same day and year and afterwards that is to say the 27th day of the same Moneth of January in the year 44th aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery of Record inrolled for and in Consideration of 10. shillings to the said William and Ralph By the Right Honourable Gilbert Earl of Shrewesbury and Mary his Wife paid granted aliened bargained and sold the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Mary his Wife To have and to hold the said Manor with the Appurtenances to the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countesse and to their Heirs for ever By virtue of which as also by force of an Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countess were of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield with their Appurtenances seised in their Demesn as of Fee And the Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Earl of Shrewesbury and Countess so as before is said being seised Afterwards that is to say the 16th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said late Queen the 44th in the Declaration above specified One Simon Stern then being Deputie of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland for the exercising the said Office of Steward of the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield came to the Town of Maunsfield to the usual place there where the Court of the Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid was commonly holden and kept to keep the Court Baron of the said Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid And the aforesaid Thomas Woodward came thither to keep the Court of the said Manor as Steward for the aforesaid Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury and that the aforesaid Thomas Woodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury and the aforesaid Simon Stern as Deputy of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland to the place aforesaid both together came And the said Simon Stern as Deputy of the said Earl of Rutland Commanded the Bayliff of the same Manor to make Proclamation for the holding of the Court Baron of the said Manor by him the said Simon Stern as Deputy of the aforesaid Earl of Rutland then to be holden And the aforesaid Thomas VVoodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury likewise Commanded the Bayliff of that Manor that he make Proclamation for the holding of the Court Baron of the Manor aforesaid by him the said Thomas VVoodward as Steward of the aforesaid Earl of Shrewsbury But no Court then was holden but by the said Thomas VVoodward it was then adjorned And from thence until the bringing of the aforesaid Original Writ The aforesaid Thomas VVoodward and Steward of the aforesaid Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury kept the Courts of the Manor aforesaid and allwayes from thence he the said Thomas Woodward and the aforesaid Robert Spencer Received all the Fees belonging to the Steward there as they became due And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It sahll seem to the Court here that the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas VVoodward are guilty of the Trespass within written Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are guilty of the Trespasse within written as the said Roger Earl of Rutland within against them complaineth And then they assesse the Damages of the said Roger Earl of Rutland above his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to Forty pound and for his costs and charges to Twelve pence And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are not guilty of the Trespasse within written Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Robert Spencer and Thomas Woodward are not guilty of the Trespass within written as the said Robert and Thomas within have alleged And because c. TRESPAS Michaelmass Term Anno 10. of King JAMES Rot. 574. in the KINGS-BENCH Co. 10. part The Case of Suttons Hospital Fol. 1. MEmorandum that at another time that is to say Trinity Term Middle past before the Lord the King at Westminster come Simon Baxter Gent. by George Cuppledick his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lord the King then and there his Bill against Richard Sutton Esq and John Law Gentleman in the custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss Middlesex ss Simon Baxter Gentleman complaineth of Richard Sutton and John Law in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey being before the King himself For that That they The 30th day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 10th with force and Arms the Close and House of him the said Simon that is to say A Capital Messuage with the Appurtenances called The late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-Field at the Parish of Saint Sepulchre in the County aforesaid they brake and entred and other harms to him did against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is to the damage of the said Simon 40. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute And now at this day That is to say Friday next after 8. days of Saint Michael this Term until which day the aforesaid Richard and John had license to imparl to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lord the King at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Simon by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Richard and John by Thomas Heyward their Attorny And the said Richard and John defend the force and injury when c. And say that they are not guilty and of this put themselves upon the Country and the said Simon Baxter likewise Therefore a Jury was to come thereof before the Lord the King at Westminster Saturday next after 8. days of Saint Hillary And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors were put by them in respite until Monday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary then next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Simon Baxter as the aforesaid John Sutton and John Law by their Attornies aforesaid And the said Jurors being called come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one Thomas Sutton Esquire long before the time in which the Trespass aforesaid is supposed to be done was seized of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Southminster Norton Little Hallingbury otherwise Hallingbury Bowchers and Muchstanbridge in the County of
give unto the Treasury and Storehouse of my intended Hospital to begin their Stock with and to defend the Rights of the House 1000. pound of lawful English Mony And I give to every one of my Feoffees whom I have put in trust about my intended Hospital to whom I have not given any thing in this my Will the sum of 26. pound 13. shillings and 4. pence of lawfull Mony of England as by the said Testament and last Will more fully appeareth And further the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 12th day of December in the yeer of the Reign of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid at Hackney in the County of Middlesex dyed without issue of his Body lawfully begotten And that the aforesaid Simon Baxter now Plaintiff is and at the time of the death of the said Thomas Sutton was Cosin and next Heir of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton that is to say Son and Heir of Dorothy the onely Sister of the said Thomas Sutton And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law afterwards and before the time in which c. claiming as two Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenues and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in Chater House within the County of Middlesex at the humble petition and only costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire in the names and to the use of them who are named Governours as aforesaid into all and singular the premises with the Appurtenances called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field whereof c. entred and were thereof seised as the Law requireth upon the possessions of which Richard Sutton and John Law thereof afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Simon Baxter into the said premises with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised as the Law requireth Upon the possession of which Simon Baxter thereof the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law the aforesaid time in which into the premises aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. claiming as two Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Chater-House At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq in the names and to the use of those who are called Governours as afore is said re-entred as the aforesaid Simon Baxter against them complaineth And further the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th year of King JAMES abovesaid and in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said King and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the one part the aforesaid George Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and others of the other part bearing date the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid named And the aforesaid Richard Sutton and John Law now Defendants are one and the same persons and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Thomas Lord Ellesmere Robert Earl of Salisbury the Reverend Father Launcelot Bishop of Elie Thomas Foster Henry Hobert John Overal Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law and Thomas Brown in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th yeer abovesaid named and in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the said Lord the King and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made to George Arch Bishop of Canterby and others are one and the same persons and not others nor divers And that the most Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Robert Earl of Salisbury John Bishop of London Launcelot Bishop of Elie Thomas Foster Henry Hobart John Overal George Mountain Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law and Thomas Brown in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lord the King mentioned and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of the one partt and the aforesaid Reverend Father in God Gerrge Arch Bishop of Canterby Thomas Lord Ellesmere Robert Earl of Salisbury John Bishop of London Launcelot Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Thomas Foster Henry Hobart John Overal George Mountain Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law Thomas Brown and John Hutton of the other part are one and the same persons and not others nor divers And that all the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th yeer abovesaid and in the aforesaid Letters Patents by the aforesaid Lord the King to the aforesaid Thomas Sutton granted and in the Indenture aforesaid of Bargain and Sale made Between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton and the aforesaid George Arch Bishop of Canterbury and others except the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments called the late dissolved Charter House besides Smithfield purchased of the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk mentioned are one and the same Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Lands Tenements and Hereditaments called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smithfield in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale made Between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton and the aforesaid Thomas Earl of Suffolk and others bearing date the 9th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th abovesaid and in the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lord the King to Thomas Sutton aforesaid and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale between the aforesaid Thomas Sutton and the aforesaid Arch Bishop of Canterbury and others likewise named whereof c. are one and the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid Thomas Sutton in the aforesaid Act of Parliament of the 7th yeer abovesaid named and in the Writing aforesaid to John Hutton aforesaid made is one and the same person and not others nor divers And that the aforesaid George Mountain at the time of the making of the aforesaid Letters Patents of the aforesaid Lord the King was and now is Dean of the Church collegiat at Westminster And that the aforesaid George Mountain in the said Letters Patents of the said Lord the King named and the aforesaid George Mountain in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale by the aforesaid Thomas Sutton to the aforesaid Geo. Arch Bishop of Canterbury and others as afore is said made named is one and the same person and not other nor divers And that the aforesaid John Hutton in the aforesaid Writing named and in the aforesaid Indenture of Bargain and Sale of the aforesaid Tho. Sutton named is one and the same person and not other nor divers But
the Queen that now is the 29th day at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex before Christopher VVray Knight then Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas before the said Queen holden Assigned by their certain writing Obligatory Sealed with their Seals had granted themselves to be bounden and did acknowledge themselves to owe to the aforesaid Titus by the name of Titus VVestbie Citizen Merchant Taylor of London or to his certain Attorny shewing the said writing his Heirs or Executors in the feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and if they should make default in the payment of the debt aforesaid Then the said Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard they willed and granted that then there should run upon the said Thomas Edward and Anthony and every of them their Heirs and Executors the penalty in the Statute staple of debts for Merchandizes in the same bought to be recovered ordained and provided and whereas also the said Thomas Edward and Anthony the said 440. pound by them in the form aforesaid acknowledged in the Feast aforesaid to the aforesaid Titus had not payed nor any of them had paid By which afterwards that is to say the Eleventh day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Queen that now is the 30th One Iohn Chomley Esquir the Clark of then said Lady the Queen that now is the Recognisance for debts to be recovered according to the form of the Satute in the like case provided deputed by his writing Sealed with his Seal the Recognisance aforesaid in the Chancery of the said Queen that now is at VVestminster aforesaid then being at the request of the said Titus did Certifie And the said Titus thereupon afterwards that is to say the 31th day of August in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid sued forth out of the said Court of Chancery at VVestminster aforesaid then being a certain Writ of the said Lady the Queen to the then Sheriffs of London directed By which Writ reciting Because the aforesaid Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard the 20th day of Ianuary in the year of the Reign of the said-Lady the Queen that now is the 29th before Christopher VVray Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas before the said Queen to be holden assigned did acknowledge themselves to owe to the abovesaid Titus 440. pound which he the same Titus they ought to have paid in the Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and the same day of issuing out of this Writ had not payed nor any of them then had paid as was said The said Lady the Queen by the said Writ the then Sheriffs of London commanded That the bodies of the said Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard if they were Lay-men to take and in the prison of the said Lady the Queen that now is untill the said Thomas VVestbie of the debt aforesaid of the debt aforesaid safely to be kept and all the Lands and Chattels of the said Thomas Edward and Anthony in the Bailywick of the said Sheriffs by the Oaths of honest and lawful men of their Bailywick they should diligently extend and apprize and seize into the Lands of the said Lady the Queen that the same to the beforesaid Titus untill to him of his debt aforesaid he should be fully satisfied they should make delivery according to the form of the Statute at VVestminster for the like debts to be recovered thereof made unprovided and how the said Sheriffs aforesaid should execute the same they should make known to the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery in 15. dayes of Saint Martin then next coming wheresoever it should then be by their Letters Sealed and that they should have there the said Writ which said Writ the said Thomas VVestbie afterwards and before the said 15. day of Saint Martin that is to say the 8th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid at London that is to say in the Parish of Christ-Church in the Ward of Farrington within delivered to the said Themas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London in form of Law to be executed And the said Titus further saith That the said Anthony Bastard at the same time of the delivery of the said Writ to the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher as before is said made was a Layman and yet is a Layman And that by virtue of rhe said Writ after and before the Retorn thereof that is to say The said 8th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid the aforesaid Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London the aforesaid Anthony Bastard at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by virtue of the Writ aforesaid took and arrested and the said Anthony in Execution for the said aforesaid 440. pound then and there had according to the exigencie of the said Writ and the said Anthony under the Custody of the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher Sheriffs in execution in the form aforesaid being The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher Sheriffs The said Anthony Bastard afterwards that is to say the 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid from the Custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher Sheriffs at large where he would go did suffer the said Titus of the aforesaid 440. pound not being satisfied Be which Action acrued to the said Titus to require and have of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher the aforesaid 440. pound for his debt aforesaid by the said Anthony in form aforesaid acknowledged yet the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Gatcher although often requested c. the aforesaid 440. pound to the said Titus have not yet rendred but have hitherto denyed to render the same unto him and do yet deny so to do Whereupon the said Titus saith that he is the worse and hath Damage to the value of 400. pounds and thereof he bringeth his Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Monday next after 8 bh of St. Hillary the self same Term until which day the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher had license to imparle to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the said Titus Westbie by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher by Christopher Rust their Attorny And the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher defend the force and injury when c. And say That they do not owe to the aforesaid Titus the aforesaid 440. pounds or any penny thereof in manner and form as the said Titus above against them delareth And of this
in Execution being The said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London within written the 8th day of September the 30th year aforesaid by virtue of the Writ aforesaid at London aforesaid took and arrested the within named Anthony Bastard in manner and form as the said Titus within likewise against the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher declared And that the said Anthony Bastard so taken and arrested under the custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Cacther then Sheriffs of London aforesaid in form aforesaid being The said then Sheriffs of London the said Anthony Bastard in Execution for the aforesaid 440. pounds then and there had according to the Command of the said Writ And moreover the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Anthony Bastard so in custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher for the aforesaid 440. pounds for the aforesaid other Debt of 240. pounds to the said Robert Dighton in form aforesaid being The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher afterwards that is to say the within written 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid in the going out of their Office aforesaid the said Anthony Bastard by Indenture delivered to Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall in Execution for the aforesaid Debt of the said Robert Dighton without any other mention of the said Execution of 440. pounds made to the aforesaid Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall or to any of them given or notified And fuâ—ther the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That then That is to say The 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid The said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher from their Office aforesaid were discharged And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That after that the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher from their Office aforesaid in form aforesaid were discharged That the said Anthony Bastard without payment of any of the aforesaid Debts in the Custody of the aforesaid Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall in form aforesaid being for the said 240. pounds the said Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall the said Anthony Bastard having none nor any of them ever having any Notice to them or either of them given of the said Execution of the aforesaid 440. pounds at London aforesaid out of the Prison aforesaid suffered to go at large where he would But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher ought to be charged for the aforesaid said Debt of 440. pounds in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are altogether ignorant And they pray the Advice of the Court of the said Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being And if it shall seem to the said Court That the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher ought not to be charged for the said 440. pounds in Law upon the whole matter above found The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Cacther do owe to the said Titus VVestbie the said 440. pounds in manner and form as the said Titus within against them declared And they do also assesse the damages of the said Titus Westbie by occasion of detaining of the said Debt besides his charges and costs by him about his Sute in this part expended to 20. pounds and for his charges and costs to 53. shillings and 4. pence And if it shall seem to the Court aforesaid That the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher do not owe to the said Titus Westbie the said 440. pounds in manner and form as the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher within pleading have alleged c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given are not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael for to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plaint aforesaid was Adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Queen at Westminster until the day of St. Michael in a moneth At which day the Plaint aforesaid was further adjorned by another Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Queen until the next of All Souls then next following at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford At which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady here of their giving of their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford aforesaid untill Tuesday next after 8 th of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term until Thursday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement c. cause the Court of the Lady the Queen here c. At which day be-before the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which Seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises looked into and understood and mature deliberation be thereof had because that it seemes to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the said Tho. Skinner and John Catcher ought to be charged for the said 440. pound It is granted That the said Titus Westbie shall recover against the aforesaid Tho. Skinner John Catcher his debt aforesaid his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 10. pound 13. shill and 4. pence for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said Titus by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjudged Which damages in the whole do amount to 33. pounds 6. shillings 8. pence and the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in mercy c. Afterwards that is to say Upon Monday the 10 th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th The Transcript of the Record and proceedings between in the parties aforesaid with all things touching the same by a certain Writ of the Lady the Queen of Errors correcting by the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in the premises was brought to the Justices of the Lady of the Queen of the Common Pleas and the Barons of the Exchequer of the Lady the Queen In the Chamber of the Exchequer aforesaid according to the form of a Statute in the Parliament of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster the 23 th day of November in the year of her Reign the 27 th holden and made in the same
is the 35 th at Lugershall aforesaid dyed After whose death the said George Brown into the Tenements within written with the appurtenances in which c. upon the possession of the said Edmond Bridges William and Anthony Bridges Sons of the said Edmond thereof entred and was thereof seised as the Law requireth and so being thereof seised afterwards and before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the within written 22 th day of October in the 35 year aforesaid Demised to the said James the said whole Tenements within written with the appurenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said James and his assignes from the within written Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel until the end and Term within mentioned of 4 years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleated by virtue of which demise the said James into the said Tenements within written with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed as the Law requireth upon whose possession of the said James the aforesaid Thomas Spencer as servant of the said Edmond Bridges and by his Commandment within written the time in which c. into the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land entred and the said James from his Farm aforesaid thereof did eject But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the aforesaid Jurors in form aforesaid found the entry of the said Thomas Spencer into the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said James thereof be a good and Lawfull Entry in Law or not the said Jurors are altogether Ignorant and Pray thereof the advise and discretion of the Justices here c. And if upon the whole aforesaid matter It shall seem to the Justices and Court here that the aforsaid Entry of the aforesaid Thomas Spencer upon the possession of the said Iames Linche be not a good and Lawfull entry in Law then the said Jurors say upon their Oath that the said Thomas Spencer is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid in the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land as the aforesaid Iames against him within complaineth and then they assess the damages of the said Iames by the occasion of the said Trespass and Ejectment above his charges and costs by him about his sute in his behalf expended to 4 pence and for his charges and costs to 12 pence and if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Justices and Court here that the aforesaid entrie of the said Thomas Spencer upon the possession of the said Iames be a good and Lawfull entrie in Law then the said Jurors say upon their Oath that the said Thomas Spencer is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid in the said Messuage within alleged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgment thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8 dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because that the said Justices here thereof are not yet c. at which day come as well the aforesaid Iames as the aforesaid William and Thomas by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Justices here will further advise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day farther is given to the parties aforesaid here until from Easter in 15 dayes for to hear their Judgement therof because the said Justices here are not thereof yet c. At which day here come aswell the said Iames by George Dancombe his Attorny as the said William and Thomas by their Attorny aforesaid and because the Justices here will farther avise of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further day is given to the parties aforesaid here until the morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here come aswel the aforesaid Iames by the aforesaid George Dancombe his Attorny as the said Willam and Thomas by their Attorny aforesaid and because the Justices here will avise of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further day is given to the parties here until in 8 dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgment thereof because the said Justices here thereof are not yet At which day here come aswell the said Iames Linch by the aforesaid George Dancombe his Attorny as the aforesaid William Spencer and Thomas Spencer by their Attorny And upon this the verdict aforesaid being seen and by the Justices here fully understood it seemeth to the Justices here that the aforesaid entry of the aforesaid Thomas Spencer into the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land upon the possession of the said Iames Linch is not a good and Lawfull entry in Law Therefore It is granted that the aforesaid Iohn Linch recover against the aforesaid Thomas Spencer his Term aforesaid yet to come of and in the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances and his damages aforesaid to 16 pence by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also 26 pound 9 shillings to the said Iames at his request for his charges and costs aforesaid by the Court here of increase adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 26 pound 10 shillings and 4 pence and the aforesaid Thomas be taken c. And also the said Iames in mercy for his false clamor against the aforesaid William Spencer of the whole Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid and against the aforesaid Thomas Spencer of the residue of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid thereof the said William and Thomas and the Jurors aforesaid above be acquitted therefore the said William and Thomas go thereof without day c. and hereupon the said Iames prayeth the writ of the Lady the Queen to the Sheriff of the County aforesaid to be directed to give him possession of his Term yet to come of and in the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances and it is granted unto him retorneable here from the day of Saint Martin in 15 dayes c. Afterwards that is to say the 26 th day of November in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 40 th come here into Court the aforesaid Iames by the aforesaid George his Attorny and by a special warrant to him in that behalf made confessed himself to be satisfied of the damages aforesaid therefore the aforesaid Thomas of the said damages be acquitted c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Term 40. Elizabeth Rott 748. in the KINGS BENCH Adams and Lamberts Case C. 4. part fo 96. Buck MEmorandum That at another time That is to say in Michaelmass Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Theophilus Adams Gentleman by Iohn Povey his Attorny and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his bill
now is the 35 to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed amongst other things it more fully appeareth By colour of which said Indenture and the inrolment thereof the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler were of the aforesaid Messuage and of the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances in which c. amongst other seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of England in this case requireth it and the aforesaid Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler so thereof being seised if the Law of England this requireth after and before the time in which c. that is to say the 23 day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36. aforesaid into the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in their demesn as of Fee if the Law of England requireth and so thereof seised the aforesaid John Lambert continuing his possession aforesaid if the Law of England this requireth the said Robert Snelling and Thomas Butler the aforesaid 23 day of May at the said Town of Buckingham demised and to Farm let the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances amongst other to the aforesaid Theophilus Adams to have to the said Theophilas Adams his executors and assigns from the aforesaid 23 day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 36 aforesaid until the end and Term aforesaid of 10 years fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which the said Theophilus Adams into the Messuage aforesaid and into the aforesaid 6 Acres of pasture parcel c. with their appurtenances amongst other things afterwards that is to say the 16 day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 39 entred and was thereof possessed if the Law in this case requireth upon whose possession of the said Theophilus thereof the aforesaid John Lambert afterwards that is to say the same 16 day of April in the 39 year aforesaid into the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances entred and the same Theophilus Adams from his Farm aforesaid thereof his Term aforesaid thereof not yet ended ejected expelled and amoved and him the said Theophilus from his possession thereof held out and yet holdeth out as the said Theophilus before against him declared But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid found in form aforesaid It shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the trespass and ejectment of the said Theophilus Adams of and in the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture c. with the appurtenances or not the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant of and thereof they pray the advice of the Court here c. and if upon the said whole matter in form aforesaid found it shall seem to the Court here that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the Ejectment and Trespass to the said Theophilus of the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. w th the appurtenances then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment thereof as the aforesaid Theophilus above against him thereof complaineth and then they assess the damages of the same Thophilus by the occasion of the Trespass and Ejectment besides his charges and Costs by him about his sute in his behalf put unto to 12 pence and for his charges and costs to 12 pence and if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid â—ound It shall seem to the Court here That the aforesaid John Lambert is not guilty of the Ejectment and Trespass aforesaid of and in the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances then the aforesaid Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Lambert is not thereof guilty as the said John for himself above in pleading hath alleged and farther the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid John Lambert in nothing is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid in 4 Acres of Pasture of the said 10 Acres of Pasture residue above supposed to be done as the said John Lambert above in pleading hath alleged c. and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster until Friday next after the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because that the Court of the said Lady the Queen here are not yet c. And so from Term to Term untill Tuesday next after the morrow of All Souls to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the said Lady the Queen are not yet c. At which day before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid in their proper persons upon which seen and by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation thereupon had for that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the aforesaid John Lambert is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the said Theophilus Adams of and in the Messuage aforesaid and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture parcel c. with the appurtenances therefore it is considered that the aforesaid Theophilus Adams shall recover against the aforesaid John Lambert his Term aforesaid yet to come of and in the aforesaid Messuage and the aforesaid 6 Acres of Pasture the aforesaid 10 Acres of Pasture parcel with the appurtenances and his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 25 pound for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said Theophilus Adams by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjuged which said damages in the whole do amount to 25 pound 2 shillings and the said John Lambert be taken c. and likewise the aforesaid Theophilas Adams in mercy for his false clamor against the aforesaid John Lambert for the rest of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid whereof the said John Lambert is acquitted therefore the said John Lambert as to the rest of the said Trespass and Ejectment go thereof without day c. Ejectione Firme Mich. 10. of King James It begun Easter Term 1 of King James Rott 1639 in the Common pleas Arthur Legats Case C. 10. part fol. 109. a. Norff. EDward Cockel late of Wimondham in the County aforesaid Husbandman was attached to answer to Arthur Legat Gent. of a plea wherefore with force and Arms 6 Acres of Pasture and
not yet concealed nor detained but the Rents and the Reversions thereof to the said Lord the King and Lady the Queen then were answered And that Mannor was in charge and account of Record and the Rents and the Reversions thereof to the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary were answered But whether the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration above mentioned by the said Letters Patents to the aforesaid George Howard Kt. passed or not the Jurors aforesaid are ignorant and thereof pray the Advice and Consideration of the Court in the premises And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court That the aforesaid Lands and Tenements in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the Lord Philip and Mary late King and Queen of England to the aforesaid George Howard did passe Then the Jurors aforesaid say that the aforesaid Edward Cockle is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment as he before in pleading hath alleged And if upon the whole matter by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices and Court That the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written by the aforesaid Letters Patents of the Lord Philip and Mary King and Queen of England to the said George Howard passed not c. False Imprisonment Michaelmass Term in the 6th yeer of King JAMES in the COMMMON-PLEAS Doctor Bonhams Case Co. 8. part London HEnry Atkins of London Doctor of Physick George Turner of London Doctor of Physick Thomas Moundford of London Doctor of Physick John Argent of London Doctor of Physick John Taylor of London Yeoman And William Bowden of London Yeoman were Attached to answer to Thomas Bonham of London Doctor in Philosophy and of Physick of a Plea wherefore they together with William Dun of London Doctor of Physick and Richard Ware of London Skinner with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham took imprisoned and evil handled and him in Prison against the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of England did long detain and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said Thomas Bonham and against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is c And whereupon the same Thomas Bonham by Richard Coke his Attorny complaineth That the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together c. the 10th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 4th with force and Arms him the said John in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and evilly handled and him there so in Prison a long time that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England detained and other harms c. to the great damage c. and against the Peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 300. pounds and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden by Francis Barker their Attorny come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming with force and Arms say That they are not thereof guilty And of that put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid Thomas Bonham likewise And as to the rest of the Trespass and Imprisonment aforesaid above supposed to be done The said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and VVilliam Bowden say That the aforesaid Thomas Bonham his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have because they say That before the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid Trespasse and Imprisonment to be done The Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 23d day of September in the yeer of his Reign 〈◊〉 by his Letters Patents which the said Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden with his great Seal of England sealed bearing date at VVestminster the same day and yeer here in Court brought Reciting Wherereas he thought it the duty of his Kingly Office in all reason to provide for the good and welfare of his People That would first of all be done if he might in due season meet with the enterprizes of wicked men first therefore ye held it necessary to restrain the boldness of wicked men who professed Physick more for avarice than out of confidence of a good Conscience Whereupon very many incommodities did arise to the rude and credulous Cōmon-people Therefore partly imitating the example of the well-governed Cities and other Nations inclined thereunto at the request of the grave Men and Doctors John Chambre Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria his Physicians of Nicholas Hatswel John Francisco and Robert Yoxley Physicians and chiefly of the right Reverend Father in Christ and Lord Thomas titled of the Holy Church beyond Tyber Priest of the most Holy Church of Rome Cardinal of York Arch-Bishop and our Well beloved Chancellor of our Kingdom of England A College perpetual of Doctors and Grave Men who Physick in his City of London and the Suburbs and within 7. Miles from the said City every way might publickly exercise he Willed and commanded to be instituted to whom for his honour and in the name of the publick good and care as he hoped the ignorance and rashness of the malitious which he remembred as well by their example and gravity to deterr as by his Lawes late made and and by Constitution to be made by the same College to punish Which that they might more easily well accomplish to the remembred Doctors John Chambers Thomas Linacre Ferdinand de Victoria his Physicians Nicholas Hatswel John Francisco and Robert Yoxley Physicians he granted that they and all Men of the same faculty of and in the City aforesaid should be in deed and Name one Body and Comminalty perpetual or College perpetual and that the said Comminalty or College every yeer for ever might chose and make of that Cōminaltie any diligent man and skilful in the faculty of Physick to be President of the said College or Comminalty to oversee rule and govern for that yeer the College or Comminalty aforesaid and all men of the said faculty and their businesses And that the said President and College or Comminalty should have perpetual succession and a Common Seal to serve for the businesses of the said Comminalty and President for ever And that they and their Successors for ever should be persons able and capable to purchase and possesse in Fee and for ever Lands Tenements Rents and other possessions whatsoever He also granted to them and their Successors for him and his Heirs That they and their Successors might purchase to them and their Successors aswell in the said City as out of it Lands and Tenements whatsover not
year of our Lord 1595 above said in the University aforesaid at Cambridge aforesaid in the County of Cambridge was duly and lawfully ordained and made a Graduate of â—â—e University aforesaid that is to say Doctor in Physick according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid and that he the said Thomas Bonham then and there had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid by his form without grace from time to time according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and Ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid By colour whereof the same Thomas Bonham a Graduate of the University of Cambridge aforesaid that is to say being Doctor in Physick in the form aforesaid who had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid for his form without any grace The said faculty of Physick from time to time in the said City of London that is to say in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid did exercise as it was lawful for him to do until the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together with c. the aforesaid 10th day of November in the 4th yeer abovesaid with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham at London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and him there in Prison long that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England did detain as the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above against them complaineth and this he is ready to averr Whereupon in as much as the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid above have acknowledged The said Thomas Bonham demandeth Judgement and his damages by reason of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the Action of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham against them the said Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden to maintain and that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid by Replication pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement and that the said Thomas Bonham from having his Action aforesaid against them to be barred And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Henry Atkins George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden do not deny nor to the same any wayes answer but the same averment altogether to admit do refuse as at first he demands Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged to him c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises aforesaid whereof the parties have put themselves to the Judgement of the Court aforesaid before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here are not yet c. Formedon Michaelmass Term Anno 37. 38. Eliz. Rot. 82. in the COMMON PLEAS Lincoln College Case C. 3. part fol. 53. a. Robert Chamberlain Esq by Apollo Plain his Attorny demandeth against the Warden or Rector and Scholars of the Blessed Lady Mary and All Saints of Lincoln in the University of Oxford the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances Except 120. Acres of Pasture in Pettesho aforesaid and 30. Acres of Pasture in Eckney aforesaid which Alured Cornburgh Esq Richard Danvers Esq Nicholas Statham and William Callow gave to Richard Chamberlain Esq and Sibil Fowler and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten And which after the death of the aforesaid Richard and Sibil and of Edward Son and Heir of the said Edward Chamberlain and of Leonard Son and Heir of the said Edward and of Francis Son and Heir of the said Leonard to the aforesaid Robert Son and Heir of the aforesaid Francis ought to descend by the form of the gift aforesaid c. Whereupon he saith That the aforesaid Alured Connâ—burgh Richard Danâ—â—rs Nicholas and William gave the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil and to the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten in form aforesaid c. By which gift the said Richard and Sibil were seised of the said Mannors with the appurtenances that is to say the said Richard in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and the said Sibil in her Demesn as of Free hold by the form c. in the time of peace in the time of the Lord Ed. late King of England the 4th after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the yeerly value c. And from him the said Richard the Right descended by the form to one Edward as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Edward the Right descended by the form c. to one Leonard as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to one Francis as Son and Heir c. And from the said Fran. Son of the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to this Robert who now demandeth as Son and Heir c. And which after the death c. And thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by William Pain their Attorny come and defend their Right when c. And say That the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have By protestation taking it That the aforesaid Alured Cornburgh Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow did not give the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil Fowler in manner and form as in the Declaration aforesaid is alleged For Plea say That long after the time in which the gift aforesaid is supposed to be made Richard Lyster Gent. Martin Linsey John Cotesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor Clerks were seised of the Mannors aforesaid with th appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seised The aforesaid Sibil Great-Grandmother of the said Robert Chamberlain whose Heir the same Robert is The 5th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England
the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop did not infeoff the foresaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances By Protestation also That the aforesaid Sibil for the better security of the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford Iohn Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor in the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances according to Agreement between them the said Edward Sibil first before the aforesaid Recovery above supposed to be had by her Writing of Release aforesaid did not remise and release to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Iohn Cottesford Iohn Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars above in their Rejoynder have alleged By Protestation also That the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain at the day of the bringing of the Original Writ of the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop out of the Court of the Chancery of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th that is to say the second day of Iune in the yeer of the Reign of the same late King the 4th or ever after was Tenant of the Freehold of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances For Plea The said Robert Chamberlain saith That the aforesaid Pâ—eâ— of the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars above by Rejoynder pretended is not sufficient in Law to bar him the said Robert from having his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars aswel for that that the Rejoynder is a Departure from the aforesaid Barr of them the Warden or Rector and Scholars as for want of sufficient matter in the said Rejoynder contained And this he is ready to aver wherefore for want of a sufficient Rejoynder of the said Warden or Rector Scholars in this part The said Robert Chamberlain as at first demandeth Judgement seisin of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances to him to be adjudged c. And the Warden or Rector Scholars in as much as they sufficient matter in Law to bar the aforesaid Robert from having his Action aforesaid against them the Warden or Rector and Scholars above by rejoyning have alleged which they are ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Robert doth not deny nor to the same any wayes Answereth so to admit of the same averment altogether refused as at first demand Judgement And that the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain to have his Action aforesaid be barred And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement because that the said Justices here therof not yet c. At which Day come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of upoÌ„ the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until from the day of Easter in 15. Dayes to hear their Judgment therof because the said Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here are thereof not yet At which Day here come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of upon the Premiseâ— before they give their Judgement thereof further day is given to parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this the premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Justices here That the Plea of the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars above by Rejoynder pretended is sufficient in Law to barr the said Robert to have his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Robert take nothing by his Writ aforesaid that he be in Mercy for his false Clamour And that the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars go thereof without Day c. Indictment At the Sessions of Gaol Delivery at Newgate 5 to Decembris in the 8 th Year of King JAMES Machalleys Case Co. 9. part fol. 61. b. AT the Sessions of Gaol Delivery of Newgate holden for the City of London at the Justice Hall in the Old Baily in the Parish of St. Sepulchre without Newgate in the Suburbs of the said City upon Wednesday the 5th day of December in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith the 8th and of Scotland the 44th Before William Craven Knight Mayor of the City aforesaid Thomas Flemming Knight Chief Justice of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned George Snigg Knight one of the Barons of the Exchequer of the said Lord the King John Croke Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench Edward Bromley Knight one of the Barons of the said Lord the King of his Exchequer aforesaid John Sotherton another Baron of his Exchequer aforesaid Henry Mountague Knight Recorder of his said City of London and other of his Companions Justices of the said Loâ—d the King by Letters Patents of the said Lord the King to them and others and to any 4. or more of them thereof made To enquire by the Oaths of good and lawful men of the City London aswel within liberties as without by whom the truth of the matter might best be known of what Treasons soever Misprisions of Treasons Insurrections Rebellions And of whatsoever Murthers Felonies Man slaughters Killings Burglaâ—ies Misdeeds Offences and Injuries whatsoever within the City aforesaid committed in the said Letters Patents specified and to the said Treasons and other the premises according to the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of the Lord the King of England to hear and determine As also Justices of the said Lord the King to Gaol delivery of Prisoners there being assigned by the Oaths of Ralph Edmunds Leonard Harwood John Frost Edward Dames John Lyssant Francis Barton Edward Parnell Thomas Hyet Henry Kent Edward Motley
with the Pannel of the names of the Jurors which are in the file of Writs executed for the Queen of the 34th Yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is with the Remembrancer of London And the Jurors did not appear Therefore it was coÌ„manded the Sherifs that they distrein the Jurors by their Lands c. So that c. in 8. Dayes of Holy Trinity or in the mean time before the Beloved and Faithful to the Lady the Queen Roger Manwood Knight Chief Baron of this Exchequer at Guiâ—d-hall of the City of London aforesaid upon Fryday the 26th day of May in the Yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 34th in the Afternoon of the same Day if he shall first come thither And it is said to the aforesaid Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain that they keep their Day before the aforesaid Chief Baron at the said Day and Place and that they be here at the said 8. dayes of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement If c. At which day the said John Porter and Henry Cockin come here as before And the aforesaid Chief Baron before whom delivered here the Tenor of the Record aforesaid in form aforesaid directed which is amongst the Inquisitions and Extents of this Yeer of the 34th of the Reign of the Queen that now is with this Remembrancer indorsed thus ss Afterwards that is to say the Day and Place within contained before Roger Manwood Knight Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen came aswell the within named John â—opham who prosecutes for the said Lady the Queen as the said within written John Porter and Henry Cockain in their proper persons and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them appeared and some of them not as it appeareth in the Pannel c. And some of them now appearing that is to say Roger Tasker Humphry Street George Gunbey Thomas Cox Thomas Langhorn John Eaton William Fruit and John Math upon the Jury aforesaid are sworn and because the rest of the Jurors of the Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by by the Sherifs of the County aforesaid to be chosen at the Request of the said John Popham and by the command of the aforesaid Chief Baron were new put whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such case late made and provided And the Jurors so anew put that is to say Thomas Wiggs Henry Ayleward Ralph Baily and Cutbert Booth being called likewise came Who to the truth of the matter within contained together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the aforesaid time of Intrusion aforesaid above supposed to be done One Nicholas Gibson was seized of and in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Information aforesaid specified in his Demesn as of Fee and the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid held of the Lady the Queen in Socage that is to say of the free Borough of the City of London by fealty onely And so being thereof seized the said Nicholas afterwards and before the time of the Intrusion aforesaid c. that is to say the 23d day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 32th at London in the Parish of St. Dunstans in the East made his Testament and last Will in Writing and constituted one Avice then his Wife Executrix of his said Will and by the said his Will bequeathed and devised amongst other things the Whars and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Avice and her Heirs in these English Words and in form following That is to say In the name of God Amen I Nicholas Gibson Citizen and Grocer of London whole of Mind and of perfect Memory albeit sick of Body make this my present and last Will and Testament aswel concerning the Order and Disposion of my Goods Chattels and other things moveable as of my Lands and Tenemetns Rents Reversions and Services and Hereditaments whatsoever First I give and bequeath my Soul unto Almighty God my Maker Redeemer and Saviour and my Body to be buried where it shall please God after the said discretion of my well beloved Wife Avice Gibson my sole Executrix under written whom I put in special trust that she shall see these things hereafter declared to be well and truly executed don and declared and performed as hereafter shall be recited Unto whom also I give and bequeath All my Goods Chattels Debts and other things as well moveable as unmoveable real and personal Lands and Tenements Rents Reversions Services and all my other Profits and Commodities and other Hereditaments whatsoever with all and singular the appurtenances To have and to hold possesse and injoy All and singular my said Lands and Tenements Rents Reversions and Services with the appurtenances Goods Chattels and other things and all and singular other the premises with the appurtenances unto the said Avice Gibson her Heirs Executors Administrators and Assignes for ever upon condition following That is to say Where it hath pleased God to put me the said Nicholas Gibson in Mind to edifie diverse Meases Mansions and places convenient for a Free-school the Master of the same and certain Beadmen and Beadwomen and that the same cannot be established to continue without great charges to be imployed and bestowed upon the same and also Lands and Tenements and other Hereditaments to be assured for the continuance of the same I Will and Declare by this my last Will and Testament That the said Gift Legacy and bequest of my Lands and Tenements Goods Chattels and other things aforesaid shall inure and take effect by reason hereof unto my said Wife upon condition following That is to say That my said Wife by the Advice of Learned Counsel in all convenient speed after my decease shall assure give and grant all my said Lands and Tenements and other Hereditaments whatsoever for the maintainanee of the said Free-school Almesmen and Almeswomen for ever if it shall please God that my said Wife Avice Gibson shall have all the Issues Revenewes and Profits yeerly comming arising and growing of the premises during her life bearing the charges for the keeping of the said School Beadmen and Beadwomen and other charges for the maintainance of the premises in manner and form as I the said Nicholas have kept and maintained the same and as the same is now kept and maintained without any diminution in any wise Which Avice Gibson I make my sole Executrix of this my present Testament and last Will. These being Witnesses Thomas Rushton Sergeant at the Law William Gunston Esquire Thomas Wood Cooper Thomas Reinolds Clothworker and Iohn Mucklow Scrivener In witnesse whereof I have hereto put my Seal Given the 23th Day of September in the yeer of our Lord God 1540.
their demesn as of Fee and Right and of the Advowson aforesaid as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the profits thereof to the value c. And in which c. And thereof then they brought sute c. And the said John Hunt in his proper person then defended his Right when c. And vouched thereof to warranty the aforesaid William Capel who then present there in the same Court here in his proper person willingly the Manor Tenements and Rent aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid to him did warrant And upon that The said Thomas and Baldwin then demanded against the aforesaid William Tenant by his Warranty the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advoson aforesaid in form aforesaid c. And whereupon then said That they themselves were seized of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances in their demesn as of Fee and Right And of the Advowson aforesaid as of Fee and Right in time of Peace in the time of the Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits thereof to the value c. And the aforesaid William Tenant by his Warranty aforesaid then defended his Right when c. And further then vouched to warranty John Howel who then likewise was present here in the said Court in his proper person and willingly the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Apurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid to him did warrant c. And thereupon The said Thomas and Baldwin then demanded against him the said John Howel Tenant by his warranty the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid in form aforesaid c. And whereupon they then said That they themselves were seized of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid in their demesn as of Fee and Right And of the Advowson aforesaid as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said Lady the Queen that now is taking the Profits therof to the value c. in wch c. And thereof then brought therâ— sute c. And the aforesaid John Howell Tenant by his Warranty defended then his Right when c. And then said That the aforesaid Hugh did not disseise the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and of the Advowson aforesaid as the said Thomas and Baldwin by their Writ and Declaration above then supposed and of that then put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and John Barldwin then demanded licence thereof to in parl and had it and aferwards the said Thomas and Baldwin came back here into the same Court here the same Term in their proper persons and the aforesaid John Howel although he was solemnly called did not then come back but in contempt of the Court departed and made default By which Then it was granted in the same Court here That the aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin recover their seisin against him the said John Hunt of the Manor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the Advowson aforesaid And that the said John should have of the Lands of the said William Capel to the value c. And that the said William further should have of the Lands of the said John Howel to the value c. And that the said John then should be in mercy c. By virtue of which Recovery The aforesaid Thomas Spenceley and Baldwin into the Manor and Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in their demesn as of Fee Which Recovery and the Execution thereof in form aforesaid sued forth and had was to the use of the said John Hunt and his Heirs for ever By which and by force of the Statute aforesaid the said John Hunt was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized before the time of the taking c. put his Cattel aforesaid into the aforesaid 300. Acres of Land the grass then there growing to eat and the Cattel aforesaid were in the said 300. Acres of Land the grass in them then growing eating until the aforesaid Thomas Gateley the aforesaid 22th day of November in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Hew Capel aforesaid in the aforesaid place called Stockins took the said Cattel of him the said John and them unjuly detained against Gages and Pledges until c. as the said John against him above complaineth And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the aforesaid Thomas Gately the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. above acknowlegeth The said John demands Judgement and his damages for the occasion of the taking and unjustly detaining of the said Cattel to him to be adjudged And the aforesaid Thomas Gateley saith That the aforesaid Plea of the said John Hunt in bar of the Avowry aforesaid pleaded iâ— insufficient in Law to bar him the said Thomas as Bayliff of the aforesaid Anthony from the just avowage of the taking of the Cattel a-aforesaid in the place in which c And that he to that Plea in form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor is bound by the Law to Answer And this he is ready to aver wherefore for want of a sufficient Plea in this behalf The said Thomas demands Judgement and a return of the Cattel aforesaid together with his damages to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid John Hunt in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to the aforesaid Thomas as Bayliff of the same Anthony from the just acknowleging of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place aforesaid in which c. to be barred above confesseth which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Thomas doth not deny nor to the same any wayes Answereth but altogether refuseth to admit the same Averment As at first demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion of the taking and unjustly detaining of the Cattel aforesaid to be to him adjudged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because that the said Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here come aswel the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid
aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here of their Iudgement thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because â—he Iustices here will further avise themselves before they give their Iudgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes â—o hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices will further avise themselves of and upon the premises day is given to the partis aforesaid here untill in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of the premises before they give their Iudgment thereof day is given to the parties aâ—oresaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is further given to the parties aforesaid untill in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at whiâ—h day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day furthe is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgment thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day further is given to the parties aâ—oresaid here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes to hear their Iudgment thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgment thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Iudgment thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the morrow of All Soules to hear their Iudgment thereof because the said Iustices here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment from Westminster in the County of Middlesex unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen of Hertford in the County of Hertford at the same morrow of All-Soules c. At which day here that is to say at the Castle of Hertford cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgment thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgment thereof before the said Iustices here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Queen of Common adjornment from the said Castle of the said Queen of Hertford in the County of Hertford unto Westminster aforesaid in the aforesaid County of Middlesex at the same 8. dayes of St. Hillary c. And now here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh as well the aforesaid John as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this the premises being seen and by the Iustices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Iustices here That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Iohn Hunt above in Barr of the Conusance aforesaid pleaded is sufficient in Law to him the said Thomas Gateley as Bayliff of the said Anthony justly acknowledging the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which to Barr as the aforesaid Ihhn Hunt above alleged for which the aforesaid Iohn Hunt his damages for the occasion of the taking and unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid against the aforesaid Thomas Gateley ought to recover But because it is not known what damages the aforesaid Iohn Hunt for the occasion of taking and unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid susteined It is CoÌ„manded to the Sheriff that by the Oaths of good and lawful men of his County he diligently enquire what damages the said Iohn Hunt susteined as well by the occasion of the taking unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid as for his Costs and Charges by him about his sute in this behalf expended and the Enquire which c. The Sheriff make to appear here
the Country and the said Iohn Hayward likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Easter in 5. weeks 12. c. by whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as wel c. At which day here came the Parties c. And the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore as before It is cmmanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here 12. c. in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity To recognize c. At which day here cometh the parties And the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff as at first That he cause to be here the morrow of Saint Martin 12. c. to Recognize in the form aforesaid At which dayes come the Parties and the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore as at first it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come here 12. c. 8. dayes of St. Hillary c. To Recognise c. in the form aforesaid c. At which day the Parties come c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanâ—ed to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from Faster day 15. dayes 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. at which day here come the Parties c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come here in the morrow of the holy Trinity 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. At wch day the parties come here c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therefore as at first it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here in the morrow of Saint Martin 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. At which day the Parties come here c. and the Sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore it is commanded the Sheriff that he cause to come in 8. days of Saint Hillary 12. c. to Recognize in form aforesaid At which day the Parties come and the Sheriff sent not the Writ And so several Venire Facias were award to the Sheriff from Term to Term to return Jurors at a day every of the said Term as at first and the parties come at the said dayes and the Sheriff sent not the Writ as in the Rolls upon Record appeareth And Process was continued between the Parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put in respite untill this day that is to say in days of St. Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 31. Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Wednesday the 27th of Iune at East Greinstead in the County aforesaid first should come And now at this day as wel the aforesaid John Heyward as the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth come by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Robert Clarke one of the Barons of the Lady the Queen of her Exchequer and Iohn Puckering one of the Serjeants at Law of the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County of Sussex Assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Iohn Hayward by William Siday his Attorney as the within written Thomas Bettisworth by John Lyons his Attorney And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say Edward Pickham William Ayles Thomas â—etley William â—revet Edmond Gray Iohn Lock Iohn Capron and John Andrew appeared and was sworn Jurors in the said Jury And because the rest of that Jury did not appear others of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff at the request of the aforesaid Thomas Bettisworth And by the command of the Justices aforesaid were new put to them whose nâ—mes to the Pannel within written are filled according to the form of the Statute in such case of late made and provided The names of which Jurors so put to that is to say John Pitte Thomas Bayley William Leefe and Thomas Aglewyn come and to say the truth of the matter within contained together with the Juros first impannelled and sworn chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That one John Bettisworth was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the within written Messuage and Garden witht the Appurtenances in Iping within written whereof the within written place in which c. and at the within written time in which as also time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary was parcel And further the Jurors say upon their Oaths aforesaid that the aforesaid place in which c. doth contain and the aforesaid time in which c. did contain in it â—elf one Acre and half an Acre of Land and called by the name of Rainolds and is and the aforesaid time in which c. as also time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary was a several Close by it self separately inclosed and further the Iurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Bettisworth so thereof as before is said being seized Afterwards that is to say the 20th day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 11th at Iping afoâ—esaid By his Indenture within written made between the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the one part and the aforesaid John Hayward of the other part demised granted and to farm let to the aforesaid John Hayward the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have and to hold the said Tenements with the Appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesaid John Hayward and his Assigns from the Feast of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following unto the end and term of 21. years then next following fully to be compleat and ended Yielding and paying therefore yearly to the aforesaid John Bettisworth and his Assigns 12. d. At the Feast of St. Michâ—el the Archangel or within 10. days next after the said Feast By vertue of which Demise the said John Hayward into the Tenents aforesaid with the Apurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof possessed the reversiâ—n thereof to the aforesaid John Bittesworth and his Heirs expectant And he the said John Heyward of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. being possessed and the aforesaid John Bettisworth of the Reversion thereof and of the Rent aforesaid being seisâ—d in Demesn as of Fee The said Iohn Bettisworth into the aforesaid Close in which c. called Rainolds in the possâ—ssion of the said Iohn Heyward entred and there immediatly after sealed and delivered as his Deed a certain Deed containing a Feoffment
quit claimed to the aforesaid Miles Hitchcock and Thomas Abany all the aforesaid Condition Proviso Covenant and Agreement before mentioned and all and all manner of such Power Liberty Authority Right Title or Demand which the said Franc. after the death of the said Peter had or could have claim or challenge or demand by force and virtue of the same Condition and Proviso in the aforesaid deeâ— of Feoffment contained So that the said Francis of and from the death of the aforesaid Peter Penruddâ—â—k should not claim challenge demand exercise use or have any power liberty or authority to alter change determine diminish or amplifie any use or uses limitations or declarations in the aforesaid deed of Feoffment contained expressed limited or appointed but that the said FRANCIS from the death of the said Peter of and from all such liberty power and authority as before is said should stand and remain utterly barred excluded and discharged for ever And further the said Francis by that Writing granted to the aforesaid Miles and Thomas and their Heirs that from thenceforth the aforesaid Condition Proviso Covenant and Agreement and the aforesaid Power Liberty and Authority should cease and be utterly void to all Intents Constructions and Purposes And this he is ready to aver Whereupon as at first he demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid John Grendon from having his action aforesaid against him the said Thomas Albany be barred c. And the aforesaid John Grenden saith That the Plea aforesaid by the aforesaid Thomas Albany in form aforesaid above by Rejoynder pleaded and the matter in the same contained is not sufficient in Law to bar him the said John Grendon from having his Action aforesaid against the said Thomas Albany To which the said John Grendon needeth not nor is bound any wayes by the Law of the Land to Answer Wherefore for want of a sufficient Rejoynder in this Plea The said John Grendou demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Thomas Albany saith That the Plea of him the said Thomas in manner and form aforesaid above by Rejoynder pleaded and the matter in the same contained is good and sufficient in Law to bar the said John Grendon from having his Action aforesaid against him the said Thomas Albany which Plea and the matter in the same contained the said Thomas is ready to aver and prove as the Court c. And because the said John Grendon to that Plea doth not answer nor doth the same any wayes deny The said Thomas Albany as at first prayeth Judgement and that the said John Grendon from having his Action aforesaid against the said Thomas Albany be barred c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid here before the Lady the Queen at VVestmin until Thursday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the Blessed Mary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here is not yet c. TRESPAS Hillary Term Anno 31o. ELIZABETH Rot. 65. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 1. part Chudleighs Case fol. 113. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Hillary Term Devon last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came William Dillon Esquire by Edward Hall his Attorny And brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against John Frayne in the Custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass and are Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss William Dillon Esquire complaineth of John Frayne in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that That he the 6th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th with force and Arms c The Close of him the said William called Sedan Close at Tawestock in the County as aforesaid brake and entred and his grass â—â—ere to the value of 5. pound then and there growing with his Cattel that is to say with Horses Oxen Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed continuing the Trespass aforesaid as to the treading and consuming the grasse from the aforesaid 6. day of November the yeer 29th aforesaid until the bringing of this Bill that is to say the 8th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 30th divers dayes continuing and diverse other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said VVilliam 40. Marks And thereof he bringeth Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary this Term until which day the said John Frayne had license to imparl to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the said William Dillon by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid John Frayne by John Halstaf his Attorny and the said John Frayne defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith that he is not thereof guilty and of this puts himself upon the Country and the said VVilliam Dillon likewise c. Therefore a Jury was to come before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster upon Tuesday next after 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards the processe thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned first upon Monday the 7th day of July at the Castle of Exeter in the County aforesaid by the form of the Statute c. câ—me for default of Jurors c. At which Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael befoâ—â— the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. sent their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Thomas Gent one of the Barons of the Exchechequer of the Lady the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of Devonshire assigned by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named VVilliam Dillon by Morrice Evans his Attorny as the aforesaid John Frayne by Thomas Felton his Attorny
male by the aforesaid Christopher Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 6th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And for default of such Issue to the use of the 7th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid 7th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use of the 8th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Chudley Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 8th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And for default of such Issue to the use of the 9th Issue male by the aforesaid Christopher Lawfully to be begotten and the Heirs of the Body of the aforesaid 9th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use of the 10th Issue male Lawfally to be begotten and the Heirs of the body of the aforesaid 10th Issue male Lawfully to be begotten And if it should happen the aforesaid Christopher to dy without Issue male of his body Lawfully to be begotten then the aforesaid Feoffees and every of them their Heirs and Assigns should stand and be seised of and in the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things to the use and behoof of the aforesaid Thomas Chudleigh another Son of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and the Heirs of his body Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use and behoof of the aforesaid Oliver Chudleigh another Son of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and the Heirs of his body Lawfully to be begotten and for default of such Issue to the use and behoof of the right Heirs of the said Richard Chudleigh Knight for ever as by the said Indenture Quadrupartite amongst other things more fully it appeareth By colour of which Feofment and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 4th day of February in the 27th yeer of his Reign at Westminster in the County of Middlesex of transferring uses in possession there holden made and provided the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh was seised of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof amongst otherthings as the Law requireth And the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. so being seited the same Richard before the within written time in which c. that is so say the 17th day of November in the yeers of the Reigns of the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 5th and 6th dyed and that neither at the time of the death of him the said Richard Chudleigh and before the day of the bringing of the Bill within written there was any Heir of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh of the bodies of any the aforesaid Mary Elizabeth Emlem Johan and Lawrence Lawfally begotten And that after the death of the aforesaid Richard Chudleigh and before the time in which the aforasaid John Sentleger Giles Strangewaies John Wadham John Gilbert Themas Carew Richard Bampfield John Bridgway Robert Fulford Thomas Williams John Eveleigh and William Hole into the Manors aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things entred and were thereof possessed or seised as upon the whole matter aforesaid the Law requireth and so thereof being possessed or seised Christopher Chudleigh after the death of the aforesaid Richard before the within written time in which c. took to wife Christian Sracheley and that the aforesaid John Sentleger Giles Strangewaies John Wadham John Gilbert Thomas Carew Richard Bampfield John Ridgeway Robert Falford Thomas Williams John 〈◊〉 and William Hole of the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things in form aforesaid possessed or being seiâ—â—â— before the within written time in which c. that is to say The â—ath day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that nâ— was the first the said Oliver Chudleigh then living being in full life by their writing sealed with their Seals and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the same day and yeer freely and without any Consideration amongst other things enfeoffed the aforesaid Christopher Chudleâ—gh then and before having notice of the making of the aforesaid Qâ—â—dâ—upâ—tite Indenture and of the uses in the same conteined To have and to hold the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. amongst other things To the said Christopher his Heirs and Assigns for ever to the only â—â— behoof of the said Christopher his Heirs Assigns for ever By virtue of wâ—â— Feoffment The said Christopher Chudleigh was seized of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof amongst other things as the Law requireth And so thereof being seized The said Christopher Chudleigh before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 20th day of September in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the third had issue of his Body lawfully begotten one Stretchlâ—y Chudley his first Son And that the said Christopher Chudleigh afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the 30th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is had another issue of his Body lawfully begotten that is to say one John Chudleigh his second Son And the aforesaid Christo Chudleigh of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seized The said Christopher afterwards and before the within written time in which c. that is to say the first day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 6th by his writing indented sealed with his seal and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in Evidence whose date is the said first day of July in the 6th yeer abovesaid And afterwards that is to say the â—th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 6th abovesaid before Robert Dennis Knight one of the 〈◊〉 of the said Lady the Queen for the County aforesaid and George 〈◊〉 Esquire Clerk of the Peace of the said County to be kept assigned â—s the deed of the said Christopher acknowleledged and according to the form of the Statute in such such case made and provided inrolled in consideration of 220. pound to him by one John Chichester Knight before then paid bargained and sold to the said John Chichester the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. To have to hold to the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns forever to the only use and behoof of the said John Chichester his Heirs and Assigns for ever And that the aforesaid Christopher Chudleigh moreover before the within written time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that
the 22th day of June in this present 9th yeer of his Reign over England upon the humble Sute of the said Thomas to give License Power and Authority to him the said Thomas Sutton to place found and erect an Hospital and Free-school in the House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field in the County of Middlesex And like License Power and Authority for him the said Thomas Sutton at any time during his life to ordain appoint and place a Master of the said Hospital And that the said Hospital should be called by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And where furthermore by the said Letters Patents The Master of the said Hospital for the time being is ordained and appointed to be one of the 16. Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the said Hospital And that the same 16. Governours are by the said Letters Patents incorporate to purchase and take Lands to them and their Successors for ever for the maintainance of the said Hospital by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and the onely costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more at large may appear By reason whereof there must be a Master made before such time as the said Thomas Sutton can convey the Lands intended by the said Thomas Sutton to be conveied for the maintaiance of the said Hospital unto the said Governours according to the said Letters Patents Now the said Thomas Sutton minding the performance of the said charitable Act hath according to the power given him by the said Letters Patents and by these presents doth place nominate constitute and appoint his Right trusty and Well-Beloved John Hutton Clerk the first and present Master of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire To have and to hold the said Office Room and place of Master of the said Hospital to him the said John Hutton from henceforth during the good will and pleasure of the said Thomas Sutton In witnesse whereof the said Thomas Sutton hath put his Hand and Seal dated the 13th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of our said Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. And of Scotland the 45th And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of all and singular the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid being seized Afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England c. the 9th abovesaid made a certain Indenture between him the said Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the Right Reverend Father in God George â—ord Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of â—lie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet the Kings Attorny General that now is John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk By the name of the Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet Attorny General of the Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and at the onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire of the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the 4th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 9th abovesaid in the Court of Chancery of the Lord the King that now is at Westminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And whereof one part sealed with the Seal of the said Thomas Sutton to the Jurors aforesaid was shewed in Evidence bearing date the same day and yeer The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the first day of November in the yeer of our Lord God 1611. and in the yeers of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. that is to say of England France and Ireland the 9th and of Scotland the 45th Between Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the most Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Right Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Right Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Sir Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorny General of our Sovereign Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London
George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of our Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of the said Thomas Sutton Esquire the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Chater-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire of the other part Witnesseth That whereas It hath pleased the Kings most Excellent Majesty that now is By his Highnesse Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster the 22th day of June in this present 9th yeer of his Highnesse over England upon the humble Sute of Thomas Sutton to give License Power and Authority to him the said Thomas Sutton to place erect found and establish at or in the said House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith-field within the said County of Middlesex One Hospital House or place of abiding for the finding sustentation and relief of poor aged maimed needy and impotent people As also to place found and establish at or in the said House One Free-school for the instructing maintainance and education of poor Children or Scholars And that the said Hospital should ever after be incorporated named and called The Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Chater-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And that he the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours and their Successors for ever should have full Power License and Authority to ordain appoint and place therein a Master a Preacher a School-Master and Usher and such number of poor people Scholars and Officers as they should think meet And in default thereof his Majesty his Heirs and Successors And where likewise our said Sovereign Lord the King Majesty by the said Letters Patents hath incorporated the said Lord Arch Bishop Lord Chancellor Lord Treasurer Iohn Bishop of London Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Sir Thomas Foster Knight Sir Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet John Overal George Mountain Henry Thursby Jeffery Nightingale Richard Sutton John Law Thomas Law Thomas Brown and the Master of the said Hospital for the time being by the name of Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And moreover hath hereby granted License as well to the said Governours and their Successors to have take and purchase as also License and Authority to the said Thomas Sutton his Heirs and Assigns to give grant and assure unto the Governours and their Successors for the better continuance of the said Hospital and Free school for ever and for the better maintainance of the Master Preacher School Master Usher and such number of poor people Scholars and Officers of and in the said Office for ever as shall be therein placed as aforesaid And all and every the Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Advowsons and Hereditaments hereafter herein mentioned to be granted or conveied as in the said Letters Patents amongst other things more at large may appear Since which said Letters Patents The said Thomas Sutton hath by his Deed under his Hand and Seal bearing date the 13th day of October last ordained and appointed the said John Hutton to be the first present Master of the said Hospital according to the purport Tenor and true meaning of the said Letters Patents And the said Tho. Sutton being minded in his life time to perfect the said godly charitable act himself and not to leave it to be perâ—ected after his death by others This Indenture therfore witnesseth That the said Tho. Sutton for and in consideration of the continuance of the said Hospital and Free-school for ever hereafter and for the better maintainance of the said Master Preacher School-master Usher poor people Scholars and Officers for ever hereafter with the Rents Revenews Issues Commodities and Profits of the Manors Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Advowsons and Hereditaments hereafter in these presents mentioned to be conveied and for and in consideration of the sum of 5. pound of lawful Mony of England by the said Lord Arch-Bishop and other the Governours aforesaid paid which said sum of 5. pound he the said Thomas Sutton confesseth and acknowledgeth himself to have received of the said Governours and thereof doth acquit and discharge the said Governours for ever by these presents And in consideration of the yeerly Rent of 12. d. of lawful Mony of England hereafter in and by these presents reserved to the said Thomas Sutton and his Heirs And for divers other good and reasonable considerations him especially moving according to the said License of the Kings Majesty to him the said Thomas Sutton in that behalf given Hath bargained sold granted and confirmed and conveied and by these presents doth for him and his Heirs bargain sell give grant confirm and convey unto the said Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire and to their Successors for ever All that the Mansion-house commonly called the Charter-house besides Smith-field in the said County of Middlesex And all and singular the Messuages Houses Courts Yards Gardens Orchards Closes and other Hereditaments within the County of Middlesex lately purchased by the said Thomas Sutton of the Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Suffolk And all those his Manors and Lordships of Southminster Norton Little Hallingbury otherwise Hallingbury Bowchers and Much Stanbridge in the County of Essex with all their and every of their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And also all those his Manors and Lordships of Bustingthorp otherwise Baslingthorp and Dunnesby in the County of Lincoln with their and every of their Rights Members Appurtenan whatsoever And all those his Manors of Salthorp otherwise Saltrop otherwise Halthorp otherwise Halstrop Chilton Black grove Vsscot Misenden otherwise Misenden Waklescot otherwise Wiglescot otherwise Wiglescet VVescote oâ—herwise Wescete and Elcomb in the County of Wilts with their and every of their Rights Members and Apurtenances And all those his Lands and Pasture Grounds called Black grove containing by estimation 200. Acres of Pasture with their Appurtenances in Black grove and Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And also all those Lands and Pastures containing by estimation 100. Acres of Land 60. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Wiglescote and Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And also all those his two Messuages
at Westminster in the County of Midd. was holden at Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen c. is adjorned c. and their holden c. Afterwards the said Lady the Queen By other Letters Patents Constituted John Clench and Francis Rodes one of her Serjants at Law Justices to Assizes in the a-aforesaid County of York c. And the said Justices by virtue of the said Lett. Patents Afterward that is to say Monday in the 4th week of Lent in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th At the Castle of York came before whom then and there come the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorney aforesaid and pray a Writ of Reattachment to the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats c. that they be before the Justices of the Lady the Queen at the next Assizes in her County of York to be taken assigned to be holdē at the afores Castle of York to hear the Record and their Judgement of the Assize aforesaid w hc was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at the Castle aforesaid so that that Assize then be here in the State as it was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy Justices to Assizes c. At the aforesaid Castle of York the aforesaid Monday the 6th day of August in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th in which day the Assize aforesaid was adjorned before the said John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices c. from the aforesaid Castle of York unto the aforesaid Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London untill the aforesaid Saturday next after the aforesaid morrow of All Souls then next following c. At which next Assizes holden at the Castle of York aforesaid Monday the 29th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices to Assizes c. came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert by the aforesaid Thomas Hill their Attorny And the Sheriff that is to say Thomas Wentworth Esq now sent That the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert c. And upon this day is given to them before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench in the Bench at Westminster in the morrow of All Souls next comming to hear and receive what to the said Justices should seem in this behalf because the said Iohn Clench and Francis Rodes Justices to Assizes c. thereof not yet c. And the Assize aforesaid with all touching the same to the said Justices of the Bench is sent c. The Warrant of Attorny followes and the Writ of Resummons in the Roll and the Tenor of the Writ of Reattachment and Retorn of the said Writ Elizabeth c. To the Sherriffs of York greeting Reattach Edward Vavasor Esq George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert or their Bailiffs if they shall not be found before our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned at the Castle of York in your County upon Monday the 22d. day of Iuly then next to come to hear the Record and Judgement of the Assize of Novel disseisin which was in our Court at the Castle aforesaid which Assize Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his Wife there arraigned against them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Spaldington VVillytoft and Southcone So as they that Assize then be there in the same state as it was in our Court before Iohn Clench third Baron of our Exchequer and Francis Gawdy one of our Serjants at Law our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned At the aforesaid Castle of York Monday the 6th day of August last past which day the assize aforesaid for certain causes was from thence adjorned before the same our Justices unto the Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London Untill Saturday next after the morrow of All Souls then next following And have here the names of the Pledges and this Writ Iohn Clench at the Castle of York the 11th day of March in the yeer of our Reign the 25th Frankland Cresly The within named Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert hath not any thing nor any of them have any thing in my Baliwick by which they can be attached or any of them can be attached nor have they nor any of them hath a Bailiff or Bailiffs nor are they or any of them to be found in the same Thomas VVentworth Esq Sheriff And now here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid at this day that is to say at the aforesaid morrow of All Souls came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by the aforesaid Henry Cressy their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by Tho. Algar their Attony And because the Justices of the Bench here will avise themselves of and upon the premses before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until 8. dayes of St. Hillary and so it is continued in 8. dayes of St. Hillary the yeer following At which day here come as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Indenture by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq after the aforesaid Recovery in form aforesaid made and had was good and sufficient in the Law to lead the uses of the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenunces so that the same Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid put and in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the aforesaid Andrew VVindsor VVilliam Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundere against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq in form aforesaid had was to those uses in the aforesaid barr of the aforesaid Edward above specified in manner and form as the said Edward in his bar aforesaid above alleged Therefore it is considered That the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but in mercy for their false clamour c. And the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert go thereof without day c. Audita Querela Easter Term Anno 80. of King JAMES Doctor Druries Case C. 8. part Fol. 139. a. AT another time as appeareth in
c. in Gosfield aforesaid entred and was thereof seised in his Demesn as of Freehold for the Term of his life And the said Thomas Lawrence and Marcy further say That at the time of the death of the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. the aforesaid Zachary was within the Age of 21. yeers that is to say of three yeers by which the said Marcy whilest she was single as Guardian and for nurture of the said Zachary into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in Wetherfiald aforesaid being seised and that the said Zachary of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid in form aforesaid being seised And the said Marcy in form aforesaid being possessed Afterwards and before the making of the aforesaid Writing of Release here in Court brought at Gosfield aforesaid It was concluded and agreed between the said Marcy whilest she was single and the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son that the said Marcy should release to the said Thomas Nash the Son all her Dower happening to her after the death of the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes the husband c. in all Lands and Tenements of the said Thomas in Wetherfield aforesaid And that the said Thomas Nash the Son should enfeoff John Tiler the elder and John Tiler the younger and their heirs of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid to the use of the said Zachary and the heirs of his body Lawfully begotten and the said Thomas Lawrance and Marcy farther say that the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son of the Tenements aforesaid in Wethersfield aforesaid in the form aforesaid being seised and the aforesaid Marcy of the Tenements with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid being possessed the said Marcy afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 27th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 35 th abovesaid whilest she the said Marcy was single at Gosfield aforesaid the aforesaid writing of Release to the aforesaid Thomas the Son sealed and delivered And the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son the 28th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said late Queen the 35 th aforesaid at Gosfield aforesaid enfeoffed the aforesaid John Tiler the elder and John Tiler the younger and their heirs of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid To the use of the aforesaid Zachary and the heirs of his body Lawfully begotten and this they are ready to aver whereupon they demand Judgement and seisin of the third part of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid to be adjudged to the said Thomas Lawrance in manner and form aforesaid and that the matters above in the replication aforesaid are not sufficient in Law them the said Thomas and Marcy the Dower of the said Marcy in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. against the said Edward and Margaret to have and maintain and that they need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient Replication of the aforesaid Thomas and Marcy in this part the said Edward and Margaret as at first demand Judgement And that the said Thomas Lawrence and Marcy from the Dower of the said Marcy of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. against them to have be barred And the said Thomas and Marcy for as much as they sufficient matter in Law the said Thomas and Marcy to have and maintain their Action aforesaid against the said Edward and Margaret above by Replication have alleged which they are ready to aver Which matter the said Edward and Margaret do not deny nor to the same any wayes Answer but the Averment aforesaid altogether Refuse to admit as before demand Judgement and seisin of the third part aforesaid to be adjudged unto them And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here thereof not yet c. Debt Ester Term 26. of Queen Elizabeth Rott 1608. RIchard Mauser late of London yeoman otherwise called Richard Mauser of Gillingham in the County of Kent Yeoman was summoned to Answer to William Painter Esq of a Plea that he render to him 40. pound whicb he oweth him and unjustly deteineth c. And whereupon the said William by Thomas Antrobas his Attorney saith That the said Richard the 6th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 12th at London in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap by a certain writing Obligatory granted himself to be bounden to the said William in the said 40. pound to be paid to the said William in the Feast of the Ascension of our Lord then next following Yet the aforesaid Richard although often required the aforesaid 40 pound to the said William hath not yet rendred but the same to him hitherto hath denyed and yet doth deny whereupon he saith he is the worse And hath damage to the value of 10. pound and thereof he bringeth sute And he brings here in Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid doth testifie the date of which is the day and year aforesaid c. And the said Richard by John Cook his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And prayeth the hearing of the writing aforesaid and it is read unto him in these words The Condition of this Obligation is such That whereas the within bounden Richard Mauser and John Mouser his Son by their deed of â—eoffment bearing date the date of this Obligation have given granted and confirmed unto the within named William Paynter and his Heirs all that parcel of Wood-land called South-wood conteining by estimation 10. Acres be it more or lesse lying together in the Parish of Gillingham within said and Bedherst in the County within said to the Lands of one Thomas Remsby towards the East West and North and to the Kings way towards the South as the same do more at large it appear If the said William Paynter and his Heirs shall and may at all times hereafter have hold and injoy all the aforesaid parcell of Wood-land with the appurtenances and charged or saved harmlesse of and from all and every former Bargain Sale Gift Grant Lease Right Copihold Dower Rent Charge and all other things and incumbrances whatsoever had made or suffered to be done by the said Richard Mauser or his Heirs or Assignes and also if
to the plea of the said Richard Horsted Tenant by his warrant aforesaid in form aforesaid pleaded to reply c. and the said Richard Horsted Tenant by hâ—s warranty aforesaid although sollemnly called came not again but in contempt of the Court departed and made default Therefore It is considered by the said Court That the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick shall recover seisin against the said William Pelham of the aforesaid 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. to hold to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and their heirs acquitted from the said William Pelham and his heirs and also from the said Thomas Bowes and his heirs as also from the said Richard Horsted and his heirs for ever and that the said William Pelam have of the Lands and Tenements of the said Thomas Bowes to the value c. and that the said Thomas Bowes have of the Lands and Tenements of the aforesaid Richard Horsted to the value c. and that the said Richard Horsted be in mercy c. and hereupon at the self same Hastings at the petition of the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick it was commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick and their heirs for ever of the Messuages aforesaid with the appurtenances give full and peaceable seisin and how the said Command was executed that they make known unto the Court here at the next Hastings of London of pleas of Lands in the guildhall of the City aforesaid to be holden c. at which day that is to say â—t the Hustings of pleas of Lands holden in the Guild-hall London Monday next before the feast of Saint Philip and James in the year of the said Lady the Queen the 14 th aforesaid the Sheriff of London that is to say Henry Mils and John Branch retorned and certified to the Court here c. That they by virtue of the precept to them directed full and peaceable seisin to the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick of the 8 Messuages with the appurtenances c. made to have according to the effect of the precept aforesaid as it was above commanded unto them c. as by the said recovery aforesaid under the seal of the office of the Mayraltie of the City aforesaid to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in evidence fully appeacheth And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid that the said William Pelham in the Indenture aforesaid named and the said William Pelham against whom the said Nicholas Parker and Simon Patrick sued forth the writ of Right aforesaid is one and the same person and not another nor diverse And that the said Thomas Bowes Son and heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight and the said Thomas Bowes in the recovery aforesaid specified whom the said William Pelham vouched thereto warranty and the said Thomas Bowes above named is one and the same person and not another nor divers By colour whereof the said Nicholas and Simon afterwards and before the 8 th day of May in the year of the raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14 th that is to say the first day of May in the 14 th year aforesaid in the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things entred and were thereof amongst other things seised And farther the said Jurors say upon their oath aforesaid that the recovery aforesaid of the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things in form aforesaid had was had with the assent and agreement of the said Nicholas and Simon William Pelham Thomas Bowes Son of the aforesaid Martin Bowes Knight and Richard Horsted and without any just title of the said Nicholas and Simon to the use of the said William Pelham his heirs and assigns for the farther his assurance of and in the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things according to the form and effect of the Covenants and agreements of the said indenture of bargain and sale specified by the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight to the said William Pelham as before is said made by colour of which recovery as also by force of the aforesaid Act of Parliament of transferring of uses into possession the said William Pelham was seised of the aforesaid Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things as the Law requireth and that afterwards that is to say the first day of December in the year of the raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 16 th the said Martin Bowes Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight then being within the age of 21 years that is to say of 17 years dyed without issue of his Body Lawfully begotten And that the aforesaid William Pelham of the said Messuage with the appurtenances amongst other things as before is said recovered in form aforesaid being seised before the aforesaid time in which c. that is to say the 10 th day of September in the year of the Raign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 27 th demysed the said Messuage with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified to the aforesaid Edward Griffin to have to him and his assigns from the feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then next ensuing until the end and Term of 21 years then next following By virtue of which demyse the said Edward Griffin was of the said Messuage with the appurtenances possessed and that afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of January in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29th the aforesaid Thomas Bowes Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son and heir of the said Martin Bowes Knight into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified upon the possession of the said Edward Griffin thereof entred and then and there demysed granted and to farm let to the said Henry Page the said Messuage with the appurtenances to have to him his executors and assignes from the within written feast of the birth of our Lord then last past unto the end and Term of the within written Six years and that the said Edward Griffin afterwards that is to say the within written 11th day of January in the 29th year abovesaid into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Henry Page thereof did reenter and the said Henry from the possession of the Messuage aforesaid did expel and amove and that the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight and Father of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts yet living and being in full life that is to say at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the entry of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts Son of the said Thomas Bowes Son of the said Martin Bowes Knight into the messuage aforesaid with the
with the appurtenances in the declaration aforesaid above specified at the time of the said recovery in the aforesaid Court of Hustings in the Guild Hall of London in form aforesaid had for which cause the entry of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Declaration aforesaid specified was not lawfull Item in this also it is Erred for that the aforesaid recovery was had in the said Court of Hustings before the 8th day of May in the yeare of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 14th and that the said Thomas Bowes who before was Tenant for Term of life was vouched in the said Court by the aforesaid William Pelham in the said Recovery named to warrant the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things which Thomas afterwards by Summons by his Attorny appeared in Court and freely the Messuage aforesaid to the said William did warrant and farther vouched to warrant the aforesaid Richard Horsted who present in the same Court the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances farther warranted and afterwards made default by which Judgement against the said William Pelham in the said Recovery was given and execution thereof in the form aforesaid was had so as the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts of the remainder without any demand in the Messuages aforesaid with the appurtenances to have stood utterly excluded and for that cause the aforesaid entry of the aforesaid Thomas Bowes Master of Arts into the said Messuage with the appurtenances after the said Recovery in form aforesaid had and executed was unlawfull 1. Item in this also it is erred because it was found that before any entry of the said Thmas Bowes Master of Arts the Judgement aforesaid was fully and in due manner executed after which Execution so had although the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts before the Execution aforesaid had had title of Entry Yet the said Thomas by the Law of the Land into the Messuage aforesaid after the Eexcution aforesaid so had could not enter Item in this further it is erred because it is found by the Jurors aforesaid That the said Thomas Bowes the Father c. who was Tenant for Term of his life of the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances is yet living and is in full life And so the aforesaid Entry of the said Thomas Bowes Master of Arts in the Messuage aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid during the life of the said Tho. Bowes his Father made ought not to be adjudged lawful And for these causes the Judgement aforesaid for â—he said Henry Page against the said Edward Griffin and all thereupon depending upon the Bill aforesaid against the said Edward in form aforesaid spoken and exibited is not sufficient in Law and he prayeth That the said Judgement aforesaid for the Errors aforesaid and others in the Record and processe aforesaid being be revised annulled and utterly holden for none and that he unto all which by the occasion of the Judgement aforesaid given he lost he be restored And further the said Edward Griffin the Writ of the Queen to warn the said Henry Page that he should be before the said Chancellor and Treasurer in the Court aforesaid at Westminster to hear the Record and processe aforesaid and also the Errors aforesaid and further to do and receive what should be just in the premises c. And it was granted to him retornable upoÌ„ Tuesday the 28 th day of Octo. next following c. At which day before the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer in the Court aforesaid at Westminster came the said Henry Page by his Attorny aforesaid And the Sheriffs of London that is to say Richard Gourney and Stephen Soame now sent by Thomas Bickliff and Humphry Walsingham good and lawfull Men of their Baliwick That they did warn the said Henry Page that he should be before the Chancellor and Treasurer aforesaid in the aforesaid Chamber at the day and place aforesaid to do and receive as the said Writ commanded and required And thereupon the said Edward by John Hawkesworth his Attorny came likewise and demanded the hearing of the Record and Processe as also of the Errors aforesaid And they are read unto him c. which being read and heard The said Henry Page said That in the Record and Processe aforesaid made in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is in nothing erred and prayed that the Court here proceed as well to the Examination of the Record and the Processe aforesaid as the causes aforesaid for Errors alleged And that the Judgement aforesaid in all things might be affirmed And because the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer would advise of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement day is given to the parties aforesaid here that is to say in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuseday the 11 th day of November next following to hear their Judgement c. At which day before the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the aforesaid Chancellor or Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuseday the 18th day of November then next following to hear their Judgement c. At which day before the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the parties aforesaid untill Tuesday the 25 th day of November following to hear their Judgement c. At which day before the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the Premises further day is given to the parties aforesaid here before the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 27 th day of January next following to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chancellor and Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid come as well the said Henry Page by John Hawkesworth his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward Griffin by Rich. Hatton his Attorny aforesaid and thereupon the said Henry sayd That the said Edward his Writ aforesaid for correcting of Errors against the said Henry in this case further to prosecute or maintain ought not because he saith That after the last continuance of the Plea aforesaid that is to say after the aforesaid Tuesday that is to say the 25 th day of November from which day the Plea aforesaid was last continued untill this day that is to say
shillings 8 pence due unto the said Thomas Amerie upon one obligation of certein years yet during and upon farther Condition that the said Thomas Amerie shall bring in the said Obligation to my Executors to be cancelled and utterly discharged upon this consideration before such time as the said Thomas Amerie shall make any entry upon the premises and that the said Thomas Amerie neither his assignes shall not during the said 8 years fell any of the Woods Timber nor Undrwoods in nor uppon the said upper part but shall preserve the Woods hawts and Springs to the behoof of the Heir in remainder and after the Term of the said 8 years the said upper part to remayn to my Executors until such time as Hugh Boraston shall accomplish his age of 21 years and the mean profits to be imployed by my Executors towards the performance of this my last will and Testament and when the said Hugh commeth unto twenty and one yeares of age then I will that he shall enjoy the said upper part to him and his heirs for ever Provided alwaies that if the said Thomas Amerie do refuse to bring in his Obligation or to preserve the Woods upon the said upper part then my Executors to enjoy the premises during the said Term of 8 years paying the said Amerie his 46 shillings 8 pence during the said Term of 8 years as by the Tenement and last will aforesaid amongst other things it appeareth And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Boraston so of the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances being seised afterward that is to say the 14 th day of the aforesaid Moneth of August in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the first at Aldenham aforesaid of such his estate dyed seised and farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the aforesaid Hugh Boraston in the said Testament and last will named was Son and heir of the said Henry Boraston and that the said Hugh Boraston dyed before that he came to the age of 21 years that is to say about the age of 9 years And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the Interest of the premises aforesaid in the said Testament and last will mentioned and devised aswell to the said Thomas Amry and Amphillis his wife as to the Executors of the said Testament before the day of the bringing of the Bill within written ended and determined And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That Philip Boraston was and is Brother and next heir of the said Hugh Boraston by colour whereof the said Philip Boraston after the aforesaid Interest of the premises to the said Thomas Amerie and Amphillis his wife and the exetors aforesaid by the aforesaid Testament and last will given and devised was ended and determined unto the aforesaid 10 Acres of Lands with the appurtenannces as brother and next heir of the said Hugh entred and was thereof sâ—ised as the Law requireth and so therof seised the said Philip boraston afterwards and before the time of the exhibitage of the Bill aforesaid that is to say the 20 day of June in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 28 demised granted and to Farm let to the aforesaid William Ambry now defendant the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said William Ambry and his assignes for a whole year from thence next following to be fully compleat and ended and so from year to year as long as both parties should please By virtue of which â—â—â—ise The aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid Thomas brand and Constance his wife William Davis and Margaret his wife as in the right of the said Constance and Margaret afterwards that is to say the 9 day of July in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 20 aforesaid into the aforesaid 10 Acres of land with the appurtenances in upon the possession of the said William Ambry entred and were thereof seised as the Law requireth and so thereof being seised at Aldenham aforesaid the said Thomas Brand and Constance his wife William Davis and Margaret his wife afterwards that is to say the said 9th day of July in the year 28 aforesaid by their Indenture bearing date the same day and year demised granted and to Farm let the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Hynde to have and to hold the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances unto the said Richard Hynde and his assigns from the Feast of Saint John the Baptist then last past until the end term of 7 years from thence next ensuing fully to be complete ended By virtue of which demise the said Richard Hynde into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances the aforesaid 9th day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 28th aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid William Ambry afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 9 th day of July in the 28 year aforesaid with force and Armes c. into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the Appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde thereof by the precept and command of the aforesaid Philip Boraston re-entred and him the said Richard Hynde from his possession thereof held out and yet hold out But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good or lawfull re-entry the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant and thereof pray the advice of the Court of the Lady the Queen and if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court of the said Lady the Queen that the Re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be not nor in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull Re-entry Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid William Ambry is guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment within specified in manner and form as the aforesaid Richard Hynde within against him complaineth and then they Assesse the damages of the said Richard Hynde by occasion of the Trespass and Ejectment out of his Farm besides his charges and costs by him about his sute in his behalf expended to 8. shillings and for his Charges and Costs to 30. shillings and 4 pence but if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court of the Lady
appurtenances as before is said being seised dyed thereof so seised And farther by the same Inquisition it is found that the Manor of Yoke otherwise Yokes Court aforesaid the appurtenances in Lenham and Frensted in the said County of Kent at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid and at the time of the death of the aforesaid Thomas Digges were holden of Warham St-leger Knight as of his Castle of Leeds by the half of a Knights Fee and were worth by the yeer in all reprofits above reprises 5 pound 14 shillings And that the Manor of Fokeham and other the premises to the said Manor belonging in Framsted and Lenham at the sayd time of the taking of the said Inquisition and at the time of the death of the said Thomas Digges of whom or by what services the Jurors of the same Inquisition were altogether ignorant and they were worth by the yeer in all the profits above reprises 7 pound And that the aforesaid Manor of Outlemestone and other the aforesaid premises whatsoever with the appurtenances to the said Manor belonging and appertaining at the time of the taking of the said Inquisition aforesaid and at the time of the death of the said Thomas Digges were worth by the yeer in all the profits above reprises 20 pound and that the said Land called Eastendown and Beacondown in Burham and Kingstone aforesaid were holden of the Arch Bishop of Canterbury in the right of his Bishoprick aforesaid but by what services the aforesaid Jurors are altogether ignorant and they were worth by the yeer above reprizes 3 pound 6 shillings 8 pence and that the aforesaid Lands called the Haute and Reed late percel of the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborne and purchased by the aforesaid Christopher Digges of the aforesaid William Awcher Esquire were holden of the said Lady the Queen in Capite by Knights service that is to say by particular according to the rate and quantity of the said Manor of Bishopsborn and that the said Lands and Pasture called Throughly Close and Tylers in Barham aforesaid late purchased by the aforesaid Christopher Digges by way of Exchange of William Boyes of who or whom or by what services they were holden the Jurors aforesaid are altogether ignorant and that the aforesaid Land and Woods called Haute and Reed and the aforesaid Land Wood and Pasture purchased of the aforesaid William Boyes were worth by the yeer above reprises 4 pound And that the aforesaid 2 Acres of Land in Wemings Woold aforesaid were holden of who or whom or by what services the aforesaid Jurors were altoge-Ignorant and they were worth by the yeer above reprises 2 shillings and that the said Thomas Digges had not nor had more or other Lands and Tenements in the said County of Kent in demesn or service of us nor of any other the aforesaid dayin which he dyed and that the aforesaid Tho. Digges dyed the 10th day of April in the yeer of our Reign the 32th leaving the said Margaret his wife w th child with Tho. Posthumus Digges And that the said Thomas Posthumus Diggs born the second day of July in the 32 year aforesaid was Son and Heir of the said Thomas Digges and that the said Thomas Posthumus Digges the Son at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid was of the age of 2 yeers 9 weeks and 6 dayes as by the Inquisition aforesaid in our Chancery retorned and in the Files there remaining of Record it more fully appeareth And whereas afterwards that is to say the 23th day of January in the Term of Saint Hillary in the yeer of our Reign the 39th before us in our Chancery aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid then being came Christopher Digges and Edward Digges Sons of the said Christopher Digges in the Inquisition aforesaid named and prayed the hearing of the Inquisition aforesaid which was read unto them which being read and heard and by them fully understood the said Christopher and Edward complained them by colour of the said Inquisition aforesaid to be grieved and molested and that they from the possession of the said Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances to the said lands called Eastendown and of two parts of so much of the demesn and of the said Manor of Owtelmestone with the appurtenances to the said Lands called Eastendown adjoyning in 4 parts to be divided as with the aforesaid Lands called Eastendown extend to the third part of all the Mannors Lands and Tenements whereof the aforesaid Christopher the Father dyed seised for the part of the aforesaid Christopher and Edward of the premises aforesaid to be expelled and amoved and that they from the possession thereof and of every parcel thereof by colour of the said Inquisition to be held out and that unjustly by cause they take it by Protestation That the Inquisition aforesaid and the matter in the same contained was insufficient in Law to which they needed not nor by the Law of the Land were holden any waies to Answer And shewing of their Right in that behalf The said Christopher and Edward said That the aforesaid Christopher Digges Father of them the said Thomas Christopher and Edward was in his life time seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the aforesaid Mannor of Owtelmeston in Barham in the County aforesaid and of all and singular the Rights Members parcel and appurtenaces whatsoever containing 200 Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood And also was seized of and in the aforesaid Mannor of Yoke and Fockham lying and being in the Parish of Lenham Frensted and Harrisham with his Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever containing 800. Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood And of and in the Mannor of Marton lying and being in the Parishes of Sturrey Hackington and Saint Stephen in the said County containing by estimation 40. Acres of Land Pasture Meadow and Wood And of diverse Gardens in the City of Canterbury containing half an Acre of Land And of and in the Mannor of Netherherds with the Appurtenances in the County aforesaid containing 200. Acres of Land And also of a certain peece of Land called Eastendown lying and being in Barham aforesaid containing by Estimation 110. Acres And of another peece or parcel of Land called Haute and Reed lying and being in the Parish of Barham aforesaid containing 61. Acres and a half and in another peece of Land lying in Barham aforesaid late as before is said purchased by Exchange of the aforesaid William Boyes containing 40. Acres of Lands which said Mannors Lands and Tenements and other the premises amount in the whole to 2500. Acres of Lands and the said Christopher Digges the Father of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized The first day of February in the yeer of our Reign the 19th made his Testament and last Will in Writing and by the said Testament and last Will declared and limitted as to the disposition of the third part of all
Queen here are not yet c. Prohibition Michaelmas Term Anno 31. and 32. Eliz. Rot. 447. in the Common-Pleas Co. 4. part Jeffreyes Case Fol. 64. Mâ—morandum That upon Monday next after a Moneth of St. Michael this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came William Jeffrey Cent. in his proper person and informed the Couâ—t of the Lady the Queen that now is here That whereas according to the Law of the Land and the Custom of this Kingdom of England time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary within the said Kingdom had and used The Inhabitants and Residents within any Parish within the Kingdom aforesaid within which any Parish Church is The said Church at their own propper costs as often as need required was repaired and from the whole time aforesaid used to be and ought to be repaired And that every other person or persons inhabiting without the same Parish in any other Parish from the Reparations thereof from the time aforesaid were discharged and acquitted And whereas by the Law of the Land and the Custom aforesaid It is not lawful to any person or persons to impose any Rate or Tax upon any person not dwelling in any Parish where such Church to be repaired is in respect or by reason of any Lands or Tenements which the said person holdeth or occupieth in the said Parish where the said Church is to be repaired as above is said for the Reparation of any Church so unrepaired without his consent And whereas also the Tryal and Determination of the cause aforesaid is a matter determinable at the Common Law and not by the Laws or Censures Ecclesiastical any wayes to be Tryed Ended or Discussed nor used to be time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary Yet Abraham Kenshely and Thomas Foster Church-wardens of the Parish of Haylesham in the County of Sussex not being ignorant of the Premises falsely and subtilely pretending the aforesaid William Jessrey to be an Inhabitant within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid whereas in truth the aforesaid William Jeffrey is and was dwelling within the Parish of Chiddingly in the County aforesaid and never was dwelling within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid And the same Church of Haylesham aforesaid by Tenants and Proprietors of Lands and Tenements within the same Parish behoved and ought to be repaired Endeavouring the Queens Majesty that now is and her Regal Crown to desinherit and the Conusance of Pleas which to the said Queens Majesty and to her Regal Crown and not to the spiritual Court doth belong to draw to be determined in the spiritual Court The said William Jeffrey in the spiritual Court aforesaid before Doctor DREWRT Doctor of Law in and throughout the whole Archdeaconry of Lewis of the most Reverend Father in Christ by Divine Providence Thomas Lord Bishop of Chichester lawfully deputed at the procuring of the same Abraham and Thomas in this behalf of and for a certain Tax upon him the said William Jeffrey to and about the Reparations of the Parish Church of Haylesham aforesaid imposed caused to be cited and him the said William in the spiritual Court aforesaid before the aforesaid spiritual Judge to appear and him the said William so appearing to answer to certain Articles of for the Tax aforesaid that is to say for that the said William Jeffrey knew believed heard that within the Archdeaconry of Lewes in the County aforesaid there was a Church commonly called the Parish Church of Haylesham that the said Parish Church as well in the tiling as in the covering thereof as in other things needed and wanted so that unless it were repaired it was feared it would fall to decay and ruine And that as well of Common Right and of an ancient and laudable Custom as also time whereof the Memory of Men is not to the contrary inviolably and unquestoned it was used and observed within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid That all and singular the Parishoners intending the Reparation of any Church unrepaired according to the Rate and the Quality of their possessions having and occupying in same Parish might or ought to impose a Rate or Tax and also that the said Church mature deliberation being had thereof could not be repaired for lesse sum than Threescore and Ten pounds As also that the Church-wardens of the Parish Church of Haylesham aforesaid for the time being in the yeer of our Lord 1589. and two yeers then last past of and with the consent of all the Parishioners of Haylesham aforesaid or the greater or better number of the same A Rate according to the Quantity and Qualities of the possessions aforesaid and of the Rents within the said Parish being for the Reparation of the said Church of the possessions aforesaid or Rents in the said Parish of all and singular to be imposed and the same to be taxed had decreed and had appointed a day and place for the Rate and Tax aforesaid to be made And that of the same day in which the said Rate should be imposed notice was given to all the Parishioners aâ—oresaid as also to Forreiners having Lands Possessions or Rents in the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid and also in the publick Market there And that at the time and place appointed for the imposing of the aforesaid Tax or Rate those Church wardens as also the Parishioners of the said Parish to the Rate and Tax aforesaid to be made proceeded And the sum of 4. pence of every Acre of Land called Marsh-land as also the sum of 2. pence of lawful Mony of England of every Acre of Land called Vpland within the Parish of Haylesham aforesaid being for the Reparations of the aforesaid Parish Church by the havers and occupiers of the aforesaid Acres were imposed to be paid to the Church-wardens of the aforesaid Parish Church As also that the said William 30. Acres of Marsh called Marsh Ground and 100. Acres of Land called Vpland within the Parish aforesaid held and occupyed or Rents for the same then received And that the sum from the havers and occupyers of the possessions aforesaid or Rents within the aforesaid Parish of Haylesham aforesaid did not extend unto above the sum of 50. pounds of good and lawful Money of England according to the Rate and Tax aforesaid to be levied and collected under the name colour of their Office as before is said of upon the premises to answer unjustly bound And although the said William Jeffrey the matter aforesaid above contained in the spiritual Court aforesaid before the aforesaid spiritual Judge in his discharge of the premises often had pleaded alleged and the same with inevitable truth and good Witnesse offered to prove that he by the Law of the Land in form aforesaid ought not to be cited for the payment of the aforesaid sum upon him the said William Jeffrey for the Reparations of the Church of Haylesham aforesaid as before is said taxed and for
Essex with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever As also of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Bustingthorp otherwise Buslingthorp and Dunnesby in the County of Lincoln with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And of and in all those Manors of Salthorp otherwise Saltrop otherwise Halthrop Chilton and Black-grove in the County of Wilts with their Rights Members and Appurtenances And of and in all those Lands and Pastures called Black-grove conteining by estimation 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Black-grove and Wroughton in the County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors of Mihenden otherwise Missenden otherwise called the Manors of Mussenden in the Parish of Wroughton Lydepard and Tregose in the said County of Wilts with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances and of all that Manor of Elcomb and Park called Elcomb Park with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Wattlescote otherwise Wigglescote otherwise Wiggetscete with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Mannor of Wescot otherwise Wescet with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Lands and Pastures conteining by estimation 100. Acres of Land and 60. Acres of Pasture in Wigglescot Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Vscot with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those two Messuages and 1000. Acres of Land 2000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Pasture and 300. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Broadhinton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Campes otherwise Campes-Castle otherwise called Castle Campes with the Appurtenances situate lying being and extending into the Counties of CAMBRIDGE and ESSEX or either of them or elsewhere in the Kingdom of ENGLAND And also of and in all that Manor of Balsham in the County of Cambridge with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And also of and in all and singular those Messuages and Lands situate and being in the Parish of Hackney and Tottingham in the County of Middlesex with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever which Messuage was lately purchased of Will. Bowper Knight the said Lands in Tottenham now are or late were in the Tenure or Occupation of William Benning Yeoman And of and in all and singular Manors Lordships Messuages Lands Tenements Reversions Services Feedings Pastures Woods Advowsons Patronages of Churches and Hereditaments of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton whatsoever situate lying and being in the said Counties of Essex Lincoln Wilts Cambridge and Middlesex or any of them with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever in his demesn as of Fee And the said Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Sutton so thereof being seised before the time in which that is to say At the 4th Session of Parliament begun and holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 9th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. the 7th and of Scotland the 3d. and there continued untill the 24th day of July then next following and then prorogued until the 16th day of October then next following amongst other things it was Enacted and established by Authority of the same Parliament as followeth in these words Humbly beseecheth your Majesty Your Loyal and dutiful Subject Thomas Sutton of Bedsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire That it may please your most excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled To Enact Ordain Establish And be it Enacted Ordained and Established by the Authority aforesaid That in the Town of Hallingburn otherwise called Hallinborn Bowchers in the County of Essex there may be builded and erected at the Costs and Charges of your suppliant one meet fit and convenient House Buildings and Rooms for the abiding and dwelling of such number of poor People Men and Children as your suppliant shall name by limit and appointment to be lodged harboured abide and be relieved there And for the abiding dwelling and necessary use of one School-master and Usher to instruct the said Children in Reading Writing and the Latine and Greek Grammar And of one Divine and godly Preacher to instruct and teach all the rest of the same House in the knowledge of God and his word And of one Master to govern all these persons of in or belonging unto the same House And that the same shall and may be called The Hospital of King James founded in Hallingbury in the County of Essex at the humble Petition and at the only Costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And that the Right Reverend Father in God Richard now Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and his Successors Arch-Bishops there Thomas Lord Ellesmore Lord Chancellor of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Lord Chancellors or Lord Keepers of the Great Seal of England for and during the time they shall so continue or be in the same Office Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England for and during the time they shall continue or be in the same Office The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Bishop of Ely and his Successors Bishops there Richard Bishop of Rochester and Dean of the Cathedral Church of Westminster and his Successors of and in the same Deanery Sir Thomas Foster Kt. one of the Justices of your Majesties Court of Common-Pleas usually holden at Westminster Sir Henry Hobart Knight your Majesties Attorney General John Overal Doctor of Divinity Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London and his Successors Deans there Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of your Majesties Court of Chancery Thomas Fortescue Thomas Paget Geffrey Nightingale and Richard Sutton Esquires John Law and Thomas Brown Gent. and such others as shall be from time to time for ever hereafter chosen and nominated in and to the places and steads of such of them as shall decease by your suppliant during his life and after his decease by the most part of them which them shall be Governors of the said Hospital to be and succeed in and to the place and places of him and them deceasing shall and may be the Governors of the said Hospital and of the Members Goods Lands Revenews and Hereditaments of the same at all times hereafter for ever And that the same Governors and Hospital shall for ever hereafter stand and be incorporated Established and founded in name and indeed a body Politick Corporate to have continuance for ever By the name of the Governors of the Hospital
And that the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors for ever and the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall have full Power License and lawful Authority at his or their Wills and Pleasures from time to time and at all times hereafter to place therein such number of poor Children or Scholars as to him the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease to the said Governours and their Successors and to the Survivors or Survivor of them and his and their Successors and to the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall seem convenient And also one godly and learned Preacher to teach and preach the Word of God to all the said persons poor People and Children As also one learned able and sufficient person to be the School-Master of the said School and one learned able and sufficient person to be the Usher thereof to teach and instruct the said Children in Grammar And further we of our said special Grace certain Knowledge meer Motion have ordained constituted assigned limitted appointed and by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors do ordain constitute assign limit and appoint That the said House and other the premises shall from henceforth for ever hereafter be remain continue and be converted imployed and used for an Hospital and House and Place for the abiding sustentation and relief of such number of poor People Men and Children as the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and all and every the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall name assign limit or appoint to be lodged harbored abide and to be maintained and relieved there and for the abiding dwelling sustentation and relief of such number of poor Children as the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being shall from time to time name assign limit or appoint to be lodged harbored abide and to be maintained and relieved there And for the abiding dwelling sustentation and finding of one School-Master one Usher and one Preacher as is aforesaid and of one Master or Head of the said House and Hospital And that it shall and may be lawful to and for the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher poor people Children Men and Officers of the said Hospital or therein to be placed for the time being to assemble be remain abide and cohabit together in the said Hospital And that the said Hospital shall for ever hereafter be incorporated named and called the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And the same Hospital and Free-school by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq We do firmly by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors erect found establish and confirm to have continuance for ever And for the better maintainance and continuance of the said Hospital and Free-school and the said godly and charitable uses intents and purposes and that the same may have and take the better effect and that all and every the Manors Lands Tenements and Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments Goods and Chattels granted conveied assigned devised willed limitted and appointed for the maintainance sustentation and relief of the persons aforesaid in the same Hospital may be the better governed used imployed and bestowed for the mantainance of the persosn in the said Hospital for the time being to have continuance for ever We Will Ordain and do appoint assign limit and name and for us our Heirs and Successors do grant and ordain by these presents That there shall be for ever hereafter 16. persons who shall be called Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And for that purpose we have elected nominated ordained assigned constituted limitted and appointed and by these presents do for us our Heirs and Successors elect nominate ordain assign constitute and appoint The Right Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury our trusty and Well-Beloved Counsellor Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England our trusty and Well-Beloved Cosin and Counsellor Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England John the elect Bishop of London Launcelot now Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of our Justices of our Court of Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet our Attorny General John Overal now Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of our Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and the Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of the said Thomas Sutton Esquire and such person and persons as shall be from time to time Master or Masters of the said Hospital for and during such time as they shall be Master or Masters thereof to be the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire and that they and the Survivors of them and such as the Survivors or Survivor of them from time to time Elect and Chuse to make up the number of 16. when and as often as any of them or any of their Successors shall happen to decease or to be removed from being Governours or Governour thereoâ— shall be incorporated and have a perpetual succession for ever in Deed Fact and Name and shall be one Body Politick and Corporate And that the said persons and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and such as shall be elected and chosen to succeed them as aforesaid shall be incorporated named and called by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition
School-Master Usher Members Officer Officers of or for the said Hospital as he the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease the Governours for the time being and their successors or the more part of them shall think meet and convenient nevertheless if the Rents Reversions or Profits of all or any of the Manors Lands Tenements and Hereditataments Goods or Chattels at any time to be granted and conveyed to the said Governours of the said Hospital and their successors for the maintenance of the people in the said Hospital shall happen to increase or to be raised or augmented to a better or greater yeerly valew theu formerly the same was or that the Rents Revenues and Possessions of the said Hospital shall be further increased by the determination of any former estates in any of the said possessions of the said Hospital otherwise that all and every such increase shall be imployed to the mayntenance of more and other poor people to be placed in the said Hospital or to the further augmentation of the allowances of those persons that for the time being shall be in the said Hospital according to the true Intent and meaning of these presents and shall not be converted or imployed to an private use And also we do by the presents for us our Heirs and successors will grant and ordayn that when soever and as often as any of the said places or Rooms of any of the said Master Preacher School-master or Usher Poor men or Children Scholars Members or Officers or any of them shall happen to become void by Death Resignation Deprivation or otherwise that then and so often it shall and may be Lawfull for the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death for the said Governours for the time being and their successors or the most part of them within one Month after such avoydance by writing under the Seal of the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death by the siad Governours for the time being and their successors under their Common Seal to nominate appoint other meet person and persons in the Rooms place and places of them and every of them so deceasing resigning or otherwise becoming void and if in case the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the most part of them shall not within two Months after such avoidance nominate assigne and appoint as is aforesaid that then and so often and in every such case from and after the death of the said Thomas Sutton it shall be Lawfull for us our Heirs and successors by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England or Privy Seal to nominate and appoint meet Person and Persons to all and every such Office Rooms Place and Places as shall remain void for the time aforesaid by the default of the said Governours and their successors as is aforesaid And we do further of our special grace certain knowlege and meer motion for us our Heirs and successors give and graunt that the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher Poor Men Children Scholars Members and Officers of the said Hospital and every of them shall be allowed ordered directed visited placed or displaced by the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death by the said Governours and their successors and the most part of them according to such allowances Rates Statutes and Ordinanâ—ns as shall be appointed set forth made devised or established by the said Thomas Sutton during his life in writing under his hand and Seal and after his death by the Governours for the time being and their successors or the more part of them under the said Common Seal And further we have given and granted and by these presents do give and grant to the said Thomas Sutton during his life by writing under his hand and Seal and to the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the more pare of them after his decease under the said Common Seal to make set down and appoint such Rates Statutes and Ordinances for the Rule Government and well ordering of the said Hospital and of the Master Preacher School-Master Usher Poor People Children Scholars Members and Officers for the time being and for their and every of their Wages ' Stipends and allowances for and towards their or any of their Mayntenance and Relief as to the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease to the said Governours and their successors for the time being or the more part of them shall seem meet and convenient And that the same Orders Rates Statutes and Ordinances so by him them or any of them to be made set down and prescribed as aforesaid shall be and stand in force and strength in Law to all constructions intents and purposes the same not being repugnant to our Prerogative Royal nor contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm of England nor unto any Ecclesiastical Canons or Constitutions of the Church of England which then shall be in force And that for the better Government of the said Hospital the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease the said Governours for the time being or the most part of them or such and so many of them as the said Thomas Sutton shall by his writing under his hand and Seal thereunto assign appoint and nominate shall and may after the decease of the said Thomas Sutton have full power and Lawfull authority to visit order and punish place or displace the Master Preacher School-Master Usher Poor People Sholars Members and Officers of the said Hospital and every of them and to order reform and redress all and every the disorders misdemeanours offences and abuses in the persons aforesaid and every of them or in the said Hospital or Free-School or in or touching the Government Order and disposal of the same And to censure suspend deprive and displace the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher Poor People Scholars Members and Officers and all and every or any of them as to him the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death to the said Governours for the time being and their successors or the more part of them or to such and so many of them as the said Thomas Sutton by his writing under his hand and Seal shall thereunto assigne nominate and appoint as shall to him or them respectively seem fit just and convenient so allwaies that no visiâ—ation act or thing in or touching the same be had made or done by any person or persons during the life of the said Thomas Button other than by the said Thomas Sutton and after his death by the said Governors for the time being and their successors or the more part of them or by such or so many of them as the said Thomas Sutton by his writing under his hand and Seal shall nominate and appoint thereunto And we of our further special grace certain knowledge and meer motion and by our supream