Recantation of the Antinomian errour in an Epistle of D. Luther to Mr. D. Guthel containing the minde of Luther touching Antinomians as a Sect that had their rise from the Devill 69 70 71 72 73 74 Luther is for the Law 70 71 That none is perfect in this life and we are to sorrow for sin 73 74 Islebius recanted his Recantation and returned to spread Antinomianisme after Luthers death 80 81 The tenets of Islebius Antinomians in Luthers time 81 82 The Antinomian way of Paulus Crellius in Luthers time 182 183 184 How Antinomians stated the question of old 83 How the Law is a patient to beleevers 84 Of the Antinomianisme of Michael Neander 84 85 Divers distinctions touching the use of and freedome from the law tending to cleare Luthers mind 86 87 Three speciall uses of the law according to Luther Ibid. Luther refuteth Antinomians in terminis and is most contrary to them 86 87 89 How faith only justifieth as Luther saith 100 How faith and works are contrary 101 How according to Luthers minde the Law hath power over the flesh and not over the renewed conscience 102 103 How Good workes conforme to the law are not necessary 103 The law the same now and under the covenant of works Ibid The law is given properly to the new man not to the flesh 103 104 How the terrified conscience is freed from the law 105 106 How the law condemneth and terrifieth how not 106 107 How the law is given to the New man how not 108 109 Excellent replyes of a beleever to the accusing law 109 110 The tempted beleever freed from challenges of the law 110 111 How a tempted beleever is to comfort himselfe against law-temptations in the conscience 112 113 Luther is for conditions in the Covenant and for preparations before conversion 114 115 Sundry excellent answers to Satan and the law what a sinner is at the brink of dispaire 115 116 117 118 How we are patients in justification how not 118 119 How the law is weak 119 How good workes are naught 120 121 How the law is abolished how not 121 122 That the law is to be preached to all 119 120 Of the union betweene Christ and a beleever opposite to the phancied union of Familists and Antinomians who say that a beleever is Godded and Christed 123 124 125 Of our legall union our union by faith our union by marriage by nature and the intervening of interests and conditions with Christ and a sinner 125 126 127 Luther makes sin to dwell in the justified contrary to Antinomians 129 130 How it is in them and how removed pardoned sinne is essentially sin 131 132 133 134 How we are under the law and under grace in regard of the flesh and the Spirit 134 135 The divers respects of Law and Gospel 138 How the law is a dead Letter 139 Of the Letter and the Spirit 139 140 Luther detesteth allegories 139 How the beleever needeth not the Law in the Letter 142 143 None are perfect in this life as Luther saith contrary to Antinomians 143 144 We must then have patience 144 145 Sin in the beleever rageth to their feeling and yet is made lesse sin 145 146 Luther taught that the Jewes were Justified and actually pardoned by faith as we are contrary to Antinomians 146 147 148 Ch. IX Of Christian liberty and of true false sense 148 149 c. Luther in the point of Christian liberty is against the Antinomians 148 149 How the Law hath nothing to doe with the conscience according to Luther 149 150 151 152 Antinomians distinction that we sinne not against the Law but against Christ removed 151 Luther unduly chargeth these he calleth Sacramentarians with making the Spirit without the word their rule it being the doctrine of Antinomians in his time 153 154 How wee are to judge of our spirituall estate by sense how not 153 154 Luthers minde of freewill and contrary to Antinomians therein 155 156 How the will is a patient rather then an agent in good 157 158 Of the subjective and active power of freewill 158 159 Thirteen considerations of the Author touching freewill 160 161 162 163 An absolute independent power in the will to doe without the predeterminating grace of God neither peculiar to the Covenant of workes before the fall nor to the Covenant of grace after the fall 160 161 Chap. XIV Of the piece called Theologia Germanica and of the Bright starre 163 164 c. Libertines sprang from the Gnosticks Familists from Libertines Antinomians from both 163 164 165 Of John Waldesso who hath sundry principles of Familisme and Antinomianisme in his booke 164 165 God is the creature saith Theologia Germanica 165 To ascribe any thing to the creature is sinne the new man is Christ. 165 166 How creatures are under-causes of their owne working 166 The hell and heaven of Familists 167 The Familists acknowledge no Christ but a metaphoricall Christ. 167 168 So Theol. Germanica and the piece called the Bright-star The workes of H. Nicholas 168 Familists of England dissemble their grossest points Their Petition to King James 168 Vent their malice in the Petition against Puritans were tollerated by Prelates because they railed against non-conformists 169 The contents of the Petition of the Familists in England to King James 168 169 170 Chap. XV. Of the Familists and Antinomians in New England 171 Their rise ib. Their tenets 171 172 173 The Saints suffering are God manifested in the flesh as Saltmarsh and Familists say 172 173 174 Saltmarsh Chaplaine to the Generall Sir Tho. Fairfax goes along with the Familists of N. England ibid. Ordinances of preaching reading hearing Sacraments are not to be seperated from the Spirit nor the Spirit from them 175 Chap. XVI Of the first Authors of Antinomianisme and Familisme in N. England as Mistresse Hutchison M. Wheelwrit their preaching seditious railing and foule tenets 176 177 178 Mrs. Hutchison bold maintained she might preach to a Congregation and alledged the example of Priscilla 178 Her abominable tenets in which she denied the immortality of the soule the resurrection Christ heaven sanctification asserted revelations beside and without the word of God 178 179 A Generall Assembly at Cambridge in N. England confuted and condemned M. Hutchison M. Wheelwright and others 180 M. Hutchison bare thirty formed monsters 181 Was excommunicated banished to the Road-Iland killed by the Indians she and all her house 181 182. as is reported Mrs. Dyer a Familist the wife of William Dyer a prime Familist brought forth a terrible monster 181 182 Chap. XVII Of the late Familists banished out of N. England in Massachusets and now inhabitants of Shaw-omet otherwise called Providence 188 The blasphemous tenets of Sam. Gortyn a wicked Familist who preacheth openly in and about London 183 184 185 Gortyn and these Familists deny God incarnate and say every suffering Saint is Christ and there is not another Christ. 184 185 186 So doth M. Beacon
prorsus cogitare nosse debet nisi unicum Christum acsummis viribus adnitatur ut tum legem quam longissime è conflâ—ctu abjiciat Extra locum justificationis debemus cum Paulo reverenter sentire de lege eam summis laudibus evehere appellare sanctam bonam justam spiritualem divinam â—ebemus extra conscientiam facere ex ea Deum in conscientia verò est verè Diabolus A man a beleever terrified in conscience and under the despairing apprehensions of wrath doth never sin more horribly then in that article of time when he beginneth to feele and understand the Law in its condemning power It s unpossible that Christ and the Law can dwell together in one soule for either must the Law or Christ yeeld the one to the other Luther Let us learne to distinguish these two righteousnesses that we may know how far we are to obey the Law for we said that the Law ought not to exceed its limits but only have dominion over the flesh of a Christian to shew that he is a sinner Saltmarsh saith free gr 145. he is but a seeming sinner say thou to the law stay within thy limits and exercise dominion over the flesh but come not neare my conscience to condemne me otherwise to obliege as a rule of obedience it doth where there is no Law It s the great skill and wisdome of Christians to be ignorant of the Law and workes and of all active righteousnesse especially when the conscience wrestleth with the justice of God as without the Church of God it is the great wisdome of God to know consider and presse the law works and active righteousnes To the Divell accusing thou art a sinner and therefore damned we may answer because thou callest me a sinner therefore I shall be just and saved yea thou shall de damned no for I flye to Christ who gave himselfe for my sinnes When the concience is terrified with the Law and wrestleth with the justice of God consult neither with naturall reason nor with the Law but lean only to free grace and the word of consolation and theâ—e thou mayest behave thy self as if thou hadst never heard any thing of the Law of God there thou mayest enter in darknesse where there shineth neither law nor reason but only the mirror of faith which may save thee without and beyond the Law the Law is also to be heard in the own time and place Luther A Christian hath nothing at all to doe especially under a temptation with the Law and sin in so far as he is a Christian he is above the Law and sin for he hath Christ the Lord of the Law inclosed in his heart as a ring hath a pearle indented in it therefore when the Law accuseth him and sin terrifieth him he beholdeth Christ who when he is apprehended by faith he hath with him the conquerour of the law sin death and hell who commandeth these that they hurt him not Extenuations of the Law are referred to the conflict of conscience Nor can we vilely and hatefully enough speake of the Law in this argument therefore the conscience in a true conflict ought to thinke of or know nothing but only Christ and with all its might endeavour to remove the Law as far as can be from the conflict Setting aside the case of justification we ought with Paul to thinke reverently of the Law and extoll it with great praises as holy good just spirituall divine and when the Law is out of the conscience we are to make a God of it but in the conscience it s the Devill Now Antinomians not only in the case of Justification debase the Law but they cry it downe as a rule of life they have nothing to doe with Moses and his Law or strict walking And where as Antinomians tell us the sinnes of beleevers are but sinnes to our sense and feeling or before men or sinnes in our conversation not really not before God not in our conscience not to faith they never learned this from Luther who expoundeth sense and faith a far other way For so Luther speaketh in a conflict of conscience we know by experience sense of sin wrath hell death hath dominion then we must say to the tempted Brother thou wouldst have a sensitive righteousnesse that is thou desirest to hâ—ve such a sense of righteousnesse as thou hast of sinne that shall not be but thy righteousnesse must goe beyond the sense of sinne and beleeve thou art righteous before God that that is thy righteousnesse is not visible or sensible but there is hope it shall bee revealed in its owne time Luther In certamiâ—e conscientiae experientiâ— doctiscimus fortitor dominatur sensus peccati irae dei mortis inferni-Ibi tum dicendum est tentato Tu frater vis habere iustititam sensitivam id est cupis ita sentire iustitiam ut peccatum sentis hoc non fiet Sed tua iustitia debet transcendere sensum peccati sperare te coram Deo justum esse hoc est â—ustitia tua non est visibilis non sensibilis sed speratur suo tempore revelanda Luther never denyed the sinnes of beleevers to be reall sins and that there was â—o more originall sinne dwelling in a beleever then in Christ as our grosse libertines doe But he forbiddeth the tempted to measure their owne condition as forlorne and hopelesse from sense because they feel sinne wrath hell death terrours of conscience but contrary to the sense of all this the weake soule must beleeve an invisible and spirituall righteousnesse and seek no sensitive righteousnesse as most men doe in conflicts of conscience Luther hath divers comfortable grounds of beleeving when the Law in its condemning power breakes in upon the conscience In cruce aliud peccatum invenio contra meum peccatum quod me accusat devorat peccatum scilicet aliud in carne Christi qui tollit peccatum mundi omnipotens est damnat devorat peccatum meum l Fateor me peccâsse sed peccatum meum quod peccavi damnatum est in Christo qui est peccatum damnans est autem peccatum illud damnans fortius damnato 2 Luther Sicut tutissimum est canem latrantem contemnere praeterire ita una vincendi ratio est contemnere rationes Satanae neque cum iis disputare diutius Textatus à Satana cum nullum evadendi modum sent is simpliciter claude oculos nihil responde commenda causam Deo Luther Sathan nihil minus ferre potest quam sui contemptum Hi sunt amplexus ejus quibus amplectitur sponsam prae impatientia amoris Luth. Non enim feram te O lex Tyrannum durum crudelem exactorem in conscientia mea regnare siquidem ea sedes est templum Christi filii Dei Qui possum esse sanctus cum habeam
against the flesh in some more in some lesse The time of grace is when the heart is erected and saith why art thou cast downe O my soule c. Hee that knowes this art well is deservedly a Divine I and those like me know scarse the first elements thereof The more godly any is the more he feeles this battle When I was a Monk I thought my heaven gone so often as I felt the concupiscence of the flesh I assay'd much I confessed every day but in vaine while I understood Paul saying The flesh lusteth against the Spirit then I was not so afflicted I thought then as now Martin even thou though godly shalt not want sin and this battle despaire not but fight then thou art not under the Law Staupicius said I have vowed a thousand times to be godlier but I keep not I le vow no more c. Luther That which is truely sin against the Law the Law cannot accuse as sin in the godly Luther Sin that is pardoned is broken through confidence of mercy that it condemne not or accuse not yet because of the flesh it springs up and warres in the flesh Beware to think little or much of the reliques of sin for so the purger the holy Spirit is lightly esteemed The reliques of sin remaine in us which need daily pardon All the beleevers sinnes are pardoned and covered but not yet purged so much pride hatred lust c. yea inward blots unbeleefe impatience murmuring remaine in us The reliques of sin remain in our flesh even when wee are justified least we should be idle that wee may have exercises of godlinesse Sin as Augustine speaks remaineth in us actually and in guilt it passeth away that is the thing it self that is truely sin is both pardoned and tollerated by God and the remnant of it remaines in the flesh and is not close dead except that by Christ the Serpents head is bruised yet his tongue moveth and his taile threatens a stroake What you will say ought not the ten Commandements to bee kept or if they be kept is not that our righteousnesse I answer wee will performe and keepe the ten Commandements but with a large that is with a truly Evangelick dispensation and distinction because we receive only the first fruits of the Spirit and the sighs of the Spirit remaine in our heart also our flesh with the lusts and concupiscence that is the whole tree the whole body of sin in its nature and being say Antinomians what they will with the fruits thereof remains this is the cause why the Law can never be perfectly kept Luther does most excellently deliver the differences of Law and Gospell of which Antinomians are altogether ignorant Luther calleth the Law a letter a dead a condemning letter not as Antinomians say because in the Gospel as Del saith The word and the Spirit are alwayes conjoyned and therefore Christ saith the words that I speake are spirit and life that is they come from the Spirit and carry Spirit with them which the Law doth not but Luther meaneth that the Law as the Law and Covenant of workes hath nothing at all of the Spirit but as a pedagogue to Christ it hath the Spirit conveying it in the hearts of the elect and the Gospel as the Gospel promiseth and hath conjoyned with it the Spirit not alwayes not when preached to Capernaim as Del citeth ignorantly the text Joh. 6. not when preached to Pharisees but when preached to the elect and not alwayes not when their hearts are hardned Mark 6.52 Mark 8.16 17. but when God is pleased to open their hearts and effectually to concurre with the word of the Gospel For Luther saith what ever revealeth sinne wrath and death does the office of the Law whether in the Old or New Testament according to Luther the Gospel may act the Laws part on a hardned hearer and so it hath not the Spirit alwayes accompanying it and the Law when it is made a Pedagogue to lead us to Christ carryeth the Spirit with it but Antinomians mean no other thing but that the Gospel is the very holy Spirit himself A most absurd Doctrine the Gospel is the word of grace the Holy Spirit is God making the word of grace effectuall Luther The Evangell is a word both of power and grace while it beats on the ears within powres in the Spirit But if it powre not in the Spirit a hearing man differeth not from a deafe man Then the Gospel is sometimes without the Spirit as well as the Law Except the doctrine of faith by which the heart is purified and justified be revealed all teaching of all commands is literall and the tradition of Fathers The Law teacheth what is your debt and what you want Christ giveth what you should doe and what you should have Augustine saith the Law of works saith doe what I command the law of faith saith to God grant Lord what thou commandest and again what the Law of works commandeth by threatning that the Law of faith obtaines by beleeving the people of the Law is hauty the people of Faith sighes for pardon Every law especially Gods Law is a word of wrath the power of sin the law of death the Gospel is the word of grace life salvation the word of righteousnesse and peace It is a wonder and unknown to the world to teach Christians to be ignorant of the Law and to live so before God as if there were no Law For except thou be ignorant of the law and conclude in thy heart there is no law no wrath but onely grace and mercy in Christ Jesus thou cannot be saved for by the law is the knowledge of sin by the contrary so the law and works must be pressed on the unbeleeving world as if there were no Gospel promise no grace Luther The Gospel is a preaching of Christ that he pardons sin gives grace justifies and saves sinners Whereas there are Commandements in the Gospel they are not Gospel but expositions of the law and consequences of the Gospel Evangelium verbum virtutis gratiae simul est dum aures pulsat intus Spiritum infundit Quod si Spiritum non infundit nihil differt audiens â surdo Luther Nisi doctrina â—idet quâ cor purificatur justificatur reveletur omnis omnium praeceptorum eruditio Literalis paterna traditio Lex docet quid debeas quo careas Christus dat quod facias habeas Augustinus dicit lex factorum dicit homini fac quod jubeo Lex autem fidei dicit Deo da quod jubes iterum quod lex factorum minando imperat hoc lex fidei credendo impetrat Luther Lex quae cunque presertim divina est verbum irae virtus peccati lex mortis Evangelium verò est verbum gratiae vitae salutis verbum
quaÌ„ ista praesumptio quasi apprehenderit opus quaerendi non sit hinc etiam multi relabuntur marcessunt securitate ignavia Sic Bernardus Stare in viâ Dei est retrogredi quare qui caepit esse Christianus hoc restat ut cogites so nondum esse Christianum sed quaerere ut fiat Christianus ut cum Paulo possit gloriari non sum sed cupio esse Christianus non est in facto sed in fieri igitur qui Christianus est non Christianus est hoc est qui se putat Christianum factum cum sit tantum facienâ—us Christianus tendinâ—us in coelum non sumus in coelo Vae illi qui jam totus renovatus est id est qui putat sese esse renovatum ille absque dubio non caepit renovari nec unquaÌ„ gustavit quid sit esse Christianum c. Luther Animus humanus quando est in tentatione periculo difficulter hâc consolatione acquiescit sic enim perpetuo aâ—gi quaeri solet Quid fiet Quando fiet Vbi fiet Respondeo igitur exspecta exspecta Quodsi longius differtur rursus quaerit non habeo aliud quod consulaâ— inquies quam ut â—eraâ— et exspectes amplius annum unum duos tres veniens veniâ—â— non tardabet Saltmarsh and Town teach contrary to this a beleever wanteth nothing say they of heaven in this life but beleeve he is in heaven and he is not saved by hope but hath heaven already in this life Luther Grace doth not so change the godly that it maketh them in all things new and perfect Many things are purged especially the very head of the Serpent unbeliefe ignorance of God is loved but the scally body and the reliques of sin remaine in us Luther Sin in the Saints not onely hath being life will operation fighting but also it robs and leads captive yea which is a greater wonder it rages like a madde man more in the godly then in the wicked Luther It is one thing to speak of God incarnate or man made God and another thing of God and man simply so sin out of the element of grace is one thing and sin in grace another as you may imagine grace or the gift of God made sinlesse and sin graced so long as we are here so that because of grace sin shall not be sin Luther Gratia non â—ic mutat pios ut per omnia reddat novos perfectos Multa quidem purgantur praecipâ—â— autem ipsum caput serpentis iâ—credulitas ignorantia Dei praeciditur conteritur sed squamosum corpus reliquia pecâ—ati manent in nobis Luther Peccatum in sanctis non solum est non solum vivit non solum vult non solum operatur non solum repugnat sed etiam furit captivat Imo quod mireris in impiis non sic furit Luther Aliud est de Deo incarnato vel homine Deificaâ—o loqui aliud de Deo homine simpliciter Ita aliud est peccatum extra gratiam aliud in gratia ut possis imaginari gratiam â—eu donum Dei esse impeccatificatum peccatum gratificatum quamdiâ— hic sumus ut propter donum gratiam peccatum jam non peccatum sit If Antinomians would learn Luther hath a necessary mystery in this for he meaneth that sin is exceeding sinfull in its own element in a wicked man being not pardoned in Christ in him sin is sin but sin in a beleever though it keep still the nature of sin justification destroyeth not nor removeth as Antinomian ignorantly dream sin in its nature but onely in its guilt or actuall condemnation yet in a beleever sin is made as it were sinlesse or no sin in regard that sin in them is lustered and graced with pardon and so leaveth off to be sin-condemning and cursing as it is in the wicked Luther Libenter in credente Spiritus vellet totus esse purus sed caro conjuncta illi non permittit Frustrà exspecâ—amus in hâc vitâ perfectionem hanc ut toti justi simus ut Deum perfectè diligamus c. Luther David fatetur Spiritum sanctum se habere sed nondum perfectè aut totum sunt enim tantum primitiae Spiritus Luther Haec propria scientia Christianorum est scire â—se in peccatis natum esse idque in carne haerere usque ad mortem nec posse nos ab eo perfectè liberari mundari nisi per mortem vermes ignem extremum Luther Gladly would the Spirit in the beleever be wholly pure but the flesh conjoyned therewith will not permit it In vain look we for perfection in this life that we should be all just and love God perfectly and our neighbour as our self Luther David acknowledgeth that he hath the holy Spirit but not perfectly or in whole for they be but the first fruits of the Spirit This is the proper knowledge of Christians to know that they are borne in sin and that it sticks in the flesh to death and that we cannot be freed and purged perfectly therefrom but by death the worms and the last fire 9 Conclusion Luther is farre from denying remission of sins and that compleat and actuall to the Jews under the Law or any way of Justification to them by the Law but by faith in Christ as we are justified and saved Luther ipse Moses qui sub eo fuerunt non sunt justificati ex lege JustiJustitia enim non est facere legem sed credere prâ—mittenti Deo Luther Peccatorum remissio omnibus â—aeculis fuit eadem Christus autem heri hodie idem est etiam in saecula illi igitur fiduciâ Christi venturi nos fiduciâ Christi exhibiti passi glorificati salvamur remissionem peccatorum consequimur Holacaâ—sâ—a in lege a sanctis justis exhibita eo sine offâ—rebantur non ut justificarentur per ea sed ut testarerentur se accepisse misericordiam sic bos immolatus est testis gratiae seu ut ita dicam operaria vox gratitudinis seu gratitudo manualis quâ manus effundit gratitudinem tanquam realibus vocabulis Christum illi crediderunt futurum nos scimus eum exhibitum abiisse ad patrem ut pararet nobis mansiones c. Vidit Abraham diem Christi Joh. 8. sed vidit in fide Spiritu tantum Idem Christus eademque fides ab Habel ad finem mundi per varia â—aecula regnavit in electis Luther Moses himselfe and those that were under him were not justified by the Law for righteousnesse is not to doe the Law but to beleeve God promising There was the same Remission of sins in all ages Christ is the same to day yesterday and the same for ever they were saved and justified by faith in Christ to
come we by faith in Christ come suffering glorified Luther saith tom 1. p. 529. Non facta sed fidem patrum imitemur let us follow not the deeds but the faith of the Fathers Luther burnt offerings were not for justification but a sacrificed Oxe was a witnesse of grace and to speak so a working voyce of thankfulnesse or an handy or manuall gratitude by which the hand powred out thankfulnesse by reall words They beleeved in Christ to come we know he is come and gone to the father to prepare dwelling places for us Luther Abraham saw Christs day in faith and the spirit onely Luther the same Christ the same faith from Abâ—l to the end of the world and did reigne in divers ages of the world Antinomians as Den Crisp Saltmarsh Del deny any heart-Reformation true conversion to God actuall remission of sins and of all sins or free justification by free grace in a Gospel-way to the Jews under Moses as we are justified and saved under the Messiah and make the promises and covenant of grace with Papists and Sâ—â—inians to differ in substance and nature from our Gospel-promises and free covenant as if their law tutory Gal. 4. had varied the way of Justification and salvation to them and to us CHAP. XII Of Christian Liberty and of sense true and false 10 Conclusion Antinomians have not Luther for them in the Doctrine of Christian Liberty Luther Vnusquisque Christianus sciat sâ— per Christum constitutum esse in conscientia dominum legis peccati mortis contra scâ—at quoque hanc servitutem externam corpori suo impositam ut per charitatem serviat pâ—oprio Qui autem aliter intelligunt libertatem c. Luther Omnia sunt libera nobis per fidâ—m omnia serva per charitatem ut simul stet servitus libertatis et libertas servitutis Libertas Evangelii non tollit res corpora debitâ— nominum sed conscientias liberat a vinculis spiritualibus Luther Christianus in conscientia debet esse medicus in externis moribus debet esse asinus Per fidem Christi non sumus liberi ab operibus sed ab opinionibus operum id est a stultâ praesumptione justitiae per opera quesitae Let every Christian know that by Christ he is made in his conscience as he beleeveth in Christ the Lord of law sin death so that these have no power over him On the contrary let him know that this externall servitude is laid on the outward man that by love he is to serve his neighbour Those who otherwise understand Christian liberty as Antinomians who think they owe no obedience to the Law they enjoy the gaine of the Gospel to their owne destruction and are worse Idolators under the name of Christians then they were in Popery All things are free to us by Faith yet all things are under obligation of Law in regard of charity that so the servitude of liberty and the liberty of servitude might stand together The liberty of the Gospel takes not away things bodies nor duties of men but freeth the consciences from spirituall bands of wicked opinions Thâ— Christian in his conscience should be a physitian but without in externall conversation an Asse to beare the burthen of Brethren Luther meaneth in things indifferent that are without the case of scandall as hee exponeth himself Tom. 1 472.528 and clearly To. 1. In Christum credentibus omnia munda indifferentia licita sunt quaecunque vel praecipiuntur vel prohibentur externis ceremoniis c. and Tom. 2.154 155 156 158. Through faith in Christ wee are not free from works but from opinions of works that is from a foolish presumption of righteousnesse to come by works Now by opinion of good works Luther meaneth conscience and the resting of the conscience on good works as our righteousnesse hence so often saith Luther the Law hath nothing to doe with the conscience the Law hath no power over the conscience the Law ought not to reigne over the conscience And so 2. he placeth our Christian liberty not only in freedom from the Judiciall Law Tom. 4 on 1 Pet. 2. Rom. 13. and from the Ceremonies of the Law of Moses Tom. 4. fol. 145. But also from the condemnation of the Morall Law As is clear Luther That Christian liberty which Christ hath purchased is not so easily beleeved as spoken if it could be apprehended by a sure and firme faith no fury nor terror of the world of law sin death and the devill could be so great which would not be swallowed up as a little spark of fire by the great sea Libertas illa quam nobis Christus peperit non tam cito creditur quam nominatur Si certa ac firmâ fide apprehendi posset nullus furor aut terror mundi legis peccati mortis et diaboli tam maguâ— esse posset qui non 〈◊〉 seu scintilla a mari ab ea absorberetur Then Luther evidently thinketh our Christian Liberty is not from duties commanded in the Law but from the terrors accusation and condemning power of the Law after wee have sinned against the Law Luther Verba illa libertas ab ira Dei lege peccato morte c. Dictu facilia sunt sed Magnitu dinem hujus libertatis sentire fructum ejus in certamine in agone conscientiae applicare hoc plus quaÌ„ dici potest difficile est Luther In carne nulla debet esse libertas Debemus enim subjecti esse parentibus Magistratibus in summâ omnium servi esse sed in Spiritu conscientiâ Liberrimi ab omni servitute ibi nulli credimus nulli confidimus nullum timemus nisi solum Christum qui regnat inter medias afflictiones cum gaudio laetitia inter media peccata cum virtute fortitudine These words Liberty from the wrath of God law sin death c. are soon said but to finde the greatnesse of this liberty and the fruite thereof in a conflict and agony of conscience and apply it practically is more hard then can be spoken So he expresly clearely this Liberty in the flesh that is in sinning there ought to be no liberty for we ought to be subject to Parents Magistrates and finally the servants of all but in the spirit and conscience we are most free from all servitude for there we beleeve none trust in none feare none but onely Christ who reignes in the midst of afflictions with joy and gladnesse in the midst of sins with strength and courage It s clear by the flesh Luther cannot mean as Antinomians and Papists with Libertines doe the sensitive part which they call the Asse contradistinguished from the minde will and conscience as if the renewed man in whole sinned not with will affection reason conscience for the reason that Luther giveth is contrary to that for saith
over them for ye cannot say that a willing man or a man delighting to obey God is compelled to obey God But if we speake of man fallen in sinne who is unable to performe perfect active obedience the Law stands over him in a highest pitch of morall compulsion for whether he be willing to obey or have the Spirit or be unable and void of the Spirit the Law standeth above him exacting a summe of ten thousand talents from him that cannot pay the hundreth part of halfe a talent or an halfpenny as he ought And the man out of Christ and under the Law is still compelled in both active and passive obedience the letter of the Law and this ministration of death without the Spirit hailes and draws him as the literall prisoner fettered by a extremely exacting Law void of all Spirit and conferring no saving strength on him to doe or suffer the penalty of the Law And for the beleever in Christ the rigor of the Law is abated not that the Law as the Law requireth lesse of him then absolutely perfect obedience but because in what hee comes short in performing of new obedience from a new principle to wit a Gospell-spirit in him he is pardoned in Christ and the rest is accepted for Christs sake as if it were obedience Now in this new obedience the Spirit so oyleth the wheeles of free-will as obedience in its kinde is as free connaturall delightfull being sweetned with the love of God as if there were not an awing Law but a sweetly alluring and heart-drawing free love so that the beleever obeyes with an Angell-like obedience then the Spirit seemes to exhaust all the commanding awsomenesse of the Law and supplyes the Lawes imperious power with the strength and power of love if we suppose there had been no Law commanding Christ absolute obedience yet if we suppose a meer directing light without any compelling to shew him what is good and agreeable to Gods commanding will so did Christ obey perfectly from a principle of love and so doth the justified beleever give obedience though imperfect yet sincere to what is Gods will then it followeth 1. The higher and larger measure of willingnesse or the more superlatively the will be bended the light of a divine Law shining on the minde and will the more of the Spirit because the Spirit is essentially free Ps. 51.12 2 Cor. 3.17 the more freenesse and the more freenesse the more renewed will in the obedience and the more renewed will the lesse constraint because freenesse exhausteth constraint and especially when constraint looketh toward eternall punishment and the Law compelleth under pain of eternall death those that are under Law-obligation to obey Now fear of eternall wrath is wholly swallowed up where a free spirit of love and strong delight to obey intervenes between obedience and such feare as is cleare in the man Christ in the dayes of his flesh and the confirmed Angels and though I doubt nothing but feare of the second death was in its way and so farre as was congruous and convenient for a state of sinlesse innocencie to worke upon the will of the first Adam and Evah to deterre them from sinning otherwise that threatning of God In the day thou eatest thou shalt dye had no intrinsecall end nor was it rationall which cannot be said yet Law-threatnings had no influence on the will of the confirmed Angells much lesse on the perfect and holy will of the second Adam which was so filled with God so balasted with so many talent weights of sweet delight and free love Ps. 40.7 8. Joh. 4.34 as Angels and Christ obeyed without any eye-looke or glance of their thoughts to Law-threatning And the justified beleever◠now obeying as a Sonne not as a bond-slave yeeldeth willing obedience from a free leading Spirit the Spirit of adoption proper to sons who obey their father out of an instinct of love not out of a principle of commanding awing and terrifying Law as slaves under bondage doe obey their masters Rom 8.14 15 16 17. And the Law of the Spirit of life commeth in into the place of the compelling and cursing Law not that the directing and obliging power thereof is removed and acteth a beleever to obey as if there were no Law over him at all and freeth him from the Law of sinne from the dominion of the Law in binding him over to a curse Rom. 8.2 Rom. 7.1 2 3. as if there were not a Law given to a justified man 1 Tim. 1.9 And looke how wee say the willing free obedience of men consisteth well with the necessity of Gods absolute decree so sweet delightfull freenesse of a Gospel-spirit led by God does well consist with the necessity of an obliging and strongly commanding Law though the sting of the cursing and threatning be removed 7. Now the fond conceit of Waldesso consideration 63. is utterly to be rejected for he saith the Scripture shines as a light in a darke place untill the day-star arise in the heart 2 Pet. 1. and then the man hath no more need to seeke that of the holy Scripture which departs of it selfe as the light of a candle departs when the Sunne-beames enter even as Moses departed at the presence of Christ and the Law at the presence of the Gospell But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 untill noteth not a certaine time of the removing of the light of the word since Peter there preferres it to the revelation at Christs transfiguration Matth. 1.25 Joseph knew her not untill she brought forth her first borne it followeth not ergo he knew her after so Matth. 11.13.15 the Law and Prophets are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 untill John then no more Law and Prophets after John it followeth not Matth. 12.20 he shall not breake a bruised reed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till he bring forth judgement to victory therefore when he has brought forth judgement to victory he must then break the bruised reed and be no longer tender to weak ones Matth. 14.22 he constrained his Disciples to goe to the other side till he send the multitude away then he sent not the multitude away when the Disciples were come to the other side it is absurd So Matth. 16.28 they shall not taste of death untill they see the Kingdome of God come ergo they shall live no longer then they see the Kingdome of God come it followeth not Matth. 22.44 Sit thou at my right hand till I make thine enemies thy footstoole ergo after Christs enemies are subdued he shall sit no longer at the right hand of the Father Joh. 5.17 My Father worketh untill now and I worke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ergo my father works no more after this in his providence in governing the world what more absurd 1 Tim. 4.13 Till I come give attendance to reading to exhortation to doctrine then must Timothy read exhort and preach no more after Paul is come The place presseth us to wait on
is a reall change of our state in justification YEa clearely before God there is an excellent change in the state of the Saints from ungodlinesse to justification so as they were not from eternitie nor before they beleeved justified and godly 1. because the Lord saith In time past the Gentiles were no people and obtained no mercie and now are a people and have obtained mercy Jerusalem was once polluluted in her owne bloud and the Lord looked on her so and he washed her and adorned her 2. The Apostle was once to God a blasphemer a persecutor and God saw him so else neither was the Apostle so nor could he speake truth in saying so but he obtanied mercy So in other Scriptures a most reall change is holden forth and that in Gods eye CHAP. XXI We mixe not workes and grace in the matter of Justification WEe utterly deny that Antinomians can make good their charge that we mixe works and the Law in matter of justification with faith and the free grace of God 1. Works done by grace smell of the mired fountaine they spring from they are polluted with sinne now Paul Rom. 3. saith All Jewes and Gentiles have sinned none doth good Psal. 14. Psal. 53. Void of sinne therefore by the Law can no flesh be justified and so the righteousnesse by which we stand before God must be free of sinne and free of a breach deserving a curse which must fall on us if we continue not in all the Law in the most gracious works we can doe yea if not in all that the Law requires to the least jot or tittle we are not justified now with such a Gospel-inherent righteousnesse as no man hath 2. Christ must be a Saviour by halfes and quarters if we divide the righteousnesse of our Saviour betweene faith or works between Christ and our merits Free grace is a jealous thing and admitteth of neither compartner corrivall or fellow with Christ. Paul will have his owne righteousnesse in the plea but dung 3. It quite brangleth the peace of God that issueth from justification that it is a peace that free will createth to my selfe from my owne works and not a peace dipt in satisfactory bloud 4. It taketh much glory from Christ that we weare a garment foreternitie of our spinning better the wedding garment bee begged and all its threeds be of free grace and that full glory be given to the Lambe 5. Law and Gospel Grace and Law-payment must be confounded 6. Christ must die in vaine CHAP. XXII Antinomians deny sinne to be in the justified ANtinomians will have no sinne remaining at all in a justified person and nothing contrary to Gods holy Law And Crispe saith It s close removed as if it had never been All which is true of the Law-guilt and actuall obligation to eternall wrath but of the Essence being or blot of in-dwelling-sinne in us it s most false 1. Pardoned sinne that Christ payed for is so sinne that if wee who are pardoned John and the rest of beleevers who have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous say wee have no sinne wee deceive our selves and the truth is not in us 2. Who even of the justified can say I have made my heart cleane I am pure inherently from my sinne there is not a just man on earth that doth good and sinneth not There is none that doth good not David who is justified by faith no not one 3. The flesh in the regenerate sinnes and lusts against the Spirit and the holy Law of God and the body of sinne though subdued having lost the Kingly dominion as a Tyrant though not the nature and being as Augustine saith of sinne as an underling dwelleth in all the justified but is not imputed 4. What we want of the perfection that God requireth to be in our sanctification and mortification which are but in growing while we are in this life must be sinfull imperfection 5. For we dayly aske of our Father which is in heaven forgivenesse of sinnes which we could not doe except sinne remained in us nor doe wee with Papists say that Christ but covereth but washeth not away our sinnes in his bloud for the guilt obleiging to satisfactory punishment is fully washen away not covered onely CHAP. XXIII Antinomians say to faith there is no sinne WEe judge that unsound which Towne saith To Faith there is no sinne nor any uncleane heart for then should Christ dwelling in the heart by faith and sinning be inconsistent which is known to be contrary to Scripture to the experience weaknesses complaints of the Saints groaning under a body of sinne as captives in bolts and yron fetters 2. And must argue that who ever beleeve are as perfect as Angels in heaven 3. That a justified person beleeveth not onely pardon but the perfection of Angels and that he sinneth not and must be perfectly sanctified if he beleeve a lye to wit that he sinneth not but is perfectly holy and this fancie they build on Luthers words perverted who saith I beleeve that there is a holy Church which is indeed nothing else but I beleeve there is no sinne no malediction no death in the Church Whereas Luther speaketh not of sinne in its in-dwelling blot but of sinne as in point of Law it doth actually curse condemne and inflict the second death in which sense in point of free iustification there is no sinne in the invisible Church of the justified and effectually called Saints Saltmarsh Free grace pag. 154. Thus the Scripture calleth us ungodly and sinners and children of wrath not that we are so but seeme so or not so in Gods account but in the worlds CHAP. XXIV The raigne of Faith not absolute as Antinomians say ANtinomians will have the raigne of faith so absolute that in faiths kingdome of grace there is no sinne which were more then a golden heaven on earth for so 1. Faith were perfectly strong and in the highest pitch of fulnesse of perfection in all the justified 2. If withall the whole morall acts of a justified person should flow from no other spring but this strong faith ever acting us to good But wee cannot yeeld to either Libertines or Antinomians that Faith is so absolute a Prince as that all sin rout and branch not only in its fullest dominion but also in its being and simply indwelling must be banished out of Faiths dominions so as once beleeving we could no more as sinnefull men but must act as beleevers for ever but wee thinke under faiths raigne sinne dwelleth as an underling as of old the Gibeonites dwelt under conquering Joshuah and victorious Israel as hewers of wood and drawers of water Yet these Cananites were said to be spued out of that good land 1. Jure bellâ— by the Law of conquest and of victorious inheritors as sometime they were 2. They make
of grace of justification or of salvation or that the Gospel hath any conditions at all Yea though yee should not beleeve yet God is faithfull and cannot deny himselfe to be your Redeemer So saith Saltmarsh it s not the way of a covenant that the Gospel useth but rather the promise or grace and salvation It is true if we take a condition 1. For an antecedaneous quallification going before Redemption the Gospel is no covenant of grace so as God will neither redeeme us in Christ nor propose a covenant of grace nor transact covenant-waies to be our God while we beleeve So faith is no condition Antinomians ignorant of the doctine of Protestants fancied that of us Nor doth it follow as Crispe and Antinomians say Faith obedience and repentance are not conditions because pardon and justification and salvation goe before them or because by them we purchase not Christ it onely followeth they are not such conditions as are antecedent and purchase Christ which we grant 2. If a condition be taken in Law tearmes for a condition qualification or some thing that issueth from free will without the determining grace of Christ and such a condition as salvation and righteousnesse imputed dependeth on in a proper way of condition so faith is neither strictly a condition of justification nor of righteousnesse or salvation because God of meere grace worketh both the condition faith and the thing conditioned for a condition is properly a qualification or worke to be done by a party by way of contract league and bargaine and done of the parties owne strength as the one side halfe or quarter of a covenant that obleigeth the other party to bestow a favour or reward for the performed condition as Armâ—nians say and neither in this sense doe wee ascribe a condition to men 1. Because Christ as surety undertaketh by promise to fulfill both our part and his owne I will writ my Law in their hearts Christ subscribeth the covenant for me and himselfe and leadeth our trembling hand at the pen and causeth us consent in this notion the Gospel is all promise rather then a covenant or a bargaine and there is neither limbe nor lith nor joynt of the covenant but it s all pure grace both worke and wages Antinomians cannot say that we teach We are redeemed justified saved for faith for works But if a condition be taken Evangelically for a qualification wrought in us by the grace of Christ and without which we are not justified nor saved then to deny the Gospel to be a conditionall covenant is to bely the Gospel For the whole Gospel saith He that beleeveth hath life is freely justified hee that beleeveth not is damned and the wrath of God abideth on him And that repentance and doing of Gods will and new obedience are conditions is evident by Scripture Nor is it a Popish way by works to say We seeke glory and honour and immortality by well doing Workes are not so much conditions of justification as Faith is yet are they conditions required in these that shall be saved And because Christ worketh faith in us it proveth it is not a condition of our owne working but not that it is no Evangelike condition CHAP. XXXIX Of Mortification WEe judge Repentance and Mortification of the old man to be a personall turning from sinne and the abating of the lusts of the old Adam a deading of the heart to the pleasures of sinne a growing in a heavenly disposition to rise with Christ and seeke the things that are above flowing from the death and resurrection of Christ apprehended by faith Antinomians say To repent and to mortifie sinne is to beleeve that Christ repented and mortified sinne for us and obeyed the whole Law for us It is not the not acting of sin nor is it the mortifying clensing and purifying our sinnes out of the sight of God no not by the Spirit of sanctification but it is to purifie out of our owne sight and sense before the world and declaratively these sinnes which the wedding garment hath purified out of the sight of God What is Mortification saith Denne but the apprehension of sinne slaine by the body of Christ What is vivification but our new life the just shall live by Faith I must needs say this is a shorter cut to heaven and a more Hony-Gospel then Christ and his Apostles knew For 1. They command us to mortifie our members which are on earth fornication uncleannesse inordinate affection c. And to forbear lying Antinomians free us from all personall mortifying our selves and put us on an imputative mortification to beleeve that Christ hath satisfied justice for our fornication and that Christ was chast in his owne person and abstained from fornication and lying for us this is to blow away all sanctification and make justification all 2. So may we live in our lusts and beleeve our lusts to be mortified in Christ and they are so and if wee should live slaves of sinnes and sonnes of the Devill and under the dominion of our lusts if we beleeve that Christ hath mortified our lusts our naked act of beleeving without any personall change in our selves maketh us sonnes of God which is nothing else but to turne the grace of God into wantonnesse Antinomians tell us it is but an abusing of grace to wantonnesse to sinne because grace doth abound and he that beleeveth cannot walke still and live according to the flesh if he still lives in his lusts his faith is no faith Answ. It s most true if Faith be taken for the affiance and recumbency of a broken sinner on Christ but the Antinomian faith is a perswasion of a fleshly Pharisie standing on his tiptoes proudly resisting Christ burning in his lusts and beleeving his boyling lusts are pardoned and remitted before ever they were committed and that they are no sinnes 2. Wee grant it is not grace but the abuse of grace that teacheth David Peter to act adultery and deny Christ but if it be the grace of Faith that is to beleeve contrary to sense that Adultery and deniall of Christ are not sinnes because sinnes pardoned are no sinnes then grace it selfe doth teach us to sinne 3. We must be justified by mortification if mortification he the faith or apprehension of our lusts crucified with Christ. 4. When the Holy Ghost biddeth us beleeve repent pray mourne rejoyce in God we have this Gospel-sense of these from Antinomians we doe all this compleatly when wee beleeve that Christ beleeved repented prayed mourned rejoyced in God for us and there is an end for sure the doing of all these came from a Spirit of Faith drawing life and strength out of Christs death and resurrection to doe all these as we draw strength from Christ to mortifie the lusts of the flesh 5. The word expoundeth mortification not to be in relative acts to beleeve Christ mortified
the beauty of grace and gracious actings are in Christ pure spirituall cleane abstracted In us in whom there dwelleth a Law in the members it is muddie clayie in dregs and concretion abstracta sunt puriora concretis 5. What we over-behold that we over love what we over-love in that wee over-confide the affections both in their flowings and their over-banke-flowings are linked together so we see not that actings of grace are made secret substituted Mediators with Christ but these flow from the corruption of our nature not from the straine of our Doctrine in these points CHAP. LVII Of the liberty which Christ hath purchased to us by his death ANtinomians generally contend for a Christian liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and we contend for the same but the question is wherein the liberty consisteth it concerneth us much that we take not licence for liberty We thinke 1. We are freed by Christ from not onely the Ceremoniall Law so as Christ profiteth us nothing if we come under that yoake againe but also from all Commandements of men for all these Ceremonies being now not commanded but forbidden of God become the Commandements of men from which both Jewes and Gentiles were freed in Christ. 2. We are freed and redeemed from the Morall Law as cursing and condemning by the Son of God who makes us free indeed 3. We are redeemed from the dominion of sin by the Spirit of grace for where this Spirit is there is liberty and Christ freeth us from this service of sin in regard that the Law is a Lord by irritating our corruption more and more though this be accidentall to the Spirituall Law that bringeth forth in us sonnes and children to death and over-aweth and compelleth us to keep the Law as a manifestation of wrath whereas the Spirit of the Lord is a free sweet lovely-constrayning-Spirit in the Gospel-working in a farre other way obedience to the Law then the Law-spirit of bondage doth And upon these are we 4. freed from a necessity of being justified by the Law or the works thereof 5. From all conquering Law-power of all enemies But we are not delivered and freed from the commanding directing obliging and binding power of the Law as a binding rule of life so as beleevers once being beleevers sinne not because they are under no Law farre lesse is it such a freedome as is that which is from the yoake of the Ceremoniall Law as Towne saith But if we be free from the Law with this kind of freedome which is licence it is free to us to sinne whereas the end of our Redemption is to change the yoake of a condemning and cursing Law in a sweet easie yoak of Christ to serve God in holynesse and righteousnesse the compend of the two Tables of the Law to deny ungodlinesse and worldly lusts 2. The Word of God calleth freedome from doing Gods will a not using our liberty in Christ as an occasion to the flesh and commandeth doing and fulfilling of the Law in loving our neighbour as our selfe 3. The service of sinne is the greatest bondage that is and the sinner is overcome by this Tyrant now the Sonne of God hath freed us from this bondage Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin if the Son make you free then are ye free indeed And to serve God is a free mans life as David saith I will walk at liberty for I seek thy precepts and Christ hath loved us and washed us in his bloud and made us Kings and Priests unto God Now Kings are of all men the freest on earth but Kings and Priests to God are Lords over their owne lusts which is more then to take a walled City and are to offer themselves and their bodies as a holy living and acceptable sacrifice which is their reasonable service 4. And the whole Gospel urgeth the same for it subjecteth us to Gods externall Commandement of honouring father and mother of having our conversation honest amongst the Gentiles in abstaining from fleshly lusts of walking in Christ as we have received him and it is the Commandement that the Apostle gave by the Lord Jesus which is our sanctification and that we should abstain from fornication and the whole doctrine of the Apostles that we be holy as he is holy nor doth the Law cease to be the Law to beleevers as Towne saith Because it neither can nor actually doth condemne and curse these that are in Christ and consequently it cannot oblige them as a commanding rule for you cannot separate the condemning power of the Law saith he from the commanding power of it If the Law cannot condemn it loseth the being of the Law and Luther saith it is no more Law Lex non damnans non est Lex not one jot or title of the Law can perish But the truth is the Law as it is an instrument of the covenant of works and justifieth or condemneth ceaseth to be the Law to the beleever as Luther saith it ceaseth to be the Law of life and righteousnesse and the way to heaven according to the tenour of the first covenant which is He that doth these things abiding in all things written in the Law in thought word and deed perfectly without the least breach in one Iota by his own strength he shall live that is he shall be justified and obtaine eternall life by the Law without a Mediator and shall be saved but not be in Christs debt nor obliged in one graine to the grace of the Gospel But where liveth I pray you this good man Neither in heaven nor earth except the man Jesus Christ. So the Law is not such a Law as can save to any man now under sin so Luther saith right but it was never Luthers mind that the Law simpliciter ceaseth to be the Law commanding and obliging to holy walking So it is a sophisme a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad dictum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it justifieth and saveth Legally is no damning Law and loseth its being as it is a covenant of works to all beleevers True ergo it is in no sort a Law to them it followeth not such a just Judge and King condemneth not this guilty man because his Sonne the Prince and heire suffered for him ergo he is not a Law-judge condemning the poore guilty man true but ergo he is not King and Judge to command this man to be obedient to all his good Lawes and ergo this pardoned man is in all other things and good Lawes loosed from this oath of allegeance and the band of loyalty and hee is no more the the Kings subject so as if the man now break the Kings Lawes and he doth not sin against the King as Law-giver or his Lawes surely it cannot
beleever But the beleever is not and shall not be till his dying day as free of sinne and spotlesse in the sight of God as Christ himselfe and whosoever feareth sinne and beleeveth not that God seeth no sinne in him being once justified robbeth God of his glory and is undoubtedly damned say they for its unpossible God can see sinne where there is none at all say they nor is this our freedome to be freed from the Law that is from the servile feare of eternall wrath or mercenary hope of reward as if the Law of God could command such slavish feare and hireling hope as Towne saith For the Law never did never could command sinne but so to feare or serve God as to seeke him earely when his rod is on us and when he slayeth us when the heart is like a deceitfull bow as Pharaoh did is slavish feare and to serve the Almighty for hire or gaine is sinne to feare the punishment and love the reward more then God is slavish and mercenary Gods holy Law can command no feare no obedience but what is free liberall ingenuous sinlesse sonnely filiall and holy for the Law is spirituall it is holy just and good 6. Christian liberty is not in freedome from subjection and obedience to Magistrates Masters Kings Parliaments for this Peter saith is to use our liberty as a cloake of maliciousnesse and that opened the mouthes of ignorant and foolish heathen who objected this to some peeping-up Antinomians in these daies who said their Christian liberty freed them from that yoake of subjection to lawfull Authority Kings Governours Masters now beside that Antinomians teach that Saints should not serve nor obey those that are not Saints nor beleevers as if Dominion and Civill power were founded on grace as Papists teach They doe not speake out but when they teach that Murthers Adulteries or any thing done against our brethren or to the disturbance of the peace of humane Societies committed by beleevers are no sinnes before God and that there is no more sinne in the children of God then in Christ himselfe and upon this ground God in justice cannot punish yea nor rebuke them for sinne Then say I these Adulteries and Murthers committed by beleevers if they bee no sinnes against God nor his Law they can bee no sinnes before man neither For the Magistrate beareth the sword to take vengeance on evil doers if these bee not sinnes against God even because they are sinnes against our neighbour then the Magistrate doth unjustly punish them 1. The Magistrate is the Vicegerent of God not judging for man but for the Lord and so should not punish but for these ill deeds for the which the Lord himselfe would punish But the Lord judgeth them neither sinnes against his Law nor can in justice punish them say Antinomians Ergo neither can the Lords Vicegerent judge them sinnes for they are against no Law of God nor can he punish them upon the same reason 2. The Law commandeth to Love our neighbour as our selves no lesse then to love God and he that loveth not his brother loveth not God and then who ever sinneth not as an evill doer against God cannot sinne against his brother and the peace of humane Societies and so the Magistrate ought not to draw his sword against him I grant Gods not punishing sinne is not a ground nor rule to the Magistrate not to punish sinne but sure Gods not punishing sinne and his none-displeasure against any thing as no sinne as having lost the nature and being of sinne as being against no Law as all the Adulteries Murtherings Cousonings Cheatings Robbing Stealing false-Witnesse-bearing of beleevers are supposed to bee in regard they are no more sinnes against a Law of God then any thing that Christ doth must be a rule to the Civill Magistrate who may no more strick the innocent who faileth against no Law of God nor he may kill robbe and oppresse Antinomians make a found escape from this they say The Adulteries Murthers lyings of beleevers are sinnes before men not before God or sinnes to their sense and feeling not to their faith and before God or sinnes in conversation not in conscience or sinnes in the flesh not in the Spirit So Towne Saltmarsh Denne Eaton So the Magistrates doe punish men for seeming Adulteries and Murthers fancied to be murthers but are not so indeed nor before God onely the unbeleeving weake conscience and erring sense or flesh taketh them to bee sinnes but they are not any reall injuries to God nor contrary to any Law of God 2. The Magistrate in conscience cannot judge that to bee violence to the life of a brother nor worthy of death which no Law of God can condemne as a sinne nor can hee in justice for imaginary Murther inflict reall death 3. Adultery and Murther must be then true and reall innocencies CHAP. LVIII Antinomians teach beleevers must not walke in their conversation as in the sight of God but must live by faith with God ANtinomians from their mis-understood justification of which they be utterly ignorant with Familists inferre That justified persons must not walke and live blamelesly with men and by sense but must live and have their dayly conversation in the sight and presence of God and so they abandon all sinceritie of holy walking before men and must live by faith up with God without sinne Dr. Tayler strongly proveth the Law to be in force to beleevers because the same sins are forbidden after faith and before faith and so the same holy and sincere doing of the Law by personall strength of free grace is given to us in Christ and Towne answereth him Keepe the Law and works here below on earth and as Enoch converse in spirit and walke with God in the alone righteousnesse of Christ and though justification be one individuall action and not by succession and degrees as inherent holynesse yet the vertue and efficacie of it is to cleare the coast of the conscience from all sinne to keep the unbeleever in everlasting favour peace securitie happinesse though the Jebusite must be in the Land and the prick in the flesh uncessantly forcing us to sinne more or lesse inwardly or outwardly yet Faith banisheth all the vapours that arise from our earthly members The same Saltmarsh hath But this is a subtile way of fleshly living 1. The word requireth sincerity as in the sight of God in our walking and conversing here on earth below with men Servants saith Paul obey in all things your masters according to the flesh not with eye-service as men-pleasers but in singlenesse of heart fearing God Then servants are to serve as beleeving they are under the eye and sight of God and childrens obeying their parents is well-pleasing to God then doth God see and judge our works and Enoches walking with God
to enter into the holyest and to draw neere with a true heart in full assurance of faith having our hearts sprinkled from an ill conscience and our bodies washed with pure water all which agree to the beleevers onely 3. John deduceth a ground of comfort from Christs Advocation with the Father if we sinne Now this extendeth onely to such as 1 Joh. 1.7 walke in light as confesse their sinnes are pardoned and they know him by keeping his Commandements 1 Joh. 2.4 This comfort cannot be stretched out to the unconverted who sinne not of infirmity but with a higher hand as is cleare from Ephes. 2.1 2 3. Tit. 3.3 1 Tim. 1.13 though we shall not deny but Christ hath another eye upon the elect in the course of their sinnefull vanity then on others and so that he keeps a fountaine for them and indeclinably calleth them to grace and glory CHAP. XCII Antinomians contend for the faith of assurance and reject the faith of Dependance ANtinomians contending for faith of assurance and leading men to be perswaded that God loveth every one whom he commandeth to beleeve with an everlasting love and that no man ought to call in question more whether hee beleeve or no then he ought to question the Gospel and Christ doe with Libertines acknowledge a faith of assurance but deny all faith of dependance on God through Christ as if wee were not justified by such a faith Now the Scripture expresseth saving faith most frequently with a dependance and recumbency on God as Psal. 22.8 he trusted or he rouled himselfe on the Lord that he would deliver him Jehovah was my stay or staffe So the same word is used The Lord taketh from Judah the stay and the staffe The residue of Jsrael shall leane upon the Lord. So is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to beleeve on Christ or rest on the stone layd on Zion 2. Many weake ones rest upon Christ and so beleeve who cannot come up to an assurance of perswasion they are chosen to life and have faith and yet faint and doubt As Mark 9.24 I beleeve helpe my unbeliefe Psalm 31.22 I said in my hast I am cut off from before thine eyes Then there hath not beene in David much assurance yet he had faith else he could not so pray as to be hoard when he saith Neverthelesse thou heardst the voice of my supplication when I cryed to theâ— a crying faith is Faith whereas a dumbe faith is no faith See Jona 2.4 CHAP. XCIII Antinomians deny the Law to bee any instrument at all of our Sanctification ANtinomians teach that the Law is no instrument of Sanctification but the Gospel onely Now the reason they give is because the Law commands but gives no grace to obey the Gospel is the operation of the Spirit and the ministration of righteousnesse And in the Gospel saith Del The Word and the Spirit are alwaies joyned and therefore saith Christ the words that I speake are Spirit and life that is they come from the Spirit and cary Spirit with them But in the Law their Letter without was Spirit Antinomians alwaies compare the Law as the Law in the cursing Letter of it against sinners as in the hand of Moses voyd of the Spirit not with the Gospel in the Letter of precepts and promises onely and as void of the Spirit but with the Gospel in its powerfull and effectuall operation by the Spirit and its actuall ministration of grace and righteousnesse on the elect onely and so no marvell the Gospel be Spirit and life and the Law the dead letter and ministration of death But compare the Law and Gospel both in their Letter and the Antinomian differences are false It s true the Gospel promiseth a new heart and grace and righteousnesse to the elect which the Law as the Law doth not But the Gospel in its letter doth no more give grace and righteousnesse then the Law but the Gospel only as accompanied by the Spirit giveth grace Antinomians doe dreame that the Gospel in its Letter is life and Spirit whereas it is to thousands the savour of death unto death no lesse then the Law but â—oth Law and Gospel in their onely Letter through our sinne and unbeliefe are death onely the Gospel promiseth a new heart and righteousnesse which the Law doth not but there the Spirit of grace going alongs with the election of grace fulfilleth and maketh good the promise in the elect But the Law in the hand of Christ even as it condemneth by the operation of the Spirit promised in the Gospel in the Spirits intention is a Pedagogue to lead us to Christ and a meanes of our sanctification though a meanes inferiour to the Gospel 1. Whatever is a Pedagogue to lead us to Christ our surety is a meanes of sanctification being accompanied by the Spirit for Christ is our sanctification as well as our wisdome and righteousnesse 1 Cor. 1.31 But such is the Law Gal. 3.23.24 2. That which bringeth the knowledge of sinne and being accompanyed by the operation of the Spirit serveth to humble us and render us weary and loaden leadeth us to Christ and is a meanes of sanctification But the Law is such in its office Rom. 3.20 Rom. 7.7 and in Gods blessing of it by his Spirit Acts 2.37 Acts 9.5.6.7 Acts 16.26.27.28 3. That which we are commanded to doe by the grace of Christ as a testimony of our thankfulnesse and to make our calling and election sure and to be a rule of life obliging us so to walke that is a meanes of our sanctification But such is the Law wee are commanded to doe the Law by grace as is proved before 4. If any thing hinder the Law to be a meanes of sanctification as well as the Gospel though not in that degree it is the want of the operation of the Spirit but this is no cause because in the Old Testament when the ministration of the Law was in vigour and that onely as Antinomians dreame the Spirit wrought with the Law or with that which Antinomians call onely Law Caleb had another Spirit Numb 14.24 A Spirit of Faith where as others could not enter in Gods rest through unbeliefe Hebr. 3.18.19 A right renewed Spirit Psalm 51.10 And the Spirit was promised to the Seed of Jaakob then as now Isai. 59.19 20. 2. They were justified by faith as we are Rom. 4.1 2 3 4.5 â—3 24 Pardoned as we are Psalm 32.1 2. Esai 43.25 26. Micha 7.19 20. then they had the Spirit of faith 3. They prayed in faith and the power of the Spirit as we doe 1 Sam. 1. 1 Sam. 2. In all the book of the Psalmes Daniel 9. Ezra 9.5 6 7 c. And because Christ and his Apostles Math. 5.1 2 3. c. Paul Rom. 12.1 2 3. Coloss. 3.1 2 3. Ephes. 4.1 2 3 c. Presse the same Law-dueties commanded in the Law as acts of Sanctication 5.
were in the matter of Oathes Magistracy Pedobaptisme confuted by Hallerus and by Kolvius at Bern and forced to say The Spirit taught them otherwise then the Letter of the Scripture spake And also at Zosing in Argovia An. 1532. Conradus Grebelius with his labouring to seduce many were confuted and cast out of Sengall Thomas Schuker the Disciple of Melchior Rinkius beheaded with a sword his brother Leonard by the impulsion of the Spirit at Sengal but it was not the Holy Ghost who leadeth us in Scripture truth saying in that The will of God was done and it was finished this made a Spirit without Scripture hatefull to many having made much adoe with their Scriptures Spirit at Strâ—asbrough Wormes Ausbourg Vlmes and being driven out of Helvetia and High-Germany they carried their plague to Morâ—via and adjoyned to themselves seditious men in Bohemia Poland Hungaria Austria and Silesia Balthasar Hubmeier for tumults in Moravia was burnt at Vienna Hence in West-phalia Frizland Holland and especially at Munster arose new Revelations In comes An. 1533. John Becold out of his own element of a Tailor amongst the Prophets with the Prophet Baker John Matthiz and some of Munster Roâ—mannus a faint and fained confuter of Anabaptists turnes to them and with him Herman Strepeda Hen. Rullius and Godfrey Stralen strengthen them they were confuted in a publick dispute and ordained to depart the City of Munster and did depart but they partly steal in again in the night partly hide themselves and make themselves masters of the city one Warendrop a Godsmith prophesies that John of Leiden must be King of the whole earth and King of Jerusalem that all Princes must obey him Becold appoints Bernard Knippeâ—dolling and Kippenbrugh Consulls the Christian Magistrates are deposed John Matthiz after a revelation from heaven commands all books to be burnt except the Bible all Gold and Silver to be brought and laid downe at his feet that all might be common Truteling a Smith called them dirty Prophets therefore Matthiz shot him dead and Matthiz himselfe not long after was cut off by the enemy Righteous is the Lord. Becold after three dayes lying in a fancied transe commands Polygamy in obedience to his own Vision marries three wives then other three til he came to fifteen Becold according to the prophesie of a Tailor is made a most Gorgeous King and sent out twenty eight Apostles to shew his Kingdome was above Christ he would have this number twice twelve Apostles and four Angels as Evangelists sent to the foure corners of the earth to Preach Tailor Becold King of Kings all of them were killed some say one only returned to give an account of spreading the spirit of Anabaptisme Becold appointing a great Lords Supper the King Tayler came in to see the Guestâ—s and findes a man and reading on his face the want of a wedding garment others say he saw him to be a Iudas killeth the innocent man presently After he had prophecied the Towne of Munster now beseiged should be supplied and killed one of his wives who said his prophecies came not to passe he and Knipperdoling were deservedly after Torturing Killed and hanged in an iron cage in the Cathedrall pinâ—cle The Tenents of Anabaptists in which they side with Antinomians are these more of this see in the writers cited The Reformation of Luther and others was Legall Literall carnall not Spirituall So Del. The Father Son and Spirit are not three distinct persons and in essence and nature one God so Familists deny Christ to be God and make every Saint equall with Christ. 3 The Lord Iesus did not really and truely but in imagination take our nature Antinomians say a beleever is God incarnate Godded and Christed Theol. Ger. c 22. Rise reig er 11. 4 The doctrine of Christ before his suffering is not so much to be observed as after his death for Peter resisted ill Saltm saith Shadowes flying away pag. 7 8 9. Christ and Iohn Baptist preached legally and spake not fully of free grace 5 Christ hath removed the Law and all its obleiging power and now the pure Gospell and Command of faith is our onely rule so Antinom 6 Christ reformed the ten commandes and brought in a more perfect rule Antinomians say they have nothing to doe with Moses and the Law The Law is now in the Spirit saith Saltmash free grace 146. Del. ser. p. 19.26 7 In the old Testament oaths were permitted perjury only forbidden all oathes are forbidden in the new the Sabbath was kept then not now so our Antinomians and Familists of new E. 8 They deny that the soules of the Godly or wicked goe to heaven or Hell till the day of Iudgement and deny the resurrection of the same body that was buried or that flesh and bloud â—shall rise againe contrary to Scripture Iob 19.26 27 28. Esay 26.19 Ezek. 37 11.12 Daniel 12.2.13 Phil. 3.19 20. 1 Cor. 15. 53. Ioh. 20.27 So say Antinomians life eternall is in this life the resurrection is past that the soule is mortall 9 The visible Church consisteth of those that are perfect and onely of those so Antinomians 10 None can with a good conscience exercise the office of a Magistrate under the New Testament Familists say its against Christian liberty 11 Vniversities Schooles humane arts ought not to be Saltmarsh they are legall and litterall 12 That its unlawfull to goe to law and that warres are unlawfull See Del. serm 6 7 8. 13 These Anabaptists called Libertines deny all Scripture as a dead Letter all preaching Sacraments church assemblies singing of Psalmes praying all ordinances and say the Spirit the inward anoynting and the internall word that proceeds immediately out of the mouth of God as Gideons sword is the onely meanes of Gospell-reformation so Antinomians reject all Ordinances as legall and say the spirit is all and some as Del. serm Beacon Catechism tit say the joyfull knowledge of God and man and all things else that relate to either is alone in the Spirit by Iesus Christ he counts all ordinances and externall duties and worship triviall and indifferent O therefore preface if distempered Christian Nations he excepteth not Papists Arminians Socinians c. were once wise to forbeare this clashing and dashing themselves in pieces one against another for matters externall triviall and circumstantiall in religion and would content themselves with that which is alone saving c. To the Antinomian Beacon Idolatry Angell-worship preaching praying scriptures duties of the Law precepts of the Gospell of nature of grace opinions c. all controversies in Religion these in which the distempered nations now contravert yea Church-government sacraments ministers are matters externall triviall and circumstantiall in religion not things in which salvation consisteth not to be contended for on either side 14 The second rancke of Anabaptists called concionatores preachers denyed all the Old Testament
as abrogate How little Antinomians esteeme Moses and the Prophets wee all know 15 The third rancke called Apostolici said we must become young with children Antinomians abandon sense nature reason and say we must live by faith only So hony-combe Towne Saltmarsh Den. 16 The third ranke were Spiritualists who abstained from cloathing meat feasts musicke to Saltmarsh all externalls are legall and carnall 17 The fourth ranke were the holy and sinlesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and would not pray the Lords prayer forgive us our sinnes and contended for Saints in this life without spot or wrinkle Crispe and other Antinomians say the beleevers are as cleane from sinne as Christ himselfe and cite the same place Ephes. 5.25 26. for it So Del the spirituall Church is led and taught by the anoynting the carnall Church by councels letter of the word 18 These denyed originall sinne in infants Antinomians deny it in all the elect who are justified from eternity or from Christs Death or from the time of their beleeving 19 The fifth ranke were Silentiaries tacentes they denyed necessity of preaching as Antinomians doe because the anoynting is sufficient they thought it indifferent to deny their Religion 20 The sixt ranke prayed only which Antinomians doe never but praise onely 21 The seaventh were arreptitiously and Enthysiastically inspired and fell in transes and saw visions of lyes Antinomians hold revelations and rapts of the Spirit without the word for their rule 22 The eight rank were these in higher Germany that are called libâ—ri fratres free brethren they were abominable impure and so uncleane that they were excommunicated by the rest they said they were delivered by Christ from all lawes covenants vowes paying of tithes or debts as Saltmarsh saith to doe any thing from these grounds is law-bondage free grace pag. 180 they owe no obedience unto Magistrates they said marriage was free with any of neerest blood that men could not be saved except they were Publicans and Harlots they held men might have many wives at once that after rebaptization they cannot sinne as Eaton the Antinomian saith hony-comb c. 3 p. 25. that not they but the flesh sinned as Towne saith asser pag. 35. 23 The ninth ranke were called also liberi fratres they said baptizing of infants Magistrates oathâ—s were things indifferent preaching â—earing scriptures were needlesse because we shall be all taught of God Sacraments are but common signes that beleevers need not it was free and indifferent to confesse Christ before men if danger be God delights not in our blood nor requires he that we dye for his truth we may dissemble our religion deny Christ before men so we keepe the truth in our hearts I often prove Antinomians to run in this straine 24 The tenth sort were called Huttites from Iohn Hut these took on them to cut off all the Cananites that is all the ungodly with the sword and gave away their goods because they said the day of judgement was neare at hand Ioh. Hut and the like false Prophets in their owne name could not learne wit from Cochebaâ— the Jew the son of a starre who called himselfe the Starre of Iacob and Redeemer of Israel but proved Benchozba the sonne of a lye he and his were destroyed by Tynius Ruffus president of Palestina he arose in time of Aelius Adrianus An. 118. or 120 Eusebius eccle Hist. l. 4. c. 5. nor would learne wit from the folly of a Jew who rose Anno. 379 in the time of Theodosius the great he called himselfe Moses promised to lead the people to Canaan drye through the sea caused the Iewes leap into the sea who drowned themselves and beat out their brains in the rocke and counterfeit Moses it may be the Devill disapeared and was seen no more Tripart Hist. l. 12. c. 9. Nicep l. 14. c. 4. 25 The eleventh ranke were called Augustinians from one Augustine a Bohemian Enthysiast they were ruled by scriptureles dreames 26 Anabaptists deny that scripture can prove any thing by consequence but it must be in so many syllables logicke and consequencies say Antinomians are to be abandoned in divinity 27 Melchior Hoffman a Skinner an 1529 said Strasburg was new Ierusalem 2 He was to be called an Apostle from heaven 3 Leaned to Enthysiasmes 28 Hoffman said he was Elias and Cornel Polterman Enoch 29 Menno Simonz the sonne of a secular priest borne in Frizland neere Harlingen about an 1532 rejected Enthysiasmes and yet slighted the scriptures 2 rejected apostolick calling 3 maintained the grosest Pelagianisme that the saints live free from all sinne as Eaton the Antinomian honie-combe CHAP. IIII. Of David George DAvid Georgius born in Delâ— was the son of a Mountebank or Iugler say some by trade a painter he vented his heresie an 1540 he was a composed plaistered hypocrite austerer than any bare footed Fryer or Capucian did often fast three dayes together was eloquent he taught that He himselfe 1 was the sonne of God the true and spirituall David borne of the spirit where as Iesus Christ was borne of the flesh 2 He was sent to restore the house of Israel not by death but by grace 3 The doctrine of Moses the Prophets Christ and the Apostles was unperfect carnall litterall Antinomians reject all written law and Gospell as a legall covenant of works and his was spirituall and perfect 4 He said the law was abolished as doe also Antinomians and he was the true and living law to his discipâ—es Antinomians say the Spirit of life in beleivers is all their law Del. Ser. pag. 26. Saltmarsh free grace 146. 5 He transformed the scriptures in allegories said Angels were but motions in the minde of man so do Familists and Antinomians Randel the Familist preached that because Christ preached parables therefore it is lawfull to expound the scriptures in allegories and that all things in nature and art were sacraments of the supernaturall mysteries of the Gospell therefore they expound God manifested in the flesh to be a believer Godded and Christed with the being of God in Faith and love The pâ—ice called Philosophy dissected maketh all the workes of Creation Articles of faith 6 He said to act adulteries and all villanies without sense of sin and shame as with a deadned conscience was the onely spirituall mortification and new birth his followers should labour for and then and not while then were they borne of the Spirit the same Libertines taught and so doe Antinomians and Familists that to repent sorrow and mourne for sin or to be touched with any sense thereof or from this sense to confesse sin is from fleshly unebeliefe and the old Adam then to sinne without sense is faith and mortification and this is cousen German with the Libertines regeneration and nearer 7 All marriage of nearest of bloud though under Moses and Christ they were forbidden yet are they now lawfull under this mâ—re spirituall
regeneration is not said to worke with the word but a more common operation of God there is which begetteth literall knowledge or some higher illumination 2 the Spirit worketh with the word so as in one and the same act the Spirit opens the heart to heare and receave what is carryed along in the letter of the word and so the Spirit worketh mediately not immediately 6 How in the infusion of the new heart and of the habit of the grace of God in which we are meere patients and put forth no cooperation with God more then the dead doth to quicken it selfe Ephes. 2.1 2. and the withered ground to receave the raine I see not Esai 44.3 4. in regard that though the word goe before and the word may be preached in the meane time yet the act of infusion of the new heart is no morall action of God but as it were physicall and it is a reall action receaved by us by no subordinate literall action or morall apprehension of the minde or act of the will and therefore in this formall act of infusion what the word doth but by way of disposition or preparing I must professe my ignorance though it be most true that faith commeth by hearing and in the very mean time Act. 10.44 whilst Peter yet spake these words the Holy Ghost fel on them which heard the word Then if conversion be taken in congregato vel concreto in the humbling selfe disparing of a sinner and all preparatory acts going before the infused life of Christ and in the first operations flowing from this infused life the word is an instrument of conversion but I cannot see how it is any active or morall instrument in the soules lying under the Lords act of infusion of the life of Christ except yee call it a passive instrument because it perswades not the soule to receeve the new life nor is the soule being a meere patient an apprehending knowing choosing or consenting faculty under this action of omnipotency while the Lord powres in a new heart It is true the word is thus farre the instrument that the Spirit worketh in us the same habit of new life and the same Spirit of grace and supplication that is promised in the word Esa. 44.3 4. Zach. 12.10 Ezeck 36.26 27. and the same Spirit that the Scripture saith Christ by his merits purchased Ioh. 1.16 17 18. Ioh. 12.32 Revel 1.5 Heb. 10.19 20 21 22. 1 Conclusion The word preached is that meane that instrumentally concurreth with the Spirit for begetting of faith Rom. 10.14.17 faith commeth by hearing and hearing by the word of God and that he speaketh of the externall and not of the substantiall increated and internall word is cleare ver 14 15 16. he speaketh of such a word as a sent preacher carrieth 2. such glad tydings as messengers on the mountaines bring which is not the Spirit of faith to all that the messengers are sent to 3 It is such a word as he calleth ver 16. a report Now this is not an inward substantiall report or word because all that heareth the father to them the Spirit makes an inward report they come to Christ and beleeve the report Ioh. 6.45 But few or none beleeve this report ver 16. Who hath beleeved our report 1 Cor. 1.23 25. But we preach Christ crucified to the Iewes a stumbling blocke to the Greekes foolishnesse But unto them that are called both of Iewes and Greekes Christ the power of God and the wisdome of God then the word externally preached is instrumentally the power of Goâ— and that he speaketh of externall preaching not of the substantiall word or Spirit himselfe is cleare 1 Because the Spirit internally preached is received as the power of God Esay 59 19 20. And a God teaching Spirit but this word of it selfe is not such a Spirit 1 Because the Apostles preach it Men such as the Apostles were doe speake or preach of Christ and of the Spirit but they cannot preach or effectually inpreach to speake so Christ and the Spirit to the hearers for then should they give the Holy Spirit to al those they preach to which both is against scripture and experience Act. 12. Act. 14. Act. 17. and is blasphemous for God onely giveth the Holy Ghost 2 Because the internall and substantiall word preached to the eares internally is effectuall conversion but this preached Christ must be externally preached onely to some to Iewes and Greekes who stumble at Christ and beleeve not 1 Pet. 2. And the same is proved by 2 Cor. 2.15 Wee are unto God preaching the Gospell v. 14 a sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them that perish to the one wee are the savour of death unto death to the other the savour of life unto life Now the internall substantiall word is to none a savour of death 1 Thes. 2.13 For this cause also thanke we God without ceasing because when yee received the word of God which yee heard of us yee received it noâ— as the word of men but as it is in truth the word of God which effectually worketh also in you that beleeve That is 1 The externall word which yee heard of us 2 It is the instrument of the Spirit Yee received it not as the word of men but as it is indeed the word of God 3 It s not the internall word for it was not received of all that heard it for ver 14 15 16. the Iewes that heard it received it not 2 Conclusion The word preached of it selfe is not a dead letter as Swenckfeldians say with Antinomians Paul calleth the Law a dead Letter Because it teacheth what we should doe but promiseth not the Spirit of Grace to obey as the Gospell doth And punit delinquentes punisheth eternally delinâ—uâ—â—ts saith Chrysost 2 Cor. 3. hom 7. and Oecumenius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophylact saith the same Augustine saith the Law makes us know not eschew sinne and the Gospell is not a dead letter of it selfe even as the Letter of it is voyd of the Spirit except by accident in the same sense that it is the savour of death unto death and a rocke of offence to those that stumble at the word But is not may some say the law also by accident and through our sinfull condition a condemning letter aswell as the Gospell and so both because they are externall and literall must be a dead letter I answer not so because the Gospell in the letter and literall sense ofâ—ereth a way or meanes of reconciliation to thoâ—e that beleeve but the Law as the Law in no sense can either offer or give life but in regard that all have sinned the proper use of the Law to all under the Law is to give out a sentence of condemnation in the very externall and literall sense of it If the Law lead as a Paedagogne any to Christ that is now by a
For therefore also it is printed that every one who will or can read may peruse it least it should be conceived that it was penned only for your sake Since I am not able to disappoint Satan by any other meanes who still labours by writings to traduce or misconstrue both my person and opinions And truly I wonder exceedingly how it came to be imputed to me that I should reject the Law or ten Commandements there being extant so many of my owne expositions and those of severall sorts upon the Commandements which also are daily expounded and used in our Churches to say nothing of the Confession and Apology and other bookes of ours Adde hereunto the custome we have to sing the Commandements in two different tunes besides the painting printing carving and rehearsing them by children both morning noone and evening So that I know no other way then what we have used but that we doe not alas as we ought really expresse and delineate them in our lives and conversations And I my selfe as old as I am use to recite them dayly as a Child Word for Word so that if any should have mistaken what I had written he might seeing and feeling as it were how vehemently I use to urge these Catechisticall exercises in reason have beene perswaded to call upon me and demand these or the like questions What Good Doctor Luther dâ—'st thou presse so eagerly the ten Commandements and yet teachest withall that they must be rejected Thus they ought to have dealt with me and not secretly vndermine me behinde my backe and then to wait for my death that so they might afterwards make of me what themselves pleased Well I forgive them if they leave these courses Verily I have taught and still teach that sinners must be moved to Repentance by the preaching pondering of the sufferings of Christ that they may see how great the wrath of God is against sinne and that it cannot bee otherwise expiated but by the death of the sonne of God Which is not mine but St Bernards doctrine But why doe I mention St Bernard It is the doctrine of the whole Christian world and which all the Prophets and Apostles have delivered But how doth it hence follow that therefore the law must be taken away I finde no such inference in my Logick and I would gladly see or heare that Logician that would demonstrate the truth of this conclusion When Isaias saith chap. 35 I have smitten him for the sinnes of my people I pray tell me here Christs sufferings are preached that he was smitten for our sinnes Is the Law hereby rejected what is the meaning of these words For the sinnes of my people Is not this the sense of them Because my people have sinned against my law and not kept the same Or can it be imaginable that there should be any sinne where there is noe law Whoesoever abrogates the law must of necessity abrogate sinne allsoe If hee must suffer sinne to bee hee must much more suffer the being of the law For the Apostle saith Rom 5 Where noe law is there is noe sinne If there bee noe sinne then Christ is nothing For why died hee if there were no law nor sinne for which hee ought to die Hence you may see that the Devill intends by this Ghostly Gambold to take away not so much the law as Christ the fulfiller of the law For hee knowes too well that Christ may quickly lightly bee forgotten but the law being engraven in the bottome of the heart it is impossible to raze it out as you may observe in the complaints which are uttered by the blessed Saints of God in the Psalmes that are not able to undergoe the wrath of God which can be nothing else but the lively preaching of the law in their consciences And the Devil also is not ignorant of this that it is impossible the law should be taken out of the hearts of men as the Apostle prooves in his second chap to the Rom. v. 14 15. For when the Gentils which have not the law In the German Copie which received not the law by Moses do by nature the things contained in the Law they having not the Law are a Law to themselves which shew the work of the Law written in their hearts c. His maine plot therefore is to make people secure and to teach them to slight both law sin that when they are once suddainely overtaken either by death or in an evill conscience they might without any remedy sink into hell as having binâ— accustomed to all manner of sensuality and taught nothing else in Christ but a sweet security soe that when terrors of conscience seize on them they take it for a certaine signe that Christ who can be nothing but sweetnesse it selfe had reprobated and forsaken them This the Divell seekes and would faine compasse But it appears to mee that these fanatick spirits are of opinion that all those which attend the preaching of the word must needs be such Christians as are altogether without sinne wheras indeed they are such whose hearts are altogether sorrowfull and pensive such as feare God and feel their sins and therefore they ought to have comfort administred unto them For to such the love of Christ can never be made sweet enough but they still need more and more of it as I have found in experience in a great many to say nothing of my self But these teachers are themselves farre short of such Christians because they are so jocund and secure Much lesse their Auditors who likewise are as fearlesse and foole-hardy There is a godly Virgin an excellent singer who speaks thus in a certain Hymne He hath filled the hungry with good things but the rich he hath sent empty away Hee hath put down the Mighty from their seats and â—xalted them of low degree And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation God cannot but be angry if there be any truth in the Magnificat with such spirits who are secure and dread nothing and such of necessity must those hold Bayards be which take away both law and sin Let mee therefore beseech you Good Mr Doctor to continue as hetherto you have in the pure doctrine and to preach that sinners can and must be drawne to Repentance not only by the sweetnesse of grace that Christ suffered and died for us but alsoe by the terrors of the Law For when they pretend that wee must follow but one kinde of Method in teaching the Doctrine of Repentance to wit that Christ suffered for us lest all Christendome should deviate from the true and onely way this is little to the purpose For it is our duty to improve all manner of means such as are divine Menaces Promises Punishments Blessings and what ever helps we can to bring men to Repentance I mean by all the Presidents in the word to bring them to the
or the flesh and old man in every man So say the English Antinomians that the precepts of a Christian conversation doe onely obleige the hypocrites under the law that are mixed with true beleevers so doth Towne all the duties Mat. 5. Blessed are the meeke c. are performed by the beleever in Christ and Christ presseth not these â—uties as obleiging the beleever but that he may destroy all vaine boasting and confidence in mans owne righteousnesse of workes bred by the Scribes and Pharisies which is an abominable doctrine for then there was no beleever on earth blessed through personall meekenesse spirituall poverty hungring for Christ and the Apostles and beleevers were not blessed nor had any reward to looke for in heaven in that they were persecuted and killed for Christs sake the contrary is cleare in scripture The putting on of the new mâ—n said they and walking in newnesse of life is nothing but externall discipline and hath nothing common with the Spirit So Eaton Crispe Den Saltmarsh it s but to walke according to the outward conversation honestly as in the sight of men not as in the sight of God yea walking contrary to new obedience and after the lusts of the old man in beleevers is no sinne which God can see in beleevers say Eaton Towne Saltmarsh in Luthers time Christopherus Petzelius wrote a bitter peece for Antinomianisme against Ioannes Wigandus Crellius in spoâ—gia contra Ioâ—n Vigandum and others as Petrus Paladius in catalo aliquot haereseor relateth Antinomians now as of olâ— pretended that Luther is of their mind and alleadge diverse testimonies out of Luther But Luther instituted six publicke disputations at Wittingburg against the Antinomians but the style of Luther was according to his Spirit and zeale hot hyperbolicke vehement against justification by works and therefore these distinctions are to bee observed to cleare Luthers minde 1 Luther speaketh one way of the Law and the workes of the law in the matter of justification and a far otherway of the Law and workes simply as they obleige all 2 To Luther the law teaching squaring commanding is one thing the law in strict terms commanding perfection under highest eternal paine compelling terrefying cursing condemning is another thing 3 The Law compelling legally and condemning that it may condemne is one thing and the Law compelling and condemning materially not that it may destroy and condemne but condemning to the end it may chase the sinner to Christ and save intentionally is a farre other thing 4 The conscience simply is one thing and the conscience terrifyed crushed shaken with dispaire a far other thing Luther constantly â—aught that the law obligeth the conscience of believers as well as unbelievers and yet that the law ought to exercise no dominion over the terrified affrighted conscience of a believer to presse him to despair 5 The Law according to Luther hath three speciall uses 1 That it may reveale sinne and wrath and by this be a paedagogue 〈◊〉 lead the sinner to Christ. 2 To be a rule of a holy life 3 To discipline and compesce with the fury and feare of wrath hypocrites and wicked men that they may be disciplined externally and not goe with loose raines after their lusts 6 The Law in its rigour as it sounds out of the mouth of Moses and is violated and presseth us to absolute obedience out of our owne strength without a Mediator or a Mediators free grace is to the beleever a rough and bloody enemy and preacheth bloody tragedies and craveth and exacteth hard things but the Law as pacified with the blood of a surety and as it is the sweet â—reathing of the love of Christ through the Spirit and as it saith walke in love through the strength of him that hath loved you to death it is a sweet warme kindly lovely freind and leadeth us being willing 7 The law is eternall the law condemning forceing cursing a believer is not eternall but ceaseth to the believer in that bloody office through the satisfaction of Christ. 8 Luther highly magnifieth good works in themselves but as the agent resteth on them with confidence he abaseth them 9 The law without the Spirit is a poore thin liueles hopeles useles dead letter the law animated with the Spirit and tempered with some ounces of Gospel-breathings of free grace concurreth instrumentally to convert quicken revive us and to promote salvation 10 The law as it teacheth directeth commandeth obligeth bindeth to duties for the authority of the law-giver and is ever an active rule to the believer and never a passive thing But as it condemneth and â—urseth it is to a believer a meere passive and a naked stander by and hath no activity nor can it act in that power upon any in Christ as the law of Spaine is meerly passive in condemning a free borne man dwelling in Scotland 11 The binding authority in the law laying on the sinner an obligation to doe and act is different from the binding power of the law to suffer punishment for transgressing of the law The former agreeth to the Law simply as it is a Law the latter agreeth to the Law aâ— it is violated and disobeyed 2 The former is eternall urgeth the believer unbeliever before the fall after the fall in the life to come the latter is removed in Christ to all those that are in Christ for the law fully satisfied neither condemneth nor can it condemne to eternall suffering for Christs passive obedience removeth all possibility of our passive obedience for sin in a satisfactory way 12 The Law admonishâ—th but helpeth not Hence these conclusions for the clearing of the truth and of the minde of Luther more fully 1 Conclusion Luther expresly declared himselfe against Antinomians by that title and name They are saith Luther pernitious teachers who in our time moved by ways I know not what contend that the law should not be preached in the Church wouldest thou not preach the Law where there is truely a people for Law to wit men greedy proud unclean usurers Idolaters In the Antinomian sect saith Luther this is a peculiar proposion if any was an adulterer a murtherer c. let him only believe that God is gratious to him and that 's enough but what a Church is this in which so horrible a voice doth sound But we must teach that there be two sort of sinners some who acknowledge their sin some who securely please themselves therein I intreat Saltmarsh Eaton Crispe Den Towne Del Randel Simson who are so much against all preparations for Christ and for sole beleeving and cry out so much against strict walking with God to consider this How can the preaching of the Law bee excluded out â—f the Church doe ye not also exclude the fear of God and a great part of the works of God The Antinomians these new prophets contend that men should
this sanctification of life is not a jot the way of that justified person to heaven I perswade my selfe Luther had an eye to Antinomians when he said 〈◊〉 feared after his death that the doctrine of the true office of the law should be obscured Luther to 3. fol. 102 admoneo pietatiâ— amatores praecipue qui aliquando sunt futuri doctores ut diligentèr ex Paulo disâ—â—â—t intelligere verum et proprium usum legis qui ut timeo post tâ—mpora nostra interim obscurabitur et prorsus obruetuâ— to 4.106 timeo quod ista doctrina de vero legis usu nobis extinctiâ—â—bscurabitur 3 Conclusion Luther saith the New man needeth no law it s the flesh the old man the body of sin that is under the Law The law in a Christian ought not to exceed his bounds and ought onely to have dominion over the flesh which is subject to it and remaineth under it but oh law wilt thou invade the conscience and exercise dominion there and accuse the conscience of a justified beleever none terrified of sin and take away the joy of heart thou dost this beyond thy office When I behold Christ I am all holy and pure knowing nothing of the Law as it curseth and condemneth the beleever but if I behold my flesh I finde avarice lust wrath pride feare of death sadnes horror hatred murmuring and impatience against God in so farre as these are present Christ is absent or if he be present he is weakely present here there is need yet of a paedagogoe who should exercise and vex this strong asse the flesh that by this paedagogue sinnes may bee diminished and a way prepared for Christ. Luther Lex in Christiano non debet excedere limites suos sed tantum dominum habere in carnem quae et ei subiecta sit et sub ea maneat hoc ubi fit lex consistit intra suos limites lex si tu vis ascendere in regnum conscientiae et ibi dominari loquitur de conscientia hominis justificati sub tentationibus terrefacta et eam arguere peccati et gaudiâ—m cordis tollere hoc praeter officium tuum facis Si Christum inspicio totus sanctuâ— et purus sum nihil plane sciens de lege Si vero meam carnem inspicio sentio avaritiam libidinem iram superbiam timorem mortis tristitiam pavorem odium murmurationem et impatientiam contra Deum quatenus ista adsunt catenus abest Christus aut si adest infirme adest hic opus est adhuc paedagogo qui fortem asinum carnem exerceat et vexet ut hac paedagogia minuantur peccatâ— et Christo via paretur I grant the Antinomians now as Town Saltmarsh Den and the old Antinomians in Luthers time spoke after the same Grammer and stile and so did the Libertines in Calvins time say non ego pecco sed Aâ—inus meus It s not I that transgresse the law and am under the law but my asse But they have a farre other minde then Luther for the Antinomians as Schlusfelburgius saith cato heriti l 3. p. 53 54. taught that the flesh only and the unrenewed man was under the law but the renewed and justified man was under no law more then if it had beene never given to him and the law was no rule of life and obedience to a beleever Luther cryeth against this as most false and Luther saith those that beleeve in Christ must be daily mortified by daily Law-rebukes and arguenda sunt peccata et proponenda ira dei propter incredulos qui in ecclâ—sia sunt imo etiam propter credentes ne adhaerescenti peccato et innatae imbicillitati indulgeant lex manet inquit ante evangelium et justificationem in justificatione et post justificationem Luther verum tunc amplius non sunt opera legis sed Christi in nobis per fidem operantiâ— et viventis per omnia ideo non possunt sunt Mogis omitti quam ipsa fides nâ—c sunt minus necessaria quam ipsa fides Caeterum opera legalitâ—r perfecta quae verè sunt legis ficta et falsa sunt Good workes saith Luther are not any more the workes of the law compelling under the paine of damnation for he saith in the same place libere et gratis facienda sunt but workes of Christ working in us by faith and every way living in us therefore they can no more be omittted then faith it selfe and are no lesse necessary then faith it selfe Observe this in reading Luthers works that he taketh the law as opposed to justifieing grace and as it may condemne or justifie and so as an instrument of the Covenant of works exacting perfect obedience in a legall sence otherwise neither Luther nor any of our Divines will say good works absolutely perfect and in all things conforme to the Law are necessary to salvation for it is false all beleevers are saved by faith in Christ without any such good workes or perfect legall obedience Then we must hold this to be Luthers minde that if good workes be commanded to the renewed man in the law as well as faith and be as necessary as faith then the renewed part is under the law commanding good workes as well as it is under the command of faith but Luther saith the former Antinomi say nothing sins but the flesh nothing is under the law but the flesh so nothing is under a command and an obleiging rule of law or Gospell to doe good workes and beleeve but the flesh a senselesse untruth For it is the new man by the Spirit of Christ saith Luther from the word of truth that doth good workes and beleeveth So Luther to 4. fol. 499 in Psal. 130. 2 and excellently saith Luther to 1 fol. 436 Christiana lâ—bertas est quando non â—utata legâ— mâ—taâ—tur homines ut lâ—x eadem quae prius libero arbitrio odiosaâ—uit iam defusa per spiritus saâ—ctâ— charitatem cordibus nostris iucunda fiat Hence Luther saith two things that contradicts the Antinomians 1. The Law is not changed when the sinner is changed but that which was hatefull to free will before is the same law but now sweet and pleasant to the heart then if the law be not so much as changed it is not abolished to the beleever it s made of hatefull pleasant 2. That Law that is pleasant to the heart and sweet it is not given to the flesh and unrenewed part but especially to the renewed part 3 The renewed part in the beleever doth either do good workes by the grace of Christ and so keepe the law though unperfectly or not doe good workes at all If the latter be said the renewed part is not renewed but dead and is the very old man which is a contradiction but if thâ— former be said that it is the new man or renewed part that
legis opera id est non esse justos nec facere bona opera The Law is not given to a just man who so liveth that hee hath no need in his terrified and quaking conscience of the Law as compelling and forcing with curses and as condemning of a Law which should admonish presse and compell him but without any compulsion of the Law of his owne accord hee doth what the Law requireth therefore the Law cannot accuse and impleade beleevers as guilty nor can it trouble their conscience it terrifieth and accuseth but Christ apprehended by faith chaseth it away with the terrours and threatnings thereof therefore the law to them is simply abrogated nor hath it authority to accuse them for they doe willingly what the law requireth We must then walk saith Luther in the Kings way that we may neither utterly reject the Law nor ascribe more to it then is due Before Christ the Law as it rigidly commands and condemnes is holy after Christ justifieth it is death Therefore when Christ commeth being apprehended by faith we should know or acknowledge in the renewed conscience nothing of the compelling and condemning Law nothing simply of the Law but in so farre as it hath dominion over the flesh which it oweth and presseth So the Law saith Luther of the ten Commandements without faith in Christ bringeth death not that the Law is evill but because it cannot justifie but hath the plaine contrary effect The proper office of the Law as the Law without a Mediator is to make us guilty to humble kill bring to hell take all from us but for this end as it is the hand of the Mediator that we may be justified and then it killeth not simply but killeth to salvation Therefore Luther the Law hath dominion indeed over the body and the old man let this man be under the Law let the Law prescribe what he ought to doe what he ought to suffer let it not pollute the chamber in which Christ only ought to rest and sleep that is let it not trouble the new man with its use and office Wee grant saith Luther there is no Law given to the just as they are just and live in the Spirit but as they are in the flesh and have in them a body of sin and are under the Law and doe the workes of the Law for that is not to be just nor to doe the workes But the Antinomians in Luthers time and in our dayes doe wickedly inferre then these and the like commandements Walke in my Laws put â—n the new man who is created according to God serve one another in love doe not belong to the new man but only to the flesh and to those that are under the law for what need is there said the old Antinomians to bid a man put on his coat when his coat is already on him therefore wee say this to a man that hath not put on his coat that is to a man under the Law and to the old man in the beleever not to the new man for it is true these precepts as they are meerly legall and to be obeyed without the grace of the Mediator and as they exact perfect Law obedience in a compulsive way under the paine of death eternall are not given to the new man nor to the beleever at all that is most true But that these commands Evangelically considered and as they urge obedience unperfect and by the grace of God are not given to the new man but to the old only is a most palpable untruth for Christ biddeth the beleever and the new man put on his coat though he have put it already on but imperfectly there is a sleeve or a shoulder of his new wedding coat not on yet it is not perfectly buttoned in this life though the coat of imputed righteousnesse be perfect and if sanctification be sincere yet it is not every way so sewed and pinned on us but the very new man hath need in regard that his faith is in the growing hand of that command Put yee on the Lord Jesus The just as just should have no need of a compelling Law if they were perfectly just both in person and works as Antinomians say they are And it is most false that the Law is givâ—n formally to the flesh as if sinfull flesh were commanded to beleeve and put on Christ or were capable of righteousnesse as before is cleared 4. Conclusion Luther saith the conscience of a beleever weake and tender terrified challenged accused hath nothing to doe with the Law Luth. Nunquam pâ—câ—at homo horribilius quam in eo articulo in quo incipit legeÌ„ sentire sâ—u intelligere Impossibile est Christum legem simul habitare in corde aut enim legem aut Christum cedere oportet Discamus igitur diligentissimè hanc artem distinguendi inter has duas justitias ut sciamus quatenus legi parere debeamus diximus autem suprà quod lex in Christiano non debet excedâ—re limites sâ—os seâ— tantum hâ—bere dominium in carnem Christiani Dicas legi consiste intra limites tuos exerce dominium in carnem conscientiam autem nâ— attingas mihi ubi nulla lex est Summaâ—â—rs sapientia Christianorum est nescire legem ignorare opera totam justitiam activam presertim cum conscientia luctatur cum judicio Dei sicut extra populum Dei summa sapientia est noscere inspicere urgere legem opera activam justitiam Luther Diabolo accusanti tues peccator ergo damnatus respondere possumus quia tu me peccatorem dicis ideo volâ— esse justus salvus imo damnaberis non confugio enim ad Christum qui sem tipsum tradidit pro peccatis meis Cum conscientia perterrefit lege nec ratio nem nec legem consulas sed sola gratiâ ac consolationis verbo nitarâ—â— ibi omnino sic te geras quasi nunquam de lege Dei quicquam audieras sedâ—scendas in tenebras ubi nec lex nec ratio lucet sed solum aenigma fidei quae certo statuit te salvari extrà ultrà legem est lex audienda sed suo loco tempore Luth. Christiano nihil prorsus negoâ—ii esse debet praesertim in tentatione cuÌ„ lege peccatâ— quatenus est Christiâ—nus est supra legem peccatum habet enim in corde praesenâ—em inclusum ut 〈◊〉 gemmam Christum dâ—mâ—num legis itaque cum lex cum accusat peccatum perterre facit intâ—â—tur Christum quo fide apprehenso habet â—â—cum victorem legis peccati â—ortiâ— diaboli qui illis omnibus imperat ne noâ—ere possint Luther Extenâ—â—tiones legis referendâ— sunt ad certamen conscientiae Nequâ— satis viliter odiose cum in hoc argumento versamur de ea loqui possumuâ— ideo conscientia in vero agone nihil
that being once justified and having obtained the Spirit they are not obliged by any obligation of a command involving sin in case of disobedience to either read heare or meditate in the Scriptures but are so freed from the signe having obtained the thing that they are not under the letter of law or Gospel written or preached or under any outward command or Ordinance or Law or Sacrament or sin or obligation at all but are led by a free arbitrary Spirit separated from all letter of the word A vain dream For Luther holdeth the letter of the Law to be an erroneous false and wicked seeking of righteousnesse by the works of the Law and a living to sin and from the oldnesse of the letter in this sense we are freed by the Spirit of faith and Luther explaineth himselfe when hee saith Obtentare jam signo non opus having obtained the Spirit we need not the letter He meaneth nothing lesse then when we have received the Spirit we need not the written Scriptures or the Commandement or any outward Ordinances nor any commanding Sure Sathan devised that sense it came never in Luther never in Pauls minde but he meaneth having obtained the thing that is the Spirit we need not the signe that is the letter of the Law only without the Spirit now the letter of the Law only commandeth perfect and exactly absolute obedience under the paine of eternall damnation But Luther explaineth himselfe in the very next words Ideo obtenta re Spiritu jam signo non opus Itaque neque justo lex ost posita What is that Luther to 4. fol. 178. Lex justo non est posita sic enim justus vivit ut nullâ lege opus habeat c. He so liveth that hee hath not need of the Law to teach and command without Christ that he must performe absolutely pâ—rfect obedience to the Law otherwise he is eternally condemned this is the letter of the Law for the just man is in Christ. Ideo Lex saith Luther there non potest accusare reos agere credentes in Christum the Law cannot accuse and condemne beleevers in Christ in the same sense saith Luther to 1.451 Justus non debet bene vivere the justified man ought not to live holily according to the letter of the absolute commanding Law enjoyning obedience under paine of eternall condemnation for faith looseth him from this debet and from this Law debt yet vivit bene hee liveth holily and he ought to live holily in an Evangelick sense and that this is Luthers minde is cleare the just man is loosed from that Law that the unjust and beleever is under as Luther saith in the same place Injustus debet bene vivere Now the beleever being under the Law he is a full debter to pay active and passive obedience to the brim he owes in a manner as much as Christ paid to the Law 2. Luther saith in the same place Hoc totum urget c. God presseth all this that we seeke not a letter-righteousnesse that is righteousnesse by the workes of the Law for the Law in its letter requireth absolute obedience under the paine of death But Christs intention sense is not that the â—etter of the Law Cursed be he that obeyeth not in all that is written in the Law to doe it shall stand against the beleever but that the spirituall sense shall stand that the beleever shall bee cursed in his head Christ suffering for him and that he shall fulfill the Law not in the letter that is perfectly and compleatly for so the old letter is now out of date and passeth away to the beleever but in the Spirit that is an Evangelick obedience to the Law 8. Conclusion Antinomians hold that a justified man is perfect and free from sin both in person and works as if he were in heaven and that the naturall civill and religious works of beleevers are made perfect in the sight of God Then must they perfectly keep the Law and Christ must make our good works exactly conforme to the Law what can hinder us then to be justified by works Randal the Antinomian and Familist said These are ever learning and never come to the knowledge of the truth who say That perfection is not attainable in this life So Bullinger l. 1. c. 8. tells of the fourth sort of Anabaptists in his time that said they could not sinne and the Church was without spot and wrinckle they left out in the Lords prayer Forgive us our sinnes and said we are justified by workes and could keep the Law perfectly Sure Luther denyes the beleevers to be perfect in this life Say not I am perfect I cannot fall but be humble and fear thou that stands to day mayst fall to morrow Luther So is the life of a Christian that he who hath begun may seem to have nothing therefore Paul saith I beleeve not that I have apprehended Phil. 3. because nothing is more pernitious to a faithfull man then that presumption as if he had apprehended it and there were no need to seeke so many make defection and whether through security and negligence So Bernard to stand in the way of God is to goe backe then to him that is be-back then to him that is begun to be a Christian this remaineth to esteem himself not a Christian but to seek to be a Christian. A Christian is not at his end but in his way that he may glory with Paul I am not but I desire to be and as many of us as are perfect let us remaine in this rule then he that is a Christian is no Christian that is he that beleeveth he is made a Christian when he is to be made a Christian we endevour toward heaven we are not in heaven so he is already in heaven who indevours toward heaven because God counts him to be in heaven woe to him that is wholly renewed that is who beleeveth he is renewed Then woe to Towne Saltmâ—rsh for these that are as free from sin as Christ must be perfect Luther The minde of man when it is in temptation and danger with difficulty rests on this consolation for thus it doth perpetually complaine What shall be done when shall it be done where shall it be done I answer then wait on wait on if it be longer deferred and the mind ask againe when shall it be say thou I have no other advice but that thou indure and wait on longer one two three years he that commeth will come and will not â—arry Luther Ne dicas ego perfectus sum non possum labi sed humiliare et time ne hodie stans cras cadas Luther Sic est vita Christiana ut qui caeperit sibi videatur nihil habere sed tendit pergit ut apprehendat unde Paulus non arbitror me apprehendisse Phil. 3. quia re vera nihil pernitiosius est homini fideli
Georgians Henry Nicholas and his 5 There be no created graces in the Saints Christ takes them out of their owne hands into his 6 There was no created graces in the human nature of Christ he was only acted by the God-head 7 The Image of God in Adam was not in holinesse but in being like to Christs manhood 8 No scripture warranteth Christs manhood to be now in heaven but the body of Christ is his Church So Saltm Sparkles of glory as before observed 9 We are united to Christ with the same union that Christs humanitie on earth was with his Godhead Joh. 17.21 that is right downe Christ and every Saint is one person then were the saints personally and really crucified dyed buryed rose again and ascended to Heaven with Christ. 10 No evidence of our good estate is either from absolute or conditionall promises 11 The Disciples were not converted before Christs death Matth. 18.3 12 The Law is no rule of life to a Christian. 13 There is no Kingdome of heaven but onely Christ. 14 There is a first ingraffing in Christ by union from which a man might fall 15 The first thing God reveales is to assure us of election 16 Abraham till he offered his son and saw the firmenesse and certainty of his election was not in the state of grace 17 Vnion to Christ is not by faith 18 All commands even of faith kill as the Law doeth Rom. 3.17 Contrary to the Gospel that gives life and commands faith in Christ also 19 There is no faith of dependance but onely that of assurance 20 A hypocrite may have Adams righteousnesse and perish and is obliged to keep the Law 21 There is no inherent righteousnesse in us 22 We are dead to all spirituall acts and onely acted by Christ. 23 Not being bound to the Law it is no transgression against the Law to sin for our sins are inward spirituall exceeding sinfull and onely against Christ. 24 Her own revelations about future events are as infallible as Scripture the Holy Ghost is author of both she is obliged with certainty of faith to beleeve the one as well as the other 25 So farre as a man is in union with Christ he can doe no duties perfectly and without the communion of the unregenerate part with the regenerate 26 Exhortations to worke out our salvation to make sure our calling and election by good works are given onely to those that are under a covenant of works M. Weld sheweth when preaching could not prevaile to gain Familists though thereby many were gained to the truth many doubting ones confirmed an assembly was appointed at Cambridge then called New-Towne M. Hooker and M. Bulkley were chosen Moderators The Magistrates sitting by as hearers and speakers when they saw fit Liberty being given to the people to hear that they especially might be satisfied in conscience touching the truth then controverted by wicked wits A place was appointed for all the Opinionists to come in and speak due order being observed Which if done by citation and the Ministeriall power of Jurisdiction as may be gathered from Matth. 18.15 16 17 18 19 20. 1 Tim. 5.19 And they accused upon the Testimony of witnesses and publickly rebuked and not onely the Heresies condemned but the holders of such opinions ministerially and by authority and power given of Christ for edification 2 Cor. 10.8 declared publickly to be such as trouble the Churches and pervert soules Act. 15.24 and that the people of God beleeve no such lying opinions nor follow such wicked practices Act. 21.25 and if the Opinionists should refuse to heare the Church or Churches offended they should be excommunicated and holden for Heathen and Publicans as Matth. 18.15 16 17 18. 1 Cor. 5.1 2 3 4 5. that they leven not the whole lumpe of many Churches Gal. 5.9 10. compared with Gal. 1. v. 2. if I say so they had been dealt with it had been right But though this Synod did much work upon many the chiefe leaders remained obstinate When foure Elders were sent to Mistris Hutchison she with a fiery countenance asking whence they came received this answer We come in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ from the Church of Boston to labour to convince you Answered with disdaine from the Church of Boston I know no such Church call it the whore and strumpet of Boston no Church of Christ. As men turn to these abominable opinions God gives them up to vilde affections for divers of them became unclean M. Weld saith they had no prayer in their family no Sabbath insufferable pride hideous lying some of them convicted of five some of ten lies one smitten of God in the act of lying fell in a deep swoune and being recovered said Oh God thou mightst have struck me dead as Annanias and Saphira for I have maintained a lye Mistris Hutchison and others were excommunicated for lies others for other foule scandals Mistris Hutchison defended her twenty and nine errors in the Church of Boston openly with lyâ—ng knowne to many that heard her she brought forth deformed Monsters to the number of thirty Omnipotency of Divine Justice further interposeth a revenging hand from heaven for at Boston 1637. October 17. When God was beginning to take vengeance on persecuting Prelates and their adherents in Scotland for the Assembly of Glascow was convened the end of the next year Anno 1638. in which the Prelates of Scotland were excommunicated and the morning of Britans Reformation was dawning at this time the Wife of William Dyer a proper comely yong woman was delivered of a large woman childe as the Story saith Rise Reigne p. 43 44 it was still-born about two moneths before the time the child lived a few houres The child was a fearfull and rarely prodigious Monster It had no head but a face which stood so low on the brest as the eares most like an Apes eares grew on the shoulders the eyes and mouth stood farre out the nose was hooking upward the brest and back was full of sharpe prickles like a Thornback the Navell and all the belly with the distinction of the sex were where the lower part of the back and hips should have been and those back-parts were on the side the face stood the armes and hands were as other childrens but instead of toes it had upon each foot three claws with talons like a young foule upon the back above the belly it had two great holes like mouths and in each of them stuck out a piece of flesh it had no forehead but in the place thereof above the eyes foure hornes whereof two were above an inch long hard and sharpe the other two shorter The Father and Mother were the grossest and most active Familists malicious opposers of the godly the father of the Monster after a Moneths absence came to Boston the Lords day the just time when it was borne and the same day was convented before the Church for making Christ and the Saints a
as well as we know one another by voyce features statures of the outward man then must the light of this new spirit be as certaine as our knowledge by sense why then are we bidden try the spirits and beleeve not every spirit Peter sayth he pag. 150 151 152. walked in his fleshly appearance with his sword not knowing God was to call him out of that dispensation of the flesh to more glory into the same glory he had with God before the world was Eye for eye and wars are from the Law and legal principles Ans. Peter was not called to the glory that Christ had with his father before the world was in this life so long as his flesh needed the defence of a sword except heaven and the resurrection be in this life while we are clothed with flesh as Familists teach 2 Sinlesse Gallesse selfe-defence and defensive warres without malice desire of revenge are perpetuall morall duties under the Gospel oblieging the most spirituall man by the sixt Commandement thou shalt not murther to defend his owne and brothers life from unjust violence Eph. 5.28 1 Chro. 12.1.2.22.36 1 Sam. 26.2 2 Kings 6.32 1 Sam 14.44 Pro. 24.11 So Fortunius Garcias Comment in l. ut vim vi ff de justit jure So the Law l. Gener. c. de decur l. 10. l. si alius § bellissime ubique gloss in vers c. Ferdin Vasquez illustr question l. 1. c. 8.11.18 the Gospel the spirit looseth no man from the Law of nature thou shalt not murther 2 Eye for eye was a judicial Law falsly exponed by the Pharisees to maintatne hatred of our enemie and private revenge which both Law and Gospel forbids 3 If because we are clothed with flesh we may not in an innocent way defend our selves as the wormes and all beasts doe but the Gospel must forbid this the Gospel must forbid to eat drink sleepe cloth our selves 4 Saltmarsh in this condemneth Christians and Familists to beare armes or to be Magistrats the contrary of which is their daily practice preserve thy selfe and deny thy selfe are nor contrary as Saltmarsh imagineth pag. 160. nor did God ever command contraries in Law and Gospel CHAP. XXII The highest discovery Familists have of Christ to wit that he is a man only figuratively not true man OF the highest last discovery of God to man saith Saltm 201. They say speakinge of Familists Adam was a way by which God preached first to man and was not the first man in whom all stood and fell but a way by which this mystery of God was made to appeare first to the creation and Adam held forth nature or a part of this creation in communion with God as to grace and love while hee stood and another part of the creation or nature out of communion with God as to love and grace he should say as to no love no grace but in communion or union to God as to Law and Justice thus they interpret these scriptures of mans first glory fall lesse in the very letter and more in the mystery and in this twofold state were all the rest Cain and Abel c. They say the Gospel or fulnesse of time of the clearer discoverie of this mystery was the Lorâ— Jesus himselfe or God manifested in the flesh or as in one man a figure of the whole mystery as to grace and love or God in flesh or in his or of God in that other part of his creation his Church or Saints And all that Christ did from his childhood to his crucifing death and crosse was a discovery of God by this figure in the whole mystery how God is in all his how he works hath his times of law and of graces and gospel of crucifing and offering up all to death through the eternall spirit which is the blood of the everlasting Covenant or Seale whereby God witnesseth to his people that he is their God and they his people by killing all the strength and life and power of the first creation and carrying it up into a more excellent life his own Spirit And so all Christs birth growing submitting to ordinanecs crucifying death buriall resurrection ascension were so many discoveries as to us in the flesh of the whole mystery of God in the Saints made out in these parts and degrees and severall ages and conditions to shew how God weakens and brings to nothing the life of nature or of this creation in which he will dwell and make his Tabernacle and carry it up into a higher and more excellent life even himselfe and his own glory So as they say all that is spoken of Christ as in that person that was born of a virgin who was crucified dead and buried risen and ascended is spoken in figure in a mystâ—ry an â—llegory not in Christ as a true reall man of the 〈…〉 into which God enters or is born into the world and so 〈…〉 along with him through severall adminiâ—trations into 〈◊〉 Answ. In all this observe a greater and higher mystery of Familists then in Antinomians though they be birds of the same nest Saltmarsh speakes of them in the third person that he may seem not to own them but they are his own Sparkles of vain glory while as he would speake his Antinomianisme and Familisme in so high mysterious suâ—lime a strain so farre above and beyond the Lâ—tter and written Scripture that Mr. Gattaker and those whom he calleth Legaliâ—ts doe not understand him page 320 3â—1 The same very thing saith Calvin of Libertines They used straâ—ge and dark language so prating of Spirituall things that they could not be understood Instruct. adveâ—s Libertinos cap 3. in Opusâ— p 435. Caeterum obscuro peregrino sermone utebantur ut de rebus spiritualibus obâ—annientes minimè intelligi possent Libertini But lest this high and last discovery of the Spirit should not be known to all the Familists of England he will reveale it them and in print too to all Legalists whereas before we heard Familists reveale their secrets but to some few of the perfectâ—â—â— of their own Tribe So H. Nicholas tels us Exhor 1. c. 6. Sect. 5.7 8 9. And in his Elidad Sect. 5. But 1. there is nothing of the first Adams sinne imputed to us that is plainly denied They say Adam was a way that is a figure mystery or example by which God preached first to man Law Justice and Wrath and was not the first man in whom all stood and fell What then He was not a materiall man at all it was no tree no fruit no eating materiall or bodily For all that is according to the Familists way to expone the word in the letter and flâ—sh not in the Spirit For saith he thus they interpret 〈◊〉 Scriptures of mans first glory and fall lesse in the very Letter and more in the mystery So to expone all the histories of the first Adam and of Christ not in the
God in Ordinances Familists and Antinomians willingly mistake and pervert Scripture while they conceive the letter that killeth which is the Law of woâ—ks as opposed to the Gospel and nothing else to be the whole Ordinances of God as in formes that is the written scriptures praying preaching seales hearing conference and that if we beleeve God conveys his spirit in or by these we are Idolaters and worship God in formes images and signes the very Doctrine of H. Nicholas but Rom. 7.6 the oldnesse of the letter is the law commanding intire and absolutely perfect obedience under a curse and having no promise of the spirit and grace to obey and this oldnesse of the letter is the meere letter of the law as law-holding us as the Sonnes of the old Adam under condemnation And the newnesse of the spirit is the grace of the Gospel inabling us to obey what the law commandeth and whereas we cannot obey perfectly assuring us we are under a new Husband and Surety who by his merits takes away the guilt of our sinne for the oldnesse of the letter is opposed to the newnesse of the spirit in the Text as two contrary states to wit the state of Law and the state of Grace which are as two contrary Husbands the one saving the other condemning But the oldnesse of the letter or of the law is not contrary to the ordinances of scripture Hearing Praying Sacraments for then the law should condemne and forbid all these which it doth not 2 Because Paul had called the Law the oldnesse of the letter some might say then the Law is essentially an ill thing and sin He answereth ver 7. What shall wee say then is the Law sin God forbid Then it is cleare by the oldnesse of the letter he meant the law 3 The oldnesse of the letter is opposed in the Text to the newnesse of the spirit then the oldnesse of the letter cannot be ordinances scripture the letter of the Law and Gospel the written and preached word for the written and preached word is never opposed to the grace of Christ or the renewing spirit The word spirit are diverse never opposite or contrary And 2 Cor. 3. the letter is not the written word and seales and ordinances and Ministers preaching the Gospel 1 Because Paul saith expresly God hath made us able Ministers of the new Testament Now sure in this sense they were Ministers of the letter to the far largest part to whom they preached yea the savour of death unto death 2 Cor. 2.16 and their Gospel hid and so a mere letter to these that perish yea and to the most part to a world 2 Cor. 4.3 4. but they were Mininisters of the spirit not of the letter not because they preached not the letter and externall word of the crosse to the effectually called for the contrary is said 1 Cor. 1.23 and if the letter be ordinances the Apostles were Ministers of the letter to all saved and not saved for word and seals and Law and Gospel were written spoken preached held forth by the Apostles to both saved and lost in the visible Church But Paul expresly denies that they were Ministers of the letter but of the spirit 2 The letter is the ministration of death The ministration of death written on stones only And not on fleshly tables of the heart not the Law written in the inward parts Jer. 31. For this Law on stones is the Law commanding but promising no grace to obey and commanding all and perfect obedience under a curse and eternall wrath and for that a killing letter yea for that the ministration of death the letter is not then new Testament ordinances as the written and preached Gospell and seales of the Covenant for as these are written on paper and not on the heart they are also a killing letter but not in the Apostles sense and yet the Apostles were Ministers of the new Testament in these to those that were lost and to those that were saved 3 The ministration of death had a glory that Israel could not behold and if a glory then a spiritualnesse as it is v. 7. and v. 9 it is called glory but letters graven on stones are dead of themselves and have no glory at all except in the thing signified then the written Law as it is here spoken of is not a naked signe figure and shadow But a spirituall ordinance including the thing signified and so something of God and therefore the Letter or ministration of death here cannot be so large as all written or preached ordinances and seales and that as they are meere formes types figures 4 The letter spoken of here v. 11 is done away and opposed to that which remaineth and is not done away but the letter of the written Law and the Ordinance of the Gospel preaching of Christ and the seales of the new Covenant and expresly the Lords Supper are not in this sense a letter a meere sign figure and shaddow for they are not done away The old and new Testament doe remaine and must be preached till Christs second comming Yea that the letter and outward ordinances are not done away as Moses his veile and his shaddows and types is most evident in that John who wrote after the ministration of the Spirit was come and to these who have the anointing that teach them all things 1 John 2.27 saith expresly 1 John 1.3 we declare unto you by writing the word of life 1 John 2.1 I write these ver 12. I write to you little Children 13. I write to you Fathers 14. I have written 26. These things have I written to you concerning them that seduce you and Paul must be a Minister of the letter in all the Epistles he wrote to the Churches by this way 5 The Gospel and new Testament Ordinances are delivered with much plainenesse of speech v. 12. and the old Testament is yet to be read and far more the new Testament is to be read and preached as is cleare v. 14. Then the letter cannot comprehend all Ordinances and old and new Testament in their formes and preaching to be done away as Familists dreame 2 As touching the supposed Idolatry of serving God in Ordinances written read and preached Scriptures of the old and new Testament 1. We doe not include and imprison the infinite God who is incomprehensible in sounds letters writen or spoken in creatures Sacraments that are not God we confesse but holy and warrantable Ordinances of God for we are here to do as God himself doth for we teach no man to fix or pin the Almighty within his ordinances the way of the Spirit with the word we dare not determine but the Spirit goes along with the word the Lord putteth his word and his Spirit in the holy seed in Covenant with him Esa. 59.21 The foolishnesse of preaching is a mean to save 1 Cor. 1.23.18 And if it be Idolatry to serve God in his own Ordinances Familists stumble
and the blowing of the last Trumpet 52. and the swallowing up of death in victory 55 56 57. as if all these should come to passe in this life agreeable to this saith H. N. Evangel ch 35. se 9. In which resurrection of the dead God sheweth unto us that the time is now fulfilled that his dead or the dead which are fallen asleepe in the Lord rise up in this day of his judgement and appeare unto us in godly glory which shall also henceforth live in us everlastingly with Christ and reigne upon the earth wherein the Scripture commeth to be fulfilled in this present day And Saltm willeth these that are as spirituall as himself and his Familists to beleeve this and receive it that is except we make shipwracke of faith and say the resurrection is past in this life as did Hymeneus and Philetus wee are all legall literall men and void of the Spirit 2. Saltmarsh is unwilling to contradict the truth of God 1 Cor. 15.24 too openly to wit that in the end the Kingdome shall be delivered up Now whether this be meant of Christs reigning no more in his Church in this life by Ordidinances or as Chrysostome doth expound the place it be the rendering up to the Father his conquâ—isâ—d and purchased people as it is most agreeable to Eph. 5.27 I dispute not now but Saltmarsh saith faintly This is not only done on the whole body of Christ at the last but also here He dares not say this rendering up is not onely at the last day but also in this life yet the Apostle is cleare he thought of no rendering up of the Kingdome in this life as Saltmarsh by this new spirit supposeth for the text is cleare v. 22.23 every man shall rise againe from the dead Christ first and then his members 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Then is the end when he shall deliver up the Kingdome to the Father Then there is no rendring up till the dead in Christ be raised v. 23.24 but the dead in Christ in their bodies of which undoubtedly the Apostle speaketh 1 Cor. 15.1 2 3 4 c. doe not rise in this life 2. This rendering up is not till the end then shall the end be 3. It is when all rule and authority shall be put downe v. 27. This is not in this life 4. It is when the last enemy shall be subdued 26. 5. When God shall be all in all 28. These are not in this life therefore Saltm dreames Saltmarsh Sparkles p. 165. Jer. 38 2. He that goeth forth to the Chaldeans shall live but if yee stay in the City yee shall be consumed this is a figure of abiding no longer under any dispensation Law Christ in the flesh Gospel Spirit then God and his presence appeares upon it Ans. We know not this Spirit that dreames of phansied types and allegories without shadow of reason in the holy Scripture wee have no ground to beleeve that the Holy Ghost intends any thing of this kinde only Saltmarsh his Popish Spirit saith so the Scripture is silent Saltmarsh pag. 145.147 148. he saith Mal. 3. ver 18. Ye shall discorne betweene the righteous and the wicked proveth the Spirit of discerning by which we shall know false teachers Antichrists as in the Apostolicke Church and who feares God truely who not as the sense knows its object Answ. By this Familists deny the spirits and hereticks are to be judged by the word but that man is the Hereticke the Legalist though never so heavenly if he be a Puritan the spirit of Familists discerns him to be a Cain or a Judas 2 The place of Malachie is this ver 14 15. Ye say it is in vaine to serve the Lord and there is no reward for it But serve ye God and ye shall finde in your owne experience a reward and comfortable fruit in differencing betweene him that serveth God and serveth him not for ch 4.1 Christs trying day cometh Saltmarsh also sparkles p. 70 71. abuseth these Scriptures Gal. 41. and 1 Cor. 3.1.2 He applyeth the former to the Disciples of Christ under Johns ministery and Christs in the flesh but these words The Heire so long as he is a child differeth not from a servant though he be Lord of all Touch not the times of John Baptist or of Christ in the dayes of his flesh though in these times the Ceremonies were still in vigor but the Heir under nonage and Tutors Gal. 4. is the Church of the Jews under the bondage of the Law and the Ceremonies thereof and the Rudiments of the World it was not the Holy Ghosts mind to speake of Christ in the flesh as a Mosaicall Lawgiver or that his heavenly Sermons he preached Matth. 5. Matth. 23. John 10. Joh chapters 13 14 15 16. his heavenly Prayer John 16. hâ—s death and sufferings and resurrection was a dispensation to be layd aside as the tutory of the law and beggerly Ceremonies Sabbath and shadows he speaketh of Gal. 4. for then the Apostles in vaine call us to mind of the words and commandements of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as hee commanded them to doe Matth. 28.19 20 21. 1 John 1.1 2 3 4. 2 Pet. 1.15 16 17 18 19. and though Christ promised at his ascending to send the Spirit this was not to abolished the doctrine of John and that which Christ had taught them in the dayes of his flesh for of that Spirit he promiseth to send he saith Joh. 14.16 Yee know that Spirit for he dwelleth in you for the present and shall be in you in a larger measure when I shall send him Act. 2. But Familists and Antinomians must have no ministration of the Spirit till Christ ascended to heaven And for the other place Paul 1 Cor. 3.1.2 calleth the Corinthians carnall and could not write to them as spirituall not because they were under the doctrine of Iohn Baptist and Christ as Saltmarsh dreameth for that doctrine taught no carnall divisions but he calleth them carnall on this ground v. 3.4 Whereas there is among you envying strife and divisions are ye not carnall and walke as men For while one saith I am of Paul another I am of Apollo are ye not carnall if the Apostle call the Corinthians carnall as Saltmarsh saith because they were under the doctrine of John Baptist and Christ in the flesh of which there is not a syllable in that text or in all the Scripture then must Christ and John Baptist have taught their hearers striving envying schismes and one to say I am of Paul and another I am of Apollo which is blasphemous Now it is against sense and reason that ever God ordained any ministration so carnall as that these under it were carnall because of their striving and envying Saltmarsh tells us as I observe every man should stay under the ministration he is in till the Spirit say come up hither then Paul calleth the Corinthians to abide in this carnality of
without the Spirit is a dead letter as well as the Law and if so then to sinne against any meane of conversion must be against the law of God and so this law which commandeth to heare and obey all that God commandeth us must obleige us perpetually 6. Christ saith expresly that he came not to loose any from obedience 〈◊〉 though unperfect to the least jot of the law The 〈◊〉 covenant of works for so the Scripture calleth it is now so farre forth abrogated as that we are freed from the necessity of justification by the Law and the curse of it and thus far goe the Antinomian Arguments and no further Antinomians free us from the Law as its a beame of Christ in substance and matter so as wee are not to seeke the light of one beame now when the Sunne of righteousnesse is risen himselfe though Master Towne be not so strict Hence is it that they offend so much that any glimmering of light should come to us from the letter of Commandements either of Law or Gospel that to search Christ in the Scriptures is not safe and all covenants in the written and preached Word take men off Christ. CHAP. VII How the Law and the Gospel require the same obedience BUt seeing the Law cannot contradict the Gospel and speaketh nothing of a Surety and Mediator and so is negatively diverse from the Gospel yet positively it is not contrary nor denyeth that there ought to be a Mediator for so should there be two contrary wils in God and so it had bin injustice and against a just law that God should send his Sonne to die for sinners It is the same very obedience commanded in the Law as a strict covenant of works to be done by strength from our own nature and for the authority of the Law-giver and the love of God and now enjoyned in a mild covenant of grace from the strength of the grace of Christ and now not onely acteth on us by Legall motives the love of God the authority of the Law-giver which the Gospel excludeth not but upon the love of a free Redeemer and Ransome-payer as it may bee the same debt which a man payeth of his owne proper goods and of the money borrowed from a rich friend 1. Perfect obedience which the Law requireth and imperfect obedience which the Gospel accepteth for it requireth perfection as well as the Law doth are but graduall diffeâ—ences as the same summe of gold though clipped if accepted by the the creditor as full payment the rest which is wanting being pardoned may in grace and value bee as good as the full payment It is the Law that commandeth the love of God under paine of eternall death for the least faile and by way of a covenant of works Now the tenure of a covenant of works is an accident of the Law 2. A new obligation of obedience varieth not the nature of it as it is the same morall obedience that God commanded to the heathen and the Jews but that it was written and preached to Jewes addeth more guiltnesse when they disobey and these same duties that Moses commanded of righteousnesse holynesse and sobriety Exod. 20. doth the grace of the Gospel injoyne Tit. 3.11 and the Apostles command as acts of sanctification and though Moses should not command them by the motives of the grace of Redemption which yet is false except when he presseth the Law as a covenant of works yet Gospel-motives vary not the nature of duties as a Master may command the same duties to his sonne and his servant upon different grounds 3. The Gospel abateth nothing of the height of perfection in commanding what ever the law commandeth in the same perfection for t is as holy pure and spirituall in commanding we be perfect as our heavenly Father and holy as he is holy as the Law is In acceptation of grace the Gospel accepteth lesse then the law but commandeth no lesse therefore the Gospel granteth pardons but no dispensations the Law though it deny not pardons nor forbid them positively yet it granteth neither CHAP. VIII Of the promissorie part of the Law the differences between the two covenants mistaken by Antinomians are opened FOr the promissory part of the Law It promiseth life and reward to no obedience but to perfect and absolute obedience if there be the least defect in the least jot the garland and crowne promised is forfeited so as there is no regâ—ining of it for ever by that bargaine But the Gospel promiseth to the least sincere obedience were it but a cup of cold water to a Disciple a reward of glory Therefore the difference standeth not as Antinomians dreame betweene the covenants chiefely in doing and not doing as if the Gospel or covenant of grace did not also command doing in relation to life eternall yea and with a promise as well as the Law doth but in a farre other way for Godlinesse hath the promises of the life that now is and that which is to come and to the followers of Christ and though they halt in their walking and such as forsake all for Christs name is promised sitting on thrones and a hundreth fold in this life and in the life to come life eternall But the difference is 1. That no obedience is accepted in the Gospel without a Mediator not so in the Law 2. That the Law is given in its strictest bargaine to a holy perfect nature the Gospel to a lamed wounded and dead sinner 3. The Law giveth by way of debt not excluding boasting in some measure not that Adam could merit an infinite crowne by a peece finite-work or could doe beyond obligation more then we but because for holy works by strict covenant without the Mediators grace without pardon the worker might claime his wages humbly yet glorying hee had woon them by natures good deeds and by works and for works not of grace When Paul saith Rom. 4.2 If Abraham hath whereof to glory it s not before God He meaneth not that justification by the works of the Law giveth ground of boasting or glorying in our selves For 1. a conditionall proposition can conclude nothing positively 2. He speaketh of glorying as chap. 3.27 comparatively Law-justification is more like glorying then grace for Angels cannot boast Rom. 11.36 â—7 the Gospel giveth of free grace But 4. the â—aw could not accept another mans imputed righteousnesse that is supernaturall and to beleeve this required grace and strength of a higher straine then Adam had it demandeth but â— mans owne personall and perfect righteousnesse and curseth the sinner for the least wrinesse or crookednesse in the first bud or spring of the inclinations or motions 5. The Gospel leaâ—â—th place to repentance which the Law doth not and openeth a doore of hope to a lost sinner and the speciall condition is Faith that a ransome payed by Christ shall buy me a title and
right to heaven of which the Law saith nothing 6. The Law gives a reward as a due debt though not merit the Goâ—pel giveth a reward against merit CHAP. IX Of the threatnings of the Law and Gospel TOuching the third part as the Law is in strict tearmes divided from the Gospel 1. The Law-threatnings are on the person for the actions and for the least faile in thought word or deed but the Gospel-threatnings are rather on the â—tate then the actions or if they be on the actions it is for the condition and state therefore the learned Pareus saith that the Gospel as the Gospel hath no threatnings at all For indeed the state of the kingdome of the beleever fenceth him from the curse he is free from condemnation because he is under another King then the man that is under the Law As the man in Scotland is free from Murther which he committed in Spaine not because his act of Murther deserveth not hee should die but because he is a member of the state of Scotland and no penal law of Spaine can reach him in that Sate Pareus thus farre saith true that it is the Law properly that curseth and that the Gospel as the Gospel curseth not but is properly glad tydings For 1. He that beleeveth not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is already condemned that is before his unbeliefe sentence is passed on him by the Law and the Gospel doth but ratifie the sentence For if we suppose there had never been a Gospel nor a Mediatour the sinner should have been a cast-away and sentenced man but now because he beleeveth not he shall not see life but the wrath of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 abideth on him then it was on him before if hee should beleeve in the Sonne of God the sentence of the Law should be taken off the Prince offereth a pardon of grace to a man that hath 〈◊〉 hâ—s Sonne so he will accept of it he refuseth to accept of a Pardon and therefore dyeth rather for his bloud-shâ—d then for his not accepting pardon it would seeme among men too lâ—w a cause of death to put him to death for refusall of a pardon at 〈◊〉 the sentence was given out for killing the Kings Sonne onely he dyeth more deservedly that both he killed the Son and despised his Princes grace or rather his doome is aggravatâ—d and the chaines of Capernaum are made heavieâ— because they comparatively justifie Sodome and so the Gospel-vengeance is an addition to the Law-vengeance as he that dyeth of an extreame distemper of body and by a gracious Physitian may be cured but refuseth the medicine the distemper is the Physicall cause of his death his contempt of the art of the Physitian is the morall cause and a reason why he dyeth without the compassion of his friends and with greater torment of mind to himselfe Yea Faith is not properly the cause that hath any effective influence on so noble effects as are free pardon and free salvation farre lesse is it any meritorious cause Christ hath no joint causes with him in this excellent worke of saving a sinner unbeliefe is a morall cause non removens prohibens 2. The Gospel is an exception of grace against the Law for the Law saith He that sinnes shall dye the Gospel addeth except he beleeve or he shall certainly dye except he beleeve in him who justifieth the ungodly so that the Gospel saith Amen to the Lawes threatning and taketh them not off nor contradicteth them in their owne nature 3. What ever threatnings are executed against an unbeleever they are the Law-threatnings it s a law-Law-death that the unbeleever dyeth for all that eternally perish doe perish under the law and the covenant of works never man is lost under Christ if therefore the Gospel say Whoremonâ—ers Adulterers Murtherers Drunkards shall not inherite the kingdome of God this threatning doth necessarily presuppose a Law-state if they which doe such things remaine under the Law otherwise the Gospels intent is not that they perish but that they beleeve and be saved CHAP. X. Of Gospel feare 〈…〉 with Gospel-freedome to feare hell so wee 〈…〉 and punishment more then sinne for sinne is a 〈…〉 then punishment For 1. we are commanded to 〈◊〉 him who can cast both soule and body into hell 2. It s not a Law-spirit of bondage that some tremble at the word of 〈◊〉 nor for Josiahs hâ—â—rt to melt at the reading of the â—aw 3. Not to be affraid of judgement is a part of a heart rockie and hardened Though Felix his trembling at judgement did prove him to bee under the Law because hee feared onely â—udgement and judgement as a greater evill then sinne Nor is it mercinary to love the reward so it be not more in our intention then a holy communion with God For 1. Moses by Faith had an eye to the recompence of reward Paul set the garland before him as his end 2 Wee are commanded so to runne that we may obtaine to lay up a sure foundation that we may lay hold on life eternal Onely wee are not to make happinesse and our created blessednesse so much out formall end in running our race as holynesse and our objective happinesse which is God himselfe If Antinomians would difference betweene love of a hire and hireling love then should not Towne condemne the just nor can the Fathers under the Law be said to have served the Lord with an upright heart if they served him for hire which Satan judged hypocrisie in Job cap. 1. vers 9.10 See Psalm 73.25 Job 13.15 CHAP. XI Law-feare and Gospel-faith consistent NOr doth Master Towne and Antinomians inferre by good arguing because beleevers may bee stricken off sinnes upon the consideraton of Law-threatnings that their sinnes deserve not wrath as well as the sinnes of others as â— Job saith What then shall I doe when God riseth up and â— Destruction from God was a terror to me But it followeth not that therefore to obey God sub paenà for feare of the condemning Law is not free Gospel-obedience For it s most false seeing this obedience for feare of the desert of sinne was in Paul though he was perswaded that eternall wrath should never be inflicted on him as is cleare by his words Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord wee perswade mâ—n And we know if our earthly house be dissolved we have an house not made with hands but eternall in heaven 2. Law-threatning when Faith assureth the conscience of freedome from the wrath to come and love-perswading are most consistent For most cleare it is that Christ and his Apostles doe command and strictly charge in the Gospel So Antinomians erre who teach that the Gospel perswadeth rather then commandeth and reasons and argues us to duties rather then bindes and enforces and that holinesse and sanctification now is not such as is faâ—hioned by the Law of outward command but by
follow that the Law bee urged in tenour of a meere covenant of works yea or as hedged with ceremoniall and bloudy sacrifices that are Heraulds of our guiltinesse and hand-writings of condemnation is accidentall to the Law not essentiall though the Law have its denomination from this sad office Rom. 7. Rom. 8. Yee are dead to the Law yee are not under the Law so that under the Gospel the Law is substantially and formally the same saith Luther as death is essentially the same before the fall under Moses and under Christ Luth. tom 1. fol. 56. Relativè non formaliter aut substantialiter est peccatum sublatum Lex abolita mors distructa then the Law in its essence and obliging power is eternall never abolished But Antinomians will have the Gospel-grace to loose a man from all commanding Lawes because he is pardoned and because he getteth a pardon for Adultery and murther and such like they conceive this pardon giveth a dispensation that though he commit Adultery and Murther being once a pardoned David he sinneth now against no Law henee beleeve and be pardoned saith the Antinomian and sinne if you can The most ingenious Antinomian I know is M. Randall who as M. Gataker saith Preached that it s as possible for Christ himselfe to sin as for a child of God to sinne And M. Simson That if a man know himselfe by the Spirit to be in the state of grace though he be drunk or commit murther God seeth no sinne in him And when Abraham denied his wife and lyed even then truly all his thoughts words and deeds were perfectly holy and righteous from all spot of sinne in the sight of God And Randall Its blasphemy for a child of God to crave pardon for sinne And it cannot bee avoided the Adultery of a beleever is but seeming Adultery and he is an Adulterer and a sinner so saith Saltmarsh to the eyes of the world and else-where to sense and feeling not truely and before God or in his account for to Faith saith Towne there is no sinne And even that same Text That not a tittle of the Law can perish proveth the same for Matth. 5.19 Whosoever beleever or unbeleever shall breake one of these least Commandements and shall teach men so as Antinomians doe shall bee called the least in the kingdome of heaven and whosoever shall doe and teach the same shall be called great in the kingdome of heaven Now 1. that Christ speaketh of the Law there as ordinarily it was taken for a binding and obliging rule is cleare vers 17 Think not I am come to destroy the Law and the Prophets for hee speaks of that which he came to fulfill but hee came to fulfill the Law by doing and suffering 2. That which may be broken in a sinnefull way is a binding and obliging rule but the Law Christ speaketh of there may be broken for hee saith Whosoever therefore shall breake c. 2. That he intendeth that the Law stand as a rule binding to personall obedience and not to imputative obedience onely in the Mediator is cleare For 1. he saith Whosoever shall breake the least of these it must bee understood of personall breaking not imputative for hee that breaketh the Law in Christ his breach being imputed to Christ shall not be the least man but a chiefe man in the kingdome of heaven even a heire of heaven 2. If the binding and obliging Law bee not understood Christ came in the Antinomian sense to free beleevers both from the cursing and obliging and commanding Law Now sure Christ came to destroy the Law as it curseth and condemneth beleevers for he exhausted the curse and dyed the cursed death for us but he came not to take away the binding power because he both threatneth the breaker and the Antinomian teacher of breaches with being the least of the kingdome of heaven that is with being excluded out of heaven by a meiosis for it is opposed to be great in the Kingdome and also he promiseth a reward to the doer he shall bee great in the kingdome Now that Law which is hedged with threatning and reward is a binding Law 2. The beleever can neither breake the Law in order to punishment nor keepe and doe the Law in order to reward by the Antinomian way because they are freed from all binding and obliging Law say the Antinomians as well as from all cursing and condemning Law so Christ could doe no more if he intended to come in the flesh to destroy the Law then if he should take away the whole nature and being of the Law for he removeth say the Antinomians all the binding and commanding all the threatning and minatory power and the rewarding and promissory power of the Law from beleevers What then leaveth hee of the Law to any man who beleeveth Just nothiâ—g Antinomians say Christ came to fulfill the Law by doing and suffering and so came not to destroy it Anâ—w That cannot be his meaning here for the Argument of our Saviour should so conclude nothing and it is this If whosoever breaketh the least Commandement of the Law and teacheth others to doe so bee debarred out of heaven and who so doth and teacheth men to doe the Law be great in heaven then I the Saviour of man came not to destroy but to fulfill the Law But the former is true Ergo so is the latter The major proposition hath no truth for by the Antinomian way beleevers according to the Antinomian Gospel are neither excluded heaven in breaking the Law nor admitted to heaven in doing the Law but Christ doth all for them and they are not excluded heaven for breaking a Law they are freed from all binding commanding and obliging power of the Law and who can breake a Law who is under no Law Where there is no Law there is no transgression saith Saltmarsh applying it wickedly to this case and to all trouble of conscience for sinne when we are once justified 5. The Antinomians place liberty from the Law in the free loose and wide walking without any feare of sinning against a Law which to them is a shaddow a fancie and nothing and in being compelled for feare of wrath and eternall vengeance to love and serve God as if the Law of God did command us to serve God for feare of wrath and hire or hope of reward But the holy Law of God biddeth us feare sinne before and after it is committed For the Law commandeth the whole feare of God and the offending of his Majesty by sinne And happy is the man that feareth alway this fearing of sin is contrary to hardnesse of heart he is happy who feareth an oath lest he be insnared Now fearing sinne as sinne is contrary to a law is bondage and floweth from the Spirit of bondage say Antinomians Yea it is unbeliefe and a making God a lyar because say they there is no spot of sinne in the
carnall or sold under sinne Yea so it would appeare to Antinomians nothing in man is under an outward Law or Command either of Law or Gospel or any Gospel-promise or Law-threatning save onely the fleshly body of sinne then Christ came in the flesh to redeeme and save onely the Old Adam and the corrupt flesh then is the corrupt flesh and it onely obliged by a Law without and the Letter to beleeve in Christ to eat the flesh and drinke the bloud of the Sonne of man to live with and in Christ to sit in heavenly places with Christ to have right to the Tree of life to have the hid Manna the White stone the new Name given to it And what then shall be the condition of the New man shall not he beleeve walke in Christ converse with God seeke the things that are above rejoyce evermore repent mortifie the deeds of the flesh c. this is strange Divinity 4. This savours strongly of another Antinomian and Familisticall fancie The old Adam sinneth Jam. 3.2 is found to bee a sinner reproved accursed condemned he and all his works shut up under the Law and wrath of God then the man sinneth not is under no Law no Gospel No Law without and in the Letter onely the flesh the Libertines Asse corrupt Adam sinneth is to be reproved sent to Hell and whither shall the other halfe or quarter of the man goe to heaven But if yee will listen to Scripture that which was under the Law was under the curse what was under the curse is redeemed by Christ beleeveth is justified by Faith is blessed with Abraham Gal. 3.10 11 12 13. But is the old Adam the flesh sinne dwelling in Paul redeemed from the curse justified by faith blessed and saved with Abraham Or is the beleever freed from the Law because of the flesh and for the old Adam that dwells in him Then because the flesh and sinne dwelleth in him while he is in this life he must then sinne bee under the Law deserve the curse in so far Or must the flesh be an invisible Spirit that lusteth in man against the holy and just Law but God seeth it not What dreames are these The last difference is The end of the Law saith he was to bondage feare tutorship revealing of sinne outward conformity the end of the Gospel-Lawes is to love newnesse of Spirit praise and thankesgiving for righteousnesse and life received Answ. Bondage and feare servile such as he meaneth here was never any proper or intrinsecall end of the Law the Law is spirituall and can command no sinne nor have any intrinsecall end that is sinnefull servile feare is sinnefull feare This is an use of the Law which God maketh through occasion of our sinnefull condition and holy feare that the Law commandeth is the end of the Gospel-Lawes as well as love Gospel-grace teacheth us to feare God and to walke in godly feare It s true we were shut up under the Law that the Law might be to us in its bloudy ordinances and legall washings and cursings a herald of our guiltinesse and a rigid exactor and craver of our debts to compell us to runne to the surety and as the persuer and avenger of bloud to drive us to our feet that upon life and death we may escape to Jesus our City of refuge our sanctuary and be safe not that for doing of the Law we may be justified but we come to Christ also to the end we may sow to the Spirit walke in holinesse not because we have heaven in compleat fruition already but that wee may attaine the resurrection of the dead and may come by life eternall the free reward of grace CHAP. LXV The Gospel is a rare Covenant of grace WEe agree that the Gospel is not a Covenant such as is betweene God and man in Law-termes like this If yee doe without a Mediators grace perfectly yee shall live God in a manner said of the Crowne Buy heaven and winne it and have it Give works without grace and it s your owne 2. Nor is the Gospel such a covenant as is betweene man and man in which he fulfils his part and he is the one not helping the other but because this is the covenant of grace all the bones articles joynts limmes lithes and parts of the covenant is free grace Christ undertaketh for his Father hee shall faithfully make good all he sayes hee undertaketh for himselfe as surety to make sure worke of the purchase to buy all with a ransome an over-ransome he shall give an over-summe an infinite price for all hee indents for he ingages for the Holy Ghost I will send you the Comforter Christ impawneth his word for all the three Christ bindeth for his people in covenant to give them of his fulnesse to keepe them in his truth to intercede and Advocate for them that their faith faile not and to raise them up at the last day this last is in no covenants between man and man But Saltmarsh speaketh not soberly when he indirectly challengeth the Holy Ghost as a Legalist for using the word Covenant which hath a little saith he corrupted some in their Notion of free grace and makes them conceive a little too Legally of it for it is a promise But with his leave a promise is as legall a word as a covenant and there be as peculiar characters of God and of free grace in Gods Gospel-promises above all Law-promises or promises and bonds betweene man and man as in the covenant of grace nor is any promise between man and man capable of such free grace as the Gospel-promises are and this is a false principle of Antinomians falsely asserted and never proved That if righteousnesse and life be covenanted to us upon conditions meerely Evangelick and which the pure free unmixed grace of Christ worketh in us then life should be purchased by us not for us CHAP. LXVI Antinomians errors touching the covenant of grace ANtinomians grossely mistake the conditions of the Covenant of works and of grace they would hold forth That wee were taken into the Covenant of works upon some condition in us before But in the New Covenant saith Saltmarsh we are not his people before he be our God first But I know none who ever wrot or spoke of free grace dâ—d draw the covenant of grace in such a proportion as that Christ should first woe and sue us to a condition in which by some preparing grace we might earne and as hirelings worke our selves into a meriting condition and make our selves first Gods people and first chuse Christ and provoke free grace so as in all reason and congruitie God must if he be rationall joyne in league and article himselfe to be our God Why We have first articled our selves by the condition of honest hirelings to be his people 1. This is as much as Christ will never covenant nor indent to be our husband while we
without cause and Marrying another and in robbing the Widdow and Orphane and taking the Oxe away from the fatherlesse and so followeth his calling 2. Sinning according to sense and the flesh as lying and whoring are not sinnes according to Faith and before God sense is unbeliefe and a blind judge and reputeth that to be sin which is not sinne saith Eaton For Faith seeth them above sense to be utterly abolished 3. The beleever following his sense in Adultery rapine lying is under no law Ergo his following of his sense his being present at a Masse his robbing his brother cannot be a sinne then it must either be in it selfe lawfull and a following of his calling as the Libertine said or it is unlawfull The Antinomian must speake condictions to call that unlawfull which is against no Law 2. Randell a Familist setting forth a peece of Cusanus Intituled The Vision of God hath a Familists conscience to picture God himselfe and Clouds encircling him expressely forbidden in the second Command but it is no Command to him Master Denne Doctrine of John Baptist 65. retaineth the destinction of Clergy and Laicks condemned by all Protestant Divines and Pag. 66. hee saith Hee will condemne the removall of Images Idols Crucifixes of Wood Glasse of Stone but he mentions no command of God to justifie it for we are commanded no worship externall in the New Testament but Faith that is no sinne as sinne is forbidden but unbeliefe to this Towne assert grace pag. 94. cannot answer one word So H. Nicholas in his joyfull message of the Kingdome cap. 31.33.34 highly extolleth the Romish Church Pope Cardinals Bishops Priests c. Service Ceremonies till hot contention arose about them 3. We know Antinomians thinke nothing of Idolatry adding to the worship of God and that some of them speake their conscience when deterred from Adultery Murther Rapine they have said What Adultery God seeth no sinne in beleevers One of them in Scotland said hee would take the Lords Supper on the crowne of his head if Authority should command him Another said once dipping or ten times were indifferent Most of them are for libertie of all blasphemous religions and their saying is Beleeve in Christ and sin against the Law if thou canst This is to make sense that which Libertines call naturall inclination Yea all outward Commandements to Towne and Saltmarsh are but shaddowes the Spirit is all the beleevers obliging rule No externall Command can oblige a Beleever under perill of sinning against God in his court in foro Dei and wee know how broad and large their consciences bee in the matter of Marriage and Divorce CHAP. LXXXI Sundry Antinomians say Irish Papists ought to have liberty of conscience and to injoy their religion Parall XIII LIbertines said they knew that their soules were immortall and live for ever in heaven but Christ by his death hath taken away that opinion and hath restored life to us in that now wee know wee shall not die Antinomians cannot deny but wee die but they will have no death to be the execution of the righteous Lords sentence for sinne to the godly but that they returne to dust beleeving and neither feeling nor fearing sinne or punishment for sin for that is against the power faithfulnesse providence free grace sufferings of Christ faith all religion and Archer Saltmarsh Crispe upon the same grounds that the beleever committeth Adultery to his owne sense but his Adultery really and to his faith is no sinne so they are not to feare or feele any afflictions or death but to beleeve them to be shaddowes Now the removall of feare and the opinion of dying is imputed to Christs death so as Saltmarsh saith The Spirit of Christ sets a beleever as free from hell the Law and bondage here on earth as if hee were in heaven nor wants he any thing to make him so but to make him beleeve he is so for Sathan sinne sinnefull flesh and the Law are all so neere him that he cannot so walke by sight and in the cleare apprehension of it but the just doe live by Faith and Faith is the evidence of things not seene Then beside that it s his happinesse not his bondage that the Law is is so neere him that is it written in his inner parts and heart it must bee his sinne and feeling contrary to Faith which was one opinion and sense that hee knoweth and beleeveth hee must lay downe this tabernacle of clay And Towne saith Faith banisheth all the mists and vapours arising from these earthly members out of Gods sight and presence Thus I am a sinner and no sinner dayly I fall in my selfe and stand in Christ for ever But Towne lyeth in saying Hee is a sinner in himselfe and no sinner in Christ. For sinne in himselfe or to his flesh or sense is no sinne at all and against no Law his sense lyeth and deceiveth Faith by which he should walke doth truly say he is in himselfe and really no more a sinner then Christ is a sinner in himselfe and upon the same grounds sense of death and sicknesse and paine and feare are but deceiving opinions and errors contrary to faith and Christ came to dye and remove from us feare feeling opinion of all affliction and paine as contrary to faith Now it s a sinne not to walke by Faith then must the feeling of paine and death bee a sinne and Christ came to give us a sense dedolency and dulnesse of apprehending either sinne or ill of affliction and so say Libertines CHAP. LXXXII Libertines and Antinomians doubt of the Resurrection and life to come Paral. XIV LIbertines denyed the Resurrection and said with Hymeneus and Philetus That it was already done and in this life they mocked salvation in hope of the comming of the Lord they said To walke in newnesse of life was the Resurrection with Christ and all the resurrection wee are to looke for David Georgius saith As there was a revelation under Moses and the Prophets and a more cleare one under Christ and the Apostles So under himselfe the true David the Lyon of the tribe of Judah the stone hewed out of the Mountaine without hands there was now a farre more glorious revelation and most spirituall that he exceeded so farre Christ according to the flesh and the Apostles as that all Ordinances and externall worship and seales should cease when he comes because of the efficacie and spiritualnesse of his doctrine above Christ in the flesh and all the Apostles as the Spirit is above the flesh And the clouds in the which Christ was to come to judge the quicke and the dead must bee Allegorically expounded of the mindes of the Saints The Archangell that shall sound the Trumpet is the Doctrine and discipline of this David the Christ. And that the place of happinesse was in this earth not
pag. 145. Nemo negare potest sub V. T. nec vitam aeternam promissam fuisse à Deo nec modum illam consequendi fuisse patefactum Ostorodius Inst. lib. 1. cap. 5. pag. 21. Promissiones veteris Testamenti tantum corporales fuerunt spiritualibus in N. T. promulgatis Non autem spirituales eternae fuerunt consequenter non accidentale tantum sed substantiale discrimen inter Vetus Novum Testamentum si res promissas spectes statuendum est Smalcius de Divin I. C. pag. 25. â— 6 Fatentur omnes Judaei hodie nullum vitae aeternae apertum extare in ipsorum lege ut ut apertius loquar in faedere quod Deus cum iis per Mosem pepigit promissum M. Del boldly saith They are all Antichristian that are not Antichristianly Popish and of the Socinian way with him to teach there was no conversion no inward reformation no promise of salvation and life eternall nor the same covenant of grace in the old Testament that is now under the New Testament and that there was no saving grace nor operation of the Spirit accompanying the Sacraments of the old Testament but onely temporall things promised them He hath Arminians also on his side as Episcopius Disp. 11. th 5. The promises of the Law were touching temporall felicity of the Gospel concerning the everlasting inheritance â—h 7. The doctrine of the Old Testament was known by nature as agreeable to right reason the doctrine of the Gospel was unknown to the Princes of this world it is evident there is no precept say the Belgick Remonstrants Apol. cap. 22. cap. 24. clearely delivered in the Old Testament for beleeving in Christ nor in terminis any promise of life eternall It s sure Arminians are limbs of Antichrist and enemies to free grace Yet Antinomians with Del joyne hands with them against Protestants who all teach to this day the same Saviour the same promises of life eternall the same free grace of imputed righteousnesse the same covenant of grace was revealed darkely in shaddowes and types to the Jewes and more sparingly and to us more clearely and abundantly in the New Testament and that Abraham was saved as we who now are Antichistian whether Del and his Antinomians or wee These that teach the same with Antichrist and contend for perfection and freedome from all sinne in this life are not the men who must fight the battels of the Lambe But 1. was there then no Spirit and life in the Patriachs Prophets Moses David till Christ came in the flesh and reformed them inwardly What became then of the soules of those that dyed in peace and entred into their rest before Christ came in the flesh Esa. 57.1 2 3. Dyed they under the curse and severity of the second death as never inwardly converted Hee belyeth the Old Testament who saith so and doth the Letter of the Gospel without the Spirit save and inwardly reâ—orme and justifie before God more then the Letter of the Law I thinke Judas and the people whose hearts were fatted and heardned and yet heard Christ in the flesh and the Apostles preach Gospel were as farre from inward heart-reformation as uncircumcised Jewes and Heathen Mat. 13.14.15 16. Act. 28.26 27. 1 Pet. 2.7 8. Rom. 11.8 9. Joh. 8.21 Joh. 9.41 Job 5.40 Then Del must meane by the spirit some other thing then the Gospel as opposed to the condemning Law For the Gospel is a condemning Gospel to thousands who stumble at the stone laid on Zion as well as the Law 3. Del saith No outward Law of Synods Councels of men can make men perfect as pertaining to the conscience more then Leviticall Lawes could doe and so the Gospel abolisheth all such outward Lawes imposed on conscience as well now as heretofore under Moses Gospel-reformation saith he is the mortifying destroying and utter abolishing out of the faithfull and elect all that sinne corruption lust evill that did flow in upon them through the fall of Adam Or it is the taking away and destroying the body of sinne out of the faithfull and elect by the presence and operation of the righteousnesse of God dwelling in their hearts by faith This is true Gospel-reformation and beside this I know no other Esai 1.27 Zion shall be redeemed with judgement and her converts with righteousnesse Againe Christ as hee makes us righteous with his owne righteousnesse and makes us the righteousnesse of God in him so hee is called our righteousnesse not in himselfe onely but in us And therefore you see how grossely they are mistaken who take Gospel-reformation â—o bee the making of certaine Lawes and constitution by the sacred power or Clergie for externall conformity in outward duties of outward worship and government and to have these confirmed by civill Sanction and inforced upon men by secular power when in the meane time all that inward corruption and sinne they have brought with them into the world remaines in their hearts and natures as before so the old Prelats reformed His reasons are 1. All things belonging to Christ a Spirituall King having a spirituall Kingdome are spirituall a carnall Reformation is not sutable to a spirituall Kingdome The reformation of the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state is but carnall wrought by the power of flesh and bloud and stands but in outward things 2. Gospel-reformation is inward layes hold on the heart soule and inner man and changes and renewes that dâ—th not much busie it selfe about outward formes or externall conformitie but onely mindes the conformity of the heart for when the heart is right with God the outward formes cannot bee amisse Christ saith touching the worship of the New Testament God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and truth hee speakes not one word of any outward formes So that God in his Gospel-reformation aymes at nothing but the heart according to Jer. 31.33 I will put my Law in their inward parts c. So that they shall not onely have the word of the Letter in their bookes but the living word of God in their hearts But now Civill Ecclesiasticall reformation is outward and so industrious and elaborate about outward formes outward orders outward governing outward confession outward practises like the Reformation of Scribes and Pharisees notorious hypocrites who made cleane onely the outside of the cup or platter leaving them all filthy and uncleane within So Civill Ecclesiasticall reformation makes a man cleane outwardly with an outward confession of Faith when inwardly he is all filthy thorow unbeliefe and whites him over with new handsome formes of worship Object But is there no change of outward things in the Gospel Ans. Yes an outward change that flowes from an inward but not an outward change to inferre an inward c. Answ. 1. Master Del must lay downe a ground that outward Lawes were imposed on the conscience and forced on them with violence of Magistrates and Synods
Whereas Del saith the Words of Christ are Spirit and life Just so said the Libertines and cited the same Text as Calvine saith Instruct. advers Libertat cap. 10. pag. 442. Verbum Dei Spiritum esse aiant quia Dominus ait verba quae loquor Spiritus vita sunt Pag. 441. Verbum Dei nihil aliud quam Spiritum esse Pag. 451. Scripturam in naturali sensu suo acceptam literam mortuam esse ideâ— que missam faciendam ut ad Spiritum vivificantem veniamus Were they to Capernaum that stumbled at his words of life to Corazin and Bethsaida to the heardned Jewes and the blinded Pharisees Spirit and life they were death to them as well as the Law But saith he Christs words come from the Spirits and carry Spirit with them If he meane a Ministeriall and Propheticall Spirit not the killing Law came from the Spirit it is false Is not the Tenne Commandements as given by Moses a part of Scripture Exod. 20. Deut. 5. Math. 22. And is not all Scripture given by Divine inspiration no lesse then the Gospel 2 Tim. 3.16 And doth the Gospel ever carry Spirit with it Then unbeleevers the blinded and hardened hearers of the Gospel not onely resist the Ministeriall Spirit speaking in Christ the Prophets and Apostles but also the saving regenerating Spirit of Sanctification Arminians Socinians Jesuits Pelagians all enemies of free grace shall close with Del in this but Del shall not close with himselfe for he saith inward Reformation caryeth along with it the Omnipotent power of God that cannot be resisted pag. 8. 6. This opinion confoundeth the Gospel and the Spirit making the Gospel effectuall as if the Gospel were essentially life and did save all elect and reprobate and were essentially the irresistible speciall Spirit of Sanctification and so the Gospel cannot be the Gospel to these that stumble at the Gospel but the naked Letter which they say is proper to the Law and the Gospel shall bee no Letter at all no externall command urging us to obedience and indeed Del pag. 26. saith there is no Lawes in Gods Kingdome but Gods Lawes and hee speaks not one word of the Scripture and written and preached Gospel onely he acknowledgeth three Lawes in Christs Kingdome One that the Socinians acknowledge The Law of a new nature other two that the Enthysiasts and Antinomians acknowledge The Law of the Spirit of life that is in Christ and the third which the Familists call for to wit the Law of love Farewell then Scripture Law and Gospel And Towne goeth before him who saith If the Spirit be free why will you controule it by the Law To which I say because it is the lawlesse Spirit of Enthysiasts the murthering Spirit of Anabaptists Libertines Familists who kill all as Antichristian that are not of their way as Del threatneth all Presbyterians in his Preface that is a Spirit controuled or contradicted by the Law or written Word but not the true Holy Spirit FINIS Job 31.21 22. Conformities deformity p. 17 b Preface to the â— Major of London c Pag. 20.22 Juvenalis O sanctas â—entes quibus hoc nascuntur in hortis â—umiâ—a Confor defor pag. 20.21 A letter of M. Iohn Welsh An. 1605. Confor Defor Confor dâ—for Returne from the Parliament of England to the Commissioners of the Generall Assembly an 1642. Ordinance of Parl. an 1643. Feb. 9. Declarat of both Kingdoms an 1643. Declaration to the Generall Assembly of the Kirke of Scotland an 1642. Declarat to the Parl. of Scotland 1642. Declarat given to the Commissioners August 1643. Ordinance 1645. Oct. 20. Ordinance 1645. Mar. 14. Ordinance 1645. Nov. 9. Ordinance 1646. Feb. 4. Ordinan for Oxford 1647. May 1. Treatise between the Kingdomes Ordin 1643. Sep. 18. Declarat of the House of Com. an 1646. April 18. Letters of the Assembly to the Reformed Churches an 1644. Ordin 1644. Iun 3. Zach. 12. Antinomians in â—he Apostles time haâ—e their disceâ—â— from the old Katharoi called puritans The Libertines who spraâ—g up 〈◊〉 1525. of kiâ— to the Familiâ—â—s and Antinomians Finer Antinomians deny the Incarnation of the Sonne of God Coppinus Quintus Antonius Pocquius the first Libertines Anton. Pocquius a Priest the first libertine affected to be obscure and objected ignorance to Calvin that be could not understand his fooleâ—iâ—s Libertines and Antinomians in many things like other Libertines and Antinomians agree in opinionâ— in most things a Calvin adver libert cap 9. p. 441 442. b Calv. 442. c Ibid. e Rise reign â—r 2.3 Adv. libâ—râ— c. 9. p. 411. f Rise reign unsav speech â—r 8. Libertines say Angels are but motions of the minde Libertines make God the author of sinne Antinomians conspire with them g Rise reign er â— 3. h Rise reign â—r 11. i Thâ—l Germ. ca. 22. p. 52. Antinomians and Libertines have the same conceptioâ—s touching mortification and conscience of beleevers k Towne assert gr 97 98 99.115 116.42 43 Salâ—m free gr 83 84 85. Den. conference with the sicke man p. 30 31 32 33. Eaton honeycombâ— c. 8.171 172. l Town assert pag. 103. m Calv. aâ—ver liber c. 19. fo 453 454. m Denâ—ser man of sin p. 9 10 11 12. Saltm fr gr 142 Honey-combe c. 4.5 n Calvin adver lib. c. 21. o Salt fr. gr 140 Tâ—w ass gr p. 60. Mistris Hutchison Rise and reign p. 61 62 63. Nich. Stork Tho. Muncer his Rise and Tenets how sutable with Antinomian divinity p Rise aâ—d reigâ— p 36. q Del. sâ—r 26. Henry Pfeiffer and Muncer their sediâ—ious spirits and miserable end Great tumults to the killing of above an hundred thousand through Germany and about by the Antinomian spirits impulsion which waâ—tâ—th the light of Scripture Tenets of Hubmeir Tho. Schuker by the impulsion of a Spirit without Scripture beheaded his owne innocent brother Becold called John of Leiden his rise bloody attempts spirit wiâ—hout Scripture anâ— Tragicall end John Matthâ—z an Enthusiast Becolds spirit visioâ—s brâ—ng forth polygamy and haâ—iâ—g 〈◊〉 many wives Becold wouâ—d have dâ—ubâ—e the Apostles of Christ â—nd more Becolds bloody spirit A Bullinger adv Anabaptist l. 1.2.3 Sleidan hist. Heresbachius historia Anabaptistica Lambertâ—us Hortensius of the same Freder Spanhemii Diatribe historica de Anabap Ioan. Clopenburgius Gangrena Anabaptist M. Robert Baylie 2. Part of diswasive Anabaptisme the true fountaine of Independencie c. The Tenets of Anabaptists in which they side with Antinomians b. Seaven â—eaded policie by M. Gortin c. Towne assâ—r gr p. 60. Becon Catech. p. 139. he speaketh of our resurection as of a thing past p. 141.142 Rise reign p. 59. art 2 3 4 5. d. Towne ass p. 77 78. Hobson pract divin p. 87 88. Thelo German Bright star Salt Free grace p. 140. e Saltmar sâ—ad fleeing away p. 8. free grace .179 180 181. Familiâ—t Gortyn seven headed policiâ— 1. clases of Anabaptists Divers classes of Anabaptists all which hold somthing common with the
Prince m Obedience to the Kings laws to the effusion of their blood can have no orher sense but they will raise bloody wars against Puritans if the K which I hope shall not be command them I pray God it be not fulfilled in their children this day in England they promise they have been and ever will be obedient to the Kings laws which respecteth the time to comâ— so as if the King and Parliament should againe establish Popery they say for all time to come they shall be ever truly obedient and adde no limitation condition of obedience in the Lord. You may see the consciences of Familists that as after ye shall heare they prostitute themselves to avouch or deny take or leave all Religions as the times and mens lawes shall 〈◊〉 prove them or not n What Pharisees bee these doth not Paul judge himselfe the chiefe of sinners is not Elias a man compassed with infirmities No wonder it bee hâ—rd to prove any wickâ—d doctâ—ine or practise for H. Nichoâ—as in his Epistle to the two daughters of Warwicke would prove men may bely and dissemble and deny their Religion and Christ before men so the heart be good o Shall wee then beleeve that Familists now in England will not be deadly persecuters of Puritans p Puritans are against all religious ceremonies of mens devisings so that tything of mint is unjustly ascribed to to them q To Familists all outward worship and ordinances are traditions they live only upon love within and are swine without and yet sinne not q There is to Familists no judgement and mercy but that which is inward let men as touching the outward man be swine for filthinesse Lions for blood and rapine they may have inward righteousnesse and that is all and enough r Then Puritans only none or few of the prelaticall way or other Sectaries refuted Familists s Familists count all Religions popery or any thing as they come out to the view of men neither up nor downe t But the Saints of love say Familists are above and beyond all laws and Rulers Magistracie is but for fleshly men t Familists by their principles may professe or deny any Religion as the Market goes t This is no little exception in which they swerve from the Religion of England in that they are Familiâ—ts and of a sect destructive to all Christian religion to Châ—ist his person office righteousnesse imputed faith repentance Scriptures heaven hell judgement resurrection c. w He that doth evill hates the light H.N. was once thought to be homo novus But H. Nicholas was a fleshly abominable seducer and false prophet a Mercer in Amsterdam x Neithâ—r Calvin nor Luther knew any thing of God but only H Nicholas is the Catholick Apostle of the world and cannot erre y Nothing here of Christ by whose name only we are saved Act. 4.11.12 dutifull obedience to God and Magistrates and to love â—ur neighbour are such Law-â—ighteousnesse as pagans doe diefie as highest devotion in all this petition nothing smelleth of Christ his Spirit eternity nothâ—ng of Scripturall or spirituall communion with God in Christ Jesus z All hereticks make the Scripture their rule and only judge but not simply but as they understand them which is to make their owne understanding only umpire and judge in the matters of God a They afterward tempt the King to forsake the Protestant Religion and to turne Familist b It s a pure commendation that H Nicholas wrote much the more the worse since he writeth against the Prophets and Apâ—stles c Christ and his Apostles name false teachers Saduces Hymeneus Philetus Simon Magus Elimas c. but though hee name neither Calvin nor Luther yet their doctrine he calleth often carnall fleshly false ceremoniall wisdome the letter the flesh the devill hypocrisie d Thâ—se men that cry out aâ—gainst Scripture-wisdome as carnaâ—l ceremoniall â—evilish selfie as H. Nicholas and his cannot speake hâ—nourably of the perfection of Scriptuâ—e d The family of love have no heads or Kings that are borne oâ— the flesh and blâ—od of sin spirit lauâ— c 4. sect 8. they themselves reigne as only Kings on earth everlastingly fideâ—itâ—s decl c. 4. sect 18. e Of all the meanes by which men are saved through Christ they speake only of the works of the Law of inherent righteousnesse and repentance not one word of free grace faith in Christ and the impuâ—ed righteousnesse of Christ. Familists then are the legall Pelagians not we no reformation is knowne to Familists but inward that of the heart f Not more said then truth can beare for H Nicholas his doctrine is a seâ—tina a pumpe dunghill and a sea of many fleshly errors and heresies f The due fruits of repentance and newnesse of life are here made antecedent meanes and wayes going before our saving in Christ or our free redemption that is in Christ Jesus so as we must be justified by workes otherwise let any man make sense of these words g Our Saviour saith yee shall know thâ—m by their workes h The foulest of the bookes of H. Nicholas containing the mystery of Familisme and fleshly loosenesse are only to be seene by the wise and experienced Eldeâ—s who can digest them â— It is hard to prove any thing against them who profâ—sse it lawfull to deny their Religion before men H.N. Epist to the daughters of Warwicke h It is not likâ— but Q. Elizabeth heard of these bookes and saw them since many of her and K James his Court favoured them i Ioh. Knewstuâ— M Microniâ—s H. Amswâ—rth wrote against thâ—se filthy errors and set downe their own words to the world k The Prelates the Popish Magistrates never troubled these licentious men because they tooke part with them agâ—iâ—st the Puritans only some godly Magistrates nick-named Puâ—itans cast some of them in prison l Neither by oath or any other way could they be brought to make confession of the secrets of unpure Familisme l They say they will take or leave their Religion of love as the Laws thinke fit but they lie fâ—r here being cast in prison by the inferiour Magistrate they persist then the infeâ—iouâ— Magistraâ—e to them is no Magâ—strate the Law is no Law m All heretickes and impure sectarâ—es say they dâ—e wilfully maintaine no heresie and therefore plead for liberty of conscience and a toleration of all religions The Familists defame the doctrine of the Apostlâ—s and Scriptures and have nothing to doe with the martyrs of the primitive Church for H. N. as I observe taught that Christ never had any man lay down his life for him or his truth his meaning was only allegorically to renounce his lusts for Christ otherwise Christ rejoyceth not said he in our death or blood o The Puâ—itans refusing the Popish ceremonies and the Romish denomination of Prelates are branded by those men as disobedient to Magistrates p They desire the Popish Laws against hereticks to be used against