'd Others total but not final and so may be in a state of Condemnation and Justification alternatively a hundred times But a third to prevent this Absurdity adds perseverance by which a man is excluded from justification until his last breath which excludes the Doctrine of Assurance during life and pardon too which is a strangely new Doctrine yet I have heard some more cautious persons say they think there are some degrees of Grace at the attainment of which they escape that danger may be that is it they allot for the time of justification This Limitation seems unacceptable to me on these grounds 1. This Law countenances iniquity indulges transgressions for since the first Law is holy just and good what Law requires less is so far unholy unjust bad and shall we suppose an holy God that is of purer eyes than to connive at iniquity to establish iniquity by a Law was our corrupt natures or imperfectly renew'd to his image the Original to this Law as his own Nature gave birth to the first it seems reasonable to say that God accepts imperfect obedience on his account who perform'd perfect obedience in our stead as surety but that the office of the Mediator should be to obtain of God to lay by that glorious manifestation of his Holiness and change that perfect Law into a Council and Directory and to yield so far to us as to take a penny of the pound of obedience from broken debtors seems to me pregnant of difficulties and absurdities We deny our Obedience comes to be accepted as the obedience the Law requires or under the Notion Adam's righteousness was accepted viz. that which gave right to Indemnity and Life but is accepted as the way to the Kingdom and preparation for the possession of a place in these mansions where all the inhabitants are holy It is the righteousness of our Lord Jesus Christ alone by which that Law is fulfill'd he is the end of the Law for righteousness and his righteousness gives right to remission and blessedness 2ly I am inform'd this Notion of the Evangelical Law was the principal error of the Antinomians for they said since Faith and Repentance was all that was necessary to salvation what was the need of any other Law Alas it is a sad mistake for the Moral Law is the rule of true Repentance Let him that stole steal no more that hath broke the first second or third Command c. ought to do so no more that is true Repentance New Obedience The Law that did forbid stealing once forbids stealing always else it were not perfect Indeed the Gospel has such an influence on this Law and our obedience to it that it is a new Law to what it was but that ever God should lay that by and make another or make any that requires not perfection is to me unconceivable If any duty belongs to this New Law it 's patience and God commands that it be perfect Let patience have its perfect work Or for the same God to have two Laws so contrary that we may condemn'd by one and justifi'd by another 3ly As it introduces Antinomianism so a christianiz'd Pharisaism which was the error the Apostle is refuting He is not disputing against Pagans who denied the Messias or own'd many Daemons 1 Cor. 8.6 To us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things Nor against the Jews who deny'd he was come in the flesh for he tells them their Faith was famous thorough the World Rom. 1.8 But against some that believ'd and pleaded the necessity of Circumcision Rom. 3.28 That pleaded We were justified by Faith and Works for the Thesis shows the Antagonists Opinion which is we are justifi'd by faith without the deeds of the Law and Rom. 9.23 They sought after a righteousness as if it were by the works of the Law i. e. by the works of the Law in some sense and measure this may be more evident by considering the Jews Doctrine about the way of Salvation and add to it the belief of a Messias come and we may find the opinions too much alike They reckon'd that there were three ranks of Men with respect to Heaven the lowest were sinners of Publicans and Sinners we read frequently the highest were perfect men and that they thought hardly attainable it seems Mat. 19.21 That was the young mans doubt he brought to Christ If thou wouldst be perfect sell all thou hast and follow me in me the Laws perfection is to be obtain'd thou must entirely be deny'd to all things else the middle sort was called Beninim Middle-way-men Men of sincerity that should go to eternal Life either by a praeponderation of good or repentance of evil Hence say they the Life of man in the Precepts is according to his intention who performs one of the least Precepts for love of the Precept shall merit everlasting life Cant. 5.2 Open to me my Sister my Love i. e. Open to me one crevice of Repentance and I will open to thee the wide gates of Glory Zach. 9.1 The Land of Hadrach i. e. Emanuel's Land who leads men to God by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the way of repentance The gates of Prayer are shut sometimes but never the gate of Repentance If Israel would repent one day the world would be redeem'd and the Messias would come But they did not think these Boninim went straight to Heaven No Abraham and all the Prophets went to Hell in their Opinion though the best went thorough the fire like a Salamander it 's only the Messias can deliver from that Herein then seems their Error to consist that the Messias suppli'd the want of perfection so no need of going to Hell for sincere ones this the Apostle Gal. 1. calls a perverting of the Gospel a composing of another method of Salvation a counterfeit Gospel a corrupting of the pure method of Grace with mixture and allay of works 4ly It supposes two Justifications Baxter against Cartwright p. 11. It is one thing to be accus'd of treason and another thing to be accus'd of Non-performance of the condition on which remission for treason is promis'd an absolution from the first makes the one justification and absolution from the latter the Gospel Justification Resp By this Doctrine the neglect of Faith and Repentance is not Treason 2. That the justification by Christs righteousness is not compleat 3. That we must be justifi'd before we can have an interest in Christ's Righteousness and so we have Faith
forgiven thee Having removed these Limitations with the grounds of them I shall establish the Doctrine more positively And 1. By Testimony Sclater on this Verse reconciles it with Prov. 17.15 where it 's said He that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the just even they both are abomination to the Lord It were an abomination to justifie a wicked Man without a satisfaction but not where a satisfaction to the Government is given which is the Case of the ungodly Man in the Text. Who 's justified thro' the righteousness of Christ and this he quotes out of Pareus on the place Wilson another English Commentator with great plainness gives it thus At their justification he findeth them ungodly and maketh them godly and he doth it both by taking away the guilt and filth of their sin The Righteousness of Christ is reckoned the Righteousness of that Person who doth by Faith embrace him Pitcairn says Ungodly here is taken in the same sense as when God raiseth the dead and calls that which is not to be it being the term of alienation from which they are remov'd from whence he bids farewell to all antecedent Causes which some call inferiour others in some manner or measure others administrating others sine quo non others Causes of possession tho' not of right for all Holiness comes in as a way to the Kingdom not as Causes of Rule Diest thus Justifying Grace finds him so in himself but leaves him not so For whom he justifies them he sanctifies God Justifies us not as Holy in our selves but as wanting righteousness he imputes a righteousness to us The Anger of Abraham Gen. 15. for want of Children wanted a Pardon even then before this declaration about him that his Faith was imputed to him for righteousness Theodore Szuingerus whom Hottinger commends and notwithout reason as the best Commentator on this Epistle compares the Text with 1 Kings 8.2 condemning the wicked to bring his way on his Head and justifying the righteous to give him according to his righteousness and solves the difficulty these two ways 1. That the one is a Justification of a man's Cause and the other a Justification of his Person which is that in the Text. 2. This Justification of the Ungodly is not against a Law but according to a Law not without a righteousness but without his own only Besides says he Tho' it finds him ungodly it leaves him not in his ungodliness Bucer thus If God should not justifie the Wicked none should be justified for the Lord find us all wicked before we are justified Greneus Tho' Man may not justifie the ungodly God may who has Power to forgive above Law Pareus Tho' they are justified who are wicked in themselves yet not without Cause and against Rule since there is a satisfaction in Christ Marlorat's Ecclesiastick Exposition is thus The first Blessing of Salvation is Pardon and our Pardon being a Justification it must be a justification of the Ungodly What can they say to this that are Slaves to their Belly and yet brag of their Works are they better than Abraham who left his Countrey redeem'd his Brother and offered his Son and Hop'd in his God against all Hope but God in justifying leaves us not ungodly Such therefore ought rather to fear they are not justify'd because they want the fruits of Justification than brag they have the Causes of it in themselves Calvin thus It 's observable the Discourse is not about the way of living but about the Causes of Salvation He argues from contraries and as Bucer says not from words but sentences This Sentence is full of Energy Believeth on him that justifies the ungodly wherein both the Nature of Faith and Righteousness are contain'd In short no body can come to the Righteousness of Faith but who is in himself Ungodly for Faith adorns us with anothers Righteousness which it beggs of God hence God is said to justifie when he freely forgives and vouchsafes to love them with whom he may be justly angry Ver. 6. without Works they meerly cavil who think all Works are not excluded for he says not Works of the Law but simply and without restriction Works of all kinds Beda venerabilis Anno 700. says on this Text What can he be but ungodly until he be justified by Grace for what Grace gives it gives freely I dare not determine which of the two is the greater work to make a just man or to justifie an ungodly man both require equal power but the latter greater grace or mercy Boast not of thy works before faith for faith found thee a sinner Man works not righteousness until he be justified and that begins with Faith Tho. Aquinas 1260. on this Text To believe is the first act of Righteousness which God works in us by this man doth not merit righteousness but subject himself to God's justification and so thereby receives its effect This says he the Apostle proves 1. From David's sense v. 6. He is a blessed man to whom God gives a righteousness without forgoing works 2. From David's words proving he had no righteousness for he needed for Orignal Actual and Venial sin for the guilt of the Offence Fact and Penalty of sin Ambranat a late Papist 1665. Paris The Apostle before acted an Orator by interrogations and frequent Questions but now a Philosopher with clouds of Arguments before he oppos'd Gift and Works now he opposes a Believer and Worker a believer in him that endues the ungodly with his own righteousness Patiatur ergo si non operatur when he is not a doer he is made a receiver 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Erasmus says Ungodly here comprehends all kind of Unrighteousness there is no kind that is excepted But there is no end of humane testimonies for within my Cognizance I can reckon an hundred Interpreters of this Epistle I shall add two more of greatest Authority in England 1. The Westminster Assembly I shall not quote the Annotations bearing their Name but as I am inform'd on far less ground than Anthony Burgess his book of Justification which was examin'd and approv'd by them one of his Titles is That gracious works are not so much as the condition or cause sine qua non of justification and on this Text p. 288. God doth account him as righteous though a sinner in himself p. 290. While looking into our selves we see nothing but matter of death and condemnation and he has another Sermon to prove that the Act of Faith is not imputed to justification which the Assemblies Catachism expresly mentions A Second Authority is the Articles and Homilies of the Church of England But Dr. Wallis has done that in a Sermon ex preposito I shall conclude with these two noted Fathers Ambrose and Augustine the former defines a worker to be not a transgressor of the Law and a Non-worker a Transgressor the latter in his Propositions on this Epistle Tom. 4. p. 1193. Qui justificat
are more likely sences when David said Blessed is he whose sin is forgiven to mean blessed is he who has an interest in Christ and his satisfaction than to mean blessed is he who repents Nay the Prophet adds that as another thing Blessed is he in whose spirit there is no guile i. e. Blessed is the pardon'd man and the sincere man 3ly He is ungodly when forgiven therefore his righteousness is not the condition of it 4ly C. 3. v. 25. To declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past why should we think the Terms connexed other than what before he unites as cause and effect this is to unite what the Apostle separates our Works and Justification and separate what he unites Christ righteousness and remission 2. It is not supposable to think that Christ's righteousness or satisfaction should be no where mention'd in this dispute about the causes of Justification when it s confest that that is the grand and only meriting cause It is strange that he should dispute about the cause of pardon and yet never mention the true cause but instead of it always a little petty requisite without any causality at all and the more strange that he should so frequently mention that cause under the name of Christ's blood and his being deliver'd for our offences the matter of his righteousness in the context and seldom ever the effect without it but when he calls it by the name of righteousness the proper name by which it saves us for his blood saves us as it is a righteousness a conformity to the law of Redemption that wherein the Law obtain'd its end then it should not be esteem'd his but our own 3. We may learn whose righteousness it is that is mention'd in the dispute by what was propos'd in the These or Doctrine to be disputed which he proposes both negatively and affirmatively viz. Justified not by our righteousness or works but God's we are justified by Gods righteousness this he proposes Rom. 1.17 as the grand end of the Gospel Therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith surely God's Righteousness and Faith by which it s receiv'd are distinct things from thence to v. 21. c. 3. he proves that all our own righteousness is entirely rejected from any interest in this affair and again v. 21. proposes thus the righteousness of God to be that which he now undertakes to prove to be the only righteousness we are justified by But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested and that by God he means Christ Rom. 10.3 4. may be easily learn'd from his words Vnto the righteousness of God for Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness and that it is not call'd the righteousness of God because his gift we may learn from Rom. 1.8 Your faith is spoken of thoroughout the world Faith is a work this is the work of God to believe on his name and faith is a righteousness for there is a conformity to the Law in it but it is ours your faith faith differs from this righteousness as the act and object Righteousness of God reveal'd from faith to faith What unprejudic'd man would call that righteousness and faith the same faith differs from it as the effect from the cause 2 Pet. 1.1 Have obtain'd the like precious faith with us thorough the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ Who would wish for a plainer expression to prove that the gift of Faith is the fruit of Christ's merit and therefore this righteousness must be imputed to us before that gift be possess'd by us 4. The Epithets of this righteousness speaks it to be Christs Rom. 3.21 22 24. 1. It s the righteousness of God God was Author Owner Contriver Acter Giver Subject of this righteousness it deserves the name by way of Eminence who could contrive it but his Wisdom give it but his Grace bear it but his Patience work it but his Power possess it but his Fulness 2. Without the Law on two accounts both as to the person and as to the righteousness 1. The person Gal. 4. Was made under the law he came under it by his own voluntary choice not natural necessity as we are hence without the Law 2. The Righteousness was that no precept of the Law requir'd to dye or suffer that was none of its duties or righteousness it was its penalty in case of Unrighteousness 3. It s a righteousness now manifested faith and repentance has shin'd in the practice of the Patriarchs and Prophets ever since Adam Heb. 11. Abel Noah Enoch believ'd indeed Christ's was a new kind the World never saw before 4. It was witness'd by the Law and the Prophets if we take the Law for the books of Moses they bear witness to it Abraham believ'd and it was imputed to him for righteousness the bruising his heel Gen. 3. witnesses his suffering the principal matter of his righteousness If we take it for the Typical Law that witnessed to it for all the sacrifices were Types and Types are visible Prophecies and all the Language is the Messias was to suffer in the room of others to obey a Law for others and the Prophets witness Isa 45. Surely shall one say in the Lord have I righteousness Jer. 23.6 The Lord our righteousness Dan. 9. To bring in everlasting righteousness There are the Testimonies of three Prophets To him gave all the Prophets witness 5. It was a righteousness convey'd thorough faith put on them that believe v. 22. which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe 6. A righteousness that consist in a conformity to a Law which to us is a Law of Faith not Works We are bound to believe his Obedience to all the Law in the Covenant of Redemption but not to work one bit of it Hence we being justified by that righteousness our boasting is excluded v. 27. 7. A faith that consists in shedding of blood in suffering v. 25. These two are to the same effect Thorough faith in his blood and righteousness by faith 8. A righteousness whose fruit is remission of sin v. 24. To declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are pass'd the same Coherence that is in the Text between imputation of righteousness and pardon 9 Rom. 9.4 A righteousness wherein the Law attain'd its full end the Subject Life and Happiness and the Law-giver honour and glory 10. A righteousness the gift whereof glorifies grace to the uttermost the righteousness of an Angel is not such a gift as this is 5. It s a righteousness that is made ours As Adam's first offence or unrighteousness was made ours that never inher'd in us but death came on us by it then it has some relation to us and we to it this is at large in C. 5. where the Author of this righteousness is plainly call'd the second Adam and if that be not plain enough v. 21. he is call'd
Virgins that have no Oil in their Lamps 2ly The foundations this Opinion are grounded on are not very sure As 1. They say John Baptist's Ministry was to prepare the way to Christ by the doctrine of Repentance Respon The Baptists Ministry is to be consider'd either in general with all Ministers to prepare and make meet for the inheritance Luke 17.6 To prepare his ways to give knowledge of Salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins thorough the tender mercies of our God His Work was to fit for Heaven not to make Hypocrites though he did make many 2. His Ministry was to be consider'd in relation to that peculiar dispensation which was to raise and awaken peoples minds in expectation of the Messias and fulfilment of the great promises about the incarnation of the Son of God his Birth Life Death Resurrection and Constitution of his Church which was peculiar to himself A Second Foundation of these preparatory Works is Christ's Expressions preferring one People to another as such with whom the means that others enjoy'd in vain would have prevail'd for their true Repentance Matth. 11. to this purpose Christ prefers the Tyrians and Sidonians to the People of Chorazin and Bethsaida For Answer I shall give Camero's Sense of these Expressions who counts it a popular Hyperbole to upbraid the Unbelief of these People who had seen so many of his Miracles as if one should say he is as bad or worse than the Devil and these things seem to confirm this sense 1. It would seem to reflect on the Bowels and Mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that he would not walk two or three Miles to work a Miracle among a People who wanted nothing else to secure their Salvation and yet continue to Preach and work Miracles where he knew the event would be only the Aggravation of their Sin and Punishment 2. To attribute the Conversion of a People to any external means and not the efficacy and energy of the Holy Ghost is contrary to the sense of the Holy Ghost for Paul may plant and Apollo may water but God gives the encrease and yet these words taken litterally would imply this if in Tyre and Sidon the Miracles had been done which have been done in thee they would have repented long ago 3. The Letter of this Scripture would arrogate the power of Conversion to Miracles which certainly is not the Sense of the Scripture for Abram in the 16th of Luke is brought in saying in that Conference with the rich man that if they heard not Moses and the Prophets they would not believe one that rose from the dead 4. Such Hyperbolical Language Christ frequently us'd as Matth. 18.8 9. If thy Hand or thy Foot offend thee cut it off if any man smite thee on the right Cheek turn to him the other when thou dost Alms let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth And of this kind seems Moses his Wish to be who pray'd that God would rather blot him out of the Book of Life than destroy that People The import of it was only to express the earnestness of his desire A Third Foundation is Christ's commendation of the young Man Matth. 19.15 Mark 10.21 Luke 18.18 where 't is said Jesus lov'd him and that he lack'd but one thing of the Kingdom of Heaven Resp 1. The same Scripture gives no account of his coming there but rather of the impossibility of it and that 't was easier for a Camel to go through the Eye of a Needle than for such a Man to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven and farther that 't was a thing only possible to God And in more plain terms he describes him to be one who trusted in his riches and what can more unfit Man for Heaven God and Mammon are at greatest distance As to that Expression of his loving him I think it may be best explain'd by that distinction that is us'd about Christ's Tears when he wept over a dead Lazarus or sympathiz'd with his Sisters that they were expressions of his Humanity and that tho' he had not the like Passions yet the like Affections with us and could love what 's useful and in its kind beautiful amongst men and such are all these Moral Virtues that renders a Man amiable and useful in the Society where he lives A Fourth Foundation is that an Appetite and desire is antecedent unto enjoying Christ or his Benefits Isa 55.1 Ho every one that thirsteth come ye to the Waters Resp That is every one there is a great difference between a desire and the determination of it Psal 4. many say i. e. all or all unconverted Who will shew us any good but Lord lift thou up on me the light of thy countenance It is the termination of their desires on Christ on stable lasting heavenly spiritual good things the Prophet exhorts to he blames them for terminating their desires on what did not profit A 3. Argument against preparatory Works seems to be their inconsistence with the Nature of Conversion for Creation Regeneration Resurrection and Victory have no antecedent predispositions all the preparation in order to be conquer'd and overcome is to oppose with the greater force to prevent it the others imply a Divine Omnipotency working upon nothing or what 's unfit for the produc'd effect 4. It being granted that there 's no necessary Connection between preparatory Works and Pardon I see no reason why some may not be pardon'd without it as well as some have it and not pardoned 5. The design of the Gospel being to exalt pardoning Grace Ver. 15 16. It 's of Faith that it might be of Grace The less the Preparation appear the more Grace is exalted and manifested Obj. Should then a Man do nothing until he be justified Resp 1. Many are justified who know it not 2. Our Priviledges are not the Rule of our Duty but God's Command 3. That is without doubt we should do all we can few if any do what they may be always trying whether God gives ability or not 4. To all under the means of Grace at least God gives common Grace and by that they may live a sober just and honest Life among men and they may and ought to attend on Ordinances Phil. 2.12 Work in and about your own Salvation as Camero excellently translates it wait there until God works effectually he doth it of his own good pleasure where and when he will Let fear and trembling therefore accompany thy attendance lest thou miss the gale of that Wind that blows where it listeth Here is no room for Idleness to a Non converted and unpardoned Soul Faith comes by hearing be thou a diligent hearer 5. God gives Life thorough the Command of the Law he speaks a Pardon thorough the Precept it 's that makes the Law evangelical when he commands the dead to arise Lazarus come forth Lame Cripple rise and walk Bed rid man carry home thy bed thy sins are
God's method but our own Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to his mercy hath he saved us Will we reject the way and method that all the cloud of witnesses were sav'd in and will we be saved in that way never one was sav'd in they attain not unto the Law of righteousness because they sought it or as it were by the works of the Law Christ is the true and living way is there any fault we can find in him is he not able to save to the uttermost is there any righteousness like his it's everlasting Can we give any satisfaction to divine Government like what he hath given Can we bear the Curse and drink the Cup that he did is he not altogether lovely in himself and altogether fit for us infinite Wisdom and infinite Goodness fitted and prepared him and is he not willing that we should share of his righteousness doth not his offer speak it Come unto me all ye that are heavy laden doth not his tears and his sorrows over them that refuse and defer speak it doth not that eternal Chearfulness he undertook his Work with speak it Lo I come in the volume of thy Book 't is written of me thy Law is within my Heart the bent of my Heart is to do thy will and that desire left him not nor ever was abated under the heat of the day and heaviest of the curse I have a baptism to be baptized with and how am I straightned till it be accomplisht with desire have I desired to eat this passover having lov'd his own he lov'd them to the end And will not all this Love towards us kindle some sparks of desire in our frozen breasts don 't we think they deserve an Anathema Maranatha that love not this Lord Jesus Christ The depth and height the breadth and length of his Love passeth all knowledge he was full of Love as he was a man he lov'd Lazarus so and he lov'd the young man in the Gospel so he was full of love as he was a Mediator Such was that love whose dimensions our narrow minds cannot span but he was more full of love as he was God God is love and God so lov'd the World to give his Son is not this Emanuel worthy of our acceptation Gods infinite Wisdom found him can we find a better or do without him have we no self-love for our souls what will become of us without a pardon can we bear the curse of the Law or wrath of God is it not worthy acceptance on any terms but what terms can be better it 's come to God and beg Repentance the Almighty makes the heart soft I will pour down the spirit of Grace and supplication and they shall look on him whom they have pierced and mourn Obj. But coming to God is believing and I cannot believe until he gives me faith which is not yet Resp Put that to Tryal what if the Spirit of God be now directing and quickning thy conscience to this Work and the Language of thy heart is stay until time for Prayer at night or to morrow you will think of it Alas Alas this is the common answer to Gods Spirit himself what wonder the Prophets cry To whom is the Arm of the Lord revealed Lord bless this for better fruits SERMON II. ROM IV. 5 6. His Faith is counted for Righteousness Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the Man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works IN the Former Discourse you have an account of the condition and disposition of the subject of Justification in this I propose an account of the Gospel-method how God justifies the ungodly it is a different Question from that of the convicted Jews Acts 2. Men and Brethren what shall we do to be saved This is What doth God do to save a sinner that has contemn'd his Authority brought disorder into his Government violated his holy just and good Laws and goes on frowardly without repenting of what he has done the Rebel doth not will not yield shall the Governour yield doth God need us how is it possible to reconcile God's justice and Man's enmity how can a just God justifie an ungodly person The Apostle makes but two sentences of the Answer 1. He imputes his Faith to Righteousness 2. He says that Righteousness is imputed to Blessedness The nature of the Discourse is didactick instructive and there are these three Questions that are matters of no small Moment nor mean Contraversies 1. Whos 's this Righteousness is 2. What is the importance of the imputation of righteousness to a man for blessedness 3. What is the meaning of Faiths being imputed to righteousness I shall only propose what I am most perswaded of to be the true sense of them and what perswades me to be of that mind without using means to confute others I shall leave them to the same liberty I presume on As to the first there are but two general Opinions viz. Either Christs or our own though each are subdivided in what righteousness of Christs it is or of ours My Business is to confirm and establish this truth that this Righteousness in the Text imputed for blessedness is the righteousness inherent in our blessed Mediator and if this one Character of being without works were to be understood abstracted from the Apostles design which is not to exclude works from righteousness but our works and our righteousness I should think it a distinguishing Mark between Christ's righteousness and any mans else for the righteousness of Works consists in a conformity to the preceptive part of the Law but Christs Righteousness consists also in a conformity to the sanction of the Law He was made a curse for us and that is not to work in the Scripture phrase but to suffer though in it self hard work even Soul-travel but doubting the solidity of this I shall propose others of greater stability 1. That Righteousness that is the cause of Blessedness and whose fruit is the remission of sin is the righteousness of Christ for there is no other name given under Heaven and therefore no other righteousness by which a Man can be saved but the righteousness in the Text is the cause of blessedness and pardon there must be some near connexion between pardon and imputation of righteousness else the Apostle did mistake the Prophets sence saying he meant imputation of righteousness unto blessedness when he said Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven the connexion is either pretended to be that of the cause to the effect or some kind of requisite condition They who say this is our own righteousness are for the latter who say it s Christ's are for the former and with reason for our own righteousness wants not works our justifying faith is not without works but this is 2ly The righteousness of Christ and our pardon are more necessarily united than our faith for pardon is as soon given as it These
Jesus Christ our Lord And that it s made ours 1. By a gracious gift abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness 2. It still remain'd inherent in him alone for justification of life came upon all men by the righteousness of one If it were ours there must be as many righteousneses as justifications but here by the obedience of one many are made righteous 3. It s convey'd thorough a Law The word made imports a legal constitution and the first Adam's case shews it until the Law sin was in the world sin is not imputed when there is no law wherever imputation is there is a Law the Hostage cannot suffer for his King or Country but by some Law Christ was made sin for us only by Law and we the righteousness of God in him by law The Debtor is reliev'd thorough the Sureties discharge by a Law and this Law is the Law of Faith that we ought daily to study the Law was If thou as sponsor wilt dye for them they shall live if thou wilt go under the curse of their Law take their Law-place for thy sake they shall have the place of Sons It s much harder to me to comprehend how Adam's first offence should be imputed to us for death then Christs righteousness for life and it seems worthy observation that the one imputation is never very clearly reveal'd until the other be set over against it The Apostle thereby tells us we are no losers but gainers by it an imputed righteousness may well free from an imputed guilt and commends that righteousness imputed for it frees from more than that viz. from all guilt This 5th C. gives account of the Original of imputation how it comes that one should be justified by anothers righteousness or condem'd by anothers sin Solomon Eccles 7.24 among his many learned Enquiries in his latter days enquires after the original of sin how a righteous man should become a sinner One thing have I found that God made man upright but we have found out many inventions The Apostles enquiry is of a greater depth how one mans guilt or righteousness should be convey'd to another Adam's sin or Christ's righteousness 6. It s a righteousness made ours as he was sin 2 Cor. 5.21 Isa 53. which did never inhere in him 7. From the very Title of imputed but that will be made clear in the 2d general head to which I now come and whether I refer a considerable Question belonging to this viz. What righteousness of Christ is it that is imputed II. As to the second Question What is meant by Imputation of righteousness I shall begin with the signification of the word which as others is translated from humane use to signifie by similitude some divine thing Putation thinking belongs to the Art of Logic and in the Greek the words are Conjugates branches of the same root and in Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used for thoughts too The Lord knoweth the thoughts of men that they are vanity Psal 94.11 2. Computation belongs to Arithmetick and Greek Authors explain this word by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to calculate number or reckon and as the Art of Logick has the name from the Greek the Art of Arithmetick Accompting in Hebrew has its Name from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 see Munster's Lexicon and so the Scripture uses the word Lev. 25.27 Let him count the years of the sale thereof Eccl. 7.26 Counting one by one to find out the accompt 3. Imputation is an applying of Accompts and the things valued and esteemed thereby it is accompt assign or ascribe by way of counting and reckoning to some particular persons We have here then the righteousness of Christ as a rich treasure of Grace in the bank of God it 's one individual Jewel given of God for the redemption of slaves and its value is so great and the way it 's communicated being by Accompts it may be distributed to pay for the redemption of Millions all at various times and places We have God represented as a great Merchant with his rich Fund and his Books of Accompts the Merchandize Prov. 3. Is better than that of silver or gold Rev. 3. the Naked may buy garments of Righteousness and Isa 55. they may buy without Money or Price Among these Books Rev. 20.12 The books were open'd and another book was open'd There is one Book that is call'd The Lambs Book Rev. 13.8 Whose Names are not written in the book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the World There are two Books of Life one for Angels by their own inherent righteousness another for fallen Man who obtain it thorough the Death of the Lamb his passive righteousness In this book Christ has Credit for the redemption of all agreed for between the Father and Son and when a persons Name is put in that Book Christ's righteousness is transferr'd to him for Life for a salvation from all evil Dan. 12.1 Thy People shall be deliver'd every one that shall be found written in the Book Luk. 10.20 Rejoice that your Names are written in Heaven We may then see what the Imputation of Christ's righteousness to us is it was the putting our Names in among the Number for whom Christ dy'd it 's having all Christ did and suffer'd put so to our accompt that we may actually partake of all the Blessings God's goodness and grace design'd for us but the transgress'd Law render'd it inconsistent with the Governour 's Authority Honour and Wisdom to confer it upon us the way this impediment and bar was remov'd was by the sufferings of Immanuel Imputation is either the application of that benefit from Eternity in the Elective Decree of God or the actual investing the Person with it in time It 's my present Light that the Imputation of Righteousness to Blessedness was the eternal act and the imputation of Faith to Righteousness the temporal the former was 2 Tim. 1.9 a purpose of conferring this grace and gift of Righteousness upon us in Christ before the World began There was a double Gift set down in that Book by him that is God of all grace sovereign Proprietor 1. We were given to Christ Thine they were and thou gavest them me 2. Christ's Righteousness was given to us by his Consent he became surety his Name was put in our Book of Debt and Death and ours in his of Righteousness and Life Two things need proof here 1. That Christ's Righteousness is transferr'd in its Value and Virtue to us in way of accompt 2. That that was from Eternity The first is manifest from the Text for one cannot be justified without an antecedent righteousness the Non-worker and Ungodly person has no righteousness of his own it must then be anothers transferr'd tho' it still inhere in him only yet its value may be transferr'd to us Thus Money may still lye in its old Chests and yet be transferr'd in accompts thorough
whom he justifies its relative Language should be I justifie thee I pardon or absolve thee for the same Gift may have two Uses as a Ring in Marriage it enriches and it marries the one by its own Inherent value the other by constitution so Faith sanctifies by its own inherent vertue and justifies by impuration 3. It shews us what influence the Holy Ghost has in our justification all the three Person concur in all transient and external Acts and in particular this act is ascrib'd to the Spirit 1 Cor. 6.11 But ye are wash'd but you are sanctifi'd but you are justifi'd in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God There 's no more reason for derogating justification from the Spirit of God then from derogating sanctification from the Name of the Lord Jesus The verse contains two Blessings Sanctification and Justification two Authors of them the Lord Jesus and the Spirit two ways of Application of their vertue the Merit of the one and the Spiritual Efficiency of the other in name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of God Some think the Spirits Efficiency in Justification is to give the comfort and the knowledge of it but that 's no causality that may come forty years after the effect but this gives an easie solution to the Text the Spirit of God works Faith which entitles to Christ's Righteousness therefore we are justifi'd by the Spirit and may be is called the Spirit of Adoption upon the same account for the Spirit of Faith and Spirit of Prayer are one and the Spirit of Adoption Rom. 8.15 is that whereby we call Abba Father so he may be also call'd the Spirit of Justification by his working justifying faith and this seems to be pointed at 1 Tim. 1.14 The grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love There are two Blessings mention'd and both Preventive exceeding grace with faith and love It is not said and Faith and Love to import barely the contemporariness of the Gift of Pardon and Faith but the way of conveyance thus God gave me Faith and Love when I was a Blasphemer and a Persecutor and with Faith or thorough Faith I obtain'd mercy the Grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant in this blessing in giving faith and a pardon thorough faith 4. Christ's justification is a pattern of ours Rom. 4.24 He rose again for our justification 1 Tim. 3.16 He was justifi'd in the Spirit the work of the Spirit in raising him from the Dead was a justifying act upon him in the World he was condemn'd as a meer man and thereby a deceiver saying he was God but Rom. 1.3 He was declar'd to be the Son of God with power by the spirit of holiness in his resurrection His state of Humiliation was status reorum he was in the condition of a guilty man in prisonand judgment Isa 53. He was condemn'd that he might condemn sin in the flesh and that there might be no condemnation to them that are in him he could not be punish'd under God's Government without sin inherent or imputed Isa 50.8 He is near that justifieth me he justified him in his raising him from the dead and setting him at his right hand so condemn'd him in humbling him at the resurrection his justification and vivification was one and the same thing in different relations 1 Pet. 3.18 He was put to death in the flesh but quicken'd by the Spirit when the Spirit quicken'd him he justified him his death was consequently a condemnation not only by man but God as by his determinate counsel under his Government Sydenham and Brinsley say in his resurrection as Attorney he took up the bond of the old Covenant in Court for his Clients John 16. The spirit now in the Gospel bears witness to his righteousness as our Head and Surety because he goes to his Father i. e. witnesses he was justified as our Surety and therefore his resurrection is our acquittance or solution he had never gone to Heaven else 5. No punishment can be justly removed before the Person be justifi'd or absolv'd the removal of our Spiritual Death by the gift of his Spirit is a removal of our greatest punishment therefore it carries absolution in its bosome and by it we may easily answer the Papists who argue our justification and sanctification to be one because the Scripture mentions a relation certainly above a bare connexion of time Rom. 8.1 2. in v. 1. a connexion but in v. 2. some causality This place says Stapleton Ant. p. 625. is a torment to Beza and Calvin but Calvin's Comment frees himself for though he yields inherent holiness to be the sense of the 2d v. the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or for the influence it has on no condemnation in the v. 1. is thus Non assignari caasam à paulo sed modum quo soâ—vimur à reatu Sanctification contains a way of our being freed from guilt as well as filth of sin I argue against the Papists thus there could be no Argument to prove the one from the other if both were one 2ly This interprets the relation such texts as this and more evidently Tit. 3. 1 Cor. 6. implys between these two twins viz. the same grace sanctifies as a principle of efficiency in the Believer and justifies as a foundation of relation it raises between the Believer and God now let the Papists find one Scripture to torment a Protestant Interpreter with this key in his hand or any advantage to their side who say justification is justification is the ornamental or enriching value of the Ring its marriage vertue or the relation between man and wife 6. The being put in Covenant is also a relative blessing and we are brought thereinto by God's pouring out his spirit on us This is my covenant Heb. 8. There is a very obvious objection against this viz. The Scripture commonly attributes Justification and Pardon to the exercise of Faith Abraham believ'd in God and 't was counted to him for righteousness but this Doctrine about it lays the stress of its justifying vertue on the gift of it and the same objection may be otherways propos'd the Scripture lays the justifying vertue of faith on the object of it it is not a miraculous faith believing I shall be cur'd nor an Historical Faith believing the truth of a particular relation in the Scripture but a Believing on him that justifies the ungodly for justification a believing on him that rais'd up Jesus our Lord from the dead thorough the belief of his being deliver'd for our offences and rais'd again for our justification And 3. The like objections may be rais'd against these Eph. 2.8 That we are sav'd by grace thorough faith and that not of our selves but as the gift of God For we are his Workmanship Tit. 3.5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to his mercy he sav'd us by the washing of regeneration that being